Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Allie, On 23 May 2005, 21:43 you wrote: If only women came with pulldown menus and online help. ...and a reset button. ;-) -- As ever, .\\artin | ICQ 15893823 I've got a little list. I've got a little list. W S GILBERT ___ IMAP Client: The Bat! Version 3.5.0.11 IMAPS Server: Dovecot | OS: Windows XP Professional (Service Pack 2) Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Martin, -- 24.05.2005 08:58 +0100: If only women came with pulldown menus and online help. ...and a reset button. ;-) I thought they do have buttons. ... nice day to you all. ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Martin. --On 24 May 2005 08:58 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: ..and a reset button. ;-) A Shut your gob button would be nice too :) -- Tony. M. pgpiIuqWn4sxK.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Allie. --On 23 May 2005 18:06 -0500 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is not working. Any hints, or am i missing something. I had initially had it working. This was when I had previously had PGP8 installed, and then ran the PGP9 installation without first uninstalling PGP8. Same problem, I just tried it. The Bat! also looks for a txt file rather than an xml file. PGP9 now works fine with TB! I see what you mean Allie about the whole PGP program popping up just to verify a message. To get PGP9 working with TB! you need to create a text file called PGPprefs.txt In that file needs to be the path to your PGP keyring in this format, each line needs to be on one whole line: PublicKeyringFile=C:\Documents and Settings\Tony\My Documents\PGP\pubring.pkr PrivateKeyringFile=C:\Documents and Settings\Tony\My Documents\PGP\secring.skr Edit the paths to your own name obviously. Then save that file to Docs and Settings\Username\Application data\PGP corporation\PGP\PGPprefs.txt RIT Labs need to update the pgp.dll to look for an xml pref file as well as a txt pref file. God Allie we're good 'aint we :) -- Tony. M. pgppygiR0WvWu.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Tony, Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 2:44:39 PM, you wrote: TB God Allie we're good 'aint we :) :-) Besides that, is it (not the both of you, but PGP9) worth upgrading? - - -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.5 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 Comment: iQA/AwUBQpMtFxCgaTAR5oA9EQIREACfSuwWJS1sJSw5FOmm2d07CTi+oagAoJa4 gL6HSRckG/jcVs9vzRffoJwF =RvD0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Mark. --On 24 May 2005 15:33 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Besides that, is it (not the both of you, but PGP9) worth upgrading? That's for you to decide. I got fed up with all the agro I was getting with trial versions or free Gnu versions, it was a confidence thing, so in an attempt to get some stability from PGP I fully bought and paid for PGP9 Desktop complete with PGP disk or virtual disk as it now it. I still have a few minor problems and I've not even asked if my signatures verify on here at all, but I'm getting there. I personally am glad I bought it so I'd say yes it is worth it. There are a few things I don't like, I prefer pre v9 tray right click menu, with v9 you have to open the whole program to get to PGPkeys and verifying in TB! opens the whole program interface as well. Apart from that I like it. -- Tony. M. pgp74pFSZ9Vb2.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony, A reminder of what Tony Boom on TBUDL typed on: 24 May 2005 at 16:08:56 GMT +0200 I still have a few minor problems and I've not even asked if my signatures verify on here at all, I doubt they will, I've just fired up TB! and none of them do, not even here. Is it usual to have to wait 30-45 seconds for a message to appear in an IMAP folder with TB!? -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5 Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Tony, TB I still have a few minor problems and I've not even asked if my signatures TB verify on here at all, but I'm getting there. I got a bad signature for this one... - -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.5 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 Comment: iQA/AwUBQpNJphCgaTAR5oA9EQLI/gCeMGCyNX36Si0dNsJipKgSmJld1bUAn1nL MZxF/qfoCDZdXRBfofnAAAHY =i2R+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony, Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 4:02:09 PM, you wrote: TB That's for you to decide. I got fed up with all the agro I was getting with TB trial versions or free Gnu versions, it was a confidence thing, so in an TB attempt to get some stability from PGP I fully bought and paid for PGP9 TB Desktop complete with PGP disk or virtual disk as it now it. I haven't bought anything on the internet yet since I found out my visa card had been charged for 230 $ for an online casino with address in London. :-( -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.5 Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mark. - --On 24 May 2005 17:35 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: I got a bad signature for this one... They should all be bad on TBUDL and TBBETA. They don't even register as digital signatures here, even though I signed them. I'm working on that too but I've a feeling it an idiosyncrasy of the dutaint lists. Try this one? - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNMlNanuJ+T+uXWEQL/NQCg3X3be1BKLcfhKULD4jt0iNitmNEAoNyO mdGz/4VwhF7LB+vjXuwH73Fc =EW1E -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mark. - --On 24 May 2005 17:37 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: I haven't bought anything on the internet yet since I found out my visa card had been charged for 230 $ for an online casino with address in London. :-( Ooops. I use mine all the time. - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNM49anuJ+T+uXWEQJSIACguo4wuLtyxA+a8FM4ySAt6jhgpAoAoJA0 sP3xmZX+ezSiNCsw7uur8BOM =mxGl -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hallo Tony, On Tue, 24 May 2005 16:47:28 +0100GMT (24-5-2005, 17:47 +0200, where I live), you wrote: TB I'm working on that too but I've a feeling it an idiosyncrasy of the TB dutaint lists. Try this one? Verifies ok. -- Groetjes, Roelof Mistrust first impulses, they are always good. The Bat! 3.5 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 2 pop3 accounts, server on LAN pgpqCcspDhw7T.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony, Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 5:47:28 PM, you wrote: TB I'm working on that too but I've a feeling it an idiosyncrasy of the TB dutaint lists. Try this one? I get OK PGP verified for this one... -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.5 Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Roelof, Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 11:59:13 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo Tony, RO On Tue, 24 May 2005 16:47:28 +0100GMT (24-5-2005, 17:47 +0200, where I RO live), you wrote: TB I'm working on that too but I've a feeling it an idiosyncrasy of the TB dutaint lists. Try this one? RO Verifies ok. Works fine here too back at you PGP9 - -- Best regards, dangermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.5.0 Comment: iQA/AwUBQpNUXnrWNKgp50M4EQJu9gCg51tjkrhYz8yS06qz9/QtnnULGj8AnAqZ qaCOO8jGgouMocAoOg1KcAu7 =YQNC -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Roelof. - --On 24 May 2005 17:59 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Verifies ok. It's clear signed though, not MIME, not ideal but the only way I can get a verification on these lists. - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNVV9anuJ+T+uXWEQKqyQCcCBirOKP8hgh3nJmPrnM7FC4nugQAnRbV K4hTjFRDmLplKzmCUq8p31L0 =3MiV -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mark. - --On 24 May 2005 18:08 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: I get OK PGP verified for this one... Clear signed, not MIME. - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNVftanuJ+T+uXWEQJIZwCgz7FQIlUJWmo7Mb5i6si2ZHDvPaQAoLF5 ZLzmqLW+s7kWJqsxErf0YBBi =1nWf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Tony, On 24/05/2005 01:44 PM +0100, you wrote: God Allie we're good 'aint we :) Yeah. Good work!! PGP9 was assimilated. ;) -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- (A)bort, (R)etry, (T)ake down entire network? Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Tony, On 24/05/2005 03:02 PM +0100, you wrote: There are a few things I don't like, I prefer pre v9 tray right click menu, with v9 you have to open the whole program to get to PGPkeys and verifying in TB! opens the whole program interface as well. Apart from that I like it. Maybe this will be a cue for TB! to start auto-checking PGP signatures. It's really about time it began doing this. The usability of PGP/GnuPG makes a huge leap with that. -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- (A)bort, (R)etry, (T)ake down entire network? Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Mark, On 24/05/2005 05:37 PM +0200, you wrote: I haven't bought anything on the internet yet since I found out my visa card had been charged for 230 $ for an online casino with address in London. :-( May as well return the card. You're still vulnerable and really can't be sure that your card was compromised on the Internet. -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- (A)bort, (R)etry, (T)ake down entire network? Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello danger. - --On 24 May 2005 12:20 -0400 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Works fine here too back at you PGP9 *** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION *** *** Status: Good Signature *** Signer: danger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (0x29E74338) *** Signed: 24/05/2005 17:20:46 *** Verified: 24/05/2005 17:40:37 *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNZKtanuJ+T+uXWEQK75ACffyYO5p+3Ql69MxQm1OmIa3ITJ8UAoKdf 51PAtYSpEQ8pcaaaJmHF2nb3 =Brod -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie. - --On 24 May 2005 11:31 -0500 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: PGP9 was assimilated. ;) No problem for The Caribbean English Alliance. Now where's that big bad black Jedi geezer with the funny torch, we'll sort him out next :) Did you get the file I sent by the way? - -- Tony. M. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mulberry PGP Plugin v3.0 Comment: processed by Mulberry PGP Plugin iQA/AwUBQpNap9anuJ+T+uXWEQLOGwCgnKqpewCcg3UvqSzcMWlt1YXiKw0AoIMY ZjiSXoeauqJcglZ3BtSE8F3R =UFWs -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Allie, Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 6:36:13 PM, you wrote: AM May as well return the card. You're still vulnerable and really can't AM be sure that your card was compromised on the Internet. The day I found out, the card was canceled immediatly. See TBOT (tomorrow I'm awake for 22 hours, time to stop). -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.5 Current version is 3.5.0.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Tony, On 24/5/2005 5:47 PM +0100, you wrote: Did you get the file I sent by the way? What file? :/ -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- Wit levels low. Attempting to compensate. Current version is 3.5.0.11 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello TB List, Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is not working. Any hints, or am i missing something. -- Ciao Thomas Using: TheBat! 3.5 System: Windows XP Build 2600 Service Pack 2 PGP:Key-ID: 0x70D9F03B Visit: TheBat! World on http://www.thebatworld.de pgpu7wbeEtkkY.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Thomas. --On 23 May 2005 12:55 -0300 you wrote about PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is not working. Any hints, or am i missing something. I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is another way, Allie will shout at me for telling you this but try enabling email proxy in PGP9. It works here with no problems. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Tony, On 23/5/2005 4:59 PM +0100, you wrote: I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is another way, Allie will shout at me for telling you this but try enabling email proxy in PGP9. It works here with no problems. LOL!!! I'd try the usual way first, yes. However, for me, I had simply installed PGP9 and then opened TB! and it worked. I did nothing else. shrug What happens Peter? Nothing? -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony, On 23 May 2005, 16:59 you wrote: I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is another way, Allie will shout at me for telling you this but try enabling email proxy in PGP9. It works here with no problems. Does this explain why your message ID is always something like mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Or is this the IP address assigned by your router? Either way, TB! can't locate a message with this type of ID. Same goes for Allie's messages, e.g. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. -- As ever, .\\artin | ICQ 15893823 People love chopping wood. In this activity one immediately sees results. ALBERT EINSTEIN ___ IMAP Client: The Bat! Version 3.5 Return RC9 IMAPS Server: Dovecot | OS: Windows XP Professional (Service Pack 2) Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Martin, On 23/5/2005 5:19 PM +0100, you wrote: Does this explain why your message ID is always something like mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Or is this the IP address assigned by your router? Either way, TB! can't locate a message with this type of ID. Same goes for Allie's messages, e.g. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. .. and here I was liking it, since my domain name isn't included in the message id. :( -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- Fer Sell Cheep: 1 Bran New Spel Chekker. Nevur Usd. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Allie, On 23 May 2005, 17:39 you wrote: Does this explain why your message ID is always something like mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Or is this the IP address assigned by your router? Either way, TB! can't locate a message with this type of ID. Same goes for Allie's messages, e.g. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. .. and here I was liking it, since my domain name isn't included in the message id. :( Do these IP-based message IDs work with *cough* mU1b3rry? :-) -- As ever, .\\artin | ICQ 15893823 Would you like me to give you a formula for success? It's quite simple really. Double your rate of failure. THOMAS J WATSON ___ IMAP Client: The Bat! Version 3.5 Return RC9 IMAPS Server: Dovecot | OS: Windows XP Professional (Service Pack 2) Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Martin Webster on tbudl everyone else, on 23-Mai-2005 at 18:46 you (Martin Webster on tbudl) wrote: .. and here I was liking it, since my domain name isn't included in the message id. :( Do these IP-based message IDs work with *cough* mU1b3rry? :-) Sorry to hijack this thread, I just had to place a reply somewhere using the IMAP account I just created. I'm a 11 customer just like Tony, and I just created an IMAP account in TB to access my mails see if they thread or not, as I still don't see how an *incoming* mail server like IMAP would affect *outgoing* mails that are sent via SMTP, no matter if its POP or IMAP. Btw. I manually fixed the first reference [EMAIL PROTECTED] while replying, so that was not a miracle work of TB. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) The Kentucky Meat Shower, which attracted so much attention recently, has now been supplanted by a rain of live snakes in Memphis, Tennessee. -- Anonymous report in Scientific American, 1877 Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Alexander, -- 23.05.2005 18:53 +0200: I just created an IMAP account in TB Nice middle name. ;) Threading seems okay. -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander, Monday, May 23, 2005, 6:53:05 PM, you wrote: Sorry to hijack this thread, I just had to place a reply somewhere using So... it threads just fine... using the same provider... but TB as a client instead... -- Best regards, Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Martin. --On 23 May 2005 17:19 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Does this explain why your message ID is always something like No, that's nothing to do with PGP. That IP is the one issued to this PC by my router... You don't want me to get rid of that as well do you? -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Allie. --On 23 May 2005 11:12 -0500 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: However, for me, I had simply installed PGP9 and then opened TB! and it worked. I did nothing else. shrug Just exactly what have I done to deserve this? I'm a good person, law abiding, looking after under privileged children, don't do drugs, don't go to pubs, don't do sex much either. I must have been really bad in a previous life! -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony Boom everyone else, on 23-Mai-2005 at 19:07 you (Tony Boom) wrote: Does this explain why your message ID is always something like No, that's nothing to do with PGP. That IP is the one issued to this PC by my router... You don't want me to get rid of that as well do you? The interesting thing is that everyone using Mulberry has MID's that end with their local IP address instead of their local domain. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Since I do not forsee that atomic energy is to be a great boon for a long time, I have to say that for the present it is a menace. Perhaps it is well that it should be. It may intimidate the human race into bringing order into its international affairs, which, without the pressure of fear, it would not do. (Albert Einstein, 1945) Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Manuel Breitfeld everyone else, on 23-Mai-2005 at 19:04 you (Manuel Breitfeld) wrote: I just created an IMAP account in TB Nice middle name. ;) Just to keep them apart. Threading seems okay. Your message, too... and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that the distant sound of Tony banging his head onto a wall? ;-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) You can only see a thing well when you know in advance what is going to happen. -- John Tyndall Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Alexander, -- 23.05.2005 19:07 +0200: and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that the distant sound of Tony banging his head onto a wall? ;-) Long before Tony in trial period. ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony, on Monday, 23. May 2005, at 16:59:55 [GMT +0100] you wrote regarding PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is not working. Any hints, or am i missing something. I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is another way, Allie will shout at me for telling you this but try enabling email proxy in PGP9. It works here with no problems. Hm, somebody knows if in there will be a plugin or an internal support for PGP 9 in the future? -- Ciao Thomas Using: TheBat! 3.5 System: Windows XP Build 2600 Service Pack 2 PGP:Key-ID: 0x70D9F03B Visit: TheBat! World on http://www.thebatworld.de pgpNEwNxvIvWU.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander, On 23 May 2005, 18:10 you wrote: Does this explain why your message ID is always something like No, that's nothing to do with PGP. That IP is the one issued to this PC by my router... You don't want me to get rid of that as well do you? To answer Tony's message first... I thought it could be your router. However, I would have thought that your machine would be identified by its name and local domain. The interesting thing is that everyone using Mulberry has MID's that end with their local IP address instead of their local domain. I had noticed this and wondered if it was a coincidence or not. Nonetheless, should TB! working with IP-based message IDs? Also, will you try Mulberry with 11? -- As ever, .\\artin | ICQ 15893823 You can do anything in this world if you are prepared to take the consequences. W SOMERSET MAUGHAM ___ IMAP Client: The Bat! Version 3.5 Return RC9 IMAPS Server: Dovecot | OS: Windows XP Professional (Service Pack 2) Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony, Monday, May 23, 2005, 7:04:12 PM, you wrote: However, for me, I had simply installed PGP9 and then opened TB! and it worked. I did nothing else. shrug TB Just exactly what have I done to deserve this? TB I'm a good person, OK... TB law abiding, Nice... TB looking after under privileged children, Even better than average... TB don't do drugs, Fine... TB don't go to pubs, Wouldn't even be a problem as long as not exaggerated... TB don't do sex much either. Oh-Oh must be the lying that does it! :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.5 Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 18:53 +0200 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: I'm a 11 customer just like Tony, and I just created an IMAP account in TB to access my mails see if they thread or not Like I said, they will. The Bat! doesn't yet handle IMAP the way it should but that's not the point. Mulberry handle IMAP to the very letter of any RFC law and that's why it's happening, it's not getting the correct response from the server. Tell me Alex, does this one thread properly? If I'm right, I suspect it will and I#ve not doctored the headers in anyway. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 18:53 +0200 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Sorry to hijack this thread, I just had to place a reply somewhere using the IMAP account I just created. I'm a 11 customer just like Tony, and I just created an IMAP account in TB to access my mails see if they thread or not, as I still don't see how an *incoming* mail server like IMAP would affect *outgoing* mails that are sent via SMTP, no matter if its POP or IMAP. It only happens with Mulberry, not The Bat for reasons discussed at length last week. And it's nothing to do with SMTP, it's when you reply to a post that's stored on your IMAP server. Forget the SMTP side of it, that has nothing to do with it. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Manuel. --On 23 May 2005 19:04 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Threading seems okay. Your not listening to me are you? -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 19:06 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: So... it threads just fine... using the same provider... but TB as a client instead... This one will thread OK as well, not with TB! as a client. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 19:07 +0200 you wrote about Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Your message, too... and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that the distant sound of Tony banging his head onto a wall? ;-) No, why would I need to do that? Your the one who's not playing the same game as me. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Tony, -- 23.05.2005 18:52 +0100: Tell me Alex, does this one thread properly? If I'm right, I suspect it will and I#ve not doctored the headers in anyway. Me is not Alex, but unfortunatelly your message has *no* references at all. Therefore it can't be threading in any way. -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Thomas. --On 23 May 2005 14:24 -0300 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Hm, somebody knows if in there will be a plugin or an internal support for PGP 9 in the future? That's one for the developers. Oh look, it threads :) -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Tony, -- 23.05.2005 18:56 +0100: Threading seems okay. Your not listening to me are you? I am, Tony, I am. Just wanted to confirm Alex' question. I know that Mulberry gets the wrong information from your server whereas TB! doesn't fetch the information from the server and does everything on its own, which doesn't fit 100% into IMAP specification. Correct? ;-) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony Boom everyone else, on 23-Mai-2005 at 19:52 you (Tony Boom) wrote: Tell me Alex, does this one thread properly? If I'm right, I suspect it will and I#ve not doctored the headers in anyway. No threading at all. Well, the one thing I learn from this is... I'll keep my hands off of IMAP. With all those different (buggy) server types that need special care by one or the other client, its a no-no for me. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Parsifal -- the kind of opera that starts at six o'clock and after it has been going three hours, you look at your watch and it says 6:20. -- David Randolph Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 19:07 +0200 you wrote about Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Your message, too... and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that the distant sound of Tony banging his head onto a wall? ;-) Why don't people listen? He uses Mulberry yes, he doesn't however use 1and1. -- Tony. M. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Mark. --On 23 May 2005 19:38 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: TB don't do sex much either. Oh-Oh must be the lying that does it! :-) OK, you got me. But only 4 or 5 times a week, nothing like when I was younger. I do have the odd glass of red wine or 3 every night as well... But I don't go down the Pub, honest! -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Manuel. --On 23 May 2005 20:00 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Me is not Alex, but unfortunatelly your message has *no* references at all. Therefore it can't be threading in any way. Don't you start, I thought you was on my side :) -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Martin. --On 23 May 2005 18:33 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Also, will you try Mulberry with 11? If he does try Mulberry with 1and1 IMAP then we must remember his server is in Germany, mine is in England... They may not be affected by the same problems. -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Manuel. --On 23 May 2005 20:03 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: I am, Tony, I am. Just wanted to confirm Alex' question. I know that Mulberry gets the wrong information from your server whereas TB! doesn't fetch the information from the server and does everything on its own, which doesn't fit 100% into IMAP specification. Correct? ;-) That is how it was explained to me by a very proficient IMAP guru. No, he's not on this list :) But then again your on the list he's on so you probably read his explanation as well. In fact your explanation is so right I had to quote it all for Alex' sake. -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Alexander. --On 23 May 2005 20:09 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: No threading at all. After this post I promise my threading will be OK. Well, the one thing I learn from this is... I'll keep my hands off of IMAP. With all those different (buggy) server types that need special care by one or the other client, its a no-no for me. :-) Defeatist :) -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony, Monday, May 23, 2005, 12:38:13 PM, you wrote: T OK, you got me. But only 4 or 5 times a week, nothing like when I T was younger. T I do have the odd glass of red wine or 3 every night as well... But T I don't go down the Pub, honest! moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Tony. ' This thread is moving into the Off-Topic realm. Please continue this on TBOT (this message has been CC'd to the TBOT list to maintain threading.) You can subscribe to TBOT by sending a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you subscribed. Thank you. /moderator -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__) _)(_ )__) Roguemoticons: http://PCWize.com/thebat ()()()(__)PCWSmileys: http://PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php Tagline of the day: Someday we'll look back on this, laugh nervously and change the subject. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Tony Boom everyone else, on 23-Mai-2005 at 20:34 you (Tony Boom) wrote: Also, will you try Mulberry with 11? If he does try Mulberry with 1and1 IMAP then we must remember his server is in Germany, mine is in England... They may not be affected by the same problems. Nah, I won't waste my time with this and litter the list with more Mulberry and 11 IMAP servers in the UK off-topic babbling. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know what we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true. -- Bertrand Russell Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Leif. --On 23 May 2005 12:44 -0600 you wrote about OT: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: Please don't feel singled out Tony. You just got the hump 'cos I get my leg over more than you :) -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
ON Monday, May 23, 2005, 7:04:12 PM, you wrote: TB Just exactly what have I done to deserve this? I'm a good person, law TB abiding, looking after under privileged children, don't do drugs, don't go TB to pubs, don't do sex much either. I must have been really bad in a TB previous life! Hi Tony, I don know but you are missing a lot of the fun things ;-) -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Real Programmers never work from 9 to 5. If any real programmer is around at 9 a.m., it's because they were up all night. Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hello Gerard. --On 23 May 2005 21:08 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!: I don know but you are missing a lot of the fun things ;-) Shhh, can't stop, kids are all in bed asleep. Must get on... If you'll excuse the pun :) And stop baiting me, I've already been trouted twice. -- Tony. M. PGP.sig Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
Hi Thomas, On 23/5/2005 2:24 PM -0300, you wrote: Hm, somebody knows if in there will be a plugin or an internal support for PGP 9 in the future? I had it working fine in TB! just before removing it for other reasons. I think the current PGP support will tango with PGP9. -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- If only women came with pulldown menus and online help. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!
On Monday, May 23, 2005 at 10:55:35 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas Martin wrote: Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is not working. Any hints, or am i missing something. I had initially had it working. This was when I had previously had PGP8 installed, and then ran the PGP9 installation without first uninstalling PGP8. I had since remove PGP from the system after having some other problems. I decided to try again and reinstalled PGP9. The experience is now different and I think it's because I did a fresh installation on this occasion, rather than installing without first uninstalling PGP8. PGP9 no longer works with TB!. -- -= Allie Martin =- The Bat! v3.5 System Specs: http://www.landscreek.net/sysspecs.htm -=-=- Break up a relationship - buy a computer!! Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
