[Bug 1905387] Autopkgtest regression report (samba/2:4.11.6+dfsg-0ubuntu1.9)

[Ubuntu SRU Bot]

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted samba (2:4.11.6+dfsg-0ubuntu1.9) for 
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

libsoup2.4/2.70.0-1 (amd64)
gvfs/1.44.1-1ubuntu1 (amd64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#samba

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905387

Title:
  samba-common-bin should call systemd-tmpfiles before testparm

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1905387/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928360] Re: Switch to Fcitx 5 for Chinese

[James Henstridge]

I hadn't realised that they renamed the IM module with the version bump:
that means snaps built against older platforms won't load the old (but
working) Fcitx 4 module when run on a host system configured with Fcitx
5.

We can certainly look at adding the new IM module to the platform snaps,
but that will also switch to the new IPC protocol.  From a quick look
through the source it will probably be allowed by existing AppArmor
rules in the "desktop" interface, but that will need testing.

It's probably going to be easiest to see if we can get things working
with a core20 based platform snap though, since we have fcitx5 packages
there (albeit for a git prerelease version).

For the core18 based platform snaps, we would need to backport the
fcitx5 packages themselves.  Alternatively, I wonder if we could get
away with symlinking the old module name to the new one?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928360

Title:
  Switch to Fcitx 5 for Chinese

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lubuntu-default-settings/+bug/1928360/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930943] Re: package evolution-common 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to stat './usr/share/help/sl/evolution/figures' (which I was about to install): Input/output error

[Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot]

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.  Reviewing your dmesg attachment in this bug report it
seems that there is a problem with your hardware.  I recommend
performing a back up and then investigating the situation.  Measures you
might take include checking cable connections and using software tools
to investigate the health of your hardware.  In the event that is is not
in fact an error with your hardware please set the bug's status back to
New.  Thanks and good luck!

[This is an automated message.  I apologize if it reached you
inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]

** Tags added: hardware-error

** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930943

Title:
  package evolution-common 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  unable to stat './usr/share/help/sl/evolution/figures' (which I was
  about to install): Input/output error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1930943/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1913051] Re: 20.04LTS from 18.04lts in amd64

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913051

Title:
  20.04LTS from 18.04lts in amd64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1913051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1900913] Re: Apparmor prevents kill, resulting in error mysql-server-8.0.postinst: line 47: kill: (18631) - Permission denied

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]

** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900913

Title:
  Apparmor prevents kill, resulting in error mysql-server-8.0.postinst:
  line 47: kill: (18631) - Permission denied

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1900913/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1913488] Re: could not determine upgrade an unresolvable problem occured

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913488

Title:
  could not determine upgrade an unresolvable problem occured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1913488/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1913722] Re: cannot upgrade ubuntu from 18.04 to 20.04

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913722

Title:
  cannot upgrade ubuntu from 18.04 to 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1913722/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1915346] Re: Upgrade to LTS 20.04 fails

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915346

Title:
  Upgrade to LTS 20.04 fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1915346/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1915389] Re: Release upgrade fails to apply

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915389

Title:
  Release upgrade fails to apply

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1915389/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1915945] Re: package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed sudo package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for sudo (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915945

Title:
  package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed
  sudo package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1915945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1916788] Re: Update bricht mit Fehlermeldung ab.

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916788

Title:
  Update bricht mit Fehlermeldung ab.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1916788/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1916805] Re: 18.04 to 20.04 upgrade failure

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916805

Title:
  18.04 to 20.04 upgrade failure

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1916805/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1917104] Re: do-release-update from 18.04 to 20.04 failed

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917104

Title:
  do-release-update from 18.04 to 20.04 failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1917104/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1917124] Re: Upgrate Ubuntu 18.04 ti 20.04 impossible

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917124

Title:
  Upgrate Ubuntu 18.04 ti 20.04 impossible

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1917124/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1917136] Re: issue upgrading 18.04 20.04

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917136

Title:
  issue upgrading 18.04 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1917136/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1917202] Re: Reported as bug when i tried to upgrade from ubuntu 18 to 20

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917202

Title:
  Reported as bug when i tried to upgrade from ubuntu 18 to 20

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1917202/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1917790] Re: An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917790

Title:
  An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1917790/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1918015] Re: Unable to update to 20.04

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918015

Title:
  Unable to update to 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1918015/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1918208] Re: failed upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918208

Title:
  failed upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1918208/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1918293] Re: cannot upgrade to 20.04 LTS

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918293

Title:
  cannot upgrade to 20.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1918293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1918641] Re: migration to ubuntu20.04 failed

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918641

Title:
  migration to ubuntu20.04 failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1918641/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1919009] Re: upgrade reporter bug cant upgrade the software to 20.04

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919009

Title:
  upgrade reporter bug cant upgrade the software to 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1919009/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1919482] Re: No se ha podido calcular la actualización Se produjo un problema irresoluble al calcular la actualización. Esto podría deberse a: * Paquetes de software no oficiales, no proporci

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919482

Title:
  No se ha podido calcular la actualización  Se produjo un problema
  irresoluble al calcular la actualización.   Esto podría deberse a:  *
  Paquetes de software no oficiales, no proporcionados por Ubuntu
  Utilice la herramienta «ppa-purge» desde el paquete  ppa-purge para
  quitar software de una PPA de Launchpad PPA e  intente actualizar de
  nuevo. No engo instalado comando ppa-purge. Eliminanado todos los ppa
  en Orígenes delsistema, el error persiste.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1919482/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1919068] Re: Upgrade to 20.04 (from 18.04) fails with error "Could not calculate the upgrade"

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919068

Title:
  Upgrade to 20.04 (from 18.04) fails with error "Could not calculate
  the upgrade"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1919068/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1920626] Re: Can't upgrade Ubuntu Budgie 18.04 to Ubuntu Budgie 20.04

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920626

Title:
  Can't upgrade Ubuntu Budgie 18.04 to Ubuntu Budgie 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1920626/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1920809] Re: Could not calculate the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920809

Title:
  Could not calculate the upgrade   An unresolvable problem occurred
  while calculating the upgrade.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1920809/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1920917] Re: Please fix it for me

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920917

Title:
  Please fix it for me

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1920917/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1922337] Re: I tried locating the mysql.sock file but couldn't find it. The error keeps trying to access it but the socket is missing

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]

** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922337

Title:
  I tried locating the mysql.sock file but couldn't find it. The error
  keeps trying to access it but the socket is missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1922337/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921423] Re: package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

[Expired for sudo (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921423

Title:
  package sudo 1.8.31-1ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: o
  subprocesso instalado, do pacote sudo, o script post-installation
  retornou erro do status de saída 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1921423/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930945] Re: ubuntu desktop - changing display configuration lost wallpaper (trap messages filled dmesg)

[Ubuntu QA Website]

This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.

A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/1930945

** Tags added: iso-testing

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930945

Title:
  ubuntu desktop - changing display configuration lost wallpaper (trap
  messages filled dmesg)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1930945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930946] [NEW] Upgrade from 20.10 to 21.04 changes anthy settings

[DarkTrick]

Public bug reported:

On 20.10 Anthy was set to choose the keyboard layout according to the current 
input language. 
After the upgrade to 21.04, this setting got lost; Apparently the settings of 
anthy are not upgrade-safe.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: anthy 1:0.4-2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-19.20-generic 5.11.21
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Sat Jun  5 12:46:04 2021
SourcePackage: anthy
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-06-05 (0 days ago)

** Affects: anthy (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hirsute

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930946

Title:
  Upgrade from 20.10 to 21.04 changes anthy settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/anthy/+bug/1930946/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854621] Re: ubuntu 20.04 daily boots with no background, selecting other background has warped picture

[Chris Guiver]

Booted today's impish daily (live QA-test) on
- dell [optiplex] 755 (c2d-e6850, 5gb, amd/ati radeon rv516/x1300/x1550)

On initial boot there were glitches on the top of the display (panel &
top of wallpaper below panel).  It booted with wallpaper (not no
wallpaper today so not identical).

On changing wallpaper I get either
- correct wallpaper
- glitchy version (blocky bad-digital-reception type) of wallpaper some of 
which looks, parts do not
- no background
- magnified version of wallpaper so only part visible  (current image is like 
it's 1/8th of chosen 'hippo' wallpaper instead of all of it... part of image 
though is warped

choosing the same wallpaper does NOT mean you get the same result the
next time though

** Tags added: impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854621

Title:
  ubuntu 20.04 daily boots with no background, selecting other
  background has warped picture

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1854621/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901401] Re: SD card does not work on linux, but window (O2Micro)

[DarkTrick]

Fixed in Ubuntu 21.04

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901401

Title:
  SD card does not work on linux, but window (O2Micro)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1901401/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930945] Re: ubuntu desktop - changing display configuration lost wallpaper (trap messages filled dmesg)

[Chris Guiver]

Possibly related (duplicate of)?

- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1893493


** Description changed:

- Ubuntu Desktop Impish daily test.
+ Ubuntu Desktop Impish daily test on
+ - - hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 5gb, nvidia quadro nvs 290)
  
  Changing display positions in settings.  I have two monitors, one above
  the other (so not the default).
  
- I made change and it look okay so I said keep. I noticed I was wrong
- having TOP/BOTTOM displays the wrong way, detected via mouse movements
- between displays so I made another change of the TOP/BOTTOM displays in
- "DISPLAYS" of GNOME settings...
+ I made change and it looked okay so I said keep. I noticed I was wrong
+ having TOP/BOTTOM displays the wrong way (detected via mouse movements
+ between displays) so I made another change of the TOP/BOTTOM displays in
+ "DISPLAYS" of GNOME settings clicked apply again & keep...
  
  ** Expected Results
  
  On changing display orientation I expect wallpaper to be redrawn, or
  remain on screen
  
  ** Actual Results
  
  I now have BLUE background on both displays.
+ 
+ (this was soon changing.. but that didn't occur until I tried to change
+ wallpapers...)
  
  /var/crash is empty... operation appears normal; I lost background.
  lots of TRAP messages though fill `dmesg`
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
  Package: ubuntu-desktop 1.469
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-16.17-generic 5.11.12
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-16-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu67
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.461
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sat Jun  5 03:01:52 2021
  LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Alpha amd64 (20210604)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-meta
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930945

Title:
  ubuntu desktop - changing display configuration lost wallpaper (trap
  messages filled dmesg)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1930945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930945] Re: ubuntu desktop - changing display configuration lost wallpaper (trap messages filled dmesg)

[Chris Guiver]

I'm unable to change wallpaper now.

On selecting some they appear to flash on screen, then get replaced by a
image... currently this firefox window appears on my other display with
this "add comment" box frozen at the word "currently" last line when the
image was changed...

Wallpaper on other image just re-freshed, now contains all of last
paragraph... setting is on the 'clock' or change image..

No squashfs errors appear in `dmesg`.

As stated earlier.. operation of box appears unimpacted, however the
'firefox' image replacing the originally-blue background is a
concentration-problem for me..

The other screen now appears to be updating regularly as I type, rather
than time interval.. behavior appears somewhat inconsistent with
background (no longer static).

Likely nouveau/nvidia issue; sorry I was unsure thus the incorrect
`ubuntu-desktop`.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930945

Title:
  ubuntu desktop - changing display configuration lost wallpaper (trap
  messages filled dmesg)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1930945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930945] [NEW] ubuntu desktop - changing display configuration lost wallpaper (trap messages filled dmesg)

[Chris Guiver]

Public bug reported:

Ubuntu Desktop Impish daily test.

Changing display positions in settings.  I have two monitors, one above
the other (so not the default).

I made change and it look okay so I said keep. I noticed I was wrong
having TOP/BOTTOM displays the wrong way, detected via mouse movements
between displays so I made another change of the TOP/BOTTOM displays in
"DISPLAYS" of GNOME settings...

** Expected Results

On changing display orientation I expect wallpaper to be redrawn, or
remain on screen

** Actual Results

I now have BLUE background on both displays.

/var/crash is empty... operation appears normal; I lost background.
lots of TRAP messages though fill `dmesg`

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: ubuntu-desktop 1.469
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-16.17-generic 5.11.12
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu67
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.461
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Jun  5 03:01:52 2021
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Alpha amd64 (20210604)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubuntu-meta
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish

** Attachment added: "sudo dmesg >dmesg.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930945/+attachment/5502569/+files/dmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930945

Title:
  ubuntu desktop - changing display configuration lost wallpaper (trap
  messages filled dmesg)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1930945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930943] [NEW] package evolution-common 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to stat './usr/share/help/sl/evolution/figures' (which I was about to install): Input/output error

[Jeff Wilson]

Public bug reported:

Novice user. submitting report because Ubuntu said I should

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: evolution-common 3.36.4-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-53.60~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Sat Jun  5 11:35:08 2021
ErrorMessage: unable to stat './usr/share/help/sl/evolution/figures' (which I 
was about to install): Input/output error
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-27 (8 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.5
SourcePackage: evolution
Title: package evolution-common 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 
unable to stat './usr/share/help/sl/evolution/figures' (which I was about to 
install): Input/output error
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930943

Title:
  package evolution-common 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  unable to stat './usr/share/help/sl/evolution/figures' (which I was
  about to install): Input/output error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1930943/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930884] Re: failure to boot impish daily (no boot in 65 mins)

[Chris Guiver]

Current Lubuntu daily was written to media using

`sudo dd bs=4M oflag=sync status=progress of=/dev/sdb
if=/de2900/lubuntu_64/impish-desktop-amd64.iso`

and that boots normally...  with desktop up & visible within 6 mins
anyway  (I forgot to look at clock; too busy picking up mouth from
floor..)

This maybe is issue with MKUSB ?? and not a Ubuntu syslinux anyway...
back to INCOMPLETE.

** Changed in: syslinux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930884

Title:
  failure to boot impish daily (no boot in 65 mins)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syslinux/+bug/1930884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [apparmor] [Bug 1928360] Re: Switch to Fcitx 5 for Chinese

[Seth Arnold]

On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 01:27:19AM -, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> It means that it explicitly looks for the fcitx 5 gtk im module, while
> Chromium only has access to the fcitx 4 one.

Oh! Excellent debugging to find the root cause.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928360

Title:
  Switch to Fcitx 5 for Chinese

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lubuntu-default-settings/+bug/1928360/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930939] Re: package shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

[Steve Langasek]

** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: $uperu$er (nozzz) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930939

Title:
  package shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1930939/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930940] Re: The files in grub/i386-pc are not in the /boot/grub directory

[tomdean]

hwmatch should not be used in x86_64 systems.
set GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=keep in /etc/defaults/grub

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930940

Title:
  The files in grub/i386-pc are not in the /boot/grub directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1930940/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928360] Re: Switch to Fcitx 5 for Chinese

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

I presented the snap problem for James Henstridge, and he gave me a very
useful hint: The Chromium snap makes use of the bionic library stack
(the gnome-3-28-1804 snap) including the im module installed by fcitx-
frontend-gtk3, i.e. the fcitx 4 gtk im module.

That made me think of . That bug is
still open, and as a result im-config currently sets these variables for
fcitx 5:

GTK_IM_MODULE=fcitx5
XMODIFIERS=@im=fcitx
QT_IM_MODULE=fcitx5

It means that it explicitly looks for the fcitx 5 gtk im module, while
Chromium only has access to the fcitx 4 one.

So as a test I tweaked im-config to set:

GTK_IM_MODULE=fcitx
XMODIFIERS=@im=fcitx
QT_IM_MODULE=fcitx

and that made a difference. With that environment I could successfully
input beautiful Chinese characters in Chromium using fcitx 5. :)

Consequently there seems to be no need to add any extra stuff to
apparmor to handle fcitx 5. Instead I see two options:

1. Change im-config's variable assignment, or

2. somehow add the fcitx 5 im modules for gtk and qt to the snap library
stack.

I'm going to consult with Debian's input method team about which route
is preferable.

@James: Do you see a problem from your POV with adding the fcitx 5 im
modules to the snaps?

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #977203
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977203

** Also affects: snappy
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Package changed: apparmor (Ubuntu) => im-config (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928360

Title:
  Switch to Fcitx 5 for Chinese

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lubuntu-default-settings/+bug/1928360/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1215882] Re: Emails are silently discarded on 554 reply to STARTTLS

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: thunderbird
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215882

Title:
  Emails are silently discarded on 554 reply to STARTTLS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1215882/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1405452] Re: Typo in man page ("introduce a much improvement mechanism")

[Mathew Hodson]

Patch sent upstream:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/hostap/patch/20210525031333.7665-1-mathew.hod...@gmail.com/

** Tags added: patch-forwarded-upstream

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405452

Title:
  Typo in man page ("introduce a much improvement mechanism")

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1405452/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1930940] [NEW] The files in grub/i386-pc are not in the /boot/grub directory

[tomdean]

On 6/4/21 5:29 PM, tomdean wrote:
> Public bug reported:
> 
> Grub2 will not boot FreeBSD:
>error:can't find command 'hwmatch'
> 
> The file hwmatch.mod is in the i386-pc directory, which is not in the
> proper location for grub to find during boot.
> 
> cp -R /usr/lib/grub/i386-pc /boot/grub
> 
> fixes this problm
> 
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
> Package: grub2 2.04-1ubuntu26.12
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-55.62~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
> Uname: Linux 5.8.0-55-generic x86_64
> ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
> Architecture: amd64
> CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
> CurrentDesktop: GNOME
> Date: Fri Jun  4 17:25:28 2021
> InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-10 (25 days ago)
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
> (20210209.1)
> ProcEnviron:
>   TERM=xterm-256color
>   PATH=(custom, no user)
>   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
>   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
>   SHELL=/bin/bash
> SourcePackage: grub2
> UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
> 
> ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
>   Importance: Undecided
>   Status: New
> 
> 
> ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal
> 

setting GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=keep in /etc/default/grub is a better fix.

Please close this report.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930940

Title:
  The files in grub/i386-pc are not in the /boot/grub directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1930940/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1930940] [NEW] The files in grub/i386-pc are not in the /boot/grub directory

[tomdean]

On 6/4/21 5:29 PM, tomdean wrote:
> Public bug reported:
> 
> Grub2 will not boot FreeBSD:
>error:can't find command 'hwmatch'
> 
> The file hwmatch.mod is in the i386-pc directory, which is not in the
> proper location for grub to find during boot.
> 
> cp -R /usr/lib/grub/i386-pc /boot/grub
> 
> fixes this problm
> 
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
> Package: grub2 2.04-1ubuntu26.12
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-55.62~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
> Uname: Linux 5.8.0-55-generic x86_64
> ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
> Architecture: amd64
> CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
> CurrentDesktop: GNOME
> Date: Fri Jun  4 17:25:28 2021
> InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-10 (25 days ago)
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
> (20210209.1)
> ProcEnviron:
>   TERM=xterm-256color
>   PATH=(custom, no user)
>   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
>   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
>   SHELL=/bin/bash
> SourcePackage: grub2
> UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
> 
> ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
>   Importance: Undecided
>   Status: New
> 
> 
> ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930940

Title:
  The files in grub/i386-pc are not in the /boot/grub directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1930940/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1215882]

[Mkmelin+mozilla]

Thunderbird 91 is just around the corner, and any change to 78 could no
longer get beta testing, so even with a fix to the old code we would not
take it at this point.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215882

Title:
  Emails are silently discarded on 554 reply to STARTTLS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1215882/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1215882]

[Jonathan Kamens]

The other reason this is a critical bug is because if the user does not
have Thunderbird configured to save messages in Sent Mail -- which the
user *shouldn't*, e.g., if the user is using Gmail, since Gmail saves
outbound messages automatically, then this bug causes DATA LOSS by
closing the window without saving the message ANYWHERE.

Can believe this bug is still not fixed after nearly a decade. Glad to
see it's about to be fixed, but as someone else pointed out in a recent
comment, if this is just a matter of changing the status codes that
cause Thunderbird to leave the compose window open, then maybe we should
make that fix in TB78 rather than waiting until the next major release
for it to be fixed?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215882

Title:
  Emails are silently discarded on 554 reply to STARTTLS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1215882/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1215882]

[rns]

We have a [Smtpd.jsm](https://searchfox.org/comm-
central/source/mailnews/test/fakeserver/Smtpd.jsm) fakeserver for
testing, we don't have a test case for this bug though.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215882

Title:
  Emails are silently discarded on 554 reply to STARTTLS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1215882/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1215882]

[Vseerror]

I just realized Ben has a test script comment 160.  Does smtp-js have a
test library, and does it cover this?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215882

Title:
  Emails are silently discarded on 554 reply to STARTTLS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1215882/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1215882]

[rns]

(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #180)
> Do we expect this to be gone with smtp-js?

Yes, I think so. Compose window is still open in my local test.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215882

Title:
  Emails are silently discarded on 554 reply to STARTTLS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1215882/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1215882]

[Vseerror]

Do we expect this to be gone with smtp-js?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215882

Title:
  Emails are silently discarded on 554 reply to STARTTLS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1215882/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921632] Re: build module CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE_SOF_MACH=m for 5.11, 5.13-rc2 and later

[Marian Klein]

Opened another ticket to upgrade alsa-lib to 1.2.5 for impish.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1930941

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921632

Title:
  build module CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE_SOF_MACH=m for 5.11,
  5.13-rc2 and later

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1921632/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930884] Re: failure to boot impish daily (no boot in 65 mins)

[Chris Guiver]

Ubuntu Desktop boots good on
- dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 
5000/6000/7350/8350)

(http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/424/builds/231660/testcases/1303/results)
ISO was written using GNOME-disks (recovery)

at ~2 mins 19 the maybe-ubiquity TRY/INSTALL question appeared & was asking 
which..
by ~3 mins 2 secs the desktop appeared stable

Lubuntu ISO (comment #5) was also tested on
- hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 5gb, nvidia quadro nvs 290)
- dell [optiplex] 755 (c2d-e8300, 8gb, amd/ati radeon rv610/radeon hd2400 
pro/xt)
- dell [optiplex] 755 (c2d-e6850, 5gb, amd/ati radeon rv516/x1300/x1550)
- dell [optiplex] 755 (c2d-e6850, 5gb, amd/ati radeon rv516/x1300/x1550)
Timings can be noted on 
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/424/builds/231678/testcases/1303/results/
 but these were 2 mins + change.. to boot (reasonable I believe)

(I'm wondering if I need to rule out mkusb involvement next)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930884

Title:
  failure to boot impish daily (no boot in 65 mins)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syslinux/+bug/1930884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930941] [NEW] upgrade ALSA libraries to version 1.2.5

[Marian Klein]

Public bug reported:

Please build the latest alsa libraries (version 1.2.5) for impish/
upgrade from version 1.2.4

libasound2 1.2.4-1.1ubuntu2
libasound2-data 1.2.4-1.1ubuntu2
alsa-utils 1.2.4-1ubuntu3
alsa-topology-conf 1.2.4-1
alsa-ucm-conf 1.2.4-2ubuntu1.1
alsa-tools 1.2.2-1
alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7

https://alsa-project.org/wiki/Main_Page

See also
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1921632/comments/48

Modern hardware (HP spectre X360) seems to need the latest alsa
libraries and configurations.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930941

Title:
  upgrade ALSA libraries to version 1.2.5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1930941/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921632] Re: build module CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE_SOF_MACH=m for 5.11, 5.13-rc2 and later

[Marian Klein]

In case of non-kernel packages can ubuntu deviate from debian?
According to 
https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=debian
debian uses alsa-lib version 1.2.4 in testing branch. 
Is it the reason ubuntu cannot upgrade to 1.2.5 of this package for impish?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921632

Title:
  build module CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE_SOF_MACH=m for 5.11,
  5.13-rc2 and later

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1921632/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930884] Re: failure to boot impish daily (no boot in 65 mins)

[Chris Guiver]

New Lubuntu daily attempting to boot on 
- dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 
5000/6000/7350/8350)
stop watch started at grub/lubuntu as I hit enter..

today's Lubuntu daily was written with mkusb/LIVE  (yesterdays was
mkusb/CLONE I believe)

75mins on the stopwatch and I'll FAIL this test at that mark...
cursor is still blinking top left corner, no change..

I don't believe it's a lubuntu issue.. ; switching to boot today's
ubuntu daily on box)

Ubuntu ISO was written to thumb-drive using GNOME-DISKS on my primary
impish box  (not yet tested)


** Changed in: syslinux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930884

Title:
  failure to boot impish daily (no boot in 65 mins)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syslinux/+bug/1930884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930884] Re: failure to boot impish daily (no boot in 65 mins)

[Chris Guiver]

** Summary changed:

- failure to boot impish daily  (or too slow; i gave up ~15 mins in..)
+ failure to boot impish daily (no boot in 65 mins)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930884

Title:
  failure to boot impish daily (no boot in 65 mins)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syslinux/+bug/1930884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921632] Re: build module CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE_SOF_MACH=m for 5.11, 5.13-rc2 and later

[Marian Klein]

Two questions.

1) Will impish 5.13 kernel be backported and made available to ubuntu
21.03/hirsute ?

2) Will the packages
libasound2 1.2.4-1.1ubuntu2 
libasound2-data1.2.4-1.1ubuntu2
alsa-utils 1.2.4-1ubuntu3
alsa-topology-conf 1.2.4-1
alsa-ucm-conf  1.2.4-2ubuntu1.1 
alsa-tools 1.2.2-1
alsa-base  1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7

   be upgraded to version 1.2.5 in impish? There is a syntax change in
the latest alsa-ucm-conf (git clone https://github.com/alsa-project
/alsa-ucm-conf.git) that can be read only with 1.2.5 alsa-utils library.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921632

Title:
  build module CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SOUNDWIRE_SOF_MACH=m for 5.11,
  5.13-rc2 and later

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1921632/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930940] [NEW] The files in grub/i386-pc are not in the /boot/grub directory

[tomdean]

Public bug reported:

Grub2 will not boot FreeBSD:
  error:can't find command 'hwmatch'

The file hwmatch.mod is in the i386-pc directory, which is not in the
proper location for grub to find during boot.

cp -R /usr/lib/grub/i386-pc /boot/grub

fixes this problm

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: grub2 2.04-1ubuntu26.12
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-55.62~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-55-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Fri Jun  4 17:25:28 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-10 (25 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: grub2
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930940

Title:
  The files in grub/i386-pc are not in the /boot/grub directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1930940/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1526507] Re: cal 2016 , 4th week of Jan,Feb & Mar is missing

[Alain Spineux]

I don't have the "faulty" system anymore (it was in 2015)
I cannot reproduce the problem on another machine running 16.04 and 
bsdmainutils-9.0.6ubuntu3
I cannot reproduce the problem on 18.04 nor 20.04.
The years 2020-2023 looks good to me on 20.04 then you can close this ticket.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1526507

Title:
  cal 2016 , 4th week of Jan,Feb & Mar is missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bsdmainutils/+bug/1526507/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1920567] Autopkgtest regression report (ply/3.11-3ubuntu0.1)

[Ubuntu SRU Bot]

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ply (3.11-3ubuntu0.1) for focal have 
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

astropy/4.0-4ubuntu1 (armhf)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#ply

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920567

Title:
  Misbuilds on focal: virtual packages are not provided

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ply/+bug/1920567/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 440051] Re: Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: firefox
   Status: Confirmed => Expired

** Changed in: firefox
   Importance: Wishlist => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440051

Title:
  Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1335388] Re: Firefox does not play local flash files

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: firefox
   Status: Confirmed => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335388

Title:
  Firefox does not play local flash files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1335388/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 440051]

[Niklasbetz20]

Adobe Flash is no longer supported.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440051

Title:
  Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 440051]

[Marja Erwin]

Depending on browser settings, Adobe's website can strobe, trigger
migraines, and for some people, trigger seizures, with several refreshes
per second. I think it may be a cookie-handling bug. Firefox shouldn't
point any users to the website.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440051

Title:
  Firefox should not offer a manual install of Flash on First Run

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/440051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1335388]

[Niklasbetz20]

Adobe Flash is no longer supported.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335388

Title:
  Firefox does not play local flash files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1335388/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1365701] Re: clang crashed with SIGSEGV, reproducible with c file

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: llvm
   Status: Confirmed => Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365701

Title:
  clang crashed with SIGSEGV, reproducible with c file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/llvm/+bug/1365701/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1365701]

[Koutheir-attouchi]

This issue also happens when targeting ARM in 32-bits mode.

It can be fixed, similarly to the x86 fix, by calling
setLibcallName(RTLIB::MUL_I128, nullptr) inside
ARMTargetLowering::ARMTargetLowering(const TargetMachine , const
ARMSubtarget ) in the file
"llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365701

Title:
  clang crashed with SIGSEGV, reproducible with c file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/llvm/+bug/1365701/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930939] Re: package shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

[Apport retracing service]

** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930939

Title:
  package shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1930939/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1862053]

[Rguenth]

GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862053

Title:
  Compiler gets stuck (or extremely slow) on ppc64el

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1862053/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930939] [NEW] package shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

[$uperu$er]

Public bug reported:

occurred yesterday upon install i believe then it occurred again right
now when i restarted my laptop

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-18.19-generic 5.11.17
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-18-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
.proc.sys.kernel.moksbstate_disabled: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or 
directory: '/proc/sys/kernel/moksbstate_disabled'
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1
Architecture: amd64
BootEFIContents:
 BOOTX64.CSV
 grub.cfg
 grubx64.efi
 mmx64.efi
 shimx64.efi
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
Date: Thu Jun  3 18:22:10 2021
ErrorMessage: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess 
returned error exit status 1
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.9, Python 3.9.5, python3-minimal, 3.9.4-1
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.20.9ubuntu1
 apt  2.2.3
SecureBoot: 6   0   0   0   0
SourcePackage: shim-signed
Title: package shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: 
installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: shim-signed (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: $uperu$er (nozzz)
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package hirsute

** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => $uperu$er (nozzz)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930939

Title:
  package shim-signed 1.47+15.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1930939/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1920674] Re: AMD A8-7680 (amdgpu): broken Xorg acceleration and hibernation

[RBX2]

Ok, I thank you very much for your effort!
If anything else comes to your mind I'm willing to do the testing.

Can you please suggest how do I get the debug code and what the
pm_genpd_add_device() function is?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920674

Title:
  AMD A8-7680 (amdgpu): broken Xorg acceleration and hibernation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1920674/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930884] Re: failure to boot impish daily (or too slow; i gave up ~15 mins in..)

[Chris Guiver]

@Brian - it maybe that very issue (why I mentioned the bug in the
description & likely wrote as if it was) but for it to be that issue,
the box has to eventually boot..

feels similar yes, but still different..
I didn't want to leave the box on overnight (I thought about; it'd have 
answered the boot question) 

I'm writing an updated lubuntu daily now (mkusb/live; yesterday was
mkusb/clone as I recall) for testing..

I also plan to zsync my ubuntu ISO & try that..  I'll give it an hour to
boot today.. so I hope to have more info by this arvo.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930884

Title:
  failure to boot impish daily  (or too slow; i gave up ~15 mins in..)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syslinux/+bug/1930884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930911] Re: virtualbox dkms should not prevent building for unsupported kernel

[Brian Murray]

** Package changed: ubuntu => virtualbox (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930911

Title:
  virtualbox dkms should not prevent building for unsupported kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1930911/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930938] Re: package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.12 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127

[Apport retracing service]

** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930938

Title:
  package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.12 failed to install/upgrade: installed
  grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error
  exit status 127

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1930938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930938] [NEW] package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.12 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127

[Mike Rudd]

Public bug reported:

Don't know enough to provide more info.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.12
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-50.56~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-50-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Fri Jun  4 18:33:07 2021
DuplicateSignature:
 package:grub-pc:2.04-1ubuntu26.12
 Setting up grub-pc (2.04-1ubuntu26.12) ...
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-pc.config: 1: /etc/default/grub: If: not found
 dpkg: error processing package grub-pc (--configure):
  installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error 
exit status 127
ErrorMessage: installed grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess 
returned error exit status 127
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-08 (27 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
InvalidGrubScript: /etc/default/grub
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-50-generic 
root=UUID=891fe260-86c8-4362-b5d4-2768480b646a ro quiet splash
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.5
SourcePackage: grub2
Title: package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.12 failed to install/upgrade: installed 
grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 
127
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930938

Title:
  package grub-pc 2.04-1ubuntu26.12 failed to install/upgrade: installed
  grub-pc package post-installation script subprocess returned error
  exit status 127

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1930938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930921] Re: Apache 2.4.41 corrupts files from samba share

[Seth Arnold]

I've added a few more packages to the bug; nothing in the various links
suggested to me that anyone has yet identified where the fault lies.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930921

Title:
  Apache 2.4.41 corrupts files from samba share

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1930921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927124] Re: Azure/Xenial Pro FIPS: RuntimeError: duplicate mac found!

[Chad Smith]

cloud-config userdata to provide during Azure PRO FIPS 16.04 (Xenial)
launch with accelerated networking: via 'az vm create --custom-data
azure-xenial*workaround.yaml...'

** Attachment added: "azure-xenial-pro-fips-workaround.yaml"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1927124/+attachment/5502540/+files/azure-xenial-pro-fips-workaround.yaml

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927124

Title:
  Azure/Xenial Pro FIPS: RuntimeError: duplicate mac found!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1927124/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927124] Re: Azure/Xenial Pro FIPS: RuntimeError: duplicate mac found!

[Chad Smith]

I have proposed an upstream PR to fix this inconsistency in handling
excluded drivers for azure in stages at https://github.com/canonical
/cloud-init/pull/914

Given that Xenial is currently in Extended Security Maintenance for
support, I don't know if we will be able to publish a fix into xenial-
updates to fix this corner case.

This will only affect fresh launches of Azure Ubuntu PRO FIPS 16.04
(Xenial) images which also have Accelerated networking enabled.

Two posible workarounds in the absence of a cloud-init fix in xenial-updates:
 1. Provide the following #cloud-config userdata during Ubuntu PRO FIPS 16.04 
with accelerated networking (Attached as azure-xenial-pro-fips-workaround.yaml)

#cloud-config
bootcmd:
- "sed -i '/distro = self._distro/i \\if self.datasource.dsname 
== \"Azure\":\\nself._distro.networking.blacklist_drivers = 
[\"mlx4_core\", \"mlx5_core\"]' 
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/stages.py"


OR 

 2. Launch a Ubuntu PRO 16.04 (Xenial) with Accelerated networking
enable FIPS & reboot:

   ssh 
   # Add overrides to /etc/ubuntu-advantage/uaclient.conf
   $ echo "features:\n  allow_xenial_fips_on_cloud: true" | sudo tee -a 
/etc/ubuntu-advantage/uaclient.conf
   $ sudo ua enable fips --assume-yes
   $ sudo reboot
 

The reason option 2 works is because SSH keys will have already been
generated so the Traceback on duplicate mac addresses won't affect
accessibility of VM once it reboots into FIPS mode.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927124

Title:
  Azure/Xenial Pro FIPS: RuntimeError: duplicate mac found!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1927124/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930921] Re: Apache 2.4.41 corrupts files from samba share

[Seth Arnold]

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930921

Title:
  Apache 2.4.41 corrupts files from samba share

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1930921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 915059] Re: [Upstream] Compare Document highlighting unchanged words as changed

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: df-libreoffice
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915059

Title:
  [Upstream] Compare Document highlighting unchanged words as changed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/915059/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1388491] Re: [upstream] calc: "Cut" and "Paste special" -> "Transpose" affects other cells

[Bug Watch Updater]

** Changed in: df-libreoffice
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1388491

Title:
  [upstream] calc: "Cut" and "Paste special" -> "Transpose" affects
  other cells

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1388491/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1582334] Re: aide --init fails with "/var/lib/aide/please-dont-call-aide-without-parameters/aide.db.new"

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: aide (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582334

Title:
  aide --init fails with "/var/lib/aide/please-dont-call-aide-without-
  parameters/aide.db.new"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aide/+bug/1582334/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 915059]

[timur]

Created attachment 172605
version compared screen

This bug seems to have been resolved in 3.6 which makes it opposite to bug 
71155 which started then. 
Comparison attached.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915059

Title:
  [Upstream] Compare Document highlighting unchanged words as changed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/915059/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 915059]

[Qa-admin-q]

Dear Leo H,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open,
confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked
on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has
been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really
appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still
present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of
LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information 
from Help - About LibreOffice.
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to 
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help 
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular 
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a 
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your 
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from 
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: 
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915059

Title:
  [Upstream] Compare Document highlighting unchanged words as changed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/915059/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1388491]

[Libreoffice-commits]

scito committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/c82d96da1c9a03e1742f2f5a7a93b9993c96a0a0

tdf#68976 fix paste transposed regression for notes/patterns

It will be available in 7.2.0.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1388491

Title:
  [upstream] calc: "Cut" and "Paste special" -> "Transpose" affects
  other cells

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1388491/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1881811]

[Buzea-bogdan]

it's ok in
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 3b57ebb445df8a2bc3d916ea79f8af45e20e4e62
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881811

Title:
  Values cleared when scrolling in standard filter dialog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1881811/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877088] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-base/4.5ubuntu3.5)

[Ubuntu SRU Bot]

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-base (4.5ubuntu3.5) for focal 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

linux-hwe-5.8/5.8.0-55.62~20.04.1 (amd64)
linux-gcp-5.8/5.8.0-1032.34~20.04.1 (amd64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-base

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877088

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] installkernel script does not symlink /boot/initrd.img
  which is required with the default zipl.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1877088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928700] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-base/4.5ubuntu3.5)

[Ubuntu SRU Bot]

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-base (4.5ubuntu3.5) for focal 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

linux-hwe-5.8/5.8.0-55.62~20.04.1 (amd64)
linux-gcp-5.8/5.8.0-1032.34~20.04.1 (amd64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-base

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928700

Title:
  new postinst hook requires initramfs-tools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-base/+bug/1928700/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1929255] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-base/4.5ubuntu3.5)

[Ubuntu SRU Bot]

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-base (4.5ubuntu3.5) for focal 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

linux-hwe-5.8/5.8.0-55.62~20.04.1 (amd64)
linux-gcp-5.8/5.8.0-1032.34~20.04.1 (amd64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-base

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929255

Title:
  update-initrd-links creates incorrect symlinks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-base/+bug/1929255/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-kvm/5.4.0.1041.39)

[Ubuntu SRU Bot]

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-kvm (5.4.0.1041.39) for 
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 (amd64)
sl-modem/2.9.11~20110321-16ubuntu1 (amd64)
virtualbox/6.1.16-dfsg-6~ubuntu1.20.04.2 (amd64)
nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server/450.119.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 (amd64)
dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu6.2 (amd64)
nvidia-graphics-drivers-460/460.80-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 (amd64)
lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 (amd64)
glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.2 (amd64)
nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server/460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 (amd64)
backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.3 (amd64)
v4l2loopback/0.12.3-1ubuntu0.4 (amd64)
oss4/4.2-build2010-5ubuntu6~20.04.2 (amd64)
rtl8821ce/5.5.2.1-0ubuntu4~20.04.3 (amd64)
rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.2 (amd64)
virtualbox-hwe/6.1.16-dfsg-6ubuntu1.20.04.2 (amd64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-kvm

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013

Title:
  Packaging resync

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930937] [NEW] Default dependency resolution in Focal pulls in full GNOME Desktop

[Daniel Dadap]

Public bug reported:

In Bionic, screen-resolution-extra has a dependency on policykit-1-gnome
| polkit-1-auth-agent. Focal replaces this with a dependency on gnome-
shell | policykit-1-gnome | polkit-1-auth-agent. As a result, when
install screen-resolution-extra (e.g. as a dependency of nvidia-
settings) on a system that doesn't already have GNOME or another polkit
auth agent installed, the default dependency resolution pulls in a full
GNOME desktop in Focal, while it does not do so under the same
circumstances in Bionic. This can be worked around by explicitly
installing policykit-1-gnome (or another package which provides the
polkit-1-auth-agent virtual package), but it would be nice to not pull
in GNOME by default on a system that doesn't already have it.

** Affects: screen-resolution-extra (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930937

Title:
  Default dependency resolution in Focal pulls in full GNOME Desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/screen-resolution-extra/+bug/1930937/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

[Seth Arnold]

Hmm, I thought the only 'reliable' way of addressing the 'not yet
active' problem was to use the sd_notify(3) family of functions to let
systemd know when a service is actually ready to handle requests. I
suggest proposing your patch in a Debian bug to get the maintainer's
feedback on it. (A test case to demonstrate why you're proposing the
change would probably help.)

As for the socket accepting both user commands and administrative
commands, I think that will require a discussion with the upstreams of
the various projects. It's wild to me that those things  are co-mingled
into one socket, but perhaps that's intentional for good reasons.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930393

Title:
  any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1930393/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1738987] Re: /usr/share/calendar/calendar.ubuntu is missing releases

[Brian Murray]

It's not really clear to me the use case for having
/usr/share/calendar/calendar.ubuntu at all. Does anybody have a use for
the file existing?

** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738987

Title:
  /usr/share/calendar/calendar.ubuntu is missing releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bsdmainutils/+bug/1738987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898815] Re: Focal upgrade fails, can't mark packages for upgrade

[Brian Murray]

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898815

Title:
  Focal upgrade fails, can't mark packages for upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1898815/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1929146] Re: Can't upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04

[Brian Murray]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1886748 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886748

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1886748
   upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 fails to calculate if libomp5 is installed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929146

Title:
  Can't upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1929146/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928868] Re: fails in upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04

[Brian Murray]

Thanks for taking the time to report this upgrade failure. There is
currently a new version of the release upgrader available which may
resolve the error you've encountered. Please run the following command
to test the new version of the upgrader:

  do-release-upgrade

Please lets us know the results in this bug report. Thanks again and
good luck!

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

** Tags added: lp-1928397

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928868

Title:
  fails in upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1928868/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930393] Re: any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

[Seth Arnold]

** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930393

Title:
  any local user can shut clamd down via control socket

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1930393/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930640] Re: Error when using S3 multipart upload - TypeError: cannot use a string pattern on a bytes-like object

[Jon Yoon]

I've tried using boto3+s3:// as well before and it was unsuccessful.
Swapping it out with this newer version of duplicity produced an error
regarding the HeadBucket operation.

See new failure below. I turned up the verbosity to 9 for this one.

Note: My company is using Duplicity 0.8.11 and Duply in other servers
(Servers are running Ubuntu 20.04 w/Python 3.5.8) without issue.
However, this particular machine is the only one where we needed to
implement multipart chunks due to the size of the backup being so huge
compared to our other servers that don't need it.

I know that on a different server (Ubuntu 16.04) running Duplicity
0.7.19 on Python 2.7, the multipart chunking worked without issue, but
since we can't run that version of Python or Duplicity on this newer
version of Ubuntu, I'm not sure what else we need to do to get 0.8.19 to
work here.



Start duply v2.2, time is 2021-06-04 21:26:37.
Using profile '/root/.duply/artifactory_backup'.
Using installed duplicity version 0.8.19, python 3.8.5 (/usr/bin/python3), gpg 
2.2.19 (Home: /root/.gnupg), awk 'GNU Awk 5.0.1, API: 2.0 (GNU MPFR 4.0.2, GNU 
MP 6.2.0)', grep 'grep (GNU grep) 3.4', bash '5.0.17(1)-rele
ase (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)'.
Checking TEMP_DIR '/tmp' is a folder and writable (OK)
Test - En/Decryption skipped. (GPG disabled)

--- Start running command PRE at 21:26:37.615 ---
Skipping n/a script '/root/.duply/artifactory_backup/pre'.
--- Finished state OK at 21:26:37.628 - Runtime 00:00:00.012 ---

--- Start running command BKP at 21:26:37.659 ---
Using archive dir: /root/.cache/duplicity/duply_artifactory_backup
Using backup name: duply_artifactory_backup
GPG binary is gpg, version (2, 2, 19)
Import of duplicity.backends.adbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.azurebackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.b2backend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.boxbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.cfbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.dpbxbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.gdocsbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.gdrivebackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.giobackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.hsibackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.hubicbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.idrivedbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.imapbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.jottacloudbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.lftpbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.localbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.mediafirebackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.megabackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.megav2backend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.megav3backend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.multibackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.ncftpbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.onedrivebackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.par2backend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.pcabackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.pydrivebackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.rclonebackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.rsyncbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.s3_boto3_backend Succeeded
Multiprocessing is not supported on linux, will use threads instead.
Import of duplicity.backends.s3_boto_backend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.ssh_paramiko_backend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.ssh_pexpect_backend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.swiftbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.sxbackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.tahoebackend Succeeded
Import of duplicity.backends.webdavbackend Succeeded
Reading globbing filelist /root/.duply/artifactory_backup/exclude
Main action: inc
Acquiring lockfile b'/root/.cache/duplicity/duply_artifactory_backup/lockfile'

duplicity 0.8.19
Args: /usr/bin/duplicity --name duply_artifactory_backup --no-encryption 
--verbosity 9 --full-if-older-than 7D --volsize 1024 --s3-use-multiprocessing 
--s3-multipart-chunk-size 512 --allow-source-mismatch --exclude-filelist 
/root/.duply/artifactory_backup/exclude /labkey 
boto3+s3://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/BUCKET-NAME/artifactory_backup
Linux ip-172-30-115-92 5.4.0-1049-aws #51-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 12 21:13:52 UTC 
2021 x86_64 x86_64
/usr/bin/python3 3.8.5 (default, May 27 2021, 13:30:53) 
[GCC 9.3.0]

Using temporary directory /tmp/duplicity-_k91zmc2-tempdir
Registering (mkstemp) temporary file 
/tmp/duplicity-_k91zmc2-tempdir/mkstemp-t1cl2e0h-1
Temp has 138928574464 available, backup will use approx 1395864371.
Backtrace of previous error: Traceback (innermost last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/duplicity/backend.py", line 384, in 
inner_retry
return fn(self, *args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/duplicity/backend.py", line 604, in list
return