[Bug 1947587] [NEW] Context (right click) menu does not appear on dual-monitor setup when dock is active on all screens

2021-10-18 Thread Michael K
Public bug reported:

I have a dual monitor setup, primary monitor on the left, secondary
monitor on the right, exactly lined up, on Wayland, Intel graphics
drivers, Ubuntu 21.10 (but issue was already present in 21.04)

I have Ubuntu Dock enabled on all monitors, on the left side of the
screen (which is default) and symbol size 28 (but this size does not
seem to matter).

Independent from the running program, when I try to bring up the context
(right click) menu close to the right side of the left screen, the
context menu will not show up.

I disabled the "dock on all monitors" and _then_ the context menu will
show up, but weirdly on the right monitor stuck to the left side of the
screen - even if the context menu gladly will right-align when not too
close to the border of the screen.

Now the dock and the weird context menu behaviour seem to overlap
somehow and the context menu will not show up at all.

Sounds similar to this:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1783

and while searching I found this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1930567
which sounds very similar or might be even the same.


I will try in X11 and report if the issue is there as well.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: gnome-shell 40.5-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Oct 18 14:38:50 2021
DisplayManager: gdm3
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-06-15 (489 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 40.5-1ubuntu2
SourcePackage: gnome-shell
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-15 (2 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947587

Title:
  Context (right click) menu does not appear on dual-monitor setup when
  dock is active on all screens

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1947587/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1859592] Re: Bluetooth unavailable after updates - Reading Intel version information failed (-110)

2021-02-08 Thread Michael K.
I had the same problem after a suspend/resume cycle => bluetooth was not 
working with the message `hci0: Reading Intel version information failed 
(-110)` in the syslog.
For me the kernel parameter `btusb.enable_autosuspend=0` fixed this problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859592

Title:
  Bluetooth unavailable after updates - Reading Intel version
  information failed (-110)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1859592/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1550950] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package openjdk-9-jdk-head

2018-03-30 Thread Michael K. Edwards
Still broken:

Preparing to unpack .../openjdk-9-jdk_9~b115-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking openjdk-9-jdk:amd64 (9~b115-1ubuntu1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-9-jdk_9~b115-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite 
'/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in 
package openjdk-9-jdk-headless:amd64 9~b115-1ubuntu1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950

Title:
  package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
  overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h',
  which is also in package openjdk-9-jdk-headless:amd64 9~b107-0ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1550950/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1662594] [NEW] package kaccounts-providers (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/etc/signon-ui/webkit-options.d/accounts.google.com.conf', which is also in package acco

2017-02-07 Thread Michael K
Public bug reported:

Attempted to install KDE Plasma 5.8.5 on fresh install of Ubuntu 16.10.  
Installation failed:  
Errors were encountered while processing:
/temp/apt-dpkg=install-JnTmBH/742-kaccounts-providers_4%3a16.04.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code(1)

Used possible solution:
sudo dpkg --configure -a

Attempted reinstall sudo apt-get install kubuntu-desktop
Response:  already installed

Restarted.  KDE failed to load.  Now getting above error.

Additional info:
===
Description:Ubuntu 16.10
Release:16.10
===
Package:  kaccounts-Providers 4:16.04.3-Oubuntu1

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
Package: kaccounts-providers (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-37.39-generic 4.8.16
Uname: Linux 4.8.0-37-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8.2
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Feb  7 11:25:53 2017
DuplicateSignature:
 package:kaccounts-providers:(not installed)
 Unpacking kaccounts-providers (4:16.04.3-0ubuntu1) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-JnTmbH/742-kaccounts-providers_4%3a16.04.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
 (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite 
'/etc/signon-ui/webkit-options.d/accounts.google.com.conf', which is also in 
package account-plugin-google 0.13+16.10.20160929.1-0ubuntu1
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite 
'/etc/signon-ui/webkit-options.d/accounts.google.com.conf', which is also in 
package account-plugin-google 0.13+16.10.20160929.1-0ubuntu1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-02-07 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release i386 (20160420.1)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.10ubuntu1
 apt  1.3.4
SourcePackage: kaccounts-providers
Title: package kaccounts-providers (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 
trying to overwrite '/etc/signon-ui/webkit-options.d/accounts.google.com.conf', 
which is also in package account-plugin-google 0.13+16.10.20160929.1-0ubuntu1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to yakkety on 2017-02-07 (0 days ago)

** Affects: kaccounts-providers (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 package-conflict yakkety

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662594

Title:
  package kaccounts-providers (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
  trying to overwrite '/etc/signon-ui/webkit-
  options.d/accounts.google.com.conf', which is also in package account-
  plugin-google 0.13+16.10.20160929.1-0ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kaccounts-providers/+bug/1662594/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1417727] Re: fatal error: Could not open /proc/acpi/toshiba/lcd

2015-02-24 Thread Michael K
It happens in 14.04LTS Xubuntu Toshiba Satellite C75D-B

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417727

Title:
  fatal error: Could not open /proc/acpi/toshiba/lcd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fnfx/+bug/1417727/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1424311] [NEW] Recovring from Suspend - no video, have to restart

2015-02-21 Thread Michael K
Public bug reported:

Going into Suspend, and then recovering - it wakes up for a second, and
then nothing happens, black screen. The only way is to hold Power button
for few seconds and laptop reboots.

kotelyan@mk-Satellite-C75D-B-xub:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
Release:14.04
kotelyan@mk-Satellite-C75D-B-xub:~$ 

kotelyan@mk-Satellite-C75D-B-xub:~$ sudo apt-cache policy powermgmt-base
[sudo] password for kotelyan: 
powermgmt-base:
  Installed: 1.31build1
  Candidate: 1.31build1
  Version table:
 *** 1.31build1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
kotelyan@mk-Satellite-C75D-B-xub:~$

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: powermgmt-base 1.31build1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-45.74-generic 3.13.11-ckt13
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-45-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.7
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Sat Feb 21 22:00:52 2015
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-02-16 (5 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 14.04.1 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140723)
SourcePackage: powermgmt-base
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: powermgmt-base (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1424311

Title:
  Recovring from Suspend - no video, have to restart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powermgmt-base/+bug/1424311/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1303411] Re: Steam not installing? 14.04

2014-04-10 Thread Michael K
I have the same issue

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303411

Title:
  Steam not installing? 14.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1303411/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 736661]

2011-07-12 Thread Michael K. Edwards
The problem seems to be that promote_decl_mode() is changing the value
returned from the pair constructor from HImode to BLKmode:

(gdb) p debug_tree(decl)
 
unit size 
align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x2b5d9930
fields 
unsigned nonlocal decl_3 QI file PR48660.cpp line 6 col 7
size 
unit size 
align 8 offset_align 64
offset 
bit offset  context 
 chain > 
context 
full-name "struct pair"
X() X(constX&) this=(X&) n_parents=0 use_template=1 interface-unknown
pointer_to_this  chain >
used ignored regdecl BLK file PR48660.cpp line 31 col 1 size  unit size 
align 8
(reg:HI 140 [  ])>

This is in turn happening because DECL_MODE (decl) == BLKmode, while in
the caller, GET_MODE (decl_rtl) == HImode.  It's not clear to me whether
the rtx expression should have been in BLKmode in the first place, or
whether expand_expr_real_1() should tolerate the conversion.  The
context in expand_expr_real_1() suggests that the point of the call to
promote_decl_mode() was to get the signedness of the result, and the
only use of its return value is in the gcc_assert().  I will check
whether moving the gcc_assert() inside the results in
promote_function_mode() branch results in correct code; however, that
may just be papering over a real problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736661

Title:
  armel FTBFS due to compiler ICE

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/736661/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 490371] Re: Atomic operations not safe for ARMv7, Thumb-2 and multicore

2011-06-24 Thread Michael K. Edwards
It seems that the ordered primitives do need fixing, as dmart suggests;
for confirmation see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126 .
I would also think that the ref()/deref() methods should have ordered
semantics, since they function like locks (a caller which sees deref()
return 0 is entitled to tear down the associated instance).

My personal preference is to use the GCC intrinsics, since they're more
likely to get full review, and I'm skeptical of the performance benefits
of the "relaxed" primitives in practice (on any system that actually has
atomics and doesn't need kernel help).  Particularly in the ordered
cases, I see no reason whatsoever to embed inline assembly.  But I
suppose it is not wrong for Qt's "relaxed" primitives to contain
equivalent assembly, without the memory barriers -- as long as the
compiler won't insert memory operations in between the ldrex/strex pair.
(The ARM folks' reading of the ARM ARM is that hardware speculation of
memory accesses into the critical region should not break the local
monitor.)

Another advantage of using the GCC intrinsics is that they will work for
64-bit operands once this support is in GCC, without embedding yet more
complex assembly into Qt.  David Gilbert has implemented 64-bit atomics
for ARMv7, and I'm helping test; I intend to implement them also for
32-bit x86 (using cmpxchg8b).

Would you entertain a patch that makes the use of inline assembly for
the non-ordered primitives optional at compile time?  (Via a template
specialization, so it still works for double-word operands if the
compiler can handle them.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490371

Title:
  Atomic operations not safe for ARMv7,Thumb-2 and multicore

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/+bug/490371/+subscriptions

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 490371] Re: Atomic operations not safe for ARMv7, Thumb-2 and multicore

2011-03-14 Thread Michael K. Edwards
I believe that upstream is mistaken.  It is not safe to allow other
memory accesses to be speculated into the ldrex/strex region, and (at
least on Cortex A9/A15) the only way to prevent that is to issue full
memory barriers before and after.  Arguably the compiler should be
allowed to move memory accesses across the whole block, but that seems
like a small optimization (compared to the memory barrier overhead), and
I have seen no benchmark data to support it.  I don't know whether GCC's
later optimization passes can be relied upon not to move opcodes into
the critical region if the "memory" attribute on the assembly block were
omitted.

See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126, which
suggests a fix to GCC's compare-and-swap intrinsics to prevent them from
skipping the trailing memory barrier.

** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #48126
   http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48126

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490371

Title:
  Atomic operations not safe for ARMv7,Thumb-2 and multicore

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 490371] Re: Atomic operations not safe for ARMv7, Thumb-2 and multicore

2011-03-14 Thread Michael K. Edwards
Alternately, one could use the GCC intrinsics.  They are more
conservative about memory barriers, which I believe to be more correct
in any case (it is not safe to let the compiler or the instruction
scheduler move memory accesses into the ldrex/strex critical region).
Other than memory barrier differences, the intrinsic-based
implementation should be equally fast.  (Although there is no equivalent
of fetchAndStore, the only actual use cases store 0, and I've special-
cased that in this implementation using __sync_fetch_and_and().)


** Patch added: "Implement Qt atomics using GCC intrinsics"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qt4-x11/+bug/490371/+attachment/1908862/+files/x-0003-Use-GCC-intrinsics-for-armv6-atomic-operations.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490371

Title:
  Atomic operations not safe for ARMv7,Thumb-2 and multicore

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 730860] Re: [regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa, at dwarf2out.c:1861

2011-03-09 Thread Michael K. Edwards
With this patch, the whole system image (including Qt and Glibmm) builds
with -Os.  Run-time tests to follow.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730860

Title:
  [regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa, at
  dwarf2out.c:1861

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 730860] Re: [regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa, at dwarf2out.c:1861

2011-03-09 Thread Michael K. Edwards
The attached patch from Bernd fixed the libstdc++ build failure for me
(without needing -fno-shrink-wrap).  I'll build a whole system image
with it and see whether it works properly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730860

Title:
  [regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa, at
  dwarf2out.c:1861

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 720055] Re: Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort (0x1406) at 0x2ada61a8

2011-03-04 Thread Michael K. Edwards
i had a similar oops when bringing up another on-chip core (the SGX).
It turned out that the core's power and clock needed to be turned up
before executing code that poked at its registers; the "imprecise data
abort" reflected an aborted fetch from a memory location mapped to a
powered-down on-chip core.  Your oops may be related to the issue
addressed by http://gitorious.org/linux-omap-
dss2/linux/commit/096b38e85e9512b6eddd08d33f0adcb5b45573fe .

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720055

Title:
  Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort (0x1406) at 0x2ada61a8

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 642830] Re: Google Calendar freezes Evolution

2010-11-29 Thread Michael K
Hi,

I experience similar issue, no matter what I try I keep getting the ~30
seconds evolution hang when doing anything related to the calendar (e.g.
opening calendar tab, opening email with meeting invite etc.)

DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.10
DISTRIB_CODENAME=maverick

GNOME 2.32.0
evolution 2.30.3

uname -a
Linux ** 2.6.35-23-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 17 22:14:33 UTC 2010 
x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thank you in advance.

Michael

-- 
Google Calendar freezes Evolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642830
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 578119] Re: Boot on battery power ends up with black screen [HP tx1000]

2010-10-14 Thread Michael K, Ham
HP Pavilion tx1000, - Ubuntu 10.10 - Yes, this is still a problem.  Stay
away from the proprietary NVIDIA accelerated graphics drivers.  These
drivers are not developed by the Ubuntu team and they are not guaranteed
to work at all.  I have attempted to use them under Ubuntu 10.04. and
now with 10.10 with the same exact results.  Another re-install was done
to correct the issue of the driver.  Below is my prior post on the
matter of the nVidia driver.

"Michael K, Ham  wrote on 2010-08-23:

HP Pavilion tx1000, Ubuntu 10.04. Initial install with the default
graphic drivers worked fine both AC/DC, but when proprietary NVIDIA
accelerated graphics driver (version 173) were activated the system
experienced blank screen booting from battery and when booting from AC
the system would boot to a standard screen resolution with no
acceleration. The conflict is simply the Nvidia proprietary drivers.
Just do not activate it. I had to re-install Ubuntu to correct the
graphics issue to return to default graphic drivers because deactivating
the proprietary driver did not fix the problem. The system boots great
from either AC/DC now, and the games and applications I have used on
this system work very well so far using the default graphic drivers."

-- 
Boot on battery power ends up with black screen [HP tx1000]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578119
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 539814] Re: tar: futimens() with a bad file descriptor (AT_FDCWD) causes bootstrapping failure with kernels < 2.6.22

2010-10-06 Thread Michael K. Edwards
The tar bug is fixed; the inability to debootstrap lucid on an old
kernel remains.  Is Canonical likely to provide a version of debootstrap
that knows how to use packages from lucid-updates during the initial
bootstrapping pass?  I adjusted my hacked debootstrap to get
supplemental packages from lucid-updates rather than lucid-proposed, and
that seems to work OK.  Is there somewhere that I should post that patch
for consideration -- with the understanding that it's half-baked (for
instance, it breaks debootstrap for lenny, which doesn't have a
corresponding lenny-updates)?

-- 
tar: futimens() with a bad file descriptor (AT_FDCWD) causes bootstrapping 
failure with kernels < 2.6.22
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539814
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 539814] Re: tar: futimens() with a bad file descriptor (AT_FDCWD) causes bootstrapping failure with kernels < 2.6.22

2010-09-29 Thread Michael K. Edwards
I hacked a bit on debootstrap to teach it about lucid-proposed, and can
confirm that this updated tar resolves the inability to debootstrap
lucid on an old kernel (in this case, the 2.6.18 variant shipped with
RHEL5.4).  Thanks for following up and driving this to closure; I was
not looking forward to backporting enough current packages to lenny to
run the LAMP stack app I need.  (RHEL was of course not even an option,
userland-wise; but as long as I leave it on there as the boot
environment, I don't have to deal with the hardware.)

The debootstrap hack I did was pretty gross, and doesn't know about
lucid-updates or lucid-security.  Assuming this version of tar makes it
out of lucid-proposed, will it go to lucid or lucid-updates?  If the
latter, it won't do people a lot of good unless there's a better way
than my hack to get debootstrap to use -updates right out the chute.  Is
there another debootstrap floating around that does know how to compress
the "debootstrap, update sources.list, apt-get update, apt-get dist-
upgrade" sequence down to a single pass?

-- 
tar: futimens() with a bad file descriptor (AT_FDCWD) causes bootstrapping 
failure with kernels < 2.6.22
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539814
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 578119] Re: Boot on battery power ends up with black screen [HP tx1000]

2010-08-22 Thread Michael K, Ham
HP Pavilion tx1000, Ubuntu 10.04. Initial install with the default
graphic drivers worked fine both AC/DC, but when proprietary NVIDIA
accelerated graphics driver (version 173) were activated the system
experienced blank screen booting from battery and when booting from AC
the system would boot to a standard screen resolution with no
acceleration.  The conflict is simply the Nvidia proprietary drivers.
Just do not activate it.  I had to re-install Ubuntu to correct the
graphics issue to return to default graphic drivers because deactivating
the proprietary driver did not fix the problem.  The system boots great
from either AC/DC now, and the games and applications I have used on
this system work very well so far using the default graphic drivers.

-- 
Boot on battery power ends up with black screen [HP tx1000]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578119
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs