Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

[Rajaram Krishnamurthy]

8:56:02 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I am not here to cure your mental illness; nothing is left out except
>>> your guilt alone pricks you to dance your dummy brain. there are 3 points
>>> of your avivelam mentioned, in which the second was "not reading in between
>>> the lines; and under there is no stand etc as you assumed; when you do not
>>> get the idea that all the three quality-under you are there , then you are
>>> pathetic; I know your capacity of childish understanding; you are the three
>>> clouded UNDER. Rajaram writes with an intonation which LKG may not
>>> understand; here is stand ; so use those malayalam words for yourself,
>>> instead of mad dog sentences as if trying to become smart; in that time you
>>> can read and vet your Q and A. KR  NB  try to understand the inner meaning
>>> than word watching without your sense
>>>
>>> -- Forwarded message -
>>> From: *gopala krishnan* 
>>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 at 09:16
>>> Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
>>> To: keralaiy...@googlegroups.com ,
>>> Narayanaswamy Iyer , Iyer ,
>>> Patty Thatha , Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>> keyarinc...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mr Rajaram,
>>>
>>> I pointed out your reaction, by missing words in your response. You
>>> don't reccognize it . There is a Malayalam saying"Uthram Muttiyal Konjanam
>>> Kutthum"( If not able to answer, make bad body movements.) That is
>>> responding by writing-  Has he gone mad
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 06:41:00 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Has he gone Mad ? Really I think -Qand A  Can you tell a mad joke?
>>>
>>> -- Forwarded message -
>>> From: *gopala krishnan* 
>>> Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:29
>>> Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
>>> To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy , Patty Thatha <
>>> thatha_patty@googlegroups.com>, Kerala Iyer <
>>> keralaiy...@googlegroups.com>, Iyer ,
>>> Narayanaswamy Iyer , APS Mani 
>>>
>>>
>>> Mr Rajaram,
>>>
>>> In your reaction you wrote- *not* reading in between lines, perhaps you
>>> meant reading in between lines.
>>>
>>> In your reaction you wrote-"If you are not a learned to *under* that
>>> only you" perhaps you meant understand and not under.
>>>
>>> You have used Brahmin tribe in your posting at many places.
>>>
>>> I have applied concentrated phenol all over, still the *fly* is coming
>>> and sitting some where.   What to do with the fly?
>>>  Gopalakrishnan
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:17:08 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I know your lack of knowledge, not reading in between the lines, when
>>> someone writes, and hasty generalisation alone place you in misery; as long
>>> as you are controlled by that Singapore Butler and canteen server your
>>> resurrection is impossible. I have written clearly " *Only people like
>>> your tribe in those ages within 500 years" -*means
>>> illiterate narayanasamy sharma and yourself formed a tribe and similar
>>> tribe exited 500 years before harmed the society of brahmins varna not
>>> caste, reducing the status of women  So tribe is only correctly used. If
>>> you are not a learned to under that only you , you look so pathetic ; INDA
>>> KOSUTHOLLAI THANGA MUDIYALLIYE NARAYANA Goundamani joke KR IRS 7524
>>>
>>> On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 21:04, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <
>>> iyer...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sir,
>>>
>>> You have not still pointed out his statement- Brahmin *tribe.*  There
>>> is difference between caste and tribe.
>>>
>>> I have never read in any book a Brahmin, Kshathriya, Vaisya or Soodra is
>>> included in  TRIBE. They are included under castes. *Probably in Mr
>>> Rajaram's Lexicon it may be so. *
>>>
>>> Only those who lived in tribal areas were/ are called tribal.
>>> Gopalakrishnan
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 07:20:30 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer <
>>> iyern...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>&

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

[Rajaram Krishnamurthy]

waiting for proof  KR  What have you written> better write well; I am not
able to understand anything? how lies can understood? KR

On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 08:29, 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty <
thatha_patty@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Dear Mr Sharma,
>
> I am very happy and proud to know Mr Tarsem Lal , a commerce graduate from
> army wrote U P S C Examination and got selected to IRS. While I was working
> in Trivandrum Training centre as senior Lecturer, one Mr Tampi joined from
> air force after passing U P S C  and posted to ITS as Director. His air
> force certificate was equivalent to Engineering degree.
>
> I am also told  about the negatives and non popularity of Mr Rajaram, by
> one of his colleagues, but not to disclose his name.Through these years of
> interaction I  am also forced to think, Mr Rajaram is having more
> negatives.
>
> I recollect once Mr Rajaram wrote in the groups, from one of his B S N L
> friend in Chennai, I was most unpopular. He never knew I am a different
> person from Kerala circle. Mr Rajaram goes to sudden conclusions.
>
> Sir, Please stop abusing words. We are far far above Mr Rajaram. Let us
> prove it to him.
> Gopalakrishnan
>
>
> On Thursday, 9 May, 2024 at 04:06:57 pm IST, Laxminarayan Sarma <
> laxminarayan.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> *And Shri Gopalakrishnan-ji *
>
> *I temember my personal batm*
>
> *,Sepoy Tarsem Lal, graduated in Commerce*
>
> *while serving in the army, took the UPSC*
>
> *Exam , joined the IRS and rose to a high*
>
> * position *
>
> *I ran into him one day and he told me that *
>
> *he knew about a loud-mouthed bombastic, *
>
> *arrogant Madrasi Choothiya called Rajaram*
>
> *I DON'T know which Rajaram he referred to *
>
> *but from his description, I'm sure that*
>
> *he referred to the Thengalai Tgevidiya PUNDAI *
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 9 May, 2024, 3:55 pm Laxminarayan Sarma, <
> laxminarayan.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> *Dear Gopalakrishnan-ji *
>
> *Let's appeal to the administrator of this*
>
> *group a an interpretor/translator*
>
> *specialising in gibberish to interpret the out*
>
> *pouring of some weird bi-peds that emit*
>
> *more gas and sound than sense*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 9 May, 2024, 7:28 am 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123, <
> iyer...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Mr Rajaram,
>
> Here as a Brahmin, you are putting your legs in slippery ground. When I
> write something, why do you include any other member, unless I mention of
> them?
> I pointed out your hurried nature  and reaction. Nothing more.
> Gopalakrishnan
>
>
> On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:56:02 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I am not here to cure your mental illness; nothing is left out except your
> guilt alone pricks you to dance your dummy brain. there are 3 points of
> your avivelam mentioned, in which the second was "not reading in between
> the lines; and under there is no stand etc as you assumed; when you do not
> get the idea that all the three quality-under you are there , then you are
> pathetic; I know your capacity of childish understanding; you are the three
> clouded UNDER. Rajaram writes with an intonation which LKG may not
> understand; here is stand ; so use those malayalam words for yourself,
> instead of mad dog sentences as if trying to become smart; in that time you
> can read and vet your Q and A. KR  NB  try to understand the inner meaning
> than word watching without your sense
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: *gopala krishnan* 
> Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 at 09:16
> Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
> To: keralaiy...@googlegroups.com ,
> Narayanaswamy Iyer , Iyer ,
> Patty Thatha , Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> keyarinc...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Mr Rajaram,
>
> I pointed out your reaction, by missing words in your response. You don't
> reccognize it . There is a Malayalam saying"Uthram Muttiyal Konjanam
> Kutthum"( If not able to answer, make bad body movements.) That is
> responding by writing-  Has he gone mad
>
> On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 06:41:00 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Has he gone Mad ? Really I think -Qand A  Can you tell a mad joke?
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: *gopala krishnan* 
> Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:29
> Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
> To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy , Patty Thatha <
> thatha_patty@googlegroups.com>, Kerala Iyer ,
> Iyer , Narayanaswamy Iyer ,
> APS Mani 
>
>
> Mr 

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

['gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty]

 Dear Mr Sharma,
I am very happy and proud to know Mr Tarsem Lal , a commerce graduate from army 
wrote U P S C Examination and got selected to IRS. While I was working in 
Trivandrum Training centre as senior Lecturer, one Mr Tampi joined from air 
force after passing U P S C  and posted to ITS as Director. His air force 
certificate was equivalent to Engineering degree. 

I am also told  about the negatives and non popularity of Mr Rajaram, by one of 
his colleagues, but not to disclose his name.Through these years of interaction 
I  am also forced to think, Mr Rajaram is having more negatives. 

I recollect once Mr Rajaram wrote in the groups, from one of his B S N L friend 
in Chennai, I was most unpopular. He never knew I am a different person from 
Kerala circle. Mr Rajaram goes to sudden conclusions. 

Sir, Please stop abusing words. We are far far above Mr Rajaram. Let us prove 
it to him. 
Gopalakrishnan


On Thursday, 9 May, 2024 at 04:06:57 pm IST, Laxminarayan Sarma 
 wrote:  
 
 And Shri Gopalakrishnan-ji 
I temember my personal batm
,Sepoy Tarsem Lal, graduated in Commerce
while serving in the army, took the UPSC
Exam , joined the IRS and rose to a high
 position 
I ran into him one day and he told me that 
he knew about a loud-mouthed bombastic, 
arrogant Madrasi Choothiya called Rajaram
I DON'T know which Rajaram he referred to 
but from his description, I'm sure that
he referred to the Thengalai Tgevidiya PUNDAI 




On Thu, 9 May, 2024, 3:55 pm Laxminarayan Sarma,  
wrote:

Dear Gopalakrishnan-ji 
Let's appeal to the administrator of this
group a an interpretor/translator specialising in gibberish to interpret the out
pouring of some weird bi-peds that emit more gas and sound than sense





On Thu, 9 May, 2024, 7:28 am 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123, 
 wrote:

 Mr Rajaram,
Here as a Brahmin, you are putting your legs in slippery ground. When I write 
something, why do you include any other member, unless I mention of them?I 
pointed out your hurried nature  and reaction. Nothing more.Gopalakrishnan


On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:56:02 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 I am not here to cure your mental illness; nothing is left out except your 
guilt alone pricks you to dance your dummy brain. there are 3 points of your 
avivelam mentioned, in which the second was "not reading in between the lines; 
and under there is no stand etc as you assumed; when you do not get the idea 
that all the three quality-under you are there , then you are pathetic; I know 
your capacity of childish understanding; you are the three clouded UNDER. 
Rajaram writes with an intonation which LKG may not understand; here is stand ; 
so use those malayalam words for yourself, instead of mad dog sentences as if 
trying to become smart; in that time you can read and vet your Q and A. KR  NB  
try to understand the inner meaning than word watching without your sense
-- Forwarded message -
From: gopala krishnan 
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 at 09:16
Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
To: keralaiy...@googlegroups.com , Narayanaswamy 
Iyer , Iyer , Patty Thatha 
, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 


 Mr Rajaram,
I pointed out your reaction, by missing words in your response. You don't 
reccognize it . There is a Malayalam saying"Uthram Muttiyal Konjanam Kutthum"( 
If not able to answer, make bad body movements.) That is responding by writing- 
 Has he gone mad

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 06:41:00 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 Has he gone Mad ? Really I think -Qand A  Can you tell a mad joke?   
-- Forwarded message -
From: gopala krishnan 
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:29
Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy , Patty Thatha 
, Kerala Iyer , 
Iyer , Narayanaswamy Iyer , APS 
Mani 


 Mr Rajaram,
In your reaction you wrote- not reading in between lines, perhaps you meant 
reading in between lines. 

In your reaction you wrote-"If you are not a learned to under that only you" 
perhaps you meant understand and not under.
You have used Brahmin tribe in your posting at many places. 

I have applied concentrated phenol all over, still the fly is coming and 
sitting some where.   What to do with the fly? Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:17:08 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 I know your lack of knowledge, not reading in between the lines, when someone 
writes, and hasty generalisation alone place you in misery; as long as you are 
controlled by that Singapore Butler and canteen server your resurrection is 
impossible. I have written clearly " Only people like your tribe in those ages 
within 500 years" -means illiterate narayanasamy sharma and yourself formed a 
tribe and similar tribe exited 500 years before harmed the society of brahmins 
varna not caste, reducing the status of women  So tribe is only correctly used. 
If you are n

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

[Rajaram Krishnamurthy]

Because you include for a pat at your back KR

On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 20:58, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <
iyer...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Mr Rajaram,
>
> Here as a Brahmin, you are putting your legs in slippery ground. When I
> write something, why do you include any other member, unless I mention of
> them?
> I pointed out your hurried nature  and reaction. Nothing more.
> Gopalakrishnan
>
>
> On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:56:02 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I am not here to cure your mental illness; nothing is left out except your
> guilt alone pricks you to dance your dummy brain. there are 3 points of
> your avivelam mentioned, in which the second was "not reading in between
> the lines; and under there is no stand etc as you assumed; when you do not
> get the idea that all the three quality-under you are there , then you are
> pathetic; I know your capacity of childish understanding; you are the three
> clouded UNDER. Rajaram writes with an intonation which LKG may not
> understand; here is stand ; so use those malayalam words for yourself,
> instead of mad dog sentences as if trying to become smart; in that time you
> can read and vet your Q and A. KR  NB  try to understand the inner meaning
> than word watching without your sense
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: *gopala krishnan* 
> Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 at 09:16
> Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
> To: keralaiy...@googlegroups.com ,
> Narayanaswamy Iyer , Iyer ,
> Patty Thatha , Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> keyarinc...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Mr Rajaram,
>
> I pointed out your reaction, by missing words in your response. You don't
> reccognize it . There is a Malayalam saying"Uthram Muttiyal Konjanam
> Kutthum"( If not able to answer, make bad body movements.) That is
> responding by writing-  Has he gone mad
>
> On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 06:41:00 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Has he gone Mad ? Really I think -Qand A  Can you tell a mad joke?
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: *gopala krishnan* 
> Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:29
> Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
> To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy , Patty Thatha <
> thatha_patty@googlegroups.com>, Kerala Iyer ,
> Iyer , Narayanaswamy Iyer ,
> APS Mani 
>
>
> Mr Rajaram,
>
> In your reaction you wrote- *not* reading in between lines, perhaps you
> meant reading in between lines.
>
> In your reaction you wrote-"If you are not a learned to *under* that only
> you" perhaps you meant understand and not under.
>
> You have used Brahmin tribe in your posting at many places.
>
> I have applied concentrated phenol all over, still the *fly* is coming
> and sitting some where.   What to do with the fly?
>  Gopalakrishnan
>
> On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:17:08 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I know your lack of knowledge, not reading in between the lines, when
> someone writes, and hasty generalisation alone place you in misery; as long
> as you are controlled by that Singapore Butler and canteen server your
> resurrection is impossible. I have written clearly " *Only people like
> your tribe in those ages within 500 years" -*means
> illiterate narayanasamy sharma and yourself formed a tribe and similar
> tribe exited 500 years before harmed the society of brahmins varna not
> caste, reducing the status of women  So tribe is only correctly used. If
> you are not a learned to under that only you , you look so pathetic ; INDA
> KOSUTHOLLAI THANGA MUDIYALLIYE NARAYANA Goundamani joke KR IRS 7524
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 21:04, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <
> iyer...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Sir,
>
> You have not still pointed out his statement- Brahmin *tribe.*  There is
> difference between caste and tribe.
>
> I have never read in any book a Brahmin, Kshathriya, Vaisya or Soodra is
> included in  TRIBE. They are included under castes. *Probably in Mr
> Rajaram's Lexicon it may be so. *
>
> Only those who lived in tribal areas were/ are called tribal.
> Gopalakrishnan
>
> On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 07:20:30 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer <
> iyern...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear folks
>
> It is the uncivilised degenerate interloper, totally without integrity,
> without any education, without any moral upbringing, K Rajaram IRS
> 6524//7524, who should answer his own intemperate provocations:-
>
> "*Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and
&

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

['gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty]

 Mr Rajaram,
Here as a Brahmin, you are putting your legs in slippery ground. When I write 
something, why do you include any other member, unless I mention of them?I 
pointed out your hurried nature  and reaction. Nothing more.Gopalakrishnan


On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:56:02 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 I am not here to cure your mental illness; nothing is left out except your 
guilt alone pricks you to dance your dummy brain. there are 3 points of your 
avivelam mentioned, in which the second was "not reading in between the lines; 
and under there is no stand etc as you assumed; when you do not get the idea 
that all the three quality-under you are there , then you are pathetic; I know 
your capacity of childish understanding; you are the three clouded UNDER. 
Rajaram writes with an intonation which LKG may not understand; here is stand ; 
so use those malayalam words for yourself, instead of mad dog sentences as if 
trying to become smart; in that time you can read and vet your Q and A. KR  NB  
try to understand the inner meaning than word watching without your sense
-- Forwarded message -
From: gopala krishnan 
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 at 09:16
Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
To: keralaiy...@googlegroups.com , Narayanaswamy 
Iyer , Iyer , Patty Thatha 
, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 


 Mr Rajaram,
I pointed out your reaction, by missing words in your response. You don't 
reccognize it . There is a Malayalam saying"Uthram Muttiyal Konjanam Kutthum"( 
If not able to answer, make bad body movements.) That is responding by writing- 
 Has he gone mad

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 06:41:00 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 Has he gone Mad ? Really I think -Qand A  Can you tell a mad joke?   
-- Forwarded message -
From: gopala krishnan 
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:29
Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy , Patty Thatha 
, Kerala Iyer , 
Iyer , Narayanaswamy Iyer , APS 
Mani 


 Mr Rajaram,
In your reaction you wrote- not reading in between lines, perhaps you meant 
reading in between lines. 

In your reaction you wrote-"If you are not a learned to under that only you" 
perhaps you meant understand and not under.
You have used Brahmin tribe in your posting at many places. 

I have applied concentrated phenol all over, still the fly is coming and 
sitting some where.   What to do with the fly? Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:17:08 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 I know your lack of knowledge, not reading in between the lines, when someone 
writes, and hasty generalisation alone place you in misery; as long as you are 
controlled by that Singapore Butler and canteen server your resurrection is 
impossible. I have written clearly " Only people like your tribe in those ages 
within 500 years" -means illiterate narayanasamy sharma and yourself formed a 
tribe and similar tribe exited 500 years before harmed the society of brahmins 
varna not caste, reducing the status of women  So tribe is only correctly used. 
If you are not a learned to under that only you , you look so pathetic ; INDA 
KOSUTHOLLAI THANGA MUDIYALLIYE NARAYANA Goundamani joke KR IRS 7524
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 21:04, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 
 wrote:

 Sir,
You have not still pointed out his statement- Brahmin tribe.  There is 
difference between caste and tribe. 
I have never read in any book a Brahmin, Kshathriya, Vaisya or Soodra is 
included in  TRIBE. They are included under castes. Probably in Mr Rajaram's 
Lexicon it may be so. 

Only those who lived in tribal areas were/ are called tribal.Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 07:20:30 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer 
 wrote:  
 
 
Dear folks
It is the uncivilised degenerate interloper, totally without integrity, without 
any education, without any moral upbringing, K Rajaram IRS 6524//7524, who 
should answer his own intemperate provocations:-
"Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who 
are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your 
lexicon, as a civilised manner?"
My comments:-
He has the temerity to say, fumbling and stumbling as usual in his 
drain-gutter-sewer broken ungrammatical English:-
"Only people like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the 
women and feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to 
know it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different."
The unmitigated brain-dead fool did not live 500 years ago, yet assumes that 
his own blood ancestors -- long lost in cloudy history -- did not "ill treat 
the women and feigned as a sastra and dharma lovers".
Unkeeled dirty black pot calling the kettle black, as usual?
"This law is today."
Is it good law? 
With abortion freely available to pregnant sinner

Fwd: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

[Rajaram Krishnamurthy]

I am not here to cure your mental illness; nothing is left out except your
guilt alone pricks you to dance your dummy brain. there are 3 points of
your avivelam mentioned, in which the second was "not reading in between
the lines; and under there is no stand etc as you assumed; when you do not
get the idea that all the three quality-under you are there , then you are
pathetic; I know your capacity of childish understanding; you are the three
clouded UNDER. Rajaram writes with an intonation which LKG may not
understand; here is stand ; so use those malayalam words for yourself,
instead of mad dog sentences as if trying to become smart; in that time you
can read and vet your Q and A. KR  NB  try to understand the inner meaning
than word watching without your sense

-- Forwarded message -
From: gopala krishnan 
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 at 09:16
Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
To: keralaiy...@googlegroups.com ,
Narayanaswamy Iyer , Iyer ,
Patty Thatha , Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
keyarinc...@gmail.com>


Mr Rajaram,

I pointed out your reaction, by missing words in your response. You don't
reccognize it . There is a Malayalam saying"Uthram Muttiyal Konjanam
Kutthum"( If not able to answer, make bad body movements.) That is
responding by writing-  Has he gone mad

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 06:41:00 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:


Has he gone Mad ? Really I think -Qand A  Can you tell a mad joke?

-- Forwarded message -
From: *gopala krishnan* 
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:29
Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy , Patty Thatha <
thatha_patty@googlegroups.com>, Kerala Iyer ,
Iyer , Narayanaswamy Iyer ,
APS Mani 


Mr Rajaram,

In your reaction you wrote- *not* reading in between lines, perhaps you
meant reading in between lines.

In your reaction you wrote-"If you are not a learned to *under* that only
you" perhaps you meant understand and not under.

You have used Brahmin tribe in your posting at many places.

I have applied concentrated phenol all over, still the *fly* is coming and
sitting some where.   What to do with the fly?
 Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:17:08 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:


I know your lack of knowledge, not reading in between the lines, when
someone writes, and hasty generalisation alone place you in misery; as long
as you are controlled by that Singapore Butler and canteen server your
resurrection is impossible. I have written clearly " *Only people like your
tribe in those ages within 500 years" -*means illiterate narayanasamy
sharma and yourself formed a tribe and similar tribe exited 500 years
before harmed the society of brahmins varna not caste, reducing the status
of women  So tribe is only correctly used. If you are not a learned to
under that only you , you look so pathetic ; INDA KOSUTHOLLAI
THANGA MUDIYALLIYE NARAYANA Goundamani joke KR IRS 7524

On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 21:04, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <
iyer...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Sir,

You have not still pointed out his statement- Brahmin *tribe.*  There is
difference between caste and tribe.

I have never read in any book a Brahmin, Kshathriya, Vaisya or Soodra is
included in  TRIBE. They are included under castes. *Probably in Mr
Rajaram's Lexicon it may be so. *

Only those who lived in tribal areas were/ are called tribal.
Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 07:20:30 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer <
iyern...@gmail.com> wrote:



Dear folks

It is the uncivilised degenerate interloper, totally without integrity,
without any education, without any moral upbringing, K Rajaram IRS
6524//7524, who should answer his own intemperate provocations:-

"*Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and
who are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your
lexicon, as a civilised manner?"*

My comments:-

He has the temerity to say, fumbling and stumbling as usual in his
drain-gutter-sewer broken ungrammatical English:-

"*Only people like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated
the women and feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We
have to know it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different.*"

The unmitigated brain-dead fool did not live 500 years ago, yet assumes
that his own blood ancestors -- long lost in cloudy history -- did not "*ill
treat the women and feigned as a sastra and dharma lovers"*.

Unkeeled dirty black pot calling the kettle black, as usual?

"*This law is today.*"

Is it good law?

With abortion freely available to pregnant sinners, with women free to
abrogate their solemn wedding vows and sue for civil-court divorce at the
slightest provocation instead of striving to save the marriage and the
children, 

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

['gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty]

 Mr Rajaram,
I pointed out your reaction, by missing words in your response. You don't 
reccognize it . There is a Malayalam saying"Uthram Muttiyal Konjanam Kutthum"( 
If not able to answer, make bad body movements.) That is responding by writing- 
 Has he gone mad

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 06:41:00 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 Has he gone Mad ? Really I think -Qand A  Can you tell a mad joke?   
-- Forwarded message -
From: gopala krishnan 
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:29
Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy , Patty Thatha 
, Kerala Iyer , 
Iyer , Narayanaswamy Iyer , APS 
Mani 


 Mr Rajaram,
In your reaction you wrote- not reading in between lines, perhaps you meant 
reading in between lines. 

In your reaction you wrote-"If you are not a learned to under that only you" 
perhaps you meant understand and not under.
You have used Brahmin tribe in your posting at many places. 

I have applied concentrated phenol all over, still the fly is coming and 
sitting some where.   What to do with the fly? Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:17:08 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 I know your lack of knowledge, not reading in between the lines, when someone 
writes, and hasty generalisation alone place you in misery; as long as you are 
controlled by that Singapore Butler and canteen server your resurrection is 
impossible. I have written clearly " Only people like your tribe in those ages 
within 500 years" -means illiterate narayanasamy sharma and yourself formed a 
tribe and similar tribe exited 500 years before harmed the society of brahmins 
varna not caste, reducing the status of women  So tribe is only correctly used. 
If you are not a learned to under that only you , you look so pathetic ; INDA 
KOSUTHOLLAI THANGA MUDIYALLIYE NARAYANA Goundamani joke KR IRS 7524
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 21:04, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 
 wrote:

 Sir,
You have not still pointed out his statement- Brahmin tribe.  There is 
difference between caste and tribe. 
I have never read in any book a Brahmin, Kshathriya, Vaisya or Soodra is 
included in  TRIBE. They are included under castes. Probably in Mr Rajaram's 
Lexicon it may be so. 

Only those who lived in tribal areas were/ are called tribal.Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 07:20:30 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer 
 wrote:  
 
 
Dear folks
It is the uncivilised degenerate interloper, totally without integrity, without 
any education, without any moral upbringing, K Rajaram IRS 6524//7524, who 
should answer his own intemperate provocations:-
"Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who 
are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your 
lexicon, as a civilised manner?"
My comments:-
He has the temerity to say, fumbling and stumbling as usual in his 
drain-gutter-sewer broken ungrammatical English:-
"Only people like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the 
women and feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to 
know it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different."
The unmitigated brain-dead fool did not live 500 years ago, yet assumes that 
his own blood ancestors -- long lost in cloudy history -- did not "ill treat 
the women and feigned as a sastra and dharma lovers".
Unkeeled dirty black pot calling the kettle black, as usual?
"This law is today."
Is it good law? 
With abortion freely available to pregnant sinners, with women free to abrogate 
their solemn wedding vows and sue for civil-court divorce at the slightest 
provocation instead of striving to save the marriage and the children, with 
marriage itself being a mere brief formality before a civil servant, do not 
current man-made marriage laws encourage moral turpitude instead of ensuring 
the sanctity of the great major samskaaram of vivaaham?
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 10:52 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy  
wrote:

Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who are 
you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your lexicon, as 
a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa Gotra and 
aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people like your tribe 
in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the women and feigned as a sastra 
nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to know it all. And this law is 
today; ancient laws were different; and you were a supervisor in Bsnl only 
after knowing the development of communication tools and services. Once we used 
our index finger to go round and round; now we use voice to call a number; so 
as a chameleons keep changing colours and live?  That life is called sin city 
life. And what has it got to do with UPSC etc ? If you are mad, see doctors. If 
you have good conten

Fwd: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

[Rajaram Krishnamurthy]

Has he gone Mad ? Really I think -Qand A  Can you tell a mad joke?

-- Forwarded message -
From: gopala krishnan 
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:29
Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg
To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy , Patty Thatha <
thatha_patty@googlegroups.com>, Kerala Iyer ,
Iyer , Narayanaswamy Iyer ,
APS Mani 


Mr Rajaram,

In your reaction you wrote- *not* reading in between lines, perhaps you
meant reading in between lines.

In your reaction you wrote-"If you are not a learned to *under* that only
you" perhaps you meant understand and not under.

You have used Brahmin tribe in your posting at many places.

I have applied concentrated phenol all over, still the *fly* is coming and
sitting some where.   What to do with the fly?
 Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:17:08 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:


I know your lack of knowledge, not reading in between the lines, when
someone writes, and hasty generalisation alone place you in misery; as long
as you are controlled by that Singapore Butler and canteen server your
resurrection is impossible. I have written clearly " *Only people like your
tribe in those ages within 500 years" -*means illiterate narayanasamy
sharma and yourself formed a tribe and similar tribe exited 500 years
before harmed the society of brahmins varna not caste, reducing the status
of women  So tribe is only correctly used. If you are not a learned to
under that only you , you look so pathetic ; INDA KOSUTHOLLAI
THANGA MUDIYALLIYE NARAYANA Goundamani joke KR IRS 7524

On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 21:04, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <
iyer...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Sir,

You have not still pointed out his statement- Brahmin *tribe.*  There is
difference between caste and tribe.

I have never read in any book a Brahmin, Kshathriya, Vaisya or Soodra is
included in  TRIBE. They are included under castes. *Probably in Mr
Rajaram's Lexicon it may be so. *

Only those who lived in tribal areas were/ are called tribal.
Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 07:20:30 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer <
iyern...@gmail.com> wrote:



Dear folks

It is the uncivilised degenerate interloper, totally without integrity,
without any education, without any moral upbringing, K Rajaram IRS
6524//7524, who should answer his own intemperate provocations:-

"*Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and
who are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your
lexicon, as a civilised manner?"*

My comments:-

He has the temerity to say, fumbling and stumbling as usual in his
drain-gutter-sewer broken ungrammatical English:-

"*Only people like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated
the women and feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We
have to know it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different.*"

The unmitigated brain-dead fool did not live 500 years ago, yet assumes
that his own blood ancestors -- long lost in cloudy history -- did not "*ill
treat the women and feigned as a sastra and dharma lovers"*.

Unkeeled dirty black pot calling the kettle black, as usual?

"*This law is today.*"

Is it good law?

With abortion freely available to pregnant sinners, with women free to
abrogate their solemn wedding vows and sue for civil-court divorce at the
slightest provocation instead of striving to save the marriage and the
children, with marriage itself being a mere brief formality before a civil
servant, do not current man-made marriage laws encourage moral turpitude
instead of ensuring the sanctity of the great major samskaaram of vivaaham?

S Narayanaswamy Iyer

On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 10:52 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
wrote:

Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who
are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your
lexicon, as a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa
Gotra and aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people
like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the women and
feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to know
it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different; and you were a
supervisor in Bsnl only after knowing the development of communication
tools and services. Once we used our index finger to go round and round;
now we use voice to call a number; so as a chameleons keep changing colours
and live?  That life is called sin city life. And what has it got to do
with UPSC etc ? If you are mad, see doctors. If you have good content to
rebut , pl do. But what is the use of increasing your heart beats out of
azhukkaru ava and veguli the namam kedak kedum noy.?

On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 22:35, gopala krishnan  wrote:

I told in the most civilized manner, if at all told in  age old books by
sages, 

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

['gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty]

 Truth is bitter Mr Rajaram ; You are one among the Brahmins who downtrodden 
the Brahmin varna without substance , because of your  interpretations without 
proper knowledge  Gopalakrishnan


On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:01:24 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
  Truth is bitter Narayana ; You are one among the brahmin tribe who 
downtrodden the brahmin varna without substance , because of your neti 
interpretations without vivekam  KR 
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 20:50, Narayanaswamy Iyer  wrote:


Dear folks
It is the uncivilised degenerate interloper, totally without integrity, without 
any education, without any moral upbringing, K Rajaram IRS 6524//7524, who 
should answer his own intemperate provocations:-
"Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who 
are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your 
lexicon, as a civilised manner?"
My comments:-
He has the temerity to say, fumbling and stumbling as usual in his 
drain-gutter-sewer broken ungrammatical English:-
"Only people like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the 
women and feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to 
know it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different."
The unmitigated brain-dead fool did not live 500 years ago, yet assumes that 
his own blood ancestors -- long lost in cloudy history -- did not "ill treat 
the women and feigned as a sastra and dharma lovers".
Unkeeled dirty black pot calling the kettle black, as usual?
"This law is today."
Is it good law? 
With abortion freely available to pregnant sinners, with women free to abrogate 
their solemn wedding vows and sue for civil-court divorce at the slightest 
provocation instead of striving to save the marriage and the children, with 
marriage itself being a mere brief formality before a civil servant, do not 
current man-made marriage laws encourage moral turpitude instead of ensuring 
the sanctity of the great major samskaaram of vivaaham?
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 10:52 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy  
wrote:

Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who are 
you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your lexicon, as 
a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa Gotra and 
aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people like your tribe 
in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the women and feigned as a sastra 
nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to know it all. And this law is 
today; ancient laws were different; and you were a supervisor in Bsnl only 
after knowing the development of communication tools and services. Once we used 
our index finger to go round and round; now we use voice to call a number; so 
as a chameleons keep changing colours and live?  That life is called sin city 
life. And what has it got to do with UPSC etc ? If you are mad, see doctors. If 
you have good content to rebut , pl do. But what is the use of increasing your 
heart beats out of azhukkaru ava and veguli the namam kedak kedum noy.?
On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 22:35, gopala krishnan  wrote:

I told in the most civilized manner, if at all told in  age old books by sages, 
description of the girls told there should not be repeated in the modern 
society, abiding current rules reg marriage. If you still not understood, you 
are not cultured, the U P S C selected IRS officer Mr Rajaram. 

I feel ashamed to  quote the description told in your posting about the girls. 

Gopalakrishnan




-- 
On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
 
We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join 
 
Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
 
Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
 
Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"KeralaIyers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to keralaiyers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZormWMV91pF%2Bm%2BDcK_tNg4tPK-RxtQ5i%2BmaR7jYA8yxWMA%40mail.gmail.com.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to iyer123+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhPJC%2BMAnBQPHYj2Gn6y1Wo5HkfS5u4bLBW3UR2kk6aZmg%40mail.gmail.com.

  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to thatha_patty+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

['gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty]

 Mr Rajaram,
In your reaction you wrote- not reading in between lines, perhaps you meant 
reading in between lines. 

In your reaction you wrote-"If you are not a learned to under that only you" 
perhaps you meant understand and not under.
You have used Brahmin tribe in your posting at many places. 

I have applied concentrated phenol all over, still the fly is coming and 
sitting some where.   What to do with the fly? Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:17:08 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 I know your lack of knowledge, not reading in between the lines, when someone 
writes, and hasty generalisation alone place you in misery; as long as you are 
controlled by that Singapore Butler and canteen server your resurrection is 
impossible. I have written clearly " Only people like your tribe in those ages 
within 500 years" -means illiterate narayanasamy sharma and yourself formed a 
tribe and similar tribe exited 500 years before harmed the society of brahmins 
varna not caste, reducing the status of women  So tribe is only correctly used. 
If you are not a learned to under that only you , you look so pathetic ; INDA 
KOSUTHOLLAI THANGA MUDIYALLIYE NARAYANA Goundamani joke KR IRS 7524
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 21:04, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 
 wrote:

 Sir,
You have not still pointed out his statement- Brahmin tribe.  There is 
difference between caste and tribe. 
I have never read in any book a Brahmin, Kshathriya, Vaisya or Soodra is 
included in  TRIBE. They are included under castes. Probably in Mr Rajaram's 
Lexicon it may be so. 

Only those who lived in tribal areas were/ are called tribal.Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 07:20:30 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer 
 wrote:  
 
 
Dear folks
It is the uncivilised degenerate interloper, totally without integrity, without 
any education, without any moral upbringing, K Rajaram IRS 6524//7524, who 
should answer his own intemperate provocations:-
"Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who 
are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your 
lexicon, as a civilised manner?"
My comments:-
He has the temerity to say, fumbling and stumbling as usual in his 
drain-gutter-sewer broken ungrammatical English:-
"Only people like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the 
women and feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to 
know it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different."
The unmitigated brain-dead fool did not live 500 years ago, yet assumes that 
his own blood ancestors -- long lost in cloudy history -- did not "ill treat 
the women and feigned as a sastra and dharma lovers".
Unkeeled dirty black pot calling the kettle black, as usual?
"This law is today."
Is it good law? 
With abortion freely available to pregnant sinners, with women free to abrogate 
their solemn wedding vows and sue for civil-court divorce at the slightest 
provocation instead of striving to save the marriage and the children, with 
marriage itself being a mere brief formality before a civil servant, do not 
current man-made marriage laws encourage moral turpitude instead of ensuring 
the sanctity of the great major samskaaram of vivaaham?
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 10:52 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy  
wrote:

Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who are 
you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your lexicon, as 
a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa Gotra and 
aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people like your tribe 
in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the women and feigned as a sastra 
nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to know it all. And this law is 
today; ancient laws were different; and you were a supervisor in Bsnl only 
after knowing the development of communication tools and services. Once we used 
our index finger to go round and round; now we use voice to call a number; so 
as a chameleons keep changing colours and live?  That life is called sin city 
life. And what has it got to do with UPSC etc ? If you are mad, see doctors. If 
you have good content to rebut , pl do. But what is the use of increasing your 
heart beats out of azhukkaru ava and veguli the namam kedak kedum noy.?
On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 22:35, gopala krishnan  wrote:

I told in the most civilized manner, if at all told in  age old books by sages, 
description of the girls told there should not be repeated in the modern 
society, abiding current rules reg marriage. If you still not understood, you 
are not cultured, the U P S C selected IRS officer Mr Rajaram. 

I feel ashamed to  quote the description told in your posting about the girls. 

Gopalakrishnan




-- 
On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
 
We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join 
 
Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: 

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

[Rajaram Krishnamurthy]

I know your lack of knowledge, not reading in between the lines, when
someone writes, and hasty generalisation alone place you in misery; as long
as you are controlled by that Singapore Butler and canteen server your
resurrection is impossible. I have written clearly " *Only people like your
tribe in those ages within 500 years" -*means illiterate narayanasamy
sharma and yourself formed a tribe and similar tribe exited 500 years
before harmed the society of brahmins varna not caste, reducing the status
of women  So tribe is only correctly used. If you are not a learned to
under that only you , you look so pathetic ; INDA KOSUTHOLLAI
THANGA MUDIYALLIYE NARAYANA Goundamani joke KR IRS 7524

On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 21:04, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <
iyer...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Sir,
>
> You have not still pointed out his statement- Brahmin *tribe.*  There is
> difference between caste and tribe.
>
> I have never read in any book a Brahmin, Kshathriya, Vaisya or Soodra is
> included in  TRIBE. They are included under castes. *Probably in Mr
> Rajaram's Lexicon it may be so. *
>
> Only those who lived in tribal areas were/ are called tribal.
> Gopalakrishnan
>
> On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 07:20:30 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer <
> iyern...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear folks
>
> It is the uncivilised degenerate interloper, totally without integrity,
> without any education, without any moral upbringing, K Rajaram IRS
> 6524//7524, who should answer his own intemperate provocations:-
>
> "*Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and
> who are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your
> lexicon, as a civilised manner?"*
>
> My comments:-
>
> He has the temerity to say, fumbling and stumbling as usual in his
> drain-gutter-sewer broken ungrammatical English:-
>
> "*Only people like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated
> the women and feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We
> have to know it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different.*"
>
> The unmitigated brain-dead fool did not live 500 years ago, yet assumes
> that his own blood ancestors -- long lost in cloudy history -- did not "*ill
> treat the women and feigned as a sastra and dharma lovers"*.
>
> Unkeeled dirty black pot calling the kettle black, as usual?
>
> "*This law is today.*"
>
> Is it good law?
>
> With abortion freely available to pregnant sinners, with women free to
> abrogate their solemn wedding vows and sue for civil-court divorce at the
> slightest provocation instead of striving to save the marriage and the
> children, with marriage itself being a mere brief formality before a civil
> servant, do not current man-made marriage laws encourage moral turpitude
> instead of ensuring the sanctity of the great major samskaaram of vivaaham?
>
> S Narayanaswamy Iyer
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 10:52 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and
> who are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your
> lexicon, as a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa
> Gotra and aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people
> like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the women and
> feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to know
> it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different; and you were a
> supervisor in Bsnl only after knowing the development of communication
> tools and services. Once we used our index finger to go round and round;
> now we use voice to call a number; so as a chameleons keep changing colours
> and live?  That life is called sin city life. And what has it got to do
> with UPSC etc ? If you are mad, see doctors. If you have good content to
> rebut , pl do. But what is the use of increasing your heart beats out of
> azhukkaru ava and veguli the namam kedak kedum noy.?
>
> On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 22:35, gopala krishnan  wrote:
>
> I told in the most civilized manner, if at all told in  age old books by
> sages, description of the girls told there should not be repeated in the
> modern society, abiding current rules reg marriage. If you still not
> understood, you are not *cultured*, the U P S C selected IRS officer Mr
> Rajaram.
>
>
> *I feel ashamed to  quote the description told in your posting about the
> girls. *
>
> Gopalakrishnan
>
> --
> On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
>
> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join
>
> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
>
> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
>
> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions:
> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "KeralaIyers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and 

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

['gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty]

 Sir,
You have not still pointed out his statement- Brahmin tribe.  There is 
difference between caste and tribe. 
I have never read in any book a Brahmin, Kshathriya, Vaisya or Soodra is 
included in  TRIBE. They are included under castes. Probably in Mr Rajaram's 
Lexicon it may be so. 

Only those who lived in tribal areas were/ are called tribal.Gopalakrishnan

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 07:20:30 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer 
 wrote:  
 
 
Dear folks
It is the uncivilised degenerate interloper, totally without integrity, without 
any education, without any moral upbringing, K Rajaram IRS 6524//7524, who 
should answer his own intemperate provocations:-
"Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who 
are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your 
lexicon, as a civilised manner?"
My comments:-
He has the temerity to say, fumbling and stumbling as usual in his 
drain-gutter-sewer broken ungrammatical English:-
"Only people like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the 
women and feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to 
know it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different."
The unmitigated brain-dead fool did not live 500 years ago, yet assumes that 
his own blood ancestors -- long lost in cloudy history -- did not "ill treat 
the women and feigned as a sastra and dharma lovers".
Unkeeled dirty black pot calling the kettle black, as usual?
"This law is today."
Is it good law? 
With abortion freely available to pregnant sinners, with women free to abrogate 
their solemn wedding vows and sue for civil-court divorce at the slightest 
provocation instead of striving to save the marriage and the children, with 
marriage itself being a mere brief formality before a civil servant, do not 
current man-made marriage laws encourage moral turpitude instead of ensuring 
the sanctity of the great major samskaaram of vivaaham?
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 10:52 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy  
wrote:

Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who are 
you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your lexicon, as 
a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa Gotra and 
aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people like your tribe 
in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the women and feigned as a sastra 
nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to know it all. And this law is 
today; ancient laws were different; and you were a supervisor in Bsnl only 
after knowing the development of communication tools and services. Once we used 
our index finger to go round and round; now we use voice to call a number; so 
as a chameleons keep changing colours and live?  That life is called sin city 
life. And what has it got to do with UPSC etc ? If you are mad, see doctors. If 
you have good content to rebut , pl do. But what is the use of increasing your 
heart beats out of azhukkaru ava and veguli the namam kedak kedum noy.?
On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 22:35, gopala krishnan  wrote:

I told in the most civilized manner, if at all told in  age old books by sages, 
description of the girls told there should not be repeated in the modern 
society, abiding current rules reg marriage. If you still not understood, you 
are not cultured, the U P S C selected IRS officer Mr Rajaram. 

I feel ashamed to  quote the description told in your posting about the girls. 

Gopalakrishnan




-- 
On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
 
We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join 
 
Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
 
Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
 
Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"KeralaIyers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to keralaiyers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZormWMV91pF%2Bm%2BDcK_tNg4tPK-RxtQ5i%2BmaR7jYA8yxWMA%40mail.gmail.com.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to iyer123+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhPJC%2BMAnBQPHYj2Gn6y1Wo5HkfS5u4bLBW3UR2kk6aZmg%40mail.gmail.com.
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to thatha_patty+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

['gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty]

 Mr Rajaram,
Very good. You were cutting the  tree from the wrong side. When I pointed it 
out, now you have thrown the axe itself on me. But by my timely movement, axe 
has fallen on the ground and least harmed me. But Mr Rajaram, like you I will 
not take the axe and throw at you. I know it will seriously wound you. 
By bye Thank you
R Gopalakrishnan, Former ITS 7024. 

On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 06:56:15 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 Aha  your calling uncivilised is in order dragging all into and I am hitting 
you is anger No Sir  I am asking what right you have to write nonsense? It is 
not anger. Anger springs only from your side without content. I also replied to 
you on dot. If you were to act on one point conveniently then I ask you why you 
do all the old things even today. So Only you have to write the right reply 
with content. I say we read history ; will you foolishly ask why all are old 
now? It is as foolish as you are begging the question And you are angry not me. 
I will give you a lot of statistics but for you all are awesome as you are a 
kid looking at the elephant for the first time as evident from your telling 
"others do not Know" conclusion contents which are all obvious. Had you written 
it as an observation that is different; but you criticised as to why?. So I 
questioned who you were. I never question your content; I point out all your 
error prone scholastics. I express only my views as personal (without 
mentioning it is personal) and add sastric or scientific, unlike gossips in you 
 Thank u Bye KR IRS 7524
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 20:13, gopala krishnan  wrote:

 Mr Rajaram,
My response is not PROVOCATIVE. Don't react, be calm and respond.
Read what I wrote with a calm mind. You will understand what I wrote. 

When you post some thing every member can respond. I don't understand the 
reason for your anger. Yes , being a former Government servant in IRS service, 
you should know what you copy paste to a matured group of persons . It must be 
suited to the present day culture, which you are  LAGGING. 

Am I tolerate whatever you write personally attacking  me in your response of 
cultural QA postings? Am I respond like you? 
Am  I asking "Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a 
manner?"as wrote by you in your reaction. 

Don't show your anger on me. Behave as a civilized member suited to your 
official person  held. 

Are you not ashamed to quarrel like a 5th class student? You are about 78, 
should be well matured. 

Your own words- Ennathan natakkum natakkettume"

Gopalakrishnan

On Tuesday, 7 May, 2024 at 08:22:18 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who 
are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your 
lexicon, as a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa Gotra 
and aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people like your 
tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the women and feigned as a 
sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to know it all. And this 
law is today; ancient laws were different; and you were a supervisor in Bsnl 
only after knowing the development of communication tools and services. Once we 
used our index finger to go round and round; now we use voice to call a number; 
so as a chameleons keep changing colours and live?  That life is called sin 
city life. And what has it got to do with UPSC etc ? If you are mad, see 
doctors. If you have good content to rebut , pl do. But what is the use of 
increasing your heart beats out of azhukkaru ava and veguli the namam kedak 
kedum noy.?
On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 22:35, gopala krishnan  wrote:

I told in the most civilized manner, if at all told in  age old books by sages, 
description of the girls told there should not be repeated in the modern 
society, abiding current rules reg marriage. If you still not understood, you 
are not cultured, the U P S C selected IRS officer Mr Rajaram. 

I feel ashamed to  quote the description told in your posting about the girls. 

Gopalakrishnan




-- 
On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
 
We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join 
 
Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
 
Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
 
Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"KeralaIyers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to keralaiyers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZormWMV91pF%2Bm%2BDcK_tNg4tPK-RxtQ5i%2BmaR7jYA8yxWMA%40mail.gmail.com.
  


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.

Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

[Rajaram Krishnamurthy]

Aha  your calling uncivilised is in order dragging all into and I am
hitting you is anger No Sir  I am asking what right you have to write
nonsense? It is not anger. Anger springs only from your side without
content. I also replied to you on dot. If you were to act on one point
conveniently then I ask you why you do all the old things even today. So
Only you have to write the right reply with content. I say we read history
; will you foolishly ask why all are old now? It is as foolish as you are
begging the question And you are angry not me. I will give you a lot of
statistics but for you all are awesome as you are a kid looking at the
elephant for the first time as evident from your telling "others do not
Know" conclusion contents which are all obvious. Had you written it as an
observation that is different; but you criticised as to why?. So I
questioned who you were. I never question your content; I point out all
your error prone scholastics. I express only my views as personal (without
mentioning it is personal) and add sastric or scientific, unlike gossips in
you  Thank u Bye KR IRS 7524

On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 20:13, gopala krishnan  wrote:

> Mr Rajaram,
>
> My response is not PROVOCATIVE. Don't react, be calm and respond.
>
> Read what I wrote with a calm mind. You will understand what I wrote.
>
> When you post some thing every member can respond. I don't understand the
> reason for your anger. Yes , being a former Government servant in IRS
> service, you should know what you copy paste to a matured group of persons
> . It must be suited to the present day culture, which you are  LAGGING.
>
> *Am I tolerate whatever you write personally attacking  me in your
> response of cultural QA postings? Am I respond like you? *
>
> Am  I asking *"Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a
> manner?"*
> *as wrote by you in your reaction. *
>
> Don't show your *anger on me*. Behave as a civilized member suited to
> your official person  held.
>
> Are you not ashamed to quarrel like a 5th class student? You are about
> 78, should be well matured.
>
> *Your own words- Ennathan natakkum natakkettume"*
>
> Gopalakrishnan
>
> On Tuesday, 7 May, 2024 at 08:22:18 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> keyarinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and
> who are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your
> lexicon, as a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa
> Gotra and aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people
> like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the women and
> feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to know
> it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different; and you were a
> supervisor in Bsnl only after knowing the development of communication
> tools and services. Once we used our index finger to go round and round;
> now we use voice to call a number; so as a chameleons keep changing colours
> and live?  That life is called sin city life. And what has it got to do
> with UPSC etc ? If you are mad, see doctors. If you have good content to
> rebut , pl do. But what is the use of increasing your heart beats out of
> azhukkaru ava and veguli the namam kedak kedum noy.?
>
> On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 22:35, gopala krishnan  wrote:
>
> I told in the most civilized manner, if at all told in  age old books by
> sages, description of the girls told there should not be repeated in the
> modern society, abiding current rules reg marriage. If you still not
> understood, you are not *cultured*, the U P S C selected IRS officer Mr
> Rajaram.
>
>
> *I feel ashamed to  quote the description told in your posting about the
> girls. *
>
> Gopalakrishnan
>
> --
> On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
>
> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join
>
> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
>
> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
>
> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions:
> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "KeralaIyers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to keralaiyers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZormWMV91pF%2Bm%2BDcK_tNg4tPK-RxtQ5i%2BmaR7jYA8yxWMA%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to thatha_patty+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

['gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty]

 Mr Rajaram,
My response is not PROVOCATIVE. Don't react, be calm and respond.
Read what I wrote with a calm mind. You will understand what I wrote. 

When you post some thing every member can respond. I don't understand the 
reason for your anger. Yes , being a former Government servant in IRS service, 
you should know what you copy paste to a matured group of persons . It must be 
suited to the present day culture, which you are  LAGGING. 

Am I tolerate whatever you write personally attacking  me in your response of 
cultural QA postings? Am I respond like you? 
Am  I asking "Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a 
manner?"as wrote by you in your reaction. 

Don't show your anger on me. Behave as a civilized member suited to your 
official person  held. 

Are you not ashamed to quarrel like a 5th class student? You are about 78, 
should be well matured. 

Your own words- Ennathan natakkum natakkettume"

Gopalakrishnan

On Tuesday, 7 May, 2024 at 08:22:18 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy 
 wrote:  
 
 Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who 
are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your 
lexicon, as a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa Gotra 
and aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people like your 
tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the women and feigned as a 
sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to know it all. And this 
law is today; ancient laws were different; and you were a supervisor in Bsnl 
only after knowing the development of communication tools and services. Once we 
used our index finger to go round and round; now we use voice to call a number; 
so as a chameleons keep changing colours and live?  That life is called sin 
city life. And what has it got to do with UPSC etc ? If you are mad, see 
doctors. If you have good content to rebut , pl do. But what is the use of 
increasing your heart beats out of azhukkaru ava and veguli the namam kedak 
kedum noy.?
On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 22:35, gopala krishnan  wrote:

I told in the most civilized manner, if at all told in  age old books by sages, 
description of the girls told there should not be repeated in the modern 
society, abiding current rules reg marriage. If you still not understood, you 
are not cultured, the U P S C selected IRS officer Mr Rajaram. 

I feel ashamed to  quote the description told in your posting about the girls. 

Gopalakrishnan




-- 
On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
 
We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join 
 
Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
 
Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
 
Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions: https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"KeralaIyers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to keralaiyers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZormWMV91pF%2Bm%2BDcK_tNg4tPK-RxtQ5i%2BmaR7jYA8yxWMA%40mail.gmail.com.
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to thatha_patty+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/242953747.23137.1715130803602%40mail.yahoo.com.

Re: age at marriage-reg

[Rajaram Krishnamurthy]

Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who
are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your
lexicon, as a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa
Gotra and aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people
like your tribe in those ages within 500 years, ill treated the women and
feigned as a sastra nd dharma lovers. History is itihasa: We have to know
it all. And this law is today; ancient laws were different; and you were a
supervisor in Bsnl only after knowing the development of communication
tools and services. Once we used our index finger to go round and round;
now we use voice to call a number; so as a chameleons keep changing colours
and live?  That life is called sin city life. And what has it got to do
with UPSC etc ? If you are mad, see doctors. If you have good content to
rebut , pl do. But what is the use of increasing your heart beats out of
azhukkaru ava and veguli the namam kedak kedum noy.?

On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 22:35, gopala krishnan  wrote:

> I told in the most civilized manner, if at all told in  age old books by
> sages, description of the girls told there should not be repeated in the
> modern society, abiding current rules reg marriage. If you still not
> understood, you are not *cultured*, the U P S C selected IRS officer Mr
> Rajaram.
>
>
> *I feel ashamed to  quote the description told in your posting about the
> girls. *
>
> Gopalakrishnan
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to thatha_patty+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZormWMV91pF%2Bm%2BDcK_tNg4tPK-RxtQ5i%2BmaR7jYA8yxWMA%40mail.gmail.com.