RE: [U2] UV - 10.2.2 [not-secure]
We have this problem at 10.2.4 on Red Hat too. -Original Message- From: Hennessey, Mark F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 10:33 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UV - 10.2.2 [not-secure] snip usa, usm, usp (all the same executable) hang when trying certain operations. They problem evidently started with 10.2.1, and fixed at 10.2.6 (not available for Solaris yet) usa -o -pr0 for instance. Note that uvadmin, the admin menu, etc all execute these and will hang when disabling printers or changing forms. They actually take the appropriate action, it is just that you have to break or or kill the task. The IBM solution seems to be to wait until you open a case, and then send out a copy of usa rev 10.2.0, which works with 10.2.2 usd. I wasted a few hours trying to figure out what I'd done wrong with the spooler in our upgrade. The release notes for 10.2.6 are available for some platforms from the TechConnect availability matrix. Too bad I did not think of that first. /snip This was the problem to I was referring to I was lucky, in response to another issue I was told about this problem... Sort of an Oh, by the way This is one of those things that drive me nuts. Try searching the knowledge base for this problem... Depending on what you enter for search criteria you get nothing, or a guide to installing UV/NET on Unix. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UV - 10.2.2 [not-secure]
snip usa, usm, usp (all the same executable) hang when trying certain operations. They problem evidently started with 10.2.1, and fixed at 10.2.6 (not available for Solaris yet) usa -o -pr0 for instance. Note that uvadmin, the admin menu, etc all execute these and will hang when disabling printers or changing forms. They actually take the appropriate action, it is just that you have to break or or kill the task. The IBM solution seems to be to wait until you open a case, and then send out a copy of usa rev 10.2.0, which works with 10.2.2 usd. I wasted a few hours trying to figure out what I'd done wrong with the spooler in our upgrade. The release notes for 10.2.6 are available for some platforms from the TechConnect availability matrix. Too bad I did not think of that first. /snip This was the problem to I was referring to I was lucky, in response to another issue I was told about this problem... Sort of an Oh, by the way This is one of those things that drive me nuts. Try searching the knowledge base for this problem... Depending on what you enter for search criteria you get nothing, or a guide to installing UV/NET on Unix. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UV - 10.2.2 [not-secure]
Mark, Would you mind giving just a brief description of what you mean by broken please? Not in detail (unless you want to grin) but enough to let the rest of us know what to watch out for. Thanks. On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:43 , Hennessey, Mark F. wrote: Also, usa is broken at 10.2.2 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UV - 10.2.2 [not-secure]
Clifton, usa, usm, usp (all the same executable) hang when trying certain operations. They problem evidently started with 10.2.1, and fixed at 10.2.6 (not available for Solaris yet) usa -o -pr0 for instance. Note that uvadmin, the admin menu, etc all execute these and will hang when disabling printers or changing forms. They actually take the appropriate action, it is just that you have to break or or kill the task. The IBM solution seems to be to wait until you open a case, and then send out a copy of usa rev 10.2.0, which works with 10.2.2 usd. I wasted a few hours trying to figure out what I'd done wrong with the spooler in our upgrade. The release notes for 10.2.6 are available for some platforms from the TechConnect availability matrix. Too bad I did not think of that first. -Rick Nuckolls Lynden, Inc On Nov 6, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Clifton Oliver wrote: Mark, Would you mind giving just a brief description of what you mean by broken please? Not in detail (unless you want to grin) but enough to let the rest of us know what to watch out for. Thanks. On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:43 , Hennessey, Mark F. wrote: Also, usa is broken at 10.2.2 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UV - 10.2.2 [not-secure]
I am interpreting that to mean this is on those releases on all platforms (AIX) not just Solaris, correct? Thanks for the info! - Clif On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:51 , Richard Nuckolls wrote: usa, usm, usp (all the same executable) hang when trying certain operations. They problem evidently started with 10.2.1, and fixed at 10.2.6 (not available for Solaris yet) --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UV - 10.2.2 [not-secure]
You will need to check with IBM for the answer, but I suspect that it is true on a number of platforms. Who knows about Windows. It is definitely true on Solaris. -Rick On Nov 6, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Clifton Oliver wrote: I am interpreting that to mean this is on those releases on all platforms (AIX) not just Solaris, correct? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UV - 10.2.2 [not-secure]
I have had this problem on RHEL 4.0 AS Phil. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Nuckolls Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2007 3:00 p.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UV - 10.2.2 [not-secure] You will need to check with IBM for the answer, but I suspect that it is true on a number of platforms. Who knows about Windows. It is definitely true on Solaris. -Rick On Nov 6, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Clifton Oliver wrote: I am interpreting that to mean this is on those releases on all platforms (AIX) not just Solaris, correct? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
