[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki


On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 4:07:08 PM UTC-8 wrote:

>
>>
> I believe we have always been able to save to any branch we want. The only 
> limitation is that only one branch for a given repository can be published 
> via github pages to be served over HTTP, which is a github limitation and 
> not one coming from TiddlyWiki. 
>
>
Ah, that is what it was. I knew there was something.
 

> Apologies if I haven't been the most eloquent today, I am probably a 
> little bit too exhausted to be explaining things.
>

'Tis the season to be harried ...
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/23a5d7b7-0e3f-4579-b32f-c7b40dbca137n%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread Saq Imtiaz

>
> So, I guess what you're saying is that we didn't need $:/GitHub/Branch 
> before and therefore I never created it (because the default was good 
> enough).
>

Precisely. The default value in 5.1.21 shown in the UI for the saver is 
what you wanted, so you never edited it and $:/Github/Branch was never 
created. The UI and the JS used the same default ("master") and saving 
worked fine.

Now in 5.1.23 you still get shown the same default in the UI ("master"), 
but the JavaScript uses another ("main"). Editing the branch name in the UI 
creates the $:/Github/Branch tiddler, so that is used instead of the 
JavaScript default value.
 

> The new question is, can we now save on any branch that we want? Like can 
> I have a "test" branch for experiments before moving to main/master ?
>

I believe we have always been able to save to any branch we want. The only 
limitation is that only one branch for a given repository can be published 
via github pages to be served over HTTP, which is a github limitation and 
not one coming from TiddlyWiki. 

Apologies if I haven't been the most eloquent today, I am probably a little 
bit too exhausted to be explaining things.
Regards,
Saq

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f9977d1c-4105-461a-a746-fa6738503540n%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Ok, think I got it.

When I go back to my last commit from 3 months ago, I see that there is no

$:/GitHub/ <#%24%3A%2FGitHub%2FUsername>Branch

So, I guess what you're saying is that we didn't need $:/GitHub/Branch 
before and therefore I never created it (because the default was good 
enough).

The new question is, can we now save on any branch that we want? Like can I 
have a "test" branch for experiments before moving to main/master ?

Thanks!

On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 3:41:28 PM UTC-8 Mark S. wrote:

> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 3:14:52 PM UTC-8 wrote:
>
>>
>> As am I. I suggest re-reading my previous message with this in mind, as 
>> well as last looking at the links provided here and in the GitHub issue. An 
>> input field being filled in does not necessarily mean the underlying 
>> tiddler exists and has a value.
>>
>
> But ... it was working with 5.1.21. The field must have been filled in or 
> it wouldn't have worked. So how did it become unfilled? 
>
> I understand that just because a value is displayed doesn't mean there is 
> an underlying tiddler. But when and why did it disappear? It was there 
> previously, or it would not have been able to save.
>
> > I would wager you never entered a value for the branch, but rather used 
> the displayed default which is pre-filled as "master".
>  
> Why would I need to enter a branch value, when it already had one in it's 
> prior use on github? It not only APPEARED to have the field filled in, it 
> must have actually had the tiddler filled in or it would never have saved. 
> Or does the upgrade process strip out existing configuration?
>  
> In other words, why doesn't the underlying tiddler exist, or why wasn't it 
> used? I did not download "empty" and then try to save it. I was using an 
> existing TW on github which should already have had all fields filled in.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/36d53d23-0577-460d-8402-02bb52decbebn%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki


On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 3:14:52 PM UTC-8 wrote:

>
> As am I. I suggest re-reading my previous message with this in mind, as 
> well as last looking at the links provided here and in the GitHub issue. An 
> input field being filled in does not necessarily mean the underlying 
> tiddler exists and has a value.
>

But ... it was working with 5.1.21. The field must have been filled in or 
it wouldn't have worked. So how did it become unfilled? 

I understand that just because a value is displayed doesn't mean there is 
an underlying tiddler. But when and why did it disappear? It was there 
previously, or it would not have been able to save.

> I would wager you never entered a value for the branch, but rather used 
the displayed default which is pre-filled as "master".
 
Why would I need to enter a branch value, when it already had one in it's 
prior use on github? It not only APPEARED to have the field filled in, it 
must have actually had the tiddler filled in or it would never have saved. 
Or does the upgrade process strip out existing configuration?
 
In other words, why doesn't the underlying tiddler exist, or why wasn't it 
used? I did not download "empty" and then try to save it. I was using an 
existing TW on github which should already have had all fields filled in.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0cd2180d-2ee7-4050-b06b-503e00a4e79an%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread Saq Imtiaz


> I'm not talking about a brand-new setup on Github. I'm talking about an 
> existing one. So all the fields already had values. 
>

As am I. I suggest re-reading my previous message with this in mind, as 
well as last looking at the links provided here and in the GitHub issue. An 
input field being filled in does not necessarily mean the underlying 
tiddler exists and has a value.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8d721c71-618e-4f3d-ae9e-99860980f96bn%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki


On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 1:17:47 PM UTC-8  wrote:

> I would wager you never entered a value for the branch, but rather used 
> the displayed default which is pre-filled as "master". 
> Thus the $:/Github/Branch tiddler was never created in your wiki (it isn't 
> new for 5.1.23). Like all the other tiddlers for the Github saver, it is 
> only created when you enter a value.
>
>
I'm not talking about a brand-new setup on Github. I'm talking about an 
existing one. So all the fields already had values. 

My TW was 5.1.21. It was on github and saving there. All the saver fields 
were filled in. I downloaded it, upgraded it, and then filled in the 
authorization token. ALL the other fields were showing their original 
values. But it wouldn't save -- until I wrote over the branch "master" with 
the word "master".  I did not need to write over any of the other saver 
fields.
 
So, if $:/Github/Branch already existed, did it get stripped out during the 
upgrade? Why wasn't it used, just like the path, repository, api fields ?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/91486378-f2ee-4530-af12-7942c4288c60n%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread Saq Imtiaz
I would wager you never entered a value for the branch, but rather used the 
displayed default which is pre-filled as "master". 
Thus the $:/Github/Branch tiddler was never created in your wiki (it isn't 
new for 5.1.23). Like all the other tiddlers for the Github saver, it is 
only created when you enter a value.

Have a look at https://tiddlywiki.com/empty.html#%24%3A%2FControlPanel to 
see what I mean, the branch is pre-filled with a default value. Even 
backspacing by a single character and then re-typing it will actually 
create the tiddler. 

Now in 5.1.23 the displayed default value ("master"), and the default 
actually used by the saver ("main" in 5.1.23 whereas it used to be "master" 
in 5.1.22) are no longer the same, causing the save to fail.

Personally I think the pre-filled default value is deceiving and we should 
not use one. I've had similar issues in other contexts where the 
<$edit-text> widget gives the appearance that a tiddler exists but it just 
the default value being shown in the absence of the tiddler.

On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 9:59:23 PM UTC+1 Mark S. wrote:

> So I guess that configuration tiddler $:/GitHub/Branch was added to 5.1.23 
> (it doesn't seem to be in 5.1.22) ?
> I'm trying to understand why my existing configuration didn't persist 
> through the upgrade process, no matter
> what the default attribute provided. All the other configurations (path, 
> api, repository, file name) persisted.
>
> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 11:49:59 AM UTC-8 saq.i...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> @Mark S
>>
>> I posted some details in the issue I created for this: 
>> https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/5317
>>
>> The text you see is from the default attribute of the <$edit-text> in the 
>> UI, see 
>> https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/blob/master/core/ui/ControlPanel/Saving/GitHub.tid#L13
>>
>> When the underlying tiddler does not exist:
>> - the UI shows the branch as "master".
>> - the code after the recent changes, uses "main" instead.
>>
>> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:46:39 PM UTC+1 Mark S. wrote:
>>
>>> I don't understand. My branch was specified (it shows as "master" in the 
>>> saver panel). But I had to delete it and type it in again to get it to 
>>> work. So is there an internal 5.1.23 configuration file that has to be 
>>> overwritten?
>>>
>>> Thanks! 
>>>
>>> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 11:37:56 AM UTC-8 saq.i...@gmail.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Yep, we have our first bug. The placeholder shown when the branch has 
 not been specified is "master", but the code uses "main" for the branch.

 The interim fix for users is fortunately easy, just empty and re-fill 
 the branch name.

 On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:33:15 PM UTC+1 Saq Imtiaz wrote:

> Hmm. I am a bit surprised that worked. I wonder if the changes made to 
> the Github saver to reflect the change made by Github to the default 
> branch  (master vs main) got something wrong.
>
> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:30:50 PM UTC+1 Ste wrote:
>
>> Cheers Saq! 
>> Refilled in all fields and for some reason.. It works..! 
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:25:22 UTC Ste wrote:
>>
>>> Just reread my own post.. Let me clarify... Using the git hub saving 
>>> in tiddlywiki works in pre release but not from newly upgraded. This is 
>>> true both with the file on my phone or the new file uploaded to git hub 
>>> and 
>>> trying the github saver from there. 
>>> XMLHttpRequest error code: 401
>>> Sorry. It's a 401. Not a 404.. I'm losing the plot.. Mulled wine 
>>> time! 
>>>
>>> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:10:55 UTC Ste wrote:
>>>
 I'm sure it's my own muppetry and that I'm trying to do this on my 
 phone but, I can succesfully upload pre upgrade wiki but not post 
 upgrade 
 wiki to github using the git hub saving mechanism. I am getting a 404 
 error. Any one else finding this?
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/26ece1cc-68f6-4496-972b-a0fca71c8992n%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
So I guess that configuration tiddler $:/GitHub/Branch was added to 5.1.23 
(it doesn't seem to be in 5.1.22) ?
I'm trying to understand why my existing configuration didn't persist 
through the upgrade process, no matter
what the default attribute provided. All the other configurations (path, 
api, repository, file name) persisted.

On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 11:49:59 AM UTC-8 saq.i...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> @Mark S
>
> I posted some details in the issue I created for this: 
> https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/5317
>
> The text you see is from the default attribute of the <$edit-text> in the 
> UI, see 
> https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/blob/master/core/ui/ControlPanel/Saving/GitHub.tid#L13
>
> When the underlying tiddler does not exist:
> - the UI shows the branch as "master".
> - the code after the recent changes, uses "main" instead.
>
> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:46:39 PM UTC+1 Mark S. wrote:
>
>> I don't understand. My branch was specified (it shows as "master" in the 
>> saver panel). But I had to delete it and type it in again to get it to 
>> work. So is there an internal 5.1.23 configuration file that has to be 
>> overwritten?
>>
>> Thanks! 
>>
>> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 11:37:56 AM UTC-8 saq.i...@gmail.com 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, we have our first bug. The placeholder shown when the branch has 
>>> not been specified is "master", but the code uses "main" for the branch.
>>>
>>> The interim fix for users is fortunately easy, just empty and re-fill 
>>> the branch name.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:33:15 PM UTC+1 Saq Imtiaz wrote:
>>>
 Hmm. I am a bit surprised that worked. I wonder if the changes made to 
 the Github saver to reflect the change made by Github to the default 
 branch  (master vs main) got something wrong.

 On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:30:50 PM UTC+1 Ste wrote:

> Cheers Saq! 
> Refilled in all fields and for some reason.. It works..! 
>
>
> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:25:22 UTC Ste wrote:
>
>> Just reread my own post.. Let me clarify... Using the git hub saving 
>> in tiddlywiki works in pre release but not from newly upgraded. This is 
>> true both with the file on my phone or the new file uploaded to git hub 
>> and 
>> trying the github saver from there. 
>> XMLHttpRequest error code: 401
>> Sorry. It's a 401. Not a 404.. I'm losing the plot.. Mulled wine 
>> time! 
>>
>> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:10:55 UTC Ste wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sure it's my own muppetry and that I'm trying to do this on my 
>>> phone but, I can succesfully upload pre upgrade wiki but not post 
>>> upgrade 
>>> wiki to github using the git hub saving mechanism. I am getting a 404 
>>> error. Any one else finding this?
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5a20ae86-e7a2-49da-ac19-492c958a2000n%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread Saq Imtiaz
@Mark S

I posted some details in the issue I created for 
this: https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/5317

The text you see is from the default attribute of the <$edit-text> in the 
UI, see 
https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/blob/master/core/ui/ControlPanel/Saving/GitHub.tid#L13

When the underlying tiddler does not exist:
- the UI shows the branch as "master".
- the code after the recent changes, uses "main" instead.

On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:46:39 PM UTC+1 Mark S. wrote:

> I don't understand. My branch was specified (it shows as "master" in the 
> saver panel). But I had to delete it and type it in again to get it to 
> work. So is there an internal 5.1.23 configuration file that has to be 
> overwritten?
>
> Thanks! 
>
> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 11:37:56 AM UTC-8 saq.i...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> Yep, we have our first bug. The placeholder shown when the branch has not 
>> been specified is "master", but the code uses "main" for the branch.
>>
>> The interim fix for users is fortunately easy, just empty and re-fill the 
>> branch name.
>>
>> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:33:15 PM UTC+1 Saq Imtiaz wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm. I am a bit surprised that worked. I wonder if the changes made to 
>>> the Github saver to reflect the change made by Github to the default 
>>> branch  (master vs main) got something wrong.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:30:50 PM UTC+1 Ste wrote:
>>>
 Cheers Saq! 
 Refilled in all fields and for some reason.. It works..! 


 On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:25:22 UTC Ste wrote:

> Just reread my own post.. Let me clarify... Using the git hub saving 
> in tiddlywiki works in pre release but not from newly upgraded. This is 
> true both with the file on my phone or the new file uploaded to git hub 
> and 
> trying the github saver from there. 
> XMLHttpRequest error code: 401
> Sorry. It's a 401. Not a 404.. I'm losing the plot.. Mulled wine time! 
>
> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:10:55 UTC Ste wrote:
>
>> I'm sure it's my own muppetry and that I'm trying to do this on my 
>> phone but, I can succesfully upload pre upgrade wiki but not post 
>> upgrade 
>> wiki to github using the git hub saving mechanism. I am getting a 404 
>> error. Any one else finding this?
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/20bd02ba-dc43-49a6-8487-2410e2023928n%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
I don't understand. My branch was specified (it shows as "master" in the 
saver panel). But I had to delete it and type it in again to get it to 
work. So is there an internal 5.1.23 configuration file that has to be 
overwritten?

Thanks! 

On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 11:37:56 AM UTC-8 saq.i...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> Yep, we have our first bug. The placeholder shown when the branch has not 
> been specified is "master", but the code uses "main" for the branch.
>
> The interim fix for users is fortunately easy, just empty and re-fill the 
> branch name.
>
> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:33:15 PM UTC+1 Saq Imtiaz wrote:
>
>> Hmm. I am a bit surprised that worked. I wonder if the changes made to 
>> the Github saver to reflect the change made by Github to the default 
>> branch  (master vs main) got something wrong.
>>
>> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:30:50 PM UTC+1 Ste wrote:
>>
>>> Cheers Saq! 
>>> Refilled in all fields and for some reason.. It works..! 
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:25:22 UTC Ste wrote:
>>>
 Just reread my own post.. Let me clarify... Using the git hub saving in 
 tiddlywiki works in pre release but not from newly upgraded. This is true 
 both with the file on my phone or the new file uploaded to git hub and 
 trying the github saver from there. 
 XMLHttpRequest error code: 401
 Sorry. It's a 401. Not a 404.. I'm losing the plot.. Mulled wine time! 

 On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:10:55 UTC Ste wrote:

> I'm sure it's my own muppetry and that I'm trying to do this on my 
> phone but, I can succesfully upload pre upgrade wiki but not post upgrade 
> wiki to github using the git hub saving mechanism. I am getting a 404 
> error. Any one else finding this?



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9b231c30-06a9-415c-8105-ce653f3c0e72n%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread Saq Imtiaz
Yep, we have our first bug. The placeholder shown when the branch has not 
been specified is "master", but the code uses "main" for the branch.

The interim fix for users is fortunately easy, just empty and re-fill the 
branch name.

On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:33:15 PM UTC+1 Saq Imtiaz wrote:

> Hmm. I am a bit surprised that worked. I wonder if the changes made to the 
> Github saver to reflect the change made by Github to the default branch  
> (master vs main) got something wrong.
>
> On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:30:50 PM UTC+1 Ste wrote:
>
>> Cheers Saq! 
>> Refilled in all fields and for some reason.. It works..! 
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:25:22 UTC Ste wrote:
>>
>>> Just reread my own post.. Let me clarify... Using the git hub saving in 
>>> tiddlywiki works in pre release but not from newly upgraded. This is true 
>>> both with the file on my phone or the new file uploaded to git hub and 
>>> trying the github saver from there. 
>>> XMLHttpRequest error code: 401
>>> Sorry. It's a 401. Not a 404.. I'm losing the plot.. Mulled wine time! 
>>>
>>> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:10:55 UTC Ste wrote:
>>>
 I'm sure it's my own muppetry and that I'm trying to do this on my 
 phone but, I can succesfully upload pre upgrade wiki but not post upgrade 
 wiki to github using the git hub saving mechanism. I am getting a 404 
 error. Any one else finding this?
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d8948159-9655-452c-a846-f3ebf5fc52cfn%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread Saq Imtiaz
Hmm. I am a bit surprised that worked. I wonder if the changes made to the 
Github saver to reflect the change made by Github to the default branch  
(master vs main) got something wrong.

On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:30:50 PM UTC+1 Ste wrote:

> Cheers Saq! 
> Refilled in all fields and for some reason.. It works..! 
>
>
> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:25:22 UTC Ste wrote:
>
>> Just reread my own post.. Let me clarify... Using the git hub saving in 
>> tiddlywiki works in pre release but not from newly upgraded. This is true 
>> both with the file on my phone or the new file uploaded to git hub and 
>> trying the github saver from there. 
>> XMLHttpRequest error code: 401
>> Sorry. It's a 401. Not a 404.. I'm losing the plot.. Mulled wine time! 
>>
>> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:10:55 UTC Ste wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sure it's my own muppetry and that I'm trying to do this on my phone 
>>> but, I can succesfully upload pre upgrade wiki but not post upgrade wiki to 
>>> github using the git hub saving mechanism. I am getting a 404 error. Any 
>>> one else finding this?
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ad102688-5e7a-40f7-966f-04e745255a16n%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread Ste
Cheers Saq! 
Refilled in all fields and for some reason.. It works..! 


On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:25:22 UTC Ste wrote:

> Just reread my own post.. Let me clarify... Using the git hub saving in 
> tiddlywiki works in pre release but not from newly upgraded. This is true 
> both with the file on my phone or the new file uploaded to git hub and 
> trying the github saver from there. 
> XMLHttpRequest error code: 401
> Sorry. It's a 401. Not a 404.. I'm losing the plot.. Mulled wine time! 
>
> On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:10:55 UTC Ste wrote:
>
>> I'm sure it's my own muppetry and that I'm trying to do this on my phone 
>> but, I can succesfully upload pre upgrade wiki but not post upgrade wiki to 
>> github using the git hub saving mechanism. I am getting a 404 error. Any 
>> one else finding this?
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/081126cf-8bdd-48ea-9a82-e70c63eef5cbn%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread Ste
Just reread my own post.. Let me clarify... Using the git hub saving in 
tiddlywiki works in pre release but not from newly upgraded. This is true 
both with the file on my phone or the new file uploaded to git hub and 
trying the github saver from there. 
XMLHttpRequest error code: 401
Sorry. It's a 401. Not a 404.. I'm losing the plot.. Mulled wine time! 

On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 19:10:55 UTC Ste wrote:

> I'm sure it's my own muppetry and that I'm trying to do this on my phone 
> but, I can succesfully upload pre upgrade wiki but not post upgrade wiki to 
> github using the git hub saving mechanism. I am getting a 404 error. Any 
> one else finding this?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b0befae3-98a2-408c-849e-423d6a867aa5n%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Git hub saver

2020-12-24 Thread Saq Imtiaz
Long shot, but whatever is entered for "target branch", remove it and 
re-enter. Check your repo to make sure you have the right branch name 
(master/main).

On Thursday, December 24, 2020 at 8:10:55 PM UTC+1 Ste wrote:

> I'm sure it's my own muppetry and that I'm trying to do this on my phone 
> but, I can succesfully upload pre upgrade wiki but not post upgrade wiki to 
> github using the git hub saving mechanism. I am getting a 404 error. Any 
> one else finding this?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/25b5bb80-7dfb-4c47-bac4-bd3a07a18d6en%40googlegroups.com.