Re: [time-nuts] Time Nut Pickens at the MIT Flea ?

2013-05-20 Thread Ziggy
I was there as well, but did not see much of interest. That might be because 
Paul Swed scooped up the good stuff before I could finish the first pass :) 
Nice find Paul, hope they settle down for you. Would love to see a post-flea 
get together and put some faces with names, but I don't know of any places 
nearby.

Paul - K9MR

On May 19, 2013, at 10:22 PM, paul swed wrote:

Good news at least the first EGG RB fired up and after adjusting the
synthesizer is locked very nicely. Letting it bake and figuring out the dip
switches. They were wrong or purposely offset. Hard to say. Lamp voltage is
12 VDC I suspect thats quite a good number if compared to the old FRS and
FRCs I have down in the 5-6V range. The FRS/C run 12 new.
Can't really find any documentation, but expected that.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL


On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Bob Bownes bow...@gmail.com wrote:

 We should plan a Time-Nuts BOF lunch after the next flea.
 
 Saw little TN gear @ Dayton save one Efretom RBI time base for $1800 and a
 few 10811s of dubious quality for $50 ea. the dents put me off gambling on
 one since I was given or the afternoon before! ;)
 
 On May 19, 2013, at 21:50, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz output level from DATUM 9390...

2012-12-15 Thread Ziggy
Burt -

On the scope I see 950mv RMS with 50 ohm termination, 1.5V RMS with 1M. This is 
on a 9390-6000 OCXO with the default timing output configuration, 10MHz on J7. 
Hope this helps.

Paul - K9MR

On Dec 15, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Burt I. Weiner wrote:

Gang,

Does anyone have a DATUM 9390 series GPS receiver that can tell me what the (50 
Ohm) terminated output level of the 10 MHz spigot is.  One of mine started 
spurring and the other one is clean, but seems way to high in output level.

Thanks,

Burt, K6OQK

Burt I. Weiner Associates
Broadcast Technical Services
Glendale, California  U.S.A.
b...@att.net
www.biwa.cc
K6OQK 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] FE-5682A coming, any info?

2012-11-21 Thread Ziggy
The -48V RTN should be the 'positive' side and the POWER -48V should be 
the 'negative' side. On normal installations the -48V is a black wire, 
the -48V return is a red wire. It's like having a 'positive ground'. 
(I've used, manufactured, sold, and installed 48V Telco gear.) On most 
Telco gear both are isolated from earth ground - but you should check. A 
current limited supply would be nice for initial startup, but I don't 
think you'll have any issues. You should in any case, fuse it.


Ziggy

On 11/21/2012 09:10 AM, Fabio Eboli wrote:

Thank you, Peter and Paul.
Now I see that the pinout is almost identical
to LPRO-101, the only difference are pins
8 and 10 for power supply.
That's nice, I like the external C-Field control,
and monitor voltage for lamp, they can be useful.

I'm not familiar with telco power supplies,
I know only that they used 48V with positive
to ground.

So the supply should be 48V, positive
to pin 8 and negative to 10 ?

Should I expect the GND to be connected to pin
8? Or it will be floating at middle voltage
(hence the 19 to 32V rating), in this case
all I need will be a dual 24V psu.

Fabio.


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Datum/Exactime 9390-6000

2012-06-24 Thread Ziggy
Just thought I'd give a progress report.

I've successfully placed a micro (Arduino) between the GPS and the system 
board, can spit out the packets in hex, and inject/modify data on the fly. So I 
can add 1024 to the GPS week and the unit does the date conversion correctly. 
But it gets more interesting.

What I've found is that the GPS module has a nonstandard firmware. It still 
sends TSIP, but the GPS time packet 0x41 has a different format:

Header (0x10)
GPS time of week (4 byte single precision float)
GPS week number (integer)
GPS/UTC offset or leap second count (integer)
??? 4 bytes
Trailer (0x10 0x03)

For reference, a standard TSIP GPS time packet 0x41 is:
Header (0x10)
GPS time of week (4 byte single precision float)
GPS week number (integer)
GPS/UTC offset (4 byte single precision float)
Trailer (0x10 0x03)

Instead of changing the week number, I can change the offset from 15 to 17 and 
the unit correctly flips to the next epoch, showing the right day and year. I'm 
off by 2 seconds then, but it proves that field is used as the leap second 
count.

The next four bytes in question are not just the GPS time shifted. If I can get 
this decoded, I may be able to use a more modern receiver with better PPS 
performance.

Some snippets of data are below in case it looks familiar to anyone. There's 
something nagging at me, but it's eluding me for now. If anyone would like to 
help, I would much appreciate it and we could continue off list.


10 41 45 5B E7 6D 06 9E 00 0F 30 C4 7E 56 10 03 (bytes in red decoded as binary)
10 41 45 5C 38 D9 06 9E 00 0F 30 C4 7D 39 10 03 0011  1100 0100 0111 1101 
0011 1001
10 41 45 5C 8C B4 06 9E 00 0F 30 C4 7C 13 10 03 0011  1100 0100 0111 1100 
0001 0011
10 41 45 5C EE 04 06 9E 00 0F 30 75 F5 7E 10 03 0011  0111 0101  0101 
0111 1110
10 41 45 5D 3E C9 06 9E 00 0F 30 75 F3 49 10 03 0011  0111 0101  0011 
0100 1001
10 41 45 5D 91 91 06 9E 00 0F 30 75 F1 06 10 03 0011  0111 0101  0001 
 0110
10 41 45 5D F2 93 06 9E 00 0F 30 75 EE 5F 10 03 

I thought the GPS week increment might show something interesting, but it 
wasn't really:

10 41 49 13 A7 80 06 9D 00 0F 31 24 FF A0 10 03 
10 41 49 13 A7 C4 06 9D 00 0F 31 24 FF D3 10 03 
10 41 3F A7 0A 3D 06 9E 00 0F 31 25 00 10 10 10 03 (extra 0x10 is an escaped 
inline value)
10 41 40 BE 97 8D 06 9E 00 0F 31 25 00 47 10 03 
10 41 41 2C 87 2B 06 9E 00 0F 31 25 00 81 10 03 

Paul


On Jun 12, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Ziggy wrote:

The GPS unit is a module, which seems to be a a Trimble SVeeSix-CM3, or variant 
of some kind. It's marked 26889-81 on a sticker and 25040-  -D silk screened on 
the board.

Just as an interesting observation: This GPS module has two MCX connectors, one 
on the top of the board for the antenna and one on the bottom which mates with 
the system board. Directly adjacent to this is a 16.368 (or thereabouts) TCXO 
can. It works with a standard antenna, so it looks like this is setup to work 
with both downconverting and standard antennas.

I had to go to the Internet Archive to find the old Trimble page 
(http://www.trimble.com/y2kwnro/index2.htm) on Y2k/WNRO status. While this 
specific module wasn't listed, it didn't look encouraging. I do have a Trimble 
ACE III receiver which I am going to try using tonight. It is supposed to 
report the absolute GPS week since 06 January 1980 as an integer value and not 
truncated to 10 bits. Trimble says: The ACE III GPS module has been designed 
to handle WNRO, and there are no problems
with either dates or first fix after WNRO through the year 2015. Not sure what 
happens after 2015...

Note that due to the 16.368MHz TCXO can being right next to the GPS module, I 
had to modify the ACE III by changing the connector type to match the existing 
connector and move it to the other side of the board. I'll report back with the 
results. Maybe I'll get lucky for once.

Paul



On 06/12/2012 03:52 AM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
 Is the GPS unit built-in (TBolt-like) or is it a separate module? Maybe
 there is a firmware update for the GPS unit itself to fix the rollover
 problem.
 
 On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Ziggyzig...@pumpkinbrook.com  wrote:
 
 I've recently acquired one of these, primarily to use as an alternative to
 (and for comparison with) my Thunderbolt. This was a DC model that was
 inoperative when I received it and at $225 (price from the OEM) to replace
 the failed DC-DC converter, I installed an AC supply. So far, so good. The
 unit powers up, tracks, locks the OCXO and things look generally good. I'm
 giving it some burn in time before I try to characterize it. However, I
 have a couple of issues. I did search the archives, and have contacted
 Symmetricom (who politely told me this unit was obsoleted 2 generations of
 product ago :)
 
 The menus and serial command responses do not match any version of the
 manual that I can find, although the Datum 9390 manual on Didier's site is
 pretty close on the commands. Does anyone

Re: [time-nuts] Datum/Exactime 9390-6000

2012-06-12 Thread Ziggy
The GPS unit is a module, which seems to be a a Trimble SVeeSix-CM3, or 
variant of some kind. It's marked 26889-81 on a sticker and 25040-  -D 
silk screened on the board.


Just as an interesting observation: This GPS module has two MCX 
connectors, one on the top of the board for the antenna and one on the 
bottom which mates with the system board. Directly adjacent to this is a 
16.368 (or thereabouts) TCXO can. It works with a standard antenna, so 
it looks like this is setup to work with both downconverting and 
standard antennas.


I had to go to the Internet Archive to find the old Trimble page 
(http://www.trimble.com/y2kwnro/index2.htm) on Y2k/WNRO status. While 
this specific module wasn't listed, it didn't look encouraging. I do 
have a Trimble ACE III receiver which I am going to try using tonight. 
It is supposed to report the absolute GPS week since 06 January 1980 as 
an integer value and not truncated to 10 bits. Trimble says: The ACE 
III GPS module has been designed to handle WNRO, and there are no problems
with either dates or first fix after WNRO through the year 2015. Not 
sure what happens after 2015...


Note that due to the 16.368MHz TCXO can being right next to the GPS 
module, I had to modify the ACE III by changing the connector type to 
match the existing connector and move it to the other side of the board. 
I'll report back with the results. Maybe I'll get lucky for once.


Paul



On 06/12/2012 03:52 AM, Azelio Boriani wrote:

Is the GPS unit built-in (TBolt-like) or is it a separate module? Maybe
there is a firmware update for the GPS unit itself to fix the rollover
problem.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Ziggyzig...@pumpkinbrook.com  wrote:


I've recently acquired one of these, primarily to use as an alternative to
(and for comparison with) my Thunderbolt. This was a DC model that was
inoperative when I received it and at $225 (price from the OEM) to replace
the failed DC-DC converter, I installed an AC supply. So far, so good. The
unit powers up, tracks, locks the OCXO and things look generally good. I'm
giving it some burn in time before I try to characterize it. However, I
have a couple of issues. I did search the archives, and have contacted
Symmetricom (who politely told me this unit was obsoleted 2 generations of
product ago :)

The menus and serial command responses do not match any version of the
manual that I can find, although the Datum 9390 manual on Didier's site is
pretty close on the commands. Does anyone have a manual that covers this
model/firmware?

This unit suffers from a GPS epoch rollover problem. This makes the date
produced incorrect, and there is no way to override it, or offset it in my
firmware (DT813MP) other than running it in 'freewheel' or undisciplined
mode. It's my understanding that there may have been a firmware update to
address this, so if you have a firmware image, or a unit with later
firmware it would really be great to get a PROM copy/image.

And perhaps a silly question: Is the LCD supposed to be illuminated?
Because mine isn't. I haven't taken the front panel apart yet to check out
the display - I've been more concerned with getting the unit operational.

In the end, it's pretty usable the way it is, but the date being off irks
me. I'd like to fix that if I can, and docs that match the hard/firmware
would be nice. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,
Paul - K9MR
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Datum/Exactime 9390-6000

2012-06-11 Thread Ziggy
I've recently acquired one of these, primarily to use as an alternative to (and 
for comparison with) my Thunderbolt. This was a DC model that was inoperative 
when I received it and at $225 (price from the OEM) to replace the failed DC-DC 
converter, I installed an AC supply. So far, so good. The unit powers up, 
tracks, locks the OCXO and things look generally good. I'm giving it some burn 
in time before I try to characterize it. However, I have a couple of issues. I 
did search the archives, and have contacted Symmetricom (who politely told me 
this unit was obsoleted 2 generations of product ago :)

The menus and serial command responses do not match any version of the manual 
that I can find, although the Datum 9390 manual on Didier's site is pretty 
close on the commands. Does anyone have a manual that covers this 
model/firmware?

This unit suffers from a GPS epoch rollover problem. This makes the date 
produced incorrect, and there is no way to override it, or offset it in my 
firmware (DT813MP) other than running it in 'freewheel' or undisciplined mode. 
It's my understanding that there may have been a firmware update to address 
this, so if you have a firmware image, or a unit with later firmware it would 
really be great to get a PROM copy/image. 

And perhaps a silly question: Is the LCD supposed to be illuminated? Because 
mine isn't. I haven't taken the front panel apart yet to check out the display 
- I've been more concerned with getting the unit operational.

In the end, it's pretty usable the way it is, but the date being off irks me. 
I'd like to fix that if I can, and docs that match the hard/firmware would be 
nice. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,
Paul - K9MR
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] US Army Frequency Standard

2012-01-25 Thread Ziggy
Well, it's still probably better than nothing, even with the missing bits. It's 
kind of an interesting little box and the lack of a completely unencumbered 
version of this manual really annoyed me. So I've posted a complete PDF version 
on my website for those interested. It's a little hefty at 18M. The link is:

http://www.pumpkinbrook.com/files/TS65-FMQ1_Manual.pdf

Ziggy

On Jan 24, 2012, at 7:09 PM, J. Forster wrote:

Ah, thanks.

I have complained to Google about that scanning issue. IMO, it's a real
problem.

In a few years, Google may have the only extant copy of some doc.

And it will be near useless w/o the fully scanned pages. This is the third
time this has come up in the last few months.

Either they should do it correctly, or not at all.

YMMV,

-John

=


 On 01/24/2012 11:59 PM, J. Forster wrote:
 Google:
 
  FMQ-1 Test Set
 
 The -24P Parts Manual w/ exploded parts ID is in many places and has a
 drawing of the front panel. It has no schematics.
 
 The full manual will be -15 to -45 Depot Maintenance Manual, per
 standard
 Army nomenclature. The last digit will be 5, without a following P.
 
 Google has TM 11-6625-407-14 scanned.
 
 The fold-out schematic pages isn't folded out... but you get a pretty
 good idea how it works from the rest of the text.
 
 The schematics is there fractioned over the pages explaining it.
 
 Cheers,
 Magnus
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] US Army Frequency Standard

2012-01-25 Thread Ziggy
I know it's generally bad form to reply to my own post, but if you downloaded 
the manual already, you may want to do it again. I found a copy of the complete 
schematic and updated the manual, inserting the schematic where it should be.

Ziggy
---
On Jan 25, 2012, at 9:48 PM, Ziggy wrote:

Well, it's still probably better than nothing, even with the missing bits. It's 
kind of an interesting little box and the lack of a completely unencumbered 
version of this manual really annoyed me. So I've posted a complete PDF version 
on my website for those interested. It's a little hefty at 18M. The link is:

http://www.pumpkinbrook.com/files/TS65-FMQ1_Manual.pdf

Ziggy

On Jan 24, 2012, at 7:09 PM, J. Forster wrote:

Ah, thanks.

I have complained to Google about that scanning issue. IMO, it's a real
problem.

In a few years, Google may have the only extant copy of some doc.

And it will be near useless w/o the fully scanned pages. This is the third
time this has come up in the last few months.

Either they should do it correctly, or not at all.

YMMV,

-John

=


 On 01/24/2012 11:59 PM, J. Forster wrote:
 Google:
 
 FMQ-1 Test Set
 
 The -24P Parts Manual w/ exploded parts ID is in many places and has a
 drawing of the front panel. It has no schematics.
 
 The full manual will be -15 to -45 Depot Maintenance Manual, per
 standard
 Army nomenclature. The last digit will be 5, without a following P.
 
 Google has TM 11-6625-407-14 scanned.
 
 The fold-out schematic pages isn't folded out... but you get a pretty
 good idea how it works from the rest of the text.
 
 The schematics is there fractioned over the pages explaining it.
 
 Cheers,
 Magnus
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Vectron 217-9043 10MHz OCXO

2011-11-26 Thread Ziggy
Hijacking my own thread back here :)
Thanks for tip - I did know about Skycraft, and I think there was another in 
the Orlando area, but I wasn't able to make the trip over that way before I had 
to leave town.

Back on topic though, if anyone has an old catalog, or some other source of 
info on the old Vectron OCXO such as I mentioned, it would be most helpful. I'm 
not even sure if I'm running it at the right voltage.

Thanks!



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Vectron 217-9043 10MHz OCXO

2011-11-25 Thread Ziggy
While in Florida on business last week, fairly close to Cape Canaveral, I 
stopped in at the only surplus house I could find: AstroToo in Melbourne. 
Poking around there, I found several Vectron 217-9043 10MHz OCXO. I could not 
readily find any info on this model/series at the time of purchase, but bought 
one anyway. Cheap entertainment no matter what the outcome :) Thing is, I still 
cant find any directly relevant info. Digging through the time-nuts archives, I 
found info on other Vectron OCXO that have a similar 7 pin connector on the 
bottom, but this unit has no SMA connector - only the 7 pins. The standard for 
these seems to be:

1 - Output
2 - Case
3 - Power -/Case
4 - Power +
5 - EFC Supply (if present)
6 - EFC Input
7 - EFC -/Case

That seems to pretty much match this model, and I've noted that at 12V, there 
is distortion in the output, but at 15 V it looks clean. It's not quite a sine 
wave, but it looks reasonable as does the output level. The current starts out 
around 400ma and drops to 70-80ma once warmed up. So I don't think the supply 
voltage is too far off.

The thing is, pin 5 instead of being not connected, ground or some EFC supply 
voltage, also has 10MHz on it at about twice the output level as pin 1, but 
seems quite sensitive to load. Pins 6 and 7 are apparently not connected. The 
pin 5 signal doesnt match any 7 pin Vectron OCXO pinouts that I can find, so 
I'm not sure what the story is on this unit.

I'm currently running it on the bench, letting it settle in. Would have been 
nice if it had EFC but that doesn't seem to be the case. If anyone has any info 
on this series OCXO, I would much appreciate seeing it. Thanks!

Paul - K9MR
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] List Threading Behavior?

2011-10-26 Thread Ziggy
The other way that threads get broken is by thread 'hijacking'. If I 
were to hit reply to any message on this thread, change the subject and 
delete the body, I could write a 'new' message. Threaded clients would 
see that new message as part of the existing thread, but others would 
simply see a new message with a new subject. It's  bad form to use 
'reply' and change the subject. If you're going to change the subject, 
start with a new and blank message.


Ziggy

On 10/25/2011 05:38 PM, Justin Pinnix wrote:

Looking at recent instances of thread-breaking tells a different story:

X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929
Thunderbird/7.0.1
  User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.21)
Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/3.1.13

While these mailers are all running on Microsoft OSes, none of them are
actual Microsoft products.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Rapco 1804M - serial problems?

2011-10-18 Thread Ziggy
Actually no, it doesn't have to be the software. In my day job, I work for a 
company that makes terminal servers (networked serial concentrators) and have 
seen many times where USB/serial converters do not behave properly. I would bet 
that choosing a different USB/serial dongle would fix the problem. Generally 
speaking it seems the FTDI based units are the most dependable, but 
implementations vary.

HTH

Paul
---

On Oct 18, 2011, at 1:56 PM, David J Taylor wrote:

The short version: it's now OK!

The long version: I dug out the old terminal, found it had no mains plug, added 
that, and noted it was video out.  Dug out an old TV, found the remote control 
had corroded batteries (how often have I warned people about that!) had to dig 
those out and find a couple of fresh AAAs so that I could switch the TV to 
video input, and eventually got the terminal working.  Although the terminal 
didn't respond to the line feed characters, it did have a display control 
characters mode, and that showed that the data stream was OK.

Went back to the PC and noted that I had a very simple terminal emulation 
program supplied with one of the Delphi components I use (TComPort). Compiled 
that, and it displayed the data perfectly.  The program is supposed to emulate 
VT100, and that's what I had been using on the other programs (HyperTerminal 
and TeraTerm Pro).  Same serial settings, of course.  Why those others don't 
work, and this very simple emulator does, is a mystery which will have to wait 
for another day

It has to be the software, doesn't it?  Too fancy a terminal emulation? Port 
settings incorrect (but not on two programs, surely).  Answers on a five-pound 
note, please!

Anyone with an 1804 care to try it with TeraTerm Pro or HyperTerminal? And a 
Sitecom USB hub/serial/parallel box.

Half a day wasted, but at least with a positive result.  I've let the eBay 
seller know.  My thanks to all here who tried to help.

Cheers,
David
-- 
SatSignal software - quality software written to your requirements
Web:  http://www.satsignal.eu
Email:  david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions

2011-08-10 Thread Ziggy
Well, if it's any help, on my rev E unit with the 'coarse' temperature chip, 
there is a sticker on the top (near the power connector) with a bar code, a 
date (3/14/05) and the Rev E designation. There's also a series of numbers that 
could be a serial number and some other kind of rev designator but their 
significance is not clear. 

My Rev D unit with the 'fine' temperature chip has a similar sticker dated 
12/16/03. 

Paul - K9MR


On Aug 10, 2011, at 5:55 PM, Richard W. Solomon wrote:

OK, now, how old is old enough ?? Where is the units date code located ? 
Hopefully, the seller knows (or even cares) where to find it.

73, Dick, W1KSZ


-Original Message-
 From: Bob Camp li...@rtty.us
 Sent: Aug 10, 2011 9:59 AM
 To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' 
 time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions
 
 Hi
 
 The real question is what's the date code on the unit? If the rev E part is
 old enough to have the good thermometer chip in it - that's the one to get.
 
 Bob
 
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of David Garnier
 Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 10:19 PM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt hardware revisions
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm brand new to the time-nut odessy thing so please bear with me. ;-)
 
 I'm in the market to buy a used Thunderbolt, I have found a vendor that's
 selling used Thunderbolt receivers and states one can have the choice of 
 PCB
 revisions A, B or E. 
 
 Does anyone have any specific info or determined the product history of 
 these guys?
 Any information would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Dave Garnier - wb9own
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Filter

2011-03-04 Thread Ziggy
The discussion got me to thinking about how we used to filter out nearby 
interference on amateur TV - namely by using interdigital filters. This 
led to a search for GPS interdigital filters which i did indeed find. 
See Alison Microwave website at 
http://www.amlant.co.uk/DetailsAD430.htm for one example of an 
integrated antenna/filter/preamp. (I'm sure these aren't cheap, but I 
haven't asked.) As for retrofitting, you could add a filter after the 
antenna/amplifier assembly but I might be concerned that the amplified 
GPS antenna is pretty wide and may have trouble with a Lightsquared 
transmitter nearby. There are passive antennas though, and there are 
in-line amps - you'd need to add the filter in between. We made these 
ourselves for 439 and 1296 MHz - GPS L1 isn't much above that so with 
some care it should be doable. The tuning can be finicky though :\


Ziggy

On 03/04/2011 03:31 PM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:

Here's a measurement we did a few years ago on the HP 58535A:
http://www.febo.com/pages/hp_gps_splitter/port_1_hp_58535a_two_port_amp.png 



John

On 3/4/2011 1:31 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

Ok, now it's pretty obvious the RF world near your GPS will be 
changing a *lot* in the near future. Lightsquared and a bunch of 
similar outfits will be camping out right next door with very high 
power gear. They will be running 1.5KW from somewhere in town. GPS is 
running 30 watts from off planet.


Has anybody tossed the various HP / Symmetricom GPS splitters on a 
network analyzer? If so, what do the filters in them look like?


I probably should corner the market on these things before asking a 
question like that.


The new neighbors will be at 1525 to 1559 MHz.  GPS L1 is at 1575.42 
MHz.  That's what we are using for timing. L2 is down at 1227.5, 
right now it's mainly military use. Obviously these guys are a bigger 
deal for civilians than the military.


So the question is - do the built in splitter filters have any real 
rejection 15 to 50 MHz off of center?


Probably worth checking. It would be a pleasant surprise if they 
turned out to be useful.


Bob



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Lightsquared and a little math

2011-02-04 Thread Ziggy
Wow - yet another on-topic time-nuts discussion...
Really guys? I mean REALLY?

On Feb 4, 2011, at 8:30 AM, William H. Fite wrote:

 True enough.  And it certainly was not the left that condoned--or ever would
 condone--leaving the stadium lights on while turning off power to hospitals
 and nursing homes.
 
 Which didn't happen, by the way, but it makes a fantastic tale.  And power *
 did* roll off for virtually all non life-critical applications.
 
 
 
 
 On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:32 AM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
 
 Five out of nine people believe money is free speech and a corporation is a
 person.  Well five conservative judges.  ;-)
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Perry Sandeen sandee...@yahoo.com
 Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:45:05
 To: time-nuts-requ...@febo.comtime-nuts@febo.com
 Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
   time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Lightsquared and a little math
 
 List,
 
 Wrote The nationwide LightSquared network, consisting of approximately
 40,000 cellular base stations, will cover 92 percent of the U.S. population
 by 2015
 
 You can make book the missing 8 percent will be areas that exclude the
 farmers and ranchers who provide our food but the left will make sure the
 always “financially challenged” in the slums will have it and probably for
 free.
 
 The proof?  In every state in the US there is something called a universal
 service fee on your phone bill.  This is usually 35 to 45 cents.  It is not
 optional. The purpose of that fee is modeled after the postal system that
 charges you the same amount whether one sends a letter 2 miles or 2,000
 miles so that everyone can economically communicate.
 
 By law the phone companies are given that money to provide the rural areas
 with the same services that are offered in urban areas.  This includes
 broadband DSL and TV services.  It has never happened and probably won’t as
 we seem to have the best politicians money can buy.  I’m a conservative and
 I have lived in two rural areas now and the story is the same.  ATT
 continues to send me glowing adverts for bundled phone service only.  When I
 lived in a large town they came door to door trying to sign people up for
 broadband and the regularly sent glowing adverts in my phone bill to sign up
 for bundled phone, DSL broadband, and TV.
 
 This explains while they kept the lights on continuously at the Dallas
 Cowboy stadium for the superbowel, they had 15 minute rolling blackouts to
 all the area hospitals, nursing homes and elder care facilities where
 residents rely on continued electrical service for their oxygen
 concentrators and assisted breathing devices.
 
 Regards,
 
 Perrier
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt 10MHz

2010-11-06 Thread Ziggy
There is an EEPROM that can be used to store parameter such as the 
initial DAC voltage, position, etc. but it's not automatic. Have you 
explicitly saved the position (or auto stored it) after the survey is 
complete? If you don't do this then it will have to do a survey on every 
startup and that takes a bit.


Ziggy

On 11/6/2010 8:14 AM, David Hopkins wrote:

Gentlemen,
A question on the Thunderbolt.

Lately every time I turn the Thunderbolt off and then on again I have 
to do a cold reset.
It then takes about 10-20 minutes before it is fully operational 
again. This is most unsatisfactory.


Its almost as if its lost most of its settings.

Is there some internal memory backup device that dies with age?

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

David

David G. Hopkins (VK4ZF)
CAPALABA QLD
AUSTRALIA
27.32.38S 153.12.03E
QG62OL
Skype :- davhop

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Odd Lady Heather graph

2010-10-23 Thread Ziggy
I don't know if embedded images will make it through to the list, but 
can someone explain the behavior indicated in this graph? This is from 
an auction and it doesn't look at all like other graphs that I've seen. 
It's only for a 12 min span, but others with a short span aren't similar.




If the included graph doesn't make it to the list, please take a look at 
the auction (150508234942). I'd like to understand more of what I am am 
seeing there.


Thanks!
Ziggy

Please wait
Image not available

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Odd Lady Heather graph

2010-10-23 Thread Ziggy
I did note that it was the temp sensor, but the  behavior was clearly 
different. I guess my earlier search terms weren't good enough to reveal 
this info about the sensor differences in the T'bolts. I've done some 
further digging and now have the scoop on these DS1620 changes, etc. 
Other than pretty graphs, it looks like the difference between units 
using one vs. the other is a (relatively) minor difference in pps 
jitter. Also that for those interested enough, there have been plenty of 
folks that have swapped the sensor. Thanks!


Ziggy

On 10/23/2010 3:31 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

If you look at the fine print on the yellow graph, it's running right at the limit of the 
bad temp sensor. What you are seeing is normal stepping / averaging on the 
low resolution sensor.

Bob


On Oct 23, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote:


Hi Ziggy,

On 10/23/2010 09:05 PM, Ziggy wrote:

I don't know if embedded images will make it through to the list, but
can someone explain the behavior indicated in this graph? This is from
an auction and it doesn't look at all like other graphs that I've seen.
It's only for a 12 min span, but others with a short span aren't similar.

If the included graph doesn't make it to the list, please take a look at
the auction (150508234942). I'd like to understand more of what I am am
seeing there.

I assume you refer to the yellow curve...

Isn't that the average from the temp-sensor, being the modern coarse-stepped 
variant as things heats up it looks like the step-response of a one pole 
low-pass filter.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] GPSDO Comparisons

2010-10-20 Thread Ziggy
I did some searching (perhaps ineffectively) of the archives, looking 
for some discussion of the merits of the different GPSDO products that 
we commonly see on auction sites. I've seen some discussions of 
individual models, but nothing that really discusses the differences, 
and why one unit may be superior to another. I'm a newcomer, so please 
be patient with my silly questions :)


For example, what are the relative merits of the HP units? There are 
different vintages HP Z3801A, Z3805A, Z3815A, etc. and datasheets are 
available, but what  difference is there when using the output from 
these different models? For example, the Z3801A has a 6 channel GPS 
receiver. The Samsung/Symmetricom Z3805A we see out there has a 16 
channel receiver. What is the difference when it comes to practical 
usage of these two different units? Does tracking 10 or 12 satellites 
provide a benefit over tracking 6?


Then there are the different manufacturers. There are the HP units, the 
Alcatel-Lucent units (also of varying vintage), Trimble Thunderbolts, 
and others. Again, when it comes to practical usage is there any  
difference between these? Is there any value in paying the premium for a 
Z3805A over a Thunderbolt? (Above the plug and play aspects.) I can get 
an older ALU unit with both GPSDO and Ru units for $100. How am I 
hurting myself with that purchase?


There is certainly more public information available for some vendors 
and models than others. The software like Lady Heather or GPS Control 
provide a lot of information, and for the less popular units there is no 
such software option. Under what circumstances would that be a handicap?


I freely admit I'm ignorant, but I'm not thin skinned. I'm just not 
aware yet of the factors to be considered when answering the questions 
above. Any comments would be appreciated.


Thanks

Paul

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.