Re[2]: Sig cutoff
9/4/2019 9:24 PM Hi Thomas, On 9/4/2019 Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> What causes GMX to perceive that they authority to edit ANY message??? TF> First I need someone else using GMX as well to confirm, and then we TF> can ask them exactly this question. Could be interesting... Staying tuned in... TF> -- TF> Cheers, TF> Thomas. TF> Message reply created with The Bat! Version 8.8.9 (64-bit) TF> under Windows 10.0 Build 18362 TF> TF> Current version is 8.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: TF> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html - -- Paul The Bat! v.8.8.2.8 (BETA) on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7600 No IMAP No OTFE Current version is 8.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sig cutoff
9/4/2019 9:13 AM Hi Tbudl, On 9/3/2019 tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com wrote: jlttcu> Hello Thomas Fernandez, jlttcu> On Tuesday, September 3, 2019, 2:21:55 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> ...and now it's gone. Weird. >> Can someboy lese using GMX please test this, so that we can see >> whether they cut trailing blanks in order to "improve" customer >> experience? jlttcu> I don't use GMX, but looking through other messages on the list, jlttcu> messages from Chris Wilson and Feli Wilke also appear to come via GMX jlttcu> (using a different domain name in Chris' case) and are also missing jlttcu> the space, so it does look like it could be a GMX issue. jlttcu> Thomas, if you DM me a reply, I can check to see whether the space is jlttcu> missing from that, which will rule out the list software doing jlttcu> something to messages via GMX. What causes GMX to perceive that they authority to edit ANY message??? - -- Paul The Bat! v.8.8.2.8 (BETA) on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7600 No IMAP No OTFE Current version is 8.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Sig cutoff
Hello Thomas, On Tuesday, September 3, 2019, you wrote: TF> Hello Thomas, TF> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 20:09:05 +0700 GMT (03-Sep-19, 20:09 +0700 GMT), TF> Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> Hello jb, >> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:26:45 +0100 GMT (03-Sep-19, 15:26 +0700 GMT), >> jb_lists...@trink.co.uk wrote: >>> Hello Thomas Fernandez, >>> On Monday, September 2, 2019, 2:28:46 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Funny thing, this: The cut-off works when I reply to your message, but not when I reply to my own. I double-checked, and yes, there is one black after the two dashes in my template... Please try to reply to your own message and see whether it works fine. -- >>> It appears from my message thread in TB (v8.8) that Thomas' cut mark >>> is missing the space (I've copied it into a text editor to >>> double-check) and Jack's is correct. >>> Jack's messages are therefore quoting correctly, and Thomas' aren't. >> The blank is definitely in the template, please see attached. I also >> checked when creating this reply. >> -- TF> ...and now it's gone. Weird. TF> Can someboy lese using GMX please test this, so that we can see TF> whether they cut trailing blanks in order to "improve" customer TF> experience? TF> -- TF> Cheers, TF> Thomas. TF> Message reply created with The Bat! Version 8.8.9 (64-bit) TF> under Windows 10.0 Build 18362 TF> TF> Current version is 8.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: TF> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html I checked before posting this, delimiter is present, two dashes and a space. -- Chris Wilson "Using The Bat! v5.8.10 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1" -- Current version is 8.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
