Re: [OSM-talk-ie] A UK/GB OpenStreetMap group

2015-08-10 Thread Rory McCann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 05/08/15 00:13, Dave Corley wrote:
 - In terms of representation, when it comes to looking for data
 from govt. bodies, again I would keep it simple. For formal (in
 person, snail mail) representations, if the body is based in NI, it
 falls to OSM Ireland, if the body is based elsewhere it falls to
 OSM UK.

I don't know about this. I'd suggest allowing either group to be able
to make formal representations. Who knows, maybe some governmental
body might be more receptive to something from one group or the other?
Both groups can and should discuss together before making any formal
requests. We both want the same thing, and it would suck if we tied
ourselves down to one method that will bite us later. Why not keep our
options open?

Rory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVyLb7AAoJEOrWdmeZivv27IMH+gKyx0pdP2GY/g13bqcn5dgQ
eNUbmVt8/ggVhfn0Wy1VuMIUkM0RyRGdJlhEdMoGw5PtRnFsLeM44hDFfTJ/u1DO
B8d19bbgzEvjkMtBmhqeaEn4KScOwCXyWhv2u0OS/AVApYr1EXotN0vSLqOvsDPw
NRWTFTln3k1u//Po9v9T2S/ucwOTVmo0UaL8GO3Mwfe5K3pcFdBiTsseFNOzzcRV
0gGFCF+G5Ftmtoa0hq9d/yIpbbHiayKpJKk1iaA3TDK3QPhlGi6g2VKvZqUVLJjN
2sWWa9d/zhw041m+0tGdSDhPuYEuK4y5i4DN5Df+iwGizh/+kHP3IufELgqcKYI=
=xcpq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] A UK/GB OpenStreetMap group

2015-08-10 Thread Dave Corley
Good point, something I hadn't considered
On 10 Aug 2015 15:37, Rory McCann r...@technomancy.org wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 05/08/15 00:13, Dave Corley wrote:
  - In terms of representation, when it comes to looking for data
  from govt. bodies, again I would keep it simple. For formal (in
  person, snail mail) representations, if the body is based in NI, it
  falls to OSM Ireland, if the body is based elsewhere it falls to
  OSM UK.

 I don't know about this. I'd suggest allowing either group to be able
 to make formal representations. Who knows, maybe some governmental
 body might be more receptive to something from one group or the other?
 Both groups can and should discuss together before making any formal
 requests. We both want the same thing, and it would suck if we tied
 ourselves down to one method that will bite us later. Why not keep our
 options open?

 Rory
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1

 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVyLb7AAoJEOrWdmeZivv27IMH+gKyx0pdP2GY/g13bqcn5dgQ
 eNUbmVt8/ggVhfn0Wy1VuMIUkM0RyRGdJlhEdMoGw5PtRnFsLeM44hDFfTJ/u1DO
 B8d19bbgzEvjkMtBmhqeaEn4KScOwCXyWhv2u0OS/AVApYr1EXotN0vSLqOvsDPw
 NRWTFTln3k1u//Po9v9T2S/ucwOTVmo0UaL8GO3Mwfe5K3pcFdBiTsseFNOzzcRV
 0gGFCF+G5Ftmtoa0hq9d/yIpbbHiayKpJKk1iaA3TDK3QPhlGi6g2VKvZqUVLJjN
 2sWWa9d/zhw041m+0tGdSDhPuYEuK4y5i4DN5Df+iwGizh/+kHP3IufELgqcKYI=
 =xcpq
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] A UK/GB OpenStreetMap group

2015-08-06 Thread Rob Nickerson
Thanks for the comments Rory and Dave.

It all seems very sensible and logical. Naturally if we were to engage with
any organisation that is largely or primarily based in NI then it makes
perfect sense to speak with you first. We could then allocate the work out
between us as required.

From the point of view of the organisation it makes sense that they deal
with a common person for all communication. Your suggestion seems like a
good starting point - the one area that might trip it up is a NI based
entity that has close ties to UK Central Gov but we can figure those out on
a case by case basis.

Having two groups that cover NI has the benefit that we can send joint
letters co-signed by both groups. This may help add some weight to our
requests.

Anyway food for thought. I'll have to see what the others in the UK/GB
group think.

Rob



On 4 August 2015 at 23:13, Dave Corley davecor...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Rob,

 I've been thinking about this recently as I'm putting together a proposed
 Constitution for OpenStreetMap Ireland at the moment and will be sending it
 out for feedback shortly. One piece of feedback was that the issue of
 coverage should be called out in a mission statement or some other formal
 document.

 If we are doing this, and you are in the process of setting up OSM UK,
 then I think we should be smart in how we do it so that its simple in
 practice, workable and fair for all parties. You also have several regional
 groups so I'm assuming this will come up anyway in relation to Mappa
 Mercia, OSM Scotland etc. What I'm thinking is something along the lines of
 the following:

 - In terms of membership, leave it to the individual themselves to decide
 which to join, OSM Ireland or OSM UK.

 - In terms of logistics, data, resources, everything we have at the moment
 covers both North  South equally so it makes sense to stay as is. If OSM
 UK chose to supply additional resources we can always link to those and
 vice versa without restriction.

 - In terms of representation, when it comes to looking for data from govt.
 bodies, again I would keep it simple. For formal (in person, snail mail)
 representations, if the body is based in NI, it falls to OSM Ireland, if
 the body is based elsewhere it falls to OSM UK. For informal (email, phone)
 its open to either entity, but it would be a good idea to for us to contact
 you in advance (and vice versa) to see if you have already been down the
 same road before.

 Those would cover 99.9% of things that might crop up. For the 0.1%, add a
 statement that anything else can be sorted as they arise, between rep's for
 each entity and in the event of no agreement, escalate to the OSMF for a
 final decision (though I can't ever see that being required).

 Let me know what you think and if you have had this come up in relation to
 the other smaller groups within the UK so far.

 Dave

 On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Rory McCann r...@technomancy.org wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi Rob,

 Thanks for your email. Yes, we're looking into setting up OSMIE, but
 I'm not sure how far along that is at this stage.

 On 02/08/15 13:55, Rob Nickerson wrote:
  Personally I see no problem in going UK and those in NI can then
  join either group (or better still, both). This would work the same
  as if a OSM-Scotland group was formalised - those members can then
  be part of both the OSM-Scotland and OSM-UK/GB group.
 
  That's just my view. What is important to me is that I hear your
  views on this.

 That's basically the decision we came to here on talk-ie. You can see
 some of the discussion here (

 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ie/2014-November/000772.html
 ). It makes a lot of sense for some of the things we're doing that
 might require talking to outside bodies, such as requesting old maps
 for mapping townlands.

 Likewise, I think we're of the view that you can have overlapping
 areas and people can join which ones they want.

  Whatever we end up doing I think it would be great if we could
  work together on this. We both are going to need to set up a
  constitution and then once established we can share work and even
  do joint events.

 Definitely! Best of luck!

 Rory

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1

 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVv6mVAAoJEOrWdmeZivv2IGUH/R49Kq4oHXtzpndl+HE1RFxP
 PY/g5Qs6udSfBG+e6RP3rqOurD7uhAM0QmI9gP0ST1lcO/HCLzcATnHaS0bWdiXU
 OTqpPSHZSdVEdDA7cXyo51NIUakWHXehvsPBndQTLu1Z4gCNpVuGbgTGgcRtC6Eo
 3/9EkOJ/GKjorA1Q051hZ+cQkt1jIp7vxHQhzPo1zXWOEwmjhAhDZnVYfypTIghG
 Z5l98him7GdGHPiXK1rbgAMxF1x7xeBpRQ+UrMi3y3SDpoa44Mpufa06C8mgXKGm
 MwrDrpy9hDKJMIIxtYlg3MSmn1I9c1XTk7eGVvyrqNGEYm2J8jmDcXa5W3WJhks=
 =iSBI
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie



___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] A UK/GB OpenStreetMap group

2015-08-04 Thread Dave Corley
Hi Rob,

I've been thinking about this recently as I'm putting together a proposed
Constitution for OpenStreetMap Ireland at the moment and will be sending it
out for feedback shortly. One piece of feedback was that the issue of
coverage should be called out in a mission statement or some other formal
document.

If we are doing this, and you are in the process of setting up OSM UK, then
I think we should be smart in how we do it so that its simple in practice,
workable and fair for all parties. You also have several regional groups so
I'm assuming this will come up anyway in relation to Mappa Mercia, OSM
Scotland etc. What I'm thinking is something along the lines of the
following:

- In terms of membership, leave it to the individual themselves to decide
which to join, OSM Ireland or OSM UK.

- In terms of logistics, data, resources, everything we have at the moment
covers both North  South equally so it makes sense to stay as is. If OSM
UK chose to supply additional resources we can always link to those and
vice versa without restriction.

- In terms of representation, when it comes to looking for data from govt.
bodies, again I would keep it simple. For formal (in person, snail mail)
representations, if the body is based in NI, it falls to OSM Ireland, if
the body is based elsewhere it falls to OSM UK. For informal (email, phone)
its open to either entity, but it would be a good idea to for us to contact
you in advance (and vice versa) to see if you have already been down the
same road before.

Those would cover 99.9% of things that might crop up. For the 0.1%, add a
statement that anything else can be sorted as they arise, between rep's for
each entity and in the event of no agreement, escalate to the OSMF for a
final decision (though I can't ever see that being required).

Let me know what you think and if you have had this come up in relation to
the other smaller groups within the UK so far.

Dave

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Rory McCann r...@technomancy.org wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi Rob,

 Thanks for your email. Yes, we're looking into setting up OSMIE, but
 I'm not sure how far along that is at this stage.

 On 02/08/15 13:55, Rob Nickerson wrote:
  Personally I see no problem in going UK and those in NI can then
  join either group (or better still, both). This would work the same
  as if a OSM-Scotland group was formalised - those members can then
  be part of both the OSM-Scotland and OSM-UK/GB group.
 
  That's just my view. What is important to me is that I hear your
  views on this.

 That's basically the decision we came to here on talk-ie. You can see
 some of the discussion here (
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ie/2014-November/000772.html
 ). It makes a lot of sense for some of the things we're doing that
 might require talking to outside bodies, such as requesting old maps
 for mapping townlands.

 Likewise, I think we're of the view that you can have overlapping
 areas and people can join which ones they want.

  Whatever we end up doing I think it would be great if we could
  work together on this. We both are going to need to set up a
  constitution and then once established we can share work and even
  do joint events.

 Definitely! Best of luck!

 Rory

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1

 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVv6mVAAoJEOrWdmeZivv2IGUH/R49Kq4oHXtzpndl+HE1RFxP
 PY/g5Qs6udSfBG+e6RP3rqOurD7uhAM0QmI9gP0ST1lcO/HCLzcATnHaS0bWdiXU
 OTqpPSHZSdVEdDA7cXyo51NIUakWHXehvsPBndQTLu1Z4gCNpVuGbgTGgcRtC6Eo
 3/9EkOJ/GKjorA1Q051hZ+cQkt1jIp7vxHQhzPo1zXWOEwmjhAhDZnVYfypTIghG
 Z5l98him7GdGHPiXK1rbgAMxF1x7xeBpRQ+UrMi3y3SDpoa44Mpufa06C8mgXKGm
 MwrDrpy9hDKJMIIxtYlg3MSmn1I9c1XTk7eGVvyrqNGEYm2J8jmDcXa5W3WJhks=
 =iSBI
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


Re: [OSM-talk-ie] A UK/GB OpenStreetMap group

2015-08-03 Thread Rory McCann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Rob,

Thanks for your email. Yes, we're looking into setting up OSMIE, but
I'm not sure how far along that is at this stage.

On 02/08/15 13:55, Rob Nickerson wrote:
 Personally I see no problem in going UK and those in NI can then
 join either group (or better still, both). This would work the same
 as if a OSM-Scotland group was formalised - those members can then
 be part of both the OSM-Scotland and OSM-UK/GB group.
 
 That's just my view. What is important to me is that I hear your
 views on this.

That's basically the decision we came to here on talk-ie. You can see
some of the discussion here (
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ie/2014-November/000772.html
). It makes a lot of sense for some of the things we're doing that
might require talking to outside bodies, such as requesting old maps
for mapping townlands.

Likewise, I think we're of the view that you can have overlapping
areas and people can join which ones they want.

 Whatever we end up doing I think it would be great if we could
 work together on this. We both are going to need to set up a
 constitution and then once established we can share work and even
 do joint events.

Definitely! Best of luck!

Rory

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVv6mVAAoJEOrWdmeZivv2IGUH/R49Kq4oHXtzpndl+HE1RFxP
PY/g5Qs6udSfBG+e6RP3rqOurD7uhAM0QmI9gP0ST1lcO/HCLzcATnHaS0bWdiXU
OTqpPSHZSdVEdDA7cXyo51NIUakWHXehvsPBndQTLu1Z4gCNpVuGbgTGgcRtC6Eo
3/9EkOJ/GKjorA1Q051hZ+cQkt1jIp7vxHQhzPo1zXWOEwmjhAhDZnVYfypTIghG
Z5l98him7GdGHPiXK1rbgAMxF1x7xeBpRQ+UrMi3y3SDpoa44Mpufa06C8mgXKGm
MwrDrpy9hDKJMIIxtYlg3MSmn1I9c1XTk7eGVvyrqNGEYm2J8jmDcXa5W3WJhks=
=iSBI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie


[OSM-talk-ie] A UK/GB OpenStreetMap group

2015-08-02 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi all,

A few weeks ago I set up a survey to find out how people would want a
potential UK/GB OpenStreetMap group to look like. Vincent kindly forwarded
it to this list. The survey was focussed on what it should do and how it
should structure decision making and financials. It did not ask whether the
group should be GB or UK.

The results of that survey are now available at
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-August/017637.html

Given that you are currently looking to set up a more formal Ireland group,
I felt it about time I subscribe to this list so that I can write directly
to you :-)

One of the areas we need to work out is whether we will be a UK or a GB
group. I am told that the only reason that the mailing list is called
talk-gb is that gb is the correct iso-3166 code (similarly in the early
days of the internet some were pushing for .co.gb to align with this code).
Quite frankly however I don't believe the naming of one mailing list should
dictate our decision.

Personally I see no problem in going UK and those in NI can then join
either group (or better still, both). This would work the same as if a
OSM-Scotland group was formalised - those members can then be part of both
the OSM-Scotland and OSM-UK/GB group.

That's just my view. What is important to me is that I hear your views on
this.

Whatever we end up doing I think it would be great if we could work
together on this. We both are going to need to set up a constitution and
then once established we can share work and even do joint events.

Let me know your thoughts.

Best wishes,
Rob
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie