[TruthTalk] dogs being Gentiles

2003-09-26 Thread Terry Clifton



 Mr Slade Sir:
May I point out that things have changed slightly since the 
Gentiles were adopted into the family?
 
If you will read Gal.3:28-29, you will find that we are no longer 
classified as Jews or Greeks (Gentiles).  We who are in Christ are all one. 
We are all Abraham's seed; all heirs of the promise.  Jews who reject 
Christ are no longer Abraham's seed.  Gentiles who belong to Christ are no 
longer dogs.
 
Since Abraham was not a Jew, being his seed hardly makes me 
one.
You probably won't be able to grasp this, but thought I would try 
anyway.  It's in the book.  It is the truth.
 
Blessings,
 
Terry


 



[TruthTalk] Why the 10 Commandments were removed...

2003-09-26 Thread ShieldsFamily









The
Ten Commandments display was removed from the Alabama Supreme Court building.
There was a good reason for the move. 

You can't post "Thou Shalt Not Lie”
or “Thou Shalt Not Steal" in a building full of lawyers and politicians
without creating a hostile work environment.

 

 

 








Re: [TruthTalk] Ten Commandments Support

2003-09-26 Thread Slade Henson



That someone would be Slade. Why 
discuss finer points when someone doesn't understand basic 
doctrine?
 
shalom
slade
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judith H. 
  Taylor 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, 25 September, 2003 
  12:32
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Ten Commandments 
  Support
  
  Someone wrote:
  
  
   
  Read Matthew 15:21-28. Ask yourself: who are 
  the dogs? If you answer GENTILES, 
  you are correct. Now read Revelation 22:14-15. Ask yourself: who are the 
  dogs? 
  If you answer GENTILES, you are 
  correct.
   
  Judy:
  Dogs are people who are outside the 
  covenant.
  Today the covenant is with Jesus and all of 
  us enter in by faith; today the word 
  'dog' does not necessarily mean 'gentile' 
  only.
   
  Grace and Peace
  Judy


Re: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject

2003-09-26 Thread Slade Henson
Good thought. Thanks.

shalom
slade

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message - 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 24 September, 2003 19:56
Subject: RE: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject


Slade, you should have some method by which you can inform your ISP that
email from TruthTalk should be allowed through their spam filter.  It is
very easy for anti-spam software to suspect TruthTalk email as being
possible spam because it is sent out to multiple recipients in such as
way that the software knows from its header that it is coming from a
list server.  However, because our list server has not been flagged as
spam, it injects the "probable spam" message with the hope that you will
inform it of whether you want mail from this source accepted or blocked.
Talk to your ISP and see what he says.  Maybe they have a webpage setup
where all you have to do is enter the sender email address as being
allowed and their spam filter will stop modifying the subject line.
Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reason for "Re: [TruthTalk] PROBABLE SPAM" in subject

Yes. The owner of my ISP does that if certain parameters are met. I
drives me crazy because I usually remember to edit the SUBJECT, but
sometimes I forget.

I will answer Izzy and Bruce when I return from work this afternoon.

shalom
slade

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] dogs being Gentiles

2003-09-26 Thread Slade Henson



- Original Message - From: 
Terry Clifton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 26 
September, 2003 08:01Subject: [TruthTalk] dogs being GentilesMr 
Slade Sir:May I point out that things have changed slightly since the 
Gentiles were adopted into the family?

  I am always open to constructive criticism 
  and correction.
If you will read Gal.3:28-29, you will 
find that we are no longer classified as Jews or Greeks (Gentiles).  We who 
are in Christ are all one. We are all Abraham's seed; all heirs of the 
promise.  Jews who reject Christ are no longer Abraham's seed.  
Gentiles who belong to Christ are no longer dogs.

  I agree. That is exactly what I 
  said.
Since Abraham was not a Jew, being his 
seed hardly makes me one.

  Can I suggest you QUIT confusing terms? I 
  never said you were a Jew. Look back and see. I merely said you were grafted 
  into ISRAEL.
You probably won't be able to grasp this, but thought I would try 
anyway.  It's in the book.  It is the truth.

  I guess this is where I can thank you for your non-constructive criticism 
  and correction. It's always nice to have you insult and degrade. You have 
  taken lessons from TruthTalk personnel to heart.
Blessings, Terry

  Thank you. Slade


Re: [TruthTalk] Ten Commandments Support

2003-09-26 Thread Judith H. Taylor



You are right, I don't understand your 'basic doctrine' Mr. Slade but it 
makes
no difference. Dogs are still people who are outside the covenant then 
and
now and there is no Jew/ Gentile in Christ - because He has broken down 

the wall of partition.  That is, unless you have 'another Jesus'
 
Judy
 
 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That someone would be Slade. Why 
discuss finer points when someone doesn't understand basic 
doctrine?

   
  shalom
  slade
  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Judith H. 
Taylor 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Thursday, 25 September, 2003 
12:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Ten 
Commandments Support

Someone wrote:


 
Read Matthew 15:21-28. Ask yourself: who 
are the dogs? If you answer GENTILES, 
you are correct. Now read Revelation 22:14-15. Ask yourself: who are 
the dogs? 
If you answer GENTILES, you are 
correct.
 
Judy:
Dogs are people who are outside the 
covenant.
Today the covenant is with Jesus and all 
of us enter in by faith; today the word 
'dog' does not necessarily mean 'gentile' 
only.
 
Grace and Peace
Judy
   


Re: [TruthTalk] Ten Commandments Support

2003-09-26 Thread Bruce Woodford
Hi Slade,
You wrote:"Read Matthew 15:21-28. Ask yourself: who are the dogs? If you 
answer GENTILES, you are correct. Now read Revelation 22:14-15. Ask 
yourself: who are the dogs? If you answer GENTILES, you are correct."

I do not disgaree with you to be disagreeable, but I must disagree with you 
on both counts! In Matthew 15 the Lord Jesus was NOT saying that "the 
children" were Israelites and the "dogs" were Gentiles!  Neither does Rev.22 
teach that no Gentiles will enter through the gates into the great city, the 
holy Jerusalem!!  In fact many Isrealites after the flesh will be without 
and many Gentiles will be within the holy city!

The whole point of the Lord Jesus' conversation with the Canaanite woman was 
to determine whether or not she had faith. He concluded that indeed she had 
"great faith"!  Both dogs and swine (Matt.7:6) are unclean animals. When the 
terms are applied to people, they designate those who are unlean, i.e. have 
not been sanctified. Hebrews 6:11 declares that without faith it is 
impossible to please God.  So both of your Matt.15 and Rev.22 passages are 
clearly distinguishing between believers and unbelievers NOT between 
Israelites and Gentiles!!!  See parallel passages to Rev.22:14 and 15 in  
Rev.21:8 and  Rev.21:24-27 (note that the word for "nations" in 21:24 and 26 
is the very same Greek word as "Gentiles"!)

When I wrote:"Do you believe that all Gentile believers should keep the "Ten 
Commandments" which were given specificly to the nation of Israel? Ex.20"...
You responded:"The term "Gentile Believer" is an oxymoron. They do not 
exist."

Brother, as I understand scripture, it does not support the idea that 
Gentiles cease to be Gentiles when they get saved. Rather it clearly teaches 
that those who were Gentiles before conversion remain Gentiles after 
conversion. See the following scriptural statements:
Acts 15:23  And they wrote letters by them after this manner; The apostles 
and elders and brethren send greeting unto ***the brethren which are of the 
Gentiles*** in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia:
Acts 21:25  As touching ***the Gentiles which believe***, we have written 
and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep 
themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, 
and from fornication.
To the brethren at Rome who were Gentiles, Paul wrote in Romans 1:13  Now I 
would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come 
unto you, (but was let hitherto,) ***that I might have some fruit among you 
also, even as among other Gentiles.***
Romans 3:29  Is he the God of the Jews only?*** is he not also of the 
Gentiles ? Yes, of the Gentiles also:***
Romans 9:24  Even us, whom he hath called, ***not of the Jews only, but also 
of the Gentiles ***?
Romans 9:30  What shall we say then?*** That the Gentiles, which followed 
not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the 
righteousness which is of faith.***
Romans 11:11  I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God 
forbid: but rather through their fall ***salvation is come unto the 
Gentiles,***  for to provoke them to jealousy.
Romans 11:12  Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the 
diminishing of them ***the riches of the Gentiles***; how much more their 
fulness?
Romans 11:13 *** For I speak to you Gentiles,  inasmuch as I am the apostle 
of the Gentiles , I magnify mine office***:
Romans 11:25  For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this 
mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part 
is happened to Israel, ***until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.***
Romans 15:9  And ***that the Gentiles  might glorify God for his mercy***; 
as it is written, For this cause I will confess to thee among the Gentiles , 
and sing unto thy name.
Romans 15:10  And again he saith, ***Rejoice, ye Gentiles***, with his 
people.
Romans 15:11  And again, ***Praise the Lord, all ye Gentiles; and laud him, 
all ye people.***
Romans 15:12  And again, Esaias saith, There shall be a root of Jesse, and 
he that shall rise to reign over the Gentiles ;*** in him shall the Gentiles 
 trust.***
Romans 15:16  That I should be the minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles, 
 ministering the gospel of God, ***that the offering up of the Gentiles 
might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy Ghost.***
Romans 15:27  It hath pleased them verily; and their debtors they are. 
***For if the Gentiles have been made partakers of their spiritual things, 
their duty is also to minister unto them in carnal things.***
Romans 16:4  Who have for my life laid down their own necks: unto whom not 
only I give thanks, but also ***all the churches of the Gentiles.***
Galatians 2:12  For before that certain came from James, ***he did eat with 
the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, 
fearing them which were of the circumcision.***
Galatians 2:14  But when I sa

Re: [TruthTalk] dogs being Gentiles

2003-09-26 Thread Terry Clifton



Let me see if I have got this right.  You refer to 
Gentiles (I am one of many) as dogs, but you are the one who has been 
insulted.  I do not quite understand your reasoning, but please don't 
bother to explain.  I can live with it.
 
Terry

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Slade Henson 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:22 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] dogs being 
  Gentiles
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Terry Clifton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Friday, 26 September, 2003 08:01Subject: [TruthTalk] dogs being 
  GentilesMr Slade Sir:May I point out that things have changed 
  slightly since the Gentiles were adopted into the 
family?
  
I am always open to constructive criticism 
and correction.
  If you will read Gal.3:28-29, you 
  will find that we are no longer classified as Jews or Greeks (Gentiles).  
  We who are in Christ are all one. We are all Abraham's seed; all heirs of the 
  promise.  Jews who reject Christ are no longer Abraham's seed.  
  Gentiles who belong to Christ are no longer dogs.
  
I agree. That is exactly what I 
said.
  Since Abraham was not a Jew, being 
  his seed hardly makes me one.
  
Can I suggest you QUIT confusing terms? I 
never said you were a Jew. Look back and see. I merely said you were grafted 
into ISRAEL.
  You probably won't be able to grasp this, but thought I would try 
  anyway.  It's in the book.  It is the truth.
  
I guess this is where I can thank you for your non-constructive 
criticism and correction. It's always nice to have you insult and degrade. 
You have taken lessons from TruthTalk personnel to heart.
  Blessings, Terry
  
Thank you. Slade


 



Re: [TruthTalk] dogs being Gentiles

2003-09-26 Thread Slade Henson



If you are a believer in Messiah, you are in 
the Kingdom. How can that be insulting unless you are NOT a believer in 
Messiah?
 
shalom
slade
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Terry Clifton 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Friday, 26 September, 2003 
  21:09
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] dogs being 
  Gentiles
  
  Let me see if I have got this right.  You refer to 
  Gentiles (I am one of many) as dogs, but you are the one who has been 
  insulted.  I do not quite understand your reasoning, but please don't 
  bother to explain.  I can live with it.
   
  Terry
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Slade 
Henson 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:22 
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] dogs being 
Gentiles

- Original Message - 
From: Terry Clifton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 26 September, 2003 08:01Subject: [TruthTalk] dogs 
being GentilesMr Slade Sir:May I point out that things have 
changed slightly since the Gentiles were adopted into the 
family?

  I am always open to constructive 
  criticism and correction.
If you will read Gal.3:28-29, you 
will find that we are no longer classified as Jews or Greeks 
(Gentiles).  We who are in Christ are all one. We are all Abraham's 
seed; all heirs of the promise.  Jews who reject Christ are no longer 
Abraham's seed.  Gentiles who belong to Christ are no longer 
dogs.

  I agree. That is exactly what I 
  said.
Since Abraham was not a Jew, being 
his seed hardly makes me one.

  Can I suggest you QUIT confusing terms? 
  I never said you were a Jew. Look back and see. I merely said you were 
  grafted into ISRAEL.
You probably won't be able to grasp this, but thought I would 
try anyway.  It's in the book.  It is the truth.

  I guess this is where I can thank you for your non-constructive 
  criticism and correction. It's always nice to have you insult and degrade. 
  You have taken lessons from TruthTalk personnel to heart.
Blessings, Terry

  Thank you. Slade
  
  
   
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Ten Commandments Support

2003-09-26 Thread Slade Henson



That has been my whole point... Mrs. 
Judy.
 
As far as "another Jesus..." I don't know how 
to answer that one. One can never tell right off the bat if your 
"Jesus" is that same as someone else's. In time, we will know them by 
their fruit.
 
Have a restful Shabbat and Yom 
Teruah
 
shalom
slade
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judith H. 
  Taylor 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Friday, 26 September, 2003 
  19:19
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Ten Commandments 
  Support
  
  You are right, I don't understand your 'basic doctrine' Mr. Slade but it 
  makes
  no difference. Dogs are still people who are outside the covenant then 
  and
  now and there is no Jew/ Gentile in Christ - because He has broken down 
  
  the wall of partition.  That is, unless you have 'another 
  Jesus'
   
  Judy
   
   "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
  That someone would be 
  Slade. Why discuss finer points when someone doesn't understand basic 
  doctrine?
  
 
shalom
slade
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judith 
  H. Taylor 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, 25 September, 2003 
  12:32
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Ten 
  Commandments Support
  
  Someone wrote:
  
  
   
  Read Matthew 15:21-28. Ask yourself: who 
  are the dogs? If you answer GENTILES, 
  you are correct. Now read Revelation 22:14-15. Ask yourself: who are 
  the dogs? 
  If you answer GENTILES, you are 
  correct.
   
  Judy:
  Dogs are people who are outside the 
  covenant.
  Today the covenant is with Jesus and all 
  of us enter in by faith; today the word 
  'dog' does not necessarily mean 
  'gentile' only.
   
  Grace and Peace
  Judy
 


Re: [TruthTalk] Ten Commandments Support

2003-09-26 Thread Slade Henson
I have merely attempted to reconcile the verses you quoted and the concept
of "There is neither Jew nor Gentile... male nor female..."

shalom
slade

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message - 
From: "Bruce Woodford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 26 September, 2003 19:45
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Ten Commandments Support


> Hi Slade,
> You wrote:"Read Matthew 15:21-28. Ask yourself: who are the dogs? If you
> answer GENTILES, you are correct. Now read Revelation 22:14-15. Ask
> yourself: who are the dogs? If you answer GENTILES, you are correct."
>
> I do not disgaree with you to be disagreeable, but I must disagree with
you
> on both counts! In Matthew 15 the Lord Jesus was NOT saying that "the
> children" were Israelites and the "dogs" were Gentiles!  Neither does
Rev.22
> teach that no Gentiles will enter through the gates into the great city,
the
> holy Jerusalem!!  In fact many Isrealites after the flesh will be without
> and many Gentiles will be within the holy city!
>
> The whole point of the Lord Jesus' conversation with the Canaanite woman
was
> to determine whether or not she had faith. He concluded that indeed she
had
> "great faith"!  Both dogs and swine (Matt.7:6) are unclean animals. When
the
> terms are applied to people, they designate those who are unlean, i.e.
have
> not been sanctified. Hebrews 6:11 declares that without faith it is
> impossible to please God.  So both of your Matt.15 and Rev.22 passages are
> clearly distinguishing between believers and unbelievers NOT between
> Israelites and Gentiles!!!  See parallel passages to Rev.22:14 and 15 in
> Rev.21:8 and  Rev.21:24-27 (note that the word for "nations" in 21:24 and
26
> is the very same Greek word as "Gentiles"!)
>
> When I wrote:"Do you believe that all Gentile believers should keep the
"Ten
> Commandments" which were given specificly to the nation of Israel?
Ex.20"...
> You responded:"The term "Gentile Believer" is an oxymoron. They do not
> exist."
>
> Brother, as I understand scripture, it does not support the idea that
> Gentiles cease to be Gentiles when they get saved. Rather it clearly
teaches
> that those who were Gentiles before conversion remain Gentiles after
> conversion. See the following scriptural statements:
> Acts 15:23  And they wrote letters by them after this manner; The apostles
> and elders and brethren send greeting unto ***the brethren which are of
the
> Gentiles*** in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia:
> Acts 21:25  As touching ***the Gentiles which believe***, we have written
> and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep
> themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from
strangled,
> and from fornication.
> To the brethren at Rome who were Gentiles, Paul wrote in Romans 1:13  Now
I
> would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come
> unto you, (but was let hitherto,) ***that I might have some fruit among
you
> also, even as among other Gentiles.***
> Romans 3:29  Is he the God of the Jews only?*** is he not also of the
> Gentiles ? Yes, of the Gentiles also:***
> Romans 9:24  Even us, whom he hath called, ***not of the Jews only, but
also
> of the Gentiles ***?
> Romans 9:30  What shall we say then?*** That the Gentiles, which followed
> not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the
> righteousness which is of faith.***
> Romans 11:11  I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God
> forbid: but rather through their fall ***salvation is come unto the
> Gentiles,***  for to provoke them to jealousy.
> Romans 11:12  Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the
> diminishing of them ***the riches of the Gentiles***; how much more their
> fulness?
> Romans 11:13 *** For I speak to you Gentiles,  inasmuch as I am the
apostle
> of the Gentiles , I magnify mine office***:
> Romans 11:25  For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of
this
> mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in
part
> is happened to Israel, ***until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.***
> Romans 15:9  And ***that the Gentiles  might glorify God for his mercy***;
> as it is written, For this cause I will confess to thee among the Gentiles
,
> and sing unto thy name.
> Romans 15:10  And again he saith, ***Rejoice, ye Gentiles***, with his
> people.
> Romans 15:11  And again, ***Praise the Lord, all ye Gentiles; and laud
him,
> all ye people.***
> Romans 15:12  And again, Esaias saith, There shall be a root of Jesse, and
> he that shall rise to reign over the Gentiles ;*** in him shall the
Gentiles
>   trust.***
> Romans 15:16  That I should be the minister of Jesus Christ to the
Gentiles,
>   ministering the gospel of God, ***that the offering up of the Gentiles
> might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy Ghost.***
> Romans 15:27  It hath pleased them verily; and their debtors they are.
> ***For if the Gentiles have