[U2] I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade
Hi we upgraded from UD 5.2/Solaris to UD 7.2/RH about a month ago and so it looked fine so far. Now I had a call that there are purchase orders missing on a Cognos report. When I investigated I noticed that from the day of the upgrade I have rows in the table used for that report with missing dates. The report is based on a SQL Server 2000 table that gets updated every night with Purchasing information from UD using DTS. We want to track supplier performance so I take a snapshot of the outstanding Purchase order deliveries every night and add them to this table. Each row also contains the date the snapshot was done. Some order line have multiple deliveries so I created a I-type dictionary item using REUSE(@DATE). This is mapped in the schema and was working just fine under 5.2 but now there is only a date for the first multivalue. I created a new subtable using the 7.2 VSG and the result is the same. The dictionary works just fine from ECL but in SQL only the first row has a date and all others are null. Any idea why this doesn't work anymore under UD 7.2? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade
Could it be that the dates are coming through in the wrong format? e.g. if you need to change the DEFAULTS definition in your ENGLISH.MSG file? Just a thought Brian -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Mecki Foerthmann Sent: 05 March 2013 12:42 To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade Hi we upgraded from UD 5.2/Solaris to UD 7.2/RH about a month ago and so it looked fine so far. Now I had a call that there are purchase orders missing on a Cognos report. When I investigated I noticed that from the day of the upgrade I have rows in the table used for that report with missing dates. The report is based on a SQL Server 2000 table that gets updated every night with Purchasing information from UD using DTS. We want to track supplier performance so I take a snapshot of the outstanding Purchase order deliveries every night and add them to this table. Each row also contains the date the snapshot was done. Some order line have multiple deliveries so I created a I-type dictionary item using REUSE(@DATE). This is mapped in the schema and was working just fine under 5.2 but now there is only a date for the first multivalue. I created a new subtable using the 7.2 VSG and the result is the same. The dictionary works just fine from ECL but in SQL only the first row has a date and all others are null. Any idea why this doesn't work anymore under UD 7.2? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade
Sorry, that can't be the case. Should have read more carefully :( -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Brian Leach Sent: 05 March 2013 13:12 To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade Could it be that the dates are coming through in the wrong format? e.g. if you need to change the DEFAULTS definition in your ENGLISH.MSG file? Just a thought Brian -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Mecki Foerthmann Sent: 05 March 2013 12:42 To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade Hi we upgraded from UD 5.2/Solaris to UD 7.2/RH about a month ago and so it looked fine so far. Now I had a call that there are purchase orders missing on a Cognos report. When I investigated I noticed that from the day of the upgrade I have rows in the table used for that report with missing dates. The report is based on a SQL Server 2000 table that gets updated every night with Purchasing information from UD using DTS. We want to track supplier performance so I take a snapshot of the outstanding Purchase order deliveries every night and add them to this table. Each row also contains the date the snapshot was done. Some order line have multiple deliveries so I created a I-type dictionary item using REUSE(@DATE). This is mapped in the schema and was working just fine under 5.2 but now there is only a date for the first multivalue. I created a new subtable using the 7.2 VSG and the result is the same. The dictionary works just fine from ECL but in SQL only the first row has a date and all others are null. Any idea why this doesn't work anymore under UD 7.2? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] FW: Clearing Input Buffer
Like David Green, I would have suggested CLEARINPUT. I'm missing something: why all these other schemes people are talking about? On 2/22/2013 1:20 PM, Al DeWitt wrote: I have an input screen (built with System Builder) where data can either be entered manually or via a barcode scanner. The screen has 3 text boxes for input. The barcode option fills two of the text boxes and is supposed to land on the third box to await input. However, the scanner must be adding an extra return or something because when I scan it the third field's Process After executes. What can I do to flush the input buffer at the end of my validation routine on my second field...or is it better to do this on the Process Before on my third field. It's more of a nuisance but it would look more professional if I could make it clean. Thanks. Albert DeWitt, CPIM ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade
Have your compiled your i-descriptor? Is it marked as MV? David A. Green (480) 813-1725 DAG Consulting -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Mecki Foerthmann Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 5:42 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade Hi we upgraded from UD 5.2/Solaris to UD 7.2/RH about a month ago and so it looked fine so far. Now I had a call that there are purchase orders missing on a Cognos report. When I investigated I noticed that from the day of the upgrade I have rows in the table used for that report with missing dates. The report is based on a SQL Server 2000 table that gets updated every night with Purchasing information from UD using DTS. We want to track supplier performance so I take a snapshot of the outstanding Purchase order deliveries every night and add them to this table. Each row also contains the date the snapshot was done. Some order line have multiple deliveries so I created a I-type dictionary item using REUSE(@DATE). This is mapped in the schema and was working just fine under 5.2 but now there is only a date for the first multivalue. I created a new subtable using the 7.2 VSG and the result is the same. The dictionary works just fine from ECL but in SQL only the first row has a date and all others are null. Any idea why this doesn't work anymore under UD 7.2? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade
I don't know about compiling I-descriptors in UD. Never done it and never needed to. The dict is marked as MV and has an association as well. It works just fine from ECL so when I type LIST PODET WITH PO_NBR = 98587 SCHED_DEL_DATE U_RPT_DATE I get 2 dates in both columns as expected. But when I go to sql and try SELECT SCHED_DEL_DATE,U_RPT_DATE from PODET_SCHED_DETAIL1 where PO_NBR = '98587' I get 2 scheduled dates but only one report date (current date) in the first row while in the second row it is null. I found a work-around by using an Active-X control in my DTS package, but I shouldn't have to do that. I also noticed that I-descriptors calling a Basic subroutine don't work any more through ODBC or OLE-DB even though they work in UniSQL. Maybe in 7.2 I have to convert them into V-types? I prefer I-types since I just don't seem to be able to get to grips with the V-type syntax. On 05/03/2013 13:52, David A. Green wrote: Have your compiled your i-descriptor? Is it marked as MV? David A. Green (480) 813-1725 DAG Consulting -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Mecki Foerthmann Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 5:42 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade Hi we upgraded from UD 5.2/Solaris to UD 7.2/RH about a month ago and so it looked fine so far. Now I had a call that there are purchase orders missing on a Cognos report. When I investigated I noticed that from the day of the upgrade I have rows in the table used for that report with missing dates. The report is based on a SQL Server 2000 table that gets updated every night with Purchasing information from UD using DTS. We want to track supplier performance so I take a snapshot of the outstanding Purchase order deliveries every night and add them to this table. Each row also contains the date the snapshot was done. Some order line have multiple deliveries so I created a I-type dictionary item using REUSE(@DATE). This is mapped in the schema and was working just fine under 5.2 but now there is only a date for the first multivalue. I created a new subtable using the 7.2 VSG and the result is the same. The dictionary works just fine from ECL but in SQL only the first row has a date and all others are null. Any idea why this doesn't work anymore under UD 7.2? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade
Mecki: You need to when using the other stuff with UniData (non-telnet connectivity). ECL doesn't always represent what happens through a UO connection. :COMPILE.DICT MYFILE ...should do the trick. HTH, Bill Untitled Page - Original Message - *From:* mec...@gmx.net *To:* u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org *Date:* 3/5/2013 9:10 AM *Subject:* Re: [U2] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade I don't know about compiling I-descriptors in UD. Never done it and never needed to. The dict is marked as MV and has an association as well. It works just fine from ECL so when I type LIST PODET WITH PO_NBR = 98587 SCHED_DEL_DATE U_RPT_DATE I get 2 dates in both columns as expected. But when I go to sql and try SELECT SCHED_DEL_DATE,U_RPT_DATE from PODET_SCHED_DETAIL1 where PO_NBR = '98587' I get 2 scheduled dates but only one report date (current date) in the first row while in the second row it is null. I found a work-around by using an Active-X control in my DTS package, but I shouldn't have to do that. I also noticed that I-descriptors calling a Basic subroutine don't work any more through ODBC or OLE-DB even though they work in UniSQL. Maybe in 7.2 I have to convert them into V-types? I prefer I-types since I just don't seem to be able to get to grips with the V-type syntax. On 05/03/2013 13:52, David A. Green wrote: Have your compiled your i-descriptor? Is it marked as MV? David A. Green (480) 813-1725 DAG Consulting -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Mecki Foerthmann Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 5:42 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] I Descriptor no longer working in UniSQL after UD upgrade Hi we upgraded from UD 5.2/Solaris to UD 7.2/RH about a month ago and so it looked fine so far. Now I had a call that there are purchase orders missing on a Cognos report. When I investigated I noticed that from the day of the upgrade I have rows in the table used for that report with missing dates. The report is based on a SQL Server 2000 table that gets updated every night with Purchasing information from UD using DTS. We want to track supplier performance so I take a snapshot of the outstanding Purchase order deliveries every night and add them to this table. Each row also contains the date the snapshot was done. Some order line have multiple deliveries so I created a I-type dictionary item using REUSE(@DATE). This is mapped in the schema and was working just fine under 5.2 but now there is only a date for the first multivalue. I created a new subtable using the 7.2 VSG and the result is the same. The dictionary works just fine from ECL but in SQL only the first row has a date and all others are null. Any idea why this doesn't work anymore under UD 7.2? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
[U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT
So is anyone using Unidata's RESIZE CONCURRENT in production environments? I have a dedicated maintenance window, so performing regular file resizing usually isn't a problem here but I'm considering moving over to using the CONCURRENT feature - particularly if a fire crops up in our production environment. Just curious about people's experience with it and the possible impact on performance in a production environment. -- Jeffrey Butera, PhD Associate Director for Applications and Web Services Information Technology Hampshire College 413-559-5556 http://www.hampshire.edu http://www.facebook.com/hampshirecollegeit ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT
Have you used the Concurrent index build? The downside I have seen with that is the speed. I have some files that are large and the concurrent index build is very slow. So I only use the concurrent index build when I have small files. I would guess you would see similar performance with the resize. But it is a guess on my part. It will be interesting to see if anybody has used it. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Butera Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 2:43 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT So is anyone using Unidata's RESIZE CONCURRENT in production environments? I have a dedicated maintenance window, so performing regular file resizing usually isn't a problem here but I'm considering moving over to using the CONCURRENT feature - particularly if a fire crops up in our production environment. Just curious about people's experience with it and the possible impact on performance in a production environment. -- Jeffrey Butera, PhD Associate Director for Applications and Web Services Information Technology Hampshire College 413-559-5556 http://www.hampshire.edu http://www.facebook.com/hampshirecollegeit ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright (c) 2013 Cigna == ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT
I once tried RESIZE CONCURRENT on a file that had a high amount of reads happening to it, on Universe 10.3.4 on AIX. (This was when I was a RESIZE rookie). Brought the company to its knees for most of the morning. I don't like it personally, but, that's just me. Worst part is, once you start it, you better not stop it, because it will break the file header and render the file pretty much useless. It also takes a lot longer to finish because of all the activity on the file too. Luckily for me, the file did not have a lot of writes that morning, and so I was able to restore from a previous nights backup. The system at the time did not have transaction logging or anything like that enabled. Never tried it again after that. Pretty much scarred me for life. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Baakkonen, Rodney A (Rod) 46K rodney.baakko...@cigna.com wrote: Have you used the Concurrent index build? The downside I have seen with that is the speed. I have some files that are large and the concurrent index build is very slow. So I only use the concurrent index build when I have small files. I would guess you would see similar performance with the resize. But it is a guess on my part. It will be interesting to see if anybody has used it. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Butera Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 2:43 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT So is anyone using Unidata's RESIZE CONCURRENT in production environments? I have a dedicated maintenance window, so performing regular file resizing usually isn't a problem here but I'm considering moving over to using the CONCURRENT feature - particularly if a fire crops up in our production environment. Just curious about people's experience with it and the possible impact on performance in a production environment. -- Jeffrey Butera, PhD Associate Director for Applications and Web Services Information Technology Hampshire College 413-559-5556 http://www.hampshire.edu http://www.facebook.com/hampshirecollegeit ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright (c) 2013 Cigna == ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- John Thompson ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT
I too once did this with basically the same results (except that it did tons of reads/writes so I had to let it finish) and in my case the system was darn near dead of most of the day, needless to say I too was scarred for life and would/will never do a concurrent resize during business hours on anything but a VERY small and randomly accessed file and even then I probably would not do it .. my 3 cents dougc On 3/5/2013 3:55 PM, John Thompson wrote: I once tried RESIZE CONCURRENT on a file that had a high amount of reads happening to it, on Universe 10.3.4 on AIX. (This was when I was a RESIZE rookie). Brought the company to its knees for most of the morning. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT
You may want to review the following problems that have been addressed. If you are running the Recoverable File System (RFS), you will probably want to be at UniData release 7.3.3 before using RESIZE CONCURRENT on RFS files. This list was extracted from the publically available 7.3.3 and 7.2.13 release notes: 7.3.3 - Issue UDT-8887 - Problem Description RFS -- When resizing a recoverable file with the CONCURRENT option, UniData may not have removed the filename.resize work file when the RESIZE process completed. The file was no longer visible at the operating-system level, but the disk space used by the file was not released and made available. This problem occurred because one or more of the RFS daemons did not close the filename.resize file at the operating-system level. The problem was easily encountered if the udtconfig N_SYNC parameter was set to a value greater than 0. This problem has been fixed. Issue UDT-9393 - Problem Description RFS -- Prior to this release, UniData would not remove the temporary 'rsz' file associated with the CONCURRENT RESIZE of a recoverable file until all tm processes and UniData daemons released had closed their handle to the file. The file will be now be removed within two cycles of cleanupd after the RESIZE completes. 7.3.2 and 7.2.13 --- Issue UDT-8069 - Problem Description UniData -- Prior to this release, when performing RESIZE CONCURRENT on a file in another directory on the same server (not located in the same directory as the account's VOC file), an error message similar to the following example was displayed: EDEVdefault Error when trying to rename the source file before move back to the working tmp file. Intact records can be found in /home/udtacct/TEST.resize In case source file is damaged, it can be recovered from /home/udtacct/TEST.resize. This behavior required the user to use the RESTORE option to make the file accessible again. This problem has been fixed in this release, which means that RESIZE CONCURRENT can be run against these files. The error is no longer displayed and the RESTORE option is no longer needed. Issue UDT-8521 - Problem Description UniData -- When resizing an encrypted file with the CONCURRENT option, the resize operation failed and displayed an error message similar to the following example: In BP/_TEST2 at line 8 1:Grpno error. blkbuf-group=0, U_groupno=21, error in U_blkread for file 'TRIGFILE3', key '', number=21 This problem occurred because an internal variable was overwritten, and has been resolved. UDT-8757 - Problem Description [7.3.x only - problem does not exist in 7.2.x] RFS -- Before this release, all trigger information for a recoverable file was lost after performing a RESIZE CONCURRENT. This problem has been fixed. 7.3.1 and 7.2.13 Issue UDT-4352 - Problem Description UniData -- If you issued the dbpause command while a recoverable file was being resized with the CONCURRENT option, the dbpause command appeared to hang and the following message appeared: # dbpause CheckPoint time before ForceCP: Mon Feb 13 13:22:51 2012 This problem has been fixed. 7.3.0 and 7.2.13 -- UDT-4295 - Problem Description UniData -- Before this release, if you specified an incorrect blocksize of 512 for a recoverable file when using RESIZE CONCURRENT to resize the file, the resize process stopped, but the file remained in a resize state. Now, UniData checks to make sure the blocksize specified is valid before beginning the resize process. 7.2.12 - Issue UDT-4124 - Problem Description UniData -- Before this release, if a dynamic file was being resized with the RESIZE CONCURRENT command and the file contained many parts, a message similar to the following example appeared and the resize operation failed: RESIZE CONCURRENT failed to set the FL_RESIZE_DONE bit This problem occurred because UniData tried to set the resize done bit in the file header, but the file had been temporarily closed. This problem has been resolved. Wally Terhune Technical Support Engineer Rocket Software 4600 South Ulster Street, Suite 1100 **Denver, CO 80237 **USA t: +1 720 475 8055 **e: wterh...@rocketsoftware.com **w: u2.rocketsoftware.com Rocket U2 Support: +1.800.729.3553 ** Please note that I am only available on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. ** -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Butera Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 1:43 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT So is anyone using
Re: [U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT
Thanks Wally. Shouldn't you be on a sunny beach already? Jeff Butera -- A tree falls the way it leans. Be careful which way you lean. The Lorax On Mar 5, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Wally Terhune wterh...@rocketsoftware.com wrote: You may want to review the following problems that have been addressed. If you are running the Recoverable File System (RFS), you will probably want to be at UniData release 7.3.3 before using RESIZE CONCURRENT on RFS files. This list was extracted from the publically available 7.3.3 and 7.2.13 release notes: 7.3.3 - Issue UDT-8887 - Problem Description RFS -- When resizing a recoverable file with the CONCURRENT option, UniData may not have removed the filename.resize work file when the RESIZE process completed. The file was no longer visible at the operating-system level, but the disk space used by the file was not released and made available. This problem occurred because one or more of the RFS daemons did not close the filename.resize file at the operating-system level. The problem was easily encountered if the udtconfig N_SYNC parameter was set to a value greater than 0. This problem has been fixed. Issue UDT-9393 - Problem Description RFS -- Prior to this release, UniData would not remove the temporary 'rsz' file associated with the CONCURRENT RESIZE of a recoverable file until all tm processes and UniData daemons released had closed their handle to the file. The file will be now be removed within two cycles of cleanupd after the RESIZE completes. 7.3.2 and 7.2.13 --- Issue UDT-8069 - Problem Description UniData -- Prior to this release, when performing RESIZE CONCURRENT on a file in another directory on the same server (not located in the same directory as the account's VOC file), an error message similar to the following example was displayed: EDEVdefault Error when trying to rename the source file before move back to the working tmp file. Intact records can be found in /home/udtacct/TEST.resize In case source file is damaged, it can be recovered from /home/udtacct/TEST.resize. This behavior required the user to use the RESTORE option to make the file accessible again. This problem has been fixed in this release, which means that RESIZE CONCURRENT can be run against these files. The error is no longer displayed and the RESTORE option is no longer needed. Issue UDT-8521 - Problem Description UniData -- When resizing an encrypted file with the CONCURRENT option, the resize operation failed and displayed an error message similar to the following example: In BP/_TEST2 at line 8 1:Grpno error. blkbuf-group=0, U_groupno=21, error in U_blkread for file 'TRIGFILE3', key '', number=21 This problem occurred because an internal variable was overwritten, and has been resolved. UDT-8757 - Problem Description [7.3.x only - problem does not exist in 7.2.x] RFS -- Before this release, all trigger information for a recoverable file was lost after performing a RESIZE CONCURRENT. This problem has been fixed. 7.3.1 and 7.2.13 Issue UDT-4352 - Problem Description UniData -- If you issued the dbpause command while a recoverable file was being resized with the CONCURRENT option, the dbpause command appeared to hang and the following message appeared: # dbpause CheckPoint time before ForceCP: Mon Feb 13 13:22:51 2012 This problem has been fixed. 7.3.0 and 7.2.13 -- UDT-4295 - Problem Description UniData -- Before this release, if you specified an incorrect blocksize of 512 for a recoverable file when using RESIZE CONCURRENT to resize the file, the resize process stopped, but the file remained in a resize state. Now, UniData checks to make sure the blocksize specified is valid before beginning the resize process. 7.2.12 - Issue UDT-4124 - Problem Description UniData -- Before this release, if a dynamic file was being resized with the RESIZE CONCURRENT command and the file contained many parts, a message similar to the following example appeared and the resize operation failed: RESIZE CONCURRENT failed to set the FL_RESIZE_DONE bit This problem occurred because UniData tried to set the resize done bit in the file header, but the file had been temporarily closed. This problem has been resolved. Wally Terhune Technical Support Engineer Rocket Software 4600 South Ulster Street, Suite 1100 **Denver, CO 80237 **USA t: +1 720 475 8055 **e: wterh...@rocketsoftware.com **w: u2.rocketsoftware.com Rocket U2 Support: +1.800.729.3553 ** Please
Re: [U2] UV: Consuming https service from within UVBasic using SOAP
Hi again, Finally had a chance to get back to this and have had success using a slightly modified version of the code here: http://www.mail-archive.com/u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org/msg17243.html After reviewing David's suggestions below and confirming the certificate requirements, the only areas requiring change were the URL (to the https url we had set up), and the path to where our client certificate accessible by UV (e.g. /opt/uv/certificates/Client-Root.cer) This brought some success as I was at least getting a response from the webserver but it was an error code 415 indicating incorrect mime type. e.g. 415 Cannot process the message because the content type 'application/x-www-form-urle. (the output is truncated but is just enough to get an idea of what is wrong) Then I discovered that the http_method parameter for 'POST' in the createSecureRequest function has a default mime type of application/x-www-form-urlencoded so I changed the HTTP.POST variable from POST to POST:application/soap+xml. Hey presto! Now I get this reply from the webserver: e.g. ResponseHeaders : Content-Length▒518▒Content-Type▒application/soap+xml; charset=utf-8▒Server▒Microsoft-IIS/7.0▒X-Powered-By▒ASP.NET▒Date▒Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:41:35 GMT ResponseData: s:Envelope xmlns:s=http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope; xmlns:a=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing;s:Headera:Action s:mustUnderstand=1http://tempuri.org/IJobService/CreateJob1UserPartyRoleResponse/a:Actiona:RelatesTourn:uuid:5af711cc-4ed3-4208-baa1-48aa9f74af60/a:RelatesTo/s:Headers:BodyCreateJob1UserPartyRoleResponse xmlns=http://tempuri.org/;CreateJob1UserPartyRoleResult513682af531c9e1090b67f20/CreateJob1UserPartyRoleResult/CreateJob1UserPartyRoleResponse/s:Body/s:Envelope HttpStatus : 200 OK Many thanks again to David and Symeon for their assistance in this. Cheers Peter PS My code at this stage is only a prototype and is functionally the same as the example in the URL above but if anyone would like a copy then please let me know. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Hona, David Sent: Friday, 22 February 2013 9:33 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] UV: Consuming https service from within UVBasic using SOAP Hi Peter, You easily change that sample source code try amending these lines to access any SSL webserver/appserver. For example the Firstmac.com.au website using SSL by default I see - so that'll be a good site to use as an worked example - that uses a CA Root certificate. Basically, all you'll need a copy of you GeoTrust's root certificate accessible by your (UV SOAP/HTTP) client application. You must upload this (or any other SSL certificate) to your UV host and tell you UV application where it can be found... * Assumes client host can resolve and access this URL * For HTTPS SSL www.firstmac.com.au is using GeoTrust CA certificates, hence upload a DER copy of it first. URL = https://www.firstmac.com.au/home; * Define the full path to the GeoTrust CA Root certificate, uploaded to the host (exported in DER format) X.CERT.PATH=@PATH:/geotrust.cer ;* Full path to a DER copy of GeoTrust CA Root Certificate X.USED.AS=2 ; * 1=Self-signed, 2=CA Issued certificate X.FORMAT=2 ; * DER format X.ALGORITHM=1; * RSA key Hope this helps. The CA Root SSL certificate business is complex and is part of that steep learning curve! Good luck! Cheers, David -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Peter Cheney Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2013 11:44 AM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] UV: Consuming https service from within UVBasic using SOAP Hi David, Thanks for the url - am going through this now and the accompanying log. It seems the host not found in hostlist error is not an issues so will continue investigating other causes. I do believe the answer will lie somewhere in my own malformed request so just need to work it out I guess. Will post updates as this progresses. Many thanks, Cheers Peter -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.orgmailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Hona, David Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2013 20:17 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] UV: Consuming https service from within UVBasic using SOAP Peter, As Symeon mentioned, protocol logging is required to help troubleshoot issues. If you like to use Firefox, the 'Firebug' plug-in is helpful to see what goes on behind the scenes - but only once you have familiarised yourself with the basic concepts of the HTTP protocol. Otherwise, not much will make much sense... The variable unassigned and UV version, shouldn't be an issue... we got UV
Re: [U2] How do I find the code?
All, I am not versed in (PQ) PROC. Can anybody tell where I have to go to find the code for A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT? :AE VOC A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 3 lines long. : P 0001: PQ 0002: HRUN WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 0003: P Bottom at line 3. As Always, THANKS! Greg ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] How do I find the code?
You have a file called WBP so ED WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 4:50 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? All, I am not versed in (PQ) PROC. Can anybody tell where I have to go to find the code for A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT? :AE VOC A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 3 lines long. : P 0001: PQ 0002: HRUN WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 0003: P Bottom at line 3. As Always, THANKS! Greg ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] How do I find the code?
Unfortunately that was one of the first things I tried... :AE WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT Top of New A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT in WBP. *--: P Top. Top of new record. It looks like A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT doesn't live in WBP. Greg From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 07:51 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org You have a file called WBP so ED WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 4:50 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? All, I am not versed in (PQ) PROC. Can anybody tell where I have to go to find the code for A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT? :AE VOC A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 3 lines long. : P 0001: PQ 0002: HRUN WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 0003: P Bottom at line 3. As Always, THANKS! Greg ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] How do I find the code?
There is a UniBasic program for which the compiled object is in the WBP.O file. You may find its source in the WBP file. This VOC entry is to run that program. On 6 March 2013 13:49, Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu wrote: All, I am not versed in (PQ) PROC. Can anybody tell where I have to go to find the code for A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT? :AE VOC A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 3 lines long. : P 0001: PQ 0002: HRUN WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 0003: P Bottom at line 3. As Always, THANKS! Greg ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- Kate Stanton Walstan Systems Ltd 4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand Phone: + 64 9 360 5310 Mobile: + 64 21 400 486 Email: k...@walstan.com ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] How do I find the code?
Then Greg I suggest someone has stripped the source, and left you with only the object. You can do ED WBP.O A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT to verify that it exists, but DO NOT LIST IT it will screw up your terminal emulator software most likely if you display the object code ED only gives you Top, then you can do EX right away -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 5:52 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Unfortunately that was one of the first things I tried... :AE WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT Top of New A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT in WBP. *--: P Top. Top of new record. It looks like A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT doesn't live in WBP. Greg From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 07:51 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org You have a file called WBP so ED WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 4:50 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? All, I am not versed in (PQ) PROC. Can anybody tell where I have to go to find the code for A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT? :AE VOC A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 3 lines long. : P 0001: PQ 0002: HRUN WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 0003: P Bottom at line 3. As Always, THANKS! Greg ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] How do I find the code?
Kate, Thanks! We do have WBP.OBS and it is populated with some 20 items - none of which is A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT. Any other place this could be stashed? Greg From: Kate Stanton k...@walstan.com To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 08:52 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org There is a UniBasic program for which the compiled object is in the WBP.O file. You may find its source in the WBP file. This VOC entry is to run that program. On 6 March 2013 13:49, Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu wrote: All, I am not versed in (PQ) PROC. Can anybody tell where I have to go to find the code for A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT? :AE VOC A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 3 lines long. : P 0001: PQ 0002: HRUN WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 0003: P Bottom at line 3. As Always, THANKS! Greg ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- Kate Stanton Walstan Systems Ltd 4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand Phone: + 64 9 360 5310 Mobile: + 64 21 400 486 Email: k...@walstan.com ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] How do I find the code?
Can't seem to find it in either WBP.O or WBP.OBS (I do have a VOC listing for WBP.OBS). From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 09:06 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org Then Greg I suggest someone has stripped the source, and left you with only the object. You can do ED WBP.O A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT to verify that it exists, but DO NOT LIST IT it will screw up your terminal emulator software most likely if you display the object code ED only gives you Top, then you can do EX right away -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 5:52 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Unfortunately that was one of the first things I tried... :AE WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT Top of New A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT in WBP. *--: P Top. Top of new record. It looks like A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT doesn't live in WBP. Greg From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 07:51 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org You have a file called WBP so ED WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 4:50 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? All, I am not versed in (PQ) PROC. Can anybody tell where I have to go to find the code for A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT? :AE VOC A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 3 lines long. : P 0001: PQ 0002: HRUN WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 0003: P Bottom at line 3. As Always, THANKS! Greg ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] How do I find the code?
It might be a non-runnable command. Have you tried to actually RUN this to see if it complains that the code is missing? -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 6:19 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Can't seem to find it in either WBP.O or WBP.OBS (I do have a VOC listing for WBP.OBS). From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 09:06 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org Then Greg I suggest someone has stripped the source, and left you with only the object. You can do ED WBP.O A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT to verify that it exists, but DO NOT LIST IT it will screw up your terminal emulator software most likely if you display the object code ED only gives you Top, then you can do EX right away -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 5:52 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Unfortunately that was one of the first things I tried... :AE WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT Top of New A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT in WBP. *--: P Top. Top of new record. It looks like A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT doesn't live in WBP. Greg From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 07:51 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org You have a file called WBP so ED WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 4:50 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? All, I am not versed in (PQ) PROC. Can anybody tell where I have to go to find the code for A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT? :AE VOC A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 3 lines long. : P 0001: PQ 0002: HRUN WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 0003: P Bottom at line 3. As Always, THANKS! Greg ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] How do I find the code?
This is a good point. I have been trying to track down the reason why this process is NOT working. I've already spent too much time going down this rabbit hole where I have very little access to runtime processing. Out of the 12 thousand lines of code that I was able to find - A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT is my primary culprit. It will just be too easy for all this to result from the code disappearing! LOL I'm throwing in the towel for tonight - tomorrow morning I start looking for disappeared code. Thanks! From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 09:33 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org It might be a non-runnable command. Have you tried to actually RUN this to see if it complains that the code is missing? -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 6:19 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Can't seem to find it in either WBP.O or WBP.OBS (I do have a VOC listing for WBP.OBS). From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 09:06 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org Then Greg I suggest someone has stripped the source, and left you with only the object. You can do ED WBP.O A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT to verify that it exists, but DO NOT LIST IT it will screw up your terminal emulator software most likely if you display the object code ED only gives you Top, then you can do EX right away -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 5:52 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Unfortunately that was one of the first things I tried... :AE WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT Top of New A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT in WBP. *--: P Top. Top of new record. It looks like A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT doesn't live in WBP. Greg From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 07:51 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org You have a file called WBP so ED WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 4:50 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? All, I am not versed in (PQ) PROC. Can anybody tell where I have to go to find the code for A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT? :AE VOC A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 3 lines long. : P 0001: PQ 0002: HRUN WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 0003: P Bottom at line 3. As Always, THANKS! Greg ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] How do I find the code? [SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED]
Greg, Looks to me like you need to go through the entire file system looking for something (*anything*!) that looks like ... A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT..., and hope that you find something and that all you find isn't just object code. Good luck, I'm afraid you might be going to need it :-( You don't say if the target system is UV or UD, but the object code could be globally catalogued somewhere - in UV IIRC it's be something like *A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT in the GLB.CTLG file. Regards Mike -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Greg Coelho Sent: Wednesday, 6 March 2013 4:06 p.m. To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? This is a good point. I have been trying to track down the reason why this process is NOT working. I've already spent too much time going down this rabbit hole where I have very little access to runtime processing. Out of the 12 thousand lines of code that I was able to find - A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT is my primary culprit. It will just be too easy for all this to result from the code disappearing! LOL I'm throwing in the towel for tonight - tomorrow morning I start looking for disappeared code. Thanks! From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 09:33 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org It might be a non-runnable command. Have you tried to actually RUN this to see if it complains that the code is missing? -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 6:19 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Can't seem to find it in either WBP.O or WBP.OBS (I do have a VOC listing for WBP.OBS). From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 09:06 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org Then Greg I suggest someone has stripped the source, and left you with only the object. You can do ED WBP.O A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT to verify that it exists, but DO NOT LIST IT it will screw up your terminal emulator software most likely if you display the object code ED only gives you Top, then you can do EX right away -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 5:52 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Unfortunately that was one of the first things I tried... :AE WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT Top of New A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT in WBP. *--: P Top. Top of new record. It looks like A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT doesn't live in WBP. Greg From: Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, Date: 03/05/2013 07:51 PM Subject:Re: [U2] How do I find the code? Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org You have a file called WBP so ED WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT -Original Message- From: Greg Coelho coe...@american.edu To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Mar 5, 2013 4:50 pm Subject: Re: [U2] How do I find the code? All, I am not versed in (PQ) PROC. Can anybody tell where I have to go to find the code for A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT? :AE VOC A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 3 lines long. : P 0001: PQ 0002: HRUN WBP A26.ISS.EMPLOYMENT 0003: P Bottom at line 3. As Always, THANKS! Greg ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone the sender immediately. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT
almost. March 19 will be my final day. thanks Wally Terhune Technical Support Engineer Rocket Software 4600 South Ulster Street, Suite 1100 • Denver, CO 80237 • USA t: +1 720 475 8055 • e: wterh...@rocketsoftware.com • w: u2.rocketsoftware.com Rocket U2 Support: +1.800.729.3553 ** Please note that I am only available on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. ** From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] on behalf of Jeffrey Butera [jbut...@hampshire.edu] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:26 PM To: U2 Users List Cc: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata RESIZE CONCURRENT Thanks Wally. Shouldn't you be on a sunny beach already? Jeff Butera -- A tree falls the way it leans. Be careful which way you lean. The Lorax On Mar 5, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Wally Terhune wterh...@rocketsoftware.com wrote: You may want to review the following problems that have been addressed. If you are running the Recoverable File System (RFS), you will probably want to be at UniData release 7.3.3 before using RESIZE CONCURRENT on RFS files. This list was extracted from the publically available 7.3.3 and 7.2.13 release notes: 7.3.3 - Issue UDT-8887 - Problem Description RFS -- When resizing a recoverable file with the CONCURRENT option, UniData may not have removed the filename.resize work file when the RESIZE process completed. The file was no longer visible at the operating-system level, but the disk space used by the file was not released and made available. This problem occurred because one or more of the RFS daemons did not close the filename.resize file at the operating-system level. The problem was easily encountered if the udtconfig N_SYNC parameter was set to a value greater than 0. This problem has been fixed. Issue UDT-9393 - Problem Description RFS -- Prior to this release, UniData would not remove the temporary 'rsz' file associated with the CONCURRENT RESIZE of a recoverable file until all tm processes and UniData daemons released had closed their handle to the file. The file will be now be removed within two cycles of cleanupd after the RESIZE completes. 7.3.2 and 7.2.13 --- Issue UDT-8069 - Problem Description UniData -- Prior to this release, when performing RESIZE CONCURRENT on a file in another directory on the same server (not located in the same directory as the account's VOC file), an error message similar to the following example was displayed: EDEVdefault Error when trying to rename the source file before move back to the working tmp file. Intact records can be found in /home/udtacct/TEST.resize In case source file is damaged, it can be recovered from /home/udtacct/TEST.resize. This behavior required the user to use the RESTORE option to make the file accessible again. This problem has been fixed in this release, which means that RESIZE CONCURRENT can be run against these files. The error is no longer displayed and the RESTORE option is no longer needed. Issue UDT-8521 - Problem Description UniData -- When resizing an encrypted file with the CONCURRENT option, the resize operation failed and displayed an error message similar to the following example: In BP/_TEST2 at line 8 1:Grpno error. blkbuf-group=0, U_groupno=21, error in U_blkread for file 'TRIGFILE3', key '', number=21 This problem occurred because an internal variable was overwritten, and has been resolved. UDT-8757 - Problem Description [7.3.x only - problem does not exist in 7.2.x] RFS -- Before this release, all trigger information for a recoverable file was lost after performing a RESIZE CONCURRENT. This problem has been fixed. 7.3.1 and 7.2.13 Issue UDT-4352 - Problem Description UniData -- If you issued the dbpause command while a recoverable file was being resized with the CONCURRENT option, the dbpause command appeared to hang and the following message appeared: # dbpause CheckPoint time before ForceCP: Mon Feb 13 13:22:51 2012 This problem has been fixed. 7.3.0 and 7.2.13 -- UDT-4295 - Problem Description UniData -- Before this release, if you specified an incorrect blocksize of 512 for a recoverable file when using RESIZE CONCURRENT to resize the file, the resize process stopped, but the file remained in a resize state. Now, UniData checks to make sure the blocksize specified is valid before beginning the resize process. 7.2.12 - Issue UDT-4124 - Problem Description UniData -- Before this release, if a dynamic file was being resized with the RESIZE CONCURRENT command and the file contained many parts, a message similar to the following example
