Address book bug (contact deletion): anybody to confirm?
There has been a long-standing bug when deleting contacts from the AB. If the contact is in two groups, and each of those has Hide items if not explicitly selected, then when deleting _any one_ of those groups, the contact gets deleted (even though it should stay in the other group). I submitted a bug report at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5826, but Stefan says he cannot confirm it (which is somehow mysterious...). Could any kind soul out there test it with their installation and report the results on the Bugtraq? Best regards, Maksym -- Maksym Kozub(+380 44)424-1792(tel./fax), (+380 67)466-5174(mob.) Translations Interpreting Editing MK881-UANIChttp://kozub.in.ua[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Address book bug (contact deletion): anybody to confirm?
Hallo Maksym, On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:32:27 +0300GMT (25-4-2006, 10:32 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MK Could any kind soul out there test it with their installation and MK report the results on the Bugtraq? I've never noticed the behaviour you describe, so I tested it. This is what I did: Created two AB groups (hidden enabled) Created one contact belonging to both Created one contact belonging to one Deleted the group with two contacts Only the contact belonging only to the deleted group was gone Created two AB groups (hidden enabled) Created one contact belonging to both Deleted one group The remaining group had no entries Created two AB groups (hidden enabled) Created two contacts belonging to both Deleted one group The remaining group had one entry Definitely a bug, but not one that's likely to surface in a real life environment. I added a not to your bug. -- Groetjes, Roelof Be nice to your kids. They'll choose your nursing home. The Bat! 3.72.12 (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpPk4WM1X2qo.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Address book bug (contact deletion): anybody to confirm?
Roelof Otten wrote: RO Definitely a bug, but not one that's likely to surface in a real life RO environment. I found it in my real life environment... RO I added a not to your bug. Thank you, I've already seen your comment in an e-mail notification from Bugtraq. Regards, Maksym -- Maksym Kozub(+380 44)424-1792(tel./fax), (+380 67)466-5174(mob.) Translations Interpreting Editing MK881-UANIChttp://kozub.in.ua[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Address Book Bug?
Hello TBUDL, Is it just me or does the Hide items if not specifically selected option not work correctly. I created a folder that had this selected, added names, and then decided not to keep this option so that I would see the names in the main list, but it is not allowing me to do so. I just realized that I have the same names in another group that has the Hide items if not specifically selected option checked, so I assume that this is what's causing them to not show up in the main list. This leads to the question of what specifically selected means. Checking it as a favorite does not work. What I need is the 4 contacts in group 1 to show up in the main address book, but not the other 20 that are in group 2. Also when you select the address book by clicking on the To:, CC:, or BCC: you get a list that includes everyone instead of the ones that aren't hidden. -- Best regards, Stuart mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/31 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
2.02.03 Address Book Bug?
In previous versions, double clicking a name in the address book opened a compose window. Does not do so in 2.02.03. Reported. Using XP Pro. Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 2.02.03 Address Book Bug?
On Thursday, December 11, 2003, John Phillips wrote... In previous versions, double clicking a name in the address book opened a compose window. Confirmed :/ -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Copper wire was invented by lawyers arguing over a penny. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: 2.02.03 Address Book Bug?
Hello Jonathan Angliss, on Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:48:24 -0600 (2003-12-11 15:48:24 in .nl) in the message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you [JA] wrote (at least in part): JA On Thursday, December 11, 2003, John Phillips wrote... In previous versions, double clicking a name in the address book opened a compose window. JA Confirmed :/ see http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002164 Add a bugnote, maybe it will speeds things up (...) -- Kind regards, Peter Ouwehand E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - Created the above using A program which insists to be : The Bat! V2.02.3 CE An OS which insists to be : Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 2.02.03 Address Book Bug?
Hi The_Bat! Users, Thursday, December 11, 2003, 8:48:24 AM, you wrote: In previous versions, double clicking a name in the address book opened a compose window. JA Confirmed :/ Yes, and I would like to have this feature back. -- Regards, John Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
small address-book bug
Hello Everybody, when there's no 'default'-addressbook set (where addresses go when you use the ctrl-w combo), the address isn't added to any address-book... to reproduce: - delete all your address-books from the list - re-add them, don't select a default - try to add an address using ctrl-w (or right-click/specials/add sender to addressbook) -- Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen Roel [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Speelplein Aboe http://www.aboe.zzn.com * I do a lot of thinking in the john. Says a lot for my thoughts. Using The Bat! 1.49c on Windows NT 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 1 with an Amd Athlon 700 @ 256 MB 96Gb Hd -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: small address-book bug
On Tuesday, January 30, 2001, at 10:21:49 AM, Roel wrote: R when there's no 'default'-addressbook set (where addresses go when R you use the ctrl-w combo), the address isn't added to R any address-book... Personally, I think it would be nice to be able to choose "on the fly" which AB an address is added to. I find myself moving addresses from the default AB to another AB quite often. Tony O.[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: small address-book bug
Hello Tony, Tuesday, January 30, 2001, 10:33:45 AM, you wrote: TO On Tuesday, January 30, 2001, at 10:21:49 AM, Roel wrote: R when there's no 'default'-addressbook set (where addresses go when R you use the ctrl-w combo), the address isn't added to R any address-book... TO Personally, I think it would be nice to be able to choose "on the TO fly" which AB an address is added to. I find myself moving TO addresses from the default AB to another AB quite often. TO Tony O.[EMAIL PROTECTED] TO __ TO Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Anyone know the process for Importing an Address Book from Outlook Express? I am considering TheBat as a possible replacement to OE but the inability to import my large Address Book is limiting. Thanks! Doc -- Best regards, edocmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[3]: small address-book bug
Hello edoc, On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:17:52 [ -0500 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'small address-book bug': edoc Anyone know the process for Importing an Address Book from edoc Outlook Express? I don't why you call this a but. I would say many of us went thru this process. Essentially export OE to some sort of deliminated (comma, tab) file then import into a TB! AB. Should work without much difficulty. Welcome to TB! -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA Using TB! v1.49 ICQ 41116329 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[4]: small address-book bug
Hello Jan, Tuesday, January 30, 2001, 12:33:32 PM, you wrote: JR Hello edoc, JR On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:17:52 [ -0500 GMT], you wrote the JR following in regards to 'small address-book bug': edoc Anyone know the process for Importing an Address Book from edoc Outlook Express? JR I don't why you call this a but. I would say many of us went thru this JR process. Essentially export OE to some sort of deliminated (comma, JR tab) file then import into a TB! AB. Should work without much JR difficulty. Welcome to TB! I tried this several different ways without success. Anyone have a step-by-step method that does work, please? I get the names but not the E-mail addresses. I tried comma delimited and text type files. I tried a variety of manual edits to the files created using the Export feature of OE, still no success. Help? Thanks! Doc -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[2]: small address-book bug
Got it! Thanks! OE Address Book is now in TB. Missed an unlabeled drop-down window in the Import process. Doc -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re[5]: small address-book bug
Hello Doc, On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:43:31 [ -0500 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'small address-book bug': edoc I tried this several different ways without success. Anyone have edoc a step-by-step method that does work, please? edoc I get the names but not the E-mail addresses. I can give you a step by step but what occurs to me is that when you are in the import process, TB! provides a mapping dialogue so you can match incoming info with the TB! AB. Take a special look under the "Address Book Field" see if eMail is set to "no". I think TB! may do this by default if this is not changed to "yes" manually, it will import all the other info but *not* the email addresses. That could explain your dilemma. HTH -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA Using TB! v1.49 ICQ 41116329 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
