Re: [Bug 1814314] Re: add nut-scanner to build

2019-02-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi fellows,

It's always true that I'm more focused on upstream these years, than on
Debian an Ubuntu.
I'll try to make a summary to explain the what and how on this nut-scanner
feature, on the Debian ticket

cheers
Arno
-- 
Eaton Data Center Automation Solutions - Opensource Leader -
http://42ity.org
NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814314

Title:
  add nut-scanner to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1814314/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1647088] Re: NUT not work with apc backups with usb through usbhid-ups

2016-12-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi guys,

this is very possibly a duplicate of #1483615
the error is probably due to an issue retrieving a string, and not handled in 
the driver code.
To confirm, please start the driver in debug mode using (as root):
/lib/nut/usbhid-ups -u nut -DDD -a myups
then
/lib/nut/usbhid-ups -u root -DDD -a myups

if confirmed, this was fixed upstream:
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/f679a2820e49cbdec4138295de5e8947ee953a8a

However, as mentioned in the other ticket, the above fix has some negative 
impact.
this may in the end be due to another ticket (tied to udev and privileges 
application) logged by Charles Lepple. This privileges issues could lead to the 
string retrieval issue, causing these bugs.

All in all, adding the patch has more benefits than drawbacks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647088

Title:
  NUT not work with apc backups with usb through usbhid-ups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1647088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1099947] Re: driver unable to connect to CyberPower UPS using usbhid-ups driver

2014-08-01 Thread Arnaud Quette
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #721600
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721600

** Also affects: nut (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721600
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099947

Title:
  driver unable to connect to CyberPower UPS using usbhid-ups driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1099947/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1099947] Re: driver unable to connect to CyberPower UPS using usbhid-ups driver

2014-08-01 Thread Arnaud Quette
Logged upstream, fixed and due with the next 2.7.3 release:
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/140

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099947

Title:
  driver unable to connect to CyberPower UPS using usbhid-ups driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1099947/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1099947] Re: driver unable to connect to CyberPower UPS using usbhid-ups driver

2014-08-01 Thread Arnaud Quette
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #721600
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721600

** Also affects: nut (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721600
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099947

Title:
  driver unable to connect to CyberPower UPS using usbhid-ups driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1099947/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1099947] Re: driver unable to connect to CyberPower UPS using usbhid-ups driver

2014-08-01 Thread Arnaud Quette
Logged upstream, fixed and due with the next 2.7.3 release:
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/140

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099947

Title:
  driver unable to connect to CyberPower UPS using usbhid-ups driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1099947/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1197878] Re: SNMPv3 not working with APC

2013-09-07 Thread Arnaud Quette
The user has found a solution:
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/7ab6c65872f663eefa9c6cd0fc73942c3540b5b8

Simply add privProtocol=AES to your UPS entry in /etc/nut/ups.conf,
i.e.:

[myups]
driver = snmp-ups
privProtocol=AES

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197878

Title:
  SNMPv3 not working with APC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1197878/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1197878] Re: SNMPv3 not working with APC

2013-09-07 Thread Arnaud Quette
I forgot: could you please confirm back, so that I can update NUT HCL.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197878

Title:
  SNMPv3 not working with APC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1197878/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1197878] Re: SNMPv3 not working with APC

2013-09-07 Thread Arnaud Quette
I forgot: could you please confirm back, so that I can update NUT HCL.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197878

Title:
  SNMPv3 not working with APC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1197878/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1197878] Re: SNMPv3 not working with APC

2013-09-07 Thread Arnaud Quette
The user has found a solution:
https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/7ab6c65872f663eefa9c6cd0fc73942c3540b5b8

Simply add privProtocol=AES to your UPS entry in /etc/nut/ups.conf,
i.e.:

[myups]
driver = snmp-ups
privProtocol=AES

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197878

Title:
  SNMPv3 not working with APC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1197878/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1197878] [NEW] SNMPv3 not working with APC

2013-07-04 Thread Arnaud Quette
Have you tried without mentioning mibs=apcc in ups.conf?

Arno
--
(sent from my eeePad... please excuse my brevity)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197878

Title:
  SNMPv3 not working with APC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1197878/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 1197878] [NEW] SNMPv3 not working with APC

2013-07-04 Thread Arnaud Quette
Have you tried without mentioning mibs=apcc in ups.conf?

Arno
--
(sent from my eeePad... please excuse my brevity)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197878

Title:
  SNMPv3 not working with APC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1197878/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-09-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dmitry,

2012/9/11 Frederic Bohe 915...@bugs.launchpad.net

 Please see http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-
 upsuser/2012-September/007909.html


please check the above reference pointed by Fred.
This is the solution you were waiting for.

To Ubuntu packagers fellows: the patch to be applied are
http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3721
http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3723

These patches also applies to 2.6.1 (the version of the present report),
though there are a few hunks on the first one.
Since these only impacts source files, there is nothing else required than
patching before the build.

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix / Opensource Engineering Expert - Eaton -
http://opensource.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-09-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dmitry,

2012/9/11 Frederic Bohe 915...@bugs.launchpad.net

 Please see http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-
 upsuser/2012-September/007909.html


please check the above reference pointed by Fred.
This is the solution you were waiting for.

To Ubuntu packagers fellows: the patch to be applied are
http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3721
http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3723

These patches also applies to 2.6.1 (the version of the present report),
though there are a few hunks on the first one.
Since these only impacts source files, there is nothing else required than
patching before the build.

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix / Opensource Engineering Expert - Eaton -
http://opensource.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1014347] Re: NUT License prevents distribution of SSL-enabled builds

2012-06-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
We (NUT upstream) are working on fixing this long term issue.
The option we've chosen is to propose a 2nd implementation, beside of OpenSSL, 
using Mozilla NSS.
There is a branch available, that is currently under heavy testing:
https://github.com/aquette/nut/tree/ssl-nss-port-CFL

This will be available in NUT 2.8.0 (exact release date to be defined)

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #347771
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347771

** Also affects: nut (Fedora) via
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347771
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014347

Title:
  NUT License prevents distribution of SSL-enabled builds

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1014347/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 920844] Re: nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is in nut-server)

2012-06-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
This will be fixed with the next sync with Debian (nut-2.6.3-2 or
better, nut 2.6.4-1)

-- Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920844

Title:
  nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is
  in nut-server)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/920844/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1014347] Re: NUT License prevents distribution of SSL-enabled builds

2012-06-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
We (NUT upstream) are working on fixing this long term issue.
The option we've chosen is to propose a 2nd implementation, beside of OpenSSL, 
using Mozilla NSS.
There is a branch available, that is currently under heavy testing:
https://github.com/aquette/nut/tree/ssl-nss-port-CFL

This will be available in NUT 2.8.0 (exact release date to be defined)

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #347771
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347771

** Also affects: nut (Fedora) via
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347771
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014347

Title:
  NUT License prevents distribution of SSL-enabled builds

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1014347/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 920844] Re: nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is in nut-server)

2012-06-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
This will be fixed with the next sync with Debian (nut-2.6.3-2 or
better, nut 2.6.4-1)

-- Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920844

Title:
  nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is
  in nut-server)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/920844/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/6/9 Dmitry Andreychuk 915...@bugs.launchpad.net

 I'll test it next week, as soon as i get to the hardware.


great, thanks.

cheers,
-- Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/6/9 Dmitry Andreychuk 915...@bugs.launchpad.net

 I'll test it next week, as soon as i get to the hardware.


great, thanks.

cheers,
-- Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-08 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dimitry,

can you please test the last patch I sent (apc-hid-overflow-2.diff) and
report the output?

cheers,
--- Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-06-08 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dimitry,

can you please test the last patch I sent (apc-hid-overflow-2.diff) and
report the output?

cheers,
--- Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575573] Re: libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

2012-06-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
we (NUT upstream) had a lot of success report with this specific type of
units (USB 0x0665:0x5161) since this bug report, using blazer_usb
instead of megatec_usb.

Considering the bug age, the lack of activity (feedback) and the existence of a 
solution, I'm thus closing this bug.
If you feel this issue still affects you, please reopen the present bug.

cheers
--- Arnaud


** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575573

Title:
  libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/575573/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 839509] Re: nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

2012-06-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
Considering that NUT can't log the poweroff) actions, since this action
is called from halt, there is no RW filesystem at this stage.

So the log_* LSB functions are really called for console output.
upsmon already logged that it was bringing down the system, so there is no need 
to add more... in the syslog at least.

I'm thus closing this bug.

cheers
-- Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839509

Title:
  nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/839509/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2012-06-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
Wolfgang,

I'm closing the bug since you have a fix.
If you feel you are still facing an issue, don't hesitate to reopen this bug, 
or open a new one.

cheers,
--- Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608182

Title:
  problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/608182/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 575573] Re: libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

2012-06-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
we (NUT upstream) had a lot of success report with this specific type of
units (USB 0x0665:0x5161) since this bug report, using blazer_usb
instead of megatec_usb.

Considering the bug age, the lack of activity (feedback) and the existence of a 
solution, I'm thus closing this bug.
If you feel this issue still affects you, please reopen the present bug.

cheers
--- Arnaud


** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575573

Title:
  libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/575573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 839509] Re: nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

2012-06-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
Considering that NUT can't log the poweroff) actions, since this action
is called from halt, there is no RW filesystem at this stage.

So the log_* LSB functions are really called for console output.
upsmon already logged that it was bringing down the system, so there is no need 
to add more... in the syslog at least.

I'm thus closing this bug.

cheers
-- Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839509

Title:
  nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/839509/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 608182] Re: problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

2012-06-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
Wolfgang,

I'm closing the bug since you have a fix.
If you feel you are still facing an issue, don't hesitate to reopen this bug, 
or open a new one.

cheers,
--- Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608182

Title:
  problems with ups (mge pulsar es 8+)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/608182/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 915985] Re: [Nut-upsuser] libusb_get_report: Unknown error

2012-04-12 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com

 Seems I've missed confirmation mail somewhere, now registered.


  have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch?
 I've used trunk + the patch.


  I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to
  see if we're still on the overflow side.

 trunk (rev.3529) with no patch log attached.

 Btw I've checked all logs I've sent so far - all of them contain:

   1.199490 libusb_get_report: Unknown error
   1.199512 Can't retrieve Report 0c: Input/output error

 Seems you are talking about Dmitry's case (overflow).


you're right: your issues are the same, but BSD doesn't report EOVERFLOW
has it should.
while Dmitry is running on Linux, the patch should work there.

@Robert: could you please run the test again (with wathever version), using
debug level 5 (-D) and doing export USB_DEBUG=3 before launching the
driver?

if there is no way to catch overflow on BSD, I fear I'll have to create a
driver option to bypass this...

cheers,
Arno




 On 04/11/12 16:35, Arnaud Quette wrote:


 2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com
 mailto:robert.ayrapetyan@**gmail.com robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com


Hi.


 Hi Robert,

 please check your subscription.
 I'm still told that you're not subscribed!

Mine output after patch looks same (attached).


 in fact, it's different.
 It's no more an overflow error, but an I/O error!

 have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch?
 in the latter case, I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to
 see if we're still on the overflow side.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Arnaud Quette
aquette@gmail.com mailto:aquette@gmail.com** wrote:
  Hi Robert and Dmitry,
 
  I'm crossing LP with the nut mailing list, since this is the same
EOVERFLOW
  issue.
 
  @Dmitry: it comes out that my previous patch was missing the
libusb.c part
  :-/
 
  to both, the attached patch should fix your issue.
  please send compressed debug output to confirm the fix.
 
  I'll have to do some more testing tomorrow since it's blind
coded (Ie,
  just compiled, not tested with HW)
 
  cheers,
  Arnaud


 cheers,
 Arnaud
 --
 Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
 Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.**
 org/ http://www.networkupstools.org/
 Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
 Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/



-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 915985] Re: [Nut-upsuser] libusb_get_report: Unknown error

2012-04-12 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com

 Seems I've missed confirmation mail somewhere, now registered.


  have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch?
 I've used trunk + the patch.


  I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to
  see if we're still on the overflow side.

 trunk (rev.3529) with no patch log attached.

 Btw I've checked all logs I've sent so far - all of them contain:

   1.199490 libusb_get_report: Unknown error
   1.199512 Can't retrieve Report 0c: Input/output error

 Seems you are talking about Dmitry's case (overflow).


you're right: your issues are the same, but BSD doesn't report EOVERFLOW
has it should.
while Dmitry is running on Linux, the patch should work there.

@Robert: could you please run the test again (with wathever version), using
debug level 5 (-D) and doing export USB_DEBUG=3 before launching the
driver?

if there is no way to catch overflow on BSD, I fear I'll have to create a
driver option to bypass this...

cheers,
Arno




 On 04/11/12 16:35, Arnaud Quette wrote:


 2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com
 mailto:robert.ayrapetyan@**gmail.com robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com


Hi.


 Hi Robert,

 please check your subscription.
 I'm still told that you're not subscribed!

Mine output after patch looks same (attached).


 in fact, it's different.
 It's no more an overflow error, but an I/O error!

 have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch?
 in the latter case, I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to
 see if we're still on the overflow side.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Arnaud Quette
aquette@gmail.com mailto:aquette@gmail.com** wrote:
  Hi Robert and Dmitry,
 
  I'm crossing LP with the nut mailing list, since this is the same
EOVERFLOW
  issue.
 
  @Dmitry: it comes out that my previous patch was missing the
libusb.c part
  :-/
 
  to both, the attached patch should fix your issue.
  please send compressed debug output to confirm the fix.
 
  I'll have to do some more testing tomorrow since it's blind
coded (Ie,
  just compiled, not tested with HW)
 
  cheers,
  Arnaud


 cheers,
 Arnaud
 --
 Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
 Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.**
 org/ http://www.networkupstools.org/
 Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
 Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/



-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 915985] Re: [Nut-upsuser] libusb_get_report: Unknown error

2012-04-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com

 Hi.


Hi Robert,

please check your subscription.
I'm still told that you're not subscribed!

Mine output after patch looks same (attached).


in fact, it's different.
It's no more an overflow error, but an I/O error!

have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch?
in the latter case, I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to see
if we're still on the overflow side.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Arnaud Quette aquette@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi Robert and Dmitry,
 
  I'm crossing LP with the nut mailing list, since this is the same
 EOVERFLOW
  issue.
 
  @Dmitry: it comes out that my previous patch was missing the libusb.c
 part
  :-/
 
  to both, the attached patch should fix your issue.
  please send compressed debug output to confirm the fix.
 
  I'll have to do some more testing tomorrow since it's blind coded (Ie,
  just compiled, not tested with HW)
 
  cheers,
  Arnaud


cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 915985] Re: [Nut-upsuser] libusb_get_report: Unknown error

2012-04-11 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com

 Hi.


Hi Robert,

please check your subscription.
I'm still told that you're not subscribed!

Mine output after patch looks same (attached).


in fact, it's different.
It's no more an overflow error, but an I/O error!

have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch?
in the latter case, I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to see
if we're still on the overflow side.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Arnaud Quette aquette@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi Robert and Dmitry,
 
  I'm crossing LP with the nut mailing list, since this is the same
 EOVERFLOW
  issue.
 
  @Dmitry: it comes out that my previous patch was missing the libusb.c
 part
  :-/
 
  to both, the attached patch should fix your issue.
  please send compressed debug output to confirm the fix.
 
  I'll have to do some more testing tomorrow since it's blind coded (Ie,
  just compiled, not tested with HW)
 
  cheers,
  Arnaud


cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 915985] Re: [Nut-upsuser] libusb_get_report: Unknown error

2012-04-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Robert and Dmitry,

I'm crossing LP with the nut mailing list, since this is the same EOVERFLOW
issue.

@Dmitry: it comes out that my previous patch was missing the libusb.c part
:-/

to both, the attached patch should fix your issue.
please send compressed debug output to confirm the fix.

I'll have to do some more testing tomorrow since it's blind coded (Ie,
just compiled, not tested with HW)

cheers,
Arnaud


** Attachment added: apc-hid-overflow-2.diff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985/+attachment/3043072/+files/apc-hid-overflow-2.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 915985] Re: [Nut-upsuser] libusb_get_report: Unknown error

2012-04-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Robert and Dmitry,

I'm crossing LP with the nut mailing list, since this is the same EOVERFLOW
issue.

@Dmitry: it comes out that my previous patch was missing the libusb.c part
:-/

to both, the attached patch should fix your issue.
please send compressed debug output to confirm the fix.

I'll have to do some more testing tomorrow since it's blind coded (Ie,
just compiled, not tested with HW)

cheers,
Arnaud


** Attachment added: apc-hid-overflow-2.diff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985/+attachment/3043072/+files/apc-hid-overflow-2.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2012-01-27 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Martin,

thanks for your confirmation.
I'm now closing this bug.

Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779512

Title:
  nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 575573] Re: libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

2012-01-27 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dear all,

could you all please try blazer_usb, which has replaced megatec_usb for some 
time.
blazer_usb has improved a lot the situation, and many issues, like yours, have 
been fixed with it.

cheers,
Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575573

Title:
  libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/575573/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 920844] Re: nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is in nut-server)

2012-01-27 Thread Arnaud Quette
** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920844

Title:
  nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is
  in nut-server)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/920844/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2012-01-27 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Martin,

thanks for your confirmation.
I'm now closing this bug.

Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779512

Title:
  nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575573] Re: libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

2012-01-27 Thread Arnaud Quette
Dear all,

could you all please try blazer_usb, which has replaced megatec_usb for some 
time.
blazer_usb has improved a lot the situation, and many issues, like yours, have 
been fixed with it.

cheers,
Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575573

Title:
  libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/575573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 920844] Re: nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is in nut-server)

2012-01-27 Thread Arnaud Quette
** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Arnaud Quette (aquette)

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920844

Title:
  nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is
  in nut-server)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/920844/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 920844] Re: nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is in nut-server)

2012-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #634858
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634858

** Also affects: nut (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634858
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920844

Title:
  nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is
  in nut-server)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/920844/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 328057] Re: virtualbox's udev rule overwrite nut rule about group owner

2012-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
This has been fixed where it should, Ie in VirtualBox.
The fix seems to be available since VirtualBox 4.0:
https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/7759

Arnaud

** Bug watch added: Virtualbox Trac #7759
   http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/7759

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328057

Title:
  virtualbox's udev rule overwrite nut rule about group owner

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/328057/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 578200] Re: (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

2012-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
NUT release 2.6.2 has fixed the regression in udev rules file creation.

In case you're stuck with an older version, I've attached a udev rules file.
Just overwrite the one on your system, using:
1) first, identify the current location of the udev file:
$ ls /???/udev/rules.d/*nut*

This should point either '/etc/udev/rules.d/52-nut-usbups.rules' (older
release) or '/lib/udev/rules.d/52-nut-usbups.rules'

2) now, overwrite this file using the one provided here:
$ cp -f /path/to/new/52-nut-usbups.rules /???/udev/rules.d/52-nut-usbups.rules

Remember to replace '???' by either 'etc' or 'lib', according to the
result of (1).

Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578200

Title:
  (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/578200/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 578200] Re: (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

2012-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
---
Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad

** Attachment added: Fixed udev rules file for NUT
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/578200/+attachment/2690918/+files/52-nut-usbups.rules

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578200

Title:
  (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/578200/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2012-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
Martin,

could you please check this bug report, and apply the udev related procedure 
I've documented at the end of the thread:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/578200

Once applied, stop nut, unplug/replug your UPS USB cord, and restart nut
(at least the driver), and report back the status.

Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779512

Title:
  nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 920844] Re: nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is in nut-server)

2012-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #634858
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634858

** Also affects: nut (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634858
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920844

Title:
  nut-client is missing /etc/init.d/ups-monitor for MODE=netclient (is
  in nut-server)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/920844/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 328057] Re: virtualbox's udev rule overwrite nut rule about group owner

2012-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
This has been fixed where it should, Ie in VirtualBox.
The fix seems to be available since VirtualBox 4.0:
https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/7759

Arnaud

** Bug watch added: Virtualbox Trac #7759
   http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/7759

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328057

Title:
  virtualbox's udev rule overwrite nut rule about group owner

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/328057/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 578200] Re: (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

2012-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
NUT release 2.6.2 has fixed the regression in udev rules file creation.

In case you're stuck with an older version, I've attached a udev rules file.
Just overwrite the one on your system, using:
1) first, identify the current location of the udev file:
$ ls /???/udev/rules.d/*nut*

This should point either '/etc/udev/rules.d/52-nut-usbups.rules' (older
release) or '/lib/udev/rules.d/52-nut-usbups.rules'

2) now, overwrite this file using the one provided here:
$ cp -f /path/to/new/52-nut-usbups.rules /???/udev/rules.d/52-nut-usbups.rules

Remember to replace '???' by either 'etc' or 'lib', according to the
result of (1).

Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578200

Title:
  (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/578200/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 578200] Re: (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

2012-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
---
Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad

** Attachment added: Fixed udev rules file for NUT
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/578200/+attachment/2690918/+files/52-nut-usbups.rules

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578200

Title:
  (megatec_usb) error: Driver not connected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/578200/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2012-01-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
Martin,

could you please check this bug report, and apply the udev related procedure 
I've documented at the end of the thread:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/578200

Once applied, stop nut, unplug/replug your UPS USB cord, and restart nut
(at least the driver), and report back the status.

Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779512

Title:
  nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-23 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/1/19 Dmitry Andreychuk 915...@bugs.launchpad.net:
 Attaching logs with power failure for versions 2.6.1-2ubuntu2 and 2.6.3.
 Power failures and power returns are marked with NOTE in the logs.

 I noticed that UPS.PowerSummary.RemainingCapacity came with input report
 only once. The device didn't send it upon changes for some reason.

buggy firmware again...

Attached is a patch against the latest development version (Subversion trunk).
It also applies on 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 using (from within the top source dir):
$ patch -p0  /path/to/apc-hid-overflow.diff

Could you please test it (same procedure as before) and report back
(including a driver debug output) to see if things are going better?

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/


** Patch added: apc-hid-overflow.diff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985/+attachment/2689102/+files/apc-hid-overflow.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-23 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/1/19 Dmitry Andreychuk 915...@bugs.launchpad.net:
 Attaching logs with power failure for versions 2.6.1-2ubuntu2 and 2.6.3.
 Power failures and power returns are marked with NOTE in the logs.

 I noticed that UPS.PowerSummary.RemainingCapacity came with input report
 only once. The device didn't send it upon changes for some reason.

buggy firmware again...

Attached is a patch against the latest development version (Subversion trunk).
It also applies on 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 using (from within the top source dir):
$ patch -p0  /path/to/apc-hid-overflow.diff

Could you please test it (same procedure as before) and report back
(including a driver debug output) to see if things are going better?

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/


** Patch added: apc-hid-overflow.diff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985/+attachment/2689102/+files/apc-hid-overflow.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Sergey,

cc'ing NUT users list, since others may be interested in the topic
(for those, follow the bug link below).

2012/1/16 Dmitry Andreychuk 915...@bugs.launchpad.net:
 Hi Arnaud,

 Thanks for your reply! Attaching output for 2.6.0-1ubuntu3.


 ** Attachment added: usbhid-ups_2.6.0-1ubuntu3.log
   
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+attachment/2676822/+files/usbhid-ups_2.6.0-1ubuntu3.log

 --
 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to nut in
 Ubuntu.
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

 Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

ok, I got it!
first, both of your issues are related.
we reverted in 2.6.1 a change on how we get data from the UPS.
we were previously requesting a very large size, while we now only ask
for the data actual size.

your device is reporting extra garbage data (buggy firmware) when
requesting (Feature report) battery.charge
(UPS.PowerSummary.RemainingCapacity), while the notified version
(Input report, sent by the device upon changes, like SNMP traps) is
good.

this cause, at libusb level, an EOVERFLOW with 2.6.1+, which is logged
every 30 sec. (polling freq), and cause this data to not be processed.

now, Input report data should take over, and feed battery.charge!
I'd be interested in seeing a debug output of a faulty version
(2.6.1+), that includes a power failure.

the bad news: ATM, I've no solution that can be applied upstream and
distributed.
the good news: well, you already know: keep running 2.6.0 for the time being.

cheers,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 915985] Re: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-18 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Sergey,

cc'ing NUT users list, since others may be interested in the topic
(for those, follow the bug link below).

2012/1/16 Dmitry Andreychuk 915...@bugs.launchpad.net:
 Hi Arnaud,

 Thanks for your reply! Attaching output for 2.6.0-1ubuntu3.


 ** Attachment added: usbhid-ups_2.6.0-1ubuntu3.log
   
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+attachment/2676822/+files/usbhid-ups_2.6.0-1ubuntu3.log

 --
 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to nut in
 Ubuntu.
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

 Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

ok, I got it!
first, both of your issues are related.
we reverted in 2.6.1 a change on how we get data from the UPS.
we were previously requesting a very large size, while we now only ask
for the data actual size.

your device is reporting extra garbage data (buggy firmware) when
requesting (Feature report) battery.charge
(UPS.PowerSummary.RemainingCapacity), while the notified version
(Input report, sent by the device upon changes, like SNMP traps) is
good.

this cause, at libusb level, an EOVERFLOW with 2.6.1+, which is logged
every 30 sec. (polling freq), and cause this data to not be processed.

now, Input report data should take over, and feed battery.charge!
I'd be interested in seeing a debug output of a faulty version
(2.6.1+), that includes a power failure.

the bad news: ATM, I've no solution that can be applied upstream and
distributed.
the good news: well, you already know: keep running 2.6.0 for the time being.

cheers,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 915985] [NEW] usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Dmitry,

2012/1/13 Dmitry Andreychuk
 Public bug reported:

 Ubuntu 11.10
 nut 2.6.1-2ubuntu2
 UPS model: APC Back-UPS ES 525 (BE525-RS)
 driver: usbhid-ups

 I get the following error approximately every 30 seconds:
 usb 4-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 2 ret 
 -75
 The simalar error is described in the driver's known issues but increasing 
 pollinterval doesn't help - the interval between error messages just 
 increases accordingly.
 I also noticed that battery.charge returned by upsc doesn't change when the 
 UPS is actually discharging. I called upsc, unplugged UPS and called upsc 
 again after a while: ups.status, battery.runtime and input.voltage reasonably 
 changed but battery.charge stayed at 100%. So maybe the retreiving of this 
 variable is working incorrectly.

as per your provided log, both issues are related:
errno -75 is EOVERFLOW (Value too large for defined data type).

We can see 1 successful retrieval of battery. charge (HID path:
UPS.PowerSummary.RemainingCapacity, ReportID: 0x0c), obtained through
the interrupt pipe (ie, not requested explicitly, but sent by the
device itself, upon change)

All other request are failing, with EOVERFLOW, which should mean a
fault from the device (sending more data than it should

 I've tested a few other versions and got this:
 2.4.3-1ubuntu3.1 - ok
 2.6.0-1ubuntu3 - ok
 2.6.1-2ubuntu2 - error
 2.6.2-1ubuntu1 - error
 2.6.3 (upstream) - error. Actually I didn't manage to run daemon that I built 
 from source, so I ran just the driver and it reported the same error.

could you please send an output from a working version (preferably
2.6.0)?

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 915985] [NEW] usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

2012-01-13 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Dmitry,

2012/1/13 Dmitry Andreychuk
 Public bug reported:

 Ubuntu 11.10
 nut 2.6.1-2ubuntu2
 UPS model: APC Back-UPS ES 525 (BE525-RS)
 driver: usbhid-ups

 I get the following error approximately every 30 seconds:
 usb 4-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 2 ret 
 -75
 The simalar error is described in the driver's known issues but increasing 
 pollinterval doesn't help - the interval between error messages just 
 increases accordingly.
 I also noticed that battery.charge returned by upsc doesn't change when the 
 UPS is actually discharging. I called upsc, unplugged UPS and called upsc 
 again after a while: ups.status, battery.runtime and input.voltage reasonably 
 changed but battery.charge stayed at 100%. So maybe the retreiving of this 
 variable is working incorrectly.

as per your provided log, both issues are related:
errno -75 is EOVERFLOW (Value too large for defined data type).

We can see 1 successful retrieval of battery. charge (HID path:
UPS.PowerSummary.RemainingCapacity, ReportID: 0x0c), obtained through
the interrupt pipe (ie, not requested explicitly, but sent by the
device itself, upon change)

All other request are failing, with EOVERFLOW, which should mean a
fault from the device (sending more data than it should

 I've tested a few other versions and got this:
 2.4.3-1ubuntu3.1 - ok
 2.6.0-1ubuntu3 - ok
 2.6.1-2ubuntu2 - error
 2.6.2-1ubuntu1 - error
 2.6.3 (upstream) - error. Actually I didn't manage to run daemon that I built 
 from source, so I ran just the driver and it reported the same error.

could you please send an output from a working version (preferably
2.6.0)?

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985

Title:
  usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2012-01-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
  [aquette] support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
- NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
+ NUT integration in Cobbler (replace or complement fence-agents): TODO
  [aquette] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap/NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap/NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: 
INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
- [aquette] Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in 
NUT (probably not needed): POSTPONED
+ [aquette] Implement fence_nut in fence-agents: TODO
+ [aquette] Create fence_nut Cobbler template: INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: 
INPROGRESS
- [aquette] Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: TODO
+ [aquette] Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: DONE
  [aquette] Implement Python wrapper for nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] Implement Perl wrapper for nut-scanner (for inventories): TODO
  [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: DONE
- [emilienkia] AppArmor integration: TODO
+ [emilienkia] AppArmor integration: INPROGRESS
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
- Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
+ [aquette] Convert NUT initscript to systemd: DONE
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
- [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Package nut-ipmi (need freeipmi packages update): BLOCKED
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] NUT debconf support: TODO
  
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 226405] Re: Missing support for upsmon only configuration (slave)

2012-01-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
this has been fixed in nut-2.6.2 packages, though there is still a bug (missing 
client init script).
Final fix scheduled for the next Debian upload / Ubuntu sync.

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226405

Title:
  Missing support for upsmon only configuration (slave)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/226405/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 226405] Re: Missing support for upsmon only configuration (slave)

2012-01-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
this has been fixed in nut-2.6.2 packages, though there is still a bug (missing 
client init script).
Final fix scheduled for the next Debian upload / Ubuntu sync.

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226405

Title:
  Missing support for upsmon only configuration (slave)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/226405/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-12-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
I don't see any message related to usbhid-ups.
Is it started?
we can see hiddev0 (the device linked to the kernel module hiddev) loaded,
but nothing more.

So, try launching again nut, and check back /var/log/syslog for usb and nut
('ups') messages.

Arno

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779512

Title:
  nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-12-17 Thread Arnaud Quette
I don't see any message related to usbhid-ups.
Is it started?
we can see hiddev0 (the device linked to the kernel module hiddev) loaded,
but nothing more.

So, try launching again nut, and check back /var/log/syslog for usb and nut
('ups') messages.

Arno

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779512

Title:
  nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 575573] Re: libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

2011-12-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
Can you please test with the blazer_usb driver and report back?
This one has replaced megatec_usb officially since 2.4.3, but was already 
available in 2.4.1 (though not as mature).

cheers,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575573

Title:
  libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/575573/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 545319] Re: nut configuration should be config files, not conffiles

2011-12-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
There is an effort underway to provide the needed foundations for adding
a decent debconf for generating a suitable configuration.

I will leave this bug open as a reminder.
thanks for your report,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545319

Title:
  nut configuration should be config files, not conffiles

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/545319/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-12-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
Note for Ubuntu packagers:
- the original report was an issue with udev, and will be fixed with 2.6.3 
upload,
- the 2nd one (Martin Ewing) was probably invalid, due to an already running 
driver instance.
I've asked the user for some more feedback.

cheers,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779512

Title:
  nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-12-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Martin,

I'm adding the nut users list, since other may be interested in.

2011/12/16 Martin Ewing martin.s.ew...@gmail.com

 I do still have an issue with NUT on Ubuntu Natty (64 bit).

 I attach my latest info.  Will appreciate any further suggestions about
 how to tame this problem - whether my configuration or otherwise.

 Thanks!
 Martin


 ** Attachment added: ups_problem.txt

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+attachment/2636234/+files/ups_problem.txt


What is strange, as per your next mail, is that ls /dev/usb shows
hiddev1!
Can you please forward us an excerpt of your system log, using the usb
pattern.

cheers,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779512

Title:
  nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 575573] Re: libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

2011-12-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
Can you please test with the blazer_usb driver and report back?
This one has replaced megatec_usb officially since 2.4.3, but was already 
available in 2.4.1 (though not as mature).

cheers,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575573

Title:
  libusb_get_interrupt: Connection timed out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/575573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-12-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
Note for Ubuntu packagers:
- the original report was an issue with udev, and will be fixed with 2.6.3 
upload,
- the 2nd one (Martin Ewing) was probably invalid, due to an already running 
driver instance.
I've asked the user for some more feedback.

cheers,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779512

Title:
  nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 545319] Re: nut configuration should be config files, not conffiles

2011-12-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
There is an effort underway to provide the needed foundations for adding
a decent debconf for generating a suitable configuration.

I will leave this bug open as a reminder.
thanks for your report,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545319

Title:
  nut configuration should be config files, not conffiles

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/545319/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 779512] Re: nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

2011-12-16 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Martin,

I'm adding the nut users list, since other may be interested in.

2011/12/16 Martin Ewing martin.s.ew...@gmail.com

 I do still have an issue with NUT on Ubuntu Natty (64 bit).

 I attach my latest info.  Will appreciate any further suggestions about
 how to tame this problem - whether my configuration or otherwise.

 Thanks!
 Martin


 ** Attachment added: ups_problem.txt

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+attachment/2636234/+files/ups_problem.txt


What is strange, as per your next mail, is that ls /dev/usb shows
hiddev1!
Can you please forward us an excerpt of your system log, using the usb
pattern.

cheers,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779512

Title:
  nut-2.6.0-1ubuntu3 behavior regression

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/779512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-12-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
  [aquette] support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
  NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
  [aquette] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap/NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap/NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: 
INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
- [aquette] Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in 
NUT: TODO
+ [aquette] Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in 
NUT (probably not needed): POSTPONED
  [aquette] Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: 
INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] Implement Python wrapper for nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] Implement Perl wrapper for nut-scanner (for inventories): TODO
  [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: DONE
  [emilienkia] AppArmor integration: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
- [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
+ [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: INPROGRESS
+ [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Package nut-ipmi (need freeipmi packages update): BLOCKED
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] NUT debconf support: TODO
  
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 809166] Re: [Cluster-devel] Fix fence-agents manpages

2011-12-07 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/12/6 Fabio M. Di Nitto fabbi...@fabbione.net

 On 12/6/2011 4:05 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote:
  Hi Fabio,
 
  2011/12/6 Fabio M. Di Nitto fabbi...@fabbione.net:
  On 12/6/2011 2:27 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote:
  Hi Cluster-devel list,
 
  You will find attached a patch originating from Ubuntu (Andres
  Rodriguez), that fixes a few issues in manpages (namely fence_drac and
  fence_scsi).
 
 
  I wonder why the ubuntu/canonical maintainers can´t post patches
  directly for upstream inclusion.
 
  they obviously can Fabio.
  But I proposed to do this on my side, since I still have some things
  to do around fence_eaton...
  That way, they can focus on other things.
 
  After all, it's just posting an email. The actual and important work
  is to catch bugs and fix this ;-)
 
  Please consider applying it.
 
  As a side note, you may want to consider Asciidoc [1] to handle
  generation of manpages, in groff and html format.
  This already takes care of the groff formating, and would avoid the
  above kind of issues.
  That said, iirc you're also doing some POD style extraction, so it may
  not be fully relevant.
 
  goal is to have all manpages generated at build time via fence_agent -o
  metadata output. Most of patches already exists for those few agents
  that don´t it.
 
  ok, that confirms the POD style approach.
  I wasn't sure if you were standardizing on this, or going away from.

 The patch will be obsoleted in the fence-agents release or max two.


thanks for these info.
I take it as this patch is discarded, and the proper fix will come very
soon.

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809166

Title:
  Update fence-agents to 3.1.5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/809166/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 809166] Fix fence-agents manpages

2011-12-06 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Cluster-devel list,

You will find attached a patch originating from Ubuntu (Andres
Rodriguez), that fixes a few issues in manpages (namely fence_drac and
fence_scsi).

Please consider applying it.

As a side note, you may want to consider Asciidoc [1] to handle
generation of manpages, in groff and html format.
This already takes care of the groff formating, and would avoid the
above kind of issues.
That said, iirc you're also doing some POD style extraction, so it may
not be fully relevant.

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809166

Title:
  Update fence-agents to 3.1.5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/809166/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 809166] Re: Update fence-agents to 3.1.5

2011-12-06 Thread Arnaud Quette
** Attachment added: fence-agents-manpages.diff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809166/+attachment/2621786/+files/fence-agents-manpages.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809166

Title:
  Update fence-agents to 3.1.5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/809166/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 809166] Re: [Cluster-devel] Fix fence-agents manpages

2011-12-06 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Fabio,

2011/12/6 Fabio M. Di Nitto fabbi...@fabbione.net:
 On 12/6/2011 2:27 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote:
 Hi Cluster-devel list,

 You will find attached a patch originating from Ubuntu (Andres
 Rodriguez), that fixes a few issues in manpages (namely fence_drac and
 fence_scsi).


 I wonder why the ubuntu/canonical maintainers can´t post patches
 directly for upstream inclusion.

they obviously can Fabio.
But I proposed to do this on my side, since I still have some things
to do around fence_eaton...
That way, they can focus on other things.

After all, it's just posting an email. The actual and important work
is to catch bugs and fix this ;-)

 Please consider applying it.

 As a side note, you may want to consider Asciidoc [1] to handle
 generation of manpages, in groff and html format.
 This already takes care of the groff formating, and would avoid the
 above kind of issues.
 That said, iirc you're also doing some POD style extraction, so it may
 not be fully relevant.

 goal is to have all manpages generated at build time via fence_agent -o
 metadata output. Most of patches already exists for those few agents
 that don´t it.

ok, that confirms the POD style approach.
I wasn't sure if you were standardizing on this, or going away from.

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809166

Title:
  Update fence-agents to 3.1.5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/809166/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-11-29 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
  [aquette] support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
  NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
  [aquette] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
- [aquette] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
- [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
+ [aquette] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap/NUT: TODO
+ [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap/NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: 
INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
  [aquette] Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in 
NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: 
INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] Implement Python wrapper for nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] Implement Perl wrapper for nut-scanner (for inventories): TODO
  [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: DONE
  [aquette] AppArmor integration: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-ipmi (need freeipmi packages update): BLOCKED
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] NUT debconf support: TODO
  
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-11-29 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
  [aquette] support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
  NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
  [aquette] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap/NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap/NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: 
INPROGRESS
- [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: INPROGRESS
+ [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
  [aquette] Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in 
NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: 
INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] Implement Python wrapper for nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] Implement Perl wrapper for nut-scanner (for inventories): TODO
  [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: DONE
- [aquette] AppArmor integration: TODO
+ [emilienkia] AppArmor integration: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-ipmi (need freeipmi packages update): BLOCKED
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] NUT debconf support: TODO
  
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 809166] Re: Update fence-agents to 3.1.5

2011-11-29 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Andres,

 I'm sorry if my comment sound angry but I wasn't :).

ok, just wanted to be sure that there wasn't some pending problems ;-)

 And the Debian maintainer has taken my changes now so I'll be updating
 it. Thank you!

perfect! Though I've not seen a patch on cluster-devel to fix this
upstream (still better in the long run)!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809166

Title:
  Update fence-agents to 3.1.5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/809166/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-11-25 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
  [aquette] support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
  NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
  [aquette] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
  [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
  [aquette] Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: 
INPROGRESS
- Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: INPROGRESS
+ [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
- Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in NUT: TODO
- Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: INPROGRESS
+ [aquette] Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in 
NUT: TODO
+ [aquette] Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: 
INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: TODO
- Implement Python wrapper for nut-scanner: TODO
- Implement Perl wrapper for nut-scanner (for inventories): TODO
+ [aquette] Implement Python wrapper for nut-scanner: TODO
+ [aquette] Implement Perl wrapper for nut-scanner (for inventories): TODO
  [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: DONE
  [aquette] AppArmor integration: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
- [aquette] Package nut-ipmi: TODO
+ [aquette] Package nut-ipmi (need freeipmi packages update): BLOCKED
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
- NUT debconf support: TODO
+ [aquette] NUT debconf support: TODO
  
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-11-25 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
  [aquette] support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
  NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
  [aquette] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
  [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
+ [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
+ [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: 
INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
  [aquette] Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in 
NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: 
INPROGRESS
  [aquette] Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] Implement Python wrapper for nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] Implement Perl wrapper for nut-scanner (for inventories): TODO
  [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: DONE
  [aquette] AppArmor integration: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-ipmi (need freeipmi packages update): BLOCKED
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
  [aquette] NUT debconf support: TODO
  
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
- [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
- [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-11-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
+ Work Items:
  support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
  [server-team] NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
  Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with PowerWake/PowerNap: 
TODO
  [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
  
  Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: INPROGRESS
- Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO
+ Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: INPROGRESS
  Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
- Implement fence mode (no daemonization) in NUT: TODO
- Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: TODO
+ Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in NUT: TODO
+ Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: INPROGRESS
+ Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: TODO
+ Implement Python wrapper for nut-scanner: TODO
+ Implement Perl wrapper for nut-scanner (for inventories): TODO
  
- [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: INPROGRESS
+ [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: DONE
  [aquette] AppArmor integration: TODO
  
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
  NUT debconf support: TODO
  
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
- 
- Work Items:
- 
- Work Items:

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-11-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
  support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
  [server-team] NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
  Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with PowerWake/PowerNap: 
TODO
  [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
- 
  Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: INPROGRESS
  Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: INPROGRESS
  Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
  Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in NUT: TODO
  Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: INPROGRESS
  Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: TODO
  Implement Python wrapper for nut-scanner: TODO
  Implement Perl wrapper for nut-scanner (for inventories): TODO
- 
  [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: DONE
  [aquette] AppArmor integration: TODO
- 
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
  NUT debconf support: TODO
  
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-11-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
- support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
+ [aquette] support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
  [server-team] NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
- Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
+ [aquette] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
- Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with PowerWake/PowerNap: 
TODO
+ [aquette] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
  [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
- Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: INPROGRESS
+ [aquette] Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: 
INPROGRESS
  Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: INPROGRESS
- Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
+ [aquette] Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
  Implement fence mode (full args on cmd line, no daemonization) in NUT: TODO
  Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: INPROGRESS
- Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: TODO
+ [aquette] Implement IPMI detection in nut-scanner: TODO
  Implement Python wrapper for nut-scanner: TODO
  Implement Perl wrapper for nut-scanner (for inventories): TODO
  [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: DONE
  [aquette] AppArmor integration: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
  NUT debconf support: TODO
  
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 809166] Re: Update fence-agents to 3.1.5

2011-11-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hey Andres and all,

2011/11/23 Andres Rodriguez andres...@ubuntu-pe.org:
 All,

 I'll update fence-agents once the debian maintainer takes the Ubuntu
 packaging changes into the debian packages.

take it easy Andres, you seem to be a little angry on this ;)

from an upstream and DD point of view:
- FA Debian maintainer may have missed your package and patches.
Looking at the PTS, Ubuntu patch does not appear, due to the version
differences and patch reporting mechanism (3.1.4 in Ubuntu and 3.1.5
in Debian):
http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fence-agents.html

Moreover, there is no bug report that could highlight this.

- the manpages fixes have not been contributed upstream, which is best
in the long run, since this ensure the best possible solution for
everybody. AFAICT, there seem to be some POD fixes missing (only the
existing manpages have been fixed, not the generated ones!)
I can take care of thi s point if you want/need. Just let me know...

cheers,
Arnaud

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809166

Title:
  Update fence-agents to 3.1.5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/809166/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-11-15 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
- support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: TODO
+ support for power devices in OCS and Fusion inventory: INPROGRESS
  [server-team] NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
  Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with PowerWake/PowerNap: 
TODO
  [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
  
  Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: INPROGRESS
  Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO
  Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
  Implement fence mode (no daemonization) in NUT: TODO
  Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: TODO
  
  [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: INPROGRESS
  [aquette] AppArmor integration: TODO
  
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
  NUT debconf support: TODO
  
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  
  Work Items:
  
  Work Items:

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-11-12 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
  support for power devices in OCS inventory: TODO
  [server-team] NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
  Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
  Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with PowerWake/PowerNap: 
TODO
  [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
  
  Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: INPROGRESS
  Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO
  Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
  Implement fence mode (no daemonization) in NUT: TODO
- Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: TODO 
+ Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: TODO
  
- [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing/TODO
+ [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing: INPROGRESS
+ [aquette] AppArmor integration: TODO
  
  Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
  Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
  [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-ipmi: TODO
  [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
  [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
  NUT debconf support: TODO
  
- 
  Remaining bits from UDS-O
  =
  
  Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
+ 
+ Work Items:
+ 
+ Work Items:

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-11-10 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
- Bits from UDS-O
- ===
+ support for power devices in OCS inventory: TODO
+ [server-team] NUT integration in Cobbler (replace fence-agents): TODO
+ Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
+ [andreserl] Write juju charm for NUT: TODO
+ Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with PowerWake/PowerNap: 
TODO
+ [andreserl] Design OpenStack (Nova, Power Scheduler) integration with 
PowerWake/PowerNap: TODO
  
- Remaining work items from UDS-O:
- [aquette] Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: 
INPROGRESS
- [zulcss] Investigate and implement NUT Puppet, cobbler, Orchestra, Juju 
integration: TODO
- [aquette] Investigate and implement NUT Puppet, cobbler, Orchestra, Juju 
integration: TODO
- [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO
+ Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: INPROGRESS
+ Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO
+ Implement network support in nut-ipmipsu: TODO
+ Implement fence mode (no daemonization) in NUT: TODO
+ Check if all supported fence devices are present in NUT too: TODO 
+ 
+ [aquette] Update NUT script in Ubuntu QA Regression Testing/TODO
+ 
+ Convert NUT initscript to upstart: TODO
+ Convert NUT initscript to systemd: TODO
+ [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
  [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
+ [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
+ [aquette] Package nut-ipmi: TODO
+ [aquette] Package java-nut: TODO
+ [aquette] Package nut-scanner: TODO
+ NUT debconf support: TODO
+ 
+ 
+ Remaining bits from UDS-O
+ =
+ 
+ Implement NUT support in checkbox: TODO
+ [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
- 
- Other needed items derived from UDS-O or for UDS-P:
- [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
- [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
- [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
- [aquette] Package nut-ipmi, java-nut, nut-scanner: TODO
- 
- Work items DONE since UDS-O:
- [fredericbohe] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: DONE
- [aquette] Create Augeas lenses for configuration for NUT: DONE
- [bigon] Distribute NUT Augeas lenses: DONE
- [bigon] Distribute the new NUT documentation: DONE
- [bigon] Create a NUT client only (upsmon) package: DONE
- [aquette] Create Avahi publication script for NUT: DONE
- [aquette] Implement a native NUT PSU (power supply unit) / IPMI driver, using 
FreeIPMI: DONE
- [aquette] Implement improved PDU and power devices support in fence-agents: 
DONE
- [andreserl] provide fence-agents package (part of server-o-cluster-stack): 
DONE
- 
- Remaining questions:
- - is Augeas support sufficient for configuration, or does it need a more 
advanced and simple wrapper?
- - @zulcss: does Nagios nut plug-in offer sufficient features for your purpose?
- - Implement support for UPS testing in Checkbox using NUT?
- - Convert NUT initscripts to upstart?
- 
- == Items to consider ==
- 1. Implement power support in Cloud schedulers using NUT: TODO (lack an 
assignee)
- 2. Create power consumption reports (not ready for billing, only informative)
- 3. Asset management support for power devices. Ie, Provide device information 
like manufacturer name and model, serial number, location, contact, service 
dates, ...
- [aquette] This is related to servercloud-p-orchestra-itsm (Inventory 
Management system)

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing] Automated Complex Server Deployment Testing

2011-10-21 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
  Scope: Deployment and Testing of Ubuntu Server to support complex 
requirements i.e. OpenStack + others
  Coverage:
    - OpenStack
    - Wiki + Database + Memcache + Load Balancer
    - Networking File Systems
    - Samba + LDAP or Kerberos Backend
    - Backup solutions - bacula?
    - Ruby on Rails stack
  
  UDS-O - Complex Deployment Scenarios:
  
  Method: orchestra+juju AND cloud+juju
  
  james-page proposed a method for testing juju charms on juju@l.u.c - see
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/2011-October/000837.html
  
  This involves a new charm when can test other charms - results are then 
collated and can be reported on.
  This is then executed by a framework (TBN) which set's up the juju 
environment and services, executes the charm testing and then can execute tests 
on the deployed environment.
  I think this is the right way todo this testing - it can be used with any 
juju provider so can be applied in both physical and cloud environments.
  
  Frequency:
   - Daily Test with current development release
   - Triggered when key packages change in released versions of Ubuntu in 
-proposed?
  
  Questions/Proposals:
  [james-page] We need to verify the list of deployments and get volunteers to 
develop charms for them where gaps exist.
  
  Work Items:
  Develop juju charm testing framework to support all requirements: TODO
  Writing testing hooks for all charms which we want to test this way: TODO
  Setup OpenStack test lab: TODO
  Identify OpenStack testing requirements on the deployed service: TODO
  
  Stuff left from UDS-O not covered in other specs
  
  
  b) Package Removal Testing:
  
  - install services
  - start services
  - check services
  - stop services
  - uninstall services
  - re-install same services
  - start  re-check services
  
  d) Automated Boot Testing:
  
  Minimal install  - startup and shutdown OK
  Full install - startup and shutdown OK
  Complete upgrade and then re-test.
  
  f) Recovery Testing:
  
  Recovery Mode Testing:
+ 
+ 
+ aquette propose a method to automate testing of power infrastructure (UPS, 
power distribution units and servers power supplies):
+ 
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/qa-regression-testing/master/view/257//scripts/test-nut.py

-- 
Automated Complex Server Deployment Testing
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-p-cloud-power-management] Cloud power management

2011-10-21 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
- I've pushed this out to P, as it clearly won't complete in this cycle 
[robbie.w]
- I've released NUT 2.6.2 today... [aquette]
+ Bits from UDS-O
+ ===
  
- Work items:
+ Remaining work items from UDS-O:
+ [aquette] Implement PowerChain (power distribution tracking) in NUT: 
INPROGRESS
+ [zulcss] Investigate and implement NUT Puppet, cobbler, Orchestra, Juju 
integration: TODO
+ [aquette] Investigate and implement NUT Puppet, cobbler, Orchestra, Juju 
integration: TODO
+ [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO
+ [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
+ [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
+ [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: TODO
+ [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
+ [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
+ 
+ Other needed items derived from UDS-O or for UDS-P:
+ [aquette] Implement support for power management testing in 
servercloud-p-complex-deployment-testing using NUT: TODO
+ [aquette] Help / NMU FreeIPMI packages: TODO
+ [aquette] Package Avahi publication script for NUT: TODO
+ [aquette] Package nut-ipmi, java-nut, nut-scanner: TODO
+ 
+ Work items DONE since UDS-O:
  [fredericbohe] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: DONE
- [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: POSTPONED
  [aquette] Create Augeas lenses for configuration for NUT: DONE
  [bigon] Distribute NUT Augeas lenses: DONE
  [bigon] Distribute the new NUT documentation: DONE
  [bigon] Create a NUT client only (upsmon) package: DONE
- [aquette] Convert initscripts to upstart: POSTPONED
- [aquette] Create Avahi publication script for : DONE
+ [aquette] Create Avahi publication script for NUT: DONE
  [aquette] Implement a native NUT PSU (power supply unit) / IPMI driver, using 
FreeIPMI: DONE
- [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: POSTPONED
- [aquette] Implement PowerChain in NUT: POSTPONED
- [zulcss] Investigate and implement NUT Puppet integration: TODO
- [zulcss] Investigate and implement NUT cobbler integration: TODO
- [zulcss] Investigate and implement NUT Orchestra integration: TODO
- [zulcss] Investigate and implement NUT Ensemble integration: TODO
- Investigate and implement NUT Ensemble integration: TODO
  [aquette] Implement improved PDU and power devices support in fence-agents: 
DONE
  [andreserl] provide fence-agents package (part of server-o-cluster-stack): 
DONE
- [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: POSTPONED
- [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: POSTPONED
- [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
- [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
- [bencer] Implement NUT support in Zentyal: TODO
- [aquette] Implement NUT support in Zentyal: TODO
- [cr3] Implement support for UPS testing in Checkbox using NUT: TODO
- [aquette] Implement support for UPS testing in Checkbox using NUT: TODO
  
  Remaining questions:
- - is Augeas support sufficient for configuration, or does it need a more 
advanced wrapper?
- - related to the above, is a configuration library / tool needed?
+ - is Augeas support sufficient for configuration, or does it need a more 
advanced and simple wrapper?
  - @zulcss: does Nagios nut plug-in offer sufficient features for your purpose?
- - MIR for FreeIPMI?
+ - Implement support for UPS testing in Checkbox using NUT?
+ - Convert NUT initscripts to upstart?
  
  == Items to consider ==
  1. Implement power support in Cloud schedulers using NUT: TODO (lack an 
assignee)
  2. Create power consumption reports (not ready for billing, only informative)
  3. Asset management support for power devices. Ie, Provide device information 
like manufacturer name and model, serial number, location, contact, service 
dates, ...
+ [aquette] This is related to servercloud-p-orchestra-itsm (Inventory 
Management system)

-- 
Cloud power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-p-cloud-power-management

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 753661] Re: [Nut-upsuser] PowerCOM BNT-800AP (0d9f:0004)

2011-10-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Pavel,

2011/10/4 Павел Гуменюк pavel.gumen...@gmail.com:
 Hello.
 I've been trying to got it work but haven't luck.
 I'm using NUT 2.6.0-1 under Windows XP with libusb driver installed
 (USB\VID_0D9FPID_0004REV_0001).
 I had tryed all options with  such config:

 PWCOM]
     driver = usbhid-ups
     port = auto
         vendorid = 0d9f
     desc = Powercom BNT-800AP
   type=BNT

as per a previous report on Ubuntu, we know that this UPS is supported:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/753661

that being said, it seems I've not completed my actions and committed
a patch for this new device ID.
Fixed in the development version (trunk), r3265.

Also note that the type option is supported by the powercom
driver, not the usbhid-ups one.

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753661

Title:
  upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/753661/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 753661] Re: [Nut-upsuser] PowerCOM BNT-800AP (0d9f:0004)

2011-10-05 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Pavel,

2011/10/4 Павел Гуменюк pavel.gumen...@gmail.com:
 Hello.
 I've been trying to got it work but haven't luck.
 I'm using NUT 2.6.0-1 under Windows XP with libusb driver installed
 (USB\VID_0D9FPID_0004REV_0001).
 I had tryed all options with  such config:

 PWCOM]
     driver = usbhid-ups
     port = auto
         vendorid = 0d9f
     desc = Powercom BNT-800AP
   type=BNT

as per a previous report on Ubuntu, we know that this UPS is supported:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/753661

that being said, it seems I've not completed my actions and committed
a patch for this new device ID.
Fixed in the development version (trunk), r3265.

Also note that the type option is supported by the powercom
driver, not the usbhid-ups one.

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753661

Title:
  upsd write() failed for 127.0.0.1: Broken pipe

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/753661/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Blueprint server-o-infra-power] Infrastructure power management

2011-09-15 Thread Arnaud Quette
Blueprint changed by Arnaud Quette:

Whiteboard changed:
- I've pushed this out to P, as it clearly won't complete in this cycle
- [robbie.w]
+ I've pushed this out to P, as it clearly won't complete in this cycle 
[robbie.w]
+ I've released NUT 2.6.2 today... [aquette]
  
  Work items:
- [fredericbohe] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: 
INPROGRESS
- [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: TODO
+ [fredericbohe] Implement device discovery tools / libs / binding in NUT: DONE
+ [aquette] Implement configuration library and tool for NUT: POSTPONED
  [aquette] Create Augeas lenses for configuration for NUT: DONE
- [bigon] Distribute NUT Augeas lenses: INPROGRESS
- [bigon] Distribute the new NUT documentation: INPROGRESS
- [bigon] Create a NUT client only (upsmon) package: INPROGRESS
- [aquette] Convert initscripts to upstart: TODO
+ [bigon] Distribute NUT Augeas lenses: DONE
+ [bigon] Distribute the new NUT documentation: DONE
+ [bigon] Create a NUT client only (upsmon) package: DONE
+ [aquette] Convert initscripts to upstart: POSTPONED
  [aquette] Create Avahi publication script for : DONE
- [aquette] Implement a native NUT PSU (power supply unit) / IPMI driver, using 
FreeIPMI: INPROGRESS
- [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: TODO
- [aquette] Implement PowerChain in NUT: INPROGRESS
+ [aquette] Implement a native NUT PSU (power supply unit) / IPMI driver, using 
FreeIPMI: DONE
+ [aquette] MIR for libfreeipmi and libipmimonitoring for nut-ipmi: POSTPONED
+ [aquette] Implement PowerChain in NUT: POSTPONED
  [zulcss] Investigate and implement NUT Puppet integration: TODO
  [zulcss] Investigate and implement NUT cobbler integration: TODO
  [zulcss] Investigate and implement NUT Orchestra integration: TODO
  [zulcss] Investigate and implement NUT Ensemble integration: TODO
  Investigate and implement NUT Ensemble integration: TODO
  [aquette] Implement improved PDU and power devices support in fence-agents: 
DONE
  [andreserl] provide fence-agents package (part of server-o-cluster-stack): 
DONE
  [andreserl] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: POSTPONED
- [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: INPROGRESS
+ [aquette] Investigate PowerNap using NUT as a data broker: POSTPONED
  [andreserl] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT client support in PowerWake: TODO
  [bencer] Implement NUT support in Zentyal: TODO
  [aquette] Implement NUT support in Zentyal: TODO
  [cr3] Implement support for UPS testing in Checkbox using NUT: TODO
  [aquette] Implement support for UPS testing in Checkbox using NUT: TODO
  
  Remaining questions:
  - is Augeas support sufficient for configuration, or does it need a more 
advanced wrapper?
  - related to the above, is a configuration library / tool needed?
  - @zulcss: does Nagios nut plug-in offer sufficient features for your purpose?
  - MIR for FreeIPMI?
  
  == Items to consider ==
  1. Implement power support in Cloud schedulers using NUT: TODO (lack an 
assignee)
  2. Create power consumption reports (not ready for billing, only informative)
  3. Asset management support for power devices. Ie, Provide device information 
like manufacturer name and model, serial number, location, contact, service 
dates, ...

-- 
Infrastructure power management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-infra-power

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 850672] Re: port = auto does not work with bcmxcp_usb (powerware 5115)

2011-09-15 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/9/15 Tuomas Heino iheino...@cc.hut.fi

 After changing port back to auto it seems to work. System has not been
 rebooted since installing nut.
 Could this be some form of a race condition as speculated in other bug
 reports?


not at all.
the value of port, as for other NUT USB drivers, is not used.
the auto keyword is simply a standard value, but you could put whatever
you want, such as a physical path.

I don't see any particular reason to the original failure, but having more
info on the context would help.
it could simply be that udevadm trigger has been run somehow, by you or
another package installation...

as for the race condition, I have to check other bug reports.

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850672

Title:
  port = auto does not work with bcmxcp_usb (powerware 5115)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/850672/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 850672] Re: port = auto does not work with bcmxcp_usb (powerware 5115)

2011-09-15 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/9/15 Tuomas Heino iheino...@cc.hut.fi

 After changing port back to auto it seems to work. System has not been
 rebooted since installing nut.
 Could this be some form of a race condition as speculated in other bug
 reports?


not at all.
the value of port, as for other NUT USB drivers, is not used.
the auto keyword is simply a standard value, but you could put whatever
you want, such as a physical path.

I don't see any particular reason to the original failure, but having more
info on the context would help.
it could simply be that udevadm trigger has been run somehow, by you or
another package installation...

as for the race condition, I have to check other bug reports.

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850672

Title:
  port = auto does not work with bcmxcp_usb (powerware 5115)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/850672/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 839490] [NEW] NUT is not shutdown UPS

2011-09-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Dmitriy,

2011/9/2 Dmitriy Altuhov d...@altuhov.su

 Public bug reported:

 Description:Ubuntu 11.04
 Release:11.04
 nut version 2.6.0-1ubuntu3

 Problem:
 upsmon working under nut user (not root). nut user can't create file
 /etc/killpower


upsmon forks 2 instances:
- 1 running unprivileged (ie nut user), listening on the network interface
- 1 running with root privileges to be able to launch
upsmon.conf-SHUTDOWNCMD

have a 2nd look at your processes list.


 Example:
 1) Mains out. UPS on battery
 2) Battery low. set FSD
 3) upsmon executes shutdowncmd but fails to create /etc/killpower
 4) /etc/init.d/halt executes /etc/init.d/ups-monitor poweroff
 5) /etc/init.d/ups-monitor poweroff executes upsmon -K to check
 /etc/killpower (but file does not exist)
 6) not sending shutdown command to UPS (upsdrvctl shutdown is not executed)
 7) system halted, but UPS stays on battery
 8) mains come back, ups going on mains, but load is not switched off/on
 9) PC stay OFF (need manual start)


I'll have to have another look, but I recently made a full test with 2.6.1
and everything was fine.

I need more info on your setup, ie:
- your .conf files (trimmed of passwords and sensitive info)
- your ups name and type

Moreover, have you checked your BIOS for the power setting (ie power on
after a power failure or whatever its name is)?

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839490

Title:
  NUT is not shutdown UPS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/839490/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 839509] [NEW] nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

2011-09-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/9/2 Dmitriy Altuhov d...@altuhov.su

 Public bug reported:

 Ubuntu 11.04
 NUT 2.6.0

 System shutting down (battery low, FSD set) and executes /etc/init.d
 /ups-monitor poweroff

 ups-monitor script contains section poweroff. in this section we can
 see log_daemon_msg which sends info to  syslog

 but rsyslogd already stopped.

 This is in syslog when shutdown:
 Sep  2 17:37:58 gwlin upsmon[1229]: Signal 10: User requested FSD
 Sep  2 17:37:58 gwlin upsd[1225]: Client local_mon@127.0.0.1 set FSD on
 UPS [ippon]
 Sep  2 17:37:58 gwlin upsmon[1229]: Executing automatic power-fail shutdown
 Sep  2 17:37:58 gwlin upsmon[1229]: Auto logout and shutdown proceeding
 Sep  2 17:38:03 gwlin kernel: Kernel logging (proc) stopped.
 Sep  2 17:38:03 gwlin rsyslogd: [origin software=rsyslogd
 swVersion=4.6.4 x-pid=374 x-info=http://www.rsyslog.com;] exiting on
 signal 15.


I'm not sure if this can be considered as a bug (not that it's a feature!).
log_*_msg are not only used to log in the syslog (when available), but also
to display info on the console...
by the time we reach the end of the shutdown process, FS are remounted
read-only.
so even if syslogd was still active, it would not be able to log in the FS
syslog file!

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839509

Title:
  nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/839509/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 839509] Re: nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

2011-09-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
hey Laurent,

2011/9/14 Laurent Bigonville bi...@ubuntu.com

  by the time we reach the end of the shutdown process, FS are remounted
  read-only.
  so even if syslogd was still active, it would not be able to log in the
 FS
  syslog file!

 Some could argue that syslog can be configured to send logs to a central
 server over the network /devil_advocate


right, I forgot to mention that one, which is still in favor of marking this
bug invalid...

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839509

Title:
  nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/839509/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 839490] [NEW] NUT is not shutdown UPS

2011-09-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
Hi Dmitriy,

2011/9/2 Dmitriy Altuhov d...@altuhov.su

 Public bug reported:

 Description:Ubuntu 11.04
 Release:11.04
 nut version 2.6.0-1ubuntu3

 Problem:
 upsmon working under nut user (not root). nut user can't create file
 /etc/killpower


upsmon forks 2 instances:
- 1 running unprivileged (ie nut user), listening on the network interface
- 1 running with root privileges to be able to launch
upsmon.conf-SHUTDOWNCMD

have a 2nd look at your processes list.


 Example:
 1) Mains out. UPS on battery
 2) Battery low. set FSD
 3) upsmon executes shutdowncmd but fails to create /etc/killpower
 4) /etc/init.d/halt executes /etc/init.d/ups-monitor poweroff
 5) /etc/init.d/ups-monitor poweroff executes upsmon -K to check
 /etc/killpower (but file does not exist)
 6) not sending shutdown command to UPS (upsdrvctl shutdown is not executed)
 7) system halted, but UPS stays on battery
 8) mains come back, ups going on mains, but load is not switched off/on
 9) PC stay OFF (need manual start)


I'll have to have another look, but I recently made a full test with 2.6.1
and everything was fine.

I need more info on your setup, ie:
- your .conf files (trimmed of passwords and sensitive info)
- your ups name and type

Moreover, have you checked your BIOS for the power setting (ie power on
after a power failure or whatever its name is)?

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839490

Title:
  NUT is not shutdown UPS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/839490/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 839509] [NEW] nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

2011-09-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
2011/9/2 Dmitriy Altuhov d...@altuhov.su

 Public bug reported:

 Ubuntu 11.04
 NUT 2.6.0

 System shutting down (battery low, FSD set) and executes /etc/init.d
 /ups-monitor poweroff

 ups-monitor script contains section poweroff. in this section we can
 see log_daemon_msg which sends info to  syslog

 but rsyslogd already stopped.

 This is in syslog when shutdown:
 Sep  2 17:37:58 gwlin upsmon[1229]: Signal 10: User requested FSD
 Sep  2 17:37:58 gwlin upsd[1225]: Client local_mon@127.0.0.1 set FSD on
 UPS [ippon]
 Sep  2 17:37:58 gwlin upsmon[1229]: Executing automatic power-fail shutdown
 Sep  2 17:37:58 gwlin upsmon[1229]: Auto logout and shutdown proceeding
 Sep  2 17:38:03 gwlin kernel: Kernel logging (proc) stopped.
 Sep  2 17:38:03 gwlin rsyslogd: [origin software=rsyslogd
 swVersion=4.6.4 x-pid=374 x-info=http://www.rsyslog.com;] exiting on
 signal 15.


I'm not sure if this can be considered as a bug (not that it's a feature!).
log_*_msg are not only used to log in the syslog (when available), but also
to display info on the console...
by the time we reach the end of the shutdown process, FS are remounted
read-only.
so even if syslogd was still active, it would not be able to log in the FS
syslog file!

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839509

Title:
  nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/839509/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 839509] Re: nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

2011-09-14 Thread Arnaud Quette
hey Laurent,

2011/9/14 Laurent Bigonville bi...@ubuntu.com

  by the time we reach the end of the shutdown process, FS are remounted
  read-only.
  so even if syslogd was still active, it would not be able to log in the
 FS
  syslog file!

 Some could argue that syslog can be configured to send logs to a central
 server over the network /devil_advocate


right, I forgot to mention that one, which is still in favor of marking this
bug invalid...

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839509

Title:
  nut can not log to syslog when shutdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/839509/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 226405] Re: Missing support for upsmon only configuration (slave)

2011-08-01 Thread Arnaud Quette
A MIR for a nut-client package (and some others) is underway:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/816414

better late than never...

cheers,
Arnaud

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226405

Title:
  Missing support for upsmon only configuration (slave)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/226405/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


  1   2   3   4   5   >