Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

2010-05-18 Thread John Hester
Yes, I see your point.  I wonder if the integer gets treated like a
string in the first instance.  I wonder what the result with FILEVARS1
would be.

-John

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Anthony W.
Youngman
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:45 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

In message 
e6179e13392ec14aabcd5272c3aedd61124ec...@exchangesvr.momtex.com, John 
Hester jhes...@momtex.com writes
I think it's something along those lines, but I don't think it's trying
to stick the entire contents of the file into a variable.  What I think
OPENSEQ is doing is keeping track of the position where the EOF mark is
so it will know when the end of the file is reached.  For a file
greater
than 2GB in size, this position is an integer that takes more than 32
bits to store.  UV, being a 32-bit application, is not going to be able
to handle it.  The maximum positive integer value a 32-bit application
can reference is 2147483647.

The problem is, FV.FILE and FILEVARS(1) are *allegedly* *functionally* 
*identical*. An element of a dimensioned array, is supposed to be a 
normal variable in every way shape or form.

The problem is that, in this instance, it clearly isn't because the 
variable works while the element (allegedly identical) causes a crash.

I'd agree with Perry. It's a bug.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

2010-05-18 Thread John Hester
Reading my own response just made me realize what's going on.  I think
Jerry's response was right.  I remember many years ago (I won't say how
many) when we were on much slower hardware, explaining to a coworker
that it was better to use dimensioned arrays when possible because they
were faster to populate than dynamic arrays.  The reason they're faster
is because the necessary space for them is already reserved in memory.
A dynamic array has to go out and find add'l memory each time you add to
it.  Looks like putting a sequential file in a dimensioned array makes
it go out and reserve a block of memory the size of the entire file.  If
that's the case then making FILEVARS a dynamic array *should* work.

-John

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:42 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

Yes, I see your point.  I wonder if the integer gets treated like a
string in the first instance.  I wonder what the result with FILEVARS1
would be.

-John

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Anthony W.
Youngman
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:45 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

In message 
e6179e13392ec14aabcd5272c3aedd61124ec...@exchangesvr.momtex.com, John 
Hester jhes...@momtex.com writes
I think it's something along those lines, but I don't think it's trying
to stick the entire contents of the file into a variable.  What I think
OPENSEQ is doing is keeping track of the position where the EOF mark is
so it will know when the end of the file is reached.  For a file
greater
than 2GB in size, this position is an integer that takes more than 32
bits to store.  UV, being a 32-bit application, is not going to be able
to handle it.  The maximum positive integer value a 32-bit application
can reference is 2147483647.

The problem is, FV.FILE and FILEVARS(1) are *allegedly* *functionally* 
*identical*. An element of a dimensioned array, is supposed to be a 
normal variable in every way shape or form.

The problem is that, in this instance, it clearly isn't because the 
variable works while the element (allegedly identical) causes a crash.

I'd agree with Perry. It's a bug.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

2010-05-18 Thread Symeon Breen
Surely it is just a pointer to the file and the position in that file - i
open many multi gigabyte files using openseq and i would not expect the udt
process to allocate tens of Gig at that time for the readseq operations ...
It should be a tiny piece of memory to act as a pointer !! ??

 

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: 18 May 2010 20:31
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

Reading my own response just made me realize what's going on.  I think
Jerry's response was right.  I remember many years ago (I won't say how
many) when we were on much slower hardware, explaining to a coworker
that it was better to use dimensioned arrays when possible because they
were faster to populate than dynamic arrays.  The reason they're faster
is because the necessary space for them is already reserved in memory.
A dynamic array has to go out and find add'l memory each time you add to
it.  Looks like putting a sequential file in a dimensioned array makes
it go out and reserve a block of memory the size of the entire file.  If
that's the case then making FILEVARS a dynamic array *should* work.

-John

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:42 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

Yes, I see your point.  I wonder if the integer gets treated like a
string in the first instance.  I wonder what the result with FILEVARS1
would be.

-John

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Anthony W.
Youngman
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:45 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

In message 
e6179e13392ec14aabcd5272c3aedd61124ec...@exchangesvr.momtex.com, John 
Hester jhes...@momtex.com writes
I think it's something along those lines, but I don't think it's trying
to stick the entire contents of the file into a variable.  What I think
OPENSEQ is doing is keeping track of the position where the EOF mark is
so it will know when the end of the file is reached.  For a file
greater
than 2GB in size, this position is an integer that takes more than 32
bits to store.  UV, being a 32-bit application, is not going to be able
to handle it.  The maximum positive integer value a 32-bit application
can reference is 2147483647.

The problem is, FV.FILE and FILEVARS(1) are *allegedly* *functionally* 
*identical*. An element of a dimensioned array, is supposed to be a 
normal variable in every way shape or form.

The problem is that, in this instance, it clearly isn't because the 
variable works while the element (allegedly identical) causes a crash.

I'd agree with Perry. It's a bug.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


[U2] transparent or ghost areas on Web Services Developer

2010-05-18 Thread Clarke, Patrick

I encountered problems with the U2 Web services Developer (1.1.0) not 
displaying all the tabs for the various windows in the editor. There are 
transparent areas where the borders or tabs should be. Any suggestions?






Thanks.

Patrick


___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

2010-05-18 Thread John Hester
Only the UV or UD developers could say for sure, but I'd venture to
guess that multi-gigabyte sequential files weren't envisioned when the
dimensioned array code was written.  Maybe there's never been a request
to revisit it.  I quit using dimensioned arrays probably around the late
90's when faster hardware seemed to negate any performance advantage.

-John

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:59 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

Surely it is just a pointer to the file and the position in that file -
i
open many multi gigabyte files using openseq and i would not expect the
udt
process to allocate tens of Gig at that time for the readseq operations
...
It should be a tiny piece of memory to act as a pointer !! ??

 

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: 18 May 2010 20:31
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

Reading my own response just made me realize what's going on.  I think
Jerry's response was right.  I remember many years ago (I won't say how
many) when we were on much slower hardware, explaining to a coworker
that it was better to use dimensioned arrays when possible because they
were faster to populate than dynamic arrays.  The reason they're faster
is because the necessary space for them is already reserved in memory.
A dynamic array has to go out and find add'l memory each time you add to
it.  Looks like putting a sequential file in a dimensioned array makes
it go out and reserve a block of memory the size of the entire file.  If
that's the case then making FILEVARS a dynamic array *should* work.

-John
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


[U2] Code 128 Soft Font

2010-05-18 Thread Caminiti, Marc
Quick, maybe not necessarily U2 related, question.  We are looking to
generate Code 128 Barcodes from an HP LaserJet printer.  Testing on a
4050, but the production printer (yet to be purchased) will be an HP
LaserJet 9050.

 

I'm leaning toward using a soft font, but was wondering if anyone out
there had any luck with a particular font and see what is being used out
there.

 

Thanks in advance

marc

 

Marc Caminiti

IS Manager

Nashbar Direct, Inc

6103 State Route 446

Canfield, OH 44406

330.533.1989, ext 336

330.702.9733, fax

 

All generalisations are dangerous, even this one.

 



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain 
confidential information that is legally privileged. The information is solely 
for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or other use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail 
and delete this message.

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

2010-05-18 Thread Brian Leach
 Looks like putting a sequential file in a dimensioned array makes
it go out and reserve a block of memory the size of the entire file. 

Doubtful..

I'm guessing under the hood the array will resolve to a series of pointers
somewhere down the track, but those pointers will need to be cast to
different types depending on what is being stored in the array - a variable,
a file pointer, a sequential file pointer etc. So something in that cast
will be wrong - it might for example be that whatever structure controls a
sequential file originally contained a 32 bit address and now doesn't but
the cast is still expecting that, or that it gets copied with an alignment
change or something similar. 

In other words, typical C bug from a pretty unlikely occurrence.

Brian

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] transparent or ghost areas on Web Services Developer

2010-05-18 Thread Doug
I'm assuming you mean the tabs have disappeared.  You can go to WindowShow
View and add the tabs back you are missing.

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Clarke, Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 2:20 PM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] transparent or ghost areas on Web Services Developer


I encountered problems with the U2 Web services Developer (1.1.0) not
displaying all the tabs for the various windows in the editor. There are
transparent areas where the borders or tabs should be. Any suggestions?






Thanks.

Patrick


___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font

2010-05-18 Thread Jeff Powell

Marc,

Tom Pellitieri  who is active on this list has a routine that will print 
a barcode from Basic to a HP printer.


Would that be helpful?

Jeff


On 05/18/2010 03:45 PM, Caminiti, Marc wrote:

Quick, maybe not necessarily U2 related, question.  We are looking to
generate Code 128 Barcodes from an HP LaserJet printer.  Testing on a
4050, but the production printer (yet to be purchased) will be an HP
LaserJet 9050.



I'm leaning toward using a soft font, but was wondering if anyone out
there had any luck with a particular font and see what is being used out
there.



Thanks in advance

marc



Marc Caminiti

IS Manager

Nashbar Direct, Inc

6103 State Route 446

Canfield, OH 44406

330.533.1989, ext 336

330.702.9733, fax



All generalisations are dangerous, even this one.





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain 
confidential information that is legally privileged. The information is solely 
for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or other use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail 
and delete this message.

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


   

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font

2010-05-18 Thread Brutzman, Bill

We bought the bar code modules (hardware cards) from HP.  While these
were not free, they have worked out rather well.

--Bill 

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Caminiti,
Marc
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:46 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font

Quick, maybe not necessarily U2 related, question.  We are looking to
generate Code 128 Barcodes from an HP LaserJet printer.  Testing on a
4050, but the production printer (yet to be purchased) will be an HP
LaserJet 9050.

 

I'm leaning toward using a soft font, but was wondering if anyone out
there had any luck with a particular font and see what is being used out
there.

 

Thanks in advance

marc

 

Marc Caminiti

IS Manager

Nashbar Direct, Inc

6103 State Route 446

Canfield, OH 44406

330.533.1989, ext 336

330.702.9733, fax

 

All generalisations are dangerous, even this one.

 



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential information that is legally privileged. The information is
solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or other use of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by return e-mail and delete this message.

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font

2010-05-18 Thread Glen Batchelor

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.pick/browse_thread/thread/2529
1158ebe10314/9036f6c8e439fb7f?lnk=gstq=code+128#9036f6c8e439fb7f


  Or do a search on google groups for code 128 in comp.databases.pick ;
David Church posted a code128 PCL generator back in '97. I've not used it,
but I may be taking it for a spin in a few weeks to trial some new bar
coding processes. Let me know if this works well for you.


Glen Batchelor
IT Director
All-Spec Industries
 phone: (910) 332-0424
   fax: (910) 763-5664
E-mail: webmas...@all-spec.com
   Web: http://www.all-spec.com
  Blog: http://blog.all-spec.com


 -Original Message-
 From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
 boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Caminiti, Marc
 Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:46 PM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font
 
 Quick, maybe not necessarily U2 related, question.  We are looking to
 generate Code 128 Barcodes from an HP LaserJet printer.  Testing on a
 4050, but the production printer (yet to be purchased) will be an HP
 LaserJet 9050.
 
 
 
 I'm leaning toward using a soft font, but was wondering if anyone out
 there had any luck with a particular font and see what is being used out
 there.
 
 
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 marc
 
 
 
 Marc Caminiti
 
 IS Manager
 
 Nashbar Direct, Inc
 
 6103 State Route 446
 
 Canfield, OH 44406
 
 330.533.1989, ext 336
 
 330.702.9733, fax
 
 
 
 All generalisations are dangerous, even this one.
 
 
 
 
 
 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
 confidential information that is legally privileged. The information is
 solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any disclosure, copying,
 distribution, or other use of this information is strictly prohibited. If
 you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by return
 e-mail and delete this message.
 
 ___
 U2-Users mailing list
 U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font

2010-05-18 Thread Ken Hall
Check out Print Wizard from Rasmussen Software. It will give you a 
XML like markup language to use to specify forms printing and bar 
codes.  http://www.anzio.com/


Ken

At 01:45 PM 5/18/2010, you wrote:

Quick, maybe not necessarily U2 related, question.  We are looking to
generate Code 128 Barcodes from an HP LaserJet printer.  Testing on a
4050, but the production printer (yet to be purchased) will be an HP
LaserJet 9050.



I'm leaning toward using a soft font, but was wondering if anyone out
there had any luck with a particular font and see what is being used out
there.



Thanks in advance

marc



Marc Caminiti

IS Manager

Nashbar Direct, Inc

6103 State Route 446

Canfield, OH 44406

330.533.1989, ext 336

330.702.9733, fax



All generalisations are dangerous, even this one.





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain 
confidential information that is legally privileged. The information 
is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any disclosure, 
copying, distribution, or other use of this information is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify 
the sender by return e-mail and delete this message.


___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font

2010-05-18 Thread Glen Batchelor


  I couldn't resist the urge to try it. Works fine from what I've tried so
far, but I did tweak it to return the PCL code back to the calling program
instead of just printing it. I had to issue a PCL reset before the bar code
content to get our Kyocera copier to switch to PCL mode and render it. All
PCL3 and up capable printers should handle the output.
 

Glen Batchelor
IT Director
All-Spec Industries
 phone: (910) 332-0424
   fax: (910) 763-5664
E-mail: webmas...@all-spec.com
   Web: http://www.all-spec.com
  Blog: http://blog.all-spec.com


 -Original Message-
 From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
 boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Glen Batchelor
 Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 6:28 PM
 To: 'U2 Users List'
 Subject: Re: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font
 
 
 http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.pick/browse_thread/thread/25
 29
 1158ebe10314/9036f6c8e439fb7f?lnk=gstq=code+128#9036f6c8e439fb7f
 
 
   Or do a search on google groups for code 128 in comp.databases.pick ;
 David Church posted a code128 PCL generator back in '97. I've not used it,
 but I may be taking it for a spin in a few weeks to trial some new bar
 coding processes. Let me know if this works well for you.
 
 
 Glen Batchelor
 IT Director
 All-Spec Industries
  phone: (910) 332-0424
fax: (910) 763-5664
 E-mail: webmas...@all-spec.com
Web: http://www.all-spec.com
   Blog: http://blog.all-spec.com
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
  boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Caminiti, Marc
  Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:46 PM
  To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
  Subject: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font
 
  Quick, maybe not necessarily U2 related, question.  We are looking to
  generate Code 128 Barcodes from an HP LaserJet printer.  Testing on a
  4050, but the production printer (yet to be purchased) will be an HP
  LaserJet 9050.
 
 
 
  I'm leaning toward using a soft font, but was wondering if anyone out
  there had any luck with a particular font and see what is being used out
  there.
 
 
 
  Thanks in advance
 
  marc
 
 
 
  Marc Caminiti
 
  IS Manager
 
  Nashbar Direct, Inc
 
  6103 State Route 446
 
  Canfield, OH 44406
 
  330.533.1989, ext 336
 
  330.702.9733, fax
 
 
 
  All generalisations are dangerous, even this one.
 
 
 
 
 
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
  confidential information that is legally privileged. The information is
  solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any disclosure,
 copying,
  distribution, or other use of this information is strictly prohibited.
 If
  you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
 return
  e-mail and delete this message.
 
  ___
  U2-Users mailing list
  U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
  http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
 
 ___
 U2-Users mailing list
 U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

2010-05-18 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message 
e6179e13392ec14aabcd5272c3aedd61124ed...@exchangesvr.momtex.com, John 
Hester jhes...@momtex.com writes

Yes, I see your point.  I wonder if the integer gets treated like a
string in the first instance.  I wonder what the result with FILEVARS1
would be.


Illegal assignment.

You can't store a file descriptor in a dynamic array, because it's not a 
character string (it MIGHT be implemented as such, but it doesn't make 
sense to treat it as such, so it's a logical stupidity. I don't know of 
any MV implementation that permits this).


Cheers,
Wol


-John

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Anthony W.
Youngman
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:45 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] OPENSEQ and Abnormal termination of UV

In message
e6179e13392ec14aabcd5272c3aedd61124ec...@exchangesvr.momtex.com, John
Hester jhes...@momtex.com writes

I think it's something along those lines, but I don't think it's trying
to stick the entire contents of the file into a variable.  What I think
OPENSEQ is doing is keeping track of the position where the EOF mark is
so it will know when the end of the file is reached.  For a file

greater

than 2GB in size, this position is an integer that takes more than 32
bits to store.  UV, being a 32-bit application, is not going to be able
to handle it.  The maximum positive integer value a 32-bit application
can reference is 2147483647.


The problem is, FV.FILE and FILEVARS(1) are *allegedly* *functionally*
*identical*. An element of a dimensioned array, is supposed to be a
normal variable in every way shape or form.

The problem is that, in this instance, it clearly isn't because the
variable works while the element (allegedly identical) causes a crash.

I'd agree with Perry. It's a bug.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


--
Anthony W. Youngman pi...@thewolery.demon.co.uk
'Yings, yow graley yin! Suz ae rikt dheu,' said the blue man, taking the
thimble. 'What *is* he?' said Magrat. 'They're gnomes,' said Nanny. The man
lowered the thimble. 'Pictsies!' Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett 1998
Visit the MaVerick web-site - http://www.maverick-dbms.org Open Source Pick
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font

2010-05-18 Thread Tony Gravagno
Quick search on the archive shows results from an identical
thread from just 3 months ago.  Here was my response, the
recommendation remains the same.

http://listserver.u2ug.org/pipermail/u2-users/2010-February/00279
2.html

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font

2010-05-18 Thread Charlie Noah

Marc,

If you are using a small Laserjet or a 9050, why spend extra money on 
hardware or software products which might tie you to a specific setup, 
when you can use a Basic subroutine to print your Code 128 barcode (or 
many other codes) anywhere on the page you want it? I've done the grunt 
work and written the program, which uses standard commands built into 
the printer. We use this program in production every day - it works. 
This assumes you are printing to a piece of printable stock you can feed 
through your printer. I will get the latest version of the program 
tomorrow and post it. Don't worry - I wrote it, I own it and I can share 
it with anyone I want.


Sorry, Tony, I have the greatest respect you you, but printing barcode 
is just too easy to pay a lot for it. Now, if you want to print labels, 
just buy a cheap barcode label printer like the ones UPS customers use 
(Zebra, Datamax, etc.), and send the very simple codes to it. Used or 
reconditioned ones are very inexpensive, and new ones aren't 
prohibitively expensive.


Charlie Noah
Sr. Systems Analyst
Inland Truck Parts Company

On 05-18-2010 3:45 PM, Caminiti, Marc wrote:

Quick, maybe not necessarily U2 related, question.  We are looking to
generate Code 128 Barcodes from an HP LaserJet printer.  Testing on a
4050, but the production printer (yet to be purchased) will be an HP
LaserJet 9050.

 


I'm leaning toward using a soft font, but was wondering if anyone out
there had any luck with a particular font and see what is being used out
there.

 


Thanks in advance

marc

 


Marc Caminiti

IS Manager

Nashbar Direct, Inc

6103 State Route 446

Canfield, OH 44406

330.533.1989, ext 336

330.702.9733, fax

 


All generalisations are dangerous, even this one.

 




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain 
confidential information that is legally privileged. The information is solely 
for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or other use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail 
and delete this message.

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

  

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font

2010-05-18 Thread Tony Gravagno
 From: Charlie Noah
 Sorry, Tony, I have the greatest respect you you, but 
 printing barcode is just too easy to pay a lot for it.

Not a problem, Charlie, and thanks.  You're right that for any
one job it often doesn't make sense to purchase a tool.  When I
make posts like this, my long-term/consistent message which is
almost always lost in individual threads is that the tools I
promote can be used for Many purposes.  It's not just about code
128, it's about a dozen barcode formats that can be changed in a
single line of code.  It's not about barcodes, it's images,
fonts, boxes, and everything else in code that a 14 year old can
read.  It's not just about printing, it's about email, fax, and
report distribution.

Regards,
T

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Code 128 Soft Font

2010-05-18 Thread Bob Rasmussen
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Charlie Noah wrote:

 ... 
 Sorry, Tony, I have the greatest respect you you, but printing barcode is just
 too easy to pay a lot for it. 

Who said anything about paying a lot? You can get started in Print 
Wizard for $99 or $300, depending on configuration. How much is your time 
worth?

(And not all printers have barcode capabilities built in.)

(And thanks again, Tony.)

Regards,
Bob Rasmussen,   President,   Rasmussen Software, Inc.

personal e-mail: r...@anzio.com
 company e-mail: r...@anzio.com
  voice: (US) 503-624-0360 (9:00-6:00 Pacific Time)
fax: (US) 503-624-0760
web: http://www.anzio.com
 street address: Rasmussen Software, Inc.
 10240 SW Nimbus, Suite L9
 Portland, OR  97223  USA
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users