Re: delete msg in VF = delete msg in source folder - why?

2004-04-19 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:55:32 +0200, MAU wrote:

 Have you ever used the Mail Ticker? Well, all Mail Ticker is,
 is a VF.

Well, not quite.

One of the great assets of the Mail Ticker[tm] is the possibility
to actually _browse_ through the messages in it (in a separate
window called browse ticker messages. Virtual Folders don't have
this functionality. Which, I think, is a pity.


Arjan
-- 
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


delete msg in VF = delete msg in source folder - why?

2004-04-18 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
Question  as  in subject. I had an impression that VF are only collections
of  symbolic links to messages contained in actual folders. It imlies that
msg  deleted  in  actual  folder  disapperas  from  VF, but not opposite -
deleting message from VF does NOT delete msg in actual folder.

Am I right or not? :-I

Best regards, Krzysztof Kudacik
-- 
pb   _,   )\__/(   ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
   /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\  http://thebat.pl |
 /'.'; `-,`--',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Polish Support |
 \/\/^\---.\;;/.---/^\/\/ |
   Windows 2000 5.02195 Service Pack 4|



 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: delete msg in VF = delete msg in source folder - why?

2004-04-18 Thread Allie Martin
Krzysztof Kudlacik, [KK] wrote:

KK According to this logic I have to explode on mine in oreder to
KK lern simple truth that walking on mine field is not healthy way of
KK life (of die) ;)

I think you may be overstating the issue a tad. :)

Prior to using VF's you knew that hitting delete would delete the
message and send it to the trash or wherever you configure your
delete command to do (you know that you can now specify what deleting
does, right?)

Now, if you know beforehand, as you now do, that deleting a message in
a VF deletes the actual message, why do you feel like you're in a mine
field? :)

- If you reply to a message in a VF, the actual message is flagged as
replied.

- If you flag a message in a VF, the actual message is flagged.

- If you mark a message in a VF as read or unread, the actual message
is correspondingly marked as read or unread.

- If you forward a message in a VF, the actual message is flagged as
forwarded.

- If you change a message in a VF's colour group, the actual messages
colour group is correspondingly changed.

There's a pattern, isn't there? :)

So, if you delete a message in a VF, what do you think will happen
then?? :) This is why I don't think it's misleading. In fact, if the
actual message were not correspondingly deleted as happens with
everything else you choose to do with a message in a VF, it would be
unusual.

A VF gives you the opportunity to handle a message via a different
container. What you do to the message from that container actually
happens to the message.

-- 
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)

PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
Running The Bat! v2.10 on WinXP Pro (SP1) 


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: delete msg in VF = delete msg in source folder - why?

2004-04-18 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 2004-04-18 (21:01), you wrote:
 Yes. I want to find large messages to delete to save space in my
 mailbox.

Why cant you use 'view modes' - they are very good for this. ;]

  I therefor use the search folder Large messages and when I
 have decided what to delete

If  you use 'search' option, then (again) VF seems to be useless.

 It's obviously a matter of opinions.

I  am  aware  of  this  -  I only want to have 'safe' option: do not touch
acutal folder. That's all.

Best regards, Krzysztof Kudacik
-- 
pb   _,   )\__/(   ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
   /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\  http://thebat.pl |
 /'.'; `-,`--',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Polish Support |
 \/\/^\---.\;;/.---/^\/\/ |
   Windows 2000 5.02195 Service Pack 4|



 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: delete msg in VF = delete msg in source folder - why?

2004-04-18 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 2004-04-18 (21:27), you wrote:
 There's a pattern, isn't there? :)

The is but it does'nt proof what you want. See below ;]

 So, if you delete a message in a VF, what do you think will happen
 then?? :) This is why I don't think it's misleading.

Not this  way.  My  preferred  way  of  handling VF is: different folder =
different  way  of  working  -  especially:  different context menu. I can
imagine  easylliy,  that 'delete from VF' is NOT the same, as 'delete from
message base'. This is my point.

For  now  we  have: view modes / common folders / VF / common VF - in this
context  VF  have  less  and  less  differences  from acutal folder! In my
opinion, end-user is left with total confusion about the main goal of this
*different* (?) functions. And this is my base fear - TB! becomes less and
less intuitive for end-user, though it is the most powerfull e-mail client
under Win.

Best regards, Krzysztof Kudacik
-- 
pb   _,   )\__/(   ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
   /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\  http://thebat.pl |
 /'.'; `-,`--',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Polish Support |
 \/\/^\---.\;;/.---/^\/\/ |
   Windows 2000 5.02195 Service Pack 4|



 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: delete msg in VF = delete msg in source folder - why?

2004-04-18 Thread Allie Martin
Krzysztof Kudlacik, [KK] wrote:

KK I can imagine easylliy, that 'delete from VF' is NOT the same, as
KK 'delete from message base'. This is my point.

I see your point a long time ago. It's just that IMO, it's
inconsistent and I disagree with it. :) I doubt we'll convince each
other so I agree to disagree with you on this.

BTW, inexperienced endusers (newbies) may have preconceived ideas, but
they're far more accommodating to changing them. As a result, I don't
see the current behaviour as being a problem for newbies. One thing I
can say is that newbies appreciate consistency.

-- 
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)

PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
Running The Bat! v2.10 on WinXP Pro (SP1) 


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: delete msg in VF = delete msg in source folder - why?

2004-04-18 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Sunday, April 18, 2004, at 21:36:44 [UTC+0200] (Sunday, April 18, 2004
21:36 my local time) Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote:

 Yes. I want to find large messages to delete to save space in my
 mailbox.

 Why cant you use 'view modes' - they are very good for this. ;]

Unfortunately, View Modes are not capable to display messages from many
folders. This feature is assigned only to Virtual Folders, therefore they
can search through all accounts and folders tree.

  I therefor use the search folder Large messages and when I
 have decided what to delete

 If  you use 'search' option, then (again) VF seems to be useless.

Not in such a case. VFs created on the base of searching have bugs (they
cannot display of search results if searching is done in message text), but
in general, they are quite usable.

 It's obviously a matter of opinions.

 I  am  aware  of  this  -  I only want to have 'safe' option: do not touch
 acutal folder. That's all.

Safety is quite different thing, because you can implement safe deleting
in account or folder properties. Then messages will not be deleted
physically, because they will be moved to chosen folders. In my opinion,
removing message from Virtual Folder without deleting it from source folder
would be an inconsistency in implementation.

-- 
Best regards,
Zygmunt Wereszczynski
(Using The Bat! v2.10.01 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4)



 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: delete msg in VF = delete msg in source folder - why?

2004-04-18 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hi Allie,

On Sunday, April 18, 2004 at 14:27 GMT -0500, authorities charged
Allie Martin for writing:

 So, if you delete a message in a VF, what do you think will happen
 then?? :)

The only thing I find not obvious is that the message will be deleted
according to the deletion settings of the folder where the message
really exists. The only time it is sort of confusing is when your
search looks through multiple folders, each with different deletion
settings. As far as I know, there is no obvious way of browsing
virtually deleted messages, is there?


-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal

Using The Bat! 2.10.01 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



 Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/