Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-26 Thread Holger Knublauch


On 27/05/2020 11:26, Rob Atkinson wrote:

Thanks Holger

so does that mean that if you make a single edit to content of a graph 
it triggers a re-index of the whole deployment? Or you need to 
manually intervene regularly to update indices?

It just updates the individual triples (of course).


If not, is there a roundabout way to trigger a single graph by 
inserting some content temporarily?


No, if you did that then it would only apply the delta of what you have 
inserted.


Holger







On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 19:22, Holger Knublauch > wrote:


See \server.topbraidlive.org

\system-applications\tbladmin\tbladmin.ui.ttlx:
tbladmin:TextIndicesPage:



There is no way to only rebuild individual graphs.

Holger


On 26/05/2020 18:34, Rob Atkinson wrote:

as usual you are on the money Holger

it wasnt the luce index - it was the text indices - I rebuilt
these from the server admin and joy.

So how can one trigger these in a script, ideally just for a
specific graph?



On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 17:51, Holger Knublauch
mailto:hol...@topquadrant.com>> wrote:


On 26/05/2020 17:31, Rob Atkinson wrote:


So I still need to work out why in some cases we can search
included content, and other we cant.

On the same machine, same initialisation script, same
version of EDG we have workspaces where it works and where
it doesnt - an we cant work out what we did to the working
cases or repeat it - they were ones where experimentation
with Lucene was happening though.

 We have checked and they definitely include (not hold
copies of)  the data, and if we import the data instead of
including then all searches work as expected - so perhaps
there is something influencing Lucene's indexing of content
in the included graph for local search. It seems reasonable
we might need to trigger something on data setup, but cant
see what it is.


Our Lucene index will not be informed if imported graphs
change - it will only incrementally update after changes to
editable teamwork graphs from asset collections. Did you try
out manual rebuilds of the Lucene-text index at the server
admin page?

Holger





On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 15:32:09 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak
wrote:



On 26 May 2020, at 04:43, Rob Atkinson
 wrote:

OK - solved the style issue - I wasnt looking wide
enough and a colleagues code had polluted the styles in
a mod to the main menu - so at leas the checkboxes are
back and I've learned how to force scope for CSS -
another layer of contract UI mods have to adhere to.


Ok, thanks for letting us know.

Richard

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
from it, send an email to
topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
To view this discussion on the web visit

https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/8d94380c-2ef9-4e91-9798-95542fd07a96%40googlegroups.com

.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
it, send an email to
topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
To view this discussion on the web visit

https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6df3c821-6f87-c054-89e6-ec5823e1f252%40topquadrant.com

.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
To view this discussion on the web visit

https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/CACfF9LwZdL-Di41_msnQPsP8QRvW1%3DoZcF%3DdYKi5NgO999x1sQ%40mail.gmail.com

.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Groups 

Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-26 Thread Rob Atkinson
Thanks Holger

so does that mean that if you make a single edit to content of a graph it
triggers a re-index of the whole deployment? Or you need to manually
intervene regularly to update indices?

If not, is there a roundabout way to trigger a single graph by inserting
some content temporarily?




On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 19:22, Holger Knublauch 
wrote:

> See \server.topbraidlive.org\system-applications\tbladmin\tbladmin.ui.ttlx:
> tbladmin:TextIndicesPage:
>
> 
>
> There is no way to only rebuild individual graphs.
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 26/05/2020 18:34, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> as usual you are on the money Holger
>
> it wasnt the luce index - it was the text indices - I rebuilt these from
> the server admin and joy.
>
> So how can one trigger these in a script, ideally just for a specific
> graph?
>
>
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 17:51, Holger Knublauch 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 26/05/2020 17:31, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>>
>>
>> So I still need to work out why in some cases we can search included
>> content, and other we cant.
>>
>> On the same machine, same initialisation script, same version of EDG we
>> have workspaces where it works and where it doesnt - an we cant work out
>> what we did to the working cases or repeat it - they were ones where
>> experimentation with Lucene was happening though.
>>
>>  We have checked and they definitely include (not hold copies of)  the
>> data, and if we import the data instead of including then all searches work
>> as expected - so perhaps there is something influencing Lucene's indexing
>> of content in the included graph for local search. It seems reasonable we
>> might need to trigger something on data setup, but cant see what it is.
>>
>> Our Lucene index will not be informed if imported graphs change - it will
>> only incrementally update after changes to editable teamwork graphs from
>> asset collections. Did you try out manual rebuilds of the Lucene-text index
>> at the server admin page?
>>
>> Holger
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 15:32:09 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 May 2020, at 04:43, Rob Atkinson  wrote:
>>>
>>> OK - solved the style issue - I wasnt looking wide enough and a
>>> colleagues code had polluted the styles in a mod to the main menu - so at
>>> leas the checkboxes are back and I've learned how to force scope for CSS -
>>> another layer of contract UI mods have to adhere to.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, thanks for letting us know.
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/8d94380c-2ef9-4e91-9798-95542fd07a96%40googlegroups.com
>> 
>> .
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6df3c821-6f87-c054-89e6-ec5823e1f252%40topquadrant.com
>> 
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/CACfF9LwZdL-Di41_msnQPsP8QRvW1%3DoZcF%3DdYKi5NgO999x1sQ%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/da4355e6-e837-a6b6-88f5-faf13303a72d%40topquadrant.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-26 Thread Holger Knublauch
See 
\server.topbraidlive.org\system-applications\tbladmin\tbladmin.ui.ttlx: 
tbladmin:TextIndicesPage:




There is no way to only rebuild individual graphs.

Holger


On 26/05/2020 18:34, Rob Atkinson wrote:

as usual you are on the money Holger

it wasnt the luce index - it was the text indices - I rebuilt these 
from the server admin and joy.


So how can one trigger these in a script, ideally just for a specific 
graph?




On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 17:51, Holger Knublauch > wrote:



On 26/05/2020 17:31, Rob Atkinson wrote:


So I still need to work out why in some cases we can search
included content, and other we cant.

On the same machine, same initialisation script, same version of
EDG we have workspaces where it works and where it doesnt - an we
cant work out what we did to the working cases or repeat it -
they were ones where experimentation with Lucene was happening
though.

 We have checked and they definitely include (not hold copies
of)  the data, and if we import the data instead of including
then all searches work as expected - so perhaps there is
something influencing Lucene's indexing of content in the
included graph for local search. It seems reasonable we might
need to trigger something on data setup, but cant see what it is.


Our Lucene index will not be informed if imported graphs change -
it will only incrementally update after changes to editable
teamwork graphs from asset collections. Did you try out manual
rebuilds of the Lucene-text index at the server admin page?

Holger





On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 15:32:09 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak wrote:



On 26 May 2020, at 04:43, Rob Atkinson
 wrote:

OK - solved the style issue - I wasnt looking wide enough
and a colleagues code had polluted the styles in a mod to
the main menu - so at leas the checkboxes are back and I've
learned how to force scope for CSS - another layer of
contract UI mods have to adhere to.


Ok, thanks for letting us know.

Richard

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
To view this discussion on the web visit

https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/8d94380c-2ef9-4e91-9798-95542fd07a96%40googlegroups.com

.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
To view this discussion on the web visit

https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6df3c821-6f87-c054-89e6-ec5823e1f252%40topquadrant.com

.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/CACfF9LwZdL-Di41_msnQPsP8QRvW1%3DoZcF%3DdYKi5NgO999x1sQ%40mail.gmail.com 
.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid 
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/da4355e6-e837-a6b6-88f5-faf13303a72d%40topquadrant.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-26 Thread Rob Atkinson
as usual you are on the money Holger

it wasnt the luce index - it was the text indices - I rebuilt these from
the server admin and joy.

So how can one trigger these in a script, ideally just for a specific graph?



On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 17:51, Holger Knublauch 
wrote:

>
> On 26/05/2020 17:31, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
>
> So I still need to work out why in some cases we can search included
> content, and other we cant.
>
> On the same machine, same initialisation script, same version of EDG we
> have workspaces where it works and where it doesnt - an we cant work out
> what we did to the working cases or repeat it - they were ones where
> experimentation with Lucene was happening though.
>
>  We have checked and they definitely include (not hold copies of)  the
> data, and if we import the data instead of including then all searches work
> as expected - so perhaps there is something influencing Lucene's indexing
> of content in the included graph for local search. It seems reasonable we
> might need to trigger something on data setup, but cant see what it is.
>
> Our Lucene index will not be informed if imported graphs change - it will
> only incrementally update after changes to editable teamwork graphs from
> asset collections. Did you try out manual rebuilds of the Lucene-text index
> at the server admin page?
>
> Holger
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 15:32:09 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 26 May 2020, at 04:43, Rob Atkinson  wrote:
>>
>> OK - solved the style issue - I wasnt looking wide enough and a
>> colleagues code had polluted the styles in a mod to the main menu - so at
>> leas the checkboxes are back and I've learned how to force scope for CSS -
>> another layer of contract UI mods have to adhere to.
>>
>>
>> Ok, thanks for letting us know.
>>
>> Richard
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/8d94380c-2ef9-4e91-9798-95542fd07a96%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6df3c821-6f87-c054-89e6-ec5823e1f252%40topquadrant.com
> 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/CACfF9LwZdL-Di41_msnQPsP8QRvW1%3DoZcF%3DdYKi5NgO999x1sQ%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-26 Thread Holger Knublauch


On 26/05/2020 17:31, Rob Atkinson wrote:


So I still need to work out why in some cases we can search included 
content, and other we cant.


On the same machine, same initialisation script, same version of EDG 
we have workspaces where it works and where it doesnt - an we cant 
work out what we did to the working cases or repeat it - they were 
ones where experimentation with Lucene was happening though.


 We have checked and they definitely include (not hold copies of)  the 
data, and if we import the data instead of including then all searches 
work as expected - so perhaps there is something influencing Lucene's 
indexing of content in the included graph for local search. It seems 
reasonable we might need to trigger something on data setup, but cant 
see what it is.


Our Lucene index will not be informed if imported graphs change - it 
will only incrementally update after changes to editable teamwork graphs 
from asset collections. Did you try out manual rebuilds of the 
Lucene-text index at the server admin page?


Holger





On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 15:32:09 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak wrote:



On 26 May 2020, at 04:43, Rob Atkinson > wrote:

OK - solved the style issue - I wasnt looking wide enough and a
colleagues code had polluted the styles in a mod to the main menu
- so at leas the checkboxes are back and I've learned how to
force scope for CSS - another layer of contract UI mods have to
adhere to.


Ok, thanks for letting us know.

Richard

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/8d94380c-2ef9-4e91-9798-95542fd07a96%40googlegroups.com 
.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid 
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6df3c821-6f87-c054-89e6-ec5823e1f252%40topquadrant.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-26 Thread Rob Atkinson

So I still need to work out why in some cases we can search included 
content, and other we cant.

On the same machine, same initialisation script, same version of EDG we 
have workspaces where it works and where it doesnt - an we cant work out 
what we did to the working cases or repeat it - they were ones where 
experimentation with Lucene was happening though.

 We have checked and they definitely include (not hold copies of)  the 
data, and if we import the data instead of including then all searches work 
as expected - so perhaps there is something influencing Lucene's indexing 
of content in the included graph for local search. It seems reasonable we 
might need to trigger something on data setup, but cant see what it is.


On Tuesday, 26 May 2020 15:32:09 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
>
> On 26 May 2020, at 04:43, Rob Atkinson > 
> wrote:
>
> OK - solved the style issue - I wasnt looking wide enough and a colleagues 
> code had polluted the styles in a mod to the main menu - so at leas the 
> checkboxes are back and I've learned how to force scope for CSS - another 
> layer of contract UI mods have to adhere to. 
>
>
> Ok, thanks for letting us know.
>
> Richard
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/8d94380c-2ef9-4e91-9798-95542fd07a96%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-25 Thread Richard Cyganiak

> On 26 May 2020, at 04:43, Rob Atkinson  wrote:
> 
> OK - solved the style issue - I wasnt looking wide enough and a colleagues 
> code had polluted the styles in a mod to the main menu - so at leas the 
> checkboxes are back and I've learned how to force scope for CSS - another 
> layer of contract UI mods have to adhere to. 

Ok, thanks for letting us know.

Richard

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/08563B28-DE25-48D9-9136-36C5D45B19DF%40topquadrant.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-25 Thread Rob Atkinson
OK - solved the style issue - I wasnt looking wide enough and a colleagues 
code had polluted the styles in a mod to the main menu - so at leas the 
checkboxes are back and I've learned how to force scope for CSS - another 
layer of contract UI mods have to adhere to. 

On Friday, 22 May 2020 10:28:58 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, 22 May 2020 05:29:20 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 21 May 2020, at 07:00, Rob Atkinson  wrote: 
>> > 
>> > tested this on a colleagues machine using the exact same version and 
>> build of TBC, and the search works fine out of the box. I created a fresh 
>> repo and reran the same configuration script and it still fails. 
>>
>> Sounds like the search problem is related to the configuration script 
>> then? 
>>
>> unlikely to be directly causing it as the same script is used in all 
> three cases, and one case finds content and the other two dont - but I 
> expect there is some critical piece of metadata missing, and some local 
> config - like the selection of icon choices - that affects the UI behaviour 
> - so its narrowing down what it may be then identify the mechanisms to 
> enforce a necessary configuratin.
>  
>
>> > The UI is different too - i have a gear icon and a broken CSS and he 
>> has a series of icons in the tab. (both using chrome). 
>>
>> In the page header there is a button with three vertical dots. It opens a 
>> menu that has a checkbox for “Display Edit Actions as Icons”. Sounds like 
>> your colleague has that checked and you have it unchecked. 
>>
>
> OK - thats cool - I hadnt discovered that (it would make sense that this 
> would be available as some clue on the gear icon itself - such as a hover  
> - or maybe a last option in the drop down to say "show settings as icons" - 
> too many places to look
>
>>
>> I've looked through the EDG stylesheets for 6.3.2 and didn't find 
>> anything that looked like the style rule you reported. That means it could 
>> be a rule generated dynamically by some JS code. I'll ask colleagues about 
>> that possibility. 
>>
>> It could be a local customisation in your workspace. Does your workspace 
>> include any .ui.ttlx files that do anything with ui:Script, ui:Style or 
>> ui:override, ui:headIncudes? Sorry for making such allegations. It's 
>> difficult to investigate these things. 
>>
> No worries- fair enough!No - (I have overriden this in a custom SWP 
> _beacuse the style was broken_ and I needed to access the checkbox. I did a 
> brute force text search and the only style that looked like this is
>
> .chosen-container-single.chosen-container-single-nosearch .chosen-search {
>   position: absolute;
>   left: -px;
> }
>
> in TopBraid/SWA/assets.www/lib/chosen/chosen.css
>
> Looking at the styles in chrome dev tools - it doesnt claim this style 
> came from any particular CSS element - so I think this means it was 
> injected programmatically by some JS - and my guess is that is what the 
> "chosen" CSS is doing.
>
> certairnly I've never touched these styles - only custom CSS is for 
> customised logos and icons.
>
>
>
>
>> Richard
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/9419c0ca-eb2b-4c67-9c18-562728f30994%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-21 Thread Rob Atkinson


On Friday, 22 May 2020 05:29:20 UTC+10, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 21 May 2020, at 07:00, Rob Atkinson  > wrote: 
> > 
> > tested this on a colleagues machine using the exact same version and 
> build of TBC, and the search works fine out of the box. I created a fresh 
> repo and reran the same configuration script and it still fails. 
>
> Sounds like the search problem is related to the configuration script 
> then? 
>
> unlikely to be directly causing it as the same script is used in all three 
cases, and one case finds content and the other two dont - but I expect 
there is some critical piece of metadata missing, and some local config - 
like the selection of icon choices - that affects the UI behaviour - so its 
narrowing down what it may be then identify the mechanisms to enforce a 
necessary configuratin.
 

> > The UI is different too - i have a gear icon and a broken CSS and he has 
> a series of icons in the tab. (both using chrome). 
>
> In the page header there is a button with three vertical dots. It opens a 
> menu that has a checkbox for “Display Edit Actions as Icons”. Sounds like 
> your colleague has that checked and you have it unchecked. 
>

OK - thats cool - I hadnt discovered that (it would make sense that this 
would be available as some clue on the gear icon itself - such as a hover  
- or maybe a last option in the drop down to say "show settings as icons" - 
too many places to look

>
> I've looked through the EDG stylesheets for 6.3.2 and didn't find anything 
> that looked like the style rule you reported. That means it could be a rule 
> generated dynamically by some JS code. I'll ask colleagues about that 
> possibility. 
>
> It could be a local customisation in your workspace. Does your workspace 
> include any .ui.ttlx files that do anything with ui:Script, ui:Style or 
> ui:override, ui:headIncudes? Sorry for making such allegations. It's 
> difficult to investigate these things. 
>
No worries- fair enough!No - (I have overriden this in a custom SWP 
_beacuse the style was broken_ and I needed to access the checkbox. I did a 
brute force text search and the only style that looked like this is

.chosen-container-single.chosen-container-single-nosearch .chosen-search {
  position: absolute;
  left: -px;
}

in TopBraid/SWA/assets.www/lib/chosen/chosen.css

Looking at the styles in chrome dev tools - it doesnt claim this style came 
from any particular CSS element - so I think this means it was injected 
programmatically by some JS - and my guess is that is what the "chosen" CSS 
is doing.

certairnly I've never touched these styles - only custom CSS is for 
customised logos and icons.




> Richard

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/d62b9b12-0c1b-498f-b09f-c34d9156f26e%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-21 Thread Richard Cyganiak



> On 21 May 2020, at 07:00, Rob Atkinson  wrote:
> 
> tested this on a colleagues machine using the exact same version and build of 
> TBC, and the search works fine out of the box. I created a fresh repo and 
> reran the same configuration script and it still fails.

Sounds like the search problem is related to the configuration script then?

> The UI is different too - i have a gear icon and a broken CSS and he has a 
> series of icons in the tab. (both using chrome).

In the page header there is a button with three vertical dots. It opens a menu 
that has a checkbox for “Display Edit Actions as Icons”. Sounds like your 
colleague has that checked and you have it unchecked.

I've looked through the EDG stylesheets for 6.3.2 and didn't find anything that 
looked like the style rule you reported. That means it could be a rule 
generated dynamically by some JS code. I'll ask colleagues about that 
possibility.

It could be a local customisation in your workspace. Does your workspace 
include any .ui.ttlx files that do anything with ui:Script, ui:Style or 
ui:override, ui:headIncudes? Sorry for making such allegations. It's difficult 
to investigate these things.

Richard

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/DFBFEA51-AF23-410C-A74B-E4F3ADB2A103%40topquadrant.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-21 Thread Rob Atkinson


[image: edg_ui.PNG]
and more details.

Cleared browser cache - no fix.
Tried on Edge instead of chrome - same

 Ran through load on a different machine and got the same results as on 
mine, with the same broken CSS

snapshot is the broken styles and empty search results.

will try a clean install of TBC

On Thursday, 21 May 2020 16:00:43 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> An update..
>
> tested this on a colleagues machine using the exact same version and build 
> of TBC, and the search works fine out of the box. I created a fresh repo 
> and reran the same configuration script and it still fails.
>
> The UI is different too - i have a gear icon and a broken CSS and he has a 
> series of icons in the tab. (both using chrome).
>
> Will try on some other machines and compare.
>
> Wondering if it some cached stuff as i have used all previous versions.
>
> On Thursday, 21 May 2020 12:12:05 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>>
>> oops - forgot to update item #6 - thats doesnt work if a filter is 
>> included if data is included - but does work if data is copied into graph
>>
>> On Thursday, 21 May 2020 12:09:04 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok - a few layers of challenges here - gradually unpicking it:
>>>
>>> Query in both the UI and GraphiQL return data if not filter text is 
>>> specified.
>>>
>>> The graphql schema shows properties that are queryable, but if i put any 
>>> sort of filter against these in Graphql or the UI Free text search returns 
>>> no results
>>>
>>> A few UI glitches made this harder to track down,  The CSS for 
>>> checkboxes is broken in 6.3.2.
>>>
>>> here are the things i'd suggest reviewing
>>> 1) The CSS for the checkbox on the "use local results" is 
>>> element.style {
>>>
>>>
>>> }
>>> wiring_rule….editor:156
>>> input[type="checkbox"] {
>>>
>>>1. position: absolute;
>>>2. /* left: -px; */
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> i have switched it off as above and lo and behold the checkbox appears
>>>
>>> 2) hiding the indicator for whether local results are used under the 
>>> gear icon seems suboptimal. 
>>>
>>> 3) Need to know how to set the value of this setting by default when 
>>> generating an Asset collection as a wrapper that includes the data of 
>>> interest
>>>
>>> 4) possibly want to have a special type of include that limits queries 
>>> to included data, not all included shapes
>>>
>>> 5) New button on instances only works with graphql:publicSchema defined 
>>>
>>> 6) Graphql UI doesnt work (finds schema but get no results if data 
>>> included via an import) - after setting graphql:publicSchema
>>>
>>> The functionality issues I need a solution for are #3 and #6
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 23:34:45 UTC+10, Irene Polikoff wrote:



 On May 20, 2020, at 4:50 AM, Richard Cyganiak  
 wrote:


 On 20 May 2020, at 09:25, Rob Atkinson  wrote:

 OK search is _nearly_ working using the shapes once I save them and 
 force them to be imported.

 I had to set the graphql:publicClass and force-refresh the editor to 
 pick up changes.  

 If I put in no search term it finds everything - but anything in the 
 free text box gets zero results.  Is there some other step required to 
 make 
 individual fields searchable ( this is the field! in the graphql schema ?)


 I'm not sure. I know that rdfs:label is indexed, and I believe (but not 
 sure) that *all* literals are indexed.


 Yes, by default all text literals are indexed. This can be configured 
 to be less.


 Sometimes, Server Administration > Text Indices > Rebuild can resolve 
 problems with the search. In theory that shouldn't be necessary.


 In my experience, this step is only needed if asset collections are 
 brought in through project import into TBC workspace e.g., if you download 
 and install samples - as described in the instructions. But do try to see 
 if it helps.


 Also i can find any indicator showing if search is local.   At any rate 
 I will want to set a flag to force it to allow search on imported graphs - 
 is there such a property that sets that as default? and/or one that forces 
 it (disables option)


 Like in the Instances panel, results from included graphs are shown by 
 default, but that can be turned off via “Return local results only” in the 
 search panel's “gear” menu (here for a Glossary but should be the same for 
 Data Graphs):

 


 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6B57C884-5773-4897-A85C-A74CDDA2E19A%40topquadrant.com
  
 

Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-21 Thread Rob Atkinson
An update..

tested this on a colleagues machine using the exact same version and build 
of TBC, and the search works fine out of the box. I created a fresh repo 
and reran the same configuration script and it still fails.

The UI is different too - i have a gear icon and a broken CSS and he has a 
series of icons in the tab. (both using chrome).

Will try on some other machines and compare.

Wondering if it some cached stuff as i have used all previous versions.

On Thursday, 21 May 2020 12:12:05 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> oops - forgot to update item #6 - thats doesnt work if a filter is 
> included if data is included - but does work if data is copied into graph
>
> On Thursday, 21 May 2020 12:09:04 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>>
>> Ok - a few layers of challenges here - gradually unpicking it:
>>
>> Query in both the UI and GraphiQL return data if not filter text is 
>> specified.
>>
>> The graphql schema shows properties that are queryable, but if i put any 
>> sort of filter against these in Graphql or the UI Free text search returns 
>> no results
>>
>> A few UI glitches made this harder to track down,  The CSS for checkboxes 
>> is broken in 6.3.2.
>>
>> here are the things i'd suggest reviewing
>> 1) The CSS for the checkbox on the "use local results" is 
>> element.style {
>>
>>
>> }
>> wiring_rule….editor:156
>> input[type="checkbox"] {
>>
>>1. position: absolute;
>>2. /* left: -px; */
>>
>> }
>>
>> i have switched it off as above and lo and behold the checkbox appears
>>
>> 2) hiding the indicator for whether local results are used under the gear 
>> icon seems suboptimal. 
>>
>> 3) Need to know how to set the value of this setting by default when 
>> generating an Asset collection as a wrapper that includes the data of 
>> interest
>>
>> 4) possibly want to have a special type of include that limits queries to 
>> included data, not all included shapes
>>
>> 5) New button on instances only works with graphql:publicSchema defined 
>>
>> 6) Graphql UI doesnt work (finds schema but get no results if data 
>> included via an import) - after setting graphql:publicSchema
>>
>> The functionality issues I need a solution for are #3 and #6
>>
>> On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 23:34:45 UTC+10, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 20, 2020, at 4:50 AM, Richard Cyganiak  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20 May 2020, at 09:25, Rob Atkinson  wrote:
>>>
>>> OK search is _nearly_ working using the shapes once I save them and 
>>> force them to be imported.
>>>
>>> I had to set the graphql:publicClass and force-refresh the editor to 
>>> pick up changes.  
>>>
>>> If I put in no search term it finds everything - but anything in the 
>>> free text box gets zero results.  Is there some other step required to make 
>>> individual fields searchable ( this is the field! in the graphql schema ?)
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure. I know that rdfs:label is indexed, and I believe (but not 
>>> sure) that *all* literals are indexed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, by default all text literals are indexed. This can be configured to 
>>> be less.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sometimes, Server Administration > Text Indices > Rebuild can resolve 
>>> problems with the search. In theory that shouldn't be necessary.
>>>
>>>
>>> In my experience, this step is only needed if asset collections are 
>>> brought in through project import into TBC workspace e.g., if you download 
>>> and install samples - as described in the instructions. But do try to see 
>>> if it helps.
>>>
>>>
>>> Also i can find any indicator showing if search is local.   At any rate 
>>> I will want to set a flag to force it to allow search on imported graphs - 
>>> is there such a property that sets that as default? and/or one that forces 
>>> it (disables option)
>>>
>>>
>>> Like in the Instances panel, results from included graphs are shown by 
>>> default, but that can be turned off via “Return local results only” in the 
>>> search panel's “gear” menu (here for a Glossary but should be the same for 
>>> Data Graphs):
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6B57C884-5773-4897-A85C-A74CDDA2E19A%40topquadrant.com
>>>  
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/a0e1d646-2f72-4ba8-ab41-fe36de367db3%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-20 Thread Rob Atkinson
oops - forgot to update item #6 - thats doesnt work if a filter is included 
if data is included - but does work if data is copied into graph

On Thursday, 21 May 2020 12:09:04 UTC+10, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> Ok - a few layers of challenges here - gradually unpicking it:
>
> Query in both the UI and GraphiQL return data if not filter text is 
> specified.
>
> The graphql schema shows properties that are queryable, but if i put any 
> sort of filter against these in Graphql or the UI Free text search returns 
> no results
>
> A few UI glitches made this harder to track down,  The CSS for checkboxes 
> is broken in 6.3.2.
>
> here are the things i'd suggest reviewing
> 1) The CSS for the checkbox on the "use local results" is 
> element.style {
>
>
> }
> wiring_rule….editor:156
> input[type="checkbox"] {
>
>1. position: absolute;
>2. /* left: -px; */
>
> }
>
> i have switched it off as above and lo and behold the checkbox appears
>
> 2) hiding the indicator for whether local results are used under the gear 
> icon seems suboptimal. 
>
> 3) Need to know how to set the value of this setting by default when 
> generating an Asset collection as a wrapper that includes the data of 
> interest
>
> 4) possibly want to have a special type of include that limits queries to 
> included data, not all included shapes
>
> 5) New button on instances only works with graphql:publicSchema defined 
>
> 6) Graphql UI doesnt work (finds schema but get no results if data 
> included via an import) - after setting graphql:publicSchema
>
> The functionality issues I need a solution for are #3 and #6
>
> On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 23:34:45 UTC+10, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 20, 2020, at 4:50 AM, Richard Cyganiak  
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20 May 2020, at 09:25, Rob Atkinson  wrote:
>>
>> OK search is _nearly_ working using the shapes once I save them and force 
>> them to be imported.
>>
>> I had to set the graphql:publicClass and force-refresh the editor to pick 
>> up changes.  
>>
>> If I put in no search term it finds everything - but anything in the free 
>> text box gets zero results.  Is there some other step required to make 
>> individual fields searchable ( this is the field! in the graphql schema ?)
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure. I know that rdfs:label is indexed, and I believe (but not 
>> sure) that *all* literals are indexed.
>>
>>
>> Yes, by default all text literals are indexed. This can be configured to 
>> be less.
>>
>>
>> Sometimes, Server Administration > Text Indices > Rebuild can resolve 
>> problems with the search. In theory that shouldn't be necessary.
>>
>>
>> In my experience, this step is only needed if asset collections are 
>> brought in through project import into TBC workspace e.g., if you download 
>> and install samples - as described in the instructions. But do try to see 
>> if it helps.
>>
>>
>> Also i can find any indicator showing if search is local.   At any rate I 
>> will want to set a flag to force it to allow search on imported graphs - is 
>> there such a property that sets that as default? and/or one that forces it 
>> (disables option)
>>
>>
>> Like in the Instances panel, results from included graphs are shown by 
>> default, but that can be turned off via “Return local results only” in the 
>> search panel's “gear” menu (here for a Glossary but should be the same for 
>> Data Graphs):
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6B57C884-5773-4897-A85C-A74CDDA2E19A%40topquadrant.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/27af1e38-7190-48ad-aa89-40b6d05f2be0%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-20 Thread Rob Atkinson
Ok - a few layers of challenges here - gradually unpicking it:

Query in both the UI and GraphiQL return data if not filter text is 
specified.

The graphql schema shows properties that are queryable, but if i put any 
sort of filter against these in Graphql or the UI Free text search returns 
no results

A few UI glitches made this harder to track down,  The CSS for checkboxes 
is broken in 6.3.2.

here are the things i'd suggest reviewing
1) The CSS for the checkbox on the "use local results" is 
element.style {

   
}
wiring_rule….editor:156
input[type="checkbox"] {

   1. position: absolute;
   2. /* left: -px; */

}

i have switched it off as above and lo and behold the checkbox appears

2) hiding the indicator for whether local results are used under the gear 
icon seems suboptimal. 

3) Need to know how to set the value of this setting by default when 
generating an Asset collection as a wrapper that includes the data of 
interest

4) possibly want to have a special type of include that limits queries to 
included data, not all included shapes

5) New button on instances only works with graphql:publicSchema defined 

6) Graphql UI doesnt work (finds schema but get no results if data included 
via an import) - after setting graphql:publicSchema

The functionality issues I need a solution for are #3 and #6

On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 23:34:45 UTC+10, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 20, 2020, at 4:50 AM, Richard Cyganiak  > wrote:
>
>
> On 20 May 2020, at 09:25, Rob Atkinson > 
> wrote:
>
> OK search is _nearly_ working using the shapes once I save them and force 
> them to be imported.
>
> I had to set the graphql:publicClass and force-refresh the editor to pick 
> up changes.  
>
> If I put in no search term it finds everything - but anything in the free 
> text box gets zero results.  Is there some other step required to make 
> individual fields searchable ( this is the field! in the graphql schema ?)
>
>
> I'm not sure. I know that rdfs:label is indexed, and I believe (but not 
> sure) that *all* literals are indexed.
>
>
> Yes, by default all text literals are indexed. This can be configured to 
> be less.
>
>
> Sometimes, Server Administration > Text Indices > Rebuild can resolve 
> problems with the search. In theory that shouldn't be necessary.
>
>
> In my experience, this step is only needed if asset collections are 
> brought in through project import into TBC workspace e.g., if you download 
> and install samples - as described in the instructions. But do try to see 
> if it helps.
>
>
> Also i can find any indicator showing if search is local.   At any rate I 
> will want to set a flag to force it to allow search on imported graphs - is 
> there such a property that sets that as default? and/or one that forces it 
> (disables option)
>
>
> Like in the Instances panel, results from included graphs are shown by 
> default, but that can be turned off via “Return local results only” in the 
> search panel's “gear” menu (here for a Glossary but should be the same for 
> Data Graphs):
>
> 
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6B57C884-5773-4897-A85C-A74CDDA2E19A%40topquadrant.com
>  
> 
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/265cb823-2f08-4782-bed9-e992b5e8d568%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-20 Thread Irene Polikoff


> On May 20, 2020, at 4:50 AM, Richard Cyganiak  wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 20 May 2020, at 09:25, Rob Atkinson > > wrote:
>> 
>> OK search is _nearly_ working using the shapes once I save them and force 
>> them to be imported.
>> 
>> I had to set the graphql:publicClass and force-refresh the editor to pick up 
>> changes.  
>> 
>> If I put in no search term it finds everything - but anything in the free 
>> text box gets zero results.  Is there some other step required to make 
>> individual fields searchable ( this is the field! in the graphql schema ?)
> 
> I'm not sure. I know that rdfs:label is indexed, and I believe (but not sure) 
> that *all* literals are indexed.

Yes, by default all text literals are indexed. This can be configured to be 
less.
> 
> Sometimes, Server Administration > Text Indices > Rebuild can resolve 
> problems with the search. In theory that shouldn't be necessary.

In my experience, this step is only needed if asset collections are brought in 
through project import into TBC workspace e.g., if you download and install 
samples - as described in the instructions. But do try to see if it helps.
> 
>> Also i can find any indicator showing if search is local.   At any rate I 
>> will want to set a flag to force it to allow search on imported graphs - is 
>> there such a property that sets that as default? and/or one that forces it 
>> (disables option)
> 
> Like in the Instances panel, results from included graphs are shown by 
> default, but that can be turned off via “Return local results only” in the 
> search panel's “gear” menu (here for a Glossary but should be the same for 
> Data Graphs):
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6B57C884-5773-4897-A85C-A74CDDA2E19A%40topquadrant.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/EA22721D-97A5-4161-94AE-A24C837BAA91%40topquadrant.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-20 Thread Richard Cyganiak

> On 20 May 2020, at 09:25, Rob Atkinson  wrote:
> 
> OK search is _nearly_ working using the shapes once I save them and force 
> them to be imported.
> 
> I had to set the graphql:publicClass and force-refresh the editor to pick up 
> changes.  
> 
> If I put in no search term it finds everything - but anything in the free 
> text box gets zero results.  Is there some other step required to make 
> individual fields searchable ( this is the field! in the graphql schema ?)

I'm not sure. I know that rdfs:label is indexed, and I believe (but not sure) 
that *all* literals are indexed.

Sometimes, Server Administration > Text Indices > Rebuild can resolve problems 
with the search. In theory that shouldn't be necessary.

> Also i can find any indicator showing if search is local.   At any rate I 
> will want to set a flag to force it to allow search on imported graphs - is 
> there such a property that sets that as default? and/or one that forces it 
> (disables option)

Like in the Instances panel, results from included graphs are shown by default, 
but that can be turned off via “Return local results only” in the search 
panel's “gear” menu (here for a Glossary but should be the same for Data 
Graphs):



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/6B57C884-5773-4897-A85C-A74CDDA2E19A%40topquadrant.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-19 Thread Richard Cyganiak


> On 20 May 2020, at 06:20, Rob Atkinson  wrote:
> 
> the classes and instances layout is a reasonable way to navigate the 
> instances by selecting classes of interest
>   
> It only displays classes You could bring in Instances panel, it would then 
> show instances for a selected class, but it is not the most convenient view 
> for working with instances. 
> 
> it is the default that shows up

What do you mean by this? The default layout for Data Graphs has the Search 
panel on the left and the Form panel on the right.

> Does the search perhaps rely on generating shapes for every class and 
> property?

The search panel is indeed shapes-based. It will show subclasses of the root 
class. They need to be typed as *both* Class and as NodeShape. New classes 
created in the EDG ontology editor have these types, but if your ontology came 
in via a different route it may not have them.

If the Form panel works for you as you expect, then you already have the 
required shapes for your properties.

Typically, the shapes would be in the Ontology that the Data Graph is based on.

When working with ontologies from a third party source, it is often reasonable 
to have a graph with the original ontology (perhaps kept as a static file in 
the workspace) and an EDG ontology that includes the original and adds shape 
statements to make it work with EDG.

> I am having hard time understanding what you are talking about. Editors work 
> over the entire graph closure. All information is shown - whether it is in 
> the currently opened asset collection or in any of the imported graphs.
> 
> nope - it may be the design but if so its a bug -if i copy the same data into 
> the graph it shows, if i owl:import the data it doesnt show. 

There is a “gear menu” in the top right corner of the Instances pane. It has a 
checkbox for “Return local results only”. Do you have that checked perchance?

> there are good reasons not to munge everything into a single graph.

Agreed.

Richard

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/46E4D21C-F3B4-44AB-96C6-EF161E0C5237%40topquadrant.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-19 Thread Rob Atkinson

inline

On Wednesday, 20 May 2020 13:18:52 UTC+10, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>
> Please see below
>
> On May 19, 2020, at 10:38 PM, Rob Atkinson  > wrote:
>
>
> Use Case: 
>
> I have a large data graph I wish to navigate and allow users to annotate 
> so I expose in an EDG editor. 
>
>
> What asset collection type are you using for this? Data graph?
>
> yes 

> Its not really "reference data" - but its generated by scripting so the 
> body should only be changed by external processes - and the idea of 
> annotation is to provide feedback on the content, manage additional 
> information we need to attach etc.
>
> If I include the data, the class tree works but it shows no instance - 
> obviously only working on the current graph, not with imports.
>
>
> Include where?
>
> via owl:imports in the data graph
 

> If you are not working with classes and properties, why are you using the 
> class tree? 
>

the classes and instances layout is a reasonable way to navigate the 
instances by selecting classes of interest
 

> Why are you expecting a class tree to show instances? 
>
i dont
 

> It only displays classes You could bring in Instances panel, it would then 
> show instances for a selected class, but it is not the most convenient view 
> for working with instances.  
>

it is the default that shows up
 

> Typically, the Search table panel works better and you can use Asset 
> Navigator to select a class of instances you want to focus on.
>
>
OK - thats useful to know the direction - but Search gives me nothing 
useful - it obviously needs more than just the ontology and the instances 
to work.

It shows the 'rootClass" and a free text box - the free text box is not 
active and the "asset type" dialog  (is this the "asset navigator" ? and 
the drop down shows "no options'

this is for an ontology that can be navigated via classes and instances - 
so it know about everything. 

Does the search perhaps rely on generating shapes for every class and 
property? If so, perhaps it should detect there are classes but no shapes 
and provide a prompt to generate shapes (but of course I'd never want to 
pollute the data with generated shapes - they belong in the T-box world!)

 

> A screenshot would help.
>
>
> How can we control the query scope to allow a-box import heirarchies to be 
> handled - effectively i want to distinguish between a-box and t-box imports 
> I think. 
>
>
> I am having hard time understanding what you are talking about. Editors 
> work over the entire graph closure. All information is shown - whether it 
> is in the currently opened asset collection or in any of the imported 
> graphs.
>

nope - it may be the design but if so its a bug -if i copy the same data 
into the graph it shows, if i owl:import the data it doesnt show. 

>
> No problem adding a property to the graph the widget could look at to use 
> in an import closure.
>
> Obviously GraphQL in general needs to be able to access the a-box graph 
> closure.
>
> I can workaround with data load in the short term - but it means I'd have 
> to handle annotations in working copies and never commit them - or perhaps 
> have an export for the working copies I can save before committing them.
>
>
> What do you mean by “annotations”? You don’t have to commit a working 
> copy. All exports work for a working copy exactly the same as production 
> copy.
>

Dont sweat on this - i mean any additional statements I want to manage 
about the entities in the data graph without editing the underlying data 
graph itself. suffice to say data is not editable, but I want to attach 
additional statements to the data in EDG workflows.  Its not relevant to 
the actual issue being discussed - except to make clear the 'doing 
something fundamentally different than managing different aspects of 
instance data in separate related graphs' is not the answer I am seeking - 
at least until I get what seems to be basic functions working - there are 
good reasons not to munge everything into a single graph.

>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/b2f26203-7dd7-4f86-a803-ae8f9aa31c5e%40googlegroups.com
>  
> 
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/bceda023-6c87-443f-8251-1997b1afb09e%40googlegroups.com.


Re: [topbraid-users] Including content in a data graph

2020-05-19 Thread Irene Polikoff
Please see below

> On May 19, 2020, at 10:38 PM, Rob Atkinson  wrote:
> 
> 
> Use Case: 
> 
> I have a large data graph I wish to navigate and allow users to annotate so I 
> expose in an EDG editor. 

What asset collection type are you using for this? Data graph?

> Its not really "reference data" - but its generated by scripting so the body 
> should only be changed by external processes - and the idea of annotation is 
> to provide feedback on the content, manage additional information we need to 
> attach etc.
> 
> If I include the data, the class tree works but it shows no instance - 
> obviously only working on the current graph, not with imports.

Include where?

If you are not working with classes and properties, why are you using the class 
tree? Why are you expecting a class tree to show instances? It only displays 
classes You could bring in Instances panel, it would then show instances for a 
selected class, but it is not the most convenient view for working with 
instances. Typically, the Search table panel works better and you can use Asset 
Navigator to select a class of instances you want to focus on.

A screenshot would help.
> 
> How can we control the query scope to allow a-box import heirarchies to be 
> handled - effectively i want to distinguish between a-box and t-box imports I 
> think. 

I am having hard time understanding what you are talking about. Editors work 
over the entire graph closure. All information is shown - whether it is in the 
currently opened asset collection or in any of the imported graphs.

> No problem adding a property to the graph the widget could look at to use in 
> an import closure.
> 
> Obviously GraphQL in general needs to be able to access the a-box graph 
> closure.
> 
> I can workaround with data load in the short term - but it means I'd have to 
> handle annotations in working copies and never commit them - or perhaps have 
> an export for the working copies I can save before committing them.

What do you mean by “annotations”? You don’t have to commit a working copy. All 
exports work for a working copy exactly the same as production copy.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/b2f26203-7dd7-4f86-a803-ae8f9aa31c5e%40googlegroups.com
>  
> .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/5567E3AF-A764-42C6-81A1-A0766245D20A%40topquadrant.com.