Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
Well said and totally agree (well, everybody is great), and any slow down of good information and conversation is to me the worst thing that can happen in a community. I just want to clearly state that if I'm not showing appreciation, not adopting something, or not engaging: I'm just not ready to process the info, I can't transition out of current thought processes, and I'm just trying to stay in a cognitively safe place. The beauty of differences can be overwhelming to this kid. You should see me struggle at a buffet... On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:47 PM Mohammad Rahmani wrote: > Hi Charlie, > > You are great and I learn from you and what you publish in the forum! > There is no need to apologize as we discussed something technically! and > many times disagreement helps to improve things! > We have a Perdian proverb: differences make beauty! > > So, I appreciate your efforts and thoughts shared with us here! > > Best wishes > Mohammad > > > On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 8:04 PM Charlie Veniot wrote: > >> Hey, I totally agree with you, and if I sound unappreciative, then I >> totally apologize. I do very much appreciate. >> >> Each one of us learns within the confines of our own abilities, learning >> by maximizing those things that play to our strengths and minimizing those >> things that emphasize our weaknesses. >> >> I've got ADHD (attention regulation challenges), and I go into >> dysfunction when I'm overstimulated by sensory overload and/or cognitive >> overload. >> >> My safe place is immersing myself in the details of a complex and very >> focused problem/project. I'm at my happiest when hyper-focused on all of >> the intertwingled/hyperlinked intricacies of a problem/project scope and >> the tools I know for working things out. When I hit a wall because what I >> am familiar does not work, then I go seeking out the new things I need, >> within the safe boundaries of the problem/project scope. >> >> It does tickle me silly to know that there are other approaches to >> handling a problem. It is a huge benefit. But I can't study that new >> thing right away, because I'm hyperfocused (like a dog chewing on a bone) >> on churning code for the current problem with a keen desire to master a >> particular thing (in this case: filtering.) >> >> As keen as I am for folk to contribute their knowledge of alternative >> ways of doing things for everybody's benefit (I encourage that something >> silly), the best I can do is simply take note of that, and park it into a >> recess of my sponge for later reference when I need it. Back to the dog >> chewing on a bone: everything else is a squirrel. I get easily distracted, >> but unlike the dog who can forget about the bone and see just the squirrel, >> I'm more like a kid in a candy+toy store, and I don't know where to look: >> too much to process. >> >> So I take note that there are awesome alternatives out there (features in >> TiddlyWiki, plugin's, macros/scripts, upcoming new stuff, whatever), and I >> quickly park that note in subconscious memory for when I hit a wall or want >> to just enjoy learning something new. When I'm in the midst of trying to >> figure out how I can solve something with the things I've learned so far, >> trying to process alternative ways of doing things when I'm banging my head >> against a wall is like having a bunch of people talking to me at the same >> time: immediate over-stimulation and I shut right down. >> >> Most folk don't have this disability (they can easily pause something, >> and transition from one thing to another), hence my standing ovation for >> anything and everything educative. I just usually find myself having to >> ignore the discussion, because I'm already fully engaged in some pretty >> deep bush-whacking. >> >> So that long-winded diatribe just to say the stuff you're contributing >> (that everybody contributes, whenever/wherever/however) is awesome. I'm >> exceedingly appreciative. It is just hard for me to show that appreciation >> by adopting/discussing the idea because I can't cope with competing >> thoughts. >> >> Well, I also find writing a great exercise to understand oneself, too. >> Not just how I function/dysfunction, but also how it impacts others. Which >> has me on regular guilt-trips. Trying to stay in a safe place cognitively, >> while trying to be respectful/appreciative of others. Not so easy to focus >> on both when the disability is attention regulation. >> >> I can pat my head and rub my belly at the same time, so I like to think >> it is possible. Then again, show me a dog that doesn't like to have belly >> rubbed and a pat on the head ... >> >> >> >> On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 1:37:38 AM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:34 AM Charlie Veniot >>> wrote: >>> The simplest combo of filters and transclusions? That could be wildly different for each person. For each person, It would be what is easiest to understand and maintain
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
Hi Charlie, You are great and I learn from you and what you publish in the forum! There is no need to apologize as we discussed something technically! and many times disagreement helps to improve things! We have a Perdian proverb: differences make beauty! So, I appreciate your efforts and thoughts shared with us here! Best wishes Mohammad On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 8:04 PM Charlie Veniot wrote: > Hey, I totally agree with you, and if I sound unappreciative, then I > totally apologize. I do very much appreciate. > > Each one of us learns within the confines of our own abilities, learning > by maximizing those things that play to our strengths and minimizing those > things that emphasize our weaknesses. > > I've got ADHD (attention regulation challenges), and I go into dysfunction > when I'm overstimulated by sensory overload and/or cognitive overload. > > My safe place is immersing myself in the details of a complex and very > focused problem/project. I'm at my happiest when hyper-focused on all of > the intertwingled/hyperlinked intricacies of a problem/project scope and > the tools I know for working things out. When I hit a wall because what I > am familiar does not work, then I go seeking out the new things I need, > within the safe boundaries of the problem/project scope. > > It does tickle me silly to know that there are other approaches to > handling a problem. It is a huge benefit. But I can't study that new > thing right away, because I'm hyperfocused (like a dog chewing on a bone) > on churning code for the current problem with a keen desire to master a > particular thing (in this case: filtering.) > > As keen as I am for folk to contribute their knowledge of alternative ways > of doing things for everybody's benefit (I encourage that something silly), > the best I can do is simply take note of that, and park it into a recess of > my sponge for later reference when I need it. Back to the dog chewing on a > bone: everything else is a squirrel. I get easily distracted, but unlike > the dog who can forget about the bone and see just the squirrel, I'm more > like a kid in a candy+toy store, and I don't know where to look: too much > to process. > > So I take note that there are awesome alternatives out there (features in > TiddlyWiki, plugin's, macros/scripts, upcoming new stuff, whatever), and I > quickly park that note in subconscious memory for when I hit a wall or want > to just enjoy learning something new. When I'm in the midst of trying to > figure out how I can solve something with the things I've learned so far, > trying to process alternative ways of doing things when I'm banging my head > against a wall is like having a bunch of people talking to me at the same > time: immediate over-stimulation and I shut right down. > > Most folk don't have this disability (they can easily pause something, and > transition from one thing to another), hence my standing ovation for > anything and everything educative. I just usually find myself having to > ignore the discussion, because I'm already fully engaged in some pretty > deep bush-whacking. > > So that long-winded diatribe just to say the stuff you're contributing > (that everybody contributes, whenever/wherever/however) is awesome. I'm > exceedingly appreciative. It is just hard for me to show that appreciation > by adopting/discussing the idea because I can't cope with competing > thoughts. > > Well, I also find writing a great exercise to understand oneself, too. > Not just how I function/dysfunction, but also how it impacts others. Which > has me on regular guilt-trips. Trying to stay in a safe place cognitively, > while trying to be respectful/appreciative of others. Not so easy to focus > on both when the disability is attention regulation. > > I can pat my head and rub my belly at the same time, so I like to think it > is possible. Then again, show me a dog that doesn't like to have belly > rubbed and a pat on the head ... > > > > On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 1:37:38 AM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:34 AM Charlie Veniot wrote: >> >>> The simplest combo of filters and transclusions? That could be wildly >>> different for each person. >>> >>> For each person, It would be what is easiest to understand and maintain >>> for that person, based on each person's intertwingled way of seeing things, >>> based on each person's experiences (how he/she has done things before, with >>> the features/tool he/she is familiar with, etc. etc. etc.). So done in a >>> way that is likely easily recognisable long after initially written. >>> >>> Likely done à-la "git 'er done" with what one knows right away, maybe >>> with what one knows to look for without ever having worked with, maybe >>> refactored later with newly learned things (say listops, for example), or >>> things with which one now feels comfortable using. >>> >>> There is no one simplest solution for all. There are a plethora of >>> solutions, one being the
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
Hey, I totally agree with you, and if I sound unappreciative, then I totally apologize. I do very much appreciate. Each one of us learns within the confines of our own abilities, learning by maximizing those things that play to our strengths and minimizing those things that emphasize our weaknesses. I've got ADHD (attention regulation challenges), and I go into dysfunction when I'm overstimulated by sensory overload and/or cognitive overload. My safe place is immersing myself in the details of a complex and very focused problem/project. I'm at my happiest when hyper-focused on all of the intertwingled/hyperlinked intricacies of a problem/project scope and the tools I know for working things out. When I hit a wall because what I am familiar does not work, then I go seeking out the new things I need, within the safe boundaries of the problem/project scope. It does tickle me silly to know that there are other approaches to handling a problem. It is a huge benefit. But I can't study that new thing right away, because I'm hyperfocused (like a dog chewing on a bone) on churning code for the current problem with a keen desire to master a particular thing (in this case: filtering.) As keen as I am for folk to contribute their knowledge of alternative ways of doing things for everybody's benefit (I encourage that something silly), the best I can do is simply take note of that, and park it into a recess of my sponge for later reference when I need it. Back to the dog chewing on a bone: everything else is a squirrel. I get easily distracted, but unlike the dog who can forget about the bone and see just the squirrel, I'm more like a kid in a candy+toy store, and I don't know where to look: too much to process. So I take note that there are awesome alternatives out there (features in TiddlyWiki, plugin's, macros/scripts, upcoming new stuff, whatever), and I quickly park that note in subconscious memory for when I hit a wall or want to just enjoy learning something new. When I'm in the midst of trying to figure out how I can solve something with the things I've learned so far, trying to process alternative ways of doing things when I'm banging my head against a wall is like having a bunch of people talking to me at the same time: immediate over-stimulation and I shut right down. Most folk don't have this disability (they can easily pause something, and transition from one thing to another), hence my standing ovation for anything and everything educative. I just usually find myself having to ignore the discussion, because I'm already fully engaged in some pretty deep bush-whacking. So that long-winded diatribe just to say the stuff you're contributing (that everybody contributes, whenever/wherever/however) is awesome. I'm exceedingly appreciative. It is just hard for me to show that appreciation by adopting/discussing the idea because I can't cope with competing thoughts. Well, I also find writing a great exercise to understand oneself, too. Not just how I function/dysfunction, but also how it impacts others. Which has me on regular guilt-trips. Trying to stay in a safe place cognitively, while trying to be respectful/appreciative of others. Not so easy to focus on both when the disability is attention regulation. I can pat my head and rub my belly at the same time, so I like to think it is possible. Then again, show me a dog that doesn't like to have belly rubbed and a pat on the head ... On Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 1:37:38 AM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote: > On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:34 AM Charlie Veniot wrote: > >> The simplest combo of filters and transclusions? That could be wildly >> different for each person. >> >> For each person, It would be what is easiest to understand and maintain >> for that person, based on each person's intertwingled way of seeing things, >> based on each person's experiences (how he/she has done things before, with >> the features/tool he/she is familiar with, etc. etc. etc.). So done in a >> way that is likely easily recognisable long after initially written. >> >> Likely done à-la "git 'er done" with what one knows right away, maybe >> with what one knows to look for without ever having worked with, maybe >> refactored later with newly learned things (say listops, for example), or >> things with which one now feels comfortable using. >> >> There is no one simplest solution for all. There are a plethora of >> solutions, one being the "simplest" for one group of people, another >> solution being the best for another group of people, and another for >> another group, ad infinitum/nauseum.. What you may consider the simplest, >> I consider too complex. What I consider the simplest, you might consider >> too complex. >> > > but one can learn from others! that is why we have schools, teachers, > universities, books, papers, ... you may find your solution is the best, > but see other solutions and learn! > > >>
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
Hi Tones
Thank you for your solution! That solution in TW-Scripts actually belongs
to Eric and based on the question and answer I kept the
original one! Yes, we can improve or add another one with your name and
based on this thread!
Best wishes
Mohammad
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 4:02 AM TW Tones wrote:
> Mohammad,
>
> As a community we are so grateful for your publishing and documentation.
> Shiraz as an example is a substantial resource.
>
> I would like to help, extend your great content a little further and make
> it even more useful If I can so humbly suggest a few things
>
> For example I looked at
> https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Add%20Remove%20Tags%20Using%20ActionListops
>
> Some issues
>
>- To set the tiddler programaticaly including the currentTiddler the
>$macrocall form may be necessary
>- The current tiddler is not the default
>- Since you have to provide the tags but you could default to the
>current tiddler put the tags as parameter 1 and 2
>- You always have to provide the tiddlername
>
> This is my refactored code
> \define add-remove-tags(oldTag, newTag, tiddler)
> <$set name=tiddler value="$tiddler$" emptyValue=<> >
> <$button tooltip="Add '$newTag$' tag and Remove '$oldTag$' tag.">
> Change ''$newTag$'' to ''$oldTag$''
> <$action-listops $tiddler=<> $field="tags"
> $subfilter="[[$newTag$]]" />
> <$action-listops $tiddler=<> $field="tags"
> $subfilter="-[[$oldTag$]]" />
>
>
> \end
> <>
> <>
>
> SO this is the difference
>
>- << add-remove-tags a b>> will operate on the current tiddler
>- the tiddler can be provided optionally.
>
> It is my approach to always write macros for the current tiddler by
> default, this means they remain valid inside lists and edit/view templates
>
Yes, nice! If you search the TW-Script, you see such a solution which is
documented in your name!
>
>- I just reused the name $tiddler$ to Create <> with
>emptyValue <>
>- When you have replaceable values you can make a* detailed tooltip*
>and keep the* button name shorter.*
>- The button is a user function description rather than detailing what
>happens, the tooltip does that.
>
>
We can add more examples to have such options!
> Regards
> Tones
>
> On Sunday, 6 June 2021 at 02:23:08 UTC+10 Mohammad wrote:
>
>> It's a bit complicated! but it works!
>>
>> have a look at TW-Scripts for example
>>
>>
>> https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Add%20Remove%20Tags%20Using%20ActionListops
>>
>>
>>
>> Best wishes
>> Mohammad
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:56 PM Charlie Veniot wrote:
>>
>>> Nah, I didn't consider that because the particular TiddlyWiki instance
>>> I'm working with I've setup with only single-word tags.
>>>
>>> So no, that particular code sample was not designed for a tag with words
>>> separated by spaces.
>>>
>>> To handle any multi-word tag with spaces between the words:
>>>
>>> \define doIt()
>>> <$vars ldb="[["
>>> rdb="]]">
>>> <$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
>>> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
>>> [tags[]addprefixaddsuffixjoin[ ]]
>>> [[mot]addprefixaddsuffix] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
>>>
>>>
>>> \end
>>>
>>> <$button actions=<>>
>>> Tag Em
>>>
>>>
>>> I've also wrapped the new tag (hard-coded in my code sample as "mot")
>>> with double-brackets, so that if you replace "mot" with a
>>> multi-word-separated by spaces tag, the code still works otherwise as-is.
>>> (in the case of a single-word, or CamelCase word, TiddlyWiki will ignore
>>> the double-brackets.)
>>>
>>> If you want to make the actions macro more generalized, then you'll want
>>> to add a parameter (newTag?), and then replace "mot" with "$newTag$", I
>>> think without trying it.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 6:33:51 AM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote:
>>>
Does this work if you want to add [[newTag from code]]?
Or if the tiddlers already have a tag with space in the title?
Best wishes
Mohammad
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:01 AM Charlie Veniot
wrote:
> G'day,
>
> I'm refactoring the design on a TiddlyWiki project, and wanted to
> apply tag changes to batches of tiddlers.
>
> In case of any interest, here's the related code pattern:
>
> \define doIt()
> <$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
> [tags[]] [[mot]] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
>
> \end
>
> <$button actions=<>>
> Tag Em
>
>
> Cheers !
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9b84cbd5-ce87-4611-a180-4dccaf611061n%40googlegroups.com
>
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:34 AM Charlie Veniot wrote: > The simplest combo of filters and transclusions? That could be wildly > different for each person. > > For each person, It would be what is easiest to understand and maintain > for that person, based on each person's intertwingled way of seeing things, > based on each person's experiences (how he/she has done things before, with > the features/tool he/she is familiar with, etc. etc. etc.). So done in a > way that is likely easily recognisable long after initially written. > > Likely done à-la "git 'er done" with what one knows right away, maybe with > what one knows to look for without ever having worked with, maybe > refactored later with newly learned things (say listops, for example), or > things with which one now feels comfortable using. > > There is no one simplest solution for all. There are a plethora of > solutions, one being the "simplest" for one group of people, another > solution being the best for another group of people, and another for > another group, ad infinitum/nauseum.. What you may consider the simplest, > I consider too complex. What I consider the simplest, you might consider > too complex. > but one can learn from others! that is why we have schools, teachers, universities, books, papers, ... you may find your solution is the best, but see other solutions and learn! > Yeah, I just went philosophical. Too hungry for supper at the moment to > get cracking on some code. But I am mentally chewing on it, while also > thinking about chowing down on some literal food... > somethies discussing things and having different ideas from different people helps to find better solutions! > > > > > > On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 4:36:27 PM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 9:36 PM Charlie Veniot wrote: >> >>> *That is definitely short and sweet (elegant !).* Thanks for posting! >>> Great to have in one's toolkit (i.e. knowledge of listops, or simply >>> availability of excellent pre-canned solutions to focus on bigger >>> problems), so into my back-pocket for delving into someday it all goes. >>> >>> I'm on a hyper-focused quest to fully explore TiddlyWiki filtering, so >>> although on my radar, I've buried listops far under the pile until I've >>> pretty well tapped-out the possibilities with filters. It is very easy to >>> get overwhelmed trying to learn/remember/practice the whole buffet of >>> options re TiddlyWiki options/features/etc. >>> >>> I also tend to avoid plugins, however fantastic, unless they solve a >>> problem I'm really not interested in solving. For most things, trying to >>> solve them with transclusions and filtering are just too strong and >>> exciting/attractive exercises for this kid to pass up. >>> >>> For anybody with the time and desire to dabble in "the weeds of >>> TiddlyWiki empowerment", filtering is, to me, the greatest place to focus >>> on. "How would I do this/that with filters", they are such great >>> exercises. Well, this old fella sees those as great brain-age exercises of >>> the puzzle-solving kind. Every new thing learned re filtering feels like >>> an opening up of exponential possibilities. (I have way too much fun with >>> this stuff...) >>> >> >> Yes, I see your nice solution using filtering and transclusion! So, let's >> ask a question, I need it to use it in some real cases! >> I have a lengthy solution! and I am looking for a simpler one! >> >> A. >> 1. Assume I have several tiddlers tagged with data and have three fields: >> st.name, st.number, st.average >> 2. I want to make a table out of these as below >> 2.1 each row is a tiddler >> 2.2 each column is a field like this: Title, Name, Number, Average >> 3. Sort table >> 3.1. I have three buttons, clicking on each button sort table by one of >> title, number or average >> 3. Now I want to sort the table by first column: Name or Number >> 4. Then I want to sort again (doubly sort) table based on average >> >> B. >> The general solution should be like this >> - user can click on a button and get the table sorted >> - user then click on the second button and get the double sorted >> - user then click on the third button and gettriply sorted table >> >> What is the simplest filter/transclusion for this? >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 1:23:08 PM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote: >>> It's a bit complicated! but it works! have a look at TW-Scripts for example https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Add%20Remove%20Tags%20Using%20ActionListops Best wishes Mohammad On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:56 PM Charlie Veniot wrote: > Nah, I didn't consider that because the particular TiddlyWiki instance > I'm working with I've setup with only single-word tags. > > So no, that particular code sample was not designed for a tag with > words separated by spaces. > > To handle any multi-word tag with
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
Mohammad,
As a community we are so grateful for your publishing and documentation.
Shiraz as an example is a substantial resource.
I would like to help, extend your great content a little further and make
it even more useful If I can so humbly suggest a few things
For example I looked at
https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Add%20Remove%20Tags%20Using%20ActionListops
Some issues
- To set the tiddler programaticaly including the currentTiddler the
$macrocall form may be necessary
- The current tiddler is not the default
- Since you have to provide the tags but you could default to the
current tiddler put the tags as parameter 1 and 2
- You always have to provide the tiddlername
This is my refactored code
\define add-remove-tags(oldTag, newTag, tiddler)
<$set name=tiddler value="$tiddler$" emptyValue=<> >
<$button tooltip="Add '$newTag$' tag and Remove '$oldTag$' tag.">
Change ''$newTag$'' to ''$oldTag$''
<$action-listops $tiddler=<> $field="tags"
$subfilter="[[$newTag$]]" />
<$action-listops $tiddler=<> $field="tags"
$subfilter="-[[$oldTag$]]" />
\end
<>
<>
SO this is the difference
- << add-remove-tags a b>> will operate on the current tiddler
- the tiddler can be provided optionally.
It is my approach to always write macros for the current tiddler by
default, this means they remain valid inside lists and edit/view templates
- I just reused the name $tiddler$ to Create <> with emptyValue
<>
- When you have replaceable values you can make a* detailed tooltip* and
keep the* button name shorter.*
- The button is a user function description rather than detailing what
happens, the tooltip does that.
Regards
Tones
On Sunday, 6 June 2021 at 02:23:08 UTC+10 Mohammad wrote:
> It's a bit complicated! but it works!
>
> have a look at TW-Scripts for example
>
>
> https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Add%20Remove%20Tags%20Using%20ActionListops
>
>
>
> Best wishes
> Mohammad
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:56 PM Charlie Veniot wrote:
>
>> Nah, I didn't consider that because the particular TiddlyWiki instance
>> I'm working with I've setup with only single-word tags.
>>
>> So no, that particular code sample was not designed for a tag with words
>> separated by spaces.
>>
>> To handle any multi-word tag with spaces between the words:
>>
>> \define doIt()
>> <$vars ldb="[["
>> rdb="]]">
>> <$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
>> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
>> [tags[]addprefixaddsuffixjoin[ ]]
>> [[mot]addprefixaddsuffix] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
>>
>>
>> \end
>>
>> <$button actions=<>>
>> Tag Em
>>
>>
>> I've also wrapped the new tag (hard-coded in my code sample as "mot")
>> with double-brackets, so that if you replace "mot" with a
>> multi-word-separated by spaces tag, the code still works otherwise as-is.
>> (in the case of a single-word, or CamelCase word, TiddlyWiki will ignore
>> the double-brackets.)
>>
>> If you want to make the actions macro more generalized, then you'll want
>> to add a parameter (newTag?), and then replace "mot" with "$newTag$", I
>> think without trying it.
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 6:33:51 AM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote:
>>
>>> Does this work if you want to add [[newTag from code]]?
>>> Or if the tiddlers already have a tag with space in the title?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>> Mohammad
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:01 AM Charlie Veniot
>>> wrote:
>>>
G'day,
I'm refactoring the design on a TiddlyWiki project, and wanted to apply
tag changes to batches of tiddlers.
In case of any interest, here's the related code pattern:
\define doIt()
<$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
<$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
[tags[]] [[mot]] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
\end
<$button actions=<>>
Tag Em
Cheers !
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9b84cbd5-ce87-4611-a180-4dccaf611061n%40googlegroups.com
.
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/832ea5f8-e467-4e28-8785-a58ccb02562en%40googlegroups.com
>>
>>
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
The simplest combo of filters and transclusions? That could be wildly
different for each person.
For each person, It would be what is easiest to understand and maintain for
that person, based on each person's intertwingled way of seeing things,
based on each person's experiences (how he/she has done things before, with
the features/tool he/she is familiar with, etc. etc. etc.). So done in a
way that is likely easily recognisable long after initially written.
Likely done à-la "git 'er done" with what one knows right away, maybe with
what one knows to look for without ever having worked with, maybe
refactored later with newly learned things (say listops, for example), or
things with which one now feels comfortable using.
There is no one simplest solution for all. There are a plethora of
solutions, one being the "simplest" for one group of people, another
solution being the best for another group of people, and another for
another group, ad infinitum/nauseum.. What you may consider the simplest,
I consider too complex. What I consider the simplest, you might consider
too complex.
Yeah, I just went philosophical. Too hungry for supper at the moment to
get cracking on some code. But I am mentally chewing on it, while also
thinking about chowing down on some literal food...
On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 4:36:27 PM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 9:36 PM Charlie Veniot wrote:
>
>> *That is definitely short and sweet (elegant !).* Thanks for posting!
>> Great to have in one's toolkit (i.e. knowledge of listops, or simply
>> availability of excellent pre-canned solutions to focus on bigger
>> problems), so into my back-pocket for delving into someday it all goes.
>>
>> I'm on a hyper-focused quest to fully explore TiddlyWiki filtering, so
>> although on my radar, I've buried listops far under the pile until I've
>> pretty well tapped-out the possibilities with filters. It is very easy to
>> get overwhelmed trying to learn/remember/practice the whole buffet of
>> options re TiddlyWiki options/features/etc.
>>
>> I also tend to avoid plugins, however fantastic, unless they solve a
>> problem I'm really not interested in solving. For most things, trying to
>> solve them with transclusions and filtering are just too strong and
>> exciting/attractive exercises for this kid to pass up.
>>
>> For anybody with the time and desire to dabble in "the weeds of
>> TiddlyWiki empowerment", filtering is, to me, the greatest place to focus
>> on. "How would I do this/that with filters", they are such great
>> exercises. Well, this old fella sees those as great brain-age exercises of
>> the puzzle-solving kind. Every new thing learned re filtering feels like
>> an opening up of exponential possibilities. (I have way too much fun with
>> this stuff...)
>>
>
> Yes, I see your nice solution using filtering and transclusion! So, let's
> ask a question, I need it to use it in some real cases!
> I have a lengthy solution! and I am looking for a simpler one!
>
> A.
> 1. Assume I have several tiddlers tagged with data and have three fields:
> st.name, st.number, st.average
> 2. I want to make a table out of these as below
> 2.1 each row is a tiddler
> 2.2 each column is a field like this: Title, Name, Number, Average
> 3. Sort table
> 3.1. I have three buttons, clicking on each button sort table by one of
> title, number or average
> 3. Now I want to sort the table by first column: Name or Number
> 4. Then I want to sort again (doubly sort) table based on average
>
> B.
> The general solution should be like this
> - user can click on a button and get the table sorted
> - user then click on the second button and get the double sorted
> - user then click on the third button and gettriply sorted table
>
> What is the simplest filter/transclusion for this?
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 1:23:08 PM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote:
>>
>>> It's a bit complicated! but it works!
>>>
>>> have a look at TW-Scripts for example
>>>
>>>
>>> https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Add%20Remove%20Tags%20Using%20ActionListops
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>> Mohammad
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:56 PM Charlie Veniot wrote:
>>>
Nah, I didn't consider that because the particular TiddlyWiki instance
I'm working with I've setup with only single-word tags.
So no, that particular code sample was not designed for a tag with
words separated by spaces.
To handle any multi-word tag with spaces between the words:
\define doIt()
<$vars ldb="[["
rdb="]]">
<$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
<$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
[tags[]addprefixaddsuffixjoin[ ]]
[[mot]addprefixaddsuffix] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
\end
<$button actions=<>>
Tag Em
I've also wrapped the new tag (hard-coded in my code sample as
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 9:36 PM Charlie Veniot wrote:
> *That is definitely short and sweet (elegant !).* Thanks for posting!
> Great to have in one's toolkit (i.e. knowledge of listops, or simply
> availability of excellent pre-canned solutions to focus on bigger
> problems), so into my back-pocket for delving into someday it all goes.
>
> I'm on a hyper-focused quest to fully explore TiddlyWiki filtering, so
> although on my radar, I've buried listops far under the pile until I've
> pretty well tapped-out the possibilities with filters. It is very easy to
> get overwhelmed trying to learn/remember/practice the whole buffet of
> options re TiddlyWiki options/features/etc.
>
> I also tend to avoid plugins, however fantastic, unless they solve a
> problem I'm really not interested in solving. For most things, trying to
> solve them with transclusions and filtering are just too strong and
> exciting/attractive exercises for this kid to pass up.
>
> For anybody with the time and desire to dabble in "the weeds of TiddlyWiki
> empowerment", filtering is, to me, the greatest place to focus on. "How
> would I do this/that with filters", they are such great exercises. Well,
> this old fella sees those as great brain-age exercises of the
> puzzle-solving kind. Every new thing learned re filtering feels like an
> opening up of exponential possibilities. (I have way too much fun with
> this stuff...)
>
Yes, I see your nice solution using filtering and transclusion! So, let's
ask a question, I need it to use it in some real cases!
I have a lengthy solution! and I am looking for a simpler one!
A.
1. Assume I have several tiddlers tagged with data and have three fields:
st.name, st.number, st.average
2. I want to make a table out of these as below
2.1 each row is a tiddler
2.2 each column is a field like this: Title, Name, Number, Average
3. Sort table
3.1. I have three buttons, clicking on each button sort table by one of
title, number or average
3. Now I want to sort the table by first column: Name or Number
4. Then I want to sort again (doubly sort) table based on average
B.
The general solution should be like this
- user can click on a button and get the table sorted
- user then click on the second button and get the double sorted
- user then click on the third button and gettriply sorted table
What is the simplest filter/transclusion for this?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 1:23:08 PM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote:
>
>> It's a bit complicated! but it works!
>>
>> have a look at TW-Scripts for example
>>
>>
>> https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Add%20Remove%20Tags%20Using%20ActionListops
>>
>>
>>
>> Best wishes
>> Mohammad
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:56 PM Charlie Veniot wrote:
>>
>>> Nah, I didn't consider that because the particular TiddlyWiki instance
>>> I'm working with I've setup with only single-word tags.
>>>
>>> So no, that particular code sample was not designed for a tag with words
>>> separated by spaces.
>>>
>>> To handle any multi-word tag with spaces between the words:
>>>
>>> \define doIt()
>>> <$vars ldb="[["
>>> rdb="]]">
>>> <$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
>>> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
>>> [tags[]addprefixaddsuffixjoin[ ]]
>>> [[mot]addprefixaddsuffix] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
>>>
>>>
>>> \end
>>>
>>> <$button actions=<>>
>>> Tag Em
>>>
>>>
>>> I've also wrapped the new tag (hard-coded in my code sample as "mot")
>>> with double-brackets, so that if you replace "mot" with a
>>> multi-word-separated by spaces tag, the code still works otherwise as-is.
>>> (in the case of a single-word, or CamelCase word, TiddlyWiki will ignore
>>> the double-brackets.)
>>>
>>> If you want to make the actions macro more generalized, then you'll want
>>> to add a parameter (newTag?), and then replace "mot" with "$newTag$", I
>>> think without trying it.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 6:33:51 AM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote:
>>>
Does this work if you want to add [[newTag from code]]?
Or if the tiddlers already have a tag with space in the title?
Best wishes
Mohammad
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:01 AM Charlie Veniot
wrote:
> G'day,
>
> I'm refactoring the design on a TiddlyWiki project, and wanted to
> apply tag changes to batches of tiddlers.
>
> In case of any interest, here's the related code pattern:
>
> \define doIt()
> <$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
> [tags[]] [[mot]] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
>
> \end
>
> <$button actions=<>>
> Tag Em
>
>
> Cheers !
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
*That is definitely short and sweet (elegant !).* Thanks for posting!
Great to have in one's toolkit (i.e. knowledge of listops, or simply
availability of excellent pre-canned solutions to focus on bigger
problems), so into my back-pocket for delving into someday it all goes.
I'm on a hyper-focused quest to fully explore TiddlyWiki filtering, so
although on my radar, I've buried listops far under the pile until I've
pretty well tapped-out the possibilities with filters. It is very easy to
get overwhelmed trying to learn/remember/practice the whole buffet of
options re TiddlyWiki options/features/etc.
I also tend to avoid plugins, however fantastic, unless they solve a
problem I'm really not interested in solving. For most things, trying to
solve them with transclusions and filtering are just too strong and
exciting/attractive exercises for this kid to pass up.
For anybody with the time and desire to dabble in "the weeds of TiddlyWiki
empowerment", filtering is, to me, the greatest place to focus on. "How
would I do this/that with filters", they are such great exercises. Well,
this old fella sees those as great brain-age exercises of the
puzzle-solving kind. Every new thing learned re filtering feels like an
opening up of exponential possibilities. (I have way too much fun with
this stuff...)
On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 1:23:08 PM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote:
> It's a bit complicated! but it works!
>
> have a look at TW-Scripts for example
>
>
> https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Add%20Remove%20Tags%20Using%20ActionListops
>
>
>
> Best wishes
> Mohammad
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:56 PM Charlie Veniot wrote:
>
>> Nah, I didn't consider that because the particular TiddlyWiki instance
>> I'm working with I've setup with only single-word tags.
>>
>> So no, that particular code sample was not designed for a tag with words
>> separated by spaces.
>>
>> To handle any multi-word tag with spaces between the words:
>>
>> \define doIt()
>> <$vars ldb="[["
>> rdb="]]">
>> <$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
>> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
>> [tags[]addprefixaddsuffixjoin[ ]]
>> [[mot]addprefixaddsuffix] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
>>
>>
>> \end
>>
>> <$button actions=<>>
>> Tag Em
>>
>>
>> I've also wrapped the new tag (hard-coded in my code sample as "mot")
>> with double-brackets, so that if you replace "mot" with a
>> multi-word-separated by spaces tag, the code still works otherwise as-is.
>> (in the case of a single-word, or CamelCase word, TiddlyWiki will ignore
>> the double-brackets.)
>>
>> If you want to make the actions macro more generalized, then you'll want
>> to add a parameter (newTag?), and then replace "mot" with "$newTag$", I
>> think without trying it.
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 6:33:51 AM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote:
>>
>>> Does this work if you want to add [[newTag from code]]?
>>> Or if the tiddlers already have a tag with space in the title?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>> Mohammad
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:01 AM Charlie Veniot
>>> wrote:
>>>
G'day,
I'm refactoring the design on a TiddlyWiki project, and wanted to apply
tag changes to batches of tiddlers.
In case of any interest, here's the related code pattern:
\define doIt()
<$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
<$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
[tags[]] [[mot]] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
\end
<$button actions=<>>
Tag Em
Cheers !
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9b84cbd5-ce87-4611-a180-4dccaf611061n%40googlegroups.com
.
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/832ea5f8-e467-4e28-8785-a58ccb02562en%40googlegroups.com
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
It's a bit complicated! but it works!
have a look at TW-Scripts for example
https://kookma.github.io/TW-Scripts/#Add%20Remove%20Tags%20Using%20ActionListops
Best wishes
Mohammad
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:56 PM Charlie Veniot wrote:
> Nah, I didn't consider that because the particular TiddlyWiki instance I'm
> working with I've setup with only single-word tags.
>
> So no, that particular code sample was not designed for a tag with words
> separated by spaces.
>
> To handle any multi-word tag with spaces between the words:
>
> \define doIt()
> <$vars ldb="[["
> rdb="]]">
> <$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
> [tags[]addprefixaddsuffixjoin[ ]]
> [[mot]addprefixaddsuffix] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
>
>
> \end
>
> <$button actions=<>>
> Tag Em
>
>
> I've also wrapped the new tag (hard-coded in my code sample as "mot") with
> double-brackets, so that if you replace "mot" with a multi-word-separated
> by spaces tag, the code still works otherwise as-is. (in the case of a
> single-word, or CamelCase word, TiddlyWiki will ignore the double-brackets.)
>
> If you want to make the actions macro more generalized, then you'll want
> to add a parameter (newTag?), and then replace "mot" with "$newTag$", I
> think without trying it.
>
>
> On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 6:33:51 AM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote:
>
>> Does this work if you want to add [[newTag from code]]?
>> Or if the tiddlers already have a tag with space in the title?
>>
>>
>> Best wishes
>> Mohammad
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:01 AM Charlie Veniot wrote:
>>
>>> G'day,
>>>
>>> I'm refactoring the design on a TiddlyWiki project, and wanted to apply
>>> tag changes to batches of tiddlers.
>>>
>>> In case of any interest, here's the related code pattern:
>>>
>>> \define doIt()
>>> <$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
>>> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
>>> [tags[]] [[mot]] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
>>>
>>> \end
>>>
>>> <$button actions=<>>
>>> Tag Em
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers !
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9b84cbd5-ce87-4611-a180-4dccaf611061n%40googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/832ea5f8-e467-4e28-8785-a58ccb02562en%40googlegroups.com
>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAAV1gMBoWYLCQ77ro_L1hT%2B%2BFMrzv3gFUHq%3DHMCC8vULpGKVMQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
Nah, I didn't consider that because the particular TiddlyWiki instance I'm
working with I've setup with only single-word tags.
So no, that particular code sample was not designed for a tag with words
separated by spaces.
To handle any multi-word tag with spaces between the words:
\define doIt()
<$vars ldb="[["
rdb="]]">
<$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
<$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
[tags[]addprefixaddsuffixjoin[ ]]
[[mot]addprefixaddsuffix] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
\end
<$button actions=<>>
Tag Em
I've also wrapped the new tag (hard-coded in my code sample as "mot") with
double-brackets, so that if you replace "mot" with a multi-word-separated
by spaces tag, the code still works otherwise as-is. (in the case of a
single-word, or CamelCase word, TiddlyWiki will ignore the double-brackets.)
If you want to make the actions macro more generalized, then you'll want to
add a parameter (newTag?), and then replace "mot" with "$newTag$", I think
without trying it.
On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 6:33:51 AM UTC-3 Mohammad wrote:
> Does this work if you want to add [[newTag from code]]?
> Or if the tiddlers already have a tag with space in the title?
>
>
> Best wishes
> Mohammad
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:01 AM Charlie Veniot wrote:
>
>> G'day,
>>
>> I'm refactoring the design on a TiddlyWiki project, and wanted to apply
>> tag changes to batches of tiddlers.
>>
>> In case of any interest, here's the related code pattern:
>>
>> \define doIt()
>> <$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
>> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
>> [tags[]] [[mot]] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
>>
>> \end
>>
>> <$button actions=<>>
>> Tag Em
>>
>>
>> Cheers !
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9b84cbd5-ce87-4611-a180-4dccaf611061n%40googlegroups.com
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/832ea5f8-e467-4e28-8785-a58ccb02562en%40googlegroups.com.
Re: [tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
Does this work if you want to add [[newTag from code]]?
Or if the tiddlers already have a tag with space in the title?
Best wishes
Mohammad
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 10:01 AM Charlie Veniot wrote:
> G'day,
>
> I'm refactoring the design on a TiddlyWiki project, and wanted to apply
> tag changes to batches of tiddlers.
>
> In case of any interest, here's the related code pattern:
>
> \define doIt()
> <$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
> <$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
> [tags[]] [[mot]] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
>
> \end
>
> <$button actions=<>>
> Tag Em
>
>
> Cheers !
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9b84cbd5-ce87-4611-a180-4dccaf611061n%40googlegroups.com
>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAAV1gMCuXoAcbGyCdGkMVzgeAp2c7DC-w7prWuTcwvihKbnxng%40mail.gmail.com.
[tw5] A Code Pattern: Batch update of tags on tiddlers
G'day,
I'm refactoring the design on a TiddlyWiki project, and wanted to apply tag
changes to batches of tiddlers.
In case of any interest, here's the related code pattern:
\define doIt()
<$list variable="thisTiddler" filter="[tag[A]]">
<$action-setfield $tiddler=<> $field="tags" $value={{{
[tags[]] [[mot]] +[join[ ]] }}}/>
\end
<$button actions=<>>
Tag Em
Cheers !
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9b84cbd5-ce87-4611-a180-4dccaf611061n%40googlegroups.com.
