Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-27 Thread John Phillips
Hi Jeff,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, at 23:24:44 [GMT+0100] (which was Wed, 8:24:44
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:

 If you plan to do a backup and restore you really need to follow the
 other suggestions in this thread rather than do it my way :-)



Just want to thank all who assisted with help here - I just can't believe
how smooth this went!

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2 



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-23 Thread John Phillips
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, at 22:49:07 [GMT+0100] (which was Tue, 7:49:07
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:

 I could post it here but you'd need Smartsync


Thanks for the offer, but don't think I could use it.

Just to get this right (technically challenged) do I need to firstly install
Bat! on the new pc with the rego code, or do I just install without the rego
code and the registry entry takes care of this; and then restore the backup?

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2 

Error Reading FAT Table - Try Skinny one? (Y/N)





Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-23 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Group

On Tuesday, August 23, 2005, 9:00:14 PM, John wrote:

 Just to get this right (technically challenged) do I need to firstly install
 Bat! on the new pc with the rego code, or do I just install without the rego
 code and the registry entry takes care of this; and then restore the backup?

The approach I have used is to just copy the whole TB! directory over
to the new PC and run the .reg file (subject to my earlier comments
about the path being the same).

If you plan to do a backup and restore you really need to follow the
other suggestions in this thread rather than do it my way :-)


-- 
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:
Using TheBat! 3.51.10



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-22 Thread John Phillips
Hi Jeff,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, at 12:28:34 [GMT+0100] (which was 21:28:34 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:

 If the path will be the same on the new PC you can export the registry
 branch (run this from a temp directory so it's easy to find the output
 file):



When installing on a new pc, does the software have to be downloaded from
Bat! site?

If so, how about registration problems (i.e lost rego data, etc.) or is all
of this covered in the Registry Key?

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2 

Climate is what we expect, weather is what we get.





Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-22 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Group

On Monday, August 22, 2005, 11:11:44 AM, John wrote:

 When installing on a new pc, does the software have to be downloaded from
 Bat! site?

 If so, how about registration problems (i.e lost rego data, etc.) or is all
 of this covered in the Registry Key?


It must be in the registry I think, I've moved it from a desktop to a
laptop, then to another laptop when the first one broke, then back
again when it was fixed.
I just exported the registry keys (this is done automatically each day
as part of my backup regime), copied over and ran the .reg file.

-- 
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:
Using TheBat! 3.51.10



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-22 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John,

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:11:44 +1000GMT (22-8-2005, 12:11 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

JP When installing on a new pc, does the software have to be downloaded from
JP Bat! site?

Not when you've got the install file for a current version.

JP If so, how about registration problems (i.e lost rego data, etc.) or is all
JP of this covered in the Registry Key?

Is covered in the registry.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Being right too soon is socially unacceptable. -- Heinlein

The Bat! 3.60.02.0 Forerunner (Beta)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpncaCjwss1k.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-22 Thread John Phillips
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, at 13:52:30 [GMT+0100] (which was 22:52:30 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:

 I just exported the registry keys (this is done automatically each day
 as part of my backup regime), copied over and ran the .reg file.


Is this part of the Bat! inbuilt backup?  If so I must be missing this
somewhere!

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2 

Anybody can win, unless there happens to be a second entry.





Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-22 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Group

On Monday, August 22, 2005, 10:02:54 PM, John wrote:

 Is this part of the Bat! inbuilt backup?  If so I must be missing this
 somewhere!

No, sorry, it's a batch file I run. It backs up the registry branches
for TheBat! and XanaNews, runs Smartsync and then powers the computer
off. It's short, I could post it here but you'd need Smartsync or an
equivalent plus a Poweroff utility :-)

-- 
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:
Using TheBat! 3.51.10



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread John Phillips
Hi Bat! Fans,


Pretty sure i have seen this over the years, but no longer any reference to
it on my pc.

Need to plan to move all Bat! settings, folders with mail, filters, rego
info, etc, etc.,  to a new pc shortly.

Is there an FAQ for this to which I can refer?

Thanks!

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2 

CONGRESS.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/n)?





Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Group

On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 10:56:05 AM, John wrote:

 Need to plan to move all Bat! settings, folders with mail, filters, rego
 info, etc, etc.,  to a new pc shortly.


If the path will be the same on the new PC you can export the registry
branch (run this from a temp directory so it's easy to find the output
file):

c:\windows\regedit.exe /e thebat.reg HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT

This will produce a file called thebat.reg

Then just copy everything over to the new PC and copy over then double
click on 'thebat.reg' to put the data back in the registry.

You can edit the .reg file if  the path has changed.

There is another method involving exporting the data but I've never
used it, will leave somebody else to run through it :-)

-- 
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:
Using TheBat! 3.51.10



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread Paul Berger
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Sunday, August 21, 2005, 7:56:05 PM, you wrote:

JP Hi Bat! Fans,


JP Pretty sure i have seen this over the years, but no longer any reference to
JP it on my pc.

JP Need to plan to move all Bat! settings, folders with mail, filters, rego
JP info, etc, etc.,  to a new pc shortly.

JP Is there an FAQ for this to which I can refer?

JP Thanks!



I did a full backup  -  Tools - Backup

Then a fresh install of the Bat

Then Tools - Restore from the backup


-- 



Paul

-
 Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP
5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2  

...Spell chequers dew knot work write. 



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jeff,

On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 12:28:34 +0100 GMT (21/08/2005, 18:28 +0700 GMT),
Jeff Gaines wrote:

JG You can edit the .reg file if  the path has changed.

I have a similar question and quote your reply, because I am afraid
that is the only solution for me as well.

In the office, I have one HD with two partitions, C: and D:. The TB
program resides on C: and the mail on the data drive D:.

I am planning to install a second HD, with two partitions. AFAIK, this
would make Windows assign C: to the first partition on the first HD,
D: will be the first partition on the second HD, E: the second
partition on the first HD, and F: the second partition on the second
HD.

If this is correct (and I vaguely hope it is not), I will need TB to
point to E: instead of D: before being able to move the data to the
second HD. Do I need to hack the registry?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Things You Would Never Know Without the Movies: It is always possible
to park directly outside any building you are visiting.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta)
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Group

On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 1:18:21 PM, Thomas wrote:

 Hello Jeff,

 On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 12:28:34 +0100 GMT (21/08/2005, 18:28 +0700 GMT),
 Jeff Gaines wrote:

JG You can edit the .reg file if  the path has changed.

 I have a similar question and quote your reply, because I am afraid
 that is the only solution for me as well.

 In the office, I have one HD with two partitions, C: and D:. The TB
 program resides on C: and the mail on the data drive D:.

 I am planning to install a second HD, with two partitions. AFAIK, this
 would make Windows assign C: to the first partition on the first HD,
 D: will be the first partition on the second HD, E: the second
 partition on the first HD, and F: the second partition on the second
 HD.

It will if you set up a primary partition on the new HD, but it
doesn't have to be :-)

On the new HD do *NOT* add a primary partition, add an extended
partition and logical drive(s) within that partition and then the
drive letters will be in a more logical order, i.e. they will follow
the physical drives. If you are already using drive letters up to say,
L, then the new drive will be allocated the next available letter -
but you can change this after the drive is installed.

Windows defaults to putting primary partitions on a new HD, I suspect
this may be for historical reasons, it's certainly not the best
approach nowadays in my view. XP sets up new drives in the same way as
DOS, go through each physical drive in order, pick out the primary
partitions, allocate drive letters, go back and go through again
picking up the logical drives in extended partitions and allocate
drive letters. I can't see a reason for having any primary partition
apart from the very first nowadays.

Come back if that's not clear enough :-)

-- 
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:
Using TheBat! 3.51.10



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Thomas,

On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 19:18:21 +0700GMT (21-8-2005, 14:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

TF I am planning to install a second HD, with two partitions. AFAIK, this
TF would make Windows assign C: to the first partition on the first HD,
TF D: will be the first partition on the second HD, E: the second
TF partition on the first HD, and F: the second partition on the second
TF HD.

This has not to be so. This is only the case when your second HD has a
primary partition, it isn't necessary for it to have one.
Apart from that with Win XP you can freely assign drive letters to
partitions (apart from the Windows partition)

TF If this is correct (and I vaguely hope it is not), I will need TB to
TF point to E: instead of D: before being able to move the data to the
TF second HD. Do I need to hack the registry?

If I read you correct you want to move TB's mail directory to your new
disk. When you're switching your disks so that your new data partition
has the same drive letter as TB's mail directory originally had, then
you'll only have to move the mail directory to the new drive, while
TB is shut down, TB doesn't care about physical disks, only about
paths.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Veni, vidi, vacuum, (I came, I saw--nothing.)

The Bat! 3.60.02.0 Forerunner (Beta)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpBbGQ4DKEwi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jeff,

On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:05:12 +0100 GMT (21/08/2005, 20:05 +0700 GMT),
Jeff Gaines wrote:

 I am planning to install a second HD, with two partitions. AFAIK, this
 would make Windows assign C: to the first partition on the first HD,
 D: will be the first partition on the second HD, E: the second
 partition on the first HD, and F: the second partition on the second
 HD.

JG It will if you set up a primary partition on the new HD, but it
JG doesn't have to be :-)

I'm not planning to set up a primary partition, I just want to connect
the new HD. My experience with the automatic assigning of drive leters
dates back to Win98, I never did it with an XP system. I think you are
giving me good news. :-)

JG On the new HD do *NOT* add a primary partition, add an extended
JG partition and logical drive(s) within that partition and then the
JG drive letters will be in a more logical order, i.e. they will follow
JG the physical drives.

That's good then.

JG If you are already using drive letters up to say, L, then the new
JG drive will be allocated the next available letter - but you can
JG change this after the drive is installed.

No, I have only C and D, and network drive called X, pointing to the
webserver.

JG Windows defaults to putting primary partitions on a new HD, I suspect
JG this may be for historical reasons, it's certainly not the best
JG approach nowadays in my view. XP sets up new drives in the same way as
JG DOS, go through each physical drive in order, pick out the primary
JG partitions, allocate drive letters, go back and go through again
JG picking up the logical drives in extended partitions and allocate
JG drive letters. I can't see a reason for having any primary partition
JG apart from the very first nowadays.

As I said, I'm not planning to set up a new primary drive. I'm just
not quite sure what XP does when it detects a new HDD.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

It's paradoxical that the idea of living a long life appeals to
everyone, but the idea of getting old doesn't appeal to anyone.  --
Andy Rooney

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta)
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Roelof,

On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 15:07:54 +0200 GMT (21/08/2005, 20:07 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:

TF I am planning to install a second HD, with two partitions. AFAIK, this
TF would make Windows assign C: to the first partition on the first HD,
TF D: will be the first partition on the second HD, E: the second
TF partition on the first HD, and F: the second partition on the second
TF HD.

RO This has not to be so. This is only the case when your second HD has a
RO primary partition, it isn't necessary for it to have one.

So I would have to tell it to set up a new primary partition? I'm not
planning to do that, so I'll be safe?

RO Apart from that with Win XP you can freely assign drive letters to
RO partitions (apart from the Windows partition)

the Windows partition will remain to be C on the first HD.

TF If this is correct (and I vaguely hope it is not), I will need TB to
TF point to E: instead of D: before being able to move the data to the
TF second HD. Do I need to hack the registry?

RO If I read you correct you want to move TB's mail directory to your new
RO disk. When you're switching your disks so that your new data partition
RO has the same drive letter as TB's mail directory originally had, then
RO you'll only have to move the mail directory to the new drive, while
RO TB is shut down, TB doesn't care about physical disks, only about
RO paths.

That was my question. I assumed the path will change automatically
when the new HDD is physically connected. Seems like this will not be
the case.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered
as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to
us. -- Western Union internal memo, 1876.

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta)
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Thomas Fernandez  everyone else,

on 21-Aug-2005 at 14:18 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote:

 I am planning to install a second HD, with two partitions. AFAIK, this
 would make Windows assign C: to the first partition on the first HD,
 D: will be the first partition on the second HD, E: the second
 partition on the first HD, and F: the second partition on the second
 HD.

That naming scheme applies only if you have a primary partition on each
individual harddisk.

So, don't create a primary partition on the second HDD, but only an
extended partition, and the drive letters won't change.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

Now he has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me. That
means nothing. People like us, who believe in physics, know that the
distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly
persistent illusion. -- Albert Einstein



Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread Chris

Greg Strong @ 2005-8-21 10:18:23 AM
Moving to anew pc mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I did a full backup  -  Tools - Backup
 Then a fresh install of the Bat
 IIRC there is an option on the fresh install to use a TB backup.

There is.

 Then Tools - Restore from the backup
 If my memory is correct on the install options, then this wouldn't be
 necessary.

For me, The Bat! would not restore properly, so I copied that data
directory over, exported the registry, modified the registry,
re-imported it on the new computer, and then everything worked.

-- 
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me.

Using The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2.
Accessing a POP3 mailbox.

Today's Oxymoron: Synthetic natural gas


pgp6hWIPdDlWd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Moving to anew pc

2005-08-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Alexander,

On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 17:26:31 +0200 GMT (21/08/2005, 22:26 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:

ASK So, don't create a primary partition on the second HDD, but only an
ASK extended partition, and the drive letters won't change.

Thanks to all.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

What to not say to the nice policeman: So, uh, you on the take or
what?

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta)
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html