Re: DSL and the Bat!
Hello Lynn, L I hope no one will think this is a stupid question but, we recently installed DSL and I can't seem to figure out how to connect to my email using The Bat. I keep getting a window that says that no dial-up connection was made. Call me brainless but does this software work on a DSL connection and if so, how do I get it to work? Options Network Administration Connect The Internet Using - Local Area Conncection Ciao, luigi Using The Bat! v1.60m on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
PGP 7 freeware
Hello , when will The Bat support PGP 7.0? Ciao, Luigi Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Luigi mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: E-mail address filtering.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Weaven, Christopherx [WC] wrote: ... WC I want to send an auto-reply to messages received to WC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , but because the other WC address has the same text, it auto-replies to them all messages WC received. WC I've tried [[EMAIL PROTECTED]], Recipient, Yes. Hmmm. That should have worked. Ok. Try this string and enable regular expressions in the filter rules options. ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE9AITAV8nrYCsHF+IRAmnbAKDVf7iJ7ABD/F0EHDyPcr6cQ0MoDwCg6V26 F+wXzbG5NZyrThWM3A4EJGI= =ALB7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: E-mail address filtering.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Om 12:02 op vrijdag 7 juni 2002, Allie C Martin: WC I've tried [[EMAIL PROTECTED]], Recipient, Yes. Ok. Try this string and enable regular expressions in the filter rules options. ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] or add [Joe.], Recipient, No. to the filter. Mrten. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt7 iQA/AwUBPQB5r0tQMadp+KslEQLcWwCg2tNfYQ9v/lmKQfN1i3RZWXr/zsIAnRYG JnW/bOk1NO6qf0cNAANXuI4u =2YIM -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: SpamCop encountered errors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, June 7, 2002, 12:13 AM, you wrote: SpamCop is now ready to process your spam. Use links to finish spam reporting: http://spamcop.net/sc?id=xx This is what should happen and shows that all is present and correct. I didn't want to do THOSE particular messages, they werent spam! but at least it is working. MP This is where the second filter should kick in. That one should be MP automatic though. It launches a browser pointed straight at that link. well, ahem I removed all the old filters when you sent me the new ones, so I don't have the reply filter anymore ;) and I pasted the MID: line in the follow-up, see if this follows the thread for references... not to mention the subject. Still in digest mode ! / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60m on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBPQCOKj3ZlJQqDEkFEQJ44gCeNfrxZ+PgnVoa07M0bGXtDMW8nq4An1GQ b8LPPWDZHCFPh9NYlyyUrzk6 =B3Wb -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: SpamCop encountered errors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, June 7, 2002, 12:13 AM, you wrote: SpamCop is now ready to process your spam. Use links to finish spam reporting: http://spamcop.net/sc?id=xx L This is what should happen and shows that all is present and correct. I didn't want to do THOSE particular messages, they werent spam! but at least it is working. L This is where the second filter should kick in. That one should be L automatic though. It launches a browser pointed straight at that link. here is the email that triggered it: it's Nadia. please come talk with me.. I have a webcam Click HERE and have fun. and I clicked on the web page for Spamcop's reply. THAT IS AWESOME that is MUCH more info than I ever got from Arin WHOIS! / Paul Using The Bat! v1.60m on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBPQCRMT3ZlJQqDEkFEQIBDACfTtlsTyygqi7cBcRCn6NN1l83z80AoKRr 03wGT9LKhbsozV0hj/g56Rhe =L4BX -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
AntiVir and notification
Hello, I've modify a bit the notification template to add the virus name in the reply : ,- [ ] | Hello %OFROMNAME, | | Attention! | | It seems you have got the virus %- | %SETPATTREGEXP='!Virus! .*? (.*?) .*?[\n]'%REGEXPMATCH=%include=$.\Antivir.log$%- | on your machine! | Please make sure you have the latest update of your virus scanner | and check all your files right away! | | Take care, | %FROMNAME '- -- Regards, Alain Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: AntiVir and notification
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alain, @07 June 2002, 12:56:53 +0200 (11:56 UK time) Alain de Gevigney wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I've modify a bit the notification template to add the virus name in the reply : ,- [ ] | Hello %OFROMNAME, | | Attention! | | It seems you have got the virus %- | %SETPATTREGEXP='!Virus! .*? (.*?) .*?[\n]'%REGEXPMATCH=%include=$.\Antivir.log$%- | on your machine! | Please make sure you have the latest update of your virus scanner | and check all your files right away! | | Take care, | %FROMNAME '- Very good, but I only seem to be receiving Klez these days, which fakes the sender information. Because of Klez, I've turned off the notification completely because I can't actually work out the real source of the infection. I can see which network it comes from by the Received headers but that doesn't help me that much. Anyone else got any other takes on this? - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1-rc2 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9AJWQOeQkq5KdzaARAhrlAJ4wSQT8mExeY+YhxHawFND+QxliXwCgy0gX l8w2jWmPRR+JRed1+MJ5Wb8= =58U1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: AntiVir and notification
Hello Marck, On Friday, June 7, 2002 at 1:14:22 PM you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): MDP Anyone else got any other takes on this? Have a look at the 'Return-Path's ... When one computer here was infected the Return-Paths all made sense, albeit all From: headers were faked ... -- Regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2) Mom and Dad went to the Internet and all I got was this lousy tagline Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Administrator account
Hi; You are a genius. One of my accounts was the Admin and I was able get back to normal. THanks! -- - Scott mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, June 7, 2002, 5:21:50 AM, you wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP Hi Scott, MDP @07 June 2002, 05:09:25 -0600 (12:09 UK time) Scott Ames wrote in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] In changing a bunch of settings to troubleshoot a problem I must have enabled user level access. How can I get back to the Administrator account so that I can set that back? I can't seem to figure it out. MDP I'm not certain but here are a couple of ideas: MDP 1) log in to the primary account. That may be the Administrator. MDP 2) If not, try one of the other accounts. MDP 3) If all else fails, restore from the last backup. (what do you mean MDPwhat backup? g) MDP 4) Desperate measures : delete account.cfg and reconfigure MDP*everything* in the account properties. Okay, so perhaps rename MDPit rather than delete it - just in case it goes very pear shaped. MDP - -- MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator MDP TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 MDP · MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- MDP Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1-rc2 (Windows 2000) MDP iD8DBQE9AJdPOeQkq5KdzaARAkFOAJ48p9jD3+OoBQsnK3z5MTrYJwseVACdGyYx MDP fhGJAndaSyojwv3VL2/PMXg= MDP =2JWd MDP -END PGP SIGNATURE- MDP MDP Current Ver: 1.60q MDP FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com MDP Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com MDP Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com This mail is brought to you by: Hidden Villas Rental Homes http://www.hiddenvillas.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: F-PROT and TB!
On 4-6-2002 at 23:08, Haico wrote: Hello, Since none of the anti-virus plugins are of use to me.. [The only free one I can use is Antivir but I have the mcafee guard to protect my computer..] Ow.. The plugin works, but not with zip-files apparently. :-S Hmm.. I have to look into that. I thought the guard should have been loaded in order for the plugin to work. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: DSL and the Bat!
Hi Julian, On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 08:17:08 +0100, you wrote: This depends on the type of DSL connection. On my PC, my DSL connection is another Dial Up Networking (DUN) connection. Although most DSL connection software uses a DUN connection, it is just creating an interface between the operating system, and the network card to create a PPoE (Point-to-Point over Ethernet). Technically you could still use it as a local area network connection. Plus I never actually had any problems setting up the network settings to use Local Area connection, even when I was using dial-up. Just meant that TB! didn't try connection itself when checking emails. I don't know if they have changed the way that works though ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: 4.4.0 Interactive routing subsystem is not enabled
ON Friday, June 7, 2002, 11:52:10 AM, you wrote: SA Hi; SA I'm just using the USB port to physically change the DSL connection SA from one machine to the other. The internet works on both machines, SA one at a time. SA Change that to another SMTP and it works. Use the older version of SA The Bat and it works. Hi Scott, If both of the above statements are correct the only conclusion can be that it is TB! I just read yesterday that someone downloaded the Q version. You might want to give it a go. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Don't be reckless with other people's hearts, and don't put up with people who are reckless with yours. Using The Bat! v1.60i on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: PGP 7 freeware
Hello Luigi Rosa, In Reference to your Posting on Friday, June 07 2002 at 02:56 AM PDT, when will The Bat support PGP 7.0? I do not believe it ever will have direct support for PGP 7.x because it has literally been abandoned by NAI. PGP 6.5.8ckt on the other hand is fully supported by RITLabs thanks to Imad Faiad, and those CKT versions are just as feature rich as the PGP 7.x versions including an expanded list of supported Algorithms, PGPDisk, etc. Certainly worth taking a look: http://www.ipgpp.com/ -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: AntiVir and notification
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jonathan, @07 June 2002, 07:22:59 -0500 (13:22 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Have a look at the 'Return-Path's ... When one computer here was infected the Return-Paths all made sense, albeit all From: headers were faked ... Depends... not all versions of the Klez are tacking in the return-path, or should I say not all ISPs are tacking in the return-path. If they were, resolving who is infected would be a hell of a lot easier ;) Well, I get no Return-Path headers :-(. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1-rc2 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9ALFiOeQkq5KdzaARAtViAKCUw3bjVhdt2+vVmSsUfEPJn950iwCfa03G 5O2Exdltb3d8g+OjlIIvK/A= =eGwI -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Different Versions.
Hi all, I know this has probably been asked hundreds of times, but is there some way of finding out the difference between all the different versions of The Bat? I subscribed to be informed of when new versions come out, but I dont seem to receive anything. Also, I see the Whats New, but this doesnt tell us whats new from one version to the next. I think itll be useful if we were notified of each new version and what the changes were from the last version, rather than all the changes from day one. So can someone tell me whats new from The Bat! 1.60q compared 1.60m? And what happened to n, o and p? Apart from that, a superb e-mail client that I would recommend to anyone! Thanks, Chris.
Re: Different Versions.
Dear ChristopherX, Friday, June 7, 2002 at 3:36:22 PM you wrote: WC Apart from that, a superb e-mail client that I would recommend to anyone! Great! But how come you don't use it? I couldn't help noticing that you've got one of them annoying message.htm added to your mail. -- Kind regards, Britt Malka |\/| | \__/ | \/\/ | | \\ // \ / \/ ... If you have sex with your clone, are you gay or are you masturbating? ... www.malka.it - www.malka.dk - www.supermalka.dk ... Mailer: Ritlabs SecureBat! v1.60p (7Ba40-6E8D5) under Windows 2000 5.0 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: AntiVir and notification
On Friday, June 07, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote... Depends... not all versions of the Klez are tacking in the return-path, or should I say not all ISPs are tacking in the return-path. If they were, resolving who is infected would be a hell of a lot easier ;) Well, I get no Return-Path headers :-(. My point exactly ;) Some of the Klez infected emails we've been getting here, have actually had a return-path set. I'm not sure if that is by the ISP, or by the virus itself. Bit stupid if it was the virus, and if it was the ISP, I'd like to know how, Klez is supposed to run it's own SMTP server. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
RE: Different Versions.
On Friday, June 07, 2002, Britt Malka wrote... WC The reason for it anyway is because I'm not using The Bat! at the moment as WC I'm at work and behind a firewall. Otherwise, I'd love to use it here! Oh, poor you! We have a firewall at work, but fortunately we can use The Bat! there. Are you sure that it is impossible? Maybe you should just change the port-number or something like that? Or check the settings you're using in your currently client, and use those in TB! I'm using Outlook 2000, how do I find the relevant info? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Different Versions.
On Friday, June 07, 2002, Weaven, ChristopherX wrote... I'm using Outlook 2000, how do I find the relevant info? Then Outlook 2000 is either messing up your replies, or there is editing going on. As for finding out the details, go into Outlook, click Tools - Email Accounts - View or Change existing details, then select the account you want to look at, go to properties, and look at the servers page. I looked in OutlookXP, but it should be pretty close. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
RE: Re[2]: Different Versions.
Dear ChristopherX, Friday, June 7, 2002 at 3:48:45 PM you wrote: WC What's the message.htm thing? It is a file that you create if you write with HTML in Outlook Express, Outlook etc. Very often they are of no use, because most people with with black letters on white background, but they take up space on the harddisk, if you keep the messages. Some of us here have search for a way of deleting these files with a filter, but it doesn't seem possible. WC The reason for it anyway is because I'm not using The Bat! at the moment as WC I'm at work and behind a firewall. Otherwise, I'd love to use it here! Oh, poor you! We have a firewall at work, but fortunately we can use The Bat! there. Are you sure that it is impossible? Maybe you should just change the port-number or something like that? If someone could tell me how, I'd love to use it here at work! -- Kind regards, Britt Malka |\/| | \__/ | \/\/ | | \\ // \ / \/ ... Oh, I'm sorry. Did I break your concentration? ... www.malka.it - www.malka.dk - www.supermalka.dk ... Mailer: Ritlabs SecureBat! v1.60p (7Ba40-6E8D5) under Windows 2000 5.0 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
RE: Different Versions.
Dear ChristopherX, Friday, June 7, 2002 at 3:36:22 PM you wrote: WC Apart from that, a superb e-mail client that I would recommend to anyone! Great! But how come you don't use it? I couldn't help noticing that you've got one of them annoying message.htm added to your mail. What's the message.htm thing? The reason for it anyway is because I'm not using The Bat! at the moment as I'm at work and behind a firewall. Otherwise, I'd love to use it here! -- Kind regards, Britt Malka |\/| | \__/ | \/\/ | | \\ // \ / \/ ... If you have sex with your clone, are you gay or are you masturbating? ... www.malka.it - www.malka.dk - www.supermalka.dk ... Mailer: Ritlabs SecureBat! v1.60p (7Ba40-6E8D5) under Windows 2000 5.0 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Forcing wrap
Sometimes when I reply to messages (I don't know what conditions have to exist), the quoted text will not wrap. After I send the message, when I look in the sent folder, the text is wrapped, so either it wraps on sending or it just displays as wrapped in the Sent folder. Is there a way to force the wrapping while the reply is still in the composition/editor window? Among other reasons, a digital signature will presumably not come back as 'good' if the message is not wrapped in its final form at the time the signature hash is computed. -- JN Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: SpamCop encountered errors
Hello Paul, On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 06:55:45 -0400 GMT (07/06/02, 17:55 +0700 GMT), Paul Cartwright wrote: PC and I clicked on the web page for Spamcop's reply. THAT IS AWESOME PC that is MUCH more info than I ever got from Arin WHOIS! My feelings exactly. And fully automated, so forget about spending 20 minutes (at least) for each spam message. :-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. If you don't like the news, go out and make some. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Slow Sending
I'm finding that it's taking quite awhile for an e-mail to send. I click the send button and it takes approximately 15 seconds for the e-mail to send. During that time TB is locked up and I'm unable to do anything else within the program. Anyone else run into this problem? Any suggestions on what I could tweak to have the e-mail not hang like that? Michael T. Ashby Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: E-mail address filtering.
Hello ChristopherX, On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 02:43:12 -0700 GMT (07/06/02, 16:43 +0700 GMT), Weaven, ChristopherX wrote: WC I want to send an auto-reply to messages received to [EMAIL PROTECTED] WC mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , but because the other address has the same text, WC it auto-replies to them all messages received. The solution is [Joe.], presence no, location kludges, in additon to the string as you have mentioned. On the Rules page of your filter, add this condition by clicking on Add. This makes the two conditions behave as put together with a logical AND. WC Ps. What's new from The Bat! 1.60q now offered over 1.60m? And WC what happened to n, o and p? Those were beta versions that were not published on the general download sites. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. The company made me a scapegoat, just like my three previous employers. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
The Bat! Upgrades.
Hi, Im new to this QA thing for TB!, but now I know about it, I keep thinking of questions. Can there be a way of installing each upgrade as patch rather than as a whole new program and then offer the whole program separately? Being on a dial-up and with all the updates about at the moment, I think some people can benefit. When I installed the last upgrade, my registration key didnt work. Is there a way of installing the upgrade without causing key problems? Until my next question, Chris. Ps. How many people are on this distribution list?
RE: Slow Sending
I'm finding that it's taking quite awhile for an e-mail to send. I click the send button and it takes approximately 15 seconds for the e-mail to send. During that time TB is locked up and I'm unable to do anything else within the program. Anyone else run into this problem? Any suggestions on what I could tweak to have the e-mail not hang like that? What version of The Bat! are you using? Michael T. Ashby Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree
Hello Allie, On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 04:54:06 -0500 GMT (07/06/02, 16:54 +0700 GMT), Allie C Martin wrote: TF Also, I have parked messages in every single folder. Indicating TF parked messages in the folder tree would defeat the purpose. ACM What about me who has flagged messages in every folder? :-) Arrghhh... flagged over here means still needs to be replied to. Should we make the folder icon flaglets optional then? g -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. The save icon on Microsoft Word shows a floppy disk, with the shutter on backwards. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Slow Sending
I'm using version 1.60m Michael T. Ashby Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:44:34 AM, you wrote: JA On Friday, June 07, 2002, Weaven, ChristopherX wrote... What version of The Bat! are you using? JA No offence... but is there any chance you could change the outlook JA settings to actually put in the quotes for the emails you're replying JA to... I keep getting confused, and thing somebody is double posting on JA the behalf of somebody else ;) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
Hello ChristopherX, On Friday, June 7, 2002 at 08:20:20 -0700 , you wrote concerning 'The Bat! Upgrades.': ... 1. Can there be a way of installing each upgrade as patch rather than as a whole new program and then offer the whole program separately? Being on a dial-up and with all the updates about at the moment, I think some people can benefit. No. When there is a new version you can only download the whole package or just the executable (from the beta site). Talking about bandwidth: please don't post HTML-messages. 2. When I installed the last upgrade, my registration key didn't work. Is there a way of installing the upgrade without causing key problems? I never had problems with upgrading and my registration keys. AFAIK when you upgrade nothing changes in the registry so I don't know how this could happen. -- Best regards, David ** A pessimist is never disappointed. ** [TB! 1.60q] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[3]: Slow Sending
Dear Michael, Friday, June 7, 2002 at 5:47:58 PM you wrote: MTA I'm using version 1.60m Try upgrading to the latest version. There has been many problems with version m. -- Kind regards, Britt Malka |\/| | \__/ | \/\/ | | \\ // \ / \/ ... Not in *my* movie! ... www.malka.it - www.malka.dk - www.supermalka.dk ... Mailer: Ritlabs SecureBat! v1.60p (7Ba40-6E8D5) under Windows 2000 5.0 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ChristopherX, @07 June 2002, 08:20:20 -0700 (16:20 UK time) Weaven, ChristopherX wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. Can there be a way of installing each upgrade as patch rather than as a whole new program and then offer the whole program separately? Being on a dial-up and with all the updates about at the moment, I think some people can benefit. No there isn't. 2. When I installed the last upgrade, my registration key didn't work. Is there a way of installing the upgrade without causing key problems? It should always work. You should *not* uninstall before upgrading. The registration codes are held in the registry. Ps. How many people are on this distribution list? About 700. moderator Very few of whom like receiving HTLM mail. ;-) /moderator - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1-rc2 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9ANylOeQkq5KdzaARAslyAJ4qfvbrdki5bi9PDdTJYTWWnNqVEwCfX2jr yXIIzoW1Vz/aD7Wl9nupYBI= =T+Qr -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: DSL and the Bat!
Hello Lynn. At 1:18 AM on Tuesday, June 04, 2002 you wrote the following about [DSL and the Bat!]: Lynn [...] we recently installed DSL and I can't seem to figure Lynn out how to connect to my email using The Bat. I keep Lynn getting a window that says that no dial-up connection Lynn was made. [/...] Also make sure that you have a Local Area ConNection installed on your system. If its not there, you will have to install the driver via the Device Manager before DSL will work. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V1.60n/W2K_SP2 ICQ 41116329 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree
Hello Allie, What about me who has flagged messages in every folder? :-) I also have parked, flagged and coloured messages in most of my 300+ folders. So, if something as suggested in this thread was ever implemented in TB my folder tree would look quite psychedelic. The only thing that would perhaps be acceptable for me is something in conjunction with Advance Filtering. That is, that if I select for example View/Display/Only messages with attachments, the folder tree only displays folders which contain messages with attachments, and so on. In any case, whether psychedelic or not, if ever implemented it should be _optional_ and not _forced_ on any user. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
HTML email (was: The Bat! Upgrades.)
Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:20:20 AM, ChristopherX wrote: I'm new to this QA thing for TB!, but now I know about it, I keep thinking of questions. Chris, I know in another thread it was brought up that you are using Outlook 2000. Give this a try to turn off the HTML emails. Click Tools/Options, select the Mail Format tab. Select Plain Text in the message format dropdown. Do you know if the account you are mailing from is a POP account or if it is going through an Exchange Server? I seem to remember something about Exchange sending even Plain Text emails in HTML, but perhaps I'm mistaken... -- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60 RC/2 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Showing Flagged messages on Account tree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas On 07 June 2002 at 21:57:55 +0700 (which was 15:57 where I live) Thomas F rearranged electrons to get TF Also, I have parked messages in every single folder. Indicating TF parked messages in the folder tree would defeat the purpose. ACM What about me who has flagged messages in every folder? :-) Arrghhh... flagged over here means still needs to be replied to. Should we make the folder icon flaglets optional then? g Sounds like you need a draft folder. :) - -- Best regards, ___ David | SecureBat!1.60q | E-mailaholics | _| Win 2K Server 5.0.2195 SP2 | International | | Greta Gump.I vant to be a box of chocolates | ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1-rc2 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9AOH1+Yrx5mUPRTQRAlJtAKD8S/tp8ZmdcboyoSCfwWrGlm8lnwCgh+Zv ojoKiogj2adknK6bgPcFb04= =c5qF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Slow Sending
On Friday, June 07, 2002, Weaven, ChristopherX wrote... What version of The Bat! are you using? No offence... but is there any chance you could change the outlook settings to actually put in the quotes for the emails you're replying to... I keep getting confused, and thing somebody is double posting on the behalf of somebody else ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[4]: Slow Sending
Britt, Thanks, will do! Michael T. Ashby Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:50:11 AM, you wrote: BM Dear Michael, BM Friday, June 7, 2002 at 5:47:58 PM you wrote: MTA I'm using version 1.60m BM Try upgrading to the latest version. There has been many problems with BM version m. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: HTML email (was: The Bat! Upgrades.)
Hello Dave, On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 11:42:25 -0500 GMT (07/06/02, 23:42 +0700 GMT), Dave Gorman wrote: DG Do you know if the account you are mailing from is a POP account DG or if it is going through an Exchange Server? I used TB with the Exchange Server at work. There is a switch that the admin can use to allow or disallow POP access, I understand. DG I seem to remember something about Exchange sending even Plain DG Text emails in HTML, but perhaps I'm mistaken... That's not correct, as I had asked all my collegues to turn off HTML in their OL, and it worked. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. If work is so terrific, how come they have to pay you to do it? Message reply created with The Bat! 1.60q under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[5]: Slow Sending
Ok, I tried installing the latest version. Performed a reboot of the machine as well, just to be sure and the problem is not fixed. So, when I send an e-mail it's still taking 15 - 30 seconds for the message to go away and TB is hung while this process is happening. Any other suggestions? Michael T. Ashby Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:54:36 AM, you wrote: MTA Britt, MTA Thanks, will do! MTA Michael T. Ashby MTA MTA Friday, June 7, 2002, 10:50:11 AM, you wrote: BM Dear Michael, BM Friday, June 7, 2002 at 5:47:58 PM you wrote: MTA I'm using version 1.60m BM Try upgrading to the latest version. There has been many problems with BM version m. MTA MTA Current Ver: 1.60q MTA FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com MTA Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MTA Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com MTA Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MTA TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MTA Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Slow Sending
Well, it's not that the e-mail is taking long to be handled by the POP server, it's more that TB is just hanging there while it happens. It used to be that the e-mail would just go to the outbox and the connection manager would deliver the mail, while I could read other mail, etc. The problem is that TB just hangs there doing nothing until the e-mail is sent. Even just sending it to the outbox and not sending it immediately has the same effect. Michael T. Ashby Friday, June 7, 2002, 11:23:39 AM, you wrote: JR Hello Michael. JR At 11:30 AM on Friday, June 07, 2002 you wrote the following JR about [Slow Sending]: Michael I'm finding that it's taking quite awhile for an Michael e-mail to send. I click the send button and it Michael takes approximately 15 seconds for the e-mail to Michael send. [...] JR Could also be your ISP server in which case there's not a JR whole helluva lot you can do about it. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Different Versions.
Friday, June 7, 2002, 9:14:48 AM, Jonathan wrote: On Friday, June 07, 2002, Weaven, ChristopherX wrote... I'm using Outlook 2000, how do I find the relevant info? go into Outlook, click Tools - Email Accounts - View or Change existing details, then select the account you want to look at, go to properties, and look at the servers page. It's also possible, depending how your Outlook 2000 is configured, you may need to click Tools/Services. Then select Internet Email (if there is more than one, select the appropriate account) and examine the properties of the Internet Email account. HTH -- Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60 RC/2 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Administrator account
Marck- Friday, June 7, 2002, 4:21:50 AM, you wrote: MDP 4) Desperate measures : delete account.cfg and reconfigure Am I alone in finding it disturbing that all the security measures you can set up in TB can be circumvented by deleting the cfg file and constructing a new one? Does this mean that if I set up user levels and other protection in my system someone can come along and defeat my security measures that easily? Or am I reading too much between the lines here? -Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
Hello Mark, On Friday, June 7, 2002 at 09:54:24 -0700, you wrote concerning 'The Bat! Upgrades.': ... DvZ Talking about bandwidth: please don't post HTML-messages. Actually, I didn't realize you could do this with TB without explicitly attaching a file. I didn't say you can did I? Because it's not possible with TB!. -- Best regards, David ** Kids-They're not sleeping, they're recharging! ** [TB! 1.60q] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: HTML email (was: The Bat! Upgrades.)
Hello Dave, DG Do you know if the account you are mailing from is a POP account DG or if it is going through an Exchange Server? I seem to remember DG something about Exchange sending even Plain Text emails in DG HTML, but perhaps I'm mistaken... That depends on how you configure the Internet Mail Connector: you can also tell Exchange to send out every mail in plain text. Ciao, luigi Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Luigimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Administrator account
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, @07 June 2002, 10:27:51 -0700 (18:27 UK time) Mark Wieder wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP 4) Desperate measures : delete account.cfg and reconfigure Am I alone in finding it disturbing that all the security measures you can set up in TB can be circumvented by deleting the cfg file and constructing a new one? Does this mean that if I set up user levels and other protection in my system someone can come along and defeat my security measures that easily? Or am I reading too much between the lines here? If security measures are that vital I suggest you look at SecureBat!, StrongBat! and The Bat! Pro. The security in The Bat! is only meant to be casual AFAIK. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1-rc2 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9APwKOeQkq5KdzaARAm/NAJ4xmy9uZ+HjfXzDvn5OOTvFDKSNfQCdE+XF cLbevJy46Wa2I8c+KNp+pw0= =5L4M -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
--- Weaven, ChristopherX / Freitag, 07.06.2002, 17:20:20
The Bat! Upgrades.
This is a forwarded message
From: Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, June 7, 2002, 7:50:54 PM
Subject: Will someone please post this in TBUDL for me? TIA Re: The Bat! Upgrades.
===8==Original message text===
Hi Chris,
2. When I installed the last upgrade, my registration key didn't
work. Is there a way of installing the upgrade without causing key
problems?
Upon installing/upgrading earlier versions of TB!, time and time again
I found that it was not registered once the installation/upgrade
finished.
*IF* this is what you are referring to, all you need to do is locate
the email which contains your registration key (sent to you upon
registration), click on it (you don't need to open it in a separate
window...just click on it as if you were reading it...), THEN: go to
HELP / ENTER REGISTRATION CODE. When the box comes up, your key and
everything EXCEPT the password should be in there. All you need to do
is enter your password and voila! It'll be registered again.
FWIW: I just upgraded from 1.53d to 1.60q, and did not have to enter
my registration #/code as I have had to do before. (And, IMHO, this
version is awesome! VERY different, MUCH more friendly and easier to
use. :) )
Blessings and light,
~~~Angel
--
Friday, June 7, 2002 10:42:32 AM
-={+}=-Senza fiduccia niente-={+}=-
| TheBat! 1.60q
| http://www.ritlabs.com
| on Windows 2000 5 Service Pack 2 (Win2K Pro)
| 1gHz 40Gb hard disk 512Mb RAM
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
550 Error
Hello fellow Bat! fans. Any idea what this error message from my isp means? Your Message Fwd: Insurance in 2002/2003 Outgoings (Fri, 7 Jun 2002 21:16:55 +1000) could not be successfully delivered to the following recipients :- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 DATA line too long (Max 1024) This message was actually sent to two people; the other not at fashionfair; no reject notice on that one. (AFAIK) -- Regards, John Phillips Sydney, Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTML mail spam not welcome. Using Bat! 1.60q 7BE05C47 - Being used by Windows 98 4.10 Build ASony Vaio Notebook PCG-505TS Pentium 300 64meg ram Love-Lust 'Whats the Difference ?' (at 3 in the morning) Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Forcing wrap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Joseph N. [JN] wrote: ... JN Sometimes when I reply to messages (I don't know what conditions have JN to exist), the quoted text will not wrap. After I send the message, JN when I look in the sent folder, the text is wrapped, so either it JN wraps on sending or it just displays as wrapped in the Sent folder. The formatting you see in the editor is the one that's sent, unless you clearsign the message using a plugin and it's done upon sending. What you're seeing when viewing the message in the sent folder is soft wrapping done by the viewer. If you reopen the message in the editor you should see that the wrapping isn't really there. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE9ARMBV8nrYCsHF+IRAiH1AKCoGGXm8C0xZZyThhrKvXBBe6i3XwCgyZia G9B01sza8iAv/tP1aMZxydE= =wYgn -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Slow Sending
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael T. Ashby [MTA] wrote: ... MTA So, when I send an e-mail it's still taking 15 - 30 seconds for MTA the message to go away and TB is hung while this process is MTA happening. MTA Any other suggestions? Are there any compounding variables not mentioned. For example, a firewall that you have running? It could be the firewall. I doubt very much that it's TB! specifically that's the problem. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60q | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE9ARQDV8nrYCsHF+IRAlO0AJ9RF4qqiJz/WAl28k0Z7RgFGMfQcgCgjN6y KeHP/TBGXLlDHsqaUayN9E0= =fNvx -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: 550 Error
Hello John, On Friday, June 7, 2002 at 05:39:39 +1000, you wrote concerning '550 Error': ... Any idea what this error message from my isp means? Following to this site it means the following: (http://staff.ncst.ernet.in/~philip/writings/smtp-intro.html) Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable [E.g., mailbox not found, no access] -- Best regards, David ** Upgrade: take old bugs out, put new ones in. ** [TB! 1.60q] [Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2] [Running on a Celeron 800@1176 256 Mb RAM] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: is there a way 'ignore thread' ?
Hello Greg, Miguel have you given up on the pseudo ignore capability or did I miss it? No, I haven't given up. Actually I have emulated the Ignore feature with a Colour Group and an Ignore incoming filter. But I don't use it because it is actually much easier to Ctrl+Shift+M when I get new messages in a thread I am not interested in. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Watch tread
Hello Joseph, I think you misunderstood my request. Thursday, June 6, 2002, 10:23:50 PM, you wrote: JN Although TB! doesn't exactly have that watch feature, it does have JN features which do the same thing, only slightly differently. JN First, you could view your messages by thread, so that messages with JN the same subject or reference or sender, or whatever you choose, are JN grouped together. I am using the tread feature, but only the new unread messages, so normally I don't see the older ones JN Then, regardless of whether you choose to view by thread, you can JN create filters so that messages with the same information of your JN choosing, e.g., subject line, are given the same color group (thereby JN showing immediately different by color) or moved to a separate folder JN (thereby showing by the indicators in the folder tree that there are JN new messages). I could do this, use colour groups, I did it for a while. But the messages I want to watch could be numerous daily and they may or may not continue. I was using Forte Agent prior to BAT, Agent had an iconin addition to parking, flag, attachment etc called WATCH TREAD. By clicking this column, it worked similar to flag or park but it marked all the continuation of a tread. JN On Thursday, June 06, 2002, Peter Kerekes wrote in JN [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: There is a very useful feature missing from BAT: A way to mark a message so that it would automatically flag any new follow up messages in that tread, like a WATCH for. Sometimes a message is interesting and would like to see the follow-ups, replies, suggestions, but with so many E-mails it is easy to overlook unless it is highlighted somehow. JN JN Current Ver: 1.60q JN FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com JN Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JN Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com JN Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JN TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JN Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com -- Best regards, Petermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60k on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Administrator account
Marck- Thanks. No, I don't need the security measures, I just wanted to make sure that I was understanding things properly. -Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
1.60q-continued
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think I need to correct myself. I was reading the wrong line about the new HTML engine...sorry for the inaccuracy. - - Pete 8:29:47 PM - - Ask about eScan Content-Security and Anti-Virus Software. We will meet all of your Anti-Virus needs. www.milneweb.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGP%20Keys iQA/AwUBPQFsXnE/NISQI2eeEQIW+wCgksQU/0DqIkvfaW8l78OmIYr5rL0An00P AdZZHHUS3ze4NewFpwZ1Zgaz =vy8U -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: 1.60q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Pete, @08 June 2002, 20:25:53 -0600 (03:25 UK time) Pete Milne wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I was just reading a bit about the newest of The Bat!. I see it is now has an newer HTML viewing engine in it. Aside from the fact I want nothing to do with HTML in email, do I want to bother upgrading to 'q'? As time goes on, is The Bat! going to start getting sluggish and bigger due to these new 'improvements'? What is the general consensus?? But ... you are already running 1.60. You're running 'm'. 'q' contains some bug fixes over 'm', some of which include fixes for memory and resource leaks. As a runner of 1.60, you already have the features you were reading about. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1-rc2 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9AW7VOeQkq5KdzaARAupGAJ9T+OSQPkKf6b8GY7LSpjmcneH87ACgxCip qdCXXIgs+PIyAKNXEw8aeRk= =mLKk -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: 1.60q-continued
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Pete, @08 June 2002, 20:31:01 -0600 (03:31 UK time) Pete Milne wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think I need to correct myself. I was reading the wrong line about the new HTML engine...sorry for the inaccuracy. 1.60 does actually contain a new HTML rendering engine. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1-rc2 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9AW8yOeQkq5KdzaARArk+AJ9XhdwgBCYeWCqV929CMclptpdXjgCfRe+U wg047uvEAQdYy/fDiAqd8G0= =bYH9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: 1.60q-continued
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Replying to your message of Friday, June 7, 2002, 8:42:57 PM: I wasn't too sure on how much of a change you get between 'm' and 'q'...after all, it is 4 whole letters! ;o) I am pretty well pleased, minus a few little things, with what I have now. I was hoping things were going to go backwards at all. I can't imagine why they would...but one never knows. Thanks!! - -- Pete Friday, June 7, 2002 8:58:47 PM This e-mail is brought to you by: The Bat: Version 1.60m Windows 2000 build 2195 Service Pack 2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com Comment: PGP Key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGP%20Keys iQA/AwUBPQFzTnE/NISQI2eeEQIy9wCgyVSmnvqHqZ5dGJV3vrpPrhcdRsMAoO2r c4aaS6bGPf89UvVJH4dA/ea2 =fGCK -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Status on 2.0?
What's the current expected release date of at least a beta? Thanks! Best regards, Aaron Aaron Green, MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: Forcing wrap
I'm not altogether sure what your point is. My standard signature has a standard delimiter. When there is a quote of something that is significant, i.e., something which ought to remain readable, I delete the delimiter so the quote remains dark. When the quoted text is retained simply as a cue for context, I don't worry about it, and leave the delimiter there, as I did in my three-letter reply which you quoted. As for where the quoted material belongs, I think that depends in part on the context and in part on the purpose. In newsgroups, posting one's follow-up above the quoted material is considered extremely bad form, for reasons which escape me but which are clearly part of the Usenet culture. In email, the opposite is the standard; it is not unusual to see three or five levels of quotations underneath the most current response. Intermixing quotation and fresh text seems to me the most helpful of all, in Usenet or mail, but it is only useful some times. As I said, I'm not really sure of your point. If it was to complain about my delimiter screwing up the quotation below it, I'll consider removing it. Relocating the signature seems a poor choice when there could be, as I noted, several levels of quotations below the actual text which is being signed. JN On Friday, June 07, 2002, Dwight A Corrin wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday, June 7, 2002, 5:30:21 PM, Joseph N. wrote: Thx. I didn't look but I know that on either this list or tbbeta there has been some discussion about the desirability of quoting along with the response, rather than quoting at the bottom of the message. While messages below responses are difficult in general, quoting below the signature delimiter, as appeared in this message is even worse. I blocked not only the quoted text above, but a little of the text from the message before, but it was of course correctly clipped because of the delimiter. I am set up so that matter below the delimiter appears in grey text, and eight point type while message text is black and eleven point type. It shouldn't be necessary to change settings to make the signature larger and darker to read a whole message. Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re[2]: PGP 7 freeware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick, Friday, June 7, 2002, 3:21:01 PM, you wrote: NA I do not believe it ever will have direct support for PGP 7.x because it NA has literally been abandoned by NAI. Well, Nick, in my opinion, this is rather sad. PGP 7.x is now supporting the HTML format. And since The Bat! team seems to work on implementing the possibility of creating HTML messages with their V2 product, the PGP 7.x users would not be able to have a seemless integration with The Bat! - -- Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -=Robert Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=- ~ PGP public key: 0x633F6D07 (link 1 - embedded, link 2 - attached) Fingerprint: 1A1C 29F1 2A0C 4C4E 0BDA C8EE 5A1D 9F03 633F 6D07 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP%20KeyBody=Please%20send%20key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=GPG%20KeyBody=Please%20send%20key ~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32) - GPGshell v2.30.22 Comment: PGP-signed for authentication. iD8DBQE9AZDRWh2fA2M/bQcRArvrAKDS+Zef/49sT6XeFrbGW7gbYhIIcgCfZ/VD g/v4Xc0f/e2H+sCBxmgu8J4= =Qwlm -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
