Re: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem
Not to prod an already dead one, but the same problems occur using comparisons on outcomes or '@' items. For example: SOME PROCESS; IF @1= 5... yields an incorrect result by my testing. j On 1/9/08, Jerry Banker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chuck, Thanks for verifying it. Also thanks for letting me know about the DLIST command I was wondering if there was a way to look at an I-descriptor. Jerry Banker Sr Programmer Analyst IBM Certified Solutions Expert Affiliated Acceptance Corp Sunrise Beach, MO 1-800-233-8483 www.affiliated.org -Original Message- From: Geoffrey Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 6:14 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem I would think that honoring a reasonable order of operations when parsing would resolve this. The extraction operator should certainly be higher priority than comparison. In fact, it works correctly in a BASIC program (UV 10.1.8). I compiled and ran the following: 0001: XX= 0002: XX1=5 0003: XX2=X 0004: IF XX1=5 THEN CRT YES ELSE CRT NO It returned YES as expected. If it suffered from the same affliction, it should have returned NO as (XX1) is not = 5. Therefore, it would seem that the parser for the I-Types is, as originally suggested, broken, or, more specifically, is not consistent with the BASIC compiler. I confess, however, that I have not verified the alleged I-type behavior on my system. Jerry Banker wrote: I have to add that this is just the reason why I stress using spaces between signs, variables, Boolean operators, and a liberal use of parentheses. -Original Message- From: Jerry Banker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 4:46 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem What it is doing is evaluating as: If @record is less than 3 is greater-than or equal to @record6 then 1 else -1 Or In other words: If 0 is greater-than or equal to 20071217:224240 then 1 else -1 -Original Message- From: john reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 3:57 PM To: list Subject: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem In the following query, a file is listed with two identical itypes, save for field 2 spacing, as shown below. Fields 3 and 6 are all equal in the query shown. The difference is that there is no space between the and = . This appears to yield wrong results, the bad one being shown as field 2 (all minus ones) in the query. Anyone seen this? john field 3 field 6 1-1 20071217:224240 20071217:224240 1-1 20071218:165115 20071218:165115 1-1 20071217:211056 20071217:211056 1-1 20071218:105346 20071218:105346 -- IF @RECORD3 = @RECORD6 THEN 1 ELSE -1 IF @RECORD3= @RECORD6 THEN 1 ELSE -1 john --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- Geoffrey Mitchell Programmer/Analyst Home Decorator's Collection 314-684-1062 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- john --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] Cleaning out _PH_
Yes - I could see that the logic of getting the DIR would at least be reduced by the number of records being deleted and already in a list -- I mean, if I'm deleting after 30 days, today I would *know* what records are being deleted for the next 29 days at least. It would make the nightly/daily process shorter... While this is more efficient - it would be a bunch of extra logic and 'Save-Lists' that had to be kept correct - and if the process were not run 'daily' you'd have to have a 'catch-up' mechanism to walk back to the last day a list *did* exist ... This would likely be ideal if we ran the process during 'PrimeTime' -- Thanks!! (But just the idea of using SaveLists just reminded me I likely also have abandoned SaveLists to try and figure out what can be nuked -- and we don't even have a DIR function we can use there!! Argh!! Or I could just have them buy more disk space... H... Which would actually be easier...) ;-) DW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jef Lee Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 6:49 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Cleaning out _PH_ David, This will take time to settle to a time where it will function correctly. But here is my suggestion - Day 1 - save a SELECT list of _PH_ using the date of day 1 as part of the key. Day 2-30 - do the same, but remove from list the contents of the previous day's list Day 31 - delete everything in Day 1 saved list, make a new list as per Day 2. Day 32 onwards - delete what is in the list for 30 days ago. Make a new list as per Day 2. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates
Are there any plans to make XLr8 and PRC play nicely together? - John M. Horn HealthLink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of daverch Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:56 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates U2logic announces that our Free eclipse based plugin for Universe and Unidata has been updated. Instructions for downloading this tool is available at www.u2logic.com. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information or otherwise protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem
More than likely it has a lot to do with using reference variables. Jerry Banker Sr Programmer Analyst IBM Certified Solutions Expert Affiliated Acceptance Corp Sunrise Beach, MO 1-800-233-8483 www.affiliated.org -Original Message- From: john reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:10 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem Not to prod an already dead one, but the same problems occur using comparisons on outcomes or '@' items. For example: SOME PROCESS; IF @1= 5... yields an incorrect result by my testing. j On 1/9/08, Jerry Banker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chuck, Thanks for verifying it. Also thanks for letting me know about the DLIST command I was wondering if there was a way to look at an I- descriptor. Jerry Banker Sr Programmer Analyst IBM Certified Solutions Expert Affiliated Acceptance Corp Sunrise Beach, MO 1-800-233-8483 www.affiliated.org -Original Message- From: Geoffrey Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 6:14 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem I would think that honoring a reasonable order of operations when parsing would resolve this. The extraction operator should certainly be higher priority than comparison. In fact, it works correctly in a BASIC program (UV 10.1.8). I compiled and ran the following: 0001: XX= 0002: XX1=5 0003: XX2=X 0004: IF XX1=5 THEN CRT YES ELSE CRT NO It returned YES as expected. If it suffered from the same affliction, it should have returned NO as (XX1) is not = 5. Therefore, it would seem that the parser for the I-Types is, as originally suggested, broken, or, more specifically, is not consistent with the BASIC compiler. I confess, however, that I have not verified the alleged I-type behavior on my system. Jerry Banker wrote: I have to add that this is just the reason why I stress using spaces between signs, variables, Boolean operators, and a liberal use of parentheses. -Original Message- From: Jerry Banker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 4:46 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem What it is doing is evaluating as: If @record is less than 3 is greater-than or equal to @record6 then 1 else -1 Or In other words: If 0 is greater-than or equal to 20071217:224240 then 1 else -1 -Original Message- From: john reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 3:57 PM To: list Subject: [U2] Universe 10.1 Itype possible parsing problem In the following query, a file is listed with two identical itypes, save for field 2 spacing, as shown below. Fields 3 and 6 are all equal in the query shown. The difference is that there is no space between the and = . This appears to yield wrong results, the bad one being shown as field 2 (all minus ones) in the query. Anyone seen this? john field 3 field 6 1-1 20071217:224240 20071217:224240 1-1 20071218:165115 20071218:165115 1-1 20071217:211056 20071217:211056 1-1 20071218:105346 20071218:105346 -- IF @RECORD3 = @RECORD6 THEN 1 ELSE -1 IF @RECORD3= @RECORD6 THEN 1 ELSE -1 john --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- Geoffrey Mitchell Programmer/Analyst Home Decorator's Collection 314-684-1062 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- john --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates
I had a similar thought, I don't want the XLr8 Editor writing directly to the primary source repository. Will it respect the Unix permissions on an item in that Dir? Thanks. Have a great day, -Baker Hughes x3598 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horn, John Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 9:48 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates Are there any plans to make XLr8 and PRC play nicely together? - John M. Horn HealthLink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of daverch Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:56 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates U2logic announces that our Free eclipse based plugin for Universe and Unidata has been updated. Instructions for downloading this tool is available at www.u2logic.com. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates
Hi Baker, The short answer is yes. All we do is a write in either UniVerse or UniData, so if the file in question does not have write permission the item will not write. Regards Kendrew On Jan 10, 2008 9:37 AM, Baker Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a similar thought, I don't want the XLr8 Editor writing directly to the primary source repository. Will it respect the Unix permissions on an item in that Dir? Thanks. Have a great day, -Baker Hughes x3598 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Horn, John Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 9:48 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates Are there any plans to make XLr8 and PRC play nicely together? - John M. Horn HealthLink -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of daverch Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:56 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates U2logic announces that our Free eclipse based plugin for Universe and Unidata has been updated. Instructions for downloading this tool is available at www.u2logic.com. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UD] IP address in LISTUSERS command
We're allowing external users to access our UD server. When I run a LISTUSERS command I get 46 Demo (0)- LU UDTNO USRNBR UID USRNAME USRTYPE TTYIP-ADDRESSTIME DATE 1 3448 197626 support1 phantom pts/1 Console 23:16:33 Dec 15 2007 2 1808 197712 username1 udt pts/2 xx.xx.xx.xx 08:03:41 Jan 10 2008 3 3116 197802 username2 udt pts/3 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:30:28 Jan 10 2008 4496 197678 username3 udt pts/4 xx.xx.xx.xx 07:07:09 Jan 10 2008 5 1136 197739 username4 udt pts/5 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:23:25 Jan 10 2008 6236 197779 username5 udt pts/6 xx.xx.xx.xx 12:37:04 Jan 10 2008 7 1840 197631 support2 udt pts/7 192.168.1.52 14:00:56 Jan 10 2008 8 2232 197629 support3 udt pts/8 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:57:05 Jan 10 2008 17 2492 197625 uobjects udt pts/17 udcs 14:01:36 Jan 10 2008 46 2852 197626 admin1udt pts/46 192.168.1.101 13:16:01 Jan 10 2008 47384 197775 username6 udt pts/47 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:19:42 Jan 10 2008 where xx.xx.xx.xx are different IP addresses. Why are some of the reported IP addresses internal Class C network addresses? The support2 (port 7) and support3 (port 8) users are connecting from the an internal network within the same office behind a cable modem. I'm connecting as admin1 (port 46) from my local office through a network behind my cable modem. 192.168.1.101 is my internal network IP address. I'm confused. Can anyone explain? Thanks, Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] IP address in LISTUSERS command
Bill, Haven't you already asked this question before?? ;-) http://www.nabble.com/UD-IP-Address-tc10993435.html Although, seems your issue wasn't fully responded to... My best guess...you've got U2 device licensing and your local IP address is being returned to the UD server by your device licensing-aware emulator on your desktop PC. Hence, it is probably overriding your actual IP address assigned by the router/firewall on your UD servers' LAN. Regards, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:12 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UD] IP address in LISTUSERS command We're allowing external users to access our UD server. When I run a LISTUSERS command I get 46 Demo (0)- LU UDTNO USRNBR UID USRNAME USRTYPE TTYIP-ADDRESSTIME DATE 1 3448 197626 support1 phantom pts/1 Console 23:16:33 Dec 15 2007 2 1808 197712 username1 udt pts/2 xx.xx.xx.xx 08:03:41 Jan 10 2008 3 3116 197802 username2 udt pts/3 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:30:28 Jan 10 2008 4496 197678 username3 udt pts/4 xx.xx.xx.xx 07:07:09 Jan 10 2008 5 1136 197739 username4 udt pts/5 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:23:25 Jan 10 2008 6236 197779 username5 udt pts/6 xx.xx.xx.xx 12:37:04 Jan 10 2008 7 1840 197631 support2 udt pts/7 192.168.1.52 14:00:56 Jan 10 2008 8 2232 197629 support3 udt pts/8 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:57:05 Jan 10 2008 17 2492 197625 uobjects udt pts/17 udcs 14:01:36 Jan 10 2008 46 2852 197626 admin1udt pts/46 192.168.1.101 13:16:01 Jan 10 2008 47384 197775 username6 udt pts/47 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:19:42 Jan 10 2008 where xx.xx.xx.xx are different IP addresses. Why are some of the reported IP addresses internal Class C network addresses? The support2 (port 7) and support3 (port 8) users are connecting from the an internal network within the same office behind a cable modem. I'm connecting as admin1 (port 46) from my local office through a network behind my cable modem. 192.168.1.101 is my internal network IP address. I'm confused. Can anyone explain? Thanks, Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates
Does XLR8 use UniObjects for Java as the interface? So whatever UOJ allows...in conjunction with the users' permissions/groups are...for the server - directories, files, etc., etc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kendrew Peacey Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 6:31 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [Ad] XLr8 Editor and Web Developer Updates Hi Baker, The short answer is yes. All we do is a write in either UniVerse or UniData, so if the file in question does not have write permission the item will not write. Regards Kendrew On Jan 10, 2008 9:37 AM, Baker Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a similar thought, I don't want the XLr8 Editor writing directly to the primary source repository. Will it respect the Unix permissions on an item in that Dir? Thanks. Have a great day, -Baker Hughes x3598 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] IP address in LISTUSERS command
David: Yes I have. I haven't received any ideas. However... It is device licensing on the client. Our UD server doesn't have device licensing. All the external clients use AccuTerm 2K2 IE Edition, configured with no device licensing. However, I use AccuTerm 2K2 with device licensing checked in the configuration. When I uncheck this, my external IP address is shown. Thanks for the idea. :-) Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hona, David S Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 6:56 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] IP address in LISTUSERS command Bill, Haven't you already asked this question before?? ;-) http://www.nabble.com/UD-IP-Address-tc10993435.html Although, seems your issue wasn't fully responded to... My best guess...you've got U2 device licensing and your local IP address is being returned to the UD server by your device licensing-aware emulator on your desktop PC. Hence, it is probably overriding your actual IP address assigned by the router/firewall on your UD servers' LAN. Regards, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:12 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UD] IP address in LISTUSERS command We're allowing external users to access our UD server. When I run a LISTUSERS command I get 46 Demo (0)- LU UDTNO USRNBR UID USRNAME USRTYPE TTYIP-ADDRESSTIME DATE 1 3448 197626 support1 phantom pts/1 Console 23:16:33 Dec 15 2007 2 1808 197712 username1 udt pts/2 xx.xx.xx.xx 08:03:41 Jan 10 2008 3 3116 197802 username2 udt pts/3 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:30:28 Jan 10 2008 4496 197678 username3 udt pts/4 xx.xx.xx.xx 07:07:09 Jan 10 2008 5 1136 197739 username4 udt pts/5 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:23:25 Jan 10 2008 6236 197779 username5 udt pts/6 xx.xx.xx.xx 12:37:04 Jan 10 2008 7 1840 197631 support2 udt pts/7 192.168.1.52 14:00:56 Jan 10 2008 8 2232 197629 support3 udt pts/8 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:57:05 Jan 10 2008 17 2492 197625 uobjects udt pts/17 udcs 14:01:36 Jan 10 2008 46 2852 197626 admin1udt pts/46 192.168.1.101 13:16:01 Jan 10 2008 47384 197775 username6 udt pts/47 xx.xx.xx.xx 13:19:42 Jan 10 2008 where xx.xx.xx.xx are different IP addresses. Why are some of the reported IP addresses internal Class C network addresses? The support2 (port 7) and support3 (port 8) users are connecting from the an internal network within the same office behind a cable modem. I'm connecting as admin1 (port 46) from my local office through a network behind my cable modem. 192.168.1.101 is my internal network IP address. I'm confused. Can anyone explain? Thanks, Bill --- --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
