[U2] Virtual OS environment for UV

2005-06-29 Thread Stuart . Boydell
I'm interested to know if anyone is using virtual environments to run UV - 
eg Virtual PC under Win or LPAR under Aix etc.

We are thinking that this may be a good way to effectively replicate the 
live environment for development, testing and training.

If so, what has your experience been? Are there licencing issues for UV?

Regards,
Stuart


**
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have 
received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 
9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [AD] New DesignBAIS group on Google

2005-06-29 Thread Design BAIS

Link should be http://groups-beta.google.com/group/DesignBAIS

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence

2005-06-29 Thread Ross Ferris
This would still make things vulnerable whenever date/time changed on
the generating machine  the beauty of the sequential ID is that
fact that nit WILL be in real time order, regardless of what people do
with dae  time of the machine

Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage - an Evolution in Software Development

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 28 June 2005 7:14 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence

Given an uuid string generated by AIX uuid_gen:
b6e7ce371f25.02.ac.1e.10.03.00.00.00
Under Windows uuidgen.exe -x: 9b0a5933-e7b1-11d9-868e-000bcdf8b9a5

The first part(s) of these are time based, though it may be difficult
(but
not impossible) to convert it back into a UV date/time format, the
string
will date/time sort either automatically in the aix case or by sorting
on
the (4th?,) 3rd, 2nd then 1st parts in the MS case.

Doing a google search on 'uuid primary key' results in alternating for
and
against arguments.

Regards,
Stuart Boydell


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28-06-2005 17.20.58:

 But I don't think there is a way to extract a time element from the
 UUID, is there ?


**
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have
received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support
Centre
(61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV

2005-06-29 Thread brian
Stuart,

I run everything under Virtual PC, including UniVerse.

This allows me to take simple spot saves, and to move my entire working
environment between PCs without worrying about hardware differences:
something I have had to do several times in the past. 

I also keep clean images zipped that include personal editions of each
of the databases so I can unzip them for installation testing. Saves a
huge amount of time.

Brian

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29.06.2005, 08:11:46:
 I'm interested to know if anyone is using virtual environments to run UV - 
 eg Virtual PC under Win or LPAR under Aix etc.
 
 We are thinking that this may be a good way to effectively replicate the 
 live environment for development, testing and training.
 
 If so, what has your experience been? Are there licencing issues for UV?
 
 Regards,
 Stuart
 
 
 **
 This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
 and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have 
 received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 
 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action.
 
 This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
 for the presence of computer viruses.
 **
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UOJ Web Services UniSession Exception Error Code 14002

2005-06-29 Thread Robert Paterson
Only thing that really comes to mind is if something at the OS level is
grabbing the file and holding it exclusively.

At a guess I would say you may be on Windows and that a virus scanner
could be your problem?

If you supply more details about your environment that may help others
with ideas... 


Robert Paterson
Technology Support Manager
www.epicor.com
Tel.: +44 (1344) 468231
Cell: +44 (7799) 348513
Fax: +44 (1344) 468050
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

1 The Arena, Downshire Way, Bracknell, Berks, UK, RG12 1PU


This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then 
delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or 
distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission. We have taken 
precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we 
advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this 
message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software 
viruses.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV

2005-06-29 Thread Ray Wurlod
There are lots of DataStage sites running in LPARs on AIX.  DataStage is still 
close enough to UniVerse to count as a no problems response.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV

2005-06-29 Thread Hennessey, Mark F.
snip
There are lots of DataStage sites running in LPARs on AIX. 
/snip

Ray:  Would this be a partition on a mainframe?  I thought IBM wanted folks to 
go the Red Hat route, or do they support AIX and Red Hat on a LPAR?
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence

2005-06-29 Thread Stuart . Boydell
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Unidata and MQ series

2005-06-29 Thread John Harris
The UniBasic Extensions guide says you need to run the script makeu2mqs to
enable WebSphere MQ support.  I do this and it errors xlc: not found.  xlc is
the IBM C compiler.  Is my only option to buy and install the C compiler?

Thanks,

John Harris



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV

2005-06-29 Thread Stuart . Boydell
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [UD] License count update

2005-06-29 Thread Dean.Armbruster
I just used the 'stopsmm -r' command with version 6.1.10 on HP-UX and it
worked as advertised for both a number of users licensed update and for
an Authorization update.  It certainly is nice to avoid the headaches a
restart.

My only comment is that if this handy way to bypass a restart has been
around since 5.0.1, which I believe was GA in 2000, it should have it
made it into the documentation by now, namely Installing and Licensing
UniData 6.1 Products.  We skipped version 5.0, going from 4.1 to 5.2,
so we never saw that readme.

Dean Armbruster
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wally Terhune
 Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 4:44 PM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: Re: [U2] [UD] License count update
 
 From the 5.0.1 readme (yes - it's been around for a number of 
 years) I've used 'kill -HUP smm.pid' regularly on Unix. I 
 can't say that I've used 'stopsmm -r' or tried it on Windows...
 You don't want to 'fat finger' a kill -9 smm.pid, though...  :-)
 
 Issue 7795 - Problem description
 
 UniData -- Prior to this release, when any changes were made 
 for licensing purposes through the confprod utility, UniData 
 had to be stopped and started again for those changes to take 
 effect. Beginning at this release you no longer have to stop 
 and start UniData.
 
 On UniData for UNIX, after changing the licensing information 
 and obtaining an authorization code, execute either of the 
 following commands from the UNIX
 prompt:
 
 kill -HUP smm_pid_ID
 or
  stopsmm -r
 
 On UniData for Windows NT, you use the stopsmm -r command.
 Note: Certain functions require that UniData be stopped, such 
 as executing cntl_install, changing a file from recoverable 
 to nonrecoverable, changing the udtconfig file, etc.
 
 
 Wally Terhune
 Manager - U2 Advanced Technical Services IBM DB2 Information 
 Management Software
 Tel: 303.294.4866 Fax: 303.294.4832
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support - Open, Query, Update, 
 Search - Online!
 
 
 
  Andy Pflueger
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  il.com  
   To
  Sent by:  U2 User Group Mailing List
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
  stserver.u2ug.org
   cc
 
   
  Subject
  10/13/2004 01:24  [U2] [UD] License count update
  PM
 
 
  Please respond to
  u2-users
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Howdy folks,
 
 Just a question regarding updating license counts on the 
 fly without physically issuing the 'stopud' and 'startud' 
 command following the udtconfig file update for NUSERS 
 parameter. I hear there's a kill command such as the 
 following to essentially restart smm to re-read the updated 
 configuration/license information without having users logoff...
 
 :WHAT
 Hardware : Sun Station
 Operating system : Solaris
 O.S. version : 2.7
 UniData version  : 6.0.3
 
 $ kill -HUP fill in PID # of SMM process here
 
 How will this affect a system which has users connected and 
 their existing udt processes; or will it? Just want to check 
 with y'all out there and see if anyone's done this on the fly 
 and how it works.
 
 Danke,
 Andy Pflueger
 Ivy Hill Corporation
 Louisville, KY
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] [UD] License count update

2005-06-29 Thread Chuck Mongiovi
I took the UD200 admin class a while back, and you could just do a kill -1
smm_pid and it would recognize the changes in licence availability .. This
would also reset the MAX.USER count if you happend to set it to 0 to stop
logins .. The class was probably on UD 6, so I'm not sure if it works on 5.x
..

-CHuck

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:53 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] License count update


I just used the 'stopsmm -r' command with version 6.1.10 on HP-UX and it
worked as advertised for both a number of users licensed update and for
an Authorization update.  It certainly is nice to avoid the headaches a
restart.

My only comment is that if this handy way to bypass a restart has been
around since 5.0.1, which I believe was GA in 2000, it should have it
made it into the documentation by now, namely Installing and Licensing
UniData 6.1 Products.  We skipped version 5.0, going from 4.1 to 5.2,
so we never saw that readme.

Dean Armbruster
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wally Terhune
 Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 4:44 PM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: Re: [U2] [UD] License count update

 From the 5.0.1 readme (yes - it's been around for a number of
 years) I've used 'kill -HUP smm.pid' regularly on Unix. I
 can't say that I've used 'stopsmm -r' or tried it on Windows...
 You don't want to 'fat finger' a kill -9 smm.pid, though...  :-)

 Issue 7795 - Problem description

 UniData -- Prior to this release, when any changes were made
 for licensing purposes through the confprod utility, UniData
 had to be stopped and started again for those changes to take
 effect. Beginning at this release you no longer have to stop
 and start UniData.

 On UniData for UNIX, after changing the licensing information
 and obtaining an authorization code, execute either of the
 following commands from the UNIX
 prompt:

 kill -HUP smm_pid_ID
 or
  stopsmm -r

 On UniData for Windows NT, you use the stopsmm -r command.
 Note: Certain functions require that UniData be stopped, such
 as executing cntl_install, changing a file from recoverable
 to nonrecoverable, changing the udtconfig file, etc.


 Wally Terhune
 Manager - U2 Advanced Technical Services IBM DB2 Information
 Management Software
 Tel: 303.294.4866 Fax: 303.294.4832
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support - Open, Query, Update,
 Search - Online!



  Andy Pflueger
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  il.com
   To
  Sent by:  U2 User Group Mailing List
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
  stserver.u2ug.org
   cc


  Subject
  10/13/2004 01:24  [U2] [UD] License count update
  PM


  Please respond to
  u2-users






 Howdy folks,

 Just a question regarding updating license counts on the
 fly without physically issuing the 'stopud' and 'startud'
 command following the udtconfig file update for NUSERS
 parameter. I hear there's a kill command such as the
 following to essentially restart smm to re-read the updated
 configuration/license information without having users logoff...

 :WHAT
 Hardware : Sun Station
 Operating system : Solaris
 O.S. version : 2.7
 UniData version  : 6.0.3

 $ kill -HUP fill in PID # of SMM process here

 How will this affect a system which has users connected and
 their existing udt processes; or will it? Just want to check
 with y'all out there and see if anyone's done this on the fly
 and how it works.

 Danke,
 Andy Pflueger
 Ivy Hill Corporation
 Louisville, KY
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Identification Challenge

2005-06-29 Thread karlp
We are a small company (42 UV licenses) and so use AUTOLOGOUT on sessions
based on importance. Some clients are set longer than others, and some
employees likewise.

The challenge I have is to figure out who/what is logging in when they are
using a java telnet client we use for 'web-based' connectivity. The
functionality of it is, briefly, an HTTP connection to our web server,
which downloads a java telnet app to their PC, which initializes a telnet
connection through our firewall to our uniVerse server. Because of that,
when we do a listu/who -u we get our own domain.com as the answer (AIX
5.2/UV 10.1.7).

I checked in the GCI subs and getpid is the only one that is very helpful.
I wanted one that had the source IP address, but realized that even if
there was one, it would return the same IP for everyone using the java
client.

Generally it's not an issue, except for the PCs used by outside sales and
willcall. Since different users login on those things all the time,
limiting the session just for those 5 PCs is a challenge this request is
about. Since I use DHCP to lock down IP addresses by MAC address, I was
leaning that way, but have come to a deadend. I'm hoping one of you
geniuses can help me get my brains out of that box and figure out a
workable solution.

TIA

-- 
Karl L. Pearson
Director of IT,
ATS Industrial Supply
Direct: 801-978-4429
Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29
Fax: 801-972-3888
http://www.atsindustrial.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Dynamic Connect

2005-06-29 Thread vance . alspach
PE comes with a version of dynamic connect.  I cannot seem to find any 
information on licensing Dynamic Connect at IBM or on the List.  Can 
anybody point me in the right direction?

thanks,

Vance Alspach
J  L Industrial Supply
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Identification Challenge

2005-06-29 Thread George Gallen
Just a thought. When the initial HTTP connection is made, does
it run a third part software for downloading? Otherwise at that
point, you could capture the IP address, the question is how do
you tie the java login to the http session.

Or possibly setup two telnet ports, and only download the second
telnet port applet to those you want to no logout as fast. So if
the connection was made say, on port 2323 you know to not logout
but if the port is 23 then regular. This would be regardless
of the source IP address.

George

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 12:53 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Identification Challenge


We are a small company (42 UV licenses) and so use AUTOLOGOUT
on sessions
based on importance. Some clients are set longer than others, and some
employees likewise.

The challenge I have is to figure out who/what is logging in
when they are
using a java telnet client we use for 'web-based' connectivity. The
functionality of it is, briefly, an HTTP connection to our web server,
which downloads a java telnet app to their PC, which
initializes a telnet
connection through our firewall to our uniVerse server.
Because of that,
when we do a listu/who -u we get our own domain.com as the answer (AIX
5.2/UV 10.1.7).

I checked in the GCI subs and getpid is the only one that is
very helpful.
I wanted one that had the source IP address, but realized that even if
there was one, it would return the same IP for everyone using the java
client.

Generally it's not an issue, except for the PCs used by
outside sales and
willcall. Since different users login on those things all the time,
limiting the session just for those 5 PCs is a challenge this
request is
about. Since I use DHCP to lock down IP addresses by MAC address, I was
leaning that way, but have come to a deadend. I'm hoping one of you
geniuses can help me get my brains out of that box and figure out a
workable solution.

TIA

--
Karl L. Pearson
Director of IT,
ATS Industrial Supply
Direct: 801-978-4429
Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29
Fax: 801-972-3888
http://www.atsindustrial.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Identification Challenge

2005-06-29 Thread karlp
quote who=George Gallen
 Just a thought. When the initial HTTP connection is made, does
 it run a third part software for downloading? Otherwise at that
 point, you could capture the IP address, the question is how do
 you tie the java login to the http session.

The java client is third party (open source). I've emailed the authors and
they aren't willing to adjust the source because of the ramifications
which might affect others. The client has 2 options: telnet (23) and SSH
(22). We use the SSH option for clients that don't allow outbound telnet.

Another point: The HTTP server isn't the same server as our business
system. The SSH server isn't the same one as our HTTP server, so 3
different servers in our network handle the calls depending on the access
point/method.


 Or possibly setup two telnet ports, and only download the second
 telnet port applet to those you want to no logout as fast. So if
 the connection was made say, on port 2323 you know to not logout
 but if the port is 23 then regular. This would be regardless
 of the source IP address.

Because we allow our clients acces through whatever telnet client they
want to use, changing the port wouldn't really help because they wouldn't
know where to change to port or how. Changing the java port isn't an
option.


 George

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 12:53 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Identification Challenge


We are a small company (42 UV licenses) and so use AUTOLOGOUT
on sessions
based on importance. Some clients are set longer than others, and some
employees likewise.

The challenge I have is to figure out who/what is logging in
when they are
using a java telnet client we use for 'web-based' connectivity. The
functionality of it is, briefly, an HTTP connection to our web server,
which downloads a java telnet app to their PC, which
initializes a telnet
connection through our firewall to our uniVerse server.
Because of that,
when we do a listu/who -u we get our own domain.com as the answer (AIX
5.2/UV 10.1.7).

I checked in the GCI subs and getpid is the only one that is
very helpful.
I wanted one that had the source IP address, but realized that even if
there was one, it would return the same IP for everyone using the java
client.

Generally it's not an issue, except for the PCs used by
outside sales and
willcall. Since different users login on those things all the time,
limiting the session just for those 5 PCs is a challenge this
request is
about. Since I use DHCP to lock down IP addresses by MAC address, I was
leaning that way, but have come to a deadend. I'm hoping one of you
geniuses can help me get my brains out of that box and figure out a
workable solution.

TIA

--
Karl L. Pearson
Director of IT,
ATS Industrial Supply
Direct: 801-978-4429
Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29
Fax: 801-972-3888
http://www.atsindustrial.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/



-- 
Karl L. Pearson
Director of IT,
ATS Industrial Supply
Direct: 801-978-4429
Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29
Fax: 801-972-3888
http://www.atsindustrial.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Re: Identification Challenge

2005-06-29 Thread karlp
quote who=Jeff Schasny
 The obvious (to me... YMMV) solution would be to have a process run out of
 the login paragraph which requires a username and password which could be
 stored in a file with an @id of their @userno. A second process which
 parses the output of a LISTU command and shows the current  username
 assigned to a given @userno would tell you who is logged in from the java
 app at any time. If you wanted to get a bit more involved you could even
 check the IP address of the user and only require a secondary
 username/password for those coming from your firewall

I'm not sure I understand where you're going. Let me summarize what I
understand. We have an application username and password already. I
already limit the AUTOLOGOUT time using that criterion. The reason that
wouldn't be feasible is because many of our employees who would be using
the willcall PC login with there own name. I set that policy and don't
wish to change for a specific terminal. We're dealing with sales folks who
have trouble remembering more than one computer-related issue. I have them
setup with the same email password as they use on the business system just
for that reason. Asking them for an additional password would garner me
much bad press.

The SSH folks have to enter 2 login/passwd entries already. That was a
pretty hard sell, however because they were unwilling to use public key
authentication, there wasn't any other way to do it.

So, am I missing something you had in mind?

Karl


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [stuff snipped]

The challenge I have is to figure out who/what is logging in when they
 are
using a java telnet client we use for 'web-based' connectivity. The
functionality of it is, briefly, an HTTP connection to our web server,
which downloads a java telnet app to their PC, which initializes a telnet
connection through our firewall to our uniVerse server. Because of that,
when we do a listu/who -u we get our own domain.com as the answer (AIX
5.2/UV 10.1.7).



 Jeff Schasny | Denver, Colorado, USA | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/



-- 
Karl L. Pearson
Director of IT,
ATS Industrial Supply
Direct: 801-978-4429
Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29
Fax: 801-972-3888
http://www.atsindustrial.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] UV 10 ODBC and password {Unclassified}

2005-06-29 Thread Clifton Oliver

Ah. That would be the ticket. Thanks.


On Jun 28, 2005, at 1:04 PM, HENDERSON MIKE, MR wrote:


I believe there is a patch (or a patched version of the appropriate
client .dll file) available from IBM if you ask them nicely.  This
restores the former functionality.  I'm pretty sure I got that
information from a previous post on this list.

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV

2005-06-29 Thread Clifton Oliver
The about half of the UV sites I've worked with in the last two years 
have been UV running on AIX in LPAR's on p-Series machines.


Like Brian, I use VPC to maintain multiple development environments, 
although my config is a bit different. UV running in Window XP running 
in VPC running in Mac OS X (BSD).



--

Regards,

Clif

~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER  ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~


On Jun 28, 2005, at 11:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I'm interested to know if anyone is using virtual environments to run 
UV -

eg Virtual PC under Win or LPAR under Aix etc.

We are thinking that this may be a good way to effectively replicate 
the

live environment for development, testing and training.

If so, what has your experience been? Are there licencing issues for 
UV?


Regards,
Stuart


**
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have
received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support 
Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action.


This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Identification Challenge

2005-06-29 Thread karlp
quote who=George Gallen
 What your running into is a security feature of java, you can't telnet
 from
 java
 unless it's a local telnet (same machine), unless this has changed.

No it hasn't changed. However, if we put our domain, then our firewall
directs the telnet session to the correct system. If I put the internal IP
address, the telnet session is directed to the HTTP server, which allows
telnet connectivity for non-root users, but they can't do anything other
than start a VNC session, an X-session (not on win32) or PINE and read
email.

Karl


 George

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 2:17 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Identification Challenge


quote who=George Gallen
 Just a thought. When the initial HTTP connection is made, does
 it run a third part software for downloading? Otherwise at that
 point, you could capture the IP address, the question is how do
 you tie the java login to the http session.

The java client is third party (open source). I've emailed the
authors and
they aren't willing to adjust the source because of the ramifications
which might affect others. The client has 2 options: telnet
(23) and SSH
(22). We use the SSH option for clients that don't allow
outbound telnet.

Another point: The HTTP server isn't the same server as our business
system. The SSH server isn't the same one as our HTTP server, so 3
different servers in our network handle the calls depending on
the access
point/method.
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/



-- 
Karl L. Pearson
Director of IT,
ATS Industrial Supply
Direct: 801-978-4429
Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29
Fax: 801-972-3888
http://www.atsindustrial.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] BP file ownership problem (linux)

2005-06-29 Thread Scott Ballinger
After editing a program in BP the owner and group of the file gets
changed to user:user. This didn't use to be problem, as all programs in
BP were set to 666, but now that we have implemented a minimal level of
security, the BP programs are set to 664 with owner and group typically
set to user:uv (the programming staff has membership in the uv group).
What happens is that after user XXX edits a program, since the
owner:group gets changed to XXX:XXX no one else can update that program
until either XXX or someone as root chowns the file back to the uv
group. This happens with all editors: ED, WED, etc.  Is there a Universe
setting or user setting that will prevent changing the owner and group
setting on a file after editing it? (UV 10.1.4, RHEL 3).

Thanks,

Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] BP file ownership problem (linux)

2005-06-29 Thread John Hester

Scott Ballinger wrote:

What happens is that after user XXX edits a program, since the
owner:group gets changed to XXX:XXX no one else can update that program
until either XXX or someone as root chowns the file back to the uv
group. This happens with all editors: ED, WED, etc.  Is there a Universe
setting or user setting that will prevent changing the owner and group
setting on a file after editing it? (UV 10.1.4, RHEL 3).


You have a couple of options.  You can either make the uv group the 
primary group for the programming staff in /etc/passwd, or you can:


chmod g+s BP

The latter will force any files created under the BP directory to retain 
the same group ownership as the BP directory, regardless of user group 
settings.


-John
--
John Hester
System  Network Administrator
Momentum Group Inc.
(949) 833-8886 x623
http://memosamples.com
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Dynamic Connect

2005-06-29 Thread Ian Renfrew
It is my understanding that there is no licensing component for Dynamic 
Connect. You can fiind Dynamic Connect on the client CD's.


... Ian Renfrew

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 12:59 PM
Subject: [U2] Dynamic Connect



PE comes with a version of dynamic connect.  I cannot seem to find any
information on licensing Dynamic Connect at IBM or on the List.  Can
anybody point me in the right direction?

thanks,

Vance Alspach
J  L Industrial Supply
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] BP file ownership problem (linux)

2005-06-29 Thread Drew Henderson

Scott,

Are all the people modifying the program a member of the uv group?  When 
I change a source program, it sets my account as the owner, and the 
group to the group I'm a member of (which is the same group as all the 
programming staff.)


Drew

Scott Ballinger wrote:


After editing a program in BP the owner and group of the file gets
changed to user:user. This didn't use to be problem, as all programs in
BP were set to 666, but now that we have implemented a minimal level of
security, the BP programs are set to 664 with owner and group typically
set to user:uv (the programming staff has membership in the uv group).
What happens is that after user XXX edits a program, since the
owner:group gets changed to XXX:XXX no one else can update that program
until either XXX or someone as root chowns the file back to the uv
group. This happens with all editors: ED, WED, etc.  Is there a Universe
setting or user setting that will prevent changing the owner and group
setting on a file after editing it? (UV 10.1.4, RHEL 3).

Thanks,

Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
 




--
--
Drew Henderson There are two types of people -
Dir. for Computer Center Operations those who do the work and those
[EMAIL PROTECTED] who take the credit. Try to be
   in the first group, there is
110 Ginger Hall less competition.
Morehead State University   Indira Ghandi
Morehead, KY  40351   
Phone: 606/783-2445   Fax: 606/783-5078

--
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] BP file ownership problem (linux)

2005-06-29 Thread Scott Ballinger
Thanks John, your second option was exactly what I was looking for. I
had changed everyone's primary group to uv as an interim fix, but didn't
feel that was the optimal solution.

Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] BP file ownership problem (linux)

2005-06-29 Thread Anthony Dzikiewicz
Sounds like you need to set UMASK in the LOGIN paragraph.  I keep things
pretty simple myself.  I keep all users in one group.  I keep the home
directory in the main account and everyone shares the same UMASK.  The only
things I lock up is the BP files, dictionaries and paragraphs in the VOC.  I
do that by pointing all paragraphs to a PROD.VOC which only I can touch.
Anthony

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Ballinger
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 3:31 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] BP file ownership problem (linux)


After editing a program in BP the owner and group of the file gets changed
to user:user. This didn't use to be problem, as all programs in BP were set
to 666, but now that we have implemented a minimal level of security, the BP
programs are set to 664 with owner and group typically set to user:uv (the
programming staff has membership in the uv group). What happens is that
after user XXX edits a program, since the owner:group gets changed to
XXX:XXX no one else can update that program until either XXX or someone as
root chowns the file back to the uv group. This happens with all editors:
ED, WED, etc.  Is there a Universe setting or user setting that will prevent
changing the owner and group setting on a file after editing it? (UV 10.1.4,
RHEL 3).

Thanks,

Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.0/27 - Release Date: 6/23/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.0/27 - Release Date: 6/23/2005
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Re: U2 Users Digest V1 #718

2005-06-29 Thread mkmullane
Stuart,

I have a laptop running XP Pro, that has a Virtual PC session running Windows 
2000 which in turn runs UV PE (I set all this up in case there were any issues 
with XP Pro  UV, very early in the piece).   It has worked quite happily, so I 
have had no reason to change it.   I use it for development  testing,  to 
keep stuff away from prying eyes.   I believe that a new  improved version 
of Virtual PC is being released shortly (in the next couple of months), so I 
would perhaps wait until it is released (if you can).   Under Virtual PC, I 
can't write to my CD drive, but I get around that by moving the UV directories 
from 2000 to the XP area  backing them up there.   I have found Virtual PC to 
be one of the most useful offerings to have come out from Microsoft.



MARY MULLANE


 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV
 
 I'm interested to know if anyone is using virtual environments to run UV 
 - 
 eg Virtual PC under Win or LPAR under Aix etc.
 
 We are thinking that this may be a good way to effectively replicate the 
 
 live environment for development, testing and training.
 
 If so, what has your experience been? Are there licencing issues for UV?
 
 Regards,
 Stuart
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Unidata and MQ series

2005-06-29 Thread Craig Bennett

John,

 The UniBasic Extensions guide says you need to run the script 
makeu2mqs to
 enable WebSphere MQ support.  I do this and it errors xlc: not found. 
 xlc is

 the IBM C compiler.  Is my only option to buy and install the C compiler?

which release of U2 on which architecture?

regards,


Craig
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Dynamic Connect

2005-06-29 Thread vance . alspach
Thanks Ian and John,

I have PE at home and have reviewed the Support Information.  Under 
License Information, it gives the serial number and states 'users:  999'.

With that stated, we have recently installed a phone system that allows us 
to monitor customer calls and service representative's screens to help 
improve customer service.  The terminal emulation software that our 
service reps use was written specifically for our needs but unfortunately, 
the monitoring software skips screen displays (possibly because of refresh 
rates). 

In the development group, we are using wIntergrate for obvious reasons. 
Since Dynamic Connect is a 'cut-down' version of wIntegrate, we feel 
comfortable that we can use its terminal emulation capabilities 
(eliminating many of the menu options) for our users.  My only concern is 
that I am uncertain of the licensing restrictions, which I am still 
unclear as to the limitations.

From the readme file, there is mention that 'Installation no longer 
requires authorization' which leads me to believe that we could use this 
as a corporate solution to terminal emulation (baring multiple sessions 
and will it work with the phone system).

Any feedback is greatly appreciated.

Vance Alspach
J  L Industrial Supply

Yes and no

You do not need an activation key but it *is* licensed (should be in the
license information contained with the product).

JayJay


It is my understanding that there is no licensing component for Dynamic 
Connect. You can fiind Dynamic Connect on the client CD's.

... Ian Renfrew


 PE comes with a version of dynamic connect.  I cannot seem to find any
 information on licensing Dynamic Connect at IBM or on the List.  Can
 anybody point me in the right direction?

 thanks,

 Vance Alspach
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV

2005-06-29 Thread Stuart . Boydell
Thanks, this is sounding more and more promising.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -

There are lots of DataStage sites
running in LPARs on AIX.  DataStage is still close enough to
UniVerse to count as a no problems response.



**
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have 
received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 
9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] - Determining time sequence

2005-06-29 Thread Stuart . Boydell
Ross, I'm not derogating the use of sequential IDs but IIRC, the bloke had 
a reason not to use a sequential id counter and wanted an alternative. 
The uuid spec states that uuid should cater for time adjustments on the 
local clock, hence, shouldn't be vulnerable (Of course, in the real 
world, that depends on how the spec has been implimented). The uuid can be 
sequentialised and can gauranteed to be unique to a high degree of 
certainty in time and space. There are no locking or contention issues 
when a uuid is generated opposed to a heavily used key generator.
I stand by my assertion that a uuid is a viable and justifiable solution 
in the original posters problem space. ;-)
Cheers, Stuart

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -


This would still make things vulnerable whenever date/time changed
on
the generating machine  the beauty of the sequential ID is that
fact that nit WILL be in real time order, regardless of what people
do
with dae  time of the machine



**
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have 
received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 
9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Virtual OS environment for UV

2005-06-29 Thread Stuart . Boydell
This sounds good. Do you run multiple instances of UV simultaneously? Any 
issues there?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -

Stuart,

I run everything under Virtual PC, including UniVerse.

This allows me to take simple spot saves, and to move my entire
working
environment between PCs without worrying about hardware differences:
something I have had to do several times in the past. 

I also keep clean images zipped that include personal editions of
each
of the databases so I can unzip them for installation testing. Saves
a
huge amount of time.

Brian



**
This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have 
received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 
9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.
**
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/