not signed
Bonjour -- Cordialment, Claude Renaud Mailer : The Greatest Mailer You have never seen before version 1.62i Serial number : C4C1C7D5 Windows XP Version : 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 ___ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wrapping Taglines ?
Hello ~John, Saturday, February 22, 2003, 11:59:29 AM, you wrote: ~> How do I wrap taglines from within my template macros? ~> For instance if one of my taglines is really long and needs to be ~> wrapped, will this happen automatically when the message is sent? %WRAPPED="%COOKIE" -- Best regards, Jos Flachs mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bangkok, Thailand. For God so loved the world that He gave Man Free Will. Then got pissed when we didn't meet his arbitrary standards. Oh, and he had his Son offed when he realized how impossible those standards were. Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: html mailto bug
Hello Mark Wieder, On or about Monday, February 24, 2003 at 15:47:09GMT -0800 (which was 6:47 PM in the tropics where I live) Mark Wieder posted: MW> Marck- MW> Monday, February 24, 2003, 7:30:00 AM, you wrote: MDP>> You are quite right. That doesn't work at all. Why not use the link MDP>> to explain the RFC to the webmaster? ;-) I have already done this, but got no answer. neither one to a feedback sent through another address, so I guess they are not very responsive to ANY feedback! MW> One point for Marck. MW> But that *does* get us back on track. Here's what I (currently) think MW> about this: MW> Yes, the RFC does quite explicitly state that whitespace characters MW> can end the field and this is a malformed url and therefore there's MW> nothing really wrong with the way The Bat! is behaving here. But... OE MW> *does* pick up the whole string, or so I've been told, not wanting to MW> venture close enough to that beast to try it for myself. This is a case of Windows 'playing favorites' with 'its own!' If you right click on the link and copy the e-mail address only, it does NOT pick up the whole line! MW> There's nothing technically hard about grabbing the whole thing - MW> Windows does it quite easily. Right-click on the Feedback link, copy MW> it to the clipboard, and paste it into your favorite text editor - MW> there's the whole subject line, copied from the link, spaces and all. See above, as it only grabs the whole link if you select copy LINK. It won't paste properly in ANY application I could find to try it in. MW> Grabbing the whole subject line from the link is also not a violation MW> of the RFC - whitespace *can* end the tag, and technically you're MW> supposed to translate the spaces to %20s and it's considered bad form MW> if you don't, but I don't see a problem with TB working the way people MW> expect it to instead of minimally conforming to the RFC. I disagree with any deviation from the RFC's at all, if we expect TB! to be mainstream. MS Outhouse is mainstream by default, as most don't know better, and there is much that is better (especially TB!)! MW> If the next version of TB were modified to act on the whole link MW> instead of just the strict-interpretation subset I don't think it MW> would break any existing behavior. I think this would create other problems, but it could be tried. Put me in the 'I doubt it' column. MW> And now I'm quite confused about the double-quotes in the registry MW> thing. I thought this was just the thing it was supposed to fix up. Do MW> you have a url for one where it does make a difference? Yes, I'd like to know this too! -- Warmest tropical wishes, Spike A blind gynecologist can read lips. /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail \ / If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail! / \ Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML). -- Using TheBat! v1.62i hamstrung by Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1' -- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Word wrap in composing messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ~John, @24-Feb-2003, 20:11 -0600 (02:11 UK time) John Morse [j] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: J>> Got to admit, as much as I like TB, this drives me nuts too. j> This drives most users nuts, but I guess there are a few who like j> it. Seems like they could change this so that users could have it j> either way, even if they had to make two separate programs. I j> have recommended "theBat!" to several people, only to have them j> try it and un-install it because of the way it edited message j> text... such a small thing could mean many more users! The current beta has two new editors. One for the kind of behaviour many are looking for (one that behaves as you are asking for in this thread, as illogical and pointless as the die-hard TB editor fans may find it) and one for the new HTML support. So this discussion is more than a bit redundant. Furthermore, the intent is to also support "an editor of your choice" via a plug-in interface. I will continue to use the original editor - I've remapped Ctrl-Shift-F to Alt-F for quick toggle between autoformat and not. Autoformat already does reform paragraphs as you type, insert and delete in the current editor. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+WttQOeQkq5KdzaARAgptAKCF3QzLBTOpA5aF1TG6qnJq/l+mPwCg4FNl aUEEoQurnWJ5yt4XGCxMeAQ= =PPte -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Word wrap in composing messages
> J> Got to admit, as much as I like TB, this drives me nuts too. > > This drives most users nuts, but I guess there are a few who like it. > Seems like they could change this so that users could have it either > way, even if they had to make two separate programs. I have > recommended "theBat!" to several people, only to have them try it and > un-install it because of the way it edited message text... such a > small thing could mean many more users! They do... at least in the latest betas there is an option to change between TB's standard editor with the caret-free editor... or a windows editor which behaves exactly as notepad would behave for example. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Word wrap in composing messages
Jeff Davis wrote: J> Got to admit, as much as I like TB, this drives me nuts too. This drives most users nuts, but I guess there are a few who like it. Seems like they could change this so that users could have it either way, even if they had to make two separate programs. I have recommended "theBat!" to several people, only to have them try it and un-install it because of the way it edited message text... such a small thing could mean many more users! -- Regards, John Morse "Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool" Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Word wrap in composing messages
Hi Jeff, Tuesday, February 25, 2003, 1:21:25 AM, you wrote: JD> Got to admit, as much as I like TB, this drives me nuts too. It's because of the way TB is set up to handle text and, in particular, the cursor. I'm used to it now and I cut and paste and move around and then just alt-l any paras that need it before sending. -- Best regards, Mike Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Word wrap in composing messages
Monday, February 24, 2003, 11:11:45 AM, Johnathan wrote: JA> On Monday, February 24, 2003, Linda Dunn wrote... >> I'm a big re-editor in email messages, and this is driving me nuts; >> do I have a setting wrong? Or, is this a known issue? JA> Auto-Format (Utilities menu in composing) is helpful to some extent, JA> then so are the format block options... JA> That might help :) But Linda's point is well taken, I think. No other client I'm familiar with forces users to manually reformat in a situation like the one Linda cites: Once I have typed in a block of text, if I change something (take half a line out, for instance), the block does not rearrange itself, as it does in a word processor and in most email clients. The original break-points stay where they are, often leaving a big blank space at the end of a line (such as a line with only 2 words in it, then it resumes normally on the next line) or (if adding text) stretching the line out past the regular wrap point. (The line above this one, in fact, just did this). Got to admit, as much as I like TB, this drives me nuts too. Thanks, Jeff Davis Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: System check by email?
RMR>> If you think you'll receive a lot of emails, you may want to "reset" RMR>> that text file to avoid transmitting again and again the same messages. RMR>> To do that you can create a 3rd filter, with another command like RMR>> "erase history" that saves the text of the incoming mail to the text RMR>> file (like the first filter) but with an empty template (so that it RMR>> doesn't save anything) and with the option to overwrite the file RMR>> activated. G> The resetting the file might prove tricky. I will check the help files G> and see if I can find something there to do this. I think this will do it (it clears the file "c:\tmp\history.txt" when receiving a message with "reset history" in the subject): BeginFilter Name: Reset History Active: 1 Source: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Target: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CopyFolder: none MainSet: 20reset history Actions: faExport,faoExportOver AddGroups: DelGroups: ForwardTemplate: ConfirmTemplate: ReplyTemplate: FwdAddr: RedirectAddr: NewAddr: NewTemplate: ExtCmd: ExtFile: c:\tmp\history.txt ExtractDir: ColourGroup: AddAddrItems: afiFrom, DelAddrItems: afiFrom, HotKey: 0 IsOfColour: SizeBigger: 0 SizeSmaller: 0 AgeOlder: 0 AgeNewer: 0 InAddrPos: 0 OutAddrPos: 0 InAddrGroups: NoAddrGroups: KillFile: KillMethod: 0 SaveTemplate: \0D\0A SndFile: SysSound: 0 SoundTime: 0:00-0:00 AllowTime: 0:00-0:00 EndFilter -- Ricardo M. Reyes | (Mar del Plata - Argentina) | Usando The Bat! 1.60c "My software never has bugs. It just develops random features." Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: html mailto bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, @24-Feb-2003, 15:47 -0800 (23:47 UK time) Mark Wieder [MW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MW> If the next version of TB were modified to act on the whole link MW> instead of just the strict-interpretation subset I don't think MW> it would break any existing behavior. Let's look for a moment at the mechanism in use. Is it command line driven? Is that where the spaces are disappearing? Or is it a DDE exec? I don't know. Will it break existing behaviour? Again, I don't know. The place to have this discussion is surely TBBETA where Stefan can chip in with the facts. MW> And now I'm quite confused about the double-quotes in the MW> registry thing. I thought this was just the thing it was MW> supposed to fix up. So did I. In fact, I'm sure it did. Maybe the latest beta series has re-broken it? MW> Do you have a url for one where it does make a difference? No I don't. Sorry. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+WrXBOeQkq5KdzaARAllgAKCT47IGnmEVPABOBs2mFJ/KtMyM3wCfYKg7 UOagGMIU5vo/pF5XwO1fIlo= =+T6F -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: html mailto bug
Marck- Monday, February 24, 2003, 7:30:00 AM, you wrote: MDP> You are quite right. That doesn't work at all. Why not use the link MDP> to explain the RFC to the webmaster? ;-) One point for Marck. But that *does* get us back on track. Here's what I (currently) think about this: Yes, the RFC does quite explicitly state that whitespace characters can end the field and this is a malformed url and therefore there's nothing really wrong with the way The Bat! is behaving here. But... OE *does* pick up the whole string, or so I've been told, not wanting to venture close enough to that beast to try it for myself. There's nothing technically hard about grabbing the whole thing - Windows does it quite easily. Right-click on the Feedback link, copy it to the clipboard, and paste it into your favorite text editor - there's the whole subject line, copied from the link, spaces and all. Grabbing the whole subject line from the link is also not a violation of the RFC - whitespace *can* end the tag, and technically you're supposed to translate the spaces to %20s and it's considered bad form if you don't, but I don't see a problem with TB working the way people expect it to instead of minimally conforming to the RFC. If the next version of TB were modified to act on the whole link instead of just the strict-interpretation subset I don't think it would break any existing behavior. And now I'm quite confused about the double-quotes in the registry thing. I thought this was just the thing it was supposed to fix up. Do you have a url for one where it does make a difference? -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: public folders
Jernejcic- The networking or shared-folder features of TB do indeed work much better with the 1.6x version. I had the same problem using 1.53 and when I upgraded to 1.61 things improved dramatically. You should also look into the client-server features: set one computer (the one that will be updating the folder) to TCP-server mode and put the others into workstation mode. Point everything to the same computer and directories. Then the server will update the folders and tell the other machines about it. You don't mention what OS you're using, but this is how I've got things set up using Win2k. -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OFF TOPIC: How to update a SMIME certificate?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Costas, @24-Feb-2003, 22:19 +0200 (20:19 UK time) Costas Papadopoulos [CP] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: CP> Thank you for the information. I went ahead and created CP> a new certificate. Did you get a reply? I generated one this morning and sent it off for certification. Nothing has come back :-( yet. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+WqVGOeQkq5KdzaARArx9AKD1741dXbPBCQ+RNqfXCCEFKwG+oACgxbo0 p2MI2+m7kkccIhwc5V7aITY= =VY+o -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: More SPAM fighting
> I guess they put this in for a reason and since these are lost when I > press reply I am assuming that a "BOUNCE" would preserve these. > Can someone, who reads RFC's, enlighten me on this subject, and tell me > if I am correct? Bouncing mail doesn't have to have any of the original headers if it doesn't want. Most of the time a delivery report is provided which gives the destination address, date, and subject... sometimes it's the full message again > Also I have seen that with a bounce you can have a 500 error (address > unknown) but also 544 error, (You are black listed). Are there anymore > that I could use? That really depends... a lot of the messages you can customize. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
More SPAM fighting
Hi Bat Users, I have been receiving mail from a spammer witht he follwing X-tra headers in the mail: X-CID: 3 digit number X-UserID: 7 digit number X-EMail: my email address X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess they put this in for a reason and since these are lost when I press reply I am assuming that a "BOUNCE" would preserve these. Can someone, who reads RFC's, enlighten me on this subject, and tell me if I am correct? Also I have seen that with a bounce you can have a 500 error (address unknown) but also 544 error, (You are black listed). Are there anymore that I could use? -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Bogey train - A series of consecutive bogies. For professional golfers, the bogey train is a one-way ride to a job at a driving range. Using The Bat! v1.62h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Greeting dependent on time
Good evening Peter, It was foretold that on 24-2-2003 @ 20:06:30 GMT+0100 (which was 20:06:30 where I live) Peter Fjelsten would mumble: PF> Would you mind posting it here? [Begin QT] %IF:"%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=>"04:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""' <='11:59:59':'Good morning'"%-%IF:"%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=> "12:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""'<='17:59:59':'Good afternoon' "%-%IF:"%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=>"18:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""' <='23:59:59':'Good evening'"%-%IF:"%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=>"00:00:00":"%IF: '%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""'<='03:59:59':'Hello'"%- %TOFNAME, [End QT] -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/7 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. "A business whose only goal is profit is a poor kind of business." Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Greeting dependent on time
Luc, L> erhm silly me! of course that works. Now i'm feeling really L> dumb :-) Would you mind posting it here? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 1.63 Beta/7 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: System check by email?
Hi Ricardo, ON Monday, February 24, 2003, 9:08:32 PM, you wrote: G>> Now how would I send mail that I have collected in folder for G>> forwarding and would it be possible to generate a status report? RMR> about forwarding certain mails, I would make a filter that saves the RMR> text of those incoming email into a text file, using a template that RMR> includes all the relevant information (date, from, to, subject, text, RMR> something else if you want) and telling The Bat! to concatenate each RMR> email to end of that text file. I think this is very ingenuous. It will take a bit of Cut&Paste to reply but I can see this work. great idea. RMR> Then make another filter that answers to your order (maybe a message RMR> with "send status" in the subject, or something more secret) and RMR> replies with a message that "includes" the text file in the body of RMR> the message. That way you will receive a file with all your emails, RMR> one after the other. It's not exactly forwarding, but it gets close. RMR> Keep in mind that you won't receive the attachments of those messages. I my case attachements are not a problem. Forwarding of the file is jus a matter of creating a template. RMR> If you think you'll receive a lot of emails, you may want to "reset" RMR> that text file to avoid transmitting again and again the same messages. RMR> To do that you can create a 3rd filter, with another command like RMR> "erase history" that saves the text of the incoming mail to the text RMR> file (like the first filter) but with an empty template (so that it RMR> doesn't save anything) and with the option to overwrite the file RMR> activated. The resetting the file might prove tricky. I will check the help files and see if I can find something there to do this. RMR> I hope this helps you, if you need help to write the filters just RMR> tell. It dit help with so good thinking :) -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= It is on this terrace that the Oldest Member sits, watching the younger generation knocking the divot. ... Using The Bat! v1.62h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OFF TOPIC: How to update a SMIME certificate?
Hello Marck, Monday, February 24, 2003, 12:38:23 PM, you wrote (possibly edited): > I have just had this reply from Certum: >> In case of TheBat! certificates - there is no such thing as >> renewal of the certificate. You simply have to obtain new >> certificate, in the manner exactly the same as for the first >> certificate. Thank you for the information. I went ahead and created a new certificate. -- Best regards, Costasmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: System check by email?
G> Now how would I send mail that I have collected in folder for G> forwarding and would it be possible to generate a status report? about forwarding certain mails, I would make a filter that saves the text of those incoming email into a text file, using a template that includes all the relevant information (date, from, to, subject, text, something else if you want) and telling The Bat! to concatenate each email to end of that text file. Then make another filter that answers to your order (maybe a message with "send status" in the subject, or something more secret) and replies with a message that "includes" the text file in the body of the message. That way you will receive a file with all your emails, one after the other. It's not exactly forwarding, but it gets close. Keep in mind that you won't receive the attachments of those messages. If you think you'll receive a lot of emails, you may want to "reset" that text file to avoid transmitting again and again the same messages. To do that you can create a 3rd filter, with another command like "erase history" that saves the text of the incoming mail to the text file (like the first filter) but with an empty template (so that it doesn't save anything) and with the option to overwrite the file activated. I hope this helps you, if you need help to write the filters just tell. -- Ricardo M. Reyes | (Mar del Plata - Argentina) | Usando The Bat! 1.60c "Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue." Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Delete from server
Monday, February 24, 2003, 1:01:44 PM, you wrote: > Hello Mean, > On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:58:28 +0530 GMT (24/02/03, 13:28 +0700 GMT), > Mean Drake wrote: >> Does TB have the capacity to create a filter that will check for the >> filter conditions and if met delete the message from server. > Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download / New... and > try the "Kill" option under the Advanced tab. > However, I don't use this, for two reasons: > 2.) A message "killed" on (i.e. deleted from) the server is gone. If > there is a mistake in your filtering string, you will never know. > Therefore, if you download all messages and put those meeting the > filter criteria into a special folder which you can review at a later > time, you might catch "false positives". Thanks Jonathan and Thomas. My filter criteria have been checked over time...Just wanted to know where to get this part done. -- Best regards, Mean Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Word wrap in composing messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, February 24, 2003, Linda Dunn wrote... > I'm a big re-editor in email messages, and this is driving me nuts; > do I have a setting wrong? Or, is this a known issue? Auto-Format (Utilities menu in composing) is helpful to some extent, then so are the format block options... Put your cursor in the paragraph that is "messed up", and hit: ALT L => Left Align ALT J => Justify Align ALT R => Right Align ALT C => Center Align That might help :) - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQA/AwUBPlpESyuD6BT4/R9zEQJCDQCfcAqoeI80qjSRm0XUNd/8EtutLrsAnjuf 7Ohoey5EARvnjhi3qF+Fii/F =+5j3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
System check by email?
Hi Bat Users, This week I will be traveling on business for a few days and I gain will have to let my machine on the collect my mail. I get so much mail that I would pass the mail limited with my ISP's about 2 to 3 times a day. Collecting this on my laptop while traveling isn't really easy to, so that's why. What I was thinking of, would it be possible: 1) To check if the TB! is still up and running 2) What is the status of my mail and maybe auto forward certain mail to an address? I was thinking of trying to tackle the first by setting up a filter to look a a specific header and when it arrives send an automated reply. Now how would I send mail that I have collected in folder for forwarding and would it be possible to generate a status report? -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The only thing in my bag that works is the bug spray. Using The Bat! v1.62h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Word wrap in composing messages
Hi all, I have a question/issue about the word-wrapping when composing a message. Once I have typed in a block of text, if I change something (take half a line out, for instance), the block does not rearrange itself, as it does in a word processor and in most email clients. The original break-points stay where they are, often leaving a big blank space at the end of a line (such as a line with only 2 words in it, then it resumes normally on the next line) or (if adding text) stretching the line out past the regular wrap point. (The line above this one, in fact, just did this). I'm a big re-editor in email messages, and this is driving me nuts; do I have a setting wrong? Or, is this a known issue? Thanks, -- linda http://www.secondsight-music.com Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: html mailto bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Spike, @24-Feb-2003, 09:57 -0500 (14:57 UK time) Spike [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S> http://komp.com/web/feature/home_page.php S> FEEDBACK link near top-right. You are quite right. That doesn't work at all. Why not use the link to explain the RFC to the webmaster? ;-) - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+Wjp6OeQkq5KdzaARAgNzAJ96osQOPlO7Z2ECJO2tAean1W1qfACdGwDi JoscE4WXlpMiFAh2P37j3Qo= =3RZ0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: html mailto bug
Hello Marck D Pearlstone, On or about Monday, February 24, 2003 at 14:19:39GMT + (which was 9:19 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted: S>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Las Vegas Website Feedback MDP> Aha - are you talking about links in emails? That's different. The MDP> fix only applies to links in HTML pages. Nope, that's a link on the page! What I get is the same as a malformed e-mail link. ;-( Try it; http://komp.com/web/feature/home_page.php FEEDBACK link near top-right. -- Warmest tropical wishes, Spike There are 10 types of people: those who understand binary and those who don't. /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail \ / If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail! / \ Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML). -- Using TheBat! v1.62i hamstrung by Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1' -- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Greeting dependent on time
good afternoon Marcus, It was foretold that on 24-2-2003 @ 15:45:40 GMT+0100 (which was 15:45:40 where I live) Marcus Ohlström would mumble: MO> Since I haven't tried it myself, I might be making a fool out of myself, MO> but why don't you delete the initial "Good" and replace 'morning' with MO> 'Good morning' and so on? This way you could easily replace 'night' with MO> 'Hello'. erhm silly me! of course that works. Now i'm feeling really dumb :-) -- Best regards, Luc --- Powered by The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/7 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. "Envy plus rhetoric equals "social justice." - Thomas Sowell. Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
WAS: no subject is now: template question
Good afternoon list, sorry for my earlier post: hit the send button to quickly. Subject should have been 'template question' -- Best regards, Luc Powered by The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/7 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. "It is better to be betrayed than widowed. There are fewer formalities." - Alphonse Allais (1854-1905) - French writer Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Greeting dependent on time
On Monday, February 24, 2003, 15:38, Luc wrote: > > [begin] > Good > %IF:"%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=>"04:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""' > <='11:59:59':'morning'"%-%IF:"%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=>"12:00:00": > "%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""'<='17:59:59':'afternoon'"%-%IF: > "%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=>"18:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""' > <='23:59:59':'evening'"%-%IF:"%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=> > "00:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""'<='03:59:59':'night'"%- > %TOFNAME, > [end] > === > Now, what i'm looking for is this: > 00:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""'<='03:59:59':'night' should > produce 'hello' instead of goodnight but all the others should remain > "good morning",... > Is there a way of doing this? Since I haven't tried it myself, I might be making a fool out of myself, but why don't you delete the initial "Good" and replace 'morning' with 'Good morning' and so on? This way you could easily replace 'night' with 'Hello'. Or doesn't it work to enclose more then one word in single quotes? -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.62/Beta7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[no subject]
Good afternoon list, I have the following QT to make my greeting: [begin] Good %IF:"%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=>"04:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""' <='11:59:59':'morning'"%-%IF:"%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=>"12:00:00": "%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""'<='17:59:59':'afternoon'"%-%IF: "%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=>"18:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""' <='23:59:59':'evening'"%-%IF:"%TIME='hh:mm:ss'"=> "00:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""'<='03:59:59':'night'"%- %TOFNAME, [end] === Now, what i'm looking for is this: 00:00:00":"%IF:'%TIME=""hh:mm:ss""'<='03:59:59':'night' should produce 'hello' instead of goodnight but all the others should remain "good morning",... Is there a way of doing this? -- Best regards, Luc Powered by The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/7 with Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3 and using the best browser: Opera. "The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence that it is not utterly absurd." - Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) - British philosopher Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: html mailto bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Spike, @24-Feb-2003, 09:07 -0500 (14:07 UK time) Spike [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S> Has absolutely no effect in WIN-XP Home. Still get only the S> first word in the subject line of; S> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Las Vegas Website Feedback Aha - are you talking about links in emails? That's different. The fix only applies to links in HTML pages. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+Win9OeQkq5KdzaARAg3HAKCEyd1dRdodbk2h7UHzQie+85/K/wCdFVnk qrQ3AGO7PuOHaQ5fKc94SPI= =4XN6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: html mailto bug
Hello Marck D Pearlstone, On or about Sunday, February 23, 2003 at 03:31:17GMT + (which was 10:31 PM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP>>> HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command MW>> However, as I've mentioned before, this has absolutely *no* MW>> effect on my Win2k system. MDP> It has exactly the right effect on my Win2k Pro system. It works. Has absolutely no effect in WIN-XP Home. Still get only the first word in the subject line of; mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Las Vegas Website Feedback ^^^ Copies only this ^^ Ignores this Oh well, next issue! -- Warmest tropical wishes, Spike Cannot open file d:\bat\cookies.txt - substitute Oreo - Y/N? /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail \ / If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail! / \ Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML). -- Using TheBat! v1.62i hamstrung by Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1' -- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
public folders
hi, for our upcomming fax-server i am searching a solution for public (or shared, or common or whatever you will name them) folders. I tried the following scenario (using TheBat v 1.51): I created a folder "groupIn" on a shared drive from one workstation with account "A" and then created a folder with the same name from another workstation in account "B" pointing to the shared dir - so far so well. We both are able to see it and to work with it. Then i took a third workstation (let's call it dispatcher) to fetch the mails from a pop3 server and fill the mails into this folder "groupIn" - that too was just easy. But: This shared folder "groupIn" does not update automatically. Incomming mails (feeded by the dispatcher) do not show up untill i manually refresh an "A" and "B" and the same with the status of the mails (read, unread or even deleted). That behavior is not manageable for our users. Is it possible to do this with 1.62i? Anyone did that yet? thx in advance Alexander Jernejcic Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OFF TOPIC: How to update a SMIME certificate?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Costas, @23-Feb-2003, 19:10 +0200 (17:10 UK time) Costas Papadopoulos [CP] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: CP> http://www.certum.pl"; CP> I went to the above website, but I'm not sure what I should CP> do to renew the certificate. Can anyone assist please? I have just had this reply from Certum: > In case of TheBat! certificates - there is no such thing as > renewal of the certificate. You simply have to obtain new > certificate, in the manner exactly the same as for the first > certificate. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+WfYhOeQkq5KdzaARAsZhAJ0azs4qrhBkLePn63HIhllwUeMlKwCgg71D VO9lwE9Hi8mUtpYtszZS/c8= =EPQy -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: SOT: %abtohandle and others with Outlook (2002)
Hello Roelof, Monday, February 24, 2003, 10:37:08 AM, you wrote: RO> If you select the from-address in the grey header pane, there's a RO> right mouse button menu that enables you to 'reply to this address', RO> no need to delete unintended recipients afterwards. Thanks! -- Best Whishes, Mark using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SOT: %abtohandle and others with Outlook (2002)
Hallo Mark, On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 01:20:45 +0100GMT (24-2-03, 1:20 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MP> Oops, sorry, this was intended as a personal reply, not a reply to MP> the list. I forgot to delete the CC: however... :-( I gather from this remark that you used the 'reply to all' function. If you select the from-address in the grey header pane, there's a right mouse button menu that enables you to 'reply to this address', no need to delete unintended recipients afterwards. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Please consider re-configuring your automized reply for unwantedmail
Hi Frank, > Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised > as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without > altering the subject. > > On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 12:00 you wrote > > subject: **SPAM** Re: Macros and MAPI > You are flooding tbudl mailing list with automized replies, because - I think - someone sent a msg with the words "**SPAM**" in the subject line. Would you please be so kind to re-configued you automized reply? I might just as well add a kill-filter with you as sender and the word SPAM in the subject, but I think there are better ways to deal with this :-) -- Best regards, Peter Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
