Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Fabio Estevam]

[Please do not top post in mailing lists]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN
 wrote:
> Dear Fabio,
>
> I checked my PHY KSZ9021 schematic  (we used i.mx6 Dual Light) with boundary 
> devices sabre_light_revD(they used i.mx6 quad)  KSZ9021. We both use same 
> clock and data signals on both i.mx6 and PHY sides.
>
> I saw 6.25 MHz clock signal on RGMII_TXCLK pin of i.mx6dl which is connected 
> to the GTX_CLK input pin of PHY same as in sabre light. PHY is multiplying 
> this clock with 5 and generating 31.25 MHz, which is connected back to the 
> ENET_REF_CLK pin of i.mx6dl.
>
> I guess either my global ethernet clock or its pll clock registers or their 
> mask registers are not set correctly, to generate 25 MHz, instead of 6.25 MHz.
>
> May be you know, how may I correct them?

Maybe you need to call enable_fec_anatop_clock() to adjust the FEC clock.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Mehmet Ali İPİN]

Dear Fabio,

I checked my PHY KSZ9021 schematic  (we used i.mx6 Dual Light) with boundary 
devices sabre_light_revD(they used i.mx6 quad)  KSZ9021. We both use same clock 
and data signals on both i.mx6 and PHY sides. 

I saw 6.25 MHz clock signal on RGMII_TXCLK pin of i.mx6dl which is connected to 
the GTX_CLK input pin of PHY same as in sabre light. PHY is multiplying this 
clock with 5 and generating 31.25 MHz, which is connected back to the 
ENET_REF_CLK pin of i.mx6dl.

I guess either my global ethernet clock or its pll clock registers or their 
mask registers are not set correctly, to generate 25 MHz, instead of 6.25 MHz. 

May be you know, how may I correct them?

Thanks and best regards.

Mehmet Ali



-Original Message-
From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 3:29 PM
To: Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr> 
wrote:
> Dear Estevam,
>
> I am (in fact hardware engineer developed the PCB)  not an experienced 
> u-boot/linux developer, therefore sorry for my complex questions.
> I will check the forum, and google for this message, but you may help me to 
> start the right path.
>
> May be, according to your experience you can advise me to check some 
> (phy/mac) register, pin status, clock values, Or give the name of threads in 
> u-boot or nxp imx6 forum which is about similar dhcp events, if you remember.
>
> Since its a new PCB board, so we did not load/run the linux yet.

Try looking at existing supported boards that use KSZ9021, such as 
board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6x.c for example.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Lukasz Majewski]

Hi,

> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN
>  wrote:
> > Dear Estevam,
> >
> > I am (in fact hardware engineer developed the PCB)  not an
> > experienced u-boot/linux developer, therefore sorry for my complex
> > questions. I will check the forum, and google for this message, but
> > you may help me to start the right path.
> >
> > May be, according to your experience you can advise me to check
> > some (phy/mac) register, pin status, clock values, Or give the name
> > of threads in u-boot or nxp imx6 forum which is about similar dhcp
> > events, if you remember.
> >
> > Since its a new PCB board, so we did not load/run the linux yet.  
> 
> Try looking at existing supported boards that use KSZ9021, such as
> board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6x.c for example.

If I may add a remark here. If this is a new board - then look for
RGMII's internal delays, which are set in the ETH PHY chip. You may get
default values, which may not be correct in your new PCB design.

> ___
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot



Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,  Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de


pgpZ8lJ2j1kO9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Fabio Estevam]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Fabio Estevam  wrote:

> Try looking at existing supported boards that use KSZ9021, such as
> board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6x.c for example.

Or also the mx6 udoo board (board/udoo/udoo.c) :
http://download.udoo.org/files/schematics/UDOO_REV_D_schematics.pdf
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Mehmet Ali İPİN]

Thanks and best regards.

-Original Message-
From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 3:29 PM
To: Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr> 
wrote:
> Dear Estevam,
>
> I am (in fact hardware engineer developed the PCB)  not an experienced 
> u-boot/linux developer, therefore sorry for my complex questions.
> I will check the forum, and google for this message, but you may help me to 
> start the right path.
>
> May be, according to your experience you can advise me to check some 
> (phy/mac) register, pin status, clock values, Or give the name of threads in 
> u-boot or nxp imx6 forum which is about similar dhcp events, if you remember.
>
> Since its a new PCB board, so we did not load/run the linux yet.

Try looking at existing supported boards that use KSZ9021, such as 
board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6x.c for example.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Fabio Estevam]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN
 wrote:
> Dear Estevam,
>
> I am (in fact hardware engineer developed the PCB)  not an experienced 
> u-boot/linux developer, therefore sorry for my complex questions.
> I will check the forum, and google for this message, but you may help me to 
> start the right path.
>
> May be, according to your experience you can advise me to check some 
> (phy/mac) register, pin status, clock values,
> Or give the name of threads in u-boot or nxp imx6 forum which is about 
> similar dhcp events, if you remember.
>
> Since its a new PCB board, so we did not load/run the linux yet.

Try looking at existing supported boards that use KSZ9021, such as
board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6x.c for example.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Mehmet Ali İPİN]

Dear Estevam,

I am (in fact hardware engineer developed the PCB)  not an experienced 
u-boot/linux developer, therefore sorry for my complex questions.
I will check the forum, and google for this message, but you may help me to 
start the right path.

May be, according to your experience you can advise me to check some (phy/mac) 
register, pin status, clock values, 
Or give the name of threads in u-boot or nxp imx6 forum which is about similar 
dhcp events, if you remember.

Since its a new PCB board, so we did not load/run the linux yet.

Thanks and best regards.

Mehmet Ali



-Original Message-
From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 2:59 PM
To: Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr> 
wrote:
> Dear Estevam,
>
> Thank you very much; With your helps managed to use u-boot 2018, gcc 
> 7.2 and SPL, generated u-boot.img image and downloaded into board.
>
> SD card and e-MMC working well. Ethernet Phy is also answering mii info as 
> shown below:
>
> => mii info
> PHY 0x05: OUI = 0x0885, Model = 0x21, Rev = 0x01,  10baseT, HDX => 
> setenv ipadr 10.0.0.10 => dhcp FEC Waiting for PHY auto negotiation to 
> complete. TIMEOUT !
> Could not initialize PHY FEC
> BOOTP broadcast 1
> BOOTP broadcast 2
> .
> .
> .
> BOOTP broadcast 17
>
> Retry time exceeded; starting again.
>
> I would be grateful, if you Have any idea how can I test and solve the dhcp 
> command?

It's hard to understand what could be wrong without seeing your code nor 
schematics.

Are you able to get Ethernet working in Linux?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Fabio Estevam]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN
 wrote:
> Dear Estevam,
>
> Thank you very much; With your helps managed to use u-boot 2018, gcc 7.2 and 
> SPL, generated
> u-boot.img image and downloaded into board.
>
> SD card and e-MMC working well. Ethernet Phy is also answering mii info as 
> shown below:
>
> => mii info
> PHY 0x05: OUI = 0x0885, Model = 0x21, Rev = 0x01,  10baseT, HDX
> => setenv ipadr 10.0.0.10
> => dhcp
> FEC Waiting for PHY auto negotiation to complete. TIMEOUT !
> Could not initialize PHY FEC
> BOOTP broadcast 1
> BOOTP broadcast 2
> .
> .
> .
> BOOTP broadcast 17
>
> Retry time exceeded; starting again.
>
> I would be grateful, if you Have any idea how can I test and solve the dhcp 
> command?

It's hard to understand what could be wrong without seeing your code
nor schematics.

Are you able to get Ethernet working in Linux?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Mehmet Ali İPİN]

Dear Estevam,

Thank you very much; With your helps managed to use u-boot 2018, gcc 7.2 and 
SPL, generated 
u-boot.img image and downloaded into board. 

SD card and e-MMC working well. Ethernet Phy is also answering mii info as 
shown below:

=> mii info
PHY 0x05: OUI = 0x0885, Model = 0x21, Rev = 0x01,  10baseT, HDX
=> setenv ipadr 10.0.0.10
=> dhcp
FEC Waiting for PHY auto negotiation to complete. TIMEOUT !
Could not initialize PHY FEC
BOOTP broadcast 1
BOOTP broadcast 2
.
.
.
BOOTP broadcast 17

Retry time exceeded; starting again.

I would be grateful, if you Have any idea how can I test and solve the dhcp 
command?

With my best regards.

Mehmet Ali 



-Original Message-
From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 5:57 PM
To: Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

Hi Mehmet,

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr> 
wrote:
> Dear Estevam,
>
> Thank you for your helps. I finally managed to build u-boot-2018. With these 
> commands:
> export 
> CROSS_COMPILE=/opt/gcc-arm-none-eabi-7-2017-q4-major/bin/arm-none-eabi
> -
>  export ARCH=arm
>  make distclean
>  make mx6sabreauto_defconfig
>  make
>
> There are u-boot, u-boot.bin, u-boot.img, ... files, but I could not see 
> u-boot.imx file, which we use it to download to the DDR via USB, with 
> usb_loader program.
>
> I used u-boot-2016 lately, which was generating .imx file; Do you know if we 
> can generate it with 2018.1?

mx6sabreauto has been converted to SPL, so the generated binaries are SPL and 
u-boot.img.

You can flash them into the SD card like this:

- Flash the SPL binary into the SD card:

$ sudo dd if=SPL of=/dev/sdX bs=1K seek=1 && sync

- Flash the u-boot.img binary into the SD card:

$ sudo dd if=u-boot.img of=/dev/sdX bs=1K seek=69 && sync

This is described in board/freescale/mx6sabreauto/README.

You can also load SPL and u-boot.img via imx_usb_loader tool. Make sure you use 
their latest code and follow doc/README.sdp.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Fabio Estevam]

Hi Mehmet,

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN
 wrote:
> Dear Estevam,
>
> Thank you for your helps. I finally managed to build u-boot-2018. With these 
> commands:
> export CROSS_COMPILE=/opt/gcc-arm-none-eabi-7-2017-q4-major/bin/arm-none-eabi-
>  export ARCH=arm
>  make distclean
>  make mx6sabreauto_defconfig
>  make
>
> There are u-boot, u-boot.bin, u-boot.img, ... files, but I could not see 
> u-boot.imx file, which we use it to download to the DDR via USB, with 
> usb_loader program.
>
> I used u-boot-2016 lately, which was generating .imx file; Do you know if we 
> can generate it with 2018.1?

mx6sabreauto has been converted to SPL, so the generated binaries are
SPL and u-boot.img.

You can flash them into the SD card like this:

- Flash the SPL binary into the SD card:

$ sudo dd if=SPL of=/dev/sdX bs=1K seek=1 && sync

- Flash the u-boot.img binary into the SD card:

$ sudo dd if=u-boot.img of=/dev/sdX bs=1K seek=69 && sync

This is described in board/freescale/mx6sabreauto/README.

You can also load SPL and u-boot.img via imx_usb_loader tool. Make
sure you use their latest code and follow doc/README.sdp.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Mehmet Ali İPİN]

Dear Estevam,

Thank you for your helps. I finally managed to build u-boot-2018. With these 
commands:
export CROSS_COMPILE=/opt/gcc-arm-none-eabi-7-2017-q4-major/bin/arm-none-eabi-
 export ARCH=arm
 make distclean
 make mx6sabreauto_defconfig
 make

There are u-boot, u-boot.bin, u-boot.img, ... files, but I could not see 
u-boot.imx file, which we use it to download to the DDR via USB, with 
usb_loader program. 

I used u-boot-2016 lately, which was generating .imx file; Do you know if we 
can generate it with 2018.1?

Best regards.

-Original Message-
From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 2:49 PM
To: Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr> 
wrote:
> Dear Estevam.
>
> Thank you for your helps and interests,
>
> I downloaded and installed gcc/g++ version 7.2 but, make file of u-boot-2018 
> gives the message below:
>
> *** Your GCC is older than 6.0 and is not supported
> make: *** [checkgcc6] Error 1
>
> but my gcc version is 7.2.0
>
> mai@ubuntu:~/u-boot-2018.01$ gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 
> 7.2.0-1ubuntu1~14.04) 7.2.0

This is your host PC GCC. You need to upgrade your cross-compile GCC.

Or for a quick test you can do:

git revert 6b867dabe84bae1e7 , which will allow you to build with your old GCC.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Fabio Estevam]

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN
 wrote:
> Dear Estevam.
>
> Thank you for your helps and interests,
>
> I downloaded and installed gcc/g++ version 7.2 but, make file of u-boot-2018 
> gives the message below:
>
> *** Your GCC is older than 6.0 and is not supported
> make: *** [checkgcc6] Error 1
>
> but my gcc version is 7.2.0
>
> mai@ubuntu:~/u-boot-2018.01$ gcc --version
> gcc (Ubuntu 7.2.0-1ubuntu1~14.04) 7.2.0

This is your host PC GCC. You need to upgrade your cross-compile GCC.

Or for a quick test you can do:

git revert 6b867dabe84bae1e7 , which will allow you to build with your old GCC.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Peter Robinson]

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN
<mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr> wrote:
> Dear Estevam.
>
> Thank you for your helps and interests,
>
> I downloaded and installed gcc/g++ version 7.2 but, make file of u-boot-2018 
> gives the message below:
>
> *** Your GCC is older than 6.0 and is not supported
> make: *** [checkgcc6] Error 1
>
> but my gcc version is 7.2.0
>
> mai@ubuntu:~/u-boot-2018.01$ gcc --version
> gcc (Ubuntu 7.2.0-1ubuntu1~14.04) 7.2.0
>
> I am searching a solution, but if you know, please help..

Not sure about Ubuntu but when I build in Fedora you need to have a
ARM toolchain for cross compiling so I'd make sure that's updated to
the same version too.

> -Original Message-
> From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 7:34 PM
> To: Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr>
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN 
> <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr> wrote:
>> Dear Estevam,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your answer.
>> I downloaded u-boot 2018.01. Its make file required gcc 6.0 or later. Then I 
>> downloaded gcc 7.2.
>> Building it.
>>
>> Do you know is there a yocto version which is stable with u-boot 2018?
>
> Not sure about which version of U-Boot Yocto supports. You can build U-Boot 
> manually and give it a try.
>
> Does the problem happen with U-Boot 2018.01?
> ___
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Mehmet Ali İPİN]

Dear Estevam.

Thank you for your helps and interests,

I downloaded and installed gcc/g++ version 7.2 but, make file of u-boot-2018 
gives the message below:

*** Your GCC is older than 6.0 and is not supported
make: *** [checkgcc6] Error 1

but my gcc version is 7.2.0

mai@ubuntu:~/u-boot-2018.01$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 7.2.0-1ubuntu1~14.04) 7.2.0

I am searching a solution, but if you know, please help..

Best regards.


-Original Message-
From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 7:34 PM
To: Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr> 
wrote:
> Dear Estevam,
>
> Thank you very much for your answer.
> I downloaded u-boot 2018.01. Its make file required gcc 6.0 or later. Then I 
> downloaded gcc 7.2.
> Building it.
>
> Do you know is there a yocto version which is stable with u-boot 2018?

Not sure about which version of U-Boot Yocto supports. You can build U-Boot 
manually and give it a try.

Does the problem happen with U-Boot 2018.01?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Stefano Babic]

Hi Mehmet,

On 15/01/2018 17:34, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN
>  wrote:
>> Dear Estevam,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your answer.
>> I downloaded u-boot 2018.01. Its make file required gcc 6.0 or later. Then I 
>> downloaded gcc 7.2.
>> Building it.
>>
>> Do you know is there a yocto version which is stable with u-boot 2018?
> 
> Not sure about which version of U-Boot Yocto supports. You can build
> U-Boot manually and give it a try.

Last official U-Boot version in Yocto (rocko) is 2017.09. Anyway, the
best way to do is as recommended by Fabio (build manually and test).

Best regards,
Stefano Babic



-- 
=
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,  Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de
=
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Fabio Estevam]

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN
 wrote:
> Dear Estevam,
>
> Thank you very much for your answer.
> I downloaded u-boot 2018.01. Its make file required gcc 6.0 or later. Then I 
> downloaded gcc 7.2.
> Building it.
>
> Do you know is there a yocto version which is stable with u-boot 2018?

Not sure about which version of U-Boot Yocto supports. You can build
U-Boot manually and give it a try.

Does the problem happen with U-Boot 2018.01?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Mehmet Ali İPİN]

Dear Estevam,

Thank you very much for your answer.
I downloaded u-boot 2018.01. Its make file required gcc 6.0 or later. Then I 
downloaded gcc 7.2.
Building it.

Do you know is there a yocto version which is stable with u-boot 2018?

Thanks and best regards.



-Original Message-
From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 2:59 PM
To: Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:00 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN <mehmet.i...@pavotek.com.tr> 
wrote:
>
>
> From: Mehmet Ali İPİN
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 8:39 AM
> To: 'u-b...@lists.dex.de' <u-b...@lists.dex.de>
> Subject: u-boot v2016 vs v2013
>
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> Hello,
>
> We have an i.mx6dl board which was referenced to sabreauto kit, except 
> we use KSZ9021 as phy chip instead of AR8031. We installed the krogoth 
> and jethro versions of yocto; as result u-booth 2016 and 2013 versions 
> were installed accordingly. When downloaded the code
> 2013 u-boot version controlled the phy chip, even we did not touch the 
> ethernet-phy related files.
>
> But for u-boot 2016, even we modified the config and source files according 
> to KSZ9021, even MDO and MDCLK pins are not activated.
>
> I would be very grateful, if anybody knows a solution about this problem 
> and/or give me a direction.

Please try 2018.01 instead.

Another suggestion is to do a similar changes in your board file like this:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commitdiff;h=dac09fc10b71045ac261a9b8a05d34029ebec2ae;hp=0f7c6cdc8143d6cf0577a84bf27bdaadd6229ff4

Regards,

Fabio Estevam
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Fabio Estevam]

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:00 AM, Mehmet Ali İPİN
 wrote:
>
>
> From: Mehmet Ali İPİN
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 8:39 AM
> To: 'u-b...@lists.dex.de' 
> Subject: u-boot v2016 vs v2013
>
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> Hello,
>
> We have an i.mx6dl board which was referenced to sabreauto kit, except we use 
> KSZ9021 as phy chip instead of AR8031. We installed the krogoth and jethro 
> versions of yocto; as result u-booth 2016 and 2013 versions were installed 
> accordingly. When downloaded the code
> 2013 u-boot version controlled the phy chip, even we did not touch the 
> ethernet-phy related files.
>
> But for u-boot 2016, even we modified the config and source files according 
> to KSZ9021, even MDO and MDCLK pins are not activated.
>
> I would be very grateful, if anybody knows a solution about this problem 
> and/or give me a direction.

Please try 2018.01 instead.

Another suggestion is to do a similar changes in your board file like this:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commitdiff;h=dac09fc10b71045ac261a9b8a05d34029ebec2ae;hp=0f7c6cdc8143d6cf0577a84bf27bdaadd6229ff4

Regards,

Fabio Estevam
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] FW: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

[Mehmet Ali İPİN]

From: Mehmet Ali İPİN
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 8:39 AM
To: 'u-b...@lists.dex.de' 
Subject: u-boot v2016 vs v2013

Dear Sir/Madam,

Hello,

We have an i.mx6dl board which was referenced to sabreauto kit, except we use 
KSZ9021 as phy chip instead of AR8031. We installed the krogoth and jethro 
versions of yocto; as result u-booth 2016 and 2013 versions were installed 
accordingly. When downloaded the code
2013 u-boot version controlled the phy chip, even we did not touch the 
ethernet-phy related files.

But for u-boot 2016, even we modified the config and source files according to 
KSZ9021, even MDO and MDCLK pins are not activated.

I would be very grateful, if anybody knows a solution about this problem and/or 
give me a direction.

Thanks and best regards.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot