Re[2]: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-29 Thread Jamie Dainton

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Ming-Li,
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:00:40 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 3:00:40 AM (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,

Ming-Li wrote:

 No, they do not have to be an attachment. It can
 actually be the message itself and Outlook Express will
 recognize it as RTF and format it accordingly

ML Again, I could be mistaken, but AFAIK it's just OE manages to show
ML RTF attachment to you automatically, as it does with graphic
ML attachments. BTW, could you tell me what email program would format
ML its mail in RTF and send it as such?


RTF does not have to be sent as an attatchment. It can can just be a
message itself with it's encoding.

- --
 Jamie Dainton
 On Thursday, March 29, 2001 at 8:15:51 AM
 The Bat! 1.49
 Windows 98 4.10 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=sendKey

 Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOsLhW4P76OeRfCgzEQICugCfTG6qj5GOiYDWTrP0cNHZs5mRNrAAn1N+
ut1+vENLEmzwzIFY4alQhPOB
=F8x5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-29 Thread Jamie Dainton

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:23:52 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 5:23:52 AM (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,

Thomas wrote:

s We have learned that Melissa virus has recently been
s spreading again and may not be detected by any
s antivirus software including Norton AntiVirus.

T yawn Use PC-Cillin (www.antivirus.com) and be uneffected by about
T any changed file extensions. Standard setting is "scan all files,
T include boot sector".


Of course you could always use the other method. If anyone sends you
an attatchment mail them back before you open it. Ask them for an MD5
checksum and what the file is. If it's executable and you don't trust
them a lot then it's probably best to ignore it. Complete paranoia is
often the best defence against viruses.

Most O and OE problems can be fixed with the spydog patch and even
these programs support filtering which should allow you to consign all
messages with attatchments that end in .vbs to /dev/null

- --
 Jamie Dainton
 On Thursday, March 29, 2001 at 8:17:26 AM
 The Bat! 1.49
 Windows 98 4.10 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=sendKey

 Programming graphics in X is like finding sqrt(pi) using Roman numerals.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOsLiMoP76OeRfCgzEQLgbACdGMmYfwxBOl9EQ0utm7HFMrJdvGYAnjaG
r+K8lYMt9INo60j43ONdJfKG
=5F5W
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-29 Thread Ming-Li

On Wednesday, March 28, 2001 at 08:16:27 +0100 Jamie Dainton wrote:

 RTF does not have to be sent as an attatchment. It can can just be
 a message itself with it's encoding.

What got me curious is what emailer would encode its mail as rtf. Or
does it happen when one sends via MAPI from Word or other word
processor? What is it usually "formatted" (what's the "content
type"): as a hybrid with a plain text part and a rtf part (as with
most html mail), or just a rtf part (as with some html mail)?

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-29 Thread Stuart Tares

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, at 07:25:36 [GMT -0800] you wrote:

ML What got me curious is what emailer would encode its mail as rtf. Or
ML does it happen when one sends via MAPI from Word or other word
ML processor?

Any of the Microsoft mailers have an option to send an email out using
RTF.  This may even be the default.

Even if you change the client and traverse through an Exchange server,
the Exchange admin can force every outgoing mail to be in RTF format
:-(

Stuart
- --
I think, therefor I am... I think?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.3
Comment: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/

iQA/AwUBOsNirXjB/5h2FIaGEQI5XACfQKoxXIMpDv1XsbnulIzqOwgi8dQAnReV
+q6AYXYi1w39bCV19fYFtbwo
=AQ6D
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





OT: RTF mailers (was:: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus)

2001-03-29 Thread Markus Gloede

Hi,

On Thursday, March 29, 2001, 5:25:36 PM, Ming-Li wrote:

 What got me curious is what emailer would encode its mail as rtf.

Let me state for the record that Mail.app under NEXTSTEP used RTF for
formatting mail.

Regards,

Markus
-- 
Using The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 under Windows NT 4.0 Build
1381 Service Pack 5 

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-29 Thread Ming-Li

On Thursday, March 29, 2001 at 17:28:21 +0100 Stuart Tares wrote:

 Any of the Microsoft mailers have an option to send an email out
 using RTF.  This may even be the default.

H, this is new to me. OE was my emailer before switching to TB a
few months ago, and I never knew it sends "RTF" email. AFAICR, it
sends html mail by default. No idea about Outlook or Exchange
server, though. Thanks (to Markus, too) for the info.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-28 Thread SyP


Hello Thomas,

You [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 When will we discard ASCII, ISO-8859-x, Big5, GB2312, etc, and only
 use UTF?

The day TB 2.0 comes out with full UTF8 support, I will :)

Cheers, SyP
-- 
Why do rhetorical questions exist?

--
 Mi az Ön MailBox címe? - http://mailbox.hu
-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-28 Thread daveiw

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Marck,

Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 5:47:33 PM, you wrote:

MDP As we all know, TB2 has been "somewhat delayed" which may
MDP have thrown a minor spanner in the works.

Please tell me, where can I find useful information on TB! 2?

- --
Best regards,

Dave Wilson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(E-mail me subject: 'public key' and I will send it to you)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt Build 04

iQA/AwUBOsIDgYuowXdtlnXzEQKOawCg5jk/ETPaJUmIk/l60/e6zbck2qwAoL88
nzrhtIYr9d8dpSmZEGnXsJWJ
=48AV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-28 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi daveiw,

On 28 March 2001 at  16:29:59 +0100 (which was 16:29 where I  live)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone and made these points:

MDP As we all know, TB2 has been "somewhat delayed" which may
MDP have thrown a minor spanner in the works.

dcn Please tell me, where can I find useful information on TB! 2?

There is an interview with Stephan Tanurkov on the FAQ web site at
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html but it is wildly outdated,
having been published over a year ago (hence the "somewhat delayed"
remark).

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Consultant Software Engineer
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04)
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOsIJuTnkJKuSnc2gEQJUPACeLyn1IJPP9MQmP7rpMHhpdk61/OwAoJ+X
Fzs5tGPPGzCCRIEHYhnu7e9n
=FuDT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Christian Dysthe

Hello TBUDL,

  does anyone know when AVG Anti Virus mail check functionality will
  support The Bat? AVG uses MAPI, but The Bat's MAPI implementation
  doesn't work with AVG. Eudora's and OE's do.

  I remember a posting here letting me know that AVG is working on
  this. Any info would be greatly appreciated.

  TIA.

-- 
Best Regards,
Christian Dysthe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://christian.dysthe.tripod.com
ICQ: 3945810

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Christian,

On 27 March 2001 at 10:23:29 -0600 (which was 17:23 where I live)
Christian Dysthe wrote to TBUDL and made these points:

CD does anyone know when AVG Anti Virus mail check functionality will
CD support The Bat? AVG uses MAPI, but The Bat's MAPI implementation
CD doesn't work with AVG. Eudora's and OE's do.

CD I remember a posting here letting me know that AVG is working on
CD this. Any info would be greatly appreciated.

The guys at AVG use TB in-house. I'm sure they'd be keen on it but
they may have been waiting for TB2 so that they could do it as a
plug-in. As we all know, TB2 has been "somewhat delayed" which may
have thrown a minor spanner in the works.

It may be worth asking AVG.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Consultant Software Engineer
 
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  ]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt (build 04)
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness

iQA/AwUBOsDEJTnkJKuSnc2gEQIUngCePRnEXlVJtVwq1ucVxCinNLYpxn0AoKuG
TOQ3Aa2ZN0OlL032xztrXgML
=JR3d
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Marek Mikus

Hello all,
Tuesday, March 27, 2001, Christian Dysthe wrote:

   does anyone know when AVG Anti Virus mail check functionality will
   support The Bat? AVG uses MAPI, but The Bat's MAPI implementation
   doesn't work with AVG. Eudora's and OE's do.

   I remember a posting here letting me know that AVG is working on
   this. Any info would be greatly appreciated.

First of all, Grisoft (developer of AVG) works on POP3 proxy, which will
check mails going through it.

As I know, MAPI implmentation in TB is not possible to use with AVG.

Stefan told me, he will implement easy API interface for AV products and
as I asked AVG developers, if will be this implemented, they will do
plugin for TB.

But I don't know, when will be this implemented.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus

Using the best The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1
under the worst Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
Intel Celeron 266 MHz, 96 MB RAM

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Marck,

Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 11:47:33 AM, you wrote:

MDP The guys at AVG use TB in-house. I'm sure they'd be keen on it but
MDP they may have been waiting for TB2 so that they could do it as a
MDP plug-in. As we all know, TB2 has been "somewhat delayed" which may
MDP have thrown a minor spanner in the works.

Where can I find information on AVG?



-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! eMail v1.51
Windows NT 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 1)
Why are you wasting time reading taglines?



Shop online without a credit card
http://www.rocketcash.com
RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary
-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Ming-Li

On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 at 10:23:29 -0600 Christian Dysthe wrote:

   does anyone know when AVG Anti Virus mail check functionality
   will support The Bat? AVG uses MAPI, but The Bat's MAPI
   implementation doesn't work with AVG. Eudora's and OE's do.

So you want AVG to check outgoing mail for you, right? May I ask
why? TB creates and sends text-only messages, which are inherently
virus-free. As to attachments, well, if you have AVG installed, it
should have checked them on your HD, shouldn't it?

Or you just want the "virus free" statement added to your outgoing
mail, like:

 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.219 / Virus Database: 103 - Release Date: 12/05/00

I sometimes see this in newsgroups, and can't help but chuckle
(unless they have attachments). As I said, plain-text-only messages
are virus free by nature. As to attachments, I don't know why one
should trust the statement and not scan them oneself.

If you're not talking about outgoing mail, then I apologize. But
then, it has nothing to do with MAPI, AFAIK.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Marek Mikus

Hello all,
Tuesday, March 27, 2001, Ming-Li wrote:

 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.219 / Virus Database: 103 - Release Date: 12/05/00

 I sometimes see this in newsgroups, and can't help but chuckle
 (unless they have attachments). As I said, plain-text-only messages
 are virus free by nature. As to attachments, I don't know why one
 should trust the statement and not scan them oneself.

I'm in support mailinglist of this AV and as I remember, it should be
an option to "not" certificate mail without attachment.


-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus

Using the best The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1
under the worst Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 
Intel Celeron 266 MHz, 96 MB RAM

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread syv

On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 , Ming-Li wrote the
following in regards to: [The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus]

.


 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.219 / Virus Database: 103 - Release Date: 12/05/00

ML I sometimes see this in newsgroups, and can't help but chuckle
ML (unless they have attachments). As I said, plain-text-only messages
ML are virus free by nature. As to attachments, I don't know why one
ML should trust the statement and not scan them oneself.

Actually, you are mistaken. Viruses can be spread
through RTF files. RTF files and documents are supposed
to be ASCII only, and there can be macro viruses.

Of course TB cannot execute these, but Outlook and
Outlook Express can.


.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

REAL PROBLEMS / REAL SOLUTION
ISSN: 1492-7829

A free weekly newsletter on Windows and networking
email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.911networks.com

Copyright 1999-2001 by 911networks.com - All Rights Reserved

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[3]: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread ztrader

On Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 1:02:47 PM, syv wrote:

s Actually, you are mistaken. Viruses can be spread through RTF
s files. RTF files and documents are supposed to be ASCII only, and
s there can be macro viruses.

How can this happen? AFAIK RTF does not have 'dangerous commands'. Is
this just an odd behavior of Outlook? Could you give an (innocuous)
example?

Thanks,

ztrader

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Rob

Hello all,

on Tue, 27 Mar 2001, at 13:27:23 local time (GMT -0800), ztrader wrote:

 How can this happen? AFAIK RTF does not have 'dangerous commands'

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms00-005.asp

-- 
Rob
using The Bat! 1.51

... I don't mind the rat race but I could do with a little more cheese.

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Ming-Li

On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 at 22:25:57 +0200 Marek Mikus wrote:

 I'm in support mailinglist of this AV and as I remember, it should
 be an option to "not" certificate mail without attachment.

But how is the default setting? And does it know how to distinguish
plain-text messages from html ones?

Regardless, my point is: as a recipient, I don't know what to make
of the statement. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAICT,
there's no way to verify the statement. IOW, I could put the
statement into my template and suddenly all my message would appear
to be AVG certified. If that's the case, those lines don't do much
good except blowing up the message size, IMHO.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Ming-Li

On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 at 13:02:47 -0800 syv wrote:

ML I sometimes see this in newsgroups, and can't help but chuckle
ML (unless they have attachments). As I said, plain-text-only
ML messages are virus free by nature. As to attachments, I don't
ML know why one should trust the statement and not scan them
ML oneself.

 Actually, you are mistaken. Viruses can be spread
 through RTF files. RTF files and documents are supposed
 to be ASCII only, and there can be macro viruses.

I think there's some misunderstanding here. I've said "plain-text"
messages *without* attachment are virus-free by nature. RTF files
are attachments, aren't they?

Second, I don't think plain-text email includes everything that can
be read with a text editor. If that's the case, even html mail is
plain-text mail, isn't it?

Third, many programs (in its broadest sense, including macros,
scripts, etc.) are stored in a way that can be read with a plain
text editor (no binary data included). E.g., .prg (for Dbase), .vbs
(visual basic scripts), .bat files and many others.

But I don't think you'll call them "plain-text" file, and their
functionality depends on a proper "interpreter". When they're not
interpreted--i.e., when they're loaded by a plain-text editor (to
view their source codes)--they can do no harm, for a plain-text
editor would not "execute" the embedded commands.

So I think my statement still stands, though I would be happened to
be enlightened. :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/1 | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[4]: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread syv

On Tuesday, March 27, 2001 , ztrader wrote the
following in regards to: [The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus]

.

z On Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 1:02:47 PM, syv wrote:

s Actually, you are mistaken. Viruses can be spread through RTF
s files. RTF files and documents are supposed to be ASCII only, and
s there can be macro viruses.

z How can this happen? AFAIK RTF does not have 'dangerous commands'. Is
z this just an odd behavior of Outlook? Could you give an (innocuous)
z example?

 http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/melissa-rtf.html

Warning about Melissa Virus in .rtf files

We have learned that Melissa virus has recently been
spreading again and may not be detected by any
antivirus software including Norton AntiVirus. It is
important to note that this is not a new variant of the
Melissa virus.

What we have confirmed a Word document infected by
W97M.Melissa.A with the file extension of .rtf is being
sent out to many users though email. These documents
are not actually in .rtf format files as the file
extension name suggests, but is actually a Word format
file that has had the file extension name renamed to
.rtf. If the antivirus software is not configured to
scan the .rtf file extension, the virus will not be
detected.

To protect yourself from this virus, Symantec AntiVirus
Research Center recommends to update the configuration
in Norton AntiVirus to include the .rtf file extension
as well as the following file extensions in the Scanner
and Auto-Protect options.

Complete List of File Extension Recommended for Scanning:

386, ADT, BIN, CBT, CLA, COM, CPL, CSC, DLL, DOC, DOT,
DRV, EXE, HTM, HTT, JS, MDB, MSO, OV?, POT, PPT, RTF,
SCR, SHS, SYS, VBS, XL?

To add .rtf to your list of Program Files to be scanned
in NAV 95 and NAV NT:

1. Open Norton AntiVirus 
2. Click Options. The Options dialog appears. 
3. Click the Scanner Tab.
4. Click Select... in the "What to scan" section. 
NOTE: This button is dimmed (greyed out) if you have the All Files radio button 
selected. 
The Program File Extensions dialog will appear. 
5. Click New... . 
6. Type RTF in the resulting box and then click OK. 
7. Click OK in the Options dialog. 

.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

REAL PROBLEMS / REAL SOLUTION
ISSN: 1492-7829

A free weekly newsletter on Windows and networking
email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.911networks.com

Copyright 1999-2001 by 911networks.com - All Rights Reserved

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Thomas

Hi Ming-Li and syv,

On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:00:40 -0800GMT (28/03/2001, 10:00 +0800GMT),
Ming-Li wrote:

 No, they do not have to be an attachment. It can
 actually be the message itself and Outlook Express will
 recognize it as RTF and format it accordingly

 Actually most of the time HTML email is plain text.

Right. Then this is plain text also:

iQA/AwUBOrDlTp5u2uXbByI9EQJwvgCgzZneOqd6euittyJh9/di+cYaYokAn2l

because I can open it in a text editor. From which amount/precentage
of code / keywords / other stuff not intended to be read by humans
would you start saying "this is not plain text any more"?

ML H, I think we have different definition about what plain-text
ML email is. I'm not sure I'm right, though I still think I'm. :-)

I think you are. ;-)

ML HTML and RTF are, AFAIK, marked text. I don't think they're
ML considered "plain text", especially in the context of email.

They are not. They contain instructions to the computer.

ML Yes, RTF and HTML files are ASCII files in the sense that it can be
ML read with a text editor. But when you load a html (or rtf) with a
ML text editor, none of the "commands" (the markup codes) is "executed"
ML (interpreted). Hence, executing a .bat file can be harmful, but
ML loading a .bat in a text editor cannot.

Correct. But a .bat file can be a plain-text message, if one
programmer sends it to the other in the body of the message (not as
attachment) and says "have a look at my code, please".

ML BTW, I don't think only ASCII code 32 to 126 are used in today's
ML "text". At least for CJK text, ASCII codes higher than 126 are used,
ML too.

When will we discard ASCII, ISO-8859-x, Big5, GB2312, etc, and only
use UTF?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Anmeldung unter:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.51
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: The Bat! and AVG Anti Virus

2001-03-27 Thread Thomas

Hi syv,

On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:04:36 -0800GMT (28/03/2001, 09:04 +0800GMT),
syv wrote:

s We have learned that Melissa virus has recently been
s spreading again and may not be detected by any
s antivirus software including Norton AntiVirus.

yawn Use PC-Cillin (www.antivirus.com) and be uneffected by about
any changed file extensions. Standard setting is "scan all files,
include boot sector".

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Anmeldung unter:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.51
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.



-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org