[Bug 1186569] Re: Imon LCD device number changes each boot

2014-06-07 Thread Joel Ebel
In the absence of any explanation or solution as to why the device are
showing up in different places, I think the udev solution makes the most
sense.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186569

Title:
  Imon LCD device number changes each boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcdproc/+bug/1186569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1186569] Re: Imon LCD device number changes each boot

2014-02-09 Thread Joel Ebel
So this used to (At least as recently as 12.04) stably sit on /dev/lcd0,
and now, as this bug indicates, it seems to pick randomly between
/dev/lcd0 and /dev/lcd2. Is the kernel responsible for that? lcdproc is
a pretty simple, and rather unmaintained program. Getting it to
automatically detect which device is on what dev node seems rather out
of its scope, particularly when I only have one lcd device, as I imagine
most people with an lcd device do. It should always be in the same
place.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186569

Title:
  Imon LCD device number changes each boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcdproc/+bug/1186569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1186569] Re: Imon LCD device number changes each boot

2014-02-08 Thread Joel Ebel
The module creating the node on my system is
/lib/modules/3.11.0-15-generic/kernel/drivers/media/rc/imon.ko which is
part of linux-image-3.11.0-15-generic.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186569

Title:
  Imon LCD device number changes each boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcdproc/+bug/1186569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1186569] Re: Imon LCD device number changes each boot

2014-02-08 Thread Joel Ebel
Might be something udev could handle, like the persistent net and cd
files in /etc/udev/rules.d.

** Also affects: udev (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186569

Title:
  Imon LCD device number changes each boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcdproc/+bug/1186569/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416190] Re: Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on mono downmix (e g to Plantronics DA40 adapter)

2012-12-07 Thread Joel Ebel
I can confirm that the package in proposed fixes the problem for the
Plantronics DA40 adapter.  I've never been able to reproduce the problem
with my DA45.  Jan, you may want to also verify that this fixes you
DA45.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416190

Title:
  Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on mono downmix (e g to
  Plantronics DA40 adapter)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/416190/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 906035] Re: Recent LCDproc versions don't work with antec veris lcd

2012-11-28 Thread Joel Ebel
** Changed in: lcdproc (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906035

Title:
  Recent LCDproc versions don't work with antec veris lcd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcdproc/+bug/906035/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 365474] Re: During suspend LCD should be turned off

2012-11-27 Thread Joel Ebel
Would it help if I made a debdiff of this?  It's pretty simple.  Maybe
that would get it sponsored.  i independently came up with this same
solution on my mythbuntu frontend.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365474

Title:
  During suspend LCD should be turned off

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcdproc/+bug/365474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1071950] Re: gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

2012-11-07 Thread Joel Ebel
I can confirm that the new package does prevent settings in dconf from
propagating into gconf on a dconf update after the package is installed
and the user is logged out and back in.  I haven't used the new package
long enough to identify if there are any regressions, but it does seem
to fix this bug.

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071950

Title:
  gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1071950/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 963125] Re: Alt-Tab window switcher lost

2012-10-30 Thread Joel Ebel
** Also affects: gsettings-desktop-schemas (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963125

Title:
  Alt-Tab window switcher lost

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/963125/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1071950] Re: gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

2012-10-30 Thread Joel Ebel
I added my comments to bug 963125 regarding the dconf array keybindings
being converted to lists in gconf, where metacity expects strings.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071950

Title:
  gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1071950/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 963125] Re: Alt-Tab window switcher lost

2012-10-30 Thread Joel Ebel
Adding packages gnome-settings-daemon and gsettings-desktop-schemas, as
a fix could be done in either.

The issue appears to be that dconf stores the keybindings in arrays of
strings, and when set there, gnome-settings-daemon will transition those
settings to gconf as defined by /usr/share/GConf/gsettings/wm-
schemas.convert.  metacity expects those keybindings to just be strings,
not lists of strings, so after the conversion, metacity can't read the
keybindings.

Possible solutions would be
1. Allow conversion to a string, which is probably a challenging task, 
especially if the array in dconf contains multiple values.  the .convert files 
would have to indicate that a type change is required, which would be a syntax 
change from existing files, and probably not worth the effort.
2. Just remove these keybindings from the .convert files.  I suspect they 
aren't really necessary.

** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: gsettings-desktop-schemas (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963125

Title:
  Alt-Tab window switcher lost

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/963125/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1071950] Re: gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

2012-10-29 Thread Joel Ebel
I'm pretty new to dconf, so I'm making some assumptions which may be
incorrect.  When dconf update is run as root, that only updates settings
which are either mandatory or defaults system-wide.  Neither of those
changes should result in a change in the users home directory, and if a
user wasn't logged in, nothing would happen currently.  Because of that,
I'm not sure that dconf update should be sending any signals which would
trigger a gconf sync.  At most, it should just re-read the system
settings in order to accept the new default or mandatory settings.  Even
if that doesn't happen, on next login, they will be re-read, right?

Unrelated, I'm surprised to find dconf defaults that don't match up with
gconf defaults.  Like the metacity button_layout dconf default puts the
buttons back on the right.  This was the primary reason I noticed this
was all happening in the first place.  when dconf update ran, it updated
the gconf setting for the button layout and moved the buttons back the
the right.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071950

Title:
  gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1071950/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1071950] Re: gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

2012-10-29 Thread Joel Ebel
This also exposes something else, which might be better as a separate
bug.  wm-schemas.convert tries to convert metacity keybindings from
dconf to gconf.  Unfortunately the types are different, so anything
accepted by dconf probably won't actually work once it's written to
gconf.  This was exposed because a dconf update wound up writing all
these keybindings into gconf.  For example, dconf has
org.gnome.desktop.wm.keybindings switch-windows as ['AltTab'] which is
an array of strings.  However, metacity expects this to be just the
string 'AltTab'.  When the gconf conversion happens, it seems to
actually convert the key to a list of strings in gconf, and metacity
stops supporting Alt-Tab.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071950

Title:
  gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1071950/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1071950] Re: gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

2012-10-26 Thread Joel Ebel
Under what conditions would the gconf plugin for gsettings daemon
convert dconf settings into gconf?  This is triggered by a dconf update
while a user is logged in, which seems a rare use case under normal
conditions.  When is this plugin designed to operate normally, and could
that other normal operation cause this same issue?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071950

Title:
  gnome-settings-daemon dconf to gconf plugin causes settings to be lost

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1071950/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 999771] Re: myunity depends upon DISTRIB_RELEASE being the second entry in /etc/lsb-release

2012-10-04 Thread Joel Ebel
myunity checks the version of ubuntu by taking the last 5 characters of
the second line of lsb-release.  In a default install, this is the
DISTRIB_VERSION, but this is very fragile.  If anything should reorder
the lsb-release file, as often happens in customized installations, this
no longer works.  Actually using the shell to parse the variables in the
file is much more robust.

** Summary changed:

- myunity incorrectly parses lsb-release
+ myunity depends upon DISTRIB_RELEASE being the second entry in 
/etc/lsb-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999771

Title:
  myunity depends upon DISTRIB_RELEASE being the second entry in /etc
  /lsb-release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/myunity/+bug/999771/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1038371] Re: disabling in-kernel support should be optional

2012-09-17 Thread Joel Ebel
Here's a new patch I've tested against Oneiric.

** Patch added: New debdiff for lirc DISABLE_KERNEL_SUPPORT
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1038371/+attachment/3320849/+files/lirc_0.9.0-0ubuntu3.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038371

Title:
  disabling in-kernel support should be optional

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1038371/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1038371] Re: disabling in-kernel support should be optional

2012-09-17 Thread Joel Ebel
Here it is in the proper order.  Including DISABLE_KERNEL_SUPPORT in
hardware.conf isn't required because lirc.init.d includes
DISABLE_KERNEL_SUPPORT=true on line 112.  That way there will be no
changes if upgraders choose to not get the new hardware.conf.  If you
prefer to leave DISABLE_KERNEL_SUPPORT=true uncommented in
hardware.conf, I can, but it won't change the behavior.

** Patch added: debdiff take 3
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1038371/+attachment/3321187/+files/lirc_0.9.0-0ubuntu3.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038371

Title:
  disabling in-kernel support should be optional

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1038371/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1038371] [NEW] disabling in-kernel support should be optional

2012-08-18 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

I have an Antec case with an iMon knob device, as well as a serial port
IR receiver.  The knob produces events, so I don't need lirc for it.  I
also use the imon device for lcdproc.  I run lirc, solely to communicate
with the serial IR device.   The current lirc init script attempts to
modify the imon device in /sys/class/rc/rc0/protocols.  This is
unnecessary, as I don't intend to use that device with lirc, and
furthermore, for reasons unknown, it occasionally causes the computer to
fail to shut down.  I don't particularly care why echoing none to
/sys/class/rc/rc0/protocols hangs occasionally, because it isn't an
operation that needs to be done at all on my system.  I can edit the
init script to prevent this happening, but I'd much prefer for there to
be an option in /etc/lirc/hardware.conf to prevent in-kernel support
from being disabled while i run lirc, and re-enabled when I stop it.

Attached is a patch with a suggested method.

** Affects: lirc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038371

Title:
  disabling in-kernel support should be optional

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1038371/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1038371] Re: disabling in-kernel support should be optional

2012-08-18 Thread Joel Ebel
** Patch added: patch to allow preventing the disabling of in-kernel ir 
support
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038371/+attachment/3266380/+files/lirc_0.9.0-0ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038371

Title:
  disabling in-kernel support should be optional

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1038371/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1004239] Re: lirc postinst lists modules from incorrect directory

2012-08-12 Thread Joel Ebel
Ari, you have something worse broken about your installation.  You
should try to purge lirc and reinstall it.  I'm not seeing the errors
you are getting.

bobwdn, it looks like you didn't actually successfully build the
package.  If it built lirc-x_0.9.0-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb then you didn't
install the patch.  If there's no deb built, then the package failed to
build.  There's probably an error that showed up in one of the steps
that you missed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004239

Title:
  lirc postinst lists modules from incorrect directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1004239/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1004239] Re: lirc postinst lists modules from incorrect directory

2012-08-09 Thread Joel Ebel
What are you experiencing as the problem now?  If you have the package
installed, you manually edit lirc.postinst, and then run dpkg-
reconfigure lirc that should succeed without the error.

I couldn't say whether this will make it into Precise.  I'm not an
Ubuntu maintainer.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004239

Title:
  lirc postinst lists modules from incorrect directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1004239/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1004239] Re: lirc installation error in Ubuntu 12.04

2012-08-07 Thread Joel Ebel
There are a lot of unrelated problems reported in this bug.  The original 
problem was this:
ls: cannot access /lib/modules/3.2.0-24-generic/kernel/drivers/staging/lirc:
  No such file or directory

The solution to this would be to patch lirc.postinst to look in
/lib/modules/$KERNEL/kernel/drivers/staging/media/lirc

A debdiff for lirc is attached which should fix the original issue of
this bug.

For the other problems described, you should consider support forums,
mailing lists, or opening a new bug.

** Patch added: debdiff patch to fix path to modules in lirc.postinst
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1004239/+attachment/3252113/+files/lirc_0.9.0-0ubuntu2.debdiff

** Summary changed:

- lirc installation error in Ubuntu 12.04
+ lirc postinst lists modules from incorrect directory

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004239

Title:
  lirc postinst lists modules from incorrect directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/1004239/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 697999] Re: lirc init script seems to load things backwards

2012-07-31 Thread Joel Ebel
Got around to setting up Precise on my mythtv box, and I'm sad to see
that this bug hasn't been fixed yet.  I provided a patch, which still
applies cleanly to lirc in Precise.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697999

Title:
  lirc init script seems to load things backwards

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/697999/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698007] Re: lirc init script can create circular symlinks

2012-07-31 Thread Joel Ebel
Got around to setting up Precise on my mythtv box, and I'm sad to see
that this bug hasn't been fixed yet.  I provided a patch, which still
applies cleanly to lirc in Precise.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698007

Title:
  lirc init script can create circular symlinks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/698007/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416190] Re: Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

2012-07-30 Thread Joel Ebel
** Attachment added: da40 lsusb
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/416190/+attachment/3242684/+files/da40_lsusb

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416190

Title:
  Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/416190/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416190] Re: Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

2012-07-30 Thread Joel Ebel
** Attachment added: da40 amixer
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/416190/+attachment/3242680/+files/da40_amixer

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416190

Title:
  Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/416190/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416190] Re: Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

2012-07-30 Thread Joel Ebel
** Attachment added: da45 lsusb
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/416190/+attachment/3242694/+files/da45_lsusb

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416190

Title:
  Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/416190/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416190] Re: Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

2012-07-30 Thread Joel Ebel
** Attachment added: da45 amixer
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/416190/+attachment/3242693/+files/da45_amixer

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416190

Title:
  Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/416190/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416190] Re: Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

2012-07-30 Thread Joel Ebel
The da40 and da45 are mono devices.  They only have a Speaker volume
control, in addition to tone controls.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416190

Title:
  Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/416190/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416190] Re: Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

2012-07-23 Thread Joel Ebel
Thomas, Liz, if you need me to help work around bugs in Launchpad and
broken bug policies, if you can give me login access to a machine I can
log in and run apport-collect as myself.  However, in the long run,
Launchpad really should deal with this problem of turnover better.

But seriously, this bug is almost 3 years old, and I grow tired of
having to reconfirm the problem. It's hard for me to imagine that
anything at this point is being done  to get[] the issue addressed as
quickly as possible.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416190

Title:
  Pulseaudio produces overdriven audio on Plantronics DA40 adapter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/416190/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 514021] Re: serial console output does not work

2012-01-13 Thread Joel Ebel
My change fixed the problem for us.  I apologize if I closed your bug
prematurely.  Unfortunately, I don't have access to re-open the bug, nor
do I work on Ubuntu anymore.  I suggest you open a new bug if this is
still an issue for you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514021

Title:
  serial console output does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/514021/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 870835] Re: flashplugin-installer still installs i386 plugin version, though native 64 bit plugin available

2011-11-16 Thread Joel Ebel
** Summary changed:

- flashplugin-installer still installs i386 plugin version, though native 64 
bit plugin avaiable
+ flashplugin-installer still installs i386 plugin version, though native 64 
bit plugin available

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870835

Title:
  flashplugin-installer still installs i386 plugin version, though
  native 64 bit plugin available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/870835/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 870835] Re: flashplugin-installer still installs i386 plugin version, though native 64 bit plugin avaiable

2011-10-28 Thread Joel Ebel
Marc,  I tested the ppa packages on Lucid.  Works great.  Thought it
might be time to update the Homepage: value in the control file.  It
still points to http://wiki.ubuntu.com/FlashPlayer9

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870835

Title:
  flashplugin-installer still installs i386 plugin version, though
  native 64 bit plugin avaiable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/870835/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 868586] Re: Package is missing in Oneiric

2011-10-18 Thread Joel Ebel
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543927  for
background of why it was dropped.  Someone will need to take
responsibility for maintaining it.

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #543927
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543927

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868586

Title:
  Package is missing in Oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm-tools/+bug/868586/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 869498] [NEW] Control file for adobe-flashplugin contains inaccurate description and unnecessary dependencies

2011-10-06 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

adobe-flashplugin installs flash 11 now.  The control file still
describes it as flash 10, and states that it downloads the player from
adobe.  This description is inaccurate, as the adobe-flashplugin doesn't
download the player like flashplugin-installer does.  Also, the flash-
properties packages share the exact same description.  They should be
updated to describe what the flash-properties packages actually do.

Also, the dependencies for adobe-flashplugin are inaccurate.  It depends
on wget, which is only needed by flashplugin-installer, not adobe-
flashplugin.

I could create a debdiff for this if it would help, but I think the
descriptions could be better written by the actual maintainers of the
package.

** Affects: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869498

Title:
  Control file for adobe-flashplugin contains inaccurate description and
  unnecessary dependencies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/869498/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 869559] Re: kubuntu-restricted-addons amd64 package should depends on adobe-flashplugin and adobe-flash-properties-kde but not on flashplugin-installer

2011-10-06 Thread Joel Ebel
adobe-flashplugin is a package in the partner repository, but the
restricted packages are in the multiverse.  They cannot have that kind
of dependency.  What will happen is likely that the flashplugin-
installer will soon be updated to include flash 11, and the extras
packages will not require any update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869559

Title:
  kubuntu-restricted-addons amd64 package should depends on adobe-
  flashplugin and adobe-flash-properties-kde but not on flashplugin-
  installer

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-restricted-addons/+bug/869559/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 326555] Re: Please package flashplugin 64bit

2011-10-05 Thread Joel Ebel
Micah, will Flash 11 64 bit be made available in Lucid, or will it be
staying on Flash 10?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555

Title:
  Please package flashplugin 64bit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/326555/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 620693] Re: Screen not locked when turned off

2011-09-22 Thread Joel Ebel
Martin, this new package looks good on Lucid.  I went through the
testing procedure before the package, and the screen did not lock.
After installing the new package, without changing settings, the screen
did indeed lock.

Michael, thanks for taking a look at this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620693

Title:
  Screen not locked when turned off

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/620693/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 828465] Re: Kernel OOPS while running Chrome: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffff3

2011-08-19 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: regression-proposed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828465

Title:
  Kernel OOPS while running Chrome: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging
  request at fff3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/828465/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 828465] Re: Kernel OOPS while running Chrome: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffff3

2011-08-19 Thread Joel Ebel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 827198 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827198

I saw this with 2.6.32-34.73 but now with 2.6.32-34.74 I don't seem to
reproduce it.  Perhaps the changes in .74 fixed this issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828465

Title:
  Kernel OOPS while running Chrome: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging
  request at fff3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/828465/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 828465] Re: Kernel OOPS while running Chrome: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffff3

2011-08-19 Thread Joel Ebel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 827198 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827198

Looks like this could be a dupe of 813026

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828465

Title:
  Kernel OOPS while running Chrome: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging
  request at fff3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/828465/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 620693] Re: Screen not locked when turned off

2011-06-22 Thread Joel Ebel
I no longer work on the team responsible for maintaining this.  I'll
leave it and see if anyone on Goobuntu Team cares to test it or speak
up.  It may not be important to them anymore.  However, this is really
easy to reproduce, should you want to test it yourself.  I just don't
have anything newer than Lucid, since we stick with the LTS.

to reproduce, assuming the options haven't changed in natty
1. set /apps/gnome-power-manager/timeout/sleep_display_ac to less than 
/desktop/gnome/session/idle_delay
2a. set /apps/gnome-power-manager/lock/blank_screen OR
2b. set /apps/gnome-screensaver/lock_enabled and 
/apps/gnome-power-manager/lock/use_screensaver_settings
3. wait until the sleep_delay_ac time expires, and watch the screen turn off.  
See if it's locked or not.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620693

Title:
  Screen not locked when turned off

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/620693/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 703106] Re: xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list symlink with a file.

2011-04-20 Thread Joel Ebel
Here's a simple test case.
1.  Verify that /usr/share/applications/defaults.list is a symlink to 
/etc/gnome/defaults.list
2.  Download the attached .desktop file, and run 'sudo xdg-desktop-menu install 
jbebel-test.desktop'.

If /usr/share/applications/defaults.list remains a symlink, and
/etc/gnome/defaults.list contains x-test/true=jbebel-test.desktop then
it's a pass.

If /etc/gnome/defaults.list did not get edited, and instead, now
/usr/share/applications/defaults.list is a file that now contains
x-test/true=jbebel-test.desktop then that's a fail.

** Attachment added: test .desktop file
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-utils/+bug/703106/+attachment/2075153/+files/jbebel-test.desktop

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703106

Title:
  xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list
  symlink with a file.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 703106] Re: xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list symlink with a file.

2011-04-20 Thread Joel Ebel
I have verified that my test case fails with 1.0.2-6.1ubuntu3 and passes
with 1.0.2-6.1ubuntu3.1 in Lucid.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703106

Title:
  xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list
  symlink with a file.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 732252] Re: usbvideo causes failure to suspend on Thinkpad T410s

2011-04-04 Thread Joel Ebel
The issue does not exist with natty.  Presumably the uvcvideo module is
already up to date, including whatever changes fixes this problem.  I'm
hoping that the fix can be backported into Lucid, as we still intend to
use it for at least another year.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732252

Title:
  usbvideo causes failure to suspend on Thinkpad T410s

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 732252] Re: usbvideo causes failure to suspend on Thinkpad T410s

2011-04-04 Thread Joel Ebel
I can't actually reproduce this on Lucid anymore.  Perhaps it got fixed
in the Lucid kernel already.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732252

Title:
  usbvideo causes failure to suspend on Thinkpad T410s

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 703106] Re: xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list symlink with a file.

2011-03-31 Thread Joel Ebel
My name is misspelled. :(  No worries.  Thanks for getting this in.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703106

Title:
  xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list
  symlink with a file.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698007] Re: lirc init script can create circular symlinks

2011-03-30 Thread Joel Ebel
I've tested that this patch applies cleanly to natty.  I have not, and
likely won't be able to, test the functionality with natty, as my two IR
devices are in use in a mythtv machine I'm unwilling to reinstall with
natty.

** Patch added: patch that merges the patches from both bugs
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/698007/+attachment/1957482/+files/lirc.init.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698007

Title:
  lirc init script can create circular symlinks

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698007] Re: lirc init script can create circular symlinks

2011-03-30 Thread Joel Ebel
The current debian unstable package (0.9.0~pre1-1) doesn't contain
multi-device support at all.  This patch won't apply.  It does mean that
the debian package has significantly less functionality.

The transmitter functionality was added in 0.8.3~pre1-0ubuntu4 by Mario
Limonciello supe...@ubuntu.com  It would be good to get him to review
the change.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698007

Title:
  lirc init script can create circular symlinks

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698007] Re: lirc init script can create circular symlinks

2011-03-29 Thread Joel Ebel
The second patch included here is compatible with the patch in bug
69799, if the other patch is applied first.  I can combine them into a
single patch if that is preferred.

It will take me some time to re-test against natty.  Is this likely to
be included in natty if I do this soon?  If so, I'll raise the priority
of this on my todo list.

I have not been in communication with the Debian developers, as I've
only tested Ubuntu packages.  I can file upstream with Debian as well,
but I'd like to take the time to test against Debian first, and adjust
patches if necessary.

Do you have any comments regarding the magic symlinking, and if it would
be safe to only do so if the socket matches /var/run/lirc/lircd\d+  and
then symlink from /dev/$(basename $REMOTE_SOCKET)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698007

Title:
  lirc init script can create circular symlinks

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 732252] [NEW] usbvideo causes failure to suspend on Thinkpad T410s

2011-03-09 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

On a Thinkpad T410s, as well as a T410 and X201, the uvcvideo module in
the Lucid kernel frequently causes a failure to suspend.  The symptom is
that the system attempts to suspend but just drops you back at the
unlock screen.

/var/log/pm-suspend reports:
/usr/lib/pm-utils/pm-functions: line 317: echo: write error: Device or resource 
busy
Line 317 is: echo -n mem  /sys/power/state

Kern.log indicates the following:
PM: Device 1-1.6 failed to suspend: error -110

Device 1-1.6 is the integrated UVC camera with USB id 17ef:480d

By upgrading the uvcvideo module to the one from linuxtv.org, the
problem goes away.  I'm hoping that the lucid uvcvideo module can get an
update, or a patch that fixes this problem, since it's already been
fixed upstream.  However, it is also possible to work around the problem
by adding uvcvideo to SUSPEND_MODULES in pm-utils.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: glucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732252

Title:
  usbvideo causes failure to suspend on Thinkpad T410s

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 686825] Re: Server says: *** System restart required *** after updating openssl

2011-02-22 Thread Joel Ebel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 244250 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244250

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 244250
   Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades.
 * You can subscribe to bug 244250 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/244250/+subscribe

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686825

Title:
  Server says: *** System restart required *** after updating openssl

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698331] Re: thinkpad T410: Bluetooth not getting disabled on suspend

2011-02-14 Thread Joel Ebel
I've tested the proposed package and the updated 49bluetooth properly
disables bluetooth before continuing.  Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698331

Title:
  thinkpad T410: Bluetooth not getting disabled on suspend

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698331] Re: thinkpad T410: Bluetooth not getting disabled on suspend

2011-02-09 Thread Joel Ebel
Martin, what's the timeline for an SRU for Lucid?  We've got a number of
users who have confirmed this as a fix for their suspend problems on
thinkpads.  I'm wondering if we can expect a fix soon-ish, or should
fork the package internally.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698331

Title:
  thinkpad T410: Bluetooth not getting disabled on suspend

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698331] Re: thinkpad T410: Bluetooth not getting disabled on suspend

2011-02-09 Thread Joel Ebel
Ah.  Sorry for the confusion.  It's had enough testing to satisfy me.
In addition, testing has shows that this fixes the btusb suspend problem
entirely, without requiring adding it to SUSPEND_MODULES.

We still have uvcvideo in SUSPEND_MODULES, but I'm testing a newer
version of that module, which seems to fix it without requiring
unloading it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698331

Title:
  thinkpad T410: Bluetooth not getting disabled on suspend

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698331] Re: thinkpad T410: Bluetooth not getting disabled on suspend

2011-01-31 Thread Joel Ebel
Thank you Martin.  I've verified that your package does properly reduce
the btusb usage count to 0, and it does allow for btusb to be unloaded
using SUSPEND_MODULES.  The actual suspend problem is intermittent, so
time will tell if this resolves the suspend issue, with or without
actually unloading the btusb module.

Some background on the suspend issues we've encountered with the new thinkpads 
(X201, T410(s)):
At some point in the Lucid lifecycle, suspend became unreliable, with the 
behavior that suspend wouldn't complete, leaving you back at the unlock screen. 
 The error in pm-suspend.log was /usr/lib/pm-utils/pm-functions: line 317: 
echo: write error: Device or resource busy.   In kern.log, there were a couple 
errors that showed up.  The most common one was PM: Device 1-1.6 failed to 
suspend: error -110.  Device 1-1.6 was the built in webcam.  By adding 
uvcvideo to SUSPEND_MODULES, we resolved the majority of the suspend problems.

However, the other error that showed up on occasion was: PM: Device
usb1 failed to suspend: error -16  Device usb1 was the device that
contained both the webcam and the bluetooth device.  Since we were
already removing the webcam, the bluetooth device seemed likely to be
responsible.  By manually disabling bluetooth before suspending, users
have been able to reliably suspend, however, this isn't a good solution,
as you must remember to do it.  Due to this bug, adding btusb to
SUSPEND_MODULES didn't work.

Now that we have a solution to this bug, I'll have the users that can
reproduce this most often try the patch here by itself.  If it doesn't
resolve the problem on its own, I'll have them add btusb to
SUSPEND_MODULES as well.  I suspect that will resolve the problem
completely.  It's still puzzling that uvcvideo and possibly btusb are
having problems suspending, but at least we have work-arounds available.

I haven't tried to reproduce the suspend problems in natty, but I was
able to reproduce the module unloading problem reported in this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698331

Title:
  thinkpad T410: Bluetooth not getting disabled on suspend

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 636901] Re: (On usb card removed) pulseaudio process goes to 100% CPU and cannot be restarted

2011-01-18 Thread Joel Ebel
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636901

Title:
  (On usb card removed) pulseaudio process goes to 100% CPU and cannot
  be restarted

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 703106] [NEW] xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list symlink with a file.

2011-01-14 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xdg-utils

The desktop-file-utils package creates
/usr/share/applications/defaults.list as a symlink to
/etc/gnome/defaults.list.  Unfortunately, the xdg-update-menu program,
when called to install a .desktop file with new mime types, overwrites
this symlink with a file.  It does this by reading the defaults.list,
writing to a temporary file, making edits, then copying it back.  it
doesn't notice if the defaults.list file is a symlink, and overwrites it
with a file.

A common example of this is installing google chrome.  it calls xdg-
desktop-menu to install its desktop file, and the result is that
/etc/gnome/defaults.list is no longer used.

I suggest that xdg-desktop-menu should canonicalize defaults.list before
writing to it.  I've attached a simple patch as an example.  This patch
will apply both to the latest package in natty, as well as to Lucid,
where I'd really like this to be applied.

** Affects: xdg-utils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: glucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703106

Title:
  xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list
  symlink with a file.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 703106] Re: xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list symlink with a file.

2011-01-14 Thread Joel Ebel

** Patch added: patch to canonicalize defaults.list before overwriting it.
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703106/+attachment/1794171/+files/xdg-desktop-menu.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703106

Title:
  xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list
  symlink with a file.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 703106] Re: xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list symlink with a file.

2011-01-14 Thread Joel Ebel
** Also affects: xdg-utils
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703106

Title:
  xdg-update-menu overwrites the /usr/share/applications/defaults.list
  symlink with a file.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698007] Re: lirc init script can create circular symlinks

2011-01-07 Thread Joel Ebel

** Patch removed: Patch compatible with patch in bug 697999
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/698007/+attachment/1786688/+files/lirc.init.patch

** Patch added: Patch compatible with patch in bug 697999
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/698007/+attachment/1786691/+files/lirc.init.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698007

Title:
  lirc init script can create circular symlinks

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 697999] Re: lirc init script seems to load things backwards

2011-01-07 Thread Joel Ebel
** Patch removed: Patch to change order in which transmitter and remote are 
loaded
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/697999/+attachment/1786685/+files/lirc.init.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697999

Title:
  lirc init script seems to load things backwards

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs



[Bug 697999] [NEW] lirc init script seems to load things backwards

2011-01-06 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: lirc

The lirc manual describes how to load multiple devices here:
http://www.lirc.org/html/configure.html#multiple

Assuming that the primary device get started on lircd and the secondary
device gets started on lircd1:

In short the proper method is to start lircd1 with --listen, and then
lircd with --connect

The lircd init script does this backwards, lircd with --listen, and then
lircd1 with --connect.

The result is that only the primary device is visible on lircd.  Both
devices are visible on lircd1, however, most applications will require
additional configuration in order to communicate with both devices.

** Affects: lirc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697999

Title:
  lirc init script seems to load things backwards

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698007] [NEW] lirc init script can create circular symlinks

2011-01-06 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: lirc

This is related to bug 697999 and specifically my need to work around
that bug.

If, in /etc/lirc/hardware.conf, you set REMOTE_SOCKET to /dev/lircd1 and
transmitter_socket to /dev/lircd, then the lirc init script will create
a circular symlink loop between /dev/lircd and /dev/lircd1.  The script
tests if OLD_SOCKET != REMOTE_SOCKET, but it should also make sure that
OLD_SOCKET != TRANSMITTER_SOCKET  Additionally, before removing
${OLD_SOCKET}1 the script should do the same checks, which it currently
does none.

A patch for this solution is attached.

My preference would actually to be to use the new socket locations in
/var/run/lircd, however, then the the order I create those sockets is
irrelevant, as the magical symlinking always symlinks /dev/lircd to the
remote and /dev/lircd1 to the transmitter, which is backwards from how I
need it to be.  I'm not actually sure what the best fix is here.
Perhaps it could just test if the socket is /var/run/lirc/lircd\d+ and
if it is, then just symlink to /dev/$(basename $REMOTE_SOCKET)  If this
is an acceptable solution, I can probably write up a patch for this
behavior if necessary.  However, there may be other cases the current
behavior is designed to correct for.  If bug 697999 gets fixed, then
this problem will no longer affect me.

** Affects: lirc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698007

Title:
  lirc init script can create circular symlinks

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698007] Re: lirc init script can create circular symlinks

2011-01-06 Thread Joel Ebel

** Patch added: lirc init script patch to test that OLD_SOCKET ${OLD_SOCKET}1 
aren't used by either device before deleting it.
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/698007/+attachment/1784829/+files/lirc_init.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698007

Title:
  lirc init script can create circular symlinks

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 694027] Re: debconf-copydb crashed with signal 7 in Perl_pp_sort()

2011-01-06 Thread Joel Ebel
memtest passes fine.  It only happened once.  I filed in case it pointed
the devs to a bug in an uncommon case, but I don't particularly care if
you want to leave it as invalid.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694027

Title:
  debconf-copydb crashed with signal 7 in Perl_pp_sort()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698331] [NEW] thinkpad T410: Bluetooth not getting disabled on suspend

2011-01-06 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: pm-utils

I discovered this in Lucid, and verified the behavior still exists in
natty.

/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/49bluetooth attempts to disable bluetooth
using echo disable  /proc/acpi/ibm/bluetooth.  Under normal operating
conditions, this command seems to work, when run by hand:

# rfkill list
1: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
2: tpacpi_bluetooth_sw: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
4: hci0: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
# lsmod | grep ^btusb
btusb  18600  2
# echo disable  /proc/acpi/ibm/bluetooth
# rfkill list
1: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
2: tpacpi_bluetooth_sw: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: yes
Hard blocked: no
# lsmod | grep ^btusb
btusb  18600  0 

Note that after disabling bluetooth in this manner, rfkill no longer
even lists hci0, and the btusb usage count dropped from 2 to 0.

However, when this is called from /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/49bluetooth,
during a suspend, this does not appear to be working.  I patched
49bluetooth to look like this:

rfkill list
lsmod | grep ^btusb
echo Disabling Bluetooth
echo disable  /proc/acpi/ibm/bluetooth
rfkill list
lsmod | grep ^btusb

After suspending with this code in place, I get the following output in
pm-suspend.log:

Running hook /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/49bluetooth suspend suspend:
1: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
2: tpacpi_bluetooth_sw: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
6: hci0: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
btusb  18600  2 
Disabling Bluetooth
1: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
2: tpacpi_bluetooth_sw: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: yes
Hard blocked: no
6: hci0: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
btusb  18600  2 

Note that, while tpacpi_bluetooth_sw: Bluetooth is soft blocked, hci0
still exists and is not blocked.  In addition, btusb still has a usage
count of 2.  For some reason, using /proc/acpi/ibm/bluetooth to disable
bluetooth during suspend isn't working, and the module is still in use.
I would like to try unloading btusb during suspend, using
SUSPEND_MODULES, as I believe it may be causing suspend problems, but
due to this inability to disable bluetooth during suspend, the module
remains in use, and cannot be unloaded.

** Affects: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: glucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698331

Title:
  thinkpad T410: Bluetooth not getting disabled on suspend

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 697999] Re: lirc init script seems to load things backwards

2011-01-06 Thread Joel Ebel
Attached is a patch which does what I expect.  It pains me to not
include my patch for bug 698007 in the patch, but it's a separate bug,
so I'm leaving that fix there.  Please consider it as well.

** Patch added: Patch to change order in which transmitter and remote are 
loaded
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/697999/+attachment/1786685/+files/lirc.init.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697999

Title:
  lirc init script seems to load things backwards

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 698007] Re: lirc init script can create circular symlinks

2011-01-06 Thread Joel Ebel
Note that the original patch is not directly compatible with my patch in
bug 697999.  Here's a new one should that patch be applied first.

Also, the original patch was against Lucid's lirc, but should apply
cleanly to the current version as well.

** Patch added: Patch compatible with patch in bug 697999
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/698007/+attachment/1786688/+files/lirc.init.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698007

Title:
  lirc init script can create circular symlinks

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 697999] Re: lirc init script seems to load things backwards

2011-01-06 Thread Joel Ebel
As much as it pains me, I realized the rest of the file used tabs, so
here's a new patch with tabs instead of spaces.

** Patch added: New patch with consistent use of tabs
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lirc/+bug/697999/+attachment/1786690/+files/lirc.init.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697999

Title:
  lirc init script seems to load things backwards

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 660455] Re: clock-applet continually crashing

2010-12-03 Thread Joel Ebel
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660455

Title:
  clock-applet continually crashing

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 544935] Re: netcat-openbsd exits too soon

2010-12-03 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544935

Title:
  netcat-openbsd exits too soon

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 564043] Re: upstart job no longer adds options for rpc.gssd

2010-12-03 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564043

Title:
  upstart job no longer adds options for rpc.gssd

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 683955] Re: Please upgrade tftpd-hpa in lucid to at least 5.0-14

2010-12-02 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683955

Title:
  Please upgrade tftpd-hpa in lucid to at least 5.0-14

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 683955] Re: Please upgrade tftpd-hpa in lucid to at least 5.0-14

2010-12-02 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683955

Title:
  Please upgrade tftpd-hpa in lucid to at least 5.0-14

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 508545] Re: Aptitude ignores /etc/apt/preferences.d/*

2010-12-02 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508545

Title:
  Aptitude ignores /etc/apt/preferences.d/*

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 673875] Re: synclient TouchpadOff=1 toggles touchpad rather than disabling it

2010-11-30 Thread Joel Ebel
After further investigation, it looks like this was just an interaction
of the disable touchpad when typing option.  If that is disabled, then
this works as expected.

** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
synclient TouchpadOff=1 toggles touchpad rather than disabling it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 601114] Re: /etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh references $USER

2010-11-22 Thread Joel Ebel
Would a backport into Lucid be possible for this?  cron jobs which
source /etc/profile.d wind up always returning this message, making cron
jobs which should only output on error give output every time.  Perhaps
it could be patched more minimally than was done for Maverick, but some
fix for Lucid would be much appreciated.

-- 
/etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh references $USER
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601114
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 677296] [NEW] Smart copying with Ctrl-C no longer works

2010-11-18 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-terminal

As reported by one of our users...

In Lucid, gnome-terminal doesn't support copying with smart Ctrl-C. This
is a functionality regression.

Hardy behavior:
- have text selected with the mouse = CRTL-C is Copy
- have no text selected with the mouse = CTRL-C is sent to terminal.

Lucid behavior:
- selection status doesn't make a difference. It's either/or. Since all the 
rest of the world uses CTRL-C to Copy, it's pretty annoying to have to rewire 
my muscle memory to do something different.

See all the upstream drama here:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579022

** Affects: gnome-terminal
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: glucid

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #579022
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579022

** Also affects: gnome-terminal via
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579022
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Smart copying with Ctrl-C no longer works
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677296
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 667187] Re: cciss: Unknown symbol compat_alloc_user_space on installation images newer than 10.04 release

2010-11-14 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
cciss: Unknown symbol compat_alloc_user_space on installation images newer 
than 10.04 release
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 674216] Re: 0x000003e6 Error When Printing from Windows 7 x64

2010-11-11 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
0x03e6 Error When Printing from Windows 7 x64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 674216] Re: 0x000003e6 Error When Printing from Windows 7 x64

2010-11-11 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
0x03e6 Error When Printing from Windows 7 x64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 674246] Re: printers.conf integrity problems

2010-11-11 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
printers.conf integrity problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674246
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 674240] Re: Possible DoS attack from Unknown (cups)

2010-11-11 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
 Possible DoS attack from Unknown (cups)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674240
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 603854] Re: When installing onto fake raid grub still tried to install to /dev/sda

2010-11-10 Thread Joel Ebel
Verified the fix on an HP z600 using RAID 0.  grub was installed to
/dev/dm-0.

-- 
When installing onto fake raid grub still tried to install to /dev/sda
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 673875] [NEW] synclient TouchpadOff=1 toggles touchpad rather than disabling it

2010-11-10 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics

Using Lucid on a Thinkpad T410s, running synclient TouchpadOff=1 toggles
the state of the touchpad.  It should always disable it.

** Affects: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
synclient TouchpadOff=1 toggles touchpad rather than disabling it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 673875] Re: synclient TouchpadOff=1 toggles touchpad rather than disabling it

2010-11-10 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
synclient TouchpadOff=1 toggles touchpad rather than disabling it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626025] Re: ThinkPad battery applet shows incorrect information

2010-11-09 Thread Joel Ebel
** Changed in: upower (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Tags added: glucid

-- 
ThinkPad battery applet shows incorrect information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626025
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 670119] Re: Security advisory for Flash requires an update

2010-11-04 Thread Joel Ebel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 667887 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667887

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 667887
   Adobe APSA10-05
 * You can subscribe to bug 667887 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/667887/+subscribe

-- 
Security advisory for Flash requires an update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670119
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 601114] Re: /etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh references $USER

2010-10-27 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
/etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh references $USER
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601114
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 620693] Re: Screen not locked when turned off

2010-10-15 Thread Joel Ebel
The behavior is still the same in Maverick.  The screen does not lock
when the screen is blanked, even if lock/black_screen is checked, or
lock/use_screensaver_settings is checked and screensaver lock is
enabled.

The gnome power manager manual also still has inaccurate information
regarding when the idle timers start for power management functions.

** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
Screen not locked when turned off
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620693
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 660224] [NEW] notify-osd displays on top of xscreensaver

2010-10-13 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: notify-osd

steps to reproduce:

1.  run xscreensaver
2.  send a message to notify-osd

expected result: the message is not displayed, as gnome-screensaver behaves.
Actual result:  The message is displayed on top of xscreensaver.

This is bad when things like instant message content is displayed on top
of your screensaver.  notify-osd should treat xscreensaver like other
full-screen applications and not display notifications.

** Affects: notify-osd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: glucid

** Tags added: glucid

-- 
notify-osd displays on top of xscreensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660224
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 39210] Re: installer: cannot set mount option data=journal

2010-10-05 Thread Joel Ebel
We specifically need data=writeback.  I've created a patch that works
for this case.  It's a very simple patch.  Getting this into Lucid
10.04.2 would help us immensely as well.

** Patch added: patch to support data={journal,ordered,writeback}, acl, and 
noauto mount options for ext{3,4}
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-ext3/+bug/39210/+attachment/1674171/+files/partman-ext3_59ubuntu2.debdiff

** Tags added: glucid

-- 
installer: cannot set mount option data=journal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39210
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 643811] [NEW] Update flashplugin-installer for CVE-2010-2884

2010-09-20 Thread Joel Ebel
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree

Flash needs an update due to CVE-2010-2884  For more details, see:
http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa10-03.html
and
http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-22.html

Version 10.1.85.3 is available, and the flashplugin-installer package
should be updated to include it.

** Affects: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: glucid

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Also affects: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2010-2884

-- 
Update flashplugin-installer for CVE-2010-2884
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643811
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 571444] Re: Boot hangs and unable to continue when automount disk in fstab is not available (Off or Disconnected)

2010-09-03 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
Boot hangs and unable to continue when automount disk in fstab is not available 
(Off or Disconnected)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571444
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs



[Bug 623303] Re: If a drive in the fstab is missing at boot, the boot process hangs for user input

2010-09-02 Thread Joel Ebel
** Tags added: glucid

-- 
If a drive in the fstab is missing at boot, the boot process hangs for user 
input
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623303
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 620693] [NEW] Screen not locked when turned off

2010-08-19 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager

All settings I refer to here are gconf settings relative to /apps/gnome-
power-manager unless fully qualified.

If the value for timeout/sleep_display_ac (in seconds) is less than that
of /desktop/gnome/session/idle_delay (in minutes) then the screen is
blanked before the screensaver is activated.

gnome-power-manager offers gconf options, described in its manual, for
causing the screen to be locked when the screen is blanked.  This can in
theory be set by enabling lock/blank_screen or enabling
lock/use_screensaver_settings if /apps/gnome-screensaver/lock_enabled is
set.

The problem is that neither of these settings appear to work.  As a
result, if the screen is blanked before the screensaver starts, or if
the screensaver is disabled entirely, the screen does not get locked
when blanked.  These settings do not appear to behave as described in
the manual.

The manual also describes that power management timers begin only after
session idle, but that doesn't appear to be the case anymore.  power
management timers now appear to start immediately, independent of
session idle_delay.  This documentation should be updated.

** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: glucid

-- 
Screen not locked when turned off
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620693
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 591100] Re: autofs5 eats the cpu if you have large groups

2010-08-17 Thread Joel Ebel
We have been testing this exact patch (with the exception of subtle
changelog variations, verified by debdiff) for 2 months now on thousands
of machines.  It greatly improves autofs performance in a large group
environment.  I've briefly tested the package uploaded to proposed to
verify that it still works and improves performance.

-- 
autofs5 eats the cpu if you have large groups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591100
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 591100] Re: autofs5 eats the cpu if you have large groups

2010-08-17 Thread Joel Ebel
We have been testing this exact patch (with the exception of subtle
changelog variations, verified by debdiff) for 2 months now on thousands
of machines.  It greatly improves autofs performance in a large group
environment.  I've briefly tested the package uploaded to proposed to
verify that it still works and improves performance.

-- 
autofs5 eats the cpu if you have large groups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591100
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 614487] [NEW] network manager applet appears after hibernate even when it doesn't manage network devices.

2010-08-06 Thread Joel Ebel
Public bug reported:

If network manager is not responsible for managing any devices, it
normally does not appear in the notification area.  However, after a
hibernate, network manager applet re-appears with a red exclamation
point over it.  It still lists the ethernet device as device not
managed.  Restarting makes it go away again.

To reproduce:
1.  Install Lucid on a computer with one ethernet device.
2. Add this to  /etc/network/interfaces:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
3. Reboot and see that network-manager isn't displayed.
4. Hibernate/thaw and see that network-manager applet is displayed.

Expected behavior is that network manager applet remains invisible even
after hibernate if it is not responsible for managing any devices.

** Affects: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: glucid

-- 
network manager applet appears after hibernate even when it doesn't manage 
network devices.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   3   >