[Bug 1613996] Re: 30% slowdown in numerical solver exection on 16.04.1 vs. 14.04 with same solver binary

2017-04-03 Thread Marcel Stimberg
This is most likely the same bug as 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1663280
Can you confirm that the problem goes away if you run the dynamically linked 
binary with the environment variable LD_BIND_NOW=1?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613996

Title:
  30% slowdown in numerical solver exection on 16.04.1 vs. 14.04 with
  same solver binary

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1613996/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1598618] Re: Math calls to libc-2.23 compiled with g++ 5.3.1 (Ubuntu 16.04) process 2.5 time slower compared to libc-2.19 compiled with g++ 4.8.4 (Ubuntu 14.04)

2017-02-15 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1663280 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663280

I am going to mark this as a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1663280 even though
you reported the bug significantly earlier. The other bug reported has a
bunch of additional information, though, and it has explanations and
workarounds.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1663280
   Serious performance degradation of math functions in 16.04/16.10/17.04 due 
to known Glibc bug

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598618

Title:
  Math calls to libc-2.23 compiled with g++ 5.3.1 (Ubuntu 16.04) process
  2.5 time slower compared to libc-2.19 compiled with g++ 4.8.4 (Ubuntu
  14.04)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1598618/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1663280] Re: Serious performance degradation of math functions in 16.04/16.10/17.04 due to known Glibc bug

2017-02-14 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Regarding glibc 2.24: note that the version in use in Debian
testing/unstable (i.e. stretch/sid) is 2.24-9 which already incorporates
the upstream fix, i.e. Debian is not affected.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663280

Title:
  Serious performance degradation of math functions in 16.04/16.10/17.04
  due to known Glibc bug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/1663280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1663280] Re: Serious performance degradation of math functions in 16.04/16.10/17.04 due to known Glibc bug

2017-02-10 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1421121
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421121

** Also affects: glibc (Fedora) via
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421121
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663280

Title:
  Serious performance degradation of math functions in 16.04/16.10/17.04
  due to known Glibc bug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/1663280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1663280] Re: Serious performance degradation of math functions in 16.04/16.10/17.04 due to known Glibc bug

2017-02-09 Thread Marcel Stimberg
It seems that the fix has been backported to upstreams's 2.24 branch:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=4b8790c81c1a7b870a43810ec95e08a2e501123d

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663280

Title:
  Serious performance degradation of math functions in 16.04/16.10/17.04
  due to known Glibc bug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/1663280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1663280] Re: Serious performance degradation of math functions in 16.04/16.10/17.04 due to known Glibc bug

2017-02-09 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #20508
   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20508

** Also affects: glibc via
   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20508
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663280

Title:
  Serious performance degradation of math functions in 16.04/16.10/17.04
  due to known Glibc bug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/1663280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 922185] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2012-10-06 Thread Marcel Stimberg
The same issue still affects Rhythmbox in Ubuntu 12.10 beta 2, trying to
enable replaygain while a song is playing reproducibly leads to the
crash.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922185

Title:
  rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/922185/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1062571] Re: [clipboard]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with signal 5 in _XReply()

2012-10-05 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062571

Title:
  [clipboard]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with signal 5 in _XReply()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1062571/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1034710] Re: History is poorly handled

2012-08-09 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Examining the information you have given us, this does
not appear to be a bug report so we are closing it and converting it to
a question in the support tracker. We understand the difficulties you
are facing, but it is better to raise problems you are having in the
support tracker at https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu if you are
uncertain if they are bugs. You can also find help with your problem in
the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/
or asking at http://askubuntu.com or http://ubuntuforums.org. For help
on reporting bugs, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs.

** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Converted to question:
   https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+question/205398

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034710

Title:
  History is poorly handled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1034710/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032831] Re: zgrep -NUM doesn't work if NUM is two digits or greater

2012-08-08 Thread Marcel Stimberg
The patch has been submitted upstream now: 
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gzip.git/commit/?id=dc6196e2a041c022f8382b7e610b095718acccfa

@Thomas Bushnell: Do you want to prepare a patch/merge request based on
this commit (and the next one, which tests the behaviour)? Otherwise I
can do it.

** Changed in: gzip
   Status: In Progress = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032831

Title:
  zgrep -NUM doesn't work if NUM is two digits or greater

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gzip/+bug/1032831/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032831] Re: zgrep -NUM doesn't work if NUM is two digits or greater

2012-08-07 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** Bug watch added: Email to bug-gzip@gnu #
   mailto:bug-g...@gnu.org

** Also affects: gzip via
   mailto:bug-g...@gnu.org
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: gzip
   Status: New = In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032831

Title:
  zgrep -NUM doesn't work if NUM is two digits or greater

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gzip/+bug/1032831/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032998] Re: cant find explorer

2012-08-05 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your
description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful
to read How to report bugs effectively
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful
if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem.

We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures

At a minimum, we need:
1. the specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the 
problem,
2. the behavior you expected, and
3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible).
Thanks! 

** Package changed: dkms (Ubuntu) = compizconfig-settings-manager
(Ubuntu)

** Changed in: compizconfig-settings-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032998

Title:
  cant find explorer

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compizconfig-settings-manager/+bug/1032998/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032831] Re: zgrep -NUM doesn't work if NUM is two digits or greater

2012-08-05 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. I can reproduce your issue on Ubuntu
12.04 (gzip: 1.4-1ubuntu2). This is an upstream bug, therefore it would
be great if you could forward the bug to the developers. As far as I can
see, they are not using a bug tracker but a mailing list:
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gzip

Note that a workaround exists: Both
zgrep -C 10 17 file.txt.gz
and
zgrep --context=10 17 file.txt.gz
give the expected result.

** Changed in: gzip (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032831

Title:
  zgrep -NUM doesn't work if NUM is two digits or greater

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gzip/+bug/1032831/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1027655] Re: Computations terminated by system

2012-07-31 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thanks for following up on this. I'm closing the bug as the OOM killer
seems to be working as it should. Please continue to report any other
bugs you may find.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027655

Title:
  Computations terminated by system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1027655/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1027655] Re: Computations terminated by system

2012-07-28 Thread Marcel Stimberg
It sure does but, again, how much physical RAM do you have? Your command
shows a ~ 1 GB swap, as I said the PDF conversion needs about 2.5GB RAM
+ swap at the very least... Did you have a look into the log files for
whether there is any sign of the OOM killer getting active? In case
there is no evidence against this being what happens, this bug should be
closed since everything is working as expected...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027655

Title:
  Computations terminated by system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1027655/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1027780] Re: automatic tab completion does not work

2012-07-24 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 769866 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769866

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 769866, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you
can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Package changed: bash (Ubuntu) = bash-completion (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 769866
   tab completion no longer escapes filenames and completes dirnames 
incorrectly (space instead of slash)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027780

Title:
  automatic tab completion does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash-completion/+bug/1027780/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1027655] Re: Computations terminated by system

2012-07-24 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Hi,

I'm quite sure that this is not a bug, but -- as has been noted in the
answer to your stackoverflow question -- your system simply runs out of
memory and the OOM killer terminates your process. I tried your PDF
conversion example and it has a peak memory usage around 2.5GB -- how
much physical RAM and swap does your system have? In case your process
is killed for this reason, there should be a log entry in
/var/log/syslog or /var/log/kern.log . Note that some computation code
does not use the peak memory during its computations but in the end when
all the results are saved to disk. In case you are really sure that your
memory size is sufficient, please also try to run memtest -- maybe some
of your RAM is defect (even though this should rather lead to random
errors instead of the termination by the operating system).

** Package changed: python-defaults (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027655

Title:
  Computations terminated by system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1027655/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016285] Re: trying to report a bug in Update Manager

2012-07-01 Thread Marcel Stimberg
I see, sorry for this red herring -- it seems you run into the same
problem as before when using apport to gather the information.

It seems the issue is about the so called cache not being big enough to
hold all the package information. Possibly you have a lot of package
sources activated (you can change this in the Software Center -- go to
Software Sources and uncheck unneeded sources)? Either way, you can try
to increase the cache size manually. To do this, after having closed any
open update-manager or similar, open a terminal as described above and
then type:

gksudo gedit /etc/apt/apt.conf

This should (after possibly asking for your password) open a text editor. In 
this text editor, paste the following line:
APT::Cache-Limit 1;

(This increases the cache from the current value of ~25MB to ~100MB --
you can also use even higher values but it should be considerable
smaller than the total amount of memory you have, otherwise it slows
down your system a lot).

Save the file and exit the editor. Then try updating the package information 
again, either by clicking the check button in the update-manager, or by 
typing the following in the terminal:
sudo apt-get update

This might solve your issue.
In case it does *not*, please follow the (admittedly quite long...) 
instructions at the following Ubuntu help page:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PackageManagerTroubleshootingProcedure

Follow steps 1 to 5 but instead of opening a new question (as instructed
in step 6), paste all the output from the terminal window here into the
bug report.

Good luck :) !
 
---
Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad

** Package changed: update-manager (Ubuntu) = apt (Ubuntu)

** Summary changed:

- trying to report a bug in Update Manager
+ E:Dynamic MMap ran out of room

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016285

Title:
  E:Dynamic MMap ran out of room

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1016285/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016285] Re: trying to report a bug in Update Manager

2012-06-24 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report and helping to make Ubuntu better. To get more 
information about the reason for this problem, it is necessary to collect some 
information about your configuration. This can be done automatically using the 
apport-collect command. To run this command, please open a so called 
terminal, by either pressing Strg+Alt+T or finding it in the menu via 
Applications menu - Accessories - Terminal
In this terminal enter the following
  apport-collect 1016285

A window should open, leading you through the further process.

Regarding your update question: The version you are currently using
(10.04) is a so-called Long Term Stable release, i.e. a version that
is supported (gets bug fixes and updates) for 3 years. The version 10.10
is a normal release, i.e. it gets only supported for 18 months.
Therefore, since April 10.10 is no longer supported and you should not
upgrade to it (it is actually not easy to do so, anyway). 10.04 is still
supported until April 2013, so there is no need to rush with an upgrade.
If you want to upgrade, though, you can upgrade to the current LTS
release 12.04 (which will actually even be supported for 5 years).
Instructions how to do so are found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseNotes/UbuntuDesktop#Upgrading_from_Ubuntu_10.04_LTS_to_Ubuntu_12.04_LTS
(but note that is is recommended to wait with this update until the
release of 12.04.1, due in August). One thing to keep in mind is that
the graphical user interface changed quite a bit in 12.04 compared to
10.04 which you might or might not like. Maybe have a look at the
desktop user guide first, to get an idea whether you want to upgrade or
not: https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/ubuntu-help/index.html

** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016285

Title:
  trying to report a bug in Update Manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1016285/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016277] Re: Unity Lens Video shows only SOME of my Videos

2012-06-24 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** Changed in: unity-lens-video (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016277

Title:
  Unity Lens Video shows only SOME of my Videos

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-lens-video/+bug/1016277/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 995298] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2012-05-07 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. The error messages indicate a syntax error in 
line 13 of your /etc/environment file:
/etc/environment: linha 13: fim do arquivo inesperado enquanto procurava por `'

This is something that you have to fix manually. As it is not a bug in
texinfo, I'm marking this bug as invalid.

Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995298

Title:
  package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/995298/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 996012] Re: cannot reseize inserted formula in Impress

2012-05-07 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. This issue has already been reported
upstream, see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48846 . It
seems that it might not be considered a bug, to resize the formula one
can change the font size while in the formula editor.

** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #48846
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48846

** Also affects: df-libreoffice via
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48846
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Summary changed:

- cannot reseize inserted formula in Impress
+ cannot resize inserted formula in Impress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996012

Title:
  cannot resize inserted formula in Impress

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/996012/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 995353] Re: alt tab is not working

2012-05-07 Thread Marcel Stimberg
This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this
being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the
status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow
line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You
can learn more about bug statuses at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status. Thank you again for taking the time
to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please submit any
future bugs you may find.

** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: unity
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995353

Title:
  alt tab is not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/995353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 810163] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 127

2012-05-03 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. It appears your file /etc/environment has a 
syntax error (in line 4):
/etc/environment: linha 4: UNITY_FORCE_START: comando não encontrado
This is something that you have to fix manually. I'm marking the bug as invalid 
as this is not a bug in texinfo.

Please continue to report any other bug you may find.

** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810163

Title:
  package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
  sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de
  saída de erro 127

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/810163/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 778504] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127

2012-05-03 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. It appears your file /etc/environment has a 
syntax error (in line 2):
/etc/environment: line 2: CLASSPATH: command not found 
This is something that you have to fix manually. I'm marking the bug as invalid 
as this is not a bug in texinfo.

Please continue to report any other bug you may find.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778504

Title:
  package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 127

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/778504/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 991499] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 2

2012-05-03 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. It appears your file /etc/environment has a 
syntax error (in line 13):
/etc/environment: linha 13: fim do arquivo inesperado enquanto procurava por `'
This is something that you have to fix manually. I'm marking the bug as invalid 
as this is not a bug in texinfo.

Please continue to report any other bug you may find.


** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991499

Title:
  package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de
  saída de erro 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/991499/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 990681] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2012-05-03 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. It appears your file /etc/environment has a 
syntax error (in line 2):
/etc/environment: line 2: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `'
This is something that you have to fix manually. I'm marking the bug as invalid 
as this is not a bug in texinfo.

Please continue to report any other bug you may find.


** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990681

Title:
  package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/990681/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 964754] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2

2012-05-03 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. It appears your file /etc/environment has a 
syntax error (in line 1):
/etc/environment: ligne 1: Caractère de fin de fichier (EOF) prématuré lors de 
la recherche du «  » correspondant
This is something that you have to fix manually. I'm marking the bug as invalid 
as this is not a bug in texinfo.

Please continue to report any other bug you may find.


** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964754

Title:
  package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
  le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une
  erreur de sortie d'état 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/964754/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 951952] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2012-05-03 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. It appears your file /etc/environment has a 
syntax error (in line 5):
 /etc/environment: 行 5: 寻找匹配的 `' 是遇到了未预期的文件结束符
This is something that you have to fix manually. I'm marking the bug as invalid 
as this is not a bug in texinfo.

Please continue to report any other bug you may find.


** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951952

Title:
  package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/951952/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 774796] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-5ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2012-05-02 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. The problem is line 2 of your /etc/environment 
file:
LC_TIME='en_AU.utf8

It uses an opening single quote but a closing double quote -- this has to be 
consistent. BTW, you do not need any quotes at all, i.e. you could use:
LC_TIME=en_AU.utf8

I am closing this bug as invalid as it is not a bug in texinfo, please
continue to report any other bugs you may find.

** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774796

Title:
  package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-5ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/774796/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 885137] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2

2012-05-02 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report.

The problem seems to be line 4 in your /etc/environment file: It
contains an opening double quote () without a matching closing one.

I'm closing this report as invalid as it is not a bug in texinfo. Please
continue to report any other bugs you may find.

** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885137

Title:
  package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
  le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une
  erreur de sortie d'état 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/885137/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 938500] Re: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 127

2012-05-02 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your report and the follow-up comment. As this is an issue
with a manually changed /etc/environment file and not related to
texinfo, I'm closing this bug report as invalid.

Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938500

Title:
  package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-6ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
  il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo
  stato di errore 127

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/938500/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 985128] Re: Error message when open ODF_text_reference_v3.odt: Read-Error Error reading file

2012-04-24 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 986205 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986205

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #986205, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you
can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 986205
   libreoffice-writer needs libreoffice-base for form controls

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985128

Title:
  Error message when open ODF_text_reference_v3.odt: Read-Error Error
  reading file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/985128/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 936245] Re: Writer can't open attached .ott when Base not installed

2012-04-24 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 986205 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986205

The problem occurs for all documents containing form controls (text
fields, checkboxes, etc.), this issue is tracked in bug #986205, I'm
therefore marking this bug as a duplicate. Any further discussion
regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to
continue to report any other bugs you may find.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 986205
   libreoffice-writer needs libreoffice-base for form controls

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936245

Title:
  Writer can't open attached .ott when Base not installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/936245/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 986205] Re: libreoffice-writer needs libreoffice-base for form controls

2012-04-24 Thread Marcel Stimberg
I had some further look into this and the problem seems to be inherited
from Debian, the libreoffice versions in unstable and experimental both
show the same behaviour as the Ubuntu version. I forwarded the bug to
the Debian bugtracker: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670350

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #670350
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670350

** Also affects: libreoffice (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670350
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986205

Title:
  libreoffice-writer needs libreoffice-base for form controls

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/986205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 986205] Re: Libreoffice fails to open odt document with a checkbox in it

2012-04-22 Thread Marcel Stimberg
I can confirm this issue (for the file provided) on 64-Bit Ubuntu. I get
the error message Read-Error. Error reading file. I can open the file
with abiword -- although I do not see any checkbox then (just the text
Test).

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04

$ LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
libreoffice-writer:
  Installed: 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1
  Candidate: 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1 0
500 http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/ubuntu/archive/ precise/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Also affects: df-libreoffice via
   http://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48972
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986205

Title:
  Libreoffice fails to open odt document with a checkbox in it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/986205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 986205] Re: [Upstream] Libreoffice fails to open odt document with a checkbox in it

2012-04-22 Thread Marcel Stimberg
I just tried the upstream LO version (i.e. installing all the .deb's in 
LibO_3.5.2rc2_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US provided by
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/) and cannot reproduce the issue -- seems 
to be a Debian and/or Ubuntu problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986205

Title:
  [Upstream] Libreoffice fails to open odt document with a checkbox in
  it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/986205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 986205] Re: [Upstream] Libreoffice fails to open odt document with a checkbox in it

2012-04-22 Thread Marcel Stimberg
This is odd... I just reproduced the issue again with a vanilla Ubuntu
12.04 beta image from ubuntu.com (ubuntu-12.04-beta2-desktop-amd64.iso):
I started the ISO in a virtual machine, used Try Ubuntu mode and
navigated to this bug report. On opening the attachment I got the Read-
Error.  The beta still has 3.5.1-1ubuntu1, therefore I re-ran the ISO,
this time doing a proper installation (English language, nothing fancy).
The libreoffice packages have been automatically updated during the
installation (i.e. they are now 3.5.2-2ubuntu1), but again -- Read-
Error on the above file.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986205

Title:
  [Upstream] Libreoffice fails to open odt document with a checkbox in
  it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/986205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 986205] Re: [Upstream] Libreoffice fails to open odt document with a checkbox in it

2012-04-22 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Alright, I did some more testing: The problem is reproducible if the
libreoffice-base package is *not* installed. With libreoffice-base
installed, the file opens and displays, without the package it shows the
Read-Error. This is only true for the Ubuntu Precise version, both the
TDF as well as the Oneiric version can open the file without
libreoffice-base.

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986205

Title:
  [Upstream] Libreoffice fails to open odt document with a checkbox in
  it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/986205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 986205] Re: [Upstream] Libreoffice fails to open odt document with a checkbox in it

2012-04-22 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** Description changed:

  LO in Ubuntu 12.04 fails to open an odt document that contains a checkbox.
  Works fine in LO 3.4 on Ubuntu 11.10.
+ 
+ The problem occurs only when the package libreoffice-base is *not*
+ installed and only for the Ubuntu package, i.e. either installing
+ libreoffice-base or using libreoffice 3.5 from
+ http://www.libreoffice.org/download/ allows to open the file.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ * Make sure libreoffice-base is not installed.
+ * Try to open 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/986205/+attachment/3095819/+files/test_lo_checkbox.odt
+ -- You receive a Read-Error.
+ 
+ [Workaround]
+ Install the libreoffice-base package.
+ 
+ == Regression details ==
+ Discovered in version: 3.5.1-1ubuntu1
+ Last known good version: 3.4.4-0ubuntu1
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: libreoffice (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14
  Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Fri Apr 20 16:06:09 2012
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 
(20120307)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: libreoffice
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986205

Title:
  [Upstream] Libreoffice fails to open odt document with a checkbox in
  it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/986205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 661724] Re: Printing certain documents yields characters scattered all over the page

2012-04-20 Thread Marcel Stimberg
@luiscarlos and @jan-recreatie-zorg: all Ubuntu versions  10.04 (maverick) 
have this specific issue fixed, I therefore think you are not seeing the same 
bug. In case you are seeing this problem even when printing to a file (like in 
this bug report), please report  a new bug against libcairo2 (ideally using 
ubuntu-bug libcairo2 in a terminal). It is helpful if you can attach an 
example file where you are experiencing this issue, together with the result of 
printing to a file. If you are only seeing the issue when printing to a real 
printer, report a bug against the CUPS package (ubuntu-bug cups). Ideally, 
follow the steps described here: 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems#Capturing_print_job_data
Thanks in advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661724

Title:
  Printing certain documents yields characters scattered all over the
  page

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cairo/+bug/661724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 533862] Re: gthumb crashes on launch

2012-04-18 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for your bug report. Your issue seems to be different from the one 
reported here, therefore please open a new bug. To enable the developers to fix 
your problem, the best way is to open a crash report with apport. As it is by 
default disabled on Oneiric, you have to run the following in a terminal (see 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport#How_to_enable_apport for more info):
  sudo service apport start force_start=1
Then, try to reproduce the crash with gthumb. As soon as it crashes, the apport 
window should pop up, enabling you to create a new report with all the 
debugging info attached.

Thanks in advance!

** Changed in: gthumb (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533862

Title:
  gthumb crashes on launch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gthumb/+bug/533862/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 943195] Re: xpdf.real crashed with SIGSEGV in GooHash::hash()

2012-04-17 Thread Marcel Stimberg
@David: No one claimed that xpdf is useless -- it is just only
community supported, i.e. in universe and not in main. The status has
been set to Medium automatically by apport, as it does for all crash
reports. The correct status would actually be High (Prevents the
application or any dependencies from functioning correctly at all ) but
only someone with BugControl privileges can change the importance.
However, I doubt this will make this problem go away any sooner... Note
that xpdf has *not* been replaced with a new version, the poppler
library has changed and simply rebuilding xpdf was not enough,
obviously. It is worth looking at the Debian package for xpdf in debian
experimental (maintained by Michael Gilbert who commented on some of the
crash reports here in launchpad) that *seems* to be working with the
same poppler version that Ubuntu is using.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943195

Title:
  xpdf.real crashed with SIGSEGV in GooHash::hash()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xpdf/+bug/943195/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 971897] Re: segfaults with any pdf file after upgrading to 12.04

2012-04-09 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 943195 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943195

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 943195, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you
can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Changed in: xpdf (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 943195
   xpdf.real crashed with SIGSEGV in GooHash::hash()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971897

Title:
  segfaults with any pdf file after upgrading to 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xpdf/+bug/971897/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 669211] Re: Xpdf segfaults on start in libpoppler.so.7

2012-04-09 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Just for the record: the (now public) bug report for this issue in
Ubuntu 12.04 is bug #943195 -- discussion should continue there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669211

Title:
  Xpdf segfaults on start in libpoppler.so.7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xpdf/+bug/669211/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 933103] Re: evince crashed with signal 5 in g_settings_schema_get_value()

2012-04-08 Thread Marcel Stimberg
@nickolai: Thank you very much, that indeed makes evince for work me
again. Supporting an old installation in /usr/local is probably not
really worth considering, I'm therefore closing this bug as Invalid.
Thanks everybody for your help.

** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933103

Title:
  evince crashed with signal 5 in g_settings_schema_get_value()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/933103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661724] Re: Printing certain documents yields characters scattered all over the page

2012-03-16 Thread Marcel Stimberg
@luiscarlos: Are you sure you have the updates repository enabled? Could you run
apt-cache policy libcairo2 
in a terminal and paste the ouput? Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661724

Title:
  Printing certain documents yields characters scattered all over the
  page

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cairo/+bug/661724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951496] [NEW] indicator-datetime-session severely leaks memory

2012-03-10 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Public bug reported:

After the most recent update to 0.3.91-0ubuntu1, indicator-datetime-session's 
memory increases at a rate of ~5MB/s, rendering my system unusable in a couple 
of minutes. Any advice on how to debug this issue? The service is always 
respawned after I kill it, making it impossible to directly run it in a 
terminal -- is there a way to prevent that? The issue persists even if I switch 
off the date display in the indicator bar. If I do an strace to the running 
process, the following seems to be repeated in an infinite loop:
open(/usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Paris, O_RDONLY) = 14
fstat(14, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2945, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 2945, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 14, 0) = 0x7fd1a6bd9000
close(14)   = 0
munmap(0x7fd1a6bd9000, 2945)= 0
open(/usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC, O_RDONLY) = 14
fstat(14, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=118, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 118, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 14, 0) = 0x7fd1a6bd9000
close(14)   = 0
munmap(0x7fd1a6bd9000, 118) = 0
open(/usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Paris, O_RDONLY) = 14
fstat(14, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2945, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 2945, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 14, 0) = 0x7fd1a6bd9000
close(14)   = 0
munmap(0x7fd1a6bd9000, 2945)= 0
open(/usr/share/zoneinfo/America/Los_Angeles, O_RDONLY) = 15
fstat(15, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2819, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 2819, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 15, 0) = 0x7fd1a6bd9000
close(15)   = 0
munmap(0x7fd1a6bd9000, 2819)= 0
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=10, events=POLLIN}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN}, 
{fd=11, events=POLLIN}], 4, 0) = 2 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}, {fd=11, 
revents=POLLIN}])
read(3, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 16) = 8
sendmsg(11, {msg_name(0)=NULL, 
msg_iov(2)=[{l\1\0\1\0\0\0\\r\4\0\225\0\0\0\1\1o\0(\0\0\0/org/fre..., 
168}, {, 0}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 168
sendmsg(11, {msg_name(0)=NULL, 
msg_iov(2)=[{l\1\0\1\0\0\0\0001\r\4\0\233\0\0\0\1\1o\0(\0\0\0/org/fre..., 
176}, {, 0}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 176
write(3, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
recvmsg(11, {msg_name(0)=NULL, 
msg_iov(1)=[{l\4\1\1\35\0\0\0F\336b\1\247\0\0\0\1\1o\0(\0\0\0/org/fre..., 
2048}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC}, MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) = 325
write(3, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
write(3, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
write(3, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
recvmsg(11, {msg_name(0)=NULL, 
msg_iov(1)=[{l\3\1\1:\0\0\0I\336b\1w\0\0\0\6\1s\0\6\0\0\0:1.354\0\0..., 
2048}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC}, MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) = 194
write(3, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
recvmsg(11, 0x7fff9e33d3d0, MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily 
unavailable)
write(3, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=10, events=POLLIN}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN}, 
{fd=11, events=POLLIN}], 4, 0) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
read(3, \6\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 16) = 8
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=10, events=POLLIN}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN}, 
{fd=11, events=POLLIN}], 4, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
read(3, 0x7fff9e33d5d0, 16) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily 
unavailable)
write(2, \nIndicator-Datetime-WARNING **: ..., 117) = 117
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=10, events=POLLIN}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN}, 
{fd=11, events=POLLIN}], 4, 0) = 0 (Timeout)
read(3, 0x7fff9e33d5d0, 16) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily 
unavailable)
write(2, \nIndicator-Datetime-WARNING **: ..., 72) = 72
sendmsg(11, {msg_name(0)=NULL, 
msg_iov(2)=[{l\1\0\1\0\0\0\0002\r\4\0\215\0\0\0\1\1o\0(\0\0\0/org/fre..., 
160}, {, 0}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 160
write(8, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
write(7, \1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0, 8) = 8
futex(0x7fd1a000b780, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 1
futex(0x7fd1a000b2e0, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 1
futex(0x20e7e00, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1) = 1

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: indicator-datetime 0.3.91-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.28-generic 3.2.9
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: 476acdb7217a83354f628beaa5c14f06
CheckboxSystem: daed2f3d6643b4a84b4520a2427f8c2b
Date: Sat Mar 10 13:29:07 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20100114)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: indicator-datetime
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-20 (49 days ago)

** Affects: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951496

Title:
  indicator-datetime-session severely leaks memory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 951496] Re: indicator-datetime-session severely leaks memory

2012-03-10 Thread Marcel Stimberg
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951496

Title:
  indicator-datetime-session severely leaks memory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/951496/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951496] Re: indicator-datetime-session severely leaks memory

2012-03-10 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Sebastien, thanks for your advice. This is the output I get on the
commandline:


Indicator-Datetime-WARNING **: Address provider changed.  Let's change

** WARNING **: Metadata for error domain geoclue-error-quark already
registered


Indicator-Datetime-WARNING **: Address provider changed.  Let's change

Indicator-Datetime-WARNING **: Unable to get Geoclue address: Geoclue
master client has no usable Address providers

Indicator-Datetime-WARNING **: Address provider changed.  Let's change

Indicator-Datetime-WARNING **: Unable to get Geoclue address: Geoclue
master client has no usable Address providers

Indicator-Datetime-WARNING **: Address provider changed.  Let's change


The last two lines are then repeated infinitely.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951496

Title:
  indicator-datetime-session severely leaks memory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-datetime/+bug/951496/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951496] Re: indicator-datetime-session severely leaks memory

2012-03-10 Thread Marcel Stimberg
I did not have geoclue-ubuntu-geoip installed and installing it (+
logging out and back in) indeed fixed the problem, indicator-datetime-
service is back to a reasonable memory consumption which does not seem
to grow over time. indicator-datetime-service's dependence on geoclue-
ubuntu-geoip | geoclue-provider was apparently fulfilled by geoclue-
examples... judging from its name and description, this package should
possibly not claim Provides: geoclue-provider.

Many thanks for the quick help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951496

Title:
  indicator-datetime-session severely leaks memory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-datetime/+bug/951496/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951208] Re: error playing dvd

2012-03-10 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Examining the information you have given us, this does
not appear to be a bug report so we are closing it and converting it to
a question in the support tracker. We understand the difficulties you
are facing, but it is better to raise problems you are having in the
support tracker at https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu if you are
uncertain if they are bugs. You can also find a valid support at
http://askubuntu.com or posting your question in the support forum of
your local Ubuntu's community. For help on reporting bugs, see
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs.

---
Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad

** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Converted to question:
   https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+question/190298

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951208

Title:
  error playing dvd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/951208/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 933103] Re: evince crashed with signal 5 in g_settings_schema_get_value()

2012-03-09 Thread Marcel Stimberg
It does not seem to be document-specific, I'm getting it for many documents 
now, with a complaint about another key, though:
GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema 'org.gnome.Evince.Default' does not contain 
a key named 'dual-page-odd-left'

The last document where I experienced the problem was the one linked here:
http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1001026representation=PDF

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933103

Title:
  evince crashed with signal 5 in g_settings_schema_get_value()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/933103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 938235] Re: Application needs hi-res or SVG icon

2012-03-06 Thread Marcel Stimberg
 Concerning '~lyx-devel', I do not see how to enable a bug tracking feature. 
 Does anyone know if this can be done for teams?
I think bugs appear in the bug page for teams simply when they are assigned to 
the team or when the team is subscribed to the bug. I do not think there is any 
other way of directly reporting a bug to a team.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938235

Title:
  Application needs hi-res or SVG icon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lyx/+bug/938235/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 887177] Re: feature freeze exception for spyder 2.1.7-1

2012-02-20 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Hi Anatoly,

do you have any reference (e.g. upstream bug report) for that? I think
reverting is really not an option but maybe it is possible to add a
patch reverting this specific behaviour.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887177

Title:
  feature freeze exception for spyder 2.1.7-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spyder/+bug/887177/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 932446] Re: [sound-nua] gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_model_get_valist()

2012-02-18 Thread Marcel Stimberg
A possibly easier workaround (from my duplicate bug #932079): Use pavucontrol 
for switching between outputs.
Oh and @JrZabott: I removed the verification-needed tag, that tag has a very 
specific meaning for stable release updates, see 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Tags


** Tags removed: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932446

Title:
  [sound-nua] gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in
  gtk_tree_model_get_valist()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/932446/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 930639] Re: Please merge scribus 1.4.0.dfsg+r17287-1 (main) from Debian sid (main)

2012-02-16 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Hi Bernhard,

no worries, I'm glad it got merged either way! BTW: I was once told to
actually *not* subscribe ubuntu-sponsors if I have already done a merge
request (in the bazaar branch sense) and
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix#Committing_the_fix only says If
you can't find anyone to review your work, you can also click the
Subscribe someone else link and add ubuntu-sponsors.. I think several
maintainers still prefer the good old debdiff way to bazaar, though :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930639

Title:
  Please merge scribus 1.4.0.dfsg+r17287-1 (main) from Debian sid (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scribus/+bug/930639/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923087] Re: simple-scan always crashes when starting to scan

2012-02-16 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 924324 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924324

@Michael: The branch and the changelog of compiz-plugins-main mention
this bug here -- which is obviously wrong... I think it was meant to
refer to bug #932087 (note the 23 - 32 change). Maybe Didier Roche
(didirocks; the uploader of the package) should be informed about this
mistake?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923087

Title:
  simple-scan always crashes when starting to scan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/923087/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923087] Re: simple-scan always crashes when starting to scan

2012-02-16 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 924324 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924324

** Branch unlinked: lp:ubuntu/compiz-plugins-main

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923087

Title:
  simple-scan always crashes when starting to scan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/923087/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 932079] Re: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_model_get_valist()

2012-02-15 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932079

Title:
  gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in
  gtk_tree_model_get_valist()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/932079/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 933103] Re: evince crashed with signal 5 in g_settings_schema_get_value()

2012-02-15 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933103

Title:
  evince crashed with signal 5 in g_settings_schema_get_value()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/933103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 931733] Re: calling sudo and command XY with , there is no request for sudo-password

2012-02-14 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Hi again. Following your comments it seems everything works as it should, I'm 
therefore closing this bug. Regarding your second comment/screenshot regarding 
the -b option: If you use -b, you do not need the  in the end. So in your 
case it should be:
sudo -b leafpad /boot/grub/usb.mod

Oh, BTW: Some people strongly argue that one should not use sudo for graphical 
applications in the first place (see e.g. here: 
http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/graphicalsudo ). If you use gksudo instead, 
appending the  should work, i.e. you can use:
gksudo leafpad /boot/grub/usb.mod 


** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931733

Title:
  calling sudo and command XY with , there is no request for sudo-
  password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/931733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 931733] Re: calling sudo and command XY with , there is no request for sudo-password

2012-02-13 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu 
better. 
I can't reproduce the issue on Ubuntu 12.04: Running sudo ... just fails, 
because there is no way to enter the password (withouth using fg for getting 
the process back in the foreground) -- one should actually use sudo -b ... 
instead.

Could you please check whether sudo was really needing credentials and
was not just using the cached ones? Run sudo -k first, then repeat
your command -- it should do nothing, then when you do fg you should
see sudo waiting for your password.

** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931733

Title:
  calling sudo and command XY with , there is no request for sudo-
  password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/931733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 930806] Re: Ubuntu 11.10: The dash command is softlinked to /bin/sh.

2012-02-13 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.

Dash is a POSIX compliant shell that is supposed to be more efficient
than bash. For that reason, Ubuntu introduced /bin/sh as a symlink to
dash back in Ubuntu 6.10: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh

Every shell script that uses bash specific features should declare #! 
/bin/bash instead, or fix the bashisms, the above mentioned link has a lot 
of advise on that. For a makefile, an easy fix is to set 
SHELL = /bin/bash
at the beginning of it. 

Finally, if you want to disable the symlink on your system, you can run
sudo dpkg-reconfigure dash and chose not to set this symlink.

** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930806

Title:
  Ubuntu 11.10: The dash command is softlinked to /bin/sh.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/930806/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 930196] Re: Activity journal crashes when tried to open in Precise

2012-02-11 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Unfortunately, apport does not seem to handle duplicates well... please
note that bug #924988 already has a branch with a fix attached.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930196

Title:
  Activity journal crashes when tried to open in Precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-activity-journal/+bug/930196/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 930639] [NEW] Please merge scribus 1.4.0.dfsg+r17287-1 (main) from Debian sid (main)

2012-02-11 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Public bug reported:

Debian now packages the final upstream version instead of the release
candidate that is in precise.

Please note that the scribus-ng package is now at an *older* version
than scribus -- hopefully Debian will package 1.5 as a new scribus-ng
soon but if not, that package should probably be removed from Precise.

** Affects: scribus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Marcel Stimberg (marcelstimberg)
 Status: In Progress

** Changed in: scribus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: scribus (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Marcel Stimberg (marcelstimberg)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930639

Title:
  Please merge scribus 1.4.0.dfsg+r17287-1 (main) from Debian sid (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scribus/+bug/930639/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 817861] Re: nautilus SIGABRT in nautilus_window_slot_open_location_full(): (target_window == window)

2012-02-11 Thread Marcel Stimberg
@Damir: The version 3.3.5 is the version in Ubuntu 12.04 -- the Ubuntu
11.10 version in the oneiric-proposed repository is 3.2.1-0ubuntu4.1
(the former version was 3.2.1-0ubuntu3.2)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817861

Title:
  nautilus SIGABRT in nautilus_window_slot_open_location_full():
  (target_window == window)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/817861/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 930639] Re: Please merge scribus 1.4.0.dfsg+r17287-1 (main) from Debian sid (main)

2012-02-11 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Ok, I tried to do the merge myself (see the linked branch), AFAICT
everything works fine (building with pbuilder, installing, running). But
this is my first attempt at a merge, so I may well have done something
wrong. I'm under the impression that using bazaar branches is the
preferred way of doing such things, but I can also attach debdiffs if
you prefer.

** Changed in: scribus (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Confirmed

** Changed in: scribus (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Marcel Stimberg (marcelstimberg) = (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930639

Title:
  Please merge scribus 1.4.0.dfsg+r17287-1 (main) from Debian sid (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scribus/+bug/930639/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 898903] Re: gnome-activity-journal crashed with DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: No such interface `org.gnome.zeitgeist.Log' on object at path /org/gnom

2012-02-10 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 924988 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924988

I'm marking this bug as a duplicate of bug #924988, since that one has
already a branch with a fix attached to it. I hope apport redirects
duplicate reports there as well...

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 924988
   Activity journal crashes on Ubuntu P

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898903

Title:
  gnome-activity-journal crashed with DBusException in call_blocking():
  org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: No such interface
  `org.gnome.zeitgeist.Log' on object at path
  /org/gnome/zeitgeist/journal/activity

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-activity-journal/+bug/898903/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 905814] Re: eclipse crashed in libwebkitgtk-1.0 webViewExitFullscreen+0x30

2012-02-09 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Many thanks for the link, it does actually mention an easy workaround for the 
problem: Edit your configuration file (should be 
~/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.7.0_155965261/configuration/config.ini ) and 
add a line:
org.eclipse.swt.browser.DefaultType=mozilla

This way the mozilla renderer instead of webkit is used (this was the
default in 3.6) and the crash does no longer occur.

If there is no chance of fixing the real bug in time for Precise, I'd
suggest to add this line to /etc/eclipse.ini for all users.


** Also affects: eclipse (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905814

Title:
  eclipse crashed in libwebkitgtk-1.0  webViewExitFullscreen+0x30

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/905814/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 928437] Re: eclipse crashes when changing desktops or opening the workbench (in eclipse)

2012-02-09 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Hi, 
the crash seems to have to do with the webkit rendering -- the workaround in 
bug #905814 might help you as well, see: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/905814/comments/7

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928437

Title:
  eclipse crashes when changing desktops or opening the workbench (in
  eclipse)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/928437/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 809609] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

2012-02-06 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Hi Sebastien, the issue seems to be the same, a crash at
g_type_check_instance_is_a, called by g_file_equal, the segvanalysis is
bascially identical (see my bug #927150). But you are right, the
stacktrace is not exactly identical (g_type_check_instance_is_a -
g_file_equal - gtk_path_bar_finalize in this bug,
g_type_check_instance_is_a - g_file_equal - g_hash_table_lookup_node
in my case) -- so you think it is worth keeping the two bug reports
separate? I'll unmark bug #927150 as a duplicate, then.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809609

Title:
  gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/809609/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 927150] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

2012-02-06 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 809609
   gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927150

Title:
  gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/927150/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 809609] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

2012-02-06 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Got your point, I unmarked bug #927150 as a duplicate.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809609

Title:
  gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/809609/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 748153] Re: compiz assert failure: *** glibc detected *** compiz: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000000003000018 ***

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Indeed I cannot longer reproduce this issue and have upgraded since.
Closing this bug as invalid.

** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748153

Title:
  compiz assert failure: *** glibc detected *** compiz: free(): invalid
  pointer: 0x0318 ***

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/748153/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 589997] Re: apport generates bugs that keep getting rejected

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Yes, I'm seeing this issue too -- it is somewhat annoying because as a
bug triager I regularly direct users who report a crash through the
process of enabling apport and submitting a crash report. Just to have
the bug marked as invalid because the apport claims that the packages
where not up-to-date. Looking at the version numbers I get the
impression that apport only considers package version in the main
repository branch, not -updates and -security?

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589997

Title:
  apport generates bugs that keep getting rejected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/589997/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 926858] Re: file browser sometimes crashes gedit when pressing refresh view button.

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 809609 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809609

Many thanks for the bug report and the detailed instructions how to reproduce 
it -- the issue still persists on Ubuntu Precise. The crash has already been 
reported as bug #809609, I'm therefore marking this bug as a duplicate. I added 
your instructions to that bug. 
Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 809609
   gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926858

Title:
  file browser sometimes crashes gedit when pressing refresh view
  button.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/926858/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 809609] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Stimberg
The crash is reproducible on Precise (see my duplicate bug report #927150) -- I 
followed the instructions provided by fabrg in bug #926858:
Steps to reproduce:

1. Open gedit and display File Browser (side panel)
2. Open a structure folder with some folders and files (i suggest you /home/), 
and expand some folder till you see some files, like
-- /afolder/
afile
afile
-- /afolder/
afile
afile
afile
3. click refresh view button
4. the structure should collapse automaticaly. if not, try to refresh again 
untill it does. (probally gedit will crash)
5. when the folder collapse, expand it again.
6. repeat steps 3 to 5 till gedit crashes.

I had to repeat steps 3-5 quite a few times but in the end gedit crashed
when I clicked on the expand arrow for a directory.


** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809609

Title:
  gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/809609/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 927150] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

2012-02-05 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 809609 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809609

** Visibility changed to: Public

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 809609
   gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927150

Title:
  gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/927150/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 766260] Re: unable to download 11.04 whole package thro update manger

2012-02-02 Thread Marcel Stimberg
As the bug report does not include enough information to work with it,
I'm closing this issue as invalid. @val thomas: Please do not change the
status of bugs that do not directly affect you. If you have a problem
that you think is similar, please file a new bug (but please have a look
at http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html first) or seek
help through other channels, see http://www.ubuntu.com/support

** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766260

Title:
  unable to download 11.04 whole package thro update manger

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/766260/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923087] Re: simple-scan always crashes when starting to scan

2012-01-31 Thread Marcel Stimberg
When you say After I did that apport does not catch crashes, do you
mean that it no longer crashes or that apport does not come up after
enabling it with the above statement? If it does not come up, can you
check whether you have a crash report in /var/crash ? If yes, you might
be able to submit it just by double clicking it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923087

Title:
  simple-scan always crashes when starting to scan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/923087/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923087] Re: simple-scan always crashes when starting to scan

2012-01-31 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Great! Now there is one more small thing you could do: After the apport
retracing service has retraced the files in your new bug report (you
should get a mail about this, it adds a couple of files, changes some
tags, etc.), please check the attached files for any confidential
information -- normally there shouldn't be any. If you do not find
anything that you would not like to disclose, please change the bugs
visibility to public (upper right corner of the page) -- this way
everybody can have a look at the bug. Thanks again!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923087

Title:
  simple-scan always crashes when starting to scan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/923087/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923428] Re: can´t launch deja-dup

2012-01-30 Thread Marcel Stimberg
The unity PPA is only for the current development version of Ubuntu,
i.e. Ubuntu 12.04. As you are running 11.10, I'd suggest to remove the
PPA and downgrade to the libunity6 version in the repositories. Or, if
you want to contribute to testing the latest-and-greatest (but
occasionally breaking) you can of course also upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04.

** Changed in: deja-dup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923428

Title:
  can´t launch deja-dup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/923428/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 923432] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() when middle-clicking a folder on the desktop

2012-01-30 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 817861 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817861

Indeed it seems to be the same issue -- probably not seen as a duplicate
by apport because this bug is reported for precise and the other for
oneiric? I'm marking this bug as a duplicate and make a comment at bug
#817861 mentioning the newer apport info here.


** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 817861
   nautilus SIGABRT in nautilus_window_slot_open_location_full(): 
(target_window == window)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923432

Title:
  nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() when middle-
  clicking a folder on the desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/923432/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 922807] Re: Nautilus crash when middle-clicking a folder on the desktop

2012-01-30 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 817861 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817861

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 923432
   nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() when middle-clicking 
a folder on the desktop
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 817861
   nautilus SIGABRT in nautilus_window_slot_open_location_full(): 
(target_window == window)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922807

Title:
  Nautilus crash when middle-clicking a folder on the desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/922807/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 817861] Re: nautilus SIGABRT in nautilus_window_slot_open_location_full(): (target_window == window)

2012-01-30 Thread Marcel Stimberg
This issue still exists in Precise -- see bug #923432 (now marked as a
duplicate of this bug) for apport crash info, e.g. the stacktrace:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/923432/+attachment/2699947/+files/Stacktrace.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817861

Title:
  nautilus SIGABRT in nautilus_window_slot_open_location_full():
  (target_window == window)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/817861/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923943] Re: I can't hide menu, even creating a new config file or change values via gconf-editor

2012-01-30 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu 
better. Unfortunately, we can't fix it because your description didn't include 
enough information.  You may find it helpful to read How to report bugs 
effectively http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be 
grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem.  
We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at 
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures.
At a minimum, we need:
1. the specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the 
problem,
2. the behavior you expected, and
3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible).
Thanks!

** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923943

Title:
  I can't hide menu, even creating a new config file or change values
  via gconf-editor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/923943/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923087] Re: simple-scan always crashes when starting to scan

2012-01-30 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Hi Ben, 
I know you already created a new bug report with apport -- but even more useful 
would be if you could make approt catch the crash itself. For this, you have to 
enable apport crash reporting by entering 
  sudo service apport start force_start=1
in a terminal. Then reproduce the crash, apport should automatically come up 
offering to submit a crash report. Please post the new bug number here. Thanks 
in advance!


** Changed in: simple-scan (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923087

Title:
  simple-scan always crashes when starting to scan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/923087/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923038] Re: no audio/video info in Properties for mov files

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Ok. I guess you can also see the test movie that is installed by
checkbox: /usr/share/checkbox/data/video/Quicktime_Video.mov ?

I saw your movie uses ffmjpeg as a codec, thats different from the one in the 
movies I tried. Could you try installing all the other gstreamer plugin 
modules, i.e. do somthing like
sudo apt-get install gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad 
gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad-multiverse gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly

Maybe the support is in one of those packages.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923038

Title:
  no audio/video info in Properties for mov files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/923038/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923038] Re: no audio/video info in Properties for mov files

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Could you point to any specific files that are maybe available online
(legally available would be best ;) ) -- it is difficult to triage this
otherwise. Or if it applies to movies you take with a camera, could you
attach a short example to this bug? Thanks in advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923038

Title:
  no audio/video info in Properties for mov files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/923038/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 921154] Re: Ignores --color=always in GREP_OPTIONS

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.

It took me a while to find this out -- it really looks weird! The solution is 
quite simple, though: In the standard ~/.bashrc you find the following line:
alias grep='grep --color=auto'

GREP_OPTIONS are *prepended* to all other options. With the alias
definition, your --color option gets overridden by --color=auto every
time. Deleting this line from .bashrc or using unalias grep should
solve the issue for you. If it does not, please feel free to reopen this
bug report by setting the status back to New.

** Changed in: grep (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921154

Title:
  Ignores --color=always in GREP_OPTIONS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grep/+bug/921154/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923038] Re: no audio/video info in Properties for mov files

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 922069 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922069

I see. I can play quicktime videos on Ubuntu 11.10 just fine with totem, so it 
seems not to be a general issue.
I saw that you already reported a bug against totem, I'm therefore marking this 
bug here as  a duplicate (if totem can play it, nautilus will also display the 
properties info). Let's continue in bug #922069


** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 922069
   REGRESSION: can't play mov files

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923038

Title:
  no audio/video info in Properties for mov files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/923038/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 922069] Re: REGRESSION: can't play mov files

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Could you please run 'apport-collect 922069' in a terminal? This will
attach the correct debug info to this report (as your original bug was
filed against mplayer, the debug info is for mplayer currently). Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922069

Title:
  REGRESSION: can't play mov files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/922069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 922069] Re: REGRESSION: can't play mov files

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Oh, actually it does not seem to be necessary... I just found the bug that 
seems to apply to your situation (bug #856988) -- it seems to be a problem that 
only occurs after upgrades from natty to oneiric. Could you try whether running
rm -r ~/.gstreamer-0.10
fixes the issue for you?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922069

Title:
  REGRESSION: can't play mov files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/922069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 922069] Re: REGRESSION: can't play mov files

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thanks for the info (although it unfortunately did not include infos
about plugins etc...). To sort out whether it is anything totem-specific
or (as I expect) a problem in the gstreamer backend, could you please
install the gstreamer-tools package and run:

gst-launch playbin
uri=file:///usr/share/checkbox/data/video/Quicktime_Video.mov

Does this work or not? If it doesn't, what error message does it give?
Thanks again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922069

Title:
  REGRESSION: can't play mov files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/922069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 922069] Re: REGRESSION: can't play mov files

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922069

Title:
  REGRESSION: can't play mov files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/922069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923369] Re: evince[2717]: segfault at d0 ip 00007f9138adbc2a sp 00007fff0314e778 error 4 in libc-2.13.so

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu 
better.  Can you reproduce this crash? If yes, please first run:
sudo service apport start force_start=1
(will prompt for your password) in a terminal. Now try to reproduce the crash: 
A dialog box will appear asking you to send a bug report. This will 
automatically create a new bug report. After this is done, please review 
whether you find anything confidential in the attached files and if not, set 
the visibility to public (if you are not sure, you can of course leave it as 
private as well).
I'm marking this bug here as invalid, but please post the number of the newly 
reported bug here as a comment. If for some reason you can reproduce the crash 
but sending the bug report fails, feel free to reopen this bug by setting the 
status back to new and we'll sort it out. Thanks in advance!


** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923369

Title:
   evince[2717]: segfault at d0 ip 7f9138adbc2a sp 7fff0314e778
  error 4 in libc-2.13.so

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/923369/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923432] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() when middle-clicking a folder on the desktop

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923432

Title:
  nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() when middle-
  clicking a folder on the desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/923432/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 922807] Re: Nautilus crash when middle-clicking a folder on the desktop

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 923432 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923432

Many thanks for your bug report -- I'm somewhat surprised that you are
apparently the first one reporting it as it is easily reproducible for
me (both on 11.10 and on the current development version 12.04). I
created a new bug report with additional debug information (bug
#923432). For the sake of simplicity I'm marking this bug as a duplicate
even though you certainly reported it first.

---
Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad

** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 923432
   nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() when middle-clicking 
a folder on the desktop

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922807

Title:
  Nautilus crash when middle-clicking a folder on the desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/922807/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 923432] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() when middle-clicking a folder on the desktop

2012-01-29 Thread Marcel Stimberg
There's apparently already an upstream bug report about this (6 months
old but still untouched :-/), you can track it and make comments at:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655235

---
Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #655235
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655235

** Also affects: nautilus via
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655235
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923432

Title:
  nautilus crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() when middle-
  clicking a folder on the desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/923432/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >