backup problems in TheBat (IMAP folders)
Hello Bat Persons,
Back in TheBat again after a few problems ('error reading database'
and 'runtime error' messages)...and decided to back up
all...(address book, settings and folders etc with messages for two
POP accounts and one IMAP account). Synchronised the IMAP
account/folders, then went off-line Then ran Backup...
Got a message to say there were problems backing up two of the folders
(Sent and Trash) in the IMAP account...and suggested I delete the
index files and start again
Decided not to bother... I think I will just exclude IMAP message
folder from backup...or maybe copy messages to a local folder and
backup from there...
--
Regards,
Steve Love
17:17 Monday, 14 June 2004
Using The Bat! v2.11.02 (Protocol:usually IMAP)
on Windows 98 4.10 Build B
Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
persistent 'error reading database' messages
Hello BatPhiles I keep getting 'error reading database' messages... Lately when I click on of the local folders (Sent Mail)...ie not one of the IMAP folders (Maybe I should put the messages I send via my IMAP account into the IMAP account 'sent' folder instead of the local 'sent mail' folder...) I keep responding by going thru check integrity/repair..as suggested...8 damaged messages are supposedly recovered/repaired each timeand then I get the same error message when I click on the Sent Mail folder... If you think my posts about these error messages are becoming tedious...think how I feel! ;-) I noted one of the 'taglines' at the bottom of one of Peter ? 's posts...words to the effect... 'Everything is going well...Time to upgrade..' Maybe I will drop back to to 2.10.x for a while ... and/or retreat to ThunderBird for a while -- Regards, Steve Love ...going 'batty'' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 17:29 Monday, 14 June 2004 Using The Bat! v2.11.02 (Protocol:usually IMAP) on Windows 98 4.10 Build B cc rtm...my brother-in-law..who is on this list and is having a dream run with the The Bat! Your time will come... ;-) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 'error reading database' and 'runtime messages'-saga continues...
Hello SL, On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:31:45 +1000 GMT (14/06/2004, 10:31 +0700 GMT), SL wrote: S I suspect some or all of the following could be involved with 'error S reading database' and 'runtime' messages/woes: I don't have a clue what is biting your system, but some ideas: S * Newer versions of The Bat??/ this only happened I think when I S got ver 2.11. If you downgrade, does the problem go away? If so, I would suggest that for the time being. S * I need a new computer?? Win 98 is a bit too tired (although I do S regular maintenance...)//OK...I want a new computer anywayI am just S looking for excuses... My Win98 is acting up, too. That's kind of normal - that's not an excuse for Win98, to the contrary. I have been lucky that my registry is still working, but I have heard of cases where a messed-up registry was the cause of weird problems. When was your last reinstall? Oh, and you don't need to buy a new computer. Just a new OS (and harddisk, in my case). People working with XP sound pretty happy, and XP Pro in the office hasn't caused any problems. But it's expensive. That's why I am eyeing Xandros with Crossover. S * Early onset senility in the guy at the keyboard...?? From your detailled posts, I somehow don't think so... ;-) S PPS If I get The Bat up and running again (I WILL...in time...), I S will have to rename it The Phoenix (because it is rising a lot of S late from the ashes... ;-) LOL! -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. The Bagginses, they steals our taglines, preciou Message reply created with The Bat! 2.11 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: strange to me outbox error msg
Hello Jan, On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 08:12:20 -0400 GMT (14/06/2004, 19:12 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR While typing, a TB! error/warning window popped up noting that the JR outbox (empty at that time) was not able to save the msg, then JR approaching 2megs in size. JR At the time, I did try to save reproduced the error. In JR addition, I removed the attachment tried to save again w the JR same result. That shouldn't have caused the Outbox to gain so much weight. I am out of ideas. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Rechnen Sie mit robotron! Unsere Mikroelektronik ist einfach nicht klein zu kriegen! Message reply created with The Bat! 2.11 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Newbie seeking advice :-)
Hello Paul, PC On Sunday, June 13, 2004, 1:22 AM, you wrote: - plug ins TF You could ask here: TF http://www.ritlabs.com/kb/category.php?id=6 TF or in the archives. I think I saw a post somewhere recently that give TF a URL on the Ritlabs site that shows a list of pug-ins and where they TF can be downloaded. Cannot find that post any more. PC the ritlabs download page has all the TB plugins for PGP and PC dictionaries, and the international pack here: PC http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php Thanks for the link. No plugins for PGP v8.x So I installed PGP 6.5.x :) TB! only accepts *.tbp as a plugin. The plugin you suggested are *.dll TB! window still shows *.DLL as a description so I assume the extension has changed between v1.x and v2.x? Anyway how to install? -- Best regards, Tony Two wrongs are only the beginning. Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! attachment display settings?
Hello Mary, Wednesday, June 9, 2004, 2:51:36 PM, you wrote: Mary I can't find this key in my registry. But surely it is there Mary since I have the file names in Options/Preferences/Protection. I Mary opened everything in the registry I could see under HKey/Current Mary User/Software/Rit/The Bat!. Didn't find that key. Strange. HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat! is where it should be. There are a ton of keys in there. I had to scroll down a bit to see it. Mary These are .jpg files, mostly. When I save them to Desktop, they Mary come up with a Gimp icon. (I have the Gimp program, but I don't Mary recall associating Save to Desktop with it. Probably did and Mary then forgot.) The .jpg files are associated to GIMP, not the save to desktop. Mary So what if I emptied the fields for both Enable and Disable Mary under Protection? Would that be safe to do? I could save a copy Mary of them and put it back afterward. You could empty them, just being cognizant of the fact that you'll receive no warnings or disables if you try to double-click an attachment. -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Tagline of the day: Save your pennies. The dollars go to the I.R.S. Using The Bat! 2.11.03 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! attachment display settings?
Hello Leif! On Monday, June 14, 2004, 12:06 PM, you wrote: Mary I can't find this key in my registry. But surely it is there Mary since I have the file names in Options/Preferences/Protection. Mary I opened everything in the registry I could see under Mary HKey/Current User/Software/Rit/The Bat!. Didn't find that key. Mary Strange. LG HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat! is where it should be. There LG are a ton of keys in there. I had to scroll down a bit to see it. I'll look once more, out of curiosity. But this problem, which I had thought was a settings problem, has now been solved. My bat temp files had grown to be too many, with 88 empty TEMP subfolders. When I deleted those, the attachments opened normally when asked to. I was considerably relieved to get it fixed, as you can imagine and as I expressed to Urban, whose eagle-eye spotted that piece of the puzzle. Mary These are .jpg files, mostly. When I save them to Desktop, they Mary come up with a Gimp icon. (I have the Gimp program, but I don't Mary recall associating Save to Desktop with it. Probably did and Mary then forgot.) LG The .jpg files are associated to GIMP, not the save to desktop. I see. They are now associated with the ms display function--got guidance to do that on this thread. But of course, changing that association didn't help, since it was the excess .tmp files causing the problem. Even though each of the 88 was empty. Mary So what if I emptied the fields for both Enable and Disable Mary under Protection? Would that be safe to do? I could save a copy Mary of them and put it back afterward. LG You could empty them, just being cognizant of the fact that you'll LG receive no warnings or disables if you try to double-click an LG attachment. In the ongoing trial-and-error process I removed them and then I put them right back, having saved them in SmartBat. Thanks for all your help, Leif. And BTW, h2g2 , I Didn't Panic. Stayed patient and relied on tbudl and there was the answer. :42: -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Small bug or misconfiguration?
Hello Chris, . When I enter the subject auto fill takes over. A very welcome feature. The history contains the word 'subscribe' When I tried to type the current subject things go 'wrong'. When I typed the 'S' TB! instantly suggest subscribe. That's no problem because if I keep typing no harm is done. The only 'problem' is that I typed 'S' and I end up with 's' It's to irrelevant to call a bug but it's not standard behavior either C Check your history, but the subject subscribe is probably in there, C not Subscribe. That's correct. It's just that I think history shouldn't mess with the caps. I type - TB! suggests If I accept the suggestion all is fine. However if I keep typing that means the suggestion was wrong and TB! should restore what it changed. In this case change the 's' back to 'S' -- Best regards, Tony The superior man thinks always of virtue; the common man thinks of comfort. Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Newbie seeking advice :-)
Hi Tony, On Monday, June 14, 2004, at 9:52:01 AM PST, you wrote: Thanks for the link. No plugins for PGP v8.x So I installed PGP 6.5.x :) Oops! Not a good idea! Firstly, since TB has built-in *integration* with PGP v8.x, there's no need for a plug-in. :-) Secondly, PGP v6.5.8 does not have some of the vulnerability fixes that are included in v8.x, so unless there's a really good reason why you can't use v8.x, it's usually best to use the latest version. With a program like PGP, deciding whether or not to use the latest version is not just about features...it's often about having the latest security fixes as well. -- Melissa PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys TB! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 pgpI8Wi7AMhll.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Newbie seeking advice :-)
Hello Melissa, MR Hi Tony, MR On Monday, June 14, 2004, at 9:52:01 AM PST, you wrote: Thanks for the link. No plugins for PGP v8.x So I installed PGP 6.5.x :) MR Oops! Not a good idea! Eeks! MR Firstly, since TB has built-in *integration* with PGP v8.x, there's no MR need for a plug-in. :-) Unfortunately that integration doesn't work. Or maybe I should say I can't get it to work. Encrypting/signing/decryption all work. When I decrypt PGP wants to save to file. Real integration would be that it replaces the encrypted text with the plain text. Without loosing quotes/formatting etc. The OpenPGP found in TB! integrates a lot better but has problems with quotes. Maybe some smart trick with templates can solve that... But it doesn't support the latest ciphers so it's useless for me :( BTW as long as it works and handles modern ciphers it doesn't matter if it's PGP/OpenPGP/GPG/... MR Secondly, PGP v6.5.8 does not have some of the vulnerability fixes MR that are included in v8.x, so unless there's a really good reason why MR you can't use v8.x, it's usually best to use the latest version. MR With a program like PGP, deciding whether or not to use the latest MR version is not just about features...it's often about having the MR latest security fixes as well. Tell that on alt.security.pgp :-) Many there will not agree with you. Some still stick with 2.6 And many don't trust the versions where PRZ was not (closely) involved I never heard of security flaws in PGP besides academic 'weaknesses' found in MD5 But besides of that I would use a later version, if only for new ciphers/hashes. I'm running an evaluation copy of TB! as you can see from the header and I want to learn as much about TB! in that period so that I can make a founded decision. Thanks for your reply. -- Best regards, Tony One day as I came home early from work . I saw a guy jogging naked. I said to the guy Hey buddy why are you doing that for? He said Because you came home early. Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Newbie seeking advice :-)
Hi Tony, On Monday, June 14, 2004, at 11:49:09 AM PST, you wrote: Unfortunately that integration doesn't work. Or maybe I should say I can't get it to work. That is peculiar, as it does work as expected here. Encrypting/signing/decryption all work. When I decrypt PGP wants to save to file. Real integration would be that it replaces the encrypted text with the plain text. Without loosing quotes/formatting etc. As I just said above, PGP v8 integration does work as expected here. I have no idea why it's asking you to save to file. Are you trying to use the PGP options from PGPtray when you're using TB!? Or are you actually using the integration? There is a difference in how these work. BTW as long as it works and handles modern ciphers it doesn't matter if it's PGP/OpenPGP/GPG/... I use both PGP and GnuPG on my computer. Let's get one thing sorted out here. *Both* PGP and GnuPG are based on the standard called OpenPGP (and so is Hushmail...with Phil Zimmermann's help). OpenPGP is not any sort of separate application beyond PGP and GnuPG...it's merely the standard both are based upon. I wrote: MR With a program like PGP, deciding whether or not to use the latest MR version is not just about features...it's often about having the MR latest security fixes as well. Then you replied: Tell that on alt.security.pgp :-) Many there will not agree with you. And many others there will agree with me. :-) I haven't had much time lately to visit alt.security.pgp, but I've been a regular there for several years. There are indeed those who will continue to prefer the old 2.x versions, and again, those who mistrust any version after Phil Zimmermann left NAI (then NAI subsequently sold PGP to PGP Corporation), but I feel differently about these issues; as do several other experienced PGP/GnuPG users (including many regular participants at alt.security.pgp). Most end-users of PGP are not capable of evaluating the source code of PGP, so they still have to trust someone...or at least trust the idea that if the source code is available for peer review, someone is out there pouring over it, and will let the rest of us know if/when they find any problems (vulnerabilities, backdoors, etc.). The people who formed the new PGP Corporation are actually the more trustworthy of the former NAI employees who worked on PGP. I've corresponded over the years with Phil Zimmermann and a few of the current PGP Corporation people (while they were at NAI, and also after they formed PGP Corporation) enough to feel I can trust in their intentions with regards to PGP's trustworthiness. For someone like myself, who couldn't tell the difference between a backdoor and a bathtub if I were to look at the source code, I need to find other ways to trust the code; and I feel I've done all I can to assure myself that it's okay for me to use. If we want to continue this aspect of the discussion, perhaps we should move it to TBOT before the fish start flying. :-) -- Melissa PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys TB! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 pgpuvPYAXC6ee.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Newbie seeking advice :-)
Hello Melissa, Encrypting/signing/decryption all work. When I decrypt PGP wants to save to file. Real integration would be that it replaces the encrypted text with the plain text. Without loosing quotes/formatting etc. MR As I just said above, PGP v8 integration does work as expected here. MR I have no idea why it's asking you to save to file. Are you trying MR to use the PGP options from PGPtray when you're using TB!? Or are MR you actually using the integration? There is a difference in how MR these work. I just 'ask' TB! to decrypt. Probably some setting but I have no idea where to look. Any settings I should look for specifically? BTW as long as it works and handles modern ciphers it doesn't matter if it's PGP/OpenPGP/GPG/... snipped part about (mis)trust of PGP versions Let's say I feel neutral. I was just installing v6.5 to get thinks working. I want to get v8 working because of PGPdisk . MR For someone like myself, who couldn't tell the difference between a MR backdoor and a bathtub if I were to look at the source code, I MR need to find other ways to trust the code; and I feel I've done all MR I can to assure myself that it's okay for me to use. MR If we want to continue this aspect of the discussion, perhaps we MR should move it to TBOT before the fish start flying. :-) Is that a separate list? If so yes that's fine. Although our options are not that different as you might think. It junk my tacky English that's to cryptographic to read :D -- Best regards, Tony Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. (Picasso) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! attachment display settings?
On Monday, June 14, 2004, 1:39 PM, you wrote: MB I was considerably relieved to get it fixed, as you can imagine and as MB I expressed to Urban, whose eagle-eye spotted that piece of the MB puzzle. and Paul gave you the courage ( I'm the tin man:) to hit DEL. -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.11.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Apr2004 (4.1.412) (avast! version number) 0425-0 (14.06.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.412 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB! attachment display settings?
Hello Paul! On Monday, June 14, 2004, 3:10 PM, you wrote: MB I was considerably relieved to get [attachments to messages back MB to opening as they should] ... as I expressed to Urban, whose MB eagle-eye spotted that piece of the puzzle. PC and Paul gave you the courage ( I'm the tin man:) to hit DEL. Yes, credit where credit is due!! :) But isn't it the Cowardly Lion who knew where to go to get courage and the Tin Man who knew where to go to get a brain? No, that was the Scarecrow. Marck, I'm headed to tbot with this, on the instant!! And thanks again, to Martin Webster, for the staying power to get to the point where deletion appeared as a solution. He was up very late for me, trying to help me get this sorted. :) All my helpers are Wizards! :) -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Newbie seeking advice :-)
Hi Tony, On Monday, June 14, 2004, at 12:54:29 PM PST, you wrote: I just 'ask' TB! to decrypt. Probably some setting but I have no idea where to look. Any settings I should look for specifically? I'm going to have to get back to you on this, because I need to go out and run some errands soon. As far as I know, I haven't had to make any peculiar tweaks to the integration to get it working as it is for me, but I'll come back tonight and look at my settings to see if I can find anything helpful. I want to get v8 working because of PGPdisk I use PGPdisk as well, and it's definitely one of the reasons I'm not just using GnuPG exclusively on this machine. MR If we want to continue this aspect of the discussion, perhaps we MR should move it to TBOT before the fish start flying. :-) Is that a separate list? Yes. It's the The Bat! Off Topic list. Here's the direct subscription mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Melissa PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys TB! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 pgp0AyoMh7Bxw.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: %language macro crashes TB
Hello Roelof, Saturday, June 12, 2004, 8:16:34 PM, you wrote: C But when replying to certain messages, TB crashes. C TB opens the editor window as if it were about to generate the text C for my reply, but before the generated text shows up, TB gets frozen C with a white, empty editor screen; and the only way out is to kill TB. RO In the past that has happened to me too. RO Especially when I used a template that set another language for the RO spell checker than the previous message. RO However, TB only got stuck when I replied with the reply-button. When RO I replied with Ctrl-Enter I had no problems whatsoever. Indeed. Using Ctrl-Enter instead of the normal reply button does not cause these crashes. Strange! But it is rather a workaround than a solution. This is a real bug. But it is still difficult to say *when* it happens. Because it does not happen always, but only in combination with certain QTs and with the %Language macro. But it is strange that we seem to be the only ones who experienced this difficulty RO Since then I RO disabled the main toolbar and gotten used to not using it. What do you mean with disable the toolbar? Do you mean simply not to *display* it? -- Best regards, Cyrille mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ TB! 2.11.02, Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000, Pentium 233Mhz with 95MB ] Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Restore fails
All, I am currently running TheBat! 2.11.02 on Windows XP Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Build 2600. I have 216,177 messages. I am experiencing the same problem as Timo. I also noticed that the sychronize gets the same error. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks Ed From: Timo Boettcher Subject: many messages in account (Backup fails) Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 04:21:11 -0700 Hi, How many messages do you have in your TheBat!-mailaccounts? I have reached 26 mails in one account (yes, a quarter million) and though I can back it up, I can't restore it on my notebook, I always get error reading file C:\path\to\backup.tbk Is there a limit of size of a backupfile or the number of messages in a backupfile or an account that is backuped? Timo Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Newbie seeking advice :-)
Tony, [T] wrote: I just 'ask' TB! to decrypt. Probably some setting but I have no idea where to look. Any settings I should look for specifically? Have you enabled the integration? Tools//OpenPGP//Choose OpenPGP Version? -- -=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user) PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com Running The Bat! v2.11.04 on WinXP Pro (SP1) pgpFHP47Hz2Wm.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Newbie seeking advice :-)
Hi Tony, On Monday, June 14, 2004, at 12:54:29 PM PST, you wrote: Any settings I should look for specifically? Allie's suggestion is, of course, the first essential setting to enable. After that, you can either use the PGP related macros in templates (for customizing how PGP deals with certain recipients by default), and/or use the Privacy menu options on-the-fly from the message editor. Aside from these basic options and settings, I couldn't find any unusual tweaks I had to perform in order to get the PGP integration working well here. Kevin Coates wrote up very detailed guide to using the TB/PGP integration. I do have a copy of it in my files, so if you want it, I can send it along via private email. -- Melissa PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys TB! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 pgpAZ2rY5JhXc.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Newbie seeking advice :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Melissa, On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 19:20:02 -0700 (10:20 PM here), Melissa Reese [MR] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MR Kevin Coates wrote up very detailed guide to using the TB/PGP MR integration. I do have a copy of it in my files, so if you want MR it, I can send it along via private email. I have the current version available for download on a web page. Special thanks to Peter Meyns for helping with the HTML code. - -- Kevin Coates Dewitt, NY USA Using TB! v2.11.03 under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP1 (see kludges for my pgp key) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFAzmCTvZSrVDqOXK0RAo8VAKDPTTMLgfZ+9yCO5gUrrXijnRYhPgCgtDo2 amQ17KQhPmlStLLeY3EPU9k= =qhda -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Newbie seeking advice :-)
Hello Allie, AM Tony, [T] wrote: I just 'ask' TB! to decrypt. Probably some setting but I have no idea where to look. Any settings I should look for specifically? AM Have you enabled the integration? AM Tools//OpenPGP//Choose OpenPGP Version? PGP 5,6,7,8 (build in support) -- Best regards, Tony Blood is freedoms stain Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Newbie seeking advice :-)
Hello Kevin, KC -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- KC Hash: SHA1 KC Hi Melissa, KC On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 19:20:02 -0700 (10:20 PM here), Melissa Reese [MR] KC wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MR Kevin Coates wrote up very detailed guide to using the TB/PGP MR integration. I do have a copy of it in my files, so if you want MR it, I can send it along via private email. KC I have the current version available for download on a web page. KC Special thanks to Peter Meyns for helping with the HTML code. By e-mail is fine. So is the URL of the web site. It looks the testing various PGP versions didn't do any good to my system. When opening the PGP selection window in TheBat! Send the message: thebat.exe - Entry Point Not Found The procedure entry point PGPNewKeyServerFromHostName could not be located in the dynamic link library PGPsdkNL.dll Time for a good system clean when I get back from office :P -- Best regards, Tony Diligence is the mother of good luck. Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
