Re: Fwd: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
OK, sounds good. Like I said, I don't have much time to deal with it right now as I am moving so San Francisco. keep me posted if you guys make any significant progress (ie, they fix it on their end or rework the license). metasploit is a tool by them, for them, and we have the benefit of seeing the code and using it for free. they have no obligation to change anything to suit a distro's needs. just keep that in mind ;-P On 8/30/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an update, we are working with the metasploit team, to hammer out some of the issues with the current package, etc. Please see the below email for communication between myself and the team-lead. Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- Forwarded message -- From: Justin Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Aug 30, 2007 10:01 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) To: H D Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Moore: With your permission, I would like to post your comments (as well as mine) to our bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/102212 ) so others outside of this thread (including the package approvers) can keep track of our status. On 8/29/07, H D Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Justin, We can likely help with some of these in the future, but there are some things that we should clarify: I appriciate your willingness to help, and look forward to working with you and the rest of the metasploit team. 1) We will continue to use Subversion as a system for performing online updates. This means any distribution will always contain .svn directories. One solution, for a packager, is to give each user their own Metasploit 3 installation and provide a script which extracts this package and configures PATH/symlinks during the first use. This is how Metasploit 3.1 will work on Windows and a simple way to avoid having Subversion modify system-wide directories. I like the idea of each user having their own installation. Not only does it alleviate any issues implied by SVN and system-wide directories, but it also allows each user to keep their own patch level, and more importantly their own exploits. This then allows them to download third-party exploits (milw0rm and the like) and even write their own, without the fear of interfering with other users on the system. As such I will see what we can do about packaging metasploit in such a way, and at the same time keep the SVN update ability. 2) The license may change in the future, but we have no timeline set and no requirements to be compatible with debian-legal. For what its worth, our license was written by a lawyer and then reviewed again by a second legal team as a sanity check. The license stipulations are standard for EULAs and are not in line with what most folks consider open source. We understand that this doesn't make packaging easy, but allowing other people to distribute our software has not been a priority. This makes perfect sence, as does the motive behind such a restrictive license. However, this will cause the license to fall under the non-free category. Which requires a bit more user interaction and fore-thought in order to install. Thus it may scare some users away from trying metasploit, then again, if they do not know what metasploit is, they will most likely not be using it in the first place. Which I do not see as a bad thing. The major license issues we are having: * Limited ability to redistribute * The inability to redistribute changes (patches, etc) I understand that redistribution has not been a priority, and this honestly is a bunch of bureaucracy that hinders productivity, all licenses are. But allowing distributions (Ubuntu, Fedora, Suse, Backtrack) the ability to package should be something that is looked at, when the next license review comes along. The majority of users (even those who use metasploit) are far more comfortable installing packages from the distributions repositories. Some will go as far as requesting an application to be packaged and added to the distribution before they will install. It allows the user to keep a clean system and easily update all the applications. Dependencies are handled, updates are provided, and configuration complete, it makes installation painless. I also understand the wish to protect metasploit from re-branded and re-packaging. But there is ways to allow distribution of changes, while still retaining original copyright, name/branding, and maintainers etc. Thus protecting metasploit from thief but still allowing Ubuntu and others to make needed changes in order to have metasploit integrate cleanly into the distribution. 3) Splitting the package in a way that core, gui, web, and data is separate will not happen. Exploit modules often depend on updates to the libraries and
[Bug 102212] metasploit rejected for Ubuntu multiverse due to many issues outside our control (in your hands now)...
* Now talking on #ubuntu-motu * Topic for #ubuntu-motu is: Ubuntu Masters of the Universe: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU | Want to get involved with the MOTUs? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | http://ubuntu.joejaxx.org/ - TOP 10 Uploaders/Packages | REVU is back up on a new box at the same url. | Gutsy new package freeze is 30 August * Topic for #ubuntu-motu set by ScottK at Mon Aug 27 01:40:02 2007 * #ubuntu-motu :[freenode-info] if you need to send private messages, please register: http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#privmsg khermans_ got a new packages, metasploit3 khermans_ has justin wray come by to try adding it yet? khermans_ bug marked as FIX COMMITED khermans_ if anyone has this info, please contact me khermans_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] khermans_ looking to get metasploit into multiverse for Gutsy, package was made earlier khermans_ thanks... * jml has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) * jml ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #ubuntu-motu * jdong has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) * mayday_jay has quit (Leaving) * TheMuso has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) * elkbuntu has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) * blackskad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #ubuntu-motu * elkbuntu_ is now known as elkbuntu * vil has quit (Leaving.) * jml has quit (Ex-Chat) * jml ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #ubuntu-motu * Paddy_EIRE has quit (so shave your face with some mace in the dark) RAOF khermans_: Didn't that have crazy licencing problems? khermans_ RAOF, yeah but its all worked out RAOF Ah, cool. khermans_ RAOF, we found that basiclaly anything can be placed in multiverse if it allows redistribution RAOF What bug is marked as fix committed, incidentally. khermans_ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/102212 ubotu Launchpad bug 102212 in ubuntu [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) [Wishlist,Fix committed] khermans_ so i am wondering when the package will be installable form apt khermans_ i updated to latest Gutsy, apt update, but dont see it * gusguus has quit () khermans_ if you find out, please let me know khermans_ i am damn tired, moving from boston to san francisco, got tons to do tonight and tomorrow khermans_ but i wanted to make sure this was all set since cutoff date is tomorrow RAOF khermans_: Aaah, so it's actually on REVU now, presumably. khermans_ the 30th... for multiverse new package khermans_ REVU ? RAOF khermans_: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=121 khermans_ i am reading the second hit khermans_ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU khermans_ hrmm i dont see it in there... * ScottK2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #ubuntu-motu khermans_ oh ok nm khermans_ it is in there khermans_ http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=121 RAOF khermans_: It looks like it needs some work. khermans_ RAOF, a few things, but not much * ceros_ has quit (Remote closed the connection) khermans_ the errors from linda are warnings, intentionally we left them in khermans_ lintian warnings khermans_ it is complaining about .svn directories StevenK So repack the tarball khermans_ SteveA, no we want the svn entries in the release RAOF Installing files to /usr/local is a very bad thing, too. khermans_ due to the nature of the package, it needs security updates, so leaving the .svn for updating is ideal khermans_ RAOF, yeah that needs ot be ficxed khermans_ justin was not supposed to upload a pakcage with /usr/local StevenK khermans_: That's *BAD*. khermans_ SteveA, whats bad? StevenK I'm not SteveA khermans_ .svn? khermans_ StevenK, .. StevenK Do NOT encourage users to update installed packages using SVN. khermans_ StevenK, but i think you are missing the point khermans_ StevenK, metasploit is a security tool * khermans has quit (Remote closed the connection) ScottK2 khermans_: I don't imagine he is. khermans_ there will not be a new release for every update * khermans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/cisco/x-7f64be9a20688e95) has joined #ubuntu-motu khermans_ StevenK, the point is we could remove .svn, but it would make the package pretty much useless khermans_ 6 month old security exploits are too old StevenK But there are better ways than using SVN ... * jussio1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #ubuntu-motu khermans_ StevenK, yes, but not for a package with restrictive licensing khermans_ we cant modify and make an auto-update feature StevenK Ways that don't make baby Jesus cry, for example. khermans_ StevenK, ideally yes, but this is multiverse world khermans_ StevenK, i understand the reasons for why this is bad khermans_ fully... khermans_ so let me know how you would do it? * ScottK2 doesn't understand why the fact that it's multiverse makes it less bad. StevenK Agreed. khermans_ ScottK2, just means we have less control... RAOF khermans_: If the package in useless as shipped, why would we ship it? ScottK2 khermans_: Who is the we in that statement? * Hobbsee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/member/hobbsee) has joined #ubuntu-motu khermans_ RAOF, its not *useless*, but
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
I agree with everything you mentioned here, especially braking up the packages. I am actually glad that Ubuntu is rejecting it :-) it shows me that people care about what packages make it into the repositories and results in a high quality system for the users. I am a long time user since Warty :-) So, looks like we need to puch this back to the MSF team so they can clean up their act. They may not even want to, and for that, we can do nothing. So, for myself, I will just continue pulling down sources manually until they work out a new license and/or ways to deal with these issues. They may not care, since it is their tool for their use, and we have the fringe benefit of being able to use it. Oh well...we tried. I won't work on this any more. I'll let you guys take over if you like. The MSF guys don't seen to have time or want to fix these things, at least as far as I can tell. Maybe they do, but they don't care if it makes it into a distro or not... On 8/29/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I said that .svn dirs must be removed ;) A package for being accepted must be lintian *clean*, so i think, as i prev said: 1) we get a good package from dev team 2) we get an execption from ubuntu-dev Completely agree, we were just trying to see if we could get past this for the time being. I think the best solution is as follows: 1) We split metasploit into the following packages - * metasploit-core (Containing all the core components, including CLI) * metasploit-web (Containing all of the msfweb files) * metasploit-gui (Containing all of the msfgui and needed files) * metasploit-data (Containing all exploits, modules, etc.) 2) Offer a way to automatically update the exploits and modules only (leaving core, web, and gui to be updated in future releases or with security concerns). Although we need to discuss how this should be approached, specific SVN, repackaging to the archive, a download script, etc. The problem again, is how to we gain the ability to do such. The options are MSF distributes the upstream package as we have outlined above, or they allow an exception to the license that grants Ubuntu the right to modify the package and distribute in the way stated above. But it is a long shot that they would repackage just to please one distro (even though other distros could benefit from such a release). Worse it is unlikely any license exception or change will be seen until the next major release which should be accompanied by a new license. Which leaves us hanging without a metasploit release again...feedback? I wonder if the MSF team would be willing to create a separate SVN trunk for Ubuntu specifically, in which they release under the layout above? Thanks, Justin M. Wray -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
On 8/27/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Fix Committed I just updated my Gutsy install, but I don't see it. Has it made it into multiverse yet? This is the last day. Do you want me to get on #ubuntu-motu and coordinate this with you? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135071] Re: MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
** Attachment added: poster.mov http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9012289/poster.mov -- MP4Box double-free/heap corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135071] Re: MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
** Attachment added: poster.mov.2pass.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9012291/poster.mov.2pass.log -- MP4Box double-free/heap corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135071] MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gpac Tried to encode this video using podencoder, which makes a call to MP4Box, which may be corrupting itself. I have not looked at the source to see if this is a security issue or not. Tested on Feisty... podencoder is a shell script available from here: http://diveintomark.org/public/2007/06/podencoder.txt I will attach the problematic file... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ uname -a + uname -a Linux jherm-desktop 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 20:19:32 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ++ echo -ne '\033]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /tmp\007' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ podencoder poster.mov + podencoder poster.mov + version=0.20070117.0 ++ basename /usr/local/bin/podencoder + appname=podencoder + appdescription='Encode video for iPod 5G' + confname=.podencoderrc + device=/dev/dvd + outputdir=. + scratchdir=/tmp + tracks= + chapters= + naming=%d-%t + index=1 + videobitrate=450 + audiobitrate=128 + crop= + fitto4x3= + scale=320:-10 + x264encopts_required=vbv_maxrate=768:vbv_bufsize=244:nocabac:level_idc=13 + x264encopts_optional=turbo=1:me=umh:frameref=5:subq=6:partitions=all:trellis=1:direct_pred=auto:threads=auto + x264encopts= + '[' -r /home/khermans/.podencoderrc ']' + getopts :a:b:c:fi:n:o:s:t:vx: options + shift 0 + '[' -n poster.mov ']' + device=poster.mov + tty -s + : + '[' -d . ']' ++ cd . ++ pwd + outputdir=/tmp + '[' ']' ++ which mplayer + '[' -n /usr/bin/mplayer ']' ++ which mencoder + '[' -n /usr/bin/mencoder ']' ++ mencoder -oac help ++ grep faac + '[' -z ' faac - FAAC AAC audio encoder' ']' ++ mencoder -ovc help ++ grep x264 + '[' -z ' x264 - H.264 encoding' ']' ++ which MP4Box + '[' -n /usr/bin/MP4Box ']' + trap TrapBreak HUP INT TERM + '[' -f poster.mov ']' + inputfile=poster.mov ++ basename poster.mov .VOB + outputfile=poster.mov.mp4 + '[' -s /tmp/poster.mov.mp4 ']' + tracks= ++ mplayer -identify -frames 0 -vc null -vo null -ao null -nosound poster.mov + videoinfo='MPlayer 2:1.0~rc1-0ubuntu9.1 (C) 2000-2006 MPlayer Team CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ (Family: 6, Model: 8, Stepping: 1) CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 1 3DNow2: 1 SSE: 1 SSE2: 0 Compiled with runtime CPU detection. Can'\''t open joystick device /dev/input/js0: No such file or directory Can'\''t init input joystick mplayer: could not connect to socket mplayer: No such file or directory Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote control. Playing poster.mov. Quicktime/MOV file format detected. ID_VIDEO_ID=0 VIDEO: [rle ] 524x360 24bpp 15.000 fps0.0 kbps ( 0.0 kbyte/s) ID_FILENAME=poster.mov ID_DEMUXER=mov ID_VIDEO_FORMAT=rle ID_VIDEO_BITRATE=0 ID_VIDEO_WIDTH=524 ID_VIDEO_HEIGHT=360 ID_VIDEO_FPS=15.000 ID_VIDEO_ASPECT=0. ID_LENGTH=0.07 == Forced video codec: null Opening video decoder: [null] Null video decoder VDec: vo config request - 524 x 360 (preferred colorspace: BGR 24-bit) VDec: using Planar YV12 as output csp (no 0) Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied. VO: [null] 524x360 = 524x360 Planar YV12 Selected video codec: [null] vfm: null (NULL codec (no decoding!)) == ID_VIDEO_CODEC=null Audio: no sound Starting playback... Exiting... (End of file)' ++ echo 'MPlayer 2:1.0~rc1-0ubuntu9.1 (C) 2000-2006 MPlayer Team CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ (Family: 6, Model: 8, Stepping: 1) CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 1 3DNow2: 1 SSE: 1 SSE2: 0 Compiled with runtime CPU detection. Can'\''t open joystick device /dev/input/js0: No such file or directory Can'\''t init input joystick mplayer: could not connect to socket mplayer: No such file or directory Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote control. Playing poster.mov. Quicktime/MOV file format detected. ID_VIDEO_ID=0 VIDEO: [rle ] 524x360 24bpp 15.000 fps0.0 kbps ( 0.0 kbyte/s) ID_FILENAME=poster.mov ID_DEMUXER=mov ID_VIDEO_FORMAT=rle ID_VIDEO_BITRATE=0 ID_VIDEO_WIDTH=524 ID_VIDEO_HEIGHT=360 ID_VIDEO_FPS=15.000 ID_VIDEO_ASPECT=0. ID_LENGTH=0.07 == Forced video codec: null Opening video decoder: [null] Null video decoder VDec: vo config request - 524 x 360 (preferred colorspace: BGR 24-bit) VDec: using Planar YV12 as output csp (no 0) Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied. VO: [null] 524x360 = 524x360 Planar YV12 Selected video codec: [null] vfm: null (NULL codec (no decoding!)) == ID_VIDEO_CODEC=null Audio: no sound Starting playback... Exiting... (End of file)' ++ grep '^ID_LENGTH' ++ sed -e 's/^.*=//' -e 's/[.].*//' + inputlength=0 + '[' -n 0 ']' ++ basename poster.mov .VOB + avioutput=/tmp/poster.mov.temp ++ basename poster.mov .VOB + mencoderlog=/tmp/poster.mov.mencoder.log ++ basename poster.mov .VOB + mencoderpasslogfile=/tmp/poster.mov.2pass.log
[Bug 135071] Re: MP4Box double-free/heap corruption
** Attachment added: poster.mov.mencoder.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9012292/poster.mov.mencoder.log -- MP4Box double-free/heap corruption https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
So is it officially in Gutsy now? Can I sudo aptitude update sudo aptitude install metasploit3 ?? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse)
On 8/27/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not yet, I have uploaded to my PPA, (not sure the status of that system yet). I will upload to REVU now...time to face the fire. I know some of the packaging people at Canonical/Ubuntu. If they give you a hard time, mention Kristian Erik Hermansen from Cisco aka The Clonezilla Dude :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 (multiverse) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133906] Re: ndiswrapper - bootloading failed
I can confirm this in latest updates of Gutsy on my HP amd64 laptop... ** Changed in: ndiswrapper (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- ndiswrapper - bootloading failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133906] Re: ndiswrapper - bootloading failed
I have a bcm4306 wifi chipset, and this all worked in feisty amd64, as well as gutsy amd64 until a week ago... ** Changed in: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: ndiswrapper = linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.22 Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Network Team -- ndiswrapper - bootloading failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 133906] Re: ndiswrapper - bootloading failed
Oh, forgot to mention that blacklisting the ndiswrapper module still resulted in bootup deadlocking. But, manually deleting '/lib/modules/2.6.22-10-generic/ubuntu/misc/ndiswrapper/ndiswrapper.ko' allowed the system to boot properly... -- ndiswrapper - bootloading failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/21/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pulled the latest snapshot from (Rev:5080), however all of the permission issues are still present. The permissions issues are able to be modified, and do not fall under the relevant source code changes policy. They did fix the ruby files though, right? So, let me know if you need help modifying the permissions. We can do it manually for this first build, and talk to the msf boys again later. Do you want me to take over the package upload from here, or do you want to finish up with the permission issues and submit it? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/20/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be packaging tonight, and will place the package online for testing etc. Let me know if you are interested in testing. Great! Sure, I will test it. I think we should make the 'subversion' package a RECOMMENDS. What do you think? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/17/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kristian, I know you have been attempting to speak with the MSF Dev's. Any chance they will apply the patches upstream? Alessandro is right, it would make things a lot easier, because then we would have no need to edit the source. hdm is back it seems. Why don't you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], let them know what we are trying to do, and about the issues we encountered. He hasn't gotten back yet about applying my script to the source. So, they may not want to do it. But let's make the list as short as possible. Maybe we can just ask him to change the Ruby paths instead, and do it manually? I think he might have been weary of using my script on the source blindly... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67369] Re: [Feisty] Wide screen not correctly detected (16/10)
I am also encountering this bug. -- [Feisty] Wide screen not correctly detected (16/10) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/16/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, well, we should be good to go, I was able to integrate the needed permission changes into the build. The Ruby patch applies as well. Excellent. Any other needed changes? Not that I can think of! I'll post linda/lintian without SVN errors, so we can review. Anything major? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/16/07, Alessandro Tanasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello guys, i was away this days for the CCCamp. I heard it was a good time from my hackers on a plane friends :-) I see that you done a good work, but remember that tha msf sources can't modified. So you can't apply any sort of patches. The only file we modified was the ruby paths from '/usr/local/bin/ruby' to '/usr/bin/env ruby'. This is not intellectual property... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/16/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's break down the License, and see where we fall. OK. So let's do this. Will msf3 work unmodified? And will Ubuntu allow msf3 to slip in unmodified into multiverse? If so, I say we just add it to Gutsy ASAP and then worry about cleaning it up for the next release. We could easily get into many days of interpretation of the license. If we can just place it in multiverse now, we can worry about all that stuff later and get more feedback from hdm when he is not so busy... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/16/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are right, and none of us (as far as I know) are lawyers, nor Dev's for MSF. But it is clear to me that modifications are allowed, and they would result in a cleaner package. Just throwing everything together, without fixing the current linda/lintian issue, will most likely get the package rejected, meaning it may not make it in Gutsy at all. Agreed. But if the Metasploit license requires that any changes must NOT be distributed, then we may have an issue. I think we know the license's intention, but we are not allowed to take a risk on behalf of Ubuntu regarding this. The guidelines are there to protect them. So, if we want to default to the least amount of risk, let's go with unmodified. Your only issue with adding it unmodified is that it may be rejected. When we submit it, we could let them know that the issues are only warnings at that they will be resolved in Gutsy+1. If they reject it then, we can send the modified version... But to answer the question at hand, Yes. Metasploit runs fine, exactly the way it is packaged, even with the Ruby path issues, and the permissions etc. We would still have a .desktop (Menu Entry) and everything else, so it works. Excellent... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/16/07, Alessandro Tanasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that we need a law expert, and as i say in the first posts of this bug the only easy way is that the msf dev team start to distribute good archive. Yes ok, but that law does not come into play unless the package is modified, right? So we can worry about fixing the package later. We only have 12 more days to get msf3 in for Gutsy... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123857] Re: feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
Thank you for working on this! -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We need to check into this a bit more, as I asked about the policy (when I started working on MSF), and was told, it is not against policy, just frowned upon. The problem, without the SVN updates, the user would be unable to pull the new exploits and modules. And its almost pointless to repackage and distribute the entire binary deb every time one exploit is released, which may only be 15 lines of Ruby. If we do decide to scrap the SVN update capability, we will need to come up with a update path for exploits/modules. You have a good point. If it is not against policy, and since this package with be in multiverse anyways, and having updates is a good thing obviously, let's leave them in! Thanks for making a valid point to convince me. You are right. If it is not a hard rule for Debian, it really does amkes sense to leave them in if we won't be penalized for it -- due to the nature of security products and how quickly they are updated. 6 months would be a long time to wait for a new release :-) Seems in this case we just ignore the SVN issue. Yup. Let's do it. Btw, the cutoff date for multiverse is August 30th. So, if we get the package in before that time, it will be in Gutsy. I checked with #ubuntu-motu. Also, I asked them about the license issues, and the only requirement for multiverse is that the package is allowed to be redistributed. So, we will have metasploit in Gutsy if we hurry up and get this done :-) Also, some of the errors linda/lintian is producing are due to the windows files packaged within MSF and the fact that some of the ruby modules aren't set as executable. This can easily be fixed by a patch (if not safely ignored). Just take my script, and comment out the clean_svn function at the bottom. Run the other two cleanup routines, and let me know how linda/lintian handles the result. Can you do that today? Can you create a diff patch of the end result of your script. That it what we would use in the Package, as well as what the MSF devs would want to see. The only files that need to be modified are the invalid Ruby script paths (/usr/local/bin/ruby). In my script, I fix them to be (/usr/bin/env ruby). I highly doubt that this constitutes a breach of the Metasploit license agreement, as this portion of the code is not the intellectual property. If we started to modify the logic, that would be a problem, and that's what the license is trying to prevent. All the other changes my script does are dealing with executable permissions and trying to determine which files should or should not be set. I think it worked fairly well. So, get back to me when you have a moment. Maybe we can check in our package into Gutsy before the weekend :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: E: metasploit: wrong-path-for-ruby ./usr/share/metasploit/external /ruby-pcapx/examples/tcpdump.rb #!/usr/local/bin/ruby Your script does _NOT_ seem to fix this error. However, I do not get that output with or without your patch. It should! The clean_ruby_paths function should change three files which have this issue. Does it not? I basically just do a sed on the files and replace with (/usr/bin/env ruby). You could fix my script, if it is broken, but don't think it is! Or you could write another script/patch which does this. Or manually. Then we can get it packaged and uploaded for Gutsy. We only have two weeks though. So, let's hustle :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132714] make-ssl-cert does not produce any warnings on cert creation if subdirectory is non-existant
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ssl-cert # make-ssl-cert /usr/share/ssl-cert/ssleay.cnf /etc/apache2/ssl/apache.pem If the ssl sub-directory in /etc/apache2 does not exist, and you try to create the certificate, everything appears to have gone OK, but the file is never written to disk. This could be considered a bug or an enhancement. Either way, at least a warning should appear. Does make- ssl-cert not check for errors when writing the file out to disk? ** Affects: ssl-cert (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - make-ssl-cert does not produce any warnings on cert creation if subdirectory is non-existant + make-ssl-cert does not produce any warnings on cert creation if file fails to be written -- make-ssl-cert does not produce any warnings on cert creation if file fails to be written https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the diff patch to correct Ruby paths... ** Attachment added: Ruby Path Correction (diff/patch) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8841542/ruby.patch Great! So is it ready to be uploaded for Gutsy??? :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Ruby issue has been resolved, but the scripts method for determining the correct permissions only partial worked. We still have plenty of permissions issues. So we need to decide how we will proceed with those. Can you post the warning messages? In addition, I have setup a symlink to /usr/bin/ for all of the executables (msfcli, msfgui, etc). And created a menu link with the MSF (#) logo. This is all working great, with no issue. The question however, were should we install the metasploit files? I was thinking /usr/local/metasploit/framework-3.0 I think /usr/share/package name is better... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you post the warning messages? W: metasploit; Executable /usr/local/metasploit/framework-3.0/external/source/meterpreter/source/extensions/stdapi/server/net/net.h with perms 0755 is not an ELF file or script. Seems this should have been covered by the script? Should have! Did you first drop the script into the root directory of metasploit? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When packaging you cannot modify the source package at all, other then through patches. As such I added the patch to the debian/rules. Let me check something. My file is a shell script, not a patch made with diff. And I made the script require to be run from the root directory. You can change that to suit the Debian rules if you like. I am not familiar with everything they enforce... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right, I made a diff, after running your script, thats the RUBY patch above. Of course :-) I saw that... However, 'diff' doesn't catch the change in file permissions etc. Yup! Therefore, within the debian/rules I used part of your script, but that doesn't seem to be working. What I am saying is that if you put the other parts of my script into another directory (debian/rules) and run it, it will fail to catch all the files I believe. It starts searching from the current directory and recursively downward... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think there is a build function to do this, I just need to find it Let me know if you find it... I am on the road, will be back on the PC in 45. No problem. I just got back from the BeanSec security meetup in Boston. Fun times... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
On 8/15/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, so I got it working, sort of. I am now getting an error from you function, looking into this. Post the output? -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131690] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102212 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 I hope you have spoken with hdm about this, as the package is not freely distributable per the Metasploit license agreement. See my duplicate bug. I am currently try to engage them to make us a proper release for distribution in debian/ubuntu... ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 102212 [needs-packaging] metasploit -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131690 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 98886] Re: [need-packaging] drbl / clonezilla
On 8/14/07, Bryan McLellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Additionally, many of the scripts were not written by the authors. There are scripts in these packages using a number of different licenses, including GPL, MPL, Perl Artistic, BSD (with advertising clause), and many pieces of code without copyright information that will need to be resolved before inclusion. Thanks for laying out exactly which pieces need to be looked at. I am sure Steven has already begun the process of figuring out what to do here. I will check in with him and see if I can lend a hand in cleaning some of it up. They may also receive more funding from Taiwan's NCHC to work on clonezilla/drbl since it has grown in usage greatly in just a few short months... http://www.google.com/trends?q=clonezilla -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [need-packaging] drbl / clonezilla https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98886 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131690] Re: [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102212 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 On 8/14/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Kristian Hermansen, I'll make further comments on bug 102212. This bug has been labeled as invalid. You can still help package it when the time comes if you want... -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131690 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 8/14/07, Justin M. Wray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I too have a packaged version, from the unmodified metasploit release, it is more then possible to build the deb with the SVN, as SVN is used to update the exploits, and other framework modules. May not be the ideal build, but can work. Someone has claimed that leaving .svn around is against debian policy, which would be understandable... Either way, if you want to modify the original package we can simply write a patch, and place it in the debian/ directory. But again, doesn't seem modifications are necessary, everything builds fine. And that is when we start to interfere with the license. Yes, the problem is modification and distribution... The real issue here isn't the ease of packaging metasploit, but the license itself. Yup :-) msf2 is GPL, but not msf3... So do we have the license issue resolved? In what other ways can I assist? Alessandro Tanasi we should trade .changes to see where we can improve the package, before upload to REVU. hdm is busy at the moment, so we will hear from the msf devs when they get some free time. msf3 won't make it into Gutsy anyways, right? Unless there is some way we can get it into gutsy there is no reason to rush. If you know a cut off date for gutsy, let me know, but I thought the cutoff for universe/multiverse was when they did the pull from debian unstable, which is relatively early in the cycle... I am really looking forward to getting metasploit in the Ubuntu repositories. Me too :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
Here is the script I whipped up...let me know if you find any issues with it... ** Attachment added: Patch to clean up msf3 for packaging in ubuntu http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8835571/metasploit-ubuntu-pkg-clean-khermans.sh -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
Here is the script I whipped up...let me know if you find any issues with it... ** Attachment added: Script to clean up msf3 for packaging in ubuntu http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8835572/metasploit-ubuntu-pkg-clean-khermans.sh -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122608] Re: xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5
If you could submit a backtrace from the automated crash tool (apport), that would be helpful in getting at why this is occurring...thanks! ** Changed in: xfce4-mixer (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/22/07, Kristian Hermansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, let's go for option two. How about you whip up a script to make the changes you propose, so that all the MSF devs need to do is run it, and then we have the package just as we want. How does that sound? Do you want to write it or have me do it? I don't care, either way... I took the liberty of cleaning up metasploit3 and wrote a script to help. Surely there are bugs, but let me know if it makes lintian complain less. If you have any questions let me know. Let's get metasploit3 into ubuntu asap! I think hdm will like it if we can just put everything into this one script and he can check out svn and run it, then make a tar.gz. Let me know if you need any help with the next step. I want to get this going quickly. Thanks dude! -- Kristian Erik Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129799] [needs-packaging] libdca
Public bug reported: http://www.videolan.org/developers/libdca.html libdca - a free DTS Coherent Acoustics decoder libdca is a free library for decoding DTS Coherent Acoustics streams. The code is written by Gildas Bazin and was based on the a52dec project. It is released under the terms of the GPL license. The DTS Coherent Acoustics standard (ETSI 102 114 v1.2.1), as published by the ETSI, is available here The library should however already be quite useable. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: MOTU Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging ** Changed in: Ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = MOTU -- [needs-packaging] libdca https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129797] vlc crops the video output of some encoded mp4 files, but totem works fine
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vlc This file looks bad in vlc, but fine in totem. Only 1/4 of the top is seen in vlc, whereas totem shows the full picture... http://www.stevenshiau.org/misc/Clonezilla-talk-by-Kristian.mp4 ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- vlc crops the video output of some encoded mp4 files, but totem works fine https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129797 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107778] Re: adept: Failed to lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock
I am marking this bug as invalid, but please reopen if you have more information. ** Changed in: adept (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- adept: Failed to lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123857] Re: feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
On 7/25/07, Babets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand where is the problem with the mantainers of that repository; the package is present, the only thing to do is to add it in the package list. Maybe is it a good idea to send a mail to mantainers? Off topic: :) the only thing i don't like in ubuntu is that many packages (probably those present in universe/multiverse like amsn or many multimedia players) are not frequently upgraded. I agree, but they told me that they don't have enough people and are understaffed. Volunteer your time to get it in there. Ask to become a MOTU, and then from there, try to work on the Commercial repos... -- Kristian Hermansen -- feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 123857] Re: feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
On 7/24/07, Babets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This package is present in that repository as we can see in the link below http://archive.canonical.com/pool/main/r/realplay/ but i don't understand why it does not appear using the repository. However realplay package is not present in medibuntu repository https://bugs.launchpad.net/medibuntu/+bug/104115 Actually, you will notice that the latest file release date for those RealPlay packages are well before the release of Feisty Fawn in April of 2007. I spoke with one of the commercial packagers at Ubuntu Live this week, and when asked about this, he just mentioned that they didn't have enough time or resources to get a RealPlay package into Feisty Fawn (7.04). So, I think it would be a good idea to leave the bug open so that we can mark it RESOLVED if Gutsy adds the package again... -- Kristian Hermansen -- feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/20/07, Alessandro Tanasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only 2 options that i see to get metasploit in ubuntu are: 1) that we have a special agreement to package it, modifing metasploit license (hard to do) 2) that dev team release a new version debianization friendly (i think easy to do) OK, let's go for option two. How about you whip up a script to make the changes you propose, so that all the MSF devs need to do is run it, and then we have the package just as we want. How does that sound? Do you want to write it or have me do it? I don't care, either way... -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/18/07, Alessandro Tanasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds great! The todo list is: These seem relatively easy. How are we building the package after the changes are made. If you give me the steps, I can make one on my amd64 box, but it shouldn't really matter in this case, since this is all interpreted code. Just let me know what your method was for building the completed DEB... -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/19/07, Alessandro Tanasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When the author release the new tar.gz i upload the deb that i have ready. I think that the first thing is that the author make a new tar.gz So you want the metasploit dev team to release a new tar.gz with the changes you requested previously so that your DEB is legal to the license agreement (unchanged package)? Do I understand you correctly? -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/14/07, Alessandro Tanasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NO! It's released under Metasploit Framework license. The OLD Metasploit 2.0 was GPL. Your simply must, download, unpack, and read the copyright. I just emailed the developers to see if there is some way we can work this out. They are cool guys, and are not trying to prevent distribution. They are trying to prevent people reselling the product. How can we distribute Metasploit for Ubuntu, to ease installation and user accessibility, but give the developers what they want as well? If Sun can distribute their packages on Ubuntu, then Metasploit should be able to as well with some sort of license agreement screen, etc, on installation as the 'sun-java6-bin' package does (among others). This is not a technical issue. It is merely a legal and political hindrance that can be overcome by working together to satisfy all parties involved. Let's make it work. -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/14/07, H D Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The license does allow for packaging, provided that the software is not modified and is not sold for a value above the cost of distribution. A number of free software distributions include Metasploit 3 in the non-free trees. Thanks for clarifying dude. OK, so if we can all agree that the package will not be modified or sold, and Alessandro has a package ready to go, let's get it into Ubuntu. Do you think that metasploit would fit into universe or multiverse? I would think that it is free enough for universe according to http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/components but if there are any doubts it probably should be placed into multiverse. The major factor here would be how free metasploit is considered to be if the sources cannot be modified for distribution. That might make it ripe for the multiverse category... -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102212] Re: [needs-packaging] metasploit
On 7/14/07, Alessandro Tanasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, great! But before write my first comment here i talk with a couple of motu in #ubuntu-motu, they thinks that metasploit cant be in ubuntu, but if the author write this, he know sure the license better :) The problem is that the software must be modified to be a good debian package, for example i have removed the .svn directory that is crap in a package, and so on.. Great! Let's put together a list of items that need to be modified in the package, and we will present them to H D and see if he will OK them or show us a clause that allows such simple modifications. How does that sound? -- Kristian Hermansen -- [needs-packaging] metasploit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30780] Re: [PR 26167, fixed in 4.3] g++ -Wconversion fails to detect signedness conversion from int to unsigned int in function call
** Summary changed: - [PR 26167, fixed in 4.3] g++ -Wconversion fails to detect signedness conversion from int to unsigned int in fuction call + [PR 26167, fixed in 4.3] g++ -Wconversion fails to detect signedness conversion from int to unsigned int in function call -- [PR 26167, fixed in 4.3] g++ -Wconversion fails to detect signedness conversion from int to unsigned int in function call https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124895] Re: coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command
This issue is mentioned by some Debian folks... http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00144.html And the apparent realization of the issue, with no solution given... http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00147.html -- coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124895] coreutils and debianutils dependency cycle on reinstall command
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=feisty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 7.04 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a Linux hermbuntu 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Thu Jun 7 20:19:32 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude reinstall ~i~Afeisty Password: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Building tag database... Done The following packages will be REINSTALLED: acpi acpi-support acpid adduser aespipe alacarte alsa-base alsa-utils anacron apache2 apache2-mpm-worker apache2-utils apache2.2-common apmd app-install-data app-install-data-commercial apport apport-gtk appres apt apt-utils aptitude aspell aspell-en at at-spi avahi-autoipd avahi-daemon banshee base-files base-passwd bash bc beforelight belocs-locales-bin bind9-host binfmt-support binutils binutils-static bitmap bittorrent blt blubuntu-gdm-theme bluez-cups bluez-gnome bluez-pin bluez-utils boo brltty brltty-x11 bsdmainutils bsdutils bsh bug-buddy build-essential busybox-initramfs bzip2 ca-certificates capplets-data cdparanoia cdrdao cdrecord checkinstall cli-common command-not-found command-not-found-data compiz compiz-core compiz-extra compiz-gnome compiz-gtk compiz-plugins console-setup console-terminus console-tools contact-lookup-applet coreutils cpio cpp cpp-4.1 cron cupsys cupsys-bsd cupsys-client cupsys-common cupsys-driver-gutenprint dash dbus dbus-1-utils dc dcraw debconf debconf-i18n debianutils defoma deskbar-applet desktop-base desktop-effects desktop-file-utils dhcdbd dhcp3-client dhcp3-common dia dia-common dia-libs dictionaries-common diff discover1 discover1-data diveintopython dmidecode dmsetup dnsutils doc-base docbook-xml dosfstools dpkg dpkg-dev dselect dvd+rw-tools e2fslibs e2fsprogs ed edgy-gdm-themes editres eject ekiga emacs emacs21 emacs21-bin-common emacs21-common emacsen-common eog esound esound-common espeak espeak-data ethereal ethtool evince evolution evolution-common evolution-data-server evolution-data-server-common evolution-exchange evolution-plugins evolution-webcal example-content f-spot fdutils feisty-gdm-themes feisty-session-splashes feisty-wallpapers file file-roller findutils finger firebird2-common firefox firefox-gnome-support flashplugin-nonfree fontconfig fontconfig-config foo2zjs foomatic-db foomatic-db-engine foomatic-db-hpijs foomatic-filters fortune-mod fortunes-min fping freeglut3 fstobdf ftp fuse-utils g++ g++-4.1 gaim gaim-data gamin gcalctool gcc gcc-3.3-base gcc-4.1 gcc-4.1-base gcj-4.1-base gconf-editor gconf2 gconf2-common gdb gdebi gdebi-core gdm gdm-themes gedit gedit-common genisoimage gettext gettext-base gftp gftp-common gftp-gtk gftp-text gij gij-4.1 gimp gimp-data gimp-help-common gimp-help-en gimp-print gimp-python gksu gnome-about gnome-accessibility-themes gnome-app-install gnome-applets gnome-applets-data gnome-btdownload gnome-cards-data gnome-compiz-manager gnome-control-center gnome-cups-manager gnome-desktop-data gnome-doc-utils gnome-games gnome-games-data gnome-icon-theme gnome-keyring gnome-keyring-manager gnome-mag gnome-media gnome-media-common gnome-menus gnome-mime-data gnome-mount gnome-netstatus-applet gnome-nettool gnome-orca gnome-panel gnome-panel-data gnome-pilot gnome-pilot-conduits gnome-power-manager gnome-screensaver gnome-session gnome-spell gnome-system-monitor gnome-system-tools gnome-terminal gnome-terminal-data gnome-themes gnome-user-guide gnome-utils gnome-volume-manager gnomebaker gnupg gpgv graphviz grep groff-base grub gs-common gs-esp gs-esp-x gsfonts gsfonts-x11 gstreamer0.10-alsa gstreamer0.10-esd gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad gstreamer0.10-plugins-base gstreamer0.10-plugins-base-apps gstreamer0.10-plugins-good gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly gstreamer0.10-tools gstreamer0.10-x gthumb gtk-gnutella gtk2-engines gtk2-engines-pixbuf gtk2-engines-ubuntulooks gtkhtml3.14 gucharmap guile-1.6-libs gzip hal hal-device-manager hal-info hdparm hellanzb hexedit hicolor-icon-theme hostname hotkey-setup hpijs hplip hplip-data human-cursors-theme human-icon-theme human-theme hwdb-client-common hwdb-client-gnome iceauth icedax ico ifupdown info initramfs-tools initscripts inputattach installation-report intltool-debian iproute iptables iputils-arping iputils-ping iputils-tracepath iso-codes jackd java-common k3b kamera kcontrol kdebase-bin kdebase-data kdebase-kio-plugins kdelibs-data kdelibs4c2a kdemultimedia-kio-plugins kdesktop kicker klibc-utils klogd landscape-client language-pack-en language-pack-en-base language-pack-gnome-en language-pack-gnome-en-base language-selector
[Bug 123857] Re: feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
I do not agree with your statement below, as it appears you are not familiar with Canonical's commercial Ubuntu repository! http://archive.canonical.com/dists/edgy- commercial/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz Notice that realplay is there. It has nothing to do with the software provider. I want to know why realplay is provided in the commercial repository for Edgy, but not Feisty. http://archive.canonical.com/dists/feisty- commercial/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz ** Changed in: Ubuntu Status: Invalid = New -- feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123857] Re: feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
leoquant, OK. But then I must ask the question about how to file a bug report on Canonical's commercial repositories. How would I do that? Launchpad and Ubuntu are both funded by Canonical. However, I don't understand why realplay dropped from the commercial repositories, and neither do many others. VMware Server was added for instance... -- feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 98641] Re: [nvidia-glx-new] NVidia driver missing libwfb
Couldn't you guys just use nvidia-glx rather than nvidia-glx-new? Does that resolve your issues? -- Kristian Hermansen -- [nvidia-glx-new] NVidia driver missing libwfb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 98641] Re: [nvidia-glx-new] NVidia driver missing libwfb
On 7/4/07, DeleiBio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and I don't know if I'll use ubuntu or linux anymore. I hate this kind of thing. Sorry guys. I'm tired. The problem is that you chose a closed-source driver. Use nv, rather than nvidia, in your Xorg.conf and all will be well. This is the dangerous game you play when utilizing closed source drivers. The binary packages are out of the developers hands... -- Kristian Hermansen -- [nvidia-glx-new] NVidia driver missing libwfb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112444] Re: ubiquity does not scan for software RAID (mdadm) devices like /dev/md0 during installation
Assigning to ubuntu-installer team... ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Installer Team -- ubiquity does not scan for software RAID (mdadm) devices like /dev/md0 during installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112444 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92234] Re: realplay install conflicts with helix-player
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 54050 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54050 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 54050 helix-player conflicts with realplay -- realplay install conflicts with helix-player https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123857] feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does!
Public bug reported: Why did realplay disappear from feisty-commercial? ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- feisty-commercial does not include realplay, but edgy-commercial does! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98886] Re: [need-packaging] drbl / clonezilla
I am presenting on this topic at Ubuntu LIve. Can I mention any updates to this bug at the conference? http://www.ubuntulive.com/cs/ubuntu/view/e_sess/12510 http://www.ubuntulive.com/cs/ubuntu/view/e_spkr/3455 -- [need-packaging] drbl / clonezilla https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98886 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110601] Re: icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arguments
** Summary changed: - icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arghuments + icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arguments -- icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arguments https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74326] Re: unknown banshee crash
I no longer use the Audioscrobbler feature, so I cannot reproduce. Marking as closed, unless someone else wants to try and reproduce... ** Changed in: banshee (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Summary changed: - unknown banshee crash + audioscrobbler plugin crashes banshee while playing music -- audioscrobbler plugin crashes banshee while playing music https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122608] Re: xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8218138/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8218139/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8218140/ProcStatus.txt -- xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122608] xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xfce4-mixer Happens on login... ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 CoreDump: Date: Tue Jun 19 08:05:51 2007 Disassembly: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-mixer-plugin NonfreeKernelModules: cdrom Package: xfce4-mixer 1:4.4.1-3ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/xfce4/panel-plugins/xfce4-mixer-plugin socket_id 20997239 name xfce4-mixer id 11822547500 display_name Volume\ Control size 34 screen_position 1 ProcCwd: /home/khermans ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Registers: Signal: 5 SourcePackage: xfce4-mixer Stacktrace: StacktraceTop: ThreadStacktrace: Title: xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5 Uname: Linux khermans-laptop 2.6.22-7-generic #1 SMP Mon Jun 25 17:07:55 GMT 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video ** Affects: xfce4-mixer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash need-amd64-retrace -- xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122608] Re: xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5
This happens on Gutsy. It only happened once, and I cannot reproduce to obtain backtrace. Please close. -- xfce4-mixer-plugin crashed with signal 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 29503] Re: Blackbox fails to install if Fluxbox is also installed due to shared /usr/bin/bsetroot
Marking as FIXED. Bug closed... ** Changed in: blackbox (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Blackbox fails to install if Fluxbox is also installed due to shared /usr/bin/bsetroot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 115705] Re: openoffice crashes on startup
Seeing this also in Gutsy... ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- openoffice crashes on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 116591] Re: [gutsy] Open Office crashs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 111940 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111940 I am still seeing this issues in the supposedly FIXED version as well...so I wonder what is wrong! :-( ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [gutsy] Open Office crashs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 116591] Re: [gutsy] Open Office crashs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 111940 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111940
$ aptitude search openoffice.org~i | while read line; do sudo aptitude
reinstall `echo $line | awk '{print $2}'`; done
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
[gutsy] Open Office crashs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116591
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 119251] Re: software-properties-gtk should be eplaced by apt-spy backend
Sebastian Heinlein wrote: What don't you like about the current implementation? Python threading is weak and slow if the servers are unresponsive. There is no way to easily call Thread,cancel (and have it honored) if something times out. You should be able to take a list of the first responders, and the methods used make use of ping, which does not work behind firewalls or places where an HTTP/FTP proxy is in use only. Additionally, it is a GUI, so what if an Ubuntu Server admin wants to get the same effect from the command line? What does he do? -- Kristian Hermansen -- software-properties-gtk should be eplaced by apt-spy backend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119251] software-properties-gtk should be eplaced by apt-spy backend
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-properties-gtk instead of writing a custom python solution, why isn't apt-spy utilized? I have found the python implementation to be somewhat slow and less than ideal. Does anyone else agree? $ aptitude show apt-spy Package: apt-spy New: yes State: not installed Version: 3.1-16 Priority: optional Section: universe/admin Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uncompressed Size: 197k Depends: libc6 (= 2.5-0ubuntu1), libcurl3 (= 7.15.5-1) Description: writes a sources.list file based on bandwidth tests Parses a list of mirrors and tests each of the mirrors for bandwidth. Writes a /etc/apt/sources.list file based on the responses it gets. ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- software-properties-gtk should be eplaced by apt-spy backend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118437] nemesis rip crashes on feisty amd64
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nemesis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a Linux khermans-laptop 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Wed May 23 00:30:47 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=feisty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 7.04 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude show nemesis Package: nemesis New: yes State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 1.32+1.4beta3-2 Priority: extra Section: universe/net Maintainer: Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uncompressed Size: 217k Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libnet0 Description: TCP/IP Packet Injection Suite The Nemesis Project is designed to be a commandline-based, portable human IP stack for UNIX/Linux. The suite is broken down by protocol and should allow for useful scripting of injected packet streams from simple shell scripts. Key features: * support for ARP, DNS, ICMP, IGMP, OSPF, RIP, TCP, UDP protocols * layer 2 or layer 3 injection * packet payload from file Homepage: http://www.packetfactory.net/Projects/nemesis/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# rm core rm: cannot remove `core': No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nemesis rip *** glibc detected *** nemesis: free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x0051b010 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/libc.so.6[0x2ad9042bcb23] /lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x8c)[0x2ad9042c026c] /usr/lib/libnet.so.0(libnet_destroy_packet+0x16)[0x2ad9039bb816] nemesis[0x40c90c] nemesis[0x40d854] nemesis[0x40fd24] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x2ad90426a8e4] nemesis(srandom+0x3a)[0x401f2a] === Memory map: 0040-00419000 r-xp 03:03 26262365 /usr/bin/nemesis 00519000-0051b000 rw-p 00019000 03:03 26262365 /usr/bin/nemesis 0051b000-0053c000 rw-p 0051b000 00:00 0 [heap] 2ad90398-2ad90399c000 r-xp 03:03 16832438 /lib/ld-2.5.so 2ad90399c000-2ad90399f000 rw-p 2ad90399c000 00:00 0 2ad9039b8000-2ad9039be000 r-xp 03:03 4226995 /usr/lib/libnet.so.0.0.0 2ad9039be000-2ad903abd000 ---p 6000 03:03 4226995 /usr/lib/libnet.so.0.0.0 2ad903abd000-2ad903abf000 rw-p 5000 03:03 4226995 /usr/lib/libnet.so.0.0.0 2ad903b9b000-2ad903b9d000 rw-p 0001b000 03:03 16832438 /lib/ld-2.5.so 2ad903b9d000-2ad903c1e000 r-xp 03:03 16950672 /lib/libm-2.5.so 2ad903c1e000-2ad903e1d000 ---p 00081000 03:03 16950672 /lib/libm-2.5.so 2ad903e1d000-2ad903e1f000 rw-p 0008 03:03 16950672 /lib/libm-2.5.so 2ad903e1f000-2ad903e3 r-xp 03:03 16950683 /lib/libresolv-2.5.so 2ad903e3-2ad90403 ---p 00011000 03:03 16950683 /lib/libresolv-2.5.so 2ad90403-2ad904032000 rw-p 00011000 03:03 16950683 /lib/libresolv-2.5.so 2ad904032000-2ad904034000 rw-p 2ad904032000 00:00 0 2ad904034000-2ad904048000 r-xp 03:03 16950674 /lib/libnsl-2.5.so 2ad904048000-2ad904248000 ---p 00014000 03:03 16950674 /lib/libnsl-2.5.so 2ad904248000-2ad90424a000 rw-p 00014000 03:03 16950674 /lib/libnsl-2.5.so 2ad90424a000-2ad90424d000 rw-p 2ad90424a000 00:00 0 2ad90424d000-2ad904394000 r-xp 03:03 16832446 /lib/libc-2.5.so 2ad904394000-2ad904594000 ---p 00147000 03:03 16832446 /lib/libc-2.5.so 2ad904594000-2ad904597000 r--p 00147000 03:03 16832446 /lib/libc-2.5.so 2ad904597000-2ad904599000 rw-p 0014a000 03:03 16832446 /lib/libc-2.5.so 2ad904599000-2ad90459f000 rw-p 2ad904599000 00:00 0 2ad90459f000-2ad9045ac000 r-xp 03:03 16823370 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 2ad9045ac000-2ad9047ac000 ---p d000 03:03 16823370 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 2ad9047ac000-2ad9047ad000 rw-p d000 03:03 16823370 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 2ad90800-2ad908021000 rw-p 2ad90800 00:00 0 2ad908021000-2ad90c00 ---p 2ad908021000 00:00 0 7fffa7115000-7fffa712a000 rw-p 7fffa7115000 00:00 0 [stack] ff60-ff601000 r-xp 00:00 0 [vdso] Aborted (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls -lsh core 472K -rw--- 1 root root 472K 2007-06-02 18:01 core Now, I notice that when trying to compile from source, nemesis gives this error: Nemesis will *only* work with libnet version 1.0.2a Maybe this is related... ** Affects: nemesis (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- nemesis rip crashes on feisty amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118437 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
OK, so it definitely sounds like a packaging error. Assigning to the Ubuntu Kernel Video team. ** Changed in: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: grub = linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Video Team -- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards
** Summary changed: - Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX + libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards -- libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 98641 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98641 Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: Kristian: If this really is about a missing wfb driver then this is a duplicate of Bug #98641 . Be warned though nvidia-glx-new does not support every new NVIDIA card out there in Feisty (see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BinaryDriverHowto/Nvidia ) The 8800 GTS is claimed to be supported, but is broken due to libwfb. The dupe you reported seems to have an ongoing issue with the fix being rejected or may be merged with another bug fix. I will mark it a dupe nevertheless. Let me know if you have any other info. As I said, the 8800 GTS is reported to not be working, yet it is claimed to be supported by the nvidia-glx-new package. This has been confirmed by numerous reports... -- Kristian Hermansen ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 98641 [nvidia-glx-new] NVidia driver missing libwfb -- libwfb modules are missing from nvidia-glx-new, breaks some cards https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 107374] Re: adding new entries to alacarte has no effect
On 5/29/07, Damiano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I launched alacarte as root user and it did inprouve over the early attempt from the graphic launcher. Then, i made sure that the home dir was with correct ownership chown -R damiano damiano and magically the menu where behaving correctly. So, check if ownersip of files is correct. Good to know. I did this on a standard installation, so I don't believe I changed the permissions. However, if someone with a clean default installation can retest this soon, then we can verify that. I will leave the bug open for a short time until someone with a clean system can either confirm or deny the bug. Thanks for the info... -- Kristian Hermansen -- adding new entries to alacarte has no effect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107374 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
** Changed in: grub (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: xorg = grub -- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106177] Re: make dmraid play nice with udev
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- make dmraid play nice with udev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107831] Re: Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX
From the various accounts of the issue, some different than others, I am uncertain still exactly what the issue is. All I know is that there are more than enough complaints to move this to someone's queue for inspection. I am sending to Ubuntu Desktop bugs. If there is a better place for it, then please suggest so. Hopefully this issue will be resolved... ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Confirmed ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs -- Feisty don't work with nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS and 8800 GTX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 113412] gaim should depend on libmeanwhile1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gaim Many corporations use Sametime/Meanwhile, so it might be a good idea to move libmeanwhile1 into the depends section for gaim. Corporations that use Sametime already and may be possibly moving to Gaim will be happy that it is available by default. The uncompressed size is ~250KB, which is small enough, and the compressed size is ~80KB on all architectures. Obviously, all additions to default packages (gaim is on the LiveCD) should be considered with care. In this instance, I think you get a lot of reward for the addition, especially from corporations moving away from closed-source alternatives. Read the story below about Fon employees transitioning to Ubuntu. http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/fon-is-dropping-microsoft- adopting-ubuntu.html ** Affects: gaim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- gaim should depend on libmeanwhile1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107795] Re: System doesn't boot after upgrade to feisty
I ran into a similar issue. Appears to be a bug in udev upstream? http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=4703 -- System doesn't boot after upgrade to feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107795 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106864] Re: Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem
Is this not an upstream bug in udev? http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=4703 -- Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 111030] Re: dmraid no longer sees partitions in Feisty after upgrade from Edgy
Could be upstream bug in udev? http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=4703 ** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- dmraid no longer sees partitions in Feisty after upgrade from Edgy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111030 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112444] ubiquity does not scan for software RAID (mdadm) devices like /dev/md0 during installation
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity I booted an amd64 CD for Feisty and tried to set my /home partition to be on /dev/md0. Here's what happened: $ sudo -i # aptitude install mdadm # mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l 0 -n 2 /dev/sda3 /dev/sdb3 # mkfs.reiser /dev/md0 Now run installer. You will notice that when choosing to MANUALLY EDIT the file system, /dev/md0 is not shown. Therefore, I cannot set /dev/md0 to be be my /home device. So, Ubiquity should support mdadm devices... ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- ubiquity does not scan for software RAID (mdadm) devices like /dev/md0 during installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112444 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112444] Re: ubiquity does not scan for software RAID (mdadm) devices like /dev/md0 during installation
dmraid is for FakeRAID. mdadm is for Linux-only software RAID and is a completely different concept. So, it still appears that my initial bug report is legitimate. -- ubiquity does not scan for software RAID (mdadm) devices like /dev/md0 during installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112444 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 111135] linux-image-kdump is missing in feisty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-kdump I am experiencing many kernel panics on an amd64 laptop. I wanted to try kdump to get some more info, but I see it is not available any longer. Maybe a dev can explain why? And how can I get to the bottom of my kernel panics (hard panic) as I would in Red Hat / Fedora? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FC6KdumpKexecHowTo ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.17 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- linux-image-kdump is missing in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77675] Re: apache2-ssl-certificate has gone missing in feisty
I can confirm this one too!!! -- apache2-ssl-certificate has gone missing in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110918] segfault on feisty amd64 widescreen
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tremulous [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ dpkg -l tremulous Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii tremulous 1.1.0-3Aliens vs Humans, team based FPS game with e [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ tremulous tremulous 1.1.0 linux-x86_64 Nov 13 2006 - FS_Startup - Current search path: /home/khermans/.tremulous/base /usr/share/games/tremulous/base/vms-1.1.0.pk3 (4 files) /usr/share/games/tremulous/base/map-uncreation-1.1.0.pk3 (110 files) /usr/share/games/tremulous/base/map-tremor-1.1.0.pk3 (45 files) /usr/share/games/tremulous/base/map-transit-1.1.0.pk3 (135 files) /usr/share/games/tremulous/base/map-niveus-1.1.0.pk3 (134 files) /usr/share/games/tremulous/base/map-nexus6-1.1.0.pk3 (151 files) /usr/share/games/tremulous/base/map-karith-1.1.0.pk3 (118 files) /usr/share/games/tremulous/base/map-atcs-1.1.0.pk3 (87 files) /usr/share/games/tremulous/base/map-arachnid2-1.1.0.pk3 (67 files) /usr/share/games/tremulous/base/data-1.1.0.pk3 (1229 files) /usr/share/games/tremulous/base /usr/lib/tremulous/base -- 2080 files in pk3 files execing default.cfg couldn't exec autogen.cfg couldn't exec autoexec.cfg Hunk_Clear: reset the hunk ok - Client Initialization - - Initializing Renderer --- - Client Initialization Complete - - R_Init - --- Input Initialization --- Joystick is not active. ...loading libGL.so.1: Calling SDL_Init(SDL_INIT_VIDEO)... SDL_Init(SDL_INIT_VIDEO) passed. Initializing OpenGL display ...setting mode 3: 640 480 SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual SDL_SetVideoMode failed: Couldn't find matching GLX visual Couldn't get a visual ...WARNING: could not set the given mode (3) Received signal 11, exiting... - CL_Shutdown - RE_Shutdown( 1 ) Segmentation fault (core dumped) ** Affects: tremulous (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- segfault on feisty amd64 widescreen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110601] icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arghuments
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: isic [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# icmpsic usage: icmpsic [-v] [-D] -s sourceip[,port] -d destination ip[,port] [-r seed] [-m max kB/s to generate] [-p pkts to generate] [-k skip packets] [-x send packet X times] Percentage Opts: [-F frags] [-V Bad IP Version] [-I IP Options] [-i Bad ICMP checksum] [-D] causes packet info to be printed out -- DEBUGGING ex: -s 10.10.10.10,23 -d 10.10.10.100 -I 100 will give a 100% chance of IP Options ^^^ ex: -s 10.10.10.10,23 -d 10.10.10.100 -p 100 -r 103334 ex: -s rand -d rand,1234 -r 23342 causes random source addr ex: -s rand -d rand -k 1 -p 10001 -r 666 Will only send the 10001 packet with random seed 666 this is especially useful if you suspect that packet is causing a problem with the target stack. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# icmpsic -s 127.0.0.1,80 -d 127.0.0.1,80 Bad source IP [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# icmpsic -s 127.0.0.1,80 -d 127.0.0.1 Bad source IP [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# icmpsic -s 127.0.0.1 -d 127.0.0.1,80 Bad dest IP [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# icmpsic -s 127.0.0.1 -d 127.0.0.1 Compiled against Libnet 1.1.2.1 Installing Signal Handlers. Seeding with 8249 No Maximum traffic limiter Bad IP Version = 10% IP Opts Pcnt= 50% Frag'd Pcnt = 30% Bad ICMP Cksm = 10% 1000 @ 13905.5 pkts/sec and 9404.7 k/s 2000 @ 13925.6 pkts/sec and 9490.2 k/s 3000 @ 13931.1 pkts/sec and 9451.1 k/s 4000 @ 15197.8 pkts/sec and 10212.4 k/s Caught signal 2 Used random seed 8249 Wrote 4134 packets in 0.30s @ 13964.19 pkts/s ** Affects: isic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arghuments https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110601] Re: icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arghuments
Removes info about optional port designations for icmpsic... ** Attachment added: fixes the usage requirements http://librarian.launchpad.net/7438406/isic-0.06-icmpsic_ports-kristianhermansen.patch -- icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arghuments https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110601] Re: icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arghuments
My last patch left out a few places...just noticed some more issues, so use this patch instead... ** Attachment added: fixes the usage requirements and examples http://librarian.launchpad.net/7438719/isic-0.06-icmpsic_ports-kristianhermansen.patch -- icmpsic should not accept source/destination port arghuments https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110601 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104968] Re: Amarok consumes 100% Processorpower
On 4/26/07, DaSaint [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have Compiz installed but I hardly ever have it running. I never had it running when that problem occured. But the problem has (magically) been fixed now. I had it when I used the beta release of Feisty Fawn (ubuntu) But after a kernel update it stopped happening. OK, great. I will close the issue. Feel free to reopen if you can reproduce with whatever settings caused it previously. -- Kristian Hermansen ** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andrew Ash = (unassigned) Status: Needs Info = Confirmed ** Changed in: amarok (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Rejected -- Amarok consumes 100% Processorpower https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104968 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 107846] Re: cannot select mp3 encoding
This is on Feisty? Can you post some more details if you have them? When did it last work, etc. I will check it out tonight... ** Changed in: gstreamer (Ubuntu) Status: Rejected = Needs Info -- cannot select mp3 encoding https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 85452] Re: hwdb-send man page arguments are not valid
On 4/22/07, Dan O'Huiginn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I asked ogra about this bug in irc, and he said: (06:30:42 PM) ogra: hwdb-send should probably just move out of /usr/bin so it doesnt need a manpage Where are you planning to move it to? -- Kristian Hermansen -- hwdb-send man page arguments are not valid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85452 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93175] Re: [feisty-amd64] k9copy crashes on File-Open
I believe I also had libdvdcss2 installed at the time, because I know it is required to decrypt the DVD. I will close the bug, but if someone can reproduce this even with libdvdcss2, please post here and I will reopen and confirm. ** Changed in: k9copy (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected ** Changed in: k9copy (Ubuntu) Status: Rejected = Confirmed ** Summary changed: - [feisty-amd64] k9copy crashes on File-Open + [feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if libdvdcss2 is not installed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: k9copy - Inserted authentic encrypted Borat DVD into drive. Launched k9copy from the command line. Clicked File-Open. Seg fault... + Inserted authentic encrypted Borat DVD into drive. Launched k9copy from + the command line. Clicked File-Open. Seg fault... + + Instead of crashing, k9copy should fail gracefully when it encounters an encrypted DVD and no decryption libraries are installed. -- Kristian Hermansen ** Summary changed: - [feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if libdvdcss2 is not installed + [feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if decryption libraries are not installed -- [feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if decryption libraries are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93175] Re: [feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if decryption libraries are not installed
** Changed in: k9copy (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Rejected -- [feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if decryption libraries are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93175] Re: [feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if decryption libraries are not installed
I purged libdvdcss2 and tried again with the DVD 'Miracle'. I could not reproduce the issue. I anyone else can, please place your comments here. -- [feisty-amd64] k9copy segfaults on File-Open if decryption libraries are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
