Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise


Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. 

In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. 
?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in
clude the idea of ?community.? 

God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff).

That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things <
/SPAN>-- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens
ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). 

The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this wise: No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. He has given us His Spirit.
Perhaps this is where the "kingdom" comes into play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom,
? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,? ?heirs of the kingdom of promise,? then, perhaps we are on our way to understanding ?kingdom rule.? 

Kingdom is tied irrevocably to the communion of God in man;that is what I have come to believe. When we speak of sovereign rule and authority, we do the idea great injustice if we separate that rule fromits inward throne --- the heart and soul of man. Kingdom rule, at whatever level, always includes His ?subjects? That is the illusion -- kingdom = a king and His people. And that is His kingdom. His influence in the people of God.<
SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Paul says it this way: The kingdom of God is not eating and drinking but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. 

Reject the notion of community and you cannot understand the Godhead, the fellowship of the saints, the purpose of creation, the nature of God, the effect of the cross, the vitality and importance of the church, the indwelling spirit and kingdom rule. The heuristic circumstance that best pictures all these things is the consideration of community as the image of God. All of the above 

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

Clearly so.-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz




myth (false prophetsspeak ofJC in the past tense formanipulative personal reasons or asdoes the author, below)

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.



Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

And absolutely no one disagrees with this -- but if this means that it is not included, that disciple hasmissed an aspect of worship that is of God's design. 

Jd-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:47:15 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Obesity






AND worship is not always done in the throes of ecstasy. Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry CliftonSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 7:10 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity

From here, his point seems to be that you do not need a community to worship, or a building, or a pastor/priest. Job, by the way, is just one of many examples of this.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 



And your point -- that we must shave our heads, worship flat on the groundwhile tearing our clothing? ??



JD
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:48:49 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity



JOB And there was a day when his sons and his daughters were eating and drinking wine in their eldest brother's house: And there came a messenger unto Job, and said, The oxen were plowing, and the asses feeding beside them: And the Sabeans fell upon them, and took them away; yea, they have slain the servants with the edge of the sword; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, The fire of God is fallen from heaven, and hath burned up the sheep, and the servants, and consumed them; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, The Chaldeans made out three bands, and fell upon the camels, and have carried them away, yea, and slain the servants with the edge of the sword; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, Thy sons and thy daugh
ters were eating and drinking wine in their eldest brother's house: And, behold, there came a grea t wind from the wilderness, and smote the four corners of the house, and it fell upon the young men, and they are dead; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee.

Then Job arose, and rent his mantle, and shaved his head, and fell down upon the ground, and worshipped,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 



Good comments. My wife and I do not look to songs for didache -- rather we score high a service that allows us to praise God and give Him His righteous due. Perhaps reflective of how we approach the Faith in total. 



JD
-Original Message-From: Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:47:35 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity

 It plays a very important part in
 the discipline of spiritual growth.

Amen. I realized recently that the worship songs I
sing have taught me a sort of spiritual jealousy,
where I wanted to mean those songs from my heart when
I sang them. This one song had a line "You can offer
her anything her affections are all for Him only,"
that showed me how I should desire my God. Though I
wouldn't rate it over preaching and teaching, as
quoted in Lance's post, I do love worship!

Blessings!

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 
 Worship shapes our spirituality
 "...our spirituality is usually shaped more by the
 experience of communal worship than it is by
 preaching and teachingthe way we think about God
 and relate to God is influenced enormously by our
 experience of God in communal worship..Songs are
 especially formative. We are far more likely to find
 ourselves humming something we sang in church when
 we go home than we are to find ourselves meditating
 on a phrase in the sermon..(not one of yours, of
 course)..Christian philosopher and scientist Michael
 Polanyi spoke of knowledge that we simply absorb by
 a kind of 'osmosis' without even realizing that we
 have done so. This is what he refers to as 'tacit
 knowledge' Most Christians simply imbibe a theology
 through the way that they worship.
 .theology springs from right worship but theology
 also, in turn, guides and ensures right
 worship.There is a circular relationship between the
 two as healthy worship and theology support each
 otherhow theology can guide the kind of worship
 that in turn shapes people spirituality.
 
 
 How very true, for my wife and I, at least. Our
 "church of choice" is Valley Christian Center in
 Fresno. It is a 2000 member congregation with,
 perhaps, the best comtemporary worship service in
 the area. What Polanyi speaks of in the above
 quote is, perhaps, the same as that referenced by
 Paul in Eph. 5:18-20. There, spirit filling is an
 experience received on any occasion the community of
 saints gather togather in the sharing of song and
 spiritual hymns. It plays a very important part in
 the discipline of spiritual growth. Too much
 attention to the negatives expressed by some saints
 

Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

If the shoe fits, Judy. if the shoe fits. I am quite sure you ahve used the word 'liberal" on this forum. But that is not important, is it? -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:36:43 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts



Don't believe I've ever used the word "liberal" on TT JD. I am into truth vs error rather than liberal vs
whatever... and what's this with the angst? Where did that come from? jt

On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:58:42 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



Have you read Eph 5:18-20. Think "imbibe." And why would you waste everyone's time rejecting such an observation. You do not fight liberalism -- you guys just fight against anything you didn't make up. Nearly everything I believe is accepted by our friends as BSF while you pretend that youare onto something really big in fight'en those dirty ol' liberals. You got Deegan all alone up there in the North, wishing that he had paid more attention in his English comprehension class -- Izzy there in St Louis pretending that she really understands what is going on and David pretending that he is the one who cast's the larger shadow (with the Lord's help, of course.) 

Why not drop all this ankst and get on with the discussion. I will if you will. It is up to you all. Be our example and we (I am sure) will follow suit. 

JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]





If one goes around imbibing spiritual atmospheres where is spiritual discernment? The animal kingdom are
the ones who are led by instinct. Human beings need to learn and God makes surewe are taught to know
the voice of the Shepherd. jt

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:12:14 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Are we ALL as predictable as you, Judy? Given this I'm not sure why you don't just have two 'repeater' words: 'Amen' for David (by extension, Christine), Izzie Kevin. 'Nein' for all of the rest of us. The time you could save, Judy!

From: Judy Taylor 

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:48:10 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Worship shapes our spirituality
"...our spirituality is usually shaped more by the experience of communal worship than it is by preaching and teachingthe way we think about God and relate to God is influenced enormously by our experience of God in communal worship..Songs are especially formative. We are far more likely to find ourselves humming something we sang in church when we go home than we are to find ourselves meditating on a phrase in the sermon..(not one of yours, of course)..

jt: I would disagree with the above statement Lance - Is it yours? Actually spirituality shapes worship rather than vice-versa because true worship depends upon a correct heart attitude and we do not enter God's presence just any old way - We must properly prepare ourselves to worship.. And God does not accept all of it. He spoke through the prophet Amos and told the Israel of that day that their feasts and worship times literally made him want to vomit ... He also spoke through the prophet Isaiah about a crowd who were pretty pleased with themselves and thesedescended into sheol rejoicing.

Christian philosopher and scientist Michael Polanyi spoke of knowledge that we simply absorb by a kind of 'osmosis' without even realizing that we have done so. This is what he refers to as 'tacit knowledge'Most Christians simply imbibe a theology through the way that they worship.

jt: This is not the way anyone is to learn let alone Christians. This is how the animals perform (by instinct). Humans must be taught, we have been given a mind so that we can think and God will reveal Himself to whomsoever He will. The only ones who imbibe should be drunks.

.theology springs from right worship but theology also, in turn, guides and ensures right worship.There is a circular relationship between the two as healthy worship and theology support each otherhow theology can guide the kind of worship that in turn shapes people spirituality.

jt: Just like your little trinitarian dance, round and round and round we go... 







Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

Oh, I can heartedly agree. We have made church a spectator sport. But the larger assemblies are not all bad. 

Jd-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 21:23:01 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 



tERRY -- YOU ARE NO MORE p.o.ED WITHT EH CHURCH TAHN i AM -- but you might rethink your comments in view of the following: 

Do not forsake the assembling of yourselves together -- encouraging one another to love and good works. Heb 10:25

.. breaking bread from house to house, they were taking their meals together with gladness and sincerity of hear. acts 2:46

We are to share in the worship of song -- a group thing. Eph 5:18-20



Speaking the truth in love, we are to grow upin all aspects into Him the whole body (read:church) being fitted and held together  for the building up of itself (the church) in love Eph 4:15,16.


I could go on, but you know these scriptures better than I. If for no other reason, "ye who are spiritual help those who are weak" can be a reason to attend. We (my wife and I ) have our times when we do not attend  but we are always benefitted insome when we are there. 

After all, "church" was God's big idea !!



JD==I am not down on church,John. We attend regularly. We just do it from house to house like the scriptures say some of the early believers did. We share a meal and afterward we play Bereans, sing songs, the whole works. You should try it. It sure beats staring at the back of the heads in the pew in front of you while one guy gives his spiel and everyone else tries to stay awake.







Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a 
total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 
4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've 
all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods 
or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' 
contest.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: June 03, 2005 21:19
  Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV 
  Bible Quiz
  
  
  You don’t make me 
  feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. You’re really “out there” my 
  friend. And your concerns about the Congo—what are you and Canada doing 
  about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United 
  Nations? (It’s a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 
  PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV 
  Bible Quiz
  
  
  It's truly uncomfortable is it 
  not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be 
  faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in 
  the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the 
  lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, 
  Iz.
  
  
  
  You want serious? I'll give you 
  serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die 
  every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these 
  deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These 
  deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the 
  crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the 
  DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and 
  in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia 
  (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in 
  Sudan 
  (70,000)
  
  
  
  Despite this, the international 
  community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the 
  crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations 
  for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the 
  United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined 
  by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent confllict has 
  claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming 
  level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community 
  has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address 
  the crisis," according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the 
  New York based International Rescue Committee 
  (IRC) and Australia's Burnet 
  Institute.
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 


Sent: June 
03, 2005 14:27

Subject: RE: 
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


Oh, good 
grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and true 
names to call other people? If it isn’t “Hitler” it’s “McCarthy”. Get 
a new, but more creative insult please. 
Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV 
Bible Quiz


So then Kevin, in Senator 
McCarthy like fashion you hurl out accusations sans proof in the hope that 
the accusation itself will serve you well enough! I'd have though as 
much.


Re: [TruthTalk] The Truth About the Congo

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir
'THE' truth about the Congo is that you didn't even know it's location until
you just 'googled' it.


- Original Message - 
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 03, 2005 21:36
Subject: [TruthTalk] The Truth About the Congo


 US is largest contributor to UN Peacekeeping missions.  UN Officials rape
 and abuse refugees in Congo:
 http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/hl868.cfm.



 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


[TruthTalk] A public request to DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



You've outlined your reasons for being here on 
numerous occasions, Dave.You write well. You read well. You've undoubtedly 
learned much. Would you kindly consider the following:

1. Write a description of Mormonism, as if you were 
a non-Mormon, utilizing the information you've gleaned while being a participant 
on TT?

2. Write a description of Evangelicalism, from a 
Mormon persepctive, utilizing the information you've gleaned while being a 
participant on TT?

It need not be some multi-page, to-be-published, 
document. Just do what you've already demonstrated that you do 
well.

I. and every thoughtful participant on TT, 
understands that youdraw a distinction between believers  
non-believerswhich places 'us' in the NB 
category. 

I'm genuinely interested in this. Unless the 
moderator objects I'd really like to hear you on both of the above.

Lance




[TruthTalk] What is church?

2005-06-04 Thread David Miller
*Note Subject Change
Old Subject:  Obesity
New Subject:  What is church?

John wrote:
 We (my wife and I ) have our times when we do not
 attend     but we are always benefitted insome when
 we are there.
 After all, church was God's big idea  !!

I don't think Terry is against church per se.  He simply views church as the 
community of believers, not as some event that people attend.

John brings up an important point here.  Church was God's big idea.  The 
point Terry is raising concerns exactly what was this idea of church.  Terry 
contends that what most people call church today is not God's idea.  I think 
Terry has an important point here that should not be glossed over.

When God had the idea of church for man, was it the idea of a building with 
a steeple where people would come together on Sunday, sing a few song, drop 
some money in the plate that is passed, listen to a short sermon, and then 
get out of there by lunch?  Did God have the idea of people ATTENDING 
church?

At the time when Jesus appeared in the flesh, there already was something 
like this.  It was called synagogue.  Problem is, that wasn't God's idea 
either.  The synagogue was something that evolved because of Israel's sin. 
When they were dispersed because of God's Judgment upon them and the Temple 
was destroyed, they congregated in the synagogue instead of the Temple.  The 
Temple was something God had instituted, and it had a daily service, both 
morning and evening as well as during the day.  The synagogue was something 
man had instituted, and it met every Saturday.  When the Temple was built 
again, synagogue continued as well as a place to read and study Torah, but 
there really was no Biblical mandate for it.  That does not make it wrong, 
per se, but when we are talking about God's idea of an assembly, we should 
keep this perspective in mind.  God instituted Temple.  He did not institute 
synagogue.  Synagogue was something God allowed to develop, and it was 
something that God participated in.

Jesus spoke of his congregation using a different word from that which was 
used to talk about synagogue.  It was ekklesia.  This was a word used to 
talk about a smaller group called out of a larger group, and it was called 
out having a specific purpose in mind.  For example, each of the Greek city 
states had a political body that would assemble to deal with political 
issues.  This group was called ekklesia (our word we translate as 
church).  The confused mob of Ephesus in Acts 19 that was against the 
believers also was called ekklesia.  In other words, the word translated 
as church in the Bible did not have a religious connotation when it was 
used by Jesus or his disciples.  When we begin to understand this, we begin 
to see that the concept of church that God had when he put it forward as 
something he would build is not the concept of church that most of us have 
today.

The word assembly probably is closer to the original word ekklesia than 
the word church.  William Tyndale, often called the father of the English 
Bible, never used the word church once in his translation of the Scriptures. 
He always translated ekklesia as congregation instead of church.

Much more to say, but this post is too long already.  Anybody up for talking 
about what church is?  Terry has put forward that church is not something we 
attend.  John speaks of church as something we attend and seems to have 
perceived Terry to be someone who forsakes church.  My perspective is that 
while church is something we can attend, Terry has an important point about 
how we are the church and that we ought not attend church in order to 
passively warm pews, fill the offering plate, listen to someone else 
sermonize, then go home until the next time church meets.  There really is a 
kind of idolatry in this scenario, isn't there?

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity

2005-06-04 Thread David Miller
Terry wrote:
 Possibly you are correct, but I see Paul as more
 of a transient evangelist or missionary than as a
 resident elder/pastor/priest ...

I agree.  In such situations, it is natural for the group to be more passive 
and want to hear him exclusively before he leaves.

Terry wrote:
 Seems funny that when he gives details as to why
 the saints come together it is never to hear a sermon.

Actually, he does tell the saints that they come together to GIVE a sermon, 
and such implies that there will be some there to HEAR a sermon.  :-)

1 Corinthians 14:26
(26) How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath 
a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an 
interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying.

Notice the word doctrine in this list of what the Corinthian believers 
were doing when the whole church comes together.  This is teaching -- a 
sermon.  However, I think in this case, more interaction is involved than is 
found in the typical Christian congregation on a Sunday morning.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God

2005-06-04 Thread Terry Clifton




[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  
  

  Thinking
Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts
and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book
written by Alan Torrance. The following is a
combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of
his presentations. 
  
  In search of a truly heuristic
consequence, many have involved themselves in
the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the
Sonship of Christ. 
  ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of
the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest
explanation of all --- the
God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with
himself, with each other and, indeed, with all
the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the
world we know. ? (p222). And
there you have it -- ?the
simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has
been created in His very image. If there is
another explanation for that image, certainly it must in
clude the idea of ?community.? 
  
  God loves the Son, the
Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in
this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation
after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff).
  
  That being true, the
personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company
of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the
expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful
and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with
the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel
was God manifest in national function. His
Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things 
/SPAN-- a tearing
down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of
the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his
own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day
  [?ye shall not surely die ] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of
all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God
to a lost and confused world. He is the
Father, we are his adoptive children. Community
is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens
ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being.
  It is such because and only because we have been created in
that image and for that purpose. Community is
not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our
existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give
yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday
sun), in love (the
whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you
love yourself), and in
communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God,
Himself, in our lives). 
  
  The grand truth of the Christian faith
is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in
us to will and accomplish. If we understand
that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be
a beneficial part of the larger community. John
says it this wise: No one has seen God at
anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is
perfected in us ???. He
has given us His Spirit.
  Perhaps this is where the "kingdom" comes into
play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and
authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my
kingdom is not of this world? can have real and
precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New
Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom,
? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the
kingdom is not eating and drinking,? ?heirs of
the kingdom of promise,? then, perhaps we are
on our way to understanding ?kingdom
rule.? 
  
  Kingdom is tied irrevocably to the communion of
God in man;that is what I have come to believe. When
we speak of sovereign rule and authority, we do
the idea great injustice if we separate that rule fromits inward throne --- the heart and soul of
man. Kingdom rule, at whatever level, always
includes His ?subjects? That is the illusion -- kingdom = a king and
His people. And that is His kingdom. His influence in the people of God.
SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes" Paul says it this way: The kingdom
of God is not
eating and drinking but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy
Spirit. 
  
  Reject the notion of community and you cannot
understand the Godhead, the fellowship of the saints, the purpose of
creation, the nature of God, the effect of the
cross, the vitality and importance of the
church, the indwelling spirit and kingdom
rule. The heuristic circumstance that best pictures all these things is 

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread David Miller
David Miller wrote:
 ... Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.

Gary wrote:
 myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense
 for manipulative personal reasons or as does the
 author, below)

If I had spoken in the present tense and told you what Jesus Christ said to 
me today, you would still have an ad hominem slap to send my way.  How about 
giving it a rest.  We are looking for posts with substance, not posts that 
malign and accuse other TruthTalk members of evil.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread David Miller
Lance wrote:
 I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from
 DM to DH, for global issues.

I agree, Lance, that my concern for global issues is not very high.  In 
fact, my concern for national issues isn't very high either.  I'm in one of 
those situations where things are so bad here at home that I try to take 
care of the problems here and do not have much of myself left to concern 
myself with issues across the other side of the globe.  I hope one day that 
I might be used that way, but right now, my plate is full and I don't know 
how to add global issues to it.  My hope lies in the pattern seen in Acts 1, 
where he says to be witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in 
Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.  Historically there was a 
progression in maturity from things local to things global.  I think perhaps 
that you are older than me.  Was there ever a time in your life when you 
were not concerned enough with things global?

Lance wrote:
 To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond
 my comprehension.

What is your perspective about the more than 46 million deaths through 
abortion?  Do you have a solution to this problem?  Are you concerned about 
it?  I haven't heard you address the problem of abortion.  Don't you think 
we should start with this more local problem of abortion rather than the 
problems in the Ivory Coast and related areas?

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir
Was there ever a time when...Yes, there was.

Abortion. Have you read 'Freakonomics'? Look at his 'take' on abortion. Yes
I do have a solution. Starting with yourself and, working outward, tell men
not to get women pregnant who will not carry the pregnancy to term. Is this
a joke? It is not!


- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 04, 2005 08:56
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


 Lance wrote:
  I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from
  DM to DH, for global issues.

 I agree, Lance, that my concern for global issues is not very high.  In
 fact, my concern for national issues isn't very high either.  I'm in one
of
 those situations where things are so bad here at home that I try to take
 care of the problems here and do not have much of myself left to concern
 myself with issues across the other side of the globe.  I hope one day
that
 I might be used that way, but right now, my plate is full and I don't know
 how to add global issues to it.  My hope lies in the pattern seen in Acts
1,
 where he says to be witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in
 Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.  Historically there was
a
 progression in maturity from things local to things global.  I think
perhaps
 that you are older than me.  Was there ever a time in your life when you
 were not concerned enough with things global?

 Lance wrote:
  To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond
  my comprehension.

 What is your perspective about the more than 46 million deaths through
 abortion?  Do you have a solution to this problem?  Are you concerned
about
 it?  I haven't heard you address the problem of abortion.  Don't you think
 we should start with this more local problem of abortion rather than the
 problems in the Ivory Coast and related areas?

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


[TruthTalk] Jesus 'thinks' globally (how could He not?) IFF you......

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



have the mind of Christ 
then...

Both nationalism and idealism are counterproductive 
vis a vis the kingdom of God.

I'd also assert that Jesus is a critical realist! 
For those from Rio Linda (a Rushism), ask DavidM.


Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread David Miller
Lance wrote:
 We may have unamimity on my next observation (?):
 At the end of all ends what will matter is whether
 or not Jesus identifies you as a Christian.

Amen, Lance.  Well said.  Whether or not we know Jesus is not nearly as 
important as whether or not Jesus knows us.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

Mester Blaine: Jesus, indeed, is the same.The notion that he has spoken in this dispensation is apparently given credence (in your thinking) because of the claim to fame -- 4th largest denomination. What does the comparison of numbers mean when you compare to  say -- Buddhism? How are you doing in that exchange. Could it be that numbers mean absolutely nothing when it comes to the establishment of truth. I mean, my family is larger than yours... 7 kids and 12 grandchildren. That makes us --- what? Right? 

Secondly, the Mormon revelations have nothing to do with the First Church. There was no doctrine in the first church that provided for polygamy. Blacks were welcome. Grace, not works, was the theme of the day, God as expressed in the Godhead, was and is the only God, salvation was a gifted occurrence apart from the law, the church was never "right" in terms of the thinking and actions of its membership, and the governmental structure of the first church was nothing similar to what you have today -- dispite the use of such words as "elders" and "bishops."
bsp; No one believed that Temple righteousness played a role in securing new heavens and new earths for the faithful -- becoming gods to the same degree as the god of this earth. 

I mention the "first church," because the justification for the revelations of Mormonism have everything to do a supposed apostasy from the True Church of the first century.such an opinionignores the factthat "first church" was divided based on doctrine and if we count heads,doctrinal error(works salvationism -- Jewish style)was, by far, the majority opinion. The notion that the church and its leadership had controls over the individual members (a false doctrine) led to the establishment of the Pope and the continuance of works salvationism. There would have been no Pope if the membership understood that the rule of the bishop was a rule of example  only. The first church did
 not understand the theology of accepted diversity as taught in Romans 14. In fact, if we cut out all the material inthe NT letters, if we cut all the material that was written to inform and correct the thinking of the first church - we would have nothing left but a pamphlet of NT instruction.  

JD

-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 01:29:00 EDTSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH




In a message dated 6/1/2005 1:34:33 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The mormons have their JSmith; the J.Witnesses have their CT Russell, theChristian Scientists have their Mary Baker Eddy; the RCC's have their Pope,and the Incarnationalists have their "Bishop". Ever wonder if ANY of themhave the "right" Jesus? Izzy

Blaine: The "Right" Jesus is the one we all worship, and saying he is different because of this or that is rediculous.Jesus has not changed, and he has spoken to men in this dispensation, just as in olden times, and the truths he taught will eventually engulf the world, as the stone(His Church) cut out of the side of the mountain rolls forth and eventually fills the whole earth. And Pairing Joseph Smith with a bunch of other false Christs and false prophets is just another of Satan's tricks.You are using the "guilt by association" approach to reasoning, which is false reasoning, and shameful for anyone to have to resort to it. By the way, the Mormon
 Church is now the 4th largest denomination in America. Just two years ago, it was the 5th largest.


Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

Pretty much rigth on, Florida Man. And I do not know what happened when I sent this thing -- all the queston marks. ... most of them occur in the place of my ( " ") . I wrote this in Word and copied it over. I think I have done this before without this kind of problem -- sorry folks.

Jd-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 07:26:06 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 



 
Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. 

In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. 
?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? 

God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff).

That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons.. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things  /SPAN-- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the d
ay [?ye shall not surely die ] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help tho
se who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). 

The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this wise: No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. He has given us His Spirit.
Perhaps this is where the "kingdom" comes into play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,? ?heirs of the kingdom of promise,? then, p
erhaps we are on our way to understanding ?kingdom rule.? 

Kingdom is tied irrevocably to the communion of God in man;that is what I have come to believe. When we speak of sovereign rule and authority, we do the idea great injustice if we separate that rule fromits inward throne --- the heart and soul of man. Kingdom rule, at whatever level, always includes His ?subjects? That is the illusion -- kingdom = a king and His people. And that is His kingdom. His influence in the people of God. SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes" Paul 

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

Whew !! Take a pill, there DM guy. You got people on the right running wild with ad hom and you go after Mr. G ?? Predictable. 

JD-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 08:32:36 -0400Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


David Miller wrote:
 ... Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.

Gary wrote:
 myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense
 for manipulative personal reasons or as does the
 author, below)

If I had spoken in the present tense and told you what Jesus Christ said to 
me today, you would still have an ad hominem slap to send my way.  How about 
giving it a rest.  We are looking for posts with substance, not posts that 
malign and accuse other TruthTalk members of evil.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how 
you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend 
who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
he will be subscribed.



RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Poor JDno sympathy anywhere! (You
need a nice dog.) Let me know when the new me is going away so I
can hide. Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 7:56
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz











If I said these things, you would be all over me
-- boredom has its
fruit. Just remember you wrote this -- when I get off
my new me kick (hopefully that will never happen) I will get
even. Butfor the time being, I think you knew I would think
this funny, I have
act ually saved it
!! I showedone of my boys what I am up against on TT
--- laughter in the place of sympathy was all I
got. 











JD




-Original Message- 
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]com
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 03:04:03
-0500
Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV
Bible Quiz



I guess I just
have no sensitivity at all, because I'm cracking up over the

whole
thing! It only strikes me as funny coming from Smithson. I can just

see him laughing
up his sleeve. Of course it's probably true, with him

being in the
construction business, but I just thought I'd pull his leg. (If

he has one!)
Sorry!!! No more sick (nurse) humor!!! (JD
I really don't care

what's missing!)Izzy



-Original
Message-

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Charles Perry Locke

Sent: Thursday,
June 02, 2005 9:16 PM

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org

Subject: RE:
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz



Izzy,
first of all, it is none of your business if anyone on this group has 

a malady, or is
missing appendages. What do you mean, he is just now 

telling us?
What makes you think you even entitled to know this, or that he



is obligated to
tell you? Second, John gave us a valid reason for his typos,



so why do you
think he is being dishonest? Third, if you had any sensitivity



at all you would
drop your prideful attitude, quit
trying to cover up your 

comment with
cuteness, and admit it was tacky. Unless, of course, you have 

no sensitivity at
all.



Perry



From:
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org

Subject: RE:
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

Date: Thu, 2
Jun 2005 21:51:47 -0500



Why is that
Perry? When folks start make good-natured fun of JD's
typo's

suddenly he
tells us he has two missing fingers. Now how long have we 

known

JD
and he is just now telling us that? Do you believe it? If we complain

that he is
not making sense is he going to suddenly confess that he had a

lobotomy back
in the 50's, or what??? Izzy



-Original
Message-

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Charles Perry Locke

Sent:
Thursday, June 02, 2005 8:37 PM

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org

Subject: RE:
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz



Izzy,
I felt your post below was a bit tacky. I speak as your brother, not

as moderator.



 From:
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Are
those the only body parts you are missing, or are you holding out on

 us, JD?
(Sounds like a likely story to me!) Iz





--

Let
your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 

know

how you ought
to answer every man. (Colossians
4:6)

http://www.InnGlory.org



If you do not
want to receive posts from this list, send an email to

[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
you will be unsubscribed.
If you have a

friend who
wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to

[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
he will be subscribed.







--

Let
your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 

know how you
ought to answer every man. (Colossians
4:6) 

http://www.InnGlory.org



If you do not
want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
you will be unsubscribed.
If you have a 

friend who
wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
he will be subscribed.





--

Let your
speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know

how you ought to
answer every man. (Colossians
4:6)

http://www.InnGlory.org



If you do not
want to receive posts from this list, send an email to

[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
you will be unsubscribed.
If you have a

friend who wants
to join, tell him to send an e-mail to

[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
he will be subscribed.







--

Let your
speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how 

you ought to
answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org



If you do not
want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend 

who wants to
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 

he will be
subscribed.














RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Blaine, its only shameful
if Im wrong. And Im not. One day you will wish
with all your heart that you had heeded the warnings you have been given here
on TT. Izzy















From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are using the guilt by
association approach to reasoning, which is false reasoning, and shameful
for anyone to have to resort to it. 










RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Methodist, around the corner from our home.
One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful turn of the
century buildings. They are all peppered with sodomites. No wonder
we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints. Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts







what church?











On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:





..a church service..in which the
Reverend was a lesbian










RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








JD, all this talk of community above
everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men
will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each others
fellowship. Its a priority thing. Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005
12:03 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community
and the Kingdom
 of God















 



Thinking Out Loud
(again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From
Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan
Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my
understanding of the importance of his presentations. 











In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved
themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God
and the Sonship of Christ. 





?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible
to anything other than the simplest explanation of all
--- the God who has created persons in his image for personal
communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other
sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ?
(p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest
explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very
image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it
must in clude the idea of ?community.? 











God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit
is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a
part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff).











That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until
expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created
for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be
fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do
with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel
was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the
reconciliation of all things  /SPAN -- a tearing down of
the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created
by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate
the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die
] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that
reveals His power and presence -- a community of
believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He
is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written
on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The
relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very
being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that
image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of
creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our
identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the
perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who
are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to
the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love
(the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you
love yourself), and in communion
(the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our
lives). 











The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His
personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it
God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that
intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then,
understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger
community. John says it this wise: No one has seen God at
anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected
in us ???. He has given us His Spirit.





Perhaps this is where the kingdom comes into
play. If we understand that the kingdom
 of God
is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words
?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this
world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the
New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any
level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the
kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a?
kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,? ?heirs of the
kingdom of promise,? then, perhaps we are on our way to
understanding ?kingdom rule.? 











Kingdom is tied irrevocably to the communion of God in man; that
is what I have come to believe. When we speak of sovereign
rule and authority, we do the idea great injustice if we separate that rule
from its inward throne --- the heart and soul of
man. Kingdom rule, at whatever level, always includes His
?subjects? That is the illusion -- kingdom = a
king and His people. And that is His kingdom. His
influence in the people of God. SPAN style=mso-spacerun:

RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily
Jesus will undoubtedly one day set the record straight for everyone on how
important He considers God's Word to be.  That will be a day of woe for
some. Izzy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:08 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of both.
(Jesus  Scripture)


- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


 Lance wrote:
  I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe
  that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed
  to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie)

 I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into
the
 mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture.  Don't
you
 think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do?

 Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the
 following passage:

 John 10:34-36
 (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are
 gods?
 (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the
 scripture cannot be broken;
 (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the
 world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?

 Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates
 respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture.  And why not, he also
taught
 that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away.

 Matthew 5:17-18
 (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am
not
 come to destroy, but to fulfil.
 (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one
 tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

 Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey those
 expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists.

 Matthew 23:2-3
 (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
 (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do;
but
 do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.

 So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ?  Is it those who
 greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who
 think it would be evil legalism to do so?

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 
'driving' around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in order 
to fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on 
sister!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: June 04, 2005 10:42
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
  
  
  Methodist, around the 
  corner from our home. One of the great liberal city churches in these 
  huge, beautiful turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered 
  with sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of 
  saints. Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15 
  PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
  Exerpts
  
  
  what 
  church?
  
  
  
  On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
  ..a church 
  service..in which the “Reverend” was a 
  lesbian


RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do
SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO!
Shall we follow your
example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate
we are? Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz







Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack
of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths
is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made
jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some
'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 03, 2005
21:19





Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz









You dont make me feel uncomfortable
except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my
friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat
are you and Canada
doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved
United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz







It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you
sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own,
Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout
for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the
head in the sand thingy, Iz.











You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out
there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by
children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the
cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August,
1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any
other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds
other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda
(800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000)











Despite this, the international community has failed to take
the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of
funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by
August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International
Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with
2003. No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and
mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these
unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the
necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis, according
to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New
 York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's
Burnet Institute.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 03, 2005
14:27





Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz









Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals
always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it
isnt Hitler its McCarthy. Get a
new, but more creative insult please. Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz







So then Kevin, in Senator McCarthy like fashion you
hurl out accusations sans proof in the hope that the accusation itself will
serve you well enough! I'd have though as much.














RE: [TruthTalk] The Truth About the Congo

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily
Golly, I always thought it was located in Canda--imagine that! Why don't YOU
try Googleing some accurate facts once in a while yourself? Oh, yeah, you
used Liberal-Google.com, right? Iz

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:22 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Truth About the Congo 

'THE' truth about the Congo is that you didn't even know it's location until
you just 'googled' it.


- Original Message - 
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 03, 2005 21:36
Subject: [TruthTalk] The Truth About the Congo


 US is largest contributor to UN Peacekeeping missions.  UN Officials rape
 and abuse refugees in Congo:
 http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/hl868.cfm.



 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



A little like you leaving your neighborhood to 
reach your neighborhood? A I get it. 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: June 04, 2005 10:47
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and 
  the Kingdom of God
  
  
  JD, all this talk of 
  community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. 
  Lift us Jesus and all men 
  will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each other’s fellowship. 
  It’s a priority thing. Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 
  AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and 
  the Kingdom of 
  God
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  Thinking Out Loud 
  (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From 
  Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan 
  Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my 
  understanding of the importance of his presentations. 
  
  
  
  In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many 
  have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in 
  the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. 
  
  ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the 
  world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of 
  all --- the God who has created persons in his image 
  for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with 
  all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world 
  we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the 
  simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His 
  very image. If there is another explanation for that image, 
  certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? 
  
  
  
  
  God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and 
  the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of 
  those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 
  1:17ff).
  
  
  
  That being true, the personal behavior of man is 
  incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). 
  Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community 
  (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had 
  everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. 
  Israel 
  was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about 
  the reconciliation of all things  /SPAN -- a tearing down 
  of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide 
  created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to 
  misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die 
  ] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that 
  reveals His power and presence -- a community of 
  believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He 
  is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written 
  on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The 
  relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very 
  being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that 
  image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of 
  creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our 
  identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the 
  perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those 
  who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves 
  to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in 
  love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your 
  neighbor as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the 
  indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). 
  
  
  
  The grand truth of the Christian faith is our 
  participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature 
  ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If 
  we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call 
  community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a 
  beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this 
  wise: No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, 
  God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. 
  He has given us His Spirit.
  
  Perhaps this is where the "kingdom" comes into 
  play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the 
  sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the 
  kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? 
  can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New 
  Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level 
  given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom, 
  ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the 
  kingdom is not eating and drinking,? ?heirs of the kingdom of 
  promise,? then, perhaps we are on our way to 

Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir
Oh c'mon Izzie, name names. Can you recall just how well the religious
leaders quoted the scriptures? Do I believe that YOU esteem the Scriptures?
I do. Do I also think that you quote it 'religiously'? I do. You are flip,
smart-mouthed and, on occasion, rather unpleasant to read.
- Original Message - 
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 04, 2005 10:50
Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


 Jesus will undoubtedly one day set the record straight for everyone on how
 important He considers God's Word to be.  That will be a day of woe for
 some. Izzy

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
 Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:08 AM
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

 As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of
both.
 (Jesus  Scripture)


 - Original Message - 
 From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09
 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


  Lance wrote:
   I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe
   that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed
   to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie)
 
  I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into
 the
  mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture.  Don't
 you
  think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do?
 
  Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the
  following passage:
 
  John 10:34-36
  (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are
  gods?
  (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the
  scripture cannot be broken;
  (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the
  world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?
 
  Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates
  respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture.  And why not, he also
 taught
  that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away.
 
  Matthew 5:17-18
  (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am
 not
  come to destroy, but to fulfil.
  (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or
one
  tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
 
  Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey
those
  expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists.
 
  Matthew 23:2-3
  (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
  (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do;
 but
  do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
 
  So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ?  Is it those
who
  greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who
  think it would be evil legalism to do so?
 
  Peace be with you.
  David Miller.
 
 
  --
  Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
 know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org
 
  If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know
 how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



David has given you a more appropriate answer than 
Izzie but, she has a good heart? (I think so, anyway) 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: June 04, 2005 10:44
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs 
  DaveH
  
  
  Blaine, it’s 
  only “shameful if I’m wrong”. And I’m not. One day you will wish 
  with all your heart that you had heeded the warnings you have been given here 
  on TT. Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]You are using the 
  "guilt by association" approach to reasoning, which is false reasoning, and 
  shameful for anyone to have to resort to it. 
  


RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily
I agree totally, Lance. Let's just tell men not to impregnate women and
see if that flies.  I'm sure it will do a lot to change hearts and lives.
Meanwhile, for those who aren't listening, let's change laws to protect the
innocent unborn. Izzy

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 7:07 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

Was there ever a time when...Yes, there was.

Abortion. Have you read 'Freakonomics'? Look at his 'take' on abortion. Yes
I do have a solution. Starting with yourself and, working outward, tell men
not to get women pregnant who will not carry the pregnancy to term. Is this
a joke? It is not!


- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 04, 2005 08:56
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


 Lance wrote:
  I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from
  DM to DH, for global issues.

 I agree, Lance, that my concern for global issues is not very high.  In
 fact, my concern for national issues isn't very high either.  I'm in one
of
 those situations where things are so bad here at home that I try to take
 care of the problems here and do not have much of myself left to concern
 myself with issues across the other side of the globe.  I hope one day
that
 I might be used that way, but right now, my plate is full and I don't know
 how to add global issues to it.  My hope lies in the pattern seen in Acts
1,
 where he says to be witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in
 Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.  Historically there was
a
 progression in maturity from things local to things global.  I think
perhaps
 that you are older than me.  Was there ever a time in your life when you
 were not concerned enough with things global?

 Lance wrote:
  To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond
  my comprehension.

 What is your perspective about the more than 46 million deaths through
 abortion?  Do you have a solution to this problem?  Are you concerned
about
 it?  I haven't heard you address the problem of abortion.  Don't you think
 we should start with this more local problem of abortion rather than the
 problems in the Ivory Coast and related areas?

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


[TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat 
more narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of 
aids, starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me 
Worry'? N

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: June 04, 2005 10:54
  Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV 
  Bible Quiz
  
  
  Lance, get it off 
  your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly 
  what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! 
  Shall we follow your example and just blame other 
  entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? 
  Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21 
  AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV 
  Bible Quiz
  
  
  Myopia. Ask your husband about it. 
  I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To 
  make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's 
  not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your 
  neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' 
  contest.
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 


Sent: June 
03, 2005 21:19

Subject: RE: 
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


You don’t make me 
feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. You’re really “out there” my 
friend. And your concerns about the Congo—what are you and Canada doing about it? Did you 
have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (It’s 
a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV 
Bible Quiz


It's truly uncomfortable is it 
not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be 
faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in 
the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the 
lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, 
Iz.



You want serious? I'll give you 
serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die 
every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these 
deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These 
deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the 
crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the 
DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and 
in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia 
(estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in 
Sudan 
(70,000)



Despite this, the international 
community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the 
crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations 
for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the 
United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have 
declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent 
confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at 
an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the 
international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or 
resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the latest 
mortality study, a joint effort by the New 
York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet 
Institute.

  
  - Original Message - 
  
  
  From: ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  
  Sent: June 
  03, 2005 14:27
  
  Subject: RE: 
  [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
  
  
  Oh, good 
  grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and 
  true names to call other people? If it isn’t “Hitler” it’s 
  “McCarthy”. Get a new, but more creative insult please. 
  Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 
  AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] 
  NIV Bible Quiz
  
  
  So then Kevin, in 
  Senator McCarthy like fashion you hurl out accusations sans proof in 
  the hope that the accusation itself will serve you well enough! I'd have 
  though as 
  much.


RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








I suppose you would sit there and celebrate
the community of diversity under the leadership of that pervert woman? 











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:54
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts







Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 'driving'
around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in order to
fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on sister!







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 04, 2005
10:42





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Exerpts









Methodist, around the corner from our
home. One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful
turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered with
sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints.
Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts







what church?











On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:





..a church service..in which the
Reverend was a lesbian












RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Ask my neighbors. Dont ask the
sodomite whore-church. 











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:57
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community
and the Kingdom
 of God







A little like you leaving your neighborhood to reach your
neighborhood? A I get it. 







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 04, 2005
10:47





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
community and the Kingdom
 of God









JD, all this talk of community above
everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men
will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each others
fellowship. Its a priority thing. Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005
12:03 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community
and the Kingdom
 of God















 



Thinking Out Loud
(again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From
Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan
Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my
understanding of the importance of his presentations. 











In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved
themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God
and the Sonship of Christ. 





?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible
to anything other than the simplest explanation of all
--- the God who has created persons in his image for personal
communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other
sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know.
? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest
explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very
image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it
must in clude the idea of ?community.? 











God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit
is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a
part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff).











That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until
expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created
for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be
fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with
the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel
was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the
reconciliation of all things  /SPAN -- a tearing down of
the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created
by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate
the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die
] His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that
reveals His power and presence -- a community of
believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He
is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written
on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The
relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very
being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that
image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of
creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our
identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the
perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who
are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to
the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love
(the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you
love yourself), and in communion
(the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our
lives). 











The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His
personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it
God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that
intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then,
understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community.
John says it this wise: No one has seen God at anytime but if we
love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us
???. He has given us His Spirit.





Perhaps this is where the kingdom comes into
play. If we understand that the kingdom
 of God
is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words
?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this
world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the
New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any
level given vision, whether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the
kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a?
kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,? 

Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



I, for one, do not blame such as yourself, who 
choose the 'broad road' that leadeth to fellowshipping with 'non-sinners'. What 
was it again that Jesus was criticized for? With whom was he hanging out? A 
but, you take the Scriptures seriously unlike some who shall remain nameless 
(eh?)!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: June 04, 2005 11:11
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts
  
  
  I suppose you would 
  sit there and celebrate the community of diversity under the leadership of 
  that pervert woman? 
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:54 
  AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
  Exerpts
  
  
  Wasn't it Jesus who firstset 
  the example of 'driving' around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and 
  the like in order to fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! 
  Right on sister!
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 


Sent: June 
04, 2005 10:42

Subject: RE: 
[TruthTalk] Exerpts


Methodist, around 
the corner from our home. One of the great liberal city churches in 
these huge, beautiful turn of the century buildings. They are all 
peppered with sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real 
gathering of saints. Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15 
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
Exerpts


what 
church?



On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

..a church 
service..in which the “Reverend” was a 
lesbian


RE: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Im still WAITING, Lance. Answer
the QUESTION, Lance! Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:10
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:American
Nationalist PRIDE







IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat more
narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of aids,
starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me Worry'?
N







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 04, 2005
10:54





Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz









Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do
SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO!
Shall we follow your
example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate
we are? Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz







Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack
of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths
is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made
jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some
'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 03, 2005
21:19





Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz









You dont make me feel uncomfortable
except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my
friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat
are you and Canada
doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved
United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz







It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you
sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own,
Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout
for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the
head in the sand thingy, Iz.











You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out
there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by
children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the
cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August,
1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any
other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds
other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda
(800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000)











Despite this, the international community has failed to take
the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of
funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by
August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International
Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003.
No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates
remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous
facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or
resources to effectively address the crisis, according to the latest
mortality study, a joint effort by the New York
based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 03, 2005
14:27





Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk]
NIV Bible Quiz









Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals
always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it
isnt Hitler its McCarthy. Get a
new, but more creative insult please. Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz







So then Kevin, in Senator McCarthy like fashion you
hurl out accusations sans proof in the hope that the accusation itself will
serve you well enough! I'd have though as much.
















RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








ANSWER THE QUESTION LANCE. 











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:16
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts







I, for one, do not blame such as yourself, who choose the
'broad road' that leadeth to fellowshipping with 'non-sinners'. What was it
again that Jesus was criticized for? With whom was he hanging out? A but,
you take the Scriptures seriously unlike some who shall remain nameless
(eh?)!







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 04, 2005
11:11





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Exerpts









I suppose you would sit there and
celebrate the community of diversity under the leadership of that pervert
woman? 











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:54
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts







Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 'driving'
around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in order to
fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on sister!







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 04, 2005
10:42





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Exerpts









Methodist, around the corner from our
home. One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful
turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered with
sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints.
Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts







what church?











On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:





..a church service..in which the
Reverend was a lesbian














RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily
And you are a breath of fresh air, Lance.  A joy and delight. Blessings. (PS
I wasn't being flip, but utterly sincere.)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:01 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

Oh c'mon Izzie, name names. Can you recall just how well the religious
leaders quoted the scriptures? Do I believe that YOU esteem the Scriptures?
I do. Do I also think that you quote it 'religiously'? I do. You are flip,
smart-mouthed and, on occasion, rather unpleasant to read.
- Original Message - 
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 04, 2005 10:50
Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


 Jesus will undoubtedly one day set the record straight for everyone on how
 important He considers God's Word to be.  That will be a day of woe for
 some. Izzy

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
 Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:08 AM
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

 As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of
both.
 (Jesus  Scripture)


 - Original Message - 
 From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09
 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


  Lance wrote:
   I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe
   that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed
   to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie)
 
  I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into
 the
  mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture.  Don't
 you
  think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do?
 
  Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the
  following passage:
 
  John 10:34-36
  (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are
  gods?
  (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the
  scripture cannot be broken;
  (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the
  world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?
 
  Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates
  respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture.  And why not, he also
 taught
  that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away.
 
  Matthew 5:17-18
  (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am
 not
  come to destroy, but to fulfil.
  (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or
one
  tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
 
  Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey
those
  expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists.
 
  Matthew 23:2-3
  (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
  (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do;
 but
  do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
 
  So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ?  Is it those
who
  greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who
  think it would be evil legalism to do so?
 
  Peace be with you.
  David Miller.
 
 
  --
  Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
 know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org
 
  If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know
 how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL 

Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Gary, To call someone's comments a myth (even without any evidence) 
expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates 
David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, 
please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.


Perry the moderator


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600

myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative
personal reasons or as does the author, below)

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Charles Perry Locke


Lance, if you are going to state that David's citations demonstrate a 
misreadng, please provide some evidence of such and allow David to respond.


Perry the Moderator


From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:08:12 -0400

As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of 
both.

(Jesus  Scripture)


- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


 Lance wrote:
  I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe
  that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed
  to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie)

 I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name into
the
 mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture.  Don't
you
 think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do?

 Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in the
 following passage:

 John 10:34-36
 (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are
 gods?
 (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the
 scripture cannot be broken;
 (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the
 world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?

 Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates
 respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture.  And why not, he also
taught
 that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away.

 Matthew 5:17-18
 (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am
not
 come to destroy, but to fulfil.
 (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or 
one

 tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

 Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey 
those

 expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as legalists.

 Matthew 23:2-3
 (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
 (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do;
but
 do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.

 So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ?  Is it those 
who

 greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those who
 think it would be evil legalism to do so?

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir
Why?
- Original Message - 
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 04, 2005 11:37
Subject: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz



 Lance, if you are going to state that David's citations demonstrate a
 misreadng, please provide some evidence of such and allow David to
respond.

 Perry the Moderator

 From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:08:12 -0400
 
 As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of
 both.
 (Jesus  Scripture)
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09
 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
 
 
   Lance wrote:
I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe
that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed
to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie)
  
   I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name
into
 the
   mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture.
Don't
 you
   think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do?
  
   Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in
the
   following passage:
  
   John 10:34-36
   (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye
are
   gods?
   (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the
   scripture cannot be broken;
   (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the
   world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?
  
   Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he illustrates
   respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture.  And why not, he also
 taught
   that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away.
  
   Matthew 5:17-18
   (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I
am
 not
   come to destroy, but to fulfil.
   (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or
 one
   tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
  
   Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey
 those
   expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as
legalists.
  
   Matthew 23:2-3
   (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
   (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and
do;
 but
   do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
  
   So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ?  Is it those
 who
   greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those
who
   think it would be evil legalism to do so?
  
   Peace be with you.
   David Miller.
  
  
   --
   Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
may
 know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org
  
   If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
 
 
 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
 know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org
 
 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



Tell us? Ask Jesus what you should do, Iz. 
Guiltless? Have you seen 'Shake Hands With The Devil"? Look at Clinton and 
Albright showing up in Rwanda years later claiming that they did not know the 
extent of that holocaust. That holocaust was a mere 800,000. Who was the General 
who stayed behind during the conflict? Why Iz, it was Romeo Dallaire, a Canadian 
General.I'll pay for the rental cost if you'll get it and watch it. Thereafter 
I'd love to hear something other than a simple dismissal re: the second worst 
tragedy since WWII.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  ShieldsFamily 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: June 04, 2005 11:16
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:American 
  Nationalist PRIDE
  
  
  I’m still WAITING, 
  Lance. Answer the QUESTION, Lance! 
  Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:10 
  AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk] Re:American 
  Nationalist PRIDE
  
  
  IFF you are content to be and, 
  remain, somewhat more narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only 
  black people dying of aids, starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman 
  who said 'What, Me Worry'? N
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 


Sent: June 
04, 2005 10:54

Subject: RE: 
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


Lance, get it off 
your chest and please EXPLAIN to us 
exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we 
follow your example and just 
blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? 
Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21 
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV 
Bible Quiz


Myopia. Ask your husband about 
it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global 
issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, 
actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events 
outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an 
accompanying 'hollerin'' contest.

  
  - Original Message - 
  
  
  From: ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  
  Sent: June 
  03, 2005 21:19
  
  Subject: RE: 
  [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
  
  
  You don’t make me 
  feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. You’re really “out there” 
  my friend. And your concerns about the Congo—what are you and Canada doing about it? Did you 
  have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? 
  (It’s a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 
  PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] 
  NIV Bible Quiz
  
  
  It's truly uncomfortable is it 
  not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do 
  be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 
  'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland 
  security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand 
  thingy, Iz.
  
  
  
  You want serious? I'll give 
  you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people 
  die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of 
  these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. 
  These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities 
  since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. 
  This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of 
  World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, 
  including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo 
  (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan 
  (70,000)
  
  
  
  Despite this, the 
  international community has failed to take the necessary action to 
  alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the 
  United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while 
  contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to 
  DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. 
  "No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates 
  remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous 
  facts, the international community has not 

Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread Charles Perry Locke
I never use the term, and have no definition. But if I wanted one I would 
see if there was a comon usage for the term. I wouldn't make up my own 
definition to fit my own desires.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 01:37:52 EDT


So, what is your definition of priestcraft,  Perry?
Blaine


In a message dated 6/3/2005 7:17:13 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Blaine wrote:  Priestcraft is, by my  definition, ...

Here we go again...the mormons like to  make up their own meanings for
words, to suit thier own personal  perception of the world. I call this the
Queen of Hearts syndrome:  Words mean exactly what I want them to mean!

When a  person is steeped in a culture in which the cultural leaders
redefine  words to have untraditional meanings, for the purpose of making 
the


culture appear to be other than it really is, this begins to affect it's
adherents, as we see with Blaine above, and have recently seen with DaveH  
in
his limited definition of the word teach, which exclusdes his own  
actions

on TT.

Another case in point is the Clinton  case where his attempt tp liimit the
definition of certain words and  phrases to exclude his own actions has 
been

passed down to our youth, who  at times use these tactics to try to exclude
thier own  actions.

Another, but inverse,  example is the word  homophobe. In this case the
definition of the word has been EXPANDED to  include not only those who 
fear

homosexuality (traditional definition),  but to include those who beleive
that it is sinful behavior.

The root of this is in the politically correct movement, where it does
not matter what you feel or believe, but how you are  perceived.


Wow. What a  world!

Perry






--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Because if you can not support your claims, they are likely false, and 
bearing false witness...well...you know.



From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:38:36 -0400

Why?
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 04, 2005 11:37
Subject: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz



 Lance, if you are going to state that David's citations demonstrate a
 misreadng, please provide some evidence of such and allow David to
respond.

 Perry the Moderator

 From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:08:12 -0400
 
 As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading of
 both.
 (Jesus  Scripture)
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09
 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
 
 
   Lance wrote:
I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe
that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed
to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie)
  
   I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name
into
 the
   mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture.
Don't
 you
   think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do?
  
   Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does in
the
   following passage:
  
   John 10:34-36
   (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye
are
   gods?
   (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the
   scripture cannot be broken;
   (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into 
the

   world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?
  
   Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he 
illustrates

   respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture.  And why not, he also
 taught
   that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away.
  
   Matthew 5:17-18
   (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I
am
 not
   come to destroy, but to fulfil.
   (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot 
or

 one
   tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
  
   Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and obey
 those
   expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as
legalists.
  
   Matthew 23:2-3
   (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
   (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and
do;
 but
   do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
  
   So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ?  Is it 
those

 who
   greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it those
who
   think it would be evil legalism to do so?
  
   Peace be with you.
   David Miller.
  
  
   --
   Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
may
 know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org
  
   If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have 
a

 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
 
 
 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
 know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org
 
 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have 
a

 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to 

Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir
Gary might have the gift of discernment, Charles. If this is the case then,
simply 'discerning' (though he didn't, as you seem to suggest infer David
was a false prophet, IMO) is sufficient.

Why not let David take care of this privately?


- Original Message - 
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 04, 2005 11:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz


 Gary, To call someone's comments a myth (even without any evidence)
 expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment
equates
 David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack,
 please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.

 Perry the moderator

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
 Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600
 
 myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative
 personal reasons or as does the author, below)
 
 On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:
  ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir
There is no false witness being 'borne' here, CPL. I've been reading David
for a long, long, long while. He has a way of parsing definite articles. I
already know what David would say in response to my 'supportive arguments'.
So then, as I bear up under your mutual monologues with the Mormons, you can
tolerate my 'read' of David's very distinctive theological 'bent'.


- Original Message - 
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 04, 2005 11:41
Subject: Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


 Because if you can not support your claims, they are likely false, and
 bearing false witness...well...you know.

 From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:38:36 -0400
 
 Why?
 - Original Message -
 From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Sent: June 04, 2005 11:37
 Subject: Moderator commant: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
 
 
  
   Lance, if you are going to state that David's citations demonstrate a
   misreadng, please provide some evidence of such and allow David to
 respond.
  
   Perry the Moderator
  
   From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
   Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
   Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:08:12 -0400
   
   As I said David, it is you. Your citations demonstrate a misreading
of
   both.
   (Jesus  Scripture)
   
   
   - Original Message -
   From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
   Sent: June 03, 2005 20:09
   Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
   
   
 Lance wrote:
  I was simply alluding to those on TT who believe
  that God 'incarnated' in book form as opposed
  to a human being. (You, David, Judy and Izzie)

 I wouldn't use the word 'incarnated' but because you threw my name
 into
   the
 mix, I suppose you are addressing my great respect for Scripture.
 Don't
   you
 think Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do?

 Consider the straining at the letter of Scripture that Jesus does
in
 the
 following passage:

 John 10:34-36
 (34) Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said,
Ye
 are
 gods?
 (35) If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and
the
 scripture cannot be broken;
 (36) Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into
 the
 world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?

 Besides Jesus demonstrating here that he is a legalist, he
 illustrates
 respect for every jot and tittle of Scripture.  And why not, he
also
   taught
 that no jot or tittle would fail until heaven and earth pass away.

 Matthew 5:17-18
 (17) Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets:
I
 am
   not
 come to destroy, but to fulfil.
 (18) For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one
jot
 or
   one
 tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

 Remember too that Jesus encouraged his disciples to listen and
obey
   those
 expounders of Scripture whom many on TruthTalk would label as
 legalists.

 Matthew 23:2-3
 (2) Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
 (3) All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe
and
 do;
   but
 do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.

 So who here is walking in the tradition of Jesus Christ?  Is it
 those
   who
 greatly respect the Scriptures and follow it closely, or is it
those
 who
 think it would be evil legalism to do so?

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that
you
 may
   know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
   http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email
to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you
have
 a
   friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
   
   
   --
   Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
may
   know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
   http://www.InnGlory.org
   
   If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you
have
 a
   friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
  
  
   --
   Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
may
 know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org
  
   If you do not want to receive 

[TruthTalk] For those who want Scripture and in the KJV translation

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



I'd heartily recommend 2 Tim 3:1-17

enjoy


Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. 

JD-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:32:04 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz


Gary, To call someone's comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.Perry the moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible QuizDate: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Lance Muir



Ah at last! A level headed opinion. Whewww, 
thought I was being left without a 'supporter' (a nod's as good as a 
wink)

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: June 04, 2005 12:12
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] 
  Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz
  
  
  
  Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with 
  this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING 
  Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair 
  minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big 
  time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of 
  evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet 
  -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. 
  
  JD-Original Message-From: Charles Perry 
  Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: 
  Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:32:04 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator 
  Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz
  

  Gary, To call someone's 
  comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported 
  opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. 
  Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to 
  support your claim or retract it.Perry the 
  moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: 
  Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible QuizDate: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 
  21:51:16 -0600myth (false prophets speak of JC in 
  the past tense for manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the 
  author, below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 
  "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: 
  ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we 
  do.--"Let your speech be always with 
  grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every 
  man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not 
  want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him 
  to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
  he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

Well, it most certainly is not humanism, Linda. Or maybe I should ask what you think humanism is before going any further. David M accused me of the same thing -- perhaps this is where you got the idea. He too, left off giving me a definition. 

What was written below is a first draft attempt at continuing the task of understanding, on my part. It could not be more God centered -- so how is it humanism. What is you defintion?

Jd-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:47:48 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God






JD, all this talk of community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each other?s fellowship. It?s a priority thing. Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God





 

Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. 



In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. 

?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? 



God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff).



That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things  /SPAN -- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ]
sp; His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love (the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor 
as you love yourself), and in communion (the fellowship of the saints and the indwelling of God, Himself, in our lives). The grand truth of the Christian faith is our participation in His personal existence as opposed to His nature ?. For it God at work in us to will and accomplish. If we understand that intrinsic to His existence is this thing we call community, we, then, understand just how important it is to be a beneficial part of the larger community. John says it this wise:
sp; No one has seen God at anytime but if we love one another, God abides in us and His love is perfected in us ???. He has given us His Spirit.  Perhaps this is where the "kingdom" comes into play. If we understand that the kingdom of God is the sovereign rule and authority of God, then Christ?s words ?the kingdom is within,? and ?my kingdom is not of this world? can have real and precise meaning. If ?kingdom? in the New Covenant age is the reality and rule of God, Himself, on any level given vision, wh
ether ?thy kingdom come,? ?you are near to the kingdom, ? ?my father has granted me kingdom [not ?a? kingdom], the kingdom is not eating and drinking,? 

Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



Let me get this straight - IYO it is the duty of 
America as a nation to go in and try to heal the epidemic
of violence and Aids in the Congo with what?? 
Just how does the gospel of the Kingdom cover a situation
such as this? 
jt

On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:09:29 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Why? It is the gospel of the kingdom, that's 
  why.
  
From: Judy Taylor 

Lance why are you so busy judging nations? 
The Lord is the one who will take care of that in His time.
We are supposed to be examining ourselves to see if 
WE are in the faith so that we will be on the right side
when He returns. jt

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:18:23 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  If this was a source of oil Kevin, your 
  country WOULD BE THERE! Terry sees this.
  
From: Kevin Deegan 

These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 
million fatalities since the crisis began in August

Why don't you go over there and do something about it?
Talk is cheap!Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

  
  
  
  

  

  It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When 
  (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be 
  faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 
  'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland 
  security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand 
  thingy, Iz.
  
  You want serious? I'll give you serious! 
  Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die 
  every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of 
  these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of 
  age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 
  million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end 
  of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other 
  conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll 
  exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 
  dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan 
  (70,000)
  
  Despite this, the international community 
  has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. 
  During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its 
  activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the 
  United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have 
  declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent 
  confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain 
  elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous 
  facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary 
  will or resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the 
  latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based 
  International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet 
  Institute.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27
Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: 
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


Oh, good 
grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried 
and true names to call other people? If it isn’t “Hitler” it’s 
“McCarthy”. Get a new, but more creative insult please. 
Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance 
MuirSent: Friday, 
June 03, 2005 11:47 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: 
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


So then Kevin, in 
Senator McCarthy like fashion you hurl out accusations sans 
proof in the hope that the accusation itself will serve you well 
enough! I'd have though as 
much.


Discover Yahoo!Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM 
 more. Check 
it out!
  
  


Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



JD/Perry what about the fact that some (possibly 
including Gary) hold to a doctrine that teaches them that the
spiritual gifts Jesus gave to the Church are not for 
today - that they died out with the last apostle - as senseless
as that may be. A person like that would not 
accept a genuine prophet in their midst, nor would they be
qualified to evaluate the gift operating through them 
which would make their opinion on the subject without
foundation and pointless. jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:12:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with 
  this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING 
  Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair 
  minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big 
  time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of 
  evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet 
  -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. 
  
  JDFrom: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

  Gary, To call someone's 
  comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported 
  opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. 
  Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to 
  support your claim or retract it.Perry the 
  moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]myth 
  (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for 
  manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, 
  below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David 
  Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: 
  ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we 
  do.--"Let your speech be always with 
  grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every 
  man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not 
  want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him 
  to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
  he will be subscribed.
  


Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

does the "love of God" in your life say anything to this problem or is your thinking that the Government fulfills your responsiblity to those dying in the Congo? - or is that just more liberal nonsense? 

JD-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:54:13 -0500Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz






Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! Shall we follow your example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest.


- Original Message - 

From: ShieldsFamily 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: June 03, 2005 21:19

Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


You don?t make me feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. You?re really ?out there? my friend. And your concerns about the Congo?what are you and Canada doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (It?s a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, Iz.



You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000)



Despite this, the international community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute.


- Original Message - 

From: ShieldsFamily 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: June 03, 2005 14:27

Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it isn?t ?Hitler? it?s ?McCarthy?. Get a new, but more creative insult please. Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


So then Kevin, in Senator McCarthy like fashion you hurl out accusations sans proof in the hope that the accusation itself will serve you well enough! I'd have though as much.



Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. 

JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:58:11 -0400Subject: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz



JD/Perry what about the fact that some (possibly including Gary) hold to a doctrine that teaches them that the
spiritual gifts Jesus gave to the Church are not for today - that they died out with the last apostle - as senseless
as that may be. A person like that would not accept a genuine prophet in their midst, nor would they be
qualified to evaluate the gift operating through them which would make their opinion on the subject without
foundation and pointless. jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:12:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. 

JDFrom: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Gary, To call someone's comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.Perry the moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
 ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside 
from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly 
that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than 
scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To 
me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being 
honest is not a litmus test either. 
jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  What does this have to do with anything? I believe in 
  prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to 
  be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm 
  thedifference. 
  
  JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

  
  JD/Perry what about the fact that some (possibly 
  including Gary) hold to a doctrine that teaches them that the
  spiritual gifts Jesus gave to the Church are not for 
  today - that they died out with the last apostle - as senseless
  as that may be. A person like that would not 
  accept a genuine prophet in their midst, nor would they be
  qualified to evaluate the gift operating through them 
  which would make their opinion on the subject without
  foundation and pointless. jt
  
  On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:12:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  


Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with 
this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about 
ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as 
being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- 
big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- 
tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false 
prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not 
unsupported. 

JDFrom: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Gary, To call someone's 
comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported 
opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. 
Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to 
support your claim or retract it.Perry the 
moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]myth 
(false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for 
manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, 
below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David 
Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: 
..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we 
do.--"Let your speech be always with 
grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every 
man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not 
want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell 
him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and he will be subscribed.

  


Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread Terry Clifton




[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  
  Mester
Blaine: Jesus, indeed, is the same.The notion that he has spoken in
this dispensation is apparently given credence (in your thinking)
because of the claim to fame
-- 4th largest denomination. What does the comparison of numbers mean
when you compare to  say -- Buddhism? How are you doing in
that exchange. Could it be that numbers mean absolutely nothing when
it comes to the establishment of truth. I mean, my family is larger
than yours... 7 kids and 12 grandchildren. That makes us
--- what? Right? 
  
  Secondly, the Mormon revelations have nothing to do with the
First Church. There was no doctrine in the first church that provided
for polygamy.
Blacks were welcome. Grace, not works, was the theme of the day, God
as expressed in the Godhead, was and is the only God, salvation was a
gifted occurrence
  apart
from the law, the church was never "right" in terms of the thinking and
actions of its membership, and the governmental structure
of the first church was nothing similar to what you have today
-- dispite
the use of such words as "elders" and "bishops."n
bsp; No one believed that Temple righteousness
played a role in securing new heavens and new earths for the faithful
-- becoming gods to the same degree as the god of this earth. 
  
  I mention the "first church," because the justification for the
revelations of Mormonism have
everything to do a supposed apostasy from the True Church of the first
century.such an opinionignores the factthat "first church" was
divided based on doctrine and if we count heads,doctrinal error(works
  salvationism -- Jewish
style)was, by far, the majority opinion. The notion that the church and its leadership had
controls over the individual members (a false doctrine) led to the
establishment of the Pope and the continuance of works salvationism. There would have been
no Pope if the membership understood that the rule of the bishop was a rule of example
 only. The first
church did not understand the theology of accepted diversity as taught
in Romans 14. In fact, if we cut out all the material inthe NT letters, if we cut all the
material that was written to inform and correct the thinking of the
first church - we would have nothing left but a pamphlet of NT instruction.
 
  
  JD
  
  

=
Well done, John!! Especially that last sentence.
Terry

  
  
  
  

  
  






[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



JD show me in scripture where God makes "his ppl" 
responsible for the ills of the whole world? The Church is
responsible to witness to the Truth and the Truth is 
what will make them free. In the world there is always some
crisis. It is just one big demonic game. I can remember 
the 60's when my sister would send these newspaper
clippings to me about impending doom from a nuclear 
catastrophe and everyone was investing in bomb shelters
which proved to be a mirage. Missionaries have 
been sent to Zaire - we have some living locally and some boys
from that nation who are here to study. CBN is 
also very involved. ... So if there is something we are all missing
please post Chapter and verse and I for one will give 
it some thought and some prayer. jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:03:16 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  does the "love of God" in your life say anything to this problem or is 
  your thinking that the Government fulfills your responsiblity to those dying 
  in the Congo? - or is that just more liberal 
  nonsense?JDFrom: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

  
  

  
  Lance, get it off 
  your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly 
  what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! 
  Shall we follow your example and just blame other 
  entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? 
  Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Lance 
  Muir
  
  Myopia. Ask your husband about it. 
  I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To 
  make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's 
  not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events outside of either your 
  neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' 
  contest.
  
From: ShieldsFamily 




You don?t make me 
feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. You?re really ?out there? my 
friend. And your concerns about the Congo?what are you and Canada doing about it? Did you 
have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? (It?s 
a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance 
Muir

It's truly uncomfortable is it 
not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be 
faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in 
the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland security is on the 
lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand thingy, 
Iz.



You want serious? I'll give you 
serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people die 
every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these 
deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. These 
deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the 
crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the 
DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of World War II and 
in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, including Bosnia 
(estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in 
Sudan 
(70,000)



Despite this, the international 
community has failed to take the necessary action to alleviate the 
crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the United Nations 
for its activities had been raised by August, while contributions by the 
United Sates Agency for International Assistance to DRC for 2004 have 
declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. "No other recent 
confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates remain elevated at 
an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous facts, the 
international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or 
resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the latest 
mortality study, a joint effort by the New 
York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet 
Institute.

  
  - Original Message - 
  
  
  From: ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  
  Sent: June 
  03, 2005 14:27
  
  Subject: RE: 
  [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
  
  
  Oh, good 
  grief---why is it that liberals always fall back on those old tried and 
  true names to call other people? If it isn?t ?Hitler? it?s 
  ?McCarthy?. Get a new, but more creative insult please. 
  Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:47 
  AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] 
  NIV Bible Quiz
  
   

Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread Terry Clifton




Lance Muir wrote:

  
  

  
  David has given you a more
appropriate answer than Izzie but, she has a good heart? (I think so,
anyway) 

===
Izzy is the re-incarnation of miss Kitty on Gunsmoke. Tough as nails,
heart of gold. With your vast knowledge of film and television
characters I am surprised that you had not noticed that.
(If you don't believe me, ask Festus)




RE: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








STILL WAITING, LANCE. ANSWER PLEASE. 











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:27
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Re:American Nationalist PRIDE







Tell us? Ask Jesus what you should do, Iz. Guiltless? Have
you seen 'Shake Hands With The Devil? Look at Clinton and Albright
showing up in Rwanda
years later claiming that they did not know the extent of that holocaust. That
holocaust was a mere 800,000. Who was the General who stayed behind during the
conflict? Why Iz, it was Romeo Dallaire, a Canadian General.I'll pay for the
rental cost if you'll get it and watch it. Thereafter I'd love to hear
something other than a simple dismissal re: the second worst tragedy since
WWII.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 04, 2005
11:16





Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Re:American Nationalist PRIDE









Im still WAITING, Lance.
Answer the QUESTION, Lance! Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 9:10
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:American
Nationalist PRIDE







IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat more
narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of aids,
starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me Worry'?
N







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 04, 2005
10:54





Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz









Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do
SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO!
Shall we follow your
example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate
we are? Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 4:21
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz







Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack
of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths
is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made
jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some
'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 03, 2005
21:19





Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz









You dont make me feel uncomfortable
except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my
friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat
are you and Canada
doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved
United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 1:25
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz







It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you
sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own,
Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout
for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the
head in the sand thingy, Iz.











You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out
there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by
children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the
cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August,
1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any
other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds
other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda
(800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000)











Despite this, the international community has failed to take
the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of
funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by
August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International
Assistance to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with
2003. No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and
mortality rates remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these
unambiguous facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the
necessary will or resources to effectively address the crisis, according
to the latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New
 York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's
Burnet Institute.







- Original Message - 





From: 

RE: [TruthTalk] For those who want Scripture and in the KJV translation

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Were you referring to someone in
particular here, Lance?











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005
10:01 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] For those who
want Scripture and in the KJV translation







I'd heartily recommend 2 Tim 3:1-17











enjoy










RE: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








JD, if you are going to falsely accuse me
of ad hom attacks please provide the quotes. Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005
10:13 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk]
Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz











Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get
serious with this -- what about liar and Deegan.
Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the left? You
strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line
-- big time. As far as David being a false prophet
-- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a
false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not
unsupported. 











JD




-Original Message-
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:32:04 -0700
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz



Gary, To call someone's comments a myth (even without any
evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment
equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack,
please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.

Perry the moderator

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600

myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative
personal reasons or as does the author, below)

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 David
 Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
 ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and he will be subscribed.















[TruthTalk] Refresher concerning the TruthTalk forum

2005-06-04 Thread David Miller
Lance wrote:
 Why not let David take care of this privately?

Because Gary said it publicly.  Besides that, my experience is that Gary 
often does not respond to my private posts, so why should I waste my time?

Can't you, Gary, and John follow rules?  Let's not be lawless.  We have one 
rule on TruthTalk:  No ad hominem arguments.  The reason for this is because 
the dialogue degenerates into being about egos and people defending 
themselves.  We want to talk about truth.  The list is not for evangelizing, 
personal counseling, or any other similar personal ministry.  It is a place 
for discussing Truth.

Here is the way it works.

When Perry acts as moderator to guide people away from the ad hominem 
arguments, the people addressed should comply and not respond to the list. 
If you have a problem with what he is saying, write to him privately.  Perry 
is the only one on the list who can address personal issues, and he does so 
as moderator to keep the discussion on track.  So please do not reply to the 
list when reading any post where Perry signs it as moderator, or indicates 
in the subject line that the post is being made as moderator.

Concerning Kevin calling John a liar.  That is an ad hominem remark as well 
and is generally not allowed.  We have been over this many times.  Giving 
evidence along with the remark might make such a post allowable in some 
cases.  That is for the moderator to make the call on.  The reason it might 
be allowed is because if he wants to demonstrate how someone is bearing 
false witness by producing facts, that might be edifying to the list.  Just 
calling someone a liar is not edifying.  Still, what is considered solid 
evidence to one person might appear to be no evidence at all to everybody 
else, so the moderator has the final say about what will be allowed.  There 
are gray areas here.  Personally, I think it is best if nobody ever calls 
anyone a liar on the list.  That does not mean he cannot do so privately or 
in another forum.  It is not a sin to call someone a liar.  It is something 
we simply discourage on this list only.  The reason?  We want to talk about 
truth, not judge one another on the list.  The focus here should be on 
truth, concepts, ideas, theology, philosophy, and opinions, not upon people.

So to summarize:

1.  No ad hominem arugments are allowed on the list.

2.  Do not respond to the list on any posts signed by Perry as moderator. 
Accept what he says, or respond privately if needed.

3.  If you think someone has crossed the line about the ad hominem rule, 
respond to that person directly on the list in the course of your argument 
to point out their error, or write Perry privately and ask him to do 
something about it.  Do not attempt to use it to justify the ad hominem 
remarks of others.  Two wrongs do not make something right.  You cannot 
justify bad behavior by pointing out somebody else's bad behavior.

If we follow these simple rules, the list will get cleaned up and we can get 
back to some constructive discussions like we have had in the past.

Peace be with you.
David Miller
List Administrator 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Thanks for asking, JD. To me
humanism is the religion worshipping humans. Putting humans and
humanistic thinking ahead of God and thinking according to Gods
Word. I have no idea how DM would define it. I also dont
appreciate your insinuation that I get my ideas from DM. 



Regarding your post, it sounded nice
and all. But a religion that spends time promoting Community
is off-base IMO. The true Church is not about promoting the community of
humans, but is all about lifting up Jesus Christ as Lord of Lords and King of
Kings. The true community which springs from that as a byproduct is truly
wonderful, as you seem to understand. Izzy



PS Here is how a Humanist defines
Humanism: http://www.jcn.com/humanism.html.
(Is it NOT Christianity.)











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005
10:18 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community
and the Kingdom
 of God











Well, it most certainly is not humanism,
Linda. Or maybe I should ask what you think humanism is before
going any further. David M accused me of the same thing -- perhaps
this is where you got the idea. He too, left off giving me a
definition. 











What was written below is a first draft attempt at
continuing the task of understanding, on my part. It could not be more
God centered -- so how is it humanism. What is you defintion?











Jd




-Original Message-
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:47:48 -0500
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God





JD, all this talk of community above
everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men
will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each other?s fellowship.
It?s a priority thing. Izzy



















From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005
12:03 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] community
and the Kingdom of God



























 







Thinking Out Loud
(again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From
Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan
Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my
understanding of the importance of his presentations. 



















In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved
themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and
the Sonship of Christ. 









?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible
to anything other than the simplest explanation of all
--- the God who has created persons in his image for personal
communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other
sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know.
? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest
explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very
image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it
must in clude the idea of ?community.? 



















God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit
is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a
part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff).



















That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until
expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created
for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be
fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do
with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel
was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the
reconciliation of all things  /SPAN -- a tearing down of
the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created
by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropriate
the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die
]nb sp; His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all
that reveals His power and presence -- a community of
believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He
is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written
on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The
relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very
being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that
image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of
creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our
identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the
perfect law of liberty), in presence (ye who are spiritual help those who
are weak; pour yourselves out for the hunger, give yourselves to
the afflicted and see your light shine as the noonday sun), in love
(the whole law is fulfilled in this, love God and love your neighbor as you
love yourself), and in

Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread David Miller
Lance wrote:
 I, for one, do not blame such as yourself, who choose
 the 'broad road' that leadeth to fellowshipping with 'non-sinners'.
 What was it again that Jesus was criticized for?
 With whom was he hanging out?

Let's make one thing clear.  Jesus did not have fellowship with sinners.  I 
have been criticized many times for being friends with homosexuals, 
fornicators, drunkards, drug addicts, prison convicts, etc.  I have even 
been disfellowshipped for having homosexuals in my Bible studies. 
Nevertheless, I have never had fellowship with these sinners while they were 
still in their sin.

Jesus was criticized for ministering to sinners, not for having fellowship 
with them.  Every sinner who came to Jesus was told by Jesus to go and sin 
no more.  Why?  Sinners cannot have fellowship with Jesus.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily










This is
so very funny!!!













Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the
enlightenment) 










RE: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily






















=
Well done, John!! Especially that last sentence.
Terry



Ditto! Iz




































Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



I knew it! You definitely do have your own 
exclusive Bible Lance. Where do you read that Jesus went to
fellowship with "sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies, 
and the like" In my Bibles they came to Him ... In fact
read John 2:23-25 and you will see that during the 
Passover there were many who believed on Him just
because of what they saw Him do but he would 
not commit Himself to them because He knew what was in
man. So what has 
changed?? God's ppl have a responsibility to go into the highways and 
byways which
the much criticized SP's are doing to preach the 
Kingdom and call people to God. However, the Church has
a different standard, it should not be full of the 
kinds of ppl you name. As Paul told the Ephesians "such
WERE some of you" jt

On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:53:45 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 
  'driving' around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in 
  order to fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on 
  sister!
  
From: ShieldsFamily 


Methodist, around 
the corner from our home. One of the great liberal city churches in 
these huge, beautiful turn of the century buildings. They are all 
peppered with sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real 
gathering of saints. Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]

what 
church?



On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

..a church 
service..in which the “Reverend” was a 
lesbian
  


[TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



What do you propose to do about it Lance - take from 
the rich and give to the poor? Australia is a semi socialistic country like 
Canada and my mother is a good example. She went to work at 57yrs old out 
of necessity because my father (who did not believe in owning a home 
died). She was untrained for anything relevant to the 50's as she had been 
a milliner before she married but the Lord made a way for her. She began as "tea 
lady" in the office of a stock broker and graduated to the mail room, was given 
stock options as part of the job which led to being able to put adeposit 
down on a Unit which she lived in from 1969 until February 2005 when she fell 
and broke her hip. She has had to enter a Respite Hostel which is 
requiring her to sell the Unit and give them a $200,000.00 deposit. She 
was telling me on the phone this morning how unfair this is because ppl who 
don't own a home are able toenter the same place with only their 
pension. She has been frugal for all these years - and for what?? 
jt


On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:10:16 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat 
  more narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of 
  aids, starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me 
  Worry'? N
  
From: ShieldsFamily 


Lance, get it off 
your chest and please EXPLAIN to us 
exactly what you want US to do SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO! 
Shall we follow your example and just blame other 
entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate we are? 
Izzy





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance 
Muir

Myopia. Ask your husband about 
it. I've found a total lack of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global 
issues. To make light of 4M deaths is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, 
actually it's not as you've all made jokes at any reference to events 
outside of either your neighborhoods or some 'sodomite' convention with an 
accompanying 'hollerin'' contest.

  
  From: ShieldsFamily 
  
  
  
  
  You don’t make me 
  feel uncomfortable except for you, Lance. You’re really “out there” 
  my friend. And your concerns about the Congo—what are you and Canada doing about it? Did you 
  have a complaint with someone other than your beloved United Nations? 
  (It’s a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance 
  Muir
  
  It's truly uncomfortable is it 
  not? When (in print) you sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do 
  be faithful to one of your own, Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 
  'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout for 'commies' like homeland 
  security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the head in the sand 
  thingy, Iz.
  
  
  
  You want serious? I'll give 
  you serious! Does anyone out there know the following: One thousand people 
  die every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of 
  these deaths are accounted for by children under five years of age. 
  These deaths add daily to the cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities 
  since the crisis began in August, 1998 to the end of April 2004. 
  This makes the DRC conflict worse than any other conflict since the end of 
  World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds other recent crises, 
  including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda (800,000), Kosovo 
  (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan 
  (70,000)
  
  
  
  Despite this, the 
  international community has failed to take the necessary action to 
  alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of funding sought by the 
  United Nations for its activities had been raised by August, while 
  contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance to 
  DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003. 
  "No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates 
  remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous 
  facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary 
  will or resources to effectively address the crisis," according to the 
  latest mortality study, a joint effort by the New 
  York based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet 
  Institute.
  

- Original Message - 


From: ShieldsFamily 


To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 


Sent: 
June 03, 2005 14:27

Subject: RE: 
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz


Oh, good 

Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread David Miller



I think I am going to like the "new John."Very well written and 
thought provoking. Keep them coming.

Peace be with you.David Miller.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:02 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs 
  DaveH
  
  
  
  Mester Blaine: Jesus, indeed, is the 
  same.The notion that he has spoken in this dispensation is 
  apparently given credence (in your thinking) because of the claim to fame -- 4th largest 
  denomination. What does the comparison of numbers mean when you compare 
  to  say -- Buddhism? How are you doing in that 
  exchange. Could it be that numbers mean absolutely nothing when it 
  comes to the establishment of truth. I mean, my family is larger 
  than yours... 7 kids and 12 grandchildren. That makes 
  us --- what? 
  Right? 
  
  Secondly, the Mormon revelations have nothing to do with the First 
  Church. There was no doctrine in the first church that provided 
  for polygamy. Blacks were welcome. Grace, not 
  works, was the theme of the day, God as expressed in the Godhead, was and is 
  the only God, salvation was a gifted occurrence apart from the law, the 
  church was never "right" in terms of the thinking and actions of its 
  membership, and the governmental structure of the first church was 
  nothing similar to what you have today -- dispite the use of such words 
  as "elders" and "bishops."n bsp; No one believed that Temple 
  righteousness played a role in securing new heavens and new earths for the 
  faithful -- becoming gods to the same degree as the god of this 
  earth. 
  
  I mention the "first church," because the justification for the 
  revelations of Mormonism have everything 
  to do a supposed apostasy from the True Church of the first 
  century.such an opinionignores the factthat "first 
  church" was divided based on doctrine and if we count heads,doctrinal 
  error(works salvationism 
  -- Jewish style)was, by far, the majority 
  opinion. The notion that the 
  church and its leadership had controls over the individual members (a false 
  doctrine) led to the establishment of the Pope and the continuance of works 
  salvationism. There would have 
  been no Pope if the membership understood that the rule of the bishop was a rule of example 
   only. The first church did not understand the theology of accepted 
  diversity as taught in Romans 14. In fact, if we cut out all the 
  material inthe NT letters, if 
  we cut all the material that was written to inform and correct the thinking of 
  the first church - we would have nothing left but a 
  pamphlet of NT instruction.  
  
  JD
  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 
  01:29:00 EDTSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
  

  
  
  In a message dated 6/1/2005 1:34:33 PM Mountain Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  The 
mormons have their JSmith; the J.Witnesses have their CT 
Russell, theChristian Scientists have their Mary Baker Eddy; the RCC's have 
their Pope,and the Incarnationalists have their "Bishop". Ever wonder 
if ANY of themhave the "right" Jesus? Izzy
  
  Blaine: The "Right" Jesus is the one we all 
  worship, and saying he is different because of this or that is rediculous.Jesus has not changed, and 
  he has spoken to men in this dispensation, just as in olden times, and the 
  truths he taught will eventually engulf the world, as the stone(His 
  Church) cut out of the side of the mountain rolls forth and eventually fills 
  the whole earth. And Pairing Joseph Smith with a bunch of other 
  false Christs and false prophets is just another of Satan's 
  tricks.You are using the "guilt by association" approach to reasoning, 
  which is false reasoning, and shameful for anyone to have to resort to 
  it. By the way, the Mormon Church is now the 4th largest 
  denomination in America. Just two years ago, it was the 5th 
  largest.


[TruthTalk] Christian conspiracy in Canada

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Christian conspiracy in Canada:
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44581













RE: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Judy, I think Lance is talking about all
those times when Jesus hung out in the Baal temples with the
homos and prostitutesits in his Bible. Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005
10:45 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts







I knew it! You definitely do have
your own exclusive Bible Lance. Where do you read that Jesus went to





fellowship with sodomites, whores,
liberals, crazies, and the like In my Bibles they came to Him ...
In fact





read John 2:23-25 and you will see that
during the Passover there were many who believed on Him just





because of what they saw Him do but he would not commit Himself to them
because He knew what was in





man. So what has changed?? God's
ppl have a responsibility to go into the highways and byways which





the much criticized SP's are doing to
preach the Kingdom and call people to God. However, the Church has





a different standard, it should not be
full of the kinds of ppl you name. As Paul told the Ephesians such





WERE some of you jt











On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:53:45 -0400 Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:







Wasn't it Jesus who firstset the example of 'driving'
around the sodomites, whores, liberals, crazies and the like in order to
fellowship with the 'saints'.? Good for you, Izzie! Amen! Right on sister!







From: ShieldsFamily










Methodist, around the corner from our
home. One of the great liberal city churches in these huge, beautiful
turn of the century buildings. They are all peppered with
sodomites. No wonder we drive 25 miles to a real gathering of saints.
Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]





what church?











On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:





..a church service..in which the
Reverend was a lesbian




















RE: [TruthTalk] Re:American Nationalist PRIDE

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Sad story of socialism at workrob from
the workers and give to the government to give to the non-workers. Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005
11:27 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:American
Nationalist PRIDE







What do you propose to do about it Lance
- take from the rich and give to the poor? Australia
is a semi socialistic country like Canada and my mother is a good
example. She went to work at 57yrs old out of necessity because my father
(who did not believe in owning a home died). She was untrained for
anything relevant to the 50's as she had been a milliner before she married but
the Lord made a way for her. She began as tea lady in the office of
a stock broker and graduated to the mail room, was given stock options as part
of the job which led to being able to put adeposit down on a Unit which
she lived in from 1969 until February 2005 when she fell and broke her
hip. She has had to enter a Respite Hostel which is requiring her to sell
the Unit and give them a $200,000.00 deposit. She was telling me on the
phone this morning how unfair this is because ppl who don't own a home are able
toenter the same place with only their pension. She has been frugal
for all these years - and for what?? jt

















On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:10:16 -0400 Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:







IFF you are content to be and, remain, somewhat more
narrowly focused then, do so. Hell, Iz they're only black people dying of aids,
starvation and war. I think it was Alfred E Newman who said 'What, Me Worry'?
N







From: ShieldsFamily










Lance, get it off your chest and please EXPLAIN to us exactly what you want US to do
SPECIFICALLY about the CONGO!
Shall we follow your
example and just blame other entirely guiltless people for it so that we can feel how compassionate
we are? Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir





Myopia. Ask your husband about it. I've found a total lack
of concern on TT, from DM to DH, for global issues. To make light of 4M deaths
is simply beyond my comprehension. Wait, actually it's not as you've all made
jokes at any reference to events outside of either your neighborhoods or some
'sodomite' convention with an accompanying 'hollerin'' contest.







From: ShieldsFamily












You dont make me feel uncomfortable
except for you, Lance. Youre really out there my
friend. And your concerns about the Congowhat
are you and Canada
doing about it? Did you have a complaint with someone other than your beloved
United Nations? (Its a crooked JOKE!!!) Izzy













From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir





It's truly uncomfortable is it not? When (in print) you
sound, often, like someone so ?yuck! Do be faithful to one of your own,
Iz. Joe looks down from 'the great 'hearing in the sky.' He's on the lookout
for 'commies' like homeland security is on the lookout for terrorists. It's the
head in the sand thingy, Iz.











You want serious? I'll give you serious! Does anyone out
there know the following: One thousand people die every day in the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC) and nearly half of these deaths are accounted for by
children under five years of age. These deaths add daily to the
cumulative total of 3.8 million fatalities since the crisis began in August,
1998 to the end of April 2004. This makes the DRC conflict worse than any
other conflict since the end of World War II and in terms of death toll exceeds
other recent crises, including Bosnia (estimated 250,000 dead), Rwanda
(800,000), Kosovo (12,000),. and Darfur in Sudan (70,000)











Despite this, the international community has failed to take
the necessary action to alleviate the crisis. During 2004, only 42% of
funding sought by the United Nations for its activities had been raised by
August, while contributions by the United Sates Agency for International Assistance
to DRC for 2004 have declined by almost 25% when compared with 2003.
No other recent confllict has claimed as many lives and mortality rates
remain elevated at an alarming level. In spite of these unambiguous
facts, the international community has not yet mobilized the necessary will or
resources to effectively address the crisis, according to the latest
mortality study, a joint effort by the New York
based International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Australia's Burnet Institute.







- Original Message - 





From: ShieldsFamily






To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






Sent: June 03, 2005
14:27





Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz









Oh, good grief---why is it that liberals
always fall back on those old tried and true names to call other people? If it
isnt Hitler its McCarthy. Get a
new, but more creative insult please. Izzy











From: [EMAIL 

Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? 

But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. 

JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz



JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being 
honest is not a litmus test either. jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. 

JD


Re: [TruthTalk] Obesity

2005-06-04 Thread Dave


DAVEH:Service?

Charles Perry Locke wrote:


 Are there any other types of worship than singing songs?

Perry



--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread Dave




DAVEH: Denial granted.

 Does Izzy not shine so brightly that you cannot see her luster,
John?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  
  Ahh -- so it was grafted that served as the
motivation. Of course DAvH will deny tis -- but the facts are now
on the table. 
  
  Another reason why I cannot type as well as some is that I am
nearly legally blind. What is instore for me? 
  
  JD

  
  
  
  
  
  
  Dave might
just win a free eye exam from my Hubby! J Iz
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Paaleezzz.
Do your lips crack when puckered that tightly? 
  
  
  
  
  
  JD 
  
  
  
  
  
  :-)
  
  
  
  
  DAVEH:
Izzy...Your kindness is only exceeded by your beauty!
  
ShieldsFamily wrote: 
  
  Dave,
you are too much of a gentleman to ever be boring. J Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


-- 
 ~~~
 Dave Hansen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.langlitz.com
 ~~~
 If you wish to receive
 things I find interesting,
 I maintain six email lists...
 JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
 STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.






Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



Gary  Lance are referenced in my wording not yours 
because they are two of the three who are most critical of David Miller and his 
spiritual gift. I'd be interested in some examples of the rooting and 
grounding (in God's Word) that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and 
Gary JD. Lance is an expert in old movies and this is what he writes 
about. Gary is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word 
"myth" ... So how about giving me some examples of what I have 
missed. jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:42:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced 
  below in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about 
  what I actually write? But more than that aside 
  - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in 
  these brothers. So who decides? You or me? 
  Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. 
  
  JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

  
  JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside 
  from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true 
for
  either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly 
  that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and
  what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than 
  scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). 
  To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being 
  honest is not a litmus test either. 
  jt
  
  On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  


What does this have to do with anything? I believe in 
prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to 
be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm 
thedifference. 

JD
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Refresher concerning the TruthTalk forum

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise



How bout them Dadgers !!
Can't you, Gary, and John follow rules?  Let's not be lawless.  We have one 
rule on TruthTalk:  No ad hominem arguments.  The reason for this is because 
the dialogue degenerates into being about egos and people defending 
themselves.  We want to talk about truth.  The list is not for evangelizing, 
personal counseling, or any other similar personal ministry.  It is a place 
for discussing Truth.




Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

This goes on a wall in a frame !!! Thank you.-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:06:50 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH



I think I am going to like the "new John."Very well written and thought provoking. Keep them coming.

Peace be with you.David Miller.

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH



Mester Blaine: Jesus, indeed, is the same.The notion that he has spoken in this dispensation is apparently given credence (in your thinking) because of the claim to fame -- 4th largest denomination. What does the comparison of numbers mean when you compare to  say -- Buddhism? How are you doing in that exchange. Could it be that numbers mean absolutely nothing when it comes to the establishment of truth. I mean, my family is larger than yours... 7 kids and 12 grandchildren. That makes us --- what? Right? 

Secondly, the Mormon revelations have nothing to do with the First Church. There was no doctrine in the first church that provided for polygamy. Blacks were welcome. Grace, not works, was the theme of the day, God as expressed in the Godhead, was and is the only God, salvation was a gifted occurrence apart from the law, the church was never "right" in terms of the thinking and actions of its membership, and the governmental structure of the first church was nothing similar to what you have today -- dispite the use of such words as "elders" and "bishops."
mp;n bsp; No one believed that Temple righteousness played a role in securing new heavens and new earths for the faithful -- becoming gods to the same degree as the god of this earth. 

I mention the "first church," because the justification for the revelations of Mormonism have everything to do a supposed apostasy from the True Church of the first century.such an opinionignores the factthat "first church" was divided based on doctrine and if we count heads,doctrinal error(works salvationism -- Jewish style)was, by far, the majority opinion. The notion that the church and its leadership had controls over the individual members (a false doctrine) led to the establishment of the Pope and the continuance of works salvationism. There would have been no Pope if the membership understood that the rule of the bishop was a rule of example  only. The first church did
 not understand the theology of accepted diversity as taught in Romans 14. In fact, if we cut out all the material inthe NT letters, if we cut all the material that was written to inform and correct the thinking of the first church - we would have nothing left but a pamphlet of NT instruction.  

JD

-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 01:29:00 EDTSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH




In a message dated 6/1/2005 1:34:33 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The mormons have their JSmith; the J.Witnesses have their CT Russell, theChristian Scientists have their Mary Baker Eddy; the RCC's have their Pope,and the Incarnationalists have their "Bishop". Ever wonder if ANY of themhave the "right" Jesus? Izzy

Blaine: The "Right" Jesus is the one we all worship, and saying he is different because of this or that is rediculous.Jesus has not changed, and he has spoken to men in this dispensation, just as in olden times, and the truths he taught will eventually engulf the world, as the stone(His Church) cut out of the side of the mountain rolls forth and eventually fills the whole earth. And Pairing Joseph Smith with a bunch of other false Christs and false prophets is just another of Satan's tricks.You are using the "guilt by association" approach to reasoning, which is false reasoning, and shameful for anyone to have to resort to it. By the way, the Mormon
 Church is now the 4th largest denomination in America. Just two years ago, it was the 5th largest.


Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

First of all, I thought you were responding to my words, since you included them in your response -- callme crazy. Secondly, are you tryng to tell me that nothing written by Gary was (is) biblical -- all of it was rock and roll? Are you trying to convince me that the Bishop from the North only speaks of movies? That seems to be what you just said. There is no point in going onwith this discussionif that is your "recollection." What is your claim against these two men, once again? NOTHING but rock and roll and the movies? Is that what you just said? 

JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 15:06:15 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz



Gary  Lance are referenced in my wording not yours because they are two of the three who are most critical of David Miller and his spiritual gift. I'd be interested in some examples of the rooting and grounding (in God's Word) that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and Gary JD. Lance is an expert in old movies and this is what he writes about. Gary is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word "myth" ... So how about giving me some examples of what I have missed. jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:42:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced below in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. 

JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]



JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being 
honest is not a litmus test either. jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. 

JD



Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread Dave




DAVEH: According to the dictionary definition, it's obvious Blaine was
not making it up as your below assertion,
Perry

http://65.66.134.201/cgi-bin/webster/webster.exe?search_for_texts_web1828=priestcraft

...Will Blaine receive a forthcoming apology?

Charles Perry Locke wrote:
I never use the term, and have no definition. But if I
wanted one I would see if there was a comon usage for the term. I
wouldn't make up my own definition to fit my own desires.
  
  
  
So, what is your definition of "priestcraft," Perry?

Blaine



In a message dated 6/3/2005 7:17:13 AM Mountain Standard Time,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Blaine wrote: Priestcraft is, by my definition, ...


Here we go again...the mormons like to make up their own meanings for

words, to suit thier own personal perception of the world. I call this
the

"Queen of Hearts" syndrome: "Words mean exactly what I want them to
mean!"


When a person is steeped in a culture in which the cultural leaders

redefine words to have untraditional meanings, for the purpose of
making the


culture appear to be other than it really is, this begins to affect
it's

adherents, as we see with Blaine above,
and have recently seen with DaveH in

his limited definition of the word "teach", which exclusdes his own
actions

on TT.


Another case in point is the Clinton case where his attempt tp liimit
the

definition of certain words and phrases to exclude his own actions has
been

passed down to our youth, who at times use these tactics to try to
exclude

thier own actions.


Another, but inverse, example is the word "homophobe". In this case
the

definition of the word has been EXPANDED to include not only those who
fear

homosexuality (traditional definition), but to include those who
beleive

that it is sinful behavior.


The root of this is in the "politically correct" movement, where it
does

not matter what you feel or believe, but how you are perceived.



Wow. What a world!


Perry


  


-- 
 ~~~
 Dave Hansen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.langlitz.com
 ~~~
 If you wish to receive
 things I find interesting,
 I maintain six email lists...
 JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
 STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.






RE: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread ShieldsFamily










They are definitely that! ROFL! Iz

















But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is
exactly waht I see in these brothers.





JD














Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



I'd like to see something of substance that is in line 
with God's Word (not doctrines of men) written by either of them on a subject we 
have discussed on TT. If you search the archives I think you will find 
that they both excelin criticism and their own opinion which is OK if this 
is what they want to contribute.However, this will notqualify 
themas discerning disciples  jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 15:27:05 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  First of all, I thought you were responding to my words, since you 
  included them in your response -- callme crazy. 
  Secondly, are you tryng to tell me that nothing written by Gary was (is) 
  biblical -- all of it was rock and roll? Are you trying to 
  convince me that the Bishop from the North only speaks of movies? 
  That seems to be what you just said. There is no point in going 
  onwith this discussionif that is your "recollection." 
  What is your claim against these two men, once again? NOTHING but 
  rock and roll and the movies? Is that what you just 
  said? JD
  
  From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

  
  Gary  Lance are referenced in my wording not 
  yours because they are two of the three who are most critical of David Miller 
  and his spiritual gift. I'd be interested in some examples of the 
  rooting and grounding (in God's Word) that you perceive in the writings of 
  both Lance and Gary JD. Lance is an expert in old movies and this is 
  what he writes about. Gary is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob 
  Dylan, and the word "myth" ... So how about giving me some examples of what I 
  have missed. jt
  
  On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:42:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  


And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" 
referenced below in my wording - not that anyone one rigth 
really cares about what I actually write? But more than that 
aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly 
waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or 
me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. 

JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]



JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside 
from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true 
for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly 
that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) 
and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than 
scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth 
speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because 
aperson can be honestly deceived so being 

honest is not a litmus test either. 
jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  What does this have to do with anything? I believe in 
  prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim 
  to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to 
  confirm thedifference. 
  
  JD

  


Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Dave
DAVEH:   Hmm..So why did you not quote my posts about Izzy's 
beauty as an example???


David Miller wrote:

We are looking for posts with substance, 
 


--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



I say Amen and well put to what Izzy writes here and 
would also like to point out that the "definition of Kingdom"
is much more than what it is not - which ismeat 
and drink. Jesus Himself said that when He cast out Satan 
with
the finger of God - then you may know that the Kingdom 
of God is come upon you. It is "spiritual authority" -
All of this community business reminds me of Hillary 
Clinton and her "it takes a village to raise a child" mindset.
Also the way the trinity is conceptualized is bothers 
me a whole lot but I am not sure why; the Lord will reveal it
to me. jt

On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:49:46 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  Thanks for asking, 
  JD. To me humanism is the religion worshipping humans. Putting 
  humans and humanistic thinking ahead of God and thinking according to Gods 
  Word. I have no idea how DM would define it. I also dont 
  appreciate your insinuation that I get my ideas from DM. 
  
  
  Regarding your post, 
  it sounded nice and all. But a religion that spends time promoting 
  Community is off-base IMO. The true Church is not about promoting the 
  community of humans, but is all about lifting up Jesus Christ as Lord of Lords 
  and King of Kings. The true community which springs from that as a 
  byproduct is truly wonderful, as you seem to understand. 
  Izzy
  
  PS Here is how a 
  Humanist defines Humanism: http://www.jcn.com/humanism.html. 
  (Is it NOT Christianity.)
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  Well, it most certainly is not 
  humanism, Linda. Or maybe I should ask what you think humanism is 
  before going any further. David M accused me of the same thing -- 
  perhaps this is where you got the idea. He too, left off giving me 
  a definition. 
  
  
  
  What was written below is a 
  first draft attempt at continuing the task of understanding, on my part. 
  It could not be more God centered -- so how is it humanism. 
  What is you defintion?
  
  
  
  Jd
  -Original 
  Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 
  2005 09:47:48 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God
  
  
  JD, all this talk of 
  community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. 
  Lift us Jesus and all men 
  will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each other?s fellowship. 
  It?s a priority thing. Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 
  AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and 
  the Kingdom of 
  God
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  Thinking Out Loud 
  (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From 
  Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan 
  Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my 
  understanding of the importance of his presentations. 
  
  
  
  
  
  In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many 
  have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in 
  the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. 
  
  
  ?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the 
  world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of 
  all --- the God who has created persons in his image 
  for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with 
  all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world 
  we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the 
  simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His 
  very image. If there is another explanation for that image, 
  certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and 
  the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of 
  those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 
  1:17ff).
  
  
  
  
  
  That being true, the personal behavior of man is 
  incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). 
  Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community 
  (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had 
  everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. 
  Israel 
  was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about 
  the reconciliation of all things  /SPAN -- a tearing down 
  of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide 
  created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to 
  misappropriate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die 
  ]nb sp; His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all 
  that reveals His power and presence -- a community of 
  believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He 
  is the Father, we are his 

Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread Dave




DAVEH: FWIW Perry, you may be the one trying to change the culture (see below), so to speak. As I pointed out,
there are many definitions of teach, but the one I feel is appropriate
for TT agrees with what DavidM posted today about the meaning of
teaching (sermonizing)..

DavidM wrote:

Actually, he does tell the saints that they come together to GIVE a sermon, 
and such implies that there will be some there to HEAR a sermon.   :-) 

1 Corinthians 14:26
(26) How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath 
a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an 
interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying.

Notice the word "doctrine" in this list of what the Corinthian believers 
were doing when the whole church comes together.  This is teaching -- a 
sermon. 

...Do you think what I post qualifies as sermons? Furthermore,
do you really think other TTers have joined TT to listen to me sermonizing?
 Therefore Perry, is it not you who wants to use another
definition in an attempt to change the culture here?

Charles Perry Locke wrote:

  
When a person is steeped in a culture in which the cultural leaders

redefine words to have untraditional meanings, for
the purpose of making the


culture appear to be other than it really is
, this begins to affect it's

adherents, as we see with Blaine above, and have recently seen with DaveH in

his limited definition of the word "teach", which exclusdes his
own actions

on TT.

  
  
  

-- 
 ~~~
 Dave Hansen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.langlitz.com
 ~~~
 If you wish to receive
 things I find interesting,
 I maintain six email lists...
 JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
 STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.






Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread ttxpress




Isaiah'spointabout false worshipsolidifies in 
ch2, relates to 'trusting in man';in ch5, Isaiahcondemns the 
arrogant attitude/s ofGod's people; e.g., '..you live alone in the 
land' (5:8), acriticism of their 
economicswhichreflectstheirreal poverty (lording 
themselves over the poor)..apparentlysuch povertyresults primarily 
fromman-centeredness witnessed inthephilosophy partic 
ofthe/irreligious establishment(cp. 3:12, 14); 
also, 
5:14does not mention 'hell'--its about a blessed society trapped in the 
throes of(its) spiritual suicide

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:44:34 -0400 Judy Taylor 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  . read ..Isaiah 
5:13,14


Re: [TruthTalk] A review of Lance Muir

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise



Given enough time, I could offer perhaps a hundred such examples, debunking Judy's claim that Lance is not concerned with substantive matters. 



Izzy says of Mormonism:'Not worth 'fighting' about.' I'm thinking she might wish to qualify that as the nature of God and the Gospel are indeed worth very serious engagement ('fighting' aside). 

Biblical thought/question. Nothing wrong with this. 


Hey! Who wants to go on a 'Lost Books of the Bible' hunt? eh? 

Lance disagrees with the Mormon?s claim of lost NT Books - or, at least, that such a claim has anything to do with the establishment of their World Religion. 


'We are whole people living whole lives before a holy God.' Thedichotomization issue is central. Thanks for raising it! Please do notforward this message to Tim Horton's.Lance agreeing with Miller


Yes to #1. No to #2. I believe you to be a faithful child of God who demonstrates more diligence than most of those I've met.

A comment addressed to Judy Taylor. 


Jt:Do you have a friend who, on an issue of some substance, believes other than you do? If you are praying for one another over this then, how is there to be a satisfactory resolution?


A question ask by Lance that seems to be a good question

Nine times out of ten, not unlike in marriage or friendship, we accept one another including the distinctives. I sense that that is what you do also, Linda. I saw a yound man last evening, characterized by his mother as 'my dirty sweet boy'. His 'dirtyness' was swallowed up in the ontological sweetness within Mom and, in the young man.

Also yesterday, I had the pleasure of talking with someone who sees both more and better than most I know (ironically an optometrist). In her case I practice more deference than is normal for me due to the perceived presence of God's Spirit.

Lance believes in the Holy Spirit.
Dave:IFF 'orthodoxy' has any intrinsic meaning whatsoever then, you are not.This consideration might be based alone on the answer to the question posedby Jesus Himself: 'Who do people say that I am?' This could not but placeyou, and 'yours', in the camp of anti-orthodox Given this, I would notconsider your anti-christian (in the sense of 'orthodox') posts to be in anyway slanderous any more than I would a Muslim who proceded to speak of Jesusout of his Koranic understanding.It is IMO possible to preach an anti-christ message and live a genuinelychristian life.(We all do). This being said You know how it works - thosewho win the war get to hold war c
rimes trials.
A substantive response by Lance. Food for thought whether you agree or not. 








Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread ttxpress




prophetsare 
unambiguous; conjecture is not prophecy, conjecturists are not 
prophets

ftr, your original 
comment, below,promotes a false, ambiguousidea of JC which you can 
not defend truthfully by defending your self

On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 08:32:36 -0400 "David Miller" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:David Miller wrote: ... Jesus also respected 
Scripture the way that we do. Gary wrote: myth 
(false prophets speak of JC in the past tense||
 
[DavidM:] If I had spoken in the present tense 

||


Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

Let's take the first paragraph of your response below: tell me how youcan read my article, with an honest heart, and conclude that it is written with aview of prersenting humanism as opposed to a God-centered faith? I say that such is IMPOSSIBLE. 

JD-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:49:46 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God






Thanks for asking, JD. To me humanism is the religion worshipping humans. Putting humans and humanistic thinking ahead of God and thinking according to God?s Word. I have no idea how DM would define it. I also don?t appreciate your insinuation that I get my ideas from DM. 

Regarding your post, it sounded ?nice? and all. But a religion that spends time promoting ?Community? is off-base IMO. The true Church is not about promoting the community of humans, but is all about lifting up Jesus Christ as Lord of Lords and King of Kings. The true community which springs from that as a byproduct is truly wonderful, as you seem to understand. Izzy

PS Here is how a Humanist defines Humanism: http://www.jcn.com/humanism.html. (Is it NOT Christianity.)





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:18 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God




Well, it most certainly is not humanism, Linda. Or maybe I should ask what you think humanism is before going any further. David M accused me of the same thing -- perhaps this is where you got the idea. He too, left off giving me a definition. 



What was written below is a first draft attempt at continuing the task of understanding, on my part. It could not be more God centered -- so how is it humanism. What is you defintion?



Jd
-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:47:48 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God


JD, all this talk of community above everything else just comes across to me as humanism. Lift us Jesus and all men will be drawn unto Him, and coincidentally to each other?s fellowship. It?s a priority thing. Izzy







From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:03 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] community and the Kingdom of God








 


Thinking Out Loud (again). Some of these thoughts and wording comes from From Cells to Souls -- a section in that book written by Alan Torrance. The following is a combination of AT?s thinking and my understanding of the importance of his presentations. 





In search of a truly heuristic consequence, many have involved themselves in the recovery of the gospel story as realized in the triune God and the Sonship of Christ. 


?Christians acknowledge that the complexity of the world is irreducible to anything other than the simplest explanation of all --- the God who has created persons in his image for personal communion with himself, with each other and, indeed, with all the other sentient beings which contribute o to the richness of the world we know. ? (p222). And there you have it -- ?the simplest explanation of all,? that mankind has been created in His very image. If there is another explanation for that image, certainly it must in clude the idea of ?community.? 





God loves the Son, the Son loves the Father and the Holy Spirit is the _expression_ of each in this world and in the lives of those who are a part of His creation after The Reconciliation (Col 1:17ff).





That being true, the personal behavior of man is incomplete until expressed in the company of others (p210). Man was created for the expressed purpose of the expansion of community (ye shall be fruitful and multiply) ?.. God?s covenant with Abraham had everything to do with the blessing of an increasing community of persons. Israel was God manifest in national function. His Christ was all about the reconciliation of all things  /SPAN -- a tearing down of the barriers erected in the garden, allowing the bridging of the divide created by man?s decision to chart his own course, to go his own way, to misappropr
iate the revealed word of the day [?ye shall not surely die ]nb sp; His church is His bride, bearing the offspring of all that reveals His power and presence -- a community of believers that live to reveal God to a lost and confused world. He is the Father, we are his adoptive children. Community is written on every page and thought of God?s dealings with man. ?The relational dimens ion of human nature? is at the centre of our very being. It is such because and only because we have been created in that image and for that purpose. Community is not only the image of creative endeavor, it is the very purpose for our existence. Our identity as persons, our true identity is manifest in freedom (the 

Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Terry Clifton




Judy Taylor wrote:

  
  
  Where they hacked to death by other
believers in their church services JD? If they are christians then I
rejoice
  with them that they are now at a better
place. Do you think God expects every believer to be responsible for
  every other believer no matter in
whatcountry in the world JD?Should we hire the CIA to keep us up
with what is
  going on?
  

==
To hear that brothers and sisters in Christ are being killed for no
other reason but that they worship the true God, and then say "That's
not my problem" is about as cold hearted and unloving as anything you
could say, Judy. I generally agree somewhat with what you say, but you
are way off base this time. I suggest you get on your knees and beg
God to help these brothers and sisters.
Terry





Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

myth (read:lie) : Gary O has no relationship with the Word of God 

JD-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:01:25 -0600Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts






Isaiah'spointabout false worshipsolidifies in ch2, relates to 'trusting in man';in ch5, Isaiahcondemns the arrogant attitude/s ofGod's people; e.g., '..you live alone in the land' (5:8), acriticism of their economicswhichreflectstheirreal poverty (lording themselves over the poor)..apparentlysuch povertyresults primarily fromman-centeredness witnessed inthephilosophy partic ofthe/irreligious establishment(cp. 3:12, 14); also, 5:14does not mention 'hell'--its about a blessed society trapped in the throes of(its) spiritual suicide

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:44:34 -0400 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

. read ..Isaiah 5:13,14


Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise





myth (read:lie) : Gary O has no relationship with the Word of God 

Gary is not a man of many words -- kind of like Terry. He may not seem as traditional in thought as some on this forum -- but he is clearly concerned with the Word, God in Christ and so on. To argue otherwise is to pita lie against the truth. I will certainly go into the archives to demonstrate my point. I have done that with Lance...successfully , I might add. Do any doubt that this can be done with Mr. G? Will there be moderated comments about bearing false witness now that someone on the "left" has proven the accepted gossip to be a untrue. 

JD-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:01:25 -0600Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts






Isaiah'spointabout false worshipsolidifies in ch2, relates to 'trusting in man';in ch5, Isaiahcondemns the arrogant attitude/s ofGod's people; e.g., '..you live alone in the land' (5:8), acriticism of their economicswhichreflectstheirreal poverty (lording themselves over the poor)..apparentlysuch povertyresults primarily fromman-centeredness witnessed inthephilosophy partic ofthe/irreligious establishment(cp. 3:12, 14); also, 5:14does not mention 'hell'--its about a blessed society trapped in the throes of(its) spiritual suicide

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:44:34 -0400 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

. read ..Isaiah 5:13,14


Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Dave, Blaine wrote, Priestcraft is, by my  definition, which admits that 
he guessed at or made the definition up that suits him. Had he said 
according to Webster's, or  the definition of Priestcraft is I could not 
have made the assertion I made.


Perry


From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:33:09 -0700

DAVEH:  According to the dictionary definition, it's obvious Blaine was not 
making it up as your below assertion, Perry


http://65.66.134.201/cgi-bin/webster/webster.exe?search_for_texts_web1828=priestcraft

...Will Blaine receive a forthcoming apology?

Charles Perry Locke wrote:

I never use the term, and have no definition. But if I wanted one I would 
see if there was a comon usage for the term. I wouldn't make up my own 
definition to fit my own desires.




So, what is your definition of priestcraft,  Perry?
Blaine


In a message dated 6/3/2005 7:17:13 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Blaine wrote:  Priestcraft is, by my  definition, ...

Here we go again...the mormons like to  make up their own meanings for
words, to suit thier own personal  perception of the world. I call this 
the
Queen of Hearts syndrome:  Words mean exactly what I want them to 
mean!


When a  person is steeped in a culture in which the cultural leaders
redefine  words to have untraditional meanings, for the purpose of making 
the


culture appear to be other than it really is, this begins to affect it's
adherents, as we see with Blaine above, and have recently seen with DaveH 
 in
his limited definition of the word teach, which exclusdes his own  
actions

on TT.

Another case in point is the Clinton  case where his attempt tp liimit 
the
definition of certain words and  phrases to exclude his own actions has 
been
passed down to our youth, who  at times use these tactics to try to 
exclude

thier own  actions.

Another, but inverse,  example is the word  homophobe. In this case the
definition of the word has been EXPANDED to  include not only those who 
fear

homosexuality (traditional definition),  but to include those who beleive
that it is sinful behavior.

The root of this is in the politically correct movement, where it does
not matter what you feel or believe, but how you are  perceived.


Wow. What a  world!

Perry



--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.





--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH

2005-06-04 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Dave, pick a definition, any definition. Just don't pick one that labels 
what you do as teaching.



From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry vs DaveH
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:06:07 -0700

DAVEH:  FWIW Perry, you may be the one trying to change the culture (see 
below), so to speak.  As I pointed out, there are many definitions of 
teach, but the one I feel is appropriate for TT agrees with what DavidM 
posted today about the meaning of teaching (/sermonizing)/..


DavidM wrote:

Actually, he does tell the saints that they come together to GIVE a sermon, 
and such implies that there will be some there to HEAR a sermon.   :-)


1 Corinthians 14:26
(26) How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath 
a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an 
interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying.


Notice the word doctrine in this list of what the Corinthian believers 
were doing when the whole church comes together.  *This is teaching -- a 
sermon. *



...Do you think what I post qualifies as sermons?Furthermore, do 
you really think other TTers have joined TT to listen to me /sermonizing?  
/ Therefore Perry, is it not you who wants to use another definition in an 
attempt to change the culture here?


Charles Perry Locke wrote:



When a  person is steeped in a culture in which the cultural leaders
redefine  words to have untraditional meanings, for the purpose of making 
the


culture appear to be other than it really is , this begins to affect it's
adherents, as we see with Blaine above, and have recently seen with DaveH 
 in
his limited definition of the word teach, which exclusdes his own  
actions

on TT.





--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.





--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



I have no idea what is going on in the Congo Terry, and 
I suggest that you don't either. Not really. I've had enough going 
on here in my own home for the past two weeks to keep 
me more than busy. I'm sorry you thinkI am cold
hearted and unloving but Istill need the 
confirmation and witness of the Holy Spirit before begging God to do something 
when He knows the details much better than me .. Don't you think He is able to 
put it on the heart of some intercessor if that is what it would take? 
jt


Terry writes:
To hear that brothers and sisters in Christ are being killed for no other 
reason but that they worship the true God, and then say "That's not my problem" 
is about as cold hearted and unloving as anything you could say, Judy. I 
generally agree somewhat with what you say, but you are way off base this 
time. I suggest you get on your knees and beg God to help these brothers 
and sisters. Terry

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 16:25:54 -0500 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  Judy Taylor wrote: 
  
Where they hacked to death by other believers in 
their church services JD? If they are christians then I rejoice 
with them that they are now at a better place. Do 
you think God expects every believer to be responsible for every other believer no matter in whatcountry in the 
world JD?Should we hire the CIA to keep us up with what is 
going on?
==


Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread ttxpress



(the factthat 
Methodistswere having a 'church' service iz really significant--the word 
'church' in its context unravels the) myth

On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:42:55 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  
  Methodist
  ||
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:15 
  PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
  Exerpts
  
  
  what 
  church?
  
  
  
  On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:24:05 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
  ..a church 
  service..in which the Reverend was a 
  lesbian
  


Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Lance, I cannot disagree that Gary MAY have the gift of discernment. 
However, people with discernment also know WHY they discern the things they 
do.



From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:41:46 -0400

Gary might have the gift of discernment, Charles. If this is the case then,
simply 'discerning' (though he didn't, as you seem to suggest infer David
was a false prophet, IMO) is sufficient.

Why not let David take care of this privately?


- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 04, 2005 11:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Bulk] Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: NIV Bible Quiz


 Gary, To call someone's comments a myth (even without any evidence)
 expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment
equates
 David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack,
 please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.

 Perry the moderator

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
 Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:51:16 -0600
 
 myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulative
 personal reasons or as does the author, below)
 
 On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:
  ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Exerpts

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



That is your myth (read lie) JD because Inever 
made a statement anything like what you have written
below. Did I sayGary O never reads the 
Bible? What I said is thathe is not sufficiently rooted and grounded 

in God's Word to discern 
what is and what is not a genuine spiritual gift in operation. Actually I 
suspect he
would say they are all bogus because of the fact that 
he is Calvinistic at heart. jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:01:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  myth (read:lie) : Gary O has no relationship with the Word of 
  God 
  
  JDFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

  
  

  
  Isaiah'spointabout false worshipsolidifies in 
  ch2, relates to 'trusting in man';in ch5, Isaiahcondemns the 
  arrogant attitude/s ofGod's people; e.g., '..you live alone in the 
  land' (5:8), acriticism of their 
  economicswhichreflectstheirreal poverty (lording 
  themselves over the poor)..apparentlysuch povertyresults 
  primarily fromman-centeredness witnessed inthephilosophy 
  partic ofthe/irreligious establishment(cp. 3:12, 14); 
  also, 
  5:14does not mention 'hell'--its about a blessed society trapped in the 
  throes of(its) spiritual suicide
  
  On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:44:34 -0400 Judy Taylor 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
. read ..Isaiah 
  5:13,14
  


Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz

2005-06-04 Thread knpraise

They ( Then) why did Jesus blow it off by telling the disciples they would always have the poor . Well, this is perhaps the most upsetting of my discussions here on TT. I really have nothing more to say. 

We have virtually nothing in common. You will not believe me, but I am going to think about what has just happened, do some praying (part of it will be "intercessory" as we call it in the land of the Charismata) and return. 

John Smithson





On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 17:54:58 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



What I believe, Judy, is that your response is one of the more bazaar comments entertained here on TT. 
In my book, David's " children sent to hell " comment is number 1; 

jt: What on earth are you talking about JD - Solomon?

this is number 2, for the time being. You ask a question to which the answer would have absolutely no meaning to you -- so why ask? I mean, dead is dead -- right? 

jt: I have no idea what you are referring to or talking about - what was the question?

We are not going to even entertain a benevolent emotion because they are better off dead anyway!!! 

jt: Your words not mine and again, I have no idea what you are talking about or referring to.

That is not only nasty but gross and disgusting. Yeah !!! It most definitely is not the widom of God. On one hand we beat the banner for action in Iraq. I am one who, thus far, thinks intervention in Iraq is a good thing. But, for me, we should be there for the same reasons we should be in Durfar and the Congo and so on. The fact that we are not in the Congo or Durfar is evidence , to me, that humanitarian concerns had nothing to do with our going to Iraq. I believe that the people of that country benefitted from our hypocricy anyway.

jt: It's good that you have opinions about all this JD. I don't since I am not in the position to know all details
I leave that to the ppl God has placed in authority - the ones who make these kinds of decisions.

A position that ignores the blight of the poor and hungry finds people without a divine awareness, per Is 58:9-11.

jt: They why did Jesus blow it off by telling the disciples they would always have the poor among them?I guess he
must have been void ofdivine awareness also.

What is critical in the Is 58 passage is the fact that the disciple is pictured as one who is searching for God, but finding Him only when a number of realities are entertained in his life - not the lest of which is the outpouring for the hungre and and afflicted. Jd

jt: No JD; it is dealing with the sin in their lives as a whole - it is not playing God to the whole globe. jt




Re: [TruthTalk] A review of Lance Muir

2005-06-04 Thread Judy Taylor



These quotes make my point JD, especially the last one 
... You and he seem to like the word substantive. jt

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 16:43:58 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  Given enough time, I could offer perhaps a hundred such examples, 
  debunking Judy's claim that Lance is not concerned with 
  substantive matters. 
  
  I didn't say Lance was not concerned with matters 
  he thinks substantive. I said he was not rooted and grounded 
  in God's Word - HUGE difference.
  
  
  Izzy says of Mormonism:'Not worth 
  'fighting' about.' I'm thinking she might wish to qualify that as the nature 
  of God and the Gospel are indeed worth very serious engagement ('fighting' 
  aside). 
  
  Biblical thought/question. Nothing wrong with this. 
  Hey! Who wants to go on a 'Lost 
  Books of the Bible' hunt? eh? 
  
  Lance disagrees with the Mormon?s 
  claim of lost NT Books - or, at least, that such a claim has 
  anything to do with the establishment of their World Religion. 
  'We are 
  whole people living whole lives before a holy God.' The dichotomization issue 
  is central. Thanks for raising it! Please do not forward this message to Tim 
  Horton's.Lance agreeing with MillerYes to #1. No to #2. I believe you to be a faithful child of God who demonstrates more diligence than most of those I've met.
  A comment addressed to Judy Taylor. 
  Jt:Do you have a friend who, on an issue of some substance, believes other than you 
  do? If you are praying for one another over this then, how is there to be a 
  satisfactory resolution?
  
  A question ask 
  by Lance that seems to be a good question
  Nine times out of ten, not unlike 
  in marriage or friendship, we accept one another including the distinctives. I 
  sense that that is what you do also, Linda. I saw a yound man last evening, 
  characterized by his mother as 'my dirty sweet boy'. His 'dirtyness' was 
  swallowed up in the ontological sweetness within 
  Mom and, in the young man.
  
  Also yesterday, I had the pleasure 
  of talking with someone who sees both more and better than most I know 
  (ironically an optometrist). In her case I practice more deference than is 
  normal for me due to the perceived presence of God's 
  Spirit.
  
  Lance believes in the Holy 
  Spirit.
  Dave:IFF 
  'orthodoxy' has any intrinsic meaning whatsoever then, you are not. 
  This consideration might be based alone on the answer to the question posed by 
  Jesus Himself: 'Who do people say that I am?' This could not but place you, 
  and 'yours', in the camp of anti-orthodox Given this, I would not consider 
  your anti-christian (in the sense of 'orthodox') posts to be in any way 
  slanderous any more than I would a Muslim who proceded to speak of Jesus out 
  of his Koranic understanding.It is IMO 
  possible to preach an anti-christ message and live a genuinely christian 
  life.(We all do). This being said You know how it works - those who win 
  the war get to hold war crimes trials.
  A substantive response by Lance. Food for thought whether you agree or 
  not. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


  1   2   >