[Bug 1095068] Re: Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline'
I'm not sure why you come to that conclusion, but I always authorize the accounts whenever requested (the top right menu button turns red). In fact, I repeatedly authorized and unauthorized the gtalk account when debugging the problem, trying to make Empathy show the contacts. In any case the problem seems mitigated, it happens infrequently now (and never does if I just use the messaging icon workaround). Sorry if it's still a problem on my end. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095068 Title: Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1095068/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1095068] Re: Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline'
This only seems to happen if I launch Empathy from the Unity Launcher. It works correctly when I set my status to Online through the Unity Panel and then launch Empathy from there as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095068 Title: Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1095068/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1095068] [NEW] Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline'
Public bug reported: This problem happens in two computers, whether I use auto-login or not, with Ubuntu 12.10. I configured two accounts on the Online Accounts window: Facebook and Google. My Facebook contacts always appear on Empathy, but gTalk contacts almost never appear, with the error message status is set to offline appearing in red at the top of Empathy's main window. I have to restart Empathy several times until I get lucky and it shows my gTalk contacts. I also try setting my status to Online in various ways: through the Unity Panel, through Empathy's main-window 'Go Online' button, and through Empathy's main-window dropdown box. The symptoms are the same no matter what I do. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: empathy 3.6.0.3-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-21.32-generic 3.5.7.1 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jan 1 16:18:51 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-28 (33 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: empathy UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095068 Title: Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1095068/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 946677] Re: UMS dri support missing for r200
I would like to reopen this bug because it does seem that it is not a question of UMS support for dri on r200 or r300. I'm on PP beta 2 on i386, I've compiled and installed mesa 7.11 and 7.10 and the problem remains. Didn t notice before as I didn t need to disable modesetting. I'm investigating by compiling different options and it seems somehow linked to the radeondrmfb which seems to do more than framebuffering. Anyhow it seems off that UMS support for relatively recent cards would be dropped, i've googled a bit and didn t find any metion of this, just the dropping of older cards. And x700 (rv410) were quite pouplar just a few years ago. Should I file a different bug for r300/r400 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/946677 Title: UMS dri support missing for r200 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/946677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 946677] Re: UMS dri support missing for r200
same here with r300 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/946677 Title: UMS dri support missing for r200 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/946677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537703] Re: Compiz intercepts alert sound from gnome-terminal
Still present in 12.04 beta 2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537703 Title: Compiz intercepts alert sound from gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/537703/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355232] Re: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image
Sure I have old hardware, but I have to recompile the entire kernel with module enabled for speedstep-centrino instead of just compiling the module in a few seconds, as I have to patch the driver for accepting the cpufreq tables for my Sonoma (stepping C0) 2.0 GHz Pentium-M which is not standard built-in (btw also affects all Dothans (stepping B0), only Banyas tables are built-in). BIOS won't enable acpi-cpufreq, of course, supposing it has got all the tables. I guess that this ug is 3 year old and never will be fixed despite solid argumentation and flimsy counter-argumentation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355232 Title: acpi-cpufreq/powernow-k8 should not be built-in into the kernel image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/355232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931967] Re: Corrupted graphics after the login until the unity launcher appears
Nevermind, will try my luck elsewhere, i'll surely find somewhere where my login-corruption bug is described and still open. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931967 Title: Corrupted graphics after the login until the unity launcher appears To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/931967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931967] Re: Corrupted graphics after the login until the unity launcher appears
And here the problem is NOT gone with the last update. I'm on Beta 1 and compiled/installed 0.2.5ubuntu2. Did I miss some Beta 2 extra update ? Card is ATI X700. Screen still showing either displaced full login screen or multiple black login-like tiles on top. Also now logging out from session may sometimes present issues like multiple restarts of lightdm. Didn't notice that before. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931967 Title: Corrupted graphics after the login until the unity launcher appears To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/931967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931967] Re: Corrupted graphics after the login until the unity launcher appears
I'm glad that many others had their issue solved, maybe I have a different bug: I've never had this problem of reading from previous sessions, but the screen is corrupted from after login until the background is drawn (so actually before unity launcher). Can anyone tell if this is another bug ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931967 Title: Corrupted graphics after the login until the unity launcher appears To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/931967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 945514] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in get_radeon_bo()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945514 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in get_radeon_bo() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/945514/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 945514] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in get_radeon_bo()
Just to add some feedback, despite the crash notification the session is not impaired and compiz continues working, I guess it is relaunched. I wonder also if this is not related to the shortly garbled screen between the greeter login and the desktop bacgkround appearance. I doubt I'm alone at experiencing it, it seems so clearly a bug that I don't know if I need (and how) to describe it. So much for the smooth background transition from login to session. I'm assuming this typically will be ironed out for the RC. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945514 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in get_radeon_bo() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/945514/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 448095] Re: resolvconf starts after ifupdown, does not pick the dns-nameserver and dns-search lines up from /etc/network/interfaces
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 366967 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366967 I'm reluctant to apply the PPA because I fear that if it breaks I will not be able to recover. Could someone summarize/update the cli steps as done by SvG in the past for 11.10 ? I've tried these manual steps but it broke my networking startup (i.e., updated resolvconf, libc, init/resolv.conf, removed rcS.d/S07, updated symlink). I could recover by backing up the original files. My S07 script is activated at startup so should I disable it with update-rc and exactly how ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448095 Title: resolvconf starts after ifupdown, does not pick the dns-nameserver and dns-search lines up from /etc/network/interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/448095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 448095] Re: resolvconf starts after ifupdown, does not pick the dns-nameserver and dns-search lines up from /etc/network/interfaces
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 366967 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366967 Nevermind, the quickfix from GdP seems to have worked as is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448095 Title: resolvconf starts after ifupdown, does not pick the dns-nameserver and dns-search lines up from /etc/network/interfaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/448095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 869980] Re: language support should install aspell dictionaries automatically
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869980 Title: language support should install aspell dictionaries automatically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-selector/+bug/869980/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 869980] [NEW] language support should install aspell dictionaries automatically
Public bug reported: Oneiric daily build from 6 Oct 2011 When I added Portuguese as a language using the language support application, no spell check dictionaries were installed. Gedit in particular wouldn't offer to spell check portuguese and I had to manually install the package aspell-pt in order to have gedit spell checking in the language I wanted. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: language-selector-gnome 0.55 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 7 14:16:37 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-language-selector InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta amd64 (20111006) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: language-selector UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: language-selector (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869980 Title: language support should install aspell dictionaries automatically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-selector/+bug/869980/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 728745] Re: display freeze when using unity desktop
My display hangs whenever I run compiz too. Same graphics card, Natty Beta. I think I already have driver version 270.30, from the repos. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728745 Title: display freeze when using unity desktop -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554883] Re: flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1
Well, just in case this could help, i would rember this was a 32 bit system (have read about similar issues with nspluginwrapper but on 64 bit systems). There wasn't a symlink in firefox/add-ons/plugins to nspluginwrapper on my system which was being upgraded since Gutsy. Now why FF was going after the nspluginwrapper .so if all libflashplayer.so where in there, i can 't tell. Chrome and Opera seemed to be comfortable with these. Apparently until Lucid (beta) also this was not required by FF as flash worked flawlessly. -- flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554883] Re: flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1
Will reopen to highlight the issue as the bug has not been really solved ( i mean the issue of breaking the upgrade from karmic/jaunty...) -- flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554883] Re: flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1
Well, could solve the issue linking npwrapper.flashplugin.so. Not sure thgis was the original issue as I ve done quite a few reinstalls but it stills seems it could be a bug for people upgrading. I hope that LL final release will not break as for me on beta1. But then so much for the support on this issue. ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300275] Re: Failed to load module module-x11-xsmp
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- Failed to load module module-x11-xsmp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355721] Re: Jaunty won't source .xsession
Well Jaunty is quite over and better to close this ** Changed in: xinit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- Jaunty won't source .xsession https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300275] Re: Failed to load module module-x11-xsmp
✠pactl list | grep module-x11-xsmp Name: module-x11-xsmp Driver: module-x11-xsmp.c Syslog file: Apr 5 14:22:23 localhost pulseaudio[16031]: module-x11-xsmp.c: Failed to open connection to session manager: Could not open network socket Apr 5 14:22:23 localhost pulseaudio[16031]: module.c: Failed to load module module-x11-xsmp (argument: ): initialization failed. -- Failed to load module module-x11-xsmp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554883] Re: flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1
Is it an upstream bug on flash plugin ? I've found the same description here on a mozilla forum: http://support.mozilla.com/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?locale=en- UScomments_parentId=638378forumId=1 -- flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 554883] [NEW] flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree I've made an update today on Lucid beta 1 and the flash plugin for mozilla stopped working. Browsing other similar errors, I could resume functionality for Chrome and Opera by installing nspluginwrapper and editing npviewer as per the click error . Enabling compiz or not doesn t seem to make any difference. But the error remains for Firefox. Some flash will just not completely appear and in youtube I get a blank. I can see the original black screen for for a few miliseconds.. What surprised me a bit is that when using Flashblock I won't get the the logo on youtube (in other apps yes). So it seems really that I have a broken flash plugin. Reinstalling from adobe did not change anything. As noted, Chrome and Opera are working ok. I guess this is an original bug as it is not the click issue nor an install or rendering one. ** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300275] Re: Failed to load module module-x11-xsmp
With latest Lucid beta 1, message appears. Apparently, module is loaded despite warning on failure to open connection to session manager, as I receive a message that it cannot be loaded twice after pactl load-module. ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- Failed to load module module-x11-xsmp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] Re: Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] Re: Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken
I dont know if this helps but the output to the screen is not totally frozen as i can see usb messages by plugging/unplugging usb devices. Actually I can always see an error message from a previous usb keyboard initialization which was timed out, so it appears 11 s later. after the init-bottom done message. So apparently we are still on the console screen. BTW after the done message the hard drive still works hard for a good time ( 10s) and then stops any activity. -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] Re: Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken
As i had noticed I didn't have a tty0 in event.d (as i have been upgrading since 6.04), tried to install Plymouth back. In the process version 0.8.1-3 was available to upgrade. I did it and now it works. Tx. Will close the bug if Reuben confirms also. BTW, should I left created a tty0 anyway ? I've deleted it and it still works. -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 551062] Re: mountall: Could not connect to plymouth
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 530779 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530779 I'm not sure this is relevant to your opinion that this is a duplicate of bug #530779, but I was able to boot without problems until some updates ago (2 days - plymouth stopped showing), and now I'm getting this message (with today's update). Bug #530779 was opened a month ago, is that normal? Just wanted to make sure. I can boot all the time, I just don't see plymouth's splash (with GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash). -- mountall: Could not connect to plymouth https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551062 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] Re: Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken
Thanks. Could I also ask if it is normal that when I first booted with the new Plymouth version the splash screen appeared for a relatively good time ( i could see the dots move) but when I rebooted many times since it only appears very late just before gdm login screen ? I ve read a few posts telling the same and would like to know if this behavior is just normal beta tweaking. The funny thing though as I said is that on the first run it was quite ok. Rgds -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] Re: Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom
** Package changed: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) = upstart (Ubuntu) ** Summary changed: - Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom + Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, upstart scripts broken -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, upstart scripts broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] Re: Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, upstart scripts broken
Ok, removing plymouth with apt-get purge (not by disabling splash script) solved the issue and allowed me to boot. ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, upstart scripts broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] Re: Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, upstart scripts broken
Will leave bug open as the one marked as duplicated rightly consider this still open (i guess as beta this plymouth issue will be solved, but it is anyway a bug as apparently many systems are not featuring it) and since this bug being the primary one, it could hide the issue to maintainers. ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New ** Package changed: upstart (Ubuntu) = plymouth (Ubuntu) ** Summary changed: - Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, upstart scripts broken + Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth broken ** Summary changed: - Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth broken + Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] Re: Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken
Well Steve, first thanks for the attention. You all seem to confirm we were right to maintain as a bug since this is not happening to a majority of users and could remain unnoticed. Sorry if we lack more info but we were already quite lucky to bypass the issue and be able to pinpoint on plymouth. AFAIC I ve made on Monday/Tuesday (2 days ago) a totally clean upgrade from 9.10 using update-manager -d, downloaded 1,7 G and restarted. After i could init with bin/bash and network with dhclient eth0, i could do another apt-get dist-upgrade which download another 178 M (despite my really fresh upgrade), which included an update to plymouth as i could notice. So i guess i have really the lastest plymouth version. Alt-Fn wont work. Vanilla kernel options (tried xvesaforce, nodmraid, nomodeset, noapic etc... at first to no avail so i was back to standard options, especially no vga option whatsoever ). My laptop features an ATI Mobile 700 card. -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] [NEW] Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom
Public bug reported: LL beta1 just downloaded won' t boot whatever the kernel and recovery mode, and will stop after init bottom scripts. Some users pointed the same bug in the development forum in just the last few hours so may be really a new issue. No particular detail to releve but that it was an upgrade from 9.04 and that my amilo fujitsu siemens laptop has a vt6132 raid controller so that raid is afaik always enabled even if there is only one hard drive. In the past this prevented me from installing opensolaris as the driver for the raid controller was not available and the disk would not be recognized. This couldn t be disabled on bios. Also it a SCSI controlled hard drive steup. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] Re: Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom
** Package changed: ubuntu = initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552088] Re: Lucid beta 1 - will not boot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 552046 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 552046 Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom -- Lucid beta 1 - will not boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552088 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552046] Re: Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom
A couple of people confirming this issue on http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9053029posted=1#post9053029. ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 502406] Re: os-prober does not detect karmic, but only lucid ?
I don't think os_prober is supposed to detect the current running OS, isn't that 10_linux's job? If I understood correctly, you want only one kernel to boot your karmic from, right? Why not delete the older linux-images? -- os-prober does not detect karmic, but only lucid ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502406 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 546343] [NEW] Grub doesn't display distro's versions
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 I don't know if this is by design, but my opinion is it shouldn't be. Grub2 (both 30_os-prober and 10_linux) saves menu entries for linux distros using only the name and kernel version. So instead of displaying: Ubuntu 10.04 (or Ubuntu Lucid Lynx), with Linux yada yada we have Ubuntu, with Linux yada yada which is (again, in my opinion) more confusing when you're trying to choose the version you want to boot. My opinion is we should have the Distro's complete name and version and (maybe!) omit the kernel for the latest one. All the other OS's are using $LONGNAME for their menu entries, so why not linux? I don't usually know what kernel version I have in my Distros, but I do know their version numbers. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Mar 24 20:03:23 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta amd64 (20100318) Package: grub-common 1.98-1ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 SourcePackage: grub2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic x86_64 ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- Grub doesn't display distro's versions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 546343] Re: Grub doesn't display distro's versions
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41871498/Dependencies.txt -- Grub doesn't display distro's versions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542207] [NEW] nautilus draws white bars on desktop
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm running Lucid Beta 1. Nautilus version: 1:2.29.92.1-0ubuntu1 Whenever I change my theme in System Preferences Appearance, nautilus draws two white bars in the desktop, as if the wallpaper didn't fill the whole screen. They are located in the left and right borders of the screen, between panels. The problem persists even if I choose 'Solid Color' as a wallpaper, and can only be fixed if I kill nautilus and then bring it up again. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Mar 19 20:45:48 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta amd64 (20100318) Package: nautilus 1:2.29.92.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- nautilus draws white bars on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542207] Re: nautilus draws white bars on desktop
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41323563/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41323564/usr_lib_nautilus.txt -- nautilus draws white bars on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542207] Re: nautilus draws white bars on desktop
It can be hard to see if your image viewer / browser has a light background, but here is a screenshot. ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41326990/Screenshot.png -- nautilus draws white bars on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize, maximize, close
I agree with Adam Williamson and I think a lot of the heat this is generating comes from the fact that we don't know what is the Cool New Stuff that is being envisioned for the now free space. I think most people can't really see improvements with this change and maybe it would open our minds a bit if we knew what sort of plans Mark/the Design Team have in store for us. -- [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize,maximize,close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459896] Re: small gap between menu bar and main window.
This always happened, as far as I can remember. Got suddenly reminded of it by fellow Ubuntu forums user. He posted a video of the problem here: http://www.vimeo.com/10127262 -- small gap between menu bar and main window. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 427925] Re: unable to modify scsi host link_power_management_policy
I confirm this bug on my Timeline 4810t, hosts 0 and 5 don't keep the settings while the others do. -- unable to modify scsi host link_power_management_policy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427925 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 415682] Re: Stuck with KDE Cursor after installing ubuntu-desktop
I had the same problem too, when installing kubuntu-desktop on top of Ubuntu. It seems to be fixed by running: sudo update-alternatives --config x-cursor-theme and selecting /usr/share/icons/DMZ-White/cursor.theme (it was 7 in my machine) -- Stuck with KDE Cursor after installing ubuntu-desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 401823] Re: (firefox:24993): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead - overeager XID caching
I would like to know meanwhile the recommended practice ? Delete xsession-errors every week ? I'm getting 30MB+ .xession-errors files per session, will this keep increasing ? -- (firefox:24993): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead - overeager XID caching https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401823 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449007] Re: Pidgin account disabled on status change (MSN)
Nice guess :) Removing my empathy accounts fixed it. Is this the normal behavior? -- Pidgin account disabled on status change (MSN) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449007] Re: Pidgin account disabled on status change (MSN)
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33460970/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33460971/XsessionErrors.txt -- Pidgin account disabled on status change (MSN) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449007] [NEW] Pidgin account disabled on status change (MSN)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: indicator-applet (I'm using fully updated 64bit Karmic) Whenever I change my pidgin status (available, away, etc) using indicator-applet-session, pidgin says my MSN account has been disabled because I logged in from another place! This does not happen when I use pidgin's built-in icon tray menu. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Oct 11 21:01:35 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: indicator-applet-session 0.2.0-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.44-generic SourcePackage: indicator-applet Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic x86_64 ** Affects: indicator-applet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Pidgin account disabled on status change (MSN) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 25547] Re: splash screen does not free virtual console #8
I wondevrif this is not the oldest medium-importance acknowledged bug not to be fixed in the last 4 years in the Ubuntu distro -- splash screen does not free virtual console #8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355721] Re: Jaunty won't source .xsession
I would propose to close this bug as no one really cares and most probably will never get assigned and eventually fixed. It seems like xsessionrc is the one config file to use, i guess if one wants xsession too it has only to change that in /etc/X11/Xsession.d/40x11-common_xsessionrc -- Jaunty won't source .xsession https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: usplash won't deallocate vt even if console is redirected
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 25547 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25547 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 25547 splash screen does not free virtual console #8 -- usplash won't deallocate vt even if console is redirected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 25547] Re: splash screen does not free virtual console #8
This confirms my fears that my bug #429616 wouldn't be fixed quickly as this is trailing for 4 years. At least here it was ranked medium while mine was ranked low. I've investigated a bit and it seems that the culprit is in usplash.c, where the vt is opened, activated on vt8 by ioctl VT_ACTIVATE, duplicated on stdin and then closed (close(vt_fd)). Apparently this is not sufficiendt as it is detached but not deallocated. I've found a poorly documented option VT_DISALLOCATE in ioctl but it didn'work. Also adding VT_RELDISP as recommended somewhere didn help but I don't know the right sequence. The workarounds seem to be: a) set gdm.conf to start on VT9 instead of VT7 b) or hack the source code to start usplash in VT10. Mainly in usplash.c , 2 lines, and also libusplash.c for some checks (like requiring vt 10). Also needs initramfs script to maknod 10 ttys, as it only creates the bare minimum 8... c) or simply comment out 3 lines in libusplash.c where usplash is attached to vt8. It works the same and actually can't see why the usplash is attached to a vt, there must be a reason i guess. -- splash screen does not free virtual console #8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25547 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
seems like the main culprit is really usplash it tinkers with ttys in initramfs scripts. ** Package changed: gdm (Ubuntu) = usplash (Ubuntu) -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: usplash won't deallocate vt even if console is redirected
** Summary changed: - x display manager won't open session on next free vt + usplash won't deallocate vt even if console is redirected ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: xdm + Binary package hint: usplash - Since Ibex, opening a new session will create it on vt9, even if vt8 - has been released from usplash activities at kernel boot by + Since Hardy at least, opening a new session will create it on vt9, even + if vt8 has been released from usplash activities at kernel boot by console=ttyX, unless vt8 is specifically forced (through startx) - - So somehow the dm seems just to assume that vt8 is permanently assigned - to usplash or the info is not reset somewhere. Bug reproduction: - - Boot 9.04 by adding, say, console=tty4 to the kernel boot line to redirect usplash screen messages from vt8 to vt4 + - Boot 9.04 by adding, say, console=tty4 to the kernel boot line to redirect messages to vt4 - Log in new console session on tty1 - - startx -- :1 vt8 will create new graphical session on vt8 - - but startx -- :1 will create new graphical session on vt9 by default + - startx -- :1 will create new graphical session on vt9 by default + - but startx -- :1 vt8 will create new graphical session on vt8 without conflicts. - This default behaviour of course also happens at New Session from - inside the graphical session, but there you have no option to force vt8. + This default behaviour also happens at a new session from inside gdm, + but there you have no option to force vt8. - The bug is however related to usplash since this does not occur if - usplash is disabled. Guess is usplash sets some info that vt8 is busy - even if console is redirected but xdm (?) does not check or resets the - info. + The bug does not occur if usplash is disabled. -- usplash won't deallocate vt even if console is redirected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
fair enough, at least for the 4th line (the other 3 i could try to challenge). would you anyway be able to hint which file i could look into, haven t find anything in /etc/init.d (only some references to fgconsole check in usplash) ? -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
Sebastien I beg to differ. Though sure this is not a critical bug, it certainly is one since it's well documented that new vts should be created sequentially, vt7, vt8, etc... Also before I came to the startx discovery I've found quite a few complaints, some very old dating from hardy or 2005 (like this https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- users/2005-November/056772.html) from a standard user). I'm sure many people quit complaining as they assume that vt8 anyway is allocated to usplash and have not been told you can redirect it. I can say myself this is a regression as it worked ok in Feisty/Gutsy. More importand yet, there are a number of indirect bugs probably related to this, like bug #172444 running since Gutsy Also please note that the behaviour occurs inside gdm but also from pure startx command. For the time being I've modified gdm to start at vt9. Startx then launches at vt7 and a second startx session launches at vt...10. Could you maybe give a hint of which file I should hack to get startx behaving as specified or is it hardcoded ? Bottom line, I would ask you to raise to medium so that I can see it fixed one day. It doesn't seem too hard to fix and the benefits may be greater than it appears. -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
Just a comment, the startx discovery meant that vt8 was not actually locked by usplash as I had thought since Gutsy, -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429616] [NEW] x display manager won't open session on next free vt
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xdm Since Ibex, opening a new session will create it on vt9, even if vt8 has been released from usplash activities at kernel boot by console=ttyX, unless vt8 is specifically forced (through startx) So somehow the dm seems just to assume that vt8 is permanently assigned to usplash or the info is not reset somewhere. Bug reproduction: - Boot 9.04 by adding, say, console=tty4 to the kernel boot line to redirect usplash screen messages from vt8 to vt4 - Log in new console session on tty1 - startx -- :1 vt8 will create new graphical session on vt8 - but startx -- :1 will create new graphical session on vt9 by default This default behaviour of course happens at New Session from inside the graphical session. ** Affects: xdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
** Description changed: Binary package hint: xdm Since Ibex, opening a new session will create it on vt9, even if vt8 has been released from usplash activities at kernel boot by console=ttyX, unless vt8 is specifically forced (through startx) So somehow the dm seems just to assume that vt8 is permanently assigned to usplash or the info is not reset somewhere. Bug reproduction: - - Boot 9.04 normally + - Boot 9.04 by adding, say, console=tty4 to the kernel boot line to redirect usplash screen messages from vt8 to vt4 - Log in new console session on tty1 - startx -- :1 vt8 will create new graphical session on vt8 - but startx -- :1 will create new graphical session on vt9 by default This default behaviour of course happens at New Session from inside the graphical session. -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
** Description changed: Binary package hint: xdm Since Ibex, opening a new session will create it on vt9, even if vt8 has been released from usplash activities at kernel boot by console=ttyX, unless vt8 is specifically forced (through startx) So somehow the dm seems just to assume that vt8 is permanently assigned to usplash or the info is not reset somewhere. Bug reproduction: - Boot 9.04 by adding, say, console=tty4 to the kernel boot line to redirect usplash screen messages from vt8 to vt4 - Log in new console session on tty1 - startx -- :1 vt8 will create new graphical session on vt8 - but startx -- :1 will create new graphical session on vt9 by default - This default behaviour of course happens at New Session from inside - the graphical session. + This default behaviour of course also happens at New Session from + inside the graphical session, but there you have no option to force vt8. + + The bug is however related to usplash since this does not occur if + usplash is disabled. Guess is usplash sets some info that vt8 is busy + even if console is redirected but xdm (?) does not check or resets the + info. -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
seems like gdm is rather managing this ** Package changed: xdm (Ubuntu) = gdm (Ubuntu) -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60159] Re: spurious 'WARNING: cannot connect to checkip.dyndns.org:80' errors
Well, the message is still appearing over the weekend in a very random way. Since it came out of the blue and I had some mysterious ipv6-related dns-resolution lag issues lately, maybe it is not related to the package itself. Will turn back to fixed if no news. -- spurious 'WARNING: cannot connect to checkip.dyndns.org:80' errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/60159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60159] Re: spurious 'WARNING: cannot connect to checkip.dyndns.org:80' errors
Started yesterday completely out of the blue (no upgrade, no reboot, no nothing) around 17:44 GMT May 22 according to daemon log. ddclient is (or was) working fine, actually effectuated an ip update just last sunday smoothly. Obs: message is bad hostname checkip.dyndns.org i/o no route to host. Changed to checkip.dyndns.com to no avail. Of course both IPs are getting pinged fine. ** Changed in: ddclient (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- spurious 'WARNING: cannot connect to checkip.dyndns.org:80' errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/60159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352716] Re: Gnome-panel won't start when run through NX session
I could notice that the bug disappeared when I disable the Fast User switch and that consequently I had all my logout menu entries restored. I guess this is somehow linked at the way the menu probes for checking if the FUS is set to appear. Since then my remote logins on NX have been working fine, I m actually writing fron one right now. If you don+ t know about FUS, do a search. FUS automatically disables other logout methods. -- Gnome-panel won't start when run through NX session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355721] Re: Jaunty won't source .xsession
Well, actually linking .xsessionrc to .xinitrc breaks my system ... No login (some xrdb error message). But manifestly in this case it was sourced. So is having my login broken the correct behaviour ? Will search about this xrdb error. I' m an average user step-upgrading since 6.04 if 'm not wrong and running standard gdm logins. Actually I've only noticed that I hadn't an .xsession file when this bug ocurred and because i recently installed monica to adjust my yellowish/blueish screen which installs in .xinitrc (which definitely worked well under ibex but can't tell before because I'm not sure I had already monica under hardy). -- Jaunty won't source .xsession https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364889] Re: reboot in jaunty doesn't restart from bios
Well, I think it´s a bug also. I´m pretty much sure i didn´t choose to have kexec-tools installed (don´t remember about any chrashdump choice either), except that for the first time I tried the beta/rc jaunty release and maybe it was installed by default or almost (i mean, suggested in the upgrade and then i just clicked yes but can´t recall). It´s a major change of behaviour that is not explained somewhere in the process. -- reboot in jaunty doesn't restart from bios https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364889] Re: reboot in jaunty doesn't restart from bios
** Changed in: kexec-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- reboot in jaunty doesn't restart from bios https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355721] Re: Jaunty won't source .xsession
I disagree. Can´t see since when .xsessionrc is the default sourced file, this would be against a lot of legacy. Yes it was so if the scripts look the same the issue is elsewhere, that´s exactly the point. Maybe a permission issue. And in the scripts if you read all of them you will find that usexsession and altusersession should be sourced. Maybe these are not being correctly set. -- Jaunty won't source .xsession https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355721] Re: Jaunty won't source .xsession
** Package changed: xinit (Ubuntu) = xorg (Ubuntu) -- Jaunty won't source .xsession https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355721] Re: Jaunty won't source .xsession
Hi anyone Seriously, am I really the only to have this or having noticed it ? Would believe that such an issue would cause greater feedback, seems pretty serious if true. -- Jaunty won't source .xsession https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355721] Re: Jaunty won't source .xsession
** Summary changed: - Jaunty won't source xinitrc + Jaunty won't source .xsession -- Jaunty won't source .xsession https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355721] Re: Jaunty won't source xinitrc
Ok, so GDM is not meant to source .xinitrc. Notwithstanding this, it worked in Ibex. Was there a link from .xsession to .xinitrc ? I have a few xsession errors (like xmodmap), could this cause somme breakage in the sourcing or simply some rule is being enforced that .xinitrc is no more sourced (as despite all, it was ). -- Jaunty won't source xinitrc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355721] Re: Jaunty won't source xinitrc
Actually created .xsession and linked to .xinitrc to no avail. Am I really the only one experiencing this ? Please let me know if it is a non-issue. Attached my xsession-errors ** Attachment added: .xsession-errors http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24911220/.xsession-errors -- Jaunty won't source xinitrc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355721] [NEW] Jaunty won't source xinitrc
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xinit Apparently .xinitrc is not sourced at session startup. Could notice that as a gamma correction by monicarc was not called and the screen is extremely bluish. In fact, ownership of .xinitrc after install was root:root. Even after changing to user:user the problem remains. In .xsession-errors no mention to any .xinitrc sourcing error. Worked in Intrepid, of course. ** Affects: xinit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Jaunty won't source xinitrc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325973] Re: gnome-session keeps respawning nautilus when no desktop is drawed
So Sebastien, We have all understood this is a well known bug and in fact I've landed here because i wanted to upgrade form 8.10 and read about. The problem is that despite this there seems to be no 100% workaround or patch. Does this daily iso fix mean that any delta upgrade from 8.10 will also automatically contain the fixed packages ? And is this crash fix solving the issues point in this thread or is a different bug as mentioned just above ? Otherwise good luck for any beta feedback. -- gnome-session keeps respawning nautilus when no desktop is drawed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346976] Re: gedit-plugins doesn't install
Fixed as of today's updates (March 23) ** Changed in: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- gedit-plugins doesn't install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346902] [NEW] music-applet crashes when added to the panel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: music-applet I can't add the applet on Ubuntu Jaunty up-to-date (development version). It crashes with the normal panel notification, no more information is visible. Is there any way I can gather more information (debug info)? ** Affects: music-applet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- music-applet crashes when added to the panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 346976] [NEW] gedit-plugins doesn't install
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gedit-plugins Standard Ubuntu Jaunty daily build, fully updated, with minimal configuration. When trying to install the package gedit-plugins, apt always fails with the following output: Selecting previously deselected package gedit-plugins. (Reading database ... 119901 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gedit-plugins (from .../gedit-plugins_2.25.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... Setting up gedit-plugins (2.25.3-0ubuntu1) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 2147, in module main() File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 2141, in main rv = action.run(global_options) File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1457, in run self.options.exclude, byte_compile_default=True) File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1053, in install self.default_runtime.byte_compile(self.private_files, bc_option, AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'byte_compile' dpkg: error processing gedit-plugins (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gedit-plugins E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ** Affects: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gedit-plugins doesn't install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 27109] Re: nautilus uses 100% cpu after closing a ssh session
I think that this is not right way to handle a bug that has been reported since three years and through even more distros releases. I've just landed here for the first time since I'm using nautilus for sftp and was worried by this strange cpu activity even - and especially - after the download would end, fearing that my transfers could not have been cleanly closed. True that ie used in the past (more than a year ago) sftp and didn't recall this behaviour. I can reproduce at any tine: just open a remote sftp window and transfer (I've dragged the directory from my local directory window and dropped). Can see any other special setup that could influence, except that I 'm running a SSVNC session thus having two ssh sessions. Also I'm using key authentication, in case this matters. -- nautilus uses 100% cpu after closing a ssh session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27109 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 27109] Re: nautilus uses 100% cpu after closing a ssh session
Just another hint that just happened: I've tried to unmount the sftp folder and the desktop was frozen (only, other app widows would work normally) then all icons simply disappeared. Killing the sftp process made reappear the desktop icons. So maybe it a problem rather linked to the display of the sftp volume on the desktop. In the past I had complain to no avail to the rather lousy implementation of this desktop icon, which bring you back to root directory after first login, so maybe it's more a dbus issue or whatever. -- nautilus uses 100% cpu after closing a ssh session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27109 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 308211] Re: usplash fails to unlock x on vt8 (ibex)
** Changed in: usplash (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- usplash fails to unlock x on vt8 (ibex) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308211 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 308211] Re: usplash fails to unlock x on vt8 (ibex)
Update: I'll eventually invalidate this bug or change its scope because: It happens I could open an xserver on vt8 (was using only startx -- :1 instead of startx -- :1 vt8) so vt8 is definitely not locked as it would happen with default console=tty8 (and of course there is no ghost xserver). So I deduce for the time being the culprit is... the New session feature from gnome-session manager which is apparently going directly to vt9, even though vt8 IS released.. Could it be that this was modded exactly to avoid any conflict with the vt8 usplash (I doubt as the new session feature works fine if usplash is disabled) ? Or simply that new session is being misinformed about vt8 being free (it seems now since ibex that hal is taking care of some X stuff so maybe it is related - would make sense). -- usplash fails to unlock x on vt8 (ibex) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308211 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 308211] Re: usplash fails to unlock x on vt8 (ibex)
Sorry for additional comment: Bug is also not related to new session. Simply put, startx -- :1 vt8 opens normally on vt8 but startx -- :1 opens on vt9. So it seems the system believes vt8 is not available. Hal issue ? -- usplash fails to unlock x on vt8 (ibex) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308211 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 308211] [NEW] usplash fails to unlock x on vt8 (ibex)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usplash Description: on boot, everything runs fine but when a new session ornew gdm login screen is created, it jumps to vt9. Expected it to be created in vt8. Release: Upgraded Ibex 8.10 with last updates, fglrx driver 8.543 from synaptics. Some resignated people may say this is the normal behaviour of usplash, but in Hardy I had succeeded in bypassing this by passing console=tty[1-6] option to the kernel together with quiet splash. Since I upgraded (as far I can notice) to Ibex, this works no more. Console redirection still works fine and vt8 apparently won´t be used by usplash. Still, vt8 screens seems locked, even if just displays a blinking cursor on black screen as the other vt[9-12], as described above. I don´t know which is the culprit: I´ve checked that no usplash process is displayed in top or ps. There is no Xorg.1.lock in tmp and I´ve actually deleted all all /tmp/Xorg.*.lock and rebooted to no avail. Seems like a ghost xserver is created somewhere and not released. Have tried to disable special effects of the fglrx driver to no avail. After many tests though I´ve succeded briefly to fix by passing console=tty[1-2] as I realized the fonts there were modified by usplash. But having thought I had unlocked for good, I´ve restored console=tty4 as I used to and the lock reappeared and tty[1-2] won´t refix... Of course without usplash everything runs fine and new sessions are created on vt8. ** Affects: usplash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- usplash fails to unlock x on vt8 (ibex) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308211 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 239021] Re: Hardy Freeze/Lockup with kernel 2.6.24-16-generic up to 2.6.24-19-generic
Seems like a I have the same issue. Had had in the past some rare lockups but since Hardy 2.6.24 (and I guess since update to .1 - or -19 - even more) I've had more frequent lock-ups. Hard drive led starts blinking fast as for a low-level routine and nothing happens, complete freeze, only sys-alt-b works and in general when I reboot I happen to have a kernel panic for out of sync. Nothing works then included power button, have to take out the battery of my laptop ! Today happened twice, for some reason when opening Trash folder in nautilus and trying to run the script to have root rights in the window to restore a resilient file. Was able to reproduce (actually not intentionally since I never imagined this could be the cause of it). The other times seemed more linked to use of Firefox. Is it related to acpi, should i set it off ? -- Hardy Freeze/Lockup with kernel 2.6.24-16-generic up to 2.6.24-19-generic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239021 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210957] Re: Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location
I´ve now seen now that bug #198857 is indeed a duplicate technically speaking, but from my average-joe perspective I was far away from guessing the issues behind of what seems now majorly a basic UI bug rather than an architecture issue. Simply stated, I just wanted like a granma to connect to a sftp folder (true, based on the previous experience from gutsy), and expected the behaviour of the installed icon to be the same of the window opened. My suggestion is that it is a bad compromise (probably with good intention of providing legacy) and better not to display any icon on the desktop rather than a useless (for granma) and annoying (for me) root folder . Of course the best still seems to me to have the gutsy config, a folder icon opening on my home folder. -- Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210957] Re: Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location
Just to comment that I semm to understand now that it was more coincidence than legacy intent as the mounted folder appears automatically on the desktop. Seems like the best way would be to disable display of these lesser mounted volumes -- Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210957] Re: Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location
Same problem here, first connection is right. Wonder why is listed invalid. Pretty much annoying, despite being ranked low priority. Couldn't find where it has been report before except here, as it seems slightly different from other natilus root redirection issues. -- Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149622] Re: Only PCM volume control takes effect
Same here, and PCM volume change doesn't work properly, i.e. when I hold VolumeUp it increments the volume a random number of bars and then starts from the beginning (mute). -- Only PCM volume control takes effect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208006] [NEW] PCM volume control has a random factor
Public bug reported: Using Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon and Ubuntu Hardy Heron BETA on a HP Pavilion dv5000 series laptop. I found this bug because of this one (until I had that problem I didn't notice it because I didn't need to control PCM volume!): https://bugs.launchpad.net/alsa-driver/+bug/149622 When I control the volume of the PCM (the only one that produces changes in the audio according to the previously mentioned bug) with the keyboard shortcuts or the mixer applet, the slider/sound level randomly resets to 0. This is most noticeable if I hold the VolumeUp shortcut for a while and watch it go back to mute, slide up until a random level, go back, etc.. ** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- PCM volume control has a random factor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149622] Re: Only PCM volume control takes effect
Added another bug report for the above mentioned random factor in: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/208006 -- Only PCM volume control takes effect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
