Re: composing email with japanese characters in utf-8 w/ microed seems to fail
Hello WL, On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:16:03 +0900 GMT (14/03/2006, 11:16 +0700 GMT), WL wrote: W I'm pretty sure this isn't a font display issue: I can switch the editor font to W something that I know can display the chracters, but I still end up with ???. W Switching the encoding to another character set like JIS or EUC-JP will draw W the character correctly. The windows editor will draw the characters correctly W with utf-8. My preference, however, would be to use microed with utf-8. AFAIK MicroEd doesn't support UTF (yet). -- Cheers, Thomas. Atmen Sie bewusster: Jeweils zehn Minuten lang einatmen, Luft anhalten und ausatmen. Das ermuedet rasch. * http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.71.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
composing email with japanese characters in utf-8 w/ microed seems to fail
Hello, all. Coming back to a newer version of bat (3.71.03), and seeing if I may have missed something before filing a bug. I'm composing an email with japanese characters. Options-character set is set to unicode (utf-8). I can create the characters, but the words are left as ??? in the body. I'm pretty sure this isn't a font display issue: I can switch the editor font to something that I know can display the chracters, but I still end up with ???. Switching the encoding to another character set like JIS or EUC-JP will draw the character correctly. The windows editor will draw the characters correctly with utf-8. My preference, however, would be to use microed with utf-8. Any ideas? -- WL Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Need help for importing unicode UTF-8 characters set in TB3.
Hello, I've found that mails which are not well viewed in TB when they are HTML are those which are encoded in unicode UTF-8. I see in preferences that I can add a set. Someone could help me to find the table UTF-8 (web link or sending me the set by e-mail off-list), in the format of TB (XLT, XLAT ?) and say me how to import it in TB ? Thanks -- WilWilWil :flag-france: TB 3.0.1.33 BayesIt! 0.7.8 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hello Roman, On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:38:47 -0500 GMT (04/03/2005, 10:38 +0700 GMT), Roman Katzer wrote: RK Hey, we're talking about re-educating my sister here. Forget it ;) g -- Cheers, Thomas. Schule (Tollwut! Gefaehrdeter Bezirk.) * Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hello Roman, On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:26:32 +0700 GMT (02/03/2005, 23:26 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF Can you send me the message as MIME-attachment by PM? I want to play TF with the settings a bit. I received it. It is a multipart message. The first part: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 displays correctly in TB. It is shown when using the Text tab in my viewer. The second part: Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 displays incorrectly, as in your screenshot. TB will show it when clicking on the HTML tab. RK Is this worth a bug report? Yes, but to the list pertaining to the mailer the sender used: X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 18. September 2003 The reason is that TB uses the same module, namely the RTV, for displaying either part, so I don't think TB can be the problem. So I guess it's an incorrect translation into HTML that causes the problem. I don't have a tool to show the Base64-encoded message parts in plain text, otherwise I could pinpoint any wrong HTML umlaut encodings further. But I think this is exactly what is happening. On a side remark, this message uses only plain text, so there is no need for HTML anyway, but that's of cause not the point and very OT. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Unter dem Einfluss von Alkohol griff eine naechtliche Polizeistreife einen Pkw-Fahrer aus Minden. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hello MFPA, On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:21:26 + GMT (03/03/2005, 09:21 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: it really is a shortcoming of MicroEd, which cannot display UTF. So it's not really a TB bug. M Is MicroEd not part of TB!? Since it is integrated the answer must be: Yes. You are right, then. For the user that is transparent, but I understand the programmers too. For me it is an annoyance and not a bug, but I'm not religious about the terminology. I too would like to display UTF in the PTV. M Select Reply | View | Original Text and the original text window M uses the PTV. (Perhaps depending on your settings) It uses the PTV, but it loses the UTF-encoding. TB's editor is not capable of creating UTF-encoded messages. So MicroEd is used, but not UTF. That's why it displays fine when replying. It also means that MicroEd is able to translate from UTF into supported encodings, and basically, this is all we ask for the Viewer as well. M You might wish to support this one I submitted previously:- M https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4067 I added a bugnote. -- Cheers, Thomas. When nobody is looking, Power Users pretend their mouse is a toy car, and race it around the desk. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
On Thursday, March 3, 2005, 11:11:34, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Yes, but to the list pertaining to the mailer the sender used: X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 18. September 2003 On a side remark, this message uses only plain text, so there is no need for HTML anyway, but that's of cause not the point and very OT. Hey, we're talking about re-educating my sister here. Forget it ;) Regards, Roman -- It has ever been my experience that folks who have no vices have very few virtues. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hello Roman, On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:12:49 -0500 GMT (02/03/2005, 12:12 +0700 GMT), Roman Katzer wrote: RK Thanks for the suggestion. I had tried and not mentioned that. RK It didn't help. As you suspected correctly, the encoding shown was none, RK setting it to Auto made it choose Central European. Neither that nor RK Latin-9 worked. Can you send me the message as MIME-attachment by PM? I want to play with the settings a bit. RK Is this worth a bug report? I'm not sure about that. I always saw UTF-support in the PTV as a feature request, right-clicking and changing the encoding manually has always helped over here. Which font are you using in the RTV? Which Windows version are you using? -- Cheers, Thomas. If a man speaks in the forest and there is no woman around to hear him, is he still wrong? Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hi On Wednesday 2 March 2005 at 5:12:49 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roman Katzer wrote: Is this worth a bug report? There are already several about UTF-8. Perhaps this is related to one of them? -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hi On Wednesday 2 March 2005 at 4:26:32 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Fernandez wrote: I always saw UTF-support in the PTV as a feature request, right-clicking and changing the encoding manually has always helped over here. From my point of view, switching to the rich text viewer to display certain message - against my wishes and contrary to the options I have set to view all messages as plain text - is a bug. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hello MFPA, On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:56:16 + GMT (03/03/2005, 04:56 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: M From my point of view, switching to the rich text viewer to M display certain message - against my wishes and contrary to the M options I have set to view all messages as plain text - is a bug. Fair point, but it really is a shortcoming of MicroEd, which cannot display UTF. So it's not really a TB bug. For the user that is transparent, but I understand the programmers too. For me it is an annoyance and not a bug, but I'm not religious about the terminology. I too would like to display UTF in the PTV. If you hand in a bugreport, I'll support it if you post the full URL here. -- Cheers, Thomas. Manche Leute haben einen geistigen Horizont mit Radius 0 und nennen das dann ihren Standpunkt. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hi On Thursday 3 March 2005 at 1:56:17 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Fernandez wrote: it really is a shortcoming of MicroEd, which cannot display UTF. So it's not really a TB bug. Is MicroEd not part of TB!? For the user that is transparent, but I understand the programmers too. For me it is an annoyance and not a bug, but I'm not religious about the terminology. I too would like to display UTF in the PTV. Select Reply | View | Original Text and the original text window uses the PTV. (Perhaps depending on your settings) If you hand in a bugreport, I'll support it if you post the full URL here. You might wish to support this one I submitted previously:- https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4067 -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
no UTF-8 support in TB?
Is there no UTF-8 (Unicode) support in TB? I got a mail encoded in UTF-8 and the special characters are displayed wrongly. Regards, Roman -- If you must drink, please don't drive. Don't even putt. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hello Roman, On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:25:53 -0500 GMT (01/03/2005, 21:25 +0700 GMT), Roman Katzer wrote: RK Is there no UTF-8 (Unicode) support in TB? There is support but it is no good. What happens is that TB switches from the PTV (plain-text viewer) to the RTV (rich-text viewer) automatically to display a message that is UTF-encoded. One of my favourite annoyances. RK I got a mail encoded in UTF-8 and the special characters are RK displayed wrongly. Check which font you have set under: Options / Preferences / Viewer/Editor / HTML Viewer. It appears that the font there does not support the special characters you are missing. -- Cheers, Thomas. Die Pille fuer den Mann wurde bei 2 000 Maennern getestet. Und tatsaechlich - keiner von ihnen bekam ein Kind! Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hi Thomas, On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 09:40:56, Thomas Fernandez wrote: RK I got a mail encoded in UTF-8 and the special characters are RK displayed wrongly. Check which font you have set under: Options / Preferences / Viewer/Editor / HTML Viewer. It appears that the font there does not support the special characters you are missing. It seems to have special characters, but the wrong ones are used. I'll try to attach a screenshot. It's about 3KB in size. Regards, Roman -- You can tell the ideals of a nation by its advertisements. -- Norman Douglas Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 17:13:20, Roman Katzer wrote: I'll try to attach a screenshot. It's about 3KB in size. *grrmbl* I thought attachments up to 25KB could be sent? Seems that the list software filters everything out. Here it is: http://home.comcast.net/~merlynzero/utf8bad.png Regards, Roman -- Resurrected characters do it again and again and again... Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hello Roman, On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 19:19:57 -0500 GMT (02/03/2005, 07:19 +0700 GMT), Roman Katzer wrote: RK Here it is: RK http://home.comcast.net/~merlynzero/utf8bad.png Richt-click in the message body and see which encoding is used. It probably shows None. Change that to Central European (ISO or Windows) or to Latin-9. See whether that helps. -- Cheers, Thomas. Dates are for having fun, and people should use them to get to know each other. Even boys have something to say if you listen long enough. (Lynnette, age 8) Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 21:11:30, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Richt-click in the message body and see which encoding is used. It probably shows None. Change that to Central European (ISO or Windows) or to Latin-9. See whether that helps. Thanks for the suggestion. I had tried and not mentioned that. It didn't help. As you suspected correctly, the encoding shown was none, setting it to Auto made it choose Central European. Neither that nor Latin-9 worked. Is this worth a bug report? Regards, Roman -- I'm thinking to myself that I'm writing this review on a better computer than the one that got us to the moon. -- Roger Ebert reviewing Apollo 13 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
On Wednesday, March 2, 2005, 6:12:49, Roman Katzer wrote: Is this worth a bug report? Look at the message headers first. Unless the charset is declared there, it's not a bug in TB, but a bug in whichever client generated that message. -- Jernej Simoncic http://deepthought.ena.si/ Variables won't; constants aren't. -- Osborn's Law Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: no UTF-8 support in TB?
Hello Jernej, On Wednesday, March 2, 2005, at 08:47 Lithuanian Time, you wrote: JS Look at the message headers first. Unless the charset is declared there, JS it's not a bug in TB, but a bug in whichever client generated that message. I've noticed that The Bat can't display UTF-8 encoded HTML messages. Plain text version of the same message is displayed OK. Just another bug of The Bat! -- Edvinas Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:32:00 -0500GMT (11-2-2005, 3:32 +0100, where I live), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: F On 17.décembre.2004, 07:51 F (Now: 10.février.2005, 21:31), F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HdB On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 19:58:45 +0800GMT HdB (17-12-2004, 12:58 +0100, where HdB I live), you wrote: I'm having problem using built-in GnuPG starting from version 1.3.92. Now that the stable version 1.4.0 has been released, the same error remains. gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available Anyone knows the work-around for this? Clearsigned using gpgshel HdB Confirmed, I already have mentioned this on TBBETA. HdB AFAIK there is no work-around for this, I fell back to 1.2.5 :-( HdB I checked it with Thunderbird 1.0 with Enigmail and it worked fine! HdB Do you put it on BT? F Are you able to make it work with 1.2.5? F I am unable since I get the same error :/ Sorry for not responding sooner but I was away for a couple of days. 1.2.5 and the Bat! worked ok and that also goes for the version I am using now: 1.4.1rc1 - -- Henk __ The Bat! Natural Email System v3.0.1.33nl Professional on Windows XP SP2 PGPkey available at http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x12069B93DBE6E678 Gossamer Spider Web of Trust GSWoT http://www.gswot.org/ A Progressive and Innovative Web of Trust -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc1 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.955 iD8DBQFCD5LKEgabk9vm5ngRAunsAJ9tC/w0W/LegLL/tpeoTBPHCpyDVACg5Wm5 PkuK+XUbwMuQqe4+YOdgjD4= =AxV9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available
Hello Henk de Bruijn On 17.décembre.2004, 07:51 (Now: 10.février.2005, 21:31), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HdB Hello omn, HdB On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 19:58:45 +0800GMT HdB (17-12-2004, 12:58 +0100, where HdB I live), you wrote: I'm having problem using built-in GnuPG starting from version 1.3.92. Now that the stable version 1.4.0 has been released, the same error remains. gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available Anyone knows the work-around for this? Clearsigned using gpgshel HdB Confirmed, I already have mentioned this on TBBETA. HdB AFAIK there is no work-around for this, I fell back to 1.2.5 :-( HdB I checked it with Thunderbird 1.0 with Enigmail and it worked fine! HdB Do you put it on BT? Are you able to make it work with 1.2.5? I am unable since I get the same error :/ -- The Final Cut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thebat: 3.0.2.10 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: UTF-8 messages not recognised as pgp-encrypted by TB!
Hi, Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 4:34:26 AM, MPFA wrote: Incoming messages that are encoded with the utf-8 character set and then pgp-encrypted (inline) are are not recognised as PGP-encrypted messages by TB!. No button is provided to decrypt and so the message cannot be read within TB! Anybody confirm this? Yes. I face the same problem. I have to use Gpgshell current window to decrypt. -- Best regards, omnmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kajang, Malaysia Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
UTF-8 messages not recognised as pgp-encrypted by TB!
Hi Incoming messages that are encoded with the utf-8 character set and then pgp-encrypted (inline) are are not recognised as PGP-encrypted messages by TB!. No button is provided to decrypt and so the message cannot be read within TB! Anybody confirm this? -- Best regards, MFPA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm having problem using built-in GnuPG starting from version 1.3.92. Now that the stable version 1.4.0 has been released, the same error remains. gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available Anyone knows the work-around for this? [Clearsigned using gpgshell] - -- Best regards, omn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kajang, Malaysia -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.30 iD8DBQFBwsnLD4z+linXN40RAjdDAJ9Msr3qC9C+oay/0HvOpgNOhmYvQACgyc3t qgCxiDs8gO/LOcjU1OZs5o0= =K03I -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available
Hello omn, On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 19:58:45 +0800GMT (17-12-2004, 12:58 +0100, where I live), you wrote: I'm having problem using built-in GnuPG starting from version 1.3.92. Now that the stable version 1.4.0 has been released, the same error remains. gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available Anyone knows the work-around for this? Clearsigned using gpgshel Confirmed, I already have mentioned this on TBBETA. AFAIK there is no work-around for this, I fell back to 1.2.5 :-( I checked it with Thunderbird 1.0 with Enigmail and it worked fine! Do you put it on BT? -- Henk. __ :tbflag: The Bat! Natural Email System v3.0.1nl Professional on Windows XP SP2 PGP Key Request: See Headers or send email with subj.: send HenksKeyID Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://gswot.webhop.info/ pgpzN94fx0osi.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available
Dear Henk, @17-Dec-2004, 13:51 +0100 (17-Dec 12:51 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to omn: gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available Anyone knows the work-around for this? Clearsigned using gpgshel HDB Confirmed, I already have mentioned this on TBBETA. HDB AFAIK there is no work-around for this, I fell back to 1.2.5 :-( HDB I checked it with Thunderbird 1.0 with Enigmail and it worked fine! HDB Do you put it on BT? I was gonna ask you that very question. :-). (confirmed here too BTW). -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 ' pgpsKTjbVDh4H.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: gpg: conversion from utf-8 to CPO not available
Hello omn, A reminder of what omn on TBUDL typed on: 17 December 2004 at 13:28:08 GMT +0100 o Anyone knows the work-around for this? Yes, use a different version of PGP. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 17/12/2004 at 13:41 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5. 1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt pgpJ4pPl9WRIi.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-=[ UTF-8 ]=-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone ! Saturday, November 20, 2004. 02:06:21 I'm pretty much new to this mailing list, and I don't know if you have already discussed this topic, but... I pretty much manage to do everything related to Bat! on my own, but one thing I can't find info on is UTF-8 support. I have many friends using Linux, and they write by default to UTF-8 encoding. Problem is that they use Cyrillic code set, and this kind of conversion in Bat just won't work. I can read every mail properly, but when trying to reply, I end up with bunch of signs. Is there a way to outflank this or I'm left to the mercy of Ritlabs their wish list, where UTF-8 full support is already for about 2 years as I'm aware of. 10x very much. - -- Kind Regards, Milan \|||/ (o o) ___ +---oooO--(_)+ ---' ) || __) | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | __)|| () +---Ooo--+ ---.__(___) |__|__| || || ooO Ooo Currently Listening: Paul Oakenfold - Ibiza CD2 (Has Lyrics) --Foobar 2000-- --Foobar 2000--: PLAYING Days to New Year : 42 Days to My Birthday: 84 Secure Bat Lite Version: 2.12.3 Tagline of the day: Microsoft is not Y2K compliant: Windows 95, 98, ... and back again to 01 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBnpp51YZ39xOKLlgRAgmpAJ0XUHTJEKWXCu/YgQSVB4ooX3rgIgCfRVcn Z5jlXaZE+iRYHmGD0B483lg= =br5t -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: -=[ UTF-8 ]=-
Hallo Milan, On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 02:14:45 +0100GMT (20-11-2004, 2:14 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MG I pretty much manage to do everything related to Bat! on my own, but one thing I MG can't find info on is UTF-8 support. That's because it's still a promise, not a feature. -- Groetjes, Roelof When you go to the market, use your eyes, not your ears. The Bat! 3.0.2.7 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgpfV4aNcLOfD.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: UTF-8
Hello Cyrille, On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:56:35 +0200 GMT (17/06/2004, 04:56 +0700 GMT), Cyrille wrote: C there are rumors that Ritlabs plans to make TB fully UTF-8 C compatible (not only Unicode decoding, but also encoding). C Does anybody knows a bit more about what is planned ? So far, it is only a rumour, even though I think Stefan started it some time ago. I hope it will be implemented soon, but we haven't heard a word from Ritlabs about this for a long time. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. FLATULANCE: Emergency vehicle that picks you up when you've been run over by a steam roller Message reply created with The Bat! 2.11 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
UTF-8
Hello Tbudl, there are rumors that Ritlabs plans to make TB fully UTF-8 compatible (not only Unicode decoding, but also encoding). Does anybody knows a bit more about what is planned ? -- Best regards, Cyrille mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ TB! 2.11.02, Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000, Pentium 233Mhz with 95MB ] Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: XLAT-Table for UTF-8?
Hæ! Tuesday, September 30, 2003, 22:20, Marek Mikus wrote: no, but Unicode should be supported very soon, AFAIK. Soon? According to Bugtrack Unicode-support is open since January 2002... ;) -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media http://www.aesir.de/ [The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 3] Listening to: DeutschlandRadio Berlin Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: XLAT-Table for UTF-8?
Hæ! Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 11:36, Thorvald Neumann wrote: Soon? According to Bugtrack Unicode-support is open since January 2002... ;) It is in the Wishlist section... https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=234 -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media http://www.aesir.de/ [The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 3] Listening to: DeutschlandRadio Berlin Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
XLAT-Table for UTF-8?
Hæ! Is there a XLAT-table available for UTF-8 encoding? I have tried searching with Google, but I did not find any reasonable result. :( -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media http://www.aesir.de/ [The Bat! v2.00.22 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 3] Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: XLAT-Table for UTF-8?
Hello all, Tuesday, September 30, 2003, Thorvald Neumann wrote: Is there a XLAT-table available for UTF-8 encoding? I have tried searching with Google, but I did not find any reasonable result. :( no, but Unicode should be supported very soon, AFAIK. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 2.00.22 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 AMD ThunderBird 1,2 GHz, 512 MB RAM Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Displaying charset=UTF-8
Hello all, In the past few days I have received a few messages in UFT-8, the headers include this line: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To my surprise, when viewing these messages either in the preview pane or message window, they are not displayed with the font and size (Courier New, 12 bold) I have selected for my FTV, and no quote colouring at all. The whole message is displayed with same font and size (maybe Courier 10), no bold and no colours. Has anybody else seen this? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.00.6 Winamp OFF: Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Displaying charset=UTF-8
Hello MAU, On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:47:01 +0200 GMT (28/09/2003, 15:47 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To my surprise, when viewing these messages either in the preview pane or message window, they are not displayed with the font and size (Courier New, 12 bold) I have selected for my FTV, and no quote colouring at all. The whole message is displayed with same font and size (maybe Courier 10), no bold and no colours. TB is switching to the RTV, that's the font you are seeing. No tab or other option to view this in the PTV. Has anybody else seen this? Yes, it has been confirmed and reported, and in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA Marek Mikus said: this problem was already fixed, please wait for next version. Well, I have the next version (beta), and messages sent UTF-encoded are still displayed in the RTV. I'll check again on the beta list... -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Ever notice that PRICE and WORTH mean the same thing, but priceless and worthless are opposites? -- Jay Trachman Message reply created with The Bat! 2.00.18 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Displaying charset=UTF-8
Hello Thomas, TB is switching to the RTV, that's the font you are seeing. No tab or other option to view this in the PTV. Thanks for the info. It's no big deal, as long as it is already known I can wait for next release :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.00.6 Winamp OFF: Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Displaying charset=UTF-8
Hello all, Sunday, September 28, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote: TB is switching to the RTV, that's the font you are seeing. No tab or other option to view this in the PTV. Has anybody else seen this? Yes, it has been confirmed and reported, and in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBBETA Marek Mikus said: this problem was already fixed, please wait for next version. Well, I have the next version (beta), and messages sent UTF-encoded are still displayed in the RTV. I'll check again on the beta list... I have answered to part but sometimes a UTF-8 messages generates the already mentioned error message and the message cannot be read., this error was fixed. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 2.00.18 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 AMD ThunderBird 1,2 GHz, 512 MB RAM Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Displaying charset=UTF-8
Hello Marek, On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:43:02 +0200 GMT (28/09/2003, 18:43 +0700 GMT), Marek Mikus wrote: Well, I have the next version (beta), and messages sent UTF-encoded are still displayed in the RTV. I'll check again on the beta list... I have answered to part but sometimes a UTF-8 messages generates the already mentioned error message and the message cannot be read., this error was fixed. I see your message referred to the Invalid HTML message, not what I was referring to. And Stefan has already replied in the beta list that that MicroEd (the PTV) cannot display Unicode. That answers my question. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. 13. Los Angeles's full name is El Pueblo de Nuestra Senora la Reina de los Angeles de Porciuncula and can be abbreviated to 3.63% of its size,L.A. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.00.18 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Unreadable utf-8 e-mails
Hi there, I often receive e-mails that are displayed as an empty HTML page in TheBat. Checking with F9 I found that all these have the following settings: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Unfortunately all I see when I switch the view window from HTML to plain text are a few words of the e-mail. In the XLAT Tables utf-8 is not present and I did not find a suitable translation table on the web. According to TheBat history uft-8 support this should have been fixed in version 1.42 If I save the message.htm file and view it with a browser it is also nearly empty, but if I forward the message to another e-mail client and view the e-mail attachment there I can read the text. Any help appreciated. -- TIA Chris The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
