Re: Re[3]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

2005-08-22 Thread Roman Katzer
On 8/21/05, Jeff Gaines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
 now and find it much better.

AOL that.

I've never gotten BayesIt to work, and I'm not the most
computer-illiterate person out there.  When c't Magazin (renowned
German computer mag) tested several mail clients, TB among them, they
couldn't get it to work, either. Go figure.

I've been using K9 for about two year now and find it great. It's
tiny, very fast, and very reliable.

Roman

--


Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[4]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

2005-08-22 Thread Philip Storry
Hello Jeff,

Sunday, August 21, 2005, 11:21:58 PM, you wrote:

JG I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
JG now and find it much better.

And, for a flipside, I've found it great. As an example,one of my
accounts had 68 messages in it when I returned home tonight. One of
them was legitimate. All the rest was spam.
BayesIt and Bayes Spam Filter, working together, automatically deleted
62 messages. They let through the one legitimate one. One ended up in
the Junk folder, and four ended up in my inbox. The four in my inbox
were all very short messages, and an analysis of my logs shows that it
was Bayes Spam Filter that let them through - it's been running
alongside BayesIt for a while now, but seems to take longer to train.

In my experience, I've never seen something as easy and simple to set
up as BayesIT, or as quick to get working - I installed it a long time
ago, marked all my mail as ham and/or spam, and then started marking
mail that got through. After a week, it was incredibly rare to see
anything slip past.

They key seems to be the training - but BayesIt makes that very easy.
Sadly, it also doesn't make it very clear that you have to train it in
both ham and spam...

-- 
Best regards,
 Philipmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Re[3]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

2005-08-22 Thread marc
Jeff Gaines said...
 Hello Group
 
 On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 8:33:48 PM, P. wrote:
 
  So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and
  guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that
  helps.
 
 I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
 now and find it much better.

Yup. I've not had to use the white or black lists with K9 either. When 
using BayesIt, the lists became unmanageable. And you can't resize the 
dialog sigh and why is it modal? Actually, thinking about it, there's 
a lot of modal nonsense going on in TB. Grrr.

But, on a happy note, K9 is the dog's ;-)

-- 
Best,
Marc



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

2005-08-21 Thread P. Johnson
Hello Feli,

On Saturday, August 20, 2005, , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all...

FW did you also train BayesIt with Ham? Additionally you can use the
FW whitelist to prevent listmails ending in the junk folder.

PJ I haven't trained with ham yet, no, since it hasn't put good mails
PJ into the junk folder either.

I misspoke -- it *was* putting good mails into the junk folder. Thanks
for alerting me.

So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and
guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that
helps.

Thanks again.

-- 
Best wishes,
Pat

Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2




Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[3]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

2005-08-21 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Group

On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 8:33:48 PM, P. wrote:

 So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and
 guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that
 helps.

I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
now and find it much better.

-- 
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:
Using TheBat! 3.51.10



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Bayesit or Bayes Filter

2005-08-20 Thread P.Johnson
Hello,

I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my
inbox with very few ending up in the junk folder. I am using the
default settings.

I know there have been problems with Bayesit in the past but hoped
these had been solved. I am thinking of switching to Bayes Filter,
which worked well for me until I upgraded to a higher TB! version.
Anyone have experience or suggestions for either of these programs?

If I didn't want to try built-in spam software, I would go back to K9
which worked very well and which I would recommend.

Thank you in advance,

-- 
Best wishes,
Pat

Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

2005-08-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Pat,

On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:30:33 -0500GMT (20-8-2005, 18:30 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
PJ 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my
PJ inbox with very few ending up in the junk folder. I am using the
PJ default settings.

Same happened to, I don't really know what I changed, but somehow it
started to work.

What is the score before you move a message to JUNK?
  Options - Preferences - Anti-Spam
I've got it to be triggered on 40, when BayesIt doesn't catch all of
your spam, you can set that lower.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

What youth deemed crystal, age finds was dew.

The Bat! 3.60.02.0 Forerunner (Beta)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpiY4Djt3VSc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

2005-08-20 Thread Feli Wilcke
Hello Pat,

On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:30:33 -0500GMT P.Johnson wrote:

PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
PJ 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my
PJ inbox with very few ending up in the junk folder. I am using the
PJ default settings.

did you also train BayesIt with Ham? Additionally you can use the
whitelist to prevent listmails ending in the junk folder.

-- 
Regards,
Feli

The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

2005-08-20 Thread P. Johnson
Hello Feli,

On Saturday, August 20, 2005, , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
PJ 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my
PJ inbox with very few ending up in the junk folder. I am using the
PJ default settings.

FW did you also train BayesIt with Ham? Additionally you can use the
FW whitelist to prevent listmails ending in the junk folder.

I haven't trained with ham yet, no, since it hasn't put good mails
into the junk folder either. In other words, it seems to be doing
nothing at all. As Roelof suggested, maybe I should give it a little
more time ( or should I... why not just install something that works
out of the box)?

But I will try some ham training as you suggest. Thank you so much for
your help.

-- 
Best wishes,
Pat

Using The Bat! v%THEBATVERSION on %WINDOWSPLATFORMNAME %-
%WINDOWSMAJORVERSION.%WINDOWSMINORVERSION Build %-
%WINDOWSBUILDNUMBER %WINDOWSCSDVERSION


-- 
8/20/2005




Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

2005-08-20 Thread P. Johnson
Hi Roelof,

On Saturday, August 20, 2005, , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
PJ 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my
PJ inbox with very few ending up in the junk folder.

RO Same happened to, I don't really know what I changed, but somehow
RO it started to work. What is the score before you move a message to
RO JUNK? Options - Preferences - Anti-Spam I've got it to be
RO triggered on 40, when BayesIt doesn't catch all of your spam, you
RO can set that lower.

I've reset that option and hope it will now work! Thanks, Roelof.

-- 
Best wishes,
Pat

Using The Bat! v%THEBATVERSION on %WINDOWSPLATFORMNAME %-
%WINDOWSMAJORVERSION.%WINDOWSMINORVERSION Build %-
%WINDOWSBUILDNUMBER %WINDOWSCSDVERSION

-- 
8/20/2005



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Anyone combine BayesIT! and Bayes Filter for spam?

2004-10-12 Thread Michael L. Wilson
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
 boundary===-==-=-=---=--=-=-==--=====--==;
 protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1

--==-==-=-=---=--=-=-==--=====--==
Hi,

The Bat! allows more than one plug-in for spam and Anti-Virus.  Has
anyone successfully combined BayesIT and Bayes Anti spam to work
together?

--
Michael L. Wilson, MBA
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Critic
Teacher

:einsteinyoyo:

==
Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33
Windows XP 5.1 (2600) Service Pack 2)


Ponder this: The same fire that melts iron forges steel.

morning   dayevening
==   20:10






Spam Stats, last Week (BayesIt! 0.7.3)
Total Spam Emails: 72
Total Clean Emails: 507
BayesIT guessed right 96.646943% of the time
My email is 12.435233% spam
=

--==-==-=-=---=--=-=-==--=====--==
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
name=PGP.sig

-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2
Comment: 

iQA/AwUBQWyc9PvT94bCV8K0EQKXdwCgiJ8u/SUwvgD3LeEfFOYpxCRM6JMAnRus
M0x7Bttv1S6ydWrO92bzXMWw
=RRzL
-END PGP MESSAGE-

--==-==-=-=---=--=-=-==--=====--==--



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html