[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908259] Re: TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY fails with qemu 5.2

2020-12-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Upstream CI as well as local autopkgtest runs confirm that the new
systemd test code will make the new qemu pass.

# Formerly failing
$ sudo ~/work/autopkgtest/autopkgtest/runner/autopkgtest --no-built-binaries -o 
systemd-vs-qemu5.2 --apt-upgrade --apt-pocket=proposed=src:qemu 
--setup-commands="add-apt-repository ppa:ci-trg
...
autopkgtest [17:09:01]: test upstream: ---]
upstream PASS
autopkgtest [17:09:02]: test upstream:  - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - 
- - - -
autopkgtest [17:09:03]:  summary
upstream PASS
qemu-system-x86_64: terminating on signal 15 from pid 1783557 (/usr/bin/python3)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908259

Title:
  TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY fails with qemu 5.2

Status in systemd:
  Unknown
Status in qemu package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,
  this test now fails as seen on ppc here
  
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/ppc64el/s/systemd/20201214_224336_8b0d8@/log.gz

  + /bin/qemu-system-ppc64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinux-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.qFc3xq/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=hvc0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
  E: QEMU failed with exit code 1
  qemu-system-ppc64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

  Reproducible in LP infra with systemd 246.6-5ubuntu1 and qemu 5.2

  On other architectures this test is just skipped and ppc happened to complete
  faster so I saw it earlier.

  The same happens on amd64
  + /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.8Hqpmk/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=ttyS0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
  qemu-system-x86_64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)
  E: QEMU failed with exit code 1 

  
  Isolated this to a test without systemd:
  $ apt install linux-image-generic qemu-system-x86
  $ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -numa node,nodeid=0 -initrd 
/boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append 'console=ttyS0 selinux=0'

  Upgrading to 5.2 makes this:
  $ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -numa node,nodeid=0 -initrd 
/boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append 'console=ttyS0 selinux=0'
  qemu-system-x86_64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

  The numa spec is indeed a bit short
-numa node,nodeid=0
  If I change this to
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=0
  It would work, but that kind of specification is forbidden >=5.1
Parameter -numa node,mem is not supported by this machine type
Use -numa node,memdev instead
  You'd need also something like -M pc-i440fx-5.0 which isn't anything the test
  wants to set in stone I guess.
  Instead using memdev works:
-object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M -numa node,memdev=mem0,nodeid=0

  This works fine and is in qemu since quite some time.
  Properly documented since 2.12 but actually available since 2.1 (2014)

  The argument for this test is in test/TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY/test.sh
QEMU_OPTIONS="-numa node,nodeid=0"

  Fixing that to a new form should help.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1908259/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908259] Re: TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY fails with qemu 5.2

2020-12-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/17987 was accepted upstream.
I assume with the amount of dependencies that systemd has there is no easy 
"just apply this and upload" that will make anyone happy :-/

But now that everything seems ready I wanted to ask the package
maintainer (who usually has a plan on coming uploads already) when we
could get this applied?

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908259

Title:
  TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY fails with qemu 5.2

Status in systemd:
  Unknown
Status in qemu package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,
  this test now fails as seen on ppc here
  
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/ppc64el/s/systemd/20201214_224336_8b0d8@/log.gz

  + /bin/qemu-system-ppc64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinux-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.qFc3xq/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=hvc0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
  E: QEMU failed with exit code 1
  qemu-system-ppc64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

  Reproducible in LP infra with systemd 246.6-5ubuntu1 and qemu 5.2

  On other architectures this test is just skipped and ppc happened to complete
  faster so I saw it earlier.

  The same happens on amd64
  + /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.8Hqpmk/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=ttyS0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
  qemu-system-x86_64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)
  E: QEMU failed with exit code 1 

  
  Isolated this to a test without systemd:
  $ apt install linux-image-generic qemu-system-x86
  $ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -numa node,nodeid=0 -initrd 
/boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append 'console=ttyS0 selinux=0'

  Upgrading to 5.2 makes this:
  $ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -numa node,nodeid=0 -initrd 
/boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append 'console=ttyS0 selinux=0'
  qemu-system-x86_64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

  The numa spec is indeed a bit short
-numa node,nodeid=0
  If I change this to
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=0
  It would work, but that kind of specification is forbidden >=5.1
Parameter -numa node,mem is not supported by this machine type
Use -numa node,memdev instead
  You'd need also something like -M pc-i440fx-5.0 which isn't anything the test
  wants to set in stone I guess.
  Instead using memdev works:
-object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M -numa node,memdev=mem0,nodeid=0

  This works fine and is in qemu since quite some time.
  Properly documented since 2.12 but actually available since 2.1 (2014)

  The argument for this test is in test/TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY/test.sh
QEMU_OPTIONS="-numa node,nodeid=0"

  Fixing that to a new form should help.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1908259/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907306] Re: networkd dhcpv4 client never attempts more than 2 renew and 2 rebind

2020-12-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: systemd
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907306

Title:
  networkd dhcpv4 client never attempts more than 2 renew and 2 rebind

Status in systemd:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [impact]

  networkd dhcpv4 client never attempts more than 2 renew and 2 rebind

  [test case]

  configure an interface to use dhcpv4; acquire a dhcpv4 address, then
  stop the dhcpv4 server, and wait for the networkd client to perform
  its renewals and rebinds before expiring the lease

  using a 20 minute lease time as an example (all times are approximate
  due to RFC-mandated random 'fuzz' time of -1 to +1 sec):

  the current behavior would be to sent renew requests at:

  10:00
  13:45

  and then rebind requests at:

  17:30
  18:45

  then the lease would expire at 20:00

  the correct/new behavior should be renew requests at:

  10:00
  13:45
  15:37
  16:37

  and then rebind requests at:

  17:30
  18:45
  19:45

  and then lease expiration at 20:00.

  longer lease times would increase the number of retransmissions.

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in problems receiving and/or
  maintaining a dhcpv4 address

  [scope]

  this is needed in b/f/g/h.

  this was fixed upstream in:
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/17908

  that was just added, so this is not fixed in any ubuntu release yet.

  technically, this is needed in x as well, however I don't plan to
  backport to x since 1) it reaches ESM soon and 2) the default network
  management tool in x is ifupdown, not systemd-networkd.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1907306/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905790] Re: Make SSSD in 20.04 using OpenSSL and p11-kit (instead of NSS) for p11_child

2020-12-15 Thread Treviño
** Description changed:

  [ Impact ]
  
  SSSD supports in 20.04 two security backends: NSS and OpenSSL
  (speaking in past tense as upstream dropped NSS support completely).
  
  Those two backends are used for various generic crypto features (so they
  are interchangeable), but also for the management of the PKCS#11 modules
  for smart cards.
  
  In this case, the main problem is that by using NSS it also relies on
  the presence of a "system NSS" database [1] that is something present in
  Fedora and RHEL, but not in ubuntu or generic Linux distributions.
  
  In order to make SSSD to find a smart card module, we would then need to 
create a such database that mentions a p11kit proxy that will eventually load 
the p11-kit module and then add the card CA certificate to the same DB (see 
more details in [2]).
  And even in such case... It will not work at login phase.
  
  This is making support for Smart-card based authentication in 20.04
  quite complicated, and hard to implement in professional environments
  (see bug #1865226).
  
  As per this, recompiling SSSD's p11_child to use OpenSSL (as it already
  happens starting from 20.10) would be enough to make the this tool (the
  one in charge for smartcard authentications and certificate matching) to
  be able to get the smartcard devices from p11-kit allowed modules and to
  check their certificate using CA certificates in the ubuntu system ca
  certificate files (or other configured file).
  
  One more mayor reason to do this, is also that if we fix 20.04 now to
  use the "proper" method, people who will configure smartcard access
  there via SSSD (not easily possible right now) won't be affected by
  future migrations.
  
  [ Proposed Implementations ]
  
  1) Use p11-kit and openssl for p11_child, by changing the build/test system 
(preferred)
     https://salsa.debian.org/3v1n0-guest/sssd/-/commits/p11-kit-p11_child
  
  2) Build both versions and package things accordingly (hackish)
     https://salsa.debian.org/3v1n0-guest/sssd/-/commits/p11-kit-p11_child-v1
  
  3) Recompile SSSD completely to use libcrypto as backend
  
  [ Test case ]
  
  With a smartcard reader available (and with a card in its slot) as reported 
by:
   $ p11-kit list-modules
  
  launch:
   $ sudo /usr/libexec/sssd/p11_child --pre -d 10 --debug-fd=2 \
     --nssdb=/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt
  
  The tool should find your card:
  
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020395): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): Module 
List:
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020481): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): common 
name: [p11-kit-trust].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020497): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): dll 
name: [/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/p11-kit-trust.so].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020569): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): 
Description [/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt  
PKCS#11 Kit ] Manufacturer [PKCS#11 Kit 
] flags [1] removable [false] token present [true].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020611): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): common 
name: [opensc-pkcs11].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020646): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): dll 
name: [/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:025443): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): 
Description [VMware Virtual USB CCID 00 00   
VMware  ] Manufacturer [VMware  
] flags [7] removable [true] token present [true].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:025725): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): Found 
[MARCO TREVISAN (PIN CNS0)] in slot [VMware Virtual USB CCID 00 00][0] of 
module [1][/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so].
  
- Then the tool might fail if the card certificate is not added to the ca-
- certificates.crt, but this is outside the scope of the test case.
+ Then:
+  1) If you previously configured SSSD match rules and/or CA certificates:
+ - You should still get your certificate public key printed as output
+ - Configured login with smartcard should continue working
  
- What it matters is that the card is found.
+  2) If SSSD was not configured to do smartcard authentication:
+ - p11_child may fail if the card certificate was not previously added to
+   the trusted DB, but this is outside of this test case.
+ - What it matters is that the card is found.
  
  [ Regression potential ]
  
  While the change may involve quite different code paths when it comes to
  security features, I think we trust OpenSSL enough to be an acceptable
  crypto backend for PKCS#11 operations. Behavior should not change, also
  assuming that upstream dropped NSS support completely in latest release
  [3], keeping the same functionalities.
  
  As per a further review of this by xnox [4], we can safely assume that
  SSSD does not use libcrypto for operations where its behavior should
  differ from NSS. As it's needed only 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905790] Re: Make SSSD in 20.04 using OpenSSL and p11-kit (instead of NSS) for p11_child

2020-12-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked:
   https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+git/sssd/+merge/395411

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ca-certificates in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905790

Title:
  Make SSSD in 20.04 using OpenSSL and p11-kit (instead of NSS) for
  p11_child

Status in ca-certificates package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in sssd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ca-certificates source package in Focal:
  New
Status in sssd source package in Focal:
  New

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  SSSD supports in 20.04 two security backends: NSS and OpenSSL
  (speaking in past tense as upstream dropped NSS support completely).

  Those two backends are used for various generic crypto features (so
  they are interchangeable), but also for the management of the PKCS#11
  modules for smart cards.

  In this case, the main problem is that by using NSS it also relies on
  the presence of a "system NSS" database [1] that is something present
  in Fedora and RHEL, but not in ubuntu or generic Linux distributions.

  In order to make SSSD to find a smart card module, we would then need to 
create a such database that mentions a p11kit proxy that will eventually load 
the p11-kit module and then add the card CA certificate to the same DB (see 
more details in [2]).
  And even in such case... It will not work at login phase.

  This is making support for Smart-card based authentication in 20.04
  quite complicated, and hard to implement in professional environments
  (see bug #1865226).

  As per this, recompiling SSSD's p11_child to use OpenSSL (as it
  already happens starting from 20.10) would be enough to make the this
  tool (the one in charge for smartcard authentications and certificate
  matching) to be able to get the smartcard devices from p11-kit allowed
  modules and to check their certificate using CA certificates in the
  ubuntu system ca certificate files (or other configured file).

  One more mayor reason to do this, is also that if we fix 20.04 now to
  use the "proper" method, people who will configure smartcard access
  there via SSSD (not easily possible right now) won't be affected by
  future migrations.

  [ Proposed Implementations ]

  1) Use p11-kit and openssl for p11_child, by changing the build/test system 
(preferred)
     https://salsa.debian.org/3v1n0-guest/sssd/-/commits/p11-kit-p11_child

  2) Build both versions and package things accordingly (hackish)
     https://salsa.debian.org/3v1n0-guest/sssd/-/commits/p11-kit-p11_child-v1

  3) Recompile SSSD completely to use libcrypto as backend

  [ Test case ]

  With a smartcard reader available (and with a card in its slot) as reported 
by:
   $ p11-kit list-modules

  launch:
   $ sudo /usr/libexec/sssd/p11_child --pre -d 10 --debug-fd=2 \
     --nssdb=/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt

  The tool should find your card:

  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020395): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): Module 
List:
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020481): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): common 
name: [p11-kit-trust].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020497): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): dll 
name: [/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/p11-kit-trust.so].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020569): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): 
Description [/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt  
PKCS#11 Kit ] Manufacturer [PKCS#11 Kit 
] flags [1] removable [false] token present [true].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020611): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): common 
name: [opensc-pkcs11].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020646): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): dll 
name: [/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:025443): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): 
Description [VMware Virtual USB CCID 00 00   
VMware  ] Manufacturer [VMware  
] flags [7] removable [true] token present [true].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:025725): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): Found 
[MARCO TREVISAN (PIN CNS0)] in slot [VMware Virtual USB CCID 00 00][0] of 
module [1][/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so].

  Then the tool might fail if the card certificate is not added to the
  ca-certificates.crt, but this is outside the scope of the test case.

  What it matters is that the card is found.

  [ Regression potential ]

  While the change may involve quite different code paths when it comes
  to security features, I think we trust OpenSSL enough to be an
  acceptable crypto backend for PKCS#11 operations. Behavior should not
  change, also assuming that upstream dropped NSS support completely in
  latest release [3], keeping the same functionalities.

  As per a further review of this by xnox [4], we can safely assume that
  SSSD does not use libcrypto for operations where its 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872824] Re: Can't upgrade console-setup-linux (1.194ubuntu3) over (1.108ubuntu15.5), trying to overwrite '/lib/systemd/system/console-setup.service', which is also in package ke

2020-12-15 Thread David Martinka
I got stuck in this situation as well, and I was able to manually
"unstick" things like this:

```sudo apt install -f -y console-setup-linux keyboard-configuration
console-setup systemd libpam-systemd```

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to console-setup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872824

Title:
  Can't upgrade console-setup-linux (1.194ubuntu3) over
  (1.108ubuntu15.5), trying to overwrite '/lib/systemd/system/console-
  setup.service', which is also in package keyboard-configuration
  1.108ubuntu15.5

Status in console-setup package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Upgrade path from 16.04 to 20.04 fails.

  console-setup-linux_1.194ubuntu3_all.deb tries to overwrite
  '/lib/systemd/system/console-setup.service', which is also in package
  keyboard-configuration 1.108ubuntu15.5.

  I have reproduced this bug on bare metal and WSL.

  Log:

  Unpacking console-setup-linux (1.194ubuntu3) over (1.108ubuntu15.5) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/console-setup-linux_1.194ubuntu3_all.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/lib/systemd/system/console-setup.service', which is 
also in package keyboard-configuration 1.108ubuntu15.5
  dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
  Preparing to unpack .../keyboard-configuration_1.194ubuntu3_all.deb ...
  Unpacking keyboard-configuration (1.194ubuntu3) over (1.108ubuntu15.5) ...
  Preparing to unpack .../busybox-initramfs_1%3a1.30.1-4ubuntu6_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking busybox-initramfs (1:1.30.1-4ubuntu6) over (1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1.4) 
...
  Preparing to unpack .../initramfs-tools-bin_0.136ubuntu6_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking initramfs-tools-bin (0.136ubuntu6) over (0.122ubuntu8.16) ...
  Preparing to unpack .../cpio_2.13+dfsg-2_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking cpio (2.13+dfsg-2) over (2.11+dfsg-5ubuntu1.1) ...
  Preparing to unpack .../liblz4-1_1.9.2-2_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking liblz4-1:amd64 (1.9.2-2) over (0.0~r131-2ubuntu2) ...
  Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.31-0ubuntu7) ...
  Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19.1) ...
  Processing triggers for systemd (229-4ubuntu21.27) ...
  Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ...
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/console-setup-linux_1.194ubuntu3_all.deb
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/console-setup/+bug/1872824/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905790] Re: Make SSSD in 20.04 using OpenSSL and p11-kit (instead of NSS) for p11_child

2020-12-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked:
   https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+git/sssd/+merge/395410

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ca-certificates in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905790

Title:
  Make SSSD in 20.04 using OpenSSL and p11-kit (instead of NSS) for
  p11_child

Status in ca-certificates package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in sssd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ca-certificates source package in Focal:
  New
Status in sssd source package in Focal:
  New

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  SSSD supports in 20.04 two security backends: NSS and OpenSSL
  (speaking in past tense as upstream dropped NSS support completely).

  Those two backends are used for various generic crypto features (so
  they are interchangeable), but also for the management of the PKCS#11
  modules for smart cards.

  In this case, the main problem is that by using NSS it also relies on
  the presence of a "system NSS" database [1] that is something present
  in Fedora and RHEL, but not in ubuntu or generic Linux distributions.

  In order to make SSSD to find a smart card module, we would then need to 
create a such database that mentions a p11kit proxy that will eventually load 
the p11-kit module and then add the card CA certificate to the same DB (see 
more details in [2]).
  And even in such case... It will not work at login phase.

  This is making support for Smart-card based authentication in 20.04
  quite complicated, and hard to implement in professional environments
  (see bug #1865226).

  As per this, recompiling SSSD's p11_child to use OpenSSL (as it
  already happens starting from 20.10) would be enough to make the this
  tool (the one in charge for smartcard authentications and certificate
  matching) to be able to get the smartcard devices from p11-kit allowed
  modules and to check their certificate using CA certificates in the
  ubuntu system ca certificate files (or other configured file).

  One more mayor reason to do this, is also that if we fix 20.04 now to
  use the "proper" method, people who will configure smartcard access
  there via SSSD (not easily possible right now) won't be affected by
  future migrations.

  [ Proposed Implementations ]

  1) Use p11-kit and openssl for p11_child, by changing the build/test system 
(preferred)
     https://salsa.debian.org/3v1n0-guest/sssd/-/commits/p11-kit-p11_child

  2) Build both versions and package things accordingly (hackish)
     https://salsa.debian.org/3v1n0-guest/sssd/-/commits/p11-kit-p11_child-v1

  3) Recompile SSSD completely to use libcrypto as backend

  [ Test case ]

  With a smartcard reader available (and with a card in its slot) as reported 
by:
   $ p11-kit list-modules

  launch:
   $ sudo /usr/libexec/sssd/p11_child --pre -d 10 --debug-fd=2 \
     --nssdb=/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt

  The tool should find your card:

  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020395): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): Module 
List:
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020481): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): common 
name: [p11-kit-trust].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020497): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): dll 
name: [/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/p11-kit-trust.so].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020569): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): 
Description [/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt  
PKCS#11 Kit ] Manufacturer [PKCS#11 Kit 
] flags [1] removable [false] token present [true].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020611): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): common 
name: [opensc-pkcs11].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:020646): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): dll 
name: [/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:025443): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): 
Description [VMware Virtual USB CCID 00 00   
VMware  ] Manufacturer [VMware  
] flags [7] removable [true] token present [true].
  (2020-11-26 21:34:22:025725): [p11_child[100729]] [do_card] (0x4000): Found 
[MARCO TREVISAN (PIN CNS0)] in slot [VMware Virtual USB CCID 00 00][0] of 
module [1][/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so].

  Then the tool might fail if the card certificate is not added to the
  ca-certificates.crt, but this is outside the scope of the test case.

  What it matters is that the card is found.

  [ Regression potential ]

  While the change may involve quite different code paths when it comes
  to security features, I think we trust OpenSSL enough to be an
  acceptable crypto backend for PKCS#11 operations. Behavior should not
  change, also assuming that upstream dropped NSS support completely in
  latest release [3], keeping the same functionalities.

  As per a further review of this by xnox [4], we can safely assume that
  SSSD does not use libcrypto for operations where its 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906627] Re: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression

2020-12-15 Thread Matthew Ruffell
To anyone following this bug:

As we get ready to re-release the new adcli package which implements the
--use-ldaps flag, if you are happy to spend a few moments testing the
new package, I would really appreciate it. I really don't want to cause
another regression again.

You can install the new adcli package in -proposed like so:

Enable -proposed by running the following command to make a new sources.list.d 
entry:
1) cat << EOF | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-$(lsb_release 
-cs)-proposed.list
# Enable Ubuntu proposed archive
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ $(lsb_release -cs)-proposed main universe
EOF
2) sudo apt update 
3) sudo apt install adcli
4) sudo apt-cache policy adcli | grep Installed
Installed: 0.8.2-1ubuntu1.2
5) sudo apt-cache policy libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit | grep Installed
Installed: 2.1.27~101-g0780600+dfsg-3ubuntu2.3
6) sudo rm /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-$(lsb_release -cs)-proposed.list
7) sudo apt update

>From there, join your domain like normal, and if you like, try out other
adcli or realm commands to ensure they work.

Let me know how the new adcli package in -proposed goes. In my testing,
it fixes the regression, and works as intended.

To Jason Alavaliant, thanks! I really appreciate the help testing.

Thanks,
Matthew

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906627

Title:
  GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active
  Directory, causing recent adcli regression

Status in adcli package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in cyrus-sasl2 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in adcli source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in cyrus-sasl2 source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  A recent release of adcli 0.8.2-1ubuntu1 to bionic-updates caused a
  regression for some users when attempting to join a Active Directory
  realm. adcli introduced a default behaviour change, moving from GSS-
  API to GSS-SPNEGO as the default channel encryption algorithm.

  adcli uses the GSS-SPNEGO implementation from libsasl2-modules-gssapi-
  mit, a part of cyrus-sasl2. The implementation seems to have some
  compatibility issues with particular configurations of Active
  Directory on recent Windows Server systems.

  Particularly, adcli sends a ldap query to the domain controller, which
  responds with a tcp ack, but never returns a ldap response. The
  connection just hangs at this point and no more traffic is sent.

  You can see it on the packet trace below:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/WRnnRMGBPm/

  On Focal, where the implementation of GSS-SPNEGO is working, we see a
  full exchange, and adcli works as expected:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/8668pJrr2m/

  The fix is to not assume use of confidentiality and integrity modes,
  and instead use the flags negotiated by GSS-API during the initial
  handshake, as required by Microsoft's implementation.

  [Testcase]

  You will need to set up a Windows Server 2019 system, install and
  configure Active Directory and enable LDAP extensions and configure
  LDAPS and import the AD SSL certificate to the Ubuntu client. Create
  some users in Active Directory.

  On the Ubuntu client, set up /etc/hosts with the hostname of the
  Windows Server machine, if your system isn't configured for AD DNS.

  From there, install adcli 0.8.2-1 from -release.

  $ sudo apt install adcli

  Set up a packet trace with tcpdump:

  $ sudo tcpdump -i any port '(389 or 3268 or 636 or 3269)'

  Next, join the AD realm using the normal GSS-API:

  # adcli join --verbose -U Administrator --domain WIN-
  SB6JAS7PH22.testing.local --domain-controller WIN-
  SB6JAS7PH22.testing.local --domain-realm TESTING.LOCAL

  You will be prompted for Administrator's passowrd.

  The output should look like the below:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NWHGQn746D/

  Next, enable -proposed, and install adcli 0.8.2-1ubuntu1 which caused the 
regression.
  Repeat the above steps. Now you should see the connection hang.

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/WRnnRMGBPm/

  Finally, install the fixed cyrus-sasl2 package from -proposed

  https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/lp1906627-test

  $ sudo apt-get update
  $ sudo apt install libsasl2-2 libsasl2-modules libsasl2-modules-db 
libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit

  Repeat the steps. GSS-SPNEGO should be working as intended, and you
  should get output like below:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/W5cJNGvCsx/

  [Where problems could occur]

  Since we are changing the implementation of GSS-SPNEGO, and cyrus-
  sasl2 is the library which provides it, we can potentially break any
  package which depends on libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit for GSS-SPNEGO.

  $ apt rdepends libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit
  libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit
  Reverse Depends:
   |Suggests: ldap-utils
    Depends: adcli
    Conflicts: libsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal
   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906627] Re: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression

2020-12-15 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Performing verification for Bionic

Firstly, I installed adcli and libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit from
-updates:

adcli 0.8.2-1
libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit 2.1.27~101-g0780600+dfsg-3ubuntu2.1

>From there, I joined a Active Directory realm:

https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/zJhvpRzktk/
 
Next, I enabled -proposed and installed the fixed cyrus-sasl2 and adcli 
packages:

https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/cRrbkjjFmw/

We see that installing adcli 0.8.2-1ubuntu1.2 automatically pulls in the
fixed cyrus-sasl2 2.1.27~101-g0780600+dfsg-3ubuntu2.3 packages because
of the depends we set.

Next, I joined a Active Directory realm, using the same commands as
previous, i.e. not using the new --use-ldaps flag, but instead, falling
back to GSS-API and the new GSS-SPNEGO changes:

https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/WdKYxxDBQm/
 
The join succeeds, and does not get stuck. This shows that the implementation 
of GSS-SPNEGO is now compatible with Active Directory, and that the new adcli 
package is using the new implementation.

Looking at the packet trace, we see the full 30 or so packets exchanged,
which matches the expect count.

https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/k9njh3jYHh/

With these changes, the adcli and cyrus-sasl2 packages in -proposed can
join realms in the same ways that the initial packages in -updates can.

These changes fix the recent adcli regression. Happy to mark verified.

** Tags removed: regression-update verification-needed 
verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906627

Title:
  GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active
  Directory, causing recent adcli regression

Status in adcli package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in cyrus-sasl2 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in adcli source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in cyrus-sasl2 source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  A recent release of adcli 0.8.2-1ubuntu1 to bionic-updates caused a
  regression for some users when attempting to join a Active Directory
  realm. adcli introduced a default behaviour change, moving from GSS-
  API to GSS-SPNEGO as the default channel encryption algorithm.

  adcli uses the GSS-SPNEGO implementation from libsasl2-modules-gssapi-
  mit, a part of cyrus-sasl2. The implementation seems to have some
  compatibility issues with particular configurations of Active
  Directory on recent Windows Server systems.

  Particularly, adcli sends a ldap query to the domain controller, which
  responds with a tcp ack, but never returns a ldap response. The
  connection just hangs at this point and no more traffic is sent.

  You can see it on the packet trace below:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/WRnnRMGBPm/

  On Focal, where the implementation of GSS-SPNEGO is working, we see a
  full exchange, and adcli works as expected:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/8668pJrr2m/

  The fix is to not assume use of confidentiality and integrity modes,
  and instead use the flags negotiated by GSS-API during the initial
  handshake, as required by Microsoft's implementation.

  [Testcase]

  You will need to set up a Windows Server 2019 system, install and
  configure Active Directory and enable LDAP extensions and configure
  LDAPS and import the AD SSL certificate to the Ubuntu client. Create
  some users in Active Directory.

  On the Ubuntu client, set up /etc/hosts with the hostname of the
  Windows Server machine, if your system isn't configured for AD DNS.

  From there, install adcli 0.8.2-1 from -release.

  $ sudo apt install adcli

  Set up a packet trace with tcpdump:

  $ sudo tcpdump -i any port '(389 or 3268 or 636 or 3269)'

  Next, join the AD realm using the normal GSS-API:

  # adcli join --verbose -U Administrator --domain WIN-
  SB6JAS7PH22.testing.local --domain-controller WIN-
  SB6JAS7PH22.testing.local --domain-realm TESTING.LOCAL

  You will be prompted for Administrator's passowrd.

  The output should look like the below:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NWHGQn746D/

  Next, enable -proposed, and install adcli 0.8.2-1ubuntu1 which caused the 
regression.
  Repeat the above steps. Now you should see the connection hang.

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/WRnnRMGBPm/

  Finally, install the fixed cyrus-sasl2 package from -proposed

  https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/lp1906627-test

  $ sudo apt-get update
  $ sudo apt install libsasl2-2 libsasl2-modules libsasl2-modules-db 
libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit

  Repeat the steps. GSS-SPNEGO should be working as intended, and you
  should get output like below:

  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/W5cJNGvCsx/

  [Where problems could occur]

  Since we are changing the implementation of GSS-SPNEGO, and cyrus-
  sasl2 is the library which provides it, we can potentially break any
  package which depends on libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit for 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908314] Re: Flicking screen on intel card

2020-12-15 Thread Daniel van Vugt
I'm guessing this would be bug 1896091, but to be sure please attach a
photo or video of the problem.

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908314

Title:
  Flicking screen on intel card

Status in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Flicking screen on intel card

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu15
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-33.36-generic 5.8.17
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-33-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.3
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Brak dostępu: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Dec 15 22:46:01 2020
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: groovy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: No
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620 [8086:5916] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
 Subsystem: Dell HD Graphics 620 [1028:07a0]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-10 (5 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude 7480
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.8.0-33-generic 
root=UUID=2d2eba82-dddc-469c-8508-b0cc7269226b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/26/2020
  dmi.bios.release: 1.19
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.19.0
  dmi.board.name: 00F6D3
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.19.0:bd07/26/2020:br1.19:svnDellInc.:pnLatitude7480:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn00F6D3:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: Latitude
  dmi.product.name: Latitude 7480
  dmi.product.sku: 07A0
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.102-1ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.2.1-1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.9-2ubuntu1.1
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1908314/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908273] Re: Software stopped working

2020-12-15 Thread Daniel van Vugt
The only relevant error I can see is a crash in your graphics driver is
affecting some Python app:

[681600.192682] python3.8[1480136]: segfault at 24 ip 7fbbd34a3c14 sp 
7ffc3c62aef0 error 6 in iris_dri.so[7fbbd2a72000+d49000]
[681600.192702] Code: 2b 7e 30 01 c7 81 ff ff ff 00 00 0f 87 9d 17 00 00 48 01 
c8 48 89 46 38 48 85 c9 0f 84 10 06 00 00 83 ea 01 81 ca 00 00 09 78 <89> 11 48 
8d 51 04 45 85 ff 74 76 41 8d 47 ff 48 8d 4c c1 0c 0f 1f

Please try:

1. Launching the affected apps from a Terminal window then copy and
paste any errors you see here.

2. Check for crash reports using these instructions:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Missing_a_crash_report_or_having_a_.crash_attachment

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => mesa (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908273

Title:
  Software stopped working

Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  After update to Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS some of my software stopped
  working, all of it is visualization software: VMD, Discovery Studio,
  PyMOL, Gmolden, Avogadro.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-54.60-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Brak dostępu: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Dec 15 14:41:52 2020
  DistUpgraded: 2020-11-21 20:16:19,197 ERROR got error from PostInstallScript 
./xorg_fix_proprietary.py (g-exec-error-quark: Wykonanie procesu potomnego 
„./xorg_fix_proprietary.py” (Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu) się nie 
powiodło (8))
  DistroCodename: focal
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation UHD Graphics 620 (Whiskey Lake) [8086:3ea0] (rev 02) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company UHD Graphics 620 (Whiskey Lake) 
[103c:8537]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-20 (208 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 138a:00ab Validity Sensors, Inc. 
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0408:5373 Quanta Computer, Inc. HP HD Camera
   Bus 001 Device 004: ID 8087:0aaa Intel Corp. 
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: HP HP ProBook 440 G6
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-54-generic 
root=UUID=d81f0b8d-3e0f-4039-a46f-5c1c780cac2c ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-11-21 (23 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 04/27/2020
  dmi.bios.vendor: HP
  dmi.bios.version: R71 Ver. 01.11.01
  dmi.board.name: 8537
  dmi.board.vendor: HP
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 51.2A.00
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 5CD0097RK4
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHP:bvrR71Ver.01.11.01:bd04/27/2020:svnHP:pnHPProBook440G6:pvr:rvnHP:rn8537:rvrKBCVersion51.2A.00:cvnHP:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5336AN HP ProBook
  dmi.product.name: HP ProBook 440 G6
  dmi.product.sku: 5PQ09EA#AKD
  dmi.sys.vendor: HP
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2.6
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1908273/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908265] Re: bad heating

2020-12-15 Thread Daniel van Vugt
I can't see any explanation for such a problem in the attached files.
Please run 'top' in a Terminal window and tell us what processes are
using the most CPU.

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908265

Title:
  bad heating

Status in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  i had dell pre-installed ubuntu, 
  but i had erase it.
  now i am facing heating issues

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-124.127-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-124-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.21
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Dec 15 17:59:23 2020
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: bionic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: I just need to know a workaround
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Device [8086:3ea0] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:08c8]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-11 (4 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:5520 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. 
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 27c6:5301  
   Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0cf3:e009 Atheros Communications, Inc. 
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Vostro 3480
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-124-generic 
root=UUID=4f0e25d7-2cd2-474f-9088-9df1ffccd1ce ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 02/12/2020
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.8.0
  dmi.board.name: 0H40C6
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.8.0:bd02/12/2020:svnDellInc.:pnVostro3480:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0H40C6:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: Vostro
  dmi.product.name: Vostro 3480
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2~18.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.8
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:18.0.1-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.15-2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1908265/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] Lsusb.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444020/+files/Lsusb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] device 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] Lsusb-t.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lsusb-t.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444021/+files/Lsusb-t.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] UdevDb.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444029/+files/UdevDb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] PulseList.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444028/+files/PulseList.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] acpidump.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "acpidump.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444031/+files/acpidump.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] WifiSyslog.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444030/+files/WifiSyslog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] ProcModules.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444027/+files/ProcModules.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] ProcInterrupts.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444026/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] ProcEnviron.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444025/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444024/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444023/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] Lsusb-v.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lsusb-v.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444022/+files/Lsusb-v.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] Lspci.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444018/+files/Lspci.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] device 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] IwConfig.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444017/+files/IwConfig.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] Lspci-vt.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lspci-vt.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444019/+files/Lspci-vt.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] CurrentDmesg.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444016/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] CRDA.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444015/+files/CRDA.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] device 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] AlsaInfo.txt

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
apport information

** Attachment added: "AlsaInfo.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600/+attachment/5444014/+files/AlsaInfo.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] Re: WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

2020-12-15 Thread Bryan J Smalley
If I have done this correctly, and that is truly questionable, I just
installed one of the generic kernels from https://kernel.ubuntu.com
/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v5.10-rc6/amd64/ then restarted the PC and was
connected for 8 - 10 minutes, but then the connection dropped again.  I
had installed: linux-
modules-5.10.0-051000rc6-generic_5.10.0-051000rc6.202011291930_amd64.deb.
Here is what it shows I am running:

bryan@bryan-HP-Notebook:~$ uname -r
5.4.0-58-generic


I will run the apport again to upload immediately after posting this message.  
As always, I thank you for your help.  Cheers! 

** Description changed:

  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a recent
  update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after a short
  time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that the
  interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password (which was
  previously saved) and when I click on connect it will establish the
  connection for a short time, but then goes down again.  In some cases
  this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to approximately 15
  minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried restarting
  NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up, then down).
  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert and so I'm not
  sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know exactly what to
  look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of the disconnect
  and the restarting of NetworkManager:
  
   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908312] Re: [Echo-NHH, playback] fails after a while (stutter)

2020-12-15 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Package changed: ubuntu => alsa-driver (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908312

Title:
  [Echo-NHH, playback] fails after a while (stutter)

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Bluetooth playback suffers from intermittent stutters. Happens on
  multiple bluetooth speakers (I tested it).Apparently this is a known
  problem because there is a whole thread about it on Reddit, which
  seems a bit ridiculous this has been an issue for 9 or 10 years and
  hasn't been resolved yet because bluetooth speakers are so common now.
  Playback improved somewhat when auto-mute is disabled via alsmixer
  (but ONLY when the system is active. If screensaver engages to shut
  down the screens, the stutters begin shortly thereafter.Prior to
  disabling auto-mute, the system would intermittently stutter
  regardless of whether screen saver/power saver modes were active.

  Am using Ubuntu 20.10 (had the same issue under the prior version of
  ubuntu too). Software center version is 3.38.1.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-33.36-generic 5.8.17
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-33-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.2
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  j  1726 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/controlC1:  j  1726 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Dec 15 15:35:16 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-21 (208 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_Card: Echo-NHH
  Symptom_Type: Sound works for a while, then breaks
  Title: [Echo-NHH, playback] fails after a while
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to groovy on 2020-10-28 (48 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 01/11/2013
  dmi.bios.release: 4.6
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1503
  dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.board.name: M5A97 LE R2.0
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1503:bd01/11/2013:br4.6:svnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:pnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:pvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnM5A97LER2.0:rvrRev1.xx:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
  dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.product.name: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.product.sku: SKU
  dmi.product.version: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.sys.vendor: To be filled by O.E.M.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1908312/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908312] [NEW] [Echo-NHH, playback] fails after a while (stutter)

2020-12-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

Bluetooth playback suffers from intermittent stutters. Happens on
multiple bluetooth speakers (I tested it).Apparently this is a known
problem because there is a whole thread about it on Reddit, which seems
a bit ridiculous this has been an issue for 9 or 10 years and hasn't
been resolved yet because bluetooth speakers are so common now. Playback
improved somewhat when auto-mute is disabled via alsmixer (but ONLY when
the system is active. If screensaver engages to shut down the screens,
the stutters begin shortly thereafter.Prior to disabling auto-mute, the
system would intermittently stutter regardless of whether screen
saver/power saver modes were active.

Am using Ubuntu 20.10 (had the same issue under the prior version of
ubuntu too). Software center version is 3.38.1.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-33.36-generic 5.8.17
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-33-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.2
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  j  1726 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  j  1726 F pulseaudio
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Dec 15 15:35:16 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-21 (208 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: alsa-driver
Symptom: audio
Symptom_Card: Echo-NHH
Symptom_Type: Sound works for a while, then breaks
Title: [Echo-NHH, playback] fails after a while
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to groovy on 2020-10-28 (48 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 01/11/2013
dmi.bios.release: 4.6
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1503
dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: M5A97 LE R2.0
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1503:bd01/11/2013:br4.6:svnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:pnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:pvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnM5A97LER2.0:rvrRev1.xx:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.name: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.sku: SKU
dmi.product.version: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.sys.vendor: To be filled by O.E.M.

** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy
-- 
[Echo-NHH, playback] fails after a while (stutter)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908312
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch 
seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908314] [NEW] Flicking screen on intel card

2020-12-15 Thread Radoslaw
Public bug reported:

Flicking screen on intel card

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu15
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-33.36-generic 5.8.17
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-33-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.3
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Brak dostępu: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Dec 15 22:46:01 2020
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: groovy
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: No
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620 [8086:5916] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
   Subsystem: Dell HD Graphics 620 [1028:07a0]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-10 (5 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude 7480
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.8.0-33-generic 
root=UUID=2d2eba82-dddc-469c-8508-b0cc7269226b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 07/26/2020
dmi.bios.release: 1.19
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1.19.0
dmi.board.name: 00F6D3
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.19.0:bd07/26/2020:br1.19:svnDellInc.:pnLatitude7480:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn00F6D3:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
dmi.product.family: Latitude
dmi.product.name: Latitude 7480
dmi.product.sku: 07A0
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.102-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.2.1-1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.9-2ubuntu1.1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908314

Title:
  Flicking screen on intel card

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Flicking screen on intel card

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu15
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-33.36-generic 5.8.17
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-33-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.3
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Brak dostępu: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Dec 15 22:46:01 2020
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: groovy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: No
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620 [8086:5916] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
 Subsystem: Dell HD Graphics 620 [1028:07a0]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-10 (5 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude 7480
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.8.0-33-generic 
root=UUID=2d2eba82-dddc-469c-8508-b0cc7269226b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 07/26/2020
  dmi.bios.release: 1.19
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.19.0
  dmi.board.name: 00F6D3
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.19.0:bd07/26/2020:br1.19:svnDellInc.:pnLatitude7480:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn00F6D3:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: Latitude
  dmi.product.name: Latitude 7480
  dmi.product.sku: 07A0
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.102-1ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.2.1-1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.9-2ubuntu1.1
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200714-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1908314/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907306] Re: networkd dhcpv4 client never attempts more than 2 renew and 2 rebind

2020-12-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/395398

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/395399

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907306

Title:
  networkd dhcpv4 client never attempts more than 2 renew and 2 rebind

Status in systemd:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [impact]

  networkd dhcpv4 client never attempts more than 2 renew and 2 rebind

  [test case]

  configure an interface to use dhcpv4; acquire a dhcpv4 address, then
  stop the dhcpv4 server, and wait for the networkd client to perform
  its renewals and rebinds before expiring the lease

  using a 20 minute lease time as an example (all times are approximate
  due to RFC-mandated random 'fuzz' time of -1 to +1 sec):

  the current behavior would be to sent renew requests at:

  10:00
  13:45

  and then rebind requests at:

  17:30
  18:45

  then the lease would expire at 20:00

  the correct/new behavior should be renew requests at:

  10:00
  13:45
  15:37
  16:37

  and then rebind requests at:

  17:30
  18:45
  19:45

  and then lease expiration at 20:00.

  longer lease times would increase the number of retransmissions.

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in problems receiving and/or
  maintaining a dhcpv4 address

  [scope]

  this is needed in b/f/g/h.

  this was fixed upstream in:
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/17908

  that was just added, so this is not fixed in any ubuntu release yet.

  technically, this is needed in x as well, however I don't plan to
  backport to x since 1) it reaches ESM soon and 2) the default network
  management tool in x is ifupdown, not systemd-networkd.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1907306/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907306] Re: networkd dhcpv4 client never attempts more than 2 renew and 2 rebind

2020-12-15 Thread Dan Streetman
** Description changed:

  [impact]
  
  networkd dhcpv4 client never attempts more than 2 renew and 2 rebind
  
  [test case]
  
  configure an interface to use dhcpv4; acquire a dhcpv4 address, then
  stop the dhcpv4 server, and wait for the networkd client to perform its
  renewals and rebinds before expiring the lease
  
+ using a 20 minute lease time as an example (all times are approximate
+ due to RFC-mandated random 'fuzz' time of -1 to +1 sec):
+ 
+ the current behavior would be to sent renew requests at:
+ 
+ 10:00
+ 13:45
+ 
+ and then rebind requests at:
+ 
+ 17:30
+ 18:45
+ 
+ then the lease would expire at 20:00
+ 
+ the correct/new behavior should be renew requests at:
+ 
+ 10:00
+ 13:45
+ 15:37
+ 16:37
+ 
+ and then rebind requests at:
+ 
+ 17:30
+ 18:45
+ 19:45
+ 
+ and then lease expiration at 20:00.
+ 
+ longer lease times would increase the number of retransmissions.
+ 
  [regression potential]
  
  any regression would likely result in problems receiving and/or
  maintaining a dhcpv4 address
  
  [scope]
  
- this is in progress upstream, and would need to be applied to all
- releases
+ this is needed in b/f/g/h.
+ 
+ this was fixed upstream in:
+ https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/17908
+ 
+ that was just added, so this is not fixed in any ubuntu release yet.
+ 
+ technically, this is needed in x as well, however I don't plan to
+ backport to x since 1) it reaches ESM soon and 2) the default network
+ management tool in x is ifupdown, not systemd-networkd.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907306

Title:
  networkd dhcpv4 client never attempts more than 2 renew and 2 rebind

Status in systemd:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [impact]

  networkd dhcpv4 client never attempts more than 2 renew and 2 rebind

  [test case]

  configure an interface to use dhcpv4; acquire a dhcpv4 address, then
  stop the dhcpv4 server, and wait for the networkd client to perform
  its renewals and rebinds before expiring the lease

  using a 20 minute lease time as an example (all times are approximate
  due to RFC-mandated random 'fuzz' time of -1 to +1 sec):

  the current behavior would be to sent renew requests at:

  10:00
  13:45

  and then rebind requests at:

  17:30
  18:45

  then the lease would expire at 20:00

  the correct/new behavior should be renew requests at:

  10:00
  13:45
  15:37
  16:37

  and then rebind requests at:

  17:30
  18:45
  19:45

  and then lease expiration at 20:00.

  longer lease times would increase the number of retransmissions.

  [regression potential]

  any regression would likely result in problems receiving and/or
  maintaining a dhcpv4 address

  [scope]

  this is needed in b/f/g/h.

  this was fixed upstream in:
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/17908

  that was just added, so this is not fixed in any ubuntu release yet.

  technically, this is needed in x as well, however I don't plan to
  backport to x since 1) it reaches ESM soon and 2) the default network
  management tool in x is ifupdown, not systemd-networkd.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1907306/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

2020-12-15 Thread Ryan
Thank you for all of your help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908140

Title:
  Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I recently installed Ubuntu Server 20.04 to replace an ESXi server.
  During the installation, I configured a bonded interface for two
  ethernet interfaces. I configured the bond on my ZyXel GS1900-8 as a
  static LAG. During the setup process, the link came up successfully
  and was leased an IP via DHCP.

  All subsequent boots have failed to acquire an IP address for the
  bonded interface. Sometimes, if I allow dhcp4 on the enslaved
  interfaces, and run sudo dhclient -r && sudo dhclient, the enslaved
  interfaces will be leased an IP address _and_ the bond will get an IP
  address. I know this is not proper as dhclient and systemd-networkd do
  not mix.

  Also, I would like to configure this as a LACP bond instead. I have
  enabled LACP on the switch with priority 65535 and "IP/MAC address"
  load balancing algorithm, switched the LAG from static to LACP, and
  altered netplan to use the 802.3ad bond mode.

  Please let me know what, if anything, I'm doing wrong here. I've
  looked around at as many netplan DHCP bond posts here as I could find
  to no avail. See below for configuration files and command outputs. I
  cannot give you the output of `lsb_release -rd` as the package is not
  installed and there's no connection to install it.

  $ cat /etc/netplan/00-bond.yaml
  network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
  eth0:
dhcp4: false
  eth1:
dhcp4: false
bonds:
  bond0:
dhcp4: true
interfaces:
  - eth0
  - eth1
parameters:
  mode: 802.3ad

  $ sudo journalctl -b -u systemd-networkd
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: netdev ready
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: Enumeration completed.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: IPv6 successfully enabled
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: Link UP
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: docker0: Link UP

  $ sudo ip a
  lo:  mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group 
default qlen 1000
  link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
  inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  inet6 ::1/128 scope host
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  eno1:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:46 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eno2:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:47 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  bond0:  mtu 1500 qdisk noqueue 
state DOWN group default qlen 1000
  link/ether 52:8b:2c:cc:a0:15 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  docker0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state 
DOWN group default
  link/ether 02:42:26:1c:1b:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker 0
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.netdev
  [NetDev]
  Name=bond0
  Kind=bond

  [Bond]
  Mode=802.3ad

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.network
  [Match]
  Name=bond0

  [Network]
  DHCP=ipv4
  LinkLocalAddressing=ipv6
  ConfigureWithoutCarrier=yes

  [DHCP]
  RouteMetric=100
  UseMTU=true

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth0.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth0

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth1.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth1

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
  Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)

  Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
  Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)
  MII Status: down
  MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
  Up Delay (ms): 0
  Down Delay (ms): 0
  Peer Notification Delay (ms): 0

  802.3ad info
  LACP rate: slow
  Min links: 0
  Aggregator selection policy 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

2020-12-15 Thread Ryan
The BIOS update does indeed fix the type interface number issue. This
ticket can be marked as a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1578141 and closed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908140

Title:
  Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I recently installed Ubuntu Server 20.04 to replace an ESXi server.
  During the installation, I configured a bonded interface for two
  ethernet interfaces. I configured the bond on my ZyXel GS1900-8 as a
  static LAG. During the setup process, the link came up successfully
  and was leased an IP via DHCP.

  All subsequent boots have failed to acquire an IP address for the
  bonded interface. Sometimes, if I allow dhcp4 on the enslaved
  interfaces, and run sudo dhclient -r && sudo dhclient, the enslaved
  interfaces will be leased an IP address _and_ the bond will get an IP
  address. I know this is not proper as dhclient and systemd-networkd do
  not mix.

  Also, I would like to configure this as a LACP bond instead. I have
  enabled LACP on the switch with priority 65535 and "IP/MAC address"
  load balancing algorithm, switched the LAG from static to LACP, and
  altered netplan to use the 802.3ad bond mode.

  Please let me know what, if anything, I'm doing wrong here. I've
  looked around at as many netplan DHCP bond posts here as I could find
  to no avail. See below for configuration files and command outputs. I
  cannot give you the output of `lsb_release -rd` as the package is not
  installed and there's no connection to install it.

  $ cat /etc/netplan/00-bond.yaml
  network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
  eth0:
dhcp4: false
  eth1:
dhcp4: false
bonds:
  bond0:
dhcp4: true
interfaces:
  - eth0
  - eth1
parameters:
  mode: 802.3ad

  $ sudo journalctl -b -u systemd-networkd
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: netdev ready
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: Enumeration completed.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: IPv6 successfully enabled
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: Link UP
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: docker0: Link UP

  $ sudo ip a
  lo:  mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group 
default qlen 1000
  link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
  inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  inet6 ::1/128 scope host
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  eno1:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:46 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eno2:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:47 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  bond0:  mtu 1500 qdisk noqueue 
state DOWN group default qlen 1000
  link/ether 52:8b:2c:cc:a0:15 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  docker0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state 
DOWN group default
  link/ether 02:42:26:1c:1b:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker 0
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.netdev
  [NetDev]
  Name=bond0
  Kind=bond

  [Bond]
  Mode=802.3ad

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.network
  [Match]
  Name=bond0

  [Network]
  DHCP=ipv4
  LinkLocalAddressing=ipv6
  ConfigureWithoutCarrier=yes

  [DHCP]
  RouteMetric=100
  UseMTU=true

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth0.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth0

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth1.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth1

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
  Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)

  Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
  Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)
  MII Status: down
  MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
  Up 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1899262] Update Released

2020-12-15 Thread Brian Murray
The verification of the Stable Release Update for wpa has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899262

Title:
  Broken dbus GetAll message to wpa supplicant interface properties

Status in wpa package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in wpa source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  * Impact
  One of the distro patch is incorrect and create issues when trying to query 
dbus properties

  * Test Case

  $ sudo dbus-send --system --print-reply --dest=fi.w1.wpa_supplicant1
  /fi/w1/wpa_supplicant1/Interfaces/1
  org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties.GetAll
  string:fi.w1.wpa_supplicant1.Interface

  shouldn't error out

  (the /1 reflect the interface number and could be a different value,
  check with d-feet if needed)

  * Regression potential

  The fixes is in the dbus interface, check that communication with
  desktop clients (indicator, applet, settings) still works correctly,
  returning expected informations on the signal, etc

  -

  dbus-send is able to read the properties of interface using GetAll. Those 
information include interface name, status, encryption method, etc.
  The regression was introduced when someone try to have the Station attribute 
supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1899262/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1899262] Re: Broken dbus GetAll message to wpa supplicant interface properties

2020-12-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package wpa - 2:2.6-15ubuntu2.6

---
wpa (2:2.6-15ubuntu2.6) bionic; urgency=medium

  * debian/patches/fix-dbus-getall-request.patch:
- update to a fixed version of the patch to not error out when not
  in AP mode, thanks Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi (lp: #1899262)

 -- Sebastien Bacher   Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:50:58
+0100

** Changed in: wpa (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899262

Title:
  Broken dbus GetAll message to wpa supplicant interface properties

Status in wpa package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in wpa source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  * Impact
  One of the distro patch is incorrect and create issues when trying to query 
dbus properties

  * Test Case

  $ sudo dbus-send --system --print-reply --dest=fi.w1.wpa_supplicant1
  /fi/w1/wpa_supplicant1/Interfaces/1
  org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties.GetAll
  string:fi.w1.wpa_supplicant1.Interface

  shouldn't error out

  (the /1 reflect the interface number and could be a different value,
  check with d-feet if needed)

  * Regression potential

  The fixes is in the dbus interface, check that communication with
  desktop clients (indicator, applet, settings) still works correctly,
  returning expected informations on the signal, etc

  -

  dbus-send is able to read the properties of interface using GetAll. Those 
information include interface name, status, encryption method, etc.
  The regression was introduced when someone try to have the Station attribute 
supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1899262/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908136] Re: no_proxy=::1 is not honored by curl in Bionic and earlier versions

2020-12-15 Thread Balint Reczey
Maybe it was just a coincidence, but those regressions disappeared
immediately when reverting the ::1 addition:

LP: #1907959
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/samtools/bionic/amd64

LP: #1907955
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/ruby2.5/bionic/amd64

Since you are around would you be so kind and address @laney's more than wone 
yeare old comments in the following MR so the cowboy deployed can be dropped 
and does not make extra work for @laney to land fixes? 
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/376587

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to curl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908136

Title:
  no_proxy=::1 is not honored by curl in Bionic and earlier versions

Status in Auto Package Testing:
  New
Status in curl package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in curl source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in curl source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in curl source package in Focal:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Bionic:

  env no_proxy=::1 http_proxy=http://foo:8080 curl -v http://[::1]:80/bar.html
  * Could not resolve proxy: foo
  * Closing connection 0
  curl: (5) Could not resolve proxy: foo

  Focal:

  $ env no_proxy=::1 http_proxy=http://foo:8080 curl -v http://[::1]:80/bar.html
  * Uses proxy env variable no_proxy == '::1'
  *   Trying ::1:80...
  * TCP_NODELAY set
  * Immediate connect fail for ::1: Network is unreachable
  * Closing connection 0
  curl: (7) Couldn't connect to server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1908136/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884255] Re: [AMD/ATI] SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) Audio Ubuntu 20.04 not working

2020-12-15 Thread Marcelo Pires
The audio simply disappeared, because the sound card, when the voltage was 
reduced, reset, causing the kernel to recognize it as card 0 or card 1, 
different from the settings. Then the sound was gone.
After testing the input source, the voltage of 3.3 V and 5 V was below normal 
(around 3.28 V and 5.08 V) causing the card to not work properly. After 
repairing the power supply, the voltage of 3.3 V and 5 V is around 3.32 V and 
5.13 V. On the outside, the power supply appears to be of good quality, but 
inside it has few output capacitors.

** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Opinion

** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
   Status: Opinion => Invalid

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884255

Title:
  [AMD/ATI] SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) Audio Ubuntu 20.04 not working

Status in PulseAudio:
  Unknown
Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  When you start playing some audio, the sound disappears.

  00:14.2 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SBx00 Azalia 
(Intel HDA)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. M5A78L LE
Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
Kernel modules: snd_hda_intel

  
  uname -a
  Linux Marcelo-STI-FX6300 5.4.0-37-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 3 18:57:02 
UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  alsa-info

  
  !!
  !!ALSA Information Script v 0.4.65
  !!

  !!Script ran on: Fri Jun 19 13:38:12 UTC 2020

  
  !!Linux Distribution
  !!--

  Ubuntu 20.04 LTS \n \l DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu
  20.04 LTS" NAME="Ubuntu" ID=ubuntu ID_LIKE=debian PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu
  20.04 LTS" HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies
  /privacy-policy" UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal

  
  !!DMI Information
  !!---

  Manufacturer:  System manufacturer
  Product Name:  System Product Name
  Product Version:   System Version
  Firmware Version:  1201   
  Board Vendor:  ASUSTeK Computer INC.
  Board Name:M5A78L-M LX/BR

  
  !!ACPI Device Status Information
  !!---

  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/ATK0110:00/status15
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0103:00/status15
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0400:00/status15
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0501:00/status15
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0C0C:00/status11
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0C0F:00/status9
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0C0F:01/status9
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0C0F:02/status9
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0C0F:03/status9
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0C0F:04/status9
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0C0F:05/status9
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0C0F:06/status9
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/PNP0C0F:07/status9
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/device:20/status 15
  /sys/bus/acpi/devices/device:21/status 15

  
  !!Kernel Information
  !!--

  Kernel release:5.4.0-37-generic
  Operating System:  GNU/Linux
  Architecture:  x86_64
  Processor: x86_64
  SMP Enabled:   Yes

  
  !!ALSA Version
  !!

  Driver version: k5.4.0-37-generic
  Library version:1.2.3
  Utilities version:  1.2.2

  
  !!Loaded ALSA modules
  !!---

  snd_hda_intel

  
  !!Sound Servers on this system
  !!

  Pulseaudio:
Installed - Yes (/usr/bin/pulseaudio)
Running - Yes

  
  !!Soundcards recognised by ALSA
  !!-

   0 [SB ]: HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB
HDA ATI SB at 0xfe9f4000 irq 16

  
  !!PCI Soundcards installed in the system
  !!--

  00:14.2 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SBx00 
Azalia (Intel HDA) [1002:4383]
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. M5A78L LE [1043:8445]

  
  !!Modprobe options (Sound related)
  !!

  snd_pcsp: index=-2
  snd_usb_audio: index=-2
  snd_atiixp_modem: index=-2
  snd_intel8x0m: index=-2
  snd_via82xx_modem: index=-2
  snd_atiixp_modem: index=-2
  snd_intel8x0m: index=-2
  snd_via82xx_modem: index=-2
  snd_usb_audio: index=-2
  snd_usb_caiaq: index=-2
  snd_usb_ua101: index=-2
  snd_usb_us122l: index=-2
  snd_usb_usx2y: index=-2
  snd_cmipci: mpu_port=0x330 fm_port=0x388
  snd_pcsp: index=-2
  snd_usb_audio: index=-2
  snd_hda_intel: model=auto
  snd_hda_intel: dmic detect=0

  
  !!Loaded sound module options
  !!---

  !!Module: snd_hda_intel
align_buffer_size 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

2020-12-15 Thread Ryan
There's a BIOS update available for my board. I'll install this and
hopefully I won't need a SW fix.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908140

Title:
  Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I recently installed Ubuntu Server 20.04 to replace an ESXi server.
  During the installation, I configured a bonded interface for two
  ethernet interfaces. I configured the bond on my ZyXel GS1900-8 as a
  static LAG. During the setup process, the link came up successfully
  and was leased an IP via DHCP.

  All subsequent boots have failed to acquire an IP address for the
  bonded interface. Sometimes, if I allow dhcp4 on the enslaved
  interfaces, and run sudo dhclient -r && sudo dhclient, the enslaved
  interfaces will be leased an IP address _and_ the bond will get an IP
  address. I know this is not proper as dhclient and systemd-networkd do
  not mix.

  Also, I would like to configure this as a LACP bond instead. I have
  enabled LACP on the switch with priority 65535 and "IP/MAC address"
  load balancing algorithm, switched the LAG from static to LACP, and
  altered netplan to use the 802.3ad bond mode.

  Please let me know what, if anything, I'm doing wrong here. I've
  looked around at as many netplan DHCP bond posts here as I could find
  to no avail. See below for configuration files and command outputs. I
  cannot give you the output of `lsb_release -rd` as the package is not
  installed and there's no connection to install it.

  $ cat /etc/netplan/00-bond.yaml
  network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
  eth0:
dhcp4: false
  eth1:
dhcp4: false
bonds:
  bond0:
dhcp4: true
interfaces:
  - eth0
  - eth1
parameters:
  mode: 802.3ad

  $ sudo journalctl -b -u systemd-networkd
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: netdev ready
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: Enumeration completed.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: IPv6 successfully enabled
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: Link UP
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: docker0: Link UP

  $ sudo ip a
  lo:  mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group 
default qlen 1000
  link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
  inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  inet6 ::1/128 scope host
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  eno1:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:46 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eno2:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:47 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  bond0:  mtu 1500 qdisk noqueue 
state DOWN group default qlen 1000
  link/ether 52:8b:2c:cc:a0:15 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  docker0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state 
DOWN group default
  link/ether 02:42:26:1c:1b:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker 0
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.netdev
  [NetDev]
  Name=bond0
  Kind=bond

  [Bond]
  Mode=802.3ad

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.network
  [Match]
  Name=bond0

  [Network]
  DHCP=ipv4
  LinkLocalAddressing=ipv6
  ConfigureWithoutCarrier=yes

  [DHCP]
  RouteMetric=100
  UseMTU=true

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth0.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth0

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth1.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth1

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
  Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)

  Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
  Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)
  MII Status: down
  MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
  Up Delay (ms): 0
  Down Delay (ms): 0
  Peer Notification Delay (ms): 0

  802.3ad info
 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

2020-12-15 Thread Ryan
I thought this could be related to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199813. Indeed dmidecode -t
41 shows there are two interfaces for type interface 1 and two for 2.

** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #199813
   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199813

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908140

Title:
  Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I recently installed Ubuntu Server 20.04 to replace an ESXi server.
  During the installation, I configured a bonded interface for two
  ethernet interfaces. I configured the bond on my ZyXel GS1900-8 as a
  static LAG. During the setup process, the link came up successfully
  and was leased an IP via DHCP.

  All subsequent boots have failed to acquire an IP address for the
  bonded interface. Sometimes, if I allow dhcp4 on the enslaved
  interfaces, and run sudo dhclient -r && sudo dhclient, the enslaved
  interfaces will be leased an IP address _and_ the bond will get an IP
  address. I know this is not proper as dhclient and systemd-networkd do
  not mix.

  Also, I would like to configure this as a LACP bond instead. I have
  enabled LACP on the switch with priority 65535 and "IP/MAC address"
  load balancing algorithm, switched the LAG from static to LACP, and
  altered netplan to use the 802.3ad bond mode.

  Please let me know what, if anything, I'm doing wrong here. I've
  looked around at as many netplan DHCP bond posts here as I could find
  to no avail. See below for configuration files and command outputs. I
  cannot give you the output of `lsb_release -rd` as the package is not
  installed and there's no connection to install it.

  $ cat /etc/netplan/00-bond.yaml
  network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
  eth0:
dhcp4: false
  eth1:
dhcp4: false
bonds:
  bond0:
dhcp4: true
interfaces:
  - eth0
  - eth1
parameters:
  mode: 802.3ad

  $ sudo journalctl -b -u systemd-networkd
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: netdev ready
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: Enumeration completed.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: IPv6 successfully enabled
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: Link UP
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: docker0: Link UP

  $ sudo ip a
  lo:  mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group 
default qlen 1000
  link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
  inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  inet6 ::1/128 scope host
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  eno1:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:46 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eno2:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:47 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  bond0:  mtu 1500 qdisk noqueue 
state DOWN group default qlen 1000
  link/ether 52:8b:2c:cc:a0:15 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  docker0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state 
DOWN group default
  link/ether 02:42:26:1c:1b:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker 0
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.netdev
  [NetDev]
  Name=bond0
  Kind=bond

  [Bond]
  Mode=802.3ad

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.network
  [Match]
  Name=bond0

  [Network]
  DHCP=ipv4
  LinkLocalAddressing=ipv6
  ConfigureWithoutCarrier=yes

  [DHCP]
  RouteMetric=100
  UseMTU=true

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth0.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth0

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth1.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth1

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
  Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)

  Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

2020-12-15 Thread Ryan
> your bonded links are down; nothing will happen until they are brought
up.

Yes, I figured as such. I've already tried to bring up eth0, eth1, and
bond0 via ip, ifup, and ifconfig to no success.

> your pasted log appears incomplete since i see no output for eth0 or
eth1; please paste or attach your entire log.

This is the entire log since reboot. If I look at the journal from
previous boots, there are mentions of eth0 and eth1, as well as eno1 and
eno2.

$ networkctl list
IDX LINKTYPE OPERATIONAL SETUP
  1 lo  loopback carrier unmanaged
  2 eno1etheroff unmanaged
  3 eno2etheroff unmanaged
  4 eth0etheroff pending
  5 eth1etheroff pending
  6 bond0   bond no-carrier  configured
  7 docker0 bridge   no-carrier  unmanaged

After doing ip link set dev {eth0,eth1} up, they change from off to
degraded in networkctl list. Attempting the same on bond0 afterward does
nothing.

$ networkctl status -n 40
*   State: no carrier
  Address: 172.17.0.1 on docker0
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: netdev ready
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: Enumeration completed.
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: IPv6 successfully enabled
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: Link UP
Dec 14 21:31:44 lore systemd[1]: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Main 
process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Dec 14 21:31:44 lore systemd[1]: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Failed 
with result 'exit-code'.
Dec 14 21:31:44 lore systemd[1]: Failed to start Wait for Network to be 
Configured.
Dec 14 21:31:50 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
Dec 14 21:31:50 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
Dec 14 21:31:50 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
Dec 14 21:31:50 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
Dec 14 21:31:50 lore systemd-networkd[852]: docker0: Link UP
Dec 15 18:13:43 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Link IP
Dec 15 18:13:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Ganied carrier
Dec 15 18:13:47 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Gained IPv6LL
Dec 15 18:13:47 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Ganied carrier
Dec 15 18:13:48 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Gained IPv6LL
Dec 15 18:15:13 lore systemd-networkd[856]: bond0: Link DOWN
Dec 15 18:15:41 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Link DOWN
Dec 15 18:15:41 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Lost carrier
Dec 15 18:15:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Link DOWN
Dec 15 18:15:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Lost carrer

All of the lines from today (Dec 15) correspond to my attempts to bring
interfaces up as mentioned above, then bringing them back down after it
failed.

> networkctl status bond0 eth0 eth1
* 4: eth0
 Link File: n/a
  Network File: n/a
Status: off (pending)
HW Address: 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a2 (Super Micro Computer, Inc.)
   MTU: 1500 (min: 68, max: 9710)
  Queue Length (Tx/Rx): 64/64
 Auto negotiaition: yes
 Speed: n/a
  Port: tp

Dec 14 21:29:42 lore systemd-udevd[588]: eth0: Failed to rename network 
interface 4 from 'eth0' to 'eno1': File exists
Dec 14 21:29:42 lore systemd-udevd[588]: eth0: Failed to process device, 
ignoring: File exists
Dec 15 18:13:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Ganied carrier
Dec 15 18:13:47 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Gained IPv6LL
Dec 15 18:15:41 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Link DOWN
Dec 15 18:15:41 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Lost carrier

* 5: eth1
 Link File: n/a
  Network File: n/a
Status: off (pending)
HW Address: 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a2 (Super Micro Computer, Inc.)
   MTU: 1500 (min: 68, max: 9710)
  Queue Length (Tx/Rx): 64/64
 Auto negotiaition: yes
 Speed: n/a
  Port: tp

Dec 14 21:29:42 lore systemd-udevd[588]: eth1: Failed to rename network 
interface 5 from 'eth1' to 'eno2': File exists
Dec 14 21:29:42 lore systemd-udevd[588]: eth1: Failed to process device, 
ignoring: File exists
Dec 15 18:13:43 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Link IP
Dec 15 18:13:47 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Ganied carrier
Dec 15 18:13:48 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Gained IPv6LL
Dec 15 18:15:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Link DOWN
Dec 15 18:15:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Lost carrer

* 6: bond0
 Link File: /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link
  Network File: /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.network
  Type: bond
 State: off (configured)
Driver: bonding

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1901789] Re: Release upgrade 20.04 -> 20.10 removed input method from ibus

2020-12-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ibus - 1.5.23-2

---
ibus (1.5.23-2) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Team upload
  * debian/patches/Warn-deprecated-IBus-XKB-engines-w-dialog.patch:
- Show a warning dialog when a deprecated engine name from
  ibus < 1.5.23 is configured (LP: #1901789).
  * Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1

 -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson   Mon, 14 Dec 2020 13:09:45
+0100

** Changed in: ibus (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ibus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901789

Title:
  Release upgrade 20.04 -> 20.10 removed input method from ibus

Status in ibus:
  New
Status in ibus package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  What happened:
  ===

  I'm using iBus as input "method" with
  - Japanese (Anthy) // primary 
  - German
  set up. 

  I upgraded from ubuntu 20.04 to 20.10.

  EXPECTED: No changes regarding input.
  ACTUAL: German input method was removed

  
  lsb_release -rd
  ===
  Description:  Ubuntu 20.10
  Release:  20.10

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:20.10.12
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-25.26-generic 5.8.14
  Uname: Linux 5.8.0-25-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Wed Oct 28 11:10:04 2020
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to groovy on 2020-10-24 (3 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ibus/+bug/1901789/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905623] Re: df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted

2020-12-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package coreutils - 8.32-4ubuntu2

---
coreutils (8.32-4ubuntu2) hirsute; urgency=medium

  * d/p/treat-devtmpfs-and-squashfs-as-dummy-filesystems.patch:
- Extend default filesystem exlusion to fuse.portal (LP: #1905623)

 -- Julian Andres Klode   Sat, 05 Dec 2020 21:55:44
+0100

** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905623

Title:
  df: /run/user/1000/doc: Operation not permitted

Status in coreutils package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in xdg-desktop-portal package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  /run/user/1000/doc is a fuse.portal mount point, but statfs() return
  EPERM, hence df produces an error message. Maybe statfs() is not
  implemented, but it would be good to quieten this down (df even does
  not allow me to ignore it, probably because it looks at statfs to find
  out fs type, so my fs type ignoring doesn't work).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1905623/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1797002] Re: Bluetooth audio skips while the settings dialog is open

2020-12-15 Thread abcdef
Hello,

Thank you for looking at this issue.

If source code propagate downstream, then I think it would be a good
idea to come up with a system that propagates bug reports upstream.

If that effort is underway I will consider registering on arbitrary
other bug trackers in the meantime as a stopgap solution.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797002

Title:
  Bluetooth audio skips while the settings dialog is open

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  all my bluetooth headsets skips terribly after today's system update.
  it is heavy noticeable even on audio setting test form.
  it work just fine today before i applied updates.

  even reinstall ubuntu from scratch - didn't help.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: bluetooth (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-36.39-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-36-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Oct  9 18:40:44 2018
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-10-09 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  InterestingModules: rfcomm bnep btusb bluetooth
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-36-generic 
root=UUID=fc44a9dc-e173-43fb-ac3a-fdeadb1066e0 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: bluez
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 09/22/2015
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.66
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 1968
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 93.52
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 5CG32907G7
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.66:bd09/22/2015:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPENVY17NotebookPC:pvr088510305B0610100:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1968:rvrKBCVersion93.52:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV G=N L=CON B=HP S=ENV
  dmi.product.name: HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC
  dmi.product.version: 088510305B0610100
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  hciconfig:
   hci0:Type: Primary  Bus: USB
BD Address: 68:17:29:62:BE:6A  ACL MTU: 310:10  SCO MTU: 64:8
UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN INQUIRY 
RX bytes:16831 acl:64 sco:0 events:1798 errors:0
TX bytes:688571 acl:2399 sco:0 commands:125 errors:0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1797002/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908136] Re: no_proxy=::1 is not honored by curl in Bionic and earlier versions

2020-12-15 Thread Steve Langasek
While there is a curl bug here that older versions do not honor ipv6
addresses in no_proxy, there's no information here that explains why you
think this caused a *regression* in autopkgtests.  Tests attempting to
use the http proxy to connect to ::1 will fail with or without adding
::1 to no_proxy.  So how does having it listed in no_proxy cause a
regression?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to curl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908136

Title:
  no_proxy=::1 is not honored by curl in Bionic and earlier versions

Status in Auto Package Testing:
  New
Status in curl package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in curl source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in curl source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in curl source package in Focal:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Bionic:

  env no_proxy=::1 http_proxy=http://foo:8080 curl -v http://[::1]:80/bar.html
  * Could not resolve proxy: foo
  * Closing connection 0
  curl: (5) Could not resolve proxy: foo

  Focal:

  $ env no_proxy=::1 http_proxy=http://foo:8080 curl -v http://[::1]:80/bar.html
  * Uses proxy env variable no_proxy == '::1'
  *   Trying ::1:80...
  * TCP_NODELAY set
  * Immediate connect fail for ::1: Network is unreachable
  * Closing connection 0
  curl: (7) Couldn't connect to server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1908136/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908273] Re: Software stopped working

2020-12-15 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Package changed: ubuntu => xorg (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908273

Title:
  Software stopped working

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  After update to Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS some of my software stopped
  working, all of it is visualization software: VMD, Discovery Studio,
  PyMOL, Gmolden, Avogadro.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-54.60-generic 5.4.65
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Brak dostępu: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Dec 15 14:41:52 2020
  DistUpgraded: 2020-11-21 20:16:19,197 ERROR got error from PostInstallScript 
./xorg_fix_proprietary.py (g-exec-error-quark: Wykonanie procesu potomnego 
„./xorg_fix_proprietary.py” (Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu) się nie 
powiodło (8))
  DistroCodename: focal
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation UHD Graphics 620 (Whiskey Lake) [8086:3ea0] (rev 02) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company UHD Graphics 620 (Whiskey Lake) 
[103c:8537]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-20 (208 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 138a:00ab Validity Sensors, Inc. 
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0408:5373 Quanta Computer, Inc. HP HD Camera
   Bus 001 Device 004: ID 8087:0aaa Intel Corp. 
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: HP HP ProBook 440 G6
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-54-generic 
root=UUID=d81f0b8d-3e0f-4039-a46f-5c1c780cac2c ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-11-21 (23 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 04/27/2020
  dmi.bios.vendor: HP
  dmi.bios.version: R71 Ver. 01.11.01
  dmi.board.name: 8537
  dmi.board.vendor: HP
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 51.2A.00
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 5CD0097RK4
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHP:bvrR71Ver.01.11.01:bd04/27/2020:svnHP:pnHPProBook440G6:pvr:rvnHP:rn8537:rvrKBCVersion51.2A.00:cvnHP:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5336AN HP ProBook
  dmi.product.name: HP ProBook 440 G6
  dmi.product.sku: 5PQ09EA#AKD
  dmi.sys.vendor: HP
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2.6
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1908273/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908273] [NEW] Software stopped working

2020-12-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

After update to Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS some of my software stopped working,
all of it is visualization software: VMD, Discovery Studio, PyMOL,
Gmolden, Avogadro.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-54.60-generic 5.4.65
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-54-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Brak dostępu: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Dec 15 14:41:52 2020
DistUpgraded: 2020-11-21 20:16:19,197 ERROR got error from PostInstallScript 
./xorg_fix_proprietary.py (g-exec-error-quark: Wykonanie procesu potomnego 
„./xorg_fix_proprietary.py” (Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu) się nie 
powiodło (8))
DistroCodename: focal
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation UHD Graphics 620 (Whiskey Lake) [8086:3ea0] (rev 02) 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company UHD Graphics 620 (Whiskey Lake) 
[103c:8537]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-20 (208 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 138a:00ab Validity Sensors, Inc. 
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0408:5373 Quanta Computer, Inc. HP HD Camera
 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 8087:0aaa Intel Corp. 
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: HP HP ProBook 440 G6
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-54-generic 
root=UUID=d81f0b8d-3e0f-4039-a46f-5c1c780cac2c ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-11-21 (23 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 04/27/2020
dmi.bios.vendor: HP
dmi.bios.version: R71 Ver. 01.11.01
dmi.board.name: 8537
dmi.board.vendor: HP
dmi.board.version: KBC Version 51.2A.00
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 5CD0097RK4
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHP:bvrR71Ver.01.11.01:bd04/27/2020:svnHP:pnHPProBook440G6:pvr:rvnHP:rn8537:rvrKBCVersion51.2A.00:cvnHP:ct10:cvr:
dmi.product.family: 103C_5336AN HP ProBook
dmi.product.name: HP ProBook 440 G6
dmi.product.sku: 5PQ09EA#AKD
dmi.sys.vendor: HP
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2.6
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubuntu
-- 
Software stopped working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908273
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch 
seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

2020-12-15 Thread Dan Streetman
> please paste or attach your entire log

if that *is* your entire log, then please include the output of:

$ networkctl list
$ networkctl status
$ networkctl status bond0 eth0 eth1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908140

Title:
  Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I recently installed Ubuntu Server 20.04 to replace an ESXi server.
  During the installation, I configured a bonded interface for two
  ethernet interfaces. I configured the bond on my ZyXel GS1900-8 as a
  static LAG. During the setup process, the link came up successfully
  and was leased an IP via DHCP.

  All subsequent boots have failed to acquire an IP address for the
  bonded interface. Sometimes, if I allow dhcp4 on the enslaved
  interfaces, and run sudo dhclient -r && sudo dhclient, the enslaved
  interfaces will be leased an IP address _and_ the bond will get an IP
  address. I know this is not proper as dhclient and systemd-networkd do
  not mix.

  Also, I would like to configure this as a LACP bond instead. I have
  enabled LACP on the switch with priority 65535 and "IP/MAC address"
  load balancing algorithm, switched the LAG from static to LACP, and
  altered netplan to use the 802.3ad bond mode.

  Please let me know what, if anything, I'm doing wrong here. I've
  looked around at as many netplan DHCP bond posts here as I could find
  to no avail. See below for configuration files and command outputs. I
  cannot give you the output of `lsb_release -rd` as the package is not
  installed and there's no connection to install it.

  $ cat /etc/netplan/00-bond.yaml
  network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
  eth0:
dhcp4: false
  eth1:
dhcp4: false
bonds:
  bond0:
dhcp4: true
interfaces:
  - eth0
  - eth1
parameters:
  mode: 802.3ad

  $ sudo journalctl -b -u systemd-networkd
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: netdev ready
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: Enumeration completed.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: IPv6 successfully enabled
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: Link UP
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: docker0: Link UP

  $ sudo ip a
  lo:  mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group 
default qlen 1000
  link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
  inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  inet6 ::1/128 scope host
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  eno1:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:46 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eno2:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:47 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  bond0:  mtu 1500 qdisk noqueue 
state DOWN group default qlen 1000
  link/ether 52:8b:2c:cc:a0:15 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  docker0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state 
DOWN group default
  link/ether 02:42:26:1c:1b:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker 0
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.netdev
  [NetDev]
  Name=bond0
  Kind=bond

  [Bond]
  Mode=802.3ad

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.network
  [Match]
  Name=bond0

  [Network]
  DHCP=ipv4
  LinkLocalAddressing=ipv6
  ConfigureWithoutCarrier=yes

  [DHCP]
  RouteMetric=100
  UseMTU=true

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth0.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth0

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth1.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth1

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
  Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)

  Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
  Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)
  MII Status: down
  MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
  Up 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

2020-12-15 Thread Dan Streetman
> eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
> 1000
> eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
> 1000

your bonded links are down; nothing will happen until they are brought
up.

> $ sudo journalctl -b -u systemd-networkd
...

your pasted log appears incomplete since i see no output for eth0 or
eth1; please paste or attach your entire log.

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908140

Title:
  Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I recently installed Ubuntu Server 20.04 to replace an ESXi server.
  During the installation, I configured a bonded interface for two
  ethernet interfaces. I configured the bond on my ZyXel GS1900-8 as a
  static LAG. During the setup process, the link came up successfully
  and was leased an IP via DHCP.

  All subsequent boots have failed to acquire an IP address for the
  bonded interface. Sometimes, if I allow dhcp4 on the enslaved
  interfaces, and run sudo dhclient -r && sudo dhclient, the enslaved
  interfaces will be leased an IP address _and_ the bond will get an IP
  address. I know this is not proper as dhclient and systemd-networkd do
  not mix.

  Also, I would like to configure this as a LACP bond instead. I have
  enabled LACP on the switch with priority 65535 and "IP/MAC address"
  load balancing algorithm, switched the LAG from static to LACP, and
  altered netplan to use the 802.3ad bond mode.

  Please let me know what, if anything, I'm doing wrong here. I've
  looked around at as many netplan DHCP bond posts here as I could find
  to no avail. See below for configuration files and command outputs. I
  cannot give you the output of `lsb_release -rd` as the package is not
  installed and there's no connection to install it.

  $ cat /etc/netplan/00-bond.yaml
  network:
version: 2
renderer: networkd
ethernets:
  eth0:
dhcp4: false
  eth1:
dhcp4: false
bonds:
  bond0:
dhcp4: true
interfaces:
  - eth0
  - eth1
parameters:
  mode: 802.3ad

  $ sudo journalctl -b -u systemd-networkd
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: netdev ready
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: Enumeration completed.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: IPv6 successfully enabled
  Dec 14 08:06:47 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: Link UP
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link 
'7' we don't know about, ignoring.
  Dec 14 08:08:53 lore systemd-networkd[852]: docker0: Link UP

  $ sudo ip a
  lo:  mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group 
default qlen 1000
  link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
  inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  inet6 ::1/128 scope host
 valid_lft forever preferred lft forever
  eno1:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:46 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eno2:  mtu 1500 qdisk noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c3:47 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  eth1:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 
1000
  link/ether 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  bond0:  mtu 1500 qdisk noqueue 
state DOWN group default qlen 1000
  link/ether 52:8b:2c:cc:a0:15 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  docker0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state 
DOWN group default
  link/ether 02:42:26:1c:1b:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
  inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker 0
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.netdev
  [NetDev]
  Name=bond0
  Kind=bond

  [Bond]
  Mode=802.3ad

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.network
  [Match]
  Name=bond0

  [Network]
  DHCP=ipv4
  LinkLocalAddressing=ipv6
  ConfigureWithoutCarrier=yes

  [DHCP]
  RouteMetric=100
  UseMTU=true

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth0.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth0

  [Network]
  LinkLocalAddressing=no
  Bond=bond0

  $ cat /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth1.network
  [Match]
  Name=eth1

  [Network]
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885755] Re: test-cap-list fails with Linux 5.8 due to new capabilities

2020-12-15 Thread Dan Streetman
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1905044 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905044

> Can we also push the fix to Xenial

not needed in x

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1905044
   systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.8

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885755

Title:
  test-cap-list fails with Linux 5.8 due to new capabilities

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd source package in Groovy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == test-cap-list ===
  Assertion 'capability_set_to_string_alloc(c, ) == 0' failed at 
src/test/test-cap-list.c:60, function test_capability_set_one(). Aborting.
  FAIL: test-cap-list (code: 134)

  This seems to be a result of new capabilities added in 5.8. systemd
  builds an array to convert capability numbers to strings, and these
  new capabilities are not in its array, so the test bombs out when
  trying to look up the string for a capability it doesn't know about.
  Rebuilding systemd using headers from Linux 5.8 should fix this issue.

  
  Testing failed on:
  amd64: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy-canonical-kernel-team-bootstrap/groovy/amd64/s/systemd/20200630_154532_b7979@/log.gz
  arm64: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy-canonical-kernel-team-bootstrap/groovy/arm64/s/systemd/20200630_155538_0c63d@/log.gz
  ppc64el: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy-canonical-kernel-team-bootstrap/groovy/ppc64el/s/systemd/20200630_162720_b3e1b@/log.gz
  s390x: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy-canonical-kernel-team-bootstrap/groovy/s390x/s/systemd/20200630_140417_c5bdb@/log.gz

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1885755/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903222] Re: Systemd throws error with unknown capabilities

2020-12-15 Thread Dan Streetman
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1905044 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905044

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1885755
   test-cap-list fails with Linux 5.8 due to new capabilities
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1905044
   systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.8

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903222

Title:
  Systemd throws error with unknown capabilities

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The Kernel v5.8 introduces a new capability (CAP_BPF), which is not
  supported by Systemd v237 as shipped in bionic.

  Systemd added a patch to handle unknown capabilities that makes it so it does 
not error with Kernels with new capabilities:
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16420

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1903222/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905245] Re: "Failed to parse bus message: Invalid argument" with Linux 5.8

2020-12-15 Thread Dan Streetman
** Description changed:

  [impact]
  
  newer kernels introduced a new capability, and existing systemd doesn't
  have the name mapping for the new cap (since the mapping table is
  generated at systemd compile time), so it fails when trying to map the
  capability to a user-facing name, which causes failure when running
  commands like 'systemctl show'
  
  [test case]
  
  install a focal system, and install the 5.8 (or newer) kernel, e.g. from
  linux-generic-hwe-20.04-edge, and reboot into the new kernel.
  
  Find any service that does not specify its CapabilityBoundingSet; e.g.
  'apparmor', and run systemctl show on it:
  
  ubuntu@lp1905245-f:~$ systemctl show -p CapabilityBoundingSet apparmor
  Failed to parse bus message: Invalid argument
  
  the command should correctly show the value, e.g.:
  $ systemctl show -p CapabilityBoundingSet apparmor
  CapabilityBoundingSet=cap_chown cap_dac_override ...etc...
  
  [regression potential]
  
  a regression would likely occur while systemd is parsing or printing or
  otherwise handling kernel capabilities. A regression could happen when
  running systemd commands, such as systemctl, or when pid1 is managing
  services.
  
  [scope]
  
- this is needed only in focal (and possibly bionic).
+ this is needed only in b and f.
  
  This is fixed upstream by PR 16424:
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16424
  which was first included in v246, so this is already fixed in groovy and 
later.
  
- this was introduced externally from systemd, with the new capability in the 
kernel, so this fix technically is needed in x/b/f. However, x is unlikely to 
get a new kernel capability during the rest of its life cycle.
- For b, unless a kernel is added that includes a new capability, this patch is 
not needed.
+ Though b is unlikely to have the 5.8 kernel backported directly during
+ its remaining lifetime, this bug is reproducable when running a b
+ container on a host system with the 5.8 kernel, so this is needed for b.
+ 
+ This bug was introduced upstream with commit
+ dd1f5bd0aa584c5e5e10fddc735155c3501eb21e which was first included in
+ v235, so this bug does not exist in x.
  
  [original description]
  
  When I run `systemctl show myservice.service`, I get the following error
  message:
  
     Failed to parse bus message: Invalid argument
  
  systemd version: 245.4-4ubuntu3.3
  linux version: 5.8.0-29-generic #31~20.04.1-Ubuntu  (From 
linux-generic-hwe-20.04-edge)
  
  This is a bug that has been fixed in Debian. See https://bugs.debian.org
  /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964926
  
  Please can we port the fix to the ubuntu 20.04 version.

** Description changed:

  [impact]
  
  newer kernels introduced a new capability, and existing systemd doesn't
  have the name mapping for the new cap (since the mapping table is
  generated at systemd compile time), so it fails when trying to map the
  capability to a user-facing name, which causes failure when running
  commands like 'systemctl show'
  
  [test case]
  
  install a focal system, and install the 5.8 (or newer) kernel, e.g. from
  linux-generic-hwe-20.04-edge, and reboot into the new kernel.
  
  Find any service that does not specify its CapabilityBoundingSet; e.g.
  'apparmor', and run systemctl show on it:
  
  ubuntu@lp1905245-f:~$ systemctl show -p CapabilityBoundingSet apparmor
  Failed to parse bus message: Invalid argument
  
  the command should correctly show the value, e.g.:
  $ systemctl show -p CapabilityBoundingSet apparmor
  CapabilityBoundingSet=cap_chown cap_dac_override ...etc...
  
  [regression potential]
  
  a regression would likely occur while systemd is parsing or printing or
  otherwise handling kernel capabilities. A regression could happen when
  running systemd commands, such as systemctl, or when pid1 is managing
  services.
  
  [scope]
  
- this is needed only in b and f.
+ this is needed only in focal (and possibly bionic).
  
  This is fixed upstream by PR 16424:
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16424
  which was first included in v246, so this is already fixed in groovy and 
later.
  
- Though b is unlikely to have the 5.8 kernel backported directly during
- its remaining lifetime, this bug is reproducable when running a b
- container on a host system with the 5.8 kernel, so this is needed for b.
+ this was introduced externally from systemd, with the new capability in the 
kernel, so this fix technically is needed in x/b/f. However, x is unlikely to 
get a new kernel capability during the rest of its life cycle.
+ For b, unless a kernel is added that includes a new capability, this patch is 
not needed.
  
- This bug was introduced upstream with commit
- dd1f5bd0aa584c5e5e10fddc735155c3501eb21e which was first included in
- v235, so this bug does not exist in x.
+ [other info]
+ 
+ there is a testcase-only related bug 1905044
  
  [original description]
  
  When I run `systemctl show myservice.service`, I get the following error
  message:
  
     

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1899262] Re: Broken dbus GetAll message to wpa supplicant interface properties

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899262

Title:
  Broken dbus GetAll message to wpa supplicant interface properties

Status in wpa package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in wpa source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  * Impact
  One of the distro patch is incorrect and create issues when trying to query 
dbus properties

  * Test Case

  $ sudo dbus-send --system --print-reply --dest=fi.w1.wpa_supplicant1
  /fi/w1/wpa_supplicant1/Interfaces/1
  org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties.GetAll
  string:fi.w1.wpa_supplicant1.Interface

  shouldn't error out

  (the /1 reflect the interface number and could be a different value,
  check with d-feet if needed)

  * Regression potential

  The fixes is in the dbus interface, check that communication with
  desktop clients (indicator, applet, settings) still works correctly,
  returning expected informations on the signal, etc

  -

  dbus-send is able to read the properties of interface using GetAll. Those 
information include interface name, status, encryption method, etc.
  The regression was introduced when someone try to have the Station attribute 
supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1899262/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905044] Re: systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.8

2020-12-15 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905044

Title:
  systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.8

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in systemd source package in Bionic:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [impact]

  autopkgtest failure when running with 5.8 kernel, if systemd is built
  with earlier kernel (e.g. 5.4)

  [test case]

  see autopkgtest results, e.g. links in original description below

  [regression potential]

  as this only fixes a test case, any regression would likely result in
  an incorrectly passing, or incorrectly failing, test.

  [scope]

  this is needed for b/f/g/h.

  this bug was introduced by upstream commit 23cc81e7c22 which first
  added testing for 'invalid' cap numbers, but incorrectly using
  capability_list_length() instead of cap_last_cap(). That commit was
  first included in v236, so this bug does not exist before Bionic.

  this is fixed upstream by commit
  ebc815cd1c647faa934a446ceea91ff4bc9dffa4, which was first included in
  v247, so this is needed for h and earlier.

  Also note that even though the 5.8 kernel is not planned to be
  released for Bionic, this test also runs at build time, and since the
  LP build farm builds inside chroots, if the build farm ever moved up
  to Focal with a 5.8 kernel, the build of systemd for Bionic would
  start failing (since it would still be building using the older kernel
  headers, inside the chroot), so this does need to be fixed in Bionic
  systemd as well.

  [other info]

  there is a non-test bug related to this in bug 1905245

  [original description]

  Testing failed on:
  amd64: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/s/systemd/20201117_174614_4ece6@/log.gz
  arm64: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/arm64/s/systemd/20201117_221555_48b91@/log.gz
  ppc64el: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/ppc64el/s/systemd/20201117_175806_e779f@/log.gz
  s390x: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/s390x/s/systemd/20201117_153051_90e7e@/log.gz

  The failing testcases are:

  - root-unittests

  Assertion 'capability_set_to_string_alloc(c, ) == 0' failed at 
src/test/test-cap-list.c:60, funct
  ion test_capability_set_one(). Aborting.
  FAIL: test-cap-list (code: 134)

  - upstream

  TEST-24-UNIT-TESTS:

  --- test-cap-list begin ---
  Assertion 'capability_set_to_string_alloc(c, ) == 0' failed at 
src/test/test-cap-list.c:60, funct
  ion test_capability_set_one(). Aborting.
  --- test-cap-list end ---

  Both seem to be failing with the same assertion.

  These tests are successful on Focal with linux 5.4, therefore they
  would regress when upgrading the kernel from 5.4 to 5.8.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1905044/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1800836] Re: systemd-networkd doesn't process IPv6 RA properly

2020-12-15 Thread Dan Streetman
possibly needs upstream commit
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/f02ba163891bab73a80332b4599a9d73083cb6c2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800836

Title:
  systemd-networkd doesn't process IPv6 RA properly

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The gateways/firewalls in our DC are highly available and when there
  is a failover their IPv6 VIP (fe80::1) moves from the master to the
  backup one.

  We found that only our Bionic VMs behind those gateways had issues
  after a failover. Those Bionic VMs were all running systemd-networkd
  (from netplan) and before the failover they had:

  $ ip -6 route
  ...
  default via fe80::1 dev eth0 proto ra metric 1024 pref medium

  But after a failover:

  $ ip -6 route
  ...
  default proto ra metric 1024
  nexthop via fe80::1 dev eth0 weight 1
  nexthop via fe80::210:18ff:febe:6750 dev eth0 weight 1

  And after another failover:

  $ ip -6 route
  ...
  default proto ra metric 1024
  nexthop via fe80::1 dev eth0 weight 1
  nexthop via fe80::210:18ff:febe:6750 dev eth0 weight 1
  nexthop via fe80::210:18ff:fe77:b558 dev eth0 weight 1

  
  This is problematic as those then use fe80::210:18ff:fe77:b558%$IFACE as 
their default gateway even when this gateway is unavailable:

  $ ip -6 route get ::
  :: from :: via fe80::210:18ff:fe77:b558 dev eth0 proto ra src 
fe80::a800:ff:fe51:8c37 metric 1024 pref medium

  
  We concluded it was a systemd-networkd bug after checking that the following 
combinations were NOT affected:

  1) Xenial+4.4 kernel
  2) Xenial+4.15 kernel
  3) Bionic+ifupdown

  
  Additional information:

  $ apt-cache policy systemd
  systemd:
Installed: 237-3ubuntu10.3
Candidate: 237-3ubuntu10.3
Version table:
   *** 237-3ubuntu10.3 500
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   237-3ubuntu10 500
  500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages

  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
  Release:  18.04

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: systemd 237-3ubuntu10.3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-38.41-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-38-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.4
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Wed Oct 31 08:47:28 2018
  Lspci: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'lspci': 'lspci'
  Lsusb: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'lsusb': 'lsusb'
  MachineType: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-38-generic 
root=UUID=43b7ee2e-2ab1-4505-8e0b-d9fe0563a034 ro console=ttyS0 net.ifnames=0 
vsyscall=none kaslr nmi_watchdog=0 possible_cpus=1
  SourcePackage: systemd
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 04/01/2014
  dmi.bios.vendor: SeaBIOS
  dmi.bios.version: Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1
  dmi.chassis.type: 1
  dmi.chassis.vendor: QEMU
  dmi.chassis.version: pc-i440fx-xenial
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnSeaBIOS:bvrUbuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1:bd04/01/2014:svnQEMU:pnStandardPC(i440FX+PIIX,1996):pvrpc-i440fx-xenial:cvnQEMU:ct1:cvrpc-i440fx-xenial:
  dmi.product.name: Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
  dmi.product.version: pc-i440fx-xenial
  dmi.sys.vendor: QEMU

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1800836/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1905044] Re: systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.8

2020-12-15 Thread Dan Streetman
@rbalint, fyi since this is a testcase-only fix, I just pushed to the hirsute 
repo, assuming you wouldn't mind.
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd/commit/?id=d55c6f8186cb2cb73f61d6ff5b2e0ded82ef265c

** Description changed:

  [impact]
  
- autopkgtest failure when running with 5.8 kernel
+ autopkgtest failure when running with 5.8 kernel, if systemd is built
+ with earlier kernel (e.g. 5.4)
  
  [test case]
  
  see autopkgtest results, e.g. links in original description below
  
  [regression potential]
  
  as this only fixes a test case, any regression would likely result in an
  incorrectly passing, or incorrectly failing, test.
  
  [scope]
  
  this is needed for b/f/g/h.
  
  this bug was introduced by upstream commit 23cc81e7c22 which first added
  testing for 'invalid' cap numbers, but incorrectly using
  capability_list_length() instead of cap_last_cap(). That commit was
  first included in v236, so this bug does not existing before Bionic.
  
  this is fixed upstream by commit
  ebc815cd1c647faa934a446ceea91ff4bc9dffa4, which was first included in
  v247, so this is needed for h and earlier.
  
  Also note that even though the 5.8 kernel is not planned to be released
  for Bionic, this test also runs at build time, and since the LP build
  farm builds inside chroots, if the build farm ever moved up to Focal
  with a 5.8 kernel, the build of systemd for Bionic would start failing,
  so this does need to be fixed in Bionic systemd as well.
  
  [other info]
  
  there is a non-test bug related to this in bug 1905245
  
  [original description]
  
  Testing failed on:
  amd64: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/s/systemd/20201117_174614_4ece6@/log.gz
  arm64: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/arm64/s/systemd/20201117_221555_48b91@/log.gz
  ppc64el: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/ppc64el/s/systemd/20201117_175806_e779f@/log.gz
  s390x: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/s390x/s/systemd/20201117_153051_90e7e@/log.gz
  
  The failing testcases are:
  
  - root-unittests
  
  Assertion 'capability_set_to_string_alloc(c, ) == 0' failed at 
src/test/test-cap-list.c:60, funct
  ion test_capability_set_one(). Aborting.
  FAIL: test-cap-list (code: 134)
  
  - upstream
  
  TEST-24-UNIT-TESTS:
  
  --- test-cap-list begin ---
  Assertion 'capability_set_to_string_alloc(c, ) == 0' failed at 
src/test/test-cap-list.c:60, funct
  ion test_capability_set_one(). Aborting.
  --- test-cap-list end ---
  
  Both seem to be failing with the same assertion.
  
  These tests are successful on Focal with linux 5.4, therefore they would
  regress when upgrading the kernel from 5.4 to 5.8.

** Description changed:

  [impact]
  
  autopkgtest failure when running with 5.8 kernel, if systemd is built
  with earlier kernel (e.g. 5.4)
  
  [test case]
  
  see autopkgtest results, e.g. links in original description below
  
  [regression potential]
  
  as this only fixes a test case, any regression would likely result in an
  incorrectly passing, or incorrectly failing, test.
  
  [scope]
  
  this is needed for b/f/g/h.
  
  this bug was introduced by upstream commit 23cc81e7c22 which first added
  testing for 'invalid' cap numbers, but incorrectly using
  capability_list_length() instead of cap_last_cap(). That commit was
- first included in v236, so this bug does not existing before Bionic.
+ first included in v236, so this bug does not exist before Bionic.
  
  this is fixed upstream by commit
  ebc815cd1c647faa934a446ceea91ff4bc9dffa4, which was first included in
  v247, so this is needed for h and earlier.
  
  Also note that even though the 5.8 kernel is not planned to be released
  for Bionic, this test also runs at build time, and since the LP build
  farm builds inside chroots, if the build farm ever moved up to Focal
  with a 5.8 kernel, the build of systemd for Bionic would start failing,
  so this does need to be fixed in Bionic systemd as well.
  
  [other info]
  
  there is a non-test bug related to this in bug 1905245
  
  [original description]
  
  Testing failed on:
  amd64: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/s/systemd/20201117_174614_4ece6@/log.gz
  arm64: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/arm64/s/systemd/20201117_221555_48b91@/log.gz
  ppc64el: 
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/ppc64el/s/systemd/20201117_175806_e779f@/log.gz
  s390x: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907886] Re: avinfo is missing

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thanks, upstream doesn't install that utility and they seem to consider
it experimentl, fedora is including it in their binary though, we could
probably do the same for Ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907886

Title:
  avinfo is missing

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  The "avinfo" command line tools available in bluez/tools
  (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/bluetooth/bluez.git/tree/tools) is not
  available in the package.

  The package bluez-tools (https://packages.ubuntu.com/groovy/bluez-
  tools) seems to map another project external to bluez
  (https://github.com/khvzak/bluez-tools) and not the "tools" folder of
  bluez.

  "avinfo" is used for example in order to check which codecs are
  supported by a headphone set (see https://github.com/EHfive
  /pulseaudio-modules-bt/issues/31#issuecomment-462717049).

  Maybe have "bluez-tools" map the "tools" folder of bluez, and move the
  other project to another package?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1907886/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908239] Re: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is dif

2020-12-15 Thread Diki Taufik Gurohman
rm -rf /usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz

then

apt --fix-broken install

i had succes with that

** Changed in: libjpeg-turbo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libjpeg-turbo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908239

Title:
  package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-
  turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances
  of package libjpeg-turbo8:i386

Status in libjpeg-turbo package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I WILL INSTALL WINE, BUT ERROR Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-turbo8_2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1_i386.deb
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-56.62-generic 5.4.73
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-56-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Tue Dec 15 16:25:00 2020
  ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:i386
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-09-23 (82 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: N/A
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
   apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.1
  SourcePackage: libjpeg-turbo
  Title: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:i386
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo/+bug/1908239/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908167] Re: [SRU] pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be selected automatically if there is no internal mic

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908167

Title:
  [SRU] pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be
  selected automatically if there is no internal mic

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in pulseaudio source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in pulseaudio source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in pulseaudio source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  On the Dell AIO machines, there is no internal mic, after plugging a
  headset, users expect the headset-mic or headphone-mic could be selected
  automatically. But with the current rule, the headset-mic/headphone-mic will 
not be selected automatically and even users manually select them, they will 
not show up in the gnome sound setting, and users could not record sound by 
headset-mic/headphone-mic.

  [Fix]
  backport a patch from pulseaudio mergerequest, the patch is going to be
  merged to pulseaudio 14.1. This patch could be backported to hirsute without 
any change, but need to be changed if backport it to groovy and focal.

  [Test]
  On those Dell AIO, plug a headset, open the gnome sound setting, the 
headset-mic is selected automatically, use the headset-mic to record the sound, 
the sound could be recorded and the sound quality is good.

  [Where problems could occur]
  This patch could change the policy of audio device switching, it will not
  affect all audio devices, but only the devices which has AVAIL_UNKNOWN 
available status, that means it has possibility to introduce the regression on 
headphone-mic ,headset-mic, internal mic and internal speaker's switching since 
they all has AVAIL_UNKNOWN status. For example, after unpluging the headset, 
the input device will not switch to internal mic automatically or after unplug 
the headphone, the output device will not switch to internal speaker 
automatically. But this possibility is very low, we have tested the patch on 
many Dell and Lenovo machines, all worked well.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1908167/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908167] Re: [SRU] pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be selected automatically if there is no internal mic

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908167

Title:
  [SRU] pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be
  selected automatically if there is no internal mic

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in pulseaudio source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in pulseaudio source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed
Status in pulseaudio source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  On the Dell AIO machines, there is no internal mic, after plugging a
  headset, users expect the headset-mic or headphone-mic could be selected
  automatically. But with the current rule, the headset-mic/headphone-mic will 
not be selected automatically and even users manually select them, they will 
not show up in the gnome sound setting, and users could not record sound by 
headset-mic/headphone-mic.

  [Fix]
  backport a patch from pulseaudio mergerequest, the patch is going to be
  merged to pulseaudio 14.1. This patch could be backported to hirsute without 
any change, but need to be changed if backport it to groovy and focal.

  [Test]
  On those Dell AIO, plug a headset, open the gnome sound setting, the 
headset-mic is selected automatically, use the headset-mic to record the sound, 
the sound could be recorded and the sound quality is good.

  [Where problems could occur]
  This patch could change the policy of audio device switching, it will not
  affect all audio devices, but only the devices which has AVAIL_UNKNOWN 
available status, that means it has possibility to introduce the regression on 
headphone-mic ,headset-mic, internal mic and internal speaker's switching since 
they all has AVAIL_UNKNOWN status. For example, after unpluging the headset, 
the input device will not switch to internal mic automatically or after unplug 
the headphone, the output device will not switch to internal speaker 
automatically. But this possibility is very low, we have tested the patch on 
many Dell and Lenovo machines, all worked well.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1908167/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907882] Re: paprefs does not find modules

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The issue is a paprefs one though and reported upstream

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/paprefs/-/issues/7

** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/paprefs/-/issues #7
   https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/paprefs/-/issues/7

** Package changed: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) => paprefs (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907882

Title:
  paprefs does not find modules

Status in paprefs package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  on ubuntu 20.10 paprefs does not find modules, as it uses a hardcoded path.
  workaround:
  cd /usr/lib
  sudo ln -s pulse-13.99.2 pulse-13.99

  see
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531251

  strace paprefs 2>&1 |grep /lib/pulse
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-esound-protocol-tcp.so", F_OK) = 
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-native-protocol-tcp.so", F_OK) = 
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-zeroconf-publish.so", F_OK) = -1 
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-zeroconf-discover.so", F_OK) = -1 
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-raop-discover.so", F_OK) = -1 
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-rtp-recv.so", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT 
(No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-rtp-send.so", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT 
(No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-rygel-media-server.so", F_OK) = 
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/paprefs/+bug/1907882/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908265] [NEW] bad heating

2020-12-15 Thread shashikanth
Public bug reported:

i had dell pre-installed ubuntu, 
but i had erase it.
now i am facing heating issues

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-124.127-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-124-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.21
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Dec 15 17:59:23 2020
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: bionic
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: I just need to know a workaround
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation Device [8086:3ea0] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:08c8]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-11 (4 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180725)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:5520 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. 
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 27c6:5301  
 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0cf3:e009 Atheros Communications, Inc. 
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: Dell Inc. Vostro 3480
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-124-generic 
root=UUID=4f0e25d7-2cd2-474f-9088-9df1ffccd1ce ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 02/12/2020
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1.8.0
dmi.board.name: 0H40C6
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.8.0:bd02/12/2020:svnDellInc.:pnVostro3480:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0H40C6:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
dmi.product.family: Vostro
dmi.product.name: Vostro 3480
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2~18.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.8
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:18.0.1-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.15-2

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908265

Title:
  bad heating

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  i had dell pre-installed ubuntu, 
  but i had erase it.
  now i am facing heating issues

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-124.127-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-124-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.21
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Dec 15 17:59:23 2020
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: bionic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: I just need to know a workaround
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation Device [8086:3ea0] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:08c8]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-12-11 (4 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:5520 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. 
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 27c6:5301  
   Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0cf3:e009 Atheros Communications, Inc. 
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Vostro 3480
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-124-generic 
root=UUID=4f0e25d7-2cd2-474f-9088-9df1ffccd1ce ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 02/12/2020
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.8.0
  dmi.board.name: 0H40C6
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.8.0:bd02/12/2020:svnDellInc.:pnVostro3480:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0H40C6:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: Vostro
  dmi.product.name: Vostro 3480
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.101-2~18.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.8
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907882] Re: paprefs does not find modules

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug report. Indeed that's buggy in focal as well.
That has been fixed in the stable version in hirsute now

** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907882

Title:
  paprefs does not find modules

Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  on ubuntu 20.10 paprefs does not find modules, as it uses a hardcoded path.
  workaround:
  cd /usr/lib
  sudo ln -s pulse-13.99.2 pulse-13.99

  see
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531251

  strace paprefs 2>&1 |grep /lib/pulse
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-esound-protocol-tcp.so", F_OK) = 
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-native-protocol-tcp.so", F_OK) = 
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-zeroconf-publish.so", F_OK) = -1 
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-zeroconf-discover.so", F_OK) = -1 
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-raop-discover.so", F_OK) = -1 
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-rtp-recv.so", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT 
(No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-rtp-send.so", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT 
(No such file or directory)
  access("/usr/lib/pulse-13.99/modules/module-rygel-media-server.so", F_OK) = 
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1907882/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908136] Re: no_proxy=::1 is not honored by curl in Bionic and earlier versions

2020-12-15 Thread Balint Reczey
** Tags added: rls-bb-incoming rls-x-incoming

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to curl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908136

Title:
  no_proxy=::1 is not honored by curl in Bionic and earlier versions

Status in Auto Package Testing:
  New
Status in curl package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in curl source package in Xenial:
  New
Status in curl source package in Bionic:
  New
Status in curl source package in Focal:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Bionic:

  env no_proxy=::1 http_proxy=http://foo:8080 curl -v http://[::1]:80/bar.html
  * Could not resolve proxy: foo
  * Closing connection 0
  curl: (5) Could not resolve proxy: foo

  Focal:

  $ env no_proxy=::1 http_proxy=http://foo:8080 curl -v http://[::1]:80/bar.html
  * Uses proxy env variable no_proxy == '::1'
  *   Trying ::1:80...
  * TCP_NODELAY set
  * Immediate connect fail for ::1: Network is unreachable
  * Closing connection 0
  curl: (7) Couldn't connect to server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1908136/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908259] Re: TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY fails with qemu 5.2

2020-12-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Tests are somewhat blocked by PPA being under maintenance.
But I have filed the issue upstream for discussion and to trigger their CI.

Issue => https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/17986
PR => https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/17987

** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #17986
   https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/17986

** Also affects: systemd via
   https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/17986
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908259

Title:
  TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY fails with qemu 5.2

Status in systemd:
  Unknown
Status in qemu package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,
  this test now fails as seen on ppc here
  
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/ppc64el/s/systemd/20201214_224336_8b0d8@/log.gz

  + /bin/qemu-system-ppc64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinux-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.qFc3xq/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=hvc0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
  E: QEMU failed with exit code 1
  qemu-system-ppc64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

  Reproducible in LP infra with systemd 246.6-5ubuntu1 and qemu 5.2

  On other architectures this test is just skipped and ppc happened to complete
  faster so I saw it earlier.

  The same happens on amd64
  + /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.8Hqpmk/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=ttyS0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
  qemu-system-x86_64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)
  E: QEMU failed with exit code 1 

  
  Isolated this to a test without systemd:
  $ apt install linux-image-generic qemu-system-x86
  $ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -numa node,nodeid=0 -initrd 
/boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append 'console=ttyS0 selinux=0'

  Upgrading to 5.2 makes this:
  $ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -numa node,nodeid=0 -initrd 
/boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append 'console=ttyS0 selinux=0'
  qemu-system-x86_64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

  The numa spec is indeed a bit short
-numa node,nodeid=0
  If I change this to
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=0
  It would work, but that kind of specification is forbidden >=5.1
Parameter -numa node,mem is not supported by this machine type
Use -numa node,memdev instead
  You'd need also something like -M pc-i440fx-5.0 which isn't anything the test
  wants to set in stone I guess.
  Instead using memdev works:
-object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M -numa node,memdev=mem0,nodeid=0

  This works fine and is in qemu since quite some time.
  Properly documented since 2.12 but actually available since 2.1 (2014)

  The argument for this test is in test/TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY/test.sh
QEMU_OPTIONS="-numa node,nodeid=0"

  Fixing that to a new form should help.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1908259/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908259] Re: TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY fails with qemu 5.2

2020-12-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Added qemu task for update-excuse tag to be resolved.

I have a fix prepared that is building/testing right now. If successful
I'll open an upstream issue for it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908259

Title:
  TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY fails with qemu 5.2

Status in qemu package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,
  this test now fails as seen on ppc here
  
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/ppc64el/s/systemd/20201214_224336_8b0d8@/log.gz

  + /bin/qemu-system-ppc64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinux-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.qFc3xq/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=hvc0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
  E: QEMU failed with exit code 1
  qemu-system-ppc64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

  Reproducible in LP infra with systemd 246.6-5ubuntu1 and qemu 5.2

  On other architectures this test is just skipped and ppc happened to complete
  faster so I saw it earlier.

  The same happens on amd64
  + /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.8Hqpmk/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=ttyS0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
  qemu-system-x86_64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)
  E: QEMU failed with exit code 1 

  
  Isolated this to a test without systemd:
  $ apt install linux-image-generic qemu-system-x86
  $ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -numa node,nodeid=0 -initrd 
/boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append 'console=ttyS0 selinux=0'

  Upgrading to 5.2 makes this:
  $ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -numa node,nodeid=0 -initrd 
/boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append 'console=ttyS0 selinux=0'
  qemu-system-x86_64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

  The numa spec is indeed a bit short
-numa node,nodeid=0
  If I change this to
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=0
  It would work, but that kind of specification is forbidden >=5.1
Parameter -numa node,mem is not supported by this machine type
Use -numa node,memdev instead
  You'd need also something like -M pc-i440fx-5.0 which isn't anything the test
  wants to set in stone I guess.
  Instead using memdev works:
-object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M -numa node,memdev=mem0,nodeid=0

  This works fine and is in qemu since quite some time.
  Properly documented since 2.12 but actually available since 2.1 (2014)

  The argument for this test is in test/TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY/test.sh
QEMU_OPTIONS="-numa node,nodeid=0"

  Fixing that to a new form should help.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1908259/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883798] Re: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different f

2020-12-15 Thread Diki Taufik Gurohman
i had succes with that

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libjpeg-turbo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883798

Title:
  package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-
  turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances
  of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64

Status in libjpeg-turbo package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  not install file !!! packettracer

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-37.41-generic 5.4.41
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.2
  AptOrdering:
   libjpeg-turbo8:amd64: Install
   NULL: ConfigurePending
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Wed Jun 17 03:37:01 2020
  DpkgTerminalLog:
   Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-turbo8_2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1_amd64.deb ...
   Unpacking libjpeg-turbo8:amd64 (2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1) over 
(2.0.3-0ubuntu1) ...
   dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-turbo8_2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64
  ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-06-16 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.2, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: N/A
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
   apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.1
  SourcePackage: libjpeg-turbo
  Title: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 
trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', 
which is different from other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo/+bug/1883798/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883798] Re: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different f

2020-12-15 Thread Diki Taufik Gurohman
rm -rf /usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz

then

apt --fix-broken install

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libjpeg-turbo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883798

Title:
  package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-
  turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances
  of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64

Status in libjpeg-turbo package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  not install file !!! packettracer

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-37.41-generic 5.4.41
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.2
  AptOrdering:
   libjpeg-turbo8:amd64: Install
   NULL: ConfigurePending
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Wed Jun 17 03:37:01 2020
  DpkgTerminalLog:
   Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-turbo8_2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1_amd64.deb ...
   Unpacking libjpeg-turbo8:amd64 (2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1) over 
(2.0.3-0ubuntu1) ...
   dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-turbo8_2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64
  ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-06-16 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.2, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: N/A
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
   apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.1
  SourcePackage: libjpeg-turbo
  Title: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 
trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', 
which is different from other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo/+bug/1883798/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908259] [NEW] TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY fails with qemu 5.2

2020-12-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Public bug reported:

Hi,
this test now fails as seen on ppc here
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/ppc64el/s/systemd/20201214_224336_8b0d8@/log.gz

+ /bin/qemu-system-ppc64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none -kernel 
/boot/vmlinux-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.qFc3xq/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=hvc0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
E: QEMU failed with exit code 1
qemu-system-ppc64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

Reproducible in LP infra with systemd 246.6-5ubuntu1 and qemu 5.2

On other architectures this test is just skipped and ppc happened to complete
faster so I saw it earlier.

The same happens on amd64
+ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none -kernel 
/boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.8Hqpmk/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=ttyS0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
qemu-system-x86_64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)
E: QEMU failed with exit code 1 


Isolated this to a test without systemd:
$ apt install linux-image-generic qemu-system-x86
$ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none -kernel 
/boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -numa node,nodeid=0 -initrd 
/boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append 'console=ttyS0 selinux=0'

Upgrading to 5.2 makes this:
$ /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none -kernel 
/boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-25-generic -numa node,nodeid=0 -initrd 
/boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append 'console=ttyS0 selinux=0'
qemu-system-x86_64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

The numa spec is indeed a bit short
  -numa node,nodeid=0
If I change this to
  -numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=0
It would work, but that kind of specification is forbidden >=5.1
  Parameter -numa node,mem is not supported by this machine type
  Use -numa node,memdev instead
You'd need also something like -M pc-i440fx-5.0 which isn't anything the test
wants to set in stone I guess.
Instead using memdev works:
  -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M -numa node,memdev=mem0,nodeid=0

This works fine and is in qemu since quite some time.
Properly documented since 2.12 but actually available since 2.1 (2014)

The argument for this test is in test/TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY/test.sh
  QEMU_OPTIONS="-numa node,nodeid=0"

Fixing that to a new form should help.

** Affects: qemu (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: update-excuse

** Also affects: qemu (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Tags added: update-excuse

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908259

Title:
  TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY fails with qemu 5.2

Status in qemu package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hi,
  this test now fails as seen on ppc here
  
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/ppc64el/s/systemd/20201214_224336_8b0d8@/log.gz

  + /bin/qemu-system-ppc64 -smp 1 -net none -m 512M -nographic -vga none 
-kernel /boot/vmlinux-5.8.0-25-generic -drive 
format=raw,cache=unsafe,file=/var/tmp/systemd-test.qFc3xq/default.img -numa 
node,nodeid=0 -initrd /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-25-generic -append ' 
root=/dev/sda1 rw raid=noautodetect rd.luks=0 loglevel=2 
init=/lib/systemd/systemd console=hvc0 selinux=0  
SYSTEMD_UNIT_PATH=/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/testsuite-36.units:/usr/lib/systemd/tests/testdata/units:
 systemd.unit=testsuite.target systemd.wants=testsuite-36.service 
systemd.wants=end.service  '
  E: QEMU failed with exit code 1
  qemu-system-ppc64: total memory for NUMA nodes (0x0) should equal RAM size 
(0x2000)

  Reproducible in LP infra with systemd 246.6-5ubuntu1 and qemu 5.2

  On other architectures this test is just skipped and ppc happened to complete
  faster so I saw it earlier.

  The same happens on amd64
  + /bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908241] [NEW] README.sysctl refers to "service procps reload", which no longer works

2020-12-15 Thread Pi Delport
Public bug reported:

/etc/sysctl.d/README.sysctl states:

After making any changes, please run "service procps reload" (or, from
a Debian package maintainer script "deb-systemd-invoke restart procps.service").

However, "service procps reload" no longer works:

$ sudo service procps reload
Usage: /etc/init.d/procps {start|stop|status|restart|try-restart|force-reload}

It looks like the correct command should be "service procps force-
reload"?


Local versions:

Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
procps 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2

** Affects: procps (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: focal groovy

** Summary changed:

- sysctl.d/README refers to "service procps reload", which no longer works
+ README.sysctl refers to "service procps reload", which no longer works

** Tags added: focal

** Tags added: groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908241

Title:
  README.sysctl refers to "service procps reload", which no longer works

Status in procps package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  /etc/sysctl.d/README.sysctl states:

  After making any changes, please run "service procps reload" (or, from
  a Debian package maintainer script "deb-systemd-invoke restart 
procps.service").

  However, "service procps reload" no longer works:

  $ sudo service procps reload
  Usage: /etc/init.d/procps {start|stop|status|restart|try-restart|force-reload}

  It looks like the correct command should be "service procps force-
  reload"?

  
  Local versions:

  Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
  procps 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1908241/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908153] Re: [Alienware 15 R4, Realtek ALC3266, Black Headphone Out or internal speakers] Underruns, dropouts or crackling sound

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
reassigning to linux if the issue started with a kernel update

** Package changed: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908153

Title:
  [Alienware 15 R4, Realtek ALC3266, Black Headphone Out or internal
  speakers] Underruns, dropouts or crackling sound

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  With this latest update (Linux 5.4.0-58), the sound is now crackling.
  Feels like DMA buffer underruns, but I'm not sure.  Not seeing a
  significant CPU load that might have aggravated it, nor am I seeing
  any complaints in syslog or kern.log.  Restarting pulseaudio and
  running alsa force-reload had no effect.

  These sound issues started with the same update that caused the
  ath10k_pci driver to become extremely unreliable (filed as bug
  1908106).

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-58.64-generic 5.4.73
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-58-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC1:  ddt   22891 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  ddt   22891 F pulseaudio
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Dec 14 14:55:14 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-23 (266 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=screen-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: alsa-driver
  Symptom: audio
  Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:PCH failed
  Symptom_Card: Built-in Audio - HDA Intel PCH
  Symptom_Jack: Black Headphone Out, Left
  Symptom_PulseAudioLog:
   Dec 14 07:32:47 ddtlap dbus-daemon[859]: [system] Activating via systemd: 
service name='org.freedesktop.RealtimeKit1' unit='rtkit-daemon.service' 
requested by ':1.32' (uid=124 pid=1157 comm="/usr/bin/pulseaudio --daemonize=no 
--log-target=jo" label="unconfined")
   Dec 14 08:11:14 ddtlap pulseaudio[1157]: Failed to create sink input: sink 
is suspended.
   Dec 14 08:12:19 ddtlap pulseaudio[1157]: Failed to create sink input: sink 
is suspended.
   Dec 14 08:13:47 ddtlap dbus-daemon[859]: [system] Rejected send message, 0 
matched rules; type="method_return", sender=":1.70" (uid=1000 pid=1553 
comm="/usr/bin/pulseaudio --daemonize=no --log-target=jo" label="unconfined") 
interface="(unset)" member="(unset)" error name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" 
destination=":1.3" (uid=0 pid=855 comm="/usr/lib/bluetooth/bluetoothd " 
label="unconfined")
  Symptom_Type: Underruns, dropouts, or "crackling" sound
  Title: [Alienware 15 R4, Realtek ALC3266, Black Headphone Out, Left] 
Underruns, dropouts or crackling sound
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-05-12 (216 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 04/18/2019
  dmi.bios.vendor: Alienware
  dmi.bios.version: 1.7.0
  dmi.board.name: Alienware 15 R4
  dmi.board.vendor: Alienware
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Alienware
  dmi.chassis.version: Not Specified
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAlienware:bvr1.7.0:bd04/18/2019:svnAlienware:pnAlienware15R4:pvr1.7.0:rvnAlienware:rnAlienware15R4:rvrA00:cvnAlienware:ct10:cvrNotSpecified:
  dmi.product.family: Alienware
  dmi.product.name: Alienware 15 R4
  dmi.product.sku: 0876
  dmi.product.version: 1.7.0
  dmi.sys.vendor: Alienware

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1908153/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1846334] Re: cupsd assert failure: free(): invalid pointer

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Could someone try if the hirsute version fixes their issue?

** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846334

Title:
  cupsd assert failure: free(): invalid pointer

Status in cups package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Just running in the background, no user action (printing)

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
  Package: cups-daemon 2.2.12-2ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-16.17-generic 5.3.1
  Uname: Linux 5.3.0-13-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: wl
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  AssertionMessage: free(): invalid pointer
  Date: Tue Oct  1 19:41:35 2019
  ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/cupsd
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-02-09 (234 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Alpha amd64 (20190203)
  Lpstat:
   device for HP_LaserJet_CM1415fn_44A808_: 
implicitclass://HP_LaserJet_CM1415fn_44A808_/
   device for Samsung_C48x_Series_SEC84251900EE44_: 
implicitclass://Samsung_C48x_Series_SEC84251900EE44_/
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6530
  Papersize: letter
  PpdFiles:
   HP_LaserJet_CM1415fn_44A808_: LaserJet CM1415fn - IPP Everywhere
   Samsung_C48x_Series_SEC84251900EE44_: C48x Series - IPP Everywhere
  ProcAttrCurrent: /usr/sbin/cupsd (enforce)
  ProcCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.3.0-16-generic 
root=UUID=4cc2c833-0db9-4a3d-84d1-9f00f5785fca ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.3.0-16-generic 
root=UUID=4cc2c833-0db9-4a3d-84d1-9f00f5785fca ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: cups
  StacktraceTop:
   __libc_message (action=action@entry=do_abort, fmt=fmt@entry=0x7f923ecb83a5 
"%s\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:181
   malloc_printerr (str=str@entry=0x7f923ecb652a "free(): invalid pointer") at 
malloc.c:5332
   _int_free (av=, p=, have_lock=0) at 
malloc.c:4173
   ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcups.so.2
   ippDelete () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcups.so.2
  Title: cupsd assert failure: free(): invalid pointer
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups:
   
  dmi.bios.date: 11/30/2018
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: A22
  dmi.board.name: 07Y85M
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 9
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA22:bd11/30/2018:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6530:pvr01:rvnDellInc.:rn07Y85M:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: Latitude E6530
  dmi.product.sku: Latitude E6530
  dmi.product.version: 01
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  separator:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1846334/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906600] Re: WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906600

Title:
  WiFi disconnects continually (goes "down" in NetworkManager)

Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Hello everybody and thank you in advance for your help.  After a
  recent update, my machine rebooted and appeared to be fine, but after
  a short time the WiFi dropped and the NetworkManager applet shows that
  the interface is down.  I am also getting prompted for a password
  (which was previously saved) and when I click on connect it will
  establish the connection for a short time, but then goes down again.
  In some cases this is immediate in others, I will be online for up to
  approximately 15 minutes before it goes down again.  I have tried
  restarting NetworkManager, but I get the same results (short time up,
  then down).  I tried to review log data, but I am not a linux expert
  and so I'm not sure that I am looking at the right log, nor do I know
  exactly what to look for.  Here are some lines from around the time of
  the disconnect and the restarting of NetworkManager:

   '
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3541] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed unknown -> bound
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3698] device (wlo1): state change: ip-config -> ip-check (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3772] device (wlo1): state change: ip-check -> secondaries (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3856] device (wlo1): state change: secondaries -> activated (reason 
'none', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3882] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_SITE
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3945] device (wlo1): Activation: successful, device activated.
  Dec 01 21:13:24 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875204.3969] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8909] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: completed -> 
authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.8910] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
completed -> authenticating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9011] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: authenticating -> 
associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9012] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
authenticating -> associating
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: associating -> 
4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9222] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
associating -> 4-way handshake
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9223] sup-iface[0x562ab0adb110,wlo1]: connection disconnected 
(reason -1)
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9297] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: 4-way handshake -> 
disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9318] device (wlo1): Activation: (wifi) disconnected during 
association, asking for new key
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9321] device (wlo1): state change: activated -> need-auth (reason 
'supplicant-disconnect', sys-iface-state: 'managed')
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9526] dhcp4 (wlo1): canceled DHCP transaction
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9527] dhcp4 (wlo1): state changed bound -> done
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9544] manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTING
  Dec 01 21:15:48 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875348.9603] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 
4-way handshake -> disconnected
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4819] device (wlo1): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> 
scanning
  Dec 01 21:15:49 bryan-HP-Notebook NetworkManager[22616]:   
[1606875349.4820] device (p2p-dev-wlo1): supplicant management interface state: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1849886] Re: lightdm does not work on eoan on raspberry pi 4

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Could you switch to a vt after getting the issue and do 'journalctl -b 0
> journal' and add the journal file to the bug?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849886

Title:
  lightdm does not work on eoan on raspberry pi 4

Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  if you follow the directions on
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/RaspberryPi

  sudo apt-get install xubuntu-desktop

  about 20% thru the installation it will ask which window manager you want 
(using dpkg-reconfigure).
  if you select lightdm, you will only get a blank greeter screen after you 
reboot.

  using sudo dpkg-reconfigure gdm3

  resets this to gdm3 and after a reboot, everything is fine.

  this was done on a clean armhf eoan install on a 4gb raspberry pi 4B.

  I have done the install several times.   This bug is repeatable.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1849886/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908051] Re: error: Argument 7: Cannot convert from `void Unity.Internal.ScopeChannel.OwnerWatcher.owner_changed

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
you should at least specify the valac version you are using

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908051

Title:
  error: Argument 7: Cannot convert from `void
  Unity.Internal.ScopeChannel.OwnerWatcher.owner_changed

Status in libunity package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  make returns:

  unity-protocol.vapi:242.4-242.43: warning: DBus methods are recommended to 
throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
public abstract async void set_view_type (uint 
view_type) throws GLib.IOError;

  unity-launcher.vala:61.5-61.42: warning: DBus methods are recommended to 
throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public HashTable query ()
  ^^
  unity-scope-channel.vala:312.33-312.50: error: Argument 7: Cannot convert 
from `void Unity.Internal.ScopeChannel.OwnerWatcher.owner_changed 
(GLib.DBusConnection, string, string, string, string, GLib.Variant)' to `void 
GLib.DBusSignalCallback (GLib.DBusConnection, string?, string, string, string, 
GLib.Variant)'
DBusSignalFlags.NONE, this.owner_changed);
  ^^
  unity-scope-channel.vala:269.9-269.52: warning: Access to possible `null'. 
Perform a check or use an unsafe cast.
  (transfer_model as DiffModel).commit_changes ();
  
  unity-synchronizer.vala:93.5-93.18: warning: `GLib.HashTable.add' has been 
deprecated since vala-0.26. Use GenericSet.add
  unity-aggregator-scope-private.vala:434.7-434.28: warning: 
`GLib.HashTable.add' has been deprecated since vala-0.26. Use GenericSet.add
  unity-aggregator-scope-private.vala:606.7-606.72: warning: Access to possible 
`null'. Perform a check or use an unsafe cast.
(category_merger as CategoryMergerByField).map_subscope_categories 
(scope_id, proxy.categories_model);
^^
  unity-aggregator-scope-private.vala:1308.7-1308.66: warning: Access to 
possible `null'. Perform a check or use an unsafe cast.
(category_merger as CategoryMergerByScope).add_scope_mapping (owner, 
scope_id);

  unity-aggregator-scope-private.vala:1352.7-1352.66: warning: Access to 
possible `null'. Perform a check or use an unsafe cast.
(category_merger as CategoryMergerByScope).add_scope_mapping (owner, 
master_scope_id);

  unity-scope-loader.vala:41.49-41.69: warning: `GLib.ModuleFlags.BIND_LAZY' 
has been deprecated since vala-0.46. Use LAZY
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:475.5-475.27: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async void raise() throws IOError{
  ^^^
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:580.5-580.32: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async void play_pause() throws IOError
  
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:585.5-585.26: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async void next() throws IOError
  ^^
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:590.5-590.30: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async void previous() throws IOError
  ^^
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:709.5-709.39: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async void activate_playlist (ObjectPath playlist_id) throws 
IOError
  ^^^
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:714.5-714.48: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async PlaylistDetails[] get_playlists (uint32 index,
  
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:407.5-407.55: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public abstract async void EnableTrackSpecificItems (ObjectPath 
object_path, string desktop_id) throws IOError;
  ^^^
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:408.5-408.56: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public abstract async void EnablePlayerSpecificItems (ObjectPath 
object_path, string desktop_id) throws IOError;
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908051] Re: error: Argument 7: Cannot convert from `void Unity.Internal.ScopeChannel.OwnerWatcher.owner_changed

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your
description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful
to read "How to report bugs effectively"
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful
if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem.

We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures.

At a minimum, we need:

1. The specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the 
problem.
2. The behavior you expected.
3. The behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible).

Please also ensure that you include the release and flavour of Ubuntu
that you are using.

Thank you!

** Changed in: libunity (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908051

Title:
  error: Argument 7: Cannot convert from `void
  Unity.Internal.ScopeChannel.OwnerWatcher.owner_changed

Status in libunity package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  make returns:

  unity-protocol.vapi:242.4-242.43: warning: DBus methods are recommended to 
throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
public abstract async void set_view_type (uint 
view_type) throws GLib.IOError;

  unity-launcher.vala:61.5-61.42: warning: DBus methods are recommended to 
throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public HashTable query ()
  ^^
  unity-scope-channel.vala:312.33-312.50: error: Argument 7: Cannot convert 
from `void Unity.Internal.ScopeChannel.OwnerWatcher.owner_changed 
(GLib.DBusConnection, string, string, string, string, GLib.Variant)' to `void 
GLib.DBusSignalCallback (GLib.DBusConnection, string?, string, string, string, 
GLib.Variant)'
DBusSignalFlags.NONE, this.owner_changed);
  ^^
  unity-scope-channel.vala:269.9-269.52: warning: Access to possible `null'. 
Perform a check or use an unsafe cast.
  (transfer_model as DiffModel).commit_changes ();
  
  unity-synchronizer.vala:93.5-93.18: warning: `GLib.HashTable.add' has been 
deprecated since vala-0.26. Use GenericSet.add
  unity-aggregator-scope-private.vala:434.7-434.28: warning: 
`GLib.HashTable.add' has been deprecated since vala-0.26. Use GenericSet.add
  unity-aggregator-scope-private.vala:606.7-606.72: warning: Access to possible 
`null'. Perform a check or use an unsafe cast.
(category_merger as CategoryMergerByField).map_subscope_categories 
(scope_id, proxy.categories_model);
^^
  unity-aggregator-scope-private.vala:1308.7-1308.66: warning: Access to 
possible `null'. Perform a check or use an unsafe cast.
(category_merger as CategoryMergerByScope).add_scope_mapping (owner, 
scope_id);

  unity-aggregator-scope-private.vala:1352.7-1352.66: warning: Access to 
possible `null'. Perform a check or use an unsafe cast.
(category_merger as CategoryMergerByScope).add_scope_mapping (owner, 
master_scope_id);

  unity-scope-loader.vala:41.49-41.69: warning: `GLib.ModuleFlags.BIND_LAZY' 
has been deprecated since vala-0.46. Use LAZY
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:475.5-475.27: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async void raise() throws IOError{
  ^^^
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:580.5-580.32: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async void play_pause() throws IOError
  
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:585.5-585.26: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async void next() throws IOError
  ^^
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:590.5-590.30: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async void previous() throws IOError
  ^^
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:709.5-709.39: warning: DBus methods are 
recommended to throw at least `GLib.Error' or `GLib.DBusError, GLib.IOError'
  public async void activate_playlist (ObjectPath playlist_id) throws 
IOError
  ^^^
  unity-sound-menu-mpris.vala:714.5-714.48: warning: DBus methods are 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908239] [NEW] package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is d

2020-12-15 Thread Diki Taufik Gurohman
Public bug reported:

I WILL INSTALL WINE, BUT ERROR Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-turbo8_2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-56.62-generic 5.4.73
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-56-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Tue Dec 15 16:25:00 2020
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:i386
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-09-23 (82 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.1
SourcePackage: libjpeg-turbo
Title: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', 
which is different from other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:i386
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: libjpeg-turbo (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libjpeg-turbo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908239

Title:
  package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-
  turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances
  of package libjpeg-turbo8:i386

Status in libjpeg-turbo package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I WILL INSTALL WINE, BUT ERROR Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-turbo8_2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1_i386.deb
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-56.62-generic 5.4.73
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-56-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Tue Dec 15 16:25:00 2020
  ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:i386
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-09-23 (82 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
  PythonDetails: N/A
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
   apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.1
  SourcePackage: libjpeg-turbo
  Title: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared 
'/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from 
other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:i386
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo/+bug/1908239/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1797002] Re: Bluetooth audio skips while the settings dialog is open

2020-12-15 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Yeah OK... Anyone experiencing this bug please also report it to BlueZ
upstream:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Drivers=Bluetooth

and then tell us the new bug ID.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797002

Title:
  Bluetooth audio skips while the settings dialog is open

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  all my bluetooth headsets skips terribly after today's system update.
  it is heavy noticeable even on audio setting test form.
  it work just fine today before i applied updates.

  even reinstall ubuntu from scratch - didn't help.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: bluetooth (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-36.39-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-36-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Oct  9 18:40:44 2018
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-10-09 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  InterestingModules: rfcomm bnep btusb bluetooth
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-36-generic 
root=UUID=fc44a9dc-e173-43fb-ac3a-fdeadb1066e0 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: bluez
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 09/22/2015
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.66
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 1968
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 93.52
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 5CG32907G7
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.66:bd09/22/2015:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPENVY17NotebookPC:pvr088510305B0610100:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1968:rvrKBCVersion93.52:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV G=N L=CON B=HP S=ENV
  dmi.product.name: HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC
  dmi.product.version: 088510305B0610100
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  hciconfig:
   hci0:Type: Primary  Bus: USB
BD Address: 68:17:29:62:BE:6A  ACL MTU: 310:10  SCO MTU: 64:8
UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN INQUIRY 
RX bytes:16831 acl:64 sco:0 events:1798 errors:0
TX bytes:688571 acl:2399 sco:0 commands:125 errors:0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1797002/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1797002] Re: Bluetooth audio skips while the settings dialog is open

2020-12-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Unsure if that's something settings could change though, it's probably
due to the panel triggering bluetooth discovery automatically

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797002

Title:
  Bluetooth audio skips while the settings dialog is open

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  all my bluetooth headsets skips terribly after today's system update.
  it is heavy noticeable even on audio setting test form.
  it work just fine today before i applied updates.

  even reinstall ubuntu from scratch - didn't help.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: bluetooth (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-36.39-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-36-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Oct  9 18:40:44 2018
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-10-09 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  InterestingModules: rfcomm bnep btusb bluetooth
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-36-generic 
root=UUID=fc44a9dc-e173-43fb-ac3a-fdeadb1066e0 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: bluez
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 09/22/2015
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.66
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 1968
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 93.52
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 5CG32907G7
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.66:bd09/22/2015:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPENVY17NotebookPC:pvr088510305B0610100:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1968:rvrKBCVersion93.52:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV G=N L=CON B=HP S=ENV
  dmi.product.name: HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC
  dmi.product.version: 088510305B0610100
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  hciconfig:
   hci0:Type: Primary  Bus: USB
BD Address: 68:17:29:62:BE:6A  ACL MTU: 310:10  SCO MTU: 64:8
UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN INQUIRY 
RX bytes:16831 acl:64 sco:0 events:1798 errors:0
TX bytes:688571 acl:2399 sco:0 commands:125 errors:0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1797002/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1797002] Re: Bluetooth audio skips while the settings dialog is open

2020-12-15 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Can anyone experiencing this bug please report it upstream?

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues

And then tell us the new issue ID.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797002

Title:
  Bluetooth audio skips while the settings dialog is open

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  all my bluetooth headsets skips terribly after today's system update.
  it is heavy noticeable even on audio setting test form.
  it work just fine today before i applied updates.

  even reinstall ubuntu from scratch - didn't help.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: bluetooth (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-36.39-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-36-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Oct  9 18:40:44 2018
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-10-09 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  InterestingModules: rfcomm bnep btusb bluetooth
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC
  ProcEnviron:
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-36-generic 
root=UUID=fc44a9dc-e173-43fb-ac3a-fdeadb1066e0 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: bluez
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 09/22/2015
  dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
  dmi.bios.version: F.66
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: 1968
  dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.board.version: KBC Version 93.52
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 5CG32907G7
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.66:bd09/22/2015:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPENVY17NotebookPC:pvr088510305B0610100:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn1968:rvrKBCVersion93.52:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
  dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV G=N L=CON B=HP S=ENV
  dmi.product.name: HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC
  dmi.product.version: 088510305B0610100
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  hciconfig:
   hci0:Type: Primary  Bus: USB
BD Address: 68:17:29:62:BE:6A  ACL MTU: 310:10  SCO MTU: 64:8
UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN INQUIRY 
RX bytes:16831 acl:64 sco:0 events:1798 errors:0
TX bytes:688571 acl:2399 sco:0 commands:125 errors:0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1797002/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908167] Re: [SRU] pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be selected automatically if there is no internal mic

2020-12-15 Thread Hui Wang
** Description changed:

- this bug is for tracking purpose.
+ [Impact]
+ On the Dell AIO machines, there is no internal mic, after plugging a
+ headset, users expect the headset-mic or headphone-mic could be selected
+ automatically. But with the current rule, the headset-mic/headphone-mic will
+ not be selected automatically and even users manually select them, they will
+ not show up in the gnome sound setting, and users could not record sound by
+ headset-mic/headphone-mic.
+ 
+ [Fix]
+ backport a patch from pulseaudio mergerequest, the patch is going to be
+ merged to pulseaudio 14.1. This patch could be backported to hirsute without
+ any change, but need to be changed if backport it to groovy and focal.
+ 
+ [Test]
+ On those Dell AIO, plug a headset, open the gnome sound setting, the 
headset-mic
+ is selected automatically, use the headset-mic to record the sound, the sound 
could
+ be recorded and the sound quality is good.
+ 
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ This patch could change the policy of audio device switching, it will not
+ affect all audio devices, but only the devices which has AVAIL_UNKNOWN 
available
+ status, that means it has possibility to introduce the regression on 
headphone-mic
+ , headset-mic, internal mic and internal speaker's switching since they all 
has
+ AVAIL_UNKNOWN status. For example, after unpluging the headset, the input 
device
+ will not switch to internl mic automatically or after unplug the headphone, 
the
+ output device will not switch to internal speaker automatically. But this 
possibility
+ is very low, we have tested the patch on many Dell and Lenovo machines, all 
worked well.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  On the Dell AIO machines, there is no internal mic, after plugging a
  headset, users expect the headset-mic or headphone-mic could be selected
- automatically. But with the current rule, the headset-mic/headphone-mic will
- not be selected automatically and even users manually select them, they will
- not show up in the gnome sound setting, and users could not record sound by
- headset-mic/headphone-mic.
+ automatically. But with the current rule, the headset-mic/headphone-mic will 
not be selected automatically and even users manually select them, they will 
not show up in the gnome sound setting, and users could not record sound by 
headset-mic/headphone-mic.
  
  [Fix]
  backport a patch from pulseaudio mergerequest, the patch is going to be
- merged to pulseaudio 14.1. This patch could be backported to hirsute without
- any change, but need to be changed if backport it to groovy and focal.
+ merged to pulseaudio 14.1. This patch could be backported to hirsute without 
any change, but need to be changed if backport it to groovy and focal.
  
  [Test]
- On those Dell AIO, plug a headset, open the gnome sound setting, the 
headset-mic
- is selected automatically, use the headset-mic to record the sound, the sound 
could
- be recorded and the sound quality is good.
+ On those Dell AIO, plug a headset, open the gnome sound setting, the 
headset-mic is selected automatically, use the headset-mic to record the sound, 
the sound could be recorded and the sound quality is good.
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  This patch could change the policy of audio device switching, it will not
- affect all audio devices, but only the devices which has AVAIL_UNKNOWN 
available
- status, that means it has possibility to introduce the regression on 
headphone-mic
- , headset-mic, internal mic and internal speaker's switching since they all 
has
- AVAIL_UNKNOWN status. For example, after unpluging the headset, the input 
device
- will not switch to internl mic automatically or after unplug the headphone, 
the
- output device will not switch to internal speaker automatically. But this 
possibility
- is very low, we have tested the patch on many Dell and Lenovo machines, all 
worked well.
+ affect all audio devices, but only the devices which has AVAIL_UNKNOWN 
available status, that means it has possibility to introduce the regression on 
headphone-mic ,headset-mic, internal mic and internal speaker's switching since 
they all has AVAIL_UNKNOWN status. For example, after unpluging the headset, 
the input device will not switch to internal mic automatically or after unplug 
the headphone, the output device will not switch to internal speaker 
automatically. But this possibility is very low, we have tested the patch on 
many Dell and Lenovo machines, all worked well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908167

Title:
  [SRU] pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be
  selected automatically if there is no internal mic

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Groovy:
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908167] Re: pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be selected automatically if there is no internal mic

2020-12-15 Thread Hui Wang
This is the debdiff for focal, thx.


** Patch added: "pulseaudio_13.99.1-1ubuntu3.9.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1908167/+attachment/5443772/+files/pulseaudio_13.99.1-1ubuntu3.9.debdiff

** Summary changed:

- pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be selected 
automatically if there is no internal mic
+ [SRU] pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be selected 
automatically if there is no internal mic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908167

Title:
  [SRU] pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be
  selected automatically if there is no internal mic

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  this bug is for tracking purpose.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1908167/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908167] Re: pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be selected automatically if there is no internal mic

2020-12-15 Thread Hui Wang
This is the debdiff for groovy, thx.


** Patch added: "pulseaudio_13.99.2-1ubuntu2.2.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1908167/+attachment/5443771/+files/pulseaudio_13.99.2-1ubuntu2.2.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908167

Title:
  [SRU] pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be
  selected automatically if there is no internal mic

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  this bug is for tracking purpose.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1908167/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908167] Re: pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be selected automatically if there is no internal mic

2020-12-15 Thread Hui Wang
This is the debdiff for hirsute, thx.


** Patch added: "pulseaudio_14.0-1ubuntu1.1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1908167/+attachment/5443770/+files/pulseaudio_14.0-1ubuntu1.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908167

Title:
  [SRU] pulseaudio: the headset-mic or heapdhone-mic could not be
  selected automatically if there is no internal mic

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in pulseaudio source package in Hirsute:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  this bug is for tracking purpose.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1908167/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp