An Idea.

2002-06-26 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

hi list,

someone just gave me an idea:

if you have two accounts, yet in the preferences you point them to have
the same home-directory (under filesdirectories), what consequences would
that have?

could you for example still have different mail-retrieval settings or have
the accounts effectively become one-and-the-same?

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPRovqktQMadp+KslEQJwjACg2jGFYUr6iLO+l/F/Ya1cfxqE5IMAoIo0
kAQFpptdz2igikL8RUNoyhbd
=lNZs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: An Idea.

2002-06-26 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 3:35 op donderdag 27 juni 2002, Jos Flachs:

 could you for example still have different mail-retrieval settings or
 have the accounts effectively become one-and-the-same?

 Why should they?

because settings are held in files with a fixed name, perhaps.

but i dunno fersure, so i asked.

M.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPRpfUEtQMadp+KslEQImlQCg114EtAxzb3MyYkASUZjgXL2P1XQAn13a
gUpQwTritgONhIDW53g30Pja
=yyal
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: web2pop (was Re: Under account/properties/options the ** periodically checking each * does not work...)

2002-06-20 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 21:05 op donderdag 20 juni 2002, Jonathan Angliss:

 On Thursday, June 20, 2002, vj135doppa wrote...

  There is nothing else running but it says port so and so is still
  being used by another application.

 Sounds to me like something has crashed, and Windows is reporting the
 port is locked... have you tried a nice fresh reboot?

install kerio firewall (www.kerio.com); besides being a very nice firewall
it will also tell you which programs keep which ports open.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPRIdL0tQMadp+KslEQJv8wCgue21qJRFjlhiInmw7+MWRuKVULoAoPnb
vhHv31LMLrE8J62fGdAKfZ3W
=xXPO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/



Re: 2?

2002-06-11 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 17:24 op dinsdag 11 juni 2002, Paul Cartwright:

 FDH Second, I at one time did use the full name with the quoted material
 FDH i.e. Frank D. Hubeny .  But was told it was archaic and meseed up some
 FDH folks wrapping.  But I do see this alot from this list, and it does look
 FDH good, clears up who said what so to speak. Is the problem with the fact
 FDH that I did not use a wrap with my quoted material.

 if you right-click on the account in the left-panel, select
 properties. then go to templates. Hit the PLUS (+) symbol to expand it,
 select the REPLY template.  There is a section  below that starts with
  Sender information. Here you can select names, initials as you
 can see I use initials, it still shows who said what, but it doesn't
 take up alot of space !

It is, like the Re[2]: reply-extension, only usable when mailing to
another thebat! user, like one would expect on this list.

If someone with another mailclient, say, mozilla, reformats a reply to
your message with these FDH replymarkers, it *will* fuck up their
wrapping.

The replymarker is ''. Period. Get used to it.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPQYRWktQMadp+KslEQJNBwCfVVHc8ayAlsEksaK26HhunqRpxasAnRGB
sKdN+FwG9rfaNNQFT0rFy81F
=Da1W
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: E-mail address filtering.

2002-06-07 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 12:02 op vrijdag 7 juni 2002, Allie C Martin:

WC I've tried [[EMAIL PROTECTED]], Recipient, Yes.

 Ok. Try this string and enable regular expressions in the filter rules
 options.

 ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]

or add [Joe.], Recipient, No. to the filter.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPQB5r0tQMadp+KslEQLcWwCg2tNfYQ9v/lmKQfN1i3RZWXr/zsIAnRYG
JnW/bOk1NO6qf0cNAANXuI4u
=2YIM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: 1.60m - State of the art?

2002-05-31 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 15:00 op vrijdag 31 mei 2002, Joseph N.:

 Solange man bewundern und lieben kann, ist man immer jung. (Pablo
 Casals)

As long as one can love and admire, one is ever young (of heart).

 Willing to provide a translation?

sure. my german is a bit rusty (niederdeutsch! :), but i think it is
correct :)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPPdnr0tQMadp+KslEQIXfQCeMjGzO2lT0wYEJnPaWtQiO8rIEBoAoNcG
vG29TEVqyW2Tk9DGrY7YBcK7
=h+Yx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Colorized Signatures with Fixed Font

2002-05-31 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 20:37 op vrijdag 31 mei 2002, Thomas F:

TF Richt Tech Viewer,

 Now, what is that supposed to mean? Probably Rich Text Viewer, I guess.
 Use the spell checker, will you?

now is that a spell flame or what?

*poking up the fire*

M.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPPfaDEtQMadp+KslEQKkQQCbBNuSfa1/5/o/GENV85Z8IFIJ60gAnRYp
7PMhckG7qgAevg0j5+VMWh9T
=6Ueq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Colorized Signatures with Fixed Font

2002-05-31 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 23:24 op vrijdag 31 mei 2002, Lars Geiger:

 Hi Mrten,
 On Friday, May 31, 2002 at 23:16:09 [GMT +0200], you wrote:

 now is that a spell flame or what?

 *poking up the fire*

 You surely realized that Thomas replied to his own message, didn't you?
 I think he's allowed to do this. :-)

sssttt! wanna see if he returns fire to himself *grin*

M.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPPfeqEtQMadp+KslEQI2ZQCgwuY31WVTIi1srGgjsCwcusvls6QAoIi+
F+U286VswGY7P9FMHfBjziT3
=q2ZI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Auto size columns?

2002-05-25 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 20:58 op zaterdag 25 mei 2002, Tone Marie Berg:

 This is a default behaviour in Windows which all applications should
 inherit, actually. Explorer does this, and all Windows applications
 behaving as expected should do this.

trust me, it is something you, as a programmer, have to add yourself if
you do anything that isn't pre-programmed with a list.

make it a wish.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPO/V2UtQMadp+KslEQLc9gCg0xAlJ8Y8aDdHZ+wpE0Qz+ytvlg0AoKVu
vPIuN29wA90l6IudkN2VL8Tc
=qXd6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: PGP Question.

2002-05-17 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 15:01 op vrijdag 17 mei 2002, Steve VanOostbrugge:

 I have just become a new user of this program and after setting up my
 preferences I then tried to set up my defaults for PGP. It is my intent
 to always sign and encrypt by default every outgoing message with PGP. I
 have PGP 6.0.2 installed within my machine, and according to the
 literature for TB, it says that it only needs this program to sign and
 encrypt. I was unable to set up the default sign  encrypt, BUT was able
 to manually encrypt my message prior to sending from within the
 program's menu.

have you installed the plugin dll? download it from the ritlabs.com site.

i'd advise against encrypting all your outgoing messages; this list for
one will not be able to decrypt your messages. not to mention all the
people that don't have pgp installed.

 Is there any way to automatically sign and encrypt the message when I
 press send?

yes there is, i'm doing it right now (signing, that is). install the
plugin, and perhaps you should try pgp 6.5.8ckt, from www.ippgpp.com.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPOT0GEtQMadp+KslEQJIygCg4z4vtyAMdKb34hauTVDgxgCo2OcAn3tt
YaW/K8peTg43G/B9KYDCaozd
=toSu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: TB phones home, sends spam?

2002-05-15 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 16:57 op woensdag 15 mei 2002, Jonathan Angliss:

 On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, Spike wrote...

 Spammers have a trick they now use, which works if they know the
 name of the default mail server of the ISP.  They can send a
 message to whatever@mailservername and EVERYONE on the
 mailserver gets a message!  The whatever can actually be
 anything they wish to type! This really sucks, but I don't know
 what can be done about it.

this is not true. examine the headers from such messages and search for
your emailadress. you'll find it. it's just not in the To: header.

 A common one is Undisclosed.Recipients@server name. I get about 7 of
 those a day. I'm guessing depending on the mail server if you set it to
 reject anything sent directly to the server name, it should drop those
 mails. After all... why would legitimate contacts be sending email to
 your server name, instead of your domain name? I'd have to experiment
 with that one on my test network.

'undisclosed.recepients' is what you get with some mailers when you only
bcc people. no worries there. on properly configured mailservers, mail to
random@mailserver is bounced. no question about that.

on an upnote; ask your ISP to implement the ORDB blacklist in the
mailsystem (http://www.ordb.org/). mine has, and the amount of spam has
drastically reduced.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPOKCvktQMadp+KslEQKGnQCfWWhEeG3bfIDNCoOtMlvy62wZKOsAoIrs
MccE4FQ21aLxl/3zt2eCds+M
=UYxx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: TheBat! FAQ What I don't understand,and WHAT I REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND.

2002-05-14 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 22:07 op dinsdag 14 mei 2002, Daniel Grunberg:

 What I don't understand is why TheBat! doesn't make TheBat! FAQ

there has been a thread on this subject a couple of weeks ago. look it up
the archives. short summary: opera does not like the way the faq is built,
therefore a warning was built in.

you can complain about that, but it won't be changed unless the moderator
(who happens to be he faq-answerer here :) has found time to rewrite it.

you should try Mozilla, it works :) /shameless plug.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPOGBgEtQMadp+KslEQJBQQCg7VlyeXu5L/68OcwLvVB4SsSXsqYAn0vq
ndKQTk6O1SNBpzSMwfgd40SH
=CAi+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: My postings

2002-05-14 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 23:57 op dinsdag 14 mei 2002, David Elliott:

 What has happened to my postings ??

 I have changed nothing.!!

check Account  Properties  Mail Management  '8-bit characters are
treated:'. It should NOT be 'base-64', make it 'quoted-printable'.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPOGAlUtQMadp+KslEQI2kwCeOYbMLaHQ+74l6n5Zcn0aIOf/l7sAnjSO
n3SoQfDOzyStWmPXxUhyimjc
=aGMG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: TB phones home, sends spam?

2002-05-14 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 2:21 op woensdag 15 mei 2002, ztrader:

 The only way that could have happened is that TB called home
 (*without* asking), reporting that address, and then sent a spam
 email. This does not sound as though TB is respecting privacy at all. I
 am VERY disappointed!

if you are referring to the 'welcome to thebat!' or-something like that
message that is in your inbox after you install thebat, you're jumping to
conclusions. there is nothing to stop the installer from adding a friendly
welcome- message to your inbox, is there?

don't worry, your mail-address is still safe (well, it was until you used
it on this public mailinglist *evil grin*)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPOGrHktQMadp+KslEQI64ACeJA7G+aZgG5ZJWPPkP6t/ivsXgc8AoMR7
eO2VOVOt4NYq/vaJE+Mav9jj
=on5o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Word Wrapping

2002-05-14 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 0:28 op woensdag 15 mei 2002, Mike Dillinger:

 I'd like to be able to word wrap locally, but not wrap the message, if
 that makes sense.  So for instance, when I send a message out, I don't
 want the recipients to receive it word wrapped (that allows their
 e-mail client to do what they want with the message), but for neatness
 purposes on my end, I'd like to word wrap here.  Hopefully this makes
 sense.

 Is this possible?  I can only see either word wrapping everything or
 nothing.

no. WYSIWYMO, what you see is what you mail out.

tell your recipients to upgrade to a better mail-client :)

M.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPOGDUUtQMadp+KslEQJ6IQCfSJW+CHrlnpc/cmAVmLO03DR9dK8AoJ3C
e4+1+tNKP14cnmds8IAcOPUO
=pYUG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: comments and a request

2002-05-10 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 19:20 op vrijdag 10 mei 2002, Richard Butler:

 ridiculous scratch pad.  I therefore request you kill SmartBat or at
 least take it off of my window title bar. I further request that you
 add a raw SMTP\POP3 tool that can let me get down-n-dirty with my mail
 server.

i request you try putty in 'raw' mode to get down  dirty with your
mail-server. way more efficient. i also request that you learn SMTP and
POP from their respective RFCs (i've posted the link earlier this week).

furthermore i want to state that i absolutely LOVE the smartbat (my
window title bar, the nerve). it's IDEAL to reformat pieces of text
copied from somewhere that i want to paste somewhere where the windowsize
is limited (IRC, for example). just assign a system-wide hotkey to it.

there you have it. a positive note about the smartbat. thank you for your
attention.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPNxe4ktQMadp+KslEQIjyACfUqXUmhGt80lcLyY21iROvlgFhkQAoKuY
64X2QHr2u7EYQ6XoLfwkgYSb
=nRT/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Wrong mailbox

2002-05-04 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 20:16 op zaterdag 4 mei 2002, Fré van Limpt:

 I did and it didn't make any difference. I ticked ' 0 ' (as a synonym
 for 'never'), which was replaced by '15' (seems to be a standard
 setting) ! :-/

there is a checkbox before that particular setting. (you know, that thing
that look like a 'V', or a square root-sign). uncheck that one (ie.; click
on it. it will disappear).

otherwise, you might want to remove the smtp-server from the settings :)

 There aren't anymore left I'm afraid... and I don't want to uninstall
 Netsc. 4.76 because of my excellent browser (Opera was slower on my cpu
 and I don't like IE).

netscape 4.76 is an outdated browser anyway. expect most pages to be
rendered incorrectly soon (read: http://alistapart.com/stories/tohell/ , or
http://www.webstandards.org/upgrade/ )

you should try mozilla ( http://www.mozilla.org )! /shameless plug

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPNQd/ktQMadp+KslEQLG8ACffqHbLzXWjyw7fCodLVjyNYdn11EAoJbl
vjyRKAEHlppgHEkD/9+pMrBy
=Me+f
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Authentication Encryption

2002-05-02 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 15:02 op donderdag 2 mei 2002, Fré van Limpt:

 The system of secure transport of messages begins, I think, with POP3
 and/or(?) SMTP authentication. Or are they simply options on themselves,
 regardless of encryption?

messages are transported between servers as-is, so usually in plain text.
the only way to guarantee that no-one besides the recipient can read your
messages is to encrypt them end-to-end.

the reason one would secure the traffic between TheBat! and the mailserver
is a question of security, not privacy. an intruder can sniff your
connection to the mailserver and thus see your passwords. basic pop3 sends
password in plain text over the network.

smtp authentication is another beast, this is usually done by isps to
prevent spammers from using their systems.

so yes, the methods you name are options on themselves :)

 When do I (PGP or else)-sign and when isn't it worth the trouble? I'm
 looking forward to see reactions that can orientate my thoughts on the
 subject.

PGP-signing is worth the trouble when you want to make sure that the
recipient is able to check whether the message has been tampered with.

since one can not really predict when the recipient deems this
integrity-check necessary i almost always sign my messages.

signing messages is also useful as a means to promote the use of strong
cryptography in email. :)

hope this clears something up;
Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPNFAlktQMadp+KslEQIIPwCfYv1NUKDW4GCU5JncRqPZXGxfe64An1CT
rZvUDrcgnag2DOmTGm1HJejR
=NteG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Anti-Virus

2002-05-02 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 0:01 op vrijdag 3 mei 2002, Mandara:

 Btw, the term Microsoft anything-dealing-with-privacy-security sounds
 pretty weird, nein? Do you folks really think it is a good idea making
 Bat involved with a such things?

the bat! has S/MIME because outlook has it. market-push... what! no
s/mime support! me no buy!.

 Well, since M$ made own versions of almost all things/prgm languages,
 maybe is something similar with this S/MIME 'standard'. Ahhh... Just an
 idea.

*g*

 I simply couldn't browse folders by first letter of their names, in
 versions 60, 60c, d (I didn't even try further).

i'm using 1.60h and have just tried... when i type 'e' and 'r', a folder
called 'eric' gets selected... is that what you mean? (select the folder
pane first ofcourse)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPNGvVEtQMadp+KslEQJqYgCcDf8Dh7cMr8Uuse+zdLKj9OlQhB4AoLUr
4vqPgsI3n3KZu02Ew3IFTOJ4
=uNng
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Song of the forgotten bugs and S/MIME standard[s] was: Re:Anti-Virus

2002-05-02 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 2:16 op vrijdag 3 mei 2002, Mandara:

 Ahhh... Bat became so excellent right because it was *different*, and
 pretty independent. Ahhh... Hmmm... Grmph... Hmmm...

it is pretty because the programmers designed it right, and used the input
they got from their advanced customers right. microsoft probably uses the
same approach (polls, beta-testing), but their envisioned userbase is more
'stupid', and thus the resulting product has more 'fluff' liked by
'children' and less advanced features liked by 'elders'. (the terms do of
course not relate to age :)

that, and their delivery-model does not match with the beta-cycles we see
here at riotlabs (typo deliberately not corrected :).

using s/mime instead of pgp is of course a personal choice. personally i
despise s/mime for the same reason i despise html-in-mail: you bother the
recipient with more 3 to 4 K useless random crap, thus lowering to the
signal/noise ratio that is usually too low to begin with. PGP is usually
much nicer than that.

i sometimes find myself on a seemingly hopeless crusade, pointing people
to nice and not-so-nice how and why should one trim and inline-reply
one's email-sites, trying to explain, but i am often being met with a
blank stare (over email, that is :).

 Standards are very important in mass-communications, and M$ is just
 breaking it, but this is M$. Question is: why TB's supporting this? But,
 maybe I grasped TB concept wrongly...

s/mime is just another RFC... don't know exactly who started it. i vaguely
remember that it was eudora, though i might be wrong.

 Of course. But not, that's not quite exactly what I mean. If you have
 several folders starting with letter e try to browse this way and
 you'll see that you can do that only once. For instance, I have in each
 (of 21) account folder named Lists and could easily switch between
 them just by typing L all the way around. Similar is with folders
 News, Private etc.

weird. i have folders starting with 'maart', 'marie-' and 'mariek' and
find myself able to bounce happily between all of them. the only folders
that do what you describe are the inbox and my inbox-unknown folder.
spaces in names seem to be bothersome as well (folders 'mark b' and 'mark
h'), since the space seems to be caught by the preview-pane. what seems to
work though for flipping between inboxes is pressing 'down' first, then
typing the name. is that a workaround perhaps?

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPNHdbEtQMadp+KslEQJh9gCgvSpsLhzhkCmQen/kc6nWfElV5+MAnj63
FYFYFCultcP1D8u+qymbqRq+
=VJKn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Policy Amendment

2002-04-27 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 6:59 op zaterdag 27 april 2002, DJR:

well, i've tried to 'interpret' your request and have searched for the
messages are complaining about, but i can't seem to find any. haven't seen
blank subject-lines here for ages (did notice one with '(no subject)'
though).

can't say about empty From: headers, but if Marck is correct about
messages leaving the list-server, you have to seek the problem somewhere
else.

assuming you are referring to the From: kludge, not the one visible in the
preview pane of TB, right? because the organisation between parenthesis
there comes from the 'Organisation' kludge);

'' and '' are delimiters, used in the From: field to make it possible to
put a 'real name' there. See ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2822.txt,
paragraph 3.6.2 and 3.4.

the parenthesis '(' and ')' are allowed in the subject kludge by RFC 2822.
(see same URL, paragraph 3.6.5 and 3.2.6).

 My automated mail sorter does not need fixing, it's in shareware and
 has no modifications.

if your automated mail sorter does not understand parenthesis in the
subject-kludge, it needs fixing, no doubt about that. any US-ASCII
character is allowed there. the fact that it is shareware is no guarantee
that the author of it has overseen something...

 If I'm having problems, thousands of others are having the same problem.

i don't think that there are 'thousands' of people on this list. but i
might be wrong, of course... you are the first one complaining, though.

 The message was also sent to the list moderator who's job is to
 determine policy. This prevents self-centered, myopic individuals from
 turning the list into an unworkable chaos, with conflicting standards.

i suggest you read up on your RFC's (see www.rfc-editor.org for a nice
start), find some clear examples of RFC-violations and then complain to
the proper authority.

 Addressing a problem at the earliest date is a positive policy in
 itself.

that is of course correct. however, one should make certain first what the
problem is exactly before shoving suggestions onto unknowing individuals.

please reply to me personally if you wish to continue this discussion, not
on the list.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPMp7o0tQMadp+KslEQJ+pQCeN0YMTrGBhrGGvrmfqHEY9gQ3xxoAoM2s
sh1LHM3a9ny2InEoBqWo2Pz5
=cOBE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: dll files, where?

2002-04-26 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 13:51 op vrijdag 26 april 2002, Nathalie Marlier Seigneuret:

 NMS   Where I am supposed to find the two correct dll files mstext35.dll
 NMS   and scrrun.dll?

 Sorry, wrong address, wrong list. Please ignore.

folder templates anyone? :)

M.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPMk6RktQMadp+KslEQJwXACdGgj21lCMvw8xDeY6SA4o1Sv+wkoAn0jy
j6L430W5vWDL9QoIm4u6aRjG
=IDAG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: PGP or S/MIME ?

2002-04-26 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 19:58 op vrijdag 26 april 2002, Dierk Haasis:

 Is not also true that for PGP to be of any use the recipient must have
 PGP installed also? Else they cannot decode/check signature. It is this
 aspect that makes me shy away from PGP

 1. You are right, other than with S/MIME, PGP has to be installed on
 both the senders and the recipients computer. What about that lets you
 shy away?

I don't think that one can verify S/MIME signed messages when one uses elm
as a mailer, right? Or am I mistaken? Did you mean it was integrated in
Outlook? (and now also in TB..)

TB! has PGP-support integrated (albeit not really complete), so in theory
Colin should not have to shy away :) Only for the more advanced features
of keymanagement a native installation of PGP would be handy...

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPMm000tQMadp+KslEQLNVwCeNYgPnbaXFyve6k36wEU/wOz5QwkAnjXy
4spxLA+84pUWhELA+GoikAw7
=Ngn/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Policy Amendment

2002-04-25 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 23:18 op donderdag 25 april 2002, DJR:

 Of   late   several  members  have  put  either  bogus  or  misleading
 information  into  both the subject line and/or the FROM field coupled
 ...

[big snip]

I request that you fix your automated mail sorter software yourself and
stop making demands from others.

pretty please with sugar on top.

Mrten.
(was I being impolite?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPMhpxEtQMadp+KslEQIJEwCeJbKkBbqC2RHC5ZS8sZ1rILEzKX8AoJWt
hd9ffXxgcsVFi0uJu300hCXv
=zltH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Images in HTML mails

2002-04-23 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 23:55 op dinsdag 23 april 2002, Jane Ellen:

 The Bat isn't showing the images linked in the html mails I receive.
 ¿Is it a bug, or I just missed an option?.

 I wonder if this is a security precaution? Since mine don't work either,
 I generally have my html newsletters sent to a web-based email addy for
 convenience.

TheBat will display images that get sent with the message just fine.
Images that have to be downloaded however won't be downloaded and will
therefore not be displayed.

This is a feature loved by many. It will, for example, prevent spammers
from confirming your email-address. You can always click on the HTML-icon
to fire up your favourite browser ($FAVBROWSER anyone? :).

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPMXOoEtQMadp+KslEQJIqQCg5JpF/jNPCSFgGPifwczbyuaq42kAoI4K
P28lzq82/piGI+GuwI6mHQn0
=nZJs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: IFrame.Exploit virus

2002-04-19 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 18:09 op vrijdag 19 april 2002, David van Zuijlekom:

 Hi Jean-Luc, Cab't you disable Norton, then delete the email and
 re-activate Norton?

 I guess I could I am just worried that doing this it could do some
 damages in my machine.

 A virus can't do a thing without your interaction. If you don't
 execute it nothing can happen. So you can safely disable Norton and
 delete the file.

err! do not delete the file or you'll be losing all messages in your inbox!

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPMA2z0tQMadp+KslEQJYtACbBm0h17T4LzGkU0ECtNVKS4WrK3gAn23n
nfYeVanZ8BrMKhoBqggFAnYc
=BT9b
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Replying to email

2002-04-15 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 1:10 op dinsdag 16 april 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

CG Why is it that when I reply to a message the editing window comes up
CG minus the original message, even if I highlight the text and use F4.

CG For replies not to quote the original is a useful option but not one
CG that should apply all the time.

 Changes are that you are activating a template with the %clear macro in
 it. Standard TB! quotes the whole msg. Check Account/addressbook/folder
 templates.

No, TB does not reply to the complete message-body. It cuts the part below
the signature-mark in the original message. Perhaps that is the problem
that the original question was about.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPLtR0UtQMadp+KslEQIWfQCfc3PP2lWS0Ff9WvF3SJz1UOaJLDoAnRGI
kHfNQfL4B3ddja4GaCjXsoMO
=6g5z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Eudora Conversion Revisited

2002-04-09 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 16:45 op dinsdag 9 april 2002, Marck D Pearlstone:

 Is there any solution to the issue of converting Eudora's RTF messages
 (those that contain HTML tags but no indicating headers)?

ah, the reason i hated eudora. thanks for reminding me!

i remember writing a very, *very* basic program whose (is 'whose' that
correct EN?) only function was to rewrite those insanely stupid
blockquote tags to standard replymarks.

need it? mail me, you'll get a binary to run and the source as an extra :)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt7

iQA/AwUBPLL09UtQMadp+KslEQLWBQCfVZn4hVfHPL49Ef28DFnJPUeJ5bMAmwaN
feZwd9IWS/hCUEhEOxy84/xc
=zfox
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Inbox - Known - general comments (Was: Changing properties forInbox - Known)

2002-03-25 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 0:27 op dinsdag 26 maart 2002, Yuki Taga:

 Maybe it is, but to me it just seems like a typical case of software
 bloat and redundancy, albeit probably on a small scale here.

oh please. a pre-installed folder and a pre-installed rule. doesn't really
add up to 'bloat' imnsho. it is a very nice introduction for the beginning
bat-user to the concept of filtering and adressbooks. this is hardly-to-no
any bloat compared to 1.53, since i implemented it there manually.

 Basically, what it seems to do if you enable the filter is to turn
 your normal Inbox into a *temporary* or *pending* Trash folder. Fine,
 but where is there any time or energy savings in that?

i added a rule to the outgoing filters that adds any new mailadress i send
mail to to a special adressbook, so that ultimately any conversation i
have with someone ends up in the Inbox - Known.

some filtering cannot be left to automatons and has to be done in your
head. mail left in the Inbox is likely spam, whereas mail in the
Inbox-Known is most probably not spam and therefore relevant enough for
you to give it some TLA.

together with other filters, i can safely delete 95% from the mail that
ends up in the inbox. manually, yes. pressing 'del' once does not bother
me too much :)

thus there is at least 1 happy customer with the Inbox-Known :)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPJ+5+0tQMadp+KslEQLEAgCg3xtEUMOp2W/fs0IO7xIXxJPRLOgAn0qu
tWQ9rbrx2Hpi85e5TQYK5/Ts
=1Dqq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current Ver: 1.60 / 1.60a
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Feature wish: Editor improvement

2002-03-13 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 1:50 op donderdag 14 maart 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

excuse me for barging in, but:

 Right, so what do you do if you want to quote several blocks (with lines
 in between that you don't want to quote)? After quoting one block, you
 can't go back to the preview or message window, select another block and
 quote it again with F4.

i do not understand what the trouble is with just replying (and thus
quoting the complete message) and then deleting the blocks you don't need
to reply to while you type.

you need to have some context while replying, i think it works great that
way.

 BTW: Is there a way to get the attributes *bold* /italic/ and _underlined_
 showed in TB? Is this on the wish list?

yuc. messages with the reply-marker '' prepended should be
bold, and that's it, no more formatting. this ain't HTML, baby! i've seen
mozilla-mail doing just that, and it really sucks. just try to imagine it
while reading. if you need formatting to get your message across, you
should consider rephrasing your message.

which gets me to another favourite of mine: the initials (or, even worse,
the complete name!) before the '' marker. it really sucks for people that
do not use TB.

 By the quoting system I described above: You have the message you want
 to quote from on top, mark the block and press Q (or whatever button)
 to have this text inserted as quote in the actual editor window. The Bat
 can tell the source, because it is the message I just marked a block in.

and if you'd mis-click somewhere the wrong quote would end up in the wrong
window. not really what i'd call user-friendly.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPI/sUEtQMadp+KslEQInnACg+QfqUY7lQk3il2bMqeNwOR9Ij6YAn21k
kbmWz3tSKXwIkNPn7AqzuAyI
=07LO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Visual Notification

2002-03-11 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 22:43 op zaterdag 9 maart 2002, Larry Hertzog:

 I think the Ticker is a great idea. I like to have visual notification
 of received email. What I'm wondering is -- is there a way to close
 this visual without clicking HIDE -- which will actually disable it.

 Can it be done?

No, it can't be done. This is why I wrote a small program for just that.

It runs on receiving mail (thru a 'catch-all' mail-filter), checks if it
runs already and displays a small envelope in the system tray, that you
can click to make it go away, which at the same time focuses your
Bat!-window.

It Works For Me, it won't be developed any further but it suits the
purpose just fine. I can make the binary available if someone wants it
(mail me privately)?

A small drawback is that there is no communication between TB and the
program, so if you've read all your mail, there might still be an envelope
left in the system tray, which makes you believe there is new mail.
Another one is that if you receive 1200 new messages, the program is run
(through the filter) 1200 times. This slightly delays receiving new
messages. (But since the program checks if it is running, you won't see
1200 envelopes in your tray :)

I think the programmers should put this inside TB, that would make life
much easier. :)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPIz1N0tQMadp+KslEQJsiQCeMml1w2ZbqrybTQxBkHVJACzT5aMAoORu
KuvY2hB3csDulSYdx8SaRlQR
=dW3f
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: The Bat FAQ, = Navigation

2002-02-17 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 0:46 op maandag 18 februari 2002, Karin Spaink:

 On 17-02-2002 at 19:28, Marck D Pearlstone kindly wrote:
 The majority of people can read it and access it well.

 My lover just tried with his NS6.2, and he can't see it properly either.

i hate to enter in this 'me too'-contest, however, i use mozilla 0.9.8+
(2002021608 to be precise) and the FAQ works perfectly. the problem must
be at your side, Karin. do you have javascript turned on? i suppose you
do, since there is a nice big warning.

any kind of filtering in place? maybe you should try a new build of
mozilla! a nightly build perhaps?

 Putting the doc type there might help a lot.

those are the -very- minor details in HTML that do not really effect the
rendering in most browsers. the HTML itself has many, many errors (try
running http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html through
validator.w3.org) which can effect the rendering more than a doctype does,
but it seems like it is generated, so correcting by hand seems useless.

 Marck, I appreciate all the work that you put in, both for the list
 _and_ for the faq, but this page is simply not easily accessible as it
 is.

methinks that if you don't put up, you have to shut up. not personally
meant, of course :)

 And to be honest, the design looks terribly amateurish...

now *that* i have agree with the navigation is terrible as it is.
back-button functionality disbled, etc. however, since i am not
willing/able to put in the effort to make a better FAQ, i will shut up now
before i shoot my own foot :)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPHBGOEtQMadp+KslEQKOfgCfdbHRpjBrj7QWWd9kemOAjEu2sZYAoN2r
7ihVa2nKd6hDOFOazJWFK+i7
=sHh3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: OpenPGP vs. S/MIME: Preferences?

2002-01-18 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 8:07 op vrijdag 18 januari 2002, Gary Mort:

 I wouldn't classify a PGP signature as secure communications.

I agree, and if that's what you think I implied, I apologize. When writing
that last paragraph, I had SSH2 in mind.

A PGP signature just verifies that the same person wrote a series of
messages. As such, it requires no more 'trust' on my part to beleive a
key server download as to beleive you handing me a disk with the key on
it. In either case, that key could be being used by you, or by someone
else you have given it to.

Well, to paraphrase someone; the buck has to stop somewhere. I can also
IRL forge signatures. I can also fake my ID. The 'atom' in the web of
trust is a 'person'. If you can't trust a 'person', it stops right then
and there.

The bottom line is: you have to trust *someone*. There exists no (secure)
communication for the truly truly paranoid. There is a line you have to
draw somewhere and say: This Key I Trust.

This is the major problem with building a web of trust. If I know your
voice, you can confirm your public key by reading a bunch of words to me.
But to a complete stranger, this is rather a problem. I can give you my
phone number, but since you don't know my voice, well, no help there.

Personally, I don't really trust keys from key-servers very much. Too much
tampering possible. However, it is an useful way to transfer keys from
friends or collegues you *validate later on*.

 Its merely a convenient way of 'proving' what you did and did not say.
 And by 'you' I don't mean a person, simply an email address that is
 used repeatedly where all messages are signed with PGP.

Which still doesn't imply that the particular email-address belongs to me,
indeed... It could also be an elaborate Man In The Middle attack. I have
no way of knowing that the PGP-key you see in the messages you receive
from me are the same as the ones I send away.

 Secure communication would entail the encryption of your message
 itself, not the mere signing of it.

It still wouldn't be secure if we didn't exchange keys securely. Nor would
it be if you didn't trust me to keep the password to my private key-ring
in a safe place. Nor would it be if you didn't trust me at all :)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPEftGUtQMadp+KslEQJ3CgCg1AC/zRs8K9kY4ma6Glt+/m3pCWMAoLG7
CZnNj0vsDxd4bIIYF60VKxbO
=zvo1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Horizontal versus Vertical

2002-01-18 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 11:15 op vrijdag 18 januari 2002, Gerard de Vries:

 In the main screen please go to View - Split mode -- Select Horizontal
 and then Vertical split.

 Please let me know it performed the split as you would expected it.

Ja. Eerst horizontaal verdeeld 3 schermen, dan verticaal verdeeld 3
schermen.

First divided over the horizontal axis 3 screens, then vertically. What
did you see? (I hate^h^h^h^h^h dislike guessing games).

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPEf2ZUtQMadp+KslEQLUeACgxKwMUFlMCMQyon7SSE8a9UtevdgAnRTd
5K6WdAAGC66ZoysCZfYgtsOX
=InpO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: OpenPGP vs. S/MIME: Preferences?

2002-01-17 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 9:56 op donderdag 17 januari 2002, Dierk Haasis:

 I prefer PGP to S/MIME, simply because S/MIME sends your complete
 public key with every message as an attachment, which effectively turns
 a 100 byte message to an 8K one.

 Actually I see this as the only plus of S/MIME - the recipient does
 not have to have a (complicated) programme to be installed.

Well, it is my one argument against HTML-mail as well (sorry! dead
horse!), you bore the recepient with stuff the recipient IMO should
minimally be bothered with, so it should be as small as possible. Same
argument against multiple-line signatures, ...

Since I really don't know how many programs support S/MIME, I can't say
anything relevant about it.

Cryptography is (alas) not 'easy stuff', I think one needs to grasp at
least the basic concepts. You have to conciously install PGP, so one haves
at least the manual installed in c:\progra~1\pgp. That's a plus :)

 The only real 'drawback' to PGP that I can think of is that you have to
 build up your own 'web of trust'. But OTOH, for the really paranoid, that
 is just a big plus :)

 This drawback on the OTOH - as you pointed out - is the main
 advantage of PGP. It does not depend on a (dubious) central
 certificate (trust) owner.

Which moves you in the 'paranoid' category :) SSL certificates (https://)
work the same way as S/MIME certificates, with a 'root' CA. There are a
few root CA's installed with most browsers. Don't you trust SSL-encrypted
traffic either? ;) Agreed, there are root CA's that have screwed up.

 There is a short essay by Phil Zimmermann on cryptography containing
 something about the differences between S/MIME (and similar schemes)
 and PGP. It is the first part of the manual. You can get it separately
 (i.e. here: http://www.write4u.de/Dateien/PGP_Crypto_English.pdf).

I cannot find any refereces to S/MIME (at least, not until the glossary
section) in that document, I'm sorry... Excellent read anyway, though.
(The one M where RTFM really applies? :)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPEacfUtQMadp+KslEQLLiwCgvMTTki75jMuoVPtepPh39Uxn3I4An24C
WHypCfjwMX5M1/j0Ih1TXXoi
=DeBT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: OpenPGP vs. S/MIME: Preferences?

2002-01-16 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 19:43 op woensdag 16 januari 2002, Geordon VanTassle:

 I'm wondering what you all think of OpenPGP vs. S/MIME.  What is the
 benefit of one over the other?  Is there one?  Which do you prefer, and
 why?

I prefer PGP to S/MIME, simply because S/MIME sends your complete public
key with every message as an attachment, which effectively turns a 100
byte message to an 8K one.

PGP is way nicer to the recepient than that (conceded, it is not free of
annoyances either, I find things like Hash: at the beginning of your
message irritating and unnecessary, likewise with the inserting of -  on
every line that starts with a dash.)

PGP does inline signing, S/MIME (it's in the name) uses MIME (attachments)
for signing, which some older mailclients do not understand.

The only real 'drawback' to PGP that I can think of is that you have to
build up your own 'web of trust'. But OTOH, for the really paranoid, that
is just a big plus :)

Go PGP, I'd say.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPEX3bktQMadp+KslEQL3eQCeJj+FxfF3m7mG8ZTx8jyrYISZyUkAnjbI
/Rg/sY26t0KUGEuwnCFPoQK/
=5efB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: OpenPGP vs. S/MIME: Preferences?

2002-01-16 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 0:02 op donderdag 17 januari 2002, Nicholas:

 is that why when i tried to verify this message i got an error saying
 unknown key? than i couldn't import your key.. strange

*s/mime* attaches the public key to messages, PGP does not.

In the signature-part of the message are the signature, and a reference to
the public key used. you'll probably see a hexadecimal number there
(Signer Key ID: 0x69F8AB25 comes to mind), as you probably do not have
my public key in your key-ring.

You have to get my public key from the key-servers, it's there (under
another email-adress, I have so many :). I can also send it to you, if you
insist :)

However, for you to be *really* sure (we dive into details now) that I am
who I say I am, I have to *physically* give you my public key, on a floppy
disk perhaps. There is no other way to be *really* *really* sure that the
signature under my email is really mine.

Because, by getting the key from the key-server, you *trust* that
a) the key-server has not been tampered with
b) the connection you have with the key-server is not intercepted by
   someone and the data is being tampered with
c) the key in the key-server is really mine.

By requesting that I email you the key, you still do not have the
guarantee that someone is intercepting all of our communications, and
replacing my public key with his public key. This phenomenon is called
a 'man-in-the-middle'-attack.

It's kinda a chicken-and-egg problem. You cannot easily initiate a secure
conversation using only an insecure communications channel.

Just to indicate that cryptography is not as easy as it seems :)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPEYGXUtQMadp+KslEQKBagCfaTo8IUCe2WhoclUARp7sQ4ujbvAAoMyS
MxK3LrnBixGXjY1F15/1ylYw
=dwZG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: The Bat! - suggestion: 'kill dupes' per folder

2002-01-15 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 23:28 op dinsdag 15 januari 2002, Karin Spaink:

 I'd love to have the 'kill dupes' facility available on folder level
 instead of on the account level.

You mean something else then Folder - Kill Dupes? I think I'm confused
now :)

 Motivation: I *do* have double messages in a folder on occasion, but I
 can never use the feature. I imported my old mail from Eudora, whoch for
 years didn't put message-ids in sent mail, and I fear that Eudora is not
 the only mailer having done so. That makes the kill-dupes option quite
 useless, unfortunately.

Have you tried it yet? You might recover using the backup-feature :) I've
found the Kill Dupes feature very, very, useful when transferring from
Eudora. (That, and a program I had to write to filter out (almost) all the
blah-blah HTML-like shit Eudora puts in their message bases)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPESwkEtQMadp+KslEQK+nwCgpp12JQnv6Z4TIrFriH8AeVz2EXQAn0Zf
ew06tknvBPbLMjAO9YBtbvLv
=HwYP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




regexps for coloring messages

2002-01-14 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

hi all,

I'd like to color messages that have the word 'PGP' in the body of the
message, so I tried putting that in a filter. However, just marking 'PGP'
is not enough, since that marks messages with 'BEGIN PGP SIGNED' as well
:)

So it is a bit more complicated than just that, and I figured someone here
might know the answer? My guess is using regexps, but I have no experience
in using them with Thebat.

So what it comes down to is this I guess: I'd like to color messages that
have the word 'PGP' in the message BODY (not the signature!) between the
PGP-markers.

Anyone think that is feasible?

Thanks in advance!
Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPELo0ktQMadp+KslEQIuXgCfajWy/SjFzBqd2Ic9KWNpKkuJlKkAoJwL
LEHX3c6J1ZWidk/YJ9fOwfHB
=emeU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: regexps for coloring messages

2002-01-14 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 19:27 op maandag 14 januari 2002, Dierk Haasis:

 Only downside is that this would not get messages about PGP (theme in
 Body), which are also signed by PGP.

 1. Hope I am right?!

it looks like you're right, both in the solution (one of my many tries,
the best i've found to work), and in the downside.

i hate downsides :)

another downside: you refer to your PGP key in your signature, so that is
a false hit as well.


this is the regexp i have now:

(?i)(begin|end) pgp (signed message|signature) , presence NO
(?i)PGP, presence YES

Mrten.

ps. btw: can I configure thebat! so that, when replying, it does NOT cut
off the signature?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPEMb0EtQMadp+KslEQKvrgCfUxbIZaYYumQOH6LsywjGetSMwY8An3ii
S6Vzt40kTXHny5Q7aiPkazPX
=WlcV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Accented characters

2002-01-08 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 17:41 op dinsdag 8 januari 2002, Marck D Pearlstone:

 ... such as Ctrl + ' + e to give é, Ctrl + Shift + ^ + a to ...

it's a convention i only found to work in MS Office, it is not
automagically supported by Windows i guess (read: needs cumbersome
work done by programmers :).

however, if you set your keyboard locale to for example Dutch (heaven
forbid of course :), you can type é by typing 'e (apostrophe-e), â by
^a (shift-6-a), etcetera.

this is hard on people (say, programmers :), that type ' a lot,
though.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPDsaJ0tQMadp+KslEQI/dwCg2HuA9KwJOqwY88fGD9hE8pfF9bEAn0x1
c/mWjEpo5PuP3Hpxr8WT781p
=0iKo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Tabs in emails

2002-01-08 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 1:13 op woensdag 9 januari 2002, Peter Palmreuther:

 1.) This is some example text
 with this line intended. OK, I had to move the cursor for this
 indentation, but first: only the cursor, no Space hitting,
 second this line and the line before were intended automatically
 ... really practical :-)
 2.) Now I had to press 'Home' once to get the not intended second
 paragraph, but that's once in a while for the rest of automatic
 text reflow :-)

i just tried to repeat that, and I am quite sure that it does not work
in 1.53 the way you write it here...

is it a beta feature perhaps?

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPDt+MEtQMadp+KslEQJWkgCgxyGtqXrkzoigObmafQVf2nf7NU4AoJtN
Z/sMrji30M7lLzvTNwkcK9k6
=SBmW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Tabs in emails

2002-01-08 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 1:23 op woensdag 9 januari 2002, Peter Palmreuther:

 No. Maybe you have 'Utilities' / 'Auto Format' activated?

i usually do, but i tried it too when disabled. i was kinda hoping
there were some fixes to 'auto-format'.

 Does it work correctly now?

1.) iojs; oijoisgj roigj sorijg soirjg sooierjg ;osoierjg ;oiesjg
;osierjg ;oeijg ;ooeirjg oeorijgpo ij fosij f;oisjer goisjer
goisje rgoisje rgoijser goiesgj

no, it doesn't.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA+AwUBPDuByUtQMadp+KslEQJBAwCYrkfasq2a5BxH61y+3W4CG8Dv1wCdF/6Y
EHC9uBdv+cFPiSojmjkVBDs=
=FE1P
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




users vision POOR??? (was: Re: BAT's copy paste capabilities POOR???)

2002-01-07 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 0:05 op dinsdag 8 januari 2002, Sebastian:

 I will try to explain: I have a tracking number, that I need to copy
 by highlighting it and hitting ctrl-c - then, when I try to PASTE it
 into my internet explorer, it just gives me that half of the number
 that was in the upper line, but nothing from the second line.

it is there, on the second line of the box of your IE you pasted it
to...

you have to select the second line after copy/pasting the first and
ctrl-c/ctrl-v it too. it's tedious, but it works.

sometimes del works at the end of the first line in the IE-box,
sometimes it doesn't.

good luck.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPDofaEtQMadp+KslEQJXFACg6vLwMasbXlHR2QsjOqrJwAbN4kEAnilo
+hC7Br8RKTKv/cCuVixUwBMx
=Bxrn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 20:47 op zondag 6 januari 2002, Avenarius:

 And there's another hideous feature in Mozilla: pressing F5 or
 CTRL+R for refresh will bring you back to the top of the page you're
 viewing, instead of to the place on the page where you were before.

try downloading 0.9.7, it's fixed, just tried it.

very OT: if you have suggestions for Mozilla, file them at
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org . It's still in the making (hence 0.9.x),
help making it the greatest free browser available! :)

/plug

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPDigJktQMadp+KslEQItLQCgvTTUKpAB/RYAyBmk1a9Yv8O3dD4An1yt
YRTzgHCG+Yz5LccMl+CH2IeD
=bYM6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: OT: Browsers

2002-01-06 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 21:46 op zondag 6 januari 2002, Alan Poulton:

 Does Opera still behave this way?  How about Mozilla?

Mozilla has tabs, don't know if they suit your needs. You can 'open
window in new tab'. Personally I don't use the feature, so I really
can't comment on usefulness. I know it is a hit with some people I
know, you might give it a try...

But I really don't get what you mean with 'multiple windows open at
once', since I used to do that a lot when I last used Netscape (now
working with Mozilla, love it!)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPDitT0tQMadp+KslEQKaGgCeLjP2Yx8aC22fV0Cxln7qpBYTrvgAn0M0
bSB3j6A7io2OYbJvcB/pUx1s
=0nkp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Yes, I have a problem. I don't understand this. Have not seen thefaenomen in any other group or mail, I have written. Hey,there is a problem with the alphabet in my cookies too. I will try to figureout, what happened.

2002-01-05 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 14:04 op zaterdag 5 januari 2002, Britt Malka:

 SGVqIE1hcmNrLA0KDQps23JkYWcsIGRlbiA1LiBqYW51YXIgMjAwMiwga2wuIDEzOjMxIHNrcmV2
 IGR1Og0KDQpNRFA+IEFyZSB5b3UgaGF2aW5nIHNvbWUga2luZCBvZiBwcm9ibGVtPw0KDQoNCi0t
 IA0KDQpNZWQgdmVubGlnIGhpbHNlbg0KDQoNCg0KIHxcICAgIC98ICBfDQogfCBcX18vIHwgfF9f
 ICAgfCAgXyAgX3xvDQogXC8gICAgXC8gfChfKT48fF8oX3woX3x8DQogfCAgICAgIHwgIF9fXyAg
 ICAgXyBfICAgXyAgIF9fICBfXyAgICAgIF8gXw0KICBcXCAgLy8gIHwgXyApXyBfKF8pIHxffCB8
 X3wgIFwvICB8X18gX3wgfCB8X19fXyBfDQogICBcICAvICAgfCBfIFwgJ198IHwgIF98ICBffCB8
 XC98IC8gX2AgfCB8IC8gLyBfYCB8DQogICAgXC8gICAgfF9fXy9ffCB8X3xcX198XF9ffF98ICB8
 X1xfXyxffF98X1xfXF9fLF98DQoNCg0KLi4uIEvWcmxpZ2hlZGVuIGjbcmVyIGFsZHJpZyBvcC4N
 Cg0KDQouLi4gd3d3Lm1hbGthLmRrIC4uLg==

just two suggestions:

your charset is koi8-r, is that right? (a .dk person using a .ru
charset?)

and perhaps you have base64 encoding set? (account properties,
transport, '8-bit characters are treated'). i've had this problem
before, and it was that setting that got set. (not by me, by the elves
that house in your computer :) set it to 'quoted-printable'.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPDbzC0tQMadp+KslEQInMwCggGog883jZxJ7tubK/uMH96JGrAEAoN6n
l8TR05OU/+BCFSkKwu4MSHxk
=ZdRc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: filtering based on ordb

2001-12-17 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 5:10 op maandag 17 december 2001, colin gebhart:

 does anyone know if there is an easy way to use the sorting office
 selective downloads to only download emails from originators that
 are not listed at ordb.org, and approximately what the signal string
 would look like?

No, without outside help this is not possible. The way ORDB works is
that your email-server checks in the DNS (Domain Name Service, the
telephonebook for your computer to find out to what address to yell to
when you type www.cnn.com in your browser) whether the host from
which it is about to accept email from is listed by the ORDB. If so,
then the message is not accepted, and bounced with an error, so that
the receiving end knows that the mail could not be delivered.

The way you want to implement this denies possible legitimate mails to
you WITHOUT error-message returning (your friends ISP could be listed
in the ORDB without you or he knowing it! imagine unknowingly missing
the invitation for his birthday :). You can't return messages, because
you don't know who to return messages to, and besides, returning
error-messages to spammers is generally considered a bad thing, you
confirm the validity of your emailadress that way.

Try convincing your ISP to implement ORDB filtering, which is IMO the
proper place to do so.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPB3MVUtQMadp+KslEQIfcwCgpn4my3rKqBeh5JeOFagi/Z2nm4EAoJF4
YFoh7P3xAIr8vN7HpzOHMIul
=yPWz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: my first bat bug!..

2001-11-28 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 9:25 op woensdag 28 november 2001, Dierk Haasis:

 As you yourself stated the reply got cut at the official signature
 delimiter, which is quite good. So, I won't see it as a bug -
 especially considering that some of us see it as a bug that TB!
 doesn't recognize a second sig del: - --  created by PGP.

personally, i see the - -- as a bug from PGP, and a rather stupid
one as well. as if they couldn't get themselves to write the few lines
of code to parse a the complete delimiter string (hey, why else is the
remaining text there? (-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-, that BEGIN
must have some meaning doesn't it?)

but to get back to the original question; i searched the RFC database,
and nowhere I (better: the searchengine :) could find a reference to
'-- ' being a signature that should be cut off replying. i think this
way of replying should be an option, not default. nitpick, i know.

i hate software deciding for me what part of the email i should be
replying to. one of the prominent features of the bat is that it does
not edit emails in any way, i find this one therefore rather
inconsistent. i usually edit away most of the irrelevant text in the
reply anyway.

 Instead of using a reply you can create a new message and paste the
 original text in with Alt+Ins. You can also create a reply and
 copy the text below the sig del with the same shortcut in.

hmm, yes, thanks to you and peter for the workaround, i thought about
that as well when i woke up this morning :)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPASrrktQMadp+KslEQJbiACfTtUmEYzplV+tRI/drJxF3/dRT9IAoJTe
YIBxGC0PKKs9XdQKmqXAIgKX
=rNG3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: PGP

2001-11-28 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 14:42 op woensdag 28 november 2001, Joseph N.:

 When I compose a message, if I click Privacy and both Sign When
 Completed and Encrypt When Completed, TB! only encrypts. It does not
 add a signature. Can anyone using a similar configuration produce a
 different result, and, if not, any reason to think this is something
 other than a bug?

i cannot reproduce. i sent a signed  encrypted testmessage to myself,
this is what PGP sayz when decrypting:

***[28-11-01 14:53:46] PGP Signature Status: good
***[28-11-01 14:53:46] Hash: SHA1
...
***[28-11-01 14:53:46] Signed: 28-11-01 14:51:47
***[28-11-01 14:53:46] Verified: 28-11-01 14:53:46

using PGP 6.5.8ckt-6. i am signing by default, have you tried that?

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPATfhUtQMadp+KslEQIpQQCfS+oHrrcJeNth8/J+JqkhNOCjFUIAn0X6
3AGBqbNtja07hoqEKXt4DC2e
=KHQk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: PGP

2001-11-28 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 22:41 op woensdag 28 november 2001, Rémi Pach:

 1) When I sign a message, the text Hash=MD5 is automatically
 inserted on the second line. Does it serve any purpose and, if not,
 is there a way to get rid of it?

no, there is no way to get rid of it. what it is, well, you really
should read the manual that came with your copy of PGP, some of it is
complicated stuff (key-management is) that should be well-understood
before using it extensively in practice.

in short: a value is computed from your message with some algorithm,
MD5 in this case, and the computed value is shown encrypted with your
private key and displayed below between the BEGIN and END SIGNATURE
marks.

 2) Is there an easy way to encrypt an attachment together with the
 message? (I use the internal PGP implementation.)

no, there is not, not to my knowledge, that is. you can easily encrypt
the files you want to attach with the explorer (right-click, PGP)

 3) What is the difference between PGP and S/Mime? I can't get the
 latter to work.

don't bother to. S/MIME is an ugly way to sign your messages, it
attaches a 5K signature to a 100 byte body.

S/MIME is useful for the same purpose as PGP is, signing and
encrypting. PGP is just fine.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPAVZ60tQMadp+KslEQIrvACg1fY4UxM+/RR2BrREzrY8CCaxD0oAn2Lj
yNuawGyPqLyBoO+N9copvB3e
=hBke
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




my first bat bug!..

2001-11-27 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

... or actually, my second, since i noticed that search-problem as
well.

i just tried to reply to a message that contained a '-- ' halfway the
message, and the reply quoted no further then there. i know that this
is the 'official' signature delimiter, yes. it was a preview of an
email i should comment on.

selecting all text and pressing ctrl+f4 gave the same results.

my reply-template is fairly simple:

Om %OTIME op %ODATE, %OFROMNAME:
%Cursor
%quotes
%singlere%-

is there an option/macro somewhere that i overlooked?

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBPARCjEtQMadp+KslEQJVFACggO94FNt92uJBGKDOiPEOHVFtd3UAoP8w
vgPyRUHkauYOYYeL3I+oeEHR
=S7Qm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: SSH

2001-11-20 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Om 17:25 op dinsdag 20 november 2001, Peter Palmreuther:

 But how would you tunnel a POP3 request through SSH?

you cannot tunnel a pop3 request *through* ssh, just can tunnel is
*alongside* ssh. ssh has a feature called port-forwarding, and perhaps
this is meant?

you can 'forward' local port 110 to server port 110, and fetch your
mail, with thebat, at localhost:110. the pop3 traffic is then
encrypted by the local ssh-client, sent to the server, decrypted by
sshd, and passed to port 110 at the server.

i use a package called teraterm pro for my ssh-needs, i can provide a
pointer to it if you ask me (i have to look it up, i REALLY don't
remember where i got it).

this solution is not dependant on any mailclient, it is a completely
stand-alone solution and therefore viable for almost anyone, better
imho than unencrypted POP3. i get my mail this way since my account
has been broken into 'cause someone sniffed the password from the
network.

the only backdraw is that you have to have an open shell to the server
all the time. since i use it regularly, it is not a problem for me.
ymmv.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO/qrNUtQMadp+KslEQLdFQCeKVqUoRPEllx2q9K9ppp6lkL7S2wAn3+g
Tgi4jH+nfH6Z7eFFOjb6RrFD
=poSj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: PGP - config.problem

2001-10-31 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op woensdag 31 oktober 2001 schreef Han Thomas:

 Personally I'd recommend getting this one:
 http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgpdisk/ (Use the NT version if you run
 Windows 2000)

please, if you must use PGPdisk, download from http://www.ipgpp.com/
version 6.5.8ckt, it is pgp 6.5.8 (including all bugfixes since
6.0.2!) bundled with the pgpdisk from 6.0.2.

for version 7.x, also available from NAI, there is not yet a plugin
for TB.

 This version is the last freeware version that still came with PGP
 Disk for free.

...from NAI, yes.

 (Optionally even install the whole The Bat program intirely on the
 encrypted disk; when the disk is off, nobody even knows you have an
 extra program for email.)

well, there are traces of course... shortcuts perhaps on your desktop,
temporary files left behind...

 Frankly, protecting email while it's on your computer is much more
 important than protecting it while it's being transmitted. It takes
 some pretty smart people to intercept e-mail during the 10 seconds
 it takes to send over the internet, however any co-worker or your
 baby daughter can open your emails while they sit on your computer
 for all eternity.

while this is mostly true on a single computer @ home, this is
certainly not the case when your computer is plugged into any kind of
LAN. an ethernet-sniffer is easily installed, and while it generates
huge amounts of data, a quick grep at 'PASS' reveales a lot of
passwords (plain POP3 works with plain-text passwords).

yes, my account has been compromized that way. yes, i download my mail
in an ssh-tunnel these days.

@work, you should never leave your computer unattended in an unsecure
state (screensaver with password), your mail-files should be on the
network-server (where they will be backed-up), where none of your
co-workers can touch them unless authorized.

@home, you should trust your family or install Windows NT/2000/XP :)

personally, i would never trust an PGPdisk with all my email. since
all data is saved in one file, one corrupted byte will, worst-case,
deny me access to all my important stuff (remember DoubleSpace?). same
goes for a wrong press on 'del'.

PGPdisk is useful, in my opinion, for use on a laptop whilst
*transporting* datafiles.

perhaps you should look into SecureBat for ultimate security?


i think i have a tendency to go off-topic on this list, apologies :)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO9/Hz0tQMadp+KslEQICVwCeLfiPF7kyVKD4je2oqxiJkX8gC1EAoK0V
Hfl6TmlROIV4Dsr7EDg55f/X
=mu8X
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Archiving messages and attachments

2001-10-31 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op woensdag 31 oktober 2001 schreef Joseph N.:

 I am assuming the following, but please let me know if this is
 correct or not.  I am assuming that incoming attachments will
 continue to be stored in the archived Unix-style files even after
 the related messages are deleted from TB!'s mailbox folders.  I am
 also assuming that outgoing attachments will not be stored in the
 Unix-style archive after the file (which was attached) is
 independently deleted from my system.

if you've EXPORTED your messages outside your message base, i do not
think there is any reason for TB to delete messages there

you've put them in a different directory, right?

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO+AnlUtQMadp+KslEQKQiACfXGmmt1pFQ1lmbhrg9OGzCO0dkmoAoLUR
vWa/+6NF7sX3PYcCmH999Nxw
=N4JI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Expand/Collapse Threads

2001-09-24 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Op maandag 24 september 2001 schreef Dierk Haasis:

 I like the idea of viewing messages by threads especially within
 users groups like this but is there a context menu or function key
 to toggle Expand and Collapse of same?

 Expand: Yes, Collapse: Sadly No.

a workaround to collapse (nearly) *all* threads easily is to press

Alt+0, Alt+1

this switches between unthreaded and threaded mode, and as a
side-effect closes all threads (insert correct threading mode of
course, see menu View  View Threads by for details), except for the
thread you happen to have focus on.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO671CMxmXGfKa+lHEQLzAgCfcTtFRXm4XWxT9H5+GuV2HaJ8I8kAoOiP
1mqdzvalyFMG1mmP4b6FpMcN
=+HdN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re[2]: Invalid signature?

2001-09-13 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op donderdag 13 september 2001 schreef Leif Gregory:

 But to answer your question, the signature is from a X.509
 certificate issued through Thawte, and is more or less a digital
 signature saying the message came from me (or at least my machine),
 and that nothing was altered in the message.

leif,

i saw you were using *both* the PGP and the S/MIME signature. isn't
that rather an overkill?

and, of the 7435 bytes of your original message 3125 bytes were taken
up by that S/MIME signature. that is over 40% in this particular case,
which was a rather long mail. i find that number ridiculous, which is
my general argument against using S/MIME for signing messages.

in my opinion the PGP signature is cleaner and smaller (and inline!
didn't list policy dictate 'no attachments'?), so that one is and
always will be my favorite.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO6D6EcxmXGfKa+lHEQLs+wCgw7XgaMtscEW9gSoo0MJ+tzkMIUUAnRy4
G2OhRfhn9orU9j/c1wIrSbIA
=W5PG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re[2]: Images in HTML emails?

2001-09-05 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op woensdag 5 september 2001 schreef Thomas F:

 Hi Mrten,

 On Wed, 05 Sep 2001 01:54:12 +0200GMT (05/09/2001, 07:54 +0800GMT),
 Mrten wrote:

M an useful tip i don't remember who came from: set the width of the
M memo-column to 6, and make sure you enter a '!' as the first character
M of every memo.

 Why the ! ?

Well, since the memo-view is a tiny bit crippled, it's a way to
differentiate in the message-view between messages that have and
messages that have not a memo attached.

Attachments were no good here i think, let me post a link with a
screenshot: http://famke.gimmie.tudelft.nl/mrten/bat.png

as you can see there is a ! in the column when there is an attachment,
and it is empty when there is none.

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5XmZcxmXGfKa+lHEQKi6gCdF+C3VgAzSpDjVP3C6a0wXh513o0AoLjC
PoliFv0ZmECNVBDSeE/eV/m8
=rLEB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re[3]: Images in HTML emails?

2001-09-05 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op woensdag 5 september 2001 schreef Jason Palmgren:

 have you found the memo-view (ctrl-shift-i) already? it's like a
 little post-it! you can attach to emails.. it takes a bit getting
 used to, but i find it very handy.

 I'm a bit confused.  When I try to use the (ctrl-shift-i) command
 nothing happens.  Am I missing something?  Sounds like a cool feature,
 but I'm having no luck with it...?

Another way to access this function: In the main menu, go the 'view'
with your mouse, and select 'memo auto-view'.

see http://famke.gimmie.tudelft.nl/mrten/memo.png

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5XpHMxmXGfKa+lHEQIE+wCbBJI1XOr7xnakymc4zvC/0NTtcf0AoLhv
sFM21+d5YXc1kyy1wtVakisg
=hYGE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re: More on Outbox

2001-09-05 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op woensdag 5 september 2001 schreef Andrew Hodgson:

 This seems very strange, but right mouse on message and delete
 doesn't work, del doesn't work, can think of any other way to get
 rid of message!

that is because the message is 'parked'. you can drag the message from
the outbox  to 'trash' which is the safest option (and click a dialog
box away), or you might click on the hourglass-like icon to 'unpark'
the message and then immediately press 'delete'.

i've heard people tell tales that between the 'unpark' and the
'delete' action the message got sent, so go with the first option!

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5aRnsxmXGfKa+lHEQIC4wCffhciMdelPNhDzOajL9jMO47tFFEAn3EH
6b4y8/FTTbvOWAX0l+saxXoL
=YH4P
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re[2]: pgp/gnupg

2001-09-04 Thread mrten-dop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op dinsdag 4 september 2001 schreef Dierk Haasis:

 1. Since all encrypted messages have to be decrypted to be read,
 every crypto scheme has weaknesses. With advanced computer power it
 is possible to create keys that are virtually unbreakable.

that's a tight corner to pull; *because* there is decryption *there
must be* weaknesses?

(are we off-topic yet?)

 7. The other way is to get hold of the keys (especially the private
 one) *and* the passphrase of its owner.

well, that *and* was not a necessity; there was a flaw in the
definition of the private keyring (the file containing the private
keys), so that the passphrase was not necessary to sign messages.

see http://www.i.cz/en/pdf/openPGP_attack_ENGvktr.pdf for details
(cool math revealing the inner workings of PGP!)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5TWhcxmXGfKa+lHEQIPEwCg5+XTfydZoJ2qns1cfSvzrYEs++4AoJem
SN9deVUHNtaA6KKiGBnhr5wG
=O8Sp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re: Images in HTML emails?

2001-09-04 Thread mrten-dop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

to the moderators: I sent this the first time with the wrong account
selected. there is no need to allow that one through to the list as
there is no other information! apologies, i'll go to bed now. M.


Op woensdag 5 september 2001 schreef Jason Palmgren:

 I am a newbie here.  Sorry if this has been covered.

very recently... however, as many replies probably will tell you:

 How can I switch the settings so that images in the HTML emails
 *ARE* displayed?

as long as the images aren't sent along with the email, there is no
option available to make the images visible. thabat! will not, ever,
fetch images mentioned in an HTML img tag from a server with http.

trust me, that is a very big PLUS for your privacy.

 I know that this is undesirable to some people, but I use images in
 emails to help me remember the content of the message. For me it is
 just a mental trigger.

have you found the memo-view (ctrl-shift-i) already? it's like a
little post-it! you can attach to emails.. it takes a bit getting used
to, but i find it very handy.

an useful tip i don't remember who came from: set the width of the
memo-column to 6, and make sure you enter a '!' as the first character
of every memo.

you can choose columns in the message-list by right-clicking on the
column-headers there (i must be off to bed now, i'm not able to
construct semantically correct english anymore :).

have a good time!

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5VdMcxmXGfKa+lHEQJjWwCfVDP4bgHxnJNlrE+Ui17lrlIKLHEAn2uf
0ocSELT5k2ZWvlsqKTD4x0Mi
=hF+E
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re: How to MOVE folders?

2001-09-04 Thread mrten-dop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op woensdag 5 september 2001 schreef Jason Palmgren:

 I would like to move my The Bat folder from the default folder
 into another sub-folder.  How is this done?

to change the order in which the folders (inbox, outbox, sent) are
presented to you: press 'alt', then drag the folder.

if you meant to move the directory where the mail is kept for one
account: under 'account properties' (ctrl-shift-p), files 
directories, there is a possibility to change the directory for the
account.

the default for this is set in the general preferences (options,
preferences, system).

general suggestion: you should try to navigate through all menus at
least once. it's like getting to know a new house, with all the cracks
and cravices that are there. thebat! really has a LOAD of features
that you will never explore otherwise.

you'll remember more of them if you find the features yourself!

Mrten.

ps. really, i'll go to bed now. have to remove that cat from my bed
though. hmmm...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5VglcxmXGfKa+lHEQI42wCg5siXIfTNAIfsIhuzzKk8jnTqD9oAoMTq
vSazcW+hs8h9SZs6Ver9V1pI
=2Yu7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re: Images in HTML emails?

2001-09-04 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op woensdag 5 september 2001 schreef Jason Palmgren:

 I am a newbie here.  Sorry if this has been covered.

very recently, however, as many replies probably will tell you:

 How can I switch the settings so that images in the HTML emails
 *ARE* displayed?

as long as the images aren't sent along with the email, there is no
option available to make the images visible. thabat! will not, ever,
fetch images mentioned in an HTML img tag from a server.

trust me, that is a very big PLUS for your privacy.

 I know that this is undesirable to some people, but I use images in
 emails to help me remember the content of the message. For me it is
 just a mental trigger.

have you found the memo-view (ctrl-shift-i) already? it's like a
little post-it! you can attach to emails.. it takes a bit getting used
to, but i find it very handy.

an useful tip i don't remember who came from: set the width of the
memo-column to 6, and make sure you enter a '!' as the first character
of every memo.

you can choose columns in the message-list by right-clicking on the
column-headers there (i must be off to bed now, i'm not able to
construct semantically correct english anymore :).

have a good time!

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5VbmcxmXGfKa+lHEQJoHQCfcAcKd4fBoXFnfaPgi3XGHrjhKlMAn1yH
wSJtsSpngq36ozqp0QSJCwB+
=0glX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re[3]: pgp/gnupg

2001-09-03 Thread mrten-dop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op maandag 3 september 2001 schreef ::Andrew:::

 Hello Dierk,

 thanks for this very helpful. Do I need a particular version of pgp so
 it will work seamlessly with TB.

i'm using version 6.5i and it gives me no problems whatsoever. my
guess is that 6.5.x versions shouldn't give any problems.

don't try to use the 7.0.x builds as there is no bat! plugin (see
downloads-area at www.ritlabs.com).

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5PiCcxmXGfKa+lHEQKw4ACePf9a9Wevd/FEnq/flvMMw43wjE8AmgPx
NhJScEgYlaqFpvsyPSWCdw8U
=ca/j
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re[5]: pgp/gnupg

2001-09-03 Thread mrten-dop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op dinsdag 4 september 2001 schreef ::Andrew:::

 I'm also not clear where the pgp dll's have to be put..

put it in the thebat!-directory, that's c:\program files\the bat!\
with me..

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5P3DMxmXGfKa+lHEQL+1gCffqZPGiLkWiOCETKItd8m1figrBEAoJh7
Nq+wuSSdvtQedKearcEIZNJY
=CA9T
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re[5]: pgp/gnupg

2001-09-03 Thread mrten-dop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op dinsdag 4 september 2001 schreef ::Andrew:::

 'Versions of PGP later than 6.5.3 may be downloaded from anywhere in
 the world since US export restrictions were lifted from these
 versions.' do we think this is because they've been weakened in some
 way?

you might be paranoid enough to think that is so, and there are people
that still use pgp 2.x for that very reason.

the clinton administration lifted the export restrictions on
cryptography at that time, so that's the reason you can download it
from the USA now when you're not actually IN the states.

the source-code is available for all versions up to 6.5.x (x=3, i
think) so you can verify for yourself, if you want, that there are no
secret backdoors. however, the 7.0.x sourcecode WAS NOT completely
published, which made some people think that 7.0 could have some of
those hyper-sekrit rear-entry snoop-your-password entrypoints.

but for that same very reason there is no pgp-plugin for thebat!, so
you needn't worry about them backdoors anyway.

moral of the story: if you want complete secrecy, you have to check
and compile all the programs you use yourself (including the compiler
and OS that is!). i've got a story about that one as well, but that's
for a later time :)

sleep well folks,
Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5P/LsxmXGfKa+lHEQLBMACg7gFHDx0D5EZ5pPcKxBnXiKHvRhcAn0K/
FXOSfS9p+Nc7sxW2jBBarozy
=Hvhl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




Re[5]: pgp/gnupg

2001-09-03 Thread mrten-dop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Op dinsdag 4 september 2001 schreef Carren:

 I am a real PGP newbie and I too use TB! I am using the free version
 of PGP and do not have any problems combining the two. The PGP
 tray/current window controls are simple to use and right at your
 fingertips. While plugins might be a welcome luxury to some, in my
 opinion they would be only minimally quicker.

i find it cumbersome to have to press a special key-combination every
single time i want to sign or encrypt an email. it is too easy to
forget, it is too easy to make a mistake. call me lazy if you want,
but i think that ease-of-use is a necessity for an 'extension' as PGP
to attract users (not too many of course, or PGP will be an illegal
'extension' before you know it!)

for myself, i do not think that i write email that contains enough
sekrits to warrant encryption (which is, in effect, impossible for a
list like this). for single receivers as well i find it really too
much trouble to encrypt messages. though it's nice to have the option,
of course.

i do like to sign my messages, as a gesture to the
receiver, so that he/she can check if he/she wishes that the
information in the message has not been tampered with. some people
complain about the signing, which proves that you can't please
everybody.

i am very happy that i just have to set an option which makes my
emails signed by default. a little more work at the beginning makes a
lot less work in the end.

that said; to each his own of course.

 The lack of plugins is certainly *not* a good reason (or any reason)
 *not* to use TB!

that was not what i was advocating nor what Andrew was suggesting.
since there is a plugin for 6.5.x however, this is really a moot point
:)

Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO5QKYsxmXGfKa+lHEQJARQCg6smC5F0kBHASn8A/2fNZBA5KOmYAn2Gq
mHR1bpuf09kHSJfEjmbZxFGi
=VWEM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d




combining two POPs

2001-08-31 Thread Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

hello,

is it possible to (temporary) combine two POP3 accounts into one
thebat! account? i've got two places to pick up mail from (i can't
forward one to the other, difficult provider problems), but i don't
want to bother with two thebat! accounts, since i'm used to use only
one.

what i've done now is create a second account and a filter which moves
the new messages to the other account there:

BeginFilter
Name: New rule
Active: 1
Source: \\mrten-dop\Inbox
Target: \\Mrten\Inbox
CopyFolder: \\\none
MainSet: 01fyhrtyetydrtydrtyndtry
Actions: faoContinueProcessing
[snipped some for brevity]
EndFilter

however, this leaves the messages unfiltered in the first inbox! is
there a way to activate the filters there besides clicking refilter
messages all the time?

tnx,
Mrten.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO41URcxmXGfKa+lHEQIO+gCfWDyqipONcIKfAumaZvzxLaQpmf8AoJI7
cwrBt9zw3tn0uTi4/Xny+A+l
=/QJu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




The Bat! - bug report

2001-08-31 Thread mrten-dop

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello The Bat! developers  TBUDL,

i'm cc'ing this to tbudl as it seems quite relevant to the thread 'bye
bye bat' currently at hand;

  I'm using The Bat! Version 1.53o
  Serial Number 03240C1C
  under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6
  and would like to report a bug

  The bug description:
sometimes, quite at random, thebat! seems to forget a few settings i
have made in 'account properties'.

under transport: '8 bits char treatment' resets itself to 'base64';

under mail management: 'leave mail on server' doesn't change, however
'keep mail on server for x days' resets to off, and 'delete messages
when removed from trash' resets to off as well;

under options': 'check mailbox at startup' resets to off, 'periodical
check' resets to off, 'mark message as read after displaying for x
sec' resets to off, 'enable S/MIME' sets itself to on, and 'sign
messages' resets to off.

this has happened quite a few times now (about once every few days on
avereage). it is quite annoying, especially the resetting of '8 bits
char treated as bas64' setting, because emails with an 8 bit char in
it appear as unreadable garbage (well, not unreadable, but you'll
catch my drift) to my recipients.


i have two accounts, and the settings reset at the same time for both
accounts.

i'm sorry that i can't offer any more details.


Steps to reproduce the bug:
that would be difficult to list since it happens randomly.

Regards,
  Mrten

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBO492/cxmXGfKa+lHEQKGmACgjg4nBnIJijUuYbRroJMHjXzxAywAoIPU
K1ocyePBsN+F265YADSk4Swg
=TIKI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




combining two POPs

2001-08-30 Thread mrten-dop

hello,

is it possible to (temporary) combine two POP3 accounts into one
thebat! account? i've got two places to pick up mail from (i can't
forward one to the other, difficult provider problems), but i don't
want to bother with two thebat! accounts, since i'm used to use only
one.

what i've done now is create a second account and a filter which moves
the new messages to the other account there:

BeginFilter
Name: New rule
Active: 1
Source: \\mrten-dop\Inbox
Target: \\Mrten\Inbox
CopyFolder: \\\none
MainSet: 01fyhrtyetydrtydrtyndtry
Actions: faoContinueProcessing
[snipped some for brevity]
EndFilter

however, this leaves the messages unfiltered in the first inbox! is
there a way to activate the filters there besides clicking refilter
messages all the time?

tnx, Mrten.

(bat 1.53o)


-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]