Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The 2.x firmware is the magic that lets it run down to HF type frequencies. You 
really do not want to upgrade the firmware.

It would be very nice to find a back shelf somewhere with a set of original 
manuals for the 2.x version. 

Now if it just had a SR-620 counter built into it 

Bob


On Feb 2, 2010, at 1:20 AM, Don Latham wrote:

 Oh, forgot. My firmware appears to be something like A.02.4 or something like 
 that, and the manuals are A.05.0 or so. another possible problem.
 Don
 
 - Original Message - From: Bob Camp li...@cq.nu
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
 time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:42 PM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 
 Hi
 
 The big question in my mind about these is how well they do below 30 MHz. 
 Until I know I can trust them it down there, I'm not selling very much stuff.
 
 I have yet to find a data sheet from before 2000 when they shipped with the 
 sub-800 MHz stuff enabled. I get the impression that the E8285's never quite 
 did as well below 30 MHz as the 8920's do.
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Don Latham wrote:
 
 Hi Bob. Display shows use, definitely, but I can see info over the whole
 tube. I have a couple of things to do before I can start the learning
 curve, but am looking forward to using it.
 I'll have a bunch of test stuff for sale if this thing works out ;-)
 Don
 
 Bob Camp
 Hi
 
 I *suspect* that any size that was common in 2003 will be ok. I have no
 basis for that claim. That likely will limit you to 2 gig and down.
 
 Each time I called Amtronix, Rick answered on the first ring. It's
 definitely someplace I would recommend dealing with.
 
 How's the display on your unit? That sees to be the weakness of a lot of
 test gear these days.
 
 Can't wait to measure -100 dbc/Hz phase noise with mine :) 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Don Latham wrote:
 
 Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and checkout
 sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm old
 fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
 I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at
 least
 reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
 I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments with
 better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
 Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work? They're on
 Epay for as little as $10
 Don
 
 Bob Camp
 Hi
 
 I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's
 is
 now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
 looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.
 
 Bob
 
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
 communications service monitor like the HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).
 
 You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get
 one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.
 
 None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear
 I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.
 
 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this summer.
 
 A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
 Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)
 
 John
 
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean
 towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
 
 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment -Memory cards

2010-02-02 Thread Robert Atkinson
Hi Don,
Congratulations on the E8285A. I've an 8924C that does me nicely  and came with 
a bunch of other stuff including two 10811A's and a crystal impedance meter 
(gotta keep on-topic) for £300 (~$500). Another useful instrument in the range 
that can sometimes be picked up cheaply is the 8922X if you get the 06 or 106 
option you get a nice 1GHz digital SA with TG, a CW RF generator and low 
frequency scope. The GSM test stuff is an unwanted extra. A bit big, but better 
than a 141T setup.  I think you will find that the E8285A is the same as the 
8924C and uses non-volatile RAM cards, not flash. These cards are rare now and 
have CMOS ram and a lithium coin cell. You MIGHT be able to read a flash card, 
but I'm pretty certain you can't write to them.
 
Robert G8RPI.

--- On Mon, 1/2/10, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote:


From: Don Latham d...@montana.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Date: Monday, 1 February, 2010, 22:34


Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and checkout
sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm old
fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at least
reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments with
better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work? They're on
Epay for as little as $10
Don

Bob Camp
 Hi

 I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's is
 now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
 looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.

 Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
 communications service monitor like the HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).

 You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get
 one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.

 None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear
 I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.

 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this summer.

 A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
 Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)

 John
 
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean
 towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
 discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
 purpose lab.

 The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
 instrument and do nothing else.

 Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are
 your
 area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.

 -John

 

 John,

 That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you
 do
 not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all
 that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you
 will
 get a lot of valuable information here.

 You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
 soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount.
 You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or
 function
 generator may be useful too. These vary

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-02 Thread Chuck Harris

Bird wattmeters, such as the model 43 thruline, are far from
accurate devices.  They are spec'd to be +/- 5% of the full scale
reading of the installed slug.

That means for a 100W slug, the error band is +/- 5W!

If you happen to read 20W on the meter, the error band says your
true power could be anywhere from 15 to 25 watts!

As a comparison, an HP 432A wattmeter can achieve an ultimate
accuracy of +/-0.2% +/- 10uW.

-Chuck Harris

Don Latham wrote:
Amtronix did tell me that the power measurements were off, according to 
some folks who had compared them to Birds.  Of course the E's could be 
calibrated. I don't have much below 30 MHz at present either.  I sense 
that there may be enough around to warrant a Yahoo or Google group???

Don

- Original Message - From: Bob Camp li...@cq.nu
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment



Hi

The big question in my mind about these is how well they do below 30 
MHz. Until I know I can trust them it down there, I'm not selling very 
much stuff.


I have yet to find a data sheet from before 2000 when they shipped 
with the sub-800 MHz stuff enabled. I get the impression that the 
E8285's never quite did as well below 30 MHz as the 8920's do.


Bob


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment -Memory cards

2010-02-02 Thread Scott Newell
At 07:42 AM 2/2/2010 , Robert Atkinson wrote:
than a 141T setup.  I think you will find that the E8285A is the same as the 
8924C and uses non-volatile RAM cards, not flash. These cards are rare now
and 
have CMOS ram and a lithium coin cell. You MIGHT be able to read a flash
card, 
but I'm pretty certain you can't write to them.

If you're looking for PCMCIA SRAM cards, they're also used with vintage
Fanuc CNC controls.  You might end up paying a premium, but they are out
there.  (On the other side, I'm using an el-cheapo PCMCIA / PCI adapter in
a desktop PC, with the stock XP drivers.  No problems yet.)

-- 
newell  N5TNL


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment -Memory cards

2010-02-02 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The memory in the E8285A has a lithium cell associated with it. One of my
big questions is weather the firmware goes away when the coin cell dies
(battery backed SRAM) or if the firmware is in something a bit more robust.

Hopefully it's sitting on the porch when I get home tonight

--

141T ... how many do you need in addition to an E8285 ... all sorts of
questions to be answered.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Robert Atkinson
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 8:42 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment -Memory cards

Hi Don,
Congratulations on the E8285A. I've an 8924C that does me nicely  and came
with a bunch of other stuff including two 10811A's and a crystal impedance
meter (gotta keep on-topic) for £300 (~$500). Another useful instrument in
the range that can sometimes be picked up cheaply is the 8922X if you get
the 06 or 106 option you get a nice 1GHz digital SA with TG, a CW RF
generator and low frequency scope. The GSM test stuff is an unwanted extra.
A bit big, but better than a 141T setup.  I think you will find that the
E8285A is the same as the 8924C and uses non-volatile RAM cards, not flash.
These cards are rare now and have CMOS ram and a lithium coin cell. You
MIGHT be able to read a flash card, but I'm pretty certain you can't write
to them.
 
Robert G8RPI.

--- On Mon, 1/2/10, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote:


From: Don Latham d...@montana.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Date: Monday, 1 February, 2010, 22:34


Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and checkout
sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm old
fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at least
reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments with
better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work? They're on
Epay for as little as $10
Don

Bob Camp
 Hi

 I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's is
 now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
 looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.

 Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
 communications service monitor like the HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).

 You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get
 one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.

 None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear
 I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.

 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this summer.

 A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
 Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)

 John
 
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean
 towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
 discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
 purpose lab.

 The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
 instrument and do nothing else.

 Also, as others have pointed out, you

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-02 Thread Don Latham
Hi Bob: I finally figured that out. I had the manuals printed, anyway.
kinda added to the cost, but...
Don

Bob Camp
 Hi

 The 2.x firmware is the magic that lets it run down to HF type
 frequencies. You really do not want to upgrade the firmware.

 It would be very nice to find a back shelf somewhere with a set of
 original manuals for the 2.x version.

 Now if it just had a SR-620 counter built into it 

 Bob


 On Feb 2, 2010, at 1:20 AM, Don Latham wrote:

 Oh, forgot. My firmware appears to be something like A.02.4 or something
 like that, and the manuals are A.05.0 or so. another possible problem.
 Don

 - Original Message - From: Bob Camp li...@cq.nu
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:42 PM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment


 Hi

 The big question in my mind about these is how well they do below 30
 MHz. Until I know I can trust them it down there, I'm not selling very
 much stuff.

 I have yet to find a data sheet from before 2000 when they shipped with
 the sub-800 MHz stuff enabled. I get the impression that the E8285's
 never quite did as well below 30 MHz as the 8920's do.

 Bob


 On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Don Latham wrote:

 Hi Bob. Display shows use, definitely, but I can see info over the
 whole
 tube. I have a couple of things to do before I can start the learning
 curve, but am looking forward to using it.
 I'll have a bunch of test stuff for sale if this thing works out ;-)
 Don

 Bob Camp
 Hi

 I *suspect* that any size that was common in 2003 will be ok. I have
 no
 basis for that claim. That likely will limit you to 2 gig and down.

 Each time I called Amtronix, Rick answered on the first ring. It's
 definitely someplace I would recommend dealing with.

 How's the display on your unit? That sees to be the weakness of a lot
 of
 test gear these days.

 Can't wait to measure -100 dbc/Hz phase noise with mine :) 

 Bob


 On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Don Latham wrote:

 Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and
 checkout
 sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm
 old
 fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
 I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at
 least
 reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
 I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments
 with
 better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
 Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work?
 They're on
 Epay for as little as $10
 Don

 Bob Camp
 Hi

 I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix
 E8285A's
 is
 now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here
 is
 looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.

 Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
 [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of
 $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
 communications service monitor like the HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).

 You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital
 o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking
 generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you
 get
 one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software
 that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.

 None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test
 gear
 I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to
 go.

 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds
 (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw
 an
 8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for
 about
 $1500 this summer.

 A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has
 some
 Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)

 John
 
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd
 lean
 towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's is
now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K 
(actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a 
communications service monitor like the HP 
8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).

You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and 
modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope, 
and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator, 
too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get 
one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that 
lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.

None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box 
performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast 
majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear 
I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.

The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?) 
of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an 
8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about 
$1500 this summer.

A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at 
http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info 
about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some 
Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking 
generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)

John

john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean
towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM. 
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
 
 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11 
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
 discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
 purpose lab.
 
 The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
 instrument and do nothing else.
 
 Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are your
 area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.
 
 -John
 
 
 
 John,

 That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you
do
 not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all
 that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you will
 get a lot of valuable information here.

 You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
 soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount.
 You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or
function
 generator may be useful too. These vary widely depending on frequency
 range and features. There is no good single answer to any of these
 questions without knowing more about what you do with it.

 Many of us on this list have more than one of pretty much everything (I
am
 guilty of that too) to reflect the fact that no single instrument is
 universal, with possibly one exception: my favorite hand held DMM is a
 Fluke 8060A, but I am sure some people will have another favorite :)

 Don't start spending what little money you have until you know what you
 need. If you just need to spend money, may I interest you in a wonderful
 business opportunity in Nigeria?

 Didier KO4BB


  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I
 do other things...

 -Original Message-
 From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:35:22
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:

 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread Don Latham
Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and checkout
sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm old
fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at least
reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments with
better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work? They're on
Epay for as little as $10
Don

Bob Camp
 Hi

 I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's is
 now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
 looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.

 Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
 communications service monitor like the HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).

 You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get
 one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.

 None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear
 I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.

 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this summer.

 A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
 Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)

 John
 
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean
 towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
 discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
 purpose lab.

 The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
 instrument and do nothing else.

 Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are
 your
 area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.

 -John

 

 John,

 That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you
 do
 not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all
 that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you
 will
 get a lot of valuable information here.

 You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
 soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount.
 You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or
 function
 generator may be useful too. These vary widely depending on frequency
 range and features. There is no good single answer to any of these
 questions without knowing more about what you do with it.

 Many of us on this list have more than one of pretty much everything (I
 am
 guilty of that too) to reflect the fact that no single instrument is
 universal, with possibly one exception: my favorite hand held DMM is a
 Fluke 8060A, but I am sure some people will have another favorite :)

 Don't start spending what little money you have until you know what you
 need. If you just need to spend money, may I interest you in a
 wonderful
 business opportunity in Nigeria?

 Didier KO4BB


  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while
 I
 do other things...

 -Original Message-
 From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:35:22
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread Pete Lancashire
sounds like you are off to a good start. the 5345A is a great counter other
then size and the fan, check the Yahoo
Tektronix group for changing all the nasty caps in the 2465, they have a
habit of failing and destroying the circuit
board. I believe someone even has the parts list of what to replace. As to a
signal source the two biggies are
noise and upper freq, for the SA if you want higher the 2-3 Ghz it is going
to cost a lot, lot more. Mine is based
on the HP 7/MMS and for now I'm happy with the 2.9 Ghz front end. ..
join the Yahoo Tek and HP groups
and have fun !

-pete

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:35 AM, John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com wrote:

 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:

 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
 engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
 kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

 I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
 good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

 Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
 economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
 good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
 build that which I cannot afford.

 I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

 Sincerely,

 John Foege
 KB1FSX
 starving-engineer!

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

I *suspect* that any size that was common in 2003 will be ok. I have no basis 
for that claim. That likely will limit you to 2 gig and down. 

Each time I called Amtronix, Rick answered on the first ring. It's definitely 
someplace I would recommend dealing with.

How's the display on your unit? That sees to be the weakness of a lot of test 
gear these days.

Can't wait to measure -100 dbc/Hz phase noise with mine :) 

Bob


On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Don Latham wrote:

 Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and checkout
 sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm old
 fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
 I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at least
 reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
 I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments with
 better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
 Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work? They're on
 Epay for as little as $10
 Don
 
 Bob Camp
 Hi
 
 I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's is
 now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
 looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.
 
 Bob
 
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
 communications service monitor like the HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).
 
 You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get
 one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.
 
 None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear
 I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.
 
 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this summer.
 
 A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
 Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)
 
 John
 
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean
 towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
 
 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
 discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
 purpose lab.
 
 The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
 instrument and do nothing else.
 
 Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are
 your
 area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.
 
 -John
 
 
 
 John,
 
 That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you
 do
 not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all
 that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you
 will
 get a lot of valuable information here.
 
 You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
 soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount.
 You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or
 function
 generator may be useful too. These vary widely depending on frequency
 range and features. There is no good single answer to any of these
 questions without knowing more about what you do with it.
 
 Many of us on this list have more than one of pretty much everything (I
 am
 guilty of that too) to reflect the fact that no single instrument is
 universal, with possibly one exception: my favorite hand held DMM is a
 Fluke 8060A, but I am sure some people will have another favorite :)
 
 Don't start spending what little money you have until you know what

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread Don Latham
Hi Bob. Display shows use, definitely, but I can see info over the whole
tube. I have a couple of things to do before I can start the learning
curve, but am looking forward to using it.
I'll have a bunch of test stuff for sale if this thing works out ;-)
Don

Bob Camp
 Hi

 I *suspect* that any size that was common in 2003 will be ok. I have no
 basis for that claim. That likely will limit you to 2 gig and down.

 Each time I called Amtronix, Rick answered on the first ring. It's
 definitely someplace I would recommend dealing with.

 How's the display on your unit? That sees to be the weakness of a lot of
 test gear these days.

 Can't wait to measure -100 dbc/Hz phase noise with mine :) 

 Bob


 On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Don Latham wrote:

 Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and checkout
 sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm old
 fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
 I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at
 least
 reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
 I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments with
 better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
 Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work? They're on
 Epay for as little as $10
 Don

 Bob Camp
 Hi

 I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's
 is
 now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
 looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.

 Bob

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
 communications service monitor like the HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).

 You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get
 one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.

 None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear
 I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.

 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this summer.

 A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
 Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)

 John
 
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean
 towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
 discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
 purpose lab.

 The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a
 specific
 instrument and do nothing else.

 Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are
 your
 area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.

 -John

 

 John,

 That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If
 you
 do
 not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you
 all
 that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you
 will
 get a lot of valuable information here.

 You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
 soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface
 mount.
 You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or
 function
 generator may be useful too. These vary widely depending on frequency
 range and features. There is no good single answer to any of these
 questions without knowing more about what you do with it.

 Many of us on this list have more than one of pretty much everything
 (I
 am
 guilty of that too

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

The big question in my mind about these is how well they do below 30 MHz. Until 
I know I can trust them it down there, I'm not selling very much stuff. 

I have yet to find a data sheet from before 2000 when they shipped with the 
sub-800 MHz stuff enabled. I get the impression that the E8285's never quite 
did as well below 30 MHz as the 8920's do.  

Bob


On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Don Latham wrote:

 Hi Bob. Display shows use, definitely, but I can see info over the whole
 tube. I have a couple of things to do before I can start the learning
 curve, but am looking forward to using it.
 I'll have a bunch of test stuff for sale if this thing works out ;-)
 Don
 
 Bob Camp
 Hi
 
 I *suspect* that any size that was common in 2003 will be ok. I have no
 basis for that claim. That likely will limit you to 2 gig and down.
 
 Each time I called Amtronix, Rick answered on the first ring. It's
 definitely someplace I would recommend dealing with.
 
 How's the display on your unit? That sees to be the weakness of a lot of
 test gear these days.
 
 Can't wait to measure -100 dbc/Hz phase noise with mine :) 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Don Latham wrote:
 
 Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and checkout
 sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm old
 fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
 I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at
 least
 reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
 I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments with
 better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
 Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work? They're on
 Epay for as little as $10
 Don
 
 Bob Camp
 Hi
 
 I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's
 is
 now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
 looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.
 
 Bob
 
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
 communications service monitor like the HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).
 
 You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get
 one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.
 
 None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear
 I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.
 
 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this summer.
 
 A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
 Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)
 
 John
 
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean
 towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
 
 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
 discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
 purpose lab.
 
 The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a
 specific
 instrument and do nothing else.
 
 Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are
 your
 area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.
 
 -John
 
 
 
 John,
 
 That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If
 you
 do
 not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you
 all
 that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you
 will
 get a lot of valuable information here.
 
 You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread K3WRY
If goggle HP 8285a spec, you will get HP spec which say this unit is 800  
Mhz up.  The 8920, 8921, 8025 will go down to ham freq.
 
Regards,

Dr. Joseph G. Palsa P.E.
Director, Sales   Marketing
Clary Corporation
Phone: 888-442-5279
Phone:  804-674-0364
Fax: 804-674-0714
Cell:  804-350-2665
jpa...@clary.com
djpa...@yahoo.com  
k3...@aol.com
k3...@arrl.net

This e-mail (including any  attachments) is intended only for the use of 
the 
individual or entity named  above and may contain privileged, proprietary, 
or 
confidential  information.  The information may also contain technical data 
subject  to export control laws.  

 
In a message dated 2/1/2010 8:42:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, li...@cq.nu 
 writes:

Hi

The big question in my mind about these is how well they do  below 30 MHz. 
Until I know I can trust them it down there, I'm not selling  very much 
stuff. 

I have yet to find a data sheet from before 2000 when  they shipped with 
the sub-800 MHz stuff enabled. I get the impression that the  E8285's never 
quite did as well below 30 MHz as the 8920's do.   

Bob


On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Don Latham  wrote:

 Hi Bob. Display shows use, definitely, but I can see info  over the whole
 tube. I have a couple of things to do before I can  start the learning
 curve, but am looking forward to using it.
  I'll have a bunch of test stuff for sale if this thing works out ;-)
  Don
 
 Bob Camp
 Hi
 
 I  *suspect* that any size that was common in 2003 will be ok. I have  no
 basis for that claim. That likely will limit you to 2 gig and  down.
 
 Each time I called Amtronix, Rick answered on  the first ring. It's
 definitely someplace I would recommend  dealing with.
 
 How's the display on your unit? That  sees to be the weakness of a lot of
 test gear these  days.
 
 Can't wait to measure -100 dbc/Hz phase noise  with mine :) 
 
 Bob
 
  
 On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Don Latham wrote:
  
 Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and  checkout
 sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals  printed out. But, I'm 
old
 fashioned and have a hard time using  manuals onscreen...
 I also got the feeling (phone order) that  I can call Amtronix and at
 least
 reach a Real  Person who will talk to me.
 I think the E8285A will replace at  least three present instruments with
 better, once I master  Instrument Basic :-).
 Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA  memory card will work? They're 
on
 Epay for as little as  $10
 Don
 
 Bob  Camp
 Hi
 
 I do  believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix  
E8285A's
 is
 now on it's way to a  basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
 looking  for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.
  
 Bob
 
  -Original Message-
 From:  time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]  
On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent:  Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To:  john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and  frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re:  [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 If RF  measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of  
$K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds),  consider a
 communications service monitor like the  HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the  same thing).
 
 You get an RF generator,  RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation  analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital  
o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have  a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've  probably forgotten a few things.  If you 
get
 one with  spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software  that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable  fault finding.
 
 None of its  capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
  performing a single function, but they're good enough for the  vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first  significant piece of test 
gear
 I bought, and if I ever  have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.
  
 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds  (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone  production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully  functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this  summer.
 
 A guy who sells and services  a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com --  that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various  versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
  Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and  tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a  deal.)
 
 John
  
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010  03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a  general purpose lab. I'd lean
 towards RF type stuff since  I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by  ATT
 
 -Original  Message-
 From: J. Forster  j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010  12:22:11
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of  precise time and frequency
  measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re:  [time-nuts

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread Pete Rawson
The early production E8285A units operate all RF functions down to 100KHz.

You have to ask the seller to verify what he's offering operates this way.

Pete Rawson

On Feb 1, 2010, at 8:18 PM, k3...@aol.com wrote:

 If goggle HP 8285a spec, you will get HP spec which say this unit is 800  
 Mhz up.  The 8920, 8921, 8025 will go down to ham freq.
 
 Regards,
 
 Dr. Joseph G. Palsa P.E.
 Director, Sales   Marketing
 Clary Corporation
 Phone: 888-442-5279
 Phone:  804-674-0364
 Fax: 804-674-0714
 Cell:  804-350-2665
 jpa...@clary.com
 djpa...@yahoo.com  
 k3...@aol.com
 k3...@arrl.net
 
 This e-mail (including any  attachments) is intended only for the use of 
 the 
 individual or entity named  above and may contain privileged, proprietary, 
 or 
 confidential  information.  The information may also contain technical data 
 subject  to export control laws.  
 
 
 In a message dated 2/1/2010 8:42:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, li...@cq.nu 
 writes:
 
 Hi
 
 The big question in my mind about these is how well they do  below 30 MHz. 
 Until I know I can trust them it down there, I'm not selling  very much 
 stuff. 
 
 I have yet to find a data sheet from before 2000 when  they shipped with 
 the sub-800 MHz stuff enabled. I get the impression that the  E8285's never 
 quite did as well below 30 MHz as the 8920's do.   
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Don Latham  wrote:
 
 Hi Bob. Display shows use, definitely, but I can see info  over the whole
 tube. I have a couple of things to do before I can  start the learning
 curve, but am looking forward to using it.
 I'll have a bunch of test stuff for sale if this thing works out ;-)
 Don
 
 Bob Camp
 Hi
 
 I  *suspect* that any size that was common in 2003 will be ok. I have  no
 basis for that claim. That likely will limit you to 2 gig and  down.
 
 Each time I called Amtronix, Rick answered on  the first ring. It's
 definitely someplace I would recommend  dealing with.
 
 How's the display on your unit? That  sees to be the weakness of a lot of
 test gear these  days.
 
 Can't wait to measure -100 dbc/Hz phase noise  with mine :) 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Don Latham wrote:
 
 Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and  checkout
 sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals  printed out. But, I'm 
 old
 fashioned and have a hard time using  manuals onscreen...
 I also got the feeling (phone order) that  I can call Amtronix and at
 least
 reach a Real  Person who will talk to me.
 I think the E8285A will replace at  least three present instruments with
 better, once I master  Instrument Basic :-).
 Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA  memory card will work? They're 
 on
 Epay for as little as  $10
 Don
 
 Bob  Camp
 Hi
 
 I do  believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix  
 E8285A's
 is
 now on it's way to a  basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
 looking  for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.
 
 Bob
 
 -Original Message-
 From:  time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]  
 On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent:  Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To:  john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and  frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re:  [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 If RF  measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of  
 $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds),  consider a
 communications service monitor like the  HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the  same thing).
 
 You get an RF generator,  RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation  analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital  
 o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have  a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've  probably forgotten a few things.  If you 
 get
 one with  spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software  that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable  fault finding.
 
 None of its  capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the  vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first  significant piece of test 
 gear
 I bought, and if I ever  have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.
 
 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds  (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone  production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully  functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this  summer.
 
 A guy who sells and services  a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com --  that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various  versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
 Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and  tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a  deal.)
 
 John
 
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010  03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a  general purpose lab. I'd lean
 towards RF type stuff since  I'm

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread Bob Camp
HI

I agree. The 800 MHz spec was all I could find. That's the only spec that 
Google seems to know about. 

Back before some point like mid 2001, there was a different spec on these 
boxes. They went down to much lower frequencies. That information is still 
preserved in the repair manual. Unfortunately, it does not give a full detail 
set of specifications for the earlier box. The boxes Amtronix is / was selling 
have the old firmware and modules in them. They will go to the old wider 
frequency range. 

Bob


On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:18 PM, k3...@aol.com wrote:

 If goggle HP 8285a spec, you will get HP spec which say this unit is 800  
 Mhz up.  The 8920, 8921, 8025 will go down to ham freq.
 
 Regards,
 
 Dr. Joseph G. Palsa P.E.
 Director, Sales   Marketing
 Clary Corporation
 Phone: 888-442-5279
 Phone:  804-674-0364
 Fax: 804-674-0714
 Cell:  804-350-2665
 jpa...@clary.com
 djpa...@yahoo.com  
 k3...@aol.com
 k3...@arrl.net
 
 This e-mail (including any  attachments) is intended only for the use of 
 the 
 individual or entity named  above and may contain privileged, proprietary, 
 or 
 confidential  information.  The information may also contain technical data 
 subject  to export control laws.  
 
 
 In a message dated 2/1/2010 8:42:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, li...@cq.nu 
 writes:
 
 Hi
 
 The big question in my mind about these is how well they do  below 30 MHz. 
 Until I know I can trust them it down there, I'm not selling  very much 
 stuff. 
 
 I have yet to find a data sheet from before 2000 when  they shipped with 
 the sub-800 MHz stuff enabled. I get the impression that the  E8285's never 
 quite did as well below 30 MHz as the 8920's do.   
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Don Latham  wrote:
 
 Hi Bob. Display shows use, definitely, but I can see info  over the whole
 tube. I have a couple of things to do before I can  start the learning
 curve, but am looking forward to using it.
 I'll have a bunch of test stuff for sale if this thing works out ;-)
 Don
 
 Bob Camp
 Hi
 
 I  *suspect* that any size that was common in 2003 will be ok. I have  no
 basis for that claim. That likely will limit you to 2 gig and  down.
 
 Each time I called Amtronix, Rick answered on  the first ring. It's
 definitely someplace I would recommend  dealing with.
 
 How's the display on your unit? That  sees to be the weakness of a lot of
 test gear these  days.
 
 Can't wait to measure -100 dbc/Hz phase noise  with mine :) 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Don Latham wrote:
 
 Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and  checkout
 sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals  printed out. But, I'm 
 old
 fashioned and have a hard time using  manuals onscreen...
 I also got the feeling (phone order) that  I can call Amtronix and at
 least
 reach a Real  Person who will talk to me.
 I think the E8285A will replace at  least three present instruments with
 better, once I master  Instrument Basic :-).
 Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA  memory card will work? They're 
 on
 Epay for as little as  $10
 Don
 
 Bob  Camp
 Hi
 
 I do  believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix  
 E8285A's
 is
 now on it's way to a  basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
 looking  for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.
 
 Bob
 
 -Original Message-
 From:  time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]  
 On
 Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
 Sent:  Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
 To:  john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and  frequency
 measurement
 Subject: Re:  [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 If RF  measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of  
 $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds),  consider a
 communications service monitor like the  HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the  same thing).
 
 You get an RF generator,  RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation  analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital  
 o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have  a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've  probably forgotten a few things.  If you 
 get
 one with  spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software  that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable  fault finding.
 
 None of its  capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the  vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first  significant piece of test 
 gear
 I bought, and if I ever  have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.
 
 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds  (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone  production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully  functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this  summer.
 
 A guy who sells and services  a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com --  that web site will give you lots of info
 about

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread James C Cotton

Don,

Funny thing I bought a HP E8285A non-SA from Amtronix for $250 +
shipping as a RF source and spare parts for my $1200 HP 8935A...

Do you by any chance have a HP 8620A/B/C (or HP 8350B/11869A) and
HP 8709A/H10 and some 862xx RF plug-ins...(poor man's TG from .01 Mhz to
18 Ghz with the right plug-ins with 3 kHz RBW, and a 21.4 Mhz IF SA)?

I have some Cisco cards I need to try floating around my desk
somewhere...  I will let you know what I find.

Jim Cotton, N8QOH|  jim.cot...@wmich.edu
Western Michigan University  |  Phone: (269) 387-6421
Network Systems Group|  Fax: (269) 387-5473

On Feb 1, 2010 at 15:34 -0700, Don Latham wrote:

 Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:34:57 -0700 (MST)
 From: Don Latham d...@montana.com
 Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and checkout
 sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm old
 fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
 I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at least
 reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
 I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments with
 better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
 Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work? They're on
 Epay for as little as $10
 Don

 Bob Camp
  Hi
 
  I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's is
  now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
  looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.
 
  Bob
 
  -Original Message-
  From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
  Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
  Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
  To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
  measurement
  Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
  If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
  (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
  communications service monitor like the HP
  8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).
 
  You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
  modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
  and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
  too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get
  one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
  lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.
 
  None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
  performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
  majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear
  I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.
 
  The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
  of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
  8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
  $1500 this summer.
 
  A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
  http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
  about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
  Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
  generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)
 
  John
  
  john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
  Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean
  towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
  Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
 
  -Original Message-
  From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
  Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
  To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
  measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
  Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
  I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
  discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
  purpose lab.
 
  The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
  instrument and do nothing else.
 
  Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are
  your
  area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.
 
  -John
 
  
 
  John,
 
  That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you
  do
  not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all
  that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you
  will
  get a lot of valuable information here.
 
  You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
  soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount.
  You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or
  function
  generator may

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread Don Latham
Amtronix did tell me that the power measurements were off, according to some 
folks who had compared them to Birds.  Of course the E's could be 
calibrated. I don't have much below 30 MHz at present either.  I sense that 
there may be enough around to warrant a Yahoo or Google group???

Don

- Original Message - 
From: Bob Camp li...@cq.nu
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment



Hi

The big question in my mind about these is how well they do below 30 MHz. 
Until I know I can trust them it down there, I'm not selling very much 
stuff.


I have yet to find a data sheet from before 2000 when they shipped with 
the sub-800 MHz stuff enabled. I get the impression that the E8285's never 
quite did as well below 30 MHz as the 8920's do.


Bob


On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Don Latham wrote:


Hi Bob. Display shows use, definitely, but I can see info over the whole
tube. I have a couple of things to do before I can start the learning
curve, but am looking forward to using it.
I'll have a bunch of test stuff for sale if this thing works out ;-)
Don

Bob Camp

Hi

I *suspect* that any size that was common in 2003 will be ok. I have no
basis for that claim. That likely will limit you to 2 gig and down.

Each time I called Amtronix, Rick answered on the first ring. It's
definitely someplace I would recommend dealing with.

How's the display on your unit? That sees to be the weakness of a lot of
test gear these days.

Can't wait to measure -100 dbc/Hz phase noise with mine :) 

Bob


On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Don Latham wrote:


Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and checkout
sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm 
old

fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at
least
reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments with
better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work? They're 
on

Epay for as little as $10
Don

Bob Camp

Hi

I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's
is
now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] 
On

Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
(actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
communications service monitor like the HP
8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).

You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you 
get

one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.

None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test 
gear

I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.

The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
$1500 this summer.

A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)

John

john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:

Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean

towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.

Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

-Original Message-
From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency

measurementtime-nuts@febo.com

Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic 
general

purpose lab.

The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a
specific
instrument and do nothing else.

Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are
your
area(s) of interest

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-02-01 Thread Don Latham
Oh, forgot. My firmware appears to be something like A.02.4 or something 
like that, and the manuals are A.05.0 or so. another possible problem.

Don

- Original Message - 
From: Bob Camp li...@cq.nu
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment



Hi

The big question in my mind about these is how well they do below 30 MHz. 
Until I know I can trust them it down there, I'm not selling very much 
stuff.


I have yet to find a data sheet from before 2000 when they shipped with 
the sub-800 MHz stuff enabled. I get the impression that the E8285's never 
quite did as well below 30 MHz as the 8920's do.


Bob


On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Don Latham wrote:


Hi Bob. Display shows use, definitely, but I can see info over the whole
tube. I have a couple of things to do before I can start the learning
curve, but am looking forward to using it.
I'll have a bunch of test stuff for sale if this thing works out ;-)
Don

Bob Camp

Hi

I *suspect* that any size that was common in 2003 will be ok. I have no
basis for that claim. That likely will limit you to 2 gig and down.

Each time I called Amtronix, Rick answered on the first ring. It's
definitely someplace I would recommend dealing with.

How's the display on your unit? That sees to be the weakness of a lot of
test gear these days.

Can't wait to measure -100 dbc/Hz phase noise with mine :) 

Bob


On Feb 1, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Don Latham wrote:


Just bought one last week. As advertised, came with a cal and checkout
sheet.  BTW, cost another $150 to have manuals printed out. But, I'm 
old

fashioned and have a hard time using manuals onscreen...
I also got the feeling (phone order) that I can call Amtronix and at
least
reach a Real Person who will talk to me.
I think the E8285A will replace at least three present instruments with
better, once I master Instrument Basic :-).
Does anyone know which low-cost PCMCIA memory card will work? They're 
on

Epay for as little as $10
Don

Bob Camp

Hi

I do believe the last (or maybe next to last) of the Amtronix E8285A's
is
now on it's way to a basement in Pennsylvania. If anybody else here is
looking for one, I'd sure call Rick pretty quick.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] 
On

Behalf Of John Ackermann N8UR
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:14 PM
To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
(actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
communications service monitor like the HP
8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).

You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you 
get

one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.

None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test 
gear

I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.

The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
$1500 this summer.

A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)

John

john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:

Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean

towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.

Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

-Original Message-
From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency

measurementtime-nuts@febo.com

Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic 
general

purpose lab.

The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a
specific
instrument and do nothing else.

Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are
your
area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.

-John




John,

That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy

Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-25 Thread Steve Rooke
My lab/workshop is my dining room (it's great being single) and I just
went out and bought a very sturdy workbench that was on our auction
site from a person just across town. The top was pretty poor and
grubby so I just skimmed it with a sheet of plywood and it came up
nice. I had to assemble the trestles and the top in the room as it was
in pieces as there was no way I could get it through the door, and two
of us could hardly lift the heavy top. I recon it could easily support
a small car or a couple of truck engines so all the heavy gear I have
on it now is well within it's limits. I certainly wanted something
strong and deep enough to hold the sort of gear we use plus have room
at the front and back of the instruments and found most of the modern
workbences were too weak and far too narrow for me.

My advice is to make sure you have ample depth in any work bench so
you can have power distribution and cables at the back plus space at
the front to hold devices under test. Also make sure it is strong
enough so you can pile it full of gear and be able to stand on it so
you can lean over the back to plug things in and out. I discovered
this at my last place of work where we had some benches that started
to sag badly so one of my collages designed the bench from hell. It
was the sort of over engineered construction that come an earthquake
or bomb you rush over to it and hid underneath as that one could
probably hold up a truck :-)

The bad thing is that they want to replace the carpet in my house so
heaven knows how I'm going to shift this thing :-)

Steve
-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
A man with one clock knows what time it is;
A man with two clocks is never quite sure.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment Tables

2010-01-25 Thread Ralph Smith
You can make a lighter, stronger, more rigid tabletop using torsion box 
construction. Use 1/2 plywood for the top and bottom. Use 1x1 strips of a 
hardwood such as poplar to crate a lattice spaced at 6 inch intervals in 
between, glued along the lengths of the lattice. I use brads during 
construction to ensure the lattice stays in place while the glue cures, but the 
structural strength comes from proper glue bonds along the lattice.

Ralph

On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Bob Camp wrote:

 Hi
 
 If you are looking for massive tables on the cheap, you can indeed build 
 them. Have the local Home Depot rip some plywood to an appropriate width and 
 glue four sheets one on top of the other. 2x4's or 4x4's make fine legs and 
 support structure under the table top. I have 16 feet of it sitting in the 
 basement. No test gear on it at all. Other hobbies seem to have taken over 
 the entire space...
 
 The only real drawback is that it's a build in place item. You aren't going 
 to take it with you when you move. There are various versions of that table 
 scattered all over the US. 
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Jan 23, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Mike Feher wrote:
 
 I also had similar problems with my 8 ft tables for my test equipment. I
 found at Home Depot replacement fold down legs. I bought some, and installed
 them right in the middle of the tables. No more sagging problems. I had to
 shorten the legs somewhat as they were a few inches too long. But, have
 supported hundreds of ponds for many years now with no sigh of
 warping/sagging. 73 - Mike
 
 Mike B. Feher, N4FS
 89 Arnold Blvd.
 Howell, NJ, 07731
 732-886-5960
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Miles
 Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 7:38 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the furniture.
 
 I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables and
 very soon
 learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging.
 
 If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple folding
 tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets.  The idea,
 besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to wobble.
 This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing capacity.  It
 completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is otherwise
 pretty much mandatory when using folding tables.
 
 With cheap folding tables, you don't have to feel bad about drilling into
 your workbench or otherwise marring and gouging it.  Every few years, or
 when you move, just throw the old folding table away and spend $39.95 on
 another one.  Voila, a brand new workbench.
 
 Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the
 accessories possible.
 Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc.
 
 An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to gradually grow,
 as the budget allows.
 
 Also, HP/Agilent equipment racks are sometimes available on eBay.  These are
 nothing like the relay racks or server racks that you commonly see in data
 centers.  They are *stout*.  They're very expensive when new, but almost
 free for the shipping when bought used.  I used generic shelving units to
 hold test equipment for a long time, but once you use real racks, you won't
 go back.
 
 An Agilent E3662A/B rack can hold up to 81 EIA units of gear weighing up to
 1800 pounds.  I have three in my living room and wish I had more...
 
 -- john, KE5FX
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-25 Thread Nick Foster

Late to the party, I know, but I'd like to put in another recommendation for 
the DG8SAQ VNA. It's cheap, accurate, and best of all -- SMALL! It occupies 
4x3x2 and so doesn't take up a whole desk. If 1.3GHz is enough for you, that 
might be the way to go. You get about 90dB of dynamic range. You can export the 
data easily since the signal processing is done by the host PC. And the 
software contains an integrated math engine that lets you do reasonably 
complicated signal processing in custom traces, something I used to do by 
exporting data and plotting in Matlab.

Nick



 Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:44:53 -0500
 From: john.fo...@gmail.com
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 Thanks to everyone who answered in this thread.I am keenly interested
 in everything everyone had to say!

 One of the things that seems like a no-brainer, would be to scrape
 together the $700 and get an Agilent E8285A CDMA test set. It seems
 like I can't go wrong with that! My only concern with getting these
 off eBay or from anywhere else for that matter, is that apparently the
 later versions firmware only support 800Mhz and up operation instead
 of the earlier versions 100kHz-1Ghz.

 Unfortunately, Amtronix seems to have run out, or at least are on
 their last 1-2 units. I wont have the cash in time to get one, as they
 have sold 35 in the last month alone.

 Sigh.

 Another very cool set of toys that had been mentioned, were the Tek
 TM500 series, which I am also interested in! I don't need any of the
 freq. counter plugins, but the power supply, func. generators, etc.
 All very cool!

 Thanks,

 John

 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Magnus Danielson
  wrote:
 Bob Camp wrote:

 Hi

 About 8 years ago a whole lot of companies dumped a whole lot of test
 gear. Prices dropped rapidly as they did so. It's taken us all quite a while
 to burn through that pile of stuff.
 The amazing thing is that as bad as the economy is now, you don't see
 people doing the same sort of thing. You see oceans of people out of work,
 but not piles of test gear getting sold off.

 Well, when the .com bubble bursted, it had been preceeded by massive
 acceleration of an instrument-hungry industry. As the bubble bursted, both
 .com companies and otherwise stable companies accelerated by their customers
 suffered. Some folded in and some just barely survived.

 This time it was the economy folks that fluked it. Instrument hungry
 industry only suffers indirectly.

 Cheers,
 Magnus

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
  
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390709/direct/01/
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-25 Thread Steve Rooke
Solid concrete floors here. I wouldn't have trusted my bench and all
the kit I have on it (and under it) on floorboards alone, I'd probably
have laid down a thick piece of ply to cover the area under the bench
and therefore spread the weight or at least put some pieces under each
4x2 leg.

Steve

2010/1/26 Mike Naruta AA8K a...@comcast.net:

 If the top is a two-person lift, and you are
 putting all your heavy equipment on it, and
 you are not on a concrete floor, you may want
 to align the bench legs with the floor joists
 or use plates to distribute the weight.  :)


 My shop bench is made from wood from our family's
 barn.  The legs are 6 by 6 inch (15 cm) and
 the long dimension framing is 2 by 12 inch
 (5 by 30 cm) and leg brace/foot rests are 2 by 2
 inch (5 cm).  I had to use threaded rod because
 the local hardware stores did not have bolts long
 enough.  This wood was old when we purchased
 the farm in 1953.  I built it as a tribute to
 our old barn.  I mounted my father-in-law's big
 metal vise/vice on it.  It is 11.5 inches (30 cm)
 high and 29 inches (74 cm) from front to back
 when closed.  The screw handle is 7/8 inch (2 cm)
 in diameter and 16.75 inches (43 cm) long.  I
 was barely able to lift the vise to the bench
 top to mount it.

 I also have my father's half-century old Sears
 vise mounted on the bench.  It is 17 inches (43 cm)
 long (closed) and 11.5 inches (29 cm) high.  The
 vise is in remarkably good condition, especially
 considering all the projects we used it for.


 The attached photo shows the bench with the
 appropriate number of projects on it.


 Mike - AA8K


 Steve Rooke wrote:

 My lab/workshop is my dining room (it's great being single) and I just
 went out and bought a very sturdy workbench that was on our auction


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
A man with one clock knows what time it is;
A man with two clocks is never quite sure.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment Tables

2010-01-24 Thread Magnus Danielson
I use a 180x90 lab-table. It has a steel frame reaching out to the edges 
and a sufficiently thick top covered with NordStat antistatic mat. I 
experience no noticeable sagging, but then I arranged my instruments 
such that I have two towers at the two back corners and a bookshelf 
inbetween them onto which I have instruments in the middle. The 
bookshelf seems to handle it fairly well. I am annoyed that I could not 
get the shelf belonging to the table, as that would bring load off from 
the instruments.


The main problem with this arrangement is that I have no wiring isle 
behind the bench and in general too little bench area. Too much in one 
place basically. I have a full-sized Schroff rack alongside the bench.


Still, I can get some usefull stuff done.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-24 Thread d . seiter
Even worse are the tables with plastic tops...instasag! I've scavenged a few 
local leg sets from dumped tables on the curb for future projects. My lab has 
particle board tops covered with anti-stat matts, but they are sitting on 2 
drawer filing cabinets and there is no sag. I have 4 racks currently in the 
house and garage; in one case, the rack out weights the contents by quite a 
bit. It will still be working after the roaches take over the world... 

Dave 
- Original Message - 
From: John Miles jmi...@pop.net 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 5:37:55 PM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain 
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment 

 Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the furniture. 
 
 I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables and 
 very soon 
 learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging. 

If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple folding 
tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets. The idea, 
besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to wobble. 
This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing capacity. It 
completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is otherwise 
pretty much mandatory when using folding tables. 

With cheap folding tables, you don't have to feel bad about drilling into 
your workbench or otherwise marring and gouging it. Every few years, or 
when you move, just throw the old folding table away and spend $39.95 on 
another one. Voila, a brand new workbench. 

 Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the 
 accessories possible. 
 Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc. 
 
 An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to gradually grow, 
 as the budget allows. 

Also, HP/Agilent equipment racks are sometimes available on eBay. These are 
nothing like the relay racks or server racks that you commonly see in data 
centers. They are *stout*. They're very expensive when new, but almost 
free for the shipping when bought used. I used generic shelving units to 
hold test equipment for a long time, but once you use real racks, you won't 
go back. 

An Agilent E3662A/B rack can hold up to 81 EIA units of gear weighing up to 
1800 pounds. I have three in my living room and wish I had more... 

-- john, KE5FX 


___ 
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com 
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 
and follow the instructions there. 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-24 Thread d . seiter
HA! The BT remover is one of my faves when nothing else works, and I don't 
want to use the realy nasty stuff like paint remover. I was given a can about 
15 years ago and I'm just now running out. 

Dave 
- Original Message - 
From: Rex r...@sonic.net 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 12:04:46 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain 
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment 

paul swed wrote: 
 It also helps to simply clean the stuff. A bit of soap 
 and water and scrubbing gets years of grunge off. 
 

I have found that Bug and Tar Remover, sold to clean cars, works well on 
front panels. It seems to be strong enough to soften label gunk, but not 
strong enough to mar front-panel paint. 


___ 
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com 
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 
and follow the instructions there. 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment Tables

2010-01-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

If you are looking for massive tables on the cheap, you can indeed build them. 
Have the local Home Depot rip some plywood to an appropriate width and glue 
four sheets one on top of the other. 2x4's or 4x4's make fine legs and support 
structure under the table top. I have 16 feet of it sitting in the basement. No 
test gear on it at all. Other hobbies seem to have taken over the entire 
space...

The only real drawback is that it's a build in place item. You aren't going to 
take it with you when you move. There are various versions of that table 
scattered all over the US. 

Bob


On Jan 23, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Mike Feher wrote:

 I also had similar problems with my 8 ft tables for my test equipment. I
 found at Home Depot replacement fold down legs. I bought some, and installed
 them right in the middle of the tables. No more sagging problems. I had to
 shorten the legs somewhat as they were a few inches too long. But, have
 supported hundreds of ponds for many years now with no sigh of
 warping/sagging. 73 - Mike
 
 Mike B. Feher, N4FS
 89 Arnold Blvd.
 Howell, NJ, 07731
 732-886-5960
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Miles
 Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 7:38 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the furniture.
 
 I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables and
 very soon
 learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging.
 
 If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple folding
 tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets.  The idea,
 besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to wobble.
 This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing capacity.  It
 completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is otherwise
 pretty much mandatory when using folding tables.
 
 With cheap folding tables, you don't have to feel bad about drilling into
 your workbench or otherwise marring and gouging it.  Every few years, or
 when you move, just throw the old folding table away and spend $39.95 on
 another one.  Voila, a brand new workbench.
 
 Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the
 accessories possible.
 Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc.
 
 An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to gradually grow,
 as the budget allows.
 
 Also, HP/Agilent equipment racks are sometimes available on eBay.  These are
 nothing like the relay racks or server racks that you commonly see in data
 centers.  They are *stout*.  They're very expensive when new, but almost
 free for the shipping when bought used.  I used generic shelving units to
 hold test equipment for a long time, but once you use real racks, you won't
 go back.
 
 An Agilent E3662A/B rack can hold up to 81 EIA units of gear weighing up to
 1800 pounds.  I have three in my living room and wish I had more...
 
 -- john, KE5FX
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment Tables

2010-01-24 Thread Bob Paddock
 If you are looking for massive tables on the cheap, you can indeed build them.
 The only real drawback is that it's a build in place item. You aren't going 
 to take it with you when you move. There are various versions of that table 
 scattered all over the US.

My work bench is two 2 thick, eight foot long planks, bolted to two
two-drawer filing cabinets, then covered with anti-static-mat.
The anti-static-mat is screwed into the wood.  So when it comes time
to move this you unscrew and unbolt and you are on your way.
As added bonuses you have four filing cabinet drawers to keep manuals
and schematics in.

You can see it here: http://www.designer-iii.com/Solder/

Two drawer cabinets that you can buy today are a bit shorter so they
need some cement blocks hidden under them,
or double up on the planks.

I've not seen anyone address the anti-static issues in setting up a workbench...

The Preface to Murphy's Law:
 We, the willing,
  Lead by the unknowing.
   Are doing the impossible for the ungrateful...
We have done so much for so long...
 With so little...
  We are now qualified to do anything...
   With nothing...
Forever!


-- 
http://www.wearablesmartsensors.com/
http://www.softwaresafety.net/
http://www.designer-iii.com/
http://www.unusualresearch.com/

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment Tables

2010-01-24 Thread Thomas A. Frank
Even cheaper and less work than plywood - solid wood doors from Home  
Depot, laid across a rectangle using 2x4 as horizontals with 4x4 as  
legs.


It you use lag bolts (and you should, as nails work loose over time),  
you can take the things apart when you move.


My buddy has a few that all his milling machine parts sit on, and  
they haven't sagged.


Ask if they have any scratch and dent doors for really cheap.

Tom Frank, KA2CDK

On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Bob Camp wrote:


Hi

If you are looking for massive tables on the cheap, you can indeed  
build them. Have the local Home Depot rip some plywood to an  
appropriate width and glue four sheets one on top of the other.  
2x4's or 4x4's make fine legs and support structure under the table  
top. I have 16 feet of it sitting in the basement. No test gear on  
it at all. Other hobbies seem to have taken over the entire space...


The only real drawback is that it's a build in place item. You  
aren't going to take it with you when you move. There are various  
versions of that table scattered all over the US.


Bob


On Jan 23, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Mike Feher wrote:

I also had similar problems with my 8 ft tables for my test  
equipment. I
found at Home Depot replacement fold down legs. I bought some, and  
installed
them right in the middle of the tables. No more sagging problems.  
I had to
shorten the legs somewhat as they were a few inches too long. But,  
have

supported hundreds of ponds for many years now with no sigh of
warping/sagging. 73 - Mike

Mike B. Feher, N4FS
89 Arnold Blvd.
Howell, NJ, 07731
732-886-5960



-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts- 
boun...@febo.com] On

Behalf Of John Miles
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 7:38 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the  
furniture.


I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables  
and

very soon
learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging.


If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple  
folding
tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets.  The  
idea,
besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to  
wobble.
This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing  
capacity.  It
completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is  
otherwise

pretty much mandatory when using folding tables.

With cheap folding tables, you don't have to feel bad about  
drilling into
your workbench or otherwise marring and gouging it.  Every few  
years, or
when you move, just throw the old folding table away and spend  
$39.95 on

another one.  Voila, a brand new workbench.


Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the
accessories possible.
Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc.

An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to  
gradually grow,

as the budget allows.


Also, HP/Agilent equipment racks are sometimes available on eBay.   
These are
nothing like the relay racks or server racks that you commonly see  
in data
centers.  They are *stout*.  They're very expensive when new, but  
almost
free for the shipping when bought used.  I used generic shelving  
units to
hold test equipment for a long time, but once you use real racks,  
you won't

go back.

An Agilent E3662A/B rack can hold up to 81 EIA units of gear  
weighing up to

1800 pounds.  I have three in my living room and wish I had more...

-- john, KE5FX




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-24 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Oh, and I also put up 4x8 sheets of white perfboard all around my 
workspace instead of drywall, and have various metal hooks to hang 
cables from.  That's been *really* handy.


John

John Ackermann N8UR said the following on 01/24/2010 01:19 PM:
An idea I really like, but haven't had room to implement at my current 
house, is one that a friend used.  Rather than standard 19 inch racks, 
he used the heavy duty 24 inch deep, 48 inch wide, 60 inch tall shelf 
units available at home improvement stores -- the ones with the heavy 
metal frame and particle board shelves that are well supported around 
all four sides.


He had three of these units holding his test gear, with a workbench in 
front.  The shelves were arranged so that the one lined up directly with 
the workbench with the higher shelves spaced for either a single heavy 
piece or a stack of lighter stuff.  The beauty part is that he had 
enough room to get around and behind the shelves to work on the rear 
cabling.  Using shelves rather than bolting the gear into racks makes it 
much easier to rearrange the pieces when the mood strikes.


As for myself, I have a couple of racks, a 30x60 metal office table as a 
workbench, and several wooden equipment carts with casters that a 
woodworker friend built for me.  A picture of one of the carts (with a 
second partially visible behind) is attached.  They are made of 
heavy-duty plywood with metal frames for the shelves and metal cross 
braces for stabilization.  The top shelf is tilted to allow a better 
viewing angle.  These have worked really well in my fairly small space.


John






___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment Tables

2010-01-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

One thing to be very careful of using doors - the core may not be what you 
expect it to be. Solid wood may be just that, solid wood pieces laminated 
together. Think of it as a pice of butcher block countertop. It can also be 
shredded wood glued together. Think of it as  a thick piece of particle board. 
The first sort of construction is quite strong. The second not so much so 

Bob


On Jan 24, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Thomas A. Frank wrote:

 Even cheaper and less work than plywood - solid wood doors from Home Depot, 
 laid across a rectangle using 2x4 as horizontals with 4x4 as legs.
 
 It you use lag bolts (and you should, as nails work loose over time), you can 
 take the things apart when you move.
 
 My buddy has a few that all his milling machine parts sit on, and they 
 haven't sagged.
 
 Ask if they have any scratch and dent doors for really cheap.
 
 Tom Frank, KA2CDK
 
 On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 If you are looking for massive tables on the cheap, you can indeed build 
 them. Have the local Home Depot rip some plywood to an appropriate width and 
 glue four sheets one on top of the other. 2x4's or 4x4's make fine legs and 
 support structure under the table top. I have 16 feet of it sitting in the 
 basement. No test gear on it at all. Other hobbies seem to have taken over 
 the entire space...
 
 The only real drawback is that it's a build in place item. You aren't going 
 to take it with you when you move. There are various versions of that table 
 scattered all over the US.
 
 Bob
 
 
 On Jan 23, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Mike Feher wrote:
 
 I also had similar problems with my 8 ft tables for my test equipment. I
 found at Home Depot replacement fold down legs. I bought some, and installed
 them right in the middle of the tables. No more sagging problems. I had to
 shorten the legs somewhat as they were a few inches too long. But, have
 supported hundreds of ponds for many years now with no sigh of
 warping/sagging. 73 - Mike
 
 Mike B. Feher, N4FS
 89 Arnold Blvd.
 Howell, NJ, 07731
 732-886-5960
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Miles
 Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 7:38 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the furniture.
 
 I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables and
 very soon
 learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging.
 
 If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple folding
 tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets.  The idea,
 besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to wobble.
 This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing capacity.  It
 completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is otherwise
 pretty much mandatory when using folding tables.
 
 With cheap folding tables, you don't have to feel bad about drilling into
 your workbench or otherwise marring and gouging it.  Every few years, or
 when you move, just throw the old folding table away and spend $39.95 on
 another one.  Voila, a brand new workbench.
 
 Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the
 accessories possible.
 Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc.
 
 An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to gradually grow,
 as the budget allows.
 
 Also, HP/Agilent equipment racks are sometimes available on eBay.  These are
 nothing like the relay racks or server racks that you commonly see in data
 centers.  They are *stout*.  They're very expensive when new, but almost
 free for the shipping when bought used.  I used generic shelving units to
 hold test equipment for a long time, but once you use real racks, you won't
 go back.
 
 An Agilent E3662A/B rack can hold up to 81 EIA units of gear weighing up to
 1800 pounds.  I have three in my living room and wish I had more...
 
 -- john, KE5FX
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-24 Thread Keith Payea
Here's a couple of items from the Make Magazine site:

Re-purposing IKEA furniture to hold rack mount gear:
http://wiki.eth-0.nl/index.php/LackRack 

A workshop to dream about:

http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2010/01/dream_workshop.html

How many hours did that person work to make everything look good for the
cameras, and what does it look like in mid project?

In my own lab I didn't use Ikea furniture, but I did build a two bay wooden
rack.  90% of the gear is on slides or sliding shelves (using drawer
hardware), so the wood is not a drawback.  The sides and intermediate
upright are 2x4 frames with OSB panels glued into dados for strength.

Cheers,

Keith

-Original Message-
From: John Ackermann N8UR [mailto:j...@febo.com] 
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:19 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

An idea I really like, but haven't had room to implement at my current
house, is one that a friend used.  Rather than standard 19 inch racks, he
used the heavy duty 24 inch deep, 48 inch wide, 60 inch tall shelf units
available at home improvement stores -- the ones with the heavy metal frame
and particle board shelves that are well supported around all four sides.

He had three of these units holding his test gear, with a workbench in
front.  The shelves were arranged so that the one lined up directly with the
workbench with the higher shelves spaced for either a single heavy piece or
a stack of lighter stuff.  The beauty part is that he had enough room to get
around and behind the shelves to work on the rear cabling.  Using shelves
rather than bolting the gear into racks makes it much easier to rearrange
the pieces when the mood strikes.

As for myself, I have a couple of racks, a 30x60 metal office table as a
workbench, and several wooden equipment carts with casters that a woodworker
friend built for me.  A picture of one of the carts (with a second partially
visible behind) is attached.  They are made of heavy-duty plywood with metal
frames for the shelves and metal cross braces for stabilization.  The top
shelf is tilted to allow a better viewing angle.  These have worked really
well in my fairly small space.

John


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment Tables

2010-01-24 Thread J. Forster
Something I've not seen mentioned is that particle board, in addition to
bending, can creep over time, so a shelf of equipment may be straight on
day one, but sag significantly months or years later.

Not all particle board is the same, some creeps more than others.

-John

===



 Hi

 One thing to be very careful of using doors - the core may not be what you
 expect it to be. Solid wood may be just that, solid wood pieces laminated
 together. Think of it as a pice of butcher block countertop. It can also
 be shredded wood glued together. Think of it as  a thick piece of particle
 board. The first sort of construction is quite strong. The second not so
 much so 

 Bob


 On Jan 24, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Thomas A. Frank wrote:

 Even cheaper and less work than plywood - solid wood doors from Home
 Depot, laid across a rectangle using 2x4 as horizontals with 4x4 as
 legs.

 It you use lag bolts (and you should, as nails work loose over time),
 you can take the things apart when you move.

 My buddy has a few that all his milling machine parts sit on, and they
 haven't sagged.

 Ask if they have any scratch and dent doors for really cheap.

 Tom Frank, KA2CDK

 On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Bob Camp wrote:

 Hi

 If you are looking for massive tables on the cheap, you can indeed
 build them. Have the local Home Depot rip some plywood to an
 appropriate width and glue four sheets one on top of the other. 2x4's
 or 4x4's make fine legs and support structure under the table top. I
 have 16 feet of it sitting in the basement. No test gear on it at all.
 Other hobbies seem to have taken over the entire space...

 The only real drawback is that it's a build in place item. You aren't
 going to take it with you when you move. There are various versions of
 that table scattered all over the US.

 Bob


 On Jan 23, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Mike Feher wrote:

 I also had similar problems with my 8 ft tables for my test equipment.
 I
 found at Home Depot replacement fold down legs. I bought some, and
 installed
 them right in the middle of the tables. No more sagging problems. I
 had to
 shorten the legs somewhat as they were a few inches too long. But,
 have
 supported hundreds of ponds for many years now with no sigh of
 warping/sagging. 73 - Mike

 Mike B. Feher, N4FS
 89 Arnold Blvd.
 Howell, NJ, 07731
 732-886-5960



 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]
 On
 Behalf Of John Miles
 Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 7:38 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the
 furniture.

 I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables and
 very soon
 learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging.

 If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple
 folding
 tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets.  The
 idea,
 besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to
 wobble.
 This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing capacity.
 It
 completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is otherwise
 pretty much mandatory when using folding tables.

 With cheap folding tables, you don't have to feel bad about drilling
 into
 your workbench or otherwise marring and gouging it.  Every few years,
 or
 when you move, just throw the old folding table away and spend $39.95
 on
 another one.  Voila, a brand new workbench.

 Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the
 accessories possible.
 Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc.

 An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to gradually
 grow,
 as the budget allows.

 Also, HP/Agilent equipment racks are sometimes available on eBay.
 These are
 nothing like the relay racks or server racks that you commonly see in
 data
 centers.  They are *stout*.  They're very expensive when new, but
 almost
 free for the shipping when bought used.  I used generic shelving units
 to
 hold test equipment for a long time, but once you use real racks, you
 won't
 go back.

 An Agilent E3662A/B rack can hold up to 81 EIA units of gear weighing
 up to
 1800 pounds.  I have three in my living room and wish I had more...

 -- john, KE5FX



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-24 Thread Lux, Jim (337C)



On 1/24/10 10:43 AM, Keith Payea kpa...@bryantlabs.net wrote:

 Here's a couple of items from the Make Magazine site:
 
 Re-purposing IKEA furniture to hold rack mount gear:
 http://wiki.eth-0.nl/index.php/LackRack
 
 A workshop to dream about:
 
 http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2010/01/dream_workshop.html
 
 How many hours did that person work to make everything look good for the
 cameras, and what does it look like in mid project?
 
Where I used to work (a mechanical special effects shop), we used to think
about a scheme where you'd have a bench base that supported a removable
bench top. The bench top had raised edges on sides and back (so stuff
doesn't roll off), and a removable front edge. Then, you'd have a big
motorized storage rack for the benchtops.  Each project then gets it's own
bench top.  Work on project 1 for a few hours,then, stow it, and pull out
benchtop 2 for the next project.

It lets you do things like tape, fasten, or clamp parts to the bench (say,
while waiting for the glue to dry or resin to cure).  After all, for most
projects, the vertical extent on the bench is not very much (maybe a foot or
two) but the horizontal extent is great, and preferably not disturbed.  What
we want in that ideal shop is always lots of benches and tables so you
can spread out. 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-24 Thread Hal Murray

james.p@jpl.nasa.gov said:
 Where I used to work (a mechanical special effects shop), we used to
 think about a scheme where you'd have a bench base that supported a
 removable bench top. The bench top had raised edges on sides and back
 (so stuff doesn't roll off), and a removable front edge. Then, you'd
 have a big motorized storage rack for the benchtops.  Each project
 then gets it's own bench top.  Work on project 1 for a few hours,then,
 stow it, and pull out benchtop 2 for the next project. 

What do you do when the storage rack is full of cluttered bench tops?


-- 
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

You get one of those high rise rotating storage gizmos that will store 200 
bench tops in an area 40' wide x 30' deep x 600' tall.

Bob


On Jan 24, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Hal Murray wrote:

 
 james.p@jpl.nasa.gov said:
 Where I used to work (a mechanical special effects shop), we used to
 think about a scheme where you'd have a bench base that supported a
 removable bench top. The bench top had raised edges on sides and back
 (so stuff doesn't roll off), and a removable front edge. Then, you'd
 have a big motorized storage rack for the benchtops.  Each project
 then gets it's own bench top.  Work on project 1 for a few hours,then,
 stow it, and pull out benchtop 2 for the next project. 
 
 What do you do when the storage rack is full of cluttered bench tops?
 
 
 -- 
 These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-24 Thread Magnus Danielson

Hal Murray wrote:

james.p@jpl.nasa.gov said:

Where I used to work (a mechanical special effects shop), we used to
think about a scheme where you'd have a bench base that supported a
removable bench top. The bench top had raised edges on sides and back
(so stuff doesn't roll off), and a removable front edge. Then, you'd
have a big motorized storage rack for the benchtops.  Each project
then gets it's own bench top.  Work on project 1 for a few hours,then,
stow it, and pull out benchtop 2 for the next project. 


What do you do when the storage rack is full of cluttered bench tops?


Finally finish a project sounds like a good thing. Or maybe just merge 
two benchtops not in need of the full space.


Work on the low-haning fruit and get satisfaction from completeing 
something. :)


Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Complete something !! Yikes what a terrible idea. That would involve actually 
doing all the un-fun things that I've been putting off once the fun stuff was 
all done.

Bob

On Jan 24, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote:

 Hal Murray wrote:
 james.p@jpl.nasa.gov said:
 Where I used to work (a mechanical special effects shop), we used to
 think about a scheme where you'd have a bench base that supported a
 removable bench top. The bench top had raised edges on sides and back
 (so stuff doesn't roll off), and a removable front edge. Then, you'd
 have a big motorized storage rack for the benchtops.  Each project
 then gets it's own bench top.  Work on project 1 for a few hours,then,
 stow it, and pull out benchtop 2 for the next project. 
 What do you do when the storage rack is full of cluttered bench tops?
 
 Finally finish a project sounds like a good thing. Or maybe just merge two 
 benchtops not in need of the full space.
 
 Work on the low-haning fruit and get satisfaction from completeing something. 
 :)
 
 Cheers,
 Magnus
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-24 Thread Magnus Danielson

Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

Complete something !! Yikes what a terrible idea. That would involve actually 
doing all the un-fun things that I've been putting off once the fun stuff was 
all done.


Well, it may be a provoking idea to some, but there is a joy in actually 
having done those other things as well and have a working something. At 
least, that is what I've heard from friends who say they know someone 
that had an uncle that did it... maybe I'll try it myself some day.


Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-24 Thread Lux, Jim (337C)



On 1/24/10 2:06 PM, Bob Camp li...@cq.nu wrote:

 Hi
 
 Complete something !! Yikes what a terrible idea. That would involve actually
 doing all the un-fun things that I've been putting off once the fun stuff was
 all done.
 
 Bob


Well, even though we had a fair amount of time to tinker with ideas that
might pan out, most of the work was actually for a client and had a defined
delivery date (usually in a couple weeks from starting the job).

And, of course, it's just like running out of room in the garage.  Do you
just buy a bigger garage?


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment / work benches...

2010-01-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

 rent a bigger storage locker  guilty 

Bob


On Jan 24, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Lux, Jim (337C) wrote:

 
 
 
 On 1/24/10 2:06 PM, Bob Camp li...@cq.nu wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 Complete something !! Yikes what a terrible idea. That would involve actually
 doing all the un-fun things that I've been putting off once the fun stuff was
 all done.
 
 Bob
 
 
 Well, even though we had a fair amount of time to tinker with ideas that
 might pan out, most of the work was actually for a client and had a defined
 delivery date (usually in a couple weeks from starting the job).
 
 And, of course, it's just like running out of room in the garage.  Do you
 just buy a bigger garage?
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment Tables

2010-01-24 Thread Robert Atkinson
Hi,
I'm late to this thread.
On using doors as work benches, consider using lightweight panel doors instead 
of solid. They are two skins joined by a fibreboard honeycomb. Very light and 
stiff, just like the honeycomb construction used in aircraft. The one drawback 
is they can be punctured if you put a heavy bit of kit down corner first. This 
can be prevented by a top skin of 1.8 (3mm) ply. Fire rated ones have thicker 
skins but are heavy. I got some quality ones with damage to one side for a 
couple of pounds each. Lasted 18 years untill I sold the place.
 
Robert G8RPI.

--- On Sun, 24/1/10, J. Forster j...@quik.com wrote:


From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment Tables
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Date: Sunday, 24 January, 2010, 18:41


Something I've not seen mentioned is that particle board, in addition to
bending, can creep over time, so a shelf of equipment may be straight on
day one, but sag significantly months or years later.

Not all particle board is the same, some creeps more than others.

-John

===



 Hi

 One thing to be very careful of using doors - the core may not be what you
 expect it to be. Solid wood may be just that, solid wood pieces laminated
 together. Think of it as a pice of butcher block countertop. It can also
 be shredded wood glued together. Think of it as  a thick piece of particle
 board. The first sort of construction is quite strong. The second not so
 much so 

 Bob


 On Jan 24, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Thomas A. Frank wrote:

 Even cheaper and less work than plywood - solid wood doors from Home
 Depot, laid across a rectangle using 2x4 as horizontals with 4x4 as
 legs.

 It you use lag bolts (and you should, as nails work loose over time),
 you can take the things apart when you move.

 My buddy has a few that all his milling machine parts sit on, and they
 haven't sagged.

 Ask if they have any scratch and dent doors for really cheap.

 Tom Frank, KA2CDK

 On Jan 24, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Bob Camp wrote:

 Hi

 If you are looking for massive tables on the cheap, you can indeed
 build them. Have the local Home Depot rip some plywood to an
 appropriate width and glue four sheets one on top of the other. 2x4's
 or 4x4's make fine legs and support structure under the table top. I
 have 16 feet of it sitting in the basement. No test gear on it at all.
 Other hobbies seem to have taken over the entire space...

 The only real drawback is that it's a build in place item. You aren't
 going to take it with you when you move. There are various versions of
 that table scattered all over the US.

 Bob


 On Jan 23, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Mike Feher wrote:

 I also had similar problems with my 8 ft tables for my test equipment.
 I
 found at Home Depot replacement fold down legs. I bought some, and
 installed
 them right in the middle of the tables. No more sagging problems. I
 had to
 shorten the legs somewhat as they were a few inches too long. But,
 have
 supported hundreds of ponds for many years now with no sigh of
 warping/sagging. 73 - Mike

 Mike B. Feher, N4FS
 89 Arnold Blvd.
 Howell, NJ, 07731
 732-886-5960



 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]
 On
 Behalf Of John Miles
 Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 7:38 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the
 furniture.

 I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables and
 very soon
 learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging.

 If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple
 folding
 tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets.  The
 idea,
 besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to
 wobble.
 This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing capacity.
 It
 completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is otherwise
 pretty much mandatory when using folding tables.

 With cheap folding tables, you don't have to feel bad about drilling
 into
 your workbench or otherwise marring and gouging it.  Every few years,
 or
 when you move, just throw the old folding table away and spend $39.95
 on
 another one.  Voila, a brand new workbench.

 Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the
 accessories possible.
 Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc.

 An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to gradually
 grow,
 as the budget allows.

 Also, HP/Agilent equipment racks are sometimes available on eBay.
 These are
 nothing like the relay racks or server racks that you commonly see in
 data
 centers.  They are *stout*.  They're very expensive when new, but
 almost
 free for the shipping when bought used.  I used generic shelving units
 to
 hold test equipment for a long time, but once you use real racks, you
 won't
 go

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-23 Thread Magnus Danielson

Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

About 8 years ago a whole lot of companies dumped a whole lot of test gear. Prices dropped rapidly as they did so. It's taken us all quite a while to burn through that pile of stuff. 

The amazing thing is that as bad as the economy is now, you don't see people doing the same sort of thing. You see oceans of people out of work, but not piles of test gear getting sold off. 


Well, when the .com bubble bursted, it had been preceeded by massive 
acceleration of an instrument-hungry industry. As the bubble bursted, 
both .com companies and otherwise stable companies accelerated by their 
customers suffered. Some folded in and some just barely survived.


This time it was the economy folks that fluked it. Instrument hungry 
industry only suffers indirectly.


Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-23 Thread John Foege
Thanks to everyone who answered in this thread.I am keenly interested
in everything everyone had to say!

One of the things that seems like a no-brainer, would be to scrape
together the $700 and get an Agilent E8285A CDMA test set. It seems
like I can't go wrong with that! My only concern with getting these
off eBay or from anywhere else for that matter, is that apparently the
later versions firmware only support 800Mhz and up operation instead
of the earlier versions 100kHz-1Ghz.

Unfortunately, Amtronix seems to have run out, or at least are on
their last 1-2 units. I wont have the cash in time to get one, as they
have sold 35 in the last month alone.

Sigh.

Another very cool set of toys that had been mentioned, were the Tek
TM500 series, which I am also interested in! I don't need any of the
freq. counter plugins, but the power supply, func. generators, etc.
All very cool!

Thanks,

John

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
 Bob Camp wrote:

 Hi

 About 8 years ago a whole lot of companies dumped a whole lot of test
 gear. Prices dropped rapidly as they did so. It's taken us all quite a while
 to burn through that pile of stuff.
 The amazing thing is that as bad as the economy is now, you don't see
 people doing the same sort of thing. You see oceans of people out of work,
 but not piles of test gear getting sold off.

 Well, when the .com bubble bursted, it had been preceeded by massive
 acceleration of an instrument-hungry industry. As the bubble bursted, both
 .com companies and otherwise stable companies accelerated by their customers
 suffered. Some folded in and some just barely survived.

 This time it was the economy folks that fluked it. Instrument hungry
 industry only suffers indirectly.

 Cheers,
 Magnus

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-23 Thread J. Forster
I really think the Tek TM500 is a great way to set up a compact,
professional grade lab. If you get a TM515 mainframe, you can even travel
with it.

I think I'd consider carefully about getting a separate scope (465A,...)
rather than a SC50x though.

-John




 Thanks to everyone who answered in this thread.I am keenly interested
 in everything everyone had to say!

 One of the things that seems like a no-brainer, would be to scrape
 together the $700 and get an Agilent E8285A CDMA test set. It seems
 like I can't go wrong with that! My only concern with getting these
 off eBay or from anywhere else for that matter, is that apparently the
 later versions firmware only support 800Mhz and up operation instead
 of the earlier versions 100kHz-1Ghz.

 Unfortunately, Amtronix seems to have run out, or at least are on
 their last 1-2 units. I wont have the cash in time to get one, as they
 have sold 35 in the last month alone.

 Sigh.

 Another very cool set of toys that had been mentioned, were the Tek
 TM500 series, which I am also interested in! I don't need any of the
 freq. counter plugins, but the power supply, func. generators, etc.
 All very cool!

 Thanks,

 John

 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Magnus Danielson
 mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
 Bob Camp wrote:

 Hi

 About 8 years ago a whole lot of companies dumped a whole lot of test
 gear. Prices dropped rapidly as they did so. It's taken us all quite a
 while
 to burn through that pile of stuff.
 The amazing thing is that as bad as the economy is now, you don't see
 people doing the same sort of thing. You see oceans of people out of
 work,
 but not piles of test gear getting sold off.

 Well, when the .com bubble bursted, it had been preceeded by massive
 acceleration of an instrument-hungry industry. As the bubble bursted,
 both
 .com companies and otherwise stable companies accelerated by their
 customers
 suffered. Some folded in and some just barely survived.

 This time it was the economy folks that fluked it. Instrument hungry
 industry only suffers indirectly.

 Cheers,
 Magnus

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-23 Thread Adrian

John,

as for the function generator, I stick with my old Wavetek 186. I have a 
HP 33120A, but I'm using it only for special applications like precise 
swept frequency tests. Each time it takes me an hour of reading the 
manual to get through the cryptic user interface... Now the ol' Wavetek 
has a few knobs that you just dial in and... voilà! Obviously, there are 
other good function generators on the market that cost less. Just look 
for the right features like an output attenuator with 20 dB steps down 
to -60 (or at least Hi and Lo outputs) etc.


Any RF / microwave test equipment depends on the frequency range you 
want to cover and on your budget. I've had a Tek 7L13 (1.8 GHz) spectrum 
analyzer that served me well until I replaced it with a 7L14 (digital 
storage) and, later on a HP 70100A (2.9 GHz), and a while ago with a RS 
FSEA30 (3.5 GHz). There is a huge difference between the FSEA30 and the 
7L13, but also in the price tag...


Adrian


John Foege schrieb:

Thanks to everyone who answered in this thread.I am keenly interested
in everything everyone had to say!

One of the things that seems like a no-brainer, would be to scrape
together the $700 and get an Agilent E8285A CDMA test set. It seems
like I can't go wrong with that! My only concern with getting these
off eBay or from anywhere else for that matter, is that apparently the
later versions firmware only support 800Mhz and up operation instead
of the earlier versions 100kHz-1Ghz.

Unfortunately, Amtronix seems to have run out, or at least are on
their last 1-2 units. I wont have the cash in time to get one, as they
have sold 35 in the last month alone.

Sigh.

Another very cool set of toys that had been mentioned, were the Tek
TM500 series, which I am also interested in! I don't need any of the
freq. counter plugins, but the power supply, func. generators, etc.
All very cool!

Thanks,

John

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
  

Bob Camp wrote:


Hi

About 8 years ago a whole lot of companies dumped a whole lot of test
gear. Prices dropped rapidly as they did so. It's taken us all quite a while
to burn through that pile of stuff.
The amazing thing is that as bad as the economy is now, you don't see
people doing the same sort of thing. You see oceans of people out of work,
but not piles of test gear getting sold off.
  

Well, when the .com bubble bursted, it had been preceeded by massive
acceleration of an instrument-hungry industry. As the bubble bursted, both
.com companies and otherwise stable companies accelerated by their customers
suffered. Some folded in and some just barely survived.

This time it was the economy folks that fluked it. Instrument hungry
industry only suffers indirectly.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

  



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-23 Thread Stan, W1LE

Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the furniture.

I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables and 
very soon

learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging.

Final solution was industrial strength work benches with a butcher block 
maple top, 1-3/4 thick.

I use a grounded anti static rubber mat on top.
They have never sagged with lotsa test equipment on them.
My test bench is 36 deep and 72 wide.
Always plan for rear access for cleaning the air filters, plugging in 
the external references,

and other cabling.

How much work space do you really need ?  Depends on how big the stuff 
you work on is


You will probably need 18 to 24 of workspace between you and the test 
equipment.

Some test equipment like a VNA may be 22 deep, and almost 100 lbs.

Maybe the long equipment is best placed on a wheeled wire rack.
The open wire racks come in many sizes, both in width, depth, 18, 24 
etc., and height.
They breath well being open and access to the front and rear connectors 
is easy.
Mine are on wheels so I can move my T'Bolt references and counter array 
to the test location.


Caveat: Some of the industrial grade work benches with a anti static 
plastic laminate
over particle board ~ 1.25 thick  can sag with weight. Either limit the 
weight

or add another leg in the middle.

Caveat #2: Avoid the smaller wheels on the movable racks.
The cast marks on the middle of the tread will mar hardwood floors.
Bigger eurathane wheels roll nicely.

A steel framed, steel top with a anti static pad is also quite workable.
Always trim the leg height to your requirements. Ergonomics is important
when watching that 48 hour precision survey with Lady Heather.

Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the 
accessories possible.

Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc.

An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to gradually grow, 
as the budget allows.


Stan, W1LECape CodFN41sr




z

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-23 Thread John Miles
 Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the furniture.

 I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables and
 very soon
 learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging.

If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple folding
tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets.  The idea,
besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to wobble.
This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing capacity.  It
completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is otherwise
pretty much mandatory when using folding tables.

With cheap folding tables, you don't have to feel bad about drilling into
your workbench or otherwise marring and gouging it.  Every few years, or
when you move, just throw the old folding table away and spend $39.95 on
another one.  Voila, a brand new workbench.

 Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the
 accessories possible.
 Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc.

 An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to gradually grow,
 as the budget allows.

Also, HP/Agilent equipment racks are sometimes available on eBay.  These are
nothing like the relay racks or server racks that you commonly see in data
centers.  They are *stout*.  They're very expensive when new, but almost
free for the shipping when bought used.  I used generic shelving units to
hold test equipment for a long time, but once you use real racks, you won't
go back.

An Agilent E3662A/B rack can hold up to 81 EIA units of gear weighing up to
1800 pounds.  I have three in my living room and wish I had more...

-- john, KE5FX


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-23 Thread Richard W. Solomon
For my workbenches, I went to a local shop that fabricates Kitchen
Counter Tops. They will custom make most anything you want. The two
I bought were 72 wide and 34 deep and cost around $85 each.
The legs were bought from McMaster-Carr for around $30 a pair.

Works for me.

73, Dick, W1KSZ


-Original Message-
From: John Miles jmi...@pop.net
Sent: Jan 23, 2010 7:37 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the furniture.

 I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables and
 very soon
 learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging.

If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple folding
tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets.  The idea,
besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to wobble.
This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing capacity.  It
completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is otherwise
pretty much mandatory when using folding tables.

With cheap folding tables, you don't have to feel bad about drilling into
your workbench or otherwise marring and gouging it.  Every few years, or
when you move, just throw the old folding table away and spend $39.95 on
another one.  Voila, a brand new workbench.

 Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the
 accessories possible.
 Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc.

 An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to gradually grow,
 as the budget allows.

Also, HP/Agilent equipment racks are sometimes available on eBay.  These are
nothing like the relay racks or server racks that you commonly see in data
centers.  They are *stout*.  They're very expensive when new, but almost
free for the shipping when bought used.  I used generic shelving units to
hold test equipment for a long time, but once you use real racks, you won't
go back.

An Agilent E3662A/B rack can hold up to 81 EIA units of gear weighing up to
1800 pounds.  I have three in my living room and wish I had more...

-- john, KE5FX


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment Tables

2010-01-23 Thread Mike Feher
I also had similar problems with my 8 ft tables for my test equipment. I
found at Home Depot replacement fold down legs. I bought some, and installed
them right in the middle of the tables. No more sagging problems. I had to
shorten the legs somewhat as they were a few inches too long. But, have
supported hundreds of ponds for many years now with no sigh of
warping/sagging. 73 - Mike

Mike B. Feher, N4FS
89 Arnold Blvd.
Howell, NJ, 07731
732-886-5960



-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of John Miles
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 7:38 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 Another important aspect of the electronic test bench is the furniture.

 I started with the cheapie particle board fold up legged tables and
 very soon
 learned they could not hold much weight without significant sagging.

If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple folding
tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets.  The idea,
besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to wobble.
This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing capacity.  It
completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is otherwise
pretty much mandatory when using folding tables.

With cheap folding tables, you don't have to feel bad about drilling into
your workbench or otherwise marring and gouging it.  Every few years, or
when you move, just throw the old folding table away and spend $39.95 on
another one.  Voila, a brand new workbench.

 Many industrial equipment catalogs will give you an idea of the
 accessories possible.
 Shelves, drawers, electrical outlet strips.etc.

 An effective infrastructure will allow the test bench to gradually grow,
 as the budget allows.

Also, HP/Agilent equipment racks are sometimes available on eBay.  These are
nothing like the relay racks or server racks that you commonly see in data
centers.  They are *stout*.  They're very expensive when new, but almost
free for the shipping when bought used.  I used generic shelving units to
hold test equipment for a long time, but once you use real racks, you won't
go back.

An Agilent E3662A/B rack can hold up to 81 EIA units of gear weighing up to
1800 pounds.  I have three in my living room and wish I had more...

-- john, KE5FX


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-23 Thread Rex

paul swed wrote:

It also helps to simply clean the stuff. A bit of soap
and water and scrubbing gets years of grunge off.
  


I have found that Bug and Tar Remover, sold to clean cars, works well on 
front panels. It seems to be strong enough to soften label gunk, but not 
strong enough to mar front-panel paint.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-23 Thread Don Latham


If you have the space, you could do what I do, and bolt multiple folding
tables together with 'L'- and 'T'-shaped flat metal brackets.  The idea,
besides adding surface area, is to dampen the tables' tendency to wobble.
This adds a surprising amount of stability and load-bearing capacity.  It
completely eliminates the need to add a center leg, which is otherwise
pretty much mandatory when using folding tables.


I did this too; used 2x4 for legs and frames, 2 glued layers of particle 
board for top, 4'x8'. Use lots of construction adhesive. For top shelving, I 
got the put-together 18 in. deep storage shelving.
Somehow I always wind up working on the last 2-5 inches of the table anyway 
:-)
I bought rolling plastic drawer assemblies at Staples that just fit under 
the top battens for storage.
Remember Latham's law of horizontal surfaces (ahem)--any horizontal surface 
immediately becomes covered up with crud!
Store parts in oversized tackle-type partitioned boxes, they stack, and you 
can bring the needed one to the top. Tons of little drawers suck, IMHO.

$0.02
Don


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-22 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

About 8 years ago a whole lot of companies dumped a whole lot of test gear. 
Prices dropped rapidly as they did so. It's taken us all quite a while to burn 
through that pile of stuff. 

The amazing thing is that as bad as the economy is now, you don't see people 
doing the same sort of thing. You see oceans of people out of work, but not 
piles of test gear getting sold off. 

Bob


On Jan 22, 2010, at 2:12 AM, Don Latham wrote:

 
 - Original Message - From: paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com
 Its unfortunate but there used to be flea markets with truckloads of test
 equipment.
 Very inexpensive power supplies and everything else. But much of that has
 gone to ebay.
 You still find a bargain now and again. But nothing like 5 years ago.
 
 The dollar buys less than it did a mere 5 years ago; the flea market is a 
 real market and there is a lot of stuff IMHO sitting on shelves unsold. ebay 
 also has a lot of stuff in stores with absurd prices on it; it won't sell 
 either. Eventually the prices will drop, I hope...
 
 Don
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-22 Thread paul swed
All good comments.
Totally agree it depends on your interests on what will get used the most. I
have a very wide range of gear that I have picked up since becoming a test
equipment junky. Though the gear I have is not really junk, pretty far from
it. Multiple spectrum analyzers, network analyzers, generators and scopes,
on an on. One good thing is that often the gear just needs some tlc to get
back into to shape. It also helps to simply clean the stuff. A bit of soap
and water and scrubbing gets years of grunge off.
I have learned so much from repairing this equipment for my hobby. Each
piece is a lesson on how to do things right. If it an HP, Tektronix, or
Rhodes and Shwartz. Fluke has really gone down hill for my 2 cents. Pretty
junky. Sorry I purchased a fluke 87 new. Live and learn.
Anyhow stick to good names and you can't go to wrong.
As for ebay silly prices for really high risk equipment. I quit using ebay
about 4 years ago.
I actually had purchased numbers of things from the auctions. But ebay
seemed to want to know far to much info on me. As they say time to shut her
down.

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Bob Camp li...@cq.nu wrote:

 Hi

 About 8 years ago a whole lot of companies dumped a whole lot of test gear.
 Prices dropped rapidly as they did so. It's taken us all quite a while to
 burn through that pile of stuff.

 The amazing thing is that as bad as the economy is now, you don't see
 people doing the same sort of thing. You see oceans of people out of work,
 but not piles of test gear getting sold off.

 Bob


 On Jan 22, 2010, at 2:12 AM, Don Latham wrote:

 
  - Original Message - From: paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com
  Its unfortunate but there used to be flea markets with truckloads of
 test
  equipment.
  Very inexpensive power supplies and everything else. But much of that
 has
  gone to ebay.
  You still find a bargain now and again. But nothing like 5 years ago.
 
  The dollar buys less than it did a mere 5 years ago; the flea market is a
 real market and there is a lot of stuff IMHO sitting on shelves unsold. ebay
 also has a lot of stuff in stores with absurd prices on it; it won't sell
 either. Eventually the prices will drop, I hope...
 
  Don
 
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Richard W. Solomon
One thing I would get (and have gotten) is a GPSDO. They
are relatively inexpensive ($100) and will provide a
reference for your Frequency Counter.
This will enable accurate frequency measurement that the
old 5345 (of which I have two) cannot do on it's own.

73, Dick, W1KSZ


-Original Message-
From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
Sent: Jan 21, 2010 1:35 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
this list:

I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
build that which I cannot afford.

I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John Foege
KB1FSX
starving-engineer!

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Scott Burris
Well, if you want to build, how about:

http://www.scottyspectrumanalyzer.com/

a little 3GHz spectrum analyzer

I'm still building mine :-)

Get a Triimble Thunderbolt for a 10Mhz GPS locked frequency standard.
Feed that into the external frequency standard input of your HP5345A.

Scott

On Jan 21, 2010, at 10:35 AM, John Foege wrote:

 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:
 
 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.
 
 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
 engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
 kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.
 
 I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
 good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.
 
 Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
 economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
 good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
 build that which I cannot afford.
 
 I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 John Foege
 KB1FSX
 starving-engineer!
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Stan, W1LE

Hello John and the Net:

Welcome to the list.

You have to define what you really want to do, before you spec out the 
test equipment to do it.


Is your focus time and frequency accuracy and stability or more RF 
design wise ?


Find a job that has all the access to modern test equipment you could 
dream of.
If you have it at work and they tolerate home projects, you are a giant 
step ahead.

A key to the stock room also helps.

If you really have to have your own, I find Ebay to be a valuable 
(anytime) source.
Ham radio fleamarkets are another source. Timonium, NEARFEST, MIT, 
Dayton.


Ebay is like the big fleamarket in the ether, you do not know what you
bought until you put it on your test bench and evaluate its' performance..

Most test equipment vendors are simply junk/salvage dealers.
They buy by the pallet load and hope for a bonanza on Ebay.
Always consider a second unit as a parts unit.

There is nothing wrong with gear a generation or two old as long as you 
can live with the original specs.
The older HP gear I have picked up is exceptionally reliable and still 
performing.


Where are you located and what is your engineering job ?

Stan, W1LE Cape Cod FN41sr



John Foege wrote:

I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
this list:

I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
build that which I cannot afford.

I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John Foege
KB1FSX
starving-engineer!

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

  



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread J. Forster
I'd get a couple of good, variable power supplies. An SA (maybe w/
tracking generator) long before a VNA.

An RF and a Function generator would also be useful.

I'd also stick w/ your 2465. It's much less likely to lie to you.

FWIW,
-John

=



 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:

 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
 engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
 kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

 I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
 good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

 Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
 economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
 good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
 build that which I cannot afford.

 I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

 Sincerely,

 John Foege
 KB1FSX
 starving-engineer!

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread J. Forster
Disagree.

You really need to know frequency better than 1 in 10E7 unless you are
working on timing stuff.

I'd not bother until my lab was pretty well equipped otherwise.

FWIW,
-John





 One thing I would get (and have gotten) is a GPSDO. They
 are relatively inexpensive ($100) and will provide a
 reference for your Frequency Counter.
 This will enable accurate frequency measurement that the
 old 5345 (of which I have two) cannot do on it's own.

 73, Dick, W1KSZ


 -Original Message-
From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
Sent: Jan 21, 2010 1:35 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
this list:

I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
build that which I cannot afford.

I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John Foege
KB1FSX
starving-engineer!

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment... oops

2010-01-21 Thread J. Forster
 Disagree.

 You really DON'T need to know frequency better than 1 in 10E7 unless you
are working on timing stuff.

 I'd not bother until my lab was pretty well equipped otherwise.

 FWIW,
 -John

 



 One thing I would get (and have gotten) is a GPSDO. They
 are relatively inexpensive ($100) and will provide a
 reference for your Frequency Counter.
 This will enable accurate frequency measurement that the
 old 5345 (of which I have two) cannot do on it's own.

 73, Dick, W1KSZ


 -Original Message-
From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
Sent: Jan 21, 2010 1:35 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
this list:

I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
build that which I cannot afford.

I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John Foege
KB1FSX
starving-engineer!

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Richard W. Solomon
Maybe you don't need to know, but I do. 
For a small investment, it gives big returns.

But then, that's what makes politics.

73, Dick, W1KSZ


-Original Message-
From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
Sent: Jan 21, 2010 2:19 PM
To: Richard W. Solomon w1...@earthlink.net, Discussion of precise time and 
frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

Disagree.

You really need to know frequency better than 1 in 10E7 unless you are
working on timing stuff.

I'd not bother until my lab was pretty well equipped otherwise.

FWIW,
-John





 One thing I would get (and have gotten) is a GPSDO. They
 are relatively inexpensive ($100) and will provide a
 reference for your Frequency Counter.
 This will enable accurate frequency measurement that the
 old 5345 (of which I have two) cannot do on it's own.

 73, Dick, W1KSZ


 -Original Message-
From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
Sent: Jan 21, 2010 1:35 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
this list:

I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
build that which I cannot afford.

I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John Foege
KB1FSX
starving-engineer!

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.






___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Didier Juges
John,

That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you do not 
know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all that much. 
However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you will get a lot of 
valuable information here.

You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a soldering 
iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount. You also want a 
good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or function generator may be 
useful too. These vary widely depending on frequency range and features. There 
is no good single answer to any of these questions without knowing more about 
what you do with it.

Many of us on this list have more than one of pretty much everything (I am 
guilty of that too) to reflect the fact that no single instrument is universal, 
with possibly one exception: my favorite hand held DMM is a Fluke 8060A, but I 
am sure some people will have another favorite :)

Don't start spending what little money you have until you know what you need. 
If you just need to spend money, may I interest you in a wonderful business 
opportunity in Nigeria?

Didier KO4BB


 Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I do 
other things... 

-Original Message-
From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:35:22 
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
this list:

I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
build that which I cannot afford.

I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John Foege
KB1FSX
starving-engineer!

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread J. Forster
I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
purpose lab.

The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
instrument and do nothing else.

Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are your
area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.

-John



 John,

 That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you do
 not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all
 that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you will
 get a lot of valuable information here.

 You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
 soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount.
 You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or function
 generator may be useful too. These vary widely depending on frequency
 range and features. There is no good single answer to any of these
 questions without knowing more about what you do with it.

 Many of us on this list have more than one of pretty much everything (I am
 guilty of that too) to reflect the fact that no single instrument is
 universal, with possibly one exception: my favorite hand held DMM is a
 Fluke 8060A, but I am sure some people will have another favorite :)

 Don't start spending what little money you have until you know what you
 need. If you just need to spend money, may I interest you in a wonderful
 business opportunity in Nigeria?

 Didier KO4BB


  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I
 do other things...

 -Original Message-
 From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:35:22
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:

 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
 engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
 kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

 I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
 good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

 Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
 economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
 good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
 build that which I cannot afford.

 I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

 Sincerely,

 John Foege
 KB1FSX
 starving-engineer!

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread john . foege
Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean towards RF 
type stuff since I'm a HAM. 
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

-Original Message-
From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11 
To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency 
measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
purpose lab.

The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
instrument and do nothing else.

Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are your
area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.

-John



 John,

 That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you do
 not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all
 that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you will
 get a lot of valuable information here.

 You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
 soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount.
 You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or function
 generator may be useful too. These vary widely depending on frequency
 range and features. There is no good single answer to any of these
 questions without knowing more about what you do with it.

 Many of us on this list have more than one of pretty much everything (I am
 guilty of that too) to reflect the fact that no single instrument is
 universal, with possibly one exception: my favorite hand held DMM is a
 Fluke 8060A, but I am sure some people will have another favorite :)

 Don't start spending what little money you have until you know what you
 need. If you just need to spend money, may I interest you in a wonderful
 business opportunity in Nigeria?

 Didier KO4BB


  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I
 do other things...

 -Original Message-
 From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:35:22
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:

 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
 engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
 kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

 I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
 good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

 Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
 economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
 good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
 build that which I cannot afford.

 I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

 Sincerely,

 John Foege
 KB1FSX
 starving-engineer!

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Neil Gruending
Then you need some multimeters, function generators and power
supplies. The available options vary widely based on your budget.

Neil

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:43 PM,  john.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean towards 
 RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K 
(actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a 
communications service monitor like the HP 
8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).


You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and 
modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope, 
and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator, 
too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get 
one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that 
lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.


None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box 
performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast 
majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear 
I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.


The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?) 
of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an 
8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about 
$1500 this summer.


A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at 
http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info 
about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some 
Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking 
generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)


John

john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM. 
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT


-Original Message-
From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11 
To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com

Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
purpose lab.

The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
instrument and do nothing else.

Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are your
area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.

-John




John,

That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you do
not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all
that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you will
get a lot of valuable information here.

You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount.
You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or function
generator may be useful too. These vary widely depending on frequency
range and features. There is no good single answer to any of these
questions without knowing more about what you do with it.

Many of us on this list have more than one of pretty much everything (I am
guilty of that too) to reflect the fact that no single instrument is
universal, with possibly one exception: my favorite hand held DMM is a
Fluke 8060A, but I am sure some people will have another favorite :)

Don't start spending what little money you have until you know what you
need. If you just need to spend money, may I interest you in a wonderful
business opportunity in Nigeria?

Didier KO4BB


 Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I
do other things...

-Original Message-
From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:35:22
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
this list:

I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
build that which I cannot afford.

I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Didier Juges
Another advantage, they don't take 6 feet of bench space and weight 600#

Didier

 Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I do 
other things... 

-Original Message-
From: John Ackermann N8UR j...@febo.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:13:46 
To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency 
measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K 
(actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a 
communications service monitor like the HP 
8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).

You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and 
modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope, 
and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator, 
too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get 
one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that 
lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.

None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box 
performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast 
majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear 
I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.

The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?) 
of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an 
8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about 
$1500 this summer.

A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at 
http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info 
about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some 
Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking 
generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)

John

john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean towards 
 RF type stuff since I'm a HAM. 
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
 
 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11 
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency 
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
 discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
 purpose lab.
 
 The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
 instrument and do nothing else.
 
 Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are your
 area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.
 
 -John
 
 
 
 John,

 That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you do
 not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all
 that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you will
 get a lot of valuable information here.

 You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
 soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount.
 You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or function
 generator may be useful too. These vary widely depending on frequency
 range and features. There is no good single answer to any of these
 questions without knowing more about what you do with it.

 Many of us on this list have more than one of pretty much everything (I am
 guilty of that too) to reflect the fact that no single instrument is
 universal, with possibly one exception: my favorite hand held DMM is a
 Fluke 8060A, but I am sure some people will have another favorite :)

 Don't start spending what little money you have until you know what you
 need. If you just need to spend money, may I interest you in a wonderful
 business opportunity in Nigeria?

 Didier KO4BB


  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I
 do other things...

 -Original Message-
 From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:35:22
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:

 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
 engineering school and not working with much

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Lux, Jim (337C)
What frequency ranges?
If you are interested in 60MHz, then something like the TenTec TAPR VNA
($600) connects to a PC or a mac.  Works as a signal generator and as a 2
port VNA.


On 
 
 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:
 
 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.
 
 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
 engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
 kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.
 
 I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
 good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.
 
 Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
 economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
 good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
 build that which I cannot afford.
 
 I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 John Foege
 KB1FSX
 starving-engineer!
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread J. Forster
Aww...  come on. Almost ALL SAs are 19 wide or less.

-John




 Another advantage, they don't take 6 feet of bench space and weight 600#

 Didier

  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I
 do other things...

 -Original Message-
 From: John Ackermann N8UR j...@febo.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:13:46
 To: john.fo...@gmail.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 If RF measurement is your bag, and you're able to spend a couple of $K
 (actually, $2K if what I've seen recently holds), consider a
 communications service monitor like the HP
 8920A/8920B/8921/8924/8935/E8285 (all pretty much the same thing).

 You get an RF generator, RF power meter, RX frequency meter and
 modulation analyzer, audio generator, audio analyzer, digital o'scope,
 and in most units a spectrum analyzer (many have a tracking generator,
 too) in one box.  And I've probably forgotten a few things.  If you get
 one with spec analyzer and tracking generator, there's software that
 lets you do swept insertion/return loss and cable fault finding.

 None of its capabilities are as good as those of a dedicated box
 performing a single function, but they're good enough for the vast
 majority of uses.  An 8920 was the first significant piece of test gear
 I bought, and if I ever have to sell out, it'll be the last one to go.

 The prices came down a lot when Lucent surplused hundreds (thousands?)
 of them from their portable and cell phone production lines.  I saw an
 8935 with spec an, fully functional (as far as I could tell) for about
 $1500 this summer.

 A guy who sells and services a lot of these boxes is Rick at
 http://www.amtronix.com -- that web site will give you lots of info
 about the various versions and options.  (I just noticed he has some
 Agilent 8285As as a hobbyist special with spec an and tracking
 generator for $650.  That looks like a deal.)

 John
 
 john.fo...@gmail.com said the following on 01/21/2010 03:43 PM:
 Just that John, I'm looking to setup a general purpose lab. I'd lean
 towards RF type stuff since I'm a HAM.
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

 -Original Message-
 From: J. Forster j...@quik.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:22:11
 To: did...@cox.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I made the mistake of setting up a purpose-built lab once, and soon
 discovered to do most things, you really need at least a basic general
 purpose lab.

 The only exception is, I suppose, if you are going to repair a specific
 instrument and do nothing else.

 Also, as others have pointed out, you really need to define what are
 your
 area(s) of interest. Specialized gear gets $$$ pretty quickly.

 -John

 

 John,

 That sounds like asking what is the best vehicle for you to buy. If you
 do
 not know what you want to do with it, I am not sure we can help you all
 that much. However, if you have a specific objective, I am sure you
 will
 get a lot of valuable information here.

 You have a (good) analog scope, you may want a power supply or two, a
 soldering iron and maybe a desoldering station if you do surface mount.
 You also want a good hand-held multimeter. Some sort of signal or
 function
 generator may be useful too. These vary widely depending on frequency
 range and features. There is no good single answer to any of these
 questions without knowing more about what you do with it.

 Many of us on this list have more than one of pretty much everything (I
 am
 guilty of that too) to reflect the fact that no single instrument is
 universal, with possibly one exception: my favorite hand held DMM is a
 Fluke 8060A, but I am sure some people will have another favorite :)

 Don't start spending what little money you have until you know what you
 need. If you just need to spend money, may I interest you in a
 wonderful
 business opportunity in Nigeria?

 Didier KO4BB


  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while
 I
 do other things...

 -Original Message-
 From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:35:22
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency
 measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:

 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Nothing about a lab is one size fits all. That said, I think you probably
will need to add:

A way to come up with 3 DC voltages. Either a triple supply or 3 independent
supplies. Something like 0-7V @ 5-10A and a couple of 0-32V at 1-3A
supplies. 

Something to measure volts and amps. Handheld meters are very neat and they
can do a lot. I happen to like bench DVM's simply because they don't walk
around the bench as I tug on the leads. 

A bench computer. It doesn't need to be the latest and greatest. Something
that will barely run XP is probably plenty good enough. It does need to have
a net connection, a serial port, a parallel port, and a sound card. A
(mostly) working display is also helpful. If you get exotic, it should have
at least one USB port. 

A *good* soldering setup. I've seen more people destroy stuff with low end
soldering gear than just about any other thing. 

A stock of parts and wire. What we are talking about here is really how to
allocate a limited budget. Parts are just as important as anything else you
set up in a lab. Save some money to at least put in a stock of resistors and
common capacitors. 

Someplace to work. The kitchen table isn't going to cut it for long. Don't
buy more stuff than you have room to use. Also don't empty out all the
quarters from the cookie jar before a table or bench gets bought. The
strength of the bench may be a significant issue as you shop for test gear.

For radio specific stuff:

Some kind of RF signal source. Usually a signal generator for the bands that
interest you. It can be as simple as an old LM frequency meter or it can
cost as much as a new car...

A way to measure RF power accurately. You can do this with a scope or a
spectrum analyzer, but an RF power meter is more likely to give you a good
answer.

An audio generator. You could do it with a sound card, but that can get
pretty tedious. Audio / function generators are pretty cheap if you shop
around. If you'd been at the Dayton Hamfest in 1981 I would have gladly sold
you a good one for $15 (your choice from the 4 pallets full). 

A radio power supply. Depending on what you run, this might not be much. A
supply that will adjust at least from 10 to 15 volts that puts out 20 to 30A
is what I would recommend. 

The list could go on and on, but it does very much depend on what you want
to do.

Bob
 

 



-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of John Foege
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:35 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
this list:

I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
build that which I cannot afford.

I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John Foege
KB1FSX
starving-engineer!

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread J. Forster
One thing to look at is the Tek TM500 stuff. When I lived in a small
appartment, it was very helpful. There are a wide variety of modules
available, often in the $20 to $30 range. They are also mostly pretty easy
to fix and use mostly standard OTS parts.

The TM500 stuff is NOT a substitute for high end instruments, but is well
above hobby grade. BTW, the RF generators are not very good on frequency
stability. You can get 6 lab grade instruments in a box about 9 wide x
14 high x 18 deep.

FWIW,
-John




 Hi

 Nothing about a lab is one size fits all. That said, I think you
 probably
 will need to add:

 A way to come up with 3 DC voltages. Either a triple supply or 3
 independent
 supplies. Something like 0-7V @ 5-10A and a couple of 0-32V at 1-3A
 supplies.

 Something to measure volts and amps. Handheld meters are very neat and
 they
 can do a lot. I happen to like bench DVM's simply because they don't walk
 around the bench as I tug on the leads.

 A bench computer. It doesn't need to be the latest and greatest. Something
 that will barely run XP is probably plenty good enough. It does need to
 have
 a net connection, a serial port, a parallel port, and a sound card. A
 (mostly) working display is also helpful. If you get exotic, it should
 have
 at least one USB port.

 A *good* soldering setup. I've seen more people destroy stuff with low end
 soldering gear than just about any other thing.

 A stock of parts and wire. What we are talking about here is really how to
 allocate a limited budget. Parts are just as important as anything else
 you
 set up in a lab. Save some money to at least put in a stock of resistors
 and
 common capacitors.

 Someplace to work. The kitchen table isn't going to cut it for long. Don't
 buy more stuff than you have room to use. Also don't empty out all the
 quarters from the cookie jar before a table or bench gets bought. The
 strength of the bench may be a significant issue as you shop for test
 gear.

 For radio specific stuff:

 Some kind of RF signal source. Usually a signal generator for the bands
 that
 interest you. It can be as simple as an old LM frequency meter or it can
 cost as much as a new car...

 A way to measure RF power accurately. You can do this with a scope or a
 spectrum analyzer, but an RF power meter is more likely to give you a good
 answer.

 An audio generator. You could do it with a sound card, but that can get
 pretty tedious. Audio / function generators are pretty cheap if you shop
 around. If you'd been at the Dayton Hamfest in 1981 I would have gladly
 sold
 you a good one for $15 (your choice from the 4 pallets full).

 A radio power supply. Depending on what you run, this might not be much. A
 supply that will adjust at least from 10 to 15 volts that puts out 20 to
 30A
 is what I would recommend.

 The list could go on and on, but it does very much depend on what you want
 to do.

 Bob






 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Foege
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:35 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:

 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
 engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
 kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

 I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
 good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

 Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
 economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
 good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
 build that which I cannot afford.

 I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

 Sincerely,

 John Foege
 KB1FSX
 starving-engineer!

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 

Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Didier Juges
I agree, the TM-500 series has a lot of good plug-ins like DMMs, power
supplies, function generators, pulse generators and frequency counters, that
are quite useful and as good as economy stand-alone equipment, often for
much less.

One relatively deceptive instrument in the TM-500 series is the SG-503 (and
its big brother SG-504). On paper, it sounds very useful, with 250MHz max
frequency and very stable output level with a frequency counter built-in in
a single TM-500 drawer. But its frequency stability is insufficient to check
receivers, the frequency control (and counter) is too coarse, and the
attenuator has very limited range (high level only). It is perfect for what
it was designed for, which is checking the bandwidth of oscilloscopes, but
is not really useful for much else, particularly not for checking receivers.
I have one in perfect condition, and I never use it.

If you do RF work on a budget, don't buy an SG-503. They are still
relatively expensive, and not very useful. Keep your money for a true Signal
Generator, like an HP 8640 (manual tuning) or an HP 8657A (synthesized), or
a Communication Test Set.

This was my $0.02 for today...

Didier


 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com 
 [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of J. Forster
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:46 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 One thing to look at is the Tek TM500 stuff. When I lived in 
 a small appartment, it was very helpful. There are a wide 
 variety of modules available, often in the $20 to $30 range. 
 They are also mostly pretty easy to fix and use mostly 
 standard OTS parts.
 
 The TM500 stuff is NOT a substitute for high end instruments, 
 but is well above hobby grade. BTW, the RF generators are not 
 very good on frequency stability. You can get 6 lab grade 
 instruments in a box about 9 wide x 14 high x 18 deep.
 
 FWIW,
 -John
 
 
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread J. Forster
I agree. The RF generators are not really useful for radio work.

-John

==


 I agree, the TM-500 series has a lot of good plug-ins like DMMs, power
 supplies, function generators, pulse generators and frequency counters,
 that
 are quite useful and as good as economy stand-alone equipment, often for
 much less.

 One relatively deceptive instrument in the TM-500 series is the SG-503
 (and
 its big brother SG-504). On paper, it sounds very useful, with 250MHz max
 frequency and very stable output level with a frequency counter built-in
 in
 a single TM-500 drawer. But its frequency stability is insufficient to
 check
 receivers, the frequency control (and counter) is too coarse, and the
 attenuator has very limited range (high level only). It is perfect for
 what
 it was designed for, which is checking the bandwidth of oscilloscopes, but
 is not really useful for much else, particularly not for checking
 receivers.
 I have one in perfect condition, and I never use it.

 If you do RF work on a budget, don't buy an SG-503. They are still
 relatively expensive, and not very useful. Keep your money for a true
 Signal
 Generator, like an HP 8640 (manual tuning) or an HP 8657A (synthesized),
 or
 a Communication Test Set.

 This was my $0.02 for today...

 Didier


 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
 [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of J. Forster
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:46 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 One thing to look at is the Tek TM500 stuff. When I lived in
 a small appartment, it was very helpful. There are a wide
 variety of modules available, often in the $20 to $30 range.
 They are also mostly pretty easy to fix and use mostly
 standard OTS parts.

 The TM500 stuff is NOT a substitute for high end instruments,
 but is well above hobby grade. BTW, the RF generators are not
 very good on frequency stability. You can get 6 lab grade
 instruments in a box about 9 wide x 14 high x 18 deep.

 FWIW,
 -John

 



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Gerhard Hoffmann

Lux, Jim (337C) wrote:

What frequency ranges?
If you are interested in 60MHz, then something like the TenTec TAPR VNA
($600) connects to a PC or a mac.  Works as a signal generator and as a 2
port VNA.

  

Or this one:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VNWA/
(DG8SAQ)

Excellent to 500 MHz, quite usable to 1300 MHz.
Does 6 or 12 term error correction, most of this VNA is software.
I'm just using one to tune a 100 MHz oscillator with opened loop.   :-)

The only drawback is that one cannot measure compression
because the absolute levels vary over f.

But then it can embed / de-embed, virtual match, display the Q
and equivalent circuit of a crystal from S11 measurement,
L, C, time gating and and and.

regards, Gerhard  DK4XP



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Dick Moore
Hi, John -- having both a couple of GPSDOs and an HP 5345A, I'm going to offer 
the (perhaps) minority opinion that you not drive the external clock input of 
the 5345 from the 10MHz  output of a GPSDO. I was lucky enough to get a 5345 
with a really good, well-aged 10811A OCXO in it, which has proven to be very, 
very stable. I do use my Trimble TBolt to check the 5345 every once in a while, 
with the 5345 averaging over the longest time it offers; then I do the same 
thing with my other GPSDO; then I scratch my head and see how the three of them 
compare. Adjusting the 5345 is a time-consuming, frustrating, and essentially 
pointless operation, since there is no fine-tuning of the 10811's output. 
Better to just log the variances and make compensating calculations for 
critical measurements of time or frequency. 

As to other gear, maybe an HP/Agilent 34401A or the equivalent Fluke or 
Keithley 6.x digit DMM would be useful -- older HP DMMsa with 6+ digit 
resolution come up for peanuts on auction sites all the time, and a 3456A for 
example is a very good, very versatile instrument once it's cal'd.

My 2 cents.

Dick Moore

 Message: 2
 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:35:22 -0500
 From: John Foege john.fo...@gmail.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
   time-nuts@febo.com
 Message-ID:
   888d55281001211035tfa48d5ew5e36acf584cc5...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:
 
 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.
 
 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
 engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
 kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.
 
 I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
 good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.
 
 Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
 economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
 good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
 build that which I cannot afford.
 
 I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 John Foege
 KB1FSX
 starving-engineer!


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Marco Garelli

John Foege wrote:

I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
workshop of horrors.


John, I hope my first post on this Forum will be useful to you... I was 
in your same position two or three years ago.


I have to say that ebay is really handy, but I suggest you first to try 
with swapfests and flea-markets. There you can speak with the seller, 
and _ask_ for a demonstration if there's a AC plug close by.

My only suggestion is: buy what you need now, and save money for the future.

Oscilloscopes
If I'm not wrong, Tektronix is selling its entry-level models at around 
1000$. I have a TDS 210: small, portable, fits 100% the requirements for 
a general purpose scope. However, I use most my old Tek 475A (analog, 
200 MHz bandwidth)


Spectrum Analyzer
I have started with a HP 141T system, a real workhorse (and reparable).
The 141 is actually the mainframe, then you need the 855x series 
plug-in. One (8552) is the IF, the other the RF plug-in.
With the 8555 you can go up to 18 GHz. In this case, I'll consider the 
8445 preselector.

They are still worth 500$--1500$ depending on the plug-in and accessories.
Now I have a HP 8566A (100 Hz-22GHz) which I payed a little more of a 
complete HP 141 system. My father has a HP 8568B (100Hz-1.8 Ghz), that 
one is less expensive.


Signal generator
I'll consider building a DDS generator kit for frequency 150 MHz.
Analog generators/sweepers are relatively cheap, but they are not stable 
in frequency.
If your target is high frequency, the HP 8620C sweeper series is a good 
compromise. Get a C mainframe, get the 86222 and 86290 plug-ins and 
you can sweep from 10 MHz to 18 GHz. 8620C+86222 run at about 
300$--400$; the 86290 can go up to 500$ (watch ebay for deals).

If you buy an EIP source-locking counter, you can phase-lock them.
Lower prices for the heavy, old BWO-based HP 8690 sweepers. I can't 
recommend them, unless you find a good deal, with the complete plug-in 
series.
If you need a synthesizer, HP models are generally more expensive (but 
also more fixable, in general) than Marconi, Giga-tronics and Fluke.
I have a Marconi 2019 (80 kHz-1040 MHz) and it works fine and it's clean 
enough for my needs.

If you buy one, make sure it's 100% working, they are tricky to fix.

Network analyzers
Wonderful instruments. Very sophisticated. People still write entire PhD 
theses on their calibration theory.
Please don't take it badly, but if you don't really know how to use 
them, you don't need them, since a spectrum analyzer and a tracking 
generator will solve your problems and save you a lot of money.


However, if you want to acquire some pieces of history, look for the HP 
8410 from 1970's, it uses the 8620 as sweeper: the HP8412 display + 8410 
IF should go for 200$, S-parameters test-set 8745 (0.1-2 GHz) or 8746 
(0.5-12/18 GHz) for 300$; the 8511 sampler converter is about 100$: get 
at least two.
If you have money _and_ you need it, the HP 8510C is the best VNA ever 
made. But the 8510 is just the display (85101) and the IF (85102), you 
need a sweeper (8340 or 8341 or newer models) and the test-set (8515, 
8514 etc) AND the interconnecting cables.

Once you have all that, you have a Ferrari without tires.
You need at least two test cables, calibration grade adapters and 
calibration standards... new tires will cost much more than the 
second-hand Ferrari.
Both instruments are reparable, if you don't blow up the unobtanium RF 
parts (samplers and pulse generators for the test-sets, wideband 
amplifiers and YIG oscillators for the source).
(By the way, new VNA models from Agilent, Anrits, RS all have an 
embedded PC with MS Windows and a hard drive.
This simply means they are not designed to last 20+ years, but perhaps 
it's not fair to compare them with my HP 8510B...)


Oh, yes... one thing more: a PC with a National Instruments GPIB board 
if you plan to automate your measurements.


Good luck
Marco Garelli, AI4YH

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Lux, Jim (337C)
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On 
 Behalf Of Gerhard Hoffmann
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:50 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
 Lux, Jim (337C) wrote:
  What frequency ranges?
  If you are interested in 60MHz, then something like the TenTec TAPR VNA
  ($600) connects to a PC or a mac.  Works as a signal generator and as a 2
  port VNA.
 
 
 Or this one:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VNWA/
 (DG8SAQ)
 
 Excellent to 500 MHz, quite usable to 1300 MHz.
 Does 6 or 12 term error correction, most of this VNA is software.
 I'm just using one to tune a 100 MHz oscillator with opened loop.   :-)
 
 The only drawback is that one cannot measure compression
 because the absolute levels vary over f.
 
 But then it can embed / de-embed, virtual match, display the Q
 and equivalent circuit of a crystal from S11 measurement,
 L, C, time gating and and and.
 


Outstanding.. that one is very competitive in price (using a ballpark $2/GBP 
conversion) to the TAPR one.

I'm glad that more of these are becoming available (as assembled units, not as 
kits..)

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread J. Forster
I mostly agree, but for a VNA, consider the HP 8505A. It only goes to
about 1.8 GHz, but is leaa of a dinosaur than the 8410 system.

-John

=

 John Foege wrote:
 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors.

 John, I hope my first post on this Forum will be useful to you... I was
 in your same position two or three years ago.

 I have to say that ebay is really handy, but I suggest you first to try
 with swapfests and flea-markets. There you can speak with the seller,
 and _ask_ for a demonstration if there's a AC plug close by.
 My only suggestion is: buy what you need now, and save money for the
 future.

 Oscilloscopes
 If I'm not wrong, Tektronix is selling its entry-level models at around
 1000$. I have a TDS 210: small, portable, fits 100% the requirements for
 a general purpose scope. However, I use most my old Tek 475A (analog,
  200 MHz bandwidth)

 Spectrum Analyzer
 I have started with a HP 141T system, a real workhorse (and reparable).
 The 141 is actually the mainframe, then you need the 855x series
 plug-in. One (8552) is the IF, the other the RF plug-in.
 With the 8555 you can go up to 18 GHz. In this case, I'll consider the
 8445 preselector.
 They are still worth 500$--1500$ depending on the plug-in and accessories.
 Now I have a HP 8566A (100 Hz-22GHz) which I payed a little more of a
 complete HP 141 system. My father has a HP 8568B (100Hz-1.8 Ghz), that
 one is less expensive.

 Signal generator
 I'll consider building a DDS generator kit for frequency 150 MHz.
 Analog generators/sweepers are relatively cheap, but they are not stable
 in frequency.
 If your target is high frequency, the HP 8620C sweeper series is a good
 compromise. Get a C mainframe, get the 86222 and 86290 plug-ins and
 you can sweep from 10 MHz to 18 GHz. 8620C+86222 run at about
 300$--400$; the 86290 can go up to 500$ (watch ebay for deals).
 If you buy an EIP source-locking counter, you can phase-lock them.
 Lower prices for the heavy, old BWO-based HP 8690 sweepers. I can't
 recommend them, unless you find a good deal, with the complete plug-in
 series.
 If you need a synthesizer, HP models are generally more expensive (but
 also more fixable, in general) than Marconi, Giga-tronics and Fluke.
 I have a Marconi 2019 (80 kHz-1040 MHz) and it works fine and it's clean
 enough for my needs.
 If you buy one, make sure it's 100% working, they are tricky to fix.

 Network analyzers
 Wonderful instruments. Very sophisticated. People still write entire PhD
 theses on their calibration theory.
 Please don't take it badly, but if you don't really know how to use
 them, you don't need them, since a spectrum analyzer and a tracking
 generator will solve your problems and save you a lot of money.

 However, if you want to acquire some pieces of history, look for the HP
 8410 from 1970's, it uses the 8620 as sweeper: the HP8412 display + 8410
 IF should go for 200$, S-parameters test-set 8745 (0.1-2 GHz) or 8746
 (0.5-12/18 GHz) for 300$; the 8511 sampler converter is about 100$: get
 at least two.
 If you have money _and_ you need it, the HP 8510C is the best VNA ever
 made. But the 8510 is just the display (85101) and the IF (85102), you
 need a sweeper (8340 or 8341 or newer models) and the test-set (8515,
 8514 etc) AND the interconnecting cables.
 Once you have all that, you have a Ferrari without tires.
 You need at least two test cables, calibration grade adapters and
 calibration standards... new tires will cost much more than the
 second-hand Ferrari.
 Both instruments are reparable, if you don't blow up the unobtanium RF
 parts (samplers and pulse generators for the test-sets, wideband
 amplifiers and YIG oscillators for the source).
 (By the way, new VNA models from Agilent, Anrits, RS all have an
 embedded PC with MS Windows and a hard drive.
 This simply means they are not designed to last 20+ years, but perhaps
 it's not fair to compare them with my HP 8510B...)

 Oh, yes... one thing more: a PC with a National Instruments GPIB board
 if you plan to automate your measurements.

 Good luck
 Marco Garelli, AI4YH

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread John Miles
You could also get really hardcore and build the VNA described in DUBUS
4/2009 by HB9TXV.  Very nice piece of work, usable to 30 GHz.

-- john, KE5FX

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on
 Behalf Of Lux, Jim (337C)
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:44 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment


  -Original Message-
  From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
 [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Gerhard Hoffmann
  Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:50 PM
  To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
  Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment
 
  Lux, Jim (337C) wrote:
   What frequency ranges?
   If you are interested in 60MHz, then something like the
 TenTec TAPR VNA
   ($600) connects to a PC or a mac.  Works as a signal
 generator and as a 2
   port VNA.
  
  
  Or this one:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VNWA/
  (DG8SAQ)
 
  Excellent to 500 MHz, quite usable to 1300 MHz.
  Does 6 or 12 term error correction, most of this VNA is software.
  I'm just using one to tune a 100 MHz oscillator with opened loop.   :-)
 
  The only drawback is that one cannot measure compression
  because the absolute levels vary over f.
 
  But then it can embed / de-embed, virtual match, display the Q
  and equivalent circuit of a crystal from S11 measurement,
  L, C, time gating and and and.
 


 Outstanding.. that one is very competitive in price (using a
 ballpark $2/GBP conversion) to the TAPR one.

 I'm glad that more of these are becoming available (as assembled
 units, not as kits..)

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Gerhard Hoffmann

John Miles wrote:

You could also get really hardcore and build the VNA described in DUBUS
4/2009 by HB9TXV.  Very nice piece of work, usable to 30 GHz.
  

Yes, but there's a hole for the first 5 GHz...We were already dicussing
how to fix this...

This VNA should run with DG8SAQ software with minimum modifications :-)


73, Gerhard

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Mike Feher
Probably just a typo - but - the 8505A only goes to 1.3 GHz. - Mike

Mike B. Feher, N4FS
89 Arnold Blvd.
Howell, NJ, 07731
732-886-5960



-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of J. Forster
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 7:17 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

I mostly agree, but for a VNA, consider the HP 8505A. It only goes to
about 1.8 GHz, but is leaa of a dinosaur than the 8410 system.

-John


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread J. Forster
Oops.

-John



 Probably just a typo - but - the 8505A only goes to 1.3 GHz. - Mike

 Mike B. Feher, N4FS
 89 Arnold Blvd.
 Howell, NJ, 07731
 732-886-5960



 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of J. Forster
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 7:17 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I mostly agree, but for a VNA, consider the HP 8505A. It only goes to
 about 1.8 GHz, but is leaa of a dinosaur than the 8410 system.

 -John





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Luis Cupido

But only starts at 5GHz :-(  :-(

Luis Cupido
ct1dmk


John Miles wrote:

You could also get really hardcore and build the VNA described in DUBUS
4/2009 by HB9TXV.  Very nice piece of work, usable to 30 GHz.

-- john, KE5FX


-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]on
Behalf Of Lux, Jim (337C)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:44 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment



-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com

[mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Gerhard Hoffmann

Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 2:50 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

Lux, Jim (337C) wrote:

What frequency ranges?
If you are interested in 60MHz, then something like the

TenTec TAPR VNA

($600) connects to a PC or a mac.  Works as a signal

generator and as a 2

port VNA.



Or this one:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VNWA/
(DG8SAQ)

Excellent to 500 MHz, quite usable to 1300 MHz.
Does 6 or 12 term error correction, most of this VNA is software.
I'm just using one to tune a 100 MHz oscillator with opened loop.   :-)

The only drawback is that one cannot measure compression
because the absolute levels vary over f.

But then it can embed / de-embed, virtual match, display the Q
and equivalent circuit of a crystal from S11 measurement,
L, C, time gating and and and.



Outstanding.. that one is very competitive in price (using a
ballpark $2/GBP conversion) to the TAPR one.

I'm glad that more of these are becoming available (as assembled
units, not as kits..)

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread paul swed
I have 3 5345s with the good ovens and indeed they are very stable.
Use the gps just to check things.
Keep it simple.
Its unfortunate but there used to be flea markets with truckloads of test
equipment.
Very inexpensive power supplies and everything else. But much of that has
gone to ebay.
You still find a bargain now and again. But nothing like 5 years ago.
You are doing well. Another thing I have noticed is even the cheap digital
voltmeters are really very good these days. Technology moves on. Sometimes
for the good and the bad.
Good luck

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Bob Camp li...@cq.nu wrote:

 Hi

 Nothing about a lab is one size fits all. That said, I think you probably
 will need to add:

 A way to come up with 3 DC voltages. Either a triple supply or 3
 independent
 supplies. Something like 0-7V @ 5-10A and a couple of 0-32V at 1-3A
 supplies.

 Something to measure volts and amps. Handheld meters are very neat and they
 can do a lot. I happen to like bench DVM's simply because they don't walk
 around the bench as I tug on the leads.

 A bench computer. It doesn't need to be the latest and greatest. Something
 that will barely run XP is probably plenty good enough. It does need to
 have
 a net connection, a serial port, a parallel port, and a sound card. A
 (mostly) working display is also helpful. If you get exotic, it should have
 at least one USB port.

 A *good* soldering setup. I've seen more people destroy stuff with low end
 soldering gear than just about any other thing.

 A stock of parts and wire. What we are talking about here is really how to
 allocate a limited budget. Parts are just as important as anything else you
 set up in a lab. Save some money to at least put in a stock of resistors
 and
 common capacitors.

 Someplace to work. The kitchen table isn't going to cut it for long. Don't
 buy more stuff than you have room to use. Also don't empty out all the
 quarters from the cookie jar before a table or bench gets bought. The
 strength of the bench may be a significant issue as you shop for test gear.

 For radio specific stuff:

 Some kind of RF signal source. Usually a signal generator for the bands
 that
 interest you. It can be as simple as an old LM frequency meter or it can
 cost as much as a new car...

 A way to measure RF power accurately. You can do this with a scope or a
 spectrum analyzer, but an RF power meter is more likely to give you a good
 answer.

 An audio generator. You could do it with a sound card, but that can get
 pretty tedious. Audio / function generators are pretty cheap if you shop
 around. If you'd been at the Dayton Hamfest in 1981 I would have gladly
 sold
 you a good one for $15 (your choice from the 4 pallets full).

 A radio power supply. Depending on what you run, this might not be much. A
 supply that will adjust at least from 10 to 15 volts that puts out 20 to
 30A
 is what I would recommend.

 The list could go on and on, but it does very much depend on what you want
 to do.

 Bob






 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of John Foege
 Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 1:35 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

 I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
 believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
 this list:

 I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
 trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
 workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
 acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
 my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
 converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

 I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
 shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
 engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
 kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

 I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
 good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

 Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
 economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
 good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
 build that which I cannot afford.

 I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

 Sincerely,

 John Foege
 KB1FSX
 starving-engineer!

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Raj
It all depends on what you want to do! 

I prefer my 2465 to the 2012. I am comfortable with the analog scope!
My most used instrument is a Radio test set HP8920A. The spectrum
analyser HP8592A is least used !

Raj vu2zap


I realize that this e-mail is somewhat off topic, however, I also
believe that I will get some of the best answers from the members of
this list:

I have recently started to build an electronics lab, and am currently
trying to acquire test and general equipment for my little basement
workshop of horrors. So far, being on a limited budget, I have
acquired a Tek 2465A in good working order, a Fluke 1953A counter, and
my little gem (ok not quite so little) HP5345A with the 4-ghz freq
converter plugin w/ opt 11  12.

I'd just like to ask everyone what they would be, if they were in my
shoes, attempting to acquire. Unforunately, however, I am just out of
engineering school and not working with much of a budget here. I'd
kill to have all the fancy gear some of you nuts have.

I'd really love a DSO instead of the Tek 2465A I have. I'd kill for a
good spectrum analyzer or VNA etc.

Any suggestions on what I should acquire and/or suggestions for
economical equipment that I should make that is a must have? I am a
good DIYer when it comes to building equipment, so often I attempt to
build that which I cannot afford.

I appreciate everyone's' opinions in advance. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John Foege
KB1FSX
starving-engineer!


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test Equipment

2010-01-21 Thread Don Latham


- Original Message - 
From: paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com

Its unfortunate but there used to be flea markets with truckloads of test
equipment.
Very inexpensive power supplies and everything else. But much of that has
gone to ebay.
You still find a bargain now and again. But nothing like 5 years ago.


The dollar buys less than it did a mere 5 years ago; the flea market is a 
real market and there is a lot of stuff IMHO sitting on shelves unsold. ebay 
also has a lot of stuff in stores with absurd prices on it; it won't sell 
either. Eventually the prices will drop, I hope...


Don


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment-level phase noise PLLs

2008-07-22 Thread David Forbes
Matt Ettus wrote:
 In looking into extremely low phase noise synthesizers, I have come
 across the new HMC700LP4 chip from hittite, which seems to have the
 best figure of merit I have found, -227 dBm/Hz.  That gives you
 -107dBc/Hz at 20 kHz offset at 6 GHz according to the datasheets.
 
 That sounds amazingly good, but my R+S signal generator does better.
 Do they use a different sort of architecture?  Do they not use
 conventional dividers?  Some other sort of phase detector?
 
 Thanks,
 Matt

Matt,

They usually use a microwave mixer heterodyning against a harmonic multiplier 
driven by the reference frequency, producing an IF in the 30-50 MHz area. Often 
there will be a dual loop PLL to improve performance.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Test equipment-level phase noise PLLs

2008-07-22 Thread John Miles
I've played with the Hittite chips before and obtained PN results in the
same ballpark (see http://www.ke5fx.com/hpll.htm ), but at 8 GHz rather than
6 GHz.  To save further head-scratching, the figure of merit on these chips
works like this:

In-band phase noise in dBc/Hz = FOM + 10*log(Fcomp) + 20*log(N)

This is the best-case noise level that you will get assuming a
perfectly-clean reference and no VCO noise contribution.  As usual,
Hittite's less-than-ideal data sheet doesn't make that relationship clear.

Specifically, the 5.8-GHz integer-N plot in figure 1 appear to have been
made with a 50 MHz comparison frequency and N=116.  -107 dBc/Hz - 77 - 41
= -225 dBc/Hz.

From that relationship, you can see that minimizing N is the most important
thing you can do.  Good-quality signal generators work on the basis of
minimizing N at all costs.  Fractional techniques are common but the
ultimate performance still comes from cascaded or nested synthesis stages
with an integer-N output loop.

The HP 8672/8673 family, for instance, uses a comparison frequency (really a
harmonic sampler drive signal) in the 200 MHz neighborhood.  They still
don't achieve inband PN better than about -100 dBc/Hz, because the earlier
stages that generate the Fcomp signal are relatively noisy.  It's safe to
say that your RS synthesizer uses a similarly-low N factor, cleaner
reference synthesizers, and a cleaner output loop.

The easy way to get a few more dB out of the Hittite chip would be to run
with an Fcomp in the 100 MHz vicinity instead of 50 MHz.  It is rated for
Fcomp = 140 MHz in the (quieter) integer-N mode.

-- john, KE5FX


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Behalf Of Matt Ettus
 Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:16 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: [time-nuts] Test equipment-level phase noise PLLs


 In looking into extremely low phase noise synthesizers, I have come
 across the new HMC700LP4 chip from hittite, which seems to have the
 best figure of merit I have found, -227 dBm/Hz.  That gives you
 -107dBc/Hz at 20 kHz offset at 6 GHz according to the datasheets.

 That sounds amazingly good, but my R+S signal generator does better.
 Do they use a different sort of architecture?  Do they not use
 conventional dividers?  Some other sort of phase detector?

 Thanks,
 Matt



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.