[Bug 460733] Re: Transmission BitTorrent doesn't honor speed limitation preferences
Been having that issue for a long time. Stops all my internet connections and yet when I check the status bar sometimes it only reads a few KBPS (I imagine that torrent 'overhead' is the problem but that seems uncontrollable since I've set speed limits well below my bandwidth allowance). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460733 Title: Transmission BitTorrent doesn't honor speed limitation preferences To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/transmission/+bug/460733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1061659] Re: package nvidia-settings-updates 304.43-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/nvidia-settings.1.gz', which is also in package nvidia-settings 30
@Thijs: Does this solve the problem if nvidia-settings is removed? Did you reinstall it afterwards? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061659 Title: package nvidia-settings-updates 304.43-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/nvidia- settings.1.gz', which is also in package nvidia-settings 304.51-0ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-settings-updates/+bug/1061659/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 965371] Re: HTTPS requests fail on sites which immediately close the connection if TLS 1.1 negotiation is attempted, on Ubuntu 12.04
I see from some of the comments that this is the Evernote "Can't connect to server" bug. Is that so? Will there be a fix released soon - it seems progress has stalled on this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965371 Title: HTTPS requests fail on sites which immediately close the connection if TLS 1.1 negotiation is attempted, on Ubuntu 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssl/+bug/965371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 960092] Re: Latest update renders system unbootable "error: no such partition"
Its true - in a sense - a similar bug was produced after a recent update to grub which caused similar errors as this one - I got a "blocklist" error and while I could still boot Ubuntu I could not boot Windows. >From Ubuntu I ran Boot-Repair which re-identified a harddrive missed by Grub and restored my bootloader. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960092 Title: Latest update renders system unbootable "error: no such partition" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/960092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 960092] Re: Latest update renders system unbootable "error: no such partition"
Thanks Andreas - the Boot-Repair program worked like a charm and I'm back in Ubuntu 12.04! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960092 Title: Latest update renders system unbootable "error: no such partition" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/960092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 960092] Re: Latest update renders system unbootable "error: no such partition"
Also have this problem - have multiple disk system likely with some old grub installs from past configurations. Latest upgrade broke boot into Ubuntu & Windoze. Using LiveCD now but could use some advice for a quick fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960092 Title: Latest update renders system unbootable "error: no such partition" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/960092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 819043] Re: ubuntu-sso-login crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not se
I am having a related problem - I believe the source is DBus (or selinux). I have received a DBus error identical to this one when trying to run Empathy/Telepathy and the new deja-dup backup program. ** Changed in: ubuntu-sso-client (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819043 Title: ubuntu-sso-login crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-sso-client/+bug/819043/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649294] Re: When speed limit is set, Speed reported in the status bar is mostly wrong
I'm not sure what principle of KISS would imply bogus speed reporting. I think a car is a good example here because the interface a person has with a car is generally considered quite intuitive and simple and not in a way that obscures important aspects of control. For example, even when I set cruise-control at "60km/h" the speedometer reads the speed independently. This is especially clear if one has previously set cruise-control, and then altered speed and resumes it. One can see the speedometer climb or fall to the set speed. Transmission merely reports that set speed immediately. Similarly, if a radical change in terrain slows or speeds the car, one sees that reported on the speedometer and also gauge cruise-control's attempt to correct it. Seems to me that is KISS. -- When speed limit is set, Speed reported in the status bar is mostly wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649294] Re: When speed limit is set, Speed reported in the status bar is mostly wrong
Here is a screenshot of the System Monitor following exiting Transmission... Speeds have returned to nil (basically 2-3KBPS). This means the difference between what Transmission reports ~15KBPS and the actual speed ~65KBPS is about 40KBPS of "overhead." ** Attachment added: "Screenshot-System Monitor.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+bug/649294/+attachment/1705953/+files/Screenshot-System%20Monitor.png -- When speed limit is set, Speed reported in the status bar is mostly wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460733] Re: Transmission BitTorrent doesn't honor speed limitation preferences
Also, I'd like to add that part of the problem with the divergence in capped speed vs actual speed is that Transmission reports actual speed as capped speed. What I would prefer to see is that when speed is capped, Transmission still report the actual speed (spikes and all) - this would at least make it easier to gauge Transmission's success - but as it is, it simply states the capped # when all data to the contrary shows that is not the case. So that even if all torrent clients have a problem accurately capping they should not have a problem accurately reporting their attempt to cap... -- Transmission BitTorrent doesn't honor speed limitation preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 460733] Re: Transmission BitTorrent doesn't honor speed limitation preferences
Perhaps related to this issue is Bug #649294 referenced by Vish. I wanted to share my experience where having uncapped upload and download results in continually low readings for my upload speed (usually around 15KBPS on a 70KBPS line) whereas my System Monitor reports continuous ~60KBPS range upload (which is correlated by my slow browsing experience). I have monitored this over days and hours with more or less other activity and it all seems to point to Transmission as the culprit. I'm worried also that this will result in skewed upload stats. ** Attachment added: "Transmission-Speeds.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+bug/460733/+attachment/1705055/+files/Transmission-Speeds.png -- Transmission BitTorrent doesn't honor speed limitation preferences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649294] Re: When speed limit is set, Speed reported in the status bar is mostly wrong
On this issue, I am seeing Tranmission report almost no activity on my 70KBPS upload band while my System Monitor shows continous max-out uploading (which is confirmed by my slow browsing experience). This is when Transmission is run with speeds uncapped. ** Attachment added: "Contradiction between real speed and Transmission's reported speed" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+bug/649294/+attachment/1705010/+files/Transmission-Speeds.png -- When speed limit is set, Speed reported in the status bar is mostly wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649294] Re: When speed limit is set, Speed reported in the status bar is mostly wrong
Can anyone comment on whether the misreported speeds may lead to erroneous download/upload stats as well? -- When speed limit is set, Speed reported in the status bar is mostly wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555169] Re: Can't log in after regular update on Lucid
Keyboard works in: 1. in grub 2. in rescue mode (only if keys pressed during boot-up) This is with a PC running Lucid Beta 1 updated with late March / early April packages. The keyboard is a Logitech bluetooth/USB keyboard. Everything worked fine before the last major set of upgrades. -- Can't log in after regular update on Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555169] Re: Can't log in after regular update on Lucid
Thanks Russ - maybe I'm experiencing a different bug because I'm not sure its Xorg related. For example, I suffer this bug when conducting a normal safeboot that ends at the prompt (and doesn't load X). Although I can, as I've mentioned earlier, use the keyboard prior to that point - even to have full keyboard access with a safeboot to root user. I have added a basic mouse/keyboard config to xorg.conf pointing to the /dev/input/events that correspond to my USB/BT logitech setup and rebooted but with no results. There is something that loads at the very end of regular boot that disrupts my USB/BT keyboard and mouse. -- Can't log in after regular update on Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555169] Re: Can't log in after regular update on Lucid
Installed packages include: ubuntu-desktop 1.195 hal 0.5.14 plymouth 0.8.1 + plymouth-x11 0.8.1 ubuntu-minimal 1.195 udev 151-7 dbus-x11 dbus 1.2.16 initscripts 2.87dsf upstart 0.6.5-6 mountall 2.10 xserver-org-input-evdev 1:2.3.2-5 usbmuxd 1.0.2-1 -- Can't log in after regular update on Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555169] Re: Can't log in after regular update on Lucid
Another update - I found that selecting safeboot option and typing during the boot (random keys) will secure me keyboard access when the safe mode options load. If I don't use the keyboard during boot it will be locked out to like in a regular boot. From the safe mode I can choose options like booting to root console in order to run updates (I am completely up-to-date as of April 5) and do other keyboard tasks from the console. However, returning to normal boot mode still results in a loss of keyboard support requiring hard-reboot. I can copy out some items from the dpkg log if that'll help. -- Can't log in after regular update on Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555169] Re: Can't log in after regular update on Lucid
Having the same problem - keyboard seems to work during boot but cuts out when gdm launches. Bug could be related to gdm. Plymouth was also part of recent updates an possibly udev. -- Can't log in after regular update on Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556057] Re: 10.4 Bluetooth Keyboard Logitech diNovo stopped working
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 555169 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555169 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 555169 Can't log in after regular update on Lucid -- 10.4 Bluetooth Keyboard Logitech diNovo stopped working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556057 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
Recently received a similar message after upgrading my 10.04 Beta 1 with some nightly updates. Unfortunately it is my mouse and keyboard that are connected to via Bluetooth and USB which has meant they have been disabled. I have mouse/kb activity until about the time gdm launches at which point they become disabled. Removing the Logitech BT adapter from the USB slot prints this message: btusb_bulk_complete: hci1 urb 88017fa30480 failed to resubmit btusb_bulk_complete: hci1 urb 88017fa3 failed to resubmit btusb_send_frame: hci1 urb 8801813cb780 submission failed Attempts to re-insert do not resolve the error and removal of the adapter adds more messages of a similar type to above. At this time I cannot do anything else in my Lucid 10.04 and have had to file the bug from another platform. -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350839] Re: [Jaunty] "urb ... submission failed" with bluetooth headset
Can anyone recommend how I can restore my USB/BT keyboard/mouse in order to run updates on Lucid? Is there something I can pass to the kernel on boot when I still have kb control? -- [Jaunty] "urb ... submission failed" with bluetooth headset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350839] Re: [Jaunty] "urb ... submission failed" with bluetooth headset
Recently received a similar message after upgrading my 10.04 Beta 1 with some nightly updates. Unfortunately it is my mouse and keyboard that are connected to via Bluetooth and USB which has meant they have been disabled. I have mouse/kb activity until about the time gdm launches at which point they become disabled. Removing the Logitech BT adapter from the USB slot prints this message: btusb_bulk_complete: hci1 urb 88017fa30480 failed to resubmit btusb_bulk_complete: hci1 urb 88017fa3 failed to resubmit btusb_send_frame: hci1 urb 8801813cb780 submission failed Attempts to re-insert do not resolve the error and removal of the adapter adds more messages of a similar type to above. At this time I cannot do anything else in my Lucid 10.04 and have had to file the bug from another platform. -- [Jaunty] "urb ... submission failed" with bluetooth headset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 392722] Re: No sound in firefox. vedio runing but no sound
Same problem here. Bug also affects Firefox 3.5 both independently installed (from tar.gz at mozilla.org) and from ubuntu debs. I notice that in the new (and shiny!) sound interface it does not list Firefox as playing/recording sound as it does when Totem or another app is running. -- No sound in firefox. vedio runing but no sound https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392722 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 406763] Re: [karmic] no sound in firefox after update (pulseaudio bug?)
I'm having this same problem with Karmic updated up until Saturday Aug 22. Sound in apps but no sound in Firefox when viewing videos that utilize Flash or Moonlight. -- [karmic] no sound in firefox after update (pulseaudio bug?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 388146] Re: firefox tear-off tab to new window does not create new entry in taskbar
Being trying to re-duplicate this bug since posting this and am not having luck. Unless anyone else has run into this, I'd suggest deleting this bug-post. -- firefox tear-off tab to new window does not create new entry in taskbar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 388146] [NEW] firefox tear-off tab to new window does not create new entry in taskbar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg Testing the preview release of Firefox 3.5 shows that when a tab is torn-off the window in order to create a new separate window, X does not create an entry for it in the taskbar (in Gnome), although it does allow the window to exist separately. This can create the following problem: Start Firefox Create two tabs Tear one tab off to create a new window Taskbar reports only the original window, not the new window Move new window to another desktop. Navigate away from that desktop and then back --> X will immediately change desktops to the one with the original window, denying access to that desktop until the original window is brought to the new window (reuniting them in the same taskbar entry). Closing or re-merging the windows will alleviate the problem between the X desktops. ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: xorg Testing the preview release of Firefox 3.5 shows that when a tab is - torn-off the window in order to create a new separate window, X does an - entry for it in the taskbar (in Gnome), although it does allow the - window to exist separately. + torn-off the window in order to create a new separate window, X does not + create an entry for it in the taskbar (in Gnome), although it does allow + the window to exist separately. This can create the following problem: Start Firefox Create two tabs Tear one tab off to create a new window Taskbar reports only the original window, not the new window Move new window to another desktop. Navigate away form that desktop and then back --> X will immediately change desktops to the one with the original window, denying access to that desktop until the original window is brought to the new window (reuniting them in the same taskbar entry). Closing or re-merging the windows will alleviate the problem between the X desktops. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: xorg Testing the preview release of Firefox 3.5 shows that when a tab is torn-off the window in order to create a new separate window, X does not create an entry for it in the taskbar (in Gnome), although it does allow the window to exist separately. This can create the following problem: Start Firefox Create two tabs Tear one tab off to create a new window Taskbar reports only the original window, not the new window Move new window to another desktop. - Navigate away form that desktop and then back --> X will immediately change desktops to the one with the original window, denying access to that desktop until the original window is brought to the new window (reuniting them in the same taskbar entry). + Navigate away from that desktop and then back --> X will immediately change desktops to the one with the original window, denying access to that desktop until the original window is brought to the new window (reuniting them in the same taskbar entry). Closing or re-merging the windows will alleviate the problem between the X desktops. -- firefox tear-off tab to new window does not create new entry in taskbar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348885] Re: tracker stops indexing, 100% cpu load
Ditto: Confirming & subscribing. This is an irritating one. Any information required I will post here post haste :) -- tracker stops indexing, 100% cpu load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337488] Re: Internet / Network delays or pauses continuously
Fixed this issue using new wireless-compat drivers from: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download I believe the ath9k driver in the kernel still has issues which should be remedied. -- Internet / Network delays or pauses continuously https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337488] Re: Internet / Network delays or pauses continuously
I think I've narrowed this bug down to the ath9k driver that was included in the 2.6.27 or 2.6.28 kernel. This issue does not affect all hardware configurations. I am using the Athereos 5008 chip on a DWA-552 PCI Wireless N adapter. -- Internet / Network delays or pauses continuously https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313218] Re: IPV6 causes slow internet access
I've listed a new bug report for a bug I was experiencing that I thought *might* have been related to this one. If anyone is interested in commenting or relating please see here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/337488 -- IPV6 causes slow internet access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337488] Re: Internet / Network delays or pauses continuously
** Attachment added: "Picture of Internet connectivity." http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23395189/Screenshot.png -- Internet / Network delays or pauses continuously https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337488] [NEW] Internet / Network delays or pauses continuously
Public bug reported: I was originally subscribing to the [Bug 313218] Re: IPV6 causes slow internet access thread but that has devolved. I am not sure if what problem I am having is an IPV6 error but the Internet since Alpha 5 now pauses (no activity, not even with router) for a minute or so and then allows full connectivity for a few minutes before repeating the cycle (I attach a picture of network activity taken from my Azureus statistics window). Here is also some ping data from between myself and the router noticing the pause in the middle. 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=160 ttl=64 time=4.56 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=161 ttl=64 time=18.4 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=162 ttl=64 time=7.68 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=163 ttl=64 time=14.3 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=164 ttl=64 time=302 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=165 ttl=64 time=125 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=208 ttl=64 time=5855 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=209 ttl=64 time=4847 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=210 ttl=64 time=3841 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=211 ttl=64 time=2833 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=212 ttl=64 time=1825 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=213 ttl=64 time=818 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=214 ttl=64 time=0.445 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=215 ttl=64 time=0.294 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=216 ttl=64 time=0.316 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=217 ttl=64 time=0.503 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=218 ttl=64 time=0.576 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=219 ttl=64 time=0.694 ms --- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics --- 219 packets transmitted, 130 received, 40% packet loss, time 218627ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.294/181.210/5855.511/802.607 ms, pipe 6 Here is the data from ifconfig: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1d:7d:00:04:59 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) Interrupt:250 Base address:0x4000 eth0:avahi Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1d:7d:00:04:59 inet addr:169.254.2.229 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:250 Base address:0x4000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:568123 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:568123 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:399491755 (399.4 MB) TX bytes:399491755 (399.4 MB) wlan1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:22:b0:cc:b2:46 inet addr:192.168.0.199 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::222:b0ff:fecc:b246/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:65878 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:66178 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:64713966 (64.7 MB) TX bytes:30849735 (30.8 MB) wmaster0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-22-B0-CC-B2-46-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Internet / Network delays or pauses continuously https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313218] Re: IPV6 causes slow internet access
I am also having what I am guessing is this problem. It happened around the time of Jaunty Alpha 5's release as my Internet was unaffected earlier. The disconnect is between my computer and my router, which can be verified by transfers on the LAN and WAN being interrupted. Firefox and all other apps are affected. The router is fairly new (DLink DIR 655 Wireless N Series) so I'm unsure why it would not be able to switch between IPV6 and IPV4 as the other commenter noted regarding his Belkin router. If there is any date (ifconfig, etc.) I can add let me know. -- IPV6 causes slow internet access https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335904] [NEW] can't install ubuntu-desktop
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-desktop Message from pop-up window after attempting to run a recommended partial upgrade from around Jaunty Alpha 4 to Jaunty Alpha 5 "It was impossible to install a required package. Please report this as a bug." The package in question is ubuntu-desktop. Normally I'd just wait to see if any dependencies it required had yet to be released into the repositories but it insisted it be reported so here is the report. ** Affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- can't install ubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
