[Bug 1838485] [NEW] package policykit-1 0.105-14.1ubuntu0.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: I don't have Window. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: policykit-1 0.105-14.1ubuntu0.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-28.32~16.04.2-generic 4.10.17 Uname: Linux 4.10.0-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.19 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jul 30 11:19:23 2019 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-07-27 (3 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20170801) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.5 apt 1.2.32 SourcePackage: policykit-1 Title: package policykit-1 0.105-14.1ubuntu0.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: policykit-1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838485 Title: package policykit-1 0.105-14.1ubuntu0.5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/+bug/1838485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1509723] Re: [Acer Aspire ES1-311] Ubuntu freezes occasionally
All, This is a horrible kernel bug that affects BayTrail systems. See here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109051 >From what I see there is still no solution. And little activity from Intel or kernel devs to fix it. Which is too bad: there are a *lot* of BayTrail systems out there... jds -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509723 Title: [Acer Aspire ES1-311] Ubuntu freezes occasionally To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1509723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993187] Re: ubuntu 12.04 completely freezes frequently.
I am also getting complete lockups, no mouse movement. Fresh install of 12.04 64-bit with all updates. Computer: HP DM1Z with AMD E-450 CPU and ATI graphics. I have to say, after challenges with 11.04 and 11.10 I thought surely that 12.04 LTS would be a good release for me. Alas. Back to the Mac it is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993187 Title: ubuntu 12.04 completely freezes frequently. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/993187/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774538] Re: [dash] some uninstalled applications are still shown (desktop files still present)
I can reliably reproduce this bug on a fresh, stock install of 12.04 with all updates done. Install, say, Medit. It appears in the taskbar. Unintall Medit, icon is still in the taskbar. It's amazing to me that such an *obvious* bug could make it into a final LTS release. It's the sort of easily-encountered, semi-cosmetic breakage that turns people off immediately -- when the system works in unexpected ways, the motivation to use it drops. If such a simple thing is broken, who knows how many more essential aspects of the system are also broken? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774538 Title: [dash] some uninstalled applications are still shown (desktop files still present) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/774538/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
Sorry if this is an obvious question, but are you sure you rebooted from the patched kernel and not some updated ubuntu kernel? jds On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, matt_callaghan <642...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote: > bah; comment spamming (sorry). > > I did: > 1) installed the patched kernel/images/headers, seemed flawless. > 2) rebooted, yay! was fixed. the "shiny" ubuntu logo appears as expected, > and there were no FATAL messages. > 3) ubuntu prompted me for a whack of updates (it looked like several > applications needed to be updated w/ the newer kernel) > 4) rebooted, darn. got the same error as before. ... FATAL message > present again. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 > > Title: > Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep > > Status in The Linux Kernel: > Confirmed > Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > Status in “linux” source package in Maverick: > Fix Committed > > Bug description: > When I turn on my computer I can read this on my screen > > "modprobe: Fatal: Could not load > /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep: no such file or directory" > > After 4-5 seconds, plymouth starts and the system works fine. > > salve, ho lo stesso problema, mi chiede la psw del portachiavi e poi > rimane con lo schermo nero..ed è impossibile lavorare...! grazie > > hi, I have the same problem, I asked the psw keychain and then left > with a black screen .. and it is impossible to work ...! thanks > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/642421/+subscribe > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 Title: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
I didn't use the patch command at all. I just installed the two header files and the kernel using 'dpkg -i ', then rebooted. Grub will show you the new kernel on the boot screen. jds On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:59 PM, lunix <642...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > > > Once i figured out to install headers-all before headers, it went > > smoothly - thanks so much for the patch! > > > > -- > > > > I have been resisting putting the patch on as I share > this machine with others and I didn't want to upset anything or screw up in > the order. I suppose I could just boot from one of the other kernels if > something went wrong. > > Perhaps someone who has been successful, apparently all of you might post > an > extra procedure for those that are used to just going through the normal > update options. > Will this patch be released as an update? > > I have a 64-bit machine. It looks like I need to install: > linux-image-2.6.35-25-generic_2.6.35-25.43lp642421v201101091714_amd64.deb > > linux-headers-2.6.35-25_2.6.35-25.43lp642421v201101091714_all.deb > > linux- > headers-2.6.35-25-generic_2.6.35-25.43lp642421v201101091714_amd64.deb > > Then do I reboot and come up on this and then apply the patch or apply the > patch straight away while running the older kernel? > > 0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-ensure-root-is-ready-before-running-use.patch > > Do I just type as root: patch > 0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-ensure-root-is-ready-before-running-use.patch > > Does it matter what directory the above patch file is in when I run the > patch command? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 > > Title: > Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep > > Status in The Linux Kernel: > Confirmed > Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > When I turn on my computer I can read this on my screen > > "modprobe: Fatal: Could not load > /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep: no such file or directory" > > After 4-5 seconds, plymouth starts and the system works fine. > > salve, ho lo stesso problema, mi chiede la psw del portachiavi e poi > rimane con lo schermo nero..ed è impossibile lavorare...! grazie > > hi, I have the same problem, I asked the psw keychain and then left > with a black screen .. and it is impossible to work ...! thanks > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/642421/+subscribe > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 Title: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
Andy's patched kernel worked like a charm on my EEE PC 1001px, on which I originally noticed the boot-time error message. On the netbook 10.10 was installed in its own partition, separate from the bootable partition of the system (which has 10.04 on it). Thanks Andy, terrific work. I was also one of the early greasy-well complainers about this bug, arguing that it's much more than merely cosmetic. I still think that's true! jds On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Gerald Williams <642...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote: > Affects my Toshiba A215-S7422 laptop. In addition to boot warnings, > menus don't appear properly transparent and video artifacts appear. > > Going back to latest stable kernel from 10.4 resolves all, recommended > workarounds with initramfs and rebuilding modules.dep did not help. > Haven't tried the backported kernel yet (have an AMD Turion64, was > running 32-bit, didn't want to grab the wrong version). > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 > > Title: > Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep > > Status in The Linux Kernel: > Confirmed > Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > When I turn on my computer I can read this on my screen > > "modprobe: Fatal: Could not load > /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep: no such file or directory" > > After 4-5 seconds, plymouth starts and the system works fine. > > salve, ho lo stesso problema, mi chiede la psw del portachiavi e poi > rimane con lo schermo nero..ed è impossibile lavorare...! grazie > > hi, I have the same problem, I asked the psw keychain and then left > with a black screen .. and it is impossible to work ...! thanks > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/642421/+subscribe > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 Title: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
Andrew, Thanks for your reply, and for keeping the (totally misplaced) discussion going :) I too for a long time held the position you have stated. My opinion has changed though. First observe that Macs also have a command-line interface (though one can get away with using it rarely) and that game support for Macs is extremely limited compared to Windows. But mainly, in my professional life I have observed many software developers -- leading-edge users who otherwise know Unix up and down -- simply wonder away from Linux (to Macs) precisely because of issues such as this: that Linux installations feel brittle, untested, held together by hacks and tape. That's why the optics *are* important. The attitude that "oh well it's just a message that flashes by, and hey it doesn't actually affect the system" in my view is so mistaken. Things that make the system seem broken and unstable send the wrong message to end users. I was very excited when Ubuntu kicked off because I thought, at last here's an attempt to bring rigour and polish to Linux packaging. Instead, release after release I see that the old attitudes are still prevalent. The new netbook interface in 10.10 is *just terrible*, how anyone thought to release it without saying, "this is really rough so play with it and file bugs" is beyond me.Compare the language here http://www.ubuntu.com/netbook to the reality here http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=9953240&postcount=1 -- Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
"While it is undesirable that this error is emitted so prominantly during boot on any system, even had this error been on the release teams radar, it is unlikely it would have been a release blocker as it does not seem to affect functionality, nor does it affect a large percentage of the install base." And right here you have, in its tightest expression, the core reason why Ubuntu will never reach levels of popularity beyond the tiniest fraction of computer users world-wide. -- Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
Michael, Again, I'm totally sympathetic with what you're saying, but I don't believe this case is comparable to the experience you have in your organization. Here we don't have a minor bug that some bunch of free- loaders are whinging about. In fact, as far as my own usage is concerned, I could care less whether this gets fixed -- it's not yet clear whether it affects the operation of the system, and in any case I can just stick to LTS. The point is: how can it be that such monster bugs make it into a final release? The real bug is the process, not this particular exemplar. And yet one sees little effort on the part of Canonical to alter the process to prevent this sort of thing. And thus potential users turn away. That is the frustration. -- Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
Michael, I hear you, but I read your reply as reproductive of the head-in-the- sand mentality that won't examine cases such as these as opportunities for improvement. I've been a regular user of Ubuntu for many years, and I've always felt the releases are rushed, whenever a "Final" comes out, several weeks, sometimes months, go by before it reaches the stability of the previous one. That my be fun for geeks, but it's not 'Linux for Humans'. So if this keeps happening over and over again, there's a real problem to be solved. Saying that this affects some small subset, that it's happened before, see there's a Debian thread from two years ago ... is so not the point. Here we have a case of an error that occurs across, it seems, many hardware configurations -- I'm using a stock netbook that (after a few months of updates) works more-or-less fine under 10.04, I'm not on some exotic motherboard etc. I suspect that many, many users are seeing this. And an error that hits you immediately upon the first boot with FATAL really doesn't inspire a lot of confidence, whatever the impact later. And a link to an old discussion that ends with another link to a thread on how to recompile the kernel is hardly an effective argument for why this shouldn't be a release blocker. The broader point here is: what needs to happen to harden these releases? Maybe the 6-month thing should be rethought, or at least the non-LTS releases should be tagged as geek-oriented, unstable experiments (I wish the LTS releases would be more stable on the release date). Instead Canonical makes a big deal that this is the latest and greatest OS for the masses. There is such a gap between the rhetoric and the reality that people naturally just walk off to buy a Mac. -- Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642421] Re: Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep
I'm curious about something: how can Ubuntu ship with such a massive error right at boot? I'd like to understand the release process better. Surely this sort of thing could benefit form a post-release analysis? It's absolutely a priority-1 blocker! -- Maverick could not load /lib/modules/2.6.35-22-generic/modules.dep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642421 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519553] Re: Right click menu could confuse users, leading to accidental removal of panel applet
Does the closing of this bug mean that this won't be fixed until the next Ubuntu release? Note that at Apple this bug would be considered a total show-stopper. User can delete volume control icon and never get it back. -- Right click menu could confuse users, leading to accidental removal of panel applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519553] Re: Right click menu could confuse users, leading to accidental removal of panel applet
This is the sort of severe and *OBVIOUS* usability issue that just kills Linux in the consumer space. I just installed 10.04 on a test system, went to (what I thought was) delete the mail icon, lost the other icons including the volume control applet, which I want. I browsed the web to restore it, found a comment about re-adding the Notification area. Did so, ending up with an empty space in the menu bar. Read a note about deleting ~/.gnome2 and re-log in, did so, got the battery and bluetooth icons back but still no volume icon. -- Right click menu could confuse users, leading to accidental removal of panel applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441828] Re: System Monitor ignores close request and uses 100% of one core
Same happens when I connect an iphone to a system running 9.10. -- System Monitor ignores close request and uses 100% of one core https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441828 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218794] Re: integrated microfone does not work (sony vaio, hardy)
Nikos, Does Ubuntu 8.10 otherwise work fine on your VAIO NS? For example, when you plug a headset into the headphone jack, are the speakers muted appropriately? Does X run normally, at full resolution? Thanks, jds -- integrated microfone does not work (sony vaio, hardy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299677] Re: package mysql-server_5.0.51a-3ubuntu5.4_all.deb: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19769573/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package mysql-server_5.0.51a-3ubuntu5.4_all.deb: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299677] [NEW] package mysql-server_5.0.51a-3ubuntu5.4_all.deb: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: MythTV 8.04 Synaptic The install to finish It crashed instead ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Nov 18 15:48:06 2008 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: mysql-server None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server.list] PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: mysql-dfsg-5.0 Title: package mysql-server None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server.list] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.24-21-generic i686 ** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package mysql-server_5.0.51a-3ubuntu5.4_all.deb: subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
