Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging

2020-07-03 Thread Mark Goodge



On 03/07/2020 21:07, Andy Mabbett wrote:

On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 15:31, Tony OSM  wrote:


Question: Should uprn be applied to the building outline or to a node?


Yes ;-)

Some UPRNs have a 1:1 relation with a building or object (terraced,
semi- or detached house, telephone box, etc.)

Some do not (apartments; subdivided houses, etc.)

I propose we tag accordingly.


I agree. But, where multiple UPRNs are co-located with a single 
building, there's no consistent way to tell from the Open UPRN data 
which UPRN attaches to which subdivision. The open data has no z-index, 
so where you have a flat above a shop, for example, the data will give 
you two UPRNs for the same building but no indication of which is the 
flat and which is the shop.


For that, you need local knowledge - and it can't be local knowledge 
obtained from incompatible sources. So there won't be any easy way to 
look it up, as all the lookups are likely to be based on data obtained 
from MasterMap and AddressBase.


Mark

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging

2020-07-03 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 15:31, Tony OSM  wrote:

> Question: Should uprn be applied to the building outline or to a node?

Yes ;-)

Some UPRNs have a 1:1 relation with a building or object (terraced,
semi- or detached house, telephone box, etc.)

Some do not (apartments; subdivided houses, etc.)

I propose we tag accordingly.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging

2020-07-03 Thread Jez Nicholson
I believe that the French have been using the country namespace in ref
codes recently and, although I was initially doubtful, I now see the value
in not claiming a reference code for the entire world. Some examples in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Liste_des_r%C3%A9f%C3%A9rences_nationales

Sure, USRNs must have already been added a while back from the UK National
Address Gazetteer or something, but that doesn't make ref:usrn right and
fair to other countries that may have a different meaning for the acronym.

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 6:43 PM Nick  wrote:

> Hi Mike
>
> I tend to agree in terms of consistency. Looking at the results for
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=usrn - the key 'ref:usrn'
> dominates so to me makes sense to use 'key:uprn'. Searching on UPRN
> reveals the lack of clarity.
>
> Cheers
>
> Nick
>
> On 03/07/2020 17:47, Mike Baggaley wrote:
> > I note that ref:usrn was added to the Key:ref wiki in May 2017 and I can
> see no real reason to add GB into the key, especially if it is upper case.
> There are lots of examples of other country specific tags which do not
> include a country code on that page, in fact I can't see a single one that
> does include a country code.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mike
> >
> >> Agree with ref:GB:uprn and ref:GB:usrn.
> >
> > ___
> > Talk-GB mailing list
> > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging

2020-07-03 Thread Nick

Hi Mike

I tend to agree in terms of consistency. Looking at the results for 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=usrn - the key 'ref:usrn' 
dominates so to me makes sense to use 'key:uprn'. Searching on UPRN 
reveals the lack of clarity.


Cheers

Nick

On 03/07/2020 17:47, Mike Baggaley wrote:

I note that ref:usrn was added to the Key:ref wiki in May 2017 and I can see no 
real reason to add GB into the key, especially if it is upper case. There are 
lots of examples of other country specific tags which do not include a country 
code on that page, in fact I can't see a single one that does include a country 
code.

Regards,
Mike


Agree with ref:GB:uprn and ref:GB:usrn.


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging

2020-07-03 Thread Michael Collinson
Which makes it difficult to know or guess what the  a tag relates to 
without research, especially if used wrongly or without consultation.  
Tags should be self-descriptive to the extent possible. Sorry, 
parochialism just gets up my nose! :-) Definite thumbs up up to using an 
ISO country code if nationally specific. Encourages good practice for all.


Mike

On 2020-07-03 17:47, Mike Baggaley wrote:

I note that ref:usrn was added to the Key:ref wiki in May 2017 and I can see no 
real reason to add GB into the key, especially if it is upper case. There are 
lots of examples of other country specific tags which do not include a country 
code on that page, in fact I can't see a single one that does include a country 
code.

Regards,
Mike


Agree with ref:GB:uprn and ref:GB:usrn.


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging

2020-07-03 Thread Andrew Hain
If there are more than 19 UPRNs for the same building the reference will be 
longer than OSM’s tag value limit of 255 characters.

--
Andrew


From: Tony OSM 
Sent: 03 July 2020 15:31
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org 
Subject: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging


As we have access to the data and Robert Whittaker has produced a great UPRN 
locations map, how are we planning to tag OSM objects?

ref:UK:uprn and ref:UK:usrn

have been suggested as tags - I think this is the way to go.


There is also Key:ref:NPLG:UPRN:1 in the wiki.


Question: Should uprn be applied to the building outline or to a node?

The OS data applies them as nodes, they are assigned by local authorities to a 
location as a node.

The uprn is applied to many objects even bus shelters, and individual flats 
within a block; there may be what appear to be duplicates.

I suggest that for OSM buildings or building parts which are individually 
linkable to a uprn then the uprn is assigned to the building way outline; 
otherwise to an OSM node if the mapper deems appropriate

Tony Shield---   TonyS999
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging

2020-07-03 Thread Mike Baggaley
I note that ref:usrn was added to the Key:ref wiki in May 2017 and I can see no 
real reason to add GB into the key, especially if it is upper case. There are 
lots of examples of other country specific tags which do not include a country 
code on that page, in fact I can't see a single one that does include a country 
code.

Regards,
Mike

>Agree with ref:GB:uprn and ref:GB:usrn.


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging

2020-07-03 Thread Tony OSM

Agree with ref:GB:uprn and ref:GB:usrn.

Yes we do need to understand the data. If a usrn is given to a road, 
then the road is extended is the extension included in the original usrn 
or given a new usrn. Plenty of scope for decisions when using in OSM.


T

On 03/07/2020 16:55, Robert Skedgell wrote:

Surely these should be ref:GB:uprn and ref:GB:usrn, as UK is not an ISO
3166-1 alpha-2 country code?

Having had a quick look at USRN data, it appears that roads may have
more than one USRN, as a road may have more than one of 'Designated
Street Name', 'Officially Described Street', 'Numbered Street' and
'Unofficial Street Name'. In addition to this, some streets appear to
have a UPRN for the 'street record'.

On 03/07/2020 15:31, Tony OSM wrote:

As we have access to the data and Robert Whittaker has produced a great
UPRN locations map, how are we planning to tag OSM objects?

ref:UK:uprn and ref:UK:usrn

have been suggested as tags - I think this is the way to go.


There is also Key:ref:NPLG:UPRN:1 in the wiki.


Question: Should uprn be applied to the building outline or to a node?

The OS data applies them as nodes, they are assigned by local
authorities to a location as a node.

The uprn is applied to many objects even bus shelters, and individual
flats within a block; there may be what appear to be duplicates.

I suggest that for OSM buildings or building parts which are
individually linkable to a uprn then the uprn is assigned to the
building way outline; otherwise to an OSM node if the mapper deems
appropriate

Tony Shield    ---   TonyS999


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging

2020-07-03 Thread Robert Skedgell
Surely these should be ref:GB:uprn and ref:GB:usrn, as UK is not an ISO
3166-1 alpha-2 country code?

Having had a quick look at USRN data, it appears that roads may have
more than one USRN, as a road may have more than one of 'Designated
Street Name', 'Officially Described Street', 'Numbered Street' and
'Unofficial Street Name'. In addition to this, some streets appear to
have a UPRN for the 'street record'.

On 03/07/2020 15:31, Tony OSM wrote:
> As we have access to the data and Robert Whittaker has produced a great
> UPRN locations map, how are we planning to tag OSM objects?
> 
> ref:UK:uprn and ref:UK:usrn
> 
> have been suggested as tags - I think this is the way to go.
> 
> 
> There is also Key:ref:NPLG:UPRN:1 in the wiki.
> 
> 
> Question: Should uprn be applied to the building outline or to a node?
> 
> The OS data applies them as nodes, they are assigned by local
> authorities to a location as a node.
> 
> The uprn is applied to many objects even bus shelters, and individual
> flats within a block; there may be what appear to be duplicates.
> 
> I suggest that for OSM buildings or building parts which are
> individually linkable to a uprn then the uprn is assigned to the
> building way outline; otherwise to an OSM node if the mapper deems
> appropriate
> 
> Tony Shield    ---   TonyS999
> 
> 
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> 


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb