[Bug 450172] Re: Does not use upstart properly - patch included
There is an upstart config file attached to comment #1, but this is by now rather pointless as systemd is being used instead of upstart and the openntpd already has the required unit file for systemd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450172 Title: Does not use upstart properly - patch included To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openntpd/+bug/450172/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1258422]
For me, this bug only triggers when the panel is placed between the monitors. If I move it from the right side of the left screen to the left side of left screen everything is OK. Same thing applies to the right monitor in the inverse. This is supposedly a limitation in X that requires panels to be flush against an absolute edge. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1258422 Title: Maximized windows go under panel if panel attached to screen edge between two monitors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdebase-workspace/+bug/1258422/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 458061] Re: openntpd no longer installs -/etc/openntpd/ntpd.conf: Permission denied
Still present on 13.04 raring. The apparmor restart workaround does the trick. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458061 Title: openntpd no longer installs -/etc/openntpd/ntpd.conf: Permission denied To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openntpd/+bug/458061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872095] Re: gvim from vim-gnome hang up on start
Turns out it wasn't for me. I'm running KDE and was using the Oxygen-Molecule GTK theme which exhibits this behaviour. Changing the GTK theme to oxygen-gtk solved the problem. In my case not only vim-gtk was affected - emacs was as well but changing the GTK theme solved it for both. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872095 Title: gvim from vim-gnome hang up on start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/872095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872095] Re: gvim from vim-gnome hang up on start
I am seeing the exact same problem which exists with both vim-gtk and vim-gnome. A workaround is to install vim-athena which is incredibly ugly but at least it works. I can also confirm that removing .vimrc files makes no difference. Running the vim-gtk and vim-gnome binaries in console mode works fine. Maybe this is related to GTK or some GNOME libraries? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872095 Title: gvim from vim-gnome hang up on start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/872095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697971] [NEW] Ruby 1.8 packages do not use alternatives system
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ruby1.8 ruby1.8 should install an alternative for /usr/bin/ruby together with ri, rdoc, irb and so on. This will allow multiple ruby versions to co- exist better. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: ruby1.8 1.8.7.299-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.36-1.7-generic 2.6.36 Uname: Linux 2.6.36-1-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Jan 6 13:19:06 2011 ProcEnviron: LC_TIME=en_GB.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=en_SG:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_SG.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ruby1.8 ** Affects: ruby1.8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697971 Title: Ruby 1.8 packages do not use alternatives system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697971] Re: Ruby 1.8 packages do not use alternatives system
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697971 Title: Ruby 1.8 packages do not use alternatives system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 630001] Re: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects
@Maletor, after downgrading/trying bluedevil, did you remove the device (untrust and remove the connection) and ensure that /var/lib/bluetooth is empty and then try re-adding? I must admit that the Apple bluetooth devices have been insanely hard to get running but when running everything is peachy. I also saw a few times that my bluetooth dongle wasn't being detected and I had to replug it into another USB port before it was detected properly. That obviously also added to the pairing issues -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 Title: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 630001] Re: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects
@Maletor - try downgrading the bluez stack to the version found in lucid and see if that makes a difference. In my case as mentioned a few comments above, removing the device and re-adding it with bluedevil did the trick. /Peter -- Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 630001] Re: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects
@Andre: are you sure about those versions? Because maverick comes with 4.69 which is then unrelated to the arch issue. -- Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 672412] Re: High memory use causes IO storm
Oh, and I forgot to add - I can replicate this behaviour using stock .35-22 kernel in addition to on another machine. -- High memory use causes IO storm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 672412] Re: High memory use causes IO storm
-- High memory use causes IO storm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 672412] [NEW] High memory use causes IO storm
Public bug reported:
On machines WITHOUT swap, when memory gets close to full, massive
amounts of IO is generated and the machine comes to a halt until some
memory is freed up.
Basically running a few memory intensive applications (VirtualBox with a
few VMs and chrome) will easily use up all the memory. When free memory
drops to 300-400mb, I can see in iotop that pretty much all the
processes running start generating IO and the HDD LED lights up solid.
After a minute or so, iotop will also stop updating the screen. If I
have a shell running in a VC, then issuing 'killall chromium-browser'
which frees up memory will almost immediately make the machine
responsive again and the IO will stop. This is NOT related only to
chromium - it's just the easiest to kill to free up a lot of memory.
Just to make sure it is clear - this machine has swap disabled, so this
is not a case of swapping.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: linux-image (not installed)
Regression: No
Reproducible: Yes
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.36-1.7-generic 2.6.36
Uname: Linux 2.6.36-1-generic x86_64
.etc.asound.conf:
pcm.pulse { type pulse }
ctl.pulse { type pulse }
pcm.!default { type pulse }
ctl.!default { type pulse }
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23.
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
Subdevices: 2/2
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
Subdevice #1: subdevice #1
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: local 8414 F pulseaudio
/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: local 8414 F...m pulseaudio
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf6adc000 irq 44'
Mixer name : 'Intel Cantiga HDMI'
Components : 'HDA:111d76b2,10280233,00100302
HDA:80862802,80860101,0010'
Controls : 25
Simple ctrls : 16
Date: Mon Nov 8 14:17:48 2010
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=cfcb2267-1e40-4d5b-8f7a-bca833977355
MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6400
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.36-1-generic
root=UUID=6d99a14c-e196-4cc7-8531-4f232db7755b ro quiet splash
enable_mtrr_cleanup mtrr_spare_reg=1
ProcEnviron:
LC_TIME=en_GB.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=en_SG:en
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_SG.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.38
SourcePackage: linux
UserAsoundrc:
# ALSA library configuration file
# Include settings that are under the control of asoundconf(1).
# (To disable these settings, comment out this line.)
/home/local/.asoundrc.asoundconf
WpaSupplicantLog:
dmi.bios.date: 06/04/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A25
dmi.board.name: 0HT027
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA25:bd06/04/2010:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6400:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0HT027:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
dmi.product.name: Latitude E6400
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hibernate kernel-power maverick
needs-upstream-testing resume
--
High memory use causes IO storm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 630001] Re: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects
I've just tried with bluedevil from kde sc 4.5.1 and it doesn't work either. -- Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 630001] Re: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects
It now works with bluedevil - I haven't tried if the following steps do the trick with blueman/gnome-bluetooth: 1) Remove the device using bluedevil (untrust, disconnect then remove) 2) Add new device 3) When prompted for a PIN, let it autoselect (which then becomes ) 4) Success -- Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660451] Re: X memory leak
Latest xorg-edgers packages + 2.6.35-1-generic kernel from same repository still show the same problem. -- X memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660451] Re: X memory leak
Just figured out what is going on here. It was actually chromium causing the leakage in the X server when it has GPU Accelerated Canvas 2D enabled (it's off by default). I just disabled it, restarted X and now things are working brilliantly again. W h. Now, whether or not there is a bug in chromium, the fact that X leaks memory due to a misbehaving application is clearly not right, so can somebody else who is seeing this (or if you aren't, please try to see if you can trigger the bug by enabling the 2d acceleration in chromium) so we can get the proper information to the developers? -- X memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660451] Re: X memory leak
** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/chromium/issues #57782 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=57782 ** Also affects: chromium-browser via http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=57782 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- X memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
Regarding the PPA, you can always get the new kernel from here: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.36-maverick/ /Peter -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 630001] Re: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects
For the record, it doesn't work with 2.6.36 from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.36-maverick/ either. On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:24, Maletor 630...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Why does this still not work? -- Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
I haven't looked through the 3 patch files in that directory, but according to this guy: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12309#c510 stock .36 fixes the problem. /Peter -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 630001] Re: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects
Nope, doesn't work here. Same problem. /Peter -- Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660451] Re: X memory leak
Some more observations: 1) I left the machine on last night and the memory use of X only increased slightly to about 8% of available memory over a period of approximately 12 hours uptime. 2) During one hour of actually trying to get some work done this morning it ballooned to 30%. So it seems like the leakage is related to activity which off hand makes perfect sense... -- X memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
For whatever it's worth, I'm seeing a separate issue where X leaks memory like crazy, which obviously has the interesting effect that I see impressive disk thrashing, and this is with swap turned off. As soon as free memory drops to a few 100 MBs, then my HDD light is pretty much lit up solid and everything slows to a complete crawl. This is with the .35-22 kernel (standard maverick generic kernel). So something generates a lot of IO (what I still don't know) and when that happens, nothing works except for the 3 finger salute. I'm willing to try pretty much anything if somebody can tell me what I should do or what information to provide. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
I'll try that on the box tomorrow. The other odd thing is that turning off swap is extremely slow. As an example if I have about 60% memory used then it will start swapping a few 100 MBs. If I then do a swapoff -a, then the box obviously starts swapping in, but it happens at approximately 500KB/s. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 630001] Re: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects
Odd - maverick fully up to date 1 hour ago still exhibits the same behaviour for me (ie, it's still broken). -- Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
I haven't, no, but what effect would swappiness have if there is no swap anyway? /Peter On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 23:54, daneel 131...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Have try swappiness = 0 ? 2010/10/21 Peter Hoeg pe...@hoeg.com: I'll try that on the box tomorrow. The other odd thing is that turning off swap is extremely slow. As an example if I have about 60% memory used then it will start swapping a few 100 MBs. If I then do a swapoff -a, then the box obviously starts swapping in, but it happens at approximately 500KB/s. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in The Linux Kernel: Invalid Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “linux-source-2.6.22” package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.22 When compared with 2.6.15 in feisty, heavy disk I/O causes increased iowait times and affects desktop responsiveness in 2.6.22 this appears to be a regression from 2.6.15 where iowait is much lower and desktop responsiveness is unaffected with the same I/O load Easy to reproduce with tracker - index the same set of files with 2.6.15 kernel and 2.6.22 kernel and the difference in desktop responsiveness is massive I have not confirmed if a non-tracker process which does heavy disk i/o (especially writing) replicates this yet - will do further investigation soon To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/131094/+subscribe -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660451] Re: X memory leak
And just to be sure it wasn't the desktop environment (KDE in my case) that did something wonky with X, I tried running XFCE for the last couple of hours and I can confirm that X is still leaking worse than the Deepwater Horizon. -- X memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660451] Re: X memory leak
I have 2 other machines both running maverick without any problems, but this one is simply unusable. I get a few hours uptime before the memory fills up and I need to restart X, which is obviously a royal pain in the rear. After 32 minutes up, X now takes up 1397M VIRT and 476M RES. Both numbers are slowly increasing regardless of activity levels. -- X memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660451] [NEW] X memory leak
Public bug reported: I updated to maverick when it was released and if I leave the machine running for a few hours, /usr/bin/X will slowly eat up all memory. Running memory intensive applications like Virtualbox or firefox and chromium with lots of tabs open seems to accelerate the leakage. If I log out again so I'm back at the kdm log in screen, the memory is still not released. I need to 'stop kdm ; start kdm' in order to get the memory released. The problem occurs with both stock maverick as well as latest xorg- edgers packages (as of 2010-10-14). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.9.0-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.34-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 DRM.card0.DisplayPort.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: On modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.DisplayPort.2: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: On modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.DisplayPort.3: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: On modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.HDMI_Type_A.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: On modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.HDMI_Type_A.2: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: On modes: edid-base64: DRM.card0.LVDS.1: status: connected enabled: enabled dpms: On modes: 1440x900 edid-base64: AP///wAyDEABAAASAQOQHhN4CteFk1lUjCkiUFQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBsCeggFGEGjAwIDYAML4QAAAasCeggFGE5zEwIKoAML4QAAAa/gBDVDAwOIAxNDFXUDIKAAIBCiAgAOo= DRM.card0.VGA.1: status: disconnected enabled: disabled dpms: On modes: edid-base64: Date: Thu Oct 14 18:37:53 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/Xorg MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6400 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=UUID=6d99a14c-e196-4cc7-8531-4f232db7755b ro quiet splash enable_mtrr_cleanup mtrr_spare_reg=1 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_SG:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_SG.UTF-8 SourcePackage: xorg-server dmi.bios.date: 06/04/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A25 dmi.board.name: 0HT027 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA25:bd06/04/2010:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6400:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0HT027:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr: dmi.product.name: Latitude E6400 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. system: distro: Ubuntu codename: maverick architecture: x86_64 kernel: 2.6.35-22-generic ** Affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- X memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660451] Re: X memory leak
-- X memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660451] Re: X memory leak
In terms of how quickly it happens, then a few hours use will have X taking up 50% of the memory on this 4GB system. -- X memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 630001] Re: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects
** Also affects: blueman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 630001] Re: Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects
I have the same problem here with maverick RTM with both gnome-bluetooth and blueman. Just for the record, the same kernel version 2.6.35-22-generic under lucid worked fine, so I'm guessing it has to do with bluetoothd. -- Bluetooth: pairing Apple Wireless keyboard constantly disconnects and reconnects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 36215] Re: update-notifier leads to 100% cpu usage
I haven't experienced it with Lucid on 2 different machines. If my memory isn't playing tricks on me, I think I did see it once or twice with Karmic. -- update-notifier leads to 100% cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36215 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450172] Re: Does not use upstart properly - patch included
It works fine here on lucid with that configuration file and without -d passed to the daemon. What's in your /etc/default/openntpd ? -- Does not use upstart properly - patch included https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
Ravindran, please see Johannes' comment To use modes other than ordered on the root filesystem, pass the mode to the kernel as boot parameter, e.g. rootflags=data=journal. /peter On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 13:45, Ravindran K ravindra...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Johannes H. Jensen j...@pseudoberries.comwrote: So I just tested writeback on my desktop computer which exhibits the same problems. I mounted both the root filesystem and /home with data=writeback (ext3). So far the difference is *huge*! The system is much more responsive - I'm writing this while 'stress -d 4' is running in the background. The same applies to the dd test - all apps respond almost instantly with writeback, as opposed to sluggish and hanging with ordered. Applications open much faster as well I'll do some more testing to confirm - mainly writeback only on /home vs root and also on my laptop. Is this a bug in ext3 then, or is ordered mode supposed to be so slow / problematic on desktop systems? What problems might occur when using writeback mode? I'm a bit concerned about the following comment from the mount manual: It guarantees internal filesystem integrity, however it can allow old data to appear in files after a crash and journal recovery. By the way, to use writeback on the root filesystem, setting data=writeback in fstab only is not sufficient. As 'man mount' states: To use modes other than ordered on the root filesystem, pass the mode to the kernel as boot parameter, e.g. rootflags=data=journal. - Johannes On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Johannes H. Jensen j...@pseudoberries.com wrote: I haven't tried writeback, no. Is it possible to remount with this option, or do I need to modify fstab and reboot? - Johannes On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Peter Hoeg pe...@hoeg.com wrote: Have you tried mounting the filesystems with writeback instead of ordered? /peter On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 15:42, Johannes H. Jensen j...@pseudoberries.com wrote: I just tested with the anticipatory scheduler on the stock Ubuntu 2.6.32: # echo anticipatory /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler This did not seem to have any effect - the problem was still very much present. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in The Linux Kernel: Invalid Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “linux-source-2.6.22” package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.22 When compared with 2.6.15 in feisty, heavy disk I/O causes increased iowait times and affects desktop responsiveness in 2.6.22 this appears to be a regression from 2.6.15 where iowait is much lower and desktop responsiveness is unaffected with the same I/O load Easy to reproduce with tracker - index the same set of files with 2.6.15 kernel and 2.6.22 kernel and the difference in desktop responsiveness is massive I have not confirmed if a non-tracker process which does heavy disk i/o (especially writing) replicates this yet - will do further investigation soon To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/131094/+subscribe I'm using Ext4 and when I try to use data=writeback for my root partiton (it was ext3 and converted to ext4), I get a error while booting which indicates unable to change mode from ordered to writeback while remounting.. I think it is another bug.. Anyone else seeing this? -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
Ritesh. ext3 has supported writeback mode since at least 2001 (look here: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-fs8.html), so I hardly think this could have caused any damage. If you have lost some VMs it must be because something else is terribly wrong with your setup. /peter On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 18:15, Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@researchut.com wrote: On Wednesday 23 Jun 2010 15:22:04 you wrote: I haven't tried writeback, no. Is it possible to remount with this option, or do I need to modify fstab and reboot? On the fly remount of the data= mode was denied. And then, setting data=writeback into /etc/fstab ended up with a read-only rootfs. Unless someone confirms, don't do it. My VMs are gone now. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
Have you tried mounting the filesystems with writeback instead of ordered? /peter On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 15:42, Johannes H. Jensen j...@pseudoberries.com wrote: I just tested with the anticipatory scheduler on the stock Ubuntu 2.6.32: # echo anticipatory /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler This did not seem to have any effect - the problem was still very much present. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582172] [NEW] Icons missing for padevchooser in oxygen-icons
Public bug reported: padevchooser is missing a number of icons (most noticable is the tray icon) when running under kde. The attached patch fixes the inheritance, which makes the icons show properly. ** Affects: oxygen-icons (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Icons missing for padevchooser in oxygen-icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582172] Re: Icons missing for padevchooser in oxygen-icons
** Attachment added: inheritance_fix.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48647676/inheritance_fix.patch -- Icons missing for padevchooser in oxygen-icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582172] Re: Icons missing for padevchooser in oxygen-icons
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 486605 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486605 This bug related to padevchooser - the other bug relates to pavucontrol and thus not a duplicate. -- Icons missing for padevchooser in oxygen-icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to oxygen-icons in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462193] Re: djvulibre-bin produces garbage in the root (/man1/*)
Problem still present on lucid. -- djvulibre-bin produces garbage in the root (/man1/*) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 478851] [NEW] Extension Manager crashes Writer when checking for updates
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org I installed the Writer's Tools and History Master extensions. Clicking Check for Updates... in the Extension Manager crashes Writer with and produces the following output: pe...@mildred:~/tmp$ oowriter QPixmap: It is not safe to use pixmaps outside the GUI thread QPixmap: It is not safe to use pixmaps outside the GUI thread QPixmap: It is not safe to use pixmaps outside the GUI thread QPainter::begin: Cannot paint on a null pixmap X-Error: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter) Major opcode: 62 (X_CopyArea) Resource ID: 0x0 Serial No:113996 (113996) I tried installating each extension but the error is reproducible irrespectively of which extension is loaded (I admittedly only tried with the 2 mentioned earlier in this port). ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 9 10:23:52 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.1.1-5ubuntu1 [modified: var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/services.rdb] ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic x86_64 XsessionErrors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2872): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Extension Manager crashes Writer when checking for updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478851 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 478851] Re: Extension Manager crashes Writer when checking for updates
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35394725/Dependencies.txt -- Extension Manager crashes Writer when checking for updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478851 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450172] Re: Does not use upstart properly - patch included
** Attachment added: Upstart configuration file for OpenNTPD http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33580062/openntpd.conf -- Does not use upstart properly - patch included https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450172] [NEW] Does not use upstart properly - patch included
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openntpd OpenNTPD version 3.9p1+debian-2 (the latest in karmic as of 2009-10-13) still uses the old init scripts and is not yet converted to the new upstart system. I have attached an upstart configuration file that fixes that. The following changes are required in order to properly use upstart: a) Rip out the old /etc/init.d/openntpd script b) Make /etc/init.d/openntpd a symlink to /lib/init/upstart-job c) Add the attached file to /etc/init The attached works beautifully here. ** Affects: openntpd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Does not use upstart properly - patch included https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432943] [NEW] The package util-linux should be rebuild with new debhelper to get trigger support
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: util-linux When installing version 2.16-1ubuntu3 (latest in karmic as of 2009-09-19) the following message is shown: Setting up util-linux (2.16-1ubuntu3) ... Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script The package util-linux should be rebuild with new debhelper to get trigger support ** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- The package util-linux should be rebuild with new debhelper to get trigger support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432943 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296610] Re: ALPS DualPoint Touchpad flaky performance
I can confirm that the problem persists in stock karmic as of 2009-09-11 with an E6400. -- ALPS DualPoint Touchpad flaky performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296610 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 36215] Re: update-notifier leads to 100% cpu usage
I am having the same problem on and amd64 with the latest jaunty packages as of 2009-08-19. It's actually been like that since intrepid, that at times the update-notifier sucks up all remaining CPU on one of the cores. Doesn't happen regularly and I haven't found a pattern yet. I have moved the files from /var/lib/update-notifier/user.d out of the way and will perform the steps described in comment 24 when I see this again. ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Incomplete -- update-notifier leads to 100% cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36215 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343714] Re: Kubuntu Jaunty KDE 4.2 very high memory usage
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = In Progress -- Kubuntu Jaunty KDE 4.2 very high memory usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343714] Re: Kubuntu Jaunty KDE 4.2 very high memory usage
I am running jaunty with nvidia graphics and am also seeing excessive (realising that top doesn't report shared memory properly) memory usage. This machine has been up for a number of days and here is the output of top PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 24707 local 20 0 913m 290m 15m S8 7.4 1241:22 kwin 11822 local 20 0 935m 140m 53m S4 3.6 0:54.55 plasma-desktop 24401 root 20 0 950m 432m 3652 S2 11.0 368:24.92 Xorg X using 432m and kwin 289m seems excessive to me. If I then log out, I can see that X still continues to take up all the memory, but after /etc/init.d/kdm restart and logging back in this is the picture: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 19151 local 20 0 557m 80m 36m S1 2.0 0:20.91 kwin 18778 root 20 0 573m 63m 12m S0 1.6 0:20.25 Xorg 19158 local 20 0 705m 54m 24m S2 1.4 0:07.12 plasma-desktop A whole different situation. Everything else was the same in both scenarios with the exception of uptime. There were no applications running. -- Kubuntu Jaunty KDE 4.2 very high memory usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 320086] Re: qps segmentation fault
** Also affects: jaunty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- qps segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236595] Re: [needs packaging] ThinkingRock
Hey, I'm using your v2.0.1 package. Version 2.2.1 was released some days ago and I'd like to know if you are planning on packaging that? http://www.trgtd.com.au/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=110 :whats-new-in-221catid=41:releasescatItemid=82 Thanks, Peter -- [needs packaging] ThinkingRock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236595 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
Yes, it is built in. I believe as a part of the general 'speed up the boot process' work that's taking place. -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131094] Re: Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness
I am experiencing the exact same problems on my 64-bit intrepid laptop but strangely enough not on my 64-bit intrepid desktop - both use SATA drives. But can somebody also confirm a similar problem when writing to USB disks? As an example, copying a large music collection to an ipod has the same effect as 'normal' disk io. -- Heavy Disk I/O harms desktop responsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316205] Re: Regression: USB/Wireless keyboards not working on Jaunty alternate daily CD - from Alpha 2
Errhmmm... Please ignore my prev ious comment. Turns out that the dongle had lost its association with the mouse and keyboard and the wireless keyboard/mouse combo is in fact working perfectly. Yes, I should have checked that. -- Regression: USB/Wireless keyboards not working on Jaunty alternate daily CD - from Alpha 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283759] Re: rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver
Problem still persists in latest intrepid/jaunty, hence not fixed. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283759] Re: rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver
I've just tried with a self-compiled version from linuxwireless.org with the same outcome. Funny thing is, that this seems to be a recurring problem for ages. Look at this bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/86980 which is over 2 years old. Could it have anything to do with that 'USB disconnect' message showing - the card is built-in so it obviously isn't being jerked out, but for some reason a disconnect is being registered and maybe the driver just doesn't handle that very gracefully. I have usb autosuspend deactivated so that's not it. -- rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283759] Re: rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver
Did a little more investigating into this - error -19 is 'ENODEV' or 'No such device' so obviously the problem is that the device is being pulled away, the driver noticing it (hence the error -19) and then not handling it properly. @Andy - any ideas as to what we can try to find out how come the device is being disconnected? As I see it, there are two problems: a) The device disappears for unknown reasons, and b) The driver bombs when trying to deal with that situation The 2 are actually unrelated in the sense that fixing either of them would (theoretically) solve the problem although the right thing is obviously to fix both. -- rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283759] Re: rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver
Today I also had an oops thrown in for good measure after having used the system just fine for a number of hours. Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704602] [ cut here ] Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704605] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/fs/sysfs/group.c:138 sysfs_remove_group+0xd9/0xe0() Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704608] sysfs group 80904c80 not found for kobject 'wlan0' Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704610] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc ppdev bnep vboxnetflt vboxdrv bridge stp kvm_intel kvm video output xfs dm_crypt vhba coretemp it87 hwmon_vid sbp2 lp parport arc4 ecb snd_hda_intel tda18271 snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi tda8290 snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq tda10048 snd_timer rt73usb crc_itu_t snd_seq_device rt2x00usb rt2x00lib led_class input_polldev cx23885 snd lbm_cw_mac80211 cx2341x videobuf_dma_sg soundcore snd_page_alloc nvidia(P) serio_raw lirc_mceusb2 lbm_cw_cfg80211 lirc_dev videobuf_dvb dvb_core videobuf_core v4l2_common videodev v4l1_compat v4l2_compat_ioctl32 btcx_risc tveeprom usbhid usb_storage forcedeth ohci1394 ieee1394 fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704677] Pid: 41, comm: khubd Tainted: P 2.6.28-11-generic #37-Ubuntu Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704679] Call Trace: Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704685] [80250927] warn_slowpath+0xb7/0xf0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704689] [802e26fc] ? __slab_free+0xac/0x110 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704694] [802fdc6c] ? ifind_fast+0x9c/0xa0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704697] [802fdca6] ? ilookup+0x36/0x50 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704701] [80348ca1] ? release_sysfs_dirent+0x61/0xe0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704704] [803483dd] ? sysfs_find_dirent+0x2d/0x40 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704707] [80349fe9] sysfs_remove_group+0xd9/0xe0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704713] [804b7578] device_remove_attrs+0x48/0xe0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704717] [804b7710] device_del+0x100/0x1d0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704722] [805c4957] netdev_unregister_kobject+0x27/0x30 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704726] [805b51d6] rollback_registered+0xa6/0x130 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704729] [805b527d] unregister_netdevice+0x1d/0x70 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704747] [a0923dfc] ieee80211_remove_interfaces+0x7c/0xb0 [lbm_cw_mac80211] Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704762] [a09170d1] lbm_cw_ieee80211_unregister_hw+0x31/0xf0 [lbm_cw_mac80211] Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704770] [a09995a9] rt2x00lib_remove_hw+0x89/0xa0 [rt2x00lib] Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704776] [a0999600] rt2x00lib_remove_dev+0x40/0x60 [rt2x00lib] Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704783] [a09a60ea] rt2x00usb_disconnect+0x2a/0x70 [rt2x00usb] Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704788] [80532f72] usb_unbind_interface+0x62/0x150 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704793] [804b9ecd] __device_release_driver+0x9d/0xe0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704796] [804ba01b] device_release_driver+0x2b/0x40 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704799] [804b9365] bus_remove_device+0xa5/0xe0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704803] [804b7718] device_del+0x108/0x1d0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704807] [8052fd79] usb_disable_device+0xb9/0x140 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704811] [8052b03c] usb_disconnect+0xbc/0x180 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704815] [8052b6de] hub_port_connect_change+0x1be/0xab0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704819] [8052f5a5] ? usb_free_urb+0x15/0x20 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704822] [805307b1] ? usb_start_wait_urb+0x91/0xe0 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704825] [80530a4f] ? usb_control_msg+0xef/0x110 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704828] [8052c3d3] hub_events+0x2e3/0x660 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704832] [8052c78d] hub_thread+0x3d/0x180 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704837] [80268960] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704840] [8052c750] ? hub_thread+0x0/0x180 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704844] [802684f9] kthread+0x49/0x90 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704848] [80213979] child_rip+0xa/0x11 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704852] [802684b0] ? kthread+0x0/0x90 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704855] [8021396f] ? child_rip+0x0/0x11 Mar 26 20:42:13 dolores kernel: [16405.704857]
[Bug 283759] Re: rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver
I am running on a 64-bit kernel and was experiencing the error -19 error when using the stock .27-11 kernel as well as the same symbol errors as reported earlier by others when trying the backported modules. I couldn't use the wireless.kernel.org drivers either (segfault), but the custom kernel done by Ubuntu's Andy Whitcroft and available from his PPA finally did the trick for me: http://people.ubuntu.com/~apw/lp258985-intrepid/ It's finally working. Thanks Andy! -- rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283759] Re: rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver
@Andy. Hmmm... This is getting rather odd. I spoke too soon earlier but it took a lot longer to trigger the error this time around. I then bit the apple and downloaded the latest jaunty alternate install cd and upgraded to jaunty. Same problem... The connecting keeps dropping and my log is full of error -19 messages. Restarting and/or unloading/loading the rt73usb works like one out of 10 - the machine needs to be physically powered off before it works again. I'm willing to try anything you can throw my way in terms of sorting this one out. /Peter -- rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283759] Re: rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver
lsusb Just fyi, the wifi card is built in, so I can't really unplug it to test. ** Attachment added: lsusb http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24354250/lsusb.txt -- rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283759] Re: rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver
OK, this is against jaunty with all packages updated as of 2009-03-26 and with l-b-m installed - keep in mind I was getting the same error on intrepid. [ 162.075171] rt73usb 1-9:1.0: firmware: requesting rt73.bin [ 162.169579] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready [ 172.979832] wlan0: authenticate with AP 8800379e4aa0 [ 172.982964] wlan0: authenticated [ 172.982967] wlan0: associate with AP 8800379e4aa0 [ 172.985595] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 88012d84c03e (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=1) [ 172.985598] wlan0: associated [ 172.998106] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready [ 183.440011] wlan0: no IPv6 routers present [ 399.397583] usb 1-9: USB disconnect, address 10 [ 399.400427] phy1 - rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x07 failed for offset 0x3040 with error -19. [ 399.400515] phy1 - rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x06 failed for offset 0x3040 with error -19. [ 399.400601] phy1 - rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x06 failed for offset 0x3028 with error -19. [ 399.400687] phy1 - rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x06 failed for offset 0x3064 with error -19. [ 399.400772] phy1 - rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x0c failed for offset 0x with error -19. [ 399.400863] phy1 - rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x0a failed for offset 0x with error -19. [ 399.401019] phy1 - rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x0a failed for offset 0x with error -19. [ 399.401125] phy1 - rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x0a failed for offset 0x with error -19. [ 399.401232] phy1 - rt2x00usb_vendor_request: Error - Vendor Request 0x0a failed for offset 0x with error -19. [ 399.412044] wlan0: deauthenticating by local choice (reason=3) This is then following later by lots of: [ 536.908015] wlan0: direct probe to AP 88012d84eaa0 try 1 [ 536.910249] wlan0 direct probe responded [ 536.910252] wlan0: authenticate with AP 88012d84eaa0 [ 536.911995] wlan0: authenticated [ 536.911997] wlan0: associate with AP 88012d84eaa0 [ 536.914625] wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 8800ca5cb03e (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=1) [ 536.914627] wlan0: associated [ 541.943211] wlan0: deauthenticated (Reason: 16) [ 542.940015] wlan0: direct probe to AP 88012d84eaa0 try 1 [ 542.942460] wlan0 direct probe responded [ 542.942463] wlan0: authenticate with AP 88012d84eaa0 [ 542.944309] wlan0: authenticated [ 542.944311] wlan0: associate with AP 88012d84eaa0 [ 542.946833] wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 8800ca5cc03e (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=1) [ 542.946835] wlan0: associated [ 547.974415] wlan0: deauthenticated (Reason: 16) [ 548.972010] wlan0: direct probe to AP 88012d84eaa0 try 1 I have attached the complete log. Let me know what you want me to try out. ** Attachment added: dmesg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24354223/dmesg2.txt -- rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 283759] Re: rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver
lspci ** Attachment added: lspci http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24354282/lspci.txt -- rt73usb intrepid 8.10 beta -- wireless connection periodically lost; must restart driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316205] Re: Regression: USB/Wireless keyboards not working on Jaunty alternate daily CD - from Alpha 2
I am running nightly 2009-03-25 and I DO have the problem. WIth a HP USB Multimedia Wireless Kit it doesn't work - neither mouse nor keyboard, but plugging in a generic USB keyboard does work. -- Regression: USB/Wireless keyboards not working on Jaunty alternate daily CD - from Alpha 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
@TJ: as pointed out in an earlier comment - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- source-2.6.20/+bug/88746/comments/447 - the load order does not fix it for everybody. I'm guessing it's just covering up the error in your case. -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 320086] Re: qps segmentation fault
This bug was fixed 1.5 years ago upstream, although the updated source package never made it into Ubuntu. From the project page: qps 1.9.20 ( 2007-08-27 ) * x86_64 segfault bug fixed Suggest the maintainer(s) to package the updated version instead as it is completely pointless to ship the same broken version in Jaunty. ** Changed in: qps (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- qps segmentation fault https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320086 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
Am taking the liberty of changing the status for intrepid as a fix has most certainly not been committed and I want to make sure this bug doesn't fall off the radar. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Fix Committed = Confirmed -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317525] Re: [jaunty] Amarok crashes the second time it's run in a session
I'm using the 2.0.1.1-0ubuntu1~ppa1 amarok package for intrepid, but am seeing exactly the same problem. Phonon is already set up to use Pulseaudio. Interestingly, I have a laptop with exactly the same package versions and it works flawlessly through pulse. Any ideas? -- [jaunty] Amarok crashes the second time it's run in a session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
Bad news people. The linux-image-2.6.27-11-generic packages from -proposed do not fix it for me - with max_sectors set to 128, it doesn't happen as frequently as with max_sectors = 240, but there is no difference between kernels -11 and -9 for me. Bear in mind, that my chipset is nVidia MCP73 and thus not covered by the AMD SB600/700 workaround (I'm assuming). I was getting the error about ohci loading first, so I forced ehci_hcd to load first by editing /etc/initramfs-tools/modules, but it still doesn't fix it. So to sum it up, using the -11 kernel from proposed, max_sectors = 128 and ehci_hcd loading before ohci_hcd and this is what I get: pe...@dolores:~$ dmesg | grep reset [ 10.052941] usb 1-6.1: reset low speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 9 [ 937.341197] usb 1-6.2: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 10 [ 2341.333491] usb 1-6.2: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 10 [ 2957.343520] usb 1-6.2: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 10 Any others hints as to what to try out? -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
Turns out the Intrepid standard kernel gives me the disconnects on my main desktop too, although they don't make the machine lose connectivity to the USB drives - things just work slowly for a brief moment and then everything stabilises again. This machine has an nVidia MCP73 chipset. The max_sectors fix seem however to do the trick, so here is a udev rule that will make udev set the correct max_sectors on all USB drives automatically and while YMMV it does in fact work for me. It seems like the safe thing is to default max_sectors to 128 instead of 240 as it works with more chipsets and doesn't require kernel workarounds. Anyway, drop the following into /etc/udev/rules.d/81-usb_max_sectors.rules and make sure that the SUBSYSTEM line is in fact on one line and not broken into two. # Set max_sectors to 128 for USB HDDs as the default 240 causes problems # SUBSYSTEM==block, BUS==usb, KERNEL==sd*, RUN+=/bin/sh -c 'echo 128 /sys/block/%k/device/max_sectors' I need this machine for work purposes so am a little hesitant to try out the jaunty kernel especially since the workaround works and the workaround can be implemented by policy as opposed to waiting for kernel support. -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
Great. Turns out I was a little too hasty. While the udev rule does make the resets happen significantly less frequently, they are still happening. Damn. In the process of downloading the jaunty kernel and will report back when installed. It does however take forever here in China. The internet connection here might be restricted, slow and unreliable, but at least it's expensive -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300658] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/kernel/softirq.c:136 local_bh_enable_ip+0x8d/0xc0()
Hi, I haven't experienced the problem since it was reported. I'll gladly try out the -proposed kernel if that makes a difference, but based on Henrik's note, it seems to be more of a cdemu problem that a kernel issue. So should I try out the -11 kernel? -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/kernel/softirq.c:136 local_bh_enable_ip+0x8d/0xc0() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
Something just struck me. This error was happening with a previous laptop, but neither my current laptop nor current desktop. I had an external LaCie HDD, which when formatted with VFAT would show this kind of behaviour but was working fine with EXT2. I know that offhand it doesn't sound like it makes a lot of sense assuming the error is in the USB level code, but can one of you people who can reliably reproduce the error, give it a go with EXT2? -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
I have nowhere near enough knowledge of the linux kernel to make any kind of qualified statement on this - it is however, not going to stop me from doing it anyway... I see two possible reasons: a) An actual vfat error (linux's vfat code) b) Due to different usage patterns, the vfat usage triggers a (timing?) error in the USB code I am hoping that somebody with more technical insight can shed some light on this. Can somebody else try with ext2/3 ? I can't myself, as I have no machines affected by this. -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296610] Re: ALPS DualPoint Touchpad flaky performance
I have a Dell E6400 and am seeing the same problems with the reset messages. It also sounds to me like the same issue as mentioned by slowrobot. -- ALPS DualPoint Touchpad flaky performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296610 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300658] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/kernel/softirq.c:136 local_bh_enable_ip+0x8d/0xc0()
Public bug reported: Just happened out of the blue. i have no more details to give, but do shout if there is anything I can do to assist in tracking this down. /peter ProblemType: KernelOops Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.27-7-generic 2.6.27-7.16 ProcCmdLine: User Name=UUID=b05db85d-8ea9-41aa-b85b-1e24ca270595 ro quiet nosplash clocksource=hpet ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.27-7.16-generic SourcePackage: linux Title: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/kernel/softirq.c:136 local_bh_enable_ip+0x8d/0xc0() ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-kerneloops -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/kernel/softirq.c:136 local_bh_enable_ip+0x8d/0xc0() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300658] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/kernel/softirq.c:136 local_bh_enable_ip+0x8d/0xc0()
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19833125/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19833126/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19833127/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: HalComputerInfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19833128/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: LsUsb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19833129/LsUsb.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19833130/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: OopsText.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19833131/OopsText.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuInfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19833132/ProcCpuInfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19833133/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19833134/ProcModules.txt -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.27/kernel/softirq.c:136 local_bh_enable_ip+0x8d/0xc0() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300658 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268956] Re: [intrepid] unknown media type during update
As pointed out by NeoFax, this bug IS relevant to Ubuntu as it is an error for intrepid in kdelibs5-data from the official repositories. ** Changed in: kde4libs (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = kde4libs Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- [intrepid] unknown media type during update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268956 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kde4libs in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271059] Re: Intel x4500HD (GM45) and ubuntu installation = graphic failure's
First of all, there is no version 2.04 of Ubuntu. I'm sure you mean 8.04. Or are you talking about the x.org intel driver which is version 2.4.0? 1) The graphics chipset should be supported in Intrepid Ibex. I suggest you try that out. Alpha 5 can be found here: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/intrepid/alpha-5/ 2) When you boot run in single user mode, the network should still be functional. What does ifconfig tell you? -- Intel x4500HD (GM45) and ubuntu installation = graphic failure's https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271059] Re: Intel x4500HD (GM45) and ubuntu installation = graphic failure's
It is correct that it's possible there are other bugs in the 8.10 alpha just as well as there are bugs in all software. But why not try it out and see if it works for you? You could at the same time provide feedback to the Ubuntu guys in order to give them the information they need to ensure that this will work out of the box in 8.10. In order to manually configure x.org, you can edit /etc/X11/xorg.conf with your editor of choice. You could potentially also try running with the vesa driver instead. It will give you no hardware accel and it might not work either, but at least it's worth a shot. In terms of compatibility, you will find that GNU/Linux probably has the best out of the box support for hardware of all current operating systems. It is true that there are newer pieces of hardware not working properly but not all hardware manufacturers have realized the importance of supporting the free/open software movement. As mentioned, why not try the alpha, report back and do your part to assist in improving Ubuntu for the benefit of all? -- Intel x4500HD (GM45) and ubuntu installation = graphic failure's https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271059 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 31205] Re: Doesn't install or display properly on console, keys broken on xterm
On hardy, v.0.50.0-1.4, fte-terminal is not affected by this bug. fte-terminal works as expected on TERM=(xterm|linux) ** Changed in: fte (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Doesn't install or display properly on console, keys broken on xterm https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31205 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 200464] Re: [Hardy Alpha 6] - Restricted (Hardware) Driver stopped working
I get the same Hardware revision not support' error with the same network card on 2.6.24-16-generic. -- [Hardy Alpha 6] - Restricted (Hardware) Driver stopped working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157939] Re: no iPod (Gen 5 80 GB) automount in Gutsy (upgrade from Feisty
Caleb, I am having exactly the same problem which is driving me nuts. Automounting was working fine in the past and now no more. It just doesn't make sense. -- no iPod (Gen 5 80 GB) automount in Gutsy (upgrade from Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157939 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157939] Re: no iPod (Gen 5 80 GB) automount in Gutsy (upgrade from Feisty
Caleb, just one thing though. If you kill and subsequently start gnome- volume-manager again killall gnome-volume-manager ; sleep 2 ; gnome- volume-manager do the devices magically remount? Mine do which seem to indicate the problem is with gvm. -- no iPod (Gen 5 80 GB) automount in Gutsy (upgrade from Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157939 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
