Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
So, rather than a new protocol, you have created a new e-mail server and client system which communicates in its own proprietary binary format? dZ. On Feb 6, 2008, at 18:50, David A. G. wrote: Dear friends, I have developed a complete and very improved e-mail protocol, highly immune to the SPAM, with data encryption and compression, with sender ID validation, etc. BUT not compatible with the standard email (SMTP). -- DZ-Jay [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
I wonder why he chose a binary format instead of text as no popular/common protocol is designed that way (i.e. HTTP, FTP, IMAP--all telnet based)! Regards, SZ On 2/7/08, DZ-Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, rather than a new protocol, you have created a new e-mail server and client system which communicates in its own proprietary binary format? dZ. On Feb 6, 2008, at 18:50, David A. G. wrote: Dear friends, I have developed a complete and very improved e-mail protocol, highly immune to the SPAM, with data encryption and compression, with sender ID validation, etc. BUT not compatible with the standard email (SMTP). -- DZ-Jay [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
I suspect that's half the point. Only like equipped users can communicate. Guess there could be a use in the financial or military markets, or other intentionaly closed environments... There again, I'd also guess they have such systems implemented already? Servers, nothing to stop you delivering directly, as many corporate systems do already, ours included, so long as you know the IP or domain address of course... I suspect for the above type of users, regular POP/SMTP/IMAP etc incompatability would not be a problem! Have to say though, spam is primeraly user driven from personal experience, from website form filling and so on. And what happens when a spammer gets hold of one of these secure mailer clients etc. Wonder why PGP or Open GPG is not as popular as it could be? There are plugins that integrate OK with the likes of Outlook (ugh!) Thunderbird, Pegasus etc... Ah, of course, the powers that be, like to watch what goes on Silly me... Cheers.. I'll crawl back under my rock, it's a bit too bright out here... Dave B. -Original Message- From: DZ-Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:56 AM To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!) Hello: Also, if it is not compatible with SMTP, how does anybody outside your own mail server network get it? And if it does communicate with external SMTP servers in order to inter-operate with other networks (otherwise, what's the point in sending yourself e-mail?) then it *is* susceptible to SPAM and abuse. dZ. -- DZ-Jay [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html This mail has been scanned by Palmer Cook Computer Services Limited. www.palmercook.co.uk -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
MP3 is not a protocol but a file format. You are right that TCP/UDP uses binary headers but we are talking about a high level protocol, which if popularized, will be coded by third party coders according to RFC and this I believe will not be so trivial for the binary case! ICS has codes for SMTP/POP/HTTP/FTP (all text) but not for TCP. Wasn't there a need for low level stacks? Think again--we have all lived through syn-attacks and ping-o-deaths. Keep in mind that Microsoft recoded the entire TCP/IP stack in Windows 2008 Server just for this. But since it was something hard to do, through the past decade, Microsoft was being waited to step forward. ALso, for adoption, large enterprises want to test every protocol they use--when they are new. Testing a binary protocol for them would also be hard and this might hammer adoption globally. We have customers who study and stress test for 29 days to understand how our caching and then decide to buy at the end of the trial period! Regards, SZ On 2/7/08, Hoby Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, IMNSHO (In My Not So Humble Opinion), binary protocols make much smarter sense for binary machines. Even with the discrepancies of the various flavors of binary formats (big vs little endian, etc), it is WAY MORE EFFICIENT for binary machines to use binary protocols than to interpret human readable formats (text, xml, etc) into binary formats so that they may be processed appropriately by processor and related software. Only humans think in the context of textual formats; computers do not. The overhead associated with textual translation is a horrible side effect of the web phenomenon. Actually, the statement no popular/common protocol is designed that way is horribly inaccurate. True, the W3C has an inherent conflict of interest in driving the pervasive use of textual formats. However, there are tens of thousands of binary formats that predate the stupid web stack and continue to emerge daily. For example, consider TCP, which is a binary protocol and the actual core technology upon which this mail list and ICS is founded. I would consider TCP to be popular and common. It is only the layer 7 centric, web focused protocols that are textual in nature. Unfortunately, the web has set computing back about 20 years, the effects of which has only recently begun to be realized in all of its awful consequences (slow cumbersome interfaces, security issues galore, etc). Quite some time back, before clients of various types were ubiquitous, it was necessary for servers to understand human readable formats (ftp, etc). That need has long been outlived and the perspective that drives it is seriously antiquated. With very few exceptions, the data needs of server systems are way too complex to be constrained by human readable formats. For example, are you going to type the binary values for a MIME image that you want to embed in an email? Try doing that via a textual SMTP interface. The whole need of MIME was to overcome the stupid limitations of a textual email standard. Let's see, how do I represent binary data in a textual format. Yeah, that makes perfect sense. In a web world, I guess it does. How about a word document? Do you want a format that you have to type the font details manually, like HTML? NO, you use a word processor that does all that for you and then stores it in format that the system understands. How about audio? Do you want a media stream protocol that is human readable? Such a media protocol would be too slow be feasible. MP3 is a BINARY solution that attempts to answer the audio data issues. Everyone uses a piece of software that understands MP3. I would consider MP3 to be common and popular, even though it is BINARY. For computing needs, the future reality is surely a return to strong binary representations that can be interpreted into forms that humans can understand as needed, or can be handled by clients as necessary. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fastream Technologies Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 5:43 AM To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!) I wonder why he chose a binary format instead of text as no popular/common protocol is designed that way (i.e. HTTP, FTP, IMAP--all telnet based)! Regards, SZ On 2/7/08, DZ-Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, rather than a new protocol, you have created a new e-mail server and client system which communicates in its own proprietary binary format? dZ. On Feb 6, 2008, at 18:50, David A. G. wrote: Dear friends, I have developed a complete and very improved e-mail protocol, highly immune to the SPAM, with data encryption and compression, with sender ID validation, etc. BUT not compatible with the standard email (SMTP). -- DZ-Jay [TeamICS] http
Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
ICS has codes for SMTP/POP/HTTP/FTP (all text) but not for TCP. I'm not sure about what you mean. ICS as TWSocket and TWSocketServer for TCP. Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS) http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
Hello SZ... Astute observation about formats vs. protocols. However, I don't think that David has done away with TCP/IP, the transport protocol used for sending the email with. In a sense, all layer 7 solutions can really be considered a format in a TCP payload. So, the distinction really blurs there to some degree. Regardless, the core issue is still relevant, namely that binary systems think in a binary context. If a driving constraint is efficiency and minimalist approaches, binary formats and protocols are mandated. Regardless of how you slice it, binary makes better sense FROM THE SYSTEMS perspective. As for the TCP hacking attacks you reference, they PALE in comparison to the security flaws that are revealed and exploited on a daily basis that stem from the inherent lack of security in the original web protocol designs. Additionally, those TCP hacks provide no security related exposure, in the sense of data compromise, but rather in systems resiliency. Syn-attacks will not get to your corporate data. XSS attacks, on the other hand, can provide a wonderful mechanism for compromising your systems in a number of ways. Additionally, SSL dependence is at the root of almost ALL BAD web thinking. However, everyone still thinks the Emperor looks great and somehow it's just going to work itself out. If the web protocols had envisioned ANY CONCEPT of user and state, instead of the stupid session-less paradigm it enforces, as well as in-transit security, there would be no need for the web stack paradigm to exist in its currently flawed state. Regarding testing new protocols, new standards emerge EVERY DAY. In the xml related world (given this is a format not a protocol), they emerge every minute. Considering that numerous security hacks attack FORMAT weaknesses in the OS and related software (image files, etc), this issue still applies. Scores of them pass through corporate enterprises without testing every day. Additionally, anything constructed as a layer 7 solution is going to pass through the internet architecture just fine, barring various packet inspector rules, etc. Again, I don't think David has invented a new TCP stack, but rather just different info being passed through TCP. Regards... Hoby -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fastream Technologies Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:35 AM To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!) MP3 is not a protocol but a file format. You are right that TCP/UDP uses binary headers but we are talking about a high level protocol, which if popularized, will be coded by third party coders according to RFC and this I believe will not be so trivial for the binary case! ICS has codes for SMTP/POP/HTTP/FTP (all text) but not for TCP. Wasn't there a need for low level stacks? Think again--we have all lived through syn-attacks and ping-o-deaths. Keep in mind that Microsoft recoded the entire TCP/IP stack in Windows 2008 Server just for this. But since it was something hard to do, through the past decade, Microsoft was being waited to step forward. ALso, for adoption, large enterprises want to test every protocol they use--when they are new. Testing a binary protocol for them would also be hard and this might hammer adoption globally. We have customers who study and stress test for 29 days to understand how our caching and then decide to buy at the end of the trial period! Regards, SZ On 2/7/08, Hoby Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, IMNSHO (In My Not So Humble Opinion), binary protocols make much smarter sense for binary machines. Even with the discrepancies of the various flavors of binary formats (big vs little endian, etc), it is WAY MORE EFFICIENT for binary machines to use binary protocols than to interpret human readable formats (text, xml, etc) into binary formats so that they may be processed appropriately by processor and related software. Only humans think in the context of textual formats; computers do not. The overhead associated with textual translation is a horrible side effect of the web phenomenon. Actually, the statement no popular/common protocol is designed that way is horribly inaccurate. True, the W3C has an inherent conflict of interest in driving the pervasive use of textual formats. However, there are tens of thousands of binary formats that predate the stupid web stack and continue to emerge daily. For example, consider TCP, which is a binary protocol and the actual core technology upon which this mail list and ICS is founded. I would consider TCP to be popular and common. It is only the layer 7 centric, web focused protocols that are textual in nature. Unfortunately, the web has set computing back about 20 years, the effects of which has only recently begun to be realized in all of its awful consequences (slow cumbersome interfaces, security issues galore, etc). Quite
Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
Answering to all... DZ-Jay: So, rather than a new protocol, you have created a new e-mail server and client system which communicates in its own proprietary binary format? That is correct, but according the definition of protocol and thinking about my system runs directly over TCP/IP... DZ-Jay: Also, if it is not compatible with SMTP, how does anybody outside your own mail server network get it? For the moment I have the only server, but this system works in the same way than the standard e-mail ... using Domains and MX-DNS queries. Fastream Technologies: I wonder why he chose a binary format instead of text as no popular/common protocol is designed that way. The reason is simple, using a binary protocol ensures a minimum consumption of bytes through the net. And the most important reason, my protocol uses only 4 steps to send or receive an e-mail: 1- client: connection and authentication 2- server: response 3- client: work identification and e-mail transmision (in a single block!) 4- server: final response (CRC validation made!) 5- client: request to close connection This kind of protocol ensures a very fast interaction client/server and enables a native data compressión. Darin McGee So you lock out 99.9% of the email - no wonder it blocks spam. hehehe ... I added many features that ensures a real spam blocking, not only taking hand on the incompatibility, please read my webpage www.hidens.com.ar I meaning that all known spamming methods are blocked or minimized (from address thefts to mail pumps), except a user sending a real e-mail to another one (obviously). Well you can just denounce that user to the webmaster... Darin McGee That's what I love about standards, everybody has one :) Yes, the only problem here is how to popularize it... hehehe Thanks for your time to every body, you are invited to use it... David Jorge Aguirre Grazio www.djag.com.ar - Original Message - From: Dave Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, 07 February, 2008 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!) I suspect that's half the point. Only like equipped users can communicate. Guess there could be a use in the financial or military markets, or other intentionaly closed environments... There again, I'd also guess they have such systems implemented already? Servers, nothing to stop you delivering directly, as many corporate systems do already, ours included, so long as you know the IP or domain address of course... I suspect for the above type of users, regular POP/SMTP/IMAP etc incompatability would not be a problem! Have to say though, spam is primeraly user driven from personal experience, from website form filling and so on. And what happens when a spammer gets hold of one of these secure mailer clients etc. Wonder why PGP or Open GPG is not as popular as it could be? There are plugins that integrate OK with the likes of Outlook (ugh!) Thunderbird, Pegasus etc... Ah, of course, the powers that be, like to watch what goes on Silly me... Cheers.. I'll crawl back under my rock, it's a bit too bright out here... Dave B. -Original Message- From: DZ-Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:56 AM To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!) Hello: Also, if it is not compatible with SMTP, how does anybody outside your own mail server network get it? And if it does communicate with external SMTP servers in order to inter-operate with other networks (otherwise, what's the point in sending yourself e-mail?) then it *is* susceptible to SPAM and abuse. dZ. -- DZ-Jay [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html This mail has been scanned by Palmer Cook Computer Services Limited. www.palmercook.co.uk -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
Actually, IMNSHO (In My Not So Humble Opinion), binary protocols make much smarter sense for binary machines. Even with the discrepancies of the various flavors of binary formats (big vs little endian, etc), it is WAY MORE EFFICIENT for binary machines to use binary protocols than to interpret human readable formats (text, xml, etc) into binary formats so that they may be processed appropriately by processor and related software. Only humans think in the context of textual formats; computers do not. The overhead associated with textual translation is a horrible side effect of the web phenomenon. Actually, the statement no popular/common protocol is designed that way is horribly inaccurate. True, the W3C has an inherent conflict of interest in driving the pervasive use of textual formats. However, there are tens of thousands of binary formats that predate the stupid web stack and continue to emerge daily. For example, consider TCP, which is a binary protocol and the actual core technology upon which this mail list and ICS is founded. I would consider TCP to be popular and common. It is only the layer 7 centric, web focused protocols that are textual in nature. Unfortunately, the web has set computing back about 20 years, the effects of which has only recently begun to be realized in all of its awful consequences (slow cumbersome interfaces, security issues galore, etc). Quite some time back, before clients of various types were ubiquitous, it was necessary for servers to understand human readable formats (ftp, etc). That need has long been outlived and the perspective that drives it is seriously antiquated. With very few exceptions, the data needs of server systems are way too complex to be constrained by human readable formats. For example, are you going to type the binary values for a MIME image that you want to embed in an email? Try doing that via a textual SMTP interface. The whole need of MIME was to overcome the stupid limitations of a textual email standard. Let's see, how do I represent binary data in a textual format. Yeah, that makes perfect sense. In a web world, I guess it does. How about a word document? Do you want a format that you have to type the font details manually, like HTML? NO, you use a word processor that does all that for you and then stores it in format that the system understands. How about audio? Do you want a media stream protocol that is human readable? Such a media protocol would be too slow be feasible. MP3 is a BINARY solution that attempts to answer the audio data issues. Everyone uses a piece of software that understands MP3. I would consider MP3 to be common and popular, even though it is BINARY. For computing needs, the future reality is surely a return to strong binary representations that can be interpreted into forms that humans can understand as needed, or can be handled by clients as necessary. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fastream Technologies Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 5:43 AM To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!) I wonder why he chose a binary format instead of text as no popular/common protocol is designed that way (i.e. HTTP, FTP, IMAP--all telnet based)! Regards, SZ On 2/7/08, DZ-Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, rather than a new protocol, you have created a new e-mail server and client system which communicates in its own proprietary binary format? dZ. On Feb 6, 2008, at 18:50, David A. G. wrote: Dear friends, I have developed a complete and very improved e-mail protocol, highly immune to the SPAM, with data encryption and compression, with sender ID validation, etc. BUT not compatible with the standard email (SMTP). -- DZ-Jay [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
Go David. As a disclaimer, I admit that I am seriously biased, since I am probably the only nerd on the planet that thinks Tim Berners Lee should be shot for giving us the stupid web trash we have now, or perhaps it is the large corporate interests to blame that determined for their own personal gain that the web was should be the ULTIMATE vehicle for software facilitation. Either way, I plainly admit my anti-web bias. Nonetheless, the ONLY solution for overcoming the massive amounts of oversights in various areas (security, scalability, state management, etc) in the current protocols (SMTP, FTP, HTTP, etc) is by RETHINKING and REPLACING them with something that inherently thinks smarter. Kudos to David for thinking OUT of the box to ANY DEGREE. Innovation should be supported, not rebuffed for its lack of status quo complicity. Ok, I am deflating my personal soap box now... You may return to your regularly scheduled programming... :) Hoby -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David A. G. Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:13 AM To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!) Answering to all... DZ-Jay: So, rather than a new protocol, you have created a new e-mail server and client system which communicates in its own proprietary binary format? That is correct, but according the definition of protocol and thinking about my system runs directly over TCP/IP... DZ-Jay: Also, if it is not compatible with SMTP, how does anybody outside your own mail server network get it? For the moment I have the only server, but this system works in the same way than the standard e-mail ... using Domains and MX-DNS queries. Fastream Technologies: I wonder why he chose a binary format instead of text as no popular/common protocol is designed that way. The reason is simple, using a binary protocol ensures a minimum consumption of bytes through the net. And the most important reason, my protocol uses only 4 steps to send or receive an e-mail: 1- client: connection and authentication 2- server: response 3- client: work identification and e-mail transmision (in a single block!) 4- server: final response (CRC validation made!) 5- client: request to close connection This kind of protocol ensures a very fast interaction client/server and enables a native data compressión. Darin McGee So you lock out 99.9% of the email - no wonder it blocks spam. hehehe ... I added many features that ensures a real spam blocking, not only taking hand on the incompatibility, please read my webpage www.hidens.com.ar I meaning that all known spamming methods are blocked or minimized (from address thefts to mail pumps), except a user sending a real e-mail to another one (obviously). Well you can just denounce that user to the webmaster... Darin McGee That's what I love about standards, everybody has one :) Yes, the only problem here is how to popularize it... hehehe Thanks for your time to every body, you are invited to use it... David Jorge Aguirre Grazio www.djag.com.ar - Original Message - From: Dave Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, 07 February, 2008 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!) I suspect that's half the point. Only like equipped users can communicate. Guess there could be a use in the financial or military markets, or other intentionaly closed environments... There again, I'd also guess they have such systems implemented already? Servers, nothing to stop you delivering directly, as many corporate systems do already, ours included, so long as you know the IP or domain address of course... I suspect for the above type of users, regular POP/SMTP/IMAP etc incompatability would not be a problem! Have to say though, spam is primeraly user driven from personal experience, from website form filling and so on. And what happens when a spammer gets hold of one of these secure mailer clients etc. Wonder why PGP or Open GPG is not as popular as it could be? There are plugins that integrate OK with the likes of Outlook (ugh!) Thunderbird, Pegasus etc... Ah, of course, the powers that be, like to watch what goes on Silly me... Cheers.. I'll crawl back under my rock, it's a bit too bright out here... Dave B. -Original Message- From: DZ-Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:56 AM To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!) Hello: Also, if it is not compatible with SMTP, how does anybody outside your own mail server network get it? And if it does communicate with external SMTP servers in order to inter-operate with other networks (otherwise, what's the point in sending yourself e-mail?) then it *is* susceptible to SPAM and abuse. dZ. -- DZ-Jay [TeamICS] http
Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
I mean the TCP stack itself. The bugs in first Trumpet and then MS Winsock caused many problems throughout the years since Internet flourished. (AFAIK, since 1993-4). All the coders chose to implement top-level protocols (like you) and it was left to MS for doing the complex TCP job... Regards, SZ On 2/7/08, Francois PIETTE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ICS has codes for SMTP/POP/HTTP/FTP (all text) but not for TCP. I'm not sure about what you mean. ICS as TWSocket and TWSocketServer for TCP. Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS) http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
Dear friends, I have developed a complete and very improved e-mail protocol, highly immune to the SPAM, with data encryption and compression, with sender ID validation, etc. BUT not compatible with the standard email (SMTP). Let me introduce you to High Density Mail Protocol (HDMP): This very improved e-mail protocol takes advantage of the technology available in the 21' century and offers benefits far superior in contrast with the actual system based on technology and security standards now obsolete (SMTP was created in 1982). Some features: - Data compression (transfers up to 10 times faster than the actual e-mail system). - Data encryption (protects the content using encryption methods, like AES, 3DES, etc). - Minimum handshaking, only 4 steps are needed to send or receive an e-mail. - Immune to the SPAM (for more info visit our website). - Persistent Digital Signature (PDS)(FREE). Can be used to identify an user and automatically decrypt protected e-mails. - Full binary protocol (in contrast with the text based protocol used by SMTP). - Multiple-Body capability. Automatic e-mail checking and notification. Etc. - FREE SERVICE. You can know all about the protocol features by going here: www.hidens.com.ar Create your account (free) and download the e-mail client by going here: www.hidensmail.com.ar Used ICS components: HiDens Mail Server: WSocketServer HiDens Mail Client: WSocketClient and HttpClient HiDens User Account Manager: HttpServer Protocol development time and testings: 2 years. Final applications development time: 8 months. I think this is an interesting alternative for many peoples (like me) and companies now very tired about the high volume of spam and poor security levels found using the standard e-mail... thanks for your time, David Jorge Aguirre Grazio www.djag.com.ar -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
