Re: The worlds smallest email?
On 27-1-2005, 16:10, Gerard wrote: G The whole e-mail, when you press F9 (view msg source) has only one header, G Return-Path: and that is empty. G G The whole e-mail has a size of 17 bytes as reported by TB! Is sounds to me as if this e-mail got corrupted. Maybe by TB! or a local spam filter client. -- Best regards, Sander van den Berg :nlflag: The Bat! v3.0.1.33 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: rss plugin?
On 15-1-2005, 19:33, Buiculescu Virgil wrote: BVIs there any RSS plugin for The Bat !? Not that I know of. But there is another way, a program called FreePOPs: http://www.freepops.org/ It contains an aggregator module which 'transforms' the RSS feed to a POP stream. So you can read the feed with The Bat! as if it were a POP mailbox. Direct link to the aggregator module description: http://www.freepops.org/en/viewplugin.php?plugin=aggregator.lua -- Best regards, Sander van den Berg :nlflag: The Bat! v3.0.1.33 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with Norton's Firewall/Antivirus and The Bat
On 19-12-2004, 20:36, Charles wrote: C I have been using The Bat for several years with three different OSs C on different PCs with out problems. Recently, both my wife and I C purchased Sony PCV RS630G's running Windows XP Home (with SP2 C installed). Both machines are behind a router and run Norton's C Firewall and Antivirus. We both use The Bat Professional Edition C 3.0.1.33, which runs flawlessly on her machine, but on my PC it to C fail to connect to my e-mail accounts over 50% of the time. When it C fails to connect, my PC want to send Microsoft an error report about C ccApp.exe (a Norton's module). Rebooting the PC and/or stopping then C re-starting Norton's solves the problem for awhile, but it sometimes C takes two or three tries. I am running Norton AntiVirus as well, no problems here. So it should be possible. Which version of Norton are you running? You say you have SP2 installed and also Norton's Firewall. SP2 has a built-in firewall which is ON by default. If this is also the case for you, then you are running two firewalls at the same time... And what about the router? Is it purely a router? I am asking this because many routers for home use have a built-in firewall. If so, it is not necessary to run one on your pc. C I find this problem very frustrating. So much so that I am considering C installing FireFox. But, my dear wife convinced me ask for help! You probably mean Thunderbird. Firefox is a web browser. C I have un-installed and re-installed both Norton's and The Bat in C every order I can think of. Don't despair. It must be possible to run Norton and The Bat! simultaneously. -- Best regards, Sander van den Berg :nlflag: The Bat! v3.0.1.33 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Signature text
On 12-11-2004, 20:51, rich gregory wrote: rg I changed my display fonts and now (not knowing if this is related or rg not... seems to be) the signature text (anything under the rg DASH-DASH-SPACE) is no longer lightened text, it looks the same as the rg rest of the message. rg rg I only saw a place to set signature text properties separately if the rg mssg is html but not plain text mssgs. I think this is the problem: There is no space behind the dash-dash in your signature. Change it in your template (not manually in the message editor, space will be ignored). -- Best regards, Sander van den Berg :nlflag: The Bat! v3.0.1.33 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SpamPal or K9?
On 29-9-2004, 7:06, Michael L. Wilson wrote: MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do MLW others think? Never used K9. I have used SpamPal for quite some time now. After a while, when the Bayesian plugin has learned enough, it becomes almost flawless. And if you don't like bayesian filtering, you can always choose not to use it and rely on its blacklist system, regular expression filtering (plugin), URL filtering (plugin), etc. etc. But, to be honest, I would prefer a freeware Windows version of SpamAssassin. But it does not exist... :-( -- Best regards, Sander van den Berg :nlflag: The Bat! v3.0 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: SpamPal or K9?
On 29-9-2004, 10:25, Nick Dutton wrote: ND Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 8:30:55 AM, you wrote: SvdB But, to be honest, I would prefer a freeware Windows version of SpamAssassin. SvdB But it does not exist... :-( ND ND SA is just perl, I had it running nicely OK on a PC a couple of years ND back. ND ND Have a google on it... I know, I had it running too (it was called Pop3Proxy). But it didn't use all the extensions like a full installation of SpamAssassin on a unix system. Therefore, it was not as effective as it should be. Onetime, there was a free program called SAproxy, but a while ago it has gone commercial: http://www.statalabs.com/products/saproxy/ -- Best regards, Sander van den Berg :nlflag: The Bat! v3.0 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Splash ?
On 21-9-2004, 19:21, WilWilWil wrote: W I've found cool SplashScreens on http://www.bat-mail.de.vu/ but I don't understand how to use it. W W And I find nothing on the site itself. W W Any idea what to do with the .JPG file ? They are all old splashscreens of previous versions of The Bat! (not that cool in my opinion). It looks like you need a tool called ExeScope. Nearly at the bottom of the SplashScreens page you can find a link to the tool, with explanation. It is all in German, but they link also to an English tool (Resource Hacker). In The Netherlands we have a saying that translates somewhat like this: Search, and you will find it. :-) -- Best regards, Sander van den Berg :nlflag: The Bat! v3.0 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: [News] Logos for mobile phones
On 11-9-2004, 12:24, Denis wrote: D This sounds all but respectful of its users here. Their efforts D would be much more appreciated to implementing/fixing their website D or even bug fixing TheBat!... Or writing a helpfile! -- Best regards, Sander van den Berg :nlflag: The Bat! v3.0 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filter questions/problems
On 8-9-2004, 17:22, Sander van den Berg wrote: SvdB I have some questions and a problem concerning the NFS. :pacsnip: In two days not a single reply... :boohoo: -- Best regards, Sander van den Berg :nlflag: The Bat! v3.0 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Filter questions/problems
Hello TBUDL, I have some questions and a problem concerning the NFS. First a problem: Recently I upgraded from v2.12 to v3.0 (I never used beta versions). Now I suspect the conversion of my old filters to the NFS went not as it should. It seems some messages get filtered based on a rule which I already altered before the upgrade. I cannot verify which filter rule it uses, it concerns a Read messages filter and apparently these aren't logged. Has anybody else had problems like this? Or other filter conversion problems? This leads to my second question: The incoming mail filter actions are logged in the account log. But is it not possible to log all the other kinds of filter actions (read, sent, etc.) as well? I am using The Bat! about 4.5 years now and my filter collection has become quite large. Sometimes I am puzzled which filter it is using, then a logfile would be helpful. Third question (also about the NFS): When using Address groups in a filter rule, is manually typing the name of the group the only way to select it? In the old filter system you could just select it from a dialog box. And what if I want to select multiple groups? Do I type Group1+Group2 or Group1,Group2 or ... ? Lot of questions... I hope you can help me. -- Best regards, Sander van den Berg :nlflag: The Bat! v3.0 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
