Re: Wahoo! I'm back....
Any validity to this theory or is it completely out to lunch? I can't confirm Stuart. I use the same servers and mail service that Curtis does but I don't filter all my mail from my Inbox and, at the moment, it contains over 2,000 messages. I do use FastMail's serverside filtering as much as possible and all of my 20 or so folders are viewed in TB as threaded. I don't synchronise any of them in TB. I don't know where that leaves things except, as I've already said, Ritlabs appear to have changed something in the architecture of the prog in this beta that has solved the performance problems for me here. Strange! -- Regards, Clive Taylor TheBat!:3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) Windows XP: Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
3.60.xx IMAP: Problem with drafts not being deleted returns
Hello beta testers. I this beta series I have had several instances where drafts in the remote outbox are not deleted when a new version is auto-saved. Even when the message is sent, there remains a number of previous versions there as parked versions. This is for Exchange and MailMax. Anyone else seeing this? Also, I still have hanging, locked connections that hold up the rest of the connection queue. When this connection is deleted, all the rest spring to life and behave as supposed to. Primarily noticed this on Exchange. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) Pro /thebat version env. ~12 POP3, 4 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) is now available
Hello Peter, 9 [*] Other: right alignment of name column in message header pane Thank you. I really like this better. And I thought the left alignment had been intentional... sigh of relief :)) Then I'd bet you 'suffer' a lot when composing messages, because headers in editor window have always been left aligned ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) is now available
Hello MAU, On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M Then I'd bet you 'suffer' a lot when composing messages, because headers M in editor window have always been left aligned It's strange what you get used to isn't it? I suppose the message headers are more noticeable because oyu look at them almost every time you read a message and they are there 24/7 (as long as the PC is on and you are using it of course) whereas the editor is opened on a very irregular basis so it's not so noticeable. For instance, although it stares you in the face, I hadn't noticed the discrepancy until you wrote that message! Anyway, there are far more important things in life. Can't think of one just now though ;-) -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Wahoo! I'm back....
8/25/2005 6:57 AM Hi Clive, On 8/25/2005 Clive Taylor wrote: CT I can't confirm Stuart. I use the same servers and mail service that CT Curtis does but I don't filter all my mail from my Inbox and, at the CT moment, it contains over 2,000 messages. I do use FastMail's serverside CT filtering as much as possible and all of my 20 or so folders are CT viewed in TB as threaded. I don't synchronise any of them in TB. I am not an IMAP user because I have developed a system of POP management that works well for me. However, in following the IMAP threads for many months one thing seems incongruous to me and may help explain some of the various levels of success. It seems to me that server-side filtering should be the primary method of filtering and only client-side sub-filtering when truly necessary. If all the filtering is done on the client one of the major advantages of IMAP is ignored. Server-side filtering _has_ to be much more efficient. Since IMAP adds another management layer it becomes real important to understand and properly implement the filters on both sides. Your approach to this seems the most logical to me. -- Take Care, Paul The Bat! v.3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Wahoo! I'm back....
Your approach to this seems the most logical to me. And to me! The real advantage is that whether I choose to view my mail using TB, another client or the server's web interface, all the folders are identical, all achieved without putting strain on my computer. -- Regards, Clive Taylor TheBat!:3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) Windows XP: Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Wahoo! I'm back....
Hello Clive, Thursday, August 25, 2005, 1:31:15 AM, you wrote: Any validity to this theory or is it completely out to lunch? CT I can't confirm Stuart. I use the same servers and mail service that CT Curtis does but I don't filter all my mail from my Inbox and, at the CT moment, it contains over 2,000 messages. I do use FastMail's serverside CT filtering as much as possible and all of my 20 or so folders are CT viewed in TB as threaded. I don't synchronise any of them in TB. I guess the difference here is that you have no sync set. As I said it seems to be the syncing along with filtering that really slows things down. The only reason I have gone back to syncing my TB folder is so when I select a message it shows up almost instantly now. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Wahoo! I'm back....
On Wednesday, August 24, 2005, at 01:53 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: If you look under this you will see Manage IMAP Folders. This is where I have turned off all Syncronization. I'm not sure what this will do with the server software you are connected to, but here it seems to speed things up to have sync turned off. I don't understand why this should be as I would have thought that by syncronizing headers and body everything would be waiting for you to read when you select the folder you want to read. When you set TB! to synchronise, it will spend a lot of its bandwidth and connection doing autosync's. This is all too often at the expense of a request for a message body that you may have. Your message body request is often stuck in a long queue of requests concerning synchronizing of other folders you're not interested in at that particular moment. So the overall effect is that if you just download what you need as you go along, TB! is a lot more responsive. A lot of the apps that supposedly speed up browsing works similarly. They download other pages on the site in the background. However, this is often at the expense of the speed of download of a page you may wish to view at a particular time. -- -= Curtis=- Using TB! v3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name =-=-= ...Health is the slowest rate at which one can die. Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Wahoo! I'm back....
On Thursday, August 25, 2005, at 06:06 AM, Paul Van Noord wrote: It seems to me that server-side filtering should be the primary method of filtering and only client-side sub-filtering when truly necessary. Correct! This is what I do and I've been without performance issues for a long time. Only the odd message or so requires a TB! filter. If all the filtering is done on the client one of the major advantages of IMAP is ignored. Server-side filtering _has_ to be much more efficient. Indeed it is. Not to mention the fact that it saves you the trouble of having to maintain multiple filter sets across multiple TB! or other client installations. Since IMAP adds another management layer it becomes real important to understand and properly implement the filters on both sides. Your approach to this seems the most logical to me. Agreed. -- -= Curtis=- Using TB! v3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name =-=-= ...Defeat isn't bitter if you don't swallow it. Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Wahoo! I'm back....
On Wednesday, August 24, 2005, at 04:17 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: OK, new theory. I had turned off synchronization completely and everything seemed to run a bit more smoothly. Only problem was every time I clicked on a message it had to be downloaded before I could read it. Even with high speed this slowed things down. That much? I find the performance hit using synchronisation is greater. Here, loading a message body typically takes about 1 second if that much. The larger bodies (HTML etc.) take under 5 seconds or rarely go above that. I have been reading Guru Curtis (alias Allie) about how he filters everything out of his inbox to avoid problems with the constant changes in the inbox. Also noted that he does server side filtering. Gary doesn't filter all messages from his Inbox and his major problems have disappeared. My not keeping messages in the Inbox is a personal habit of mine taken from POP. The side-effect was that the IMAP problems while working with a busy Inbox didn't affect me. Anyway, the point is now moot since that issue seems to have been laid to rest.. finally. :) Well being the rogue that I are, (and the fact that I am testing) I decided I would have everything filter to my TB folder as well as do some color grouping, but only using TB's filtering features. Does colour grouping really work? Is it saved server side so that you can appreciate it across multiple TB! installations? With this setup and synchronization set for all folders everything was bogging down. I can well imagine. My theory here is that it would sync to my inbox then color change and move and then unsync from my inbox and then sync with my TB folder. All these steps were slowing things down. Another way your filters can bog down TB! is if you're searching for strings in the message body. So TB! will filter only when the message bodies are retrieved. My new setting, is to only sync All Messages in TB folder and things are much faster now as my messages do not have to sync with the Inbox along the way. Any validity to this theory or is it completely out to lunch? I think you're right on this. The less folders you set to sync at intervals, the better the overall performance. -- -= Curtis=- Using TB! v3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name =-=-= ..file not found. Should I fake it? (Y/N) Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Ctrl+Ins doesn't allways work when copying text to clipboard from RTV
Hello, manytimes when I select HTML message, mark some text, hit Ctrl+Ins and paste it via Shift+Ins into TB's Microed editor, previously stored text in clipboard is pasted, not last one. Anybody can confirm? -- Thanks and Bye, Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Ctrl+Ins doesn't allways work when copying text to clipboard from RTV
Hello all, Thursday, August 25, 2005, Marek Mikus wrote: manytimes when I select HTML message, mark some text, hit Ctrl+Ins and paste it via Shift+Ins into TB's Microed editor, previously stored text in clipboard is pasted, not last one. Anybody can confirm? seems like Ctr+C and Ctrl+V works always. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Ctrl+Ins doesn't allways work when copying text to clipboard from RTV
Hello Marek, manytimes when I select HTML message, mark some text, hit Ctrl+Ins and paste it via Shift+Ins into TB's Microed editor, previously stored text in clipboard is pasted, not last one. Anybody can confirm? Use Ctrl+C instead. But anyway, it happens with other softwares, too, not only with TB! Copyying from HTML sometimes just does not work... -- Vili Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Wahoo! I'm back....
Hello Curtis, A reminder of what Curtis typed on: Thursday, August 25, 2005 at 07:54:05 GMT -0500 C That much? I find the performance hit using synchronisation is C greater. Here, loading a message body typically takes about 1 second C if that much. The larger bodies (HTML etc.) take under 5 seconds or C rarely go above that. I think this also depends on the amount of mail you are receiving. Well being the rogue that I are, (and the fact that I am testing) I decided I would have everything filter to my TB folder as well as do some color grouping, but only using TB's filtering features. C Does colour grouping really work? Is it saved server side so that you C can appreciate it across multiple TB! installations? Yes and no. I filter firstly by tbbeta (red)or tbudl (blue) and then whether or not it was TO or From me (green). My colors for the lists stick while the green color gets set and then changes, more or less once I start viewing the messages. Not sure what is happening here. The problem I have is that if I filter into TB folder on the server I will not be able to set color groups as the filters only work on the Inbox. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[3]: Fast typing in quick search field with Enter causes The Bat! to show no letters at all.
Hello, Paul. You wrote 25.08.2005 @ 7:48 in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] using mailer: The Bat! (v3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta)) Home PVN The erasing of the letters is because there was no matching string. PVN The reason for disappearing from right to left is because it will PVN erase until there is a match. If you type a letter that doesn't exist PVN at all it will stare at you with a blank box. Yes, it is. But I suggested that the searching will stop when you just clear the search string. It is simple - press p - and you will see the letters begin with p. Press then r - and the letters with pr come. But the thing which I found as non-native - when you delete the non-matching string from the search field, the letters don't reappear. I.e., when I type abrakadabraEnter - just cleaning up quick search - and even pressing Enter in the _empty_ field doesn't cause letters to reappear. Ctrl+'=' works, but it doesn't seem to be native action. My suggestion was that - again, - typing p shows all letters with p, typing pr - all messages with pr. Erasing r - again, shows all letters with p, cleaning up the search field completely - causes ALL letter to appear. -- Sincerely, Alexey. Using TB 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) on WinXP Pro SP2 (2600), spelling by ORFO2002 (CSAPI) ..with Kaspersky Antivirus Plugin (ver 3.5 Gold) antispam filter BayesIt! 0.8.2 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[4]: Fast typing in quick search field with Enter causes The Bat! to show no letters at all.
8/25/2005 1:22 PM Hi Alexey, On 8/25/2005 Alexey N. Vinogradov wrote: ANV My suggestion was that - again, - typing p shows all letters ANV with p, typing pr - all messages with pr. Erasing r - again, shows all ANV letters with p, cleaning up the search field completely - causes ALL letter to ANV appear. This is precisely what the search function accessed with [F7] is supposed to do. Quick Search is just that and would no longer be as quick if the behavior changed much. -- Take Care, Paul The Bat! v.3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Wahoo! I'm back....
On Thursday, August 25, 2005, at 08:33 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: Yes and no. I filter firstly by tbbeta (red)or tbudl (blue) and then whether or not it was TO or From me (green). My colors for the lists stick while the green color gets set and then changes, more or less once I start viewing the messages. Odd. Could it be that you haven't similarly assigned the colours to when the messages are read as opposed to when they are unread? Not sure what is happening here. The problem I have is that if I filter into TB folder on the server I will not be able to set color groups as the filters only work on the Inbox. I thought you could make filters work on any folder. I haven't tried it, but the filter setup certainly seems to make this possible. Take a look at the folders tab for the rules setup dialog. It allows you to apply the filter to messages from: ... Couldn't you specify a specific folder other than the Inbox? -- -= Curtis=- Using TB! v3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) System Specs: http://specs.aimlink.name =-=-= ...Ever notice that 'What the hell' is always the right decision? Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Sound Events
1. It would be really great if a filter action could be that it *DOES NOT* play /any/ sound -- even if the mail arrival sound for the account is enabled. 2. In order to simulate #1, I had turned OFF the mail arrival sound for my account and set all of the filters that weren't catching SPAM to play a sound. Unfortunately, for the last /n/ (with /n/ greater than twenty or so) builds/versions of TB, that causes each sound to be played TWICE for EACH message... not fun after a long weekend with things backing up on the server. If there any way to get the behavior I'm looking for (new mail sound by default, but NOT when SOME SPECIFIC filters are triggered) or must I pray that RIT adds this sort of capability in the future? -- Steve Valliere | tb3.60.03 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
IMAP - Forward With Attachments Broken
When I try to forward a message that has attachments, the attachments end up with a size of zero. This might be because the message has not been downloaded, but the client should figure that out, should it not? -- Best regards, John Thomas Using The Bat! v3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Replies to HTML messages default to HTML
Hello Ian, Thursday (August 25, 2005, 2:16 PM) you wrote: For the first time I have noticed that when I reply to a HTML only message, The Bat! replies in the same format. In the past the reply would be plain text. Has something changed with the latest beta? I figured out the choice is under options, preferences, viewer/editor. This works on forwards to which is great, but it does need work. For example, selecting part of a message and hitting F4 includes the entire message, not the selected portion. It would be great when replying or forwarding an HTML message to have a choice of HTML or TXT. Further, it would be great to have a choice of people to reply to (for you Mulberry users you will know what I am talking about). -- Best regards, John Thomas Using The Bat! v3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Replies to HTML messages default to HTML
Hello Ian, A reminder of what Ian A. White typed on: Thursday, August 25, 2005 at 07:16:21 GMT +1000 IAW For the first time I have noticed that when I reply to a HTML only IAW message, The Bat! replies in the same format. In the past the reply IAW would be plain text. Has something changed with the latest beta? Yes I just noticed it as well. Is it just in this build? Would have been nice if they had let us know. :( Actually it is kind of neat. :) -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Replies to HTML messages default to HTML
Hallo John, On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:30:42 -0700GMT (25-8-2005, 23:30 +0200, where I live), you wrote: For the first time I have noticed that when I reply to a HTML only message, The Bat! replies in the same format. In the past the reply would be plain text. Has something changed with the latest beta? JT I figured out the choice is under options, preferences, viewer/editor. JT This works on forwards to which is great, but it does need work. It definitely needs work, for it doesn't work for me. I had it enabled (per default, I guess), but I was still replying with MicroEd to HTML mail. Anyway, I just disabled it, just to prevent me from sending HTML accidentally. -- Groetjes, Roelof Win95 -Microsoft. Lose$95 -Usenet Oracle. The Bat! 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpHwNs6rKo9o.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Mail to: External link
Hello tbbeta, I just clicked on an external link in bugtrack as in mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and it launched a series of Internet Explorer pages that al needed to be closed individually. I thought I had set TB as my mailto emailer, but when I checked it wasn't set. I put a checkmark beside mailto and exited. When I went back in the checkbox was off again. Can anyone else reproduce this or is it just me as usual. -- Best regards, Stuart mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Mail to: External link
Hallo Stuart, On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:48:02 -0500GMT (26-8-2005, 0:48 +0200, where I live), you wrote: SC I thought I had set TB as my mailto emailer, but when I checked it SC wasn't set. I put a checkmark beside mailto and exited. When I SC went back in the checkbox was off again. Can anyone else reproduce SC this or is it just me as usual. I've had that several times. It's because I'm running Windows in a restricted user account. For some obscure reason Windows XP SP2 thinks that the default mailto handler should be defined system wide by somebody with admin rights and not by a restricted user. Silly OS, what could be more personal than one's own mail client. -- Groetjes, Roelof WINDOWS is to computing what Etch-a-Sketch is to art. The Bat! 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpVGIzcz6idL.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Mail to: External link
Hello Roelof, A reminder of what Roelof Otten typed on: Thursday, August 25, 2005 at 01:23:59 GMT +0200 RO I've had that several times. RO It's because I'm running Windows in a restricted user account. For RO some obscure reason Windows XP SP2 thinks that the default mailto RO handler should be defined system wide by somebody with admin rights RO and not by a restricted user. RO Silly OS, what could be more personal than one's own mail client. Unfortunately that is not my entire problem because this is the admin account. Any ideas how to fix it. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[3]: Mail to: External link
Hello Stuart, A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on: Thursday, August 25, 2005 at 18:30:14 GMT -0500 SC Unfortunately that is not my entire problem because this is the admin SC account. Any ideas how to fix it. Thought I had it by changing the default client in Internet explorer, it was set to OE. This still did not help however. The error I get says the default client is not installed properly then launches 20 copies to IE. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Mail to: External link
Hallo Stuart, On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:30:14 -0500GMT (26-8-2005, 1:30 +0200, where I live), you wrote: SC Unfortunately that is not my entire problem because this is the admin SC account. Any ideas how to fix it. Set OE as default mail client and afterwards set it to TB. -- Groetjes, Roelof Newsbytes - Microsoft announce EDLIN for Windows. The Bat! 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpbJsXW3992P.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.60.03 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
