Re: Format block as quoted

2002-12-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo M.,

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:24:00 -0700GMT (20-12-02, 1:24 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:

ME You'll also notice a bug with Bat! if you are reading this message
ME in it. The three lines above are shown in bold because Bat! thinks
ME I want them to indicated quoted text.

As you've been told, it's a setting. ;-)
But if you start the line with a space TB will never display it as
bold.



-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Leave on server woes.

2002-12-20 Thread Johannes Posel
Dear Thomas,

On 04:39 20.12.2002, you [Thomas Fernandez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])]
wrote...

 What is the UID for anyway, since the MID is already unique?

The MID is only in the headers of the message. The client would have
to issue TOP for each message in order to see wheter it already has
that message. Server ssupporting UIDL can give you such a list in one
row. :)

Cheers,
 Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Any time things appear to be going better,
you have overlooked something.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Updating AB

2002-12-20 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Eddie,

 I know of a work around [...]
EC ... that did what I needed :)

I am happy I could help you :)

EC Let me just as a follow-up question.
EC Is it possible to synchronize two AB?

I am am sure there is a way but unfortunately its beyond my
knowledge :( This list is great, I am sure someone either
knows how or has a work around.

Happy Holidays :)

- - -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPgLi0l3LB35+TCg0EQLNaACfYPVAcyJRY8WoBkb2ONCtCK9nbbgAn13C
jA/W3lp1Vj4enLwiTGmazTrn
=PPok
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Setting up Web2pop account in The Bat!

2002-12-20 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello Thomas,

Thursday, December 19, 2002, 3:57:08 PM, you wrote:


 What do you recommend I do so that I can access my Hotmail account
 via The Bat!?

TF If you insist on Hotmail, then a program by the name of web2pop is
TF your solution. I don't have the URL handy, but it was built for
TF services like Hotmail that only offer web access. This (freeware?)
TF proggy will make it possible for you to check your Hotmail with TB.
TF Google knows the download location.

I have downloaded Web2pop from their Website and installed it. I
cannot see where it is running on my computer. I have also tried to
set up an account in The Bat! to download my Hotmail messages via
Web2pop. I cannot get this to work though. Could you tell my how to
set up the account and how to configure this to download my Hotmail
messages. I appreciate your alternative suggestions to Hotmail which I
can look into at some future date. At present I just want to reach a
stable position from where I can move forward.


-- 
Love and Light,
 Granville  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Format block as quoted

2002-12-20 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Roelof!

On Friday, December 20, 2002 at 9:49:58 AM you wrote:

 But if you start the line with a space TB will never display it as
 bold.

And if it is Bold specifically that bothers you switch - like me -
to the PTV (Yes, your lines would have been shown in red).




-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

Why don't you ever see the headline, Psychic Wins Lottery?



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas!

On Friday, December 20, 2002 at 4:37:25 AM you wrote:

 If I do that, will you allow me one line for the X-Face?

Let's be perfectly honest, the best way to get rid of unnecessary
overhead would be to ban e-mail, actually computers. The Internet is
there to solve problems one would not have without them.

Take the TB lists, perfectly self-referential and therefore useless to
everyone not using TB.

That is why I hate arguments on specifics, in this case bandwidth.
It does not hold for me, my line is wide enough to download even the
notoriously big security patches from MS in a little more than 2
minutes - and this line doesn't cost me extra for time or traffic.

I still don't want X-Face or something similar. I also don't want
people to always be exposed to my face - or whatever I chose to put
in. I like the idea of the Rogues Gallery but even that is not used
honestly. In my experience there'll always be clowns using Bart
faces, *LotR* characters, *Star Wars* images. I don't want to see
that.



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

Only the strong survive.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Miguel,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:57:14 +0100
Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If more ml software uses them and more MUAs implement it's
 interpretation it can be a help to list members.

 Yeap, specially these two ;-)
 
 ,- [  ]
 | List-Subscribe:
 | http://stromgrade.its-toasted.org/mailman/listinfo/tbudl,
 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe
 `-

In conjunction with a public accessible archive that offers to download
messages in MBOX format: yes :-)
-- 
Pit


Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: PGP passphrase caching

2002-12-20 Thread Simon Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

'Lo Toby,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:25:22 +1100 your time, you said:

I  don't  know  whether this is OK, but I'm going to say it anyway: when you
start   a new thread can you not reply to an existing message and change the
subject line please. What happens is that people that are threading messages
by reference suddenly get a new topic attached to the middle of an unrelated
thread. If you set up a template for The Bat! in your address book you won't
have to worry about filling in the To: field, and avoid thread hijacking.

All the best :)

- --
Slán,

 Simon @ theycallmesimon.co.uk

**
PGP Key: http://pgp.theycallmesimon.co.uk/

Faffing about with TB! v1.62 on W2K SP3

#1089. Qualm Drowsy Sire ¶

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Privacy is freedom. Protect your freedom with PGP!
Comment: KeyID: 0x5C7E8966
Comment: Fingerprint: 851C F927 0296 FF1C 70A2  474F CB6E 6FFE 5C7E 8966

iQA/AwUBPgLyGMtub/5cfolmEQKPFQCfQO+EVvSZkZnFCwth0Q129fgcE1EAoOoi
5TpZrTN4TAAlD3mhxESUjb5D
=k3Xz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Updating AB

2002-12-20 Thread Allie C Martin
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Eddie Castelli [EC] wrote:'

EC Let me just as a follow-up question. Is it possible to
EC synchronize two AB?

It would appear that this is possible by right clicking on one of
the address books you wish to synchronize, select copy and paste it
in the other address book. Then do the reverse, i.e., copy and paste
the other address book into the original one you copied from.

TB! will not duplicate address book groups or entries when doing
this.

-- 
  -=] Allie C Martin [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Thomas,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:37:25 +0700
Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 And a minimum of 7 by the list server.

 I see only 5 lines added to the body by the server :-)
 
 *ahhh* You refer to 7 lines in header ... :-)
 Yes, could But I think _these_ lines are quite useful.

 You think so. Others don't. I think X-Face (1 line) is useful. You
 don't. My offer to you: I exchange 7 List-Header lines for one X-face
 line. Interested? ;-)

No. Not interested :-)
The one category of header lines offer technical information and help,
the other only fun. Recognizing a person on a ML is usually done by
it's name, so X-Face is a pure toy.
One might find it funny, but it's use is far behind the one of
List-headers. :-)

 You can have the footer, too.

We already to have.
Me personally don't need the list footers :-)

 Nobody reads that anyway. 

Sadly the truth :-/

 How about the sig? I see no value in it, you can see my name in the
 From address.

Yes, I can.
But as you might have noticed: some signature don't contain only the
name, but maybe also a nickname (as mine sometimes do) and different
contact information or PGP-Key-IDs. These information are usually not in
From: header :) (or any other)

 Some people even use cookies!

Yes ... of course ... it's christmas time!!! :-

 These should be outlawed. 

No. they're _too_ delicious :-)))

 Oh, and then, let's do away with the greeting. It is not useful.

??? You seem not to understand the meaning of an attribution line?!?
Didn't we had this discussion on any of the TB!-lists recently? :-)

 I am looking at a way to reduce the number of Received headers. Surely
 they are useful (most people check every mail about its routing), but
 maybe I should use my own SMTP server after all, connect directly to
 the recipient's server and thus reduce the number of header lines.

I do have. But you still don't have any influence on number of
Received lines in incoming mails :-)
But yes, I've written a program for myself to strip header lines out of
a mail. :-) It's primary use is to strip SpamAssassin headers when
submitting mails to SpamCop. As it takes the headers to strip as command
line arguments (multiple are allowed) it would be easy stip Received
headers on incoming mails too :-)

 If I do that, will you allow me one line for the X-Face?

I didn't forbid it, so I don't need to allow it now or later, no
matter what changed in circumstances. I just expressed my opinion it's
superfluous :-)


 If more ml software uses them and more MUAs implement it's
 interpretation it can be a help to list members. Especially those
 telling the same over and over again (Send an empty message to ...
 to unsubscribe., Use the followin link to crawl through the
 archive ..., etc, etc.)

 I absolutely agree. Those threads arising from people asking these
 things, which you know already so aren't interested in downloading,
 should be deleted on server side.

Seems you want to misunderstand or misinterpret. That's sad.
I did not say these messages should be deleted, neither server side nor
client side, just because of it's content.
I said having references for FAQs can be helpful.
I don't like the idea of typing the same answer over and over again.
I don't like creating a QT for every FAQ. So pointing the questioner to
the correct location of the answer is a possible solution.
If these pointer / reference is in message headers (inserted by list
server software) I (and others) can refer there, the answer will be
short an precise and everybody _can_ be happy.
Those with 1000+ mails per day because the number ain't increasing more
than needed with only redundant information, the others because they got
a short and exact answer to their question, instead of a 20+ mails
thread with 19 possible ... answers.

 After all, TB uses the ML headers correctly, so they are useful, and
 any questions superfluous.

??? Lets switch off the computer. It's superfluous. Somebody once said:
Computers are there to solve problems we wouldn't have without them.
[source unknown] 

I have seen a figure of a cow, applicable at the roof of a car.
It increases the factor of recognition if I drive through the city,
albeit it increases the consumption of fuel significant ... Superfluous
or necessary?

P.S.: I smell a fish ... let's hide on TBOT before it hits :-)
-- 
Pit


Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Dierk,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:16:00 +0100
Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 That is why I hate arguments on specifics, in this case bandwidth.

Just to clear things a little bit: I was not nitpicking on waste of
bandwidth because of too much headerline or superfluous information
in mails.

I just wanted to express _this_ special header line is IMO superfluous
AND I wanted to show quickly the ratio of header vs. body. No
implicit meaning of let's concentrate on reducing header lines before
we continue with anything else ... just a quick note ... there's an
interesting fact: there can be more meta information than information.
-- 
Pit


Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Peter!

On Friday, December 20, 2002 at 11:48:04 AM you wrote:

 Just to clear things a little bit: I was not nitpicking on waste of
 bandwidth because of too much headerline or superfluous information
 in mails.

No problem with your arguments, actually we just took the same
approach with partly even identical wording in answering Thomas' -
hopefully tongue-in-cheek - post. As you have read by now.



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

Statistics are like bikinis: What they reveal is suggestive, but what
they conceal is vital.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Simon Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

'Lo Dierk,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:16:00 +0100 your time, you said:

DH That  is why I hate arguments on specifics, in this case bandwidth.

That was brave g

I  don't  like X-Face either - I have an X-Face of 269 bytes after trying it
out.  Apart  from anything else, the quality is rubbish. It seems to me that
X-Face  is  better  suited  to Instant Messengers and 'Avatar-centric' email
clients...

However,  I  wouldn't  complain  at all if there was a better way for photos
used for The Bat! AB to be exchanged via TB!/TB! users though.

Let's  say a check box under your personal photo *in your personal VCard* to
allow  sending  of  your photo, and then to add your personal photo to a new
message  in  TB!  as  an  attachment  you'd  choose a menu entry maybe under
Utilities menu such as 'Insert VCard Photo' or something, when you wanted to
send  your  visog  to  someone  in particular for their TB! AB. Yes, I would
quite like that.

- --
Slán,

 Simon @ theycallmesimon.co.uk

**
PGP Key: http://pgp.theycallmesimon.co.uk/

Faffing about with TB! v1.62 on W2K SP3

#1988. Warm Qed Sir Lousy ¶

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Privacy is freedom. Protect your freedom with PGP!
Comment: KeyID: 0x5C7E8966
Comment: Fingerprint: 851C F927 0296 FF1C 70A2  474F CB6E 6FFE 5C7E 8966

iQA/AwUBPgL6F8tub/5cfolmEQJi3ACeNwwZvST1T0AX2LHB5NM3+ox4HCUAn29p
2eyGhTj/hH/a9TvyK6A+AZRC
=s8OX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Getting 'educational' out of the headers?

2002-12-20 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tim Fountain [TF] wrote:'

TF Although I was a student when I bought the TB!, I'm not now. Is
TF there any way to get rid of the 'educational' part of X-Mailer
TF header line short of buying a new copy of the program, or should
TF I be doing that anyway?

I contacted Ritlabs and did get a specific answer on this.

If you're no longer a student, to continue legally using TB! you
have to upgrade to the private license. You can do so at the same
site that you purchase TB!. The upgrade options are there.

https://www.cifnet.com/cgi-bin/ritlabs/thebat.html

- -- 
  -=] Allie C Martin [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: See http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html for key

iD8DBQE+AwCOV8nrYCsHF+IRAlNsAKCdTnpxAaxIDofpMuFZNzEC+9bhlwCdF+EW
z8RgTrBM43sTCo3ih06khdM=
=isrS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Setting up Web2pop account in The Bat!

2002-12-20 Thread Paul Cartwright

On Friday, December 20, 2002, 4:39 AM, you wrote:


GC I have downloaded Web2pop from their Website and installed it. I
GC cannot see where it is running on my computer. I have also tried to
GC set up an account in The Bat! to download my Hotmail messages via
GC Web2pop. I cannot get this to work though. Could you tell my how to
GC set up the account and how to configure this to download my Hotmail
GC messages. I appreciate your alternative suggestions to Hotmail which I
GC can look into at some future date. At present I just want to reach a
GC stable position from where I can move forward.


the web2pop globe with envelope over it should be in your system tray if
it is running. You need to start it and configure it, you probably
haven't done that. When you run it for the first time, it asks you to
setup your known accounts, yahoo, hotmail...whatever. You need to tell
it your username  password so it can talk to those web accounts. then
you setup TB with web2pop as the RECEIVE MAIL SERVER. then for username
you put it [EMAIL PROTECTED] you need the @hhotmail part in
there, not just the username. then check mail!


-- 
 Paul
Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Leave on server woes.

2002-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Johannes,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:19:34 +0100 GMT (20/12/02, 16:19 +0700 GMT),
Johannes Posel wrote:

 The MID is only in the headers of the message. The client would have
 to issue TOP for each message in order to see wheter it already has
 that message. Server ssupporting UIDL can give you such a list in one
 row. :)

I see. But from an efficiency POV, it is - well, inefficient to create
two unique IDs for each message in the internet. Room for improvement
in the RFCs, I'd think. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

I bought a portable cable tv.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:43:59 +0100 GMT (20/12/02, 17:43 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:

 ??? Lets switch off the computer. It's superfluous. Somebody once said:
 Computers are there to solve problems we wouldn't have without them.
 [source unknown] 

That's the truth. Yeah, man.

 P.S.: I smell a fish ... let's hide on TBOT before it hits :-)

(I just had to post this last comment g).

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

All generalizations are false.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Scheduling message sending -- a _possible_ work around (forwhat it's worth)

2002-12-20 Thread Daniel Grunberg
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:26:17 [GMT +0100] (5:26 PM EST here) Marek Mikus
wrote:

 Thursday, December 19, 2002, Sean wrote:

 Is it possible to schedule a message to be sent at a later time?  For
 example, if I compose a message at 1pm, but want it sent at 5pm, is
 there any way to tell TB! to do that?

 it is not in 1.62 version, but should be in the next version, as I
 listen from developers. You can use commandline parametres /MAIL and
 /SEND for creating and sending messages now.

FWIW, at http://www.karenware.com/powertools/powertools.asp Karen Ware
lists free Power Tools. Karen says that her Countdown Timer II and her
Emailer-II tools may be coupled to send emails at specified times.






Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition 
on Windows 95 4.0 Build  B



-- 

Daniel A. Grunberg   Kensington, Maryland, USA
homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Leave on server woes.

2002-12-20 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Thomas,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:51:57 +0700
Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The MID is only in the headers of the message. The client would have
 to issue TOP for each message in order to see wheter it already has
 that message. Server ssupporting UIDL can give you such a list in
 one row. :)

 I see. But from an efficiency POV, it is - well, inefficient to create
 two unique IDs for each message in the internet. Room for improvement
 in the RFCs, I'd think. ;-)

No. But that's far to technically.
-- 
Peter



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Need help setting the *charset*

2002-12-20 Thread Robert D.
I tick-marked the Always use this charset for 8859-1
I also put %charset=ISO-8859-1 in the template for many addresses,
including this one.

Yet, when I CC a message back to myself, I see the RFC headers contains
*charset=us-ascii* ---

Could someone please tell me *if* I am doiong something incorrectly?
-- 

Thanks for the help ...
Robert D.
___
The Bat! ver. 1.62 Beta/17
Windows ME- 4.90 Build:3000.
IE 6.0 Sp1




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Simon!

On Friday, December 20, 2002 at 12:08:07 PM you wrote:

 Let's  say a check box under your personal photo *in your personal VCard* to
 allow  sending  of  your photo,

*That* is a good idea.
Two years ago I couldn't include a portrait into my vCard because the
vCard consistently crashed OL/OE - and most of my contacts use that.
As some of them are business associates it is not a good idea to send
them messages crashing their PCs.

Hence, what I suggest is to give Add vCard a submenu: - with photo
- without photo
- just photo



-- 
Dierk Haasis

The Bat 1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1

Marriage is a wonderful institution, but who wants to live in an
institution?



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Insert macro in Msg

2002-12-20 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello  Eddie,

On  Friday, 20. December 2002  at 19:06:56 [GMT +0100] you wrote:

 When I'm in the AB and have a group selected then start a new Msg. I
 can't find any 'Macro' Button to Insert Macros into the Msg Body. Can
 this be confirmed and must I in this case insert macros on my own
 (e.g. Dear %TOname)?

The Macros like %TOname you insert in your templates of the AB Group,
not in the Message Editor.

-- 
Ciao
Thomas

Mailer:  The Bat!1.62 Christmas Edition | Windows XP
PGP: 6.58 ckt Build 8 - Key 0xBB9237A9
ICQ: 121117424 (hardly ever online)
HP:  http://www.thebat.int.tc/



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Insert macro in Msg

2002-12-20 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Friday, December 20, 2002, Thomas Martin wrote...

 When I'm in the AB and have a group selected then start a new Msg.
 I can't find any 'Macro' Button to Insert Macros into the Msg Body.
 Can this be confirmed and must I in this case insert macros on my
 own (e.g. Dear %TOname)?

 The Macros like %TOname you insert in your templates of the AB
 Group, not in the Message Editor.

You can always use a Quick Template to produce that kind of affect,
then use:

  quicktemplatenameCTRL + SPACE

To insert the content of the Quick Template, including resolved
Macros. (Replace quicktemplatename to whatever you called it).

- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQA/AwUBPgNiryuD6BT4/R9zEQIWOACggHZxZrbRdqhNv3uoFM8ihXkHjLwAn1MM
+zfjUSc5SDRo/OTENDJPgwJY
=xGqZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Gerard

ON Friday, December 20, 2002, 7:00:17 PM, you wrote:
DH Hence, what I suggest is to give Add vCard a submenu: - with photo
DH - without photo
DH - just photo

And for the appearance challenged   - Photo of a randomly selected
movie star :-)

Yes yes I know.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Sudden success at golf is like the sudden acquisition of wealth. It is
apt to unsettle and deteriorate the character. And, as it comes almost
miraculously, so only a miracle can effect a cure. ==P.G Wodehouse - THE
MAGIC PLUS FOURS ==

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Green AB

2002-12-20 Thread Allie C Martin
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Eddie Castelli [EC] wrote:'

EC Could someone tell me what the 'green' AB are for and how they
EC are created?

They're for searching LDAP servers.

You can create one if you know LDAP Servers and wish to use them for
searching for e-mail addresses. In fact, a couple of these address
books are created during the TB! installation. I deleted mine since
I don't use them.

You can create one by creating a new address book and under the LDAP
tab enable the option 'this address book is associated with an LDAP
Server'. You can then fill in the LDAP server address.

Whenever you wish to search the LDAP server, go to the File menu and
select 'search'. From the popup you can enter the search string and
select the LDAP address book. TB! will then connect to the server
and all matching addresses will be displayed in the LDAP address
book. You can then copy whichever one you wish, to another of your
address books.

Tip:

Never use an LDAP address book to store addresses because each time
you do a search all entries in the address book are deleted and
replaced with the newly found addresses.

Hope this helps.

-- 
  -=] Allie C Martin [=-  {List Moderator}

MUA: TB! v1.62 Christmas Edition ___ OS: WinXP Pro (SP1)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Insert macro in Msg

2002-12-20 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Jonathan,

 When I'm in the AB and have a group selected then start a new Msg.
 I can't find any 'Macro' Button to Insert Macros into the Msg Body.
 Can this be confirmed and must I in this case insert macros on my
 own (e.g. Dear %TOname)?

I know exactly how you feel. It's one of the major bummers
of TB! in handling mass mailing or on the fly macro
creation.

 The Macros like %TOname you insert in your templates of the AB
 Group, not in the Message Editor.

JA You can always use a Quick Template to produce that kind of affect,

True, It took me a while to get how it works but the idea is
simple. If you ever wish to put macros into your document so
the end receivers can see the true values and not the
%%macros you'll have to first create a quick template.

Consider the quick template the real editor when it comes to
composing your messages to the masses.

JA   quicktemplatenameCTRL + SPACE

JA To insert the content of the Quick Template, including resolved
JA Macros. (Replace quicktemplatename to whatever you called it).

You'll simply have to learn how to use quick templates. They
pretty much hold dear the answers you're looking for.

I hope I helped.

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPgOKVV3LB35+TCg0EQJT7ACg1+6ymjI4poDISHVjxmV7YPUspGIAnjDQ
3JKKqQDl3gPtskl7lKE/1MdA
=olOF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Simon Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

'Lo Dierk,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:00:17 +0100 your time, you said:

DH Hence,  what  I suggest is to give Add vCard a submenu: - with photo -
DH without photo - just photo

Yes, indeed, and I agree that such a submenu would also be a great addition.
And  of  course utilising the vCard photo obviously means not adding useless
xtra  features  like X-Face, but rather building on a useful feature already
present in TB! :)

- --
Slán,

 Simon @ theycallmesimon.co.uk

**
PGP Key: http://pgp.theycallmesimon.co.uk/

Faffing about with TB! v1.62 on W2K SP3

#2809. Ray Qed I Low Mrs Us ¶

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Privacy is freedom. Protect your freedom with PGP!
Comment: KeyID: 0x5C7E8966
Comment: Fingerprint: 851C F927 0296 FF1C 70A2  474F CB6E 6FFE 5C7E 8966

iQA/AwUBPgOdkstub/5cfolmEQKMoQCgg7byMj1ME+aAl9Jp2Us0bzKtLQoAn2mK
owTiUt0YbA+3hHpYVf8qn3M7
=wsoC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Dierk,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:00:17 +0100 GMT (21/12/02, 01:00 +0700 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:

 Let's  say a check box under your personal photo *in your personal VCard* to
 allow  sending  of  your photo,

 *That* is a good idea.
 Two years ago I couldn't include a portrait into my vCard because the
 vCard consistently crashed OL/OE - and most of my contacts use that.
 As some of them are business associates it is not a good idea to send
 them messages crashing their PCs.

Well, I never used OL/OE, but I also had some business associates who
sent me their vCards with every message. Quite an annoying habit. Once
I have their details in my AB, I don't need them to attach their vCard
again and again.

A small little X-Face, though... (scnr)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Hypnotophobie: Angst vor dem Bettenmachen.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Need help setting the *charset*

2002-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Robert,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:45:24 -0500 GMT (21/12/02, 00:45 +0700 GMT),
Robert D. wrote:

 I tick-marked the Always use this charset for 8859-1
 I also put %charset=ISO-8859-1 in the template for many addresses,
 including this one.

 Yet, when I CC a message back to myself, I see the RFC headers contains
 *charset=us-ascii* ---

I may be mistaken, but isn't that just another word for the same
enoding?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

A fool and his money are soon partying.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Need help setting the *charset*

2002-12-20 Thread Robert D.
Recently, Thomas Fernandez squawked:


 I may be mistaken, but isn't that just another word for the same
 enoding?

Well, that might be so! I shall change the *charset* here to something
interesting and make a *test* to myself ...

Thanks for the idea ...

-- 

Bye Now,
Robert D.
___
The Bat! ver. 1.62 Beta/17
Windows ME- 4.90 Build:3000.




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Need help setting the *charset*

2002-12-20 Thread Robert D.
Recently, Thomas Fernandez squawked:


 I may be mistaken, but isn't that just another word for the same
 enoding?

I just set the charset in the template for TBUDL  in the *Account*, to
be Ukranian KOI8, or something like that --- I tried Central European
--- and still the charset, in the headers, is always us-ascii

So --- OK -- I must be doing something wrong here. Everyone's says
*us-ascii*

-- 

Bye Now,
Robert D.
___
The Bat! ver. 1.62 Beta/17
Windows ME- 4.90 Build:3000.




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



how to do this - pictures, address book, file extract

2002-12-20 Thread speedguy

well, again some excellent questions from a TB newbie :)

-is it possible to create a rule so that all incoming messages are
added to address book and its attachment file goes as entry for
picture in the address book

-if picture for particular address exists in AB, can some rule be
created which show preview of picture for incoming emails from this
address

-there is a possible way to create filter that can extract
attachements and save in some directory but it doesn't allow us to
select the file name. is there anyway, where i can specify that file
name should of format say first_name or email_address or something..

-thanks in advance ;)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Need help setting the *charset*

2002-12-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Robert,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:09:28 -0500 GMT (21/12/02, 07:09 +0700 GMT),
Robert D. wrote:

 I may be mistaken, but isn't that just another word for the same
 enoding?

 I just set the charset in the template for TBUDL  in the *Account*, to
 be Ukranian KOI8, or something like that --- I tried Central European
 --- and still the charset, in the headers, is always us-ascii

I jsut did a test myself and can confirm this. Very odd indeed.

 So --- OK -- I must be doing something wrong here. Everyone's says
 *us-ascii*

I was thinking the list server overrides the settings, but when I just
sent out a message in Thai encoding, the headers still insist it is
us-ascii. :-(

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62 Christmas Edition
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



(SOT?) Double proxies with TB

2002-12-20 Thread Peter Fjelsten
TheBat-users,

 I have decided to test how good the anti-spamming tools available today
 are. Therefore I have installed POPfile (an content-based anti-spam
 agent) and SpamPal (a blocklist-lookup agent).

 My question goes as to how to set these 2 tools up as they both want TB
 to have localhost/127.0.0.1 as the POP3 server. I can set the
 listening port in both agents.

 I imagine something like:

 TheBat - POPFile - SpamPal. Is this possible?

-- 
greeting Best regards /greeting 
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 1.62 Beta/17 /thebat version
os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  /os




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: (SOT?) Double proxies with TB

2002-12-20 Thread Geoff Lane
On 21 December 2002, 00:34, Peter Fjelsten wrote:

  I have decided to test how good the anti-spamming tools available today
  are. Therefore I have installed POPfile (an content-based anti-spam
  agent) and SpamPal (a blocklist-lookup agent).

  My question goes as to how to set these 2 tools up as they both want TB
  to have localhost/127.0.0.1 as the POP3 server. I can set the
  listening port in both agents.

  I imagine something like:

  TheBat - POPFile - SpamPal. Is this possible?
~~~

It should be possible to do TheBat-SpamPal-POPFile-ISP. FWIW, I had
Norton Antivirus 2001 working with Spampal, and both wanted 127.0.0.1
(localhost).

AFAICT, the trick is to get Spampal to use a non-standard port (it
configured itself to use port 1110 in my case). You then need to tell
TB to connect to localhost on port 1110 with username
whatever_POPFile_needs@isp_pop3_server

Alternatively, if you can configure POPFile to use a non standard
port, you can do it your way around. See the Spampal docs about how to
pass the non-standard port info.

Check out the Spampal documentation for the a more detailed
explanation. The Installation page is quite thorough.

HTH,

-- 
Geoff Lane
Cornwall, UK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

Just when I hit bottom, someone hands me a shovel. 



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Pictures

2002-12-20 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Simon!

On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 2:45:31 PM you wrote:

S 'Lo Dierk,

DH Hence,  what  I suggest is to give Add vCard a submenu: - with photo -
DH without photo - just photo

S Yes, indeed, and I agree that such a submenu would also be a great addition.
S And  of  course utilising the vCard photo obviously means not adding useless
S xtra  features  like X-Face, but rather building on a useful feature already
S present in TB! :)

This is excellent reasoning, and I would like to see these ideas
implemented. How soon can you set about getting the request to the
programmers? This is something I would use, if it were in my copy of
The Bat!

-- 

Best regards,
Mary

The Bat 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Need help setting the *charset*

2002-12-20 Thread Robert D.
Recently, Thomas Fernandez squawked:

 I was thinking the list server overrides the settings, but when I just
 sent out a message in Thai encoding, the headers still insist it is
 us-ascii. :-(

Thanks for testing the idea --- well, I'm lost but must keep trying to
figure it out, one way or the other. There is a List-Server I am sub'd
to and, as of about ten days ago, I can not post to it --- I neither get
a bounce nor ack-bak --- and I started investigating the headers ---I
used my OE-6 here and DID get through. OE headers showed me that the
message was 8859-1 --- and hence began my *trying* to make TB tell me
it had changed it's charset when I told it to ---

sigh BTW --- the status bar, lower right, tell me this is Ukranian.

-- 

Bye Now,
Robert D.
___
The Bat! ver. 1.62 Beta/17
Windows ME- 4.90 Build:3000.




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Problem mirroring my mailboxes on a second computer

2002-12-20 Thread Michael S. Greenbaum
I'm using TB 1.61 Business Edition on a Pentium III laptop PC running
Windows 98 SE with 256 mb RAM.

I need to have a mirror copy of my mailboxes on a backup computer.

My main computer is a laptop and my backup computer is a desktop.
Currently, I use the TB Backup function to create a backup file from
my laptop which I then move, using PC Anywhere, to my desktop that I
use strictly for backup. After I move the file over to the desktop, I
do a Restore in TB.

The backup/restore process works fine. It brings over all the new
messages; however, it also keeps all previous messages, many of which
have been deleted from my laptop--or moved from one mailbox to another.

I'd like to be able to restore all my mailboxes so that the desktop
will mirror what is on my laptop.

I thought that the Synchonise program would do that, but I had
problems understanding how to use it.

Before writing this, I went to the list archive and found Allie
Martin's great explanation from January 2002 which seems to deal with
the same problem I'm having. Her instructions were much clearer than
the instructions in the Help Menu for the Maintenance center.

However, in her email she stated: The synchronisation process doesn't
delete mail. It merely adds mail, folders and settings from the source
system that aren't present in the target system.

I tried the Synchronisation program--to be sure--and just as she said,
mail was added but not deleted.

Since neither Synchronise nor Backup/Restore will create this mirror
image I need, can anyone suggest an alternate solution?


Thanks.


Mike Greenbaum



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Problem mirroring my mailboxes on a second computer

2002-12-20 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Michael,

MSG I need to have a mirror copy of my mailboxes on a backup computer.

The only solution I currently have to help you mirror an
inbox is to share your accounts directory with the desktop.
I mean file, folder and printer sharing provided by Windows.
The only problem I can see arise from this is what actually
happens is any changes you make last on one PC will reflect
in the next one on next access.

MSG My main computer is a laptop and my backup computer is a desktop.
MSG Currently, I use the TB Backup function to create a backup file from
MSG my laptop which I then move, using PC Anywhere, to my desktop that I
MSG use strictly for backup. After I move the file over to the desktop, I
MSG do a Restore in TB.

You backup on your notebook, pass the file to your desktop
and then restore it on your notebook or on your desktop? If
you restore TB! files on your desktop it means you're not
really using your desktop solely for backup. In this case
share the mail account if possible to have both your desktop
and notebook access one account. Otherwise backing up TB! is
always a good idea and storing it elsewhere is better.

MSG The backup/restore process works fine. It brings over all the new
MSG messages; however, it also keeps all previous messages, many of which
MSG have been deleted from my laptop--or moved from one mailbox to another.

If you're deleting messages but they seem to show up after a
restore are you purging and compressing all of your folders?
I purge, compress, backup and every restore never brought
from the dead a message that was meant to be deleted.
Purging and compressing your folders I believe will wipe
your account of deleted folders, messages and attachments,
etc.

MSG I'd like to be able to restore all my mailboxes so that the desktop
MSG will mirror what is on my laptop.

If you share your account the problem will disappear and
what will happen is your notebook will mirror your desktop
and your desktop mirror your notebook.

I have the same setup as yourself. My notebook is my primary
and my desktop my secondary. Both run XP and both are
connected to each other via a very simple network.

I thought running a network will cost and arm and a leg but
it's really less than 10.00 dollars to accomplish. Look at
the back of your PCs and see if you have 1394 IEEE firewire
ports and if you do you're in luck. Your PCs should be able
to communicate in live time and at blazing speeds.

Nothing beats a stable network for less than 10.00 and a
network sure beats almost anything else :)

- -- 
Best regards,
 Victor B. Gonzalez  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Request My PGP Public Keys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iQA/AwUBPgQbz13LB35+TCg0EQKHUQCeN4kOsDVIl3imiG4f3adSBW9BvYoAn2Ei
SlaFdS7Kzz6hQ233s3R50z0M
=GH0C
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html