Re: [time-nuts] 50 ohm Driver

2015-03-04 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
One comment on the parallel AC gate approach.  It may not be directly 
applicable to Martyn's issue, but there is a common confusion about the 
value of the summing resistors.


Per Tom Clark, who came up with the idea, they are *not* intended to 
provide a near-end line termination to 50 ohms, but are simply there to 
protect the paralleled devices if the gates have slightly different 
delays (in which case one gate could end up sinking the other two).


So, the commonly used 47 ohm value isn't magic.  You can use a lower 
value, and thus get more voltage at the far end.  I haven't experimented 
to see how far you can take that idea before destroying gates.


John

On 3/4/2015 5:26 AM, Martyn Smith wrote:

Hello,

A quick question.

My output driver for a simple amplifier.

I use three gates (in parallel with resistors) from a 74AC14 to give me about 
0-3.2V into 50 ohm.

I want to have a driver that gives me a full 0-5V (at least 0-4.5V) swing into 
50 ohms.

Can anyone recommend an IC that can delivery this.

But it needs to have similar jitter performance to the 74AC14.

I use it up to 10 MHz.

Best Regards

Martyn

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 50 ohm Driver

2015-03-04 Thread Bob Albert via time-nuts
5V into 50 Ohms means 100 mA.  Perhaps you need a medium power transistor 
amplifier or opamp.
Bob
 

 On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 6:09 AM, Martyn Smith mar...@ptsyst.com 
wrote:
   

 Hello,

A quick question.

My output driver for a simple amplifier.

I use three gates (in parallel with resistors) from a 74AC14 to give me about 
0-3.2V into 50 ohm.

I want to have a driver that gives me a full 0-5V (at least 0-4.5V) swing into 
50 ohms.

Can anyone recommend an IC that can delivery this.

But it needs to have similar jitter performance to the 74AC14.

I use it up to 10 MHz.

Best Regards

Martyn 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


   
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 50 ohm Driver

2015-03-04 Thread Graham / KE9H
Building on top of John's comments, if you are using a logic gate, look at
the
maximum output (pull up) current per pin, set the series resistor so that
this
current is not exceeded into a short, then also see if there is a maximum
total
current draw for all gates combined, or some power input pin, and do not
exceed
that.

You can also look at switching the termination resistor from a simple 50 Ohm
resistor to ground, to a Thevenin load, which is 100 Ohms from +V to the
load point,
and another 100 Ohm resistor from the load point to ground. This way you
still have a 50 Ohm termination, but only draw one half the DC current.
In the event of no input, the receiver voltage will go to half scale. Make
sure your system will not misbehave when this happens.

Alternate driver is to use a video line driver with sufficient bandwidth.

--- Graham / KE9H

==

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:54 AM, John Ackermann N8UR j...@febo.com wrote:

 One comment on the parallel AC gate approach.  It may not be directly
 applicable to Martyn's issue, but there is a common confusion about the
 value of the summing resistors.

 Per Tom Clark, who came up with the idea, they are *not* intended to
 provide a near-end line termination to 50 ohms, but are simply there to
 protect the paralleled devices if the gates have slightly different delays
 (in which case one gate could end up sinking the other two).

 So, the commonly used 47 ohm value isn't magic.  You can use a lower
 value, and thus get more voltage at the far end.  I haven't experimented to
 see how far you can take that idea before destroying gates.

 John
 

 On 3/4/2015 5:26 AM, Martyn Smith wrote:

 Hello,

 A quick question.

 My output driver for a simple amplifier.

 I use three gates (in parallel with resistors) from a 74AC14 to give me
 about 0-3.2V into 50 ohm.

 I want to have a driver that gives me a full 0-5V (at least 0-4.5V) swing
 into 50 ohms.

 Can anyone recommend an IC that can delivery this.

 But it needs to have similar jitter performance to the 74AC14.

 I use it up to 10 MHz.

 Best Regards

 Martyn

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
 mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

  ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
 mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 50 ohm Driver

2015-03-04 Thread Tom Van Baak
Martyn -- the 74AC spec allows Vcc to go up to 6.0 VDC (absolute max is 7.0 
VDC) so that might help you meet your 4.5 VDC goal, especially if this is for 
play and not a product. Pick the resistors and use more than 3 gates if 
necessary. Note the peak current spec is 50 mA per gate. Not sure what the 
combined gate current limit is; there is a package thermal limit. You also have 
to decide if you want some level of short-circuit protection or if you can 
always assume 50R termination.

John -- have you tried long duration output shorts on the TADD-2? I figured 
that was also a reason for each gate having its own resistor.

/tvb

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] new tdc from Texas

2015-03-04 Thread Angus
Hi,
 
I've not seen any mention of anything other than the TDC1000. 

I was a bit surprised that they went down the less-integrated route
and separated the TDC, but it turns out that for a lot of the sort of
things they designed it for, a uC provides good enough timing itself,
and no extra TDC is needed at all.

I see that Acam have released a bit more info on their new GP30,
although no data sheet yet. It quotes typical LSB of 11ps, and rms
noise of 1.2 LSB, which is quite an improvement on the GP22.
It would just be good if they offered a simple online way of getting
low volumes of them - I suspect that the specialist distributors would
be just as happy as the customers would be!
 
Angus.


On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:43:25 -0800, you wrote:

Hi Angus:

Do you know if they have an IR pulse front end which would be more interesting 
than the ultrasonic front end?

Mail_Attachment --
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html
Angus wrote:
 In case anyone is interested, the full data sheet is on the TI site
 now, although I didn't see any actual IC's yet other than the ones in
 the eval boards.

 Angus.


 On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 21:24:08 -0200, you wrote:

 Initial datasheet:

 http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tdc7200.pdf

 EVM:

 http://www.ti.com/tool/tdc1000-tdc7200evm

 Seems good... what do you think?

 Daniel
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 50 ohm Driver

2015-03-04 Thread Dan Kemppainen

Hi,

Correct me if I'm wrong but being that AC series gates are MOS devices, 
isn't there inherent current limiting in the MOS junction itself? I 
would think that for the few nanoseconds of skew across gates the tens 
of ohms of junction resistance would make 'shoot through' negligible in 
terms of heating and gate damage.


Of course, a TTL device would be a completely different story and I 
would fully expect summing or balancing resistor would be needed there.


Does anyone have further input regarding paralleling MOS logic devices?

Dan




One comment on the parallel AC gate approach.  It may not be directly
applicable to Martyn's issue, but there is a common confusion about the
value of the summing resistors.

Per Tom Clark, who came up with the idea, they are*not*  intended to
provide a near-end line termination to 50 ohms, but are simply there to
protect the paralleled devices if the gates have slightly different
delays (in which case one gate could end up sinking the other two).

So, the commonly used 47 ohm value isn't magic.  You can use a lower
value, and thus get more voltage at the far end.  I haven't experimented
to see how far you can take that idea before destroying gates.

John

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Thunderbolt NMEA ?

2015-03-04 Thread Didier Juges
The code is in C and Silabs has small dev kits (Toolsticks) that cost $10 to 
which you need to add $18 for the programming dongle. A little more expensive 
than an Arduino, or less, depending on where you buy it...

To that you need to add a MAX232 (or two serial-TTL adapters at $4 each or so 
on ebay) and you are in business.

Total cost about the same as a dedicated GPS receiver with antenna and NMEA 
output. Choose your poison :)

Didier KO4BB


On March 3, 2015 10:23:56 PM CST, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com 
wrote:
Is the code in C?  If so I bet it would run on some development board. 
No
need to make custom PCBs.

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Didier Juges shali...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Tim,

 It shouldn't be too hard to modify the code for my Thunderbolt
monitor to
 make it into a TSIP-NMEA converter. The last version of the kit has
a uC
 with two serial ports. I m out of the kits at the moment but I have a
few
 spare boards left over.


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

-- 
Sent from my Motorola Droid Razr HD 4G LTE wireless tracker while I do other 
things.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 50 ohm Driver

2015-03-04 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

If you want to drive out of a 50 ohm source into your 50 ohm load *and*
get 5V into the load … that’s a fancy amp. 10V power and some careful
work to get it going. 

If you just want to get roughly 5V into a 50 ohm load, then it’s a matter of 
how 
many gates you decide to parallel. If you go with “32 ma” drivers, you should 
be able to get it done with 8 of them in parallel. Drive them all off of a 
single  
dedicated fast gate that’s on the same supply. Probably best to stuff
a 20 or 30 ohm resistor in series with each of the outputs. If it’s *got* to
be a full 5V, don’t use the resistors. 

Bob

 On Mar 4, 2015, at 5:26 AM, Martyn Smith mar...@ptsyst.com wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 A quick question.
 
 My output driver for a simple amplifier.
 
 I use three gates (in parallel with resistors) from a 74AC14 to give me about 
 0-3.2V into 50 ohm.
 
 I want to have a driver that gives me a full 0-5V (at least 0-4.5V) swing 
 into 50 ohms.
 
 Can anyone recommend an IC that can delivery this.
 
 But it needs to have similar jitter performance to the 74AC14.
 
 I use it up to 10 MHz.
 
 Best Regards
 
 Martyn 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 50 ohm Driver

2015-03-04 Thread Hal Murray

j...@febo.com said:
 Per Tom Clark, who came up with the idea, they are *not* intended to
 provide a near-end line termination to 50 ohms, but are simply there to
 protect the paralleled devices if the gates have slightly different  delays
 (in which case one gate could end up sinking the other two). 

Is that a real problem?  How far off can the prop delay be for 2 gates on the 
same chip?

I seem to remember reading something saying it was OK to just wire them up in 
parallel.  It could have been an app note, or it could have been a rumor on 
usenet.

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 50 ohm Driver

2015-03-04 Thread Charles Steinmetz


Is [one gate sourcing or sinking current into paralleled gates that 
don't switch at
exactly the same time] a real problem?  How far off can the prop 
delay be for 2

gates on the same chip?

I seem to remember reading something saying it was OK to just wire them up in
parallel.  It could have been an app note, or it could have been a rumor on
usenet.


Most manufacturers sanction direct paralleling of gates on the same 
chip (and forbid any paralleling, ballasted or otherwise, of outputs 
from different chips).  However, there are other considerations 
(short-circuit protection, maximum output current rating per gate, 
maximum supply and/or ground current rating per package, maximum 
power dissipation, etc.).  Good design practice is to put series 
resistors on each gate output that will prevent any of these ratings 
from being exceeded into a short circuit to ground or to Vcc.  For 
HC, AC, NC7NZ, and NC7SZ, the per-gate output current rating is +/- 
24 (or 25) mA, which suggests that each gate should have a 200 ohm 
series resistor -- but you need to check all of the other ratings 
mentioned above for the chip you use, to make sure they won't be violated.


Unfortunately, if the load is 50 ohms to ground, pulling it to even 
4.5v from a 5v logic supply requires a source resistance of only 5.6 
ohms, or 36 parallel gates each with 200 ohms in series (this assumes 
that the gates can pull all the way to 5v while delivering rated 
current, which they can't -- so the reality is even worse).  You can 
make things a little better by terminating the output into 50 ohms to 
1/2 Vcc (i.e, the center of a voltage divider with 100 ohms to Vcc 
and 100 ohms to ground), but (i) it only gets a little better, and 
(ii) now it won't pull all the way to ground.


All that said, why do you want to generate a high-current square 
wave, anyway?  If you're distributing a frequency standard, it is 
much better to distribute a sine wave (you don't have to worry about 
the harmonics being skewed, and there is exponentially less of a 
problem with it radiating and getting into every radio and other 
sensitive electronic device in your house and the other houses on the block).


Best regards,

Charles



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] new tdc from Texas

2015-03-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp

In message blu170-w50577ecf0b24fa2bcefc50ce...@phx.gbl, Mark Sims writes:

Sparkfun is selling a board (around $15) based on the STM VL6180
chip that measures distance based upon time-of-flight of pulses
from an on chip (or at least in-package) VCSEL IR laser.   Claims
to have a range of 0 .. maybe 30 cm.   Unfortunately it doesn't
look like you can directly access the time interval measurement
portion of the chip.

It doesn't measure time interval, it measures frequency.

These devices contain an oscillator where the flight of the light pulse
is the delay element, then measure the resulting frequency.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] 50 ohm Driver

2015-03-04 Thread Martyn Smith
Hello,

A quick question.

My output driver for a simple amplifier.

I use three gates (in parallel with resistors) from a 74AC14 to give me about 
0-3.2V into 50 ohm.

I want to have a driver that gives me a full 0-5V (at least 0-4.5V) swing into 
50 ohms.

Can anyone recommend an IC that can delivery this.

But it needs to have similar jitter performance to the 74AC14.

I use it up to 10 MHz.

Best Regards

Martyn 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.