[talk-ph] 2021 Drone Imagery Collection Grant by Datum and OSMph

[maning sambale]

Hi,

At day 3 of #pistangmapa2021, OpenStreetMap Philippines and DATUM.ph
announced our drone data collection grant! This is open to
#OpenStreetMap volunteers in the Philippines so you can build the most
up to date map of your community in OpenStreetMap.
For details visit:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/2021_Drone_Imagery_Collection_Grant_by_Datum_%26_OSMph

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Action for Economic Reforms OSM Data Model

[maning sambale]

Just one quick note, please split building tags from other features.
For example, in educational institutions, you have both amenity,
operator combined with building:levels, floor:material, roof:material.
The spreadsheet seems to indicate this should be added for each
feature which is not good practice.  Also, Im not sure if you did so
already, make sure you align with what HOTOSM PH previously did in
Pampanga.
Just looking at the educ insti tab, it looks like it's not aligned
with what they did in Pampanga.

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 7:24 PM Mark Aimon Pangan
 wrote:
>
> Hello, everyone!
>
> Action for Economic Reforms (AER) is planning on conducting field mapping as 
> part of the COLLABDev and PH3D projects where we aim to provide tools for 
> more data-driven planning and decision making to our partner municipalities.
>
> In line with this, we have drafted a data model for the features that our 
> team and partners will be collecting on field. We would like to get your 
> comments and opinions on the combination of tags we'll be using.
>
> Document access is limited to Commenter.
> Access the document here: 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lW5vPI-h6Yc9qAJbrDZuxMUszz5jjpAIN8vlb-IR4BY/edit?usp=sharing
>
> All the best,
> Aimon
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Training for New YouthMappers Chapter; NU Manila

[maning sambale]

Sweet! All the best to the new chapter. Let us know what we can do to help.

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 13:43 Pierre Edwin See Tiong 
wrote:

> Good Day!
>
> Re-sending forgot to cc the chapter president and adviser email from my
> last email.
>
> Online Mapping Training with NU Manila YouthMappers
>
> Date & Time:
>
> Oct. 17, 2020 / 11am - 4pm (time schedule subject to change)
>
> Target Participants:
>
> National University JPCS Chapter members, and faculties
>
> Background:
>
> NU Manila is a new YouthMappers Chapter here in the Philippines. Their
> application was accepted last March 2020, suppose that without the pandemic
> there will be a YouthMappers Ambassador who will do the training for them
> last April 2020.
>
> Purpose:
>
> The purpose of this training is to teach the new YouthMappers
> Members/Chapter on what YouthMapper usually do and equip them with the
> basic knowledge of mapping through OpenStreetMap. There will also be a
> discussion and training for their Chapter Officers on how to manage and
> what are the annual requirements and opportunities in YouthMappers.
>
> The whole training setup will be the usual introduction to YouthMappers,
> OpenStreetMap, Tasking Manager and other important groups and tools that
> they can use for them to utilize for their chapter.
>
> As for the hands-on activity, We’re planning to use the active tasks
> project by Mikko Tamura of Mapbeks to train the new mappers. All edits that
> the participants will create will be monitored by Pierre Edwin See Tiong to
> avoid the wrong and missed edits by the participants.
>
>
> We will be using #NUManilaYM for the edits.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre
> ___________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
-- 
Maning Sambale (mobile)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Help fix the road network in the Philippines with MapRoulette challenges

[maning sambale]

le. I wanted to let everyone know that we
>>>>> just updated the MapRoulette challenges related to road network issues in
>>>>> the Philippines with new OSM data.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can find all of the challenges in this MapRoulette project:
>>>>> https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/39286 and they include things
>>>>> like overly sharp road angles, roads that cross but aren’t connected, 
>>>>> roads
>>>>> that aren’t connected to anything, overlapping roads, turn restrictions,
>>>>> roads that are close but not connected to others, and other similar 
>>>>> issues.
>>>>> I plan to work on some of them myself too.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you haven’t used it before, MapRoulette lets you go through
>>>>> potential issues in OSM data one by one and either correct them or 
>>>>> indicate
>>>>> they are not a problem. The challenges were created with our Atlas
>>>>> data analysis tool: https://github.com/osmlab/atlas.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you aren’t sure what challenge to try, sharp angles or crossing
>>>>> roads are probably the easiest but they should all be fairly
>>>>> straightforward.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know if you have any suggestions or feedback. Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew Wiseman |  Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 |
>>>>> andrew_wise...@apple.com
>>>>> ___
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ___
>
> talk-ph mailing list
>
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
> --
Maning Sambale (mobile)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] The call for presentations for Pista ng Mapa 2020 has been extended until October 10, 2020

[maning sambale]

EXTENDED! The call for presentations for Pista ng Mapa 2020 has been
extended until October 10, 2020.
Share your research, ideas, community projects, and more at this
year's conference! You may submit your presentations at
bit.ly/pnm20cfp

You may visit https://pistangmapa.github.io/2020/ for more information.
We wish to let you know that Pista ng Mapa 2020 is offering incentives
to accepted session proposals.
#PistaNgMapa #PnM #PistaNgMapa2020 #PnM2020 #OSM #OpenStreetMap #FOSS4G

The incentives for accepted presentations are:
PhP 4000 - 55+ minute Presentation/Workshop
PhP 2000 - 25-minute Presentation
PhP 800 - Lightning Talks
Notes on the incentives:
1. Incentive offer is valid only for presenters with a local bank
account, or local digital wallet.
2. Non-local presenters may opt to receive a digital gift voucher

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Fwd: [hotosm-membership] A Call to Correct Narratives about Geospatial Work

[maning sambale]

of Partnerships & Community
rebecca.fi...@hotosm.org, Senior Communications Manager
gihan.hassan...@hotosm.org, or Gender Lead rachel.vann...@hotosm.org.



Best,

Tyler on behalf of the HOT management team



*Tyler Radford*
Executive Director
tyler.radf...@hotosm.org
@TylerSRadford

*Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team*
*Using OpenStreetMap for Humanitarian Response & Economic Development*
web <http://hotosm.org/> | twitter <https://twitter.com/hotosm> | facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/hotosm> | donate <https://hotosm.org/donate>




On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:01 PM Mikko Tamura  wrote:

> Too many lives have been lost due to the pandemic not knowing what they
> actually contributed to the world. Let us not be like that and give credit
> where credit is due. 
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 12:49 AM Blake Girardot 
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:14 PM arnalie faye vicario
>>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Encourage one another to speak up, and take time to listen. Reflect.
>> Good leadership does not cre fear.
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear friends,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you and OSM PH for making sure this gets addressed, corrected
>>
>> and we do what we can to avoid it in the future.
>>
>>
>>
>> I encourage you all to post the OSM PH statement to your social media
>>
>> and mention folks who will amplify the message, and amplify the ones
>>
>> you see.
>>
>>
>>
>> Everyone I know should read the OSM PH's statement so we can all
>>
>> better recognize, avoid and call out these colonialist narratives
>>
>> going forward.
>>
>>
>>
>> Respectfully,
>>
>> Blake
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> 
>>
>> Blake Girardot
>>
>> OSM Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot
>>
>> HOTOSM Member - https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot
>>
>> skype: jblakegirardot
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to membership+unsubscr...@hotosm.org.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>
>
> *MIKKO L. TAMURA*
> *Lead Advocate*
> *Map Beks Initiative*
>
> *Externals Head*
> *Pilipinas Chubs X Chasers*
>
> *Volunteer Mapper*
> *OpenStreetMap Philippines*
>
> *Contact Number: +639173290655*
>
>
>
>







-- 


To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to membership+unsubscr...@hotosm.org.


-- 
Maning Sambale (mobile)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Rollback of admin boundary edits in the Philippines due to incompatible license (was Re: Alaminos Barangay borders)

[maning sambale]

Hi everyone,

This work is finished.  It took a while due to the complexity of the revert.
What this means right now is that place geocoding (via nominatim ) is
less accurate and the visual map for boundaries has less details.
However, our map is much better without incompatible licensed data!
Thanks to all who helped!
https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-673892712

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:56 AM maning sambale
 wrote:
>
> After reviewing initial results of the automated rollback [0] we
> decided to do a manual process involving a couple of mappers [1].
> Please check the workflow linked and let us know if anyone wants to help.
>
> [0] https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-653891322
> [1] https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-655266926



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Rollback of admin boundary edits in the Philippines due to incompatible license (was Re: Alaminos Barangay borders)

[maning sambale]

After reviewing initial results of the automated rollback [0] we
decided to do a manual process involving a couple of mappers [1].
Please check the workflow linked and let us know if anyone wants to help.

[0] https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-653891322
[1] https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-655266926

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Rollback of admin boundary edits in the Philippines due to incompatible license (was Re: Alaminos Barangay borders)

[maning sambale]

FYI, we are starting the rollback, I advise that we don't touch any of
the related changesets until the rollback is done.
https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67#issuecomment-653737739

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 3:18 PM maning sambale
 wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> After reviewing the edits and communicating with the mapper, we
> decided to roll-back all edits related to this issue due to
> incompatible source.
> We plan to do this as a local community.  Please see the plane here
> for comments and suggestions:
> https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67
>
> cc'ed here is OpenStreetMap Foundation's Data Working Group for guidance.
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:39 PM Erwin Olario  wrote:
> >
> >
> > Glen, thank you for the heads up! Boundaries are great to have, but I'll 
> > also look into the affected changesets, and reach out to the contributor
> >
> > Are you still in Pangasinan? Stay healthy and safe.
> >
> > /erwin
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > » email: er...@ngnuity.xyz | gov...@gmail.com
> > » mobile: https://t.me/GOwin
> > » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:21 PM Glen Scott  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi PH mapping folks,
> >> I was just in a boring online meeting and had a chance to look at OSM 
> >> (been too busy to get to it for a while).  I noticed Barangay borders have 
> >> been added to Alaminos (and between Alaminos and other Pangasinan cities), 
> >> yet these are radically different to either Alaminos Town Hall maps or the 
> >> Cadastal survey map set I got from DENR.
> >>
> >> The borders were added by VMPanes, I'll try to contact VMPanes to 
> >> establish the basis of the borders. I think that no borders is better than 
> >> incorrect borders, unfortunately I haven't had the time to stitch the 
> >> cadastral set together in electronic format to arrive at a more accurate 
> >> border than the Alaminos City Hall map, which is at quite a small scale.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Glen
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> talk-ph mailing list
> >> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
> >
> > ___
> > talk-ph mailing list
> > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://github.com/maning
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Rollback of admin boundary edits in the Philippines due to incompatible license (was Re: Alaminos Barangay borders)

[maning sambale]

Hi Everyone,

After reviewing the edits and communicating with the mapper, we
decided to roll-back all edits related to this issue due to
incompatible source.
We plan to do this as a local community.  Please see the plane here
for comments and suggestions:
https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67

cc'ed here is OpenStreetMap Foundation's Data Working Group for guidance.

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:39 PM Erwin Olario  wrote:
>
>
> Glen, thank you for the heads up! Boundaries are great to have, but I'll also 
> look into the affected changesets, and reach out to the contributor
>
> Are you still in Pangasinan? Stay healthy and safe.
>
> /erwin
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> » email: er...@ngnuity.xyz | gov...@gmail.com
> » mobile: https://t.me/GOwin
> » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:21 PM Glen Scott  wrote:
>>
>> Hi PH mapping folks,
>> I was just in a boring online meeting and had a chance to look at OSM (been 
>> too busy to get to it for a while).  I noticed Barangay borders have been 
>> added to Alaminos (and between Alaminos and other Pangasinan cities), yet 
>> these are radically different to either Alaminos Town Hall maps or the 
>> Cadastal survey map set I got from DENR.
>>
>> The borders were added by VMPanes, I'll try to contact VMPanes to establish 
>> the basis of the borders. I think that no borders is better than incorrect 
>> borders, unfortunately I haven't had the time to stitch the cadastral set 
>> together in electronic format to arrive at a more accurate border than the 
>> Alaminos City Hall map, which is at quite a small scale.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Glen
>>
>>
>> ___
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Alaminos Barangay borders

[maning sambale]

Thanks, I'll check them out.

On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 06:19 Glen Scott  wrote:

> Hi Maning,
>
> Well, perhaps someone could help
> I've dropped photos of the survey maps here:
>
>
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aP320V49extQNfx5nPmrGivWWnBCO_YJ?usp=sharing
>
> The plan was to reduce file size a bit, then stitch them together to get a
> less expansive view - to be able to focus on Barangay boundaries vs.
> features, rather than land lots.
>
> The survey is quite old (e.g I know of some street names and alignments
> that have changed) but the DENR chief of the licenses and deeds section at
> Alaminos told me this was the only survey done. As you can see, some of
> those prints are OLD! Apparently there are better copies elsewhere (another
> DENR office) but no digitisation.
>
> It would be great to edit what Vincent has put in there rather than
> totally remove what he's done. I just don't have the time right now -
> probably not for 6 months at least.
>
> The fallback would be to edit based on the Alaminos City hall maps - these
> are very large scale though - examples I sourced from the city hall
> attached here FYI.
>
> So the big chunk of work is to stitch the map photos together, but in a
> manageable size but with enough resolution to see features that peg
> boundary location.
>
> When I was first thinking of adding Barangay boundaries I had a look
> around at what was available online - nothing was consistent (wildly
> different in fact), and nothing matched the Alaminos City Hall maps. It's
> clear the city hall maps are based on the cadastral survey maps, and it's
> hard to imagine that these are not the correct boundaries.
>
> Cheers
>
> Glen
>
>
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 00:22, maning sambale 
> wrote:
>
>> hi glen,
>>
>> unfortunately I haven't had the time to stitch the cadastral set together
>>>> in electronic format to arrive at a more accurate border than the Alaminos
>>>> City Hall map, which is at quite a small scale
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> How can we help you get this done?
>>
>>> --
>> Maning Sambale (mobile)
>>
> --
Maning Sambale (mobile)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Alaminos Barangay borders

[maning sambale]

>
> hi glen,

unfortunately I haven't had the time to stitch the cadastral set together
>> in electronic format to arrive at a more accurate border than the Alaminos
>> City Hall map, which is at quite a small scale
>>
>

How can we help you get this done?

> --
Maning Sambale (mobile)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] OSM Philippines celebrates Open Data Day 2020 with 3 events on March 7

[maning sambale]

Dear everyone,

Open Data Day will be celebrated all around the world on March 7.  Our
community has 3 events happening that day.
Choose an event you want to join!

1. OSM-PH Open Data Day 2020 at co.lab in Pasig City.  Morning
mapathon and afternoon talks -
https://www.facebook.com/events/2439505106154288/
2. Mapatime! sa SLU, Baguio City - https://ti.to/mapatime/slu-osmapaaralan
3. SlumBEAR Mapping Party an open data pajama mapathon by Mapbeks at
Farenheight Cafe and Fitness Center New Manila -
https://www.facebook.com/events/240026903659097/

Enjoy your open data day!  Happy mapping!
-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Community call with Allan Mustard (OSMF Board Chair)

[maning sambale]

Is this going to be recorded? I have an overlap and would love to hear the
community discussion.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 15:29 Eugene Alvin Villar  wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> The community call with the OSMF Chairperson Allan Mustard will push
> through this Wednesday at 8:00pm Philippine Time (12:00 UTC).
>
> Please join us on Google Hangouts:
>
> https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/calendar/ZjZiczNyY2pzNDFkbXFxOGFycXQ5MGZoMGtAZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5kYXIuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbQ.6anvsfmpb4j0p1is3q9ngoo44r?authuser=0
>
> For the call, I would recommend turning off video and just use audio in
> order to make better use of Internet bandwidth (given our dismal Internet
> access in the country).
>
> Here's a little bit of background of our guest.
>
> Allan P. Mustard is a retired United States career diplomat and was
> previously the United States Ambassador to Turkmenistan from 2014 until his
> retirement in 2019. Aside from his official duties representing the United
> States government in the former Soviet country, he spent his free time
> mapping the capital of Ashgabat in OSM making the city one of the
> best-mapped places in Central Asia in any mapping service. Before he was
> appointed an ambassador, he worked as a Foreign Service Officer under the
> U.S. Department of Agriculture and had been posted in various places
> worldwide such as Istanbul, Vienna, Moscow, Mexico City, and New Delhi.
> Aside from English, Allan also speaks German and Russian, the latter of
> which he learned as an undergrad at the University of Washington.
>
> More info:
> https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/236205.htm
>
> http://www.allgov.com/news/appointments-and-resignations/us-ambassador-to-turkmenistan-who-is-allan-mustard-140816?news=853983
>
> Regards,
> Eugene
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:41 AM Eugene Alvin Villar 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Allan Mustard, the new chairperson of the Board of Directors of the
>> OpenStreetMap Foundation, would like to have a one-hour call with the OSM
>> community in the Philippines. Allan has been reaching out to various OSM
>> local communities all over the world. For instance, he did a call with the
>> OSM Indian community last January 29:
>> https://mobile.twitter.com/osm_in/status/1221609512420794368
>>
>> Basically, Allan would like to learn more about our community in the
>> Philippines, the mapping and work that we do, the opportunities and
>> challenges that we face while we contribute to and promote OSM, and to seek
>> input on what the OSM Foundation can do to support local communities.
>>
>> If you are interested to join the call (which will be done remotely and
>> online probably via Google Hangouts), please do indicate your availability
>> on this poll:
>>
>> https://framadate.org/bO4YJq6yLweEZLmJ
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eugene
>>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
-- 
Maning Sambale (mobile)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Proposal to update the PH resources in the osm-community-index

[maning sambale]

Thanks for this pr eugene. I will archive the slack channel when this
becomes live.

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 04:57 Eugene Alvin Villar  wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> If you have ever edited in OSM using the iD editor, you may have noticed a
> list of communication channels on the left sidebar after you have saved
> your edits. This list comes from the osm-community-index:
> https://github.com/osmlab/osm-community-index
>
> I would like to propose some changes to the list for the Philippines:
>  • Remove Slack since we no longer use this communication channel
>  • Update the order as follows: Telegram group, talk-ph mailing list
> (this one), Facebook page
>  • Update descriptions and add extended descriptions
>
> You can see the detailed changes in the following GitHub commit:
>
> https://github.com/OSMPH/osm-community-index/commit/4a8a8ee9dc2158bec3c74e76e62214dd56d88988
>
> Please do review the changes and provide feedback and suggestions. Once we
> have consensus for the changes, I will submit a pull request to have the
> changes integrated into the main index.
>
> Thanks!
> Eugene
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
-- 
Maning Sambale (mobile)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Follow-up on possible LGU-led mapping in Batangas

[maning sambale]

TagaSanPedroAko,

> and asked GOwin and maning on GitHub to contact directly any of the LGUs 
> involved, but there has been no response since then.

I'm not sure what else I can do here, you mentioned that you already
contacted 3 users and there was no response.
Secondly, these LGUs are likely swamped with work due to the Taal
response, asking about this issue at this time seems inappropriate.


On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 4:35 AM Jherome Miguel  wrote:
>
> It has been a month ago since I raised quality issues on map data added on a 
> possible local government-led mapping project in some municipalities in 
> Batangas near Taal Volcano. Last December, we have seen a spike in mapping 
> activity around the municipalities of Taal, Lemery, San Luis, San Nicolas, 
> and Santa Teresita in Batangas, and involves around 24+ users, many mapping 
> using accounts with their real names. I opened a papercut_fix ticket 
> (https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/56), partially cleaned up the 
> questionable edits, sent private emails to some of the users involved, and 
> asked GOwin and maning on GitHub to contact directly any of the LGUs 
> involved, but there has been no response since then. Since the 2020 eruption 
> of Taal Volcano, I have thought of a possibility the organized mapping 
> project has something to do with disaster preparedness (taking in account the 
> location of those municipalities around Taal Volcano), though it also equally 
> possible the editing is also for land use planning (for Comprehensive Land 
> Use Plan maps) and other purposes. Can someone follow up attempts to contact 
> the LGUs, especially through their disaster risk reduction/management or 
> planning/development offices (though this may not be possible due to the 
> lockdown on the volcano danger zone), or bring up any previous attempts to 
> contact them?
>
>
> --TagaSanPedroAko
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Tagging of barangays and sitios/puroks

[maning sambale]

Pardon for my confusion, but I don's see the value of splitting
barangays to village and quarter in the context of the Philippines.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Jherome Miguel  wrote:
>
> I also thought of using the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) 
> subclassifications of barangays to determine which gets quarter or village, 
> as being inside a city boundary doesn't make every barangay urban.
>
> * urban barangay - quarter
> * rural barangay - village
>
> We may also consider having a tag to handle the PSA subclassification.
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:03 PM Jherome Miguel  
> wrote:
>>
>> Eugene suggested to tag barangays in cities as place=quarter when 
>> applicable. We already agree to tag remote or rural sitios/puroks as 
>> place=hamlet, and we haven't agreed on how to deal with urban barangays.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 6:56 PM maning sambale  
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dquarter
>>> "This does not have to be an administrative entity. "
>>>
>>> We agreed in the past that barangay is synonymous to place=village.
>>> Were there any changes with this view?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:57 AM Jherome Miguel  
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I am already seeing retagging of barangays in urban areas (e.g. Metro 
>>> > Manila) from place=village to place=quarter. Our present guidelines for 
>>> > tagging local government unit (LGU) says barangays always get tagged as 
>>> > village regardless if it's in an urban or rural area, but the 
>>> > recommendation to tag urban barangays to quarter hasn't been documented 
>>> > yet nor discussed (though I agree with it as they better reflect the 
>>> > situation in urban areas and the general tagging recommendations).
>>> >
>>> > Our current guidelines on mapping sitios/puroks is to tag them as 
>>> > place=neighbourhood, even if it's on a rural or isolated area. I tag them 
>>> > as place=hamlet instead, as they better reflect how they are in reality 
>>> > (those are usually clusters of homes with populations of ~100-200, though 
>>> > those are just approximates as they are not covered in censuses) and best 
>>> > follows general tagging recommendations. I'm also considering having this 
>>> > scheme for sitios/puroks depending on their location:
>>> >
>>> > * Urban - place=neighbourhood
>>> > * Rural - place=hamlet
>>> > ___
>>> > talk-ph mailing list
>>> > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> cheers,
>>> maning
>>> --
>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>> https://github.com/maning
>>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
>>> --



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Tagging of barangays and sitios/puroks

[maning sambale]

From the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dquarter
"This does not have to be an administrative entity. "

We agreed in the past that barangay is synonymous to place=village.
Were there any changes with this view?

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:57 AM Jherome Miguel  wrote:
>
> I am already seeing retagging of barangays in urban areas (e.g. Metro Manila) 
> from place=village to place=quarter. Our present guidelines for tagging local 
> government unit (LGU) says barangays always get tagged as village regardless 
> if it's in an urban or rural area, but the recommendation to tag urban 
> barangays to quarter hasn't been documented yet nor discussed (though I agree 
> with it as they better reflect the situation in urban areas and the general 
> tagging recommendations).
>
> Our current guidelines on mapping sitios/puroks is to tag them as 
> place=neighbourhood, even if it's on a rural or isolated area. I tag them as 
> place=hamlet instead, as they better reflect how they are in reality (those 
> are usually clusters of homes with populations of ~100-200, though those are 
> just approximates as they are not covered in censuses) and best follows 
> general tagging recommendations. I'm also considering having this scheme for 
> sitios/puroks depending on their location:
>
> * Urban - place=neighbourhood
> * Rural - place=hamlet
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] request to review and archive HOT TM projects in the Philippines

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Disaster.ninja is an awesome tool! https://disaster.ninja/

Today, I noticed a lot of open projects in the Philippines which are
very old.  Im not sure if these projects are still in in use.
 - 
https://disaster.ninja/live/#overlays=hotActivations,alert-shape-GDACS_TC_1000636_25,bivariate_class;id=GDACS_TC_1000636_25;layer=default-style;position=123.00011635260273,12.325244838282373;zoom=5.2865913153230295
- 
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/353700/69926855-fde89f80-14ad-11ea-846e-b3850b908910.png

To all project creators, can you please go over the projects you
created and archive projects not in active mapping anymore.
To do this, login to the HOT TM and check your dashboard:
https://tasks.hotosm.org/admin/dashboard
-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] [Tabang-AI] Siquijor road mapping project

[maning sambale]

TabangAI Siquijor road mapping is 93% mapped, 69% validated.
Please grab a few tasks to take this to the finish line!
https://tasks-assisted.hotosm.org/project/16/
Daghang salamat!

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:13 AM maning sambale
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> TabangAI Siquijor Mapping is complete, we need help validating:
> https://tasks-assisted.hotosm.org/project/16
> If you have project specific notes to share, please post here:
> https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/10
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:58 PM maning sambale
>  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In collaboration with our local contacts in Lazi, Siquijor, we have
> > just launched our very fist AI-assisted road mapping project for the
> > province of Siquijor [0]!
> > Please help improve/complete the roads in Siquijor in the tasking
> > manager linked in the ticket.
> >
> > Beyond mapping we would love to hear feedback on workflow and how we
> > can do it better.
> >
> > Happy mapping!
> >
> > [0] https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/10
> > --
> > cheers,
> > maning
> > --
> > "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> > https://github.com/maning
> > http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> > --
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://github.com/maning
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] [Tabang-AI] Siquijor road mapping project

[maning sambale]

Hi,

TabangAI Siquijor Mapping is complete, we need help validating:
https://tasks-assisted.hotosm.org/project/16
If you have project specific notes to share, please post here:
https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/10

Thanks!

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:58 PM maning sambale
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In collaboration with our local contacts in Lazi, Siquijor, we have
> just launched our very fist AI-assisted road mapping project for the
> province of Siquijor [0]!
> Please help improve/complete the roads in Siquijor in the tasking
> manager linked in the ticket.
>
> Beyond mapping we would love to hear feedback on workflow and how we
> can do it better.
>
> Happy mapping!
>
> [0] https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/10
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://github.com/maning
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Help fix the road network in the Philippines with MapRoulette challenges

[maning sambale]

hi andrew,

Thank you for preparing these challenges. Are there plans for your team to
fix them?

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 05:48 Andrew Wiseman via talk-ph <
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> Hi OSM Philippines,
>
> My name is Andrew, I work for Apple on the Maps team. We recently used our
> Atlas data analysis tool (https://github.com/osmlab/atlas) to look at a
> few types of potential issues related to roads and routing on
> OpenStreetMap, such as roads that have overly sharp angles, roads that
> cross but don't connect, routing problems, turn restrictions, places where
> navigation is impossible due to missing connections or potentially
> incorrect one-way roads, and other similar issues.
>
> I've posted the results of those checks on MapRoulette, a tool that lets
> you go through potential issues one by one and either correct them or
> indicate they are not a problem. I wanted to let you know they are
> available in case others wanted to try fixing some of them — I also plan to
> go through some of them myself.
>
> In MapRoulette you can either pick a random task to fix or click on a
> specific one. If you want to do tasks around a certain location, such
> as somewhere you are familiar with, you can click on one from the map view,
> and then click Next task: Nearby when you finish it.
>
> The checks are:
>
> Crossing roads: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/8807
> Routing problems: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/8804
> Floating and disconnected roads:
> https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/8810
> Sharp angles: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/8808
> Road connectivity check: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/8806
> Invalid lanes: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/8814
> Invalid turn restriction: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/8815
> Malformed roundabouts: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/8809
> Road links: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/8813
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or suggestions.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Andrew
>
> Andrew Wiseman |  Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 |
> andrew_wise...@apple.com
>
> ___________
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
-- 
Maning Sambale (mobile)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] [Tabang-AI] Siquijor road mapping project

[maning sambale]

Hi,

In collaboration with our local contacts in Lazi, Siquijor, we have
just launched our very fist AI-assisted road mapping project for the
province of Siquijor [0]!
Please help improve/complete the roads in Siquijor in the tasking
manager linked in the ticket.

Beyond mapping we would love to hear feedback on workflow and how we
can do it better.

Happy mapping!

[0] https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/10
-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] [Tabang-AI] HRSL derived vector polygons for coordinating/tasking mapping (V1)

[maning sambale]

Hi,

We have just released 2 vector polygons covering most populated areas
in the Philippines through this Tabanga-AI project.
To download the data, please visit the repo [0].

The purpose of this dataset is to efficiently coordinate remote
mapping by using the data to identify areas to map via Tasking
Manager.
You can see this in action in our test in Camiguin [1]. Based on our
quick evaluation, using this data can cover up to 95% of a certain
region's populated/settlement areas [2]

We encourage everyone to use this data when creating tasks/projects
for organized mapping. Top of my head, I'm thinking of UP-RI, HOTOSM
Philippines, Map.ph, YouthMapper chapters.

As always, we are open for feedback or further collaboration with anyone.

[0] https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/tree/master/data
[1] https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/4
[2] https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/pull/6#issuecomment-528920713

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Announcing the Tabang-AI initiative

[maning sambale]

Hi everyone,

We wrapped up our evaluation of RapiD in Camiguin. Thanks to all who
worked on the project especially @GOwin and his CWTS++ crew!
Detailed notes here:
https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/4#issuecomment-528343960

tl;dr We increased road coverage in Camiguin by 36%!

We will proceed with next actions on this initiative in the coming days.
For those interested in tracking the project activities, visit our GH
repo: https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue


On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 2:26 PM Eugene Alvin Villar  wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> We are pleased to announce an initiative to use AI or machine learning 
> (ML)-derived data to help improve the coverage of OpenStreetMap in the 
> Philippines and we are calling it Tabang-AI. This is word play on on Cebuano 
> word tábangay which means "collaboration" or "teamwork". We believe that AI 
> and ML, when used properly, and always with the local mappers leading the 
> effort, is a fruitful complement to conventional forms of mapping in OSM.
>
> One of the first projects under this initiative is related to the AI road 
> detection technology developed by Facebook under their Map With AI 
> (https://mapwith.ai/) service. We requested Facebook to run their machine 
> learning models in the Philippines and they have provided the detected road 
> data through their RapiD editor.
>
> Together with various local partners (LGUs, NGOs, etc.) that we have forged 
> from the recent Pista ng Mapa conference in Dumaguete, we plan to promote 
> baseline road mapping throughout the country to further increase data 
> coverage. This will be implemented in several phases to ensure that the data 
> added to OSM conforms to the defined quality standards outlined by the local 
> community.
>
> You can read more about this initiative on the OSM Wiki:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Tabang-AI
>
> If you want to start coordinating map tasks within your community, please 
> feel free to reply to this email, or sent a private message to 
> osm.pilipinas+aimappingrequ...@gmail.com or create a GitHub ticket here: 
> https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/new
>
> Happy mapping!
> Eugene
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [OSM-talk] Announcing the Tabang-AI initiative

[maning sambale]

Hi y'all,

Putting on record that I was part of those who requested FB to
generate road detection for the Philippines there are a few more
people involved.
I defer to these individuals if they want to put forward their names.

While I agree that a few people does not necessarily represent the
whole local community,
I believe those we talked to initially were the most active both in
mapping and community-building in the Philippines.

As mentioned in the announcement, organized mapping effort will only
be initiated if there are local groups (local in the geographic region
they want to map) willing to manage and coordinate.
However, individual mappers who want to use existing detections
provided by FB can directly map their own mapping patches via RapiD.

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:13 PM Peter Barth  wrote:
>
> Hi Eugene,
>
> Eugene Alvin Villar schrieb:
> > Unfortunately, I cannot provide you with a link since we communicated with
> > Facebook's OSM team privately. This is completely our own initiative and
> > was not initiated from Facebook's side.
>
> who is this "we"/"our", how many people were directly involved in this
> communication?
>
> I am a bit worried about your definition of "local community". If this
> initiative was driven by the local community, as you say, why is it only
> recently announced on the talk-ph mailing list?
>
> Also, for everyone, especially the local community to follow up, you
> could just put the direct messages to the wiki for documentation.
>
> Thanks,
> Peda
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [talk-ph] Announcing the Tabang-AI initiative

[maning sambale]

Thank you announcing Eugene.
Also for everyone, we announced this initiative to the international
community [0].
We would love comments from both community to make this initiative successful.

[0] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-August/083104.html

On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 2:26 PM Eugene Alvin Villar  wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> We are pleased to announce an initiative to use AI or machine learning 
> (ML)-derived data to help improve the coverage of OpenStreetMap in the 
> Philippines and we are calling it Tabang-AI. This is word play on on Cebuano 
> word tábangay which means "collaboration" or "teamwork". We believe that AI 
> and ML, when used properly, and always with the local mappers leading the 
> effort, is a fruitful complement to conventional forms of mapping in OSM.
>
> One of the first projects under this initiative is related to the AI road 
> detection technology developed by Facebook under their Map With AI 
> (https://mapwith.ai/) service. We requested Facebook to run their machine 
> learning models in the Philippines and they have provided the detected road 
> data through their RapiD editor.
>
> Together with various local partners (LGUs, NGOs, etc.) that we have forged 
> from the recent Pista ng Mapa conference in Dumaguete, we plan to promote 
> baseline road mapping throughout the country to further increase data 
> coverage. This will be implemented in several phases to ensure that the data 
> added to OSM conforms to the defined quality standards outlined by the local 
> community.
>
> You can read more about this initiative on the OSM Wiki:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Tabang-AI
>
> If you want to start coordinating map tasks within your community, please 
> feel free to reply to this email, or sent a private message to 
> osm.pilipinas+aimappingrequ...@gmail.com or create a GitHub ticket here: 
> https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/new
>
> Happy mapping!
> Eugene
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Potentially problematic edits

[maning sambale]

Hi Andy,

Yes we aware of this issue, we are tracking it here:
https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/50



On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:00 PM Andy Townsend  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Do the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71374826 look
> OK to everyone?  See
> http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9248920 for
> previous comments on this user's changesets.  They're currently blocked
> until they engage with the community (or more likely, have created
> another sock-puppet account that hasn't been noticed yet).
>
> Various people within the community have reverted previous edits in the
> past; just checking whether this one needed to be done too.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



--
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] OSM i could not save may edit this moment??

[maning sambale]

Works for me Marianne.  I just uploaded a few changesets right now.

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:12 PM marianne mores
 wrote:
>
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Feb 16 Mindanao Mapping Party

[maning sambale]

I’ve had discussions with OSMF and HOT the guidelines don’t really apply to
> volunteer mapping parties
>

This is great information. May we get a public record of this discussion?
I was not personally aware of exemptions in the guidelines provided by the
OSMF:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf


> This kicks off a four month first phase initiative as we continue field
> work and OSM mapping workshops, map validation and community building
> across 60 local municipalities and NGOs in Mindanao.
>

The above statements does not add up to me based on the previous statement
that this is a volunteer effort though.


> For the validation, we have a support group to help ensure new mappers
> have a positive experience and aren’t intimidated by other mapper’s
> comments. They will tag their edits as #newbie. Local Youthmappers
> chapters, George Washington University Humanitarianian Mapping Society, and
> HOT will support the validation of their edits and provide community and
> technical support.
>

Looking forward to the validation process!

cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Request for clarification on road tagging guidelines

[maning sambale]

There is a list:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Link_roads_between_different_highways_types
But not everyone agrees. ;)

Agree with Eugene here.  It depends on the traffic-flow and general purpose
of that segment.

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:13 PM Eugene Alvin Villar 
wrote:

> Hi Lavanya,
>
> I personally would tag this the same as the side street and not the link
> version of the major road.
>
> My reason is: imagine if the side street actually goes through the major
> road to the other side. To me it makes logical sense that the minor street
> retains the characteristics such as name and type on its entire length and
> not be suddenly interrupted just because it crosses a major street. I then
> use the same logic even if the minor street ends on the major street like
> in your example.
>
> But I know that other people have different opinions on this and you can
> see both types of tagging worldwide. I say just leave things as they are
> and only change them if you have compelling reasons to do so such as local
> road and traffic conditions. For example, if more drivers use this bit of
> road to transfer between the major and minor road then tag it as minor. But
> if more drivers use it to make u-turns on the major road then making it a
> major link road makes sense.
>
> ~Eugene
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, 11:45 AM grab osm via talk-ph <
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org wrote:
>
>> Apologize Erwin.
>>
>> Here are the further details of our question.
>>
>> When a way segment that connects to a Major road, please suggest if the
>> the connector should have same classification as the way segment or that of
>> a Major Road with link attribute assigned
>>
>> Below is an example:
>> [image: image]
>> 
>> Please suggest, if any further infirnation is needed.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Lavanya
>>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>


-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Mapping private information in Lupang Arenda

[maning sambale]

Hi everyone,

Over the last couple of days we noticed several mappers in Lupang
Arenda Taytay/Cainta are adding names of residents on buildings.
We have been reviewing and fixing a lot of theses edits [0].  I
believe Erwin also added comments in some changesets.

We are not sure what is the purpose of these edits, our hunch is that
the data is being used for a community based land tenure project.
While using OSM for land rights is a commendable endeavor, private
information such as names of residents should not be in OSM.
We are requesting the Data Working Group to redact these data ASAP.

If anyone knows about this initiative, we would love to talk to the
organizers so that we can help them how to use OSM without
compromising privacy.


[0] 
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/?filters=%7B%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22geometry%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%7B%22coordinates%22%3A%5B%5B%5B121.09267299103794%2C14.553205630453988%5D%2C%5B121.11572489832605%2C14.553431006907346%5D%2C%5B121.1203818492969%2C14.530554123541435%5D%2C%5B121.113473703%2C14.523466229286896%5D%2C%5B121.10683755375703%2C14.526171095636244%5D%2C%5B121.0964758378588%2C14.540145711273581%5D%2C%5B121.09426378614421%2C14.541836129052285%5D%2C%5B121.09267299103794%2C14.553205630453988%5D%5D%5D%2C%22type%22%3A%22Polygon%22%7D%2C%22value%22%3A%7B%22coordinates%22%3A%5B%5B%5B121.09267299103794%2C14.553205630453988%5D%2C%5B121.11572489832605%2C14.553431006907346%5D%2C%5B121.1203818492969%2C14.530554123541435%5D%2C%5B121.113473703%2C14.523466229286896%5D%2C%5B121.10683755375703%2C14.526171095636244%5D%2C%5B121.0964758378588%2C14.540145711273581%5D%2C%5B121.09426378614421%2C14.541836129052285%5D%2C%5B121.09267299103794%2C14.553205630453988%5D%5D%5D%2C%22type%22%3A%22Polygon%22%7D%7D%5D%2C%22is_suspect%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Yes%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22True%22%7D%5D%2C%22harmful%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Show%20Bad%20only%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22True%22%7D%5D%7D
-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Grab's OSM data team is planning to work on roads of Cebu city

[maning sambale]

What happened to the metro manila work [0]?  Before proceeding to
other cities I personally prefer they should wrap-up previous
initiatives so we can understand what worked, what doesn't and how
previous experience/issues (if any) can be mitigated.

A good example is Kaart's and ProjectNOAH's wrapup notes posted in this list.

[0] https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/19
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:20 AM Erwin Olario  wrote:
>
>
> Grab's data team is back to working on, and reviewing Cebu city roads  [0], 
> to identify missing roads, and geometry issues.
>
> FYI.
>
> [0]: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/26
> --
>
> /Erwin Olario
>
> e: er...@ngnuity.xyz | v/m: https://t.me/GOwin | s: https://mstdn.io/@GOwin
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] XKCD does GIS

[maning sambale]

Done! https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3403603

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 at 12:52 Jim Morgan  wrote:

>
> https://xkcd.com/2029/
>
>
> --
>
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
-- 
Maning Sambale (mobile)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[OSM-talk] anonymous notes spam?

[maning sambale]

I'm getting several single letter notes comments since yesterday.
Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/562375
Are people noticing the same?

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [talk-ph] Road segment alignment validation effort in Central Visayas

[maning sambale]

Excellent work Kaart team!

> We have completed the road alignment validation effort in Metro Manila [0]


Curious what are your main takeaways with the state of road dat in
Metro Manila.  Appreciate if you can summarize in the GH ticket.

> and will soon tackle the same concern in Central Visayas [1], initially 
> prioritizing Metro Cebu.

Daghang salamat bai!

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Erwin Olario  wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> We have completed the road alignment validation effort in Metro Manila [0]
> and will soon tackle the same concern in Central Visayas [1], initially
> prioritizing Metro Cebu.
>
> The offset adjustments created from the tasks are uploaded to the Imagery
> Offsets Database [2], which we strongly encourage all JOSM users to utilize,
> for consistency and convenience.
>
> If there are any questions, or concerns about the methodology or process, we
> would love to hear from you. You may also know more about our efforts
> elsewhere, and our team through our public wiki page [3].
>
> Also, public Maptime! Manila sessions [4] are now hosted by PUP San Juan on
> the last Thursday of every month. We have other friends pitching in for
> moral and logistical support. Please join us if you're by our neck of the
> woods, and tell us about the projects you're working on, or maybe give us a
> hand in the projects our volunteers are undertaking.
>
> If that's too far from you, check out the #geofolks from Maptime! Diliman
> [5] who run their session on the same day.
>
> Cheers,
> Erwin
>
> [0]: https://git.io/vAW43
> [1]: https://git.io/fNGZR
> [2]: http://offsets.textual.ru/map
> [3]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kaart
> [4]: https://ti.to/mapamore
> [5]: https://twitter.com/MaptimeDiliman
> --
>
> /Erwin Olario
>
> e: er...@ngnuity.xyz | v/m: https://t.me/GOwin | s: https://mstdn.io/@GOwin
>
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] [JPCS YouthMappers] Mapping Activity for District 2 of Manila Update.

[maning sambale]

Great initiatives! All the best.  Replies inline:

> Questions:
>
> By using the OSM, can we place a tag for the location of PWD’s residence in
> the map?

You shouldn't do this.  OSM is open to all and even if you got consent
from the respective PWD to map their community, you shouldn't put
personal information into OSM.
You can of course collect them and manage data in your own internal DB.

> We are currently searching but currently having a hard time, how can we
> create a visual presentation using the data in OSM? Like creating a visual
> presentation of heights of buildings for flood map.

Desktop GIS.
Use QGIS and threejs plugin.
See for example:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Quiapo_in_3D.png

Web tools
* https://osmbuildings.org/
* https://demo.f4map.com/

Or build your own:
https://twitter.com/maningsambale/status/822419508421861376

Code is in the tweet.

LMK how can I help.

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Fwd: [info-hotosm] Inquiry About HOT in the Philippines

[maning sambale]

-- Forwarded message --
From: maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: [info-hotosm] Inquiry About HOT in the Philippines
To: Blake Girardot HOT/OSM <blake.girar...@hotosm.org>
Cc: Rabby Lavilles <rabby_lavil...@dlsu.edu.ph>


Thanks for the intro Blake.
@Rabby lmk, the specifics, we can hop on a call with other core mappers if
you want.

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Blake Girardot HOT/OSM <
blake.girar...@hotosm.org> wrote:

> Hi Rabby,
>
> OSM is very active in the Philippines.
>
> I am including my colleague Maning on this email to connect you two, I am
> pretty sure Maning is still based there, my apologizes if that is not the
> case Maning.
>
> Also, there is an email list dedicated to OSM-PH:
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
> The OSM Wiki has some historical info on the OSM-PH community:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Philippines
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_Philippines_Inc.
>
> And they look to have an active Facebook page as well:
> https://www.facebook.com/OSMPH/
>
> I think you will be in good hands here, please let us know if we can be of
> any additional help.
>
> Respectfully,
> blake
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 6:40 AM, Rabby Lavilles <
> rabby_lavil...@dlsu.edu.ph> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am part of Disaster Management Project of De La Salle
>> University-Manila, Philippines. As part of our initial findings in Legazpi
>> (one of the cities in the Philippines), they need to manage and update
>> their maps to be able to support disaster plans and mitigation. We
>> introduce to them OpenStreetMap as one of the tools they can be used to
>> update their maps. However, they asked us how we can help them in
>> conducting community mapping. The group decided to conduct a mapping
>> activity (using OpenStreetMap) to participating government and
>> non-government organizations involved in disaster management of the city.
>>
>> As an exploring user of OpenStreetMap, I would like to ask if there is a
>> support group in the Philippines that we can refer to as a start; for us to
>> develop our workshop.
>>
>> Hope to hear from you. Thank you so much.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Rabby Q. Lavilles
>> De La Salle University-Manila
>>
>>
>>
>> <http://www.dlsu.edu.ph> <https://www.facebook.com/DLSU.Manila.100>
>> <http://instagram.com/dlsu> <https://twitter.com/dlsumanila>
>> <http://dlsumanila.tumblr.com/> <http://iblog.lasalle.ph/>
>>
>> DISCLAIMER AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> The information contained in this e-mail, including those in its
>> attachments, is confidential and intended only for the person(s) or
>> entity(ies) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient,
>> you must not read, copy, store, disclose, distribute this message, or act
>> in reliance upon the information contained in it. If you received this
>> e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
>> computer or system. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
>> individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of De La Salle
>> University.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 
> Blake Girardot
> Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Mayon Volcano Eruption Jan 2018

[maning sambale]

Quick update.

Big thanks to everyone who helped with the 2 projects for Mayon Volcano.

We already shared the data (through the HOT export tool) to the
Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS)
this is the government institution who supports the local government
units in responding to the disaster.
Also thanks to Erwin for providing updated GPS maps, which is now used
by people on the ground.

No new requests for mapping at the moment since we have covered the
designated danger zones (PDZ + EDZ).



On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Erwin Olario <gov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alert Level 4 (hazardous eruption imminent) is in effect over Mayon volcano
>
> Mapping the Permanent Danger Zone is already complete, and validated. There
> is another  on-going effort to update and map the surrounding Extended
> Danger Zone [1] , which now stands at 52% complete.
>
> Again, the new task URL is https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/4037
>
> /Erwin
>
> [0]:
> http://www.phivolcs.dost.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content=article=8377:mayon-volcano-bulletin-23-january-2018-800-am-=70:latest-volcano-bulletin=58
> [1]: https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/4037
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:56 AM maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Mayon Volcano in the Philippines erupted this week.  Local community
>> is mapping from pre-event imagery.
>> This is not yet a full HOT Activation.  We are still assessing the
>> needs of responders, but if anyone has spare time,
>> we have a task [0] ready for the permanent danger zone.  This mapping
>> is focused on mapping infrastructure (roads and buildings) and
>> waterways.
>>
>> [0] https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/4027
>>
>> --
>> cheers,
>> maning
>> --
>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
>> --
>>
>> ___
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
>
>
> --
>
> /Erwin Olario
>
> e: er...@ngnuity.xyz | v/m: https://t.me/GOwin | s: https://mstdn.io/@GOwin



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Mayon Volcano Eruption Jan 2018

[maning sambale]

Ervin,

Thanks, this is so much bigger than the EDZ [0].  I feel its too much
too big AOI for mapping.
If we can have detailed poly that identifies at risk areas, that's much better.

[0] 
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/353700/35045993-ab1fce48-fbbb-11e7-9a98-51930ebc17c0.png

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Ervin Malicdem <schad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here it is, Maning
>
> https://owncloud.cxsmedia.com/index.php/s/xI7M2yqVI0Zrrs0
>
> Ervin M.
> Schadow1 Expeditions - A Filipino must not be a stranger to his own
> motherland.
> http://www.s1expeditions.com
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:46 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Ervin,
>>
>> > A poly file [0] was created to prioritize its southwest quadrant where
>> > the
>> > magma initially flowed and also to include evacuation centers we mapped
>> > back
>> > during its phreatic eruption in 2014. I suggest we can also make this as
>> > the
>> > bounds for the HOT task.
>>
>> I can't find my poly to geojson coverter right now, can you share
>> geojson or shapefile?
>>
>> --
>> cheers,
>> maning
>> --
>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
>> --
>
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Mayon Volcano Eruption Jan 2018

[maning sambale]

Ervin,

> A poly file [0] was created to prioritize its southwest quadrant where the
> magma initially flowed and also to include evacuation centers we mapped back
> during its phreatic eruption in 2014. I suggest we can also make this as the
> bounds for the HOT task.

I can't find my poly to geojson coverter right now, can you share
geojson or shapefile?

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Mayon Volcano Eruption Jan 2018

[maning sambale]

Thanks everyone for finishing the task really quick!  We have 100%
mapped and 57% validated as of this time.
Also thanks to the mappers before us who already mapped a lot before this event.

We created a new task to include the expanded danger zone [0],
reference material [1].
Compared to the previous task, this needs more effort since these
areas are more populated than the permanent danger zone.

This continues to be a local response, but anyone is welcome to participate

[0] https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/4037
[1] http://www.ifrc.org/docs/appeals/rpts09/PHvol221209.pdf

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Ervin Malicdem <schad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Schadow1 Expeditions has initiated producing a humanitarian version of GPS
> navigation map for this area a few hours after its magmatic eruption in
> January 14.
> Let me know if the HOT activation needs a daily update for this one.
> A poly file [0] was created to prioritize its southwest quadrant where the
> magma initially flowed and also to include evacuation centers we mapped back
> during its phreatic eruption in 2014. I suggest we can also make this as the
> bounds for the HOT task.
>
> Map is available on site [1]
>
>
> [0] https://owncloud.cxsmedia.com/index.php/s/zEQ1ZAyM9AyTg0b
> [1]
> http://www.s1expeditions.com/p/the-gps-navigation-map-of-philippines.html
>
>
> Ervin M.
> Schadow1 Expeditions - A Filipino must not be a stranger to his own
> motherland.
> http://www.s1expeditions.com
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:55 AM, maning sambale
> <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Mayon Volcano in the Philippines erupted this week.  Local community
>> is mapping from pre-event imagery.
>> This is not yet a full HOT Activation.  We are still assessing the
>> needs of responders, but if anyone has spare time,
>> we have a task [0] ready for the permanent danger zone.  This mapping
>> is focused on mapping infrastructure (roads and buildings) and
>> waterways.
>>
>> [0] https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/4027
>>
>> --
>> cheers,
>> maning
>> --
>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
>> --
>>
>> ___
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Mayon Volcano Eruption Jan 2018

[maning sambale]

Mayon Volcano in the Philippines erupted this week.  Local community
is mapping from pre-event imagery.
This is not yet a full HOT Activation.  We are still assessing the
needs of responders, but if anyone has spare time,
we have a task [0] ready for the permanent danger zone.  This mapping
is focused on mapping infrastructure (roads and buildings) and
waterways.

[0] https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/4027

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] intro to Kaart initiative in PH

[maning sambale]

Hi Erwin,

Thanks for leading this work.  As many of you know, I work in Mapbox
and my primary focus is to make OSM navigable.
I wonder what would be the best approach in the context of driving in
the Philippines.
Would love to share notes and approaches.  One thing I have in mind (I
shared this during the meetup), while every country
has specific nuances tagging, there is a danger of making the tags too
specific as its difficult to create routing engines for each country.


On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Erwin Olario  wrote:
> Happy new year everyone.
>
> In case some of you are wondering about some of my recent changeset comments
> with the phrase,  "Better PH data with #Kaart", I've recently linked up with
> Kaart [0], and their initiative to improve OSM data in the Philippines.
>
> One of the things we'd like to tackle is road network improvement, initially
> in Metro Manila, and later (maybe soon?), expanding to other regions.
>
> Improvements that are intended to be addressed include the following:
> * Adding missing roads
> * Improving road attributes (names, lanes, restrictions, etc.)
> * Correcting road connectivity issues
> * Improving road classification consistency according to OSM guidelines and
> local convention
> * Correcting road alignment issues
> * Other one-off fixes
>
> Of course, we intend to work closely with the community, and other
> stakeholders, especially at the local level.
>
> We also hope to organize, or lead, activities for developing technical
> skills, and enhancing collaboration, and community mapa-thons.  Think of
> this as an extension of my earlier MapAmore [1] initiatives.
>
> The tasking for Metro Manila [2] is now up, and is hosted by HOT Tasking
> Manager instance, and open to all interested contributors.
>
> In tomorrow's meet-up, I'll take the opportunity to elaborate on this
> initiative tomorrow. I'm looking forward to hear your feedback, and to
> answer any questions here, or directly by email.
>
> I also hope for your usual helpful collaboration, and support.
>
> Kind regards,
> Erwin
>
>
> [0]: http://kaartgroup.com/
> [1]: https://github.com/mapamore
> [2]: https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/3997
>
>
> --
>
> /Erwin Olario
>
> e: er...@ngnuity.xyz | v/m: https://t.me/GOwin | s: https://mstdn.io/@GOwin
>
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

[maning sambale]

FYI, 717 roads will be affected by this redaction in the Philippines.
Let's discuss next actions.

-- Forwarded message --
From: Frederik Ramm 
Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 7:19 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75,000 street names contributed by user chdr
To: Talk Openstreetmap ,
"talk...@openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap" 


Hi,

   in 2010 I was privately contacted by another OSM user with the
suspicion that user "chdr" might be copying names from Google maps
(there were few "easter eggs" in Oman that were only on Google and not
in the real world, and they suddenly popped up on OSM). "chdr" was
contacted at the time, but continued unfazed. In 2013 another mapper
lodged a complaint with DWG about edits by chdr, and I emailed chdr
asking him about his sources. At that point chdr stopped mapping. He
never replied about his sources though, even when I set an ultimatum (of
31st August 2013) threatening to remove all names he contributed if he
can't tell us his source. We do have to assume that all names
contributed by chdr are copyright violations.

(chdr has added names all around the world, making a harmless survey
unlikely.)

For various reasons I neglected to act on this, and was only reminded
now, 5 years later, when DWG received a complaint from a user in Brazil
where chdr has even used "source=google" occasionally. (But as I said,
the suspicion is that Google was used throughout.)

I have now compiled a list of all street names that were contributed by
chdr and are still visible today; we're talking about almost 75,000
street names world wide. The most affected countries are:

  18023 "United States of America"
  16345 "Mexico"
  15109 "Brazil"
   6791 "RSA"
   2802 "Spain"
   2614 "Australia"
   1923 "Argentina"
   1673 "Nigeria"
   1569 "India"
   1441 "Canada"
954 "Malaysia"
744 "Botswana"
717 "Philippines"
619 "Indonesia"
553 "Italy"
414 "Turkey"
290 "Hungary"
284 "Chile"
250 "Kenya"
127 "Saudi Arabia"
107 "Paraguay"
106 "Panama"
100 "Morocco"

I've left out those countries with less than 100 affected ways.

For the US, I can break it down by state:

   5696 "Arizona"
   5116 "Texas"
   2294 "New York"
   1164 "District of Columbia"
740 "Iowa"
494 "Colorado"
416 "New Jersey"
339 "Illinois"
268 "Michigan"
239 "Pennsylvania"
181 "Missouri"
147 "Georgia"
129 "New Mexico"
123 "North Carolina"
115 "California"
106 "Virginia"

The breakdown for Mexico:

   7749 "Baja California"
   2084 "Puebla"
   1964 "Chihuahua"
   1539 "Coahuila"
   1161 "Mexico"
   1040 "Chiapas"
342 "Tamaulipas"
241 "Sonora"
185 "San Luis Potosi"
129 "New Mexico"

and Brazil:

  10904 "São Paulo"
   2605 "Paraná"
945 "Rio de Janeiro"
270 "Rio Grande do Sul"
154 "Goiás"

and South Africa:

   4422 "Gauteng"
750 "KwaZulu-Natal"
600 "Eastern Cape"
439 "Western Cape"
400 "Northern Cape"
179 "Mpumalanga"

- each time leaving out a couple others under 100.

We believe that only names, not geometries have been taken from other
maps so we'll remove and redact the names only. In identifying "names
contributed by chdr" I took care to really only pick up the names that
were introduced by them, not names that were there before, and also when
chdr split a way that had a name I will make sure that the newly created
way doesn't count as "named by chdr". Additionally, I have ignored those
cases where chdr simply performed a TIGER expansion (St->Street etc) of
a name that was there before.

My process has two weak points (that I am aware of):

1. It doesn't properly "follow" a chrdr-contributed name through way
splits performed by other users; if someone has split a way created by
chdr, then the name will remain on the bit that was created by this
user. This is somewhat unsatisfying but after having manually checked a
random sample I think the problem is small enough to be ignored.

2. It is possible that, like with a recent case in Switzerland where I
had to do a similar redaction, some of these chdr-contributed names will
have been confirmed by others in a survey, i.e. someone else surveyed
the area and checked the name, but saw no need to change it in any way
since it was already correct. Sadly my process will now remove the name
even though, had the name not been there in the first place, that person
could have added the name. This is not nice but I don't see how it could
be avoided.

Here's a list of way IDs affected, with country and state:

http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details

I am trying to keep the damage to OSM to a minimum while at the same
time respecting copyright. If anyone wants to spot check a few names in
their area and can suggest a refinement of the process that would leave
more names in place because there's reason to assume they are legit, I'm
all ears.

It has been suggested to me that 

[Talk-us] Request to review edits by Zowie Polie

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Our team noticed Zowie Polie [0] deleting/modifying/adding major
roads, service roads and buildings, random fictional features such as
parks etc. over the US.  We think a lot of her/his edits are
suspicious.  See changeset here [1].  This user also had a block from
DWG [2].

We commented on one of the changesets and reported the incident to
DWG.  While we fixed many of the changesets already. Would love for
the community to review if there are other data that broke the map.



[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zowie%20Polie
[1] 
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/?filters=%7B%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3Anull%7D%5D%2C%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Zowie%20Polie%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Zowie%20Polie%22%7D%5D%7D
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1348
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50470330
-- 

cheers,
Maning Sambale
Data, Mapbox

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] SEO Damage to OSM

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Our team came across duplicated highways like this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144422919/.
Based on the latest changeset, this is probably due to the revertion
of the SEO spam.
We documented the issue here: https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/310


> Reverting all these edits would probably create a lot of collateral
> damage. We could manually go through them and revert all that contain
> marketing speak, but even that would probably throw out a few babies
> with the bathwater here and there. If anyone has a recommendation... I
> noticed that typical SEO content tends to begin with the business name
> ("Waldo's Warts is a health spa overlooking the beautiful parking lot of
> ...") but that's probably not a hard-and-fast marker.
>
> With regard to blocking or deleting accounts: DWG usually blocks
> accounts only to stop someone from doing someting or to force them to
> read a message; hence we don't see much reason in blocking month-old
> accounts that will in all likelihood never be used again. Pure spam
> accounts (usually that's diary spam) can be deleted by the admins, but
> in these cases that would actually hide the traces of spammers, since
> the edits they made would now be by user "user_1234" instead of user
> "soandsohotel" and it would be more difficult to follow their actions
> through the web interface. So I can see the frustration of spam hunters
> when the spam account is not removed, but I don't think it would
> actually help.


-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] MS Buildings (Re: Talk-us Digest, Vol 112, Issue 25)

[maning sambale]

Hi,

My colleague Chethan played around with visualizing MS buildings in 3D:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Chetan_Gowda/diary/41705

Webmap here: 
https://osmlab.github.io/ms-building-import/#15.72/39.2862/-76.6135/-1.2/60

The quality is generally good, but there are spots where small
buildings are not  orthogonal like these residential areas in Orlando

https://osmlab.github.io/ms-building-import/#18.4/28.45983/-81.38851/53/27
https://osmlab.github.io/ms-building-import/#17.36/28.50154/-81.49417/33.8/27

Obviously, this shouldn't be imported wholesale, so I suggest to
whoever plans to do import/conflate them should review the quality of
each data.


> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:37:15 -0700
> From: Clifford Snow 
> To: talk-us 
> Subject: [Talk-us] Available Building Footprints
> Message-ID:
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I am happy to announce that Microsoft has made available approximately 9.8
> million building footprints including building heights in key metropolitan
> areas. These footprints are licensed ODbL to allow importing into OSM.
> These footprints where manually created using high resolution imagery. The
> data contains no funny field names such as tiger:cfcc or gnis:featureid or
> fcode=46003, just building height.
>
>
> Please remember to follow the import guidelines.
>
> The wiki [1] has more information on these footprints as well as links to
> download.
>
> [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dieterdreist/diary/40727
>
> Enjoy,
> Clifford Snow
>
>
-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Unreviewed TIGER in Jacksonville (was Re: Talk-us Digest, Vol 114, Issue 22)

[maning sambale]

While our team is working on Jacksonville, we found unreviewed TIGER
(v1, tiger:reviewed:=no) in some areas.
See example here:
https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/300#issuecomment-305399104
We are fixing them as we encounter them in the TM tasks.

We are also reviewing the extent of effort to fix this once we are
done with building tracing.
If there are existing efforts to fix in TIGER data in Jacksonville our
team can help as well.


> Thank you everyone for all the information. To start with our team is going
> to be working on improving the building footprints in Jacksonville, Florida
> [0] on OpenStreetMap. You can track the progress in our /mapping ticket [1].
> Let us know if you have any feedback, please post in this thread or in the
> ticket.
>
> [0] - http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/96
> [1] - https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/300
>
>
> Cheers,
> Jinal Foflia
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> 
>
> --
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
> --
>
> End of Talk-us Digest, Vol 114, Issue 22
> 



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [talk-ph] Mapbox Satellite imagery updates (May 2017)

[maning sambale]

But wait! There's more!

http://blog.digitalglobe.com/news/digitalglobe-satellite-imagery-launch-for-openstreetmap/
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/353700/25863783/b91e7e4a-350a-11e7-96d3-2d025a3a5e1c.gif

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Jherome Miguel 
wrote:

> Finally, the long wait for more recent and detailed imagery for tracing in
> OpenStreetMap, especially in Metro Manila and Calabarzon, has come.
>
> Mapbox Satellite has released new imagery of Metro Manila, Bulacan,
> Pampanga, Cavite,  Batangas, Laguna, and Quezon for tracing in
> OpenStreetMap. The newly released imagery replaced cloudy imagery on
> southern Metro Manila, Cavite, part of Laguna, Batangas and Rizal, and
> imagery possibly taken between 2010, 2011, or 2012 (and also used by Bing)
> in areas in Cavite and Laguna. Most areas of Batangas not previously
> covered by Mapbox Satellite, like the rest of Lipa, Cuenca, Alitagtag, San
> Jose, Batangas City, Ibaan, Lobo, and Taysan, have finally received more
> recent imagery, possibly taken in early or mid-2016. This allowed more
> detailed mapping and mapping the latest developments on areas in Batangas
> where Bing has older coverage (e.g. western Batangas, eastern Lipa, Padre
> Garcia, Rosario, and part of San Juan, which has imagery dated April 2010
> or April 2013), cloudy imagery (e.g. parts of San Jose and Ibaan) or no
> imagery (e.g. western Rosario, rest of Taysan and San Juan, and some
> barangays of Batangas City, near the boundary with Taysan). I took some
> time to map missing features (e.g. streets of the poblacion of Taysan, some
> buildings and the San Jose Cockfighting Arena in barangays Calansayan and
> Aguila, San Jose, a creek near barangay Lapu-Lapu in Ibaan, an NGCP 69 kV
> line near barangay Malainin, Ibaan, and the Puyat Steel Plant in barangay
> Masaya, Rosario) and recent developments (Camella Solamente and San Gabriel
> Power Plant in Batangas City), using the latest imagery.
>
> Aside from Batangas, Quezon (western areas), Bulacan, Pampanga, Bataan,
> and parts of Tarlac and Nueva Ecija received new imagery. The latest
> imagery in Quezon replaces the blurry imagery that once covered the areas
> from Tiaong to Atimonan, including Lucena. The new imagery in Rizal
> included the area from Tanay to the boundary with Laguna in Pililia, and
> the 54 MW Pililia Wind Farm is shown in detail. Bulacan, which is also
> covered by the past update has newer coverage, which also includes
> Pampanga, Bataan, Zambales (Olongapo, including parts of Subic Bay Freeport
> Zone), Tarlac (up to Tarlac City anc La Paz), and Nueva Ecija (up to
> Zaragoza, Jaen, and western part of Santa Rosa)
>
> Happy mapping.
>
> --TagaSanPedroAko
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
>


-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[OSM-talk] Fwd: Call for scholarship applications to attend State of the Map Asia 2017

[maning sambale]

Call for scholarships for SotM-Asia 2017 is now open.
http://stateofthemap.asia/scholarships.html

-- Forwarded message --
From: kshitiz khanal 
Date: Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:05 PM
Subject: Call for scholarship applications to attend State of the Map Asia
2017
To: Nama Budhathoki , Pradip Khatiwada <
youthpra...@gmail.com>


Dear OSM community member,
​​
​We want to welcome you to State of the Map Asia 2017, which will be
organized in Kathmandu, Nepal on September 23 - 24, hosted by Kathmandu
Living Labs and OSM community of Nepal.

The event website is now live at: http://stateofthemap.asia/

A call for scholarships is now open. Please use this link

to apply.

Call to apply for scholarships to attend State of the Map Asia is now open.
Please fill this form to apply for receiving support to attend SotM Asia
2017. We can not guarantee that we can provide scholarships for all
applicants, but we are trying to gather resources for as many as possible.
The deadline for application is June 10, 2017.

We need your support to make this a successful event and help foster the
growth of OSM in Asia and beyond.

Please refer to the website for further details.

With best regards,

Kshitiz Khanal
Researcher, Open Data and OpenStreetMap
Kathmandu Living Labs​



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[talk-ph] Fwd: Call for scholarship applications to attend State of the Map Asia 2017

[maning sambale]

Call for scholarships for SotM-Asia 2017 is now open.
http://stateofthemap.asia/scholarships.html

-- Forwarded message --
From: kshitiz khanal 
Date: Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:05 PM
Subject: Call for scholarship applications to attend State of the Map Asia
2017
To: Nama Budhathoki , Pradip Khatiwada <
youthpra...@gmail.com>


Dear OSM community member,
​​
​We want to welcome you to State of the Map Asia 2017, which will be
organized in Kathmandu, Nepal on September 23 - 24, hosted by Kathmandu
Living Labs and OSM community of Nepal.

The event website is now live at: http://stateofthemap.asia/

A call for scholarships is now open. Please use this link

to apply.

Call to apply for scholarships to attend State of the Map Asia is now open.
Please fill this form to apply for receiving support to attend SotM Asia
2017. We can not guarantee that we can provide scholarships for all
applicants, but we are trying to gather resources for as many as possible.
The deadline for application is June 10, 2017.

We need your support to make this a successful event and help foster the
growth of OSM in Asia and beyond.

Please refer to the website for further details.

With best regards,

Kshitiz Khanal
Researcher, Open Data and OpenStreetMap
Kathmandu Living Labs​



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] fixing overlapping buildings

[maning sambale]

I created a task for crossing/overlapping buildings in tofix, details
here: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/13
Please help, we need to fix 31K in to-fix. :)

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Usability of translating Wikidata world places to Tagalog/Filipino

[maning sambale]

Hi,

I started this conversation in OSMPH slack but would like to open
discussion in this list.  Also apologies if this is not entirely
related to OSM but a very close project since as per Eugene's
assessment wikidata community is not very active in the Philippines.

Our team at Mapbox is pushing for completing Wikidata places
translation to several languages [0] including Filipino/Tagalog.  The
aim is to connect the two projects and leverage from the data that
both project have (location in OSM, translations in Wikidata). [1]

Eugene posted suggestions, here's our conv in Slack

maning [April 26th at 10:49 AM]
@here what's our best practice for name tagalog?  We use english names right?

seav [Apr 26]
We should use the Tagalog translation if it is available and well
attested. Examples: Maynila (Manila), Kabite (Cavite), Bulakan
(Bulacan), Hilagang Samar (Northern Samar), Alemanya (Germany),
Estados Unidos (United States), Hapon (Japan), Tsina (China).

My question is while this is desirable, is it essential for locals in
the Philippines or travelling abroad to use a navigation app with
translated places in Filipino/Tagalog.  In most cases Filipinos are
comfortable with using English names for places (e.g. "Germany"
instead of "Alemanya")

[0] 
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Planemad_mapbox/World_places_translation_project
[1] https://www.mapbox.com/blog/scaling-openstreetmap-wikidata-knowledge/

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[OSM-talk] Invitation to participate in State of the Map Asia 2017 in Kathmandu

[maning sambale]

Forwarding invitation from the SotM-Asia Organizing team, see you in Nepal!

Dear OSM community members,

We want to welcome you to State of the Map Asia 2017, which will be
organized in Kathmandu, Nepal on September 23 - 24, hosted by Kathmandu
Living Labs and OSM community of Nepal.

The event website is now live at: http://stateofthemap.asia/

A call for session proposals is now open. We will be opening calls for
travel scholarships and event registration soon. You are invited to propose
creative and informative sessions (presentations, workshop etc.) including
your country's state of the map.

We need your support to make this a successful event and help foster the
growth of OSM in Asia and beyond.

Please refer to the website for further details.

With best regards,

Kshitiz Khanal
Researcher, Open Data and OpenStreetMap
Kathmandu Living Labs


-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[talk-ph] Invitation to participate in State of the Map Asia 2017 in Kathmandu

[maning sambale]

Forwarding invitation from the SotM-Asia Organizing team, see you in Nepal!

Dear OSM community members,

We want to welcome you to State of the Map Asia 2017, which will be
organized in Kathmandu, Nepal on September 23 - 24, hosted by Kathmandu
Living Labs and OSM community of Nepal.

The event website is now live at: http://stateofthemap.asia/

A call for session proposals is now open. We will be opening calls for
travel scholarships and event registration soon. You are invited to propose
creative and informative sessions (presentations, workshop etc.) including
your country's state of the map.

We need your support to make this a successful event and help foster the
growth of OSM in Asia and beyond.

Please refer to the website for further details.

With best regards,

Kshitiz Khanal
Researcher, Open Data and OpenStreetMap
Kathmandu Living Labs


-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Batangas City data cleanup

[maning sambale]

Hi jherome,

Thanks for taking care of Batangas.

Can you post your mail here as a ticket in
https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix ill try to help fix a few i find to
be inconsistent lets also track progress in the papercutfix ticket.

Keep on mapping!


On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 at 22:51 Jherome Miguel <jheromemig...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Batangas City needs to be cleaned up, as the data there is becoming
> affected (some POI's are being affected). Most edits are being done on
> weekdays (except holidays), and most of the users are possibly city
> government employees, which have not disclosed their editing background. I
> messaged those users or commented on several changesets they did, but they
> still do not reply. There are too many data already edited for one user to
> cleanup, and other mappers should do.
>
> Here are tasks for Batangas City:
>
> 1. Monitor latest edits by local users. Please keep a monitor on
> changesets around Batangas City, and closely inspect map data being edited,
> then do the appropriate action (clean-up tags, message user, revert to a
> previous version, or leave it alone). Priority is edits by
> "imeeperezveedor" (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/imeeperezveedor),
> that I have a hard time to deal with that user's edits, as it repeatedly
> touched several POI's, and renamed them to "commercial". A few POIs and
> named buildings affected by that user's changesets include Jollibee
> (Kumintang Ilaya branch), BPI (Batangas City Jose P Laurel Highway branch),
> BDO (Batangas Rizal Avenue branch), STI Academic Center Batangas, Nuciti
> Central, Boy Scouts of the Philippines Batangas City Council, Imperial
> Appliance Plaza, N.J. Dimaano Building, Recto and Ofelia Buildings A and B,
> Junction Commercial Complex, Dayton Hotel, and Reyes Haircutters.
>
> 2. Cleanup data touched in previous changesets. Cleanup possible redundant
> tags or replace them with an appropriate tag. Revert name changes to
> existing POI's occupying buildings, and named buildings (mostly done by
> "imeeperezveedor".)
>
> Thanks,
> TagaSanPedroAko
> _______
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
-- 
Maning Sambale (mobile)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[OSM-talk] Fwd: [HOT] Call for Logos for State of the Map Asia 2017

[maning sambale]

FYI, State of the Map Asia 2017 will happen in Kathmandu Sept-Oct 2017
(dates TBD).  Please help us design the logo.

-- Forwarded message --
From: kshitiz khanal 
Date: Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:23 AM
Subject: [HOT] Call for Logos for State of the Map Asia 2017
To: h...@openstreetmap.org, sotm-a...@openstreetmap.org,
talk...@openstreetmap.org


Dear all,

The State of the Map Asia 2017 working group is pleased to announce a
call for logo designs. We need your help to build a strong
recognisable logo for State of the Map Asia 2017 (SotM Asia)
conference taking place in Kathmandu, Nepal. The conference is
OpenStreetMap’s annual gathering of the community, interested parties
and others in Asia.

We have put together a Design Brief which outlines what we were
looking for in a logo. Entrants could be an individual or team of
people, or even a design company.

All entries will be considered to give copyright ownership to SotM so
that it can be used across different mediums. Entries have to appear
on the wiki page State Of The Map Asia 2017/Logo entries by 23:59 UTC
(before midnight) on 15th of April 2017. The SotM Asia 2017 working
group will decide by vote the logo to go with.

The winning entry will be rewarded with one full weekend ticket to
State of the Map Asia 2017!

For guidelines and other details, please refer to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Call_for_logo_sotm_asia_2017


Regards,


Kshitiz Khanal

Researcher

Kathmandu Living Labs




___
HOT mailing list
h...@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-us] SF Building Height Import Mapathon (March 14, 2017) @ Mapbox SF

[maning sambale]

Hi,

We are doing a mapathon for the SF building height import at Mapbox SF office.
Details about the event here:
https://www.meetup.com/Maptime-SF/events/232888163/

Brandon Liu will lead this event.  If your in town, please join.

-- 
cheers,
maning sambale

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Duplicated buildings in the Miami building import

[maning sambale]

Hi,

To the import team,  great job in importing the buildings in Miami.
While validating the changesets using
[OSMCha](https://osmcha.mapbox.com/), I came across one
[changeset](https://osmcha.mapbox.com/46393859/) where I found some
overlapping and duplicate buildings.

Please advise mappers to run the validator in JOSM before uploading
the data to OSM. Also,  there maybe cases when the mapper indeed ran
the Validator but did not detect any errors.  To fix this, always
uncheck 'Use ignore list' in your JOSM preferences.  See this:
https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/170#issuecomment-277603950

List of edits with a #miabuildings changeset comment
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/?comment__icontains=%23miabuildings+_suspect=False_whitelisted=All=False=All



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Open Building datasets for San Jose, Fremont and Berkeley

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Recently we came across three open buildings datasets for San Jose[1],
Berkeley[2] and Fremont[3]. We have evaluated the quality of each of
the datasets and found them to have good coverage and building
extrusions match recent satellite imagery. We have updated the wiki[4]
with the above sources for California.


- San Jose: 
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1933377/22969874/09901660-f396-11e6-93a9-225dfab1ccc9.png
- Berkeley: 
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1933377/22469786/28cb43b4-e7f3-11e6-979c-0fcc27cea67d.png
- Fremont: 
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1933377/22917071/97fb3536-f2a8-11e6-885c-26a5f0a6ce14.png

The datasets for San Jose and Berkeley also contain building heights
and that of San Jose contains building parts as well.

- Building part details in San Jose:
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1933377/22919803/e374ba8c-f2b7-11e6-9d03-3693401851fe.png

Our team would be happy to collaborate if you are open to importing
these datasets to OpenStreetMap.

[1] - http://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?NID=3308

[2] - https://data.cityofberkeley.info/City-Government/Roofprints-2006/gnp8-t9x8

[3] - 
http://egis-cofgis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/5b4a263844634084af2001f82a5174a5_0

[4] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potential_Datasources#California



-- 
cheers,
Maning
Data, Mapbox

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Creating dual-carraigeways where there are existing oute relations

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Our team at Mapbox has been adding turn lanes in several cities in the
US. In some cases, bi-directional roads need to be converted to
dual-carriageways when there is a physical separation.  However, we
are finding it difficult to create dual-carriageways since most major
roads already have route relations and there is a danger of breaking
route relations.

We are documenting the process here:
https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/180#issuecomment-279367407
Would love the community's inputs on how we can avoid relation breakage.

-- 
cheers,
Maning Sambale
Data, Mapbox

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-TW] Working together in improving Taiwan roads

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Final update on this realignment effort.

We completed the realignment project by validating 42 TM projects
covering (~70%) of mainland Taiwan.
See srividya's diary here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/srividya_c/diary/39839

Along with this, we also updated the offset database for areas we
encountered that Bing imagery has an offset, see:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BharataHS/diary/39752

One more cleanup task is needed which is the overlap of buildings and
roads this is available as a tofix task for the community:
http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/task/crossinghighwaysandbuildings

We will work on this in the coming weeks but the majority of
realigning effort is done.

In behalf of the Mapbox data team, we would like to thank the TW
community for supporting this project.
We are looking forward for more collaboration in the future.  Thank again!



Maning Sambale
Data, Mapbox

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:16 PM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick note to keep the community updated on this.
>
> Today we are wrapping-up re-alignment of Taiwan roads using
> Bing/Mapbox and Strava.
> We created 42 TM projects covering 25K km^2 (~70%) of mainland Taiwan.
> Approximately 57K kms of roads (48% OSM roads) were improved. We will
> continue validating and we appreciate if the community will help as
> well.
>
> As always please don't hesitate to comment on our mapping ticket:
> https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/233
>
> BTW, it was great to personally meet several OSMers of Taiwan at
> SOTM-Asia 2016 in Manila.  Looking forward for more collaboration with
> your awesome community in the future.
>
>
> Maning Sambale
> Data, Mapbox



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-TW mailing list
Talk-TW@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Re: [talk-ph] [HOT] Fwd: Ilocos Norte Mapping in light of Typhoon Lawin / Haima

[maning sambale]

Thanks for this Ervin.  @hotties, this will be a local pre-crisis
activation and can escalate (hopefully not) after we get better idea
in the coming days.  Everyone is invited to participate of course.

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Ervin Malicdem  wrote:
> Forwarding for request for mapping on extreme northern Luzon in the
> Philippine due to Super Typhoon Haima.
>
> Ervin M.
> Schadow1 Expeditions - A Filipino must not be a stranger to his own
> motherland.
> http://www.s1expeditions.com
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ervin Malicdem 
> Date: Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:11 AM
> Subject: Ilocos Norte Mapping in light of Typhoon Lawin / Haima
> To: OSM-PH 
>
>
> Good day to the OSM Community here in the Philippines.
>
> In light of the incoming typhoon Haima / Lawin which is predicted to
> landfall in extreme northern Luzon at CAT5 strength, we encourage everyone
> to map in OpenStreetMap preferably in the areas of Cagayan Valley and Ilocos
> Norte.
>
> As of this time , Ilocos Norte has a current HOT Task which you can take and
> help us in mapping.
>
> This task is led by Project NOAH and the Philippine Heritage Map.
> http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1996
>
> Starting tomorrow, Schadow1 Expeditions will release a daily update of the
> activation version of the Philippine GPS routable map for this purpose to
> mirror the efforts of the mapping task we are working on which can be used
> by relief and rescue operations. It is downloadable here
> http://www.s1expeditions.com/p/openstreetmaps.html
>
> Ervin M.
> Schadow1 Expeditions - A Filipino must not be a stranger to his own
> motherland.
> http://www.s1expeditions.com
>
>
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> h...@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [Talk-TW] Working together in improving Taiwan roads

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Related to our previous email and diary, we have been realigning roads
for several areas in Taiwan.  Last week, we have modified 2,500 km of
roads.  Here's a map:

https://api.mapbox.com/styles/v1/maning/cisit2qu700392wnv88ytg6bs.html?fresh=true=true_token=pk.eyJ1IjoibWFuaW5nIiwiYSI6IlhjWGNfdTQifQ.ras0nImWG638BCDSxU8bqw#6.78/23.750/121.673

You may have seen some of our edits around your neighbourhood. If you
notice any issues don't hesitate to comment on any of our changesets.
 Some of you did already [0 & 1], thank you very much!

After last week's trial run, we are going to continue our realigning
by focusing on areas that has updated imagery from Mapbox Satellite.
We invite everyone to join.
We coordinate using github: https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/233


cheers,

Maning Sambale
Data, Mapbox

[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/712784
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42318873


On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Pierre Equoy <pierre.eq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Srividya!
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Srividya Bharadwaj <srivi...@mapbox.com> 
> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> As discussed earlier by Maning [0], we reviewed alignment of current
>> OpenStreetMap data and imagery available for tracing with Strava GPS traces.
>> I posted my observations in my diary [1].  As a result of our review, our
>> satellite team at Mapbox updated our imagery for several cities in Taiwan
>> [2].  All our Mapbox Satellite imagery is open for tracing in OpenStreetMap.
>> We hope the community will find this useful in improving the data.  This is
>> just a start and we are excited to work together with the TW-OSM community.
>
> Thanks a lot for these updates and for the article in your diary!
>
>
>
> --
> Pierre Equoy



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-TW mailing list
Talk-TW@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Re: [Talk-TW] Working together in improving Taiwan roads

[maning sambale]

; https://trello.com/c/4vpR36Wp/56-osmose-1-0-2016-04-09
> [11] Road tagging system in Taiwan -
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan/Taiwan_tagging#Trunk_Roads_.2F_Expressways
> [12] General Purpose Map in WMS/WMTS 臺灣通用電子地圖(不含等高線) -
> http://data.moi.gov.tw/moiod/Data/DataDetail.aspx?oid=EAF031FB-8834-4947-91A0-4BDA69342785
> [13] General Purpose Map with contour line in WMS/WMTS
> 臺灣通用電子地圖(套疊等高線，比例尺小於一萬八千分之一) -
> http://data.moi.gov.tw/moiod/Data/DataDetail.aspx?oid=067C5474-539C-45D4-A743-55A7C6113511
> [14] General Orthoimage Map in WMS/WMTS 臺灣通用電子地圖正射影像 -
> http://data.moi.gov.tw/moiod/Data/DataDetail.aspx?oid=D9E44C4B-A5CD-4E44-BBF7-0C208513FA8E
>
> Cheers
> -Rex
>
> 2016-09-08 2:11 GMT+08:00 Dennis Raylin Chen <b92612...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi Maning
>>
>> It's great to see Mapbox improving the data quality. I saw there are several
>> Mapbox accounts using the QA tool to fix small errors in Taiwan some times
>> ago.
>>
>> I'm curious about how will Mapbox do to improve the data quality, especially
>> to enhance the navigation part. And what the local community can do to help?
>>
>> Dennis
>> aka Supaplex
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:06 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 你好!
>>>
>>> I'm Maning Sambale from Mapbox.  Our data team is looking at improving
>>> road network for Taiwan in OpenStreetMap, this is similar to what we
>>> did in Japan [0] last year.  This initiative is part of our mission to
>>> make OpenStreetMap more navigable.
>>>
>>> We are in the early stages of research and we will share our findings
>>> soon.  Initially, we are seeing the following:
>>>
>>> * Road coverage is very good especially for the major cities on the
>>> west coast of the country.
>>> * There were alignment issues in some major roads when compared to
>>> Strava heat map (our team fixed some of them last week).
>>> * It's difficult to use current Bing imagery because its old and they
>>> are not aligned to Strava in some areas.
>>>
>>> Before we proceed, it would be great to discuss with everyone here on
>>> how we can work together.  I'd be happy to discuss in a conference
>>> call if needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> [0] https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/120
>>>
>>> 多謝
>>>
>>> Maning Sambale
>>> Data team, Mapbox
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Talk-TW mailing list
>>> Talk-TW@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-TW mailing list
>> Talk-TW@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
>>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-TW mailing list
Talk-TW@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

[OSM-talk] Scholarship applications for SOTM-Asia 2016, Manila Philippines

[maning sambale]

Hi,

We are happy to announce that the scholarship applications for
SOTM-Asia 2016 is now open!  Details here:

http://stateofthemap.asia/scholarship.html

We are looking for 4 community mappers and excited to hear their
stories during the conference.  See you in Manila in October!



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[talk-ph] Scholarship applications for SOTM-Asia 2016, Manila Philippines

[maning sambale]

Hi,

We are happy to announce that the scholarship applications for
SOTM-Asia 2016 is now open!  Details here:

http://stateofthemap.asia/scholarship.html

We are looking for 4 community mappers and excited to hear their
stories during the conference.  See you in Manila in October!



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[Talk-us] (Cleanup of LABuilding import (was Re: [Imports] Updates:LA County building import (Los Angeles, California, USA))

[maning sambale]

Hi,

After validation via TM [0], we will implement a series of cleanup[1]
for several issues during the import.  Details on each cleanup will be
documented in the respective ticket and also updated in the wiki later
on. I'm reading the Automated Edits CoC [2] right now and I have a few
questions.

Some cleanup require manual review by the community like the split
buildings, we are proposing they use their previous import account
(username_labuildings) using a micro tasking interface like
maproulette or to-fix.

Others can be scripted like mistagged condos this requires some
scripting knowledge and we want specific users to do this.

Do we need a separate mechanical edit account or their own import
account is enough to do this?

Ideas welcome.



[0] http://labuildingsimport.com
[1] 
https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Acleanup
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:56 PM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Christoph,
>
> Thank you for the observation.
>
> Specific to "roads now intersect buildings indicating that mapping is
> inaccurate - like here:"
> They are mostly unreviewed TIGER import, I also saw one instance where
> we have building but no roads.
> This was already discussed by the import team and will be fixed during
> the cleanup/validation stage.
>
> Keep your  comments and suggestions coming! Will ticket each one and
> fix whatever we can.
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Christoph Hormann <chris_horm...@gmx.de> 
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 19 July 2016, maning sambale wrote:
>>>
>>> Another round of updates on LABuildings import.
>>> Last week we've imported ~1.1M buildings in LA City. Over 100
>>> usernames participated.
>>> We are close to finishing Phase 1 (LA City) and will continue data QA
>>> and cleanup if needed.
>>
>> A few observations from looking over the map there:
>>
>> * There are quite a few cases where gaps between buildings are either
>> very small (significantly less than a meter) or buildings touch at a
>> single node.  Both are usually artefacts (probably primarily due to
>> roof based rather than footprint based outlines).
>> * There seem to be a lot of cases where garages and sheds are tagged as
>> building=house or building=residential - like here:
>>
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409191451
>>
>> * In some cases boundaries of pre-existing landuse polygons (like
>> landuse=residential/landuse=industrial) and roads now intersect
>> buildings indicating that mapping is inaccurate - like here:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/34.07461/-118.48376
>>
>> All of these problems could probably be turned into maproulette tasks or
>> be otherwise worked into QA tools - although at least the first two
>> will require on-the-ground assessment for proper correction.
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Hormann
>> http://www.imagico.de/
>>
>> ___
>> Imports mailing list
>> impo...@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Updates:LA County building import (Los Angeles, California, USA)

[maning sambale]

Christoph,

Thank you for the observation.

Specific to "roads now intersect buildings indicating that mapping is
inaccurate - like here:"
They are mostly unreviewed TIGER import, I also saw one instance where
we have building but no roads.
This was already discussed by the import team and will be fixed during
the cleanup/validation stage.

Keep your  comments and suggestions coming! Will ticket each one and
fix whatever we can.
Thanks!


On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Christoph Hormann <chris_horm...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 July 2016, maning sambale wrote:
>>
>> Another round of updates on LABuildings import.
>> Last week we've imported ~1.1M buildings in LA City. Over 100
>> usernames participated.
>> We are close to finishing Phase 1 (LA City) and will continue data QA
>> and cleanup if needed.
>
> A few observations from looking over the map there:
>
> * There are quite a few cases where gaps between buildings are either
> very small (significantly less than a meter) or buildings touch at a
> single node.  Both are usually artefacts (probably primarily due to
> roof based rather than footprint based outlines).
> * There seem to be a lot of cases where garages and sheds are tagged as
> building=house or building=residential - like here:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409191451
>
> * In some cases boundaries of pre-existing landuse polygons (like
> landuse=residential/landuse=industrial) and roads now intersect
> buildings indicating that mapping is inaccurate - like here:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/34.07461/-118.48376
>
> All of these problems could probably be turned into maproulette tasks or
> be otherwise worked into QA tools - although at least the first two
> will require on-the-ground assessment for proper correction.
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann
> http://www.imagico.de/
>
> ___
> Imports mailing list
> impo...@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Updates:LA County building import (Los Angeles, California, USA)

[maning sambale]

Hi everyone,

Another round of updates on LABuildings import.
Last week we've imported ~1.1M buildings in LA City. Over 100
usernames participated.
We are close to finishing Phase 1 (LA City) and will continue data QA
and cleanup if needed.

We've posted OSM diaries on the process:
- On tools we built: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/manings/diary/38969
- On the data: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/manings/diary/39081

As always comments, from the community is appreciated.
- Github - https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues/
- Chat - https://gitter.im/osmlab/labuildings
- Wiki - 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Los_angeles,_California/Buildings_Import



On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:07 PM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Over the past month, since we started the LA building import [0],
> ~330K buildings were added by 74 different users [1]. We ran several
> mapathon events [2] in LA to kickstart the import with local mappers.
>
> As this has been going on we've been validating the work, and fixing
> any data quality issues we've encountered. If you have specific concerns,
> please post in the repo [3].
>
> The OSM Operations group has asked that we pause on all large mapping
> import activities for the next two weeks as they prepare for the
> upcoming
> server move. Since we are adding thousands of nodes for each changeset,
> this is slowing down the backup process.
>
> We will update the list once we get the green light again. [4]
>
> [0] 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Los_angeles,_California/Buildings_Import
> [1] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/lacounty:ain#overview
> [2] http://www.meetup.com/MaptimeLA/
> [3] https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues
> [4] https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues/88
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:48 PM, maning sambale
> <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We've started the import this during MaptimeLA [0] last April 2.
>> First project focused on Southside LA [1].
>> For any issues regarding the process and the data please post a ticket
>> in GH [2].
>>
>> [0] http://www.meetup.com/MaptimeLA/events/229861154/
>> [1] http://labuildingsimport.com/project/2
>> [2] https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Christoph Hormann
>> <chris_horm...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> On Thursday 24 March 2016, maning sambale wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > - Tagging still looks vague.  What you have on
>>>> > https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/blob/master/README.md is just
>>>> > a list of OSM keys to use but there is no information on the values
>>>> > -
>>>>
>>>> Right, I updated the wiki to describe the tags.  Still a work in
>>>> progress, but see here:
>>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Los_angeles,_California/Buildings
>>>>_Import#Data_Preparation
>>>
>>> Thanks, this clarifies things a lot and mostly looks good.
>>>
>>> Regarding tagging plans please consider that building=farm is
>>> exclusively for residential building on a farm, not for other buildings
>>> with farming related use.
>>>
>>>> The initial offset we saw was due to re-projection issues from NAD83
>>>> to WGS84 datum.  By using a custom projection parameters the
>>>> difference is very minimal difference (10 micrometer precision
>>>> range). Reprojection is now step is now added in the wiki.
>>>
>>> OK. I was also concerned about vertical datum (i.e. reference geoid) for
>>> elevation values and feet vs. meters for ele and height.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christoph Hormann
>>> http://www.imagico.de/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> cheers,
>> maning
>> --
>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
>> --
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[OSM-ja] Join State of the Map Asia October 1-2, 2016 in Manila, Philippines

[maning sambale]

Dear everyone,

[crosspost]

We are happy to announce that the 2nd State of the Map Asia will
happen in Manila, Philippines on October 1-2, 2016. Two days in the
Philippines with talks, discussions, and workshops all around the free
and open map of the world.

This is a free event (no registration fee), if you plan to join, head
over to the website to register.

http://stateofthemap.asia/

Call for proposal/prsentations is here: http://stateofthemap.asia/program.html

In the coming weeks, we will announce the scholarship applications and
other details. We are also looking for sponsors to cover for food and
other expenses needed to make this awesome.  If you are interested,
please contact: osmpilipinas+sotmasia2...@gmail.com

We hope the OSM community in Asia and all over the world can join.

Maning Sambale
In behalf of the SOTM-Asia 2016 Organizing Team

___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

[OSM-talk] Join State of the Map Asia October 1-2, 2016 in Manila, Philippines

[maning sambale]

Dear everyone,

We are happy to announce that the 2nd State of the Map Asia will
happen in Manila, Philippines on October 1-2, 2016. Two days in the
Philippines with talks, discussions, and workshops all around the free
and open map of the world.

This is a free event (no registration fee), if you plan to join, head
over to the website to register.

http://stateofthemap.asia/

In the coming weeks, we will announce the call for proposals,
scholarship applications and other details. We are also looking for
sponsors to cover for food and other expenses needed to make this
awesome. If you are interested, please contact:
osmpilipinas+sotmasia2...@gmail.com

We hope the OSM community in Asia and all over the world can join.


Maning Sambale
In behalf of the SOTM-Asia 2016 Organizing Team

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[talk-ph] Join State of the Map Asia October 1-2, 2016 in Manila, Philippines

[maning sambale]

Dear everyone,

We are happy to announce that the 2nd State of the Map Asia will
happen in Manila, Philippines on October 1-2, 2016. Two days in the
Philippines with talks, discussions, and workshops all around the free
and open map of the world.

This is a free event (no registration fee), if you plan to join, head
over to the website to register.

http://stateofthemap.asia/

In the coming weeks, we will announce the call for proposals,
scholarship applications and other details. We are also looking for
sponsors to cover for food and other expenses needed to make this
awesome. If you are interested, please contact:
osmpilipinas+sotmasia2...@gmail.com

We hope the OSM community in Asia and all over the world can join.


Maning Sambale
In behalf of the SOTM-Asia 2016 Organizing Team

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Updated node density maps

[maning sambale]

Thanks for this Eugene.  Interesting that Metro Manila is still getting updated.

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar  wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've completed the node density maps for 2015 and 2016-to-date:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Node_density_maps
>
> Some things that I've noticed:
> - 2016 Q1 shows activity due to HOT tasks #1129 (Missing Maps - Leyte),
> #1636 (Project NOAH - Cavite), and #1684 (Project NOAH - Camiguin)
> - 2015 Q4 shows a lot of activity in La Union and Benguet. I don't know
> what's the reason.
> - 2015 Q2 shows the activity from the Luzon roads mapping project
>
> ~Eugene
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] SotM: Call for session proposals and Scholarship fund

[maning sambale]

-- Forwarded message --
From: Ben Abelshausen 
Date: Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:24 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] SotM: Call for session proposals and Scholarship fund
To: osm 


Hi all,

I'm delighted to report that the planning for State of the Map 2016 is
going well. We have now opened the call for session proposals
(presentations). You have until Saturday 21st May to submit your idea.

Please see:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/04/19/propose-your-session-to-state-of-the-map-2016/

We have also opened the scholarship programme. This has the same
deadline so don't hesitate. The option is there if you need it so
don’t let the cost of travel stand in your way!
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/04/25/we-want-you-at-state-of-the-map-apply-for-a-scholarship/

Hope to see many of you in Brussels! :-)

Best regards,
Ben

p.s. There are still sponsorship opportunities should your business
want to support OSM via this route. If interested drop us a note.

___
talk mailing list
t...@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[Talk-us] Updates:LA County building import (Los Angeles, California, USA)

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Over the past month, since we started the LA building import [0],
~330K buildings were added by 74 different users [1]. We ran several
mapathon events [2] in LA to kickstart the import with local mappers.

As this has been going on we've been validating the work, and fixing
any data quality issues we've encountered. If you have specific concerns,
please post in the repo [3].

The OSM Operations group has asked that we pause on all large mapping
import activities for the next two weeks as they prepare for the
upcoming
server move. Since we are adding thousands of nodes for each changeset,
this is slowing down the backup process.

We will update the list once we get the green light again. [4]

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Los_angeles,_California/Buildings_Import
[1] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/lacounty:ain#overview
[2] http://www.meetup.com/MaptimeLA/
[3] https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues
[4] https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues/88

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:48 PM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've started the import this during MaptimeLA [0] last April 2.
> First project focused on Southside LA [1].
> For any issues regarding the process and the data please post a ticket
> in GH [2].
>
> [0] http://www.meetup.com/MaptimeLA/events/229861154/
> [1] http://labuildingsimport.com/project/2
> [2] https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Christoph Hormann
> <chris_horm...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> On Thursday 24 March 2016, maning sambale wrote:
>>>
>>> > - Tagging still looks vague.  What you have on
>>> > https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/blob/master/README.md is just
>>> > a list of OSM keys to use but there is no information on the values
>>> > -
>>>
>>> Right, I updated the wiki to describe the tags.  Still a work in
>>> progress, but see here:
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Los_angeles,_California/Buildings
>>>_Import#Data_Preparation
>>
>> Thanks, this clarifies things a lot and mostly looks good.
>>
>> Regarding tagging plans please consider that building=farm is
>> exclusively for residential building on a farm, not for other buildings
>> with farming related use.
>>
>>> The initial offset we saw was due to re-projection issues from NAD83
>>> to WGS84 datum.  By using a custom projection parameters the
>>> difference is very minimal difference (10 micrometer precision
>>> range). Reprojection is now step is now added in the wiki.
>>
>> OK. I was also concerned about vertical datum (i.e. reference geoid) for
>> elevation values and feet vs. meters for ele and height.
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Hormann
>> http://www.imagico.de/
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[OSM-talk] well mapped area for area navigation

[maning sambale]

Hi,

I'm looking for an area to test navigation in light with the new OSRM
v5 release [0]. Can anyone recommend an area which you think is
"navigation complete" in OSM?

Of course, "navigation complete means" different for different people,
here I define navigation for car.  So I'm looking for an area that has
"complete" map for:

- roads and names
- oneways
- traffic signals
- turn restrictions (including conditional turn restrictions)
- turn lanes (including bike lanes)
- speed limits
- exit signs and destinations for motorways

Advance thanks!

[0] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2016-April/001184.html

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [talk-latam] [activation hotosm] Re: Terremoto Ecuador - TMS Ortoimágenes IGM / IGM orthoimages

[maning sambale]

Hola,

I also compiled a list of all the orthophotos from
http://www.geoportaligm.gob.ec/portal/index.php/catalogo-de-datos/

The gist URL opens automatically in JOSM:

https://gist.github.com/maning/da747dd283909b66950503eae4532517


2016-04-18 16:05 GMT+05:30 Jean-Guilhem Cailton :
> Hola, (in English below)
>
> Aquí están capas TMS agrupando imágenes del WMS del Instituto Geográfico
> Militar (IGM) de Ecuador. Como a veces hay "partes blancas" alrededor de las
> imágenes que pueden esconder el contenido de otras imágenes, hay varios
> grupos.
>
> Ocho imágenes seleccionadas ayer con Daniel, Humberto y Fred:
> http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/ecuador_orto/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
> Una cobertura por cuadrícula de imágenes (que aparecen ser de 2014) :
> http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/ecuador_orto_grid/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
> Otras imágenes de 2014 :
> http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/ecuador_orto_2014/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
> imágenes de 2015 :
> http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/ecuador_orto_2015/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
> Una capa con todas estas (escondiéndose a veces) :
> http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/ecuador_orto_todo/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
> Cada imagen puede accederse también sola en WMS (en JOSM), desde :
>
> http://www.geoportaligm.gob.ec/orto/wms?service=wms=1.3.0=GetCapabilities
>
>
> Saludos
>
> -
>
> Hi,
>
> TMS layers grouping images from Instituto Geográfico Militar (IGM) de
> Ecuador are available. As some "white parts" around the images can sometimes
> cover the content of other images, several groupings are available.
>
> Eight images selected yesterday by Daniel:
> http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/ecuador_orto/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
> A grid cover (that appears to have been taken in 2014):
> http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/ecuador_orto_grid/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
> Other images taken in 2014:
> http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/ecuador_orto_2014/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
> Images taken in 2015 :
> http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/ecuador_orto_2015/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
> A layer with all the above (which sometimes hide each other):
> http://imagery.openstreetmap.fr/tms/1.0.0/ecuador_orto_todo/{zoom}/{x}/{y}
>
> Each image can also be accessed individually via WMS (in JOSM), from:
>
> http://www.geoportaligm.gob.ec/orto/wms?service=wms=1.3.0=GetCapabilities
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Jean-Guilhem
>
>
> Le 17/04/2016 22:27, temporalista a écrit :
>
> Gracias a todos por su apoyo. Estamos ya coordinando con Humberto de HOT y
> las organizaciones de gobierno. Les mantendremos al tanto.
>
> Daniel.
>
> 2016-04-17 15:21 GMT-05:00 Johnattan Rupire :
>>
>> Desde la comunidad de Perú también nos sumamos,gracias Miryam por abrir el
>> hilo,quedamos atentos
>>
>> El 17 de abril de 2016 15:18:16 GMT-05:00, "Gonzales, Miriam - (p)"
>>  escribió:
>>>
>>> Hola comunidad mapera,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Desafortunadamente el día de ayer  hubo un temblor de 7.8 grados en
>>> Ecuador, al momento van más de 200 muertos, más de 1500 heridos y un número
>>> no determinado de desaparecidos. Se solicita que la comunidad mapera de MX y
>>> LatAm ayudemos con las labores de mapeo y así apoyar al pueblo de Ecuador,
>>> les comparto abajo los links del Wiki y de la Tarea HOT.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> De antemano gracias por su apoyo,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:2016_Ecuador_earthquake
>>>
>>> http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1794
>>>
>>> 
>
> -- "Je pense, avec Pascal, que le zèle est étrange « qui s'irrite contre
> ceux qui accusent des fautes publiques, et non pas contre ceux qui les
> commettent »." Marc Bloch "I think, with Pascal, that it is a strange zeal «
> which chafes against those who accuse public faults, and not against those
> who commit them »."
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Activation Working Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to activation+unsubscr...@hotosm.org.
> To post to this group, send email to activat...@hotosm.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/hotosm.org/d/msgid/activation/5714B875.2050204%40arkemie.org.



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-latam mailing list
talk-latam@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-latam

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] RFC: LA County building import (Los Angeles, California, USA)

[maning sambale]

Hi,

We've started the import this during MaptimeLA [0] last April 2.
First project focused on Southside LA [1].
For any issues regarding the process and the data please post a ticket
in GH [2].

[0] http://www.meetup.com/MaptimeLA/events/229861154/
[1] http://labuildingsimport.com/project/2
[2] https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues


On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Christoph Hormann
<chris_horm...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 24 March 2016, maning sambale wrote:
>>
>> > - Tagging still looks vague.  What you have on
>> > https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/blob/master/README.md is just
>> > a list of OSM keys to use but there is no information on the values
>> > -
>>
>> Right, I updated the wiki to describe the tags.  Still a work in
>> progress, but see here:
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Los_angeles,_California/Buildings
>>_Import#Data_Preparation
>
> Thanks, this clarifies things a lot and mostly looks good.
>
> Regarding tagging plans please consider that building=farm is
> exclusively for residential building on a farm, not for other buildings
> with farming related use.
>
>> The initial offset we saw was due to re-projection issues from NAD83
>> to WGS84 datum.  By using a custom projection parameters the
>> difference is very minimal difference (10 micrometer precision
>> range). Reprojection is now step is now added in the wiki.
>
> OK. I was also concerned about vertical datum (i.e. reference geoid) for
> elevation values and feet vs. meters for ele and height.
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann
> http://www.imagico.de/



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [OSM-talk] Redaction or revertion?

[maning sambale]

Thanks Martin and Frederik for the clarification.

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/23/2016 08:19 AM, maning sambale wrote:
>> I'm aware that redaction is only for DWG dedicated accounts.  What's
>> the best practice/criteria for redaction?
>
> Edits that are *reverted* will stop showing on everything that is based
> on the current version of our data (map, search, routing, editors etc)
> and they will also not be findable with search engines.
>
> But they can still be retrieved through (a) requesting the object
> history from the API, (b) downloading a (current) full history planet
> file, (c) downloading an older planet snapshot or planet history file,
> (d) requesting the history from downstream services that store it (I
> believe Overpass is such a service).
>
> Edits that are *redacted* (note: only non-current versions of an object
> can be redacted) will be suppressed by the API and hence vanish from the
> methods (a) and (b) mentioned above; they will still be accessible by
> the methods (c) and (d) because we don't retroactively change old planet
> files that might have contained a problematic edit.
>
> We will usually consider redaction if someone has uploaded content that
> should remain secret (eg the location of a shelter for victims of
> domestic abuse), is grossly offensive, or constitutes a large and
> obvious violation of someone else's copyright.
>
> On minor copyright violations (user uploads 10 houses with
> source=Google, we tell him that's not allowed, he says sorry and deletes
> the houses again) we usually don't bother with a redaction, although if
> the copyright holder were to complain we would have to execute one. (If
> a copyright holder were to really really complain we'd even have to
> remove old planet files and old history planets that contain the
> problematic data from our servers but this hasn't happened yet.[*])
>
> Redactions are more of a last resort and not a routine tool; they make
> working with the data more difficult hence we try to avoid them when not
> necessary.
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> [*] There was one incident long, long ago where several old planet files
> were re-written to leave out a large amount of data for a Baltic country
> that had been illegaly imported.
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Redaction or revertion?

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Just want to be clear whenever I report something that I think is harmful edit.
When should I propose revertion or redaction?

I'm aware that redaction is only for DWG dedicated accounts.  What's
the best practice/criteria for redaction?

Thanks!
-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [talk-ph] Various farmed landuses

[maning sambale]

Thanks for this work David!

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:38 PM, David Groom <revi...@pacific-rim.net> wrote:
> Hopefully fixing the geometries in this area is now complete
>
> David
>
>
> On 19/03/2016 17:53, David Groom wrote:
>>
>> Its now been one month with no major objections to my proopesed cnages, so
>> I have made them, but with the suggestion made by Eugene.
>>
>> However the exisiting geometry of the landuse polygons is very messy, with
>> many overlapping ways.  I am fixing these, but with over 230 ways to fix I
>> wont able to do this all in one editing session, and probably not even all
>> in one day.
>>
>> The affected area is SW of Tacloban, Leyte at
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/11.1154/124.8905
>>
>> If anyone notices the half fixed geometry do not think this is vanadalsim,
>> or poor editing, it will be fixed.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On 14/02/2016 13:53, maning sambale wrote:
>>>
>>> Agree with Eugene. There are other who mapped riceland as meadows and
>>> should be fixed as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/489780
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I agree with changes 2 and 3. For #1, I think it should be
>>>> landuse=farmland instead of meadow. Rice fields are far from being
>>>> meadows.
>>>>
>>>> On 2/14/16, David Groom <revi...@pacific-rim.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> While looking at existing tagging of landuse areas in Leyte I have come
>>>>> across a number which do not seem to fit the tagging structure on the
>>>>> main OSM wiki, and I cant see anything in the Philippines/Mapping
>>>>> conventions  which contradicts the main OSM wiki (except that under
>>>>> agricultural landuse the tag landuse = farm is suggested whereas this
>>>>> seems to have been deprecated in favour of landuse = farmland  -  maybe
>>>>> the Phillipine / mapping conventions page is out of date?)
>>>>>
>>>>> An example of some of the current tagging can be seen here:
>>>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/11.1121/124.8899
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to change the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Areas currently tagged landuse = meadow; name = Ricefield   - change
>>>>> to landuse = meadow; crop=rice [1]
>>>>> 2) Areas currently tagged landuse = farmland; name = Coco Land   -
>>>>> change to landuse = orchard;  trees = coconut_palms [2]
>>>>> 3) Areas currently tagged landuse = orchard; crop = coconut - change to
>>>>> landuse = orchard;  trees = coconut_palms [2]
>>>>>
>>>>> Are these 3 changes acceptable?
>>>>>
>>>>> My one slight discomfort is that I dont like the way crop = rice is
>>>>> rendered on the map, but then we should't be tagging for the rennderers
>>>>> anyway!
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crop
>>>>> [2]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trees
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>>>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
>
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] [OSM-talk] Reporting a potential vandal (bryanpiczon)

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Some updates on this case.  The OSM-PH community and others have
reverted many of the changes made by this user (details is tracked in
this ticket [0] ). For older edits we cannot do a full revert since
many were probably touched by other users already, so we are doing
manual reviews. In addition to the listed user accounts, we noticed a
new user account of similar behavior [1].  We added them in the list
and we have reverted most this user's edits already.

We feel this person won't stop unless we revert edits right away.

[0] https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
[1] ttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user/asalasangkay/history#map=7/9.070/125.035

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:35 PM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you confirming bad edits in other areas.  We will raise this to DWG now.
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Most of the changesets I've looked at so far have been highly
>> suspicious and there is definitely a lot of damage to the map still
>> out there from this user. A few examples:
>>
>> He tagged a random industrial building as the "South Shore Plaza" mall:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29661237
>>
>> South Shore Plaza is a well known upscale mall and already mapped here:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44123566
>>
>> He tagged a building near the Lincoln Monument as a Burger King:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66418664
>>
>> Added a place=city node for Boston in the wrong location (and this
>> place=city node already exists in the correct place)
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4000134306
>>
>> Have you contacted the Data Working Group? They can at least issue a
>> ban that he must look at before being able to edit any more and
>> potentially revert all of the changes at once. I am adding them to
>> this email.
>>
>> Toby
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:38 AM, maning sambale
>> <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The OSM-PH community have been monitoring who we suspect as a vandal
>>> using several accounts.  While in the past he mostly edit in the PH,
>>> we feel that the larger community should monitor since he has edited
>>> in other parts of the world.  Most recently, the National Mall in
>>> Washington, DC.
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37139218#map=15/38.8883/-77.0313
>>>
>>> We strongly believe that this person is a vandal, but would like to
>>> confirm the scale and impact to other parts of the world.
>>>
>>> See summary of our notes here:
>>> https://gist.github.com/maning/d76192c4a2cf5ba34c4c
>>>
>>> Raw document and some sample cases here:
>>> https://hackpad.com/Bryan-Picson-Z5Px9SzYNQC
>>>
>>> --
>>> cheers,
>>> maning in behalf of OSM-PH
>>> --
>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
>>> --
>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk mailing list
>>> t...@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [OSM-talk] Reporting a potential vandal (bryanpiczon)

[maning sambale]

Hi,

Some updates on this case.  The OSM-PH community and others have
reverted many of the changes made by this user (details is tracked in
this ticket [0] ). For older edits we cannot do a full revert since
many were probably touched by other users already, so we are doing
manual reviews. In addition to the listed user accounts, we noticed a
new user account of similar behavior [1].  We added them in the list
and we have reverted most this user's edits already.

We feel this person won't stop unless we revert edits right away.

[0] https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
[1] ttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user/asalasangkay/history#map=7/9.070/125.035

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:35 PM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you confirming bad edits in other areas.  We will raise this to DWG now.
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Most of the changesets I've looked at so far have been highly
>> suspicious and there is definitely a lot of damage to the map still
>> out there from this user. A few examples:
>>
>> He tagged a random industrial building as the "South Shore Plaza" mall:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29661237
>>
>> South Shore Plaza is a well known upscale mall and already mapped here:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44123566
>>
>> He tagged a building near the Lincoln Monument as a Burger King:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66418664
>>
>> Added a place=city node for Boston in the wrong location (and this
>> place=city node already exists in the correct place)
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4000134306
>>
>> Have you contacted the Data Working Group? They can at least issue a
>> ban that he must look at before being able to edit any more and
>> potentially revert all of the changes at once. I am adding them to
>> this email.
>>
>> Toby
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:38 AM, maning sambale
>> <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The OSM-PH community have been monitoring who we suspect as a vandal
>>> using several accounts.  While in the past he mostly edit in the PH,
>>> we feel that the larger community should monitor since he has edited
>>> in other parts of the world.  Most recently, the National Mall in
>>> Washington, DC.
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37139218#map=15/38.8883/-77.0313
>>>
>>> We strongly believe that this person is a vandal, but would like to
>>> confirm the scale and impact to other parts of the world.
>>>
>>> See summary of our notes here:
>>> https://gist.github.com/maning/d76192c4a2cf5ba34c4c
>>>
>>> Raw document and some sample cases here:
>>> https://hackpad.com/Bryan-Picson-Z5Px9SzYNQC
>>>
>>> --
>>> cheers,
>>> maning in behalf of OSM-PH
>>> --
>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
>>> --
>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM 292

[maning sambale]

-- Forwarded message --
From: Jinal Foflia 
Date: Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:46 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM 292
To: t...@openstreetmap.org


The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 292, is now available online
in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the
OpenStreetMap world:

http://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/6959

Among others:

What plans for weekend? You might want to get out and know the world
around you through field mapping, read more about how to map with
field papers...
Do roads have a smell? Have a look at the smelly maps and find how
each road smells in your city...
Interested in being a part of the Open Data Day, look in here for the
events taking place in your city...
New to JOSM? There is a guide to help you with your first steps with JOSM...
Cities based on where people take photos, a brilliant collection of
maps by Eric Fischer...
Have an interesting map to share, North American Cartographic
Information Society invites submissions for the Atlas of Design...


Enjoy! weeklyOSM is brought to you by ...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM
Cheers,
Jinal Foflia

___
talk mailing list
t...@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [OSM-talk] Reporting a potential vandal (bryanpiczon)

[maning sambale]

Thank you confirming bad edits in other areas.  We will raise this to DWG now.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Toby Murray <toby.mur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Most of the changesets I've looked at so far have been highly
> suspicious and there is definitely a lot of damage to the map still
> out there from this user. A few examples:
>
> He tagged a random industrial building as the "South Shore Plaza" mall:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29661237
>
> South Shore Plaza is a well known upscale mall and already mapped here:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44123566
>
> He tagged a building near the Lincoln Monument as a Burger King:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66418664
>
> Added a place=city node for Boston in the wrong location (and this
> place=city node already exists in the correct place)
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4000134306
>
> Have you contacted the Data Working Group? They can at least issue a
> ban that he must look at before being able to edit any more and
> potentially revert all of the changes at once. I am adding them to
> this email.
>
> Toby
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:38 AM, maning sambale
> <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The OSM-PH community have been monitoring who we suspect as a vandal
>> using several accounts.  While in the past he mostly edit in the PH,
>> we feel that the larger community should monitor since he has edited
>> in other parts of the world.  Most recently, the National Mall in
>> Washington, DC.
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37139218#map=15/38.8883/-77.0313
>>
>> We strongly believe that this person is a vandal, but would like to
>> confirm the scale and impact to other parts of the world.
>>
>> See summary of our notes here:
>> https://gist.github.com/maning/d76192c4a2cf5ba34c4c
>>
>> Raw document and some sample cases here:
>> https://hackpad.com/Bryan-Picson-Z5Px9SzYNQC
>>
>> --
>> cheers,
>> maning in behalf of OSM-PH
>> --
>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
>> --
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [talk-ph] Massive deletion of nodes?

[maning sambale]

Edits seems legit, but I didn't check everything.  Should we discuss
this on the user's changeset comment?

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jim Morgan <j...@datalude.com> wrote:
> maning sambale wrote on Monday, 22 February, 2016 11:48 AM:
>> I found this user editing lots of duplicated nodes:
>> http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?country=23=96=-1=%3E=1000=d=n#4/-18.52/0.26
>
> Appears to be an automated bot:  "I use the botdidier2020 account to make 
> corrections on the buildings (import Maps) and correcting duplicated ways"
>
> Jim
>
> --
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Massive deletion of nodes?

[maning sambale]

I found this user editing lots of duplicated nodes:
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?country=23=96=-1=%3E=1000=d=n#4/-18.52/0.26

Not sure if vandalism, will dig deeper.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar  wrote:
> I was checking out the OSM Philippines statistics page from Pascal Neis and
> I noticed that almost 100,000 nodes were deleted last Friday, Feb 19. Does
> anybody know what happened? I'm worried if this is vandalism.
>
> http://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries=Philippines
>
> ~Eugene
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Reporting a potential vandal (bryanpiczon)

[maning sambale]

Hi,

The OSM-PH community have been monitoring who we suspect as a vandal
using several accounts.  While in the past he mostly edit in the PH,
we feel that the larger community should monitor since he has edited
in other parts of the world.  Most recently, the National Mall in
Washington, DC.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37139218#map=15/38.8883/-77.0313

We strongly believe that this person is a vandal, but would like to
confirm the scale and impact to other parts of the world.

See summary of our notes here:
https://gist.github.com/maning/d76192c4a2cf5ba34c4c

Raw document and some sample cases here:
https://hackpad.com/Bryan-Picson-Z5Px9SzYNQC

-- 
cheers,
maning in behalf of OSM-PH
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[OSM-talk] Reporting a potential vandal (bryanpiczon)

[maning sambale]

Hi,

The OSM-PH community have been monitoring who we suspect as a vandal
using several accounts.  While in the past he mostly edit in the PH,
we feel that the larger community should monitor since he has edited
in other parts of the world.  Most recently, the National Mall in
Washington, DC.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37139218#map=15/38.8883/-77.0313

We strongly believe that this person is a vandal, but would like to
confirm the scale and impact to other parts of the world.

See summary of our notes here:
https://gist.github.com/maning/d76192c4a2cf5ba34c4c

Raw document and some sample cases here:
https://hackpad.com/Bryan-Picson-Z5Px9SzYNQC

-- 
cheers,
maning in behalf of OSM-PH
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [talk-ph] Various farmed landuses

[maning sambale]

Agree with Eugene. There are other who mapped riceland as meadows and
should be fixed as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/489780

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar  wrote:
> I agree with changes 2 and 3. For #1, I think it should be
> landuse=farmland instead of meadow. Rice fields are far from being
> meadows.
>
> On 2/14/16, David Groom  wrote:
>> While looking at existing tagging of landuse areas in Leyte I have come
>> across a number which do not seem to fit the tagging structure on the
>> main OSM wiki, and I cant see anything in the Philippines/Mapping
>> conventions  which contradicts the main OSM wiki (except that under
>> agricultural landuse the tag landuse = farm is suggested whereas this
>> seems to have been deprecated in favour of landuse = farmland  -  maybe
>> the Phillipine / mapping conventions page is out of date?)
>>
>> An example of some of the current tagging can be seen here:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/11.1121/124.8899
>>
>> I would like to change the following:
>>
>> 1) Areas currently tagged landuse = meadow; name = Ricefield   - change
>> to landuse = meadow; crop=rice [1]
>> 2) Areas currently tagged landuse = farmland; name = Coco Land   -
>> change to landuse = orchard;  trees = coconut_palms [2]
>> 3) Areas currently tagged landuse = orchard; crop = coconut  - change to
>> landuse = orchard;  trees = coconut_palms [2]
>>
>> Are these 3 changes acceptable?
>>
>> My one slight discomfort is that I dont like the way crop = rice is
>> rendered on the map, but then we should't be tagging for the rennderers
>> anyway!
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> David
>>
>> [1]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crop
>> [2]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trees
>>
>> ___
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[Talk-us] RFC: LA County building import

[maning sambale]

Hi,

[posted in talk-us and imports-us lists.]

We are proposing a building import of the public domain building and
assessor data for LA County [0].
This covers ~3M buildings for the whole county (2008 - 2014). Two
datasets from LA county will be imported.
The building data for geometry and the assessors data for building use
(i.e. residential, commercial, etc.).
There is also an address data but we are punting this for now due to
various data conflation issues.

Before we go ahead with the process, we are requesting the community
for review and approval:

* Scripts and conversion available in github [1] based on NYC imports process.
* Workflow for a community managed manual import [2].
* Sample data for evaluation, available in a custom Tasking Manager
[3].  Please evaluate the data and test the
workflow.

Do not import any data into the main OSM DB.  If you want to test the
full import process use the OSM dev server.
For any issues, please post in the Github [4].

Thanks!

In behalf of the team,

Alan McConchie, @almccon
Jon Schleuss, @jschleuss
Omar Ureta, @cityhubla
Maning Sambale, @maningsambale

- [0] 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Los_angeles,_California/Buildings_Import
- [1] https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings
- [2] https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/blob/master/IMPORTING.md
- [3] http://52.74.49.58:6543/project/15
- [4] https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [talk-ph] Coastlines - was Forest landcover

[maning sambale]

Hi David,

I saw a similar ifsar/insar import over Baybay City, which I removed
since it overlapped with existing coastline and riverbank polygons
traced in Bing. I'm curious who did this but I did not followed up
with the concerned mapper.  From what I remembered, PH gov acquired
ifsar data over Leyte after Typhoon Haiyan. I'm quite sure that the PH
gov did not give any permission to import them to OSM or its
derivatives. In addition, ifsar vectors were derived from hires raster
(~20m), so the staircase will be in a similar length.

Might be good to probe more.  Can you give me sample changesets so I
can ask around.

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:48 PM, David Groom  wrote:
> Eugene
>
> the coastline ways which I am improving seem to derive from an import of
> IFSAR 2012 data (See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33871982)
>
> So these are after the 2010 mini project to improve the coaastline
>
> David
>
>
>>As for the saw-tooth coastlines, I'm actually surprised they still
>>exist to a large degree since we did a mini-project back in 2010 to
>>improve those coastlines:
>>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Coastline_corrections
>>
>>~Eugene
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM 289

[maning sambale]

-- Forwarded message --
From: Jinal Foflia 
Date: Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:20 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM 289
To: t...@openstreetmap.org


The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue #289 is now available online in
English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the
OpenStreetMap world:

  http://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/6789

Highlights of the weekly

Wikimedia Italia is now official Chapter of OpenStreetMap ...
Interested in Crowdsourcing Data and Quality Control, lookin for
information related to this webinar ...
Do you want hear a map talk to you? ...
Worried about the privacy related to the location you are sharing?
Lookin for the App Location Privacy ...
HOT is searching for a web-developer to build and OSM Data Quality
Analysis Tool, look in for more information ...

weeklyOSM is brought to you by ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM

Regards,

Jinal Foflia


___
talk mailing list
t...@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM 288

[maning sambale]

Beginning today, I will forward the weekly OSM news here.  This is a
weekly summary of what's up in the OSM planet.
I personally find it useful to catchup. Let me know if this is noise.

-- Forwarded message --
Subject: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM 288
To: t...@openstreetmap.org


The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 288 is now available online
in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the
OpenStreetMap world:

  http://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/6731

Highlights of the weeklyOSM edition 288

Want to know what's in store with the next Vespucci release? ...
Pascal Neis writes an interesting blog on how to find suspicious changesets ...
Mapbox created two OpenSource and free tools for better maps: OSMLint
(For quality analysis of OSM data) and OSM Comments (To track
conversations in OpenStreetMap) ...
10 interesting things you need to know about OpenStreetMap ...
New to OSM? There is a training module for you ...
Do you want to know more about the rare optical phenomenon (streets in
Sky), read in here for more information ..

Enjoy!

weeklyOSM is brought to you by ...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM.


-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] error dashboard

[maning sambale]

Hi,

I made this simple dashboard to view  and fix errors.
http://osmph.github.io/errors/

Diary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/manings/diary/3

I have 678 errors. Fixing my edits now. ;)

-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Fwd: GIS consultant needed (ADB)

[maning sambale]

FYI.


-- Forwarded message --

Date: Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:59 PM
Subject: GIS consultant needed (ADB)

Hi, guys,

You or your friends might be interested.

http://www.adb.org/projects/47338-001/main?page-1=1




-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Any value in keeping imagery boundaries in OSM?

[maning sambale]

Doen! https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/6

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:49 AM, maning sambale
<emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, started working on this.  To be sure, inspect each polygon and
> check if it depends on valid data.
> See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/6#issuecomment-169888701
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If I remember correctly, the boundaries were re-added for the benefit of
>> students mapping from the George Washington University. I can't find it now
>> but there was a note (tag?) requesting that the boundaries not be deleted.
>>
>> I prefer that these be deleted as these are not data that properly belongs
>> in the main OSM database.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:55 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Discuss here or in the ticket:
>>> https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/6
>>> --
>>> cheers,
>>> maning
>>> --
>>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>>> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
>>> --
>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk-ph mailing list
>>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Any value in keeping imagery boundaries in OSM?

[maning sambale]

OK, started working on this.  To be sure, inspect each polygon and
check if it depends on valid data.
See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/6#issuecomment-169888701

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I remember correctly, the boundaries were re-added for the benefit of
> students mapping from the George Washington University. I can't find it now
> but there was a note (tag?) requesting that the boundaries not be deleted.
>
> I prefer that these be deleted as these are not data that properly belongs
> in the main OSM database.
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:55 PM, maning sambale <emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Discuss here or in the ticket:
>> https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/6
>> --
>> cheers,
>> maning
>> --
>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
>> https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
>> --
>>
>> ___
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>
>



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph