Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff). That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things < /SPAN>-- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this wise: No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. He has given us His Spirit. Perhaps this is where the "kingdom" comes into play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,? ?heirs of the kingdom of promise,? then, perhaps we are on our way to understanding ?kingdom rule.? Kingdom is tied irrevocably to the communion of God in man;that is what I have come to believe. When we speak of sovereign rule and authority, we do the idea great injustice if we separate that rule fromits inward throne --- the heart and soul of man. Kingdom rule, at whatever level, always includes His ?subjects? That is the illusion -- kingdom = a king and His people. And that is His kingdom. His influence in the people of God.< SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Paul says it this way: The kingdom of God is not eating and drinking but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. Reject the notion of community and you cannot understand the Godhead, the fellowship of the saints, the purpose of creation, the nature of God, the effect of the cross, the vitality and importance of the church, the indwelling spirit and kingdom rule. The heuristic circumstance that best pictures all these things is the consideration of community as the image of God. All of the above
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Clearly so.-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz myth (false prophetsspeak ofJC in the past tense formanipulative personal reasons or asdoes the author, below) On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.
Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity
And absolutely no one disagrees with this -- but if this means that it is not included, that disciple hasmissed an aspect of worship that is of God's design. Jd-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:47:15 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Obesity AND worship is not always done in the throes of ecstasy. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry CliftonSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 7:10 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity From here, his point seems to be that you do not need a community to worship, or a building, or a pastor/priest. Job, by the way, is just one of many examples of this.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And your point -- that we must shave our heads, worship flat on the groundwhile tearing our clothing? ?? JD -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:48:49 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity JOB And there was a day when his sons and his daughters were eating and drinking wine in their eldest brother's house: And there came a messenger unto Job, and said, The oxen were plowing, and the asses feeding beside them: And the Sabeans fell upon them, and took them away; yea, they have slain the servants with the edge of the sword; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, The fire of God is fallen from heaven, and hath burned up the sheep, and the servants, and consumed them; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, The Chaldeans made out three bands, and fell upon the camels, and have carried them away, yea, and slain the servants with the edge of the sword; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, Thy sons and thy daugh ters were eating and drinking wine in their eldest brother's house: And, behold, there came a grea t wind from the wilderness, and smote the four corners of the house, and it fell upon the young men, and they are dead; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. Then Job arose, and rent his mantle, and shaved his head, and fell down upon the ground, and worshipped, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good comments. My wife and I do not look to songs for didache -- rather we score high a service that allows us to praise God and give Him His righteous due. Perhaps reflective of how we approach the Faith in total. JD -Original Message-From: Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:47:35 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity It plays a very important part in the discipline of spiritual growth. Amen. I realized recently that the worship songs I sing have taught me a sort of spiritual jealousy, where I wanted to mean those songs from my heart when I sang them. This one song had a line "You can offer her anything her affections are all for Him only," that showed me how I should desire my God. Though I wouldn't rate it over preaching and teaching, as quoted in Lance's post, I do love worship! Blessings! --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Worship shapes our spirituality "...our spirituality is usually shaped more by the experience of communal worship than it is by preaching and teachingthe way we think about God and relate to God is influenced enormously by our experience of God in communal worship..Songs are especially formative. We are far more likely to find ourselves humming something we sang in church when we go home than we are to find ourselves meditating on a phrase in the sermon..(not one of yours, of course)..Christian philosopher and scientist Michael Polanyi spoke of knowledge that we simply absorb by a kind of 'osmosis' without even realizing that we have done so. This is what he refers to as 'tacit knowledge' Most Christians simply imbibe a theology through the way that they worship. .theology springs from right worship but theology also, in turn, guides and ensures right worship.There is a circular relationship between the two as healthy worship and theology support each otherhow theology can guide the kind of worship that in turn shapes people spirituality. How very true, for my wife and I, at least. Our "church of choice" is Valley Christian Center in Fresno. It is a 2000 member congregation with, perhaps, the best comtemporary worship service in the area. What Polanyi speaks of in the above quote is, perhaps, the same as that referenced by Paul in Eph. 5:18-20. There, spirit filling is an experience received on any occasion the community of saints gather togather in the sharing of song and spiritual hymns. It plays a very important part in the discipline of spiritual growth. Too much attention to the negatives expressed by some saints
Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
If the shoe fits, Judy. if the shoe fits. I am quite sure you ahve used the word 'liberal" on this forum. But that is not important, is it? -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:36:43 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts Don't believe I've ever used the word "liberal" on TT JD. I am into truth vs error rather than liberal vs whatever... and what's this with the angst? Where did that come from? jt On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:58:42 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Have you read Eph 5:18-20. Think "imbibe." And why would you waste everyone's time rejecting such an observation. You do not fight liberalism -- you guys just fight against anything you didn't make up. Nearly everything I believe is accepted by our friends as BSF while you pretend that youare onto something really big in fight'en those dirty ol' liberals. You got Deegan all alone up there in the North, wishing that he had paid more attention in his English comprehension class -- Izzy there in St Louis pretending that she really understands what is going on and David pretending that he is the one who cast's the larger shadow (with the Lord's help, of course.) Why not drop all this ankst and get on with the discussion. I will if you will. It is up to you all. Be our example and we (I am sure) will follow suit. JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] If one goes around imbibing spiritual atmospheres where is spiritual discernment? The animal kingdom are the ones who are led by instinct. Human beings need to learn and God makes surewe are taught to know the voice of the Shepherd. jt On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:12:14 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are we ALL as predictable as you, Judy? Given this I'm not sure why you don't just have two 'repeater' words: 'Amen' for David (by extension, Christine), Izzie Kevin. 'Nein' for all of the rest of us. The time you could save, Judy! From: Judy Taylor On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:48:10 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Worship shapes our spirituality "...our spirituality is usually shaped more by the experience of communal worship than it is by preaching and teachingthe way we think about God and relate to God is influenced enormously by our experience of God in communal worship..Songs are especially formative. We are far more likely to find ourselves humming something we sang in church when we go home than we are to find ourselves meditating on a phrase in the sermon..(not one of yours, of course).. jt: I would disagree with the above statement Lance - Is it yours? Actually spirituality shapes worship rather than vice-versa because true worship depends upon a correct heart attitude and we do not enter God's presence just any old way - We must properly prepare ourselves to worship.. And God does not accept all of it. He spoke through the prophet Amos and told the Israel of that day that their feasts and worship times literally made him want to vomit ... He also spoke through the prophet Isaiah about a crowd who were pretty pleased with themselves and thesedescended into sheol rejoicing. Christian philosopher and scientist Michael Polanyi spoke of knowledge that we simply absorb by a kind of 'osmosis' without even realizing that we have done so. This is what he refers to as 'tacit knowledge'Most Christians simply imbibe a theology through the way that they worship. jt: This is not the way anyone is to learn let alone Christians. This is how the animals perform (by instinct). Humans must be taught, we have been given a mind so that we can think and God will reveal Himself to whomsoever He will. The only ones who imbibe should be drunks. .theology springs from right worship but theology also, in turn, guides and ensures right worship.There is a circular relationship between the two as healthy worship and theology support each otherhow theology can guide the kind of worship that in turn shapes people spirituality. jt: Just like your little trinitarian dance, round and round and round we go...
Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity
Oh, I can heartedly agree. We have made church a spectator sport. But the larger assemblies are not all bad. Jd-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 21:23:01 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tERRY -- YOU ARE NO MORE p.o.ED WITHT EH CHURCH TAHN i AM -- but you might rethink your comments in view of the following: Do not forsake the assembling of yourselves together -- encouraging one another to love and good works. Heb 10:25 .. breaking bread from house to house, they were taking their meals together with gladness and sincerity of hear. acts 2:46 We are to share in the worship of song -- a group thing. Eph 5:18-20 Speaking the truth in love, we are to grow upin all aspects into Him the whole body (read:church) being fitted and held together for the building up of itself (the church) in love Eph 4:15,16. I could go on, but you know these scriptures better than I. If for no other reason, "ye who are spiritual help those who are weak" can be a reason to attend. We (my wife and I ) have our times when we do not attend but we are always benefitted insome when we are there. After all, "church" was God's big idea !! JD==I am not down on church,John. We attend regularly. We just do it from house to house like the scriptures say some of the early believers did. We share a meal and afterward we play Bereans, sing songs, the whole works. You should try it. It sure beats staring at the back of the heads in the pew in front of you while one guy gives his spiel and everyone else tries to stay awake.
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 21:19 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz You dont make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it isnt Hitler its McCarthy. Get a new, but more creative insult please. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz So then Kevin, in Senator McCarthy like fashion you hurl out accusations sans proof in the hope that the accusation itself will serve you well enough! I'd have though as much.
Re: [TruthTalk] The Truth About the Congo
'THE' truth about the Congo is that you didn't even know it's location until you just 'googled' it. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 21:36 Subject: [TruthTalk] The Truth About the Congo US is largest contributor to UN Peacekeeping missions. UN Officials rape and abuse refugees in Congo: http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/hl868.cfm. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
[TruthTalk] A public request to DaveH
You've outlined your reasons for being here on numerous occasions, Dave.You write well. You read well. You've undoubtedly learned much. Would you kindly consider the following: 1. Write a description of Mormonism, as if you were a non-Mormon, utilizing the information you've gleaned while being a participant on TT? 2. Write a description of Evangelicalism, from a Mormon persepctive, utilizing the information you've gleaned while being a participant on TT? It need not be some multi-page, to-be-published, document. Just do what you've already demonstrated that you do well. I. and every thoughtful participant on TT, understands that youdraw a distinction between believers non-believerswhich places 'us' in the NB category. I'm genuinely interested in this. Unless the moderator objects I'd really like to hear you on both of the above. Lance
[TruthTalk] What is church?
*Note Subject Change Old Subject: Obesity New Subject: What is church? John wrote: We (my wife and I ) have our times when we do not attend but we are always benefitted insome when we are there. After all, church was God's big idea !! I don't think Terry is against church per se. He simply views church as the community of believers, not as some event that people attend. John brings up an important point here. Church was God's big idea. The point Terry is raising concerns exactly what was this idea of church. Terry contends that what most people call church today is not God's idea. I think Terry has an important point here that should not be glossed over. When God had the idea of church for man, was it the idea of a building with a steeple where people would come together on Sunday, sing a few song, drop some money in the plate that is passed, listen to a short sermon, and then get out of there by lunch? Did God have the idea of people ATTENDING church? At the time when Jesus appeared in the flesh, there already was something like this. It was called synagogue. Problem is, that wasn't God's idea either. The synagogue was something that evolved because of Israel's sin. When they were dispersed because of God's Judgment upon them and the Temple was destroyed, they congregated in the synagogue instead of the Temple. The Temple was something God had instituted, and it had a daily service, both morning and evening as well as during the day. The synagogue was something man had instituted, and it met every Saturday. When the Temple was built again, synagogue continued as well as a place to read and study Torah, but there really was no Biblical mandate for it. That does not make it wrong, per se, but when we are talking about God's idea of an assembly, we should keep this perspective in mind. God instituted Temple. He did not institute synagogue. Synagogue was something God allowed to develop, and it was something that God participated in. Jesus spoke of his congregation using a different word from that which was used to talk about synagogue. It was ekklesia. This was a word used to talk about a smaller group called out of a larger group, and it was called out having a specific purpose in mind. For example, each of the Greek city states had a political body that would assemble to deal with political issues. This group was called ekklesia (our word we translate as church). The confused mob of Ephesus in Acts 19 that was against the believers also was called ekklesia. In other words, the word translated as church in the Bible did not have a religious connotation when it was used by Jesus or his disciples. When we begin to understand this, we begin to see that the concept of church that God had when he put it forward as something he would build is not the concept of church that most of us have today. The word assembly probably is closer to the original word ekklesia than the word church. William Tyndale, often called the father of the English Bible, never used the word church once in his translation of the Scriptures. He always translated ekklesia as congregation instead of church. Much more to say, but this post is too long already. Anybody up for talking about what church is? Terry has put forward that church is not something we attend. John speaks of church as something we attend and seems to have perceived Terry to be someone who forsakes church. My perspective is that while church is something we can attend, Terry has an important point about how we are the church and that we ought not attend church in order to passively warm pews, fill the offering plate, listen to someone else sermonize, then go home until the next time church meets. There really is a kind of idolatry in this scenario, isn't there? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity
Terry wrote: Possibly you are correct, but I see Paul as more of a transient evangelist or missionary than as a resident elder/pastor/priest ... I agree. In such situations, it is natural for the group to be more passive and want to hear him exclusively before he leaves. Terry wrote: Seems funny that when he gives details as to why the saints come together it is never to hear a sermon. Actually, he does tell the saints that they come together to GIVE a sermon, and such implies that there will be some there to HEAR a sermon. :-) 1 Corinthians 14:26 (26) How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying. Notice the word doctrine in this list of what the Corinthian believers were doing when the whole church comes together. This is teaching -- a sermon. However, I think in this case, more interaction is involved than is found in the typical Christian congregation on a Sunday morning. Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff). That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things /SPAN-- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this wise: No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. He has given us His Spirit. Perhaps this is where the "kingdom" comes into play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,? ?heirs of the kingdom of promise,? then, perhaps we are on our way to understanding ?kingdom rule.? Kingdom is tied irrevocably to the communion of God in man;that is what I have come to believe. When we speak of sovereign rule and authority, we do the idea great injustice if we separate that rule fromits inward throne --- the heart and soul of man. Kingdom rule, at whatever level, always includes His ?subjects? That is the illusion -- kingdom = a king and His people. And that is His kingdom. His influence in the people of God. SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes" Paul says it this way: The kingdom of God is not eating and drinking but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. Reject the notion of community and you cannot understand the Godhead, the fellowship of the saints, the purpose of creation, the nature of God, the effect of the cross, the vitality and importance of the church, the indwelling spirit and kingdom rule. The heuristic circumstance that best pictures all these things is
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
David Miller wrote: ... Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do. Gary wrote: myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative personal reasons or as does the author, below) If I had spoken in the present tense and told you what Jesus Christ said to me today, you would still have an ad hominem slap to send my way. How about giving it a rest. We are looking for posts with substance, not posts that malign and accuse other TruthTalk members of evil. Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Lance wrote: I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. I agree, Lance, that my concern for global issues is not very high. In fact, my concern for national issues isn't very high either. I'm in one of those situations where things are so bad here at home that I try to take care of the problems here and do not have much of myself left to concern myself with issues across the other side of the globe. I hope one day that I might be used that way, but right now, my plate is full and I don't know how to add global issues to it. My hope lies in the pattern seen in Acts 1, where he says to be witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. Historically there was a progression in maturity from things local to things global. I think perhaps that you are older than me. Was there ever a time in your life when you were not concerned enough with things global? Lance wrote: To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. What is your perspective about the more than 46 million deaths through abortion? Do you have a solution to this problem? Are you concerned about it? I haven't heard you address the problem of abortion. Don't you think we should start with this more local problem of abortion rather than the problems in the Ivory Coast and related areas? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Was there ever a time when...Yes, there was. Abortion. Have you read 'Freakonomics'? Look at his 'take' on abortion. Yes I do have a solution. Starting with yourself and, working outward, tell men not to get women pregnant who will not carry the pregnancy to term. Is this a joke? It is not! - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 08:56 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance wrote: I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. I agree, Lance, that my concern for global issues is not very high. In fact, my concern for national issues isn't very high either. I'm in one of those situations where things are so bad here at home that I try to take care of the problems here and do not have much of myself left to concern myself with issues across the other side of the globe. I hope one day that I might be used that way, but right now, my plate is full and I don't know how to add global issues to it. My hope lies in the pattern seen in Acts 1, where he says to be witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. Historically there was a progression in maturity from things local to things global. I think perhaps that you are older than me. Was there ever a time in your life when you were not concerned enough with things global? Lance wrote: To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. What is your perspective about the more than 46 million deaths through abortion? Do you have a solution to this problem? Are you concerned about it? I haven't heard you address the problem of abortion. Don't you think we should start with this more local problem of abortion rather than the problems in the Ivory Coast and related areas? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
[TruthTalk] Jesus 'thinks' globally (how could He not?) IFF you......
have the mind of Christ then... Both nationalism and idealism are counterproductive vis a vis the kingdom of God. I'd also assert that Jesus is a critical realist! For those from Rio Linda (a Rushism), ask DavidM.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Lance wrote: We may have unamimity on my next observation (?): At the end of all ends what will matter is whether or not Jesus identifies you as a Christian. Amen, Lance. Well said. Whether or not we know Jesus is not nearly as important as whether or not Jesus knows us. Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Mester Blaine: Jesus, indeed, is the same.The notion that he has spoken in this dispensation is apparently given credence (in your thinking) because of the claim to fame -- 4th largest denomination. What does the comparison of numbers mean when you compare to say -- Buddhism? How are you doing in that exchange. Could it be that numbers mean absolutely nothing when it comes to the establishment of truth. I mean, my family is larger than yours... 7 kids and 12 grandchildren. That makes us --- what? Right? Secondly, the Mormon revelations have nothing to do with the First Church. There was no doctrine in the first church that provided for polygamy. Blacks were welcome. Grace, not works, was the theme of the day, God as expressed in the Godhead, was and is the only God, salvation was a gifted occurrence apart from the law, the church was never "right" in terms of the thinking and actions of its membership, and the governmental structure of the first church was nothing similar to what you have today -- dispite the use of such words as "elders" and "bishops." bsp; No one believed that Temple righteousness played a role in securing new heavens and new earths for the faithful -- becoming gods to the same degree as the god of this earth. I mention the "first church," because the justification for the revelations of Mormonism have everything to do a supposed apostasy from the True Church of the first century.such an opinionignores the factthat "first church" was divided based on doctrine and if we count heads,doctrinal error(works salvationism -- Jewish style)was, by far, the majority opinion. The notion that the church and its leadership had controls over the individual members (a false doctrine) led to the establishment of the Pope and the continuance of works salvationism. There would have been no Pope if the membership understood that the rule of the bishop was a rule of example only. The first church did not understand the theology of accepted diversity as taught in Romans 14. In fact, if we cut out all the material inthe NT letters, if we cut all the material that was written to inform and correct the thinking of the first church - we would have nothing left but a pamphlet of NT instruction. JD -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 01:29:00 EDTSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH In a message dated 6/1/2005 1:34:33 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The mormons have their JSmith; the J.Witnesses have their CT Russell, theChristian Scientists have their Mary Baker Eddy; the RCC's have their Pope,and the Incarnationalists have their "Bishop". Ever wonder if ANY of themhave the "right" Jesus? Izzy Blaine: The "Right" Jesus is the one we all worship, and saying he is different because of this or that is rediculous.Jesus has not changed, and he has spoken to men in this dispensation, just as in olden times, and the truths he taught will eventually engulf the world, as the stone(His Church) cut out of the side of the mountain rolls forth and eventually fills the whole earth. And Pairing Joseph Smith with a bunch of other false Christs and false prophets is just another of Satan's tricks.You are using the "guilt by association" approach to reasoning, which is false reasoning, and shameful for anyone to have to resort to it. By the way, the Mormon Church is now the 4th largest denomination in America. Just two years ago, it was the 5th largest.
Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
Pretty much rigth on, Florida Man. And I do not know what happened when I sent this thing -- all the queston marks. ... most of them occur in the place of my ( " ") . I wrote this in Word and copied it over. I think I have done this before without this kind of problem -- sorry folks. Jd-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 07:26:06 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff). That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons.. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things /SPAN-- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the d ay [?ye shall not surely die ] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help tho se who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this wise: No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. He has given us His Spirit. Perhaps this is where the "kingdom" comes into play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,? ?heirs of the kingdom of promise,? then, p erhaps we are on our way to understanding ?kingdom rule.? Kingdom is tied irrevocably to the communion of God in man;that is what I have come to believe. When we speak of sovereign rule and authority, we do the idea great injustice if we separate that rule fromits inward throne --- the heart and soul of man. Kingdom rule, at whatever level, always includes His ?subjects? That is the illusion -- kingdom = a king and His people. And that is His kingdom. His influence in the people of God. SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes" Paul
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Whew !! Take a pill, there DM guy. You got people on the right running wild with ad hom and you go after Mr. G ?? Predictable. JD-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 08:32:36 -0400Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz David Miller wrote: ... Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do. Gary wrote: myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative personal reasons or as does the author, below) If I had spoken in the present tense and told you what Jesus Christ said to me today, you would still have an ad hominem slap to send my way. How about giving it a rest. We are looking for posts with substance, not posts that malign and accuse other TruthTalk members of evil. Peace be with you. David Miller. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Poor JDno sympathy anywhere! (You need a nice dog.) Let me know when the new me is going away so I can hide. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 7:56 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz If I said these things, you would be all over me -- boredom has its fruit. Just remember you wrote this -- when I get off my new me kick (hopefully that will never happen) I will get even. Butfor the time being, I think you knew I would think this funny, I have act ually saved it !! I showedone of my boys what I am up against on TT --- laughter in the place of sympathy was all I got. JD -Original Message- From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]com To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 03:04:03 -0500 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz I guess I just have no sensitivity at all, because I'm cracking up over the whole thing! It only strikes me as funny coming from Smithson. I can just see him laughing up his sleeve. Of course it's probably true, with him being in the construction business, but I just thought I'd pull his leg. (If he has one!) Sorry!!! No more sick (nurse) humor!!! (JD I really don't care what's missing!)Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 9:16 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Izzy, first of all, it is none of your business if anyone on this group has a malady, or is missing appendages. What do you mean, he is just now telling us? What makes you think you even entitled to know this, or that he is obligated to tell you? Second, John gave us a valid reason for his typos, so why do you think he is being dishonest? Third, if you had any sensitivity at all you would drop your prideful attitude, quit trying to cover up your comment with cuteness, and admit it was tacky. Unless, of course, you have no sensitivity at all. Perry From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:51:47 -0500 Why is that Perry? When folks start make good-natured fun of JD's typo's suddenly he tells us he has two missing fingers. Now how long have we known JD and he is just now telling us that? Do you believe it? If we complain that he is not making sense is he going to suddenly confess that he had a lobotomy back in the 50's, or what??? Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 8:37 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Izzy, I felt your post below was a bit tacky. I speak as your brother, not as moderator. From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are those the only body parts you are missing, or are you holding out on us, JD? (Sounds like a likely story to me!) Iz -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Blaine, its only shameful if Im wrong. And Im not. One day you will wish with all your heart that you had heeded the warnings you have been given here on TT. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are using the guilt by association approach to reasoning, which is false reasoning, and shameful for anyone to have to resort to it.
RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
Methodist, around the corner from our home. One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered with sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts what church? On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..a church service..in which the Reverend was a lesbian
RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
JD, all this talk of community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each others fellowship. Its a priority thing. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff). That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things /SPAN -- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this wise: No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. He has given us His Spirit. Perhaps this is where the kingdom comes into play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,? ?heirs of the kingdom of promise,? then, perhaps we are on our way to understanding ?kingdom rule.? Kingdom is tied irrevocably to the communion of God in man; that is what I have come to believe. When we speak of sovereign rule and authority, we do the idea great injustice if we separate that rule from its inward throne --- the heart and soul of man. Kingdom rule, at whatever level, always includes His ?subjects? That is the illusion -- kingdom = a king and His people. And that is His kingdom. His influence in the people of God. SPAN style=mso-spacerun:
RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Jesus will undoubtedly one day set the record straight for everyone on how important He considers God's Word to be. That will be a day of woe for some. Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:08 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of both. (Jesus Scripture) - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance wrote: I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie) I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into the mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture. Don't you think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do? Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the following passage: John 10:34-36 (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture. And why not, he also taught that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away. Matthew 5:17-18 (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey those expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists. Matthew 23:2-3 (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ? Is it those who greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who think it would be evil legalism to do so? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 'driving' around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in order to fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on sister! - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:42 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts Methodist, around the corner from our home. One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered with sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts what church? On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..a church service..in which the Reverend was a lesbian
RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we follow your example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 21:19 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz You dont make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis, according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it isnt Hitler its McCarthy. Get a new, but more creative insult please. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz So then Kevin, in Senator McCarthy like fashion you hurl out accusations sans proof in the hope that the accusation itself will serve you well enough! I'd have though as much.
RE: [TruthTalk] The Truth About the Congo
Golly, I always thought it was located in Canda--imagine that! Why don't YOU try Googleing some accurate facts once in a while yourself? Oh, yeah, you used Liberal-Google.com, right? Iz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:22 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Truth About the Congo 'THE' truth about the Congo is that you didn't even know it's location until you just 'googled' it. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 21:36 Subject: [TruthTalk] The Truth About the Congo US is largest contributor to UN Peacekeeping missions. UN Officials rape and abuse refugees in Congo: http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/hl868.cfm. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
A little like you leaving your neighborhood to reach your neighborhood? A I get it. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:47 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God JD, all this talk of community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each others fellowship. Its a priority thing. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff). That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things /SPAN -- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this wise: No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. He has given us His Spirit. Perhaps this is where the "kingdom" comes into play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,? ?heirs of the kingdom of promise,? then, perhaps we are on our way to
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Oh c'mon Izzie, name names. Can you recall just how well the religious leaders quoted the scriptures? Do I believe that YOU esteem the Scriptures? I do. Do I also think that you quote it 'religiously'? I do. You are flip, smart-mouthed and, on occasion, rather unpleasant to read. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:50 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Jesus will undoubtedly one day set the record straight for everyone on how important He considers God's Word to be. That will be a day of woe for some. Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:08 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of both. (Jesus Scripture) - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance wrote: I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie) I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into the mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture. Don't you think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do? Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the following passage: John 10:34-36 (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture. And why not, he also taught that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away. Matthew 5:17-18 (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey those expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists. Matthew 23:2-3 (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ? Is it those who greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who think it would be evil legalism to do so? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
David has given you a more appropriate answer than Izzie but, she has a good heart? (I think so, anyway) - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:44 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Blaine, its only shameful if Im wrong. And Im not. One day you will wish with all your heart that you had heeded the warnings you have been given here on TT. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]You are using the "guilt by association" approach to reasoning, which is false reasoning, and shameful for anyone to have to resort to it.
RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
I agree totally, Lance. Let's just tell men not to impregnate women and see if that flies. I'm sure it will do a lot to change hearts and lives. Meanwhile, for those who aren't listening, let's change laws to protect the innocent unborn. Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 7:07 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Was there ever a time when...Yes, there was. Abortion. Have you read 'Freakonomics'? Look at his 'take' on abortion. Yes I do have a solution. Starting with yourself and, working outward, tell men not to get women pregnant who will not carry the pregnancy to term. Is this a joke? It is not! - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 08:56 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance wrote: I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. I agree, Lance, that my concern for global issues is not very high. In fact, my concern for national issues isn't very high either. I'm in one of those situations where things are so bad here at home that I try to take care of the problems here and do not have much of myself left to concern myself with issues across the other side of the globe. I hope one day that I might be used that way, but right now, my plate is full and I don't know how to add global issues to it. My hope lies in the pattern seen in Acts 1, where he says to be witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. Historically there was a progression in maturity from things local to things global. I think perhaps that you are older than me. Was there ever a time in your life when you were not concerned enough with things global? Lance wrote: To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. What is your perspective about the more than 46 million deaths through abortion? Do you have a solution to this problem? Are you concerned about it? I haven't heard you address the problem of abortion. Don't you think we should start with this more local problem of abortion rather than the problems in the Ivory Coast and related areas? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
[TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE
IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat more narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of aids, starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me Worry'? N - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:54 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we follow your example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 21:19 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz You dont make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it isnt Hitler its McCarthy. Get a new, but more creative insult please. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz So then Kevin, in Senator McCarthy like fashion you hurl out accusations sans proof in the hope that the accusation itself will serve you well enough! I'd have though as much.
RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
I suppose you would sit there and celebrate the community of diversity under the leadership of that pervert woman? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:54 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 'driving' around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in order to fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on sister! - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:42 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts Methodist, around the corner from our home. One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered with sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts what church? On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..a church service..in which the Reverend was a lesbian
RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
Ask my neighbors. Dont ask the sodomite whore-church. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:57 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God A little like you leaving your neighborhood to reach your neighborhood? A I get it. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:47 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God JD, all this talk of community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each others fellowship. Its a priority thing. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff). That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things /SPAN -- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this wise: No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. He has given us His Spirit. Perhaps this is where the kingdom comes into play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,?
Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
I, for one, do not blame such as yourself, who choose the 'broad road' that leadeth to fellowshipping with 'non-sinners'. What was it again that Jesus was criticized for? With whom was he hanging out? A but, you take the Scriptures seriously unlike some who shall remain nameless (eh?)! - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 11:11 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts I suppose you would sit there and celebrate the community of diversity under the leadership of that pervert woman? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:54 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 'driving' around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in order to fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on sister! - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:42 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts Methodist, around the corner from our home. One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered with sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts what church? On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..a church service..in which the Reverend was a lesbian
RE: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE
Im still WAITING, Lance. Answer the QUESTION, Lance! Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:10 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat more narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of aids, starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me Worry'? N - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:54 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we follow your example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 21:19 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz You dont make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis, according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it isnt Hitler its McCarthy. Get a new, but more creative insult please. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz So then Kevin, in Senator McCarthy like fashion you hurl out accusations sans proof in the hope that the accusation itself will serve you well enough! I'd have though as much.
RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
ANSWER THE QUESTION LANCE. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:16 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts I, for one, do not blame such as yourself, who choose the 'broad road' that leadeth to fellowshipping with 'non-sinners'. What was it again that Jesus was criticized for? With whom was he hanging out? A but, you take the Scriptures seriously unlike some who shall remain nameless (eh?)! - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 11:11 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts I suppose you would sit there and celebrate the community of diversity under the leadership of that pervert woman? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:54 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 'driving' around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in order to fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on sister! - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:42 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts Methodist, around the corner from our home. One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered with sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts what church? On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..a church service..in which the Reverend was a lesbian
RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
And you are a breath of fresh air, Lance. A joy and delight. Blessings. (PS I wasn't being flip, but utterly sincere.) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:01 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Oh c'mon Izzie, name names. Can you recall just how well the religious leaders quoted the scriptures? Do I believe that YOU esteem the Scriptures? I do. Do I also think that you quote it 'religiously'? I do. You are flip, smart-mouthed and, on occasion, rather unpleasant to read. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:50 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Jesus will undoubtedly one day set the record straight for everyone on how important He considers God's Word to be. That will be a day of woe for some. Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:08 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of both. (Jesus Scripture) - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance wrote: I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie) I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into the mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture. Don't you think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do? Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the following passage: John 10:34-36 (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture. And why not, he also taught that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away. Matthew 5:17-18 (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey those expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists. Matthew 23:2-3 (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ? Is it those who greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who think it would be evil legalism to do so? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL
Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz
Gary, To call someone's comments a myth (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it. Perry the moderator From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600 myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative personal reasons or as does the author, below) On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Lance, if you are going to state that David's citations demonstrate a misreadng, please provide some evidence of such and allow David to respond. Perry the Moderator From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:08:12 -0400 As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of both. (Jesus Scripture) - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance wrote: I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie) I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into the mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture. Don't you think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do? Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the following passage: John 10:34-36 (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture. And why not, he also taught that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away. Matthew 5:17-18 (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey those expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists. Matthew 23:2-3 (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ? Is it those who greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who think it would be evil legalism to do so? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Why? - Original Message - From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 11:37 Subject: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance, if you are going to state that David's citations demonstrate a misreadng, please provide some evidence of such and allow David to respond. Perry the Moderator From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:08:12 -0400 As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of both. (Jesus Scripture) - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance wrote: I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie) I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into the mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture. Don't you think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do? Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the following passage: John 10:34-36 (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture. And why not, he also taught that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away. Matthew 5:17-18 (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey those expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists. Matthew 23:2-3 (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ? Is it those who greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who think it would be evil legalism to do so? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE
Tell us? Ask Jesus what you should do, Iz. Guiltless? Have you seen 'Shake Hands With The Devil"? Look at Clinton and Albright showing up in Rwanda years later claiming that they did not know the extent of that holocaust. That holocaust was a mere 800,000. Who was the General who stayed behind during the conflict? Why Iz, it was Romeo Dallaire, a Canadian General.I'll pay for the rental cost if you'll get it and watch it. Thereafter I'd love to hear something other than a simple dismissal re: the second worst tragedy since WWII. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 11:16 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE Im still WAITING, Lance. Answer the QUESTION, Lance! Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:10 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat more narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of aids, starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me Worry'? N - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:54 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we follow your example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 21:19 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz You dont make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
I never use the term, and have no definition. But if I wanted one I would see if there was a comon usage for the term. I wouldn't make up my own definition to fit my own desires. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 01:37:52 EDT So, what is your definition of priestcraft, Perry? Blaine In a message dated 6/3/2005 7:17:13 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blaine wrote: Priestcraft is, by my definition, ... Here we go again...the mormons like to make up their own meanings for words, to suit thier own personal perception of the world. I call this the Queen of Hearts syndrome: Words mean exactly what I want them to mean! When a person is steeped in a culture in which the cultural leaders redefine words to have untraditional meanings, for the purpose of making the culture appear to be other than it really is, this begins to affect it's adherents, as we see with Blaine above, and have recently seen with DaveH in his limited definition of the word teach, which exclusdes his own actions on TT. Another case in point is the Clinton case where his attempt tp liimit the definition of certain words and phrases to exclude his own actions has been passed down to our youth, who at times use these tactics to try to exclude thier own actions. Another, but inverse, example is the word homophobe. In this case the definition of the word has been EXPANDED to include not only those who fear homosexuality (traditional definition), but to include those who beleive that it is sinful behavior. The root of this is in the politically correct movement, where it does not matter what you feel or believe, but how you are perceived. Wow. What a world! Perry -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Because if you can not support your claims, they are likely false, and bearing false witness...well...you know. From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:38:36 -0400 Why? - Original Message - From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 11:37 Subject: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance, if you are going to state that David's citations demonstrate a misreadng, please provide some evidence of such and allow David to respond. Perry the Moderator From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:08:12 -0400 As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of both. (Jesus Scripture) - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance wrote: I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie) I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into the mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture. Don't you think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do? Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the following passage: John 10:34-36 (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture. And why not, he also taught that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away. Matthew 5:17-18 (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey those expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists. Matthew 23:2-3 (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ? Is it those who greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who think it would be evil legalism to do so? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to
Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz
Gary might have the gift of discernment, Charles. If this is the case then, simply 'discerning' (though he didn't, as you seem to suggest infer David was a false prophet, IMO) is sufficient. Why not let David take care of this privately? - Original Message - From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 11:32 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz Gary, To call someone's comments a myth (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it. Perry the moderator From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600 myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative personal reasons or as does the author, below) On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
There is no false witness being 'borne' here, CPL. I've been reading David for a long, long, long while. He has a way of parsing definite articles. I already know what David would say in response to my 'supportive arguments'. So then, as I bear up under your mutual monologues with the Mormons, you can tolerate my 'read' of David's very distinctive theological 'bent'. - Original Message - From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 11:41 Subject: Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Because if you can not support your claims, they are likely false, and bearing false witness...well...you know. From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:38:36 -0400 Why? - Original Message - From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 11:37 Subject: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance, if you are going to state that David's citations demonstrate a misreadng, please provide some evidence of such and allow David to respond. Perry the Moderator From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:08:12 -0400 As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of both. (Jesus Scripture) - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance wrote: I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie) I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into the mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture. Don't you think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do? Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the following passage: John 10:34-36 (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture. And why not, he also taught that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away. Matthew 5:17-18 (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey those expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists. Matthew 23:2-3 (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ? Is it those who greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who think it would be evil legalism to do so? Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive
[TruthTalk] For those who want Scripture and in the KJV translation
I'd heartily recommend 2 Tim 3:1-17 enjoy
Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz
Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. JD-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:32:04 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz Gary, To call someone's comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.Perry the moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible QuizDate: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz
Ah at last! A level headed opinion. Whewww, thought I was being left without a 'supporter' (a nod's as good as a wink) - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 12:12 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. JD-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:32:04 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz Gary, To call someone's comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.Perry the moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible QuizDate: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
Well, it most certainly is not humanism, Linda. Or maybe I should ask what you think humanism is before going any further. David M accused me of the same thing -- perhaps this is where you got the idea. He too, left off giving me a definition. What was written below is a first draft attempt at continuing the task of understanding, on my part. It could not be more God centered -- so how is it humanism. What is you defintion? Jd-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:47:48 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God JD, all this talk of community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each other?s fellowship. It?s a priority thing. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff). That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things /SPAN -- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ] sp; His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this wise: sp; No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. He has given us His Spirit. Perhaps this is where the "kingdom" comes into play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, wh ether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,?
Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Let me get this straight - IYO it is the duty of America as a nation to go in and try to heal the epidemic of violence and Aids in the Congo with what?? Just how does the gospel of the Kingdom cover a situation such as this? jt On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:09:29 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why? It is the gospel of the kingdom, that's why. From: Judy Taylor Lance why are you so busy judging nations? The Lord is the one who will take care of that in His time. We are supposed to be examining ourselves to see if WE are in the faith so that we will be on the right side when He returns. jt On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:18:23 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If this was a source of oil Kevin, your country WOULD BE THERE! Terry sees this. From: Kevin Deegan These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August Why don't you go over there and do something about it? Talk is cheap!Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it isnt Hitler its McCarthy. Get a new, but more creative insult please. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz So then Kevin, in Senator McCarthy like fashion you hurl out accusations sans proof in the hope that the accusation itself will serve you well enough! I'd have though as much. Discover Yahoo!Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM more. Check it out!
Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
JD/Perry what about the fact that some (possibly including Gary) hold to a doctrine that teaches them that the spiritual gifts Jesus gave to the Church are not for today - that they died out with the last apostle - as senseless as that may be. A person like that would not accept a genuine prophet in their midst, nor would they be qualified to evaluate the gift operating through them which would make their opinion on the subject without foundation and pointless. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:12:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. JDFrom: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary, To call someone's comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.Perry the moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
does the "love of God" in your life say anything to this problem or is your thinking that the Government fulfills your responsiblity to those dying in the Congo? - or is that just more liberal nonsense? JD-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:54:13 -0500Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we follow your example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 21:19 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz You don?t make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. You?re really ?out there? my friend. And your concerns about the Congo?what are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (It?s a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it isn?t ?Hitler? it?s ?McCarthy?. Get a new, but more creative insult please. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz So then Kevin, in Senator McCarthy like fashion you hurl out accusations sans proof in the hope that the accusation itself will serve you well enough! I'd have though as much.
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:58:11 -0400Subject: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz JD/Perry what about the fact that some (possibly including Gary) hold to a doctrine that teaches them that the spiritual gifts Jesus gave to the Church are not for today - that they died out with the last apostle - as senseless as that may be. A person like that would not accept a genuine prophet in their midst, nor would they be qualified to evaluate the gift operating through them which would make their opinion on the subject without foundation and pointless. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:12:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. JDFrom: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary, To call someone's comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.Perry the moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD/Perry what about the fact that some (possibly including Gary) hold to a doctrine that teaches them that the spiritual gifts Jesus gave to the Church are not for today - that they died out with the last apostle - as senseless as that may be. A person like that would not accept a genuine prophet in their midst, nor would they be qualified to evaluate the gift operating through them which would make their opinion on the subject without foundation and pointless. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:12:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. JDFrom: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary, To call someone's comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.Perry the moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mester Blaine: Jesus, indeed, is the same.The notion that he has spoken in this dispensation is apparently given credence (in your thinking) because of the claim to fame -- 4th largest denomination. What does the comparison of numbers mean when you compare to say -- Buddhism? How are you doing in that exchange. Could it be that numbers mean absolutely nothing when it comes to the establishment of truth. I mean, my family is larger than yours... 7 kids and 12 grandchildren. That makes us --- what? Right? Secondly, the Mormon revelations have nothing to do with the First Church. There was no doctrine in the first church that provided for polygamy. Blacks were welcome. Grace, not works, was the theme of the day, God as expressed in the Godhead, was and is the only God, salvation was a gifted occurrence apart from the law, the church was never "right" in terms of the thinking and actions of its membership, and the governmental structure of the first church was nothing similar to what you have today -- dispite the use of such words as "elders" and "bishops."n bsp; No one believed that Temple righteousness played a role in securing new heavens and new earths for the faithful -- becoming gods to the same degree as the god of this earth. I mention the "first church," because the justification for the revelations of Mormonism have everything to do a supposed apostasy from the True Church of the first century.such an opinionignores the factthat "first church" was divided based on doctrine and if we count heads,doctrinal error(works salvationism -- Jewish style)was, by far, the majority opinion. The notion that the church and its leadership had controls over the individual members (a false doctrine) led to the establishment of the Pope and the continuance of works salvationism. There would have been no Pope if the membership understood that the rule of the bishop was a rule of example only. The first church did not understand the theology of accepted diversity as taught in Romans 14. In fact, if we cut out all the material inthe NT letters, if we cut all the material that was written to inform and correct the thinking of the first church - we would have nothing left but a pamphlet of NT instruction. JD = Well done, John!! Especially that last sentence. Terry
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
JD show me in scripture where God makes "his ppl" responsible for the ills of the whole world? The Church is responsible to witness to the Truth and the Truth is what will make them free. In the world there is always some crisis. It is just one big demonic game. I can remember the 60's when my sister would send these newspaper clippings to me about impending doom from a nuclear catastrophe and everyone was investing in bomb shelters which proved to be a mirage. Missionaries have been sent to Zaire - we have some living locally and some boys from that nation who are here to study. CBN is also very involved. ... So if there is something we are all missing please post Chapter and verse and I for one will give it some thought and some prayer. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:03:16 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: does the "love of God" in your life say anything to this problem or is your thinking that the Government fulfills your responsiblity to those dying in the Congo? - or is that just more liberal nonsense?JDFrom: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we follow your example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest. From: ShieldsFamily You don?t make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. You?re really ?out there? my friend. And your concerns about the Congo?what are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (It?s a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it isn?t ?Hitler? it?s ?McCarthy?. Get a new, but more creative insult please. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Lance Muir wrote: David has given you a more appropriate answer than Izzie but, she has a good heart? (I think so, anyway) === Izzy is the re-incarnation of miss Kitty on Gunsmoke. Tough as nails, heart of gold. With your vast knowledge of film and television characters I am surprised that you had not noticed that. (If you don't believe me, ask Festus)
RE: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE
STILL WAITING, LANCE. ANSWER PLEASE. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:27 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE Tell us? Ask Jesus what you should do, Iz. Guiltless? Have you seen 'Shake Hands With The Devil? Look at Clinton and Albright showing up in Rwanda years later claiming that they did not know the extent of that holocaust. That holocaust was a mere 800,000. Who was the General who stayed behind during the conflict? Why Iz, it was Romeo Dallaire, a Canadian General.I'll pay for the rental cost if you'll get it and watch it. Thereafter I'd love to hear something other than a simple dismissal re: the second worst tragedy since WWII. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 11:16 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE Im still WAITING, Lance. Answer the QUESTION, Lance! Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:10 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat more narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of aids, starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me Worry'? N - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 10:54 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we follow your example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 21:19 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz You dont make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis, according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute. - Original Message - From:
RE: [TruthTalk] For those who want Scripture and in the KJV translation
Were you referring to someone in particular here, Lance? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:01 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: [TruthTalk] For those who want Scripture and in the KJV translation I'd heartily recommend 2 Tim 3:1-17 enjoy
RE: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz
JD, if you are going to falsely accuse me of ad hom attacks please provide the quotes. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:13 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about liar and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. JD -Original Message- From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:32:04 -0700 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz Gary, To call someone's comments a myth (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it. Perry the moderator From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600 myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative personal reasons or as does the author, below) On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
[TruthTalk] Refresher concerning the TruthTalk forum
Lance wrote: Why not let David take care of this privately? Because Gary said it publicly. Besides that, my experience is that Gary often does not respond to my private posts, so why should I waste my time? Can't you, Gary, and John follow rules? Let's not be lawless. We have one rule on TruthTalk: No ad hominem arguments. The reason for this is because the dialogue degenerates into being about egos and people defending themselves. We want to talk about truth. The list is not for evangelizing, personal counseling, or any other similar personal ministry. It is a place for discussing Truth. Here is the way it works. When Perry acts as moderator to guide people away from the ad hominem arguments, the people addressed should comply and not respond to the list. If you have a problem with what he is saying, write to him privately. Perry is the only one on the list who can address personal issues, and he does so as moderator to keep the discussion on track. So please do not reply to the list when reading any post where Perry signs it as moderator, or indicates in the subject line that the post is being made as moderator. Concerning Kevin calling John a liar. That is an ad hominem remark as well and is generally not allowed. We have been over this many times. Giving evidence along with the remark might make such a post allowable in some cases. That is for the moderator to make the call on. The reason it might be allowed is because if he wants to demonstrate how someone is bearing false witness by producing facts, that might be edifying to the list. Just calling someone a liar is not edifying. Still, what is considered solid evidence to one person might appear to be no evidence at all to everybody else, so the moderator has the final say about what will be allowed. There are gray areas here. Personally, I think it is best if nobody ever calls anyone a liar on the list. That does not mean he cannot do so privately or in another forum. It is not a sin to call someone a liar. It is something we simply discourage on this list only. The reason? We want to talk about truth, not judge one another on the list. The focus here should be on truth, concepts, ideas, theology, philosophy, and opinions, not upon people. So to summarize: 1. No ad hominem arugments are allowed on the list. 2. Do not respond to the list on any posts signed by Perry as moderator. Accept what he says, or respond privately if needed. 3. If you think someone has crossed the line about the ad hominem rule, respond to that person directly on the list in the course of your argument to point out their error, or write Perry privately and ask him to do something about it. Do not attempt to use it to justify the ad hominem remarks of others. Two wrongs do not make something right. You cannot justify bad behavior by pointing out somebody else's bad behavior. If we follow these simple rules, the list will get cleaned up and we can get back to some constructive discussions like we have had in the past. Peace be with you. David Miller List Administrator -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
Thanks for asking, JD. To me humanism is the religion worshipping humans. Putting humans and humanistic thinking ahead of God and thinking according to Gods Word. I have no idea how DM would define it. I also dont appreciate your insinuation that I get my ideas from DM. Regarding your post, it sounded nice and all. But a religion that spends time promoting Community is off-base IMO. The true Church is not about promoting the community of humans, but is all about lifting up Jesus Christ as Lord of Lords and King of Kings. The true community which springs from that as a byproduct is truly wonderful, as you seem to understand. Izzy PS Here is how a Humanist defines Humanism: http://www.jcn.com/humanism.html. (Is it NOT Christianity.) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:18 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God Well, it most certainly is not humanism, Linda. Or maybe I should ask what you think humanism is before going any further. David M accused me of the same thing -- perhaps this is where you got the idea. He too, left off giving me a definition. What was written below is a first draft attempt at continuing the task of understanding, on my part. It could not be more God centered -- so how is it humanism. What is you defintion? Jd -Original Message- From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:47:48 -0500 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God JD, all this talk of community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each other?s fellowship. It?s a priority thing. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff). That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things /SPAN -- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ]nb sp; His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you love yourself), and in
Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
Lance wrote: I, for one, do not blame such as yourself, who choose the 'broad road' that leadeth to fellowshipping with 'non-sinners'. What was it again that Jesus was criticized for? With whom was he hanging out? Let's make one thing clear. Jesus did not have fellowship with sinners. I have been criticized many times for being friends with homosexuals, fornicators, drunkards, drug addicts, prison convicts, etc. I have even been disfellowshipped for having homosexuals in my Bible studies. Nevertheless, I have never had fellowship with these sinners while they were still in their sin. Jesus was criticized for ministering to sinners, not for having fellowship with them. Every sinner who came to Jesus was told by Jesus to go and sin no more. Why? Sinners cannot have fellowship with Jesus. Peace be with you. David Miller. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
This is so very funny!!! Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment)
RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
= Well done, John!! Especially that last sentence. Terry Ditto! Iz
Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
I knew it! You definitely do have your own exclusive Bible Lance. Where do you read that Jesus went to fellowship with "sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies, and the like" In my Bibles they came to Him ... In fact read John 2:23-25 and you will see that during the Passover there were many who believed on Him just because of what they saw Him do but he would not commit Himself to them because He knew what was in man. So what has changed?? God's ppl have a responsibility to go into the highways and byways which the much criticized SP's are doing to preach the Kingdom and call people to God. However, the Church has a different standard, it should not be full of the kinds of ppl you name. As Paul told the Ephesians "such WERE some of you" jt On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:53:45 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 'driving' around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in order to fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on sister! From: ShieldsFamily Methodist, around the corner from our home. One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered with sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] what church? On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..a church service..in which the Reverend was a lesbian
[TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE
What do you propose to do about it Lance - take from the rich and give to the poor? Australia is a semi socialistic country like Canada and my mother is a good example. She went to work at 57yrs old out of necessity because my father (who did not believe in owning a home died). She was untrained for anything relevant to the 50's as she had been a milliner before she married but the Lord made a way for her. She began as "tea lady" in the office of a stock broker and graduated to the mail room, was given stock options as part of the job which led to being able to put adeposit down on a Unit which she lived in from 1969 until February 2005 when she fell and broke her hip. She has had to enter a Respite Hostel which is requiring her to sell the Unit and give them a $200,000.00 deposit. She was telling me on the phone this morning how unfair this is because ppl who don't own a home are able toenter the same place with only their pension. She has been frugal for all these years - and for what?? jt On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:10:16 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat more narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of aids, starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me Worry'? N From: ShieldsFamily Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we follow your example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest. From: ShieldsFamily You dont make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Oh, good
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
I think I am going to like the "new John."Very well written and thought provoking. Keep them coming. Peace be with you.David Miller. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Mester Blaine: Jesus, indeed, is the same.The notion that he has spoken in this dispensation is apparently given credence (in your thinking) because of the claim to fame -- 4th largest denomination. What does the comparison of numbers mean when you compare to say -- Buddhism? How are you doing in that exchange. Could it be that numbers mean absolutely nothing when it comes to the establishment of truth. I mean, my family is larger than yours... 7 kids and 12 grandchildren. That makes us --- what? Right? Secondly, the Mormon revelations have nothing to do with the First Church. There was no doctrine in the first church that provided for polygamy. Blacks were welcome. Grace, not works, was the theme of the day, God as expressed in the Godhead, was and is the only God, salvation was a gifted occurrence apart from the law, the church was never "right" in terms of the thinking and actions of its membership, and the governmental structure of the first church was nothing similar to what you have today -- dispite the use of such words as "elders" and "bishops."n bsp; No one believed that Temple righteousness played a role in securing new heavens and new earths for the faithful -- becoming gods to the same degree as the god of this earth. I mention the "first church," because the justification for the revelations of Mormonism have everything to do a supposed apostasy from the True Church of the first century.such an opinionignores the factthat "first church" was divided based on doctrine and if we count heads,doctrinal error(works salvationism -- Jewish style)was, by far, the majority opinion. The notion that the church and its leadership had controls over the individual members (a false doctrine) led to the establishment of the Pope and the continuance of works salvationism. There would have been no Pope if the membership understood that the rule of the bishop was a rule of example only. The first church did not understand the theology of accepted diversity as taught in Romans 14. In fact, if we cut out all the material inthe NT letters, if we cut all the material that was written to inform and correct the thinking of the first church - we would have nothing left but a pamphlet of NT instruction. JD -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 01:29:00 EDTSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH In a message dated 6/1/2005 1:34:33 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The mormons have their JSmith; the J.Witnesses have their CT Russell, theChristian Scientists have their Mary Baker Eddy; the RCC's have their Pope,and the Incarnationalists have their "Bishop". Ever wonder if ANY of themhave the "right" Jesus? Izzy Blaine: The "Right" Jesus is the one we all worship, and saying he is different because of this or that is rediculous.Jesus has not changed, and he has spoken to men in this dispensation, just as in olden times, and the truths he taught will eventually engulf the world, as the stone(His Church) cut out of the side of the mountain rolls forth and eventually fills the whole earth. And Pairing Joseph Smith with a bunch of other false Christs and false prophets is just another of Satan's tricks.You are using the "guilt by association" approach to reasoning, which is false reasoning, and shameful for anyone to have to resort to it. By the way, the Mormon Church is now the 4th largest denomination in America. Just two years ago, it was the 5th largest.
[TruthTalk] Christian conspiracy in Canada
Christian conspiracy in Canada: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44581
RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
Judy, I think Lance is talking about all those times when Jesus hung out in the Baal temples with the homos and prostitutesits in his Bible. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:45 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts I knew it! You definitely do have your own exclusive Bible Lance. Where do you read that Jesus went to fellowship with sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies, and the like In my Bibles they came to Him ... In fact read John 2:23-25 and you will see that during the Passover there were many who believed on Him just because of what they saw Him do but he would not commit Himself to them because He knew what was in man. So what has changed?? God's ppl have a responsibility to go into the highways and byways which the much criticized SP's are doing to preach the Kingdom and call people to God. However, the Church has a different standard, it should not be full of the kinds of ppl you name. As Paul told the Ephesians such WERE some of you jt On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:53:45 -0400 Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 'driving' around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in order to fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on sister! From: ShieldsFamily Methodist, around the corner from our home. One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered with sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] what church? On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..a church service..in which the Reverend was a lesbian
RE: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE
Sad story of socialism at workrob from the workers and give to the government to give to the non-workers. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 11:27 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE What do you propose to do about it Lance - take from the rich and give to the poor? Australia is a semi socialistic country like Canada and my mother is a good example. She went to work at 57yrs old out of necessity because my father (who did not believe in owning a home died). She was untrained for anything relevant to the 50's as she had been a milliner before she married but the Lord made a way for her. She began as tea lady in the office of a stock broker and graduated to the mail room, was given stock options as part of the job which led to being able to put adeposit down on a Unit which she lived in from 1969 until February 2005 when she fell and broke her hip. She has had to enter a Respite Hostel which is requiring her to sell the Unit and give them a $200,000.00 deposit. She was telling me on the phone this morning how unfair this is because ppl who don't own a home are able toenter the same place with only their pension. She has been frugal for all these years - and for what?? jt On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:10:16 -0400 Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat more narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of aids, starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me Worry'? N From: ShieldsFamily Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we follow your example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest. From: ShieldsFamily You dont make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz. You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000) Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis, according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27 Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it isnt Hitler its McCarthy. Get a new, but more creative insult please. Izzy From: [EMAIL
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD
Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity
DAVEH:Service? Charles Perry Locke wrote: Are there any other types of worship than singing songs? Perry -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
DAVEH: Denial granted. Does Izzy not shine so brightly that you cannot see her luster, John? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ahh -- so it was grafted that served as the motivation. Of course DAvH will deny tis -- but the facts are now on the table. Another reason why I cannot type as well as some is that I am nearly legally blind. What is instore for me? JD Dave might just win a free eye exam from my Hubby! J Iz Paaleezzz. Do your lips crack when puckered that tightly? JD :-) DAVEH: Izzy...Your kindness is only exceeded by your beauty! ShieldsFamily wrote: Dave, you are too much of a gentleman to ever be boring. J Izzy -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Gary Lance are referenced in my wording not yours because they are two of the three who are most critical of David Miller and his spiritual gift. I'd be interested in some examples of the rooting and grounding (in God's Word) that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and Gary JD. Lance is an expert in old movies and this is what he writes about. Gary is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word "myth" ... So how about giving me some examples of what I have missed. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:42:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced below in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD
Re: [TruthTalk] Refresher concerning the TruthTalk forum
How bout them Dadgers !! Can't you, Gary, and John follow rules? Let's not be lawless. We have one rule on TruthTalk: No ad hominem arguments. The reason for this is because the dialogue degenerates into being about egos and people defending themselves. We want to talk about truth. The list is not for evangelizing, personal counseling, or any other similar personal ministry. It is a place for discussing Truth.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
This goes on a wall in a frame !!! Thank you.-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:06:50 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH I think I am going to like the "new John."Very well written and thought provoking. Keep them coming. Peace be with you.David Miller. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Mester Blaine: Jesus, indeed, is the same.The notion that he has spoken in this dispensation is apparently given credence (in your thinking) because of the claim to fame -- 4th largest denomination. What does the comparison of numbers mean when you compare to say -- Buddhism? How are you doing in that exchange. Could it be that numbers mean absolutely nothing when it comes to the establishment of truth. I mean, my family is larger than yours... 7 kids and 12 grandchildren. That makes us --- what? Right? Secondly, the Mormon revelations have nothing to do with the First Church. There was no doctrine in the first church that provided for polygamy. Blacks were welcome. Grace, not works, was the theme of the day, God as expressed in the Godhead, was and is the only God, salvation was a gifted occurrence apart from the law, the church was never "right" in terms of the thinking and actions of its membership, and the governmental structure of the first church was nothing similar to what you have today -- dispite the use of such words as "elders" and "bishops." mp;n bsp; No one believed that Temple righteousness played a role in securing new heavens and new earths for the faithful -- becoming gods to the same degree as the god of this earth. I mention the "first church," because the justification for the revelations of Mormonism have everything to do a supposed apostasy from the True Church of the first century.such an opinionignores the factthat "first church" was divided based on doctrine and if we count heads,doctrinal error(works salvationism -- Jewish style)was, by far, the majority opinion. The notion that the church and its leadership had controls over the individual members (a false doctrine) led to the establishment of the Pope and the continuance of works salvationism. There would have been no Pope if the membership understood that the rule of the bishop was a rule of example only. The first church did not understand the theology of accepted diversity as taught in Romans 14. In fact, if we cut out all the material inthe NT letters, if we cut all the material that was written to inform and correct the thinking of the first church - we would have nothing left but a pamphlet of NT instruction. JD -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 01:29:00 EDTSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH In a message dated 6/1/2005 1:34:33 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The mormons have their JSmith; the J.Witnesses have their CT Russell, theChristian Scientists have their Mary Baker Eddy; the RCC's have their Pope,and the Incarnationalists have their "Bishop". Ever wonder if ANY of themhave the "right" Jesus? Izzy Blaine: The "Right" Jesus is the one we all worship, and saying he is different because of this or that is rediculous.Jesus has not changed, and he has spoken to men in this dispensation, just as in olden times, and the truths he taught will eventually engulf the world, as the stone(His Church) cut out of the side of the mountain rolls forth and eventually fills the whole earth. And Pairing Joseph Smith with a bunch of other false Christs and false prophets is just another of Satan's tricks.You are using the "guilt by association" approach to reasoning, which is false reasoning, and shameful for anyone to have to resort to it. By the way, the Mormon Church is now the 4th largest denomination in America. Just two years ago, it was the 5th largest.
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
First of all, I thought you were responding to my words, since you included them in your response -- callme crazy. Secondly, are you tryng to tell me that nothing written by Gary was (is) biblical -- all of it was rock and roll? Are you trying to convince me that the Bishop from the North only speaks of movies? That seems to be what you just said. There is no point in going onwith this discussionif that is your "recollection." What is your claim against these two men, once again? NOTHING but rock and roll and the movies? Is that what you just said? JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 15:06:15 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Gary Lance are referenced in my wording not yours because they are two of the three who are most critical of David Miller and his spiritual gift. I'd be interested in some examples of the rooting and grounding (in God's Word) that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and Gary JD. Lance is an expert in old movies and this is what he writes about. Gary is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word "myth" ... So how about giving me some examples of what I have missed. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:42:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced below in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
DAVEH: According to the dictionary definition, it's obvious Blaine was not making it up as your below assertion, Perry http://65.66.134.201/cgi-bin/webster/webster.exe?search_for_texts_web1828=priestcraft ...Will Blaine receive a forthcoming apology? Charles Perry Locke wrote: I never use the term, and have no definition. But if I wanted one I would see if there was a comon usage for the term. I wouldn't make up my own definition to fit my own desires. So, what is your definition of "priestcraft," Perry? Blaine In a message dated 6/3/2005 7:17:13 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blaine wrote: Priestcraft is, by my definition, ... Here we go again...the mormons like to make up their own meanings for words, to suit thier own personal perception of the world. I call this the "Queen of Hearts" syndrome: "Words mean exactly what I want them to mean!" When a person is steeped in a culture in which the cultural leaders redefine words to have untraditional meanings, for the purpose of making the culture appear to be other than it really is, this begins to affect it's adherents, as we see with Blaine above, and have recently seen with DaveH in his limited definition of the word "teach", which exclusdes his own actions on TT. Another case in point is the Clinton case where his attempt tp liimit the definition of certain words and phrases to exclude his own actions has been passed down to our youth, who at times use these tactics to try to exclude thier own actions. Another, but inverse, example is the word "homophobe". In this case the definition of the word has been EXPANDED to include not only those who fear homosexuality (traditional definition), but to include those who beleive that it is sinful behavior. The root of this is in the "politically correct" movement, where it does not matter what you feel or believe, but how you are perceived. Wow. What a world! Perry -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
RE: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
They are definitely that! ROFL! Iz But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. JD
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
I'd like to see something of substance that is in line with God's Word (not doctrines of men) written by either of them on a subject we have discussed on TT. If you search the archives I think you will find that they both excelin criticism and their own opinion which is OK if this is what they want to contribute.However, this will notqualify themas discerning disciples jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 15:27:05 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: First of all, I thought you were responding to my words, since you included them in your response -- callme crazy. Secondly, are you tryng to tell me that nothing written by Gary was (is) biblical -- all of it was rock and roll? Are you trying to convince me that the Bishop from the North only speaks of movies? That seems to be what you just said. There is no point in going onwith this discussionif that is your "recollection." What is your claim against these two men, once again? NOTHING but rock and roll and the movies? Is that what you just said? JD From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary Lance are referenced in my wording not yours because they are two of the three who are most critical of David Miller and his spiritual gift. I'd be interested in some examples of the rooting and grounding (in God's Word) that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and Gary JD. Lance is an expert in old movies and this is what he writes about. Gary is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word "myth" ... So how about giving me some examples of what I have missed. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:42:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced below in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
DAVEH: Hmm..So why did you not quote my posts about Izzy's beauty as an example??? David Miller wrote: We are looking for posts with substance, -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
I say Amen and well put to what Izzy writes here and would also like to point out that the "definition of Kingdom" is much more than what it is not - which ismeat and drink. Jesus Himself said that when He cast out Satan with the finger of God - then you may know that the Kingdom of God is come upon you. It is "spiritual authority" - All of this community business reminds me of Hillary Clinton and her "it takes a village to raise a child" mindset. Also the way the trinity is conceptualized is bothers me a whole lot but I am not sure why; the Lord will reveal it to me. jt On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:49:46 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks for asking, JD. To me humanism is the religion worshipping humans. Putting humans and humanistic thinking ahead of God and thinking according to Gods Word. I have no idea how DM would define it. I also dont appreciate your insinuation that I get my ideas from DM. Regarding your post, it sounded nice and all. But a religion that spends time promoting Community is off-base IMO. The true Church is not about promoting the community of humans, but is all about lifting up Jesus Christ as Lord of Lords and King of Kings. The true community which springs from that as a byproduct is truly wonderful, as you seem to understand. Izzy PS Here is how a Humanist defines Humanism: http://www.jcn.com/humanism.html. (Is it NOT Christianity.) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, it most certainly is not humanism, Linda. Or maybe I should ask what you think humanism is before going any further. David M accused me of the same thing -- perhaps this is where you got the idea. He too, left off giving me a definition. What was written below is a first draft attempt at continuing the task of understanding, on my part. It could not be more God centered -- so how is it humanism. What is you defintion? Jd -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:47:48 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God JD, all this talk of community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each other?s fellowship. It?s a priority thing. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff). That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things /SPAN -- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ]nb sp; His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
DAVEH: FWIW Perry, you may be the one trying to change the culture (see below), so to speak. As I pointed out, there are many definitions of teach, but the one I feel is appropriate for TT agrees with what DavidM posted today about the meaning of teaching (sermonizing).. DavidM wrote: Actually, he does tell the saints that they come together to GIVE a sermon, and such implies that there will be some there to HEAR a sermon. :-) 1 Corinthians 14:26 (26) How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying. Notice the word "doctrine" in this list of what the Corinthian believers were doing when the whole church comes together. This is teaching -- a sermon. ...Do you think what I post qualifies as sermons? Furthermore, do you really think other TTers have joined TT to listen to me sermonizing? Therefore Perry, is it not you who wants to use another definition in an attempt to change the culture here? Charles Perry Locke wrote: When a person is steeped in a culture in which the cultural leaders redefine words to have untraditional meanings, for the purpose of making the culture appear to be other than it really is , this begins to affect it's adherents, as we see with Blaine above, and have recently seen with DaveH in his limited definition of the word "teach", which exclusdes his own actions on TT. -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
Isaiah'spointabout false worshipsolidifies in ch2, relates to 'trusting in man';in ch5, Isaiahcondemns the arrogant attitude/s ofGod's people; e.g., '..you live alone in the land' (5:8), acriticism of their economicswhichreflectstheirreal poverty (lording themselves over the poor)..apparentlysuch povertyresults primarily fromman-centeredness witnessed inthephilosophy partic ofthe/irreligious establishment(cp. 3:12, 14); also, 5:14does not mention 'hell'--its about a blessed society trapped in the throes of(its) spiritual suicide On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:44:34 -0400 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: . read ..Isaiah 5:13,14
Re: [TruthTalk] A review of Lance Muir
Given enough time, I could offer perhaps a hundred such examples, debunking Judy's claim that Lance is not concerned with substantive matters. Izzy says of Mormonism:'Not worth 'fighting' about.' I'm thinking she might wish to qualify that as the nature of God and the Gospel are indeed worth very serious engagement ('fighting' aside). Biblical thought/question. Nothing wrong with this. Hey! Who wants to go on a 'Lost Books of the Bible' hunt? eh? Lance disagrees with the Mormon?s claim of lost NT Books - or, at least, that such a claim has anything to do with the establishment of their World Religion. 'We are whole people living whole lives before a holy God.' Thedichotomization issue is central. Thanks for raising it! Please do notforward this message to Tim Horton's.Lance agreeing with Miller Yes to #1. No to #2. I believe you to be a faithful child of God who demonstrates more diligence than most of those I've met. A comment addressed to Judy Taylor. Jt:Do you have a friend who, on an issue of some substance, believes other than you do? If you are praying for one another over this then, how is there to be a satisfactory resolution? A question ask by Lance that seems to be a good question Nine times out of ten, not unlike in marriage or friendship, we accept one another including the distinctives. I sense that that is what you do also, Linda. I saw a yound man last evening, characterized by his mother as 'my dirty sweet boy'. His 'dirtyness' was swallowed up in the ontological sweetness within Mom and, in the young man. Also yesterday, I had the pleasure of talking with someone who sees both more and better than most I know (ironically an optometrist). In her case I practice more deference than is normal for me due to the perceived presence of God's Spirit. Lance believes in the Holy Spirit. Dave:IFF 'orthodoxy' has any intrinsic meaning whatsoever then, you are not.This consideration might be based alone on the answer to the question posedby Jesus Himself: 'Who do people say that I am?' This could not but placeyou, and 'yours', in the camp of anti-orthodox Given this, I would notconsider your anti-christian (in the sense of 'orthodox') posts to be in anyway slanderous any more than I would a Muslim who proceded to speak of Jesusout of his Koranic understanding.It is IMO possible to preach an anti-christ message and live a genuinelychristian life.(We all do). This being said You know how it works - thosewho win the war get to hold war c rimes trials. A substantive response by Lance. Food for thought whether you agree or not.
Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
prophetsare unambiguous; conjecture is not prophecy, conjecturists are not prophets ftr, your original comment, below,promotes a false, ambiguousidea of JC which you can not defend truthfully by defending your self On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 08:32:36 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:David Miller wrote: ... Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do. Gary wrote: myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense|| [DavidM:] If I had spoken in the present tense ||
Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
Let's take the first paragraph of your response below: tell me how youcan read my article, with an honest heart, and conclude that it is written with aview of prersenting humanism as opposed to a God-centered faith? I say that such is IMPOSSIBLE. JD-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:49:46 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God Thanks for asking, JD. To me humanism is the religion worshipping humans. Putting humans and humanistic thinking ahead of God and thinking according to God?s Word. I have no idea how DM would define it. I also don?t appreciate your insinuation that I get my ideas from DM. Regarding your post, it sounded ?nice? and all. But a religion that spends time promoting ?Community? is off-base IMO. The true Church is not about promoting the community of humans, but is all about lifting up Jesus Christ as Lord of Lords and King of Kings. The true community which springs from that as a byproduct is truly wonderful, as you seem to understand. Izzy PS Here is how a Humanist defines Humanism: http://www.jcn.com/humanism.html. (Is it NOT Christianity.) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:18 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God Well, it most certainly is not humanism, Linda. Or maybe I should ask what you think humanism is before going any further. David M accused me of the same thing -- perhaps this is where you got the idea. He too, left off giving me a definition. What was written below is a first draft attempt at continuing the task of understanding, on my part. It could not be more God centered -- so how is it humanism. What is you defintion? Jd -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:47:48 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God JD, all this talk of community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each other?s fellowship. It?s a priority thing. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff). That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things /SPAN -- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropr iate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ]nb sp; His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the
Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Judy Taylor wrote: Where they hacked to death by other believers in their church services JD? If they are christians then I rejoice with them that they are now at a better place. Do you think God expects every believer to be responsible for every other believer no matter in whatcountry in the world JD?Should we hire the CIA to keep us up with what is going on? == To hear that brothers and sisters in Christ are being killed for no other reason but that they worship the true God, and then say "That's not my problem" is about as cold hearted and unloving as anything you could say, Judy. I generally agree somewhat with what you say, but you are way off base this time. I suggest you get on your knees and beg God to help these brothers and sisters. Terry
Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
myth (read:lie) : Gary O has no relationship with the Word of God JD-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:01:25 -0600Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts Isaiah'spointabout false worshipsolidifies in ch2, relates to 'trusting in man';in ch5, Isaiahcondemns the arrogant attitude/s ofGod's people; e.g., '..you live alone in the land' (5:8), acriticism of their economicswhichreflectstheirreal poverty (lording themselves over the poor)..apparentlysuch povertyresults primarily fromman-centeredness witnessed inthephilosophy partic ofthe/irreligious establishment(cp. 3:12, 14); also, 5:14does not mention 'hell'--its about a blessed society trapped in the throes of(its) spiritual suicide On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:44:34 -0400 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: . read ..Isaiah 5:13,14
Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
myth (read:lie) : Gary O has no relationship with the Word of God Gary is not a man of many words -- kind of like Terry. He may not seem as traditional in thought as some on this forum -- but he is clearly concerned with the Word, God in Christ and so on. To argue otherwise is to pita lie against the truth. I will certainly go into the archives to demonstrate my point. I have done that with Lance...successfully , I might add. Do any doubt that this can be done with Mr. G? Will there be moderated comments about bearing false witness now that someone on the "left" has proven the accepted gossip to be a untrue. JD-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:01:25 -0600Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts Isaiah'spointabout false worshipsolidifies in ch2, relates to 'trusting in man';in ch5, Isaiahcondemns the arrogant attitude/s ofGod's people; e.g., '..you live alone in the land' (5:8), acriticism of their economicswhichreflectstheirreal poverty (lording themselves over the poor)..apparentlysuch povertyresults primarily fromman-centeredness witnessed inthephilosophy partic ofthe/irreligious establishment(cp. 3:12, 14); also, 5:14does not mention 'hell'--its about a blessed society trapped in the throes of(its) spiritual suicide On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:44:34 -0400 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: . read ..Isaiah 5:13,14
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Dave, Blaine wrote, Priestcraft is, by my definition, which admits that he guessed at or made the definition up that suits him. Had he said according to Webster's, or the definition of Priestcraft is I could not have made the assertion I made. Perry From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:33:09 -0700 DAVEH: According to the dictionary definition, it's obvious Blaine was not making it up as your below assertion, Perry http://65.66.134.201/cgi-bin/webster/webster.exe?search_for_texts_web1828=priestcraft ...Will Blaine receive a forthcoming apology? Charles Perry Locke wrote: I never use the term, and have no definition. But if I wanted one I would see if there was a comon usage for the term. I wouldn't make up my own definition to fit my own desires. So, what is your definition of priestcraft, Perry? Blaine In a message dated 6/3/2005 7:17:13 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blaine wrote: Priestcraft is, by my definition, ... Here we go again...the mormons like to make up their own meanings for words, to suit thier own personal perception of the world. I call this the Queen of Hearts syndrome: Words mean exactly what I want them to mean! When a person is steeped in a culture in which the cultural leaders redefine words to have untraditional meanings, for the purpose of making the culture appear to be other than it really is, this begins to affect it's adherents, as we see with Blaine above, and have recently seen with DaveH in his limited definition of the word teach, which exclusdes his own actions on TT. Another case in point is the Clinton case where his attempt tp liimit the definition of certain words and phrases to exclude his own actions has been passed down to our youth, who at times use these tactics to try to exclude thier own actions. Another, but inverse, example is the word homophobe. In this case the definition of the word has been EXPANDED to include not only those who fear homosexuality (traditional definition), but to include those who beleive that it is sinful behavior. The root of this is in the politically correct movement, where it does not matter what you feel or believe, but how you are perceived. Wow. What a world! Perry -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Dave, pick a definition, any definition. Just don't pick one that labels what you do as teaching. From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:06:07 -0700 DAVEH: FWIW Perry, you may be the one trying to change the culture (see below), so to speak. As I pointed out, there are many definitions of teach, but the one I feel is appropriate for TT agrees with what DavidM posted today about the meaning of teaching (/sermonizing)/.. DavidM wrote: Actually, he does tell the saints that they come together to GIVE a sermon, and such implies that there will be some there to HEAR a sermon. :-) 1 Corinthians 14:26 (26) How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying. Notice the word doctrine in this list of what the Corinthian believers were doing when the whole church comes together. *This is teaching -- a sermon. * ...Do you think what I post qualifies as sermons?Furthermore, do you really think other TTers have joined TT to listen to me /sermonizing? / Therefore Perry, is it not you who wants to use another definition in an attempt to change the culture here? Charles Perry Locke wrote: When a person is steeped in a culture in which the cultural leaders redefine words to have untraditional meanings, for the purpose of making the culture appear to be other than it really is , this begins to affect it's adherents, as we see with Blaine above, and have recently seen with DaveH in his limited definition of the word teach, which exclusdes his own actions on TT. -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
I have no idea what is going on in the Congo Terry, and I suggest that you don't either. Not really. I've had enough going on here in my own home for the past two weeks to keep me more than busy. I'm sorry you thinkI am cold hearted and unloving but Istill need the confirmation and witness of the Holy Spirit before begging God to do something when He knows the details much better than me .. Don't you think He is able to put it on the heart of some intercessor if that is what it would take? jt Terry writes: To hear that brothers and sisters in Christ are being killed for no other reason but that they worship the true God, and then say "That's not my problem" is about as cold hearted and unloving as anything you could say, Judy. I generally agree somewhat with what you say, but you are way off base this time. I suggest you get on your knees and beg God to help these brothers and sisters. Terry On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 16:25:54 -0500 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Judy Taylor wrote: Where they hacked to death by other believers in their church services JD? If they are christians then I rejoice with them that they are now at a better place. Do you think God expects every believer to be responsible for every other believer no matter in whatcountry in the world JD?Should we hire the CIA to keep us up with what is going on? ==
Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
(the factthat Methodistswere having a 'church' service iz really significant--the word 'church' in its context unravels the) myth On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:42:55 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Methodist || From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts what church? On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..a church service..in which the Reverend was a lesbian
Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz
Lance, I cannot disagree that Gary MAY have the gift of discernment. However, people with discernment also know WHY they discern the things they do. From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:41:46 -0400 Gary might have the gift of discernment, Charles. If this is the case then, simply 'discerning' (though he didn't, as you seem to suggest infer David was a false prophet, IMO) is sufficient. Why not let David take care of this privately? - Original Message - From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: June 04, 2005 11:32 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz Gary, To call someone's comments a myth (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it. Perry the moderator From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600 myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative personal reasons or as does the author, below) On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
That is your myth (read lie) JD because Inever made a statement anything like what you have written below. Did I sayGary O never reads the Bible? What I said is thathe is not sufficiently rooted and grounded in God's Word to discern what is and what is not a genuine spiritual gift in operation. Actually I suspect he would say they are all bogus because of the fact that he is Calvinistic at heart. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:01:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: myth (read:lie) : Gary O has no relationship with the Word of God JDFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isaiah'spointabout false worshipsolidifies in ch2, relates to 'trusting in man';in ch5, Isaiahcondemns the arrogant attitude/s ofGod's people; e.g., '..you live alone in the land' (5:8), acriticism of their economicswhichreflectstheirreal poverty (lording themselves over the poor)..apparentlysuch povertyresults primarily fromman-centeredness witnessed inthephilosophy partic ofthe/irreligious establishment(cp. 3:12, 14); also, 5:14does not mention 'hell'--its about a blessed society trapped in the throes of(its) spiritual suicide On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:44:34 -0400 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: . read ..Isaiah 5:13,14
Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
They ( Then) why did Jesus blow it off by telling the disciples they would always have the poor . Well, this is perhaps the most upsetting of my discussions here on TT. I really have nothing more to say. We have virtually nothing in common. You will not believe me, but I am going to think about what has just happened, do some praying (part of it will be "intercessory" as we call it in the land of the Charismata) and return. John Smithson On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 17:54:58 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What I believe, Judy, is that your response is one of the more bazaar comments entertained here on TT. In my book, David's " children sent to hell " comment is number 1; jt: What on earth are you talking about JD - Solomon? this is number 2, for the time being. You ask a question to which the answer would have absolutely no meaning to you -- so why ask? I mean, dead is dead -- right? jt: I have no idea what you are referring to or talking about - what was the question? We are not going to even entertain a benevolent emotion because they are better off dead anyway!!! jt: Your words not mine and again, I have no idea what you are talking about or referring to. That is not only nasty but gross and disgusting. Yeah !!! It most definitely is not the widom of God. On one hand we beat the banner for action in Iraq. I am one who, thus far, thinks intervention in Iraq is a good thing. But, for me, we should be there for the same reasons we should be in Durfar and the Congo and so on. The fact that we are not in the Congo or Durfar is evidence , to me, that humanitarian concerns had nothing to do with our going to Iraq. I believe that the people of that country benefitted from our hypocricy anyway. jt: It's good that you have opinions about all this JD. I don't since I am not in the position to know all details I leave that to the ppl God has placed in authority - the ones who make these kinds of decisions. A position that ignores the blight of the poor and hungry finds people without a divine awareness, per Is 58:9-11. jt: They why did Jesus blow it off by telling the disciples they would always have the poor among them?I guess he must have been void ofdivine awareness also. What is critical in the Is 58 passage is the fact that the disciple is pictured as one who is searching for God, but finding Him only when a number of realities are entertained in his life - not the lest of which is the outpouring for the hungre and and afflicted. Jd jt: No JD; it is dealing with the sin in their lives as a whole - it is not playing God to the whole globe. jt
Re: [TruthTalk] A review of Lance Muir
These quotes make my point JD, especially the last one ... You and he seem to like the word substantive. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 16:43:58 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Given enough time, I could offer perhaps a hundred such examples, debunking Judy's claim that Lance is not concerned with substantive matters. I didn't say Lance was not concerned with matters he thinks substantive. I said he was not rooted and grounded in God's Word - HUGE difference. Izzy says of Mormonism:'Not worth 'fighting' about.' I'm thinking she might wish to qualify that as the nature of God and the Gospel are indeed worth very serious engagement ('fighting' aside). Biblical thought/question. Nothing wrong with this. Hey! Who wants to go on a 'Lost Books of the Bible' hunt? eh? Lance disagrees with the Mormon?s claim of lost NT Books - or, at least, that such a claim has anything to do with the establishment of their World Religion. 'We are whole people living whole lives before a holy God.' The dichotomization issue is central. Thanks for raising it! Please do not forward this message to Tim Horton's.Lance agreeing with MillerYes to #1. No to #2. I believe you to be a faithful child of God who demonstrates more diligence than most of those I've met. A comment addressed to Judy Taylor. Jt:Do you have a friend who, on an issue of some substance, believes other than you do? If you are praying for one another over this then, how is there to be a satisfactory resolution? A question ask by Lance that seems to be a good question Nine times out of ten, not unlike in marriage or friendship, we accept one another including the distinctives. I sense that that is what you do also, Linda. I saw a yound man last evening, characterized by his mother as 'my dirty sweet boy'. His 'dirtyness' was swallowed up in the ontological sweetness within Mom and, in the young man. Also yesterday, I had the pleasure of talking with someone who sees both more and better than most I know (ironically an optometrist). In her case I practice more deference than is normal for me due to the perceived presence of God's Spirit. Lance believes in the Holy Spirit. Dave:IFF 'orthodoxy' has any intrinsic meaning whatsoever then, you are not. This consideration might be based alone on the answer to the question posed by Jesus Himself: 'Who do people say that I am?' This could not but place you, and 'yours', in the camp of anti-orthodox Given this, I would not consider your anti-christian (in the sense of 'orthodox') posts to be in any way slanderous any more than I would a Muslim who proceded to speak of Jesus out of his Koranic understanding.It is IMO possible to preach an anti-christ message and live a genuinely christian life.(We all do). This being said You know how it works - those who win the war get to hold war crimes trials. A substantive response by Lance. Food for thought whether you agree or not.