Re: Deleting HTML Attachment in 2.10.01
Joseph N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 25-Apr-2004 11:52:01 PM Deleting HTML Attachment in 2.10.01 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Prior to the current version, 2.10.01, TB! would gray out the 'delete' option when right-clicking on an HTML attachment when the associated e-mail message was sent only in HTML, not multi-part. In practice, this meant that it was safe to delete the HTML part any time the 'delete' option was *not* grayed-out. That was then. SNIP Can anyone confirm this? Not confirmed when trying to delete the HTML from a message with Content-type: text/html -- Chris - Nun mi Esperanton lernas. Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma. Using The Bat! v2.10.01 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 A day without sunshine is like, night. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Roland Burger ! On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 13:29:30 +0200 GMT your local time, which was 15.04.2001, 13:29 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: Hmmm, I'm a bit lit in this thread (Happy Easter)!! but I gues you would like to have something that changes the address to e.g. Roland Burger at TBUDL %TO=""%TO='"%OFROMNAME on %ABoreplyNAME" %OREPLYADDR' I use a macro that uses a regex (I know, wrong group, that's why I'm not going to explain it!) one long line %TO=""%TO="""%OFROMNAME bei %setpattregexp=""(.*?)\@""%RegExpBlindMatch=""%OReplyAddr""%SubPatt=""1"" ""%OREPLYADDR" /one long line I didn't create it myself; someone else did it. May be it's a bit kludgy and could be improved, but it works :-)) [...] - -- Best regards, Gerd == Using The Bat! Version 1.51 PGP/GPG-Keys on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_key - Erwerbsregel #32 Sei vorsichtig mit dem was Du verkaufst Es knnte genau das erfllen, was der Kunde erwartet. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4d (r3/Cygwin) - GnuPGshell v1.70 Comment: Digitally signed! So you know it's me!! Key_ID 0xD56C61 iD8DBQE62roOTL+wetVsYYcRAgnjAKCdmn/khEIfYtlQCpBwEp95n2Iw7wCdFULD pztgSxtdvsljmUwHtWyn4j4= =Wu+3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
Hi Gerd, on Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:23:30 +0200 GMT (which was 16.04.2001, 11:23 +0100 GMT where I live) Gerd Ewald wrote: %TO=""%TO='"%OFROMNAME on %ABoreplyNAME" %OREPLYADDR' I use a macro that uses a regex (I know, wrong group, that's why I'm not going to explain it!) one long line %TO=""%TO="""%OFROMNAME bei %setpattregexp=""(.*?)\@""%RegExpBlindMatch=""%OReplyAddr""%SubPatt=""1"" ""%OREPLYADDR" /one long line With this RegEx I also got only for example: FirstName Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] For you and all others I also wish a nice last Easter Day! -- Best regards, Roland mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key: 0x0D023C45 I use The Bat! v1.51 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A ! -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
Hi David, on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:05:33 +0100 GMT (which was 14.04.2001, 19:05 +0100 GMT where I live) David Elliott wrote: %TO=""%TO='"%OFROMNAME on %ABoreplyNAME" %OREPLYADDR' I tried this with all lists, but with my German lists I don't have success with it! -- Best regards, Roland mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key: 0x0D023C45 I use The Bat! v1.51 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A ! -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Roland, On 15 April 2001 at 13:01:00 +0200 (which was 12:01 where I live) Roland Burger wrote to David Elliott on TBUDL and made these points: RB on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:05:33 +0100 GMT (which was 14.04.2001, 19:05 RB +0100 GMT where I live) David Elliott wrote: %TO=""%TO='"%OFROMNAME on %ABoreplyNAME" %OREPLYADDR' RB I tried this with all lists, but with my German lists I don't have RB success with it! You have to have an address book entry for every list you want to use this method with. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Consultant Software Engineer [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOtmELTnkJKuSnc2gEQLPHgCglonuWL0Xf4GkXTxYZNutIQOU7pwAn0yL 5+M99cGdf3HZq0CYuu6jW71Y =gNP/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
Hi Marck, on Sun, 15 Apr 2001 12:21:17 +0100 GMT (which was 15.04.2001, 13:21 +0100 GMT where I live) Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: On 15 April 2001 at 13:01:00 +0200 (which was 12:01 where I live) Roland Burger wrote to David Elliott on TBUDL and made these points: RB on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:05:33 +0100 GMT (which was 14.04.2001, 19:05 RB +0100 GMT where I live) David Elliott wrote: %TO=""%TO='"%OFROMNAME on %ABoreplyNAME" %OREPLYADDR' RB I tried this with all lists, but with my German lists I don't have RB success with it! You have to have an address book entry for every list you want to use this method with. I have it! But for example with PGP-Friends I got only (I'll take your name): "Marck D. Pearlstone" [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Roland mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key: 0x0D023C45 I use The Bat! v1.51 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A ! -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, On 14 April 2001 at 13:43:06 +0800 (which was 06:43 where I live) Thomas wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone on TBUDL and made these points: MDP Of course. T Seeing the rest of your message, I believe you mean "of course T not", as otherwise I'm unable to contradict you. ;-) Reading it back, I think you're right. I did mean "Of course not". MDP How can you delete the only part of a message? T And if the context type is multipart/alternative or T multipart/mixed, deleting part of that message is OK? Absolutely. You are free to do as you please with a real and actual attachment. T Or if you have a "real" attachment, is that not technically a part T of the message? I mean that if a message is a single entity with no attachments or parts, there is no "part" that *can* be deleted. MDP As for TB keeping the self generated text approximation of such MDP a message - why should TB betray one of its base fundamentals of MDP not interfering with incoming email? T It is generated from text actually in the message, thus the message T body is shown (not some "generated text", but the message minus the T HTML tags). "Shown" is the operative word. It isn't stored anywhere. It is just displayed as a courtesy to allow you to see the text with the tags. T So, part of the message is filtered, That is a leap of faith. Nothing is saved from this filtering operation - that would constitute an interference. T and I want to delete only the part that is not shown. You may want to, but it doesn't exist in isolation. That's my point. T Same idea as when I have a message that was sent as T multipart/alternative, the HTML part (text plus tags) is not shown, T and I want to delete that part. In the former case it would be T betrayal, in the latter it would be fine? T Kindly clarify for me. It would be fine because in the multipart/alternative it is a real and not an imaginary part and can be separated from the plain text version of the message and thus the HTML attachment alter-ego can be easily deleted. Without the multipart/alternative formatting there is *no* "other" part to leave behind, just a single body full of HTML tags. If you take away the body of the message all that is left is the headers - - not sustainable as a message. The plain text *view* of the message is just that in such a case - a view; it doesn't really exist as an entity. While I understand that you're saying that it possibly *could* exist, /I'm/ saying that making it do so would constitute the kind of interference that TB shuns. I'm only against it because of that principle. Having said that, Douglas Hinds has presented what strikes me as a very effective work-around for the problem. Have you tried it? - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Consultant Software Engineer [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOtgc1znkJKuSnc2gEQK3JwCgz6xqWpBx8h0ZDsOAOQyJb9dpRUgAnjpW 2HalFTLeB1/74cSTJ3IOwBiL =siuB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
Hallo Marck, On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 10:48:06 +0100 GMT (14/04/2001, 17:48 +0800 GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP While I understand that you're saying that it possibly *could* exist, MDP /I'm/ saying that making it do so would constitute the kind of MDP interference that TB shuns. I'm only against it because of that MDP principle. I see your line of thinking, whch makes sense, and our discussion comes down to exactly that principle, and the question: should we enforce it for text/html message or not? You say yes, I say no, we agree to disagree. ;-) MDP Having said that, Douglas Hinds has presented what strikes me as a MDP very effective work-around for the problem. Have you tried it? No, because I was discussing the principle. I want to able to delete the HTML attachments from within The Bat! in any case. I thought that had been agreed earlier and I had found a bug. Obviously, I was mistaken. This has been clarified now; thank you for your patience. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. The hardness of the butter is directly proportional to the softness of the bread. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.49g under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
Hello Thomas others on this TB! list following this thread, Friday, April 13, 2001, you asked whether: T Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message with a T content-type text/html? DH This is what I do: DH I redirect the message T ... several months ago, I suggested that TB allows the deletion T of all HTML attachments, and for those messages that consist only T of an HTML message (where there is no plain text part), TB keeps T the plain-text part it generates. ... and many agreed with me ... So would I. My suggestion is still just a work around (as Marck mentioned) that requires changing to the outbox back. Copying the message to the outbox (instead of redirecting) would also provide a work around, but this (copying) has proved exaggeratingly slow on my machine (a slow cpu 300+ folders may be involved). The message could be dragged there instead, but the auto-way you suggested would certainly be best (someone on another list mentioned that Eudora does this - of course my reply was "I use TB!"). T Since Ritlabs is a fast-working compnay, we I have been able to delete T more HTML attachments in a subequent version, but very seldom I still T come across one where the delete function for the HTML attachment is T greyed out from the context menu. Right (and I did assume that this is probably worse on older versions of TB! like mine. T I just want to know where we are, is this by design, is it a flaw, is T it only me? ... My vote sides w/ your suggestion, but what counts is whether or not you forwarded that to Stef Max. Douglas -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
Hello Marck others on this TB! list following this thread, (I'll take the opportunity to ask: How does one generate the "on TBUDL or on TBTech add on automatically - i.e. via the reply template? I tried including "on %Reply-to" with less than the desired results). In the interest of clarity, this reply contains responses to two separate messages from the same author on the same subject. Friday, April 13, 2001, you stated regarding : MDP ... As for TB keeping the self generated text approximation of MDP such a message - why should TB betray one of its base MDP fundamentals of not interfering with incoming email? In the interest of user control; just a a user can kill dupes or deal with spam, either automatically, via a folder or "all" based command option, or individually. This is why I have consistently asked since 1999 for the option of editing incoming messages via a command, rather than having to drag (redirect or copy) them to the outbox and back. While there are clearly other issues involved (i.e. the interest of philosophical purism regarding header info), while I wouldn't deny relevance or importance to those issues, I focus more on user control and take responsibility for my own acts. (The same logical can be applied to gun control laws, where more than one point of view has it's merits). MDP As for TB keeping the self generated text approximation of such MDP a message - why should TB betray one of its base fundamentals of MDP not interfering with incoming email? It isn't stored anywhere. It is just displayed as a courtesy to allow you to see the text with the tags. T So, part of the message is filtered, MDP That is a leap of faith. Nothing is saved from this filtering MDP operation - that would constitute an interference. T and I want to delete only the part that is not shown. MDP You may want to, but it doesn't exist in isolation. That's my point. T Same idea as when I have a message that was sent as T multipart/alternative, the HTML part (text plus tags) is not shown, T and I want to delete that part. In the former case it would be T betrayal, in the latter it would be fine? T Kindly clarify for me. MDP ... Without the multipart/alternative formatting there is *no* MDP "other" part to leave behind, just a single body full of HTML MDP tags. If you take away the body of the message all that is left MDP is the headers - - not sustainable as a message. The plain text MDP *view* of the message is just that in such a case - a view; it MDP doesn't really exist as an entity. MDP While I understand that you're saying that it possibly *could* MDP exist, /I'm/ saying that making it do so would constitute the MDP kind of interference that TB shuns. I'm only against it MDP because of that principle. MDP Having said that, Douglas Hinds has presented what strikes me MDP as a very effective work-around for the problem. ... Thank you. (Note has been taken :=). Having said that, I still vote for not having to do it. I'd rather see the option to generate the plain text and eliminate the original html version built into TB!. It seems to me that "No HTML" is the more basic principle here (just as it is on all TB! lists). But that's just one TB! user TB! List subscribers opinion (that's perhaps as valid as any). Douglas -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
Hi Douglas, on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 08:33:17 -0600 GMT (which was 14.04.2001, 16:33 +0100 GMT where I live) Douglas Hinds wrote: Hello Marck others on this TB! list following this thread, (I'll take the opportunity to ask: How does one generate the "on TBUDL or on TBTech add on automatically - i.e. via the reply template? I tried including "on %Reply-to" with less than the desired results). For your templates (answer): %TO=""%TO="""%OFromName on TBUDL"" [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Best regards, Roland mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key: 0x0D023C45 I use The Bat! v1.51 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A ! -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment (was: Uninstall Problem-Help.)
Hi Thomas, @ 4:16:25 AM on 4/13/2001, Thomas wrote: ... T It seems the attachment extension depends on the machine. I jsut T received another HTML message, the attachment is also called T "message.shtml", but the content-type is multipart/alternative T (followed by a boundary), and I have no problems deleting the T attachment. T Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message T with a content-type text/html? Mine are always .htm, and I don't have the delete option in the context menu *only* when the content-type is text/html. But, I can hit the Del key to delete it. -- Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Architect, Designer, and Programmer PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8 [TB! 1.52 Beta/4, Windows 98 (SE) 4.10 Build A] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
Hallo Douglas, On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 07:50:54 -0600 GMT (14/04/2001, 21:50 +0800 GMT), Douglas Hinds wrote: T I just want to know where we are, is this by design, is it a flaw, is T it only me? ... DH My vote sides w/ your suggestion, but what counts is whether or not DH you forwarded that to Stef Max. Thanks for your support, but I'm looking first whether we can come to some consens here. So far, we have two different opinions as far as the principle is concerned. More opinions are welcome. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. -It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.49g under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment (was: Uninstall Problem-Help.)
Hi Thomas, On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, at 16:16:25 +0800 you wrote: Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message with a content-type text/html? I think that a message with content type text/html contains *only* a html part and that's the reason why TB! is unable to delete that part. Deleting the only content would create an empty message. So IMHO it is the right thing not to let the user delete that part. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1 |Lars Geiger | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=GetPublicKey | -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
Hi Lars, On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:28:35 +0200GMT (13/04/2001, 16:28 +0800GMT), Lars Geiger wrote: LG I think that a message with content type text/html contains LG *only* a html part Correct. LG and that's the reason why TB! is unable to delete that part. TB should keep the text it generates, see my other posting. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Anmeldung unter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message reply created with The Bat! 1.51 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 on a Pentium II/350 MHz. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, On 13 April 2001 at 16:16:25 +0800 (which was 09:16 where I live) Thomas wrote to Lars Geiger on TBUDL and made these points: LG On my machine, the attachment is shown as "message.html", not LG .shtml and its content type is text/html. But you are right, I LG can't delete the attachment either. T It seems the attachment extension depends on the machine. Not in the 1.52 beta series in version after beta 1. I made a clear bug report about why this was happening and it got fixed. TB was enumerating the html/text file types and picking the *last* listed extension instead of the *first* in the list. As a result any incoming html attachments get given an fairly inappropriate extension. T Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message T with a content-type text/html? Of course. How can you delete the only part of a message? As for TB keeping the self generated text approximation of such a message - why should TB betray one of its base fundamentals of not interfering with incoming email? - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Consultant Software Engineer [ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04) Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness iQA/AwUBOtbE0znkJKuSnc2gEQL8BwCdGfb5xZKeyU7q+EbiQg3SsowMF/0AoL7n v5xoezLHIgb6qo2X/m2HMkrY =PZOR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment (was: Uninstall Problem-Help.)
Hello Thomas others on this TB! list following this thread, Friday, April 13, 2001, you asked: T Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message with a T content-type text/html? This is what I do: I redirect the message using Crtl+F6, addressing it to the same address it came in with. I then select the attachment and delete it. Then I save it to the outbox, and drag it back to the folder it was in. Lastly, I delete the original. This is one of things redirecting is good for. Douglas -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
Hallo Marck, On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:20:19 +0100 GMT (13/04/2001, 17:20 +0800 GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: T Has anybody ever been able to delete the HTML part of a message T with a content-type text/html? MDP Of course. Seeing the rest of your message, I believe you mean "of course not", as otherwise I'm unable to contradict you. ;-) MDP How can you delete the only part of a message? And if the context type is multipart/alternative or multipart/mixed, deleting part of that message is OK? Or if you have a "real" attachment, is that not technically a part of the message? MDP As for TB keeping the self generated text approximation of such a MDP message - why should TB betray one of its base fundamentals of MDP not interfering with incoming email? It is generated from text actually in the message, thus the message body is shown (not some "generated text", but the message minus the HTML tags). So, part of the message is filtered, and I want to delete only the part that is not shown. Same idea as when I have a message that was sent as multipart/alternative, the HTML part (text plus tags) is not shown, and I want to delete that part. In the former case it would be betrayal, in the latter it would be fine? Kindly clarify for me. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Monday is an awful way to spend 1/7th of your life. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.49g under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using an Intel Celeron 366Mhz, 128MB RAM -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Deleting HTML attachment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Assad You wrote: AT Does anyone know how I could automate the deletion of HTML AT attachment? I was thinking of using the external filter rule to AT delete email with HTML attachments but I don't know how I should AT input the command to automate the process... Anyone? I believe it is presently impossible (at least it appeared so when I asked the same question myself. I tried changing the setting to have attachments be stored in a separate folder, but HTML-attachments seem to be treated differently from normal ones. I haven't gotten around to put in on the official wish list yet. Lars Erik Bryld [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.larserik.suite.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBOl8ky/pbkgvBshHUEQKg1gCeN3EcSFc9g2s+PByg75MfSRL8U54AniDy hgjpMt4UXtk0Dvdwy/fah+E6 =o2Ts -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
