Strip signatures

2005-09-04 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello everyone,

is it possible to write a TB filter that automatically strips the S/MIME
certificates from incoming messages? They're such a waste of space,
especially on public mailinglists, I'd rather get rid of them before they
are stored in my message base...

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes? -- Groucho Marx

I don't jog. It makes the ice jump right out of my glass.



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Removing + Sigms

2005-09-04 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello TBUDL,

Could anyone tell me how to remove the + sign which displays in the
received messages section of my inbox. When I receive messages from
the same source the messages get grouped together under the + sign.
This is quite annoying as I like to be able to view all my messages
in each folder.

Thank you.

-- 
Love and Light,
 Granville  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Removing + Sigms

2005-09-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Granville,

@4-Sep-2005, 16:11 Granville Cousins [GC] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:

GC Could anyone tell me how to remove the + sign which displays in the
GC received messages section of my inbox. When I receive messages from
GC the same source the messages get grouped together under the + sign.

This is called Threading. Select View .. View threads by ... None
and you're done.

-- 
Cheers --  //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v3.61.02 beta on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
'

pgpvnGpWkxM3x.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Removing + Sigms

2005-09-04 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Namaste, Granville Cousins...

on 04-Sep-2005 at 17:11 you (Granville Cousins) wrote:

 Could anyone tell me how to remove the + sign which displays in the
 received messages section of my inbox. When I receive messages from
 the same source the messages get grouped together under the + sign.
 This is quite annoying as I like to be able to view all my messages
 in each folder.

Press ALT+0 to view threads by none (the same option is available in the
View menu).

HTH

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

What is a physicist? I was asked on the floor of the house what in the
name of common sense a physicist is, and I could not answer. --
Anonymous congressman, 1914



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Removing + Sigms

2005-09-04 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Granville,

On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:11:59 +0100 GMT (04/09/2005, 22:11 +0700 GMT),
Granville Cousins wrote:

GC Could anyone tell me how to remove the + sign which displays in the
GC received messages section of my inbox. 

Alt-0 (alt and zero)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

If the professor on Giligan's Island can make a radio out of a
coconut, why can't he fix a hole in a boat?

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.61.02 beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Strip signatures

2005-09-04 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: TIGER192

   ***^\ ._)~~
 ~( __ _o   Was another beautiful day, Sun, 4 Sep 2005,
   @  @  at 15:30:32 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:

 is it possible to write a TB filter that automatically strips the
 S/MIME certificates from incoming messages? They're such a waste of
 space, especially on public mailinglists, I'd rather get rid of them
 before they are stored in my message base...

Arrgghh! That would be a bliss of irremovable happiness and welfare!

My tongue shall troll the brave face immensely who make such a
terminator.

- --
Mica
PGP keys nestled at: http://bardo.port5.com/pgpkeys/
[Earth LOG: 368 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium
 with nestled ZipSlack(tm) Linux 9.1, and, for TB sometimes,
 Gentoo and Vector Linuxes via Wine...
 ~~~ For PM please use my full address as it is *exactly* given in my
 From|Reply To field(s). ~~~
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQEVAwUBQxsMnbSpHvHEUtv8AQY3Tgf/WjXGM3x3tQ3mLHU0PxpJcUjXLhW6WZSq
CHh3kuCf/ELq8rUQ9BSnewJ1yj4ApdqOqzQkKGoN+s3xC04P8C8TOEw+HO8094qC
rdmFhfZL+36r3APFFZFf4U+xmDnPBgvx2wI0/3af/5Ko583BAdmtN4QiYhcj26Z7
8Ub2dipCiWU6Hmvi7vQoJpAVqc88G8PSboDXQueeh5SmJ5EDdv0FJuO+949tn+b/
okXr0Qw3UfFfG+RosZRxZYxLt+5CLv/y34AB7eGT6FM6OZcP+N0Em2vcIHd7HoaM
kAgIIGlcflDKPr4bWXTg0BsvBHHQqlG5SdVy9hOlX35sdOCMw182Pg==
=HWVh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Replying to HTML mails: How to use plain text?

2005-09-04 Thread Andreas Schwartmann
Hi, Bat folks,

on  Fri, 2 Sep 2005 at 22:52:10 GMT +1000 (which was Friday, September
2, 2005, 14:52 where I live) Ian A. White wrote the following lines
regarding Replying to HTML mails: How to use plain text?:

IAW Andreas,

IAW On Friday, September 2, 2005, 9:57:04 PM, you (Andreas Schwartmann) wrote:

AS Hello, Bat fans,

AS when replying to an html-message TB 3.6 automatically replies in html
AS as well.

AS But I don't want to write html-mails, but just plain text.

AS How can I change this irritating behaviour?

IAW Options|Preferences|Viewer/Editor and check the option to reply to
IAW HTML messages in plain text.


Thanks, I did not know of this new option.


Take care,
Andreas



-- 
My homepage: www.andreas-schwartmann.de | ICQ#: 23060752
PGP 8.0 key: www.andreas-schwartmann.de/pubring.pkr

- Mailed with The Bat! 3.61.01 beta on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 
-

The worm that destroys you is the temptation to agree with your critics, to 
get their approval. - Thomas Harris, Hannibal


pgphJz1K1Xv04.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Removing + Sigms

2005-09-04 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello Thomas,

Sunday, September 4, 2005, 4:22:39 PM, you wrote:

Thomas Hello Granville,

Thomas On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:11:59 +0100 GMT (04/09/2005, 22:11 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Granville Cousins wrote:

GC Could anyone tell me how to remove the + sign which displays in the
GC received messages section of my inbox. 

Thomas Alt-0 (alt and zero)


Thanks. It's all fine again now.

-- 
Love and Light,
 Granvillemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Removing + Sigms

2005-09-04 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello Marck,

Sunday, September 4, 2005, 4:22:50 PM, you wrote:

Marck Dear Granville,

Marck @4-Sep-2005, 16:11 Granville Cousins [GC] in
Marck mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:

GC Could anyone tell me how to remove the + sign which displays in the
GC received messages section of my inbox. When I receive messages from
GC the same source the messages get grouped together under the + sign.

Marck This is called Threading. Select View .. View threads by ... None
Marck and you're done.


Thanks Mark. I'm back to normal again now.

-- 
Love and Light,
 Granvillemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Removing + Sigms

2005-09-04 Thread Granville Cousins
Hello Alexander,

Sunday, September 4, 2005, 4:25:48 PM, you wrote:

Alexander Namaste, Granville Cousins...

Alexander on 04-Sep-2005 at 17:11 you (Granville Cousins) wrote:

 Could anyone tell me how to remove the + sign which displays in the
 received messages section of my inbox. When I receive messages from
 the same source the messages get grouped together under the + sign.
 This is quite annoying as I like to be able to view all my messages
 in each folder.

Alexander Press ALT+0 to view threads by none (the same option is available 
in the
Alexander View menu).

Alexander HTH


Thanks. It's all fine again now. Makes everything more simple.

-- 
Love and Light,
 Granvillemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


character sets in MicroEd?

2005-09-04 Thread Paul A. Thiessen
Hi! I'm using TB! 3.60.07, and am having a problem with character sets. I
get e-mail from a particular person in HTML in chinese simplified (gb2312),
although it's English correspondence (dunno why he has his e-mail set that
way...). I can view the e-mails just fine, but when I reply to his
messages, the character set displayed in the editor (microed) is all messed
up, squashed together. I can fix this by manually switching to a different
character set, but I have to do this each time I respond to an e-mail like
this. How do I tell TB! to never use this set? I've unchecked it from the
XLAT table in the preferences, but that only seems to serve to not put that
font in the character set pull-down menu. Is there some way to tell TB!
never to use this particular encoding in MicroEd?

TIA,

 - Paul

-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   Paul A.   |NCBI / NIH
  Thiessen   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: character sets in MicroEd?

2005-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Paul!

On Sunday, September 04, 2005, 2:57 PM, you wrote:

 Hi! I'm using TB! 3.60.07, and am having a problem with character
 sets. ... HTML in chinese simplified (gb2312),... when I reply to
 his messages, the character set displayed in the editor (microed) is
 all messed up, squashed together. ... Is there some way to tell TB!
 never to use this particular encoding in MicroEd?

I don't think there's a way to choose.

However, the problem may have been addressed (or fixed) in a
subsequent beta.

I've run a search, but I can't find anything specific about it in the
change logs. I do know that the problems of replying in HTML are being
addressed.

Would you consider signing up as a beta tester and running the current
beta, 3.61.02? It's running reliably and stably for me, with no
problems.

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.61.02 beta on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2








Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: character sets in MicroEd?

2005-09-04 Thread Paul A. Thiessen
Hi Mary!

MB Would you consider signing up as a beta tester and running the current
MB beta, 3.61.02? It's running reliably and stably for me, with no
MB problems.

Thanks for the tip, and I tried 3.61.2, but the behaviour is the same. Note
that I'm composing in plain text/MicroEd mode, not HTML. In HTML mode the
fonts are okay, but in microed mode it's messed up.

- Paul

-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   Paul A.   |NCBI / NIH
  Thiessen   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: character sets in MicroEd?

2005-09-04 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Paul!

On Sunday, September 04, 2005, 5:13 PM, you wrote:

MB Would you consider signing up as a beta tester and running the current
MB beta, 3.61.02? It's running reliably and stably for me, with no
MB problems.

 Thanks for the tip, and I tried 3.61.2, but the behaviour is the same. Note
 that I'm composing in plain text/MicroEd mode, not HTML. In HTML mode the
 fonts are okay, but in microed mode it's messed up.

I know. Without HTML in the mix, in an earlier beta, I was having
problems with MicroEd in its choice of charsets and was having to set
them manually in order to reply using MicroEd.

That was fixed. Occasionally RitLabs will fix something and not log
it. So I was hoping this was fixed.

They are working on Unicode and charsets among their main focuses as
they develop their new interface for TB! further.

I suggest that you write an issue report about this in Bug Tracker.

Do you have an account there? If not, go here, and you can register as
a BT reporter:

https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/main_page.php

-- 
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 3.61.02 beta on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2








Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


How to delete a Common/Virtual Folder

2005-09-04 Thread z5worg

I installed v.2 on my laptop (Win98SE) a few days ago.  I had a 1.6x
before; but I didn't find an uninstall, so I simply deleted 1.6x; and
installed v.2

After setting up all the Accounts, somehow I ended up with an extra
yellow folder (I'll call it Folder 1A) at the end (of my Account
list) that is a duplicate of one of my accounts (Folder 1). I don't know
how it got there.  Both Folder 1 and 1A has the same name.

I tried to delete that Folder 1A; but it says that there are parked
messages, and I have to unparked them first.  And I found that as I
unparked the messages in Folder 1A, the same thing happened in Folder 1.

Is Folder 1A a Common folder or a Virtual folder?  And how do I delete
it without affecting Folder 1?

-- 
Thanks in advance
JM


Using The Bat! 2.12.04
Under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: How to delete a Common/Virtual Folder

2005-09-04 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello z5worg,

On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:18:19 -0400 GMT (05/09/2005, 08:18 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


zzc Is Folder 1A a Common folder or a Virtual folder?  And how do I delete
zzc it without affecting Folder 1?

It's neither a common nor a virutal folder, it's a duplicate. It was
likely caused by deleting rather than uninstalling the previsou TB
version (by the way, you could have just installed the new version
over it, no need to uninstall).

So, in order to fix your problem, we would need to look into your
registry key and into the folder structure on your harddisk.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Man: Your place or mine? Woman: Both. You go to yours, and I'll go to
mine.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.61.02 beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: character sets in MicroEd?

2005-09-04 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul,

On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 15:57:08 -0400 GMT (05/09/2005, 02:57 +0700 GMT),
Paul A. Thiessen wrote:

PAT Hi! I'm using TB! 3.60.07, and am having a problem with character sets. I
PAT get e-mail from a particular person in HTML in chinese simplified (gb2312),
PAT although it's English correspondence (dunno why he has his e-mail set that
PAT way...). I can view the e-mails just fine, but when I reply to his
PAT messages, the character set displayed in the editor (microed) is all messed
PAT up, squashed together.

TB will use the charset of the incoming messages for replies, and that
is as designed. You have the choice of downloading a font for that
charset in which the Latin characters please your eye, or you need to
manually change it.

It thought there was a macro to change the charset (and you could use
it in conjunction with IF and OCHARSET), but I cannot find that macro
in the help right now.

I get messages in GB2312 and Big5 and don't consider the font a
problem - much better than UTF8, which triggers my Thai font and the
Latin characters look ugly. I am still waiting for the plain-text
viewer to interpret UTF.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

If you don't like the news, go out and make some.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.61.02 beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: character sets in MicroEd?

2005-09-04 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Mary,

On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 15:30:28 -0500 GMT (05/09/2005, 03:30 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:

MB Would you consider signing up as a beta tester and running the current
MB beta, 3.61.02? 

This is not a beta issue...

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.61.02 beta
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Upgraded from Dial-Up to DSL, TB Knocked Out - (Sent by Webmail)

2005-09-04 Thread jmtb
Hi,

I upgraded from my dial-up connection (worldnet.att.net) to DSL with the same 
ISP.  Everything works fine -- except for TB.  It won't connect.  I'm using TB 
version 148e, which has been doing just fine for me, sorting and handling all 
incoming and outgoing corresondece flawlessly, along with my 50K archived 
message.  Did until now, that is. 

I changed outgoing port settings from 25 to 465, incoming from 110 to 995, as 
instructed, fussed with all other of what seemed to be reasonable 
possibilities, with the best guesses of ATT tech support, which doesn't know 
TB.  That support seems baffled that there is no SSL setting in this version of 
TB (at least that I can find), which seems to be required in order for TB to 
work with ATT DSL.  (I tried checkiing the MD5APOP Challenge/Response 
(RFC-1734) option under Properties  Transport  Receive Mail  Authentication, 
but that didn't do anything.)

Anyone have a solution?

(Webmail is agonizing.)

Many thanks.

Jerry 


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: character sets in MicroEd?

2005-09-04 Thread aam
A Bat-fellow, Thomas Fernandez,
wrote on Monday, 5th September 2005 at 08:53:45 (GMT +0700),
which was 3:53 a.m. in Bratislava, Slovakia --

 I thought there was a macro to change the charset (and you could use
 it in conjunction with IF and OCHARSET), but I cannot find that macro
 in the help right now.

%Charset=ISO-8859-1

Are you sure a macro like %OCharset exists, Thomas? I can't see
anything like that here in 2.12.

If it does exist, might the correct syntax for Paul's purposes
be the following?

%IF:%OCharset=gb2312:%Charset='ISO-8859-1'

-- 
Yours,
Alex. of Slovakia
www.avenarius.sk

[flying with The Bat! 2.12.00
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
amd athlon 2400 mhz  704 mb ram]



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: How to delete a Common/Virtual Folder

2005-09-04 Thread z5worg

Sunday, September 04, 2005, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:18:19 -0400 GMT (05/09/2005, 08:18 +0700 GMT),
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

zzc Is Folder 1A a Common folder or a Virtual folder?  And how do I delete
zzc it without affecting Folder 1?

 It's neither a common nor a virutal folder, it's a duplicate. It was
 likely caused by deleting rather than uninstalling the previsou TB
 version (by the way, you could have just installed the new version
 over it, no need to uninstall).

For my future information, how would I uninstall The Bat!?

 So, in order to fix your problem, we would need to look into your
 registry key and into the folder structure on your harddisk.

What exactly am I looking for?

I search in the Registry for the Account name (that has the duplicate);
and it was only listed ONCE in [HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\RIT\The
Bat!\Users Depot].

Before I install v.2, I deleted the entire [HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\RIT]

Would it help to uninstall and reinstall at this point?  If yes, what
is the procedure that would involve the least amount of work?

-- 
Thanks in advance
JM


Using The Bat! 2.12.04
Under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Folder Maintenance - Check Integrity/Repair

2005-09-04 Thread z5worg

When I run that for all the Accounts/subfolders, there were 3 damaged
folders.

e.g. Subfolder1

 Messages recovered: 4,926, damaged parts (part.bin), Saved:0

I  do not find a part0001.bin on my HD's subfolder1.  There is a
part0001.bin in another subfolder from an earlier run of Folder
Maintenance.  What do I do with that file?  Does it contain the damaged
messages?  How do I recover them?

Also, the messages listed against Subfolder1 is 4,920. Where are the
other 6 messages? There are similar differences in # of messages for the
other 3 damaged folders.

-- 
Thanks in advance
JM


Using The Bat! 2.12.04
Under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html