Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
"Up to 125 Mbps capacity" - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Mathew Howard" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:49:15 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios With a pair of 20mhz channels (or even a 10 and a 20), it would certainly be worthwhile... with 3550-3650 it would definitely make sense. If I remember correctly, PTP450 in 3.65 is pretty close to the same price as AF5... maybe a bit less. I think they claim something like 125Mbps... so yeah, airfiber would probably perform better, even if it was limited to half duplex. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:21 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios It's possible they could get AF certified in a pair of 20 mhz channels and 1024QAM. That should do ~250Mbps FD . I would expect between $2000-$3000 per link. What does a PTP 450 in 3.65 run price wise? P erformance? josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 05:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be possible in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm not sure it would realistically be able to do anything that can't be done now with a 3.65 PTP450. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the 3.65 rules... I they'll 3550-3650 if it gets opened up, and I can't see their current products being made to work with the new rules. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ j...@spitwspots.com ] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:44 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios A 10Mhz wide AF5 can do ~190Mbps HD @ 8 miles in 256QAM. If they push that up to 1024QAM it'd look at a lot better. If I were Ubiquiti, I'd wait to see how the potential 3.65 rules play out first. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 04:30 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mailto:mat...@litewire.net> wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... -- *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ j...@spitwspots.com <mailto:j...@spitwspots.com> ] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users <mailto:listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
With a pair of 20mhz channels (or even a 10 and a 20), it would certainly be worthwhile... with 3550-3650 it would definitely make sense. If I remember correctly, PTP450 in 3.65 is pretty close to the same price as AF5... maybe a bit less. I think they claim something like 125Mbps... so yeah, airfiber would probably perform better, even if it was limited to half duplex. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:21 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios It's possible they could get AF certified in a pair of 20mhz channels and 1024QAM. That should do ~250Mbps FD. I would expect between $2000-$3000 per link. What does a PTP450 in 3.65 run price wise? Performance? josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 05:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be possible in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm not sure it would realistically be able to do anything that can't be done now with a 3.65 PTP450. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the 3.65 rules... I they'll 3550-3650 if it gets opened up, and I can't see their current products being made to work with the new rules. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com<mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:44 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios A 10Mhz wide AF5 can do ~190Mbps HD @ 8 miles in 256QAM. If they push that up to 1024QAM it'd look at a lot better. If I were Ubiquiti, I'd wait to see how the potential 3.65 rules play out first. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com><http://www.spitwspots.com><http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 04:30 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mailto:mat...@litewire.net><mailto:mat...@litewire.net><mailto:mat...@litewire.net> wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... -- *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org><mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org><mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org><mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org><mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com<mailto:j...@spitwspots.com><mailto:j...@spitwspots.com><mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org><mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org><mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com><http://www.spitwspots.com><http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users<mailto:listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users><mailto:listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users><mailto:listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org><mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org><mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org><mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org><mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
The ePMP is faster than the PMP, just uses more spectrum. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Josh Luthman" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:45:49 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios The force110 ptp is 220 megs so I'm sure the 450 meets or exceeds. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 9:43 PM, "Mike Hammett" < wispaubntus...@ics-il.net > wrote: I'm guessing ~100 megs HDX as that's what the PMP450 does. Not sure price wise. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@spitwspots.com > To: "ubnt users" < ubnt_users@wispa.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:21:59 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios It's possible they could get AF certified in a pair of 20 mhz channels and 1024QAM. That should do ~250Mbps FD . I would expect between $2000-$3000 per link. What does a PTP 450 in 3.65 run price wise? P erformance? josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 05:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be possible in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm not sure it would realistically be able to do anything that can't be done now with a 3.65 PTP450. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the 3.65 rules... I they'll 3550-3650 if it gets opened up, and I can't see their current products being made to work with the new rules. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ j...@spitwspots.com ] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:44 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios A 10Mhz wide AF5 can do ~190Mbps HD @ 8 miles in 256QAM. If they push that up to 1024QAM it'd look at a lot better. If I were Ubiquiti, I'd wait to see how the potential 3.65 rules play out first. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 04:30 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mailto:mat...@litewire.net> wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... -- *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ j...@spitwspots.com <mailto:j...@spitwspots.com> ] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users <mailto:listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
The force110 ptp is 220 megs so I'm sure the 450 meets or exceeds. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 9:43 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > I'm guessing ~100 megs HDX as that's what the PMP450 does. Not sure price > wise. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > -- > *From: *"Josh Reynolds" > *To: *"ubnt users" > *Sent: *Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:21:59 PM > *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios > > It's possible they could get AF certified in a pair of 20mhz channels and > 1024QAM. That should do ~250Mbps FD. I would expect between $2000-$3000 > per link. > > What does a PTP450 in 3.65 run price wise? Performance? > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com > > On 12/16/2014 05:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be > possible in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm > not sure it would realistically be able to do anything that can't be done now > with a 3.65 PTP450. > > I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the 3.65 rules... I > they'll 3550-3650 if it gets opened up, and I can't see their current > products being made to work with the new rules. > > ____________ > From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf > of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:44 PM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios > > A 10Mhz wide AF5 can do ~190Mbps HD @ 8 miles in 256QAM. If they push that up > to 1024QAM it'd look at a lot better. > > If I were Ubiquiti, I'd wait to see how the potential 3.65 rules play out > first. > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> > <http://www.spitwspots.com> > > On 12/16/2014 04:30 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of > spectrum :/ > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" > <mailto:mat...@litewire.net> wrote: > > > > I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... > ------ > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> > > [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> > ] on > behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com<mailto:j...@spitwspots.com> > ] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM > *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios > > AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 > and 160MHz wide channels. > > 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> > <http://www.spitwspots.com> > > On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: > > Would solve some BH issues. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing > listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users<mailto:listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing listubnt_us...@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing listubnt_us...@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing > listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
Sorry. I just knew it was higher than AF24. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Mathew Howard" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:43:04 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AF5 can actually do QAM1024. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:41 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AF5 is QAM256. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Josh Luthman" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:39:53 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios Isn't AF24 QAM64? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 9:38 PM, "Mike Hammett" < wispaubntus...@ics-il.net > wrote: and higher QAM and ditching that 802.11 overhead. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" < ubnt_users@wispa.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:30:46 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" < mat...@litewire.net > wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ j...@spitwspots.com ] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
AF5 can actually do QAM1024. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:41 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AF5 is QAM256. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> From: "Josh Luthman" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:39:53 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios Isn't AF24 QAM64? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 9:38 PM, "Mike Hammett" mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net>> wrote: and higher QAM and ditching that 802.11 overhead. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com [http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> From: "Josh Luthman" mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:30:46 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com<mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
I'm guessing ~100 megs HDX as that's what the PMP450 does. Not sure price wise. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Josh Reynolds" To: "ubnt users" Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:21:59 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios It's possible they could get AF certified in a pair of 20 mhz channels and 1024QAM. That should do ~250Mbps FD . I would expect between $2000-$3000 per link. What does a PTP 450 in 3.65 run price wise? P erformance? josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 05:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be possible in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm not sure it would realistically be able to do anything that can't be done now with a 3.65 PTP450. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the 3.65 rules... I they'll 3550-3650 if it gets opened up, and I can't see their current products being made to work with the new rules. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ j...@spitwspots.com ] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:44 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios A 10Mhz wide AF5 can do ~190Mbps HD @ 8 miles in 256QAM. If they push that up to 1024QAM it'd look at a lot better. If I were Ubiquiti, I'd wait to see how the potential 3.65 rules play out first. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 04:30 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mailto:mat...@litewire.net> wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... -- *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ j...@spitwspots.com <mailto:j...@spitwspots.com> ] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users <mailto:listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
It's possible they could get AF certified in a pair of 20mhzchannels and 1024QAM. That should do ~250Mbps FD. I would expect between $2000-$3000 per link. What does a PTP450 in 3.65 runprice wise? Performance? josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 05:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be possible in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm not sure it would realistically be able to do anything that can't be done now with a 3.65 PTP450. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the 3.65 rules... I they'll 3550-3650 if it gets opened up, and I can't see their current products being made to work with the new rules. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:44 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios A 10Mhz wide AF5 can do ~190Mbps HD @ 8 miles in 256QAM. If they push that up to 1024QAM it'd look at a lot better. If I were Ubiquiti, I'd wait to see how the potential 3.65 rules play out first. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 04:30 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mailto:mat...@litewire.net> wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... -- *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com<mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users<mailto:listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
AF5 is QAM256. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Josh Luthman" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:39:53 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios Isn't AF24 QAM64? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 9:38 PM, "Mike Hammett" < wispaubntus...@ics-il.net > wrote: and higher QAM and ditching that 802.11 overhead. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" < ubnt_users@wispa.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:30:46 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" < mat...@litewire.net > wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ j...@spitwspots.com ] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
Isn't AF24 QAM64? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 9:38 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > and higher QAM and ditching that 802.11 overhead. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > -- > *From: *"Josh Luthman" > *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" > *Sent: *Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:30:46 PM > *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios > > With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of > spectrum :/ > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" wrote: > >> I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... >> -- >> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on >> behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM >> *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org >> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios >> >> AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 >> and 160MHz wide channels. >> >> 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. >> >> josh reynolds :: chief information officer >> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com >> >> On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: >> >> Would solve some BH issues. >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing >> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
and higher QAM and ditching that 802.11 overhead. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Josh Luthman" To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:30:46 PM Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" < mat...@litewire.net > wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [ j...@spitwspots.com ] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be possible in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm not sure it would realistically be able to do anything that can't be done now with a 3.65 PTP450. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the 3.65 rules... I they'll 3550-3650 if it gets opened up, and I can't see their current products being made to work with the new rules. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:44 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios A 10Mhz wide AF5 can do ~190Mbps HD @ 8 miles in 256QAM. If they push that up to 1024QAM it'd look at a lot better. If I were Ubiquiti, I'd wait to see how the potential 3.65 rules play out first. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 04:30 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mailto:mat...@litewire.net> wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... -- *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org>] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com<mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users<mailto:listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
A 10Mhz wide AF5 can do ~190Mbps HD @ 8 miles in 256QAM. If they push that up to 1024QAM it'd look at a lot better. If I were Ubiquiti, I'd wait to see how the potential 3.65 rules play out first. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 04:30 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" wrote: I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... -- *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
With all 25 MHz? I mean they can only get heavy throughput with loads of spectrum :/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 16, 2014 8:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" wrote: > I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... > -- > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on > behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM > *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios > > AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 > and 160MHz wide channels. > > 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com > > On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: > > Would solve some BH issues. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing > listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com<http://www.spitwspots.com> On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
AC gets most of it's bandwidth via some neat tricks, but primarily 80 and 160MHz wide channels. 3.65 in UBNT-land is limited to 25MHz. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 03:50 PM, Jerry Richardson (airCloud) wrote: Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
[Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios
Would solve some BH issues. Thanks. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
