[Trac] Re: reStructured text support

2009-03-30 Thread Michael Renzmann

Hi.

FWIW, same thing on trac-hacks.org (with Trac 0.10.6dev):
http://trac-hacks.org/ticket/4693

Bye, Mike

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Customise Ticket View

2009-03-30 Thread Olemis Lang

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Erik Bray hyugaricd...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Olemis Lang ole...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:45 AM, RobinP robin.pell...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Folks,

 is there an easy way to change the ticket view so that the comments
 are separated out from the change history.  If there are only a few
 comments they tend to get buried by all the tickets status changes, so
 I'd prefer to have just comments shown directly underneath the ticket
 description, then the rest of the change history lower down.
 So far I didn't find a plugin to help me do this, but maybe there is
 one...


 Perhaps this is the case where modifying the built-in template is the
 only choice ... I wish I was wrong anyway ... ;)

 I'd have to take a closer look to be sure, but it seems like something
 that could likely be accomplished through an ITemplateStreamFilter
 plugin.


Yes, maybe ... but nothing comes to my mind right now ... :-/

Let us know ... ;)

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:
Comandos : Pipe Viewer ... ¿Qué está pasando por esta tubería?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-03-30 Thread Chris Nelson

Jeff Hammel wrote:
 ...
 Maybe its worth setting up a list for people who are interested in
 seeking or doing paid development work, at least in the interim? 
 ...

I was thinking more in terms of a wiki page at Edgewall or
Trac-Hacks.org.  Don't see it here?  Maybe these developers can help.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Usiing Postgre 8.3 and Python 2.6 - Compatibility with Trac

2009-03-30 Thread ray

I am trying to get Python 2.6 and PostgreSQL 8.3 to work together
under Windows 2000 for Trac 11.3.  Per the 11.3 release notification,
this should be possible.

When I try to add Python bindings to PostgreSQL via:
createlang plpythonu dbname

I get an error:
createlang: language installation failed: ERROR:  could not load
library C:/Program Files/PostgreSQL/8.3/lib/createlang: language
installation failed: ERROR:  could not load library C:/Program
Files/
PostgreSQL/8.3/lib/plpython.dll: The specified module could not be
found.

So I Used depends to walk the references of plpython.dll, I found
that it can not find python25.dll.  THis makes since because I have
2.6, and only
python26.dll is in ...system32.

1) The first question is how do I get this stack to look for the 2.6
version?

Note (as a test):
If I make a copy of python26.dll and rename it python25.dll, that
reference is resolved but a new one appears for apphelp.dll:
  Error opening file.  The system cannot find the file specified (2).
  Warning: At least on delay-load dependency module was not found.
  Warning:  At least on module has an unresolved import due to a
missing
  export function in a delayed-load dependent module.

2) I do not find apphelp on my system.  Where do I get a copy and
where should it be placed? Is it needed for 2.6?

When I rename the dll to python26, the PL installed without error.
But I am concerned that something else is wrong.  I would really like
to find out how to get this to install correctly on a production
machine.

Ray

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-03-30 Thread Olemis Lang

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Jeff Hammel jham...@openplans.org wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:18:30PM -0700, rupert.thurner wrote:
 On Mar 29, 6:24 pm, Jeff Hammel jham...@openplans.org wrote:

  The idea occured to me to setup a trac with bounties for plugin and other 
  development work similar to RequestAHacks on trac-hacks but for paid work. 
   While I'd love to do this...probably not right now as I don't have much 
  free development time (although I could be persuaded).

 Just to throw out some things that have been going around in my head:

  * auction style bidding and back-room discussions should be discouraged

  * a potential client should post the desired hack (or a roadmap, if there is 
 more than one phase) with a time-frame and the amount they are willing to pay.

  * once a client approves a developer for work on a project, the plugin is no 
 longer open for others to work on


Instead of thinking about reinventing the wheel ... why not to look
for a working example ?

  * is the resulting work open source?  I would heartily say yes, but I know 
 there are different opinions on the matter.  As far as I'm concerned, the 
 client is paying for a solution to a problem, not for the software license.  
 If it is useful to others, it should be publically available for the good of 
 the Trac community


+1 for FOSS ... the buyer should be paying for the seller time
dedicated to building the plugin they need ... and for customizing it
so as to meet further specific reqs demanded by the buyer ...

  * the spec should be as precise as possible, though obviously several passes 
 at discussion will probably usually be necessary to refine what exactly are 
 the deliverables


IMHO this should be left to the parties to be considered ... once they
agree, deal is done ...

There *MUST* be rules to clearly arbitrate interactions between
bidders and sellers ... control  infrastructure for delivering
payments ... and many other related issues ...

... so I insist, why not to use an already existing working site for this ... ?

  * needless to say, any sort of infrastructure is a means of connecting 
 client and developer and it is up to THEM (not to this list, not to 
 as-yet-nonexistant web site, etc) to ensure the contract is fulfilled.

In case of conflicts this should be handled by an arbitration board
... if a serious approach is to be followed ... ;)

 In other words, no real legal protections are given, though of course if 
 someone faults another person then the victim will probably want to note this 
 in public forum.


This doent help ... sellers dont want to waste their time and buyers
dont want to throw out their money ... ;)

  * is post-install support required? can clients pay for installation/setup 
 work?  How many bugs and support hours are asked per hack?  What quality 
 assurance is required?


This should be left to the parties to decide ... IMHO ...

... but I still think that there are enough general purpose (I mean
Trac and beyond ;) sites for doing this ... I am not sure about using
yet another one ... that doesnt even meets the barely minimal reqs ...

However if someone ever does something like this, and meets the barely
minimal reqs ... well that'd be fine ... ;)

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:
Comandos : Pipe Viewer ... ¿Qué está pasando por esta tubería?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-03-30 Thread Olemis Lang

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Noah Kantrowitz n...@coderanger.net wrote:
 On Mar 29, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Jeff Hammel wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:18:30PM -0700, rupert.thurner wrote:

 On Mar 29, 6:24 pm, Jeff Hammel jham...@openplans.org wrote:
 The idea occured to me to setup a trac with bounties for plugin
 and other development work similar to RequestAHacks on trac-hacks
 but for paid work.  While I'd love to do this...probably not right
 now as I don't have much free development time (although I could
 be persuaded).


 I'd love to hear what thoughts others have had on this idea.

 My general thoughts:
 1. Bounty-based only, no bidding.

+1 for bidding IMO

 2. Must state desired license up-front. FOSS is preferred, but not
 required.

+1 ... even if I think that should remain being FOSS ... a broader
audience will be captured otherwise ... ;)

 3. Support is separate, ticket bounties are for the request only.

-1 ... all reqs at once ... if both parties agree, deal is closed ...

 4. Neither the Trac nor Trac-Hacks team will involve themselves in
 disputes.

ok ... but ...

 Any deal is made between the two parties only.


-100 ^ 2 ... this doesn't work ... it there *MUST* be very clear rules
and arbitration process ... otherwise it's barely useful ... safety is
a *MUST*, at least IMO ...

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:
Comandos : Pipe Viewer ... ¿Qué está pasando por esta tubería?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Usiing Postgre 8.3 and Python 2.6 - Compatibility with Trac

2009-03-30 Thread John Hampton

ray wrote:
 I am trying to get Python 2.6 and PostgreSQL 8.3 to work together
 under Windows 2000 for Trac 11.3.  Per the 11.3 release notification,
 this should be possible.
 
 When I try to add Python bindings to PostgreSQL via:
 createlang plpythonu dbname

snip a whole bunch

So, you do not need plpythonu to run trac against PostgreSQL.  plpythonu
is the ability to write stored procedures in python.  It's a PostgreSQL
thing and has nothing to do with Trac.

What you need, are the python bindings/drivers for PostgreSQL.  You can
use either psycopg2 (recommended) or pypgsql.

When you install either one of those, it will be installed into the
site-packages directory of your Python installation.  Then you can
connect to PostgreSQL via Trac.

-John

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-03-30 Thread Jeff Hammel

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:23:01AM -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
 
 On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Noah Kantrowitz n...@coderanger.net wrote:
  On Mar 29, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Jeff Hammel wrote:
  On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:18:30PM -0700, rupert.thurner wrote:
 
  On Mar 29, 6:24 pm, Jeff Hammel jham...@openplans.org wrote:
  The idea occured to me to setup a trac with bounties for plugin
  and other development work similar to RequestAHacks on trac-hacks
  but for paid work.  While I'd love to do this...probably not right
  now as I don't have much free development time (although I could
  be persuaded).
 
 
  I'd love to hear what thoughts others have had on this idea.
 
  My general thoughts:
  1. Bounty-based only, no bidding.
 
 +1 for bidding IMO

-1; I would be uninterested in such a site, for two reasons:

 1. it would be a hassle to me so I wouldn't do it

 2. it would encourage developers to try to undercut each other, which IMHO 
would ensure a shoddy product
 
  2. Must state desired license up-front. FOSS is preferred, but not
  required.
 
 +1 ... even if I think that should remain being FOSS ... a broader
 audience will be captured otherwise ... ;)
 
  3. Support is separate, ticket bounties are for the request only.
 
 -1 ... all reqs at once ... if both parties agree, deal is closed ...

I think contracts could (maybe even should) include some level of support.  For 
instance, if I write a plugin that hides security tickets (example), and the 
client states that they are satisfied, but deploying in the wild reveals a 
critical bug like search being broken, then this may demand some support.

  4. Neither the Trac nor Trac-Hacks team will involve themselves in
  disputes.
 
 ok ... but ...
 
  Any deal is made between the two parties only.
 
 
 -100 ^ 2 ... this doesn't work ... it there *MUST* be very clear rules
 and arbitration process ... otherwise it's barely useful ... safety is
 a *MUST*, at least IMO ...

I whole-heartedly disagree. While the site can/should setup rules, it is not up 
to the site to enforce the rules.  This would involve a legal team, which I for 
one would not be interested in paying for.

Jeff

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-03-30 Thread Jeff Hammel

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 07:56:40AM -0400, Chris Nelson wrote:
 
 Jeff Hammel wrote:
  ...
  Maybe its worth setting up a list for people who are interested in
  seeking or doing paid development work, at least in the interim? 
  ...
 
 I was thinking more in terms of a wiki page at Edgewall or
 Trac-Hacks.org.  Don't see it here?  Maybe these developers can help.

A tag could be added on trac-hacks that developers could add to their wiki 
pages and then a page that [[ListTagged]] these.  However, this doesn't allow 
any discussion.

Jeff

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Usiing Postgre 8.3 and Python 2.6 - Compatibility with Trac

2009-03-30 Thread Joseph, Ray

John,

Thanks for the clarification.  I have installed psycopg2 so it must be
read to go.

 Ray
 -Original Message-
 From: trac-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:trac-us...@googlegroups.com]
 On Behalf Of John Hampton
 Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:36 AM
 To: trac-users@googlegroups.com
 Subject: [Trac] Re: Usiing Postgre 8.3 and Python 2.6 - Compatibility
 with Trac
 
 
 ray wrote:
  I am trying to get Python 2.6 and PostgreSQL 8.3 to work together
  under Windows 2000 for Trac 11.3.  Per the 11.3 release
notification,
  this should be possible.
 
  When I try to add Python bindings to PostgreSQL via:
  createlang plpythonu dbname
 
 snip a whole bunch
 
 So, you do not need plpythonu to run trac against PostgreSQL.
 plpythonu
 is the ability to write stored procedures in python.  It's a
PostgreSQL
 thing and has nothing to do with Trac.
 
 What you need, are the python bindings/drivers for PostgreSQL.  You
can
 use either psycopg2 (recommended) or pypgsql.
 
 When you install either one of those, it will be installed into the
 site-packages directory of your Python installation.  Then you can
 connect to PostgreSQL via Trac.
 
 -John
 
  
 
 __
 This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
 For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
 __

__
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information which is 
confidential to, and/or privileged in favor of, CDI Corporation or its 
affiliated companies (CDI) or CDI's customers.  Any review, use, reproduction, 
disclosure or distribution by the recipient is prohibited without prior written 
approval from an authorized CDI representative.  This notice must appear in any 
such authorized reproduction, disclosure or distribution.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the original message and any attachments.  Thank you.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-03-30 Thread Jeff Hammel

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:17:54AM -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
 
 On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Jeff Hammel jham...@openplans.org wrote:
  On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:18:30PM -0700, rupert.thurner wrote:
  On Mar 29, 6:24 pm, Jeff Hammel jham...@openplans.org wrote:
 
   The idea occured to me to setup a trac with bounties for plugin and 
   other development work similar to RequestAHacks on trac-hacks but for 
   paid work.  While I'd love to do this...probably not right now as I 
   don't have much free development time (although I could be persuaded).
 
  Just to throw out some things that have been going around in my head:
 
   * auction style bidding and back-room discussions should be discouraged
 
   * a potential client should post the desired hack (or a roadmap, if there 
  is more than one phase) with a time-frame and the amount they are willing 
  to pay.
 
   * once a client approves a developer for work on a project, the plugin is 
  no longer open for others to work on
 
 
 Instead of thinking about reinventing the wheel ... why not to look
 for a working example ?

Such as?  This isn't reinventing the wheel, this is taking what I've observed 
on other sides as applied to the current needs.
 
   * is the resulting work open source?  I would heartily say yes, but I 
  know there are different opinions on the matter.  As far as I'm concerned, 
  the client is paying for a solution to a problem, not for the software 
  license.  If it is useful to others, it should be publically available for 
  the good of the Trac community
 
 
 +1 for FOSS ... the buyer should be paying for the seller time
 dedicated to building the plugin they need ... and for customizing it
 so as to meet further specific reqs demanded by the buyer ...
 
   * the spec should be as precise as possible, though obviously several 
  passes at discussion will probably usually be necessary to refine what 
  exactly are the deliverables
 
 
 IMHO this should be left to the parties to be considered ... once they
 agree, deal is done ...

Yes, but, if the spec is vague like build a mailing list for Trac, then the 
scope can be whatever.  If I petitioned to build such a plugin, and someone 
else petitioned to do such a plugin, we might have different ideas on what 
could be done.  Maybe my solution is hacky.  Maybe their solution is elegant.  
Maybe my solution doesn't fit the client's needs at all. So I don't think this 
should be negotiated behind closed doors and in fact I would encourage only 
taking petitioners once something precise is left in place.  This is for the 
protection of both the developer and the client to make sure they're on the 
same page.

 There *MUST* be rules to clearly arbitrate interactions between
 bidders and sellers ... control  infrastructure for delivering
 payments ... and many other related issues ...

Ideally yes, but I don't think anyone has the time and money to setup such an 
infrastructure.

 ... so I insist, why not to use an already existing working site for this ... 
 ?
 

Such as?

   * needless to say, any sort of infrastructure is a means of connecting 
  client and developer and it is up to THEM (not to this list, not to 
  as-yet-nonexistant web site, etc) to ensure the contract is fulfilled.
 
 In case of conflicts this should be handled by an arbitration board
 ... if a serious approach is to be followed ... ;)

Again, this seems to involve resources beyond that which are available.

  In other words, no real legal protections are given, though of course if 
  someone faults another person then the victim will probably want to note 
  this in public forum.
 
 
 This doent help ... sellers dont want to waste their time and buyers
 dont want to throw out their money ... ;)

But this already occurs, it just occurs when (e.g.) people show up to #trac and 
ask for paid development on a plugin and they negotiate via private messages.  
I'm not ready to tackle the be-all-end-all of software bounties.  I am ready to 
setup some infrastructure which is better than our no-infrastructure.

   * is post-install support required? can clients pay for installation/setup 
  work?  How many bugs and support hours are asked per hack?  What quality 
  assurance is required?
 
 
 This should be left to the parties to decide ... IMHO ...

Indeed, but it should be noted that this is explicit.  In my experience, 
clients often think they get free support.  Naive, I know.

 ... but I still think that there are enough general purpose (I mean
 Trac and beyond ;) sites for doing this ... I am not sure about using
 yet another one ... that doesnt even meets the barely minimal reqs ...

Such as?

 However if someone ever does something like this, and meets the barely
 minimal reqs ... well that'd be fine ... ;)
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 
 Olemis.

Jeff

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, 

[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-03-30 Thread yoheeb

I am not sure where this thread is headed, but I sure hope trac-hacks
doesn't become a trac specific rent-a-coder site.

As a matter of fact, this seems like something that is perfect for
rent-a-coder, or on of the dozen similar sites.  They already have the
bidding structure in place (configurable, open bid, closed bids, etc.)
the milestone and payment methods.  They handle the payment
processing, etc.  Then each party can work out all the little details
on their own.

that's my nickel anyway.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-03-30 Thread Chris Nelson

yoheeb wrote:
 I am not sure where this thread is headed, but I sure hope trac-hacks
 doesn't become a trac specific rent-a-coder site. 
 
 As a matter of fact, this seems like something that is perfect for
 rent-a-coder, or on of the dozen similar sites.  They already have
 the bidding structure in place (configurable, open bid, closed bids,
 etc.) the milestone and payment methods.  They handle the payment
 processing, etc.  Then each party can work out all the little details
 on their own. 
 
 that's my nickel anyway.

A link at Trac-Hacks or Edgewall that said, You may be able to sponsor
some Trac development at link to rent-a-coder or something would be
perfect for me.  It would steer people looking for Trac development to a
specific site where, one hoped, Trac developers would therefore hang
out.  I don't want to post my requests on 3-4 sites.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] email notification template

2009-03-30 Thread Pacôme MASSOL

Hi,

After an upgrade to 0.11, I wish to modify my ticket_notify_email.txt 
file to do something like this :

#choose ticket.status
  #when 'new'
   do something
  #end
  #when 'closed'
   do something
  #end
#end


But this doesn't work (it worked with the 0.10 and the previous template 
language).

Can anyone help me ?

Thanks in advance.

PM

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Trac 0.11.4 Released

2009-03-30 Thread Jonas Borgström

Trac 0.11.4
===

We're happy to announce the Trac 0.11.4 release.

You will find this release at the usual place:
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDownload

Trac 0.11.4 contains a number of bug fixes and minor enhancements.
The following list contains only a few highlights:

 * Custom mainnav links regression (#8153)
 * Fixed Python 2.3 incompatibility (#8061)
 * Fixed Python 2.6 notification issue (#8083)
 * Fixed PostgreSQL multi column index issue (#7600)

You can find a more detailed release note at:
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/ReleaseNotes/0.11

Acknowledgements


Many thanks to the growing number of people who have, and continue to,
support the project. Also our thanks to all people providing feedback
and bug reports that helps us make Trac better, easier to use and more
effective.
Without your invaluable help, Trac would not evolve. Thank you all.

Finally, we offer hope that Trac will prove itself useful to like-
minded programmers around the world, and that this release will prove an
improvement over the last version.

Please let us know.   :-)
/The Trac Team http://trac.edgewall.org/

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] How to clear the plugins cache ...

2009-03-30 Thread Olemis Lang

Hello ...

I wanna uninstall a plugin via the Admin  Plugins page ... I can do
it right now, however it remains there in the cache, unless I restart
the server ... I wanna remove it from the egg (plugins) cache ... How
can I ? What should I do ?

PD: If you dont get the idea and need further details, pls let me know ...

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:
Comandos : Pipe Viewer ... ¿Qué está pasando por esta tubería?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: How to clear the plugins cache ...

2009-03-30 Thread Noah Kantrowitz

It isn't a cache really, it is the memory-space of the running  
interpreter. The only way to clear this is to flush the interpreter  
memory. In the case of mod_wsgi or mod_fcgi, killing the daemon will  
do this. For mod_py a SIGHUP to apache is enough.

--Noah

On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Olemis Lang wrote:


 Hello ...

 I wanna uninstall a plugin via the Admin  Plugins page ... I can do
 it right now, however it remains there in the cache, unless I restart
 the server ... I wanna remove it from the egg (plugins) cache ... How
 can I ? What should I do ?

 PD: If you dont get the idea and need further details, pls let me  
 know ...

 -- 
 Regards,

 Olemis.

 Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
 Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

 Featured article:
 Comandos : Pipe Viewer ... ¿Qué está pasando por esta tubería?

 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-03-30 Thread Erik Bray

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Chris Nelson chr...@sixnetio.com wrote:

 yoheeb wrote:
 I am not sure where this thread is headed, but I sure hope trac-hacks
 doesn't become a trac specific rent-a-coder site.

 As a matter of fact, this seems like something that is perfect for
 rent-a-coder, or on of the dozen similar sites.  They already have
 the bidding structure in place (configurable, open bid, closed bids,
 etc.) the milestone and payment methods.  They handle the payment
 processing, etc.  Then each party can work out all the little details
 on their own.

 that's my nickel anyway.

 A link at Trac-Hacks or Edgewall that said, You may be able to sponsor
 some Trac development at link to rent-a-coder or something would be
 perfect for me.  It would steer people looking for Trac development to a
 specific site where, one hoped, Trac developers would therefore hang
 out.  I don't want to post my requests on 3-4 sites.

I suppose to add to that there could be a link somewhere prominent on
trac-hacks with a note encouraging Trac plugin developers who might be
willing to write plugins for a bounty to sign up at rent-a-coder.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: How to change commit-hook so that it closes tickets for changesets not in repo?

2009-03-30 Thread Marcus Lindblom

Jani Tiainen wrote:
 Marcus Lindblom kirjoitti:
 Hi all,

 I'm trying to fix this for the TracMercurial-hook, but I suppose it's no
 different for other hooks, such as subversion. (By default, it just
 ignores out-of-band changesets)

 I've tried to alter an existing hook but I don't know enough Trac to
 spot the problem.

 Here's the current source:
 http://bitbucket.org/marcusl/mercurial-trac-hook/src/tip/trachook.py

 All tips greatly appreciated!
 
 I've that very one hook working.
 
 Except I needed to add two lines (on demand loading doesn't seem to work 
 with Trac):
 
 from mercurial import demandimport
 demandimport.disable()
 
 Those I put very first lines and everything works, at least with Trac 
 0.11.something.

Yeah. That's not the problem. It works well, but I'm trying to modify it 
so that changesets that aren't tracked by Trac still affects tickets.

By default, it ignores those changesets, which makes it hard to use a 
single Trac instance with multiple Mercurial repositories a.t.m.

Cheers,
/Marcus


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] Re: Trac plugin contract development

2009-03-30 Thread Michael Renzmann

Hi.

FWIW, I'd be ok with trac-hacks.org supporting a bounty-based development
model in addition to what is there already. We could support such
development by providing resources as we do already for traditional
community-developed hacks, as long as the resulting code will be released
under a recognized FOSS license.

Personally, I'm not in favour of any bidding-style models. Bounties are
fine, as they allow a group of people to throw their money in a pot if
they are interested in a similar piece of software.

I think that the Trac community should not even consider trying to involve
itself into things like providing legal services for the contracting
parties, escrow services or mediation - this is far beyond our scope. If
such services are deemed to be required , there are other platforms which
provide them (but certainly not for free).

However, these are just my 2 cents.

Bye, Mike

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] error accessing trac for first time

2009-03-30 Thread Brendon Anderson
Hello:

I am receiving this error in the Apache log file when I try to access
http://localhost/trac/

mod_wsgi (pid=1212): Target WSGI script 'C:/projects/cbs/wsgi/cbs.wsgi'
cannot be loaded as Python module.
mod_wsgi (pid=1212): Exception occurred processing WSGI script
'C:/projects/cbs/wsgi/cbs.wsgi'.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File C:/projects/cbs/wsgi/cbs.wsgi, line 6, in module
import trac.web.main
  File
c:\\python\\python26\\lib\\site-packages\\Trac-0.11.3-py2.6.egg\\trac\\web\\__init__.py,
line 12, in module
from trac.web.api import *
  File
c:\\python\\python26\\lib\\site-packages\\Trac-0.11.3-py2.6.egg\\trac\\web\\api.py,
line 17, in module
from BaseHTTPServer import BaseHTTPRequestHandler
  File C:\\python\\python26\\lib\\BaseHTTPServer.py, line 75, in module
import socket # For gethostbyaddr()
  File C:\\python\\python26\\lib\\socket.py, line 46, in module
import _socket
ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found.


Trac works when I use the standalone server (tracd).
I'm using:
Python 2.6 (latest)
PostgreSQL 8.3 (latest)
psycopg2
mod_wsgi (which seems to work when I use the example script, apache seems to
be configured correctly)
Apache 2.2 (latest)

Can anybody give me a hand?

Thanks.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[Trac] reassign ticket problem

2009-03-30 Thread zhengquan

Hi, there,
I am a sysadmin new to trac. I have a svn repo on a linux server that
has a trac frontend. Now one of the developers want to reassign some
trac tickets to me. But initially I don't have an account for trac. So
obviously they can not reassign the tickets to me.

I did the following things to try to get this done.


trac-admin /srv/trac/proj1/ permission add zhengquan TRAC_ADMIN
trac-admin /srv/trac/proj1/ permission add zhengquan TICKET_ADMIN

trac-admin /srv/trac/proj1/ permission list
show that I am already a TICKET_ADMIN and TRAC_ADMIN.
zhengquan  TICKET_ADMIN
zhengquan  TRAC_ADMIN

and I can see the admin tab in the web interface logged in as
zhengquan.

Now the problem is I still can not reassign the existing ticket to me
and I don't show up in the reassign pull-down menu username list.


I googled a while and was still confused.

Any pointers would be appreciated.

Thanks!

Z


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---