[time-nuts] Introduction & GPSDO Question
I'm not sure if Heather v5 works with all of those those receivers (I think you have what us known as a "UCCM" receiver... these are pulls from telecom equipment). If you are on Windows, you might want to try the v6 Beta code. Install the v5 from ke5fx.com, then download the v6 .exe from here: http://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/lady-heather-v6-beta-for-windows-exe/ Next, copy the v6 .exe in the .zip file to the directory you installed v5 in. You might need to start Heather with the /rxc command line option to force the "UCCM" receiver type. - > If so may want to try and connect it to your pc and use the Lady Heather > GPSDO monitoring program. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction & GPSDO Question
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Tom Kozawrote: > Hello Everyone, > > My name is Tom and my amateur callsign is WB6FYR, I'm a newcomer to this > group. > > I'm mainly interested in creating a reasonable 10mHz standard for my > various pieces of test equipment here at home. To that end I've purchased > and received an Ebay "Trimble Inside" GPSDO unit, described as model > 57963. No instructions or manual were included with the hardware. > > The unit has now been powered up for the past 18 hours with the GPS antenna > connected with a favorable outside view of the southern sky. I am however > uncertain if the hardware is GPS locked based on the two external ACT > status LEDs, the leftmost LED is solid yellow and the adjacent right LED is > rapidly flashing red. The 1pps LED is flashing once per second as expected. Welcome Tom. This unit sounds very similar to the green-fronted BG7TBL device that I have and which seem to be popular on ebay etc right now. As Bryan suggested, your best bet is to get a serial cable and get Lady Heather. Assuming it detects the unit, a good thing to do is to get the serial terminal up and check the status. To do this, do: !t (this starts terminal emulator mode) F1 (turns off echo) If a series of 2 hex digits groups are scrolling by, do: TOD DI (This DIsables TimeOfDay output) This should give you a 'UCCM >' prompt. Try: SYST:STAT? which will print out the status display which will tell you if it is tracking the satellites, what the survey location is (it may need a new survey done) > > Can anyone point me to an online manual or explain the ACT status LEDs and > how to interpret those indications. I asked my ebay seller for the manual and eventually got a 4 page PDF of not very helpful Chinglish, most of which was on configuring the serial port. It's probably not worth the electrons to send but I can try and dig it out. There is a good thread on the eevblog forum but that seems to be down right now. There is a good write up at http://andybrown.me.uk/2016/11/12/gpsdo-ebay/ One question: did you power the unit on before attaching a decent outdoor antenna ? I had problems with mine with an indoor patch antenna (the Trimble is an old GPS receiver, has a small no. of channels and is not very sensitive compared to a modern unit) and it would turn most of the lights on after a while and stop working. These problems went away after I connected on outdoor antenna and powercycled the unit. Cheers, Tim ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction & GPSDO Question
I'm mainly interested in creating a reasonable 10mHz standard for my various pieces of test equipment here at home. To that end I've purchased and received an Ebay "Trimble Inside" GPSDO unit, described as model 57963. No instructions or manual were included with the hardware. The unit has now been powered up for the past 18 hours with the GPS antenna connected with a favorable outside view of the southern sky. I am however uncertain if the hardware is GPS locked based on the two external ACT status LEDs, the leftmost LED is solid yellow and the adjacent right LED is rapidly flashing red. The 1pps LED is flashing once per second as expected. Can anyone point me to an online manual or explain the ACT status LEDs and how to interpret those indications. Tom, there seem to be several types of Chinese GPSDOs, all with green PCB looking end covers, some of which don't even seem to have OCXOs inside, The ones bearing the call sign BG7TBL seem to be quite well made, and do have an OCXO. Those at least will work with Lady Heather and some of the others even seem to have that feature advertised. Try it and see. LH is a marvellous program and with it you can do a precise survey so the Rx knows where it is and so can achieve the maximum accuracy in 2D position hold mode. http://www.ke5fx.com/heather/readme.htm will get you the program and pdf manual. Dan ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction & GPSDO Question
Hi Tom: Does the unit have a serial port?. If so may want to try and connect it to your pc and use the Lady Heather GPSDO monitoring program. From what you describe by the LED's it is possible it has not locked, or still trying to perform a survey, or maybe a error. Usually a green solid LED somewhere indicates a lock. http://www.ke5fx.com/heather/readme.htm -=Bryan=- From: time-nuts <time-nuts-boun...@febo.com> on behalf of Tom Koza <wb6...@gmail.com> Sent: April 19, 2018 1:47 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] Introduction & GPSDO Question Hello Everyone, My name is Tom and my amateur callsign is WB6FYR, I'm a newcomer to this group. I'm mainly interested in creating a reasonable 10mHz standard for my various pieces of test equipment here at home. To that end I've purchased and received an Ebay "Trimble Inside" GPSDO unit, described as model 57963. No instructions or manual were included with the hardware. The unit has now been powered up for the past 18 hours with the GPS antenna connected with a favorable outside view of the southern sky. I am however uncertain if the hardware is GPS locked based on the two external ACT status LEDs, the leftmost LED is solid yellow and the adjacent right LED is rapidly flashing red. The 1pps LED is flashing once per second as expected. Can anyone point me to an online manual or explain the ACT status LEDs and how to interpret those indications. Thanks very much! ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts time-nuts Info Page - American Febo Enterprises<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts> www.febo.com time-nuts is a low volume, high SNR list for the discussion of precise time and frequency measurement and related topics. To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the time-nuts Archives. and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[time-nuts] Introduction & GPSDO Question
Hello Everyone, My name is Tom and my amateur callsign is WB6FYR, I'm a newcomer to this group. I'm mainly interested in creating a reasonable 10mHz standard for my various pieces of test equipment here at home. To that end I've purchased and received an Ebay "Trimble Inside" GPSDO unit, described as model 57963. No instructions or manual were included with the hardware. The unit has now been powered up for the past 18 hours with the GPS antenna connected with a favorable outside view of the southern sky. I am however uncertain if the hardware is GPS locked based on the two external ACT status LEDs, the leftmost LED is solid yellow and the adjacent right LED is rapidly flashing red. The 1pps LED is flashing once per second as expected. Can anyone point me to an online manual or explain the ACT status LEDs and how to interpret those indications. Thanks very much! ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction ... HP 3586
I concur. That is a great write-up on the 3586. However, note that there are at least three revisions of that document (version 2.0, 2004, version 2.1, 2007 and 2.2, 2007). Version 2.1 (at least in the copy that I have) is missing the front panel figures in section 4 and the schematic figures in Appendix C. The copy on the KO4BB website is revision 2.2, which has the figures in section 4 but is missing the schematic figures in Appendix C. DaveD On 3/29/2018 11:59 AM, Gregory Beat wrote: I highly recommend the Practical Guide created by Bill Feldmann, N6PY (sk, 2007), found in the KO4BB repository. — NOTE: Check for damage by the NiCad battery !! —- A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR USING THE HP 3586A/B/C SELECTIVE LEVEL METER Expanded Version, (Version 2.2), September 2007 by Bill Feldmann, N6PY (Addition of figures and repagination courtesy of Perry Sandeen 7/09) http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/24.14.254.9/A_Practical_Guide_For_Using_The_HP_3586.pdf The HP 3586 family of Selective Level Meters was designed for the measurement of low power or voltage levels on telephone lines carrying multiplexed single side band radio frequency signals along with lower frequency audio signals. It’s designed to test and troubleshoot parameters commonly found on these lines. This instrument is a very sensitive, selective and accurately calibrated receiver that’s also capable of outputting a very low distortion signal of 0dBm at exactly the frequency it’s tuned to. == greg, w9gb Sent from iPad Air ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction, new list member, Ms Tisha Hayes, AA4HA
Tisha Welcome to the group. The 3586s are very nice I have more then a few. That said get the nicad battery out of the system ASAP. The charging circuit is very poor and overcharges them. (Pretty odd for HP) When they leak they destroy the power supply regulator board. It is a mess to clean up and the to repair traces. The stuff eats through the board and causes all sorts of very bad behaviors because the of trace to trace to leaks. Regards Paul. WB8TSL On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Jerry Hancockwrote: > Yep, 3586B put me in the top list two times I used it along with a > calibrated SpectrumLab + PC combo. I’d like to use my IC-7610 this time, > have to figure all that out I guess as the April test rapidly approaches > UTC time I remember now. > > > Regards, > > Jerry > > > > On Mar 29, 2018, at 5:21 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > > > > The impedance mismatch with the A or B models is't a real issue unless > you're doing precise amplitude measurements. Lots of folks use them for > FMT work without issues. There are adapters available or buildable to deal > with the odd Telco connectors. > > > > John > > > > On Mar 29, 2018, 3:04 AM, at 3:04 AM, Ruslan Nabioullin < > rnabioul...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Tisha Hayes > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Perry and I would make our pilgrimages to the Huntsville Ham Fest and > >>> usually I ended up buying equipment from him. One of the items he > >> sent my > >>> way was an HP 3586B that I am finally beginning to put to use. > >>> > >> > >> Hmm that measuring receiver model (diffs can be found in: > >> http://www.militaryradio.com/manuals/HP/hp3586-a-b-c.pdf ) was > >> apparently > >> intended for testing and troubleshooting purposes for those ancient > >> FDM-based POTS trunk systems, not as a general-purpose HF measuring > >> receiver (the HP 3586C)---I'm not sure how well they would function as > >> HF > >> receivers for WWV and CHU following impedance adaptation (b/c it > >> doesn't > >> have a 50 ohm unbalanced interface). > >> > >> In my case, I supply my time transfer volunteers with the following > >> setup: > >> > >> vertical antenna -> TVSS -> preamplifier -> military rackmount > >> preselector > >> -> military/intelligence rackmount parametric demodulator or HP 3586C > >> -> > >> Xeon NTP server via soundcard > >> > >> with GNU/Linux daemon software which commands the preselector and > >> demodulator via GPIB. > >> > >> Still, WWV/CHU-derived public NTP nodes are virtually nonexistent, and > >> therefore there's a strong need for them, regardless of the > >> sophistication > >> of the receiver, due to the pitfalls of GNSS. > >> > >> -Ruslan > >> > >> -- > >> Ruslan Nabioullin > >> Wittgenstein Laboratories > >> rnabioul...@gmail.com > >> (508) 523-8535 > >> 50 Louise Dr. > >> Hollis, NH 03049 > >> ___ > >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >> To unsubscribe, go to > >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >> and follow the instructions there. > > ___ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction ... HP 3586
I highly recommend the Practical Guide created by Bill Feldmann, N6PY (sk, 2007), found in the KO4BB repository. — NOTE: Check for damage by the NiCad battery !! —- A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR USING THE HP 3586A/B/C SELECTIVE LEVEL METER Expanded Version, (Version 2.2), September 2007 by Bill Feldmann, N6PY (Addition of figures and repagination courtesy of Perry Sandeen 7/09) http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/24.14.254.9/A_Practical_Guide_For_Using_The_HP_3586.pdf The HP 3586 family of Selective Level Meters was designed for the measurement of low power or voltage levels on telephone lines carrying multiplexed single side band radio frequency signals along with lower frequency audio signals. It’s designed to test and troubleshoot parameters commonly found on these lines. This instrument is a very sensitive, selective and accurately calibrated receiver that’s also capable of outputting a very low distortion signal of 0dBm at exactly the frequency it’s tuned to. == greg, w9gb Sent from iPad Air ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction, new list member, Ms Tisha Hayes, AA4HA
Yep, 3586B put me in the top list two times I used it along with a calibrated SpectrumLab + PC combo. I’d like to use my IC-7610 this time, have to figure all that out I guess as the April test rapidly approaches UTC time I remember now. Regards, Jerry > On Mar 29, 2018, at 5:21 AM, John Ackermann N8URwrote: > > The impedance mismatch with the A or B models is't a real issue unless you're > doing precise amplitude measurements. Lots of folks use them for FMT work > without issues. There are adapters available or buildable to deal with the > odd Telco connectors. > > John > > On Mar 29, 2018, 3:04 AM, at 3:04 AM, Ruslan Nabioullin > wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Tisha Hayes >> wrote: >> >>> Perry and I would make our pilgrimages to the Huntsville Ham Fest and >>> usually I ended up buying equipment from him. One of the items he >> sent my >>> way was an HP 3586B that I am finally beginning to put to use. >>> >> >> Hmm that measuring receiver model (diffs can be found in: >> http://www.militaryradio.com/manuals/HP/hp3586-a-b-c.pdf ) was >> apparently >> intended for testing and troubleshooting purposes for those ancient >> FDM-based POTS trunk systems, not as a general-purpose HF measuring >> receiver (the HP 3586C)---I'm not sure how well they would function as >> HF >> receivers for WWV and CHU following impedance adaptation (b/c it >> doesn't >> have a 50 ohm unbalanced interface). >> >> In my case, I supply my time transfer volunteers with the following >> setup: >> >> vertical antenna -> TVSS -> preamplifier -> military rackmount >> preselector >> -> military/intelligence rackmount parametric demodulator or HP 3586C >> -> >> Xeon NTP server via soundcard >> >> with GNU/Linux daemon software which commands the preselector and >> demodulator via GPIB. >> >> Still, WWV/CHU-derived public NTP nodes are virtually nonexistent, and >> therefore there's a strong need for them, regardless of the >> sophistication >> of the receiver, due to the pitfalls of GNSS. >> >> -Ruslan >> >> -- >> Ruslan Nabioullin >> Wittgenstein Laboratories >> rnabioul...@gmail.com >> (508) 523-8535 >> 50 Louise Dr. >> Hollis, NH 03049 >> ___ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction, new list member, Ms Tisha Hayes, AA4HA
The impedance mismatch with the A or B models is't a real issue unless you're doing precise amplitude measurements. Lots of folks use them for FMT work without issues. There are adapters available or buildable to deal with the odd Telco connectors. John On Mar 29, 2018, 3:04 AM, at 3:04 AM, Ruslan Nabioullinwrote: >On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Tisha Hayes >wrote: > >> Perry and I would make our pilgrimages to the Huntsville Ham Fest and >> usually I ended up buying equipment from him. One of the items he >sent my >> way was an HP 3586B that I am finally beginning to put to use. >> > >Hmm that measuring receiver model (diffs can be found in: >http://www.militaryradio.com/manuals/HP/hp3586-a-b-c.pdf ) was >apparently >intended for testing and troubleshooting purposes for those ancient >FDM-based POTS trunk systems, not as a general-purpose HF measuring >receiver (the HP 3586C)---I'm not sure how well they would function as >HF >receivers for WWV and CHU following impedance adaptation (b/c it >doesn't >have a 50 ohm unbalanced interface). > >In my case, I supply my time transfer volunteers with the following >setup: > >vertical antenna -> TVSS -> preamplifier -> military rackmount >preselector >-> military/intelligence rackmount parametric demodulator or HP 3586C >-> >Xeon NTP server via soundcard > >with GNU/Linux daemon software which commands the preselector and >demodulator via GPIB. > >Still, WWV/CHU-derived public NTP nodes are virtually nonexistent, and >therefore there's a strong need for them, regardless of the >sophistication >of the receiver, due to the pitfalls of GNSS. > >-Ruslan > >-- >Ruslan Nabioullin >Wittgenstein Laboratories >rnabioul...@gmail.com >(508) 523-8535 >50 Louise Dr. >Hollis, NH 03049 >___ >time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >To unsubscribe, go to >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction, new list member, Ms Tisha Hayes, AA4HA
Hi Tisha, Welcome to our group. We are fortunate to have another technicians technician in our gaggle. I have replaced the bulb in two of n 3586b units and it was not difficult. I may have an extra bulb I can send you and somewhere on this list I think there was an article on replacing same. The 3586 is quite a versatile unit, along with being a musical instrument. Turn up the volume, then Push "recall" "decimal point" "center freq' "8" and then wait a few seconds. 73, Bill, WA2DVU Cape May, NJ -Original Message- From: time-nuts <time-nuts-boun...@febo.com> On Behalf Of Tisha Hayes Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 9:50 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] Introduction, new list member, Ms Tisha Hayes, AA4HA Greetings to all of the time-nuts on this list. I too have an interest (obsession?) with precision frequency measurement. I have known, visited and had dinner with Perry Sandeen (also a list member) while he lived in Tennessee where we shared a common interest in the beloved R-390A receiver and test equipment. Perry and I would make our pilgrimages to the Huntsville Ham Fest and usually I ended up buying equipment from him. One of the items he sent my way was an HP 3586B that I am finally beginning to put to use. I am trying to find out how to fix the tuning control on the HP3586B and that led me back to this list. If anyone has suggestions on making repairs I would appreciate the info; I am very capable of troubleshooting and making component level repairs, even if I have to take the tuning control apart to fix the optical chopper light source. *Ms. Tisha Hayes, AA4HA* *(Senior Engineer with 4RF USA)* *Gadsden, Alabama* ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction, new list member, Ms Tisha Hayes, AA4HA
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Tisha Hayeswrote: > Perry and I would make our pilgrimages to the Huntsville Ham Fest and > usually I ended up buying equipment from him. One of the items he sent my > way was an HP 3586B that I am finally beginning to put to use. > Hmm that measuring receiver model (diffs can be found in: http://www.militaryradio.com/manuals/HP/hp3586-a-b-c.pdf ) was apparently intended for testing and troubleshooting purposes for those ancient FDM-based POTS trunk systems, not as a general-purpose HF measuring receiver (the HP 3586C)---I'm not sure how well they would function as HF receivers for WWV and CHU following impedance adaptation (b/c it doesn't have a 50 ohm unbalanced interface). In my case, I supply my time transfer volunteers with the following setup: vertical antenna -> TVSS -> preamplifier -> military rackmount preselector -> military/intelligence rackmount parametric demodulator or HP 3586C -> Xeon NTP server via soundcard with GNU/Linux daemon software which commands the preselector and demodulator via GPIB. Still, WWV/CHU-derived public NTP nodes are virtually nonexistent, and therefore there's a strong need for them, regardless of the sophistication of the receiver, due to the pitfalls of GNSS. -Ruslan -- Ruslan Nabioullin Wittgenstein Laboratories rnabioul...@gmail.com (508) 523-8535 50 Louise Dr. Hollis, NH 03049 ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[time-nuts] Introduction, new list member, Ms Tisha Hayes, AA4HA
Greetings to all of the time-nuts on this list. I too have an interest (obsession?) with precision frequency measurement. I have known, visited and had dinner with Perry Sandeen (also a list member) while he lived in Tennessee where we shared a common interest in the beloved R-390A receiver and test equipment. Perry and I would make our pilgrimages to the Huntsville Ham Fest and usually I ended up buying equipment from him. One of the items he sent my way was an HP 3586B that I am finally beginning to put to use. I am trying to find out how to fix the tuning control on the HP3586B and that led me back to this list. If anyone has suggestions on making repairs I would appreciate the info; I am very capable of troubleshooting and making component level repairs, even if I have to take the tuning control apart to fix the optical chopper light source. *Ms. Tisha Hayes, AA4HA* *(Senior Engineer with 4RF USA)* *Gadsden, Alabama* ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction
Enrico, Nice additional labs. For short cables, the start pulse can still affect the stop pulse, potentially give it worse slew-rate as the cross-talk superpositions on top of the actual signal. Such cross-talk should be less pronounced as you have lower slew-rate on the start-pulse, but then lower slew-rate on the stop-pulse would make it more sensitive so it would even out to some degree. 3 foot cable is 90 cm is 4.5 ns time-difference, which is where I expect such effects to show up. 10 foot cable is 3 m is 15 ns time-difference, which is where I expect such effects to be essentially gone. Cross-talk between start and stop can be a bit annoying. Cheers, Magnus On 02/25/2016 11:50 PM, Enrico Bellotti wrote: Bruce, Mark and Magnus thank you for your comments. Incredibly enough, I have found some time to follow up and address some of the issues you outlined. I measured the rise time of the start and stop signals for different cable lengths and types of generators. I have also used a HP8901A/8903A that generates square waves with ~350ps transitions and 1.2V amplitude. This is the fastest source i have. I attach a pdf with the details and the Adev results. It looks like that the length of the cable effects the Adev, probably caused by the stop signal rise time degradation. It is interesting to notice that for short cables (~3ft on HP5370B #1) the Adev increases. I wonder if, unless of other measurement errors, the cable is too short to "decorrelate" start and stop. I have just had time to try one different references (TB 10MHz) instead of the internal one but i do not see much of a difference. I assume a large set of measurements is needed. Finally, HP5370B #2 is off anyway. I am going to look into the multiplier 10->200 section as it was suggested. Best. Enrico On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Magnus Danielson < mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote: Dear Enrico, On 02/24/2016 06:55 AM, Enrico Bellotti wrote: Hello to all, first of all, thank you for the great and useful work that the time-nuts have done over the years. Welcome! I have finally been able to gather all my counters (HP5335A, HP51131A, HP5370A, HP5370B #1, HP5370B #2) and try to do some "simple" measurements. I have started testing and comparing the instruments I have available using the approach that was discussed a while ago on the list and also outlined by John Ackermann (http://www.febo.com/pages/hp5370b/). Specifically, the Adev for a time interval measurement on a (90ft of) RG58A/U cable. It's a bit of a cable, so it can eat in on the rise-time somewhat. Did you check the risetime? I have attached a PDF file with the results and some additional details of the test setup. Nice setup. From what I have understood the Adev at one second is related to the counter resolution. The results I have obtained seem to be reasonable except for HP5370B #2. This instrument seems to be marginal at best. Does anybody know if the measured value for HP5370B #2 is a symptom of a multifunction or simple need for calibration? Yes, it is somewhat related. The 1/tau slope you see is expected. You can usually expect the slope to be in the neighborhood of single-shot-resolution/tau, which is rule of thumb. It's more complex as it depends on the experienced trigger jitter, which depends on the noise and the slew-rate at the trigger point. You can thus optimize the jitter by adjusting the start and stop trigger voltage. The cable delay will act to decorrelate the triggers, but for most designs, you don't need to go to 135 ns but can keep them tighter, of the benefit of maintaining nice slope. However, when the stop trigger comes just handfull of ns after the start trigger, then the remains of the start-event can shift the stop trigger. The cable decorrelates this effects so it behaves more as separate signals, so that is good. The ripples you see for shorter taus for PPS signals would be interesting to see the reason for, the phase plot should help to illustrate the reason. However, it is curious how you provide measures from 0.1 s for a 1 Hz (1 s) PPS signal. However, it is nice to see the relative close correlation between the PPS and 1 kHz signals. It would be nice to see if a slew-rate measurement of the two sources could be related to the ADEV differences. Thank you for any comments/suggestions/corrections you may have. Hope you got some input from my ramblings. Cheers, Magnus ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction
Dear Enrico, On 02/24/2016 06:55 AM, Enrico Bellotti wrote: Hello to all, first of all, thank you for the great and useful work that the time-nuts have done over the years. Welcome! I have finally been able to gather all my counters (HP5335A, HP51131A, HP5370A, HP5370B #1, HP5370B #2) and try to do some "simple" measurements. I have started testing and comparing the instruments I have available using the approach that was discussed a while ago on the list and also outlined by John Ackermann (http://www.febo.com/pages/hp5370b/). Specifically, the Adev for a time interval measurement on a (90ft of) RG58A/U cable. It's a bit of a cable, so it can eat in on the rise-time somewhat. Did you check the risetime? I have attached a PDF file with the results and some additional details of the test setup. Nice setup. From what I have understood the Adev at one second is related to the counter resolution. The results I have obtained seem to be reasonable except for HP5370B #2. This instrument seems to be marginal at best. Does anybody know if the measured value for HP5370B #2 is a symptom of a multifunction or simple need for calibration? Yes, it is somewhat related. The 1/tau slope you see is expected. You can usually expect the slope to be in the neighborhood of single-shot-resolution/tau, which is rule of thumb. It's more complex as it depends on the experienced trigger jitter, which depends on the noise and the slew-rate at the trigger point. You can thus optimize the jitter by adjusting the start and stop trigger voltage. The cable delay will act to decorrelate the triggers, but for most designs, you don't need to go to 135 ns but can keep them tighter, of the benefit of maintaining nice slope. However, when the stop trigger comes just handfull of ns after the start trigger, then the remains of the start-event can shift the stop trigger. The cable decorrelates this effects so it behaves more as separate signals, so that is good. The ripples you see for shorter taus for PPS signals would be interesting to see the reason for, the phase plot should help to illustrate the reason. However, it is curious how you provide measures from 0.1 s for a 1 Hz (1 s) PPS signal. However, it is nice to see the relative close correlation between the PPS and 1 kHz signals. It would be nice to see if a slew-rate measurement of the two sources could be related to the ADEV differences. Thank you for any comments/suggestions/corrections you may have. Hope you got some input from my ramblings. Cheers, Magnus ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction
I've found with my HP5370B's they perform best over a fairly narrow range of input signal levels.(1 to 2 volts If I recall correctly ?) Some experiments might be in order for yours. Virtually all my testing was done with 5 or 10 MHz sine waves so this may or may not be helpful in your case. I found in line attenuators and an oscilloscope to be helpful in making measurements using my HP5370B's. I've never done a full alignment of mine so this behaviour may not be typical. All the best Mark S Sent from my iPhone >> On Feb 24, 2016, at 1:36 AM, Bruce Griffiths>> wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:55:42 AM Enrico Bellotti wrote: >> Hello to all, >> >> first of all, thank you for the great and useful work that the time-nuts >> have done over the years. >> >> I have finally been able to gather all my counters (HP5335A, HP51131A, >> HP5370A, HP5370B #1, HP5370B #2) and try to do some "simple" measurements. >> >> I have started testing and comparing the instruments I have available using >> the approach that was discussed a while ago on the list and also outlined >> by John Ackermann (http://www.febo.com/pages/hp5370b/). Specifically, the >> Adev for a time interval measurement on a (90ft of) RG58A/U cable. >> >> I have attached a PDF file with the results and some additional details of >> the test setup. >> >> From what I have understood the Adev at one second is related to the >> counter resolution. The results I have obtained seem to be reasonable >> except for HP5370B #2. This instrument seems to be marginal at best. Does >> anybody know if the measured value for HP5370B #2 is a symptom of a >> multifunction or simple need for calibration? >> >> Thank you for any comments/suggestions/corrections you may have. >> >> Best. >> Enrico > Try repeating the test with a low noise external reference/If that doesn't > improve the results try realigning the filters etc in the 10-200MHz > multiplier. > > Bruce > ___ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:55:42 AM Enrico Bellotti wrote: > Hello to all, > > first of all, thank you for the great and useful work that the time-nuts > have done over the years. > > I have finally been able to gather all my counters (HP5335A, HP51131A, > HP5370A, HP5370B #1, HP5370B #2) and try to do some "simple" measurements. > > I have started testing and comparing the instruments I have available using > the approach that was discussed a while ago on the list and also outlined > by John Ackermann (http://www.febo.com/pages/hp5370b/). Specifically, the > Adev for a time interval measurement on a (90ft of) RG58A/U cable. > > I have attached a PDF file with the results and some additional details of > the test setup. > > From what I have understood the Adev at one second is related to the > counter resolution. The results I have obtained seem to be reasonable > except for HP5370B #2. This instrument seems to be marginal at best. Does > anybody know if the measured value for HP5370B #2 is a symptom of a > multifunction or simple need for calibration? > > Thank you for any comments/suggestions/corrections you may have. > > Best. > Enrico Try repeating the test with a low noise external reference/If that doesn't improve the results try realigning the filters etc in the 10-200MHz multiplier. Bruce ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction and info about a Lucent RFTG
Email is getting really annoying. Gmail makes you do a dance to get it active again. So here is my response a second time. The system has a RB and a fine oven osc that is disciplined to the RB in case the RB fails. The xtals pretty nice and even though an oven draws quite low current when warm. Both the RB and Xtal connect to a 2 way combiner to 9 way splitter for passive distribution. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 8:06 AM, gandal...@aol.com wrote: Hi Denver When you refer to one side or the other, do you have the complete RFTG unit with the two modules? I only have the internals of the Rubidium module so would hardly claim to be an expert on these, or on much else for that matter:-), but as I understand it from the documentation this is a reduntant system, in that either the GPSDO or the Rubidium module is active at any one time with the other in standby. In other words, there's no suggestion that the Rubidium module is locked to GPS, it is indeed free running, whilst the GPS module is used to discipline its own crystal oscillator. However, although the free running Rubidium module will need occasional adjustment, as opposed to the GPSDO wich shoudn't, a free running Rubidium reference is still not something to be sneezed at. Section 2.1 RFTG Functionality, in the documentation refers to this in more detail. There was a fair bit of discussion here at one time regarding these so I'm surprised you haven't found more in the archives. For example, another list member, Skip Withrow, produced an article in January 2013 detailing how to modify the RFTGm GPSDO to obtain a 10MHz output, which he suggests should also apply to the earlier versions and I've also seen information on the Rubidium modules. Because my Rubidium module arrived with just the two attached PCBs and no outer metalwork whatsoever it was easier for me anyway to just put the 15MHz generator board to one side and use the interface board only with its special D connector still attached to make the thing functional. If I'd had the complete unit, including metalwork, I would probably have approached it differently. On my unit at least the actual Rubidium module was an Efratom FRS and there's documentation available online for these should you wish to run it stand alone However, it would seem to me that without too much work, and utilising the existing metalwork, these two units between them could provide the basis for a 10MHz Rubidium Standard plus a separate 10MHz GPSDO, but turning them into a GPS disciplined Rubidium unit perhaps not quite so straightforward:-) Regards Nigel GM8PZR In a message dated 05/07/2014 07:38:44 GMT Daylight Time, denc...@gmail.com writes: Thank Rex and Paul for the replies From what I understand my RFTG has a GPSDO on oneside that has a crystal oven inside it, and a rubidium source on the other side. The rubidium source takes a signal from the GPSDO side and uses that for longer term stability. But If I am understanding you, Rex, that the rubidium is really not a gps locked oscillator and just a free running device. I will start tearing down the unit to figure out if I can make something more usable out of it. I will make sure to document it and post it somewhere on the web. I read somewhere on this group that there is a way to bypass the 15MHz generating circuit and use the existing hardware amplifier and distribution at 10MHz. I will also be looking into that as well. Rex, you are correct as there is no power supply inside and I have it hooked up to a open frame type switching supply externally. Paul - I will be setting up my GPS antenna shortly and trying to get it to lock to GPS for a more precise reference. Thanks all -Denver On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Rex r...@sonic.net wrote: Several years ago there were a number of these showing up pretty cheap on eBay, so I bought one. As I recall there were a couple of similar versions with some differences so take this recollection with a grain of salt. I did some tracing of the internals on the one I had and found the rubidium unit had no connection on the tuning pin (C-field) to the board circuits. So it was free running, only for backup in the system, and not GPS lockable. I don't remember there being any useful power supply in the box, so my advice would be to remove the LPRO rubidium and use it directly. (It does need heat sinking, so maybe some parts of the box mechanicals are useful.) In my opinion, working out how to use the supporting circuit board is not worth the effort, unless you really have a need for the 15 MHz they create. You should be able to find documentation for the internal module LPRO rubidiums on the web. I haven't looked today but KO4BB site probably has it. On 7/4/2014 1:47 PM, Denver wrote: Hi all, My name is Denver I am currently a freshman in
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction and info about a Lucent RFTG
Thank Rex and Paul for the replies From what I understand my RFTG has a GPSDO on oneside that has a crystal oven inside it, and a rubidium source on the other side. The rubidium source takes a signal from the GPSDO side and uses that for longer term stability. But If I am understanding you, Rex, that the rubidium is really not a gps locked oscillator and just a free running device. I will start tearing down the unit to figure out if I can make something more usable out of it. I will make sure to document it and post it somewhere on the web. I read somewhere on this group that there is a way to bypass the 15MHz generating circuit and use the existing hardware amplifier and distribution at 10MHz. I will also be looking into that as well. Rex, you are correct as there is no power supply inside and I have it hooked up to a open frame type switching supply externally. Paul - I will be setting up my GPS antenna shortly and trying to get it to lock to GPS for a more precise reference. Thanks all -Denver On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Rex r...@sonic.net wrote: Several years ago there were a number of these showing up pretty cheap on eBay, so I bought one. As I recall there were a couple of similar versions with some differences so take this recollection with a grain of salt. I did some tracing of the internals on the one I had and found the rubidium unit had no connection on the tuning pin (C-field) to the board circuits. So it was free running, only for backup in the system, and not GPS lockable. I don't remember there being any useful power supply in the box, so my advice would be to remove the LPRO rubidium and use it directly. (It does need heat sinking, so maybe some parts of the box mechanicals are useful.) In my opinion, working out how to use the supporting circuit board is not worth the effort, unless you really have a need for the 15 MHz they create. You should be able to find documentation for the internal module LPRO rubidiums on the web. I haven't looked today but KO4BB site probably has it. On 7/4/2014 1:47 PM, Denver wrote: Hi all, My name is Denver I am currently a freshman in college and the time bug has struck me. I recently acquired a Lucent RFTG on ebay to have a time standard for my lab(and yes already realize its 15MHz output but may be able to change that and or just use the 10MHz test point from the rubidium source). I made a power connector for it. Now that I have power applied and sort of verified its operation I am looking for more info about the connectors on the front panel. I have the KO4BB user documentation on it but it doesn't mention much about connectors and pinouts. I also have already searched the group for other mentions of the RFTG but all I am able to come up with is some of the newer models the -m and such. Maybe one of you could help point me in the right direction or give me some other ideas on how to get more use out of this unit. Thanks in advance -Denver ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction and info about a Lucent RFTG
Hi Denver When you refer to one side or the other, do you have the complete RFTG unit with the two modules? I only have the internals of the Rubidium module so would hardly claim to be an expert on these, or on much else for that matter:-), but as I understand it from the documentation this is a reduntant system, in that either the GPSDO or the Rubidium module is active at any one time with the other in standby. In other words, there's no suggestion that the Rubidium module is locked to GPS, it is indeed free running, whilst the GPS module is used to discipline its own crystal oscillator. However, although the free running Rubidium module will need occasional adjustment, as opposed to the GPSDO wich shoudn't, a free running Rubidium reference is still not something to be sneezed at. Section 2.1 RFTG Functionality, in the documentation refers to this in more detail. There was a fair bit of discussion here at one time regarding these so I'm surprised you haven't found more in the archives. For example, another list member, Skip Withrow, produced an article in January 2013 detailing how to modify the RFTGm GPSDO to obtain a 10MHz output, which he suggests should also apply to the earlier versions and I've also seen information on the Rubidium modules. Because my Rubidium module arrived with just the two attached PCBs and no outer metalwork whatsoever it was easier for me anyway to just put the 15MHz generator board to one side and use the interface board only with its special D connector still attached to make the thing functional. If I'd had the complete unit, including metalwork, I would probably have approached it differently. On my unit at least the actual Rubidium module was an Efratom FRS and there's documentation available online for these should you wish to run it stand alone However, it would seem to me that without too much work, and utilising the existing metalwork, these two units between them could provide the basis for a 10MHz Rubidium Standard plus a separate 10MHz GPSDO, but turning them into a GPS disciplined Rubidium unit perhaps not quite so straightforward:-) Regards Nigel GM8PZR In a message dated 05/07/2014 07:38:44 GMT Daylight Time, denc...@gmail.com writes: Thank Rex and Paul for the replies From what I understand my RFTG has a GPSDO on oneside that has a crystal oven inside it, and a rubidium source on the other side. The rubidium source takes a signal from the GPSDO side and uses that for longer term stability. But If I am understanding you, Rex, that the rubidium is really not a gps locked oscillator and just a free running device. I will start tearing down the unit to figure out if I can make something more usable out of it. I will make sure to document it and post it somewhere on the web. I read somewhere on this group that there is a way to bypass the 15MHz generating circuit and use the existing hardware amplifier and distribution at 10MHz. I will also be looking into that as well. Rex, you are correct as there is no power supply inside and I have it hooked up to a open frame type switching supply externally. Paul - I will be setting up my GPS antenna shortly and trying to get it to lock to GPS for a more precise reference. Thanks all -Denver On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Rex r...@sonic.net wrote: Several years ago there were a number of these showing up pretty cheap on eBay, so I bought one. As I recall there were a couple of similar versions with some differences so take this recollection with a grain of salt. I did some tracing of the internals on the one I had and found the rubidium unit had no connection on the tuning pin (C-field) to the board circuits. So it was free running, only for backup in the system, and not GPS lockable. I don't remember there being any useful power supply in the box, so my advice would be to remove the LPRO rubidium and use it directly. (It does need heat sinking, so maybe some parts of the box mechanicals are useful.) In my opinion, working out how to use the supporting circuit board is not worth the effort, unless you really have a need for the 15 MHz they create. You should be able to find documentation for the internal module LPRO rubidiums on the web. I haven't looked today but KO4BB site probably has it. On 7/4/2014 1:47 PM, Denver wrote: Hi all, My name is Denver I am currently a freshman in college and the time bug has struck me. I recently acquired a Lucent RFTG on ebay to have a time standard for my lab(and yes already realize its 15MHz output but may be able to change that and or just use the 10MHz test point from the rubidium source). I made a power connector for it. Now that I have power applied and sort of verified its operation I am looking for more info about the connectors on the front panel. I have the KO4BB user documentation on it but it doesn't mention much about
[time-nuts] Introduction and info about a Lucent RFTG
Hi all, My name is Denver I am currently a freshman in college and the time bug has struck me. I recently acquired a Lucent RFTG on ebay to have a time standard for my lab(and yes already realize its 15MHz output but may be able to change that and or just use the 10MHz test point from the rubidium source). I made a power connector for it. Now that I have power applied and sort of verified its operation I am looking for more info about the connectors on the front panel. I have the KO4BB user documentation on it but it doesn't mention much about connectors and pinouts. I also have already searched the group for other mentions of the RFTG but all I am able to come up with is some of the newer models the -m and such. Maybe one of you could help point me in the right direction or give me some other ideas on how to get more use out of this unit. Thanks in advance -Denver ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction and info about a Lucent RFTG
Denver yes indeed they do a funny dance to take the 10 Mhz and get to 15. So you are rught unless you need 15 tapping the 10 and simply filtering and buffering is a very fine way to go. There is a power amp on the output of the 15 Mhz as I recall that will work fine at 10. That can then drive a passive 6 or more way splitter. There isn't much more you can really do with it. Oh you could get crazy and lock it to GPS. But then it just depends on what do you want to accomplish. Nothing wrong with a good reference. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Denver denc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, My name is Denver I am currently a freshman in college and the time bug has struck me. I recently acquired a Lucent RFTG on ebay to have a time standard for my lab(and yes already realize its 15MHz output but may be able to change that and or just use the 10MHz test point from the rubidium source). I made a power connector for it. Now that I have power applied and sort of verified its operation I am looking for more info about the connectors on the front panel. I have the KO4BB user documentation on it but it doesn't mention much about connectors and pinouts. I also have already searched the group for other mentions of the RFTG but all I am able to come up with is some of the newer models the -m and such. Maybe one of you could help point me in the right direction or give me some other ideas on how to get more use out of this unit. Thanks in advance -Denver ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction and info about a Lucent RFTG
Several years ago there were a number of these showing up pretty cheap on eBay, so I bought one. As I recall there were a couple of similar versions with some differences so take this recollection with a grain of salt. I did some tracing of the internals on the one I had and found the rubidium unit had no connection on the tuning pin (C-field) to the board circuits. So it was free running, only for backup in the system, and not GPS lockable. I don't remember there being any useful power supply in the box, so my advice would be to remove the LPRO rubidium and use it directly. (It does need heat sinking, so maybe some parts of the box mechanicals are useful.) In my opinion, working out how to use the supporting circuit board is not worth the effort, unless you really have a need for the 15 MHz they create. You should be able to find documentation for the internal module LPRO rubidiums on the web. I haven't looked today but KO4BB site probably has it. On 7/4/2014 1:47 PM, Denver wrote: Hi all, My name is Denver I am currently a freshman in college and the time bug has struck me. I recently acquired a Lucent RFTG on ebay to have a time standard for my lab(and yes already realize its 15MHz output but may be able to change that and or just use the 10MHz test point from the rubidium source). I made a power connector for it. Now that I have power applied and sort of verified its operation I am looking for more info about the connectors on the front panel. I have the KO4BB user documentation on it but it doesn't mention much about connectors and pinouts. I also have already searched the group for other mentions of the RFTG but all I am able to come up with is some of the newer models the -m and such. Maybe one of you could help point me in the right direction or give me some other ideas on how to get more use out of this unit. Thanks in advance -Denver ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[time-nuts] Introduction to quartz oscillators and atomic frequency standards for the beginner and intermediate time-nut
Moin, As usual, while looking for something completely different, i stumbled over an old report (or rather book chapter) by Stein and Vig about the basics of frequency standards (or rather frequency sources) for communication systems. It is like an early version of Vig's tutorial, but with a lot more text and explanations. It also contains here and there gems of short sentences explaining things you've always wanted to know, but never knew how to ask. So it's worth to read even if you already know the topics quite well. [1] Frequency Standards for Communication, by Stein and Vig, 1991 http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a231990.pdf Attila Kinali -- The people on 4chan are like brilliant psychologists who also happen to be insane and gross. -- unknown ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction of Z38XX
Gents, in the meantime I have received some feedback. Please read it with my answers in case you noticed something similar: 1. The vertical scale has some issues. It goes down from 10-8 to 10-23 and then goes up again to 10-7. Read the 10-23 as near zero. Everything below should have a - sign, indicating negative values. I enclose a picture how it looks here. The EFC value is remains fixed at 65000. My Z3801 goes to EFC 696364 so stays at the top always. All scales are autoscaling and should follow whatever values you have. You mave have however put the autoscaling out of work by zooming into the grahics or by panning the graphics. Zooming is initiated by pressing the left mousebutton at the top left point of the area to be zoomed and then draw a white rectangle to the bottom right point of the area to be zoomed. Panning is initiated by pressing the right mouse button within the graphics and then move the mouse while the button is pressed. You can use both actions as often as you want and return to your initial screen by reverse zoom action, i.e. press the left mouse button anywhere in the graphics and move the mouse left and up while the button is pressed. A second possibility were that you have played around with the chart editor and switched the scale to a fixed value. In this case you can turn everything to the start values by termintaing the program and then start it again. All existing data will be read in again so will only loose one value or two 2. The holdover unc. and sats the sat scale is not OK. It seems to indicate twice the number of tracked sats and a high number (76) of visible sats. First check whether the visible and tracked number of sats is shown correct in the main screen's status bar. If the error is already there then check in the parameters whether the Where to look for data in the status screen values are correct for you (You can count the lines in the receiver status screen). May be that I initialized these values wrong as long as no Z3801.Ini is available. 73 de Ulrich, DF6JB -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] Im Auftrag von Ulrich Bangert Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009 11:29 An: Time nuts Betreff: [time-nuts] Introduction of Z38XX Gents, perhaps you have read that since a few days I am the owner of a Z3805 bought on eBAy from fluke.I. The other day a friend of mine visited me and brought his GPSCON with him to test it on my Z3805. As fluke.I had pointed out, the GPSCON would work with the Z3805 but it would not work really satisfying. The reason is that the Z3801 has a 6 channel receiver and the Z3816 has a 8 channel receiver, so GPSCON is simply not prepared to read more than 8 sat data sets from the Z3805's status screen (which has a 12 channel receiver). In addition, because the Z3805's status screen uses more lines for the display of the additional sat data sets GPSCON will miss the last three lines of the z3805's status screen. This in conjunction with some other things encouraged me me to write a z3805 tool of my own named Z38XX. Of course it will handle z3801s and z3816s as well. It is far from being complete but you can get a good impression of it by downloading it from the usual place http://www.ulrich-bangert.de/html/downloads.html Z38XX talks to the Z3801/5/16 with a exact 10 s time base which means the PPS TI delivered can be used for the computation of Allan deviation (and other measures) of the internal phase comparator with a Tau0 = 10 s (which is done internally in Z38XX similar as in Lady Heather). The sat's horizont line in the Azimuth / Elevation chart will look strange in the first hours after program start. Give it some days until it looks as attched or even better. Have fun Ulrich Bangert www.ulrich-bangert.de Ortholzer Weg 1 27243 Gross Ippener ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction of Z38XX
Gents, the first users of Z38XX have found some issues with the software. I hope I have already fixed them but I want to wait for the feedback. ASAP I will inform you wheter the new version is free of this issues. Best regards Ulrich Bangert -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] Im Auftrag von Ulrich Bangert Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Juni 2009 11:29 An: Time nuts Betreff: [time-nuts] Introduction of Z38XX Gents, perhaps you have read that since a few days I am the owner of a Z3805 bought on eBAy from fluke.I. The other day a friend of mine visited me and brought his GPSCON with him to test it on my Z3805. As fluke.I had pointed out, the GPSCON would work with the Z3805 but it would not work really satisfying. The reason is that the Z3801 has a 6 channel receiver and the Z3816 has a 8 channel receiver, so GPSCON is simply not prepared to read more than 8 sat data sets from the Z3805's status screen (which has a 12 channel receiver). In addition, because the Z3805's status screen uses more lines for the display of the additional sat data sets GPSCON will miss the last three lines of the z3805's status screen. This in conjunction with some other things encouraged me me to write a z3805 tool of my own named Z38XX. Of course it will handle z3801s and z3816s as well. It is far from being complete but you can get a good impression of it by downloading it from the usual place http://www.ulrich-bangert.de/html/downloads.html Z38XX talks to the Z3801/5/16 with a exact 10 s time base which means the PPS TI delivered can be used for the computation of Allan deviation (and other measures) of the internal phase comparator with a Tau0 = 10 s (which is done internally in Z38XX similar as in Lady Heather). The sat's horizont line in the Azimuth / Elevation chart will look strange in the first hours after program start. Give it some days until it looks as attched or even better. Have fun Ulrich Bangert www.ulrich-bangert.de Ortholzer Weg 1 27243 Gross Ippener ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Introduction of Z38XX
Hi Ulrich, since our FireFly and Fury GPSDO's support GPSCon as well, I tried your plot program. We use 115.200 baud by default, but when I set your program to that speed, it defaults back to 57600 for some reason. Changing our board's baud rate fixed that problem. Our status output is shown properly in your status window (see below), and the *IDN? string is shown as well, but the program says the last smartclock status is undefined. What commands do you use to query the GPSDO that it may be getting hung up on? Your software looks quite nice, and It would be great if your software could support our units like GPSCon does. Thanks in advance, Said The status window in your software shows the following: :SYSTEM:STATUS? AQUISITION Tracking:10 Not Tracking: 3 PRN El Az SS PRN El Az 2 42 175 2414 0 331 4 59 119 2128 17 101 9 59 283 3351 44 156 12 27 30325 15 6 21811 17 36 4929 20 1 4719 26 18 26729 27 65 25033 48 45 19739 UTC 4:12:45 24 Jun 2009 LAT N 37:16:17.915 LON W 121:57:26.719 HGT 71.20 m (MSL) HEALTH MONITOR OCXO Current: OKEFC: OK GPS Receiver Status: 3D Fix 1PPS SOURCE MODE : GPS 1PPS SOURCE STATE : GPS GPSDO Status : Locked In a message dated 6/23/2009 02:29:05 Pacific Daylight Time, df...@ulrich-bangert.de writes: Z38XX talks to the Z3801/5/16 with a exact 10 s time base which means the PPS TI delivered can be used for the computation of Allan deviation (and other measures) of the internal phase comparator with a Tau0 = 10 s (which is done internally in Z38XX similar as in Lady Heather). The sat's horizont line in the Azimuth / Elevation chart will look strange in the first hours after program start. Give it some days until it looks as attched or even better. Have fun Ulrich Bangert ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[time-nuts] Introduction and a couple of requests
Hi, Name is Scott McGrath and I am a fellow time nut who in addition to playing with precise timing also plays with clocks!. My current collection of standards includes the following HP 105B HP 117A HP 5061A HP 5065A ( dead physics package unfortunately ) Austron 2100F (sold to me as a T but no internal standard so I am assuming a F) TrueTime DC-XL My requests Manual for the 5065A prefix 1840A I also need some replacement modules for a Tektronix 492A I have many spare modules for this except of course for the ones I need Manuals to Share which I will scan pre-production manual for the 5065A but it is much earlier than my current 5065A and a manual for the 117A which ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.